The Megyn Kelly Show - April 21, 2023


Biden's Foreign Policy Failures, Rise of Woke Police, and the Value of Religion, with Niall Ferguson | Ep. 534


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 35 minutes

Words per Minute

177.40698

Word Count

16,951

Sentence Count

958

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

50


Summary

World-renowned historian and author Neil Ferguson joins host Megyn Kelly on the show to discuss his life, his family, and his love for his wife, Ayaan Hirsi Ali. He also talks about why his name is so difficult to pronounce, and why he never wanted to be called Niall.


Transcript

00:00:00.480 Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations.
00:00:11.620 Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show and happy Friday.
00:00:16.660 Today we bring you world-renowned historian, Neil Ferguson. I have been so looking forward
00:00:22.220 to talking to Neil. We have had many friends of Neil's on this show. Douglas Murray, Andrew
00:00:27.440 Sullivan, is not only his friend, but God's father, too, so one of his sons. And his wife
00:00:33.900 is a superstar and one of my idols, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the one and only. Now we finally get to talk
00:00:40.900 with Neil himself for the full show. One thing about Neil is his name is spelled in a way that
00:00:46.780 really makes you want to call him Niall. He's Scottish. Anyway, it's Neil. He's the Milbank
00:00:52.260 Family Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and author of many best-selling
00:00:57.240 books, including 2021's Doom, The Politics of Catastrophe. He has fascinating thoughts on
00:01:03.180 wokeism, religion, Trump, American foreign policy, and much, much more. Neil, great to have you here.
00:01:09.260 Megan, it's a great pleasure.
00:01:11.300 Yes. So I'm going to, it'll be easier for me to call you Neil since I'm looking at you,
00:01:15.040 but whenever I read your stuff, I'm like, Niall. Why? Is that the Scottish way of spelling Neil?
00:01:21.300 Well, it's, it's Gaelic. You'd encounter it in Ireland too, and there are versions of the name
00:01:28.760 even in Iceland. But the funny thing is that the Irish mispronounced the name, Niall. And that's
00:01:35.400 wrong in the same way that it would be wrong to call me Ayaan if my name was Ian. But can you imagine
00:01:41.360 how annoying this is? Imagine if everybody kept calling you Megayne. I mean, I've never called you
00:01:46.000 that, but imagine if somebody were to do that, you'd be kind of annoyed. So all my life I've had
00:01:52.220 to correct people. I'm sure it was character building. Right. You never considered just
00:01:56.940 converting to a more Americanized spelling once you moved here? No, I think it's important to stick
00:02:03.640 to your guns. Megan, I named one of my children, in fact, Andrew Sullivan's godson Lachlan, so that he
00:02:12.600 would have to go through life correcting people. And I think it's already showing signs of having
00:02:17.600 made him as, uh, as obstinate as his father. With my name, it's usually, they think it's
00:02:24.600 Megan or they don't know if it's Megan or Megan. I don't really know the answer either. I always try
00:02:30.320 to fudge the pronunciation of my own name because I don't, I don't know how to say it. It's, it's
00:02:34.160 confusing. I've never heard it pronounced any other way, but, but Megan, but that's because
00:02:38.780 you're famous. Yeah. Well, not exactly, but my mom gave me a little weird spelling of my own,
00:02:44.820 which is confused people. It's true that there are multiple ways. These are all, these are both
00:02:49.540 Celtic names. There are multiple ways of spelling them because, and I try to remind people of this
00:02:54.520 in the past, nobody knew how to spell. So if your name was Neil, your, your parents were taking a guess
00:03:00.260 when they filled in the birth certificate. So, yeah, I mean, we should be thankful that it's not
00:03:04.480 more complex. My father at one point wanted to call me Icarus. Can you imagine how my life would
00:03:09.340 have been different with that name? He had a healthy sense of humor. Um, and then you married
00:03:15.460 the beautiful Ayaan, which is really, I mean, not to define you by your wife, but you know,
00:03:19.940 my admiration for your wonderful spouse. And that's also difficult to pronounce. Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
00:03:25.320 people are probably like, what's going on? This is a really difficult family.
00:03:27.720 Well, I certainly heard people mangle Ayaan's name. That's never struck me as particularly
00:03:34.040 difficult to pronounce. I don't mind being defined as a husband of the more famous Ayaan. That's just
00:03:40.980 fine by me. It was Dennis Thatcher's view that Margaret Thatcher was more significant than he
00:03:46.200 was. And he never complained. I feel the same way. Ah, we'll get to her in just a bit because we
00:03:51.780 definitely have to spend some time on, on her and your union and what it's like being married to Ayaan.
00:03:56.480 But we have to start with this because there is news this morning. Joe Biden is running. ABC and
00:04:02.620 others now reporting that not only is he definitely running, but he will announce next week. They
00:04:06.700 believe the announcement will come on Tuesday. And, um, to this, you say what? I know you're not a fan.
00:04:14.800 You've been openly critical. Uh, what do you make of the fact that the 80 year old Joe Biden will run
00:04:21.260 for president for a second term? Well, I think I understand the game plan, uh, that the Democrats
00:04:28.600 have, which is essentially the game plan that they had in 2020. He's the candidate they can come up with
00:04:37.320 who can beat Donald Trump. And so they have decided to, uh, uh, uh, replay, uh, that particular script.
00:04:46.660 And I think it's very, very risky for them. Uh, and I'll tell you why. Uh, first of all, uh, a
00:04:54.260 significant proportion of voters are already aware that president Biden is, shall we say on the old side
00:05:01.320 for the world's most stressful job? Uh, secondly, and more importantly, between now and that day in
00:05:08.700 November of 2024, when the votes get cast, or at least most of them get cast, there's very likely
00:05:15.420 to be a recession. Uh, the probability of, of a recession starting sometime this year is certainly
00:05:22.560 north of 50%. Larry Summers told me the other day, 80%. So between now and the election, there's going
00:05:29.060 to be a recession and it must be said that presidents who go, uh, uh, for reelection with a
00:05:35.480 recession, uh, in the pipeline don't have a great track record. So my sense is that they think they
00:05:41.060 know what they're doing, but they're underestimating, uh, the downside risk because my own view is that
00:05:47.240 at this point, Donald Trump is the favorite to win the Republican nomination and whoever is the
00:05:51.880 Republican candidate is quite likely to win next year if there's a recession. Yeah. If there's a
00:05:57.220 recession, the thing about Trump is as many, as much baggage as he has, that economy under Trump
00:06:03.440 pre COVID is unforgettable. I mean, I, and he'll be there to remind people of it in case it is.
00:06:09.080 Megan, I think people have, uh, not fully grasped, uh, that the consequences of such significant
00:06:17.380 interest rate hikes by the fed in response to the huge inflation mistake that the Biden administration
00:06:22.720 made in 2021 have yet to feed fully through, particularly if the labor market, which is still,
00:06:29.200 still pretty hot, but there's a kind of chain reaction that happens when the central bank
00:06:34.600 tightens interest rates. Uh, and it takes a little while to, to hit the ordinary, uh, household, but I
00:06:41.680 think, uh, hit it, uh, it will. And, and when that happens, people are going to start looking back,
00:06:48.200 uh, on the Trump economy. Uh, they're no longer going to have such, uh, a sense that he mishandled
00:06:54.900 the pandemic because after all, more people died in 2021 of COVID than in 2020. And I think if
00:07:01.040 president Trump places cards, right, emphasizes that they had full employment under Donald Trump,
00:07:06.420 but pretty much no inflation problem. A lot of people who turned away from him in 2020 are going
00:07:13.340 to be tempted to turn back because the combination of much higher inflation, which we've had followed
00:07:18.760 by a recession is a combination that loses you elections historically. So I think this is
00:07:24.240 the way I'm seeing it right now. A lot can happen. Of course, we're a long way off, uh, from the
00:07:28.560 election. Uh, but the assumption that they've got a winning formula that, that will beat Donald Trump
00:07:33.840 under any circumstances, I don't think that's the correct lesson of 2020. 2020 was a very exceptional
00:07:39.480 year to hold an election. Donald Trump had mishandled the way, uh, he, he dealt with the
00:07:45.120 pandemic. He was in a weak position, uh, that he wouldn't have been in without the pandemic. I think
00:07:49.880 he'd have been reelected. Uh, and now we're all pretty much over the pandemic, apart from a few people
00:07:54.860 still clinging to their masks here in Northern California. And that means that the circumstances
00:07:59.640 in 2024 will be radically different. You seem to be pro-Trump in a lot of your writings. Ayan seems to
00:08:06.960 be more pro-DeSantis. She wrote a column not long ago saying we got to move past Trump. Is that still
00:08:12.440 where you are? You know, I was never unconditionally pro-Trump, Megan. I, I was ambivalent from the
00:08:20.040 outset. And when I look back on the things that I wrote in, in 2020, uh, I was, uh, undeaded in, in 2016,
00:08:27.280 I was ambivalent, uh, from the get-go. And, and I think there are many things about Governor
00:08:33.780 DeSantis that are appealing, uh, for those of us who found the Trump years exhausting, uh, because
00:08:40.380 of his, uh, chaotic approach, uh, to government. It would be lovely to have those elements of, of
00:08:48.260 Trumpism, the policy elements that worked well, particularly for the economy, but also I would say
00:08:53.160 for foreign policy, but without the chaos, without the sense that every day your hair was in fire from the
00:08:59.140 minute, the alarm clock went off. And I think that that's the dream that DeSantis, uh, is supposed
00:09:04.960 to represent. But at this point, I don't think he's succeeding in conveying that he's Trump with
00:09:09.780 competence. And that is why at this point, the polling is showing, uh, Trump establishing a
00:09:14.900 dominating lead. So I'm, I'm, I'm still ambivalent. I slightly kind of shudder at the thought of a,
00:09:20.740 of a second Trump term, but I think at the moment I shudder more at the thought of another Biden term,
00:09:26.460 because I do think that if one strips away all the fairly positive media coverage that this
00:09:31.720 administration gets, it's done shockingly on both the economy where we've had this inflation mistake,
00:09:38.020 uh, I think mistakes understating it and, and foreign policy where I think things have really
00:09:42.740 been pretty disastrous. Uh, if you asked me, uh, would I, I prefer DeSantis over Trump, uh, then I,
00:09:50.320 I think probably I, I would in common with a lot of, uh, conservative, uh, elites.
00:09:56.460 But that is not the way, where the primary voters are right now. As far as the polling shows,
00:10:01.600 primary voters are leaning ever further in the direction of, of re-nominating Donald Trump.
00:10:06.880 And in the end, it's not, it's not up to people like me, is it?
00:10:10.920 The thing about DeSantis, and I realize he hasn't actually declared yet, but he's, you know, he
00:10:16.000 basically came out this week that the Florida delegation, the congressional delegation delegation
00:10:20.840 is mostly backing Trump, not DeSantis. And DeSantis didn't have the foresight to make sure
00:10:25.780 that was lined up. You know, he should, he should at least have those guys. And it dovetails with
00:10:30.040 something, uh, I heard my friends on national review talking about it this week. And I've heard
00:10:33.920 others talk about it, about whether DeSantis can connect with people in a way that one must in
00:10:40.720 order to advance in presidential politics. And I think some, some friends of mine were at one of
00:10:48.080 these dinners with him, you know, he's not dumb. He's been having these muckety muck dinners with
00:10:54.020 very wealthy donors and they were at one of them and their comment on DeSantis who they really liked.
00:11:00.500 I mean, they, they like him on paper was that the entire dinner, he did not ask one question of anyone
00:11:08.520 there. It was all about himself. He was happy to talk about himself, but he showed zero interest in
00:11:15.220 the people around the table, which is a cardinal sin in how to run a dinner party, how to be at a
00:11:21.040 dinner party. Nevermind how to run for president. Trump is probably the opposite, right? Even as a
00:11:26.280 reporter, Trump would call me all the time. He'd send me notes all the time in newspaper articles
00:11:30.960 about him. And he wanted to make sure I saw, um, this, I actually think it could matter. I know it
00:11:39.000 sounds like small ball, but I actually think that that difference in dynamic is probably important.
00:11:43.260 Well, Megan, I'm, I'm a historian, not, not a political pundit, but, uh, I, I have observed the
00:11:49.460 same thing, which is that, uh, I I've seen, uh, governor DeSantis give a terrific stump speech.
00:11:56.080 He's really good at that. And he knows how to hit those, uh, talking points, but then sit down
00:12:01.840 at the dinner table in a, in a ballroom and not connect with the people at that table. And,
00:12:07.980 you know, American primaries, especially in the small states that matter early on, you know,
00:12:12.360 New Hampshire, Iowa, that those are, those are places where you need to press the flesh
00:12:17.060 and connect with, uh, ordinary folks. Another Ron, I'm thinking of Ronald Reagan here, uh,
00:12:23.300 of course, one, uh, in, uh, 1980 in the wake of a pretty dismal, uh, Carter presidency, I've
00:12:30.780 often compared the, the Biden administration to the Carter administration. Uh, and I kind of
00:12:36.440 thought for a while that it would end the same way with, uh, a governor named Ron, uh,
00:12:41.680 handily winning, but, but Ronald Reagan had those, uh, interpersonal skills. Uh, he could
00:12:47.980 fake interest, uh, in the people around him. I mean, typically you have to fake it, uh, because
00:12:52.980 if you're president, you meet a lot of people, uh, but Ronald Reagan was an actor, so he could
00:12:56.720 convey interest, uh, in the people around him. And this is the thing that the governor
00:13:00.600 DeSantis does not seem at all good at. And I have to say that that for me gives him a
00:13:05.020 glass jaw in boxing terms. And that's why I've, I've come to be somewhat skeptical that
00:13:10.080 he can, that he can do this unless there can be a reconfiguration of his whole personal
00:13:14.460 style. And as well, as well, I think as the campaign strategy, this thing is going to be
00:13:19.300 like Elon Musk's rocket.
00:13:24.420 Yesterday's rocket, right. Which did not go so well though. It was weird how the internet
00:13:28.320 instantly divided on that. People were like, that's it. It blew up and we're calling it
00:13:32.420 a success. And then other people were like, he tried, he's innovative. The whole point
00:13:36.360 was to learn. I'm like, I don't know what to think or say other than it didn't go up
00:13:41.820 very high.
00:13:43.260 The thing I've learned from studying, uh, exploding rockets, this goes back to the space
00:13:48.760 shuttle Challenger is that it makes a huge difference if it's manned versus unmanned.
00:13:53.260 And I think we'd be dealing with a completely different story here. If that had been a manned,
00:13:58.320 uh, rocket, uh, when, when you think back to the, the, the challenge of disaster that,
00:14:04.080 that dominated the news cycle, uh, uh, in the United States and indeed the world because
00:14:08.860 there were people on board. Uh, so I think he can get away with an experiment failing
00:14:13.000 like this for that reason. And that reason alone, it does make, give you some perspective
00:14:17.540 though, on why he doesn't get too heated about his employee complaints over at Twitter.
00:14:21.380 It's like, I, okay, I'm launching rockets. I have an electric car company and just take
00:14:26.440 a seat. You're, you're the least of my worries. I couldn't really care less about your, your
00:14:30.260 woke objections at Twitter. And that's exactly who we need running Twitter.
00:14:33.640 I call him Napoleon. He's the Napoleonic figure of our times. Uh, he bestrides the spirit of
00:14:42.500 the age, uh, metaphorically as Napoleon did in, in his day. And it, it means that you can't
00:14:49.420 expect, uh, the kind of normal yardsticks to apply this, uh, heroic quality, uh, to Elon.
00:14:57.100 There's a crazy quality, uh, to him. He can be completely, uh, infantile in his, in his humor,
00:15:03.140 but at the same time be managing, uh, these extraordinary feats of, of engineering ambition.
00:15:09.060 And, and that's, that is what makes him such a unique personality is as an historian. I wonder
00:15:14.420 how this story will end. Is it going to end with the triumph of Elon city on Mars?
00:15:19.400 Mars in future generations, uh, or is, is it going to end with, uh, all the shorts on Tesla
00:15:25.720 finally being, being vindicated as, uh, the Chinese eat Tesla's lunch? I don't know, but
00:15:31.800 I can't help, but admire his, uh, his courage. He is, uh, fearless, uh, when it comes to business
00:15:38.840 risk. Uh, he, he is a visionary and, you know, those of us who felt that Twitter had become,
00:15:44.800 uh, uh, under previous, uh, management, the exemplar of the surveillance censorship network
00:15:52.480 platform. We cheered, uh, when Elon took over though, I must say, uh, I warned him against
00:15:59.360 doing, doing, I said, you really, you really shouldn't do this. It's, this is a worse idea
00:16:04.060 than if you were buying, uh, an Italian soccer team, uh, or one of those other ways of losing
00:16:08.860 money that, that are out there. But, uh, as usual, he did not take my advice.
00:16:13.680 Well, the nation is grateful. He did not. At least those of us who are in the center on
00:16:17.520 the right are grateful because I think Twitter is a much more delightful place with him in
00:16:21.680 charge. And you can say what's real. You know, lately I've been on a tear about biological
00:16:25.860 sex being real and keeping men out of women's spaces and half the stuff I tweet. You couldn't
00:16:32.080 have tweeted two years ago, pre Elon. So I'm very grateful. I agree, Megan. I must say as a Twitter
00:16:38.020 user, I haven't noticed some great deterioration. I don't join in these, uh, endless hissy fits about
00:16:45.080 they took my blue tick mark away. All that stuff strikes me as, as nonsense. And, uh, uh, and at
00:16:50.780 this point, the really important thing is that systematic censorship that was going on is no longer
00:16:56.280 happening. I think it'll take a long time to figure out how to make this thing work in the,
00:17:01.540 uh, in the way that I think Elon imagines where you have, uh, real free speech without the thing
00:17:07.520 becoming a kind of hellscape of bots, uh, and, and fake, uh, identities. But, uh, but I think it's
00:17:13.820 moving in a better direction than it was before. Because if you think back to 2020, the really
00:17:19.560 shocking thing was the extent to which the network platforms worked against Donald Trump worked
00:17:26.900 against conservatives, worked against people who were dissidents on the issue of the pandemic,
00:17:32.600 uh, like my colleague here, Jay Bhattacharya. I mean, it really was quite shocking to see
00:17:38.400 a bunch of private companies working some, in some measure with, uh, political operatives,
00:17:46.380 create their own version of the Chinese surveillance state. So anything that breaks that trend up has to
00:17:51.760 be good. Yes. I thought the same thing. I was like, so for a hundred bucks a year, I'm going to support
00:17:56.340 Elon's new Twitter. Oh, that's fine. That's a no brainer. I give that to half the people I subscribe
00:18:01.120 to on Substack just because I want to support their effort. It's not what it actually costs. I just pay
00:18:05.660 more because I want to support the platform or the journalist. Thankfully I'm in a position to do
00:18:10.100 that. So for me, it was like a no brainer. People are absolutely melting down over the stupid
00:18:14.180 eight dollars a month. Like, okay, get over it. Um, yeah, that is, that is again, that's one of
00:18:19.780 these many non issues that one really should try not to waste time on when we consider all the
00:18:24.520 subscriptions that our lives currently require us to pay. I hate to think how many I'm mindlessly
00:18:31.000 paying without even making much use of them. Uh, the, the Twitter issue is a non issue.
00:18:37.820 I want to spend some time just a minute on foreign policy and DeSantis and Trump, if you don't mind,
00:18:42.280 because I know you've written a lot about, uh, foreign policy in China and the cold word 2.0 that
00:18:48.040 we may be in. And DeSantis, this is one Achilles heel for him potentially, you know, he's a governor.
00:18:55.180 He, yes, he did some spend some time in the house. So he's got some exposure to thinking about foreign
00:18:59.820 policy, but it's not really your thing. It's really a presidential thing and it's not something
00:19:04.080 a governor does. And his first step out of the block on that wasn't great. He called Ukraine a
00:19:09.640 territorial dispute in response to a request from Tucker for a statement on where he stood.
00:19:14.200 And of course that's what kind of Tucker's position. So he kind of gave Tucker, I think,
00:19:18.340 what he thought would go over well with Tucker because most of these GOPers are afraid of Tucker
00:19:23.160 because he has a lot of power on his platform. And, um, then he got hit by the more establishment
00:19:28.820 GOPers who do not see it that way, who see it more as an existential potential crisis. And that if we
00:19:35.400 don't, if, if we let Russia win this, we, the United States will be weakened, uh, and that it
00:19:41.340 has direct effects and implications on us foreign policy. So then he tried to back off of it. He
00:19:46.760 flailed a bit. Trump's more hardcore territorial, you know, he's, he's a non-interventionalist.
00:19:52.340 He's the opposite of a neocon. So how do you assess those two gentlemen when it comes to foreign
00:19:58.540 policy? I don't know where DeSantis will land. You know, if he were to actually win and be in the
00:20:02.700 governing position, I don't, I'm not sure. He hasn't given us enough info, but how do you see
00:20:06.880 it right now? Well, as a general principle, anybody who's a governor hoping to run for president has to
00:20:14.400 stake out some national security territory and, uh, and has to have credibility on, on the, on the
00:20:20.560 great global issues of the day. And that was what Ronald Reagan did so successfully, uh, in the course
00:20:26.000 of the 1970s, a great part of Reagan's rise to national, uh, fame was based, uh, on his readiness
00:20:34.040 to critique date haunt. Uh, and in many ways, he was the harshest critic of Henry Kissinger at that
00:20:39.160 time. Uh, Ron DeSantis hasn't really done that. Uh, he had opportunities, uh, but until, uh, Tucker
00:20:45.540 Carlson asked him the question and many others, the question about Ukraine, he'd said relatively
00:20:50.680 little now to be fair to governor DeSantis, he, uh, the reply, which I read carefully was not a bad
00:20:57.200 one that the, in, it looked to me like somebody had inserted that, that word territorial, uh,
00:21:04.460 uh, on the basis, perhaps of focus groups. And if you take it out, uh, this, the, the reply is
00:21:09.860 actually not bad, but that was an error of judgment because it made it sound, uh, as if governor
00:21:16.260 DeSantis was really, well, trivializing the nature of, uh, the conflict and particularly
00:21:22.420 misrepresenting Vladimir Putin's objectives, which are clearly stated, namely to eradicate
00:21:28.760 Ukraine as a nation and the Ukrainian people as a people. So that's not territorial. Uh, so I think
00:21:33.820 that was a, that was a mistake. The problem that Ron DeSantis has is that Donald Trump has a much
00:21:40.080 more straightforward story to tell voters about his foreign policy, which is based on a track record.
00:21:48.060 Donald Trump can credibly say that there were no wars started on his watch. He can credibly say,
00:21:55.180 uh, that he made both Russia and China much more nervous, uh, than Joe Biden did. I, I remember,
00:22:03.700 and you may also remember it, uh, Megan Trump on, on a phone call to some golfer,
00:22:09.240 claiming, uh, last year that if he'd still been president, Putin wouldn't have invaded,
00:22:14.800 uh, Ukraine. And for that matter, Xi Jinping wouldn't be threatening Taiwan. And, uh, he,
00:22:20.800 he made the following argument that when he'd been president, he'd said to Putin, don't invade
00:22:26.440 Ukraine or I'll bomb Moscow and all those lovely golden domes will be gone. Now, when I first heard
00:22:32.220 that, I thought that that can't be right. He's making it up. But I asked people who'd been in
00:22:37.040 Donald Trump's administration, is it plausible? He did say that. And they said, Neil, he said that
00:22:41.840 stuff all the time. So one of the things that's really interesting about Trump is that he seems
00:22:47.240 to illustrate Richard Nixon's madman theory, which was that if the other guys think you're a bit crazy,
00:22:53.180 they'll be deterred. They won't take risk just in case you do something crazy. This was of course,
00:22:58.920 the opposite, uh, of Joe Biden's approach was just to say, I'm, I'm really, I may be a little old,
00:23:04.660 but oh gosh, I'm really sane. And the most you have to fear for me is sanctions. That was what
00:23:09.300 the Biden administration said to Putin in 2021. And Putin said, well, I'm not afraid of your
00:23:14.240 sanctions. I'm going to invade. I think Trump can credibly argue that Putin would have been much
00:23:19.360 less ready to take that risk if Trump had still been in the white house. So this is the key. I think
00:23:25.400 Donald Trump has a pretty good foreign policy record to run on. And if he runs on that, I don't,
00:23:31.140 I don't see how Ron DeSantis can land a punch. And if he's up against Biden on that now it's a real
00:23:37.580 ball game because you've got, you know, this has not been Biden's forte at all. And I realized that
00:23:43.840 he just released this report claiming Afghanistan was all Trump's fault. Trump made the commitment
00:23:49.100 to get us out of there. And Trump, he actually said in this report, Trump left no game plan for us to
00:23:54.020 leave. So you just decided to march blindly into doing it, into withdrawing all the troops without
00:23:59.820 getting a game plan. We're supposed to blame that on Trump. That's really actually what happened.
00:24:03.880 So those two battling it out on foreign policy, Trump and Biden could be very interesting to watch.
00:24:09.660 Right. And I think it's clear that although Trump wanted to get out of Afghanistan,
00:24:15.200 he would not have done it in the way that the Biden administration did, which was extraordinarily
00:24:21.820 in there. I mean, withdrawing the special forces people first, not really telling your allies what
00:24:28.220 you're doing. It was tremendously badly executed. And, you know, if you can talk in private to people
00:24:35.680 in the administration, they'll admit they screwed it up. And that by doing so, they then created a
00:24:41.480 credibility problem for themselves with just about everything else. But, you know, Megan, that's not
00:24:46.780 the biggest mistake of Joe Biden's presidency so far. I don't think it's well enough understood how badly
00:24:54.480 they handled Russia's threats to Ukraine the year before the war. Because I think there were ways of
00:25:02.180 deterring Putin if you'd stepped up the arms deliveries to Ukraine. In fact, they did the
00:25:08.080 opposite. They reduced them. They took the sanctions off the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. And they explicitly said
00:25:15.780 that the only thing that Putin would really have to fear would be more sanctions. Now, sanctions in all
00:25:21.740 the history of sanctions have never deterred anybody from doing anything. They punish people for doing
00:25:27.000 things. But as a deterrent, they don't work. So I think if one asks again the question, how would this
00:25:33.420 have gone if Trump had been reelected? It would not have gone the same way. I think there were ways of
00:25:38.340 deterring Putin. We can see clearly that the Russian army was not ready for an operation where they faced
00:25:46.880 serious resistance from Ukrainians. And so they could have been deterred if it had only been made
00:25:53.440 explicit that in the event of Russian aggression, there would be full scale military assistance to
00:26:01.420 Ukraine. We never said that. The United States under Joe Biden said, we'll do sanctions. At one point,
00:26:08.120 the president even talked about an incursion into Ukraine as if you could do kind of a little bit
00:26:12.680 more invading. And it's just a minor incursion. That's one thing he said. This was just such
00:26:17.580 terrible communication. And say what you like about Donald Trump. One of the things that did
00:26:22.680 impress me when he was president was his ability to intimidate foreign leaders, whether it was with
00:26:28.660 talk of fire and fury that was, of course, directed at the North Koreans, or in the way that he played
00:26:34.320 Xi Jinping. I spent quite a bit of time in China in the period before the pandemic, was a visiting
00:26:40.120 professor in Tsinghua in Beijing. It never ceased to amaze me how Donald Trump could wrong foot the
00:26:46.760 Chinese leadership. They did not know what to make of him. They went from thinking it was a good thing
00:26:51.620 that he'd won to thinking that it was a terrible thing that he'd won to going back to thinking that
00:26:55.180 it was a good thing. I mean, they really didn't know what to make of him. And if you think about US-China
00:27:00.380 policy, Megan, one of the funny things to reflect on is that if he'd won in 2020, Donald Trump would
00:27:07.840 probably have done a trade deal with China the following year. Donald Trump doesn't care about
00:27:12.940 Taiwan. He made that explicit to John Bolton. You can read it in John Bolton's memoir. We wouldn't be
00:27:18.240 having showdowns over Taiwan if Trump were president, because that was never his focus.
00:27:23.220 So I think that the question that more and more Americans will be asking themselves in the coming
00:27:27.860 months is, you know, was Trump really as bad as they kept telling us? Turns out the collusion with
00:27:34.300 Russia was not, in fact, true. Turns out that there's a kind of sustained campaign against him
00:27:40.300 now through the law courts. I mean, people are going to start asking themselves, was he really as bad as
00:27:45.460 he was painted by liberal media at the time? In terms of outcomes, and this was something I said
00:27:50.700 again and again during Trump's presidency, if you just judged him by the outcomes of policy, not by the
00:27:56.340 tweets, not by the constant news cycle, but just by the outcomes of policy, the Trump administration
00:28:01.260 was really quite a successful administration. And that is the thing that I think more and more voters
00:28:05.860 are going to be remembering. Right. And some and the perception of Trump as erratic, which of course
00:28:11.720 wasn't at least in part real, could have been a boon to us, especially as you point out, when it comes
00:28:17.500 to the perceptions of foreign leaders who didn't know what they were going to get if they made a false
00:28:21.480 move that involved U.S. interests. On the subject of Taiwan, I'm interested in following up on that
00:28:25.900 because I know you believe, as many do, that's coming. That problem is coming at us within the
00:28:31.640 next couple of years. And we need to care somewhat because they make all the semiconductors,
00:28:36.780 which we need and we're trying to catch up. But there's zero chance we're going to catch up anytime
00:28:40.960 soon in making them domestically. So how how how would that play out if you had a President Trump who
00:28:48.080 didn't want to get involved in Taiwan or if you had a President Biden that did? You know what? How's that
00:28:54.520 going to look for the United States over the next couple of years when it comes to our dependence
00:28:57.960 on Taiwan for those semiconductors and on China for trade and a lot of other things?
00:29:04.760 Well, this is a hugely important issue, Megan. In Cold War One, we nearly blew the world up over an
00:29:11.120 island, Cuba, in 1962. And I don't want us to rerun that particular experiment with another island,
00:29:18.560 Taiwan, in Cold War Two, particularly as in many ways that the case is more difficult for the United
00:29:27.060 States. Cuba is really close to the United States. Taiwan is really close to China. And so getting
00:29:33.500 into a fight over Taiwan doesn't strike me as something particularly advantageous for the United
00:29:40.020 States. In fact, one of the things I keep telling congressional leaders is, why are you talking so tough
00:29:45.660 on this issue? Any war over Taiwan would be extraordinarily difficult for the United States
00:29:51.720 because of improvements in China's military capability. They now have missiles that can
00:29:56.420 sink our aircraft carriers, which they sure didn't in the 1990s. And it just would be hard for us to
00:30:02.820 sustain any protracted conventional war. Look at how quickly our stocks of missiles have been depleted
00:30:09.600 by the war in Ukraine. So I don't know why we talk so tough on this issue when there's such
00:30:15.580 risk implicit in it. Now, Taiwan matters economically way more than Cuba did. I mean, Cuba's economy was
00:30:22.140 nothing, a rounding error. Taiwan is the most important center for the production of sophisticated
00:30:28.720 semiconductors in the world because of TSMC, the great semiconductor manufacturer founded by
00:30:34.880 Morris Chang in Taiwan. And so it's really important for the world economy that it not become
00:30:40.420 Ukraine 2.0, another battlefield where TSMC would presumably be reduced quite swiftly to rubble,
00:30:49.860 possibly by us to make sure the Chinese didn't get a hold of it. So the stakes are extraordinarily high.
00:30:55.980 Now, there is, in fact, a quite simple way to avoid a conflict over Taiwan. And that is just to stick
00:31:02.440 to the strategic ambiguity that we have had on this issue since the 1970s. Since the 1970s,
00:31:08.920 going right back to Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon, we basically accepted the Chinese claim
00:31:14.700 that Taiwan is part of China. We don't treat Taiwan as an independent country. We just kind of go along
00:31:20.220 with this claim that there's one China. In practice, Taiwan's an independent country. In practice,
00:31:26.320 it's a democracy. But we kind of just accept the fiction that it's not. And we don't have an
00:31:33.600 unambiguous commitment to defend it in the event of a Chinese invasion. We just say that if the
00:31:40.560 Chinese try to change the status quo by force, then we reserve the right to take some unspecified
00:31:46.000 action. That's the strategic ambiguity we've had really since the late 1970s. What has been very
00:31:51.700 strange to me is that over the last three years, Democrats and various foreign policy think tank types
00:31:58.920 like Richard Haas have started to question strategic ambiguity. And they've started to say,
00:32:04.340 we should be unambiguous in our commitment to Taiwan. And we should carry on like it is an
00:32:10.220 independent country. I think that was the spirit of Nancy Pelosi's visit, that the president himself,
00:32:15.480 Joe Biden has said on more than one occasion, that there's an unambiguous commitment. Now,
00:32:20.240 the simple solution to avoiding the Cuban missile crisis happening over Taiwan is just to go back to
00:32:25.720 strategic ambiguity. And I think many Taiwanese people would welcome that. They're pretty nervous
00:32:30.020 that we're making these hawkish noises because they're the ones who would have to deal with the
00:32:35.740 sharp end of a war. So I don't think it's too hard to turn this down. You just have to revert to the
00:32:41.580 status quo and stop talking like a war over Taiwan is somehow inevitable, which seems to be the way that
00:32:47.720 some of the more reckless people in Washington are talking today.
00:32:50.640 Is there a lesson that the Biden administration may have learned from the soft talk on Russia and
00:32:56.780 Ukraine here? Do you think they thought that lesson could then be applied to a totally different
00:33:02.760 country and different set of circumstances and upped the rhetoric over Taiwan because of the failure
00:33:08.440 you just outlined earlier on Ukraine?
00:33:10.580 Well, I do think that some people in the administration regard these things as very much
00:33:15.840 interconnected, that they are, in a sense, backing Ukraine in this war against Russia and backing it
00:33:22.940 with considerable firepower and finance, partly in order to make a point to China, not just to erode
00:33:30.800 Russia's fighting capability, but to signal to Xi Jinping, hey, don't mess with friends of the West.
00:33:38.120 The problem with that theory, which sounds superficially quite cynical, maybe clever,
00:33:43.520 Machiavellian, is that I think China at this point is the net winner of the war in Ukraine.
00:33:49.840 I mean, it's reduced Russia to subservience on China economically, gives China an option to pose as
00:33:56.920 even a peacemaker while at the same time giving the Russians economic support. Meanwhile, the Chinese
00:34:04.000 can sit back and watch America run down its stockpiles of missiles and other weapons on a war over Ukraine,
00:34:11.320 which China doesn't really care about that much. And so I don't think that the administration is nearly
00:34:16.720 as clever as it thinks it is about this. But the thing about deterrence is, Megan, in the end, it's not
00:34:22.640 just about words. Talking tough is not going to deter anybody if you don't have the means to back up your
00:34:30.040 tough talk. It's that whole thing about speaking softly and carrying a big stick, Teddy Roosevelt's
00:34:37.000 famous line. We currently are in danger over Taiwan of speaking loudly and not having much of a stick
00:34:44.400 at all. And I think that's very, very dangerous. Historically, the most dangerous thing to do is to
00:34:50.100 talk tough, say that you'll fight over a territory if you don't have the military wherewithal to back up
00:34:58.620 the talk. And I don't think we currently deter China in military terms from at least imposing a
00:35:05.820 blockade on Taiwan. I'm not sure the Chinese would risk an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. That would
00:35:11.320 be very difficult for the People's Liberation Army to pull off because that's kind of the hardest thing
00:35:15.960 in war. But I can easily imagine them putting a blockade around Taiwan and saying to the United
00:35:21.600 States, what are you going to do about it? And that would pose a really major challenge to any US
00:35:27.220 administration. Because if you run that blockade, if you send aircraft carriers and submarines to try to
00:35:32.680 run that blockade, you are doing what the Soviets did in 1962. In other words, we'd be rerunning the
00:35:39.720 Cuban Missile Crisis, only we'd be the Soviets. Because remember, it was John F. Kennedy who
00:35:44.340 quarantined, he called it a quarantine, but it was a blockade around Cuba, and defied the Russians to run
00:35:50.460 that blockade. I do not think it's a smart thing to get yourself into the position of Nikita Khrushchev
00:35:56.180 in 1962. Because as you know, in the end, Megan, he backed down. And I think a scenario like the one
00:36:02.760 I'm describing over Taiwan might very well lead the US to back down because the alternative would be a
00:36:09.220 really huge war with China that nobody would know how to stop and how to prevent escalating.
00:36:16.880 And the American people are not ready to see our aircraft carriers go down under Chinese fire in the
00:36:24.220 sea over there. So there's just no appetite for that after 20 years of, you know, the forever wars
00:36:28.820 here. You mentioned Henry Kissinger in passing. Later, we'll get to the story. I think it was our pal
00:36:34.820 Douglas Murray, writing up about your wedding to Ayan and how he thought he was in the receiving line
00:36:40.300 to go see you and your beautiful bride and wound up realizing that the very long line he was in with
00:36:45.680 people queuing up to see Kissinger was there, which is very fun. So many great connections. And for a good
00:36:53.380 reason, because both you and Ayan are fascinating people. We're going to have more with Neil coming
00:36:57.280 up next. Don't you want to hear his thoughts on everything? He can explain everything in such
00:37:00.180 an easy to understand way. And he knows of what he speaks. More with Neil after this.
00:37:08.980 Neil, I've got to ask you about this in the news today. Speaking of President Biden,
00:37:14.160 he has got this new rule he is proposing now that is going to penalize homeowners who have good credit
00:37:21.040 rates. He wants them to pay more on their mortgages than those who have bad credit. And even
00:37:28.880 former President Obama's senior housing official in the Obama administration has come out to say
00:37:34.280 this is not the way his name is David Stevens saying this. This is going to penalize financially
00:37:40.680 stable homebuyers to subsidize those of higher risk. And here's from the Daily Wire. This is how
00:37:46.440 they describe it. Americans purchasing a new home or refinancing their existing mortgage can expect to
00:37:52.060 pay higher mortgage rates and monthly fees starting in May if they have a higher meaning better credit
00:37:58.480 score. Those with lower credit scores and smaller down payments will be provided better rates. Homebuyers
00:38:06.360 with credit scores above 680, for instance, would pay an additional $40 each month on a home loan of
00:38:12.620 $400,000. Homebuyers who make down payments between 15 and 20% will receive the largest fees. They will be
00:38:20.320 assessing you more if you pay 20%, which is a good number to put down. And this guy, Stevens, who worked for
00:38:25.380 Obama, said this is unprecedented. We can do better programs to help more minorities get into
00:38:30.240 homeownership. This is not the way to do it. This what mentality is this reflecting that we're now going to
00:38:38.860 punish people who paid their bills on time so their credit rates are higher.
00:38:45.000 Megan, I haven't seen this proposal, and so I'll watch what I say.
00:38:50.520 But by the way, Neil, that's because no one's covering it. Literally, that's because the mainstream
00:38:54.040 media will not touch this. It's certainly, as you describe it, an extraordinary and terrible idea.
00:39:03.200 I can't believe an idea like that will get past first base. I can almost see Secretary Yellen at the
00:39:11.780 Treasury falling from her desk chair. So I'm assuming this is not intended to become real policy. But I
00:39:22.400 think it's designed so often with the administration as a little bit of virtue signaling. You did use the
00:39:30.260 word minority there. And I infer that part of the goal here is to address perceived iniquities in the
00:39:38.580 housing market. So I'm assuming it's virtue signaling with that in mind. But I find it depressing that an
00:39:47.880 idea like that would even be aired, even as a trial balloon. But it's part of a long list of terrible
00:39:57.480 policy ideas that periodically surface. You'll remember when inflation was first really surprising
00:40:05.020 to the upside. We were told that, in fact, inflation was caused by profiteering businesses,
00:40:12.620 an idea that I thought had surely been killed off long ago by Milton Friedman and his generation of
00:40:20.120 economists. So bad ideas are back in fashion, particularly on these economic questions.
00:40:26.060 And you can only console yourself that they're unlikely to be put into practice and reflect
00:40:32.540 that what they're really about is essentially political signaling of a sort that is in itself
00:40:40.980 depressing, but probably not quite so harmful as the policies would be.
00:40:46.300 It's just it's it's it happens at every turn with this administration. The way this is going down is
00:40:52.200 the current director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency made a shift, lowering the fees being
00:40:58.300 charged to borrowers with low down payments and low credit scores and compensating that loss by raising
00:41:03.740 fees on better credit worthy borrowers who are putting down larger down payments. And there's been
00:41:09.060 a pushback. They delayed it till August under pressure from Fannie Mae and all those other housing
00:41:14.880 lender companies. But now it's in place and they're under pressure to reverse it because
00:41:21.100 it's unfair. But it's it continues a policy of the people who take out college loans who fall behind
00:41:27.460 on payments. Let's reward them by getting rid of the payments. Make the truckers who didn't go to
00:41:31.940 college and had the foresight to recognize I don't need that degree and I don't want to be saddled with
00:41:37.820 that burden. Make him pay for that. Like, let's look at the the rent abatement procedures that were
00:41:44.320 kept in place long after they were necessary following the covid pandemic, which he was told
00:41:48.940 the Supreme Court was not going to allow. And he did it anyway. He extended it at every turn. It's
00:41:53.600 Neil, you could even take it down to, you know, changing the messaging on obesity to be, oh, it's not
00:42:00.280 your fault. And it's absolutely healthy and beautiful to be 200, 300 pounds overweight. All of it is
00:42:07.200 looking for an excuse for people's life choices that, no, are not serving them well. But that used
00:42:14.200 to be somebody's private business. Now it's up to people who have made better life choices to bail
00:42:19.400 you out of those problems. You know, we're moving away from the age of cost benefit analysis when you
00:42:26.860 assessed a policy with the question, will this be net beneficial to society? And that, of course,
00:42:35.660 included to the economy, we kind of left that behind. And we now can see policies that are designed
00:42:42.740 on the basis of, are we going to hit key voters in our coalition, particularly in the key states that
00:42:52.500 are going to be in play? And this is the basis of which policy now gets designed. And it's extremely
00:42:59.820 harmful in two ways. First of all, we end up with economically suboptimal policies. It's obviously
00:43:05.300 a totally terrible idea to start penalizing people who have good credit scores and awarding
00:43:11.000 those who have bad or penalizing those who haven't got student debt in order to pay off
00:43:16.460 the loans of the beneficiaries with taxpayers' money. These are suboptimal policies. Economically,
00:43:24.880 they will have costs to our economic efficiency. They will create distortions that will ultimately
00:43:30.720 reduce our rate of growth. But the second thing, which I think in some ways is worse,
00:43:35.940 is that these are so politically divisive. These are policies that are designed to ensure that the
00:43:41.520 playing field isn't level. And in particular, to make sure that the particular groups are on the
00:43:50.540 wrong side of the trade nine times out of 10. And you're kind of signaling to middle America,
00:43:56.680 to middle class America, you're kind of signaling that discrimination is okay, as long as it's against
00:44:03.300 you. And that, I think, is deeply toxic politically, quite apart from the economic costs.
00:44:09.920 There's actually now a disincentive to keep your credit score high if you're about to apply
00:44:16.100 for a mortgage. You have an incentive to go blow off your Bloomingdale's bill or your car payment
00:44:22.300 or whatever it is that previously we understood we needed to pay all of our bills on time, especially
00:44:27.360 for applying for a mortgage, so we could get a nice credit card score, credit rating, I should say,
00:44:33.360 and get a very, you know, a correspondingly low mortgage rate. Exactly the opposite now. He's
00:44:39.020 absolutely incentivizing the wrong things and for the wrong reasons. I mean, this is the kind of stuff
00:44:45.160 that really drives me nuts. It's like the left will give him a pass because they'll say, oh, he was
00:44:49.480 trying to help minorities. Why? By encouraging bad, irresponsible behavior by the masses who were
00:44:54.700 previously behaving well. But Megan, this reminds me of some of what goes on in education, where we're
00:45:02.340 told that actually standardized tests are a bad thing. And we should we should get rid of those,
00:45:09.460 because so it's alleged, they're disadvantageous to minorities. Now, in reality, the creation of
00:45:19.420 standardized tests was a way of boosting social mobility by ensuring that we made decisions like
00:45:26.280 university admissions on the basis of some kind of objective measure of academic performance and
00:45:32.600 potential. And it's highly unlikely, in my view, that getting rid of those tests will benefit anybody in
00:45:38.840 the bottom quintile of the income distribution. I should think that that's almost certainly not
00:45:43.620 going to be the consequence. It's not. Just to add to that, Neil, we just had on Heather
00:45:46.880 McDonald, who I know, you know, she's brilliant. She just wrote a new book. And she had taken a hard
00:45:51.880 look at all of this, the getting rid of the SAT scores and the ACT scores at various colleges. And so
00:45:56.900 far, the colleges are complaining, it's done nothing to increase their diversity, nothing.
00:46:01.840 Well, in fact, it will probably have the perverse opposite consequence, because if you get rid of that
00:46:09.080 measure, what are you going to end up relying on? And I've witnessed experiments of this sort at different
00:46:16.000 universities, there was a time when Oxford got rid of its entrance examination, thinking that it would
00:46:22.020 somehow benefit lower class students. But it didn't at all, because when you get rid of the exam, or you get rid of
00:46:27.660 the standardized tests, you end up relying more on things like essays that can be absolutely fine-tuned
00:46:34.080 by the kids of wealthy families who can afford tuition and all the kind of things that go into
00:46:40.500 college applications. So I'm a meritocrat, Meg, and I passionately believe in meritocracy,
00:46:49.620 in admission and promotion on the basis of academic achievement, hard work plus skill,
00:46:56.540 plus talent. That's how we should organize our society. It doesn't produce a level playing field
00:47:01.420 outcome, but it should start with a level playing field to begin with. So we have equality of
00:47:07.120 opportunity. And what I'm really depressed by is to see the left dismantling the meritocratic system
00:47:14.020 and basically killing off the paths of social mobility that were carefully built up in the 20th
00:47:20.220 century so that people with talent and hard work who happened to be born into the bottom half or the bottom
00:47:28.060 fifth of the income distribution had a shot. And it's one of these things that's quite irritating if you are a
00:47:33.500 conservative. You kind of always get presented as if somehow you are on the side of the rich and privileged
00:47:40.000 against the poor and underprivileged. And the opposite is true.
00:47:44.040 Let's just spend some time on your background, Neil, because I didn't know a lot of this about
00:47:52.320 you as my team was getting me prepared on the Neil Ferguson life story. I mentioned you're originally
00:47:58.020 from the UK. So tell us about your upbringing. You had two very smart parents from the sound of it.
00:48:03.640 Well, I grew up in Glasgow in Scotland. I was very fortunate in my appearance. My father
00:48:11.060 and mother were the first in their families to go to university. Hence, my earlier remarks before the
00:48:18.460 break about the importance of social mobility through education. My father managed to become a
00:48:24.920 doctor. He was a dedicated internist all through my childhood, tremendously devoted to his work,
00:48:34.140 regarded work as a vocation. And my mother was a physicist, a physics teacher.
00:48:39.000 My father died a few years ago, but my mum is still alive and living in England. And I owe them
00:48:47.580 everything. Without them and, of course, without my grandparents who produced them, I would be
00:48:53.080 nothing and would have achieved nothing. They gave me their genes, but they also gave me something else,
00:49:00.320 which is the kind of upbringing that I try to give my own children, in which they instilled me with
00:49:07.520 sense of responsibility, of good fortune, and a sense that one should never waste that good fortune.
00:49:15.300 And I try not to waste the good luck I've been given.
00:49:19.700 Now, one thing they did not give you was a belief in any particular religion. And what was your mom's line
00:49:26.900 about how the universe was created or what we're doing here? It was some great line.
00:49:30.220 Well, my mother and father both left the Church of Scotland really on, I think, the principle that
00:49:37.940 Glasgow and much of Scotland was afflicted by sectarian division. This was the great curse of
00:49:44.120 the part of the world where I grew up. Catholics and Protestants not only hating and despising one
00:49:51.440 another, but in Northern Ireland, of course, engaging in violence. And I think that was a big part of the
00:49:55.180 reason that my parents stopped going to church. But my mother was also a kind of committed atheist.
00:50:01.780 She loved to tell me and my sister that life was a cosmic accident and that in that sense,
00:50:09.080 one shouldn't expect the world or indeed the cosmos to revolve around us. It was all a kind of
00:50:15.460 combination of Newtonian physics and Darwinian evolution. And that was how I was raised. We didn't
00:50:23.720 go to church. Although there was a chapel, there was a religious element to my education. I always
00:50:30.680 felt somewhat detached from it. And as I said, in a sectarian society like Glasgow's, there was a
00:50:38.900 Catholic football team, Celtic and Protestant football team, Rangers. But I found the atheist
00:50:44.440 football team, Partick Thistle. And the joke always was that if you do believe in God, when you start
00:50:49.840 supporting Partick Thistle, you'll soon stop. So that was my background.
00:50:54.460 You know, it's funny, it's all coming together for me. In New York, there's this thing called the
00:50:59.420 Kelly Gang. And it's a bunch of media personalities and some other well-known Kellys. And we raise money
00:51:06.840 for charity. And we get together on St. Patrick's Day every year. And I remember saying to Ray Kelly,
00:51:12.900 who was the police commissioner for a while, and Greg Kelly's dad, I said, what's the story?
00:51:17.860 How does one get into the Kelly Gang? What am I doing here? And he said, well, there are three
00:51:22.040 rules. He said, you got to have some juice. You got to, oh God, what was the second thing? Got to
00:51:30.420 have some juice. Got to something that said there was second, it'll come to me. And he said, and the
00:51:34.260 third thing is, you can't have that second E to your point about, because those of us without the
00:51:41.220 second E are Catholics. Yeah. You know, that kind of thing mattered a lot where I grew up. And I still
00:51:46.760 always marvel at the great self-confidence of the Irish Americans and vaguely grind my teeth at the
00:51:55.980 thought of the way that back in the day, they tend to sympathize with the provisional IRA who were
00:52:02.520 conducting terrorist operations in Northern Ireland and the UK. So that background kind of creates a
00:52:09.120 certain weariness about religion because it got so associated with politics and indeed at times with
00:52:17.600 violence and certainly was associated with prejudice. So I completely get why my parents took that
00:52:22.900 approach. I found that when I left Scotland and studied history, I became less and less convinced
00:52:30.560 of atheism as a way of life or indeed as a way to organize a society. And so these days you'll find
00:52:37.700 me a regular attender at church. So I love this. I love this. Because you believe in observance,
00:52:44.780 if not true belief. So tell us how, like, why, what are you doing with your children and how did you get
00:52:50.500 to that place? Well, I think, and I felt, I have five children. I felt this, uh, in, in, uh, for all of
00:52:56.580 them that one should at least educate, uh, children about, uh, religion. And as we are, uh, a society that
00:53:05.360 came out of, uh, of Christianity, it's extremely important that you'd understand what that is. Uh, so
00:53:12.300 there's, there's that part, but there's also a sense in which a life without spirituality, uh, is at some
00:53:19.320 level, uh, a life with a missing piece. I think that GK Chesterton, uh, said something very true.
00:53:27.520 He didn't quite say this, but that's usually how it's quoted. Uh, you know, the trouble with, with
00:53:31.440 atheism is, is not that men believe in nothing. It's that they'll believe in anything. Uh, and so if
00:53:36.960 you, if you kind of opt out of religion, it's quite possible that something else might be crazy
00:53:41.560 conspiracy theories will fill it, or it might be, uh, a secular religion like Marxism. So I've kind of
00:53:48.000 come to the view that even if I don't have a strong spiritual impulse and struggle a bit to,
00:53:53.200 uh, to have belief in, in God, I do think it's important to have a part of your life, uh, that
00:54:01.260 is devoted to spiritual reflection. I think going to church is good for you. It is good to think about,
00:54:07.640 uh, Christ's teaching. It's good to be part of that tradition. Apart from anything else,
00:54:13.680 Christ has some very radical things to teach us about how to be good, how to treat our fellow,
00:54:18.340 uh, human beings. And I think that's something I want my children to know. We're definitely not
00:54:23.300 naturally good. I mean, I don't think that we, uh, have evolved to be, uh, ethical. I think that's
00:54:29.920 something that society has to drum into people somehow. And over time, I've, I've come to feel
00:54:35.600 that this is a really important part of our lives. Now, this of course raises the, the thorny
00:54:40.420 question of how does a yarn feel? Because of course, my wife is a Muslim brotherhood.
00:54:46.060 She, she went through a period in her life when she was not only a devout Muslim, but had been
00:54:51.120 radicalized by the Muslim brotherhood. She too, uh, became an atheist, but by a very different route
00:54:56.800 from me. Um, and we find ourselves, uh, a most unusual, uh, family. Both these, uh, uh, atheists
00:55:05.440 have arrived at a consensus that we should go to church on Sunday. And, uh, and we took a while to
00:55:11.740 find the right church. Uh, Northern California has strangely politicized kind of, uh, uh, religion. I,
00:55:19.000 I, I, I got very turned off by church services, which included a mandatory anti-Trump sermon, but
00:55:25.380 there's a wonderfully, uh, traditional Anglican church that we now attend, which, uh, uses, uh, the,
00:55:33.380 the traditional, uh, order of service and, uh, avoids altogether politics, uh, in the sermons.
00:55:40.440 And this is, uh, this is a source of, of considerable satisfaction to me. And I think it's
00:55:45.520 good for us as a family, good for the kids and they can make up their own minds as they grow up,
00:55:49.860 what they, they want to do. But my eldest son was recently married, uh, in London last December.
00:55:55.820 I saw some pictures of that. Yeah. Ayan sent me a couple of those pictures. You had your
00:55:58.780 traditional Scottish dress on. I had my kilt on as did nearly all the Ferguson boys. Uh,
00:56:05.980 the bridegroom himself opted not to because he was marrying an English, uh, girl. And I think felt it
00:56:12.080 might be just a little bit too much of, uh, of, of a good thing if we all were decked out like Sean
00:56:18.140 Connery in our, in our kilts. But this was a religious, uh, service, uh, in an Anglican chapel
00:56:24.920 and a beautiful thing. And the great thing about Anglicanism is the aesthetics are so good. I mean,
00:56:29.160 you may not have very uplifting, uh, spiritual impulses, but you can enjoy the music if nothing
00:56:35.000 else. And that, that, that's itself meaningful. I think that's so great because you're a historian
00:56:39.560 and, uh, and just reading up on your, what you've said about this in the past, you recognize,
00:56:44.360 you know, atheist societies don't tend to end very well. It's not a very good blueprint for society in
00:56:50.440 which you'd want to live. And so there was as much as anything, an intellectual decision to try to
00:56:55.160 raise children who were not atheists, who had a commitment to a faith unlike yourself.
00:57:00.200 Correct. And, and it, it's not just that they end badly, they, they start badly. I mean,
00:57:04.280 the great experiments with that non-Christian, uh, systems, the French revolution did it. Uh,
00:57:10.680 so did the Russian revolution. Uh, so, uh, in its way did the Chinese revolution. I mean,
00:57:15.640 these very quickly became terribly bloodthirsty regimes. Uh, I remember reading Richard Pipes's
00:57:23.240 great history of the Bolshevik revolution when I was an undergraduate and being appalled at the
00:57:27.640 descriptions of the violence, the Bolsheviks directed against the clergy, uh, against, uh,
00:57:34.040 all religious institutions, the destruction that occurred at that time of, uh, of churches in,
00:57:39.400 in Russia. So, uh, it came, it came to me, uh, that atheism wasn't just this kind of
00:57:44.760 individual choice, uh, not to believe, but it could in fact be the operating system, uh,
00:57:50.600 for a totalitarian regimes and what they do. And this is the really interesting point is they,
00:57:55.560 they try to create their own religion, uh, an ideological, a political ideology,
00:57:59.560 which then replaces Christianity. And I'll add one final point, Megan. It's worth remembering that
00:58:05.240 the people who resisted Nazism most tenaciously in Germany were nearly all religious. And, and that has
00:58:14.440 to tell us something very important about the power of religion as a kind of vaccine and inoculation
00:58:19.880 against evil. And I think it is that. Hmm. The, um, the union between you and Ayaan,
00:58:27.560 which led to two of those five children you have, uh, was a second marriage. And as I understand it,
00:58:33.800 you met at the time, 100, you were both being inducted as two of the world's most influential
00:58:39.480 people. There was a writeup about it at the time in the daily mail. And I love this quote,
00:58:44.600 a friend of Ms. Hirsi Ali said, I think that's where they met for the first time. In all the years
00:58:50.360 I've known Ayaan, she's never had a boyfriend. She's gorgeous, but with a fatwa, it's tricky to
00:58:55.320 find guys. Ayaan, we laugh, but Ayaan remains with a fatwa on her, a fatwa on her from the Muslim
00:59:04.920 brotherhood from which she ultimately fled. She was now, you know, famously or infamously working
00:59:11.480 on this film that got its director, Theo Van Gogh killed shot, um, because it was critical of Islam
00:59:19.000 and, uh, on his chest was pinned a fatwa on Ayaan, a threat on Ayaan's life, a commitment
00:59:26.760 to kill Ayaan. And she has had to live with that every day thereafter. I mean,
00:59:31.640 she's the bravest, most courageous woman I know. And you, you know, I can see the woman's point who
00:59:37.800 gave this quote to, to daily mail. You walk into this, just like this powerhouse of a woman. I mean,
00:59:43.480 I can imagine you're bowled over by meeting the Ayaan Hirsi Ali, but then it's a little
00:59:48.840 complicated. Well, honey, I've got something to tell you. Well, um, remember, don't believe
00:59:56.360 everything you read in the daily mail. Uh, actually we, we, we were on a date when we
01:00:00.760 went to the time 100 dinner. We we'd met already at a much more obscure, but I think a cooler event,
01:00:08.680 which was the, uh, the, the emergency conference of the Mont Pelerin society at the time of the
01:00:15.080 financial crisis, the Mont Pelerin society, famously a gathering of, uh, of mostly Chicago
01:00:21.000 free market economists. And we've both been invited to attend. And indeed I gave a speech
01:00:26.440 about why the financial crisis shouldn't be blamed on free markets. And, uh, and that was when,
01:00:31.240 when I was introduced to Ayaan, I knew, well, it's certainly nerdy, isn't it? Um, and, and, uh,
01:00:39.080 and she wasn't wearing that blue dress either. Uh, but, but I knew of course who she was, uh,
01:00:45.080 when a lovely Australian man named Greg Lindsay, uh, introduced us, he was the unlikely Cupid.
01:00:51.320 By the way, if you've ever read war and peace, the moment when Pierre sees Natasha, everything stops,
01:00:57.080 uh, that's what the French called a coup de foudre. It happened to me then. So I knew very much, uh,
01:01:04.040 that she was under threat and, and indeed these threats don't have expiry dates. Uh, uh, there's no
01:01:10.200 statute of limitations and we have to accept that there are people, uh, out there, uh, who, uh,
01:01:16.520 would regard killing my wife as she's an apostate and somebody who's been highly critical of Islam
01:01:22.280 and particularly political Islam, they would regard it as a, uh, a holy act. I mean, we have to live
01:01:27.000 with that. Uh, the fact that Salman Rushdie was attacked last year, uh, when he clearly felt it kind
01:01:34.280 of was over, came as a huge blow, I think, to Ayaan, uh, who was deeply upset by the attack on Salman,
01:01:41.800 whom we know. I suppose I think about it this way. First of all, terrorism is designed to inspire fear
01:01:51.960 and is its purpose. Um, and I grew up, uh, in a culture, uh, which is highly resistant, uh, to
01:02:00.280 accepting fear. Uh, my grandfathers fought in the world wars, the Scots pride themselves in their
01:02:06.520 fearlessness. And I, uh, have never been afraid of these people because I despise them. I have
01:02:13.000 utter contempt for them and I don't fear them. Uh, and indeed I'd already made the choice to move
01:02:17.960 to the United States just after 9-11, uh, because actually 9-11 prevented me from giving a lecture
01:02:25.400 at New York university. Uh, it was supposed to happen the next day. I never flew. And it was
01:02:31.160 shortly after that, that I decided to leave Oxford, take a job at New York university.
01:02:35.560 So before I met Ayaan, I think I'd already made, made it clear, uh, that I was going to march towards
01:02:40.920 rather than away from the gunfire. My grandfathers had to fight, uh, at great cost, uh, to themselves.
01:02:47.960 Uh, they didn't, uh, pay the ultimate price, but my grandfather was very badly, uh, injured in
01:02:54.280 world war one. And my mother's father suffered, uh, significant health, uh, damage in world war
01:02:59.800 two fighting the Japanese. I haven't been asked to do anything as difficult as that.
01:03:03.880 My war is a small war. Uh, it takes place, uh, uh, here. And I just have to keep my wife
01:03:09.480 safe, uh, uh, and happy, uh, and make sure that she lives a long life. Cause that will be the ultimate
01:03:15.640 victory over all those cowards who threatened her over the years. That's my war. And it's a much easier
01:03:21.400 one than my granddad had to fight. Oh my goodness. And, but like those wars,
01:03:25.400 well worth the fight, you know, that's probably on some level, what attracted her to you, you know,
01:03:30.840 that, that Scottish background, that fighter background, and the feeling that this person
01:03:34.920 will help protect me. I'm sure as strong and brave as Ayaan is, there's gotta be a fear factor for,
01:03:40.840 even for her, knowing that these very effective killers are out there thinking about her wanting to
01:03:47.480 target her. Look, I think my wife's extremely, uh, brave and good at putting up a brave face,
01:03:55.880 but I would not be, uh, doing justice to this interview if I made it sound as if it was all
01:04:03.240 okay because the mental, uh, stress of being threatened, uh, has taken a heavy toll, uh,
01:04:10.680 a very heavy toll on my wife's wellbeing, happiness. Uh, it's been a, a struggle much harder than I had
01:04:18.600 foreseen. I, I thought the challenge would be just making sure that the bad guys, uh, couldn't get
01:04:24.600 close, but the real challenge when you're facing terrorist threats like this is actually making sure
01:04:30.200 that, that your, uh, your spouse's mental health, uh, is okay. Cause that, that's really what the
01:04:36.440 terrorists are trying to do. It's not just about threats and objective security. The thing that
01:04:42.200 really turns out to matter in life is, is the subjective security. And that, that terrorism
01:04:47.320 is designed to erode. And it's, it's been a much bigger challenge than I, I foresaw one,
01:04:52.920 one that we are overcoming, but not one that we should understate.
01:04:57.320 When she came out with her book, uh, she came to Fox news and I gave, I interviewed her. I think
01:05:03.240 I was her first interview on that. And it was shocking to me, the amount of security back then,
01:05:09.000 this would have been 2013, 2014. I can't remember the year that she had to travel with. I mean it,
01:05:14.920 and even, you know, I've visited her privately since then, and it's still like, she still has
01:05:19.000 to live like this because of these lunatics who are so delusioned by poor religion and what they
01:05:25.720 think it requires of them because she's been critical of Islam. I mean, a religion, you know,
01:05:29.720 in whose name she had to undergo mutilation of her genitals. I mean, it can cause some bitterness.
01:05:36.360 It can cause you to abandon the religion, not to mention all the other things that she's written
01:05:40.120 about and talked about so many times that have happened to her. It's just deeply wrong. And
01:05:44.120 most of us would be in a puddle crying for, for most of our lives are retreating into very
01:05:49.960 private lives where people couldn't find us. The mere fact that she's chosen to live a public life,
01:05:54.840 that you live a public life. You, the two of you, you've had kids. That's another factor. You got
01:05:58.920 to layer into the worries does speak to, you know, both of your courage, Scottish, whatever the
01:06:04.120 background. Well, it's still, I mean, it still beats being in Eastern Ukraine. I mean, it still beats
01:06:13.080 what so many people around the world have to contend with. And, uh, from that point of view, I, I,
01:06:18.600 I have no, I have no complaints. And, and as long as my wife is, uh, healthy and, uh, and, and safe and,
01:06:26.600 and happy, and the same applies to our kids, then, then I'm winning, I'm winning the war. Uh, but I think
01:06:33.320 the important thing, uh, that that's worth sharing is just the kind of, uh, damage that, that is done,
01:06:41.240 which is generally speaking, not seen. I think people who, who aren't directly affected by this
01:06:47.960 kind of threat underestimate the psychological consequences of it. Cause they kind of assume
01:06:55.160 that, oh, you get used to security and you get used to, uh, you know, coming in through the back
01:07:00.600 way rather than the front way. When you give a speech, you get used to all of that. And I think
01:07:04.600 you do get used to all of that. In fact, to a certain degree, it becomes slightly second nature,
01:07:08.680 but, but you don't get used to the psychological, uh, effects of the threat. And that's the thing
01:07:15.320 that I've come to learn. And it's, it's made me much more appreciative, Megan of, of mental health,
01:07:21.320 about which I thought very little again, not the not so sunny side of, of a Scottish upbringing is
01:07:27.320 the mentality that you, you never admit to weakness. You never admit to depression. You never admit to
01:07:31.640 any mental health problem. And if there's a problem, you kind of work your way out of it. And I think
01:07:35.960 that attitude isn't really the right one. I've become much more aware of, of, of mental ill health
01:07:42.840 as a problem throughout our nation and indeed throughout the world. And I'm, I'm much more
01:07:47.720 understanding than, than I used to be when, as a young man, I dismissed all that kind of thing as,
01:07:53.240 you know, just a sign of weakness. I'm, I'm, I'm a, I'm a wiser person. Thanks to Ayan.
01:07:57.800 Hmm. The, um, I'll tell you one funny story. So you talk about this sort of that, those Scottish
01:08:04.120 roots and my husband's both Dutch and Scottish, Scottish on his mother's side. And, um, they went
01:08:09.320 back to Scotland in the not too distant past, maybe five, six years ago with the family and they found
01:08:14.440 their clan and they found their motto, their, the family motto. And it translated, it was be fearless,
01:08:22.440 but cautious. Yeah. I think we didn't get the but cautious part at the, in the Ferguson clan. Uh,
01:08:30.840 but yeah, that sort of, uh, spirit does still animate me. It's been 40 years since I've lived in
01:08:37.080 Scotland. I left when I was 17 to go to college, but it's still kind of there, uh, as a, as an operating
01:08:43.960 system. And when I, when I read Scottish literature, I spent the pandemic reading all the novels of Walter
01:08:49.480 Scott. I realized that that's really still, uh, that's still home. And that culture is still,
01:08:54.440 uh, what I, I grew out of and the Scottish enlightenment, which after all produced, uh,
01:09:00.600 some of the greatest ideas human beings have ever had. Think of Adam Smith's contribution,
01:09:05.800 the wealth of nations, the theory of moral sentiments. That's the kind of intellectual
01:09:09.480 legacy that I think of myself as being, uh, uh, uh, responsible for. And if those ideas
01:09:15.880 are not carried on to the next generation, then we lose something incredibly precious that came from my
01:09:22.680 little cold, rainy country in, uh, in the North of Europe.
01:09:27.160 So now, so we have you with this background of fight, say what you mean, stand up for your
01:09:32.520 principles. We have Ayan who found a way to say exactly what she felt, notwithstanding the enormous
01:09:38.840 threat to her personal safety in doing so on the most controversial issues you could ever speak of.
01:09:43.240 And she was doing it at a time when, you know, this is post nine 11, when, you know,
01:09:47.320 that was a very fraught conversation to be having. Um, and you two wind up who would have predicted
01:09:54.520 in academia, which you probably didn't realize at the time would be the least tolerant place for any
01:10:01.960 of those values. And it's only gotten worse over the past 10, 12 years. And you're both now at the
01:10:08.040 Hoover institution, which is this little oasis within the university system, including at Stanford,
01:10:12.440 which is, you know, we do a story every other day. I'm sure you saw what happened
01:10:15.800 with the judge who went out there, Judge Duncan, but the Hoover institution is different. However,
01:10:20.120 you're still on, you're in academia and you're on a college campus. And so how, how's that going?
01:10:26.520 Well, I think if you told me back in the 1980s, when I was an undergraduate at Oxford,
01:10:31.240 that by the 2020s, there would be less free speech, uh, in American universities than, uh,
01:10:38.760 in American saloon bars, I would have been pretty incredulous because in the early eighties,
01:10:44.120 when I was at Oxford, there was almost no restriction on what we could say.
01:10:47.640 And there was incredible intellectual diversity in the university. You could go from talking to a
01:10:53.640 Marxist professor in the morning to listening to an ultra conservative, uh, in the afternoon,
01:10:58.680 Andrew Sullivan and I were, uh, undergraduates together. We were quite outrageous and highly
01:11:03.080 offensive and said a whole range of things that would get you canceled today in a heartbeat.
01:11:06.920 I, I never foresaw that there would be an atmosphere in universities where students would
01:11:14.200 denounce one another or denounce their professors for something that was said in class. I, I never
01:11:20.280 imagined a university world in which associate deans for diversity, equity, and inclusion would decide
01:11:27.640 what could be said, uh, on university premises. Uh, I find all this completely surreal. In fact,
01:11:34.280 I think it's probably the biggest surprise of my life because back in the eighties,
01:11:38.840 I guess working with historians like the late great Norman Stone, I learned that denouncing,
01:11:44.840 informing, cancellation, all that kind of stuff went on in totalitarian regimes like Stalin's Soviet
01:11:51.400 Union or Mao's China. And that kind of behavior happened because it was a dictator in charge. And that's
01:11:56.520 how people tend to behave in such a regime. The thing that's amazing is to see people behaving that
01:12:02.200 way with no dictator in sight. In fact, they're behaving that way in a completely free society.
01:12:08.760 Uh, and that's shocking to me because I can't imagine anything, frankly, more contemptible
01:12:13.720 than writing a letter, denouncing somebody to sending it to a higher authority, asking for them to be
01:12:20.280 disciplined. But that stuff goes on all the time in American universities. Stanford is not by any means
01:12:26.120 unusual. The same kind of things are going on at all the major universities and the minor ones too.
01:12:31.480 So this is a big surprise to me. I think it's pretty appalling. Uh, in fact, I think it's highly
01:12:37.240 dangerous that there is this, uh, assault on academic freedom and on free speech because our universities,
01:12:43.720 like it or not, produce the, uh, not only the elites, but a really large proportion, uh, of the,
01:12:49.800 the people who run America. And if they leave after four years, uh, at college with a, at least
01:12:57.560 a habit of self-censorship and at worst, a kind of indoctrination, uh, in what we call work ideology,
01:13:05.080 that's terrible for America and terrible for the world. So, uh, the situation is very bad. Uh,
01:13:11.480 I think there are things we are doing that are gradually improving it, creating new institutions,
01:13:17.240 uh, like the university of Austin, making sure that the few existing institutions that are healthy,
01:13:23.160 like the Hoover institution, stay healthy, making sure that we organize so that cancel cultures sort
01:13:29.240 of doesn't succeed. I was involved in creating the academic freedom Alliance to fight back when
01:13:34.600 individuals are targeted. There's a lot we're doing. Uh, and so in this part of my life has in other
01:13:40.040 parts, I'm trying to fight the good fight because I think it's hugely important.
01:13:43.320 Mm-hmm. They, I think it was, is it Harvard that just came out with a new group, uh, saying that
01:13:49.080 they're going to fight for academic freedom, uh, including, you know, professors ability to say
01:13:53.880 what is factual and not get piled on or canceled because of it. We'll see whether that's a real
01:13:59.400 commitment or not. You know, it used to be that Princeton was the place you'd go if you really
01:14:03.160 wanted that, but they've surrendered to the woke university of Chicago was another place.
01:14:07.160 They've surrendered to the woke one by one. They dropped like dominoes.
01:14:10.280 I was very glad to see, uh, that my old friends, uh, Steve Pinker and Larry Summers and others were
01:14:17.160 creating that new organization at Harvard. It's long overdue because, uh, actually Harvard's
01:14:24.200 track record on disciplining, uh, faculty and other university members for speech quote unquote
01:14:30.440 offenses is pretty bad. Uh, so this is good. I mean, these, these are good signs, Megan, that we're,
01:14:36.120 we're getting organized and we're trying to contest, uh, and fight back against these
01:14:41.720 really deplorable trends. But I, I, I really want to stress there's a long way to go. Uh,
01:14:47.080 and, uh, the, the kind of events that you're, you're covering and others are covering and
01:14:52.120 organizations like fire are monitoring. These events are happening a lot. I sometimes I'm told,
01:14:58.040 oh, there's a pendulum that will swing back to the center. And I, I don't see that pendulum. I,
01:15:03.800 I actually think that the pendulum, if there is one has been swinging to the left with every decade
01:15:09.480 since I was an undergraduate and there's no sign of it moving the other direction, quite,
01:15:14.600 quite the opposite. The tendency is for people to hire ever more ideologically to discriminate ever
01:15:20.920 more, uh, explicitly on, on political grounds. So we've a lot of work to do to create the kind
01:15:27.960 of university that I would want, uh, our young sons to go to. Thomas is 11, Campbell is five,
01:15:34.760 and we've got, uh, just about time to make sure that there's, there's a higher education worth
01:15:41.560 they're doing by the time they get to be 18. So explain University of Austin to me. I'm,
01:15:47.480 I'm confused by it. I love everybody associated with it, but I don't understand what it is or how
01:15:52.040 it works. It's not an online university. So what is it? Well, we are building a university that will
01:16:00.040 be located in Austin, Texas, uh, that will be founded on the principles of academic freedom,
01:16:07.800 intellectual freedom, as well as meritocracy. And we will institutionalize those principles so that
01:16:14.360 that they are constitutionally guaranteed by university constitution. Yeah. Creating a
01:16:19.080 university is not easy. It's not like, uh, doing an AI startup, which seems to take about three weeks
01:16:24.840 these days. You have to go through an accreditation process, which, uh, is quite laborious and time
01:16:30.360 consuming, but we will admit our first, uh, class, uh, all going well, uh, in the fall of 2024. That's
01:16:38.360 next year. We've moved it by academic standards, uh, lightning speed. Uh, we've raised $150 million,
01:16:45.080 uh, which is chump change by Harvard standards, but, uh, but we're a startup. We don't need to
01:16:51.800 have Harvard's budget. Uh, we just need to build, uh, and, and then scale this institution. And it's
01:16:58.760 extremely exciting. And I think very American to be creating a new institution. Once upon a time,
01:17:04.600 the university of Chicago was us once upon a time, Stanford was us, you know, you, you have to
01:17:09.480 remember that by Oxford standards, both Chicago and Stanford are quite young institutions, not even
01:17:14.840 close to 200 years old. Uh, and so we, we believe that, that America needs a new university and, uh,
01:17:21.640 and it's ultimately going to be good for the existing universities. If there's one that really models
01:17:28.120 academic freedom and really models, uh, a truly meritocratic, uh, culture, uh, in which, uh, in
01:17:36.200 which we only discriminate in favor of talent, that's what we're going to do. Uh, and I think if we get it
01:17:40.680 right, we're going to attract the most exciting students in the country, because I can assure you
01:17:47.080 students at the established universities are frustrated, downright depressed in many cases,
01:17:53.800 because academic life, student life is just no fun. It's no fun when the woke police are poised to,
01:18:01.240 to jump on you. If you use the wrong word in the wrong context, uh, building a university,
01:18:06.360 which will be truly intellectually free, uh, will be, will be fun. And I think we will very quickly
01:18:12.440 be a magnet for talent. And the minute we do that, the other universities are going to realize
01:18:17.000 we have to address our own illiberal, no fun culture. And ultimately, I hope 20 years from now,
01:18:24.280 I probably only have 20 years left judging by typical life expectancy for Scotsman. I hope 20
01:18:30.360 years from now, we've really made a difference. And I believe we will. Well, the other thing is,
01:18:35.320 I think there are a lot of employers who are thirsty for this kind of a product to recruit, uh,
01:18:41.560 graduates from a school like that who haven't been indoctrinated. Anyone who would choose the
01:18:46.440 university of Austin will have a certain set of ideals and principles and ways of approaching
01:18:51.720 thinking and problem solving that I, for one, as an employer would find very attractive. And I know
01:18:57.000 there are many just like me. So that's the other thing. Once people see that the graduates of this
01:19:01.560 university get great jobs, you know, it may not be with Bud Light, but they get great jobs with
01:19:07.880 great corporations that will employ and be loyal to them. That'll change, you know, the equation there
01:19:12.760 too. You are so right, Megan. And we absolutely intend to make sure that the message, uh, gets
01:19:19.000 out. Uh, and also that we make sure that as we devise our undergraduate and master's programs,
01:19:26.520 we devise them so that our people will be like the Navy seals of the mind. And that's an image I,
01:19:33.080 I really like. We, we, we see still elitism in our military, that the desire to be the very,
01:19:39.080 very best is something that motivates the, the seals and the other special forces, uh,
01:19:44.440 folks. But where is that in academia? Uh, well, we want to build it. Uh, and if,
01:19:48.840 if you can produce the Navy seals or the green berets of the brain, then you bet the top employers
01:19:55.480 are going to want to hire our people. And this is something that our wonderful president,
01:19:59.080 Pano Canelos keeps emphasizing. Uh, we've got to make sure that we are designing programs that are
01:20:05.080 fundamentally different in, in their aspiration. We want to produce leaders. We wanted to produce
01:20:11.800 people who dare to think and learn to lead. That's my kind of preferred motto for the University of
01:20:18.120 Austin. And, and so it's actually very invigorating to be involved in, in doing this because we can
01:20:23.720 learn from history. We can learn from what's gone wrong at the established universities and try and
01:20:27.720 come up with something that's fundamentally different. There won't be departments. There won't be a
01:20:33.080 system of tenured faculty who become dominant. There won't be an enormous bureaucracy of, of officers
01:20:38.760 policing, uh, what gets said and done. All of that will be, will be got rid of. It won't exist
01:20:44.760 in those forms at the University of Austin. I love it. Two plus two will remain
01:20:49.320 four. You won't have DEI policing your math, uh, volleyball and what else, whatever else they can dream
01:20:57.080 of. Um, it's exciting. So the first incoming full class begins in 2024, fall of right.
01:21:05.240 That's that's right. And, uh, and we will, I hope scale rapidly. You mentioned the online
01:21:10.120 piece. I think that's important. Um, it's not enough in the 21st century to build, uh, a liberal
01:21:16.280 arts college, uh, in, in Texas and hope to change the world. I think what we'll do once we've attracted,
01:21:22.760 uh, the, the, the elite faculty that I think we are gonna attract is we'll make sure that content,
01:21:28.760 uh, is available, not just to the fortunate few who get admitted, but more widely. Uh,
01:21:34.680 and so I'm, I'm hoping that we can be a new kind of educational institution, one that, that cherishes
01:21:40.040 and preserves the values of the great universities of the past, because I think the great, the greatest
01:21:45.880 teaching experiences do still happen in classrooms, uh, in relatively small groups. We got to preserve all
01:21:51.800 that because it's really powerful, but we've also got to make available content to people around the
01:21:56.600 world who don't have the good fortune to be able to spend four years, uh, in, in a U S university.
01:22:03.320 I, I really feel passionately about my egalitarian mission. My egalitarian mission is to get history,
01:22:10.840 which is my subject out to the greatest number of people possible. And that includes people living
01:22:16.200 in poverty, whether it's in sub-Saharan Africa and Somalia, where my wife was born or in the deprived
01:22:21.320 parts of Scotland. I, I want that kind of historical knowledge to be accessible to everybody because
01:22:26.920 history can help you live your life better. It will help you learn from the mistakes of that vast
01:22:32.520 population who died, who've moved on. The majority of human beings are dead. The majority, uh, have
01:22:37.800 passed on and we have to learn from their experience if we're to make a better job, uh, of the 21st century
01:22:43.800 than we're currently making. So we mentioned Douglas Murray. Um, I don't think my husband Doug would mind.
01:22:49.720 He's going to be interviewing him on his podcast, which is called dedicated with Doug run. It's it's
01:22:53.720 he's an author and he interviews other authors about their writing process, their books and so on.
01:22:58.200 And Doug has been reading, uh, my dog has been reading Douglas Murray's war on the west. And he's
01:23:04.360 of course got so many similar thoughts to your own on how the absurdity of writing off every,
01:23:09.400 every bit of history as, you know, terrible and not worthy of consideration because of colonialism,
01:23:14.440 because white men, because of all the things. And I want to ask you about a similar subject right
01:23:19.880 after this break, colonialism and King Charles's commitment to atoning for it. That's kind of sad.
01:23:27.640 That's kind of sounds like where he's going. I'll, I'll tell you what he said and get your
01:23:31.800 thoughts on it right after this more with Neil Ferguson in two minutes.
01:23:35.720 So Neil King Charles, uh, is about to go through his coronation across the pond. And in his first
01:23:45.800 big speech, um, in front of a foreign leader, which was in November, he signaled that the,
01:23:52.600 his monarchy will tackle the legacy of colonialism. He's made quite a few comments about this,
01:23:58.440 his sadness about the UK's role in the slave trade. He cannot describe the depths of his personal sorrow
01:24:03.240 at the suffering of so many as he continues to deepen his own understanding of slavery's enduring
01:24:07.960 impact, but he seems to be focused on some sort of atonement for the legacy of colonialism. Good
01:24:16.280 idea to make this any sort of a centerpiece of his reign? Well, Charles, uh, King Charles, as I must learn
01:24:25.640 to call him, has, uh, had a bad press on many occasions in, in the past. And, and I often think
01:24:33.320 has been, uh, misunderstood and misrepresented. And it's easy, I think, uh, to infer from this kind
01:24:41.800 of thing, oh no, here comes the woke monarch. Uh, and I don't think that's fair. First of all,
01:24:48.200 I think Britain has been dealing with the complexities of its imperial past for a long time.
01:24:54.520 It's not as if, uh, his mother, uh, disregarded this. In fact, one of the most striking achievements
01:25:00.200 of, uh, Queen Elizabeth II's reign was the way that the legacy of empire metamorphosed into the
01:25:07.880 Commonwealth, uh, an entirely different kind of organization in which the different members,
01:25:12.840 including former colonies, were, were equals. So this is not something that he's starting from scratch.
01:25:18.680 The key in this debate, Megan, is for us not to go down the road of on one side, there being people
01:25:26.520 who say every single thing about empire and particularly the British empire was evil. And
01:25:31.800 on the other side, people saying every single thing about it was great. 20 years ago, I wrote a book
01:25:36.120 called empire, how Britain made the modern world. And in that book, I pointed out that the Britain was
01:25:41.400 responsible both for some dreadful evils, uh, uh, the transatlantic slave trade to which Britain made
01:25:49.560 a major contribution, but also the United States of America. I mean, let's face it,
01:25:54.680 the United States of America starts out as a bunch of rebellious colonies. Uh, and most of the
01:26:00.040 institutions that, that get put together to produce the United States have a pretty visible British
01:26:06.280 imprint, uh, not to mention the language we're speaking. So you can't say it's all bad and you
01:26:11.720 can't say it's all good. You've got to recognize that as with all historical phenomena, the British
01:26:16.840 empire was a tremendously complex thing. It was responsible for great misdeeds, but then so were
01:26:23.640 all empires. I mean, give me an empire that didn't have some version, uh, of slavery. I'd be very
01:26:28.840 interested to hear about it. Uh, and one can't ignore the fact that unlike many empires,
01:26:33.720 and I mentioned one earlier, uh, Hitler's empire, the British empire did a lot of good. I mean,
01:26:38.360 I don't think of any good that Germany's empire did in the 1940s, but, but over the 200 plus years
01:26:43.960 of its existence, uh, there were some undoubted, uh, benefits to British empire. You can't say that
01:26:49.640 in certain circles these days because you have to maintain the fiction that it was all bad, but I'm
01:26:54.840 a historian and I'm here to tell you that history isn't all bad and it isn't all good. Sorry. It's
01:26:59.720 complicated. It's complicated. You know, I, for one was a little concerned when they fired that
01:27:04.920 lady, Susan Hussey so quickly when she had that exchange with, um, a black activist who was
01:27:11.320 there visiting and she, the lady kept asking her, where are you actually from? But the woman was in
01:27:16.760 African garb and she had an African name and she was lady. Susan Hussey was confused that she might
01:27:24.200 not actually be from great Britain. Anyway, they fired her pretty quickly. And I just wonder whether,
01:27:28.360 you know, you don't think we're in for a woke monarch. Well, I think that kind of performative
01:27:35.480 protest, uh, which always reminds me of footballers who dive in the penalty area, clutching their face,
01:27:42.600 uh, is going to be, uh, a pretty recurrent feature of, of British and American life for years to come. There
01:27:49.720 are people who are on the lookout for reasons to be offended. And, uh, it's, it's hard to deal with
01:27:55.640 those people, especially if you're a traditional institution with centuries of history. Uh, I think
01:28:01.000 the challenge, uh, for, for the monarchy is the same challenge it had when I was born gulp nearly 60
01:28:08.200 years ago. And that is, how do you justify an institution based on the hereditary principle,
01:28:14.920 uh, in the age of, of democracy and, and in the age of, of, of technology? And the extraordinary
01:28:22.040 thing about the British monarchy is how well that's gone so far. I mean, there was a time when
01:28:27.160 you think back to, I don't know, late 18th century, when the revolutions were happening,
01:28:30.840 not only here, but also in France, where it didn't seem like monarchy had a great future ahead of it.
01:28:35.640 But what I think, uh, King Charles will have learned from his mother is that there are in fact,
01:28:41.480 great virtues to having a non-elected head of state who personifies tradition. And this is the same
01:28:48.760 thing that I was saying to you earlier about religion. Uh, you know, at some level, the United
01:28:54.600 States feels a lot more divided politically and in other ways than Britain today. Wokeism has made
01:29:01.240 far greater inroads here than in the UK. And it's partly because there's so many parts of British
01:29:06.920 life that are kind of off limits. They're not really supposed to be political. Uh, and so the church,
01:29:12.520 the crown, these things, as my old friend, Roger Scruton used to say, are other things that,
01:29:18.120 that we as conservatives should really want to conserve because they're the things that preserve
01:29:23.000 part of our lives from the scourge of democratic politics. So as a historian and a conservative
01:29:29.480 looking around at America, seeing wokeism take over, seeing the loss of biology and reality, math
01:29:37.160 realities, seeing just this incredibly divisive anti-free speech rhetoric pop up in every one of our
01:29:44.200 massive institutions. Are we, are we looking at the end of days here for this great Republic?
01:29:51.000 Uh, where, where do we go from here? If based on what you've seen historically?
01:29:55.000 Well, my last book, doom, the politics of catastrophe takes this question on. Uh, I love
01:30:02.520 that, that feature of American life that we're always predicting American decline, uh, and we're always
01:30:07.960 predicting either the next civil war or the overthrow of the constitution. I think it keeps us, uh, on our
01:30:15.160 toes to worry about that stuff. And I, I'd be kind of concerned if Americans didn't occasionally ask
01:30:20.840 themselves, are we about to blow it? Now I tend to regard most of the, the kind of exaggerated prophecies
01:30:28.440 of doom as being a, uh, not worth the paper they're printed on. I'm, I mean, I, I, I got slightly
01:30:35.320 exhausted by the, the analogies that were constantly made between Donald Trump and Mussolini or even
01:30:41.800 Hitler. And that just seems to me ludicrous. Uh, I think there are two things that are important.
01:30:47.560 First of all, there's a populist tradition in American politics. Uh, and there's also a kind of nasty
01:30:53.560 tradition in American politics. Dickens was appalled when he came to the United States by how brutally
01:30:59.000 nasty, uh, American politics was. And we mustn't forget that that's kind of part of the way this
01:31:05.320 Republic has tended to roll. Uh, and there's a very 19th century character to a lot of what we see today,
01:31:11.000 including political machines, uh, which have got to be almost Tammany Hall in their efficiency.
01:31:17.640 Uh, the second point I'd make is that we should worry about the durability of Republican
01:31:22.200 institutions. There's a reason Rome turned into an empire. It's the thing that political history
01:31:27.960 and political theory tells us we should worry about, but I don't think we are near the end of
01:31:35.480 the Republic or much less the end of days. Americans have to remember that it was a lot worse in this
01:31:41.880 country. For example, in the late sixties and early seventies, much more division and a good deal more
01:31:47.080 violence, uh, than we see today. So let's keep calm as the British poster says it and carry on.
01:31:54.360 American institutions are extraordinarily well-designed and extraordinarily strong.
01:31:59.320 And the challenges we face like the people's Republic of China under the Chinese communist party,
01:32:04.920 those challenges are not the biggest challenge. The biggest challenge we face is within it. Are we
01:32:10.600 capable of sustaining those principles that have served us so well over two centuries? And as long as we
01:32:16.520 don't throw those out the window in a paroxysm of wokeism, I think the United States will be just fine.
01:32:22.360 As the Scottish might do, we must fight to preserve them. Neil, so great to talk to you.
01:32:29.320 Please send my love to your beautiful wife and thank you so much. Really enjoyed this.
01:32:33.560 My pleasure, Megan. Great to see you.
01:32:36.040 Before we go, I wanted to bring you the latest edition of the MK mailbag. If you would like to
01:32:41.560 email me, you can do so now. Megan, M E G Y N. That's really how you say it. Megan,
01:32:46.760 M E G Y N at Megan Kelly.com. Okay. Go there now. And you can sign up for our American news minute.
01:32:52.440 If you so desire while you're there, that's my email to you that I send out on Fridays.
01:32:57.000 Okay. Some great ones this week, uh, regarding the kappa kappa gamma sorority,
01:33:01.000 insisting that they admit this trans person who was like the six foot one man who's 250 pounds.
01:33:06.840 I can't, whatever. It's a nightmare. Uh, Claudia in Ohio writes, I was a proud KKG alumna until last
01:33:12.760 fall. Uh, I attended university of Utah in the eighties was pledged chairman and president.
01:33:16.760 I was also an advisor, blah, blah, blah. The national organization is fully responsible for this.
01:33:20.760 And I hope that they pay dearly. I'm considering returning my key and resigning as an alumna. Um,
01:33:25.960 another former KKK KKG or writes in saying this guy doesn't even have a high enough GPA to be a
01:33:31.880 member. Why was he even able to rush with that pathetic score? He has a 1.9. Uh, Candace writes
01:33:36.840 in, thanks so much for bringing up this case. If those young women choose to move forward with
01:33:40.360 their suit and let their names be known, they are absolute heroes. I agree on Dylan and Bud White,
01:33:46.760 but like Bud White, but light, somebody writes in Sasha. Thanks for sticking up for real women with
01:33:52.360 the XX chromosomes. My issues, not even Dylan, but the marketing woman in charge who said she wants
01:33:57.080 to appeal to women. You pick a man dressed as a woman to do so real women should represent and be
01:34:02.840 used to be used to appeal to women. Christie writes in, uh, Christie wrote this great email. I think is
01:34:09.160 the one who forwarded us her long email to Anheuser-Busch. Yeah, it was. And Christie,
01:34:12.920 I read the whole thing. You didn't think I was going to read it. I read every word. It was amazing.
01:34:16.280 She said, I never, I've never written to a company or a person for any reason. Uh,
01:34:20.840 I just never really thought it would do much good after everything that's happened. I couldn't sit
01:34:23.880 quietly by any longer. I sent an email to Anheuser-Busch today. I wanted to thank you for helping me to
01:34:28.440 find my voice and speak up and speak out. It was a great letter. Good for you. And then lastly, uh,
01:34:34.760 I love this one. Okay. Meg's going to tell me I screen grabbed it. What? And, uh, the name is
01:34:40.200 perfect. I think it's Michelle, uh, who wrote the center. Was it my Michael, Michael, finally about your
01:34:44.600 swearing? Please do not stop. My life's journey has exposed me to a lot of profanity and a lot
01:34:49.400 of people who use profanity like everything in life. The ability to use profanity effectively
01:34:53.320 has not been distributed fairly over the years. You come to be able to distinguish between people
01:34:57.080 who are simply nasty and those who possess a certain profane elegance. Ms. Kelly, you have a gift.
01:35:03.000 Don't change a thing. God bless you and your staff. Thank you so much for that, Michael. Yes,
01:35:08.520 Michael Andrews. I appreciate that. And I will keep on swearing, sir. Have a great fucking weekend.
01:35:16.120 See you Monday, guys.
01:35:19.880 Thanks for listening to The Megyn Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.