A day before Thanksgiving, two members of the National Guard were shot and killed by an Afghan national. Why do we have so many Somalis committing fraud in Minnesota and sending their money to terrorists overseas? And what do we do about it?
00:06:47.100Like, it should always be, as Americans, the question is what's in it for us, what's in it for our people, for our children.
00:06:53.800And we don't benefit at all from bringing in a single Afghan or a single Somali.
00:06:58.380Ben, do we owe anything to these people?
00:07:00.360I mean, I think that, obviously, when it comes to the Somalis, the answer is no.
00:07:04.100I mean, their country has been a trash heap for generations at this point.
00:07:07.620And the United States tried to get involved and tried to help on a humanitarian level.
00:07:12.160And then, obviously, that didn't work out very well.
00:07:13.980The idea that we had to go from 2,500 Somalis living in the United States in 1990 to 175,000 Somalis living in the United States as of today
00:07:50.840With regard to Afghanistan, I think it's slightly more complicated.
00:07:54.240Not that we should take in vast numbers of unvetted immigrants from Afghanistan because we screwed things up in Afghanistan.
00:08:01.060I think there's a couple of original sins.
00:08:02.760One of them, frankly, is just the pullout from Afghanistan the way Joe Biden did it.
00:08:06.740I think that if you pull out from Afghanistan and leave no governing institutions behind such that everybody who helped out the U.S. Army is going to be murdered where they stand,
00:08:15.160we should find some place for them to go that's not the United States.
00:08:17.580But I do think that if we ever want to have alliances with anybody else on Earth ever again,
00:08:21.920and we're going to have to work with people against regimes that exist,
00:08:24.720then we want to find some place for some of those people to go.
00:08:27.100This case is a little bit weird because the guy not only worked with the CIA,
00:08:31.840he was pretty well vetted when he came in in 2021,
00:08:33.860and then the Trump administration did grant him actual asylum in 2025 on the basis of that prior vetting,
00:08:40.600presumably, despite the fact that in 2023, we now know from the New York Post,
00:08:45.180he actually had been reported by other members of his community as having mental breakdowns,
00:08:49.400and he was depressed, and he was going out on these long drives, and we knew where he was,
00:32:21.500It's kind of weird and claustrophobic.
00:32:23.580Um, anyway, I won't do any of that, but I will take balance of nature, which you should as well.
00:32:28.840Plus, they're launching a fantastic new product, Balance of Nature's freeze-dried snacks are 100% real fruit, bananas, mangoes, pineapple, and strawberries.
00:32:38.160Freeze-dried to lock in flavor and give that perfect crunch.
00:32:40.840Go to balanceofnature.com and get a free variety snack pack plus a free preferred customer membership with your first set of Balance of Nature supplements.
00:32:49.120Go to balanceofnature.com to claim this limited-time offer before it ends.
00:32:54.180Speaking of food, Matt, you focused on the real issues while we were all stuffing ourselves over Thanksgiving, and you talked about why restaurants suck now.
00:33:04.900And I actually, I didn't catch it, and I want to hear it.
00:33:08.660Well, you haven't caught a single piece of content I've ever put out since I've been here.
00:36:18.900And then the third part of it is that none of the people involved from, like, the person behind the cash register all the way up to the people that own the places now, none of them actually care about the quality of the food.
00:36:57.180Well, I think, well, part of it is that if you go back, again, 20 years ago, a lot of these places, they were employing, like, high school students.
00:37:06.140I worked at a pizza place when I was in high school.
00:37:09.780And that's happening less and less now.
00:37:11.580Now you've got also the numbers of people who work in these industries now who have, like, substance abuse problems, who are older with substance abuse problems.
00:37:22.880But also, if you're working for one of these, and look, I'm as capitalist as the next guy, but you're working for one of these places that's owned by some conglomerate or owned by a private equity firm, it's like you don't feel a tie to it anymore.
00:37:36.300You don't really care that much about the product.
00:37:39.360And as I said, the people that own the place don't care about it either.
00:37:42.160I actually think it's not even, I think, that it's corporate versus not corporate.
00:37:47.540Meaning, so most people who start restaurants, like small restaurants, it's usually, like, you and your family members.
00:37:52.260So I was making, we were talking about whether we should do this topic earlier, and I was kind of making fun of you guys because I was saying, in the kosher community, like, I eat kosher.
00:37:59.700So I'm coming from a different context from you guys.
00:38:02.040Like, the last time I ate at a chain restaurant, like a normal not kosher chain restaurant, I was 11 years old, and it was Kentucky Fried Chicken.
00:38:09.900And, like, they have some chain restaurants in Israel, and they are similarly not as good, but they're certainly better, I think, than the ones that are in the United States.
00:38:18.220In the kosher community, every single restaurant is a family-owned restaurant.
00:38:21.560Even the family-owned restaurants that have, like, three or four different restaurants, that's, like, the extent of it.
00:38:26.060There's no such thing as a kosher chain restaurant because there are, like, eight of us in the United States.
00:38:29.020And so what that means is that the restaurant quality has actually gotten better and better and better since I was a kid because you're getting people who are aging into more income.
00:38:37.040And as they age into more income, they can spend more of their income on these restaurants.
00:38:40.580And the community isn't big enough to support a gigantic, like, chain of hamburger restaurants.
00:38:45.040And so instead what you get are, like, really good, excellent kind of locally sourced dishes where the family owns it.
00:38:52.120Because that's ā I think everybody in our ā and you guys have big families.
00:39:00.820Somebody should actually start ā and then it turns out that restaurant is, like, the hardest business to succeed in.
00:39:05.680And they go bankrupt at an extraordinary rate.
00:39:07.760And so what that means is that particularly if you are a person who is trying to just keep your restaurant open, you've got to work your ass off, right?
00:39:15.920You've got to bring your 14-year-old in from middle school to, like, get behind the counter and really work ā I spent my entire life in restaurants, by the way.
00:39:22.960Like, my dad worked at a restaurant my entire childhood.
00:39:26.700And so I was, like, in the kitchen with the waiters and, like, hanging out with the bartenders for fully 10 years of my life, 15 years of my life when I was a kid.
00:41:03.520So my friends who grew up in the middle of the country or in the south or even a little bit on the west coast, they did not have ā
00:41:08.780Look, this is a ā I had nice family ā actual family restaurants growing up that were casual, that were cheap, but they were very, very good.
00:41:17.340And so I wasn't as ā yeah, I'd do the Applebee's every now and again.
00:41:21.480Yeah, I'd do the Outback every now and again.
00:41:22.880But if you look at the actual, like, not-chain restaurants, I think they've gotten generally much better with one exception,
00:41:30.920which is that hipsters made the plates get much smaller.
00:41:33.680They inserted, like, a bunch of dumb adjectives into it, like activated Brussels sprouts.
00:41:37.700But otherwise, I actually think ā this is the one area where I'd say things have gotten noticeably better.
00:41:46.460I basically call you all ignorant on your use of fast food.
00:41:50.100First of all, Michael, hang on a second.
00:41:51.620Michael, so you said you're going to inject facts, and then all you did was just arbitrarily go down a list of which restaurants you personally prefer more.
00:42:00.400I'm the one injecting facts in the discussion.
00:42:02.200I'm telling you that there is a number of actual significant changes that have factually occurred.
00:42:08.860One of them is that these places, most of them do not use fresh food anymore, and they used to.
00:42:16.300Like, most of these restaurants used to use fresh food, and now they don't.
00:42:19.760Now they're getting the same frozen food off the back of the same truck.
00:42:29.280I'm injecting facts in this conversation.
00:42:30.360God, the level of passion, Michael, that you have for this is ā I never ā you're big on the Aquinas, but I think that your actual area of specialty and interest lies in fast food.
00:43:10.180What you pick up when you go to, like, Applebee's or Chili's, the food ā it's literally the same food.
00:43:15.320Okay, the Cisco truck goes with the frozen food to Applebee's, and then it goes across the shopping center to Chili's and unloads the same damn food that then is put in a microwave
00:43:25.780and serve to you with a 6,000% markup, okay?
00:43:40.920You know, when Chili's came ā I'm not just blaming Chili's.
00:43:44.120I actually never got that into Chili's, but when Chili's and the similar restaurants came in, they displaced old, like, mom-and-pop diner-type things.
00:44:01.080And so I think, all right, now if the chains are being bought up by private equity faces corporations and they're all no good anymore, does this offer an opportunity ā am I being too hopeful?
00:44:09.900Does this offer an opportunity for more rancid mom-and-pop diners to fail their health inspections and delight customers like me?
00:44:18.580But the problem is, I mean, you just point out, like, Five Guys, obviously, it's not a mom-and-pop place.
00:44:22.240But it's so ā you know, it's expensive.
00:44:25.920Like, when everyone is going the frozen food route and they're getting the same, they're just ā you know, wholesale frozen food and everything, put it in a microwave, and then you come in and say, I want to do fresh food, you're going to have to charge a lot more.
00:44:37.280And then that's up to the consumer to choose the more expensive thing, which, unfortunately, most consumers won't.
00:44:42.720I mean, and that's what it comes down to.
00:44:43.820And I also think the fact ā I mean, like we said before, the fact that one of the biggest differences is that you're dealing with people who don't care.
00:44:51.980I just thought ā I had to ā this is not food, but I had a problem with Wi-Fi, and I had to call the internet company.
00:45:00.100And it's like one of those things where, you know, you have to make this phone call.
00:45:02.900You're going to be on the phone for seven hours of your day, and you've got to go through all the automated messages.
00:45:09.520I talked to, like, ten different people, and I'm aware of the fact, while I'm talking to all these people, that nobody I'm talking about gives the slightest shit about the problem that I'm having.
00:45:20.720None of them care at all, even a little bit, and there's no incentive for them to solve my problem.
00:45:26.360Whether my problem is solved or not means nothing to them.
00:45:29.400They don't benefit from it being solved.
00:45:31.120It doesn't hurt them if it isn't solved.
00:45:32.860And so it's this utterly hopeless feeling you have while you're on the phone shouting at some person in India who doesn't care at all.
00:45:51.600Matt, I'm just telling you, we're going to fast forward 20 years, and it's just going to be ā Matt Walsh's show will just be called Old Man Yells at Clouds.
00:46:01.900You're not old enough, so now it's middle-aged man yells at clouds.
00:46:05.960But one aspect of this that may be worth asking is when we were all growing up ā maybe it's because none of us, I think, grew up rich ā going out to dinner was like a big deal, right?
00:46:14.980Going out to dinner was like a super big deal.
00:46:18.940You really didn't go out to dinner unless there was a special occasion in some way.
00:46:22.040You didn't just go out casually to dinner.
00:46:23.920And I feel like people just go out to dinner much more or order in much more.
00:46:27.300And so it's possible that the market has decreased in value in terms of like what people are paying for their dinner just because people are ordering in more.
00:46:35.260Like everything when I was growing up was home-cooked, like everything.
00:46:37.640And I think that more and more people have accessed eating out or shipping food in as a normal mode of eating.
00:46:45.600And that means the prices have to go down because otherwise you just can't afford it.
00:46:48.100If you're a family that has a couple of kids and you're bringing in restaurant food every night, it can't be really, really good restaurant food every night or you're going to be poor.
00:46:56.100And so I assume that that's why all these big chain stores continue to churn out not very good food but make decent money off it because people are just too lazy to actually home cook or they don't feel like home cooking.
00:47:06.920I mean I would imagine that if you check the stats here, and we'll have to check it now, that people are eating significantly more takeout food than they were when we were growing up.
00:47:17.280You know, the salient point of Matt's rant, I think, other than his, I think, absolute calumny against fast food restaurants compared to fast casual.
00:47:27.040The really salient point is the feeling that, this happened to me at Burger King the other day, which again is not just like a homeless shelter but is a literal homeless shelter in most cases.
00:47:36.660I went up, I was standing there, I wanted to order a Whopper, and there were two women behind the counter and one employee had just gotten off.
00:47:43.020And no one would take my order, and the employee who had just gotten off was laughing at me.
00:47:47.660He was laughing at me that no one would take my order.
00:47:49.680They didn't hear, I went, I got a sandwich somewhere else.
00:47:51.920You know, I'm reminded of Barry Goldwater in his book, Conscience of a Conservative, ghostwritten by Brent Bozell, who said,
00:47:58.060we conservatives, we're not just against, you know, big monopolistic government.
00:48:01.540We're against monopolies in all of their forms because they're not as responsive and that kind of power can take away our rights as well.
00:48:07.840So I agree, we need a political missile, a legislative missile perhaps, to fix that problem.
00:48:15.100And we have literal missiles that are currently blowing up Venezuelan narco-terrorists by our Secretary of War.
00:48:22.480Now, some people, mostly on the left but a little bit in the Republican Party, are accusing the Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth,
00:48:28.640of committing war crimes by taking out the narco-terrorists.
00:48:32.000Before I get the educated opinion of a Harvard lawyer, Matt, what's your, I think this is totally fine and awesome.
00:48:41.240I think, I think, here's what I'll say.
00:48:43.900Blowing up, blowing up a, a, a boat full of narco-terrorists who are bringing poison into America
00:48:51.360and are part of a, you know, billion-dollar criminal enterprise that is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans over the past decades.
00:48:59.220You know, doing that is more defensible, I think, legally but certainly morally than anything the United States of America has ever done in the Middle East.
00:49:11.900Which is also why it's funny to have someone like Mark Kelly out there complaining about this.
00:49:18.220When this, again, is more defensible than anything that he did when he was in the Middle East, when he was part of the Navy.
00:49:25.120I think he was talking about, he was on MSNBC, I think, or CNN, one of the two, talking about when he was in the Navy, well, they, they blew up, you know, he was responsible for blowing up some Iraqi ships.
00:49:37.760But that was okay, he said, because, you know, they, they were, he was trying to kick them out of Kuwait.
00:49:43.300And so it was a good reason, it was a good reason to blow up the Iraqi ships to keep them out of Kuwait.
00:49:47.960Well, okay, so, so that's okay to keep the Iraq out of Kuwait so we could blow up ships, but to keep poison out of America that's killing actual Americans, that's a, that's a problem.
00:49:59.260Um, so I, to me, it's, it's like very clearly, this is, this is where the United States military should be most activated is in defending our actual homeland, like our actual physical country from things that are actually hurting and killing Americans directly.
00:50:16.640And, uh, once we've done that, then we could talk about the stuff that's happening thousands of miles away, but this to me is just, uh, pretty obvious.
00:50:23.460Now, the alleged war crime, uh, was according to reporting for, you know, so take it with a grain of salt, but they said there was a, an oral order, not a written order, but an oral order from the Secretary of War to kill them all.
00:50:35.120You know, to not, not like go and try to arrest them or, you know, give them a court.
00:50:38.840Yeah, that's what you do, that's what you do with a missile, that's, I, I don't know that it's true that he said to kill the survivors in the water.
00:50:44.240Yeah, I see, no, he denies it, the White House denies it.
00:50:46.440But even if he did, but, but so what? I mean, you, you hit the boat with a missile, obviously you're trying to kill everybody.
00:50:52.080So what, if some of them survive, you're just to be a good sport, you're supposed to send a rescue boat out to, uh, to rescue them.
00:50:58.600The whole point, I'm pretty sure the missile, the point was not like a practical joke or a fun prank.
00:51:03.280The point was to actually kill the people on the boat, if any are alive, then of course you kill them too.
00:51:07.760It's like if you blow up a building, do you have to have firefighters on standby to put out the fire and rescue anyone who happens to be inside the building?
00:51:14.400I mean, the whole point was to kill the people inside it, I would think.
00:51:16.540And assuming those people are actual terrorists who want to kill Americans, then it's totally legitimate.
00:51:20.840That's the Matt Walsh addendum to the Geneva Conventions.
00:51:40.580There are really two legal questions here.
00:51:42.300One is whether you need some sort of authorization from Congress to continue to blow up drug boats in the Caribbean when they're not, like, directly off of America's shores and their international waters and all the rest of this sort of thing.
00:51:53.200That's sort of question number one, you know, I'm of the legal opinion that you can totally blow up those drug ships and that that seems to be fairly well predicated at the very least.
00:52:01.980And then there's the secondary question, which came up because of this Washington Post story.
00:52:05.200Under American domestic law, you're really not supposed to be killing people who are deemed to be out of combat, right?
00:52:12.820So, for example, if you're on a battlefield anywhere in the world and you shoot somebody and you've incapacitated them, they're unconscious on the battlefield, you're not allowed to, like, walk up to them while they're unconscious on the battlefield and put two in their head.
00:52:22.460And it's just not something that you're supposed to do because they've been rendered non-threatening.
00:52:26.660And so now there's kind of a debate over whether the boat was completely destroyed or whether it theoretically could have been salvaged, whether they had the ability to call up their other drug trafficking friends and have them come out and pick them up.
00:52:37.040That was kind of the best defense that I saw of this order if it was given.
00:52:40.240I find it kind of hard to believe just on the merits that Pete Hegseth would say kill everybody and nobody in the military line of command would say, OK, I just need some clarifications.
00:52:48.100You mean that we're supposed to, you know, just, like, kill floating bodies in the water or, like, what are we talking about here?
00:52:53.560And to me, a lot of this report, something smells about this.
00:52:59.500And what I mean by that is that the Democrats started with this.
00:53:02.020You're not allowed to follow illegal order stuff last week, right?
00:53:05.380They put out this video the end of the week before last in which a bunch of Democratic Congress people and senators said, if you're a member of the military, we're telling you you're not allowed to follow an illegal order.
00:53:14.840And everybody went, what illegal orders are you talking about, right?
00:53:18.760Like, you should actually name the order because it actually is pretty counterproductive.
00:53:21.860If the idea is that we're only going to find out whether an order was illegal in your view when you gain power, how does anybody ever carry out an order at all, right?
00:53:29.260Because it could be a Democrat gets elected two, three years from now and then turns around and says, oh, by the way, every order that you carried out for the last 10 years was illegal.
00:53:37.980And so what you're really doing is creating a sort of bizarre Ferguson effect for the military, where you remember by the police, the idea was that if you enforce the law, you might go to jail.
00:53:46.240So the police stopped enforcing the law.
00:53:47.920So our Democrats trying to tell members of the military that if they don't want to go to jail, they need to not actually do the thing they're supposed to do, which is carry out the orders of the commander in chief.
00:53:57.360It feels coordinated because they released that video.
00:53:59.400And within a week and a half, there's a story in the Washington Post about Pete Hegseth issuing a quote unquote illegal order to, you know, blow people out of the water.
00:54:07.560The whole thing kind of stinks to me as a general matter.
00:54:11.780Again, we'll have to see what the fact pattern is.
00:54:13.880This is where Congress has article in one authority to actually investigate and determine who said what and when.
00:54:18.360Our sponsor, Calci, shows prediction markets regarding, for example, which cabinet member is most likely to go Pete Hegseth right now, like 29%.
00:54:26.640But, you know, the reality is that I think there's a tempest in a teapot.
00:54:30.600And it also, on the other hand, kind of feels like that time when Trump deported a wife abuser.
00:54:37.460And then the entire left was like, how dare he violate the law by deporting the wife abuser?
00:54:42.240And, you know, I just don't think that plays politically.
00:54:44.160How dare you kill the narco traffickers who are trying to murder Americans with fentanyl?
00:54:48.500Doesn't seem to have, I don't know, it doesn't seem like a political winner to me.
00:54:51.460You know, Walter Kern, I thought, had a really good take on this.
00:54:53.520He said he thinks that maybe the war on drugs failed.
00:54:56.800And I actually, I don't think the war on drugs failed.
00:54:59.040I think it actually was quite successful for a time.
00:55:31.680But then you ask, OK, what's the point of the Geneva Convention?
00:55:33.960The Geneva Convention exists in large part to protect civilians in times of war.
00:55:39.380And so part of that is if you play by the rules of war, then you can have certain privileges.
00:55:44.260And if you don't, like if you're a terrorist and you target civilians and you act outside the norms of war, you don't really get those privileges.
00:55:50.420Mark Thiessen years ago made the great point that if you extend Geneva Convention protections to terrorists, you actually totally undermine the Geneva Convention protections.
00:55:58.480So I think that's kind of interesting, though, even for terrorists, I guess you're supposed to afford them some basic, you know, privileges, notably not killing them if they're out of combat.
00:56:06.700And then to your point, Ben, on U.S. domestic policy, you have the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which says, OK, U.S. troops are not allowed to do X, Y and Z.
00:56:15.240What's very interesting about this, though, is it would not really apply, in my understanding, to the Secretary of War, because the Secretary of War is not one of the troops.
00:56:23.780He's a civilian who is in charge of that department.
00:56:26.980And so it's all very, very murky to me.
00:56:30.540And then I think, OK, well, let's get down to the brass tacks of it all.
00:56:34.040These are foreign terrorist organizations, formally declared so.
00:56:38.020They're shipping poison into our country, killing 75,000 Americans a year.
00:56:42.160We have exercised control over the Western Hemisphere for over 200 years.
00:56:46.260And now the Democrats are on the side.
00:56:48.540First, they were on the side of the wife beater who got deported because he was an illegal alien, maybe a gangster.
00:56:52.740And now they're on the side of the narco terrorists.
00:56:54.940Is this really going to play well in the midterms or in 2028?
00:56:59.440And that's the big issue, I think, for the Democrats politically here is they keep glomming on to what they think are temporary wins that end up being long term losses because they're so into the idea that, oh, my gosh, we've got him on procedural tic-tac-fowl.
00:57:11.460And because we got him on a tic-tac-fowl, the American people are going to be really, really upset with Trump.
00:57:15.860Name the American who's truly upset with Donald Trump for blowing narco traffickers out of the water.
00:57:19.640I cannot imagine who those people are unless, you know, they went to Berkeley.
00:57:23.600That's pretty much like the entire constituency for that argument.
00:57:26.560It does raise, you know, one other question, which is it looks very much as though the Trump administration is trying to force Maduro out in Venezuela.
00:57:35.160I mean, like, I think that if we can do it without very much cost, you know, low blood and treasure, not a lot, you know, no boots on the ground or not a lot of boots on the ground.
00:57:42.520Good things happening with very little cost is my game.
00:57:46.660Yeah, I really hope, let's put it this way, I hope that the CIA really does have somebody inside the Venezuelan government who's ready to push Maduro off the cliff here.
00:57:56.440Because if not, then this is an awful lot of resource expenditure for very little payoff in the end.
00:58:02.440And typically, if you're talking about a coup in Latin or South America, you have to have somebody inside the army or at least elites inside the kind of top echelon who are willing to push the guy out.
00:58:11.480Otherwise, Maduro is just going to sit there and be and be OK.
00:58:15.760Yeah. You know, Americans are sick of regime change, certainly in the Middle East.
00:58:19.280It's a little different in Latin America because we've been doing that for a very, very long time and it's closer to our interests.
00:58:24.900Matt, where I don't know, where do you fall on this?
00:58:26.740Are you are you ready for a regime change in Latin America?
00:58:29.820Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I'm always I'm always skeptical of a regime change.
00:58:33.540I do. I kind of agree with you that it's if it's closer to home, you can make a better argument for it actually advancing American interests.
00:58:43.020And when I say American interests, I mean the interests of actual Americans, like American families still.
00:58:47.160I think it's still still kind of hard to make that argument.
00:58:49.360And if you if someone was going to make that argument, I wouldn't be the one to make it.
00:58:52.560I think just politically, well, practically and also politically, I think the focus should stay on the narco terrorists.
00:59:00.400That's that's a winner. It's a winner for Americans, most importantly.
00:59:05.020And as you already pointed out, it's it's just a it's a political winner because this is this is the genius of it from a political standpoint,
00:59:10.700is that they're kind of backing Democrats into a corner of being defenders of of drug traffickers.
00:59:17.960And I don't know what polling has been done on this, but I just I'm sure there's been some polling on it.
00:59:22.140I just find it hard to believe that there's any American in the like actual American who's waking up at night.
00:59:30.400worried about the fate of of narco terrorists.
00:59:33.460I think I think we all have the same feeling of we're just we're just like we're sick of this.
00:59:36.960Why are we allowing you know, why are we allowing this scenario where these billion dollar criminal criminal enterprises are able to kill tens of thousands of Americans?
00:59:48.740We don't have to allow it. I mean, we're the United States of America.
00:59:51.880We have the most powerful military on the planet. We don't we don't this is a choice.
00:59:55.560We don't have to allow this. And and I think that's where almost every American stand.
01:00:01.040Yeah, this is, you know, this gets down to a deeper divide that's within MAGA, which is there even when people talk about like the neocons versus the populists.
01:00:10.620And that's that's that's an interesting divide, too. But at an even deeper level, there is this debate over what America first means.
01:00:17.760And there's America first, which has this hard nationalist bordering on isolationist point of view.
01:00:24.160And I don't think that's what Trump is. I think Trump has an America first, much more imperialist kind of view, which is different than the neocons who were kind of liberal imperialists who wanted to sprout up Madisonian democracy everywhere.
01:00:36.200I think Trump is is much more like a big leader of the global hegemon. And I think that's why he wants Greenland.
01:00:42.400I think that's why he's threatened to invade Canada. And I think that's why he throws his weight around on the world stage for the benefit of Americans, not for abstract ideology, but explicitly for the benefit of Americans.
01:00:52.780And I think, look, we are the world empire. And that's just a fact. And we've exerted control in our hemisphere for a very long time.
01:00:59.500And so if Maduro is willing to play ball with us, that's one thing. If he's not, if he's going to work with our enemies, if he's going to ship drugs up into our country, well, then maybe we don't need to tolerate him.
01:01:09.660And also the other thing, too, is and I think you alluded to it, that, you know, the argument against it, I think most Americans are not up at night worried about narco terrorists.
01:01:19.620But there are some people who have this libertarian view that, well, the war on drugs failed. And that that is a very common view.
01:01:26.200Yes. And my view of that is like, well, the war on drugs, the war on drugs was never tried.
01:01:31.380I mean, we never actually went to war against drugs. And I think it's kind of like that scene in Breaking Bad where, you know, where Mike says, you know, no more half measures.
01:01:42.780If you're going to do it, it's got like either do it or don't. You can't have a half measure.
01:01:47.300And when it comes to the quote unquote war on drugs, it strikes me that it was it's kind of been a at most a half measure.
01:01:55.340Right. Well, again, I think it means you've got to take the war to the to the actual drug traffickers.
01:01:59.180Well, that's that's that's the real key. Right. I mean, I think that every time we declare a war on a concept, it is bound to fail.
01:02:04.500Right. If you declare a war on poverty, you can't defeat poverty.
01:02:06.540If you declare a war on drugs, it's an object. War on terrorism. Right.
01:02:09.700Like it has to be a war on the drug traffickers. Right. War on drug cartels.
01:02:13.660Like these are material things that the material that our military, which is excellent at finding things, breaking them and destroying them, that they can actually go and do like not so good at stopping people's drug habits.
01:02:24.000Really, really good at blowing up narco terrorist boats in the middle of the Caribbean.
01:02:27.220And so it seems to me we should, you know, do what our skill set sort of suggests that we should do with the American military, which is, you know, break things.
01:02:34.300I think that we're really, really good at breaking things and we're less good at putting things back together, which is why I say about Venezuela that I really hope that there is something waiting in the wings to take over when there is or if there is a regime change.
01:02:44.540I don't think, by the way, my ideology of regime change is not that we have to have democracy everywhere.
01:02:48.540I think we need a regime that's better for America everywhere that it's possible for there to be a regime.
01:02:52.660And again, the key word there is possible.
01:02:54.600And there you have to calculate risk reward. Right.
01:02:56.420What are we risking and what's the upside reward?
01:02:58.760I think any realist would suggest that there are certain rewards that are not worth the risk and there are certain risks that are not worth the reward.
01:03:06.140And so I think that when you look at Venezuela, if you're talking about a very small pinprick military intervention and then Maduro goes bye bye and suddenly you have a friendlier regime that is going to denationalize the oil industry, for example, and crack down on the narco traffickers.
01:03:20.360If you're talking about 100,000 troops, it's a completely different story.
01:03:23.040And the same thing is true about interventions literally anywhere else on Earth.
01:03:26.260If what you're talking about is one bullet finishing a problem, I'm very much for it.
01:03:30.740If what you're talking about is 100,000 troops finishing the problem, I'm very much against it.
01:03:33.700But then the question, of course, becomes, I mean, you mentioned CIA, you know, activities within Latin America and maybe within Venezuela.
01:03:41.100The question then becomes, is the CIA James Bond, Jason Bourne, efficient, ruthless, controls everything?
01:04:09.840The evidence from the 50s of the former is much better than the evidence today for the former.
01:04:15.280I'm much closer to the burn after reading version of the CIA today than I would have been prior to the last 25 years of American history, for sure.
01:04:24.120All right, so I guess we're not going to.