Former Navy SEAL Robert O'Neill is here to react to the killing of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, and whether President Biden has some nerve talking about Afghanistan like it belongs on his list of accomplishments. Plus, we re going to get into the military s recruitment issues, and what Rob believes is behind the massive drop that we re seeing this year.
00:00:00.480Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations.
00:00:11.640Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show. Big show today with guests we love.
00:00:18.260Former Navy SEAL Robert O'Neill, the man who killed Osama bin Laden, is here to react to the killing of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.
00:00:26.420And whether President Biden has some nerve talking about Afghanistan like it belongs on his list of accomplishments.
00:00:33.820All right. Plus, we're going to get into the military's recruitment issues and what Rob believes is behind the massive drop that we are seeing this year.
00:00:43.540Just as we're backing a war in Ukraine, on the Ukrainian side, and our saber-rattling with China and behaving provocatively with respect.
00:00:53.100Is this a good time to have the military recruitment dropping?
00:00:56.420What are we doing about it? Drag shows and woke military and lectures about white rage?
00:01:01.980OK, we'll get into it. But first, we begin with Josh Rogan of The Washington Post.
00:01:06.500He covers foreign policy and national security.
00:01:09.140He was one of the very first. He might have actually been the first reporter to look into the lab leak theory involving China's Wuhan lab.
00:01:17.960This is at a time when he was looking at it right in the beginning when you were still called racist for doing that.
00:01:22.960It was being completely covered up by Fauci and Collins and by most of the media.
00:01:28.380But Josh saw something, continued to investigate and is one of the few mainstream reporters who you can really trust.
00:01:34.640He's not biased. He doesn't have an agenda.
00:01:36.620And he's been taking a hard look from the start on whether or not China has been covering up the real origin of this virus.
00:01:43.380Recently, our team noticed major news outlets touting two new studies claiming to bolster evidence that COVID emerged from the wild.
00:01:54.380It started in that Wuhan market. It wasn't from a lab.
00:01:59.420Really? Unlike the mainstream, we actually took a look at the research and who authored it and who funded it and what we found will infuriate you on a couple of different levels.
00:02:15.520Josh Rogan, welcome back to the show. How are you doing?
00:02:18.200I'm doing great, Megan. Thanks for having me on again.
00:02:20.240Okay, so we see two studies just out. Now they've been peer reviewed. They came out in February 1st and now they've been peer reviewed.
00:02:30.820So we're supposed to listen to them. And they suggest that COVID began in the Wuhan market and not in a lab.
00:02:39.220So I looked at this and I thought, okay, who studied? Who are the authors of these studies?
00:02:44.540One has 19 co-authors. One has 30 co-authors. And my my my eyes lit up when I saw it's all the same people who have been touting the Wuhan market theory as opposed to the lab leak theory all along, except for the very beginning of the pandemic.
00:03:06.220When many of these same scientists took a look at the virus and its genome sequence and all of that and said, holy shit, this looks like it came from a lab.
00:03:15.700This looks like it came from a man, like it was manmade. And then they had a conference call with Fauci and Collins, which was documented by the US Congress pursuant to emails that they get their hands on.
00:03:26.440And within 48 hours of that meeting back on February 1st, 2020, these scientists did a complete 180 and said, not only do we within 48 hours suddenly no longer believe in the lab leak theory, but it's racist, it's bigoted, it's wrong.
00:03:46.220And here they are saying the same bought and paid for manufactured nonsense. And the media, of course, without doing any investigation, just repeats it and touts it and sort of puts the finger in the thumb of the thumb in the eye of those who said, looks manmade, looks like it's probably from that Wuhan lab.
00:04:08.660Do I, do I, do I summarize the events correctly?
00:04:12.800Yeah. And what a damning recounting of events that you, I agree with every word you said, we're two and a half years into this pandemic and we still don't know how it began.
00:04:23.180And the reason, one of the main reasons we still don't know how it began is because all of the people who have that information, rather than spending all of their time and expertise and our money actually trying to figure it out, have spent it trying to obscure the origin.
00:04:39.060That's what they're doing here. They're using, abusing science to tell us something that they themselves know is not accurate, which is that they know how this started and, you know, take away the charts and the graphs and the, and the, and the data.
00:04:57.820And that motivation is an allegation that I'm making based on a mountain of evidence. And you pointed out some of it. They say different things to themselves in private than they do in public.
00:05:08.780Like they attack anyone, uh, as a conspiracy theorist who doesn't agree with their point of view. And, uh, they are constantly engaged in exaggerating the data and the science that they are so expert in using, uh, to project something onto society, which they is disingenuous, which is that there's a firm evidence that the, this thing emerged from the market, which we simply don't know. Okay.
00:05:32.700And then they go out into the press and mostly the science press, which is honestly is like a subset of the media, which is sort of the most captured source captured part of the media I've ever seen in my life because they launder this narrative, which is, Oh, we definitely know it came from the market.
00:05:49.920And if you look at the report itself, it says there's insufficient quote unquote, insufficient evidence. It's in the report that, that they know that where this came from at all. And more, more than that, the paper admits now after it got reviewed that they have no idea what happened before the market. In other words, they don't know.
00:06:08.720All they're saying is that it was a super spreader event, not the origin of that. We already knew that already.
00:06:13.120And yet here they are in, in major papers saying that, Oh yeah, this proves that the market theory is true. And the science journalists wrong with that. And it's, it's, it's, it's a pattern for two and a half years and it's, uh, egregious. And this is just the latest example of these people who have a conflict of interest, Megan. That's the, the other thing that I think you're pointing out here is if the lab leak theory is true, we don't know, but we should investigate it. Don't you think?
00:06:35.040Uh, if it's true, uh, all of these people have, uh, a lot to answer for and, uh, they don't want to answer for it. That's the bottom line all the way up from Francis Collins and Fauci to Anderson and all of these guys who have a clear conflict of interest cannot be seen as independent adjudicators of this issue because, uh, their careers depending on, depend on convincing us one, uh, theory and not the other.
00:06:58.760That's exactly right. Everything you just said is so smart and I want to pick up on, on a bunch of it. So first of all, about how,
00:07:05.040these so-called scientists who are just given the pen by science magazine, by nature magazine, just write whatever you want. They do consistently exaggerate what they actually know. And we'll get to the agenda. I mean, the reason they're exaggerating is knowable and we know it. They have an agenda at Fauci and Collins have an agenda. Collins no longer there, but had and have an agenda.
00:07:27.040And it's all the same. Uh, these guys want to do what Fauci tells them to do. And these studies were funded by Fauci. They were, they were funded by Fauci, by NAISD and by the national institutes of health. Okay. So that's sort of buried in the fine print, but first of all, that that's important. So they're, they constantly exaggerate. You said, okay, so here's what they did. They come out with these two studies in February. First of all, non peer reviewed and just pop them up in science magazine.
00:08:27.040CSEs who's done a lot of, he's done a lot of great COVID reporting. Sure. And he noticed the differences. So that's what they said. Dispositive evidence that it came from a market. Now they say, after it's been peer reviewed, while there's insufficient evidence to define upstream events, meaning they don't know what caused this, the exact circumstances remain obscure. Again,
00:08:50.040we don't know what caused it. Our analysis indicates that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 occurred via the live wildlife trade in China and show that the Hunan market was the epicenter, no longer unambiguous epicenter, but just epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. So what they, the peer reviewed version of the article basically just says, we have no freaking clue what happened before it infected a bunch of people at that market. But that market seems to have been the epicenter of the pandemic. That tells us nothing.
00:09:18.680Not only does it tell us nothing. The reason that it's funny, I mean, not haha funny, but like ironic funny is that they already got their first news story from the preprint. The New York Times did a front page article on the preprint, which made the false claims that didn't even survive the review. And again, from just from a journalism standpoint, you've got an un peer reviewed paper that's making a serious allegation. And you're just going to put it on the front page of the New York Times without any serious scrutiny and big flashy headline. Oh, it looks like the wet market did it. Oh, what are you going to do?
00:09:47.880And then here we are, what, four months later, and it's totally changed. Are they going to put another front page story on the New York Times to tell us that actually none of that was true at all, even by the papers on logic? No, all you see is like, oh, well, we're, you know, we're pretty sure it came from the market, which is, I mean, if you just step back for a second, Megan, because people can get lost in the mumbo jumbo.
00:10:07.640And, you know, I, I, I find that when I'm trying to explain this to people, it's really important to point them to the experts like Alina Chan at MIT. I mean, she just went to, she's just MIT, but anyway, give her, her, her scientific analysis a look.
00:10:20.380But the big picture here is that why are they going out of their way to push one or another? Is that what science is now? Is science about, I'm going to decide what happened before I do the research and then find every little bit of evidence that I can to support what I already think and ignore all of the evidence to the contrary?
00:10:39.780Because what's more important than the data points in this paper, which is like, oh, well, there was a raccoon dog at the market, maybe. And we also found COVID at the market and maybe COVID went through a raccoon dog, but we never found any raccoon dogs who had the, the, that's the logic, that's the argument.
00:10:56.320And then all of a sudden we definitely know what happened. I mean, it, it, it's an insult really to the intelligence of the American people and the readers and the viewers, because if you just think about it for two seconds, you realize, oh, wait, they're taking tiny bits of data that they're cherry picking and then trying to convince us of something that they must know is a super weak argument. Why are they doing, what's the, what's the scam there? And then the other thing is they're ignoring all the other evidence, which is that, you know, we don't know when the pandemic started.
00:11:25.680It may very well have started in September. Okay. So they've got an entire field of research or 30 scientists and NIH fund and all this stuff to get you a paper that assumes that it started in December when there's plenty of evidence that's not the case. You know, it may very well have started in September of 2019 or October when a lot of people got sick at the Wuhan military games.
00:11:49.040And, you know, if you just think about that one, it's like, you see the lie, you see the scam, the, the, the misdirect, the, the shell game. It's like, if we, if you believe every single piece of data we picked and ignore every piece of data that we decided to ignore, then maybe you could think that this is what happened.
00:12:06.080But the bottom line is that there's zero direct evidence that came from the market. Zero. Not one animal, not one raccoon dog, not one mink, not one. What was that? The other came up with the pangolin. Yeah. Where's that pangolin? Where's the magic pangolin? Where did, what happened to it? How did the virus get from the caves in Yunnan, a thousand miles away to this Wuhan market without spilling over on the way? How is it you didn't find like a string of pangolins and the people that they infected? And how come the, you know, virus happens to have a...
00:12:36.080Furing cleavage site that was being worked on by...
00:12:39.440Wait, wait, wait, stand by, because furing cleavage is important. Because I just want to add to what you're saying, because the second study, you know, that we're supposed to so revere, touted by the New York Times, concludes the most probable explanation for the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 into humans involves zoonotic jumps. Again, they're saying it came from an animal, from as yet undetermined intermediate host animals at the Hunan market. As yet undetermined. What they mean is we've never found the animal.
00:13:04.98080,000 plus animals have been examined. Not one had this virus. So they have to admit, as yet undetermined host animal, they haven't found it. And yet we have all this evidence on the other side, including this lab asking for permission, well, I mean, through EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak's group, for money to do exactly to a coronavirus, a back coronavirus, what was done, what appears to have been done to this COVID-19 situation where they inject the
00:13:34.980the furing cleavage site, which makes it more transmissible, potentially more dangerous. And I'll let you pick it up on a furing cleavage site.
00:13:42.300Right, right, right. I mean, you're bringing up a really crucial point, which is that the real motivation behind a lot of this sort of, you know, weak research pushed as conclusive evidence is that they want to tell people not to look into the other theory.
00:13:54.700Right. And, you know, that was easy for the first year of the pandemic because Donald Trump was president and he said it probably came from the lab.
00:14:00.820So all the people who wanted to stop you from thinking about that, all they had to say was, oh, that's a Donald Trump conspiracy theory.
00:14:07.480And most of the media was like, oh, we're not going to touch that thing. You know, we don't want to be pushing a Donald Trump conspiracy theory.
00:14:13.540But then something crazy happened, Megan, is a guy named Joe Biden said out loud on the record in a statement that the lab leak theory is one of the two possible theories and we should investigate them both.
00:14:25.620And then another crazy thing happened. The head of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros, who rejected his own WHO COVID origin studies because he didn't investigate the lab.
00:14:36.480And he said, we really need to investigate the lab. And why should we investigate the lab?
00:14:39.820And, you know, baked into all of these news stories about this weak research that cherry picks data on behalf of conflicted scientists who are trying to cover their tushies, baked into every one of those stories somehow is this idea that like, oh, well, this is settled now.
00:14:53.480We can forget about the lab. But the problem is it doesn't work anymore because, you know, there are now millions and millions of Americans who understand that that that that con game, that shell game, that, you know, let's say we believe everything in this paper, which I don't.
00:15:06.780We still need to look into the lab because it's another theory. And the people who are telling you not to look into the lab, like the Collins and Fauci's and Daszak's of the world, have retrenched to a new rhetorical position, which is like, oh, well, I guess it could have come from the lab, but we'll never figure it out because the Chinese government won't let us into the lab.
00:15:21.800And that's a retreat from their previous position, which is that you're a racist conspiracy theorist, if you even mention the lab.
00:15:28.060But it still serves this their same goal of saying that there's nothing we can do. So we might as well just accept what they say and go about our business.
00:15:35.100The problem with that, of course, look under the hood.
00:15:36.800And they don't want to look at the lab, but they really don't want us to look at their work with those labs and they don't want us to look at how American taxpayers funded the work that somehow, you know, was centered around the very similar research to the research at the Wuhan lab that somehow spilled out in the town where that lab was, not a thousand miles away where the bats were.
00:15:57.700And, yeah, I'm sure that market had a lot of people from Wuhan walking through it.
00:16:01.960It's natural that a market would be a super spread of a market, a lot of people in the market.
00:16:06.240But that has nothing to do with the fact that the unique characteristics of this virus suggest, according to people like Anderson, when they were talking privately but not publicly, that it might be connected to the lab in some way.
00:16:18.200He believed that, you know, so I think we need to check that out.
00:16:21.940And the problem is no one is checking that out because the Biden administration did a 90 day intelligence review and then concluded they couldn't figure it out and wash their hands of the matter.
00:16:31.660And the Democratic Congress doesn't want to touch it because they don't want to get in the way of their own base because progressives have concluded that this is now a political issue, which is not it's not a political issue.
00:16:41.740It's not a scientific million people are dead.
00:16:45.400Peter Daszak, the guy whose EcoHealth Alliance we were funding, Fauci kept throwing money at.
00:16:50.340That was our taxpayer money funding for this very dangerous research that we were not overseeing.
00:16:54.560He was one of the first to beg to have the lab leak theory publicly rejected and warned, quote, that that public release of the virus's genetic sequencing would bring, quote, very unwelcome attention.
00:17:10.640This is the guy doing the most dangerous research.
00:17:14.500And and to take a look at the players, all the all the same players now are authoring these two latest studies being touted by the media as like putting putting an end to the debate.
00:17:24.140All these players have been involved in this from the beginning, trying to back up what Fauci and Collins wanted them to say, which is it wasn't a lab leak.
00:17:33.460And one of them we've talked about this.
00:17:35.140I did a talking points memo on January 14th about this very thing and got into all the the details we learned from the leaked emails.
00:17:41.560So here's one of them, Christian Anderson, he's with Scripps Research, a professor, Robert Gary, two R's and Gary, Tulane professor.
00:17:50.560Both of them on these on these two papers and again, which were funded by Fauci and the NIH, they were involved earlier.
00:17:59.520And Anderson is quoted in the study as saying, I was quite convinced of the lab leak myself until we dove into this very carefully and looked at it much closer.
00:18:09.340Does he mean very carefully in 48 hours from that February 1st, 2020, 21st, 2020 conference call with Fauci and Collins?
00:18:19.120Because just to refresh the audience's memory about how we're being lied to, we're being lied to and the media is complicit in it.
00:18:27.100Just to refresh you, Feb 1, 2020, Fauci and Collins had a teleconference about origin with 11 top virologists.
00:18:35.440The next day, Christian Anderson's belief that this was a lab leak was communicated to these guys through a British scientist named Sir Jeremy Farrar.
00:18:46.540Same for Robert Gary, both of whom are authoring two of the authors on these latest studies.
00:18:51.800Fauci and Collins' preference that this, quote, very destructive conspiracy needed to be, quote, put down because it could do, quote, great potential harm to science and international harmony
00:19:04.320is on record. It's all over the emails, black and white. They're not contested.
00:19:09.340No one's claiming they're fake. Fauci called the lab leak theory a, quote, shiny object and assured colleagues that it would, quote, go away.
00:19:17.020All right. That's two days after Christian Anderson's belief in it being a lab leak theory was expressed as something between 60 and 80 percent.
00:19:25.960Two days after that initial teleconference, this guy, Robert Gary Anderson and others did a complete 180 writing an article for Nature saying it was clearly not from a lab, clearly not manmade.
00:19:39.940And now this guy's the nerve to say in the study. I was quite convinced it was a lab leak until we dove into it very carefully, looked at it much closer.
00:19:47.680You're a liar, Christian Anderson. You lied. And six months later, after they published that article in Nature magazine, after, you know, the 180,
00:19:56.840Anderson and Gary got an eight point nine million dollar grant from Fauci and Collins.
00:20:03.320And now they're at it again. Yeah, I mean, so what again, what a sort of damning, clear recitation of the events that prove the bias of these guys and prove also their likely intention to deceive us?
00:20:22.840Because, of course, he says that he changed his mind now when the emails came out now, when he's caught having said it, his explanation is I changed my mind.
00:20:31.780And don't you change your mind when people when the facts change? But he didn't tell us that that at the time.
00:20:37.000And that's where the deception is. He didn't reveal at the time that, oh, yeah, when I took a look at this virus, I thought it probably came from the lab.
00:20:44.060And then maybe I changed my mind later. No. So that two years was the crucial time when this narrative was set.
00:20:50.440And these guys were in charge of setting the narrative. Their early letters on this, again, with a million different Ph.D., you know,
00:20:57.920degrees and M.D. and papers and the best schools in the world, blah, blah, blah.
00:21:05.280Everyone bought it except for the Trump people. And people didn't like the Trump people.
00:21:09.580And that shaped the narrative that we're still dealing with. That's how the issue got politicized in the first place.
00:21:13.680The scientists politicized it on purpose, again, to cover their own asses.
00:21:18.380And so as far as I'm concerned, they've lost credibility. These scientists have lost credibility on this issue.
00:21:24.140Now, there are a lot of other scientists out there who belatedly, to be sure, because they're under a lot of pressure not to do this,
00:21:29.560have now started to look at the other side of the ledger.
00:21:32.660And when you that's why Peter Daszak got required to step down from the the COVID, the Lancet COVID origins investigation,
00:21:41.840because they finally realized he had a clear conflict of interest because there's a good chance it came from the lab.
00:21:46.760And then that entire study went away. Peter Daszak was on the WHO investigative team.
00:21:51.180He's investigating himself and his best friends in the Wuhan lab.
00:21:54.580That was amazing. 60 Minutes had a great piece on that.
00:21:56.940Who's investigating? Can you imagine if they were like, hey, OJ, we need to find out what happened to Nicole?
00:22:03.180And OJ was like, oh, don't worry, I'll figure it out. I know her. I knew her really well.
00:22:06.780Don't you want me to figure it out? You know, I knew Ron, too. Yeah, we were all good friends.
00:22:10.420I'll get to the bottom of this. That's what that's that's the mentality of putting Peter Daszak in charge of the COVID origins investigation,
00:22:16.560especially since we later found out a year later that he had proposed putting fur and cleavage sites on back coronaviruses in China.
00:22:25.700Sometimes he actually talked about doing that.
00:22:28.200And then here we have a back coronavirus with a fur and cleavage site breaking out in the city where his best friends are in the lab.
00:22:34.800But I mean, forget about Occam's razor. Common sense dictates that we should look into that lab and we should look into all.
00:22:41.560Now, you talked about that eight million dollar, eight point nine million dollar NIH contract, which is egregious.
00:22:47.140But what if I told you that USAID got a contract for one hundred twenty five million dollars, one hundred twenty five dollars they put out to restart the project of virus hunting in foreign countries?
00:22:56.860The same project that. Two hundred million dollars before it was called the predict program, which didn't predict the pandemic, which may have contributed to sparking the pandemic.
00:23:06.360So the NIH is only one part of it. You know, Fauci and friends are going back to the well.
00:23:12.340But also all of the the huge virus hunting industry, they're itching to get started again.
00:23:17.640OK, and the Biden administration, despite actually admitting that we don't know how it started and that they care about how it started and that they are trying to investigate how it started.
00:23:26.980Nevertheless, didn't blink an eye when USAID put out one hundred twenty five million dollars.
00:23:30.860Now, that's held up right now by a guy named Lindsey Graham, who's the appropriator in charge of that committee.
00:23:35.880Then you've got this investigation. You know, that's the other thing.
00:23:38.960They want this to go away. Well, I'm sorry, but we're not going to be able to let it go away because we have to figure out what happens so we can make sure that it doesn't happen again.
00:23:46.680And, you know, any disaster in the world, a plane crash, a nuclear meltdown, the obvious thing to do is to figure out what happened.
00:23:52.680Otherwise, how do you know what to do so that it doesn't happen again?
00:23:55.540And when Republicans take over the House, their investigation will be reinvigorated.
00:24:00.900And guys like Peter Daszak and Fauci, if he doesn't retire right ahead of this, which he might, are going to be called to the carpet.
00:24:08.920And they're going to and if they don't produce the documents, then they're going to face, you know, subpoenas and other pressure to do.
00:24:17.680Well, why don't we do criminal prosecutions if you can if you can prosecute Steve Bannon for not cooperating with Congress or why not Anthony Fauci?
00:24:25.600You know, it's like this is the precedent that the Democrats have set and they're going to have to live with it if and when the shoe is on their foot in terms of control.
00:24:32.180But well, it's interesting because, you know, there's a lot of sort of loose talk about, you know, criminal prosecutions of Fauci.
00:24:38.160I say, let's do the investigation. And here's the other thing.
00:24:41.060It's it's it's before we get to criminal prosecutions, why not let the FBI have a crack at the origin investigation?
00:24:46.340You know, when the intelligence community investigated for 90 days and then said case closed, we couldn't figure it out.
00:24:52.980There was one agency that had a moderate degree of confidence that the lab was connected to the outbreak.
00:24:58.680That was the FBI. OK. And because they're forensic investigators, they actually know how to do a forensic investigation.
00:25:04.160They don't care about, you know, Anderson's paper. They want to just figure out what happened.
00:25:07.880Something bad happened. So what about that?
00:25:10.320Let's go back to them. And I think you should have on your show, Senator Roger Marshall, who's written to the FBI to ask them what what why is it that they think it came from the lab?
00:25:18.460And why what happened with that investigation? So I think this is not over.
00:25:23.180And this is far from over, actually. And there's no statute of limitation on a million dead Americans back in no statute of limitation.
00:25:29.880Those cases never get closed. And there's the crime and then there's the cover up.
00:25:34.720And the cover up is what we're seeing right now when it's ongoing and it involves Americans and members of the U.S.
00:25:41.220government. And it needs to be exposed.
00:25:44.340And and, you know, we've talked about this, of course, but just in the news today, it's not, of course, just the deaths.
00:25:49.340It's the extreme disruption, not just economically, but to children and people's lives.
00:25:54.320And there's news today on how the the insanity continues here, Josh, you know, even with that.
00:26:00.300Obviously, there's still covid out there and some are reacting as though we're still in the midst of Delta or we're still in the midst of the original strain.
00:26:07.700And this is in the news as the D.C. public schools have now made the vaccine mandatory for 12 years old and up.
00:26:16.760They've made it mandatory. OK, 85 percent Washington Post reporting, 85 percent of all students between 12 and 15 have been vaccinated.
00:26:24.360But when you look at black children only, that number drops to 60 percent.
00:26:28.320So the Washington Post notes black kids who experienced disproportionately large academic setbacks during the pandemic could basically be banned from school in huge numbers next year in the name of safety and wellness.
00:26:42.740Even though these kids have virtually no risk from covid to begin with the the Washington, D.C.
00:26:50.060public schools are not alone. New Orleans in February added the covid vaccine to its list of mandatory required immunizations for kids five and up.
00:27:00.540So they're looking at that coming at the beginning of this. And here's where that goes.
00:27:04.220And just the covid policies in general. Look out at L.A.
00:27:07.400They had they had said that they were going to make the covid vaccines mandatory and now they've delayed it.
00:27:14.520And why have they delayed it? They had to. They they said, oh, it was a low transmission in schools.
00:27:20.100And, you know, some 78 percent of our students 12 and up have already been fully vaccinated.
00:27:23.900Here's the truth. Half of their students were not showing up.
00:27:27.320The parents don't want to do this. Only 31 percent of parents of five to 11 year olds have fully vaccinated their children.
00:27:33.400The vast majority of parents are not going to do this for their five to 11 year olds.
00:27:37.320And even those with 12 and up are a little reticent because the kids face very little risk.
00:27:42.160So L.A. school district now estimating tens of thousands of students are missing right now from their back to school rosters.
00:27:47.940They say it could be more than 20,000 missing.
00:27:52.300More than 200,000 were chronically absent during last year's school year.
00:27:56.600That's nearly half of all their students, much due to these unnecessary quarantines for close contacts who are asymptomatic.
00:28:06.120We dealt with this in my own school. So all the covid insanity and the loss learning and the social setbacks and so on that the children have served.
00:28:15.160This is all based on something we still haven't gotten to the bottom of.
00:28:19.740Who caused it? How is there a person who could be held accountable or a group of people?
00:28:29.240Frighteningly, are they still in charge right now?
00:28:33.940Yeah, the economic and social impact of the pandemic is ongoing and just epic, not just in America, by the way, in countries all over the world, you know, and the economic and the cost to our children.
00:28:47.320I don't have any children. My wife and I are expecting November, so I don't know exactly what I would do with my child.
00:28:53.100But I would like to think that they would live in a society that has clear and and and well understood standards for taking care of each other's health.
00:29:02.920I'm pro vaccine. And, you know, I don't I don't I'm you and I may disagree on that, Megan.
00:29:08.460That's fine. We don't have to agree on everything to agree on vaccine.
00:29:11.300Just just just not mandates. I'm not pro mandate.
00:29:13.980But the the greater point that I think we definitely agree on is that the suffering is ongoing and and accountability is is crucial.
00:29:24.200And without knowing what our government knows about this virus, we can't have confidence in our government to tell us what to do.
00:29:31.260And what I saw through the course of the pandemic so far is that our government didn't trust us with information and told us what to do without explaining to us why they were saying that.
00:29:44.840And when they were wrong, they didn't admit it. And that applies to masks.
00:29:47.940It definitely applies to schools. It applies to social distancing.
00:29:51.760And when the science changed for political reasons, both administrations, actually, the Trump and Biden administration are reluctant to admit that they might have gotten it wrong because they don't have the courage to level with the American people.
00:30:03.880And I think, you know, this is a virus that doesn't care about our politics.
00:30:07.880It treats us all the same. And we need to find the common ground to get together on this thing because it's not over and it's not going to be over for a very long time.
00:30:14.920That's right. OK, such an interesting discussion. We're going to hold Josh over because his area of expertise, one of them is China.
00:30:22.880And he just came out with a piece suggesting that the real crisis on Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan will start after she comes home.
00:30:31.380So thank goodness she did not have her jet shot down. She was not attacked while she was there.
00:30:35.920She's gone. She's left Taiwan now. But this is not over. And are we prepared for what's coming our way?
00:30:42.360We'll pick it up there right after a quick, quick break.
00:30:44.920All right, Josh. So you wrote a piece that is entitled The Real Crisis, in which you posit that the real crisis will start after Nancy Pelosi comes home.
00:31:00.220There was not a complete meltdown, at least not militarily, when she went over there.
00:31:04.020Other tensions were high. And so what do you mean the real problems are going to start after she comes home?
00:31:08.920And what's China going to do? Right. Well, Megan, for weeks, the Biden administration has been leaking to every reporter in town that this was the most dangerous trip ever.
00:31:18.620And the Chinese were really going to do something crazy. As it turns out, the sky didn't fall.
00:31:23.080You know, we didn't get into World War Three.
00:31:25.920The Chinese didn't decide to start a war over Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan.
00:31:29.940They were certainly angry about it. You know, it was certainly inconvenient for the Biden administration at a time when they were trying to downplay the tensions in U.S.-China relationship rather than stoke them.
00:31:43.480They thought that this was a an ego trip for her, a legacy item to add to her her resume.
00:31:51.280And for them, the timing was downright inconvenient. So they begged her not to go in private.
00:31:55.660And then President Biden blurted out that she was going and that the military was against it.
00:32:00.180Actually, it was the White House, but close enough for Biden.
00:32:03.540And boom, now we have an international scandal, you know, and that's just bad.
00:32:08.320That just makes us look like we don't know what we're doing.
00:32:10.880You know what I mean? Like, go or don't go, but don't have your dirty laundry inside the Democratic leadership laundered by the president of the United States.
00:32:19.120And then, of course, the Chinese Communist Party is like, oh, that's great.
00:32:22.320We're going to pounce on that. We're going to threaten everybody, scare the crap out of everybody.
00:32:26.880Maybe we can scare us. We're not going either way. We win.
00:32:29.240So it was just amateur hour over there, you know, between Pelosi and Biden.
00:32:34.220And that's embarrassing for America. OK.
00:32:36.520But at the same time, when push comes to shove, we can't let the Chinese Communist Party tell our lawmakers where to go.
00:32:44.660That has to be a firm principle that, you know, if Nancy Pelosi wants to go to Taiwan, she gets to go to Taiwan.
00:32:51.000And that's that. And don't tell her that, you know, at the same time, the reality is that, you know,
00:32:57.500while they didn't shoot her down and they didn't, you know, do anything crazy while she was there,
00:33:02.860they're going to use it as an excuse to to turn up the heat on the Taiwanese people.
00:33:07.940Right. The Chinese Communist Party always punishes the weaker party.
00:33:10.680They don't want to confront us. It's much easier for them to wait till Pelosi goes home.
00:33:14.340She forgets all about it. She got her photo op.
00:33:16.780And now they're going to torture and punish the Taiwanese people.
00:33:19.700And they already did it. They banned 100 Taiwanese export goods in a day just for the sake of it.
00:33:24.860They turned off Weibo, which is like that's how like people there communicate.
00:33:28.340That's like they're it's like Twitter plus your text message and and and WhatsApp altogether.
00:33:33.900And they just turned it off for the whole island of 20 million people just said just to be, you know, jerks about it.
00:33:39.480You know, and that's just the beginning. So, you know, I support, you know, anybody who wants to go to Taiwan.
00:33:44.980I love Taiwan. I've been there. I'm going there again soon.
00:33:49.040At the same time, it would be nice if the U.S. could get its act together so that when we do send to people,
00:33:54.740to Taiwan, it's not just, oh, let's make sure her plane doesn't get shot down, that it fits into a strategy to help the Taiwanese people deal with what's menacing them,
00:34:02.440which is an increasingly aggressive Chinese Communist Party that's acting increasingly crazy and building a crazy war machine in order to eventually attack.
00:34:11.200That's what their goal is, is to attack Taiwan when they can manage it.
00:34:15.020They can't manage it right now, but they're working towards it.
00:34:17.100Mm hmm. Yeah. So she she gets her Yas Queen moment and Taiwan is left to deal with the fallout.
00:34:24.360I mean, that's really the question. Is Taiwan exactly in a better position today than they were prior to her visit?
00:34:31.140Right. No, they're actually they're they're much worse off, you know, and they're going to continue to be worse off now.
00:34:36.260That's not to say it's too late. We have a you know, Congress could pass legislation to help Taiwan,
00:34:42.000to support Taiwan, to give them more stuff, the stuff they're going to need when China invades.
00:34:46.140First of all, we could put more of our military.
00:34:48.580The administration could put more of our military assets in the region.
00:34:51.200They could sell Taiwan more arms. They could get more involved diplomatically.
00:34:55.580They're not really doing anything. I mean, they're doing some of it, to be fair, but not enough.
00:34:59.900And meanwhile, you know, the Taiwanese people are looking 100 miles across the Taiwan Strait at a monster.
00:35:04.680And with that's building a thousand new nuclear weapons for what?
00:35:09.420Why did why does China need a thousand new nuclear weapons?
00:35:12.000Oh, yeah. To deter us from helping Taiwan.
00:35:13.880You know, they're building, you know, an amphibious landing force for what?
00:35:17.800Oh, because they're going to land there. OK, so this is happening, people.
00:35:21.740OK, we better wrap our minds around it. Now, I I get the and that doesn't mean that we're going to have a war.
00:35:27.340It means that in order to prevent the war, we have to increase our deterrence, that the Ukraine war should have taught us, in my view, that whatever we thought about deterring these totalitarian, murdering dictators, aggressive dictators like Putin and Xi Jinping, we were wrong.
00:35:44.560We miscalculated. Somehow he thought he could pull it off.
00:35:47.200Now, Putin failed because the Russian army is a paper tiger, but the Chinese army is different.
00:35:53.800OK, and when they failed yet, he hasn't failed yet. He hasn't failed yet. That's a really good point.
00:35:58.560But at least the Biden administration was wrong in that he was going to win in three days.
00:36:02.500But that's a separate issue. But to get back to Taiwan, what that should have taught us is, you know, I asked President Zelensky, I was in Singapore, Megan, at this conference and they pipe in President Zelensky onto the big screen.
00:36:12.360And I got to ask a question. I said, what would your advice be to the people of Taiwan?
00:36:16.100And he was very clear. He said, you've got to help the small countries before the big country attacks, not after.
00:36:21.900Once the attack happens, it's too late. So that's why I think that the trip was a prop, you know, again, defend her right to go.
00:36:29.480Absolutely. That's an important principle. At the same time, to just show up.
00:36:33.180It's not like she, you know, she didn't sign anything. She didn't bring anything.
00:36:36.960You know what I mean? She got her name in a building.
00:36:39.680So and then leave. And now the Biden administration has got to clean up her mess.
00:36:43.220OK. And the Chinese are saying, OK, now we've got a good excuse to do all this evil stuff to menace the Taiwanese that we didn't have an excuse for before.
00:36:50.980So we actually gave them an excuse. So all I'm saying is that the threat is rising.
00:36:56.840And let me ask you a question about what you said, because I know Thomas Friedman, The New York Times had a had a piece the other day saying we need to sort of turn help Taiwan turn itself into a porcupine.
00:37:06.420Like you got to get it now to sort of what you were saying, not entirely.
00:37:09.680But this he was making the same point of like now's the time to get them armed to the point where the Chinese would recognize it would be folly to go in there and try to take control.
00:37:18.920And I've seen others write. That's insane.
00:37:21.960Just as soon as we start shipping weapons into Taiwan and any increased basis or increasing our military presence in the region, those just act immediately.
00:37:29.320Those do it now like that. Chinese, they're not entirely rational actors.
00:37:33.340They don't seem to be very afraid of us, nor should they be right now.
00:37:36.640I mean, you can make the argument anyway. We're distracted in Ukraine.
00:37:39.720Our military is not what it used to be. We can't even meet our recruiting goals, which we're going to get to with Robin O'Neill in a minute.
00:37:44.920But what's to stop them? Why? Why if we did something like that?
00:37:49.340Right. Ship in a bunch of arms to Taiwan now when they just go in now.
00:37:53.440Right. Well, they're not ready. Otherwise, I think they would.
00:37:56.420You know, there's two things that determine when a aggressive totalitarian expansionist dictator attacks his democratic neighbor intent.
00:38:03.520And capability. They have the intent. They don't have the capability. They can't pull it off.
00:38:06.880They don't have enough. Literally, they don't have enough ships to land.
00:38:09.760They don't have enough missiles to flatten the place so that nobody's around to say boo.
00:38:13.960And they don't have enough nuclear weapons to make sure that we don't come to their defense.
00:38:17.940So they're building those three pillars. You know what else they're doing?
00:38:20.900They're siphoning off all of their banks.
00:38:23.060Why? Oh, so we can't sanction them. It's going to take some more time for them.
00:38:25.940You know what else they're doing? They're hoarding foodstuffs 20 times what they need in all sorts of greens and cassava and soy and corn.
00:38:37.720And, you know, Chinese people don't even eat cassava. It's not the point.
00:38:39.940The point is that they're making sure that when the conflict comes, that they're prepared, that they're and they're he's doing it as fast as he can.
00:38:47.460Believe me. So we have a small window.
00:38:50.000Most people think three years, maybe four, maybe five on the outside to arm the Taiwanese to the teeth so they have a reasonable chance of defending themselves.
00:38:57.600Because who knows, A, who's going to be president, but B, if we're going to be able to get there in time and who's going to make that decision.
00:39:03.540So the only choice to save Taiwan's democracy is to imagine if we had given Ukraine all those weapons that we're giving them now last year, as many people said that we should.
00:39:12.820Well, maybe, you know, thousands of Ukrainians would still be alive today.
00:39:16.620And that's how we have to think about. Now, there's big problems with that. Right.
00:39:19.460There's a risk that you're going to escalate, that the Chinese are so crazy.
00:39:22.800I get that. I'm not saying we shouldn't ignore the risks.
00:39:25.640I'm not saying we shouldn't do it thoughtfully, but I'm saying the bottom line is, as George Washington once said, preparing for a war is one of the most effective means of preserving the peace.
00:39:37.100OK, and, you know, that doesn't make it easy, but it does mean that we have to start now and it does mean the window is closing.
00:39:43.000Now, we talk about Thomas Friedman's piece.
00:39:44.920I mean, if I'm remembering it correctly, he said that her visit was reckless.
00:40:27.740No, I guess, again, sort of what I'm saying is that I think the important nuance is that we have to these trips in and of themselves are important, but not when they're handled badly.
00:40:41.120But we the the the the idea of throwing support to Taiwan, including by going there and showing the Chinese that they can't tell us where to go is important, mostly because of what it means to U.S.-China relations, because the more that we space that we give them, the more they'll take.
00:55:37.460The Haqqanis, they've been around since the 70s.
00:55:40.200They were the Haqqani network, radical and ruthless.
00:55:43.420We were funding them when they were fighting the Soviets in the 80s.
00:55:46.500You know, our hands are by no means clean on any of this, but we know exactly who they are.
00:55:51.180They're not going to tell us the truth.
00:55:52.720And they don't give a rip about human life.
00:55:55.060These are people that know that, and I'm still not saying they think, they know that when they get martyred, they're going right to heaven to be in their big mansion with 72 houses with a virgin in each and that kind of stuff.
00:56:05.720They don't care about what happens on Earth.
00:56:07.820They certainly don't care about the civilians.
00:56:49.260And then he slaughtered a lot of the Shia.
00:56:51.280And then right now in Afghanistan, which we had one in 2004, we just stay there for a long, long time.
00:56:56.660So they just they know that we don't have we're a 24 hour news cycle type of people.
00:57:00.200And everyone's sick of the war and they're tired of hearing about it.
00:57:02.720And they're going to forget about Zawahiri next week.
00:57:05.880And it's just going to it's going to be a no one's going to say never forget until they come across our southern border and attack us ruthlessly again.
00:57:14.560And they're they're not living their biggest problem right now, other than ninja rockets coming out of the sky, is it's about 115 degrees Fahrenheit.
00:57:22.820And maybe some doors don't have indoor plumbing.
00:57:24.660Yeah, the difference was we decided to pretend that we believed them in the Doha agreement and are pulling out and so on.
00:57:31.220Like we knew what they were going to do.
00:57:32.180It's not like this is news to any of our leaders that they lie and that they didn't intend to not harbor al Qaeda.
00:57:37.700But our president looked at us and told us it was so.
00:57:40.420And there's to me, that's still bothersome.
00:57:42.640I still want my president to look at me and say, these are not good guys, but we're tired of being over there.
00:57:47.500We're going to take some calculated risks.
00:57:48.960He wanted us to believe that the Taliban was going to abide by its word, that it wasn't going to shelter al Qaeda.
00:57:54.660Peter Doocy got into this with Kirby, who's both the Pentagon spokesperson and now backup or sort of co-press secretary for Kareem Jean-Pierre, because she's such a disaster.
00:58:04.520And then they got pissed off because they're like, why is the white guy covering for the black woman?
00:58:08.100It's like it's everywhere, Rob, the wokeness and the nonsense.
00:58:11.040In any event, here's Peter Doocy trying to get some straight answers from John Kirby on what the hell went wrong to the fact that they were housing Zawahiri in the first place.
00:59:03.560It was an independent, sovereign state.
00:59:06.460And the president made a bold decision to end a war that had been going on for 20 years because he believed then and still believes now that our national security interests are best met by meeting the threats of today, not the threats of 2001.
00:59:19.160And we, you know, I don't want to relitigate the whole war here, but obviously no one anticipated the Ghani government to fall as fast as it did.
00:59:28.160But we said at the time that as we depart Afghanistan, we're going to keep vigilant.
00:59:34.060We're going to stay ready and we're not going to let Afghanistan become a safe haven for terrorists who threaten our homeland.
00:59:39.560And this past weekend, we proved that case precisely.
00:59:43.320You know, Rob, my first thought is he better watch it because there is no way Zawahiri was the only guy being harbored by the Taliban.
00:59:53.160And for him to sort of say, hey, we did it.
01:00:20.880He's he's pretty much the only one that sounds like, you know, he knows what he's talking about.
01:00:24.800But you got to figure when when they're saying we didn't know, nobody predicted the Afghan government was fault would fall as quickly as they did.
01:00:33.820I wish they would have given me a call.
01:00:35.040I would have told them that about 30 seconds.
01:00:37.880If you're I don't care what your special specialization is in defense or mixed martial art, if you can't learn to fight in 20 years, you're not going to stand up to anybody else.
01:00:47.400And and, you know, Admiral Kirby's trying to to not, you know, tell it like we're not going to lose this country.
01:01:28.580There are sergeants in the Marine Corps who could have told you what's going to happen.
01:01:34.100I've trained with these people on the ground.
01:01:35.280I mean, these are these are people that honestly, when we're say back when we're training them, if we're going to do anything at all tomorrow, say, OK, training starts at 07 tomorrow.
01:01:43.740They would say inshallah, meaning God willing, if God wants me to be here at seven, I'll be there at seven.
01:01:49.480Guess what? I guess it doesn't show up.
01:01:57.060And the the lies to TV and the stuff that they tell each other, the straight brutality.
01:02:01.420I mean, if you if you think it's bad here because someone uses some word at a at a at a they them on campus, you should see what they do to women that show that any skin from their ankles underneath their burka.
01:02:23.620But Afghanistan, here's a good way to describe it.
01:02:25.680If you look it up, their time zone is however many hours and a half past ours, because that's as far away from normalcy as you could get there.
01:02:36.480So at least we we know something is normal.
01:02:39.280The thing with women is, you know, I mean, I know a lot of people say that's not our concern is a backwards sort of culture that would allow that kind of thing.
01:02:45.640But, you know, it's another thing that we were told.
01:02:50.880The Taliban's made promises on how they're going to treat women while they've been kicked out of public offices.
01:02:54.460And they've been kicked out of running businesses.
01:02:55.880And now there is a mandate that they can only show their eyes.
01:02:58.520They have to cover their entire body and they have to have escorts wherever they go.
01:03:02.300And even the Washington Post and not just an op ed, the Washington Post editorial board took aim at Joe Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal in the wake of this news.
01:03:12.780Right. Like there were some headlines yesterday ripping on more conservative commentators for saying, oh, it was great that Zawahiri was killed.
01:03:18.340But and mocking those who said, but after, well, you know what?
01:03:21.620There is a but we need to talk about the but because the fact that he was being given safe haven there to begin with and he wasn't the only one and isn't the only one is cause for concern.
01:03:31.800Here's how the Washington Post editorial board put it, quote, what was Zawahiri doing on Afghan soil in the first place?
01:03:38.140Sheltered in a building owned by a top aide, a senior Taliban leader and interior minister Haqqani.
01:03:42.960This indicates the terrorist chief had Taliban protection.
01:03:46.560How many more al Qaeda operatives are nestled in Kabul's residential districts?
01:03:51.520They go on to say after 9-11, the goal was to deny al Qaeda a safe haven in Afghanistan.
01:03:56.040Now it is back and seemingly safe. And they go on to say the new Taliban regime is no better than the old one.
01:04:04.040It's perhaps worse than the one that ruled during the 1990s.
01:04:08.180This is what Biden's chaotic withdrawal has wrought.
01:04:12.380That's that's that's a pretty big shift from The Washington Post.
01:04:16.600Yes, it is. And it would be a glimmer of hope to think that a lot of these journalists are not editorializing in their in their their main story, you know, putting the truth in paragraph 15.
01:04:29.600I hope they are. I doubt they are. But it almost seems like they're they're they're sort of enjoying they being the reporters.
01:04:36.600The fact that no one in the Democratic Party is supporting Biden for a second term, which kind of tells you where he is.
01:04:41.800And they they only need to keep this lame duck going for another two plus years.
01:04:47.220And that's about it. But if you even if you even claim that you're for human rights, if you could see what happens in Afghanistan, I mean, on a good day.
01:04:56.820So they don't they don't let girls get educated. Think about the women who got there.
01:05:00.600They became doctors and attorneys and judges when we were in power, which they did.
01:05:04.440And now they're in a place where and it's not just an escort. It has to be a relative and you can't leave the house without a relative.
01:05:10.060And you're walking behind them. And when they're they're at home, it's not only do they not get to go to school, they don't get it.
01:05:15.320They don't get to get educated. They don't get to learn. They get to sit in a room.
01:05:19.880They're in solitary confinement, sometimes with family. And that's that's their existence.
01:05:24.620Hopefully, hopefully they have the girls grow up to be women who who have children from a neighbor who bought from her bought her from her dad.
01:05:33.880That's all they have to look forward to is raising kids. And that's it. And staying inside. It's it's a horrible I mean, it turned from, you know, we we kicked the Taliban's butt.
01:05:42.140We kicked Al Qaeda out of Afghanistan. We stopped right there. They were the Taliban and Haqqani have always been given safe haven to Al Qaeda.
01:05:48.440I mean, I think Zawahiri was in Pakistan the entire time. And if you're worried about why is why is why are they harboring Al Qaeda?
01:05:56.160I mean, you go to Karachi, where the port is. They're everywhere. Go to the Torquem Gates.
01:06:01.500That's the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The federally administered tribal area is the only thing they could name it because no one knows what a border is.
01:06:09.600They don't know where Pakistan and Afghanistan and in China starts. And it's it's it's a different world.
01:06:15.420If we just went there to we should have gone there and kicked their butts and said, you ever do this again, we're going to kick your butts again.
01:06:20.940But instead, we stayed there trying to build roads and schools for people who do not want roads and schools.
01:06:26.500And then it doesn't matter what your intentions are or how many languages you speak.
01:06:29.620If you spend enough time in someone else's backyard, you are the occupier.
01:06:33.580And it's so it's so backwards again with the with the with the time thing, the time zone thing.
01:06:38.640They don't they don't know what day it is. They don't care.
01:06:41.560All they I met guys there when we were when we had I bring up safe house again.
01:06:45.380We had a safe house that I lived in in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, and we were hiring locals because the way to get hearts and minds is to hire locals for if you can hire an electrician, make sure he's a local or a plumber or even chefs and security.
01:06:57.400The security guys I was interviewing, I was in a back. I remember being in a backyard, a huge opium field, wild opium.
01:07:03.020And these dudes I'm getting interviewed thought we were the Russians and they didn't know why they were coming to work for us.
01:07:07.820And then the other guys thought that 9-11 was a direct response to us invading Afghanistan.
01:07:12.660And those are the educated guys. So we're not going to go in there and give them some Jeffersonian democracy out of nowhere and start making schools.
01:07:20.180They don't want it. And you can't just force we can't force our way of life on people who don't want it.
01:07:24.880But now that we that they're learning from us and we're not learning from us, we don't learn from our mistakes.
01:07:30.040We keep saying this is the way we've always done it. And we think we we made them stronger.
01:07:34.260The other than a couple with bin Laden and Zawahiri being two of them, pretty much everyone that was in charge is in charge again.
01:07:39.660Yeah. I mean, I'm I'm delighted to see this guy dead.
01:07:44.380You know, my only my only regret is that it was too peaceful.
01:07:47.920You know, I mean, dying like that is easy. It's it's a pleasure.
01:07:51.240I mean, most people would like to die like that.
01:07:53.360It would be a simple way to die because you get you get torn to pieces, not the way that they would if they had their way with any of us.
01:07:59.700And I'm talking to anyone listening here. I'm talking to any left or right, gay or straight, black or white person out there listening to this.
01:08:05.640Any single one of us they caught, they it would take them weeks to kill us because they're going to do in a really, really unpleasant way.
01:08:11.520They don't care that you're not at war with them.
01:08:14.520Yeah, that's right. Not to mention what the Taliban's been doing to little boys, little kids.
01:08:18.720You know, it's like you'd like to see some torture inflicted on a guy like Zawahiri thinking about the little kids who are on the airplanes that went into the buildings on 9-11-2001,
01:08:26.560which he was responsible for planning along with bin Laden. So it's like hate to see him die so quickly and painlessly.
01:08:34.020But dead is dead. And it's a good thing he's gone. All right.
01:08:37.420Let me let me shift gears and ask you about China with our first guest, Josh Rogan, expert on China and all sorts of things.
01:08:42.820We were talking about China and whether Nancy Pelosi's visit is a good idea is now a good time to be sort of provoking China or favor rattling with China or just upsetting China.
01:08:51.840And his position was basically can't live our lives that way. China has been infiltrating the United States in many ways, many times.
01:08:57.660And, you know, we can't worry about provoking them because they're all about sort of this slow takeover.
01:09:03.220So, you know, like we kind of have to do what we do. However, I was given some pause when I read how strong the Chinese military has gotten.
01:09:11.720I knew it had gotten strong, but it's like really strong. And ours, which we'll get to in our next segment, is not as strong as we'd like it to be.
01:09:19.700And we're having real difficulty recruiting new members of it. So before we get to us, let's talk about China, how strong their military is and your thoughts on the Pelosi visit and provocation.
01:09:30.720Well, China is is very, very strong. And if you look at the file footage, everything from their close in weapon systems on ships that are shooting down planes and missiles to their missile systems, to their Navy and their ships.
01:09:42.600And I'm assuming there are a lot of it looks like our stuff. And that's because it is our stuff, because they've got spies all over the place in the United States to include teaching at our universities.
01:09:51.480So, I mean, they they had a basically the exact same stealth helicopter that we flew into about about Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden within a few months, because our good allies that we give a couple billion dollars to a year, the Pakistanis sold it right to China.
01:10:04.300So they've got a powerful military. And again, they don't care about attrition. They'll they'll fight the war of attrition like they have been for hundreds and hundreds of years.
01:10:14.480Their Navy is strong. They're expanding their fleet by building manmade islands that they're militarizing.
01:10:19.700And they've got a loyalty that we haven't had in this country, I think, since the greatest generation.
01:10:24.480It's all about China strong that, you know, they're all about, you know, just talking themselves up.
01:10:29.300The president is the emperor, basically. And they really care.
01:10:35.220And they they've been studying us. They know how to fight us.
01:10:38.440What's I mean, fortunately for us, we're designed to beat large armies and navies, which we can still do.
01:10:42.760But we're really heading down a rocky road because they have the land.
01:10:45.800They have the will. They do have the firepower.
01:10:48.180And it's almost like one of those. Well, we have defense on ours.
01:10:51.100You know, they know the U.S. has Reagan is right out there, which is a carrier, which is in a strike group that is that is protected by different ships and frigates and submarines and stuff like that.
01:10:59.120It's like, well, it's like the question you would ask them, well, what if they shoot one of their anti-ship missiles at the bridge of the of the Reagan?
01:11:06.440And they'd say, well, we shoot it down. OK, cool. What if they shoot 10,000 of them at the Reagan?
01:11:10.580Are we going to shoot all of them down? So, I mean, they're they've been they haven't been lying to their youth.
01:11:15.920They haven't been lying to their population about what they're going to do in world domination.
01:11:19.780We were just I don't know why we won't accept it. And it's it's you know, it's everything from who's being paid off to shut up about China.
01:11:26.500So China's legit. China is probably the biggest threat out there facing us right now.
01:11:30.260And the saber rattling thing, it's it's almost spooky to think of how it happened, because it's not like Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, put this on her itinerary.
01:11:39.120She was she had a call with the White House. Someone heard it and they leaked it, which, you know, there are far too many people with security clearance as far as I'm concerned anyway.
01:11:47.780And and I've always said, if everyone's special, then no one's special. So you don't deserve to have a top secret compartmentalized clearance, which a lot of people do.
01:11:55.600But someone from the Democrat Party in the Biden White House heard this and released it.
01:11:58.880Just who knows why there could be something behind it because they want Pelosi to be shown on her last hurrah as the Speaker of the House.
01:12:05.100I'm not afraid of China. And I'm the lone woman and person of Congress standing up to the Chinese.
01:12:10.500So there's a lot that are scarier about this than just trying to run on their sabers.
01:12:14.520But they're definitely I mean, they're definitely not afraid of us right now.
01:12:17.600Why would we like if we wanted to be provocative with China? Why the hell would we use her?
01:12:22.420I mean, why wouldn't we demand a full and fair investigation into the court in the covid origins?
01:12:28.880Right. Like, why would we send Nancy Pelosi, 82 year old Nancy Pelosi over there to go stay one night in the holiday inn?
01:13:38.220We're going to find out about what happens with the new judge that they just replaced at the last second and happened to be a footnote at the end of whatever they're doing.
01:13:44.420And I'm not an attorney, but I'm smart enough to read the full article, I think.
01:13:48.140But but I don't think Biden could have stopped her.
01:13:50.160And I mean, if anyone could have stopped her, it would have been probably Barack Obama and Susan Rice, maybe Ron Klain.
01:13:55.300But that's about it. I mean, Joe, Joe Biden's what he's got a third dose of COVID the past week and a half because they're trying to think of a way to keep keeping him in a basement somewhere.
01:14:04.720I don't know. I think there's more to this story.
01:14:09.300And if anyone listened to me, why didn't I didn't know that you could break that news on the on the first episode of The Operator stand by because we have so much more to get to with Rob O'Neill.
01:14:20.740We are going to get into the important issue of this alarming decline in military recruitment.
01:14:26.740Do you think it has anything to do with Millie out there talking about white rage and dissing on white families who have been serving the military and serving this country honorably for decades?
01:15:11.880Fear not, because the summer is typically when services recruit the most candidates following high school graduation.
01:15:17.900So now here we are at in August and political reports that the Army is now at 66 percent of its goal for the fiscal year that ends in less than 60 days.
01:15:27.680In September, the Navy's at 89 percent.
01:15:30.240They're still below where they where they want to be and where they thought they would be.
01:15:33.400And what they are reporting is that the Army has now, for the very first time, offered a quick ship bonus of thirty five thousand dollars in all career fields for new recruits.
01:15:49.800Doesn't get to the root cause of why people didn't want to do it to begin with.
01:15:53.760What they're saying right now is that in fiscal year twenty twenty, the regular Army got sixty one thousand and change, which was one hundred percent of their goal in twenty twenty one.
01:16:06.060So they lowered the goal, but they met it by about five thousand.
01:16:09.980And now this year they wanted fifty seven seven thousand new recruits and they're not there and they don't know whether they're going to get there.
01:16:17.580Having said all this, they testified before Congress they expect to be ten thousand shoulders, soldiers short of the plan to end strength for the fiscal year.
01:16:24.860The forces are bottom line not going to be as strong as we want them to be.
01:16:27.980And they are having trouble finding new guys who want to be associated.
01:16:32.120And it's not just the Army, as I mentioned, there are other branches who are struggling to meet their numbers as well, other than the Marines.
01:16:38.040And that none of this factors in the layoffs that we've seen in the National Guard and the reserve troops of sixty thousand.
01:16:46.020We lost who can't go and fight for us now because they wouldn't get the mandatory covid vaccine and absurdity for these best, brightest and healthiest and most fit amongst Americans.
01:16:55.640Right. They we can't use them now because this is all young men.
01:17:10.540The covid vaccine is one of them right there.
01:17:13.240There are people that would either whether it's true or not, say for religious reasons they didn't want to get the vaccine of their choice, the whole my body, my choice thing.
01:17:22.580And then, you know, from where I came, it's a Chinese made biological weapon they released on the world to see how we would respond in the military.
01:17:29.460In the military, unfortunately, allegedly, allegedly, sure.
01:17:35.220They in the military, you have to follow orders.
01:17:37.920When we got in, if we wanted to fight in Iraq, we had to get I got anthrax seven to eleven different times and we got smallpox a bunch of times and a lot of people got sick doing it.
01:17:45.940But we knew there were orders we had to take them.
01:17:47.980So the vaccine thing, you know, it's six and one half a dozen the other.
01:17:52.280Whether you want to do it, how bad you want to fight for your country.
01:17:54.060But then there there's other stuff that's not necessary.
01:17:57.240There's the whole you can get a tattoo or not based on a request yet that your chain of command fills out.
01:18:02.380You can't do it here. You can do it there.
01:18:03.940Or now you can do it here. Can't do it there.
01:18:08.000Some guys are just not physically fit.
01:18:11.240Some people too much spend too much time with their with their head and their neck bent down looking at their phones.
01:18:16.340They have no interest in getting out and getting fit.
01:18:18.120And then a major reason, and I've seen this personally with people who want to join, is that they hear about how woke is taking over, which it is.
01:18:27.260And it's becoming just such a it just takes up way too much time trying to train people on different woke stuff.
01:18:33.300That shouldn't matter in the military.
01:18:34.320They're making too much stuff important in the military.
01:18:36.380I love that the Marine Corps is maintaining its its numbers because that's what Marines do.
01:18:41.920And people that want to be Marines are just awesome.
01:18:44.220And they've always wanted to be Marines in general.
01:18:45.880But some people just see what's happening in the Army, especially in the Navy.
01:18:48.760I've seen Navy SEALs that have I don't I know guys that are past 20, but you can do 30, maybe a little bit plus to just retire.
01:18:57.140I don't I don't need to take this sensitivity training before you send me over to fight Al Qaeda if we're allowed to fight them anymore.
01:19:03.100So there are Marines who would get had been ambushed in places like Afghanistan, gotten really, really long gunfights for even days at a time.
01:19:11.660And then when they get done, they find they're being charged with war crimes from from their chains of command, things like that.
01:19:17.120And that's the woke thing's a big one.
01:19:19.840The chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Mark Milley, getting on there saying he doesn't he just doesn't quite understand white rage.
01:19:25.740And he's white. So he needs to be told about it, things like that.
01:19:28.040And just. You know, there's a conversation to be had about all that stuff, but there's also a time and a place for it.
01:19:33.900And I think with our military, as long as long as we're good to people, as long as we act like good guys and, you know, the good guys and the good women on the battlefield, then it does.
01:19:43.060A lot of this nonsense online training is not necessary.
01:19:46.800And a lot of people don't want to do it.
01:19:47.740I've seen young men be talked out of trying to become CEOs because they heard too much about the sensitivity training.
01:19:52.400And it's just that we're putting way too much stuff in a room that doesn't need to be filled.
01:19:56.820Yeah, it's like you. You guys are out on the battlefield, actually shooting bad guys and say, I got him.
01:20:02.260And you're going to get corrected on. He went by them.
01:20:07.440He said that. Well, even with I'll get asked a lot about the bin Laden raid itself and they'll say, so did you guys carry cameras on the bin Laden raid?
01:20:15.840And I said, hell no, because the general doesn't need to know how justice was served.
01:20:20.160It just was. And all it's going to do, it's the same guy that's sitting on his couch that is correcting Patrick Mahomes on a Monday.
01:20:26.940Well, if I was there, I sure would have done this.
01:20:28.720No, you wouldn't have. He would have, you'd have crapped your pants.