In this episode of Year in Review, we look back at the biggest story in the world for a second year in a row: the coronavirus outbreak that shocked the world in 2011, COVID. The story quickly became one of the most talked about viral stories of the decade, and it s no surprise that it s still a hot topic to this day.
00:00:00.500Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations.
00:00:11.860Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show. Today is our year in review show where we look back at 2021 and some of the biggest stories in the news through some of my favorite episodes of The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:24.640And what's fun is this will be our all-new show for our SiriusXM listening audience. Today, we are pulling from our archives on the podcast from shows between January and September before we launched on SiriusXM Triumph Channel 111.
00:00:42.820I want to start with the biggest story in the world for a second year in a row, and we hope the final year in a row, COVID.
00:00:51.480As recently as earlier this year, you could not put out a social media post or a YouTube video claiming COVID originated in a Wuhan lab.
00:00:59.740You couldn't even question whether it did. Never mind claim that it did.
00:01:04.260But slowly, that started to change, and in no small part thanks to Josh Rogan of The Washington Post.
00:01:10.860Mainstream media is not all bad. They've got some great players here and there, like Josh.
00:01:14.840Josh joined me in April in what became a viral interview because he spoke clearly and honestly about the origins of COVID.
00:01:22.620I mean, he was truly one of the first to actually say this stuff out loud.
00:01:26.620But also, as he says, how the story got all screwed up.
00:01:30.820Knowing how it started is important, and I think there are still, there's sort of three categories of people.
00:01:37.560One that believes it came from an animal in a wet market over in China where they serve, you can walk through and see live animals, people like to eat.
00:01:46.620Number two is from a lab in Wuhan, China, where people were creating intentionally some sort of virus, the coronavirus, COVID-19, to hurt people, potentially as a military weapon.
00:02:00.800And number three, it was in a Wuhan lab being studied and accidentally got released, right?
00:02:08.680Do I basically have the three possible sources outlined?
00:02:11.960And your belief after all your reporting is what?
00:02:15.060So basically, what I lay out in the book is that there's plenty of evidence to support the still unproven theory that COVID-19 originated from an accidental leak from one of the labs in Wuhan that was doing what we call gain-of-function research.
00:02:32.240That's where they collect all the bat coronaviruses they can find, take them 1,000 miles from where the bats live to Wuhan, which is 1,000 miles away from the bats, by the way.
00:02:40.640And then they experiment on them to make them more virulent, make them more dangerous.
00:02:45.440Well, they're trying to predict the next pandemic, right?
00:02:48.720And this is a program supported by $200 million of U.S. taxpayer-funded research, okay?
00:02:55.020And what it was was hundreds of scientists, American scientists and Chinese scientists, going around, scooping up all the most dangerous viruses that you could find and bringing them to this very lab that happened to be 10 miles before the outbreak broke out and playing around with them in ways that we understand are risky and dangerous and have very little to no oversight, okay?
00:03:15.560And if you came to this story, if you were an alien and you dropped down on Earth, not knowing how this issue of the origin had become hyper-politicized for a couple of important reasons I'm about to get to, and you just looked at that set of facts, okay?
00:03:30.600You've got bats 1,000 miles away, you've got the number one bat coronavirus research lab, which was doing research on how to make these viruses more infectious on humans, and that's where the outbreak broke out.
00:03:42.060Well, Occam's razor would tell you that we should probably check out that lab, okay?
00:03:45.560That's right, it seems so obvious to hear you say it like that, like, oh my God, wait a minute, this is the number one lab in the world researching bat coronaviruses, and that's where the outbreak was?
00:03:56.400And it gets worse, because two years before the outbreak, U.S. diplomats traveled to that very lab and took a look at it, three trips, and said they didn't have enough safety procedures, they didn't have enough staff, and they warned about the very studies that they were doing, because they were publishing some but not all of their studies,
00:04:12.740about making these viruses more susceptible to infect humans in a very specific way, that is, an S-protein with an ACE2 inceptor.
00:04:21.180What they would do is they would take these mice, and they would give them, like, human-like lungs, and then they'd run the virus through them a few hundred times and see what happens, okay?
00:04:28.520Now, the virus that caused the pandemic infects the ACE2 inceptor with the S-protein.
00:04:35.240It's the exact same thing that the diplomats warned about in these cables that I wrote.
00:04:39.960But, okay, so now I'm going to tell you how the story got all screwed up.
00:04:44.640Basically, what happened is that, you know, when the virus broke out, it became a battle in the media between, on the one hand, Trump and Pompeo, who, you know, as you know, most of the media didn't like and wanted to discredit, or, you know, there were some reasons that they had lost credibility, to be honest.
00:05:02.320And then you had these scientists, and these scientists were the friends of the Wuhan lab, and they were led by this guy named Peter Daszak, who works at the EcoHealth Alliance.
00:05:10.660But basically, there's a whole group of them whose life work was invested in this.
00:05:14.840This is what they had spent their last 20 years doing.
00:05:17.360They had raised $200 million doing it.
00:05:19.240If the lab were found to be guilty, their careers and legacies would be ruined forever.
00:05:55.360Everyone said, don't worry about the origins.
00:05:57.200By the way, the reason we need to know about the origins is not because we're trying to blame China, because you can blame them for a number of things.
00:06:04.560Either way, that's what people don't get.
00:06:05.900It's like there's plenty of blame on China without the origin thing even being involved.
00:06:10.340We need to know because we need to know how to prevent the next pandemic, because if we don't know how it started, then we can't prevent the next one, which is pretty important.
00:06:56.760I'm just saying we should investigate it.
00:06:59.020And all of a sudden, these journalists can't they can't think again.
00:07:02.720They can't, you know, resist the they have they must resist the idea that they might have been wrong a year ago, you know, which I say if I'm wrong and then tell me I'm wrong and I'll change my mind.
00:07:13.600If I get new information, I think new things.
00:07:15.920That's just how I think the honest journalism should work.
00:07:18.540But for a lot of people, it's just like, no, Pompeo is not credible.
00:07:25.520And then we get to the WHO report, which I know you want to talk about.
00:07:28.160But I'll just I'll intro it here by saying this.
00:07:30.600The guy that the WHO gets to do the investigation is Peter Daszak, who has a clear conflict of interest, as I've ever seen in my entire life.
00:07:38.520They rejected the people that the U.S. government wanted them to put on.
00:07:42.140Then they had an investigation that was determined.
00:07:46.220The scope was determined by the Chinese government.
00:07:48.240The investigation was overseen by the Chinese government.
00:07:51.040Tony Blinken said the report was written by the Chinese government.
00:07:53.420And then you have the same scientists who've been denying this the whole time, who have the clear conflict of interest, say, oh, no, it couldn't have been the lab.
00:08:38.420It's a total white, total whitewash and a service to CCP propaganda.
00:08:42.580Unlike I've ever seen China Communist Party.
00:08:44.780OK, so here's that guy you've been referring to, Peter Daszak, who is one of the, quote, investigators that's supposed to get to the bottom of all this.
00:08:50.680For all of us, 2.7 million people dead.
00:08:52.820He's over there trying to figure out how it got started on our behalf and the world's behalf.
00:08:57.260And here he is talking to Leslie Stahl on 60.
00:08:59.420Something like 75 percent of emerging diseases come from animals into people.
00:10:37.500Well, they wouldn't be able to admit it or they would get killed.
00:10:41.540This is the thing about the Chinese system that people need to understand is that those scientists may be very nice people.
00:10:48.560They may be trying to solve the pandemic.
00:10:50.540They may be mortified that they might have actually sparked the pandemic while trying to solve the pandemic.
00:10:55.580But they don't get to make these decisions.
00:10:57.080They've got a general sitting up behind their shoulder who's got a party guy sitting behind his shoulder who's got Xi Jinping sitting behind his shoulder.
00:11:04.120And if they had a smoking gun, they would destroy it and bury it and we would never find it, which is a separate problem.
00:11:11.180And the whole idea that we shouldn't investigate the lab, by the way, was refuted during that exact day by Peter Daszak's boss, Dr. Tedros, the head of the WHO, who I don't think anyone would call like an anti-China pro-Trump conspiracy theorist.
00:11:43.460And the only reason that makes sense is because he's trying to salvage the credibility of this organization that Peter Daszak is trampling on.
00:11:50.420OK, and he knows that the United States is about to release the statement saying this is not going to end all the investigation.
00:11:56.260We don't think it was a real investigation, which is exactly what Blinken, to his credit, said.
00:12:00.180He said, well, because if you think about it, the Biden administration, they're not they they weren't there.
00:12:05.540Right. They're not married to this one theory or another theory.
00:12:08.300They don't care which way it turns out.
00:12:09.640They're not like, you know, unlike a lot of the like 60 Minutes, they don't they don't they didn't get it wrong the first time.
00:12:15.960Right. And, you know, the media is now trying to, like, tiptoe into this idea of, oh, well, maybe it could be the oh, no.
00:12:22.600Oh, how dare you say it? Oh, that's racist.
00:12:24.880And then here comes Robert Redfield. Right.
00:12:27.520Who is the head of the CDC at the time of the outbreak.
00:12:30.840Now, not a perfect person, not didn't go through the pandemic making zero mistakes.
00:12:35.240I'm not here to say he's a saint, but he's a virologist.
00:12:38.040He's seen the intelligence. And he says on CNN, he says, yeah, I'm pretty sure it was the lab.
00:12:42.100It was this gain of function research.
00:12:43.380He's saying that based on how the virus acted. That's evidence.
00:12:47.040He's saying that I saw how the virus acted. I saw the intelligence.
00:12:50.300By the way, the intelligence is also evidence.
00:12:52.740The Trump administration put out a lot of facts about secret work at the lab.
00:12:56.440In other words, the Trump administration confirmed by the Biden administration called Peter Daszak a liar.
00:13:01.760OK, they can't both be telling the truth.
00:13:03.840Now, Peter Daszak is calling the Biden administration a liar.
00:13:07.200They're all liars, according to Peter.
00:13:08.680Peter's like, everybody's a liar except for me.
00:13:10.320Oh, and by the way, the Chinese people who are my my chaperones, they were just there to make things go smoothly, go smoothly.
00:13:16.100And we all know what that means. Come out the way we wanted to.
00:13:19.200Right. So that's why, you know, it's actually in a way good that you weren't following this at the time because you had an open mind when this all happened a month ago.
00:13:26.480And common sense and Occam's razor point you towards, oh, we should probably take a look at the lab.
00:13:30.460And again, I create a fourth category of people.
00:13:32.940These are people who just want to figure it out.
00:13:58.260Two hundred million dollars, which failed to under the predict program.
00:14:01.580It's called predict, which failed to predict much less preempt the pandemic.
00:14:05.400They're now going to times it by six and throw one point two billion dollars into it.
00:14:10.260And I swear to God, dig up five hundred thousand new viruses that are transmissible to humans in the wild and take them to labs and play around.
00:14:21.140The world's plan, global viral project is an international project, heavily supported by guess.
00:14:26.120You guessed it, Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci and all the rest of them, all the people who have made their careers in virology based on this idea that the best way to stop pandemics is to dig up a bunch of viruses in the wild.
00:14:57.140I want to I want there's a lot to unpack in what you just said, too.
00:14:59.260So, by the way, so so you said earlier that we put American money into this lab in China, which we believe.
00:15:03.940All right. So that's so how much American money is going into this fake solution, which is actually probably another cause of yet another pandemic to come.
00:15:12.760Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to expand the program that, again, we don't know, but may have caused the current pandemic as opposed to where you could spend that money.
00:15:26.680What we're being told by people like Daszak, the World Health Organization, is now that after all the study and thought and investigation, quote unquote, in China, we think we think the virus came from bats in a cave was a thousand miles from the lab.
00:39:37.260We can think of examples in our own lives and careers.
00:39:39.700And there are many cases from the past, you know.
00:39:44.280And there were serious cases where this same truth held.
00:39:49.920The French kings were pretty incompetent.
00:39:53.480But once the post-revolutionary famines occurred, the French peoples learned that there were new levels of incompetence that they had never dreamt of.
00:40:06.200You know, the Shah of Iran had quite a lot of people in prison who were political opponents.
00:40:12.120Some thousands of people were in prison who were political opponents of his.
00:40:16.480And many people thought it just couldn't be worse until they met the Ayatollah in person.
00:40:23.480And they realized that a few thousand people being in a prison system was nothing compared to a system which decided to just shoot people on sight and hang them arbitrarily in the street for reported offenses against the new regime.
00:40:39.300I mean, these may sound like extreme examples, but they're not.
00:40:44.560When you say this thing is intolerable and the whole damn thing has to be pulled down, you are inviting people to join you in relearning a lesson that people in history have had to learn again and again.
00:40:59.720And I simply suggest, as a small c conservative, that people are better at understanding the risks of very, very violent and sudden change, that they step back from that impulse, that they weigh up the pros and cons of this.
00:41:19.860That they don't say, that they don't say, I mean, also, by the way, when you say what should one say to a person who says these things, I think this is what the adults say.
00:42:11.400Tim goes up in like this higher register when he does this one voice and you're going to die laughing.
00:42:17.040He also, however, it wasn't all jokes because he spoke some real truth about the way comedians, particularly the sort of establishment approved comedians on late night TV these days, have become heralded as these brave truth tellers.
00:42:34.040And he hilariously explained why that is such a mistake.
00:42:38.280I've always been interested in where this started.
00:42:42.020And I think that it might have started with when Tina Fey did that really brilliant and funny impression of Sarah Palin on SNL.
00:42:50.400And it may have also started with Jon Stewart, an equally brilliant guy who did a very funny show called The Daily Show.
00:42:56.400But what started to happen eventually was that people started to believe that their job was to be a teacher, was to be somebody who would affect culture with political humor.
00:43:18.640And that it would not be for the sake of being funny.
00:43:22.320I mean, there's been political humor forever.
00:43:24.040And I'm sure some of it was written with the intent that it would, would, you know, affect people.
00:43:29.360But there became this idea, and it became rather explicit, that the job of a comedian was to move the needle in a meaningful way in the political world.
00:43:42.600But those are two good examples of where it may have began, where it was Sarah Palin.
00:43:47.860And because that nailed Sarah Palin, that impression was viral, and people talked about it.
00:43:53.380And people were saying that, you know, I don't know if she could recover from that.
00:43:57.080It was so good, and it was kind of right on.
00:44:00.320And then, of course, Jon Stewart did kind of a great job at being this political comedian that did provide real information.
00:44:08.160But what has happened, like everything else, is that it has grown into a cottage industry of people who are putting their opinion in front of their comedy.
00:44:22.280And this is a big problem, because it's not always funny.
00:44:59.480It's the whole point of a great attorney, a great litigator, is that they know what the other side is going to do,
00:45:05.320and they understand the strengths of the other side.
00:45:07.940And I think he's a great comedian whose job is to make, you know, large numbers of strangers laugh.
00:45:14.040You have to kind of have some baseline respect for them as human beings.
00:45:20.640And when we turn everything into this endless, you know, festival of politics and politicized identities,
00:45:33.700we forget that the people that disagree with us are human beings and that those people, you know, are not enemies.
00:45:44.640They're people that, for whatever reason, have a different experience than you.
00:45:48.080So when I watch those late-night hosts, I go, the best way to say it is they're not really doing their job
00:45:54.800and they've carved out this, you know, group of people that want to hear them say things they agree with,
00:46:03.240similar to somebody on maybe Fox or MSNBC.
00:46:06.740And to me, it's not interesting and it's, and it does get dark and it gets sad because they don't want to do it.
00:46:12.320You know, when you look at Jimmy Kimmel, he doesn't really want to do it.
00:46:15.120You're just making so much money and you become a cog in this Hollywood machine and you're getting $20 million, $30 million.
00:46:22.640You, you're expected to do it, but they don't want to do it.
00:46:25.160You could see it in their faces that nobody got into comedy to lecture people about what, who to vote for.
00:46:31.920Are you surprised to see like that these guys being treated as these sage advisors in this serious suit?
00:46:40.420I mean, to me, it's just, it's antithetical to what a comedian generally looks like and projects like and wants to be perceived as.
00:46:48.220Yeah. Well, what it is, is also, you know, people have Google, people can remember that Chelsea Handler made a living doing race material.
00:46:58.620And now Chelsea Handler does documentaries about white privilege.
00:47:01.780Jimmy Kimmel had a show called The Man Show where they like, you know, did wet t-shirt contests and now he's talking about health insurance.
00:47:08.100Stephen Colbert did a show where he was a very funny, you know, kind of guy that was impersonating Bill O'Reilly.
00:47:13.260And then now everything, you know, and he got away with a lot of saying a lot of crazy things because it was satire and it was very funny.
00:47:20.000And now a lot of these same people exist, they act like satire doesn't exist.
00:47:24.200And if you say something, you're dead serious about it.
00:47:26.620And if you make a racial joke, you're a racist.
00:47:28.820Or if it's a homophobic joke, you're a homophober.
00:47:31.100If you make a joke about trans people, you're diminishing your trans identity.
00:47:34.420And all of these people are very Google-able.
00:48:18.860And people like me have been, I think, pretty well-received kind of pointing it out because a lot of people are going like, oh, yeah, man, that's kind of the way I feel.
00:48:28.140Like they grew up watching these comics.
00:48:43.740It was a bit you were doing about him saying something like, the comedians are the ones who get on stage and basically say, we're fucked up.
01:00:54.900one wonders about the appropriate approach to this.
01:00:57.200And one has to also wonder about the degree to which the way that concern has been generated about
01:01:03.420these issues and the way that it's being focused at the moment,
01:01:06.280if that isn't contributing to just kind of a spreading of a brush fire,
01:01:10.860as opposed to really constructive approaches to trying to address this problem.
01:01:15.940I think what's not talked about often enough is the practical limitations of a strategy of trying to pass statewide bans on various things.
01:01:23.460Like how many states can we actually get these things passed in?
01:02:35.640if they're sufficiently narrow so that they don't run afoul of the constitution and so that they don't run afoul of making it difficult to teach complicated materials,
01:02:45.300they're probably not going to be able to stop most of the things that people are concerned about.
01:02:50.140The reality is that this is a cultural issue, that there is a broad societal issue here.
01:02:55.740And we have to be meaningfully engaged in our local school boards, going to meetings, meeting with teachers.
01:03:36.880Like grassroots efforts, taking advantage of this enormous energy we've seen among parents who are outraged about this to get them on school boards and change the change the curriculum that way, as opposed to at the state level.
01:03:48.860Oh, it has to be a huge part of the solution.
01:03:51.760So I disagree with Camille about these laws.
01:03:57.760Most of them, you know, I think they're legitimate concerns about some of the wording.
01:04:02.060But let's say we, and I take his point, you know, this is only happening in red states with red legislatures and Republican governors.
01:04:18.020Two, if all we do, even if we pass these kind of laws in 50 states, just keeping teachers from making kids feel guilty from over their race, that's not a huge victory, right?
01:04:31.760That's a really minor and defensive victory when you think about it.
01:04:35.180So absolutely, these school board fights are essential and developing curricula or that teaches truthful versions of American history or protecting curricula that already do that is absolutely the ultimate name of the game.
01:04:53.920And the beauty of our system and having a highly localized system of education is you can be a parent in, you know, a small town somewhere or, you know, a suburban county and you can go get 200 signatures on your petition to get on the ballot or whatever it takes.
01:05:13.840And then you win 800 votes in a school board race and you are hugely influential in how the education of your children, your neighbor's children, is going to be carried out.
01:05:25.660And parents who are concerned about this should absolutely take advantage of that.
01:05:30.040And that's something that can happen not just in red states.
01:05:32.220It can happen in states all around the country because, you know, you look like a look at a county by county political map and, you know, there's swaths.
01:05:40.740The country, if you break it down that way, is mostly red because there's so many red localities.
01:05:47.600And so that should be the name of the game more than these state laws.
01:05:54.720I think what they're trying to do is righteous.
01:05:57.540But, again, it's really kind of a defensive and prophylactic action compared to taking over these school boards and preventing the education blob from imposing this stuff on our schools.
01:06:12.720And I also take Camille's point that mostly, you know, you look at where this is happening.
01:06:18.400But, you know, it's Cupertino, it's Portland, as you point out, it's a lot of New York.
01:06:23.480But it's coming everywhere unless you stop it.
01:06:26.480And this is the history of these sort of things.
01:06:28.400Not that we want to get into trans, but, you know, we would have a lot of us would have said, oh, look, 10 years ago, Berkeley says biological males should be able to go into female bathrooms.
01:06:41.280So I think while this debate can be won and before it's too late, it's important to undertake these state measures in the places where you can pass them and fight school board race by school board race all around the country.
01:06:55.100Because if you get control of the school boards, you can you can go as broad as you want.
01:06:59.240I mean, one of the things about these laws is they don't stop the indoctrination on trans issues.
01:07:04.820You know, they all this stuff about letting your kid leave in the middle of the day to go get cross gender hormones without telling the parents and not looping the parents in.
01:07:12.240If your kid decides one day to go from being a girl to being a boy, they don't tell the parents like it's crazy how at our school, our all boys school that we left, they were literally asking the boys every week whether they still felt like boys.
01:07:26.400That is what my son and his friends told me.
01:07:49.660Anyone feeling it a little like some of these things are suggestible.
01:07:52.520We've seen evidence on that with the trans craze through Abigail Schreier and Lisa Lipman, who did the study and so on, especially with respect to girls.
01:07:59.040Anyway, my point is none of these laws address any of that.
01:08:02.580But you get control of the school boards and you can.
01:08:14.940But like it or not, for good or for worse, there is a push with the states, you know, more and more to do this.
01:08:21.300I should point out states on the other side have done it, too.
01:08:23.360Several states have mandated the inclusion of this CRT education into their education systems like California, but several others as well, all blue states.
01:08:35.040And now red states are doing it the other way.
01:08:36.940And I do think it's it's worth noting they have discretion.
01:08:40.960The states do have discretion to set the curriculum in their schools.
01:08:50.320You know, the the K through 12 kids are a captive audience.
01:08:53.580There's a great piece on National Review of Rich by Stanley Kurtz saying there's a good reason that we we can do more to silence or control K through 12 teachers than we can college professors.
01:09:44.420Red State teacher told his students to be white is to be racist, period.
01:09:48.200You know, that we covered this school, the public schools in Buffalo teaching five year olds about racist police, making them watch videos of dead children, allegedly sort of coming back from the grave to talk about racist cops and so on.
01:10:02.500So you can see that the feeling by folks who oppose this, this is an equal emergency to stop.
01:10:07.460Well, well, again, my my perspective on this emergency, however, is, you know, does a sledgehammer actually fix those problems?
01:10:14.580And it seems to me that it that it does not, in fact, fix those problems, that that is almost certainly the case that in these in this with this local system that we have, a solution that does make a lot of sense is for parents to get involved in a circumstance like that, to go to their school board, to make the issue known to to local officials and to create a bit of a scandal at that institution.
01:10:38.260And achieve the change that they want, that that's what makes sense here, a statewide ban, again, it seems to me is going to cause no shortage of problems.
01:10:49.360And while I know Rich has some disagreement about this, the reality is that the way many of these pieces of legislation are written today, they're going to have a number of far reaching consequences that can't really be anticipated and could further politicize issues.
01:11:05.640I have good reason to believe that the degree to which folks are actually kind of overreaching here and creating a bit of a panic is probably inspiring more controversy and will and will inspire more concern.
01:11:19.660And will make the states that are more interested in these policies, perhaps even go a bit further and kind of cementing their perspective here.
01:11:27.660And to the extent folks who are interested in bans go too far in their attempts to try and restrain some of these things, it is entirely possible that they could turn public opinion against them very quickly and sort of cement some of these things in the institutions and create a great deal of sympathy for someone.
01:11:44.780The last thing that you want, if you're someone who's concerned about creeping racial essentialism in public schools, is kind of a sympathetic victim who is fired for something that seems rather frivolous to people looking at it from the outside, that makes people very suspicious about these restrictions.
01:12:04.960And I don't want to create the perception of, you know, Ibram Kendi's book being secret knowledge.
01:12:11.780If, you know, 16-year-olds have access to this book, what if they bring them from home?
01:12:16.340You know, are you going to take those things away from them?
01:12:21.260I mean, I think it's really important to just bear in mind the kind of limitations of what these schools can actually do.
01:12:28.000It's not the worst thing in the universe if there is something in the library, say, at the school that is perhaps somewhat questionable from all of our shared perspective, but that a kid might have access to.
01:12:42.700Like, there are going to be questions.
01:12:44.320These conversations are going to happen.
01:12:47.340It is impossible that students won't have conversations about Black Lives Matter in their college, you know, government and politics, in their high school government and politics courses.
01:12:56.980I mean, my wife in her second year in high school participated in a debate club and debated affirmative action back and forth.
01:13:06.360And I don't think it is an even realistic possibility that we can put the genie back in the bottle and sort of put a shield around ourselves and not have these conversations.
01:13:18.140The question becomes how to do these kinds of things productively, not to try to ban them out of existence.
01:13:22.820Next up is one of my favorite and most moving interviews we have done on this show with two inspirational heroes, true heroes.
01:13:39.580Marcus and Morgan Luttrell are identical twin brothers, Texans, Navy SEALs, and wise and unfiltered men who have been through some truly horrific experiences.
01:13:57.180When they came on to talk with us in August, it was one of the most powerful interviews I have done since launching the Megyn Kelly show since before that.
01:14:03.880I mean, in my career, you can find the full interview in our archives.
01:14:45.860Obviously, we have a all of us have a connection there.
01:14:48.880But the scenario that's unfolding right now with Americans still there waiting, feeling that that that lost feeling, that sense of hope, not hopelessness, I wouldn't think because we're still here.
01:15:06.140I spend the rest of my life trying to make my soul bleed, showing each American how precious that is to me.
01:15:12.320And when you get when something like this happens to you, you have a taste for what America truly is.
01:15:17.900I mean, I wanted to hug the first person I saw and to it ought to let you know how wonderful this place is.
01:15:24.960And in America, it is a place, but moreover, it's the people.
01:15:27.740And there are people literally holding on to the outside of our aircraft trying to get here and falling from the sky just to meet y'all, just just to hang out here.
01:15:35.000Because all they have access to so far is just the people in the military.
01:16:53.360And as I've been we've gone through it, the way I always look at it, man, nothing will ever change how much I love everybody here for coming to get me and what I try to do to show that.
01:17:04.520Biden's now saying that we'll go back.
01:17:06.480We'll get we'll get the military guys and we'll get the Americans.
01:17:08.740Americans, the promises are less explicit on getting those who helped us, the translators and sort of the Afghan people who were in support roles to our men and women in uniform over there.
01:17:20.500I wonder what you think about that, Morgan.
01:17:22.160Let me ask you that one, because we heard from a lot of military guys who are upset about that and, you know, knew how much we relied on those helpers when we were over there.
01:17:31.120You couldn't tell the difference between ourselves and our translators or our support rounds come down rage.
01:17:38.620And those that those that were tasked to us fought just as hard as we did.
01:17:44.260And we've always said and I always wanted them to have the opportunity to come over and be here because they defended our country just like it was their own.
01:17:53.660So it's very disheartening to see or hear, excuse me, that that's a possibility that that won't happen.
01:17:59.680And I'm maybe call me eternal optimist that there's enough people surrounding the administration that says, no, they're they're they need the opportunity and they must have the opportunity to come.
01:18:10.860We need to rescue them just like we need to rescue all the Americans that are that are waiting on us.
01:18:48.340I was actually listening to The New York Times podcast The Daily today, and they were talking about this soldier who had served in Afghanistan.
01:18:55.800He was talking about the relationship that you develop with the translator.
01:21:06.580I would I would say the vast majority of Americans still believe that.
01:21:12.640And I won't maybe preface this with saying I don't think we there was an intentional lie to the individuals that supported us over there from Afghanistan.
01:21:21.620The locals that supported us and the army and the interpreters.
01:21:24.540And I don't think we intentionally lied to them.
01:21:26.400I think once again, if you look at the administration, they.
01:29:34.740I'm curious how you guys, because you sound different about it.
01:29:38.480When I talked to Rob O'Neill, for example, you know, the SEAL who killed bin Laden, one of the guys who went in on that mission, the guy who tried the shot.
01:31:18.360There was never going to be a spike the ball in the end zone moment in Afghanistan.
01:31:21.060Well, that's when there was, it was, yeah.
01:31:22.760So when, when that dude came down to get some milk and cookies and found Rob O'Neill in his kitchen, blasting right in the face, that's, that, that kind of ended that.
01:32:20.860And she went from meteorologists at Fox News to a leader of the group speaking out against Andrew Cuomo.
01:32:26.860As Letitia James' attorney general report was released in August, what ended up becoming the beginning of the end for Cuomo, Janice came on and took a much deserved victory lap.
01:32:38.280I don't know about you, but I'm reeling, I'm kind of reeling in my seat about what we just heard, the specifics of what these women alleged and what he and his office allegedly did in response.
01:32:53.700I don't even know how to put this into words, you know, I always assumed that the sexual harassment charges would be the thing that might get him for many reasons.
01:33:06.500And I am so proud of those brave women today, you know, those young women who really risked their careers and their livelihoods and their reputation to go against this powerful monster.
01:33:24.180And to see our attorney general, Letitia James, who's a Democrat, go up there and just line by line, you know, deliver the information, the disgusting behavior.
01:33:42.220And, you know, it doesn't matter if we're talking about the nursing homes or we're talking about him giving out friends and family COVID tests.
01:33:51.280It's all about abuse of power with this guy.
01:33:54.760And I think today is the first day that we're going to hopefully see some accountability.
01:34:13.920This tweet is making the rounds May 17th, 2013, quote, there should be a zero tolerance policy when it comes to sexual harassment.
01:34:21.280And we must send a clear message that this behavior is not tolerated.
01:34:28.660There's no room for any of this in any workplace and certainly not in the statehouse of the great state of New York.
01:34:37.620I want to go through with you some of the specific allegations because we learned a lot, a lot from Tish James, that presser and the document, the executive summary and so on that they put out, which is over 160 pages long.
01:34:50.340So just so people don't have to take your word for it or my word for it.
01:34:54.580Let's let's see exactly what the women went in and told Letitia James.
01:34:59.300And by the way, her independent investigators, a lot of these, they take pains in the report to point out, are corroborated by independent texts.
01:35:07.180Friends who came forward, aides who admitted they saw it, state troopers who witnessed some of the behaviors.
01:35:14.900It's not to say Andrew Cuomo doesn't deny it, but just know this isn't just I mean, with all due respect to Christine Blasey Ford, it isn't just somebody coming forward after 30 years and saying, this is what I remember without any corroboration.
01:35:26.920This is painstaking executive assistant number one had close.
01:35:33.640This is her allegation, according to the executive summary, had close and intimate hugs with him, kisses on the cheeks, forehead, at least one kiss on the lips, touching and grabbing of her butt during hugs.
01:35:44.660And on one occasion, while taking selfies with him, comments about her personal life relationships, calling her and another girl mingle mamas, inquiring multiple times about whether she had cheated or would cheat on her husband, asking for her, her help, finding him a girlfriend.
01:35:58.960And then there was this at the executive mansion, November 2020, when the governor, during another close hug with this young executive assistant, quote, reached under her blouse and grabbed her breast.
01:36:12.160That's sexual assault. It doesn't even have to be that egregious, an unwanted physical touch is a sexual assault under the law.
01:36:19.000That is clear if, in fact, that happened. And it's pretty detailed under the blouse, grabbing a young woman's breast, who is a lowly executive assistant for you.
01:36:29.440There's a reason that's number one in the complaint against this guy.
01:36:33.940You know, it's it's hard for me to listen to because I had that happen as well in an office in New York, Will the Superior.
01:36:42.160He did the same thing to me. Grabbed my breasts from behind.
01:36:46.920So. So I feel for these women, I really do.
01:36:53.760I know it's kind of triggering. It is kind of I hate that word, but God damn it, it is you.
01:36:59.440You say that and it brings me right back to that office.
01:37:02.620And I know it's not about me. It's about these strong women.
01:37:05.300But you have to understand that this kind of behavior, we can't put up with this or tolerate it anymore.
01:37:12.120These brave women. I remember that what I was wearing that day when my boss did that.
01:37:17.660Um, so to hear that, uh, and to be, to be in an office with an attorney and to, you know, they're strangers, right?
01:37:26.680And you're telling them your deepest, darkest secrets that you don't even tell your boyfriend or your husband.
01:37:33.120Oh my gosh. He, I mean, I just having gone through this, you've gone through this.
01:37:37.660You just want him to go away and shame.
01:37:41.340He, he allegedly did this to this woman and the complaint says for over three months, this executive assistant kept this groping incident to herself and quote, planned to take it to the grave.
01:38:48.740Even though other women had come forward already, the dam had already broken.
01:38:53.600This young woman wasn't going to tell because, you know, very well, as along with me, that women are terrified of getting this label slapped around them, that they're a complainer, that they're going to be a me tour.
01:39:12.060She actually confided to colleagues who reported her allegations to senior staff in the executive chamber who, honestly, J.D., the stories about the senior staff are almost as concerning.
01:39:23.880The web of aides who couldn't have cared less about the 11 women staffers and outside the department as well who came forward.
01:39:39.600And the fact that these people, his administration, continued to try to smear these women, you know, up until a couple of weeks ago when Rich as a party, his top aide, was saying, I don't know if we can trust, you know, what's going on in the AG department.
01:39:55.180I don't know if we could trust these women and what they're saying.