00:00:25.260If you have questions or concerns about your gambling
00:00:26.700or the gambling of someone close to you,
00:00:27.740please go to connexontario.ca TNC Supply.
00:00:30.560Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East.
00:00:42.260Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show and happy Wednesday and an
00:00:46.540explosive day on Capitol Hill. Dr. Anthony Fauci finally forced to field questions about his
00:00:52.620handling of the COVID pandemic. So what did he say? Well, here's how it started in the Senate
00:00:59.980Homeland Security Committee. Watch this. Given Senator Paul's obvious obsession with calling
00:01:07.260for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me, and recently his publicly
00:01:16.340releasing my unredacted personal diary aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me,
00:01:25.780the only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee
00:01:34.420is to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges
00:01:43.660that I end up, in his words, quote, behind bars, unquote. Therefore, although it pains me to do so
00:01:53.520Because of the respect I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades-long record of cooperating with Congress, under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions. Thank you.
00:02:16.480that's right dr fauci who's been given a full presidential pardon pleaded the fifth on the
00:02:25.400grounds that he does not want to incriminate himself refusing to answer any and we do mean
00:02:31.720any questions it happened over and over and over can you explain to the committee why you chose
00:02:40.860to fund this dangerous research in China.
00:02:43.580On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer
00:02:47.020based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
00:02:51.220Were the scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
00:02:54.680capable of inserting a furin cleavage site into a coronavirus?
00:02:58.660On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer
00:03:01.940based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
00:03:05.500Did you fund gain-of-function research in other biolabs around the world?
00:03:09.520On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:03:17.000Do you think that the risks really are worth the benefits for gain-of-function research?
00:03:21.240On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:03:28.660Dr. Fauci, would you like to at least answer this one question for us today and let us know whether or not you've changed your mind on whether or not the benefits of gain of function research outweigh the risks?
00:03:40.940On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
00:03:48.880So he was just as forthcoming before the committee as he was when he was running our COVID response.
00:03:54.300uh which we now know from his personal diaries involved multiple lies and obfuscation i mean
00:04:02.660it was like we'll get into this in a second if you're going to assert the fifth amendment you
00:04:08.600typically assert the fifth amendment on anything because you don't want to be tricked into waiving
00:04:14.300your rights you know don't want it to be like a landmine into getting you to say something about
00:04:18.760whoops, oh, I started the pandemic. But this guy took this to laughable lengths. Watch.
00:04:26.540In the red folder on your table is a copy of Section 192 of Title II of the U.S. Code.
00:04:33.340Your counsel has been provided a copy as well. That section makes it a crime for a witness
00:04:38.780appearing under subpoena to refuse to answer any questions pertinent to the question under
00:04:43.540inquiry. Do you have that in front of you? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline
00:04:51.100to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment, let the Constitution let the record
00:04:56.360record that the witness has refused to answer whether there's a folder in front of him
00:05:01.780based on his Fifth Amendment right. I mean, you can hear the audible laughter and the frustration
00:05:08.800from Republican senators there who were seeking to be the voice of their voters looking for any
00:05:17.380tiny modicum of responsibility to be taken by this man. This is the man by his own admission who
00:05:26.620got the schools closed across the country and specifically patted himself on the back for
00:05:31.780doing it in New York and L.A., two of our biggest cities. This is the man you have to blame. This
00:05:36.480is the man who strong-armed the CDC into mandating vaccines, mandating masks, and so on. This is the
00:05:43.320guy. Just a tiny modicum of responsibility taking. And that's what the Republican senators were
00:05:50.340trying to get. They're getting ripped on MSNOW for that effort. And they were utterly unsuccessful.1.00
00:05:56.780You can't force him on the spot to answer when he's refusing. He showed up with a battery of
00:06:01.240lawyers. We'll get to that in a second. Here is newly elected, relatively, Ohio Senator Bernie
00:06:07.460Moreno trying for us all. Can you do me a favor in the audience and stand up if during the time
00:06:14.680of the COVID pandemic, you were called a racist for calling the virus a Wuhan virus or the China
00:06:22.020virus. If you thought the six foot rule was total crap, if you thought the vaccine wasn't something0.98
00:06:28.400that you should take, if you thought it was outrageous the way the mass policy was rolled0.96
00:06:33.260out, if you were fired from your job for not taking that vaccine, including members of0.99
00:06:39.400the military, if you thought closing schools was catastrophically stupid, and that you0.99
00:06:45.400thought that during these times, saying these things made you somehow a lesser human being.0.98
00:06:53.620Dr. Frederick, can you just turn around and look at the people behind you?
00:06:56.220you're not willing to do that that's not a question it's not a question to your lawyers
00:07:02.760not a question it's a request all you have to do is look up from your lawyers and look at the people
00:07:09.520who were absolutely shamed for saying what we know now to be the truth you can't even look at
00:07:17.860them that's a that's a question are you able to look at them on the advice of counsel i'm not i
00:07:24.620I mean, that's how it went. Good for him for trying. But Senator Marino was not done. Watch.
00:07:29.560When that story broke, I said to myself, I cannot stand I. Lee on the side and watch this happen.
00:07:39.400It was about six years ago today that I decided I'm going to give up my businesses, sell them all, run for office, run through the United States Senate.0.99
00:07:49.740Here I am sitting in front of you six years later saying, who the fuck do you think you were for doing that?0.94
00:07:54.620yeah great questions great questions there's a major legal question regarding fauci's0.97
00:08:03.920non-testimony today president joe biden infamously gave fauci a sweeping preemptive
00:08:10.820pardon for any federal crimes related to his government service from 2014 you may remember
00:08:16.300the pandemic began in 2020 but this pardon went back six years earlier could it have been
00:08:23.060to the date that his gain of function research began because the pardon went from 2014 to January
00:08:30.20019th, 2025, the date of the pardon. It's not legally allowed to go beyond that date. You can't
00:08:36.420say for all acts in the future forever. Senator Hawley of Missouri, who was, he is a lawyer,
00:08:43.340he cleared for the Supreme Court and he was Missouri's AG for a time, or was it AG or
00:08:48.360Solicitor General or both, I think. In any event, talented lawyer believes that Fauci cannot claim
00:08:53.820his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination because he's already been
00:08:57.980pardoned against any criminal liability. Watch. Just get one thing straight. You don't have any
00:09:02.180rights under the Fifth Amendment because you've been pardoned, as you very well know, as the
00:09:06.820Supreme Court has been clear for a century and more. Brown versus Walker, 1896. When he has been
00:09:12.660pardoned, he may not stand upon his privilege. You know that your lawyers sitting behind you now
00:09:18.420shifting nervously in their chairs. They know it. This isn't about the Constitution. This isn't
00:09:22.520about the law. This is about contempt, contempt for this body and contempt for the American people.
00:09:29.280Joining me now with analysis is attorney and founder and president of the Article 3 project,
00:09:33.960Mike Davis. We wouldn't be celebrating America 250 if it weren't for a strong foundation set
00:09:41.300by the framers. Hamilton built America's financial foundation on the principle of sound, stable
00:09:46.460money, a principle later embodied by the gold standard. But we abandoned that discipline in
00:09:52.8001971, infamously, and have since seen inflation erode the dollar's value. So what's the foundation
00:09:59.380of your savings? Is it gold? Or is it something that can be shaken, disrupted, or devalued?
00:10:06.120Birch Gold Group has been helping Americans solidify their savings with gold for the past 15
00:10:10.720years, and they will help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered IRA in gold.
00:10:18.080Now you can do this in whole or in part. If you've been thinking about gold for a while,
00:10:22.020but you want to hedge your bet, you could do it in part and see what it feels like to have
00:10:26.440some diversification and not be totally dependent on the value of the dollar. Learning how gold
00:10:33.140fits into your portfolio is easy. Just text my initials MK to the number 989898. You will receive
00:10:39.120a free no-obligation info kit. They're not going to pressure you. These guys have an A-plus rating
00:10:43.780with the Better Business Bureau, and they've got countless of five-star reviews. Consider having
00:10:48.680Birch Gold help you build your foundation with gold, the gold standard. Text MK to the number
00:10:55.160989898 today. And in another life, Mike, you used to do legal work for these committees,
00:11:01.520so you're the perfect person to talk to about this. What did you make of his
00:11:04.960repeated and just nonstop assertions of the fifth. Remember this about Tony Fauci. He funded
00:11:11.580COVID's birth in the Wuhan lab with this dangerous gain of function research. He knew it was
00:11:18.580dangerous. The COVID got out of the lab. It caused millions of deaths, trillions in lost
00:11:28.120treasure. Years of our lives were destroyed, particularly young kids, their learning loss,
00:11:35.400poor black kids, minorities who Democrats pretend to care about their lives were particularly0.99
00:11:41.120destroyed. They were subject to abuse and neglect, and they're already in terrible situations. And0.68
00:11:47.460this Tony Fauci monster said that if you dare to, he's the science and you can't question him
00:11:54.560because he's the science. He canceled, he set out funding, he threatened other scientists,
00:12:00.640other health professionals who dared to question his completely arbitrary science-free rules like
00:12:08.140the mask mandate, the six-foot rule, these arbitrary rules that Tony Fauci made up that
00:12:13.440just destroyed our lives. Our elderly, our grandparents, our parents died alone in nursing
00:12:20.680homes. And he lied about it. He covered it up. He's a monster. He is responsible for the deaths
00:12:27.160of millions and trillions lost and our lives destroyed. He's a monster. He got this pardon1.00
00:12:33.120from Biden because he's a monster and he needed a pardon because he's one of the worst criminals1.00
00:12:38.260in our history, a mass murderer. And what does he do today? Instead of coming forward and0.95
00:12:45.080testifying so Congress can address this so it never happens again. He claims that he has a
00:12:52.220Fifth Amendment right. He does not have a Fifth Amendment right here because he was not subject
00:12:56.560to criminal liability. He was not subject to criminal jeopardy because of that part. If he
00:13:01.860testified truthfully today, he could not have been prosecuted. Yet, he tried to assert the Fifth
00:13:07.620Amendment. He should be held in contempt. Senator Rand Paul, the chairman, is going to have a contempt
00:13:12.180vote next week. Then it will go to the full Senate. It just needs to pass by a simple
00:13:17.380majority, and the Trump Justice Department needs to prosecute this guy. In addition, or
00:13:22.220alternatively, the Senate can go to district court and force Fauci to testify. In addition,
00:13:29.420or alternatively, they can have the House Sergeant of Arms go arrest this guy. It hasn't happened
00:13:34.600since 1934, but go arrest Tony Fauci, put him in the Capitol jail until he agrees to testify.
00:13:42.180You state your opinion that he's a mass murderer. There may be some who are thinking that's too harsh. I'm not one of them, Mike, because there is good evidence that has never been proven entirely, but there is very good evidence that he started the pandemic, that it was his gain of function research that he was paying for, that he knew was dangerous being handled at an unsafe lab that led directly to the creation of this virus, something he's never allowed a full investigation of.
00:14:08.400And we've never pursued as fully as we ought to.
00:14:11.700And I do believe it's what motivated virtually every decision he made after that.
00:14:16.100He did not want to be exposed as having funded that dangerous research, which very clearly
00:14:21.120seems to have led to the entire pandemic worldwide, a million Americans dead alone, just just
00:14:26.800here in the United States, not to mention all the damage and lives lost from his vaccine,
00:14:31.660which he would not be honest about, which he would not force honest trials on, which
00:14:36.540he told us was safe without knowing and so on.
00:14:39.240We could be here all day when we talk about the lives, but I get it.
00:14:55.000He made, he caused the deaths of millions because he shut down alternative treatments
00:14:59.980that treatments that could have saved people's lives.
00:15:02.480he shut down and said that it that you that you can't do this it's not the science we know that's
00:15:08.060not right like ivermectin he shut that down this that tony fauci is a monster and he must be held
00:15:13.560accountable held accountable for mass murder how mike do you get at him though when he's still
00:15:21.480exposed when it comes to state law now i can't think of a state law claim that's you know being
00:15:27.400held over anthony fauci's head or even what it might potentially be but that wouldn't have been
00:15:31.760in the joe biden pardon so isn't he just going to respond to when when you know this contempt
00:15:37.080proceeding happens i was still exposed under state law claims and i was exposed for anything
00:15:42.120i might say that day that republicans the evil republicans would say was false and therefore i
00:15:47.380just decided not to answer anything well he can't do the part about the evil republicans would say
00:15:51.520was false he wouldn't have fifth amendment protections for that because he's not he he has
00:15:55.760the he has the part right but as for the state laws federal officers generally can't be charged
00:16:01.000by states or foreign governments for performing their duties. But if he does argue that he could
00:16:06.280be liable under state laws, then he's admitting that he acted outside of the scope of his federal
00:16:12.060office when he did these things. And therefore, he would be subject to criminal prosecution by
00:16:16.380these states. So go for it. I hope, look, we need to turn up the heat on this guy. We need to bring
00:16:21.960charges against him by the Trump Justice Department. Make him present his Biden pardon.
00:16:27.360That's what you have to do. The way it works is if you are pardoned, you present your pardon, your presidential pardon or a governor's pardon at your criminal trial as an affirmative defense. Make him do that. Maybe he's claiming the Fifth Amendment because he didn't accept Biden's pardon. Who knows? I don't know if he's ever said whether he accepted Biden's pardon.
00:16:48.500If he doesn't accept the pardon, then he's not pardoned. So charge him for his crimes before the pardon, and then make him raise that defense. And then if it's, okay, I was pardoned and I did accept the pardon, then he could be charged with contempt of Congress and obstruction of a congressional investigation.
00:17:08.080so you're saying if he accepted that pardon he absolutely has to answer questions about conduct
00:17:16.640that is within the pardon because it's the same as when you give a witness immunity they can't
00:17:21.460they can't in a court of law assert the fifth amendment as a bar to answering questions because
00:17:26.300they've been given immunity that the jeopardy no longer hangs over them and therefore they
00:17:31.000they must answer a court would order them to answer and you're saying it's exactly the same
00:17:35.200here. Yes. And I would say this of Tony Fauci, or if his lawyers say, no, no, no, we're still
00:17:40.440subject to liability by states, by local governments, by foreign governments, which
00:17:45.560there are statutes that protect federal officers from that. But if he's saying that he's still
00:17:51.520subject to that liability, then I would say to these states, to these local prosecutors,
00:17:56.000these state AGs, these local prosecutors across America, start indicting Tony Fauci today.
00:18:01.140Yes. Yes. Do it. Let like let's put that to the test and see him object and say, no, no, no, no. My behavior is not within the scope of your state law. I'm I'm protected as a federal officer and then have to go back to Rand Paul and answer on these immunity arguments.
00:18:18.520Here is, I want to read to you what Alan Dershowitz, a friend of the program, said when we called him to ask what his take was.
00:18:25.540He wrote, and let's not forget, Alan defended Trump in the first impeachment.
00:18:30.740He said, if I were his lawyer, I would have told him to take the fifth.
00:18:58.880Look, I love Alan. I think he's very smart. But Congress has a constitutional duty here to make sure that we don't have another mad scientist like Tony Fauci, who causes a pandemic that kills millions of people, takes trillions of our treasure, takes three years, four years of our lives, destroys kids, destroys poor kids even worse.
00:19:22.420I think Congress has an important and legitimate role here.
00:19:27.120And Rand Paul was doing that, was performing those duties today as the chairman.
00:19:31.120It's not you can make that argument about every congressional committee that you if you don't want to go testify that it's a kangaroo court.
00:19:40.180Remember, Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro went to jail for making that argument.
00:19:44.160Mm hmm. What did you make of the I get that it's not a typical to see a person asserting the fifth, assert the fifth in response to every question like we've seen that happen many times.
00:19:55.420But I really thought it was it was really stunning today. It was like, what color is your tie? He wouldn't answer. What did you make of the extreme lengths he went to on the fifth?
00:20:03.640Well, this is where Fauci may have may have screwed himself in this testimony today is he gave an opening statement, right?
00:20:12.320If you can't give an opening statement and make all your points and then claim the Fifth Amendment to questions, that's a waiver of your Fifth Amendment rights.
00:20:20.920If you go in and make an opening statement on the substance like that.
00:20:24.440So I think he's cooked on the Fifth Amendment in many different ways.
00:20:29.800yeah i thought that was extraordinary too he did make statements sweeping statements about the
00:20:36.340pandemic in that opening and then pretended the the subject of what the color of his tie was
00:20:43.080was too sensitive for him to go there grand paul now is going to have this contempt proceeding
00:20:48.320and who will be the arbiter though of that mike who gets to decide whether he's in contempt
00:20:53.040well it would be the full senate it was a simple majority vote of the full senate then it gets
00:20:57.060referred to the D.C. U.S. attorney, Judge Dean Impero, and she has to take it to a grand jury
00:21:02.440by statutes. And then, or you can, again, there are two other routes. You can have the Senate
00:21:09.280sue in district court in D.C. civilly sue and compel his testimony, or you can have the Senate
00:21:14.940have the sergeant at arms go arrest him and put him in the Capitol jail until he agrees to testify.
00:21:20.000And frankly, do all three things. First, do all three paths. Remember what, I want to flag this
00:21:25.520Because remember, it came out that after Tony Fauci got like he got his COVID shots and then he got a blood clot in his lung.
00:21:34.760Right. That same morning that that he found out that he got a blood clot in his lung, he went around with D.C. mayor, Mario Bowser, and was beating on the doors of these black residents of D.C., people who are probably correctly not not big fans of these vaccines because of the Tuskegee trials against the black community where they gave him syphilis and didn't treat it.
00:22:03.580This this black resident of D.C. is pushing back and saying the question, the science is not there.
00:22:09.780Tony Fauci is there with the D.C. mayor pushing this guy saying these covid shots are safe when Tony Fauci had a blood clot in his lung.
00:22:19.100It's unbelievable. Right. Right after he gets the vaccines, of course, from Moderna.
00:22:23.180And he doesn't he doesn't disclose that to anyone. We only know that thanks to these diaries.
00:22:28.040And by the way, let me make this point about the diaries. And I make this point really fast.
00:22:32.620These are not his personal diaries. These are his work notes on his work computer at NIH. These are government records. They're not his personal diaries. So this idea that Rand Paul grabbed his personal diaries and published his personal diaries is nonsense. They were on his work computer. He tried to look. They had to go find them because they were deleted, which is another issue of obstruction.
00:22:55.540Wow. So it's like, you know, you're sitting at your your company and you're putting in your company day planner all your hopes and dreams about the next time Julia Roberts is going to call you.
00:23:08.400You cannot then later say, oh, that was a personal diary. You put it on the company computer. Sorry, that was your bad.
00:23:14.480Yes, it's not a personal diary. These were his work notes that are subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
00:23:20.560These are government records. And he deleted them, just like he ordered people to delete
00:23:26.320emails. This guy tried to cover he he committed crimes to try to make sure he never got caught
00:23:32.560funding gain of function research and the Wuhan lab that mass murdered millions of people.0.68
00:23:39.000It's infuriating. And it's the reason why these Republicans continue to push,
00:23:43.960even though the American public, I do think it's fair to say, has some PTSD around this whole thing.
00:23:48.680You know, they just they don't want to be reminded of this nightmare.
00:23:51.640But there we need to hold the people who did this to us accountable.
00:29:35.600I heard Jim Garrity lamenting that he wasn't able to find this exact soundbite of Fauci blaming the coronavirus on the wet market.
00:29:45.260Because, of course, Garrity did a great job for National Review reporting on all the COVID excesses and lies we were being told in real time.
00:29:52.760But we found that, too, in Fauci's notes where he said it doesn't look like it came from the it says it now appears that using the data, the first infection was in early December and was not connected to the market, was not connected to the market.
00:30:08.600He wrote that on January 26th, 2020, and he wrote that right before he made this appearance
01:01:04.540They hated the social structures in France, and they even hated things like the clock and the calendar, which they tried to change because they thought they were irrational.
01:01:16.600Now, again, oversimplification, and of course, most people who disagree with me politically don't want to hurt anyone.
01:01:21.520But the sort of Luigi Mangione, you mentioned him, approach is a French revolutionary approach.
01:01:31.220he believed that the healthcare system was immoral, that it hurt people, and that it was
01:01:41.880less of a crime to kill and maim and tear it down than it would be to preserve it and perhaps change
01:01:50.640it more modestly. So yeah, they are obsessed with safetyism. But if things get in the way of
01:01:56.180safetyism, the first instinct of the sort of person who's going to behave like that is to kill those
01:02:02.240who are a threat to safetyism, which does sound a bit odd, but it does make sense once you get
01:02:06.500into their mindset. Once again, of course, most people aren't like this. Unfortunately, the
01:02:11.700handful of people who are do at present seem to belong to the same movement.
01:02:16.960Yeah. Well, speaking of the French Revolution,
01:02:20.140One of the catalysts was the rules for thee, but not for me type attitude.
01:02:28.000And that relates to our first segment as well, the COVID thing.
01:02:33.200Because one of the things we learned, I want to move on to other subjects, but I do have to say this about the COVID thing.
01:02:37.620One of the things that's so galling about the whole thing is you see how chummy Anthony Fauci was with the media.
01:02:44.900And you guys and I are in the media, and it's not unusual to text somebody who's been on your show or who's given you an interview for your article and say, great job, thanks a lot, and have some sort of chummy remark.
01:03:02.700And the repeated dinners with Jake Tapper and his wife, while he was the most controversial man in America, not Jake Anthony Fauci, you're playing with fire when you're doing that as Jake Tapper.
01:03:14.900And you're sending him chummy remarks about how Laura Ingram shouldn't have gone to Dartmouth and you're not proud of her.
01:03:35.200It was 10 days after he had told us all not to have Thanksgiving with our family and friends that he went over to Jake Tapper's house and had dinner with him.
01:03:45.540Like the rules for thee, but not for me.
01:03:48.640And by the way, Jake Tapper has not yet spoken to this and really should.
01:03:52.640Yeah, there's also a great entry where I think the French embassy, everyone was honoring Anthony Fauci.
01:03:57.520I think the French embassy wanted to do it.
01:04:00.600I think I'm going to maybe cancel on this one because I don't want to go through what I did last night.
01:04:04.700Because he was at some other event, the gala being honored, and it worried that somehow he'd gotten the virus, which I guess would be a bad look for him.
01:09:14.480And here, let me just tell you, so the Michigan restrictions that Atlas was saying rise up against, this was courtesy of Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
01:09:23.460Some of the strictest stay-at-home orders in the nation.
01:09:26.700Limit the number of customers in essential stores to four for every 1,000 feet.
01:09:31.220Prohibiting employers from making employees come to work unless they're necessary.
01:09:35.260suggesting people limit the number of household members who are running errands banning all public
01:09:41.280and private gatherings outside homes all public and private gatherings as i was saying no more
01:09:47.080private gatherings period a major anti-lockdown protest was held around lansing around with
01:09:53.480many protesting her orders and included people in their cars and people on foot the streets were
01:09:59.240jammed and she was very angry that people were questioning her words she was one of the worst
01:10:04.600the lockdown governors in the country and scott atlas was one of the smartest and while trump0.93
01:10:10.580we featured a video there or he cuomo did of atlas at the lectern at the white house because trump
01:10:17.160eventually caught on to scott atlas and started realizing some of these measures were just too
01:10:21.880draconian and the left didn't like it cuomo didn't like it and guess what rich the left still doesn't
01:10:28.640like it they're still out there ripping these republican senators today defending anthony
01:10:34.180Fauci, holding water for him, because it's not just his neck on the line. It's theirs, too.
01:10:40.040Yeah. So a lot of journalists who pride themselves on being objective, totally threw objectivity out
01:10:46.260the window and were scolding us, right? Scolding people for having the wrong views about this.
01:10:50.860And this is not retrospective, all that, right? We were saying this at the time,
01:10:55.520and there's a very important public leader who figured it out at the time, Ron DeSantis. Within
01:11:00.360Within two or three months, DeSantis had an approach that was based, as Scott Atlas was
01:11:05.760advocating, protect the people who really need protecting, people with preexisting conditions,
01:11:11.480people who are elderly, let's try to ring-fence those people as much as possible, and otherwise
01:14:54.260So I do think the release of the diaries has dented his reputation with some people otherwise much more favorable or inclined to be favorable than we are.
01:15:04.480Now, I want to move on, but I should show that I should show the moment I've been promising it for an hour that when Rand Paul threw out Anthony Fauci's lawyer, who I have to say deserved it.
01:21:17.440the Vanity Fair article from Gavin Newsom's ex-lover. Have we read this piece, gentlemen?
01:21:25.660Because it is, I don't, this is how long, look how long this thing is. This woman is very much
01:21:32.740in love with every memory she has of her interludes with Gavin Newsom. And I don't know
01:21:39.240whether you've read it but ruby rippy wants us to know all about the trysts she had with uh then
01:21:49.680the then mayor of san francisco governor or now governor of california gavin newsome and i want
01:21:57.340to ask you guys about it and i want to ask you whether you think this is going to help him or
01:22:03.200heard him because it happened 25 years ago it's not like it just happened he was married at the
01:22:11.120time to kimberly guilfoyle but they were separated and getting a divorce so i don't think many people
01:22:15.500would consider that cheating on his part and she was she was married however you guys and that's
01:22:22.100where the rub is because not only was he cheating like with her on her husband but the her husband
01:22:28.740worked for gavin newsom and this went on for i think 10 months so it was a direct betrayal by
01:22:35.940gavin newsom of somebody who had been very loyal to him and worked hard for him and by all reports
01:22:40.920really admired him and it was a specific betrayal obviously of the wife against her husband and her
01:22:47.700young two-year-old son and now she's decided just as he possibly runs for president as has vanity
01:22:54.240fair to do a what 30 page article unquote how i blew up then rebuilt my life complete with stories
01:23:02.060about how let's see um i'll find it hold on it's all about how she ripped his shirt off and there
01:23:10.140were no more buttons left on the shirt and then he texted her thank god they sold t-shirts in the
01:23:17.020hotel rich so is this a devastating expose or is this you always do this article now i'm really
01:23:24.460not going to read it you totally convinced me the whole thing is sad it's tawdry also don't get
01:23:29.940you know olivia newsy is that is that her name with with the rfk this thing where you write
01:23:34.820these expose articles not mentioning the name of the person that you're describing yeah an affair
01:23:40.360affair with in great detail i don't get that look i think it was a very messy period from
01:23:44.940Gavin Newsom's life. I wouldn't be surprised if there's more where that came from. But we're just
01:23:49.440so beyond this kind of thing being disqualifying or even a problem, really, in national politics.
01:23:56.860And it was a long time ago. You know, if this is two years ago, be a problem. If there's anything,
01:24:02.800as we saw with Plattner, involving, you know, physical conduct or intimidation or abuse,
01:24:09.500you know, that that can be a deal killer. But this kind of thing won't. He'll just say, you know,
01:24:14.620I had problems back then. I've grown and I've been happily married 20 years or whatever it is.
01:24:22.080She's not alleging non-consensual behavior, although if you read her allegations, she kind of is.
01:24:29.760She's not saying it was non-consensual, but she's saying that she was basically blacked out drunk to the point where she wet the bed in their first encounter.
01:24:39.920I mean, that's pretty far gone, Charlie.
01:24:42.320I'm not sure that's somebody any man should be sleeping with.
01:24:45.160But here's the headline from the Daily Mail.
01:24:47.860Former mistress says they first had sex after she wore white to friend's wedding
01:24:51.240and that she ripped every button off his shirt during passionate hotel encounter, Charlie.
01:24:56.380So who in their right mind goes through this,
01:25:01.540then allows a whole bunch of time to elapse and then says,
01:25:06.200I'll tell the whole world I wet the bed.
01:27:36.740shocking shocking it led to me peeing myself in bed at the time uh newsom was separated from
01:27:45.340kimberly gilfoyle details her struggle with alcoholism uh she she says my phone lights up
01:27:53.220soon after where are you but it never matters where i am because i always go to him his penthouse
01:27:57.780in Russian Hill, a private backroom at a North Beach bar, the W Hotel in Los Angeles. We meet
01:28:03.800and we drink. There is sex, but it isn't the point. The point is proximity to power, to being
01:28:09.540chosen, to feeling newly visible, no longer muted by pregnancy, by new motherhood, by the strain of
01:28:15.960white knuckling, long stretches of sobriety. She soon rushed over to see him at the W Hotel while
01:28:21.960she was on a girls weekend. The next morning, she was greeted by tiny shirt buttons scattered
01:28:26.740like coins on the floor near the bed. Ripley quickly realized that the buttons did not belong
01:28:31.200to her, that she had ripped Newsome's shirt in the heat of the moment the night before.
01:28:35.900I am overcome with the understanding that the consequence will not end with me.
01:28:40.080They may cost me the best thing that has ever happened to me. Alex, oh, her husband, run,
01:28:45.480Alex, run, goes on to say during another sexual encounter, Rippy said she watched her lover on0.94
01:28:50.920all fours near the edge of the bed, scrubbing furiously at the carpet with a washcloth after
01:28:55.080she dropped a glass of red wine from the king-sized bed. Rippy started to think there
01:28:59.140was no chance the stain would come out. But when he caught her gazing at him, Newsom snapped,
01:29:04.400you know, we really can't do this anymore. You can't be doing this to Alex, she recalled him
01:29:09.320saying. You can't be doing this to Alex. How about you? Rippy divorced Tork in early 2007.
01:29:15.880They have a son and appear to have a good relationship. Newsom went on to remarry his
01:29:19.180second wife, Jennifer Siebel, in July 2008, which is a year later. They have three children,
01:29:23.640And I am going to go on the record saying this is not going to hurt him at all.
01:29:29.700I think, sadly, if anything, it might actually help him.
01:29:33.480There might be like some women out there who find him hot, who are kind of like, let me picture the buttons coming off and a passionate affair.
01:29:39.640And it was 25 years ago, so I don't have to feel guilty about enjoying this image.
01:29:53.640The same women who think that they want to go to bed with the the guys who are in prison, you know, because they want to be the one who could like tame him and not get strangled are the ones who look at that and say, like, OK, I could have been that woman with the buttons and the peeing herself in the wine.
01:30:12.600It's probably neutral. But the one thing that it does do is blunt any holier than thou approach toward Trump.
01:30:23.640Now, I know Trump won't be running in 28. But Trump's not exactly a paragon of virtue. And there
01:30:29.920are some people who respond to this by pretending that they are. And if Gavin Newsom tries that,
01:30:36.080it won't work. Now, this probably doesn't matter. But it does take that arrow out of his quiver.
01:30:41.760Well, to get way ahead of us, you know, he'd likely be running if he's a nominee. And if
01:30:46.920JD is the nominee, JD has the best odds of any Republican being the nominee at the moment.
01:30:50.360he's running against a good family man right he just has a growing young family but i can't
01:30:56.600vance having been such a trump loyalist vance can't bring this up either so i'm gonna go with
01:31:01.480wash as well yeah okay um elsewhere there is a news story percolating about a professor at
01:31:13.880cambridge charlie but you went to oxford right i always forget from cambridge i went to oxford
01:31:19.180Okay. Well, this was in your backyard. There is a plagiarism scandal brewing at Cambridge,
01:31:28.060and it seems pretty clear to me, but no one at Cambridge cares and no one on Blue Sky cares at
01:31:35.720all either. And that is for one reason, as far as I can tell, the man being accused is black0.97
01:31:42.540and has been this much celebrated professor because he has allegedly this very compelling
01:31:48.700backstory. But it turns out the backstory to maybe utter bullshit. OK, here's I'm just going to start0.99
01:31:57.560with some of the defenses and then we can get into what the allegations are. But this is just
01:32:03.860a sampling from Blue Sky. The right wing press is attacking Jason Arday, Britain's only black
01:32:09.760autistic professor for plagiarism in his Ph.D. Then they go on to say solidarity. This is very
01:32:16.400common plagiarism is. It's just that nobody notices or complains if you're white. Another0.58
01:32:21.100one disgusted with the press for presenting this non story. If it has to be covered at all,
01:32:27.520it should be framed as discredited racist smears black Cambridge professor in sustained campaign
01:32:32.000to undermine him. Jason Arday, another one writes, is the youngest black professor in Cambridge's
01:32:36.760history. Right wing newspapers are trying to smear him with false accusations of plagiarism.
01:32:41.580We can't let them stand up to their hate and division, solidarity, vile racist hit job, and so on, nasty smear campaign of lies.
01:32:49.620But it turns out it's not just about his alleged instances of plagiarism as outlined by the Telegraph in great detail.
01:32:59.840And we can get to some of that because it goes on.
01:33:02.460It's also about the possibility that this guy lied about his entire life story.
01:33:08.580There is a question about whether he was nonverbal, as he claimed, until the age of 11, and then miraculously went on to start speaking, not just speaking, but like to the point where he could get hired as a professor at Cambridge within a few short years.
01:33:25.820He became a Cambridge professor at age 37.
01:33:29.620The UK Telegraph says he was diagnosed with autism and was nonverbal till 11.
01:33:34.420he had only learned to read and write at age 18, but then obtained a degree and a doctorate
01:33:39.340before forging his career in teaching. He has now written a memoir, Great and Unfortunate
01:33:44.460Things, set to be published next month. And yet there are questions emerging about whether he
01:33:50.720deserved that PhD or whether he plagiarized his way to it. They say that, stand by,
01:33:59.040less than a decade ago, he was given a devastating outlook. He would likely need
01:34:05.300to stay in an assisted living facility. He refused to make that a reality, writing that he would work
01:34:11.340at Oxford or Cambridge on the wall of his mom's bedroom, solidifying one of his life goals.
01:34:16.220He told the BBC that watching Nelson Mandela's prison release in 1990 and witnessing South
01:34:21.380Africa's 1995 Rugby World Cup win were among the most formative moments in his young life,
01:34:26.640vowing that if he didn't make it as a football player, uh, he would save the world. He said he
01:34:31.500never had a mentor teach him to write for academia, uh, leading to a number of rejections that is
01:34:37.720until finally reaching his goal of teaching at Cambridge in the face of adversity. He was hell
01:34:42.380bent on changing the tides in his favor. He went on to earn two master's qualifications after
01:34:46.460receiving a degree in phys ed and education studies from the university of Surrey later
01:34:51.320earned a PhD from Liverpool John Moores University in 2016. Um, and they say, okay, hold on. Um,
01:35:02.780that this is from the Telegraph. An analysis of his PhD thesis, however, identified more than 100
01:35:09.420passages that are identical or nearly identical to a 2009 PhD thesis by Paula Zwosdiak Myers,
01:35:16.600A Brunel University student, Professor Arde's 401-page thesis titled, An Exploration of Peer Monitoring Among Student Teachers, sick, so there is a grammatical error in the name of his PhD thesis, to inform reflective practice within the context of action research, mentions this Ms. Myers 17 times, but he allegedly steals her work far more than 17.
01:35:43.440and they provide the examples which are identical.
01:35:46.500I mean, I'll just give you just a couple of,
01:36:09.700Now, finally, today we get the addendum
01:36:11.820that not only did he make all these claims, but he also said he did all this, like whatever,
01:36:19.100got himself from non-speaking into a professorship at Cambridge while he had both a brain tumor
01:36:24.920and then a stroke and ran 600 miles, 600 miles in, was it 30 days or 60 days?
01:36:37.540I mean, let's see. He said in 2010 that he had run 30 marathons in 35 days, and that was 300 miles in three days, 600 miles in six days, which would have been 50 miles short of the world record for ultra distance running.
01:36:58.680Now, Southampton Solent University, which awarded him an honorary degree in 2023, has quietly removed the references to running 300 miles and 600 miles from its website.
01:37:10.480And another university, which gave him an honorary doctorate, recently changed the reference to 600 miles in six days to 600 miles in 12 days.
01:37:17.460So brain tumor, stroke, 600 miles in six days, allegedly, got the Ph.D. and gave his verbal defense of it right after he had the brain tumor and was having the stroke after being nonverbal forever and then somehow managing to talk himself.0.98
01:37:35.160Like, I smell bullshit from an ocean away.0.67
01:37:39.600But Charlie, you tell me because you're of this elite world and actually shared an original country with this guy.0.99
01:37:48.040I think somewhere George Santos is taking notes on this guy.
01:37:53.760Not Jewish, but Jew-ish as he defended himself.
01:37:57.640I mean, I feel that the best defense of this guy is that he's a plagiarist, because I looked up the work in which the plagiarism supposedly took place. And I would not have wanted to have written it because it is unadulterated garbage. And I think that that is perhaps more important. I had the same view of Claudine Gay at Harvard. It's bad to plagiarize and she shouldn't have done it.1.00
01:38:24.720But the really embarrassing thing about Claudine Gay was the work that she published under her own name, which was entirely worthless. And the same is true here. We're not talking here about somebody following in the footsteps of, say, Sir Isaac Newton, perhaps Cambridge's most famous alumnus who has been plagiarizing work.
01:38:43.540we're talking about somebody who is obsessed with race, who talks about whiteness and blackness as
01:38:50.580if they're serious concepts, who doesn't look at human beings as human beings, but as members of
01:38:57.060groups, whose language is inscrutable. He was much preferable, I suppose, when he couldn't speak.
01:39:05.460So this is more than a story about plagiarism, I think. This is a story about fraud. Now, of course,
01:39:12.480Having been to Oxford, I should at this point make lots of jokes about Cambridge, as is R1.
01:39:20.580This is a problem in academia in general at the moment, and he exemplifies it.
01:39:26.500So perhaps he's the latest person to be caught.
01:39:31.880But there is, unfortunately, within the academic sphere, much less interest in the truth than there should be,
01:39:40.100and much less interest and useful inquiry than there should be.
01:39:43.840And a great celebration of people's immutable characteristics
01:39:46.960and their ability to put out a whole bunch of guff.
01:39:50.440And this has blown up because he is all three at once.0.99
01:39:54.620He's a plagiarist, he's a fraud, and his work is useless.0.95
01:39:59.800And the sooner that we recognize that, the better our universities will be.0.97
01:40:03.580Yes, his work was found to be identical to the other professor in more than 100 passages.
01:40:08.620He only cited her 17 times. And what does Cambridge say about this whole thing, Rich?
01:40:14.060Well, their professor Bakar Vera, who serves as the pro vice chancellor of education at the university, described our day as an exceptional scholar.
01:40:24.060Quote, he will contribute significantly to Cambridge's research in this area and to addressing the underrepresentation of people from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, especially those from black, Asian and other minority ethnic communities.
01:40:40.040His experiences highlight the barriers faced by many underrepresented groups.
01:40:45.480He's he's basically saying he's black, so he's going nowhere.
01:40:50.300He's going to bring some sort of diversity to Cambridge.
01:40:53.560And we don't care how many people he plagiarized or how many lies he's told us, possibly about 600 miles in six days, a brain tumor and a stroke while defending his Ph.D.
01:41:07.220after being autistic and nonverbal and having no formal tutelage. It's crazy.
01:41:14.620So maybe the autistic thing is not as crazy as it sounds. I remember Thomas Sowell a year ago
01:41:19.020wrote a book about late talkers, and sometimes they can be incredibly talented. But the rest
01:41:23.620of this story, when you add it up that way, it's obviously too good to check. But there's no
01:41:30.480black plagiarism or white plagiarism or women's plagiarism. There's just plagiarism, right? He0.80
01:41:36.520either did it or or not and it shouldn't be acceptable acceptable but this this is kind of
01:41:41.960the dei mindset in a nutshell right the molten core of it that the value of this guy is not his
01:41:48.560scholarship is not his thought certainly not his originality it's his characteristics or supposed
01:41:54.840characteristics and that's just not how any of this is supposed to work and it's a deep corruption
01:41:59.800of academia. And it long ago jumped the ivory walls of academia as it affected all of our
01:42:08.460national life here in the United States and other Western advanced countries. So if he did it,
01:42:13.400he should be nailed to the wall and no one should hear about him again. If he has some0.96
01:42:18.180innocent explanation or if it's not truly plagiarism, fine. But the idea that this guy
01:42:23.360should be a member of a protected class because of these his characteristics is just poisonous oh
01:42:30.300yeah well now he's playing the victim card too because this first came out in 2023 when both
01:42:36.140cambridge and this john moores were alerted to this problem um this dave harris professor emeritus
01:42:43.120at plymouth margin university alerted cambridge and liverpool's john moores university to his
01:42:48.780concerns about plagiarism by this guy. This is back in 2023. He said, in my opinion, important
01:42:53.300sections of the work of this professor, Jason Arday, both his PhD thesis and some subsequent
01:42:57.720published articles, solo and jointly written display indications of serious plagiarism.
01:43:01.900He notified them both. And he also emailed Arday to his credit about the discrepancies in his
01:43:07.700published work. And how did Arday respond? Please do not email me again. Should you have time to
01:43:12.620spare? I invite you to direct your resources elsewhere. Anything further from you will be
01:43:17.240considered bullying and harassment, bullying and harassment. There's this one guy named Nathan
01:43:23.840Coughness, who's a free speech advocate, who was sacked by Emanuel at Cambridge College last year
01:43:29.880after Substack posts. And this is how they're dismissing this guy's allegations. He was one
01:43:34.800of the ones who first brought this up. They're saying, oh, he's racist. He's a crackpot biologist
01:43:38.920and racist because he said even Walt Disney would raise an eyebrow at this story. Well, that's0.97
01:43:43.620because there were accusations against him
01:43:46.480for writing this allegedly racist article,
01:43:48.820but the complaints against him were later dismissed.