Corporate Media Gate-Keeping, and Bizarre Depp-Heard Behavior, with the Ruthless Podcast Hosts, Mark Geragos, and Vinnie Politan | Ep. 312
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 35 minutes
Words per Minute
185.43382
Summary
Amber Heard is taking the stand in the Johnny Depp vs. Mark Garagos case tomorrow, and Megynkelian is here to break it all down. She's joined by Vinnie Politan of Court TV, Josh Holmes of The Ruthless Podcast, and Michael Duncan of The Daily Beast to discuss what to expect. Plus, a look back at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
Transcript
00:00:00.540
Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations.
00:00:11.580
Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show. Happy Monday.
00:00:15.460
We have a ton to get to today, including a deep dive into the Johnny Depp Amber Heard trial next hour
00:00:20.600
with two of my favorites, Vinnie Politan of Court TV and Mark Garagos, both of whom have been following it really closely.
00:00:26.800
And it's about to get very interesting because she's expected to take the stand tomorrow.
00:00:31.580
And keep in mind, we've only heard his side of the case so far, right?
00:00:34.940
So we're going to hear her side and we're going to go in depth on what to expect
00:00:38.820
because we took a deep dive into what happened over in that UK, that British court where she won.
00:00:46.000
She was accused of lying about his alleged abuse there and she won the case.
00:00:55.080
It was a defamation case. In any event, we're going to we're going to give you coverage.
00:00:59.600
You probably aren't going to hear any police else today. So stay tuned for that.
00:01:02.600
OK, first up, though, did you stay up late Saturday night to watch the press celebrate the press at the White House Correspondents Dinner?
00:01:10.180
My executive producer, Steve Krakauer, sent us a text at like 1030 on Saturday night, like,
00:01:15.580
ha ha, did you see how Biden's doing humor? I'm like, are you sitting at home watching?
00:01:19.020
Are you sitting at home watching this thing? Are you the one?
00:01:23.660
He has a new baby, so it's not his fault. He can't go out.
00:01:28.080
Twenty five hundred people in a D.C. ballroom handing out awards to themselves.
00:01:33.540
Apparently no longer too concerned about covid protocols.
00:01:37.500
Joe Biden was even there and actually did some stand up or tried to.
00:01:42.100
We've got the highlights and the lowlights with some of our favorites.
00:01:45.220
The hosts of The Ruthless Podcast are back with me today.
00:01:53.240
Joining me now to discuss it all, Michael Duncan, Josh Holmes and the man known to his Twitter minions as comfortably smug.
00:02:04.800
Yeah. So were you like Steve grilled, like riveted to your television at home Saturday night?
00:02:11.780
Not even a little bit. The funny thing is it's become such an unbelievably narcissistic, incredibly.
00:02:20.360
I mean, like I don't even know how to wrap my mind around this. Right.
00:02:23.520
They make you triple mask and double and double vacs for like the better part of two years.
00:02:27.640
And then all of a sudden, yeah, it's all good. Right.
00:02:30.580
We need twenty five hundred people in a ballroom to celebrate ourselves.
00:02:35.600
Or wait, is it over? Wait, I have to check my memo over.
00:02:38.360
Not over. Depends. Immigrants. Who are we talking about?
00:02:41.060
Yeah. It's like they can't get the story straight.
00:02:44.160
It's incredible. But, you know, here's the thing that that really bothers me about it.
00:02:48.380
And maybe this like 10 years ago, I used to go to these things.
00:02:51.540
Maybe they weren't as bad that or maybe they were.
00:02:55.920
But now if you look at it like they celebrate each other as though that they're like movie stars.
00:03:01.440
And they're all like they're all decked out, except they're all like just dorks.
00:03:10.300
And they and but they talk about it as though it's like, oh, this big celebration and like red carpets and stuff like who the hell wants to see these people on a red carpet?
00:03:20.100
So CNN treated this like it was the State of the Union address, like the big run up to it was covered.
00:03:28.820
They had full panel coverage, CNN team coverage of the White House Correspondents Dinner.
00:03:33.300
The brilliant Debbie Murphy, Canadian Debbie, has assisted in putting together a little montage of some of the pre-gaming that went on on CNN prior to this event.
00:03:45.300
But these are live pictures right now that people enjoy.
00:03:48.900
I don't know if this is the salad or the dessert portion of the meal.
00:03:51.920
It is the wine portion of the meal, which is a very important portion tonight.
00:04:02.160
We're just trying to give people the play by play of every minute.
00:04:15.580
Trevor Noah hobnobbing with White House best secretary Jen Psaki just a little bit prior to when he will be delivering jokes.
00:04:38.440
Can you think of anything that needs play by play commentary less than a White House correspondence dinner?
00:04:48.640
You know, you almost feel bad being in this line of work now.
00:04:51.680
Megan, I almost kind of feel bad for him having to fill all that that time, that empty air.
00:04:55.940
People are they're eating appetizers and you got to make it sound interesting.
00:05:01.540
The no had to come when the CNN bosses went to them and said, here's what we'd like you to do.
00:05:07.540
It needed to be shut down before it ever started.
00:05:10.200
I mean, the whole thing and even CNN doing like a play by play of it just makes it so conceited of these journalists just celebrating themselves, depicting themselves as war heroes and the grotesqueness of it all.
00:05:23.780
Well, I mean, you always see, as always, at these events, the help is wearing masks and then all the stars and celebrities.
00:05:33.220
That's what gets that's what makes it even worse.
00:05:34.860
I guess we had Kardashian and Pete, which is basically like every journo took a selfie with over the over the weekend.
00:05:42.900
But then they set the whole thing up as some grand event.
00:05:46.800
Like, can you imagine doing color commentary on top of it?
00:05:52.100
I mean, it really is like the Hunger Games or something.
00:05:56.000
You're seeing all these people in D.C., you know, celebrating themselves and Joe Biden even laughing at a joke about how everything's getting more expensive for Americans, how it's getting harder to afford food and gas.
00:06:07.940
And it's the funniest thing in the world for them.
00:06:10.660
It's not like they haven't put American people through two years of if they're lucky, they have maintained a job.
00:06:19.460
Here, listen, we have the Trevor joke about inflation and Joe Biden yucking it up.
00:06:28.100
Ever since you've come into office, things are really looking up.
00:06:35.860
No, it really has been a tough first year for you, Mr. President.
00:06:47.600
And there was a poll out just, I think, today or yesterday showing it was that 94 percent of the American people say they're either concerned or disturbed about inflation right now.
00:06:56.920
So as the president who unleashed these policies on us, you're going to have to be a little careful.
00:07:12.960
And I love the fact you can roast the president of the United States sitting next to him.
00:07:15.920
But these are the same people who enforce the no comedy absolute deadlock on everything else in American culture.
00:07:23.200
Nothing is funny unless they're doing it with themselves.
00:07:26.720
I mean, the one joke that Joe Biden did, which I actually appreciated, was when he came in, he was like, it's nice to be in a room with people who have a lower approval rating than me.
00:07:41.620
Speaking of the self-congratulatory tone of it all.
00:07:45.060
Trevor Noah, he actually did a decent job, I think, in the overall.
00:07:48.680
I expected him to be far more partisan and kind of unfortunate.
00:07:55.760
He, of course, ended it by touting how important the press is, in response to which they got all teary-eyed and excited out there that Trevor Noah had something nice to say about them.
00:08:10.160
I really hope you all remember what the real purpose of this evening is.
00:08:16.960
But the reason we're here is to honor and celebrate the fourth estates and what you stand for, what you stand for, an additional check and balance that holds power to account and gives voice to those who otherwise wouldn't have one.
00:08:47.360
Cue the national anthem playing quietly underneath the Taylor Lorenz.
00:08:53.600
It's like, you know, journalism is supposed to be about comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable.
00:08:58.500
And right there, he says, you know, it's up to us to hold the people in power to account.
00:09:03.200
When in that room, it was less of a ball than more of just buddies hanging out.
00:09:07.960
It was the White House press corps and the White House press just hanging out like the only difference is they're wearing tuxedos.
00:09:19.100
Because outside of that one guy, there isn't anybody in the White House press corps doing that right now.
00:09:29.140
Oh, and, you know, actually, Trevor Noah made a joke about how the fact checker over at CNN and I think it was the Washington Post went totally silent.
00:09:39.800
There was an article, I think it was in Politico last week that was basically like, oh, well, the briefing room now, it's so boring because, you know, Biden's such a normal president.
00:09:51.540
You know, we're not going to get any book deals.
00:09:58.200
It's an absolute indictment on the press of that's what their mission was, is they wanted they loved having Trump there because they could make careers off of trying to attack him, getting book deals of how they're like the final guardian of democracy left in America.
00:10:12.980
And in the absence of them being able to create their careers off of that, they have no like, what are we supposed to do?
00:10:26.060
A three part series now that they don't have Trump to kick around anymore on Tucker Carlson.
00:10:36.520
They're outraged that Tucker is focusing on class distinctions.
00:10:41.140
You used to care about that, too, Democrats, press corps.
00:10:46.640
And of course, they just style it all as, oh, he's a racist and he issues sort of racist tropes.
00:11:00.180
And on it goes like the examples that they provided were not moving.
00:11:04.580
And they had something like nine reporters on him watching his show for like twelve hundred
00:11:12.480
What what if they had done this on Hunter Biden?
00:11:14.960
Wouldn't that have been like couldn't that have been done?
00:11:18.940
Yeah, no, there's no news value in the people who are actually in charge.
00:11:22.260
It's the people who are talking about the other things that everybody's concerned about
00:11:25.860
outside of the the little sort of urban epicenters that all of these people live.
00:11:30.760
But you even you even made a cameo in this piece, Megan, as is providing a platform for
00:11:46.360
I remember when we when I when I interviewed Alex Jones, they they lost their minds in
00:11:58.140
And I was pointing out at the time, like, do you realize Diane Sawyer interviewed Jeffrey
00:12:05.000
OK, Alex Jones is very controversial, but he didn't eat anybody like nobody's in the freezer
00:12:15.700
Like, could you stop with your platforming nonsense?
00:12:20.360
You interview good guys, bad guys, controversial people, other people.
00:12:27.000
You talk to them and you figure out their story and then you let the audience figure out how
00:12:33.960
But don't you feel like I mean, I just pick up this.
00:12:36.100
I know exactly what I'm going to be able to read here when I picked up this story and started
00:12:54.460
But like the way that it's constructed, it's like journalists going to the zoo.
00:13:02.080
Or like a foreign exchange program where every single observation that they're making about
00:13:08.160
Tucker, about his world, about it's like, look through, peer through the glass and look
00:13:12.780
at this list of horribles that we can't possibly identify with.
00:13:16.780
It's just like all their coverage is so predictable.
00:13:21.420
And like Glenn Greenwald was tweeting this out, but it was my first reaction to which
00:13:27.340
The people who read The New York Times are almost 100 percent liberal, like virtually
00:13:31.140
everyone who reads it self-identifies as liberal.
00:13:41.360
And the people who don't believe that, right, who have no problem with Fox News and may or
00:13:46.400
may not watch Tucker, but don't accept that everything he says about the border or Black
00:13:51.340
Lives Matter is racist just because he's not on board with Team Biden's policies.
00:13:57.560
Like they're not going to listen to The New York Times and it's nine reporters and they're
00:14:09.460
I think number one is preaching to the choir, which is the only thing that they're capable
00:14:12.440
of doing now these days is speaking to a very narrow subset of the American population that
00:14:18.900
And that's the reason why these people subscribe to The New York Times in the first place, be
00:14:22.960
told that they're good people and get pats on the head.
00:14:28.660
I mean, everything from the White House Correspondents Dinner and the people in that room, they do that
00:14:32.920
But, you know, articles like this do as well, because they define what you're allowed to
00:14:41.080
And that's the most that's the most important thing for a lot of these media figures is to
00:14:49.320
Where the hell did that come from, you know, platforming or de-platforming and giving giving
00:14:55.900
voice to angry people and all this sort of stuff that sort of it's it's it's risen in
00:15:00.520
the last five years around, you know, the presidency of Donald Trump, where suddenly, you know, certain
00:15:08.660
Basically, the speed from which an opinion of like a professor at Oberlin has become
00:15:13.840
accepted reality and enforced upon the public has become stunningly fast, like it's gone
00:15:23.320
Where any crazy idea of where the Overton window lies, you know, what is acceptable, what is
00:15:28.900
not acceptable, what's considered disinformation and becomes enforced by the media.
00:15:35.620
You know, the Ministry of Truth is going to start deciding what people are allowed to discuss.
00:15:39.400
And I think a lot of that has to do with particularly the Tucker Carlson piece is the left has become
00:15:44.080
incredibly nervous, not just about this midterm, but in general, where for the for years, their
00:15:49.520
message of basic neoliberalism is, listen, you know, if we have open borders, everyone's
00:15:56.180
All you coal miners are going to learn to code.
00:16:05.440
Everything has gotten a lot worse, especially for working class people.
00:16:08.260
The same group who The New York Times is terrified might start listening to conservatives.
00:16:12.980
So they have to say, listen, you're not allowed to listen to this guy's show.
00:16:17.980
He's addressing what matters to you when this administration is laughing in your face about
00:16:22.680
But they want to signal to any person who gets the idea of, wow, maybe he does speak
00:16:26.420
for me, that if he speaks for you, then you're a white supremacist.
00:16:37.360
Tucker's got the number one show in cable news right now.
00:16:41.960
You know, in conservative circles, he's powerful and he's watched by more Democrats than any
00:16:47.060
But that's just because nobody else has ratings.
00:16:52.620
OK, so it makes them feel better to say, OK, he's horrible.
00:17:04.160
He may be doing very well in terms of the numbers.
00:17:06.020
People may be flocking to him, but those are bad people.
00:17:11.940
And it's the same reason why so many of them can't let go of January 6th.
00:17:22.440
I mean, they they love to talk about it every day.
00:17:24.780
If there's an inkling of an update, they'd love to cover it.
00:17:27.120
They can't wait until every trial goes through because it makes them feel like this is an
00:17:33.560
albatross around Trump's neck and Ivanka's neck and Eric and Don Jr.
00:17:43.560
They're the bad people and we are the good people.
00:17:46.720
We don't care how much even if he's going to win.
00:17:49.440
If he runs against Joe Biden, you remember he's bad and we're good.
00:17:54.060
Oh, and especially in light of the fact that these are the same people who contributed to
00:18:04.540
Please give to this bail fund where recidivists got back out.
00:18:10.360
There was a summer where cities across this country were set on fire in New York state.
00:18:16.960
They're like, oh, you know, sometimes burning down a building is mostly peaceful.
00:18:19.940
You know, you got to let them go away with that.
00:18:21.800
I think the greatest irony of all this with the Tucker Carson article is that it's all
00:18:27.100
done through this principle of diversity, right?
00:18:30.500
They're protecting diversity when in all honesty, it's the exact opposite of diversity in every
00:18:36.940
Unless you subscribe to this absolutely specific narrative that the New York Times, the Washington
00:18:41.720
Post conjure up on a day-to-day basis, you are the other, right?
00:18:48.920
And like, look, I don't agree with everything that Tucker Carlson has to say.
00:18:51.880
I don't suspect that most of our audience agrees with everything that I have to say either.
00:18:56.800
But asking the question and having conversations, I thought that was the reason we were all here
00:19:03.580
Unless you want to hook yourself up to the hive mind and everybody has the exact same opinion.
00:19:09.420
But it seems to be like, that's what they want.
00:19:12.220
They're really, you know, with the Ministry of Truth, they're really starting to make a
00:19:16.280
Like, I think we can make the hive mind happen.
00:19:18.380
You know, but it's an interesting thing, right?
00:19:20.960
Because I do wonder whether those attacks have really, truly lost all impact.
00:19:28.860
10 years ago, that kind of an appease, that kind of a piece by the New York Times would have
00:19:34.120
I mean, I know at Fox News we would have spent a day dealing with the PR people who would have
00:19:40.060
You know, nobody liked the Times, but they still had a lot of influence and you would
00:19:43.960
not have wanted a piece like that to have come out.
00:19:48.700
He was like, you know, this shows how much of a silo the left has put itself inside where,
00:19:54.960
you know, there was a time where if the New York Times says this individual is a white
00:20:01.320
Number one, because that term wasn't thrown around every single day for every single person
00:20:05.920
where even they've accused Clarence Thomas of being a white supremacist.
00:20:12.760
And secondly, the New York Times is only preaching to the choir.
00:20:16.880
Everyone who reads the New York Times already, you know, their base is people who hate Tucker
00:20:24.920
It doesn't matter for people like us or you or consumers of both of our programs, obviously,
00:20:30.620
but their constituency is corporate America in a lot of ways.
00:20:35.240
And so by putting out a piece like this, they still have a very responsive sector in the
00:20:40.560
most powerful corporations in this country to basically send a memo to all of them that
00:20:45.720
like you don't have you can't have anything to do with this guy.
00:20:50.800
I mean, if there's a company in America that had a look at it's a Fortune 50 company that
00:20:55.740
had a look at that piece in the New York Times, what are the chances that any of them choose
00:21:02.600
So this is all they are talking to themselves, but they're also trying to intimidate commerce
00:21:07.860
in this country to try to move away from any sort of conservative thought or basically
00:21:12.960
Because there's a lot of stuff that Tucker's talking about.
00:21:18.940
But to your point, to your point, Holmes, like you used to be just media matters, sleeping
00:21:24.900
giants, these people who like get behind the boy, right.
00:21:27.820
People on the far left who organize this stuff through social media and say, you know, don't
00:21:32.860
don't, you know, don't advertise on Tucker Carlson show.
00:21:35.640
But New York Times now is basically mainstreaming this concept where, you know, we've seen this
00:21:42.540
and you talk about it, Holmes, a lot, but like how casually we call people racist in
00:21:49.280
And so the New York Times, you know, like you were saying, it's basically just like mainstreaming
00:21:56.400
That always existed a little bit, Megan, like in the background and people will call for
00:22:01.020
But, you know, rarely would you have a publication like this willing to go this far.
00:22:08.780
So I was their target for years and still I still am one.
00:22:11.640
But when I was at Fox and they had nothing else to cover because conservative digital
00:22:16.920
It wasn't it hadn't exploded in the way it has.
00:22:20.640
They love to cover me and they loved to just distort what I had actually said into something
00:22:27.440
And back then I was a young anchor and it bothered me.
00:22:30.280
I was like, this is so this is so false and this is so dishonest.
00:22:33.720
And like that I understood it was a partisan group and I didn't need to worry about them
00:22:37.060
at all. But when I left NBC and all these left wing publications were writing up, you
00:22:45.840
know, my alleged history of racism, what they did was they took a media matters like cheat
00:22:53.220
sheet and they put it in the pages of major newspapers and nightly newscasts without any
00:23:03.340
However, there was one that they pull out sometimes.
00:23:06.940
There's so many that they that they misrepresented.
00:23:09.340
But there was one about this young black girl at a pool party outside and she had a tussle
00:23:13.780
with police like they they wound up like putting cuffs on her, getting rough with her.
00:23:20.040
Well, she was no angel prior to this because I'd been watching the whole thing live on my
00:23:24.860
And she had repeatedly disregarded the orders of the cops like they had been telling her
00:23:29.660
She had been complying over and over and over and over, whereas a lot of other people had
00:23:32.860
been complying with police orders and they didn't get no tussle with cops.
00:23:36.280
Well, it was like, you know, blaming the victim or something.
00:23:43.940
I guess the implication is people run with that.
00:23:46.700
They wrote it like as an example of like this is.
00:23:48.780
So so I, of course, I'm in a position of like, I'm very skeptical whenever they throw
00:23:53.220
this label on anybody because I know how they weaponize race.
00:23:57.160
They weaponize it to try to discredit you if you're saying something that goes against
00:24:04.680
And that's still the model, the media matters cheat sheet model.
00:24:08.060
I mean, if you go back and you read that that story on the Libs of TikTok in The Washington
00:24:12.620
Post, oh, yeah, it's basically a rubric written by the by media matters.
00:24:24.480
I mean, journalism is basically dead at this point in the country.
00:24:29.760
There's there's no one, no journalists out there trying to hold power to account.
00:24:34.120
They're all friends with the White House press corps.
00:24:35.820
They're all, you know, on the same team, essentially.
00:24:38.540
Yeah, they're outsourcing their job to a liberal.
00:24:47.340
This past weekend, you had a person from media matters tweeting about how we need President
00:24:54.120
Biden needs to forgive all student loan debt, saying that they are being crushed under the
00:25:00.200
And then someone pulled up because media matters is a nonprofit group.
00:25:04.160
Someone pulled up her income and media matters pays her one hundred and eighty thousand a
00:25:10.320
They're like, why are taxpayers paying for my education?
00:25:21.520
I was talking to there's a gal who comes and does my hair a couple of days a week because
00:25:26.040
I can't make it look like this on my own voice.
00:25:33.120
We were talking about, you know, what Biden's saying now about student debt.
00:25:36.060
And basically, I'm saying I'm looking at this woman who works so hard and I'm saying what
00:25:41.660
they want is for you to pay off the student loans of people who are now potentially doctors
00:25:47.600
and lawyers and any individual, so long as they're making less than one hundred fifty
00:25:52.400
thousand dollars a year or couples, so long as they're making less than three hundred thousand
00:25:57.760
Those are the modifications he's considering imposing, limiting the payback or the forgiveness
00:26:04.480
to couples who make over or under three hundred thousand dollars a year combined.
00:26:13.080
Like how on earth this is a reverse Robin Hood, right, where we take from the working class
00:26:19.940
And the only limiting things he's considering are that one hundred and fifty thousand or three
00:26:25.260
And maybe not even certainly, maybe if you went to law school or med school, you won't
00:26:30.900
be a candidate to have your debt forgiven, forgiven, which basically means transferred
00:26:38.000
So what's very interesting when you look at this is they're trying to make it an argument
00:26:42.980
saying that we're we're helping lower income people here, right?
00:26:46.660
They say that these are people who are suffering under under this debt.
00:26:50.780
But the people who are affected by this are inherently college educated individuals.
00:26:56.520
These are people who are already statistically going to be in a higher income bracket.
00:27:00.620
This is not helping lower income bracket individuals who didn't attend college and don't have the
00:27:05.840
But those are the individuals that are going to be paying for it.
00:27:10.500
And the people who are likely to benefit are more likely to be white, obviously more likely
00:27:14.740
to be higher educated and more likely to be higher income than your base population
00:27:23.540
Well, I mean, the thing the thing that really offends me about this whole policy isn't isn't
00:27:34.340
Yeah, they were 18 years old, you know, so there's a little bit of sympathy I have for
00:27:39.180
What I don't understand is how you could propose this huge program to basically bail out the
00:27:48.780
We're not going to reform universities or tenure or or the not going to bend the cost
00:27:56.320
We're just going to bail out universities that are robbing this next generation of income.
00:28:03.900
Yeah, why am I not seizing the endowment to pay for this?
00:28:07.720
So you guys, you're the perfect person to ask this of, right?
00:28:10.700
So you are your D.C. insiders, your swamp creatures.
00:28:17.140
So is this all about improving his numbers with young voters, which are cratering by 20
00:28:22.640
Because I look at this, the Gallup just did a poll and no one gives a shit about this.
00:28:27.880
So I'm like, who is he trying to curry favor with?
00:28:32.840
There was an article in National Review on this.
00:28:34.740
They ask people frequently what they believe is the most important problem facing the country
00:28:38.700
According to the Gallup analyst, Justin McCarthy, the pollster is, quote, unable to report the
00:28:43.400
percentage of Americans who have mentioned student debt or student debt cancellation.
00:28:46.600
Because it hasn't garnered enough mention to do so.
00:28:52.220
Gallup has conducted four polls on the question.
00:28:54.420
And just one person said this is the most important facing problem facing the nation.
00:29:02.880
Like no one's it doesn't matter enough for them to even respond to Gallup.
00:29:06.980
So it is about politics, but it's even worse than you think.
00:29:12.460
It's not that students are somehow totally in favor.
00:29:15.900
Younger Americans are totally in favor of this.
00:29:18.300
It's actually been a cottage industry that's been stood up on the left and paid for by billionaire
00:29:24.080
leftists that, you know, employ all these make work, fail sons to push paper to try to convince
00:29:30.560
people that this is the next progressive hill to climb.
00:29:33.540
It's all in the name of basically creating government run everything.
00:29:37.060
But this piece of it, they've tried to make clear that it is somehow a civil rights issue,
00:29:41.760
that somehow Hispanic caucus and the in the black caucus and everything is is important to them.
00:29:48.400
When in reality is you just ticked off in the stats.
00:29:52.600
So, yes, it's about politics, but it's actually not even about electoral politics.
00:29:55.980
It's about everything that has driven this administration since day one, which is this
00:30:00.720
constituency, this narrow, progressive constituency that he is entirely responsive towards during
00:30:09.020
So, plus, it's like we were talking to Peter Schiff, economist, about this last week.
00:30:13.680
So if he doesn't pay for this, this forgiveness of debt, you can't make debt go away like it's
00:30:19.520
being transferred from some somebody to somebody else.
00:30:21.880
So it's either other taxpayers are going to have to foot the bill.
00:30:25.900
So, you know, I've got to pay for somebody's college education, even though I already paid
00:30:29.320
for my own, even though, you know, I was responsible with my loans and I paid them back,
00:30:33.480
even though it wasn't that easy and it isn't for most people, but they do the right thing
00:30:37.120
and they pay them back or there's a whole group of other people who didn't go to college
00:30:39.840
at all because they knew that they couldn't afford this and they didn't want to be saddled
00:30:44.120
Well, now they're going to get saddled with other people's debt who can't pay their bills
00:30:49.160
People who went to med school, maybe people who went to professional school, people who
00:30:53.220
make one hundred and forty nine thousand dollars a year.
00:30:56.200
But he was saying, or they just print more money from the the Treasury.
00:31:00.640
Like if they don't want to raise the taxes, they go back to their favorite trick, which
00:31:03.480
is print more cash, which is inflationary at a time we already have eight and a half
00:31:09.880
So either way, you know, it's like what's the Saturday Night Fever?
00:31:30.360
But, you know, I mean, what it boils down to it is, I mean, you mentioned all the people
00:31:38.140
They're making great money, but they took a loan to go to a trade school that they could
00:31:43.040
I mean, ultimately, we're talking about here are people who made an investment in themselves
00:31:48.080
that was so poor that they couldn't pay it back.
00:31:51.840
If you ultimately make that kind of investment decision where you are deciding to go entirely
00:31:58.800
in the red for something that you know will never be able to pay back some art history
00:32:04.000
If you can't make that investment, why the hell should I?
00:32:09.860
But is there a more fulsome understanding of the government itself?
00:32:13.500
It is just basically there to protect every bad decision that any American could ever make
00:32:19.540
in any facet of life, including now your education.
00:32:23.760
That is such a fascinating way of looking at it.
00:32:26.240
See, this is why we like your connection to the swamp.
00:32:28.380
This is why we need advocates who are swampy, not not necessarily swamp creatures, but swampy.
00:32:38.880
Stand by because there's so much more to go over, including more from the woman who
00:32:46.760
She's now going to be in charge of whether you've said the wrong thing or thought the
00:32:54.320
Nina Jankiewicz is a name that we're going to have to become familiar with if we're not
00:33:04.600
She's going to be our new leader, our new unelected disinformation czar.
00:33:08.700
She's going to be running the Department of Homeland Security's disinformation board,
00:33:18.440
And the Mayorkas, DHS Secretary Mayorkas, was asked about her and what this board is going
00:33:25.380
to do by Dana Bash, I think, on CNN this past weekend.
00:33:29.980
Take a listen to how he described what the board is going to do.
00:33:34.460
You tell me if you feel reassured what the board is going to do.
00:33:38.180
But it's still not clear to me how this governance board will act.
00:33:43.220
So what it does is it works to ensure that the way in which we address threats, the connectivity
00:33:52.020
between threats and acts of violence are addressed without infringing on free speech, protecting
00:33:59.960
civil rights and civil liberties, the right of privacy.
00:34:03.800
And the board, this working group, internal working group, will draw from best practices
00:34:10.060
and communicate those best practices to the operators, because the board does not have
00:34:25.180
What do you mean you don't know what best practices are?
00:34:30.780
I think I think Brett Baer also asked Mayorkas this question because he was really honing
00:34:37.660
in with a conservative audience about, well, this is just foreign threats, right?
00:34:42.660
What we're really monitoring here is Russia and Russia and, you know, all that.
00:34:47.460
And so Brett was basically like, OK, so the Steele dossier, is that misinformation?
00:34:51.280
And he's like, I'm not qualified to talk about that.
00:34:55.880
He dodged, too, when Dana asked him, would you be comfortable with the Trump administration
00:35:06.840
So he was asked about Nina Jankowicz, who we do need to be concerned about because she
00:35:14.940
She's he was she was she was asking him whether she's qualified and whether she's partisan and
00:35:25.880
Republicans are criticizing your decision, the administration's decision to choose
00:35:31.360
Nina Jankowicz to lead this disinformation board.
00:35:38.440
Eminently qualified, a renowned expert in the field of disinformation.
00:35:46.420
Because she's the one who dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop as just a Trump campaign drop.
00:35:50.660
I mean, I think she's an expert in disinformation as someone who's experienced.
00:35:56.920
That was that was the experience that Mayorkas was talking about.
00:36:08.040
I don't know if you saw the video of this lady.
00:36:14.420
If you wait, I'll play it and then I'll give you the floor.
00:36:19.520
We showed you the one where she was singing the weird song about disinformation.
00:36:25.720
She's like a theater major, which is reason enough for concern.
00:36:29.300
We're looking for some prefects in the bathroom one day.
00:36:43.020
And I'd like to solve the mystery between his legs.
00:36:53.620
We know that ghosts have working that old means.
00:37:36.100
But she reminded me of, you know, those kids like Saturday morning shows that are not cartoons.
00:37:43.240
Where they have this like super overly enthusiastic.
00:37:48.560
That's trying to like pretend like they're a child.
00:37:50.780
And like you can't figure out whether it's a children's show or you're having a fever dream.
00:37:55.040
Like that's basically what I thought of the first time I saw this lady.
00:38:03.980
I feel like this woman just wants to be a star.
00:38:09.520
Does everyone like who works at the White House, who like Jen Psaki, she wants her own TV show.
00:38:19.700
She just found some weird back way to develop some alleged expertise in an area no one cares about.
00:38:24.720
And she, you know, the blind squirrel found the nut because it just happens to be the favorite thing in the Democratic Party right now.
00:38:35.560
We're laughing about this, but it should be terrifying if you really think about it.
00:38:39.140
You know, somebody who's like this, who craves attention this much and is this much of a nerd who thinks they know what misinformation and disinformation and information is, is like that's somebody who could be a tyrant.
00:38:50.720
Right. Like you look at what Anthony Fauci did with covid over the last two years.
00:38:55.200
And I'm very concerned that she will be the Fauci of information on the Internet.
00:39:00.560
And she's going to go before Congress and people are going to discuss, you know, what is allowed to be said and what's not allowed to be said.
00:39:10.220
Let alone defining that when when when America is like we should be you know, we should feel calm and good that this person is going to set best practices for what's considered acceptable to say.
00:39:21.220
I mean, that's stunning that he would think that's a good idea.
00:39:23.220
This person clearly, you know, should not be trusted with anything, let alone, you know, the American people's First Amendment.
00:39:29.120
Let me have a totally competitive take on this for a second, Megan.
00:39:33.420
I actually if Republicans get the House and Senate back, I want that I don't want this woman to go anywhere.
00:39:38.360
I want I want her to be exactly where she is, because can you imagine the entertainment value of this woman sitting in a panel in front of like Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton and the rest of them just giving her.
00:39:49.920
I mean, it would be the most pay-per-view hearing in history.
00:39:55.820
I want to I want to sit with her and just say, OK, I'll get I'll give you a couple.
00:39:58.760
OK, one hundred thousand kids are in the hospital or ICU or on ventilators because of covid right now.
00:40:12.000
It could be really fun because I guarantee you this woman has no clue what's real and what's not when it comes to the most dicey debates, because she only listens to her one side.
00:40:21.460
And they didn't report that Sotomayor was wrong in the places that she listens to.
00:40:26.680
But here's some of sort of the this is like part of the problem.
00:40:50.260
Remember, he was from the Baltimore Sun, I think he used to write for.
00:40:52.940
This guy used to be somewhat not totally normal, but somewhat like reasonable to listen to as a media critic.
00:41:00.620
He wants it like this is why I was sort of going to the surf place.
00:41:04.300
Like there are some in the masses who are like, yes, lead us, mistress, lead us away from the dangerous misinformation.
00:41:25.220
We don't have people in Congress who can make regulations that can make it work.
00:41:29.920
I think we can look to the Western countries in Europe for how they are trying to limit it.
00:41:38.840
You cannot let these guys control discourse in this country or we are headed to hell.
00:41:51.380
I mean, first of all, imagine just a scenario where you show up and you're like, you know
00:41:55.320
The one thing that we have to do to ensure the Bill of Rights is let's just try to replicate
00:42:07.000
But it's also this underlying thing that you see play out of the White House Correspondents
00:42:10.780
Dinner and everything else, which is modern liberalism.
00:42:18.520
It's not about any sort of faith in anything other than institutions to tell us what to
00:42:36.560
And what his thought is, is what's real and what's not real.
00:42:39.100
That's always that's always the turn with these people.
00:42:41.540
And that's why they always become tyrants is because when they say stuff like, oh, well,
00:42:51.860
So let's talk politics in a few minutes we have left.
00:42:54.700
Primaries are coming up in several states for folks who would like to become U.S.
00:43:01.700
I've got to play this because I got to get your reaction.
00:43:03.260
And so Trump, there was a big fight amongst the Republicans out in Ohio to try to get
00:43:08.940
And they all all these GOPers wanted Trump to bless them.
00:43:11.940
And in the end, he gave his endorsement to J.D.
00:43:15.500
And now there are cutthroat advertisements being run by the other guys against Trump's endorsement
00:43:26.240
But Josh Mandel is right behind him in the polls.
00:43:32.000
And Trump seemed to be a little confused about who he actually wound up endorsing when he
00:43:36.220
spoke at a rally in a neighboring state or another state over the weekend.
00:44:00.720
I think he'll do well for the people in the aisle.
00:44:07.540
Maybe he's just maybe maybe he's just hedging his bet, you know, whoever comes out on top.
00:44:13.680
He can be like, well, I said there I said both their names.
00:44:20.460
I mean, honestly, Ohio, Megan, for people who follow this stuff closely, this has been
00:44:24.440
the best soap opera in politics I've ever seen.
00:44:26.360
It couldn't end any other way than that clip, right?
00:44:33.000
I mean, mercifully, it's done on Tuesday because I don't know if there's going to be anybody
00:44:37.800
There was almost an open brawl on the debate stage between these candidates out there.
00:44:49.980
Like each candidate, you have to bring a 10 mil spend minimum.
00:44:53.120
It's unreal, unreal how that primary has gone down.
00:44:58.000
Do you think J.D. Vance is going to pull that out?
00:45:01.120
Because it's like Vance is at 26 percent, Mandel's at 24 percent, and then Matt Dolan's
00:45:06.620
National Review likes Matt Dolan because he's like, he wants to move beyond Trump.
00:45:11.800
But, you know, they're sort of the more sophisticated, like distinguished Republicans.
00:45:15.100
They're like, anyway, but I wonder what's going to happen.
00:45:26.280
And of course, the way the media is going to write about it is this is all a test of
00:45:30.340
If Trump's endorsed candidate doesn't win, he's a loser.
00:45:33.980
It's like without accounting for the dynamics on the ground and so on and so forth.
00:45:38.420
I mean, they pick and choose on where they want to enforce that.
00:45:41.040
I mean, look, Trump still Trump still has a huge hold on a segment of the primary electorate.
00:45:47.680
And it's evidenced by J.D. Vance basically surging six, seven, eight points in recent
00:45:54.600
Josh Mandel has been in that one or two slot now for nine months, maybe a year.
00:46:01.360
But then every other candidate in this race, as we said, it's like 10 million dollars table
00:46:07.960
Whether it's James Timken or Gibbons or now Dolan.
00:46:12.220
And so, look, I mean, it's polls show this Dolan guy is starting to surge at the end.
00:46:18.320
I think it's J.D. Vance's race to lose because of the timing of the endorsement, the timing
00:46:25.720
But I mean, you wouldn't be surprised if it got razor thin here at the end.
00:46:41.420
Well, hopefully we I mean, obviously, we don't have too much longer to wait because we are
00:46:45.320
going to get some results soon, at least in these primaries.
00:46:48.100
Herschel Walker looking good for the as a Senate candidate on the GOP side in Georgia.
00:46:57.000
McCormick and Oz have basically made that a two man race here for the last three months
00:47:07.480
By all accounts, it's within the margin of error at this point.
00:47:13.460
You've got to you've got to think that the Trump endorsement probably propels Oz to an advantage.
00:47:19.740
But I'm not ready to to rule McCormick out at all.
00:47:25.260
They've really done a lot of damage to the image of Oz statewide in Pennsylvania.
00:47:29.960
But I think ultimately, from a Republican standpoint, either of those two candidates are going to be
00:47:33.820
incredible general election candidates, particularly when matched up against this Fetterman.
00:47:41.380
Like the stories that are coming out about Fetterman.
00:47:45.420
That has to be our tease until until the next time, because we're up against a break.
00:47:57.660
We are taking an in-depth look at the trial captivating the nation right now.
00:48:06.100
Every time you tune back in, somebody said something equally outrageous to the day before,
00:48:10.840
and you didn't think that they could do it, but they found a way and everyone's got an
00:48:18.220
People came from all over to get a look at Johnny Depp.
00:48:21.440
I mean, this country is still obsessed with celebrity this week.
00:48:24.540
It's Amber Heard's turn to me now to discuss what has happened and how this case is likely
00:48:29.260
to go to very experienced lawyers who've been closely following the trial.
00:48:33.820
Vinnie Politan is a lawyer, former prosecutor and the lead anchor of Court TV.
00:48:38.400
He's covered some of the nation's most captivating and critical trials, including Scott Peterson,
00:48:42.960
Michael Jackson, Casey Anthony, Jody Arias and George Zimmerman.
00:48:50.360
I just mentioned he's a lawyer from Scott Peterson, from Michael Jackson.
00:48:55.300
He's now the managing partner of Garagos and Garagos, and he co-hosts his own podcast
00:48:58.960
called Reasonable Doubt with our pal Adam Carolla.
00:49:04.340
And Vinnie, I've been enjoying your podcast on Court TV covering this case, too.
00:49:09.500
And the young female reporter, forgive me, I can't remember her name, but she does a good
00:49:17.360
And she's been doing a good job covering that, too.
00:49:22.880
And then you guys can tell me whether I'm right or wrong.
00:49:24.940
But my take is thus far, it's only been his case.
00:49:30.220
He's suing her for for defamation, for suggesting in The Washington Post that he abused her.
00:49:35.000
And it's going well for him so far in that he's gotten a lot of evidence in that she allegedly
00:49:43.640
And that might cast doubt on her previous allegations that she suffered abuse at his hand.
00:49:54.500
He's already got hundreds of millions of dollars.
00:49:58.580
It's about squaring things up PR wise so that the public understands he wants them to think
00:50:06.060
he was the victim at a minimum that they were both tumultuous and it was ugly and bad.
00:50:15.680
And they've already been through this once before in England.
00:50:19.340
And they actually had a lot of these same witnesses and she won.
00:50:25.520
And they so they already this dance was danced before and it was a judge, not a jury.
00:50:32.500
And the judge rejected all these arguments that the press here has been spending so much
00:50:40.040
So right now I feel like he's winning PR wise and it'll remain a win because he's got enough
00:50:50.420
Well, first of all, I think and I can't find it.
00:50:54.560
I haven't seen the jury composition because one of the things I've noticed about this
00:50:59.160
so far is that it breaks almost completely down gender lines, meaning team team depth
00:51:07.180
is our females and they're the toughest on other females.
00:51:11.880
And it supports everything that I've ever known anecdotally about jury selection.
00:51:17.760
I want to know who's on that jury, because I will tell you he's got he's got the leg
00:51:22.820
up if he's got a some drivey females who are going to drive this thing.
00:51:28.020
Number one, number two, remember, and you bring it up, Megan, and people generally forget
00:51:33.920
We've seen this show before, and he lost in spectacular fashion, and this isn't about
00:51:41.140
Clearly, he doesn't need it or the amount of money that was stolen from him allegedly prior
00:51:55.240
If he had come to me, I would have tried to talk him out of this.
00:51:59.780
I understand that, you know, a lot of times this is precisely why I avoid family law like
00:52:07.660
the plague, because this is way too similar to a divorce case for my liking.
00:52:13.520
Because the way it came up in England, Vinny, was he sued a newspaper over there that had
00:52:23.080
And in England, the court found, no, there's plenty of evidence that would sustain that
00:52:30.580
And that defamation claim is not going to fly here.
00:52:33.860
And now he's got her in an American courtroom, kind of retrying similar allegations.
00:52:55.000
What does the UK not have that the United States of America does have?
00:53:03.900
So the public is actually hearing and seeing all the evidence in the case.
00:53:11.600
We heard, you know, secondhand accounts filtered, filtered through journalists who see the world
00:53:26.620
So now it's directly from the witness stand to the public.
00:53:31.840
And to me, that is the huge difference in this case, number one.
00:53:35.680
Number two, let me get to what Mark was saying, which is another big, big important factor.
00:53:42.060
This jury, I walked into that courtroom and I looked at the jury and I was like,
00:53:47.780
It's like a bunch of young guys in their 20s and predominantly Asian young men in their 20s.
00:53:54.280
I don't know if that means anything, but you've got seven jurors who will decide this case.
00:54:07.600
Then you've got an older woman, a younger woman, and a woman with a mask.
00:54:14.860
You know, that's interesting, Vinny, because if I were going to handicap it,
00:54:18.360
and I were picking the jury here, I would want young men if I was representing Amber.
00:54:24.580
And I know it sounds trite, but I've seen it anecdotally.
00:54:29.880
The people who are identifying with Johnny Depp almost breaks exclusively or tilts heavily towards women.
00:54:42.040
And I have not seen that when it comes to young males.
00:54:48.620
And I talked to him and his friends, my own personal focus group.
00:54:53.940
And they're not buying anything Johnny Depp is selling.
00:55:01.020
So the judge in England, Judge Andrew Nichol, found the great majority of alleged assaults of misheard by Mr. Depp have been proven to the civil standard.
00:55:12.400
There's a multiplicity of emails, texts and messages and diary entries in the papers before me.
00:55:16.260
He goes on to say that they may not be independent evidence of the truth, but he believes she's been corroborated in her abuse allegations.
00:55:22.080
And he goes through all of her abuse allegations, which we haven't yet heard in this case.
00:55:28.160
So this is sort of a preview of what's coming this week.
00:55:31.260
There are 14 in all, a couple of which he did discount.
00:55:36.140
But she says there were, let's say, let's just go with the ones he found he believes were supported.
00:55:46.420
She joked about his tattoo that used to say Winona Ryder now says, why no, forever?
00:55:55.240
Then he cried, apologized, saying he sometimes turns into the monster.
00:56:05.960
He hit her, quote, so hard that blood from her lip ended up on the wall.
00:56:20.240
Four, private plane from Boston to L.A., May 2014.
00:56:23.220
After drinking heavily, he had thrown objects at her, slapped her in the face, kicked her in the back, causing her to fall over.
00:56:33.500
I could keep going through all 14, 12 of which the judge believed.
00:56:37.760
But this same judge, for what it's worth, guys, found, number one, her donation of the $7 million to charity is hardly the act that one would expect of a gold digger.
00:56:53.140
She didn't donate the $7 million she got in the divorce settlement.
00:56:56.380
So the judge was confused to be charitable on that.
00:57:00.100
And then the judge also did not believe the poop incident.
00:57:04.400
He did not believe that she had defecated or had a friend defecate in the marital bed.
00:57:10.320
But this week in court, and forgive me for playing a poop sot, the chauffeur testified that she admitted it.
00:57:20.700
Did you have any discussions with Ms. Hurd on the way to Coachella that evening?
00:57:27.340
We had a conversation pertaining to the surprise she left in the boss's bed prior to leaving the apartment.
00:57:34.220
And when you refer to the surprise in the boss's bed, what are you referring to?
00:57:40.440
And what did Ms. Hurd say about the defecation in Mr. Depp's bed?
00:57:50.740
So the judge, he wasn't all that up to speed over there in England.
00:57:55.880
I mean, to the point of that's a different trial than this one.
00:58:00.880
At least that's what Johnny Depp referred to it as.
00:58:06.280
You've got all these allegations by Amber Hurd, which are going to come up this week, but this jury is hearing them a little bit differently than the judge because of one of Johnny Depp's witnesses, which was the psychologist who interviewed and analyzed Amber Hurd for this jury and described her as borderline personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder.
00:58:28.160
So there's a little bit of a different filter that that jury has right now.
00:58:31.460
And I'm sure Amber Hurd will have her own experts, but the bottom line is they've heard that that testimony from that expert describing the mind of Amber Hurd.
00:58:40.020
So now when they hear these allegations from Amber Hurd on the witness stand, maybe they look at her a little differently than the judge did.
00:58:48.160
You raised this on your podcast, which I listen to.
00:58:50.940
And we said we stole this soundbite from you, hoping that you might raise that point because it was a good one.
00:58:56.660
This is the psychologist who examined Amber for 12 plus hours and has thoughts on Amber's issues.
00:59:05.260
You're having these fluctuating moods constantly.
00:59:07.860
And again, this hypersensitivity to being slighted or feeling offended, really driven by the fear that if you're offended or slighted, if the therapist comes in two minutes late or if somebody shows up to dinner two minutes late, that they might be abandoning you.
00:59:26.640
So if they're in the middle of the restaurant and they feel offended, they're going to start the fight.
00:59:31.440
People are going to see it or they might just start crying or break down, but they'll make a lot of accusations.
00:59:39.040
And that reactivity is when you're going to just you're going to see a lot of this escalation, the bizarre behavior.
00:59:48.620
Now, Mark, they tried to poke holes in that by saying, well, you know, you only interviewed her for 12 hours and you came to this case by having dinner with Johnny Depp and his lawyers and a bunch of drinks.
00:59:56.820
And only when they talk to you over the booze did they decide she'll do.
01:00:02.900
You're like, well, would you believe that this woman, you know, right?
01:00:09.120
I'll tell you, every every time I've ever had a witness with psychiatric so-called qualifications, all you got to do is put somebody else up there who says the opposite.
01:00:20.560
And then the jury says a pox on both your houses.
01:00:23.860
I mean, this is that that to me is not going to be pivotal in the least.
01:00:30.720
Because right now they're like, she's a lunatic.
01:00:33.000
This woman's a lunatic, borderline person and histrionic personality disorder.
01:00:37.880
And it's if you if you might know somebody who has this thing and you might not know that's what it's called.
01:00:42.800
But it's somebody who tends to be hyper sexualized in lots of their conversations, trying to draw weird, inappropriate attention to themselves.
01:00:51.800
If they're not the center of attention, they get upset and they do weird things.
01:00:54.220
There was this one woman who I knew a long time ago who, like, if if the conversation was going on and she wasn't involved, she would just start like humming loudly.
01:01:01.820
She would do whatever she could to get the conversation back on her.
01:01:04.940
Always weird references to her sex life or her body or whatever.
01:01:11.200
I was going to say, Megan, you may have a sequel on your hands.
01:01:27.480
So I don't need my own defamation case against me.
01:01:32.720
Johnny Depp gets up there and he's introduced lots of evidence that he's the victim.
01:01:37.980
She claimed she was a victim falsely and ruined his career.
01:01:41.800
Here's a sampling of what he says was the physical abuse he faced.
01:01:47.160
It would commence with sort of demeaning name-calling, berated sort of to be made a fool of, and those
01:02:08.240
I would just go and lock myself in, you know, the bathroom or anywhere that she couldn't
01:02:17.640
If I stayed to argue that, eventually I was sure that it was going to escalate into violence.
01:02:33.260
It could begin with, you know, throwing a TV remote at my head.
01:02:37.760
It could be throwing a glass of wine in my face.
01:02:53.640
And I was completely taken aback by such a corrosive, horrific move.
01:03:16.940
The next move was just a bang, and just she clocked me in the jaw.
01:03:22.840
She walked up to me and reached and grabbed the bottle of vodka and then just kind of stood
01:03:35.540
And then I looked down and realized that the tip of my finger had been severed.
01:03:47.740
And what did you say in response when Miss Hurd said, tell the world, Johnny, tell them, Johnny Depp,
01:03:53.740
I, Johnny Depp, a man, I'm a victim to of domestic violence?
01:04:05.960
Look, I, I just don't, I don't understand, uh, frankly, the, the plaintiff's case.
01:04:14.180
I mean, people have to understand he brought this case and the, to my mind, the collateral
01:04:20.700
damage to him is worse than anything that ever was suggested.
01:04:26.000
And mind you, I don't even think he was named in the Washington Post editorial.
01:04:29.540
Um, by, but it was clear, it was clear, I suppose, but they, if you stop somebody on
01:04:35.480
the street and you ask them today, do you remember that editorial?
01:04:39.060
Or do you remember the, the argument over whether or not the tip of his finger was cut?
01:04:44.160
I'm going to suggest, or that somebody, um, defecated in his bed.
01:04:51.780
And now I will, I will, uh, give Vinny kudos here.
01:04:56.320
Now that I know who the jurors are in this case, I really don't understand what the point
01:05:04.680
Like if, if all I can remember about this case is that his, he lost his finger and there
01:05:12.880
I think that that is, we're taking kind of a, a snapshot right now.
01:05:18.080
I think she may, we'll see a quit herself well on the stand.
01:05:23.080
I see, you know, it's about to get worse for him for sure.
01:05:25.340
But yeah, it's, I mean, cause that's the thing, Vinny is like so far it's just been
01:05:34.800
And by the way, I'm, I'm telling you again, I see this going down gender lines.
01:05:41.940
I'll say this about her testimony though, Megan, you know, and it's six years later, but she
01:05:46.140
was deposed and I've seen the video of her deposition.
01:05:51.240
So, um, it's six years later, she's, she's a more mature woman.
01:05:55.440
She's been through it a couple of times already.
01:05:59.200
Um, but she did not come across well in her deposition.
01:06:10.780
She was bizarre that she was the, she was getting crossed by the lawyers and, and it was
01:06:15.960
getting uncomfortable and she kept shoving, was it mints?
01:06:23.660
Like every, every tough question, she'd shove her mouth full of mints or gum.
01:06:27.960
And then she'd like need a minute before she could answer.
01:06:31.320
Cause she was chewing whatever was in her mouth.
01:06:33.480
I mean, it was such an obvious delaying, like stalling mechanism.
01:06:43.220
But the one time she admits she had, I mean, he says he got hit many times.
01:06:46.500
She admits hitting him one time when she says he was allegedly threatening to throw her
01:06:50.420
sister down the stairs and just her overly dramatic, absolutely to save the life of my
01:06:57.800
Every time I will hit somebody, it was, you would think as a professional actor, she'd
01:07:06.240
Let's let's let the audience hear it for themselves.
01:07:10.560
He was about to push my sister down the stairs.
01:07:17.360
When he laid hands on her, I don't know what I did.
01:07:21.720
But I know I jumped in between the actions that I saw could lead to a fatal injury to my
01:07:28.700
She was standing on the top of a flight of the stairs and she has never hurt anyone in
01:07:32.240
And she does not deserve to be pushed down the flight of the stairs.
01:07:37.120
And I would have done what anybody who has a child or sister would have done.
01:07:45.960
I saw her standing on top of a flight of the stairs and trying to interrupt a fight in
01:07:52.060
I don't know what part of my body I put in between me and him and her, but I would have
01:08:01.780
I would have done anything to prevent her from being pushed on a flight of stairs.
01:08:08.300
Well, there's a couple of things about her testimony is with her sister.
01:08:20.940
But there are allegations that there were some problems between the sisters and where her
01:08:25.580
sister Whitney may have been a victim of Amber.
01:08:27.980
At least those are some of the allegations that are floating around all this.
01:08:31.560
So expect to hear that on cross-examination as well.
01:08:34.660
So it's going to be a huge moment when she testifies, but I know it's six years later
01:08:41.140
and she looks like a different person in the courtroom than she did in that deposition.
01:08:45.280
And we'll see if she sounds like a different person, but something tells me you don't change
01:08:53.960
The other part of this lawsuit has always been why, why, why?
01:08:59.720
Um, I think it goes back to in 2016, they had a divorce settlement and then that's it,
01:09:07.140
Mark, you divorce someone, especially if you're a public figure like they are, you don't talk
01:09:14.520
And then two years later, she poked the bear, uh, with the ACLU for some reason and, and
01:09:20.680
put out this op-ed, which he felt was directed at him.
01:09:25.840
I think it's obvious, but maybe, maybe it's not obvious to the jury.
01:09:39.240
And it's almost like an episode of curb your enthusiasm where this is the spite lawsuit.
01:09:45.280
I look, I don't disagree with you in the least.
01:09:49.020
That's why somebody should have talked to him off the ledge on this in my humble opinion.
01:09:54.240
And by the way, uh, maybe, uh, Megan will want to get to this.
01:09:58.220
The ACLU is, uh, look, I've always thought, you know, for 40 years early in my career, I
01:10:07.740
I, you know, and even as recently as the last decade, this, uh, at least if you believe what's
01:10:15.440
I don't even understand this, a three and a half million dollar donation to help coauthor
01:10:23.560
And she, and they were allegedly behind the very first draft of, of course, because let's
01:10:34.460
Megan, you are proving my gender theory in spades on this thing.
01:10:41.860
I have not ruled out the possibility that Johnny Depp abused her.
01:10:46.800
The enchanting Johnny Depp versus moron Amber Heard, but.
01:10:53.080
At least he's been, he's able to string two sentences together today versus all the
01:10:56.960
tapes we've seen of him where the guys had so much drugs and so many, so much alcohol
01:11:03.500
And I said to my team, the moral here is do not marry Johnny Depp and do not marry Amber
01:11:11.060
Well, once constantly intoxicated and drugged up, do not do family law or anything related
01:11:16.480
But, but I, I want to challenge you, Mark, because I actually don't dis, I don't disagree
01:11:29.980
Um, she, like she was sort of, she, she orchestrated that press opportunity in front of the tabloid
01:11:35.500
reporters, the paparazzi when she came out, uh, after she filed for divorce.
01:11:39.660
So she made sure that the press was going her way, that she was this abuse victim and poor
01:11:46.740
If in fact, she abused him in the way that he now claims.
01:11:49.780
So at a minimum, he's changed the national conversation to he's an abuser.
01:11:54.520
By the way, he was like fired from the pirates of the Caribbean series.
01:11:57.500
Immediately, he's changed the narrative from that to they're both hot messes.
01:12:02.780
They were in a very messy, unfortunate, abusive relationship.
01:12:06.160
And she's not just this unsullied, poor, little, woe is me abuse victim.
01:12:12.380
That, as long as we're talking about a snapshot in the trial, what if he loses?
01:12:17.780
And by the way, at least in Hollywood, um, the, the scuttlebutt, if you will, is that
01:12:25.960
he was uninsurable prior to this for reasons that had nothing to do with her.
01:12:31.960
And that was the real reason that, uh, he wasn't working as much.
01:12:38.980
He's, he's like fired his entire legal team a couple of times.
01:12:41.360
He fired his like managers or agents, something like that.
01:12:43.360
He hasn't been able to maintain relationships, which is not unusual when you have somebody
01:12:47.200
By the way, when you go through, you know, one of the things they tell you, uh, the state
01:12:50.900
bars always, and ethics lawyers always tell you is shy away from a client who's on their
01:13:03.160
She's, I mean, like all the stories about her doing the drugs too.
01:13:06.100
She's, I don't know if she's as bad of a victim when it comes to, she's got a new
01:13:15.880
Well, sorry, but that's, it's really not the fault of the PR people.
01:13:20.740
They've just, the press is in there listening to the allegations about her bad behavior.
01:13:24.840
That's why I think it wasn't a bad move for him to just say, okay, I've behaved like a
01:13:29.800
shit, not as badly as she says I have, but she's problematic too.
01:13:33.660
And let, why don't, cause now already we're seeing something like 3 million signatures
01:13:36.520
to get her booted from the Aquaman sequel, which she was in.
01:13:40.400
Um, because you know, what's good for the goose, right?
01:13:43.020
Like if he has to go from pirates, she has to go from Aquaman and it's on.
01:13:48.960
And I think, you know, ultimately with this jury and, and, you know, the law obviously is on
01:13:53.400
her side, he's a public figure, first amendment, United States.
01:13:58.240
But ultimately I think there's a chance that the jury can look at this and say, wait, this
01:14:05.340
We've, we've seen, we've now learned what this relationship was like and what it was
01:14:11.020
And, and it just didn't seem fair that she should be the one that comes out as the victim.
01:14:16.020
Um, he comes down as the cliche wife beater and, you know, his life gets disrupted.
01:14:21.980
Um, I, I can see them not coming back for the 50 million, but how about the 7 million
01:14:25.680
from the divorce just as sending a message that this whole thing wasn't fair.
01:14:31.300
I, cause I've all along, I've been thinking no public figure can win a defamation case.
01:14:35.760
So it's like, he's not going to win a defamation case.
01:14:38.540
The, the, the bar for proving defamation, if your public figure is just so impossibly high.
01:14:45.060
And then he's got the fact that there has been testimony, even on his case that he did
01:14:51.580
So, you know, technically what she implied was true, but it wasn't the full story.
01:14:57.820
So that's been, that's sort of why I've been thinking he's not going to win.
01:15:01.440
Cause maybe, maybe he did abuse her, but it wasn't the full story, but I don't see a
01:15:11.700
It's like Amber Heard and her team are really focused on the, the emotional abuse, the verbal
01:15:17.880
abuse, whereas Johnny Depp and his team are focused really on the physical abuse and that
01:15:25.440
And again, we'll see what the jury does with that, but you can see where the two sides have
01:15:29.720
split in this case and the way they're questioning witnesses trying to define abuse for this jury.
01:15:36.580
Well, and the question is, what evidence does she have?
01:15:39.020
What evidence, like he's put in pictures of his, his face hurt right underneath his eye,
01:15:46.420
And what's her actual evidence is apart from her claims that he abused her.
01:15:53.800
They saw no injuries on her when they showed up the night he allegedly whipped his phone
01:16:06.000
Um, but she's got friends too, and she's got witnesses and they're on her witness list.
01:16:11.280
Um, that's, we're going to pick it up right after this quick break.
01:16:21.460
Um, first, before we play the, him assaulting the cabinets with the, with the wine and all that,
01:16:30.000
It's 27 where she, you can hear her saying, here's what I've got on my side.
01:16:36.000
By the way, my family, my friends, everyone around me saw all the bruises and broken,
01:16:42.940
broken blood vessel under my eye, the bruises on my head, the missing chunks of hair, the
01:16:47.700
split lip, the black eye, the swollen nose, all that because you're stronger.
01:16:52.380
It does not mean, it does not mean because they hurt me that I'm somehow more responsible.
01:16:58.660
It just means they hurt me because I yell in a fight.
01:17:03.500
It doesn't mean I'm more responsible or batter.
01:17:15.320
You are, you know, that former prosecutor in you.
01:17:21.400
Um, she's not going to, she's not leaving the trial for her Mensa meeting, but neither is
01:17:27.780
Then this is probably the most damning piece of tape that we've seen because his abuse,
01:17:32.440
his alleged abuse of her, of her is not on tape.
01:17:35.140
We have no tape either way, showing somebody hitting the other person, at least not that
01:17:42.100
This made the rounds on, um, on social media and so on a long time ago.
01:18:44.340
This is at your house in West Hollywood on Sweetser Avenue, correct?
01:18:55.220
And you would agree that you were violent in that clip, correct?
01:19:06.440
I don't know what it was with regard to completely at this point, since I don't know the date.
01:19:12.660
But being legally recorded by your chosen other is quite fitting with the rest of the photographs and tape recordings she made.
01:19:34.160
So, I thought what was most interesting is that she tried to hide it from me and then that she laughed and smiled at the end.
01:19:45.140
I thought that was the most interesting part myself.
01:19:48.120
But so, yes, I did assault a couple of cabins, but I did not touch Miss Hurd.
01:19:54.620
They're kind of eating it up inside the courtroom, from what I hear, Vinny.
01:20:00.960
Like, there's a group of women that loves Johnny Depp.
01:20:10.060
They love his little jokes about the cabinets and so on.
01:20:16.160
And there was a moment in the courtroom when I was there that I've never seen before.
01:20:30.060
He goes in the back behind the judge's bench is where the door is that he goes out.
01:20:34.840
And as he's going through the doorway, he just turns and just gives them a little wave like this.
01:20:47.780
That's the level of fandom that you have inside the courtroom and outside of the courthouse.
01:20:53.120
They wait for him to come out every day as well.
01:20:55.980
And there's, you know, in fact, the demographic is basically, I'd say, probably, like, 40 to 55 is the majority of them.
01:21:05.900
He definitely has younger fans from the Pirates movies as well.
01:21:09.360
And a few guys, like one or two, but, like, 50 to, like, 150 women every day that are there for Johnny Depp.
01:21:17.860
I mean, you've made a career out of representing celebrities in trouble.
01:21:20.600
And she's a star, but she's not the kind of star he is.
01:21:25.440
Well, that's why I say jury selection is everything in a case like this.
01:21:29.340
Because you want – you're looking for a constituency.
01:21:33.180
And as Vinny has described it, that's exactly what I would have expected his constituency is, maybe even a higher on the upper band of the age.
01:21:43.540
But that is – that's kind of where they are team Depp.
01:21:48.080
The problem is that if Vinny's description – and I have every reason to believe it's completely accurate – if it's younger males, that is not his demographic.
01:22:02.140
And, you know, you may have – I don't know, Vinny, did they ask on the questionnaire whether any of these people were fans or had seen the Pirates or anything of that nature?
01:22:12.340
And I would want to know those kinds of things.
01:22:14.900
Because you can be the most popular person in a courtroom with your fans.
01:22:21.320
But remember, there's only one audience or demographic that you're appealing to, and that's the jury.
01:22:26.340
Although I would say it would be interesting to me – I don't know, Vinny, did you observe with this judge?
01:22:32.840
How does the judge treat them, and what's her interplay with the various lawyers on each side?
01:22:41.480
You know, the type of judge that calls balls and strikes is decisive, does it quickly, doesn't blow anything out of proportion.
01:22:52.980
So if she has to bring people to the bench, she'll bring them to the bench.
01:22:56.480
But I didn't get the sense one way or the other that either side was the favorite of this judge.
01:23:02.100
I mean, it's the perfect judge for a case like this.
01:23:04.860
She does, however, she has a big concern about not turning this into a circus, has very specific rules about what happens in the courtroom.
01:23:14.640
And sometimes when that courtroom gallery reacts to Johnny Depp, she has to remind them once in a while.
01:23:22.260
It hasn't happened a lot, but it happened a couple times.
01:23:26.040
The one thing, though, that she didn't allow us to see was the jury selection process.
01:23:34.660
But the judge has been amazing because the state of Virginia, Court TV, we've never done a trial in the state of Virginia before.
01:23:43.120
Yeah, because they have some of the most restrictive rules of any of the states.
01:23:48.780
I was also wondering whether you think the lawyer for Amber Heard, who's been pilloried on the Internet, deserved or not deserved?
01:24:00.180
What happens is people, you know, the people take sides.
01:24:07.900
They take sides and then they can't separate it.
01:24:11.400
Like sometimes it's hard to separate Scott Peterson from Mark Garagos, although they're completely different people who have led different lives, completely different lives.
01:24:23.540
The thing is, we're in a world now that, you know, between TikTok and Instagram and Facebook and Twitter, there's so many places.
01:24:33.640
It's so overwhelming for Johnny Depp that I think that's why Amber Heard is concerned right now, why she hired a new PR team, because the fans of Johnny Depp are there's many more of them.
01:24:46.240
And right now we're in Johnny Depp's case and they're cutting those little pieces of video and sound over and over again.
01:24:53.220
I'll give you one example that I thought was a little unfair, directed at her lawyer, whose name I don't know, one of her lawyers.
01:25:00.960
He had asked the question of Depp and Depp had started to go on a narrative and then he objected.
01:25:07.380
And he didn't use the right evidentiary objection.
01:25:10.860
I mean, he should have moved to strike non-responsive.
01:25:13.700
But he was savaged on social media, objecting to his own question.
01:25:18.780
So, but he was basically what he was trying to articulate is objection, non-responsive.
01:25:26.080
But boy, that that evidentiary distinction was lost in the great abyss that is the Internet.
01:25:32.340
Back in the day, when you take somebody's deposition, you the rules of evidence, they don't really apply.
01:25:37.940
Like you can pretty much ask mostly what you want.
01:25:40.560
And the person's just supposed to say objection to form, object to the form of the question.
01:25:44.340
But pretty much you're allowed to ask what you want and get a bunch of information and whether it's admissible at trial is a different question for a leader.
01:25:51.220
But there was this old grizzled partner at Jones Day where I practiced law and he was great.
01:26:00.180
And he'd be taking a deposition and he'd say the other the other lawyer, instead of saying objective form, would say objection, hearsay, move to strike.
01:26:11.440
It's like, OK, you don't move to strike in a deposition.
01:26:13.920
Anyway, this old grizzled lawyer, Jones Day would go overruled, motion denied.
01:26:29.200
Back to let's go back to the legal matter, because I have two brilliant legal minds here that I want to probe.
01:26:34.180
Because if she if what she said in The Washington Post op-ed is true, I am an abuse victim.
01:26:41.820
And she clearly means at the hands of Johnny Depp.
01:26:47.380
If the jury gets to the place of believing you are also an abuser.
01:26:52.020
The question is whether that can amount legally to defamation, because there is something that's known as liable by omission, liable by omission.
01:27:04.580
Now, wait, while you ponder that, I'm going to play the soundbite of Laurel Anderson, who was their marriage counselor.
01:27:11.700
She's apparently been a counselor for 40 years.
01:27:14.440
They both came in when they were still married.
01:27:18.240
And she seemed to say they both abused each other.
01:27:25.320
He had been well-controlled, I think, for almost, I don't know, 20, 30 years.
01:27:38.500
But I thought he had been well-controlled for decades.
01:27:46.480
And they engaged in what I saw as mutual abuse.
01:27:51.820
Sometimes I'm not, I know she led on more than one occasion and started it to keep him with her because abandonment and having him leave was her worst nightmare.
01:28:06.200
Okay, so if the jury believes her, mutual abuse, can he win?
01:28:11.980
Because Amber Hurd's op-ed was misleading in that it certainly did not tell the whole story and created a false impression of the relationship.
01:28:22.420
Well, I think what you're going to see is in most civil cases, this is civil, you're fighting over other people's money.
01:28:30.040
What the judge will do is give a verdict form that will have questions.
01:28:35.900
And they'll go down the verdict form and the jury will have to answer the questions.
01:28:39.820
And there are certain points where if you answer yes or you answer no, that's it.
01:28:45.720
It stops their deliberations and the verdict is done.
01:28:50.160
So this is one of the reasons I was asking Vinny, and you anticipated it, about the judge, is the crucial aspect of this case.
01:29:00.800
You know, summation is great, but summation is basically just giving your arguments to the people you think are with you so that they're effective when they're in the jury room.
01:29:09.820
But clearly what's going to happen is the jurors are going to sit down and they're going to have to figure out, at certain points, the answers to those questions.
01:29:18.580
And one of the questions, Megan, you're spot on here, you may be, if you find that she was an abuser, but he was as well, blah, blah, blah.
01:29:29.940
Those could conceivably be in the final jury instructions that the jurors get.
01:29:37.480
I wonder, because typically, and it's been a while since I've looked at this, but typically when you have a liable by omission claim, it's because like the thing that you omitted would have completely changed the meaning of the thing that you said.
01:29:54.220
And so, like, this doesn't completely change the meaning, like she's, if the jury believes he abused her, then the statement is technically correct.
01:30:03.720
That she was also a shitty person doesn't necessarily, it's context that's interesting and may ethically change your view of both parties.
01:30:11.140
But I don't know that it's going to, it's going to make what she said defamatory in a way that's illegal, you know, that's unlawful, such that he could recover.
01:30:18.900
Anyway, from a legal perspective, I find that, I find that whole thing interesting.
01:30:23.840
The other thing is, Vinny, the, so far, all the cops, all the witnesses, they're saying they saw nothing on her.
01:30:29.320
Now, she's going to have friends who are going to come and say, I saw her bruises, I saw this, I saw, but those are her friends.
01:30:34.740
Now, the cops and sort of the independent witnesses are saying, I mean, I guess his household staff is more aligned with him, right?
01:30:41.320
Like the maid in the Bahamas and his security guards, he pays their salary.
01:30:45.680
But the cops who showed up on the day she, again, he allegedly whipped his phone as hard as possible at her face, said, I saw nothing.
01:30:54.260
So how does the jury figure out who to believe, her friends versus cops and so on?
01:31:02.480
We focused a lot on this on my show, the independent witnesses, witnesses who have, you know, no known bias going into all of this.
01:31:12.920
And if you've got the officers who are responding and you had two sets of responding officers don't see any injuries, and this was the incident, this was the incident that was the subject of her going to get a restraining order against Johnny Depp, right?
01:31:28.080
This was the incident with which she took the whole thing public, right?
01:31:33.260
As soon as she went down to the courthouse and filed all this stuff, this is when it became a public matter.
01:31:38.480
And if you had the responding officers didn't see anything, but days later there were marks on her face, then the question is, well, how did the marks get there?
01:31:53.040
Maybe someone with a borderline personality disorder might do that.
01:31:58.520
But that's going to be really crucial, I think, to all of this, is the independent witnesses, and then there has to be an explanation from the other side that is inconsistent with the independent witnesses.
01:32:12.420
And right now, that's Amber Heard has to come up with that explanation.
01:32:17.420
So we don't know what's going to happen, but we learned new information about the jury, which gives me some pause, too, Mark.
01:32:27.960
That's what's going to stick in my head when we get this verdict.
01:32:30.300
I love the spring break characterization of it.
01:32:48.940
Don't go away, because up next, we're going to talk about the death of Naomi Judd.
01:32:58.300
Some terribly sad news breaking over the weekend.
01:33:01.400
Country music legend Naomi Judd died just a day before her induction into the Country Music Hall of Fame.
01:33:07.940
Her heartbroken daughters say she died of mental illness.
01:33:14.020
A few years ago, I had her on my show at NBC, and we talked about her really tough struggle with depression.
01:33:22.980
I knew that all during my life, there were periods where I would get so sad, and everybody in the family, my neighbors and friends would say,
01:33:30.680
you're so empathic, you care so much about other people, you pick up their stuff, and I do.
01:33:37.860
And my psychologist, Ted Klont, said that I'm one of the most compassionate, empathic people that he's ever worked with.
01:33:45.680
But when I came home off the tour, I went into this deep, dark, absolutely terrifying hole, and I couldn't get out.
01:33:56.940
Oh, she was such a doll, and she was so open in her book about those struggles, which is a big risk for a public figure to talk that openly about their struggles.
01:34:07.060
And she's been studying whether there was a link, you know, whether it had a genetic link, and she believed strongly that it did.
01:34:12.960
But she was doing well then, you know, so I was so, so sad to hear that she died, and that she died by suicide, and that it was a battle, ultimately, she did not prevail in.
01:34:28.220
Of course, her daughter, and she, huge, huge stars.
01:34:31.460
They scored 14 number one songs, five Grammy Awards, and a career spanning nearly three decades.
01:34:36.140
And her other daughter, Ashley, is super famous in her own right as an actress, and as one of the people who helped bring down Harvey Weinstein, a truly bad actor.
01:34:45.100
Listen, I want to tell you that the suicide hotline is there for anyone struggling.
01:34:53.760
Tomorrow, we're doing our first live in-person interview when former Attorney General Bill Barr will join me.