The Matt Walsh Show - August 10, 2024


Here Are Examples Of Real Anti-White Racism


Episode Stats

Length

21 minutes

Words per Minute

163.65479

Word Count

3,553

Sentence Count

262

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

A year ago, I began filming my new movie, Am I Racist. The goal of the movie was to go deep undercover into the world of anti-white racism and show how bad the problem really is. To prove to you how big of an issue this is, I wanted to take you on a trip down memory lane of some recent real world examples of anti white racism.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 A year ago I began filming my new movie, Am I Racist? The goal of the movie was to go deep
00:00:04.820 undercover into the world of DEI and show how bad the problem really is. There'll be some moments
00:00:09.740 in the movie that just seem too crazy to be real, but I assure you it's real and it's been a real
00:00:15.180 problem for quite a while in fact. To prove to you how big of an issue DEI is, I wanted to take
00:00:19.940 you on a trip down memory lane of some recent real world examples of anti-white racism.
00:00:25.080 But before we do that, check out the trailer for Am I Racist? Tickets will go on sale August 15th.
00:00:31.020 Visit miracist.com for more details on that. Now enjoy the trailer.
00:00:55.080 Joining us now is Matt, certified DEI expert. Here's my certification. And what you're
00:01:00.540 doing is you're stretching out of your whiteness. This is more for you than this for you. Is
00:01:04.060 America inherently racist? The word inherent is challenging there. I want to rename the
00:01:08.160 George Washington Monument to the George Floyd Monument. America is racist to its bones. So
00:01:12.560 inherently. Yeah, this country is a piece of shit. White folks. White. White supremacy. White
00:01:18.980 woman. White boy. Is there a black person around? There's a black person right here. Does he not
00:01:23.060 exist? Hi, Robin. Hi. What's your name? I'm Matt. I just had to ask who you are because
00:01:29.080 you have to be careful. I've never been too careful. In theaters, September 13th. Rated PG-13.
00:01:35.760 If you open any history textbook in this country, you'll learn that the crowning achievement of the
00:01:40.220 civil rights movement was supposedly the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And for the first time in American
00:01:45.260 history, the law banned discrimination based on race, particularly in the context of employment.
00:01:50.340 And from that point forward, we were told businesses would not be allowed to hire or fire people
00:01:55.660 because they were black or white or Asian or whatever. It was supposedly the dawn of a new
00:02:00.280 era. Lyndon Johnson might have escalated our role in Vietnam, but at least he finished what JFK started
00:02:05.360 and signed the Civil Rights Act. And we should all be thankful for that. That is the comic book version
00:02:10.900 of civil rights law anyway, which also happens to be what pretty much everybody believes to this day.
00:02:15.660 The truth is different though. The truth is that in 2023, the Civil Rights Act is not simply a dead
00:02:20.560 letter. It is a document so defunct, so pointless, so irrelevant that it stopped prohibiting racist
00:02:27.320 employment discrimination several years ago. And no one even noticed when it happened, at least since
00:02:31.940 2020 and probably much earlier. The largest corporations in this country have openly discriminated
00:02:36.820 against white people solely on the basis of skin color. And to be clear, we're not talking about a
00:02:42.340 quote unquote holistic discrimination or discrimination at the margins here. We're
00:02:46.860 talking about a de facto near total ban on hiring white people. So here are the numbers. And there's
00:02:53.780 no need to hype this up or use hyperbole because the numbers by themselves are shocking, like hard to
00:03:01.640 believe. In 2021, the largest public companies in the United States, meaning the companies in the S&P 100,
00:03:08.240 they hired collectively 300,000 people in that year. Now, of those 300,000 people, only 6% of them were white.
00:03:20.860 So a total of 94% of them were so-called people of color, meaning blacks, Hispanics, and so on. Now, this is data
00:03:28.940 so extreme that it doesn't even seem to be real. Even if you know that anti-white discrimination is a real problem,
00:03:36.400 and it's happening in this country, and it's, you know, mainstream, even if you knew that, when you hear these
00:03:43.140 numbers, it's, again, hard to believe. These are the kinds of numbers that appear at first glance to be
00:03:48.440 impossible. But they're not impossible. The biggest corporations in the United States with the best funded legal
00:03:53.600 departments in the entire world implemented this virtually absolute ban on hiring whites without any regard to the
00:04:00.220 hallowed Civil Rights Act. There was not a single member of Congress of either party who paid any attention to the fact
00:04:05.560 that 94% of new hires among the biggest corporations in the United States were non-white.
00:04:11.580 Now, to be fair, as this was happening, companies in the S&P 100 insisted that they weren't targeting
00:04:16.400 whites in particular. For example, here's one Apple executive telling the Washington Post
00:04:21.060 that their main goal in the era of George Floyd is not to punish anyone. Instead, Apple said
00:04:26.340 they just want to honor the victims of supposed racial injustice and create a more equitable playing field.
00:04:33.100 Watch. So Apple has taken an holistic approach, sort of approach to criminal justice, education,
00:04:41.380 small business, or economic empowerment. Why this approach as opposed to, say, a more
00:04:47.260 concentrated approach that focuses on one of those issues?
00:04:53.060 Yeah, it's a great question. I think we wanted to try to touch the places where we thought we could have
00:04:58.860 impact. And in honor of how this all got started, you know, our Racial Equity and Justice Initiative is
00:05:05.380 three years old. It started in the wake of the George Floyd, the Breonna Taylor deaths. And
00:05:12.000 we wanted to honor their encounters with the criminal justice system, which was so deeply unfair to say that
00:05:21.320 those murders, as they happen, should also, there should be work done in that area as well.
00:05:28.260 Yes, we have to honor them. We have to honor these scumbags. We have to honor these criminals,
00:05:34.460 drug addicts, and drug dealers. We have to honor them. We have to honor them by making sure that only
00:05:39.060 6% of our jobs go to white people. By the way, white people still account for, I think, like 70%
00:05:45.200 of the U.S. population in total. So that's 6% of the jobs going to 70% of the population.
00:05:55.300 Now, on the other end, black Americans account for about 13% of the population.
00:06:01.420 And if you see a disparity where only 6% of a certain kind of job are going to 13% of the population,
00:06:06.380 we're told that this is a massive, massive problem. And this is systemic racism.
00:06:11.660 So 6% to 13% would be systemic racism, terrible, awful. It's slavery. It's Jim Crow. But 6% of
00:06:20.460 jobs going to 70%. Now, well, there's nothing to see here. The executive at Apple goes on and on
00:06:27.580 with a bunch of platitudes. And she never mentions that the S&P 100 is going to un-person hundreds of
00:06:33.400 millions of white people, effectively. She never says that Apple is going to start running ads with
00:06:38.460 a diverse array of overweight multicultural actors having a little sit-down with an obese rendition
00:06:44.400 of Mother Earth. Apple, like so many other companies in the S&P 100, tried to keep its
00:06:50.080 hatred of white people under wraps. And for the most part, they succeeded. We only know about what's
00:06:55.360 happened here because of an article in the left-wing Bloomberg News, of all places. And incredibly
00:07:00.240 enough, this was not an article condemning the overt racist discrimination of the S&P 100. Not at all.
00:07:06.440 This was not a breathtaking piece of investigative journalism that demanded answers as to why the
00:07:11.720 most powerful corporations were not hiring whites because they're whites. Instead, the article from
00:07:17.520 Bloomberg made this racial discrimination sound like a great thing. Here's the headline from Bloomberg
00:07:21.900 News. And again, this is the only reason we even know about this. The only outlet reporting on the
00:07:28.260 fact that only 6% of the jobs went to white people is Bloomberg. But here's how they framed it.
00:07:32.560 Corporate America promised to hire a lot more people of color. It actually did. The relief from
00:07:39.160 Bloomberg was palpable. Thank God that thousands of white people didn't get hired in 2021, Bloomberg
00:07:44.220 was saying. In fact, Bloomberg went a step further than that. Bloomberg also published the story under
00:07:49.600 a banner reading equality. So they acted like it's a win for equality to reject the vast majority of
00:07:56.400 white applicants. That's equality. Because nothing screams equality like preventing white people from
00:08:02.840 getting jobs. That's equality. What Bloomberg did is collect data from the U.S. Equal Employment
00:08:08.300 Opportunity Commission, which by law requires that large companies report their demographics to the
00:08:13.020 government. And in the interest of full disclosure, we have to note that we haven't seen all this data
00:08:18.400 because Bloomberg hasn't published all of it. And a lot of this is not posted by the government
00:08:22.780 online either. But from what Bloomberg has disclosed and from publicly available records, we can make a
00:08:28.640 few determinations. And for one thing, and this is a minor point, but it's important to make it anyway,
00:08:33.920 from what we can tell, the data appears to be counting Hispanics as people of color. So you'll notice that
00:08:39.020 when Hispanics commit violent crimes, like running over retired ex-police chiefs with stolen cars, for
00:08:44.840 example, they're listed as white on official records. But in this case, they're considered people of
00:08:50.200 color. Make of that what you will. So if they get a job, they're a person of color. If they commit a
00:08:55.700 crime, they're white. Getting into credit card debt is so easy. Getting out well, the system is set
00:09:02.340 up so you can. If you're struggling with credit cards, personal loans, collections, or medical bills,
00:09:06.820 you need to check out PDS Debt. PDS provides a service to match you with debt solutions tailored to
00:09:12.680 your financial situation. If you're making payments every month on your debt and your balances aren't
00:09:16.920 going down, PDS has solutions for you. Everyone with $10,000 or more in eligible debt qualifies,
00:09:23.120 and there is no minimum credit score required, bad and fair credit accepted. I know how much debt can
00:09:28.420 weigh on your shoulders, so don't wait any longer and get in contact with PDS Debt now so you can
00:09:33.060 finally have some peace of mind. PDS Debt has customized options for anyone struggling with
00:09:37.280 credit cards, personal loans, collections, or medical bills. They strive to understand your specific
00:09:41.440 scenario and can help provide alternative solutions to becoming debt-free. Save more while paying off
00:09:46.840 your debt in a fraction of the time. Stop waiting. Start saving. Get a free debt analysis right now.
00:09:51.200 pdsdebt.com slash Walsh. It only takes 30 seconds. That's pdsdebt.com slash Walsh today. pdsdebt.com
00:09:58.880 slash Walsh. This is from Newsweek. Coca-Cola, facing mounting backlash from conservatives online,
00:10:05.040 has responded to allegations of anti-white rhetoric after an internal whistleblower leaked screenshots of
00:10:10.040 diversity training materials that encourages staff to try to be less white. By the way,
00:10:14.860 starting here in the very first sentence, you notice how Newsweek says that it's conservatives
00:10:19.120 who are the ones who are causing this backlash over the anti-white racism for Coca-Cola. Now,
00:10:26.140 that's correct. It is mostly conservatives, but you see how readily the media admits that
00:10:32.500 conservatives are the only ones who care about racism against white people. The media will readily
00:10:38.360 accept. In fact, it's happy to give that issue to conservatives. Back to the articles. It says,
00:10:46.560 on Friday, Carolyn Baransenko, an activist who supports banning critical race theory,
00:10:51.880 shared images from an internal whistleblower of the company's online racism training.
00:10:55.580 The slides included tips to learners on how to be less white, less arrogant, less certain,
00:11:01.700 less defensive, less ignorant, and more humble. Because, of course, we know that, you know,
00:11:08.380 that's synonymous with white, is being arrogant, and all those other things. Now, so this is the
00:11:14.700 part you probably heard about all this. A Coca-Cola spokesperson confirmed that the course is part of
00:11:19.120 a learning plan to help build an inclusive workforce, but also noted that, quote, the video circulating on
00:11:24.340 social media is from a publicly available LinkedIn learning series and is not a focus of our company's
00:11:29.560 curriculum. They said, our Better Together global learning curriculum is part of a learning plan to
00:11:34.900 help build an inclusive workforce. It is comprised of a number of short vignettes, each a few minutes
00:11:39.800 long. The training includes access to LinkedIn learning on a variety of topics, including on
00:11:44.060 diversity, equity, and inclusion. Okay. So that's your classic non-denial denial, because they're
00:11:53.080 saying, they're not coming out and saying, this is totally made up and photoshopped, it's not real.
00:11:58.220 They're saying, yeah, this is part of the curriculum. It's just, that's not our focus. We're not focused
00:12:01.820 on that part of it. Well, if we want to know whether that excuse should wash, then all we have
00:12:08.780 to do is, like I always say with something like this, if you want to know whether it's racist,
00:12:13.280 and if it's not immediately clear to you, like something like this should be, all you have to do
00:12:16.740 is take white out and put another race in. So if Coca-Cola was putting their employees through a
00:12:26.100 training course that at any point included the instruction to be less black, there would be
00:12:33.860 no controversy at all. This would, we wouldn't be calling this a controversy. There'd be nothing like
00:12:38.440 that around, just everybody would agree, across all aisles would agree that it's, that it's inexcusable
00:12:46.420 racism. And it's racism, by the way, just straightforward racism. Because the other thing that I've seen
00:12:51.720 in response to this Coca-Cola story is the claim that this is reverse racism. In fact, there are
00:13:00.500 still some, I think most conservatives have, have wised up on this issue, but there are still some
00:13:07.100 conservatives that I've seen saying, this is reverse racism. Coca-Cola is committing reverse
00:13:11.720 racism. No, this is not reverse racism. Let's be clear about that. Coca-Cola is not guilty of reverse
00:13:18.000 racism. They are guilty of racism. Straightforward, regular old racism. There's no such thing as
00:13:25.520 reverse racism. There's just racism. That's it. Reverse racism implies when you say reverse racism,
00:13:36.380 you are, you're surrendering the point. You're ceding ground. You're agreeing with the left's premise
00:13:43.160 that racism itself is a white thing. And that white, white people own racism. And so if a black
00:13:51.780 person or if a non-white person is racist, they are, all they're doing is reversing the racism.
00:13:58.000 Which has a hint, the phrase itself has a hint of kind of giving them a taste of their own medicine.
00:14:04.000 Right? Or just, we're reversing the racism back on you. There's no race that owns racism. Racism is
00:14:11.180 racism. Reverse racism is not a thing. This is simply racism. The Washington Post reports that
00:14:16.620 China is currently in the process of modernizing and diversifying its fleet of nuclear warheads.
00:14:22.860 The Defense Department now expects that China's arsenal will have quadrupled within the next
00:14:26.540 decade. By 2030, the communist nation should have more than a thousand nuclear warheads. Among them
00:14:32.600 will be a certain number of hypersonic orbital missiles, which can circle the globe without being
00:14:36.680 detected. And of course, that's not new technology. And China still will have fewer nuclear
00:14:41.160 weapons than we do. I mean, enough to destroy the entire planet. So probably that's sufficient.
00:14:47.160 But we'll still have more. But the point though, is that they seem focused on strengthening their
00:14:51.900 position and becoming a more formidable global force. While we have, well, other priorities.
00:14:59.200 In an interview with NPR, General David Berger announced that the Marine Corps will be overhauling
00:15:05.100 and reinventing itself in order to institute more diversity. Not nuclear diversity, but the type of
00:15:10.400 diversity that politically correct HR representatives are worried about. Reading from Yahoo News, it says,
00:15:15.720 according to Berger, Marines will work to, quote, reflect America, to reflect the society we come
00:15:21.420 from. Adding that the decision is not one related to being woke or politically correct. Sure, whatever
00:15:26.660 you say. Quote, our advantage militarily is on top of our shoulders, Berger said. It's not actually
00:15:31.980 our equipment. We are better than anybody else, primarily because we don't all think exactly alike.
00:15:37.020 We didn't come from the same backgrounds. Now, far be it for me, it's a question, the esteemed
00:15:42.620 general. I didn't serve in the military. I never fought in any war. I admit that. Even so, I'm
00:15:49.900 skeptical that any military engagement has ever been won due to a, due to, you know, diversity of ethnic
00:15:57.120 backgrounds among the victors. Can anybody point me to an example for military history of a battle that
00:16:03.840 was won because of diversity? I'm trying to imagine back, say, during the Normandy invasion,
00:16:10.940 a group of soldiers pinned down, taking heavy enemy fire. One of them shouts, we need someone with a
00:16:16.660 diverse ethnic background over here. Stat! It's hard for me to picture that. You know, I can't see why
00:16:23.340 that would have specifically helped. But the Marines are all in on their diversity plan anyway. In fact,
00:16:29.780 as Fox News reports, they're paying big bucks to make this happen. Quote from the report, a job
00:16:35.860 listing with the U.S. Marine Corps seeking a diversity, equity, and inclusion advisor with a
00:16:40.820 starting salary of $144,000 is gaining attention on social media. The USMC is hiring the advisor to
00:16:46.800 ensure that, quote, all internal and external communications reflect diversity, equity, and
00:16:51.440 inclusion, or DEI, and to develop tools that enable shifting the USMC cultural paradigm for
00:16:57.980 diversity, equity, and inclusion. The DEI advisor will work in collaboration with the chief diversity
00:17:03.340 officer and the diversity review board. The listing states, duties include the assessment of diversity
00:17:10.660 and inclusion program effectiveness, design and lead implementation of process improvement
00:17:15.700 initiatives, and provide executive level consultation. I don't know what anyone, any of
00:17:20.660 that means, as well as the development and administering of training and education guidance
00:17:24.700 to the CDO. It says, quote, you will drive strategic management concepts and principles, including
00:17:30.460 assisting with the development of Marine Corps policy, supporting the USMC's mission, vision,
00:17:34.900 values, strategic goals, and objectives, according to the listing. Now, needless to say,
00:17:39.900 $144,000 a year is significantly more than any of the men out actually doing the fighting are getting
00:17:47.820 paid. So risk your life for your country and get paid about the same as, I don't know, Papa John's
00:17:53.400 shift supervisor or less, but sit behind a desk developing equity and inclusion strategies.
00:18:00.140 And, you know, that's where the big bucks are made. At any rate, if you want more information on
00:18:05.640 our military's diversity plans, you'll be happy to know that you can go to the Marine Corps
00:18:09.580 Association website and download their full diversity, equity, and inclusion plan as written
00:18:15.160 by Lieutenant General David Ottignan and Brigadier General Jason Woodworth. Here, you'll find details
00:18:21.160 about what this chief diversity officer will do. And you can learn about the formation of the
00:18:26.300 aforementioned diversity review board, which the Marines will be using as they strive to achieve
00:18:31.400 their diversity goals. And this is not just about racial diversity, of course, as they explain,
00:18:35.920 quote, today's Marine Corps is 58% white and 42% minority. From 2010 to 2020, enlisted diversity
00:18:42.780 grew from 33% to over 45%, and our officer diversity grew from 16% to 34%. Female diversity
00:18:49.640 continues to climb each year and is currently over 9%. These are signs that we are making positive
00:18:55.040 progress, but much work remains to be done to retain and promote a more diverse, equitable,
00:18:59.740 and inclusive force across all ranks. Now, again, we must ask the question from before in the whole
00:19:07.820 history of military conflict across the entire globe. Has there ever been a battle won because
00:19:14.600 one side was more inclusive and equitable than the other? I don't think so. In fact, battles have been
00:19:22.540 one with the exact opposite approach. Rather than diversity, militaries have always valued
00:19:29.680 cohesiveness, uniformity. That's why units march in formation. That's why we call them units.
00:19:38.500 It's why they literally wear things called uniforms. Individuality has never been emphasized.
00:19:45.400 Instead, it's been subordinated ruthlessly sometimes to the needs of the unit, the group, the whole.
00:19:51.700 As for inclusiveness and equity, our military was a formidable fighting force, a two-time world
00:19:58.220 champion, because it set standards for itself that excluded those who were unfit, those who couldn't
00:20:04.900 hack it. The military has never been a democracy. It's never been a place for individual expression.
00:20:12.500 It has never been a beacon of tolerance or equality. The military is a hierarchy. All militaries are
00:20:19.280 hierarchies. There is no equality or equity in a hierarchy. There can't be. There's never been a democratic
00:20:25.800 military. There's never been a tolerant military. There's never been anything like what they are currently
00:20:32.660 turning it into right now. So once again, we see that the left's project is to demolish, deconstruct, and
00:20:39.660 fundamentally rebuild and redefine everything. Every American institution, every organization, every tradition,
00:20:45.860 every word, every idea, terms like politically correct and woke, don't really even begin to
00:20:53.600 capture what's actually happening in our country and what these people intend to do to it.
00:20:59.380 Daily Wire Plus members have unlimited on-demand access to our uncensored ad-free daily shows,
00:21:04.540 real-time breaking news, and investigative journalism. Don't be left in the dark. Join us
00:21:08.640 and the fight right now. DailyWire.com slash subscribe.
00:21:12.640 Daily Wire Plus members have unlimited on-demand access to our uncensored ad-free daily shows,