00:07:00.520There is nobody under the age of 50 who even has an active knowledge of any of that stuff.
00:07:07.000As for what they've done with like the Houthis and all that, like, first of all, a lot of these wrongs have been on the books for a long time.
00:07:12.620And many of them have already resulted in sanctions or retaliation by the United States, which leaves us asking again, why are we doing this and why now?
00:07:22.320President Trump mentioned he felt like we were getting tapped along by the negotiators dealing with our nuclear representatives, Kushner and Whitcoff, which I believe I'm sure they did.
00:09:52.920We've taken out 40 plus members of the regime.
00:09:55.060What are we going to do about all the other members of the regime?
00:09:58.080Because right now Trump is saying we, we think they're going to put down their arms, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard members, which is the most vicious group they have over there, and join with the Iranian patriots in the streets, he said.
00:10:26.280I campaigned for the president, as you know.
00:10:28.520But that doesn't mean, and being a conservative or being a Trump supporter or being part of MAGA does not mean you have to accept another Middle East war without questions.
00:10:43.020And anybody who tells you that can suck it.
00:10:47.460There's nothing unpatriotic or unsupportive of one's conservatism or general adherence to MAGA-type principles to say, I would like to be better convinced that this is worth the sacrifice of American blood and treasure.
00:11:39.620We're also going to be joined in just a bit by Iranian-American journalist, Saurabh Amari.
00:11:43.960He's terrific, and he's been writing a lot about, you know, what the risks are, what the benefits are, and how we should be thinking about this conflict.
00:11:53.060But we start today with a detractor, somebody who does not like what she's seeing, and that view will also be represented on this program.
00:12:01.400And that is former U.S. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.
00:12:05.460Our sponsor, the Electronic Payments Coalition, says Washington politicians are always getting in your wallet, and now they're messing with your credit card.
00:12:13.940They say your credit card and the security it offers are under attack, and that Senators Dick Durbin and Roger Marshall want to change the nation's payment system to benefit corporate megastores like Walmart and Target at the expense of everyday Americans.
00:12:28.300Credit cards can keep your payments secure and provide rewards that families use to help make everyday purchases more affordable.
00:12:34.480The Electronic Payments Coalition says the Durbin-Marshall mandates would let corporate megastores cut corners on credit card processing, routing transactions over cheaper, untested networks with weaker security and fewer protections.
00:12:47.840Find out more at guardyourcard.com and consider telling Congress to guard your card.
00:12:54.480It's great to see you. Thank you for being here.
00:12:56.720I sense your aggravation, your frustration as I watched your Twitter feed, and you were in the minority on X, which, again, it was just—I mean, X is completely saturated in neocons, the pro-Israel crowd, and people who would love to cheerlead us right into another Middle East ground war that's endless.
00:13:16.740I was grateful for your contrary perspective, Marjorie.
00:13:20.820Thank you for being here today, and give us your overall view on why you're against this.
00:13:25.640Well, thank you so much for having me, Megan, and I completely agree with everything you said in your intro.
00:13:30.800I'd also like to point out that X is saturated in bots as well and paid social media influencers who just echo whatever their money tells them to say, the money that they're getting paid for.
00:13:42.760And so I think that just like our media has been nothing but propaganda for as long as you and I can remember, I think social media has turned into the same thing.
00:13:52.380What I do know is most Americans, and it's being proved in polling that's coming out, most Americans are completely against this war because, like you said, the president has made no case for it.
00:14:04.640We live our ordinary lives, and we don't feel threatened by Iran.
00:14:08.860We don't walk around thinking that in any moment an Iranian ballistic missile is going to land on our head.
00:14:15.240Here's what Americans, and I want to read off this list.
00:14:18.080This is what Americans are focused on.
00:14:20.62072% of Americans can't afford health insurance.
00:14:24.38058% of Americans can't afford car insurance.
00:14:27.98067% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck.
00:14:31.72031% of Americans can't afford their back taxes.
00:14:35.64050% of Americans are in credit card debt, massive credit card debt.
00:14:41.380That's where we are in America, and I campaigned with the president.
00:14:44.960As a matter of fact, I was one of the only Republicans that was out there for Donald Trump when the rest of the neocons, by the way, that are just cheering him on now, had abandoned him and were trying to beat him in a primary and stop him from being president again.
00:15:01.460I was out there on the front lines for Make America Great Again, and Make America Great Again was supposed to be America first, not Israel first, not any foreign country first, not any foreign people first, but the American people first in our problems.
00:15:18.540And, you know, God bless the Iranian people.
00:15:22.400I hope to God that they can have a government that is for them and that treats women fairly.
00:15:27.860But what we have seen happen right now is we have seen over 100 little girls killed at a school from a bomb.
00:15:35.300And I don't know whose bomb it was, but they're dead today because America and Israel attacked Iran.
00:15:40.360So that's not really good for Iranian women.
00:15:42.700And our president is saying that the Iranian people are all of a sudden going to topple their regime.
00:15:48.360Well, I don't think the Iranian people are going to be toppling their regime when they're getting blown apart by the United States and Israel in an unprovoked attack.
00:16:24.220How much is this war going to cost us?
00:16:26.620We have seen enough of our American troops dead and murdered for foreign countries.
00:16:32.060And now we've had four dead and murdered, just like you said, for Israel and for the Iranian people, not for the American people.
00:16:40.420And I don't want to see any more dead and murdered.
00:16:42.940Our military is filled with some of the greatest people from our country.
00:16:47.340And God bless their families who are probably losing their minds right now, terrified that their son or daughter or their husband or wife or brother or sister may come home in a flag-draped coffin.
00:16:58.120And then we have the president, who, by the way, Megan, this really needs to be said.
00:17:03.280Donald Trump has said repeatedly on camera and in interviews, he doesn't think he's going to heaven.
00:17:09.380Well, I want to ask a question, a serious question.
00:17:15.740If he doesn't think he's going to heaven and he is a man towards the end, he's in the fourth quarter, he's towards the end of his life.
00:17:23.020How does that pan out for the rest of us when we have a president of the United States who doesn't think and is convinced he's not going to heaven?
00:17:31.040What does that mean his decision making is?
00:17:33.540He already said to the New York Post today that he doesn't care about the polling.
00:17:38.080He doesn't care about what the American people think.
00:17:42.720He took a, oh, this is going to be a few-day war, to now it's going to be maybe four weeks or more.
00:17:48.360I want to say, what is happening to the man that I supported, you supported, the man that denounced what happened in Iraq, the man that said no more foreign wars, no more regime change.
00:18:07.460And we're a year in, a year in, and we're in another fucking war, and we've got American troops being killed.
00:18:15.180I think it's time for America to rip the Band-Aid off, and we need to have a serious conversation about what the fuck is happening to this country, and who in the hell are these decisions being made for, and who is making these decisions?
00:18:41.200Because the President Trump that was talking to us about going in and, you know, we're going to—the Iranian people, they're going to thank me.
00:19:39.460So if that doesn't happen willingly, just by, like, the grace of God, okay, we're going to do it, then we are going to have to do it, or Israel's going to have to do it.
00:19:47.180And the more Israel fights, the more we have to fight MTG because that's what got us into this mess to begin with.
00:19:51.860We saw they were going to head and do it, and we felt like we had no choice because they were going to attack our bases first thing as soon as Israel did it.
00:20:09.640The cleric ruling class is about 50,000 deep in their government.
00:20:15.580I mean, are we going to kill all 50,000 of them before they can bring a new government in?
00:20:21.720And while this is happening, Megan, we're bombing them.
00:20:26.060We are bombing them and killing their people and destroying their buildings and wreaking havoc on their entire ability to function in daily life.
00:20:35.740Do we really think these people are going to be saying, oh, thank you, America.
01:06:30.560I now have my very own channel on Sirius XM.
01:06:33.680It's called the Megan Kelly channel and it is where you will hear the truth unfiltered with no agenda and no apologies.
01:06:39.820Along with the Megan Kelly show, you're going to hear from people like Mark Halperin,
01:06:43.200Link Lauren, Maureen Callahan, Emily Jashinsky, Jesse Kelly, Real Clear Politics and many more.
01:06:48.800It's bold, no BS news, only on the Megan Kelly channel, Sirius XM 111 and on the Sirius XM app.
01:07:00.100Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.
01:07:08.680For 47 years, the Iranian regime has chanted death to America and waged an unending campaign of bloodshed and mass murder,
01:07:20.340targeting the United States, our troops and the innocent people in many, many countries.
01:07:25.600It's been mass terror and we're not going to put up with it any longer.
01:07:30.360Iran is the world's number one state sponsor of terror and just recently killed tens of thousands of its own citizens on the street as they protested.
01:07:42.520It has always been the policy of the United States, in particular, my administration,
01:07:48.600that this terrorist regime can never have a nuclear weapon.
01:07:57.840They've rejected every opportunity to renounce their nuclear ambitions and we can't take it anymore.
01:08:06.240They're going to destroy their missiles and raise their missile industry to the ground.
01:08:11.640It will be totally, again, obliterated.
01:08:15.620Part of the messaging that we woke up to on Saturday morning after U.S. forces had invaded Iraq by air and taken out the Ayatollah among some 40 other regime leaders,
01:08:29.320in addition to reportedly somewhere around 200 dead, some portion of those civilian, though we're not sure exactly what the numbers are.
01:08:36.860We've also lost four American service personnel so far, and President Trump saying expect more in the process of this war.
01:08:48.260He used the term war that we've launched.
01:08:52.240Videos are flooding social media from all over the world of celebrations, right?
01:08:56.760So I've made my own position clear, but there's no denying that the vast majority of Iranians are thrilled that this terrible, terrible man,
01:09:06.640the brutal supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is dead.
01:09:10.800Many of them are coming from inside Iran, where this guy's iron-fisted rule is no more, but not just from inside Iran.
01:09:19.240There is this one, there's an ex-user, Vahid Online, who captured this video of Iranians tearing down a statue of the Ayatollah in southern Iran.
01:09:43.760Jubilant, mostly young men celebrating in this particular video.
01:09:49.240Either that or someone caught on fire.
01:09:58.020I mean, the scream, it doesn't sound like a scream of jubilance, but we understand from the context that it is.
01:10:05.760Women specifically have been at the forefront of a lot of these celebrations, defying decades of enforced hijab laws.
01:10:12.180We just discussed that with Saurabh, like this crowd dancing without the headdress to music in the streets of Karaj near Tehran.
01:10:20.960There was extraordinary video out of London showing what we presume are Iranian expats dancing in the streets next to Israeli expats living there.
01:10:51.100Here, domestically, we saw Iranian Americans take to the streets across the nation in large cities to celebrate the fall of the Ayatollah and the chants at something better for many of their family members who are still there.
01:11:02.760We have friends who are among those cheering this for that very reason.
01:11:06.180Had to leave Iran because of the brutal regime, but not all the family members did.
01:11:09.860And therefore, they haven't been able to see their family members.
01:11:12.900You know, their kids haven't been able to see their grandparents and so on.
01:11:16.220And now there's the possibility that things are changing.
01:11:20.780As I said at the top of the first hour, there's really no disputing that this does provide good news to the Iranians.
01:11:28.280I mean, the death of the Ayatollah seems like it's good news for the Iranians, no matter how you look at it.
01:11:33.140But it's the question of whether it's it's what's going to happen next and putting American troops on the line in this way will long term be good for America.
01:11:42.820And that's where we bring in Rich Lowry, editor in chief of National Review and Charles C.W. Cook, senior writer for National Review and host of the Charles C.W. Cook podcast.
01:11:50.880You can find all of their work by becoming an NR plus subscriber, which you should absolutely do because you'll be smarter and you will thank me.
01:12:20.980I've never put you or Charles in that in that.
01:12:23.720So that aside, I'm supportive of what President Trump's trying to do here.
01:12:27.300This regime has been at war with the United States for nearly 50 years, has blood on their hands up to their elbows.
01:12:33.560And the rule, unwritten rule has been they get to hit us and we don't get to hit them back directly.
01:12:39.640Trump made it clear he's not going to accept that rule last year with the June raid and now has made it even clearer.
01:12:44.680So I think it'd be a very good thing and I think this will happen if we flatten their nuclear capabilities or missile capabilities and significantly diminish their military.
01:12:53.900And it'd be a good thing if you get a more reasonable or a different government.
01:12:59.080Now, I say all that with misgivings and criticisms, some of which overlap with what Saurabh was saying.
01:13:05.940One, it's kind of crazy that there was basically no public – sustained public case for this in advance of this major military operation.
01:13:13.860He got the State of the Union address last week where this was an afterthought.
01:13:16.880It came in maybe the 95th or 100th minute and I think even if he technically has legal authority, he should have gone to Congress to get an authorization, one.
01:13:25.120Two, obviously, it's extremely difficult to do regime change from the air.
01:13:30.000And even if you do affect regime change, you have no idea and very little control over what's going to come next.
01:13:34.900Now, I think it's likely – you can imagine some scenarios where what comes next would be worse for us, but hard to imagine, hard to imagine.
01:13:43.100And there's some chance he'll get a more reasonable posture from the regime out of this.
01:13:47.140He'll get a Dulce Rodriguez-type candidate even though he said we've maybe killed some of those in the initial days or a popular revolution.
01:13:55.200But you don't know what it's going to be.
01:13:57.000I mean there's total guesswork behind what's behind door number three here.
01:14:01.980And then finally the rhetoric, and we heard it in the clip you played from him at the top there, 95 percent of which I agree with from President Trump.
01:14:10.000But the idea there was any imminent threat from Iran or some breakout that was going to happen in days or weeks such that we had to do this now is preposterous.
01:14:18.120It's obviously a target of opportunity.
01:15:55.120That Iran is effectively at war with the United States and has targeted us for 45 years and killed our people and paid other people to kill our people.
01:16:39.480I don't know how this is going to end.
01:16:41.600I mean, I don't know how this is going to end.
01:16:43.140And I really would have liked a sustained debate in Congress or otherwise so that I could have heard lots of different people making the case as to whether it was a good or bad idea, what the risks were, what the risks of not going in were.
01:16:56.500The one thing I am sure about, and on this, Rich, and I absolutely agree, is that the notion that this was a defensive act is ridiculous.
01:17:04.620Again, that doesn't mean I'm against it.
01:17:30.660And you could say the Iranians are gunning down the people of Iran in the street, and we're going to go in on a humanitarian basis right now.
01:17:42.000And I just don't like the sleight of hand, even if I'm open to being persuaded that the action is necessary.
01:17:47.940You know, Rich, this morning, Brit Hume was tweeting about imminent threat, saying, why should we wait for an imminent threat?
01:17:56.160If we waited for it to be truly imminent in Iran when it comes to a nuclear weapon or ballistic missiles that could hit the United States, we'd be criticizing the Trump administration for not doing something earlier.
01:18:09.820I think the reason we're debating it is because Trump said there was an imminent threat, and that's the reason we did it.
01:18:16.840And then all this reporting immediately came out saying, no, there wasn't.
01:18:20.420And Trump's own officials had briefed Congress on Sunday saying there wasn't one.
01:18:25.320So it's like the president created that own, you know, his own messaging problem there by offering that as a rationale.
01:18:30.720But putting to the side the fact that, you know, the president probably shouldn't have said that, what about Brit's point of why would we wait until it was an imminent threat before we took action?
01:19:14.460And here on the regime change part of it, I think there's still ambiguity about what he's really going to settle for.
01:19:22.620As Charlie says, he said different things in different interviews, which suggests his state of mind is up for grabs about this as well.
01:19:29.700And they certainly it is a war for regime change at the moment.
01:19:32.380But that doesn't mean that Trump, would you be shocked if two days from now he says we've destroyed all their nuclear capabilities or missile capabilities?
01:20:33.440But I think this regime, anti-Americanism in its DNA, arguably the most anti-American regime on the planet, again, with blood on its hands throughout decades since the inception of the regime.
01:20:47.020So I'm willing to see what's behind that door.
01:20:50.200But again, I'm not confident of the outcome or whether we'll be able to do it.
01:20:55.200I mean, Rich, this is funny because I told the audience this in the first hour that Doug and I, my husband and I, are disagreeing on this one.
01:21:27.240Because, I mean, of course, as a news anchor, I have been covering all these years the number of times that Iran does attack American properties or troops stationed here, there, elsewhere, or through its proxies.
01:21:38.940He's constantly, like, I don't mean to minimize it, but just like a junkyard dog in a car lot, biting us constantly, hurting us constantly, constantly.
01:21:51.240So it never blows up into a full, like, they take us out or they do a massive attack on the homeland.
01:21:56.560But he is responsible for the death of, Trump said thousands of Americans.
01:22:00.760I don't know what the number would be, but certainly in Iraq, Iran caused a lot of American servicemen and women to die.
01:22:24.160As we've seen over the last year or so, the reflex is towards action.
01:22:29.700And I think the major theme in the second term is there are a whole bunch of things he kind of thought about or wanted to do the first term, whether it's, you know, can I fire a bunch of federal workers in kneecap federal departments and agencies that I don't like?
01:23:00.140So I think this is one of those things where he's figured out.
01:23:01.560There's a soundbite making its way on the Internet right now of Trump back in 1980 saying, why would we let them have our hostages for 444 days?
01:23:43.080The big wave hasn't even happened yet.
01:23:45.680I mean, how much more of this do you think the American people will sit back and quietly allow without congressional approval, without a full fledged press conference by the president where people get to pepper him with questions?
01:23:57.720Just a few got asked with Pete Hegseth and Raisin Cain this morning.
01:24:02.540But that's a lot to expect for people to just sit back and have their Wheaties over without really getting to inquire much.
01:24:09.080I think it depends on how successful it is.
01:24:12.820Unfortunately, I think that is the standard.
01:24:15.400I have my own rules that I believe are granted in the Constitution.
01:24:19.180I don't think most people are committed to or attached to those.
01:24:23.640It's an abstract principle when it comes to war.
01:24:25.780I think Trump does have a couple of things on his side.
01:24:28.640Having criticized him, I'll make a couple of devil's advocate defenses of him.
01:24:33.880The first is he tonally did make it seem as if he would not do this.
01:24:41.480Clearly, if you were half listening to Trump during the campaigns, both of them, you would have thought that he would not get involved in the Middle East proactively like this.
01:24:53.020But the big criticism that he has had and that many of those who were attracted to Trump have had was of full scale ground wars where we sent hundreds of thousands of troops to a country.
01:25:39.460Second, I keep seeing people quoting the campaign from 2024 and saying that if Kamala Harris is elected, your sons will be drafted and then say, aha.
01:25:59.740No one's been drafted in America since the 1970s.
01:26:02.500So the big question, to answer your question, I think Trump's going to have to answer, is how many dead Americans is the public going to put up without a debate, without press conferences, without congressional involvement?
01:26:17.720That's a lot of people relative to the norm.
01:26:21.880It's not a lot of people relative to World War II.
01:26:23.820But you don't normally hear about American soldiers being killed, and that's going to quite rightly be a focal point for the media.
01:26:33.240So I think if that's it, and we spend another week and get a whole bunch of other things done, maybe people will be happy with it.
01:26:41.360But if it's four tomorrow as well, and then four on Friday and four on Saturday, I do think at that point the administration is going to have to re-evaluate.
01:26:51.820And to finish, I would note that Trump is not doing, in my view, the proactive work that he needs to do to persuade people who aren't sure whether they approve of this or not.
01:27:03.100And I say that as someone who is one of those people.
01:27:07.800I don't think you can have a press conference in the early hours of the morning on a day where people who are unprepared for it wake up to learn that we are, in his words, at war, and then have him disappear.
01:27:19.460And the next thing we hear is that four people are dead.
01:27:23.460He can win this if he does it really well.
01:27:25.820But it's not just going to happen, because that vacuum is going to be filled by Democrats and critics who are going to hammer him and hammer him and hammer him.
01:27:33.760And if Trump's this great communicator, we're always told that he is, then he should remember that and convey his position here.
01:27:39.500Because if he doesn't, I think he's going to be underwater on it, even if it's the right thing to do.
01:27:43.840I mean, I'm not sure he actually can do it in a way that's really going to persuade.
01:27:49.380I mean, obviously, the Warhawks, especially on the right, are going to accept kind of anything he says, because they're just looking for a fig leaf.
01:27:56.460So it doesn't matter what he what rationale he puts behind it.
01:27:59.500But, you know, today, The Washington Post is reporting that it was really Israel and the Saudis who were who were leaning on Trump to do this because the Saudis hate Iran.
01:28:09.980It's their Sunni, Iran's Shiite. They don't get along. They never have.
01:28:14.660Publicly, the Saudis are like, no, no, we oppose this. It's wrong.
01:28:18.000You can't use Saudi Arabia for anything connected with this.
01:28:21.040But behind the scenes, they were reportedly not only in favor of it, but pushing for it.
01:28:24.600And there's been nobody pushing for it more than Bibi Netanyahu.
01:28:27.580That's obvious. That's why he's been at the White House seven times this year.
01:28:30.780And The Washington Post reporting that the attack came despite U.S. intelligence assessments that Iran's forces were unlikely to pose an immediate threat to U.S. mainland within the next decade.
01:28:41.800Reuters and CNN matching that reporting and WAPO going on to say that in the briefing for the Gang of Eight, Secretary Rubio told lawmakers that the attack.
01:28:53.220Hold on a second. I lost my missions, timing and goals were shaped by the fact that Israel was going to attack with or without us.
01:29:01.540So they were going to go in and and the United States understood that as soon as they did it, we were going to get the retaliation because we're viewed as the big devil and they're viewed as the little devil by Iran.
01:29:12.940And I guess Trump would rather be sort of in on the offensive move there, Rich.
01:29:17.940But, you know, he can't go out to the American people and say, I did it for Israel.
01:29:23.460I did it because I wanted to have Bibi's back because he was doing it and we were going to get dragged in one way or another.
01:29:29.400He definitely does not want to say that. And he hasn't even mentioned Israel.
01:29:33.140Instead, he just throws the kitchen sink at us, which then we accurately perceive as not true because kitchen sink rationales never fly.
01:29:41.900Yeah, I think Trump's very much senior partner here.
01:29:46.040And if you want to tell Bibi, no, you just don't know.
01:29:48.980You know, he did it towards the end of the 12 day war when Israel was reportedly ready to launch a strike.
01:29:54.260Like not not apparently directed at the Ayatollah, some people thought, but at a high level officials.
01:29:58.840And Trump said, no, we've had enough. So I think Trump's very much senior partner here.
01:30:03.260He's ultimately driving the car. And I think a key insight they had going back to the first term was actually kind of the the the old conventional wisdom.
01:30:12.000You can't be pro-Israel because all the Arabs are going to hate you and you're going to alienate all your Arab allies.
01:30:17.500It's totally wrong. It's all they all hate Iran, no matter what they say publicly.
01:30:22.800And the Saudis are saying we're neutral. We don't want this to happen.
01:30:26.060Can't we talk or behind the scenes saying go?
01:30:28.900You know, this is the main threat to the to the region.
01:30:31.360And that's why you have this unprecedented military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel and actually the Gulf states joining in.
01:30:38.700What do you what do you make of the possibility, Rich, that this I don't know if it's the main goal, but a secondary bonus is to help cripple China when it comes to Iranian oil?
01:30:55.000Already we took out kind of took control of Venezuela's oil and that this is some sort of long game play to weaken the Chinese.
01:31:04.140I think there's a little to that. I think that's a it is a strategic benefit if everything goes right here.
01:31:11.380But I think this is mainly about Iran. I think Trump hates this regime, hates what they've done to Americans, considers it a threat and considers it totally intolerable that they could pursue and get a nuclear weapon.
01:31:22.200And it's come to the conclusion it's not this regime, at least under conditions as of four or five days ago, was never going to give up its nuclear ambitions.
01:31:30.320So this is what what you had to do. You've got to flatten it all and hopefully get a new regime or a more reasonable regime.
01:31:37.080I think everything else is a side issue.
01:31:38.560What do you make of the fact that neither Russia nor the Chinese stepped in to help Iran?
01:31:42.960Do you find that interesting, Rich? Like the new axis of evil, you know, like they're all together and they're having the meetings and now there's this new coalition.
01:31:51.100And it seems to me both China and Russia are like, see ya, you're on your own.
01:31:54.400Yeah, good luck. You know, I hope your meetings go well. You know, your daylight meetings go well.
01:31:59.280I do think this is, again, this is all side benefit stuff, but just the proficiency we have demonstrated militarily, the Venezuelan raid, and then this.
01:32:08.600If you look at one of our main adversaries, and China's the main one, but Russia's up there.
01:32:13.100They tried to do this four years ago in Kyiv.
01:32:15.780They sent in the special forces in a raid that was supposed to decapitate the government and send in a long column of armor that's supposed to just march into Kyiv, you know, and it'll be done in a week.
01:32:25.400The way maybe it will be done in Iran, it was a total debacle.
01:32:29.840So I do think it's a useful message that no one else on the planet has these sort of capabilities.
01:32:35.480Okay, but here we are in day two, you know, I guess Saturday's one, Sunday's two, or day three of this thing.
01:32:44.560And now you had Trump, just as we came to air, saying, I don't have the yips when it comes to boots on the ground.
01:32:51.200And I think, to your point, Rich, he's talking about limited.
01:32:55.480I believe, Trump, that he has zero desire to get us into the long, quagmire, 20-year situation.
01:33:01.100I don't believe the president would ever allow that.
01:33:02.860But the problem is unforeseen consequences.
01:33:05.520Like, that presumes we're going to be like, we're sending in troops, including on the ground, and then we'll decide when it's over and we leave.
01:33:12.980But we just don't know whether that's going to be possible.
01:33:27.440But, like, yeah, I'm just saying you just, you don't know where it's going to go.
01:33:30.840And that's how you wind up with 20-year wars.
01:33:33.500Here was Pete Hegseth on the topic of boots on the ground just this morning, Saten.
01:33:39.760Secretary Hegseth, I have two questions for you.
01:33:42.280First, are there currently any American boots on the ground in Iran?
01:33:46.140No, but we're not going to go into the exercise of what we will or will not do.
01:33:52.920I think it's one of those fallacies for a long time that this department or presidents or others should tell the American people, and our enemies, by the way, here's exactly what we'll do.
01:34:55.180But the question is, if we actually do have to put boots on the ground because the President doesn't have the so-called yips and because we are not effectively accomplishing regime change, which he has suggested is a stated goal, then I do think American attitudes could change.
01:35:13.740And one of the things I've been hearing from many online is they do not think this will have been worth it if it costs GOP the House in 2026, in November, or the presidency in 2028.
01:35:32.020Well, the boots on the ground line, as you say, can mean anything.
01:35:38.480It's possible they'll need to send in small groups of elite forces to do discrete things, as they did in Venezuela.
01:35:46.820If we had 200,000 people headed to Iran, we would notice, I think.
01:35:53.740And he's quite happy, Hegseth, to rule that one out.
01:35:57.260So I think Trump is partly intimating that he has been told that a limited use of special forces might be necessary.
01:36:06.880And he's partly being Donald Trump and saying, as he loves to say, that he's not scared, that he's not intimidated, that he will do anything that he wants to do.
01:36:17.040Working out which is which with Trump is always quite difficult.
01:36:20.140The problem with foreign policy is that it doesn't map particularly neatly onto democracy, in the sense that, by definition, a lot of what we do in our foreign policy has to be based on lies, spying, a clandestine collection of information that is not released.
01:36:45.400Most of the impetus for this action will never, ever be seen, at least not by the midterms or by 2028.
01:36:58.000So it's quite hard to calculate politically what the consequences will be there or what the consequences should be there.
01:37:08.380I think it's, in a sense, either brave or stupid of Trump to do this right now.
01:37:14.300Even George H.W. Bush waited until after the midterms.
01:37:23.680The last thing is there will be a lot of gamesmanship here, Megan, where people, if the Republicans do lose, say, the House, which I expect them to, and expected them to two weeks ago in November, will say, ah, it's because.
01:37:37.560And then they will insert the thing that they dislike to explain it.
01:37:42.420So, you know, I don't like tariffs, right?
01:37:44.700So I would say, well, it's because it's obviously because of the tariffs.
01:37:48.000Those who oppose this will say, ah, it's obviously because of the foray into Iran.
01:37:54.260I think it's it's a difficult balance.
01:37:57.800But, you know, when you are the commander in chief, you really have to take the politics into account and do your best to shape those politics.
01:38:05.920As I've said, I don't think Trump's doing a particularly good job, but not be subordinate to those politics, not be a slave to those politics.
01:38:12.740Because there are some things you have to do when you're in office that will be unpopular or at least that will take a lot of work to make popular.
01:38:20.140So I'm never as persuaded by the sorts of criticisms.
01:38:25.740I know you're just passing them on from the Internet rather than making them yourself that you mentioned there, because that that that is not leadership.
01:38:36.040And you need more leadership than than followership in foreign policy than in domestic politics, in my view.
01:38:43.940Well, one thing you're going to get for sure is you've got some significant faction of the MAGA faithful rich that's against this.
01:38:52.540The majority of Republicans, according to the polls so far, depending on which one you look at, may support it.
01:38:58.300The vast majority of Democrats are against it.
01:39:00.600The majority of independents are against it.
01:39:02.620And but you're going to get the media, Fox News is going to cheerlead it, Newsmax and so on.
01:39:08.540CNN and MSNBC, I don't know that they're going to know what to do because they're they tend to be pro military industrial complex, but they hate Trump.
01:39:17.260So this is a tough this is a tough position for them.
01:39:20.340And so far, what we've seen, let's just take The Washington Post, is a very odd tact.
01:39:29.020Ayatollah al-Khamani, Iran's supreme leader, is dead at 86.
01:39:35.340OK, so first of all, it's just so generic, just like old man dies at 86.
01:39:38.940With his bushy white beard and easy smile, Khamenei cuts a more avuncular figure in public than his perpetually scowling but much more revered mentor and the previous Khamenei.
01:39:59.120And he was known to be fond of Persian poetry and classic Western novels, Rich, especially Victor Hugo's Les Miserables.
01:40:10.920And they describe him as a closet moderate.
01:40:13.240Listen to what they said about Charlie Kirk when he was killed.
01:40:16.500Charlie Kirk, fiery voice in conservative politics, killed at 31, frequently generated outcry with provocative statements, commenting that he thought twice about flying on planes with black pilots because he questioned whether they had the job because of the airline's DEI goals.
01:40:33.820Not only is that a smear of what Charlie actually said because he and I discussed it at length right after he said it, but notice a difference in tone there, Rich, and approach?
01:40:43.780Charlie is not cuddly, but the Ayatollah sure was.
01:40:46.720Yeah, these obituaries and disparities.
01:40:50.740Yeah, how they write about dictators and how they write about American political figures on the right who just say things they disagree with, you know, who haven't killed anyone, haven't blown up a building, apartment buildings with Americans in them or embassies with Americans.
01:41:19.120Listen, guys, I appreciate you coming on.
01:41:21.120I mean, I think it's it's to your credit because I know Trump's not your favorite president, but you're defending him because you believe in what he's done here, which is one of the things I love about NR, because even if you don't like Trump, you'll say what's real in terms of the good, the bad and the ugly and well worth the subscription.