Final GOP Primary of 2024? Plus, Fani Willis Affair Drama, with Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cooke | Ep. 708
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 36 minutes
Words per Minute
179.07542
Summary
Nikki Haley is the first woman to cast a primary vote in the first primary in New Hampshire, and it's a do or die situation for her. Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cook join me to talk about the latest polling numbers and why it's Do or Die for Nikki Haley. Plus, tensions over the border crisis as the Supreme Court deals a blow to Texas in its effort to stop illegal immigrants from crossing the border, and we have new developments in the Fannie Willis case.
Transcript
00:00:00.500
Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East.
00:00:11.880
Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:17.380
It's officially underway as voters head to the polls in New Hampshire.
00:00:29.280
Her messaging has gone from, I'm going to win, to a little more like strong showing.
00:00:35.360
Although, she said to Fox News yesterday she is going to win.
00:00:38.780
So, we'll see. They're a little bit all over the board on it.
00:00:41.580
A short time ago, she was asked about securing the first victory of the day, which she did.
00:00:46.840
A six, as in six people, six votes to zero win over former President Trump in the tiny town of Dixville, Notch.
00:00:59.300
It gave us some good energy and momentum, and I'm grateful to those six people.
00:01:03.300
We're not promising that it's going to be 350,000 to zero, but we're definitely on track for that.
00:01:10.360
That was New Hampshire Governor Krista Nunu at the end, who has done more than anyone short of the candidate to actually get her elected or to at least get her a win in New Hampshire.
00:01:21.080
We know that tonight is very well going to be do or die for Nikki Haley.
00:01:27.680
We get to this and much, much more, plus tensions over the border crisis as the Supreme Court deals a defeat to Texas in its effort to stop illegal immigrants from crossing over.
00:01:40.240
And we've got new developments as well in the Fannie Willis case.
00:01:46.580
Joining me now, two of our favorites for NR Day, National Review Day here at the Megyn Kelly Show.
00:01:52.440
Rich Lowry is editor-in-chief of National Review.
00:01:55.200
Charles C.W. Cook is a senior writer for National Review and host of the Charles C.W. Cook podcast.
00:02:01.140
You can find all of their work by becoming an NR Plus subscriber, and you should do it today.
00:02:13.200
And you get extra content, too, if you actually subscribe.
00:02:21.880
So I haven't had a chance to talk to you guys yet, though I did listen to the editors on Tuesday and Thursday of last week.
00:02:33.620
Let's just start with your thoughts on whether there's any chance now that Nikki Haley pulls this out.
00:02:40.380
Because looking at the latest polls going into today, it looks terrible for her.
00:02:45.000
You know, it was tight according to a couple of polls, but the final New Hampshire tracking poll from Suffolk University, NBC, Boston Globe, came out this morning showing Trump at 60% in New Hampshire, Haley at 38%.
00:02:59.760
So, Rich, that's Trump plus 22%, which is not exactly tight.
00:03:05.960
So, New Hampshire, the polling can be squirrelly.
00:03:11.760
There's not like, in Iowa, you have the Des Moines Register polls.
00:03:16.400
You don't have a poll like that in New Hampshire.
00:03:18.860
But every poll seems to be showing the same thing.
00:03:21.580
And it's true in a lot of places, especially true in New Hampshire.
00:03:25.460
It's the momentum in the polling that matters a lot, because oftentimes there's swings in New Hampshire, because independents can vote in either primary.
00:03:34.800
But the momentum here, the margins with Trump, the momentum is with Trump.
00:03:40.260
I mean, just the feel, this thing already feels over, is with Trump.
00:03:44.140
So maybe there's some shocker where every independent in New Hampshire floods into the Republican primary and puts Nikki Haley close or even, you know, over the top.
00:03:59.360
Like, you know, in past primaries, it's like, it's exciting.
00:04:14.020
She has no chance in any place other than New Hampshire in the coming days and weeks.
00:04:24.400
I mean, in a sense, it has felt like that for months.
00:04:27.120
But there was always the question of whether it was going to end up being a mirage.
00:04:41.360
The second person is not going to win the state she needs to win.
00:04:45.460
Seems to me that it is almost inevitable that Trump will be the nominee.
00:04:50.200
That said, he is going to find himself in and out of courtrooms a great deal in the next few months.
00:04:57.700
I think Republican primary voters have forgotten or too heavily discounted this.
00:05:03.300
And I just wonder whether there will be some surprise down the stretch.
00:05:08.620
But it's not going to come from Donald Trump losing the primaries to Nikki Haley.
00:05:12.640
She, as I said, I've listened to her and Sununu, Rich, change a little bit in their messaging.
00:05:19.580
You know, she was saying, I'm going to win New Hampshire.
00:05:21.500
Then it kind of changed to, like, she's going to have a strong showing there.
00:05:27.420
But then here she is on Fox News yesterday, sounding very bullish.
00:05:36.780
And as much as everybody wants to talk about what I'm going to do, at some point, y'all are going to realize that I won this race.
00:05:44.300
And you're going to have to accept when I say I told you so.
00:05:51.320
I'm not going to pull out because somebody wants to be coronated.
00:05:54.240
I'm not going to pull out because they think that I shouldn't be there.
00:06:08.140
Or do you think she's seen some internal polls that the rest of us haven't?
00:06:12.400
Well, they're playing it really close to their chest, if that's true.
00:06:15.480
Because Sununu this morning was saying, it's going to be great.
00:06:18.920
She's going to get to 40% or maybe above, which translates into basically a 20% loss.
00:06:24.620
But as long as you're an active candidate, you've got to say you're going to win.
00:06:28.340
And you've got to say you're never going to drop out.
00:06:30.220
Even if you know you might drop out in 12 hours.
00:06:32.100
Now, I think she's, I mean, she's a dead woman walking right now.
00:06:37.840
I expect it to play out a little bit like the DeSantis, the way DeSantis did.
00:06:46.440
We, you know, as pundits, we're criticizing them all the time.
00:06:58.240
So it'll be hard for her the way it was for DeSantis to just instantly say, I'm out.
00:07:04.460
But I would expect her to be out by the end of the week.
00:07:07.960
I don't know why she'd lose New Hampshire, where, like DeSantis, DeSantis was not going
00:07:12.680
Iowa matched up for him politically, given the way he was running in the nomination fight.
00:07:20.920
He had an endorsement of a really important conservative activist, both of whom were wholly on board with
00:07:29.300
My understanding is usually he just says, oh, I endorse you.
00:07:32.860
As you say, he's been out there actively campaigning.
00:07:35.220
So if she doesn't win there, come really, really close there, where is it going to get better?
00:07:39.200
And there are more primaries in the nomination fight that are open to independence than people
00:07:45.280
They think, like, it's New Hampshire, nowhere else.
00:07:47.900
But you can't win a nomination just by winning independence and losing Republicans to the
00:07:52.940
frontrunner, which is what she'll likely do tonight and what she'd do elsewhere.
00:07:58.540
And I would expect her to drop in fairly short order and also to endorse Trump in fairly short
00:08:05.180
Charlie, it didn't happen for Ron DeSantis, your governor down in Florida and a great
00:08:10.460
governor, I think, by all three of our standards.
00:08:13.900
I've listened to you over the past year, really hopeful that he could do it.
00:08:20.200
You know, the audience knows you don't like or want Trump and then sort of wrestling with
00:08:28.240
And now, you know, it's like the five stages, right?
00:08:35.480
I think there are a lot of Republicans who are probably feeling what you're feeling right
00:08:42.120
We had this guy who probably would have been a great executive, but he didn't have the charm,
00:08:51.340
So now having had the benefit of a few days after his announcement to look back on where
00:08:56.260
he went wrong, if he went wrong, right, if it could be blamed on him at all, how are you
00:09:04.640
Well, I should say up front, my primary objective in this campaign season was to see Donald Trump
00:09:12.780
Now, had the primaries come to Florida, I would have voted for DeSantis.
00:09:17.160
We had a debate at National Review quite early on.
00:09:20.400
Michael Brendan Dowdy wrote a piece essentially saying we should put all of our chips in behind
00:09:24.240
I was on the side of not doing that because you never quite know how people are going to
00:09:30.660
So you're right to say I think he's a very good governor of Florida, although I have been
00:09:41.200
But I think DeSantis made a couple of big mistakes, you know, leaving aside the elements that
00:09:48.140
he can't control, such as that he's short and isn't especially charismatic, doesn't
00:09:57.820
The taller candidate tends to win the presidency.
00:10:04.840
And the biggest mistake that he made, in my view, as a Floridian, is that he forgot how
00:10:13.180
He won so big in Florida because he was not regarded as anything other than a normal politician.
00:10:19.860
In the country at large, he was turned into this football, a piñata at times.
00:10:29.240
He's really into cleaning up lakes and saving manatees and making sure the Everglades are
00:10:37.380
Although he has taken on the teachers' unions, he raised teachers' pay twice.
00:10:41.960
He is really good at the bread and butter of politics in Florida, much of which was laid
00:10:54.200
There are constitutional prohibitions on raising fees.
00:10:58.860
And he absolutely crushed the number one responsibility of a Florida governor, which is hurricanes.
00:11:04.780
I think it's the best hurricane response I've ever seen was Ron DeSantis' last year, actually
00:11:10.900
And then he went on the campaign trail and he talked in this strange online language.
00:11:17.560
Everything at his launch, which didn't work, the Twitter launch.
00:11:24.900
Probably not the first thing you mentioned when you're running for president of the United
00:11:30.480
They're going to decide how big the administrative state should and can be.
00:11:38.220
Now, I think, as I've said many times, that he was probably not going to win because Trump
00:11:45.400
He's just a remarkable figure, a sui generis figure within our politics.
00:11:54.040
But I think DeSantis would have had a better chance if he had talked about things that most
00:11:57.880
people care about, which is the economy and crime.
00:12:03.420
But did so in a less esoteric way or in less of a way than you would expect to see on Twitter.
00:12:12.160
It's almost as if he saw himself becoming a cultural lightning rod and he saw himself
00:12:17.320
regarded as sort of something outside of the American mainstream.
00:12:22.100
But that's just not how he was seen in Florida.
00:12:27.860
You know, there's been a debate now about whether he should have been touting the anti-woke
00:12:32.420
thing, Casey DeSantis's jacket where woke goes to die.
00:12:40.140
I count myself as an anti-woke warrior and loved everything he said.
00:12:44.480
But I can see the question about whether that should have been the thing he ran on.
00:12:49.780
You know, I mean, that, as you point out, Florida's thriving.
00:12:52.860
And, you know, Trump had some tweets, Rich, about how, oh, well, you know, it's thriving
00:13:03.480
But Ron DeSantis really changed the voting patterns in Florida and for a good reason.
00:13:08.500
So he had some things he could have bragged about on the economy, which is the number
00:13:12.800
Maybe woke plays a 20 percent role instead of an 80 percent role, which is how it felt.
00:13:18.440
So first of all, I think you just can't underestimate how the performance ability plays in national
00:13:25.460
And there's just there's not one thing anyone can remember that Ron DeSantis said that was
00:13:32.180
But maybe the closest I can remember the CNN town hall he did with Caitlin Collins.
00:13:37.300
And it was after Nikki Haley had messed up her name, called her Caitlin Clark, who apparently
00:13:43.220
So DeSantis came out with the Caitlin Clark jersey to give to Caitlin Collins, which was
00:13:47.360
sort of light or funny, but it was making fun of Nikki Haley.
00:13:51.340
You know, he had a lot of material to use for self-deprecating humor.
00:13:54.040
Even after that horrible last debate, he goes with Anderson Cooper for the interview afterwards.
00:14:01.660
I mean, it was actually like a transformative thing to see him relax.
00:14:04.700
I don't know what was going on, but he talked at the end about his five-year-old kid being
00:14:09.840
in the front row in the whole debate and making it to, you know, through the entire
00:14:14.740
So why didn't he start that debate saying, you know, here's my son.
00:14:19.560
And this is the most important metric for me in this debate, whether I'm to succeed
00:14:23.100
or not, whether I can keep him awake or whether he's going to fall asleep on me.
00:14:30.660
And it's not the most important quality of president.
00:14:33.680
No, but it's really important quality for people to identify with a political candidate.
00:14:41.420
I don't think it was crazy what he was trying to do at the beginning.
00:14:43.800
And it went to the big strategic theory of the campaign, which go to the middle of the
00:14:47.800
party, not the middle ideologically, but the middle in terms of feelings towards Trump,
00:14:52.720
MAGA people who are kind of soft on Trump and in theory persuadable to be moved away from
00:14:58.100
him and convince them that DeSantis is pure and more of a fighter.
00:15:05.680
And, you know, Trump is not really into the trans thing.
00:15:08.340
You know, abortion, he's obviously been much, much weaker this time around.
00:15:13.020
But it's just impossible to convince people that Trump is soft on cultural stuff because
00:15:21.460
If these people are movable at all, maybe they just weren't.
00:15:23.600
But you get the indictments that bond them to Trump.
00:15:27.000
And then his theory was, I'll get these people, these soft Trump voters, and then I'll establish
00:15:33.160
All the non-Trump people, and they're not a majority, so I got to worry about these people
00:15:37.680
The 20 to 25 percent never non-Trump people will just come to me because they have to.
00:15:43.700
Everyone, all the other candidates are flaking away and dropping out.
00:15:52.440
And then Nikki Haley vacuums up the non-Trump voters.
00:15:55.380
And that's why you're 20 percent in your strongest state in Iowa and 5 to 10 percent everywhere
00:16:07.520
You know, when I went down there to interview him in Florida, he, like the dinner itself
00:16:13.160
that we had the night before is off the record.
00:16:14.920
But I will tell you, he was telling stories that had us rolling.
00:16:18.280
There was an amazing story he told about a particular U.S. senator who went in front of
00:16:23.860
Trump when Trump was in the Oval Office, which I'm not at liberty to repeat.
00:16:27.380
But in telling the story, he, DeSantis, did an imitation of Trump that was the best.
00:16:34.560
I mean, it was among the best imitations I've heard.
00:16:44.780
And it got me thinking, you know, you know how they used to, in the law, they used to
00:16:49.160
say, I'm sure you guys have heard this, you hire the A students from the top schools to
00:16:54.560
And you hire like the C students at the second and third tier schools to actually get in front
00:17:01.280
Because those are people who were smart enough to get into law school and make it through
00:17:09.020
And DeSantis has had this stellar resume career, right?
00:17:13.740
With like the Yale and the Harvard Law School and right.
00:17:19.860
I mean, he's been building the presidential resume from the time he was, you know, 17.
00:17:24.400
And I do think that probably makes you risk averse.
00:17:27.480
If you're not a natural people person, your inclination would not be to press past your
00:17:34.900
It would be like, everything I've done has gotten to me what I've achieved so far.
00:17:39.180
I should not let down any of these defenses, Rich.
00:17:46.920
But it's hard to, you know, there's only a certain level which you can manage a presidential
00:17:52.340
But what they should have done, every time you said something funny in private, that
00:17:56.360
someone should have written it down and some material they can't use, right?
00:17:59.640
You're making, you're not going to mock Trump that way, or you can't talk about the senator
00:18:04.100
And then have them try it out on the stump and stuff that's funny.
00:18:11.220
Once you have a joke, you know, that's gold, right?
00:18:17.880
If people laugh at something you say that's intended to be funny, it bonds people to you.
00:18:26.160
But apparently it just, and this all goes to the top, he's just uninterested in it.
00:18:29.560
And I'd never heard your theory, but I think that makes a lot of sense.
00:18:32.560
And then the last thing, that thing about doing something wrong and the A student worried
00:18:36.900
about the misstep because he'd never made one in his life.
00:18:41.100
One reason people associate Trump with strength is he's fearless.
00:18:46.600
At least you can't feel the gears whirring around in his head, right?
00:18:51.240
He'll say anything about a clerk sitting next to the judge.
00:18:57.460
But both Haley and DeSantis, you could always feel they were calculating every line.
00:19:03.400
That debate they had must have been the most rehearsed, non-spontaneous debate ever.
00:19:07.720
I doubt any of them actually ever said anything they hadn't thought about beforehand or written
00:19:16.900
And this goes back to Charlie's point that DeSantis, he didn't run quite as DeSantis, right?
00:19:21.160
He's a conservative and he believes all the anti-wealth stuff.
00:19:27.320
And people could feel that, I think, and that hurt as well.
00:19:32.200
I mean, there's a paradox here within democracy itself in that we're all sitting around and
00:19:45.340
But the job he's running for is mostly not about performance.
00:19:51.960
I mean, if you look at DeSantis' record as governor, he's an exceptional executive.
00:19:55.860
He's the sort of person you would want to be in charge of the federal government.
00:20:05.160
Leave aside for a moment whether you agree with him or not.
00:20:09.100
If he had left-wing politics, people on the left would, I think, be able to see that he
00:20:18.840
But he's not really interested in the stuff that you need to do to be able to become the
00:20:27.120
And I don't think he was ever interested enough in changing that.
00:20:31.800
And so he's probably not going to take the next step.
00:20:38.960
And you have people who are really good at running for president.
00:20:49.720
You probably have to go back to Ronald Reagan, to someone who had both and who picked it up
00:20:54.700
And Rich said, when you have a joke that lands, you keep it.
00:21:01.460
Since he was 10 years old, he'd been telling people jokes.
00:21:13.800
During that time, he also managed to turn himself into a fantastic executive as well.
00:21:24.060
It is a bit strange, though, how much we prioritize the performance quality.
00:21:28.680
I'm not saying that we're wrong, because clearly DeSantis didn't make it.
00:21:33.880
But it's a bit frustrating, I must say, as someone who's lived in Florida and seen what
00:21:39.480
DeSantis has delivered, to read piece after piece, accurately describing what is wrong
00:21:46.500
with him, none of which actually has to do with the core job description that he was
00:21:55.920
One, to emphasize the point you're making, Charlie, and one, to add a caveat.
00:21:59.640
So just what you're saying made me think the two best communicators in Republican politics
00:22:05.480
ever were Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan, both of whom were hilarious, who were funny,
00:22:11.260
had an endless story, an endless store of jokes and stories, like for any circumstance,
00:22:17.380
They could use it to deflect certain things when they're being pressed or to emphasize
00:22:24.240
And Trump, not in that way, you know, Lincoln and Reagan did, but he's funny.
00:22:28.920
And I'll just add, yeah, you need a good executive to be president.
00:22:35.560
I remember, at least in the element, you need to look sad at the right times when you
00:22:40.380
need to be sad, strong when you need to look strong, even if you're not feeling it.
00:22:44.040
And George W. Bush, once we were meeting with him in the Oval Office, and he was talking
00:22:54.220
He's like, I read that stuff, and it upsets me.
00:22:57.280
You know, it makes me feel under attack, you know?
00:23:01.460
And if I do that, people, when I go out and do an event, they're going to, I don't want
00:23:10.020
So there is an inherent performance part of the job.
00:23:14.980
It's more of the campaign element than the presidency element, but it doesn't totally go away when
00:23:19.460
By the way, both of those presidents you mentioned from the state of Illinois, I mean, Reagan
00:23:37.000
I only know this because my 10-year-old is doing, they're researching the states and the
00:23:41.360
capitals, and he got assigned to the state of Illinois.
00:23:43.480
So he's learning all sorts of things about Illinois.
00:23:47.460
I will say, I've told this story long in the past, but when I was young in journalism,
00:23:51.740
there was a fairly well-known female news anchor who said to me, you should never try
00:24:01.100
It's very dangerous to try to use humor on the air.
00:24:04.820
And it, you know, I definitely have a goofy side and it is part of who I am to use humor.
00:24:11.300
Sometimes it lands, sometimes it doesn't, but it's just, it's like an outlet.
00:24:16.820
And I really think that it helped me, whether it landed or it didn't, people can tell you're
00:24:22.040
in earnest and they appreciate you kind of trying to make the, them, to entertain them
00:24:28.820
and that you can see the levity in a situation.
00:24:31.000
And all the more so when you're running for president and they, they get that you understand
00:24:36.540
there can be wars and there are people's lives and there are the economies in your hands
00:24:42.580
But, you know, I think I was right in this debate with this news anchor who didn't go
00:24:47.860
And, um, I think Ron DeSantis, he's got the side.
00:24:52.480
If he didn't have it, you guys, I'd be like, well, he doesn't, he doesn't have it, but he
00:25:01.740
Here's Nikki Haley, who I think she tried to use humor.
00:25:07.440
She had an interesting exchange here, uh, on the campaign trail that my team teed up.
00:25:14.600
And you look at what's happening in this election.
00:25:37.720
But I asked my, this of my panel earlier this week, there is a, like the core MAGA base
00:25:47.660
And I don't think when she throws in the towel in a couple of days, they're going to do what
00:25:54.180
I mean, there's some infighting still, like forget it.
00:25:57.240
But for the most part, I think MAGA is like, yeah, welcome to the party, to the DeSantis supporters.
00:26:01.740
I just don't think, I'm not sure Nikki Haley has any sort of a future in Republican politics.
00:26:11.380
I think she'll, there will be some deep consideration because by traditional standards, she checks
00:26:18.860
She'll be the second runner up, you know, the last candidate standing against the nominee.
00:26:24.380
She has a different base in the party and a base that Trump needs a lot of if he's going
00:26:30.960
She could help with that, help with the demographic weakness, you know, women in the suburbs.
00:26:37.960
This campaign, she's overperformed in this campaign, you know.
00:26:57.220
I mean, he holds incredible grudges, but if it's in his interest to forgive, or if you
00:27:04.500
But I think the chances are against her being, being selected.
00:27:08.140
And then we talked about this in the podcast, an episode or two ago, both DeSantis and Haley,
00:27:14.140
28, it's so long, you know, and DeSantis will have the advantage.
00:27:17.660
He's a sitting governor, and so he recently left office, so he'd still have a kind of
00:27:23.380
You're saying in 28, he will have left office within the past two years.
00:27:28.520
Whereas Haley, you know, it's really kind of yesterday's news, her service.
00:27:33.120
And, you know, she's out of sympathy where the party currently is.
00:27:37.780
I think the, I'm not a huge fan, but the level of hatred is off the charts and uncalled
00:27:43.660
for it, but it's because the MAGA people say, you know, not unreasonably, she represents
00:27:49.300
Don't pick her for Veep, you know, because you're giving the old party this foothold when
00:27:53.560
we've waged this revolution and taken it over, so why are you going to give it to her?
00:27:57.000
But that's, you know, there are many reasons they hate her, but the main one is that they
00:28:04.380
But, you know, just to, I heard you guys talking about that.
00:28:06.840
And it was kind of depressing to think, you know, I'd love to see Ron DeSantis have an
00:28:15.320
Because when, in 2028, he'll have been out of it.
00:28:23.360
But, and of course, from, I don't know, from now until, when does his term expire?
00:28:35.040
So anyway, he'll be, he'll have been out of office for two years.
00:28:42.720
She's been working for Boeing and earning, like she's been in the private sector and she
00:28:47.960
So why, why, why so pessimistic on Ron DeSantis' ability to resurface as a real contender in
00:28:56.500
Well, I'm pessimistic because, and again, leaving aside the problems that won't go away, such
00:29:10.960
Charlie's a tall guy, keeps, keeps, uh, harping.
00:29:20.480
I have this view reluctantly because I think it is so silly.
00:29:23.660
And the guy who wrote the constitution, James Madison was five foot three, but it is true.
00:29:36.420
But no, look, I think that DeSantis is going to be in a difficult position, whatever happens
00:29:40.700
in that if Trump wins, then DeSantis was the guy who didn't do well against Trump and the
00:29:51.300
Trump candidacy will have been ratified in a sense by the American public.
00:29:58.840
If Trump loses, then Joe Biden is going to be president of the United States again, perhaps
00:30:07.400
succeeded within his second term by Kamala Harris.
00:30:11.180
And there's going to be a great deal of upset on the right at what Joe Biden and or Kamala
00:30:19.140
And there's going to be someone who becomes the face of the resistance.
00:30:23.820
Now, in the first Biden term, that happened to be Ron DeSantis.
00:30:30.400
So COVID obviously spanned both presidencies, but Donald Trump was a private citizen living
00:30:40.860
in Mar-a-Lago by the time that Biden was really kicking into gear.
00:30:46.460
He was the governor of Florida, the third most popular state.
00:30:51.100
And he was the guy on the national stage saying, we're not going to stand for this.
00:30:54.740
And he became the face of the conservative opposition to Biden.
00:31:00.920
I suspect someone else will be that in 2027, 2028, right when they need to be ahead of the
00:31:11.140
And I don't think that DeSantis' success, such as it was in Iowa, followed by his dropping
00:31:17.920
out, is going to be enough to persuade voters who at that point should be livid, Democrats
00:31:24.520
having in that scenario won four of the last five elections, to go back to that well.
00:31:30.760
And on Nikki Haley, I just think Nikki Haley, although she's done really well and far, far
00:31:34.700
better than anyone anticipated, including myself, I think Nikki Haley's success is the product
00:31:45.740
If Donald Trump tomorrow were abducted by aliens and we never saw him again, I can't quite
00:31:50.560
see what role Nikki Haley would play in a 2028 primary.
00:31:54.920
Why would anyone, and this is no disrespect to her, she's accomplished, but why would anyone
00:31:59.920
say at that point, you know who we really need?
00:32:02.420
We need the former governor of South Carolina, former UN ambassador who hasn't been in office
00:32:09.740
And to your point, that poll I mentioned when we started asked her voters, is your vote going
00:32:22.200
And it was basically 50-50, evenly split, 46 and 46, for Haley versus for, against Trump.
00:32:29.800
Whereas with the Trump voters, 84% said, I'm going to vote for him because I want him.
00:32:37.220
Only 10% said, I'm going to go because I don't like Nikki Haley.
00:32:40.760
That's just what's happening with the Republican party.
00:32:50.360
They, they see the problems with it, the temperament and all that, but they've learned to love that
00:32:54.540
too, because it's indicative of other characteristics.
00:32:57.320
I think that they value and the law affair and all that is so much the better for them.
00:33:03.600
I mean, they, they see the fighter that they love fight even harder.
00:33:11.880
He gets in the face of the judges who try to silence him.
00:33:14.560
Just, he cannot be controlled, which is another thing Republicans want to see.
00:33:18.380
They don't want anybody who can be controlled by anyone.
00:33:22.900
And yet I know our mutual friend, Annie McCarthy is saying over and over as are many, this is
00:33:29.960
This is the Democrats plan working to perfection that they wanted to get exactly the results.
00:33:35.040
They're probably going to get tonight in New Hampshire.
00:33:36.580
They got last week in Iowa and they have been holding their fire and it's about to unleash
00:33:45.500
And if you think Trump's not going to lose his status as the front runner in those swing
00:33:51.740
state polls really quickly, then you don't understand the Democrats war machine.
00:33:57.420
That's where we will pick it up right after this quick, quick break from your commercial
00:34:04.080
I've been indicted more than Al Capone and he got indicted less than me.
00:34:16.280
Nobody's ever done this before in the history of our country.
00:34:18.280
They do it in third world nations, but they don't do it here.
00:34:22.960
And I have a feeling maybe it's going to be the last time because people are going to
00:34:27.480
And somebody said, don't indict him anymore, please.
00:34:30.880
You're going to indict him right into the White House.
00:34:38.620
You know, guys, we were all together for National Review last spring on the day of the first
00:34:44.920
And we talked, I remember about, you know, how this is just going to send the poll numbers
00:34:49.200
through the roof for him that remember that he should be on his hands and knees praying
00:34:55.780
Lo and behold, it came and, you know, look at us now for indictments later.
00:35:00.600
However, however, as to part two of the Democrats plan, if indeed this is a plan, you know,
00:35:08.580
I don't know, sometimes I sometimes I wonder whether we get too conspiratorial on this stuff,
00:35:14.040
like there's some master Democrats pulling the strings, you know, like, OK, and then
00:35:17.440
we'll go to Fannie Willis and we'll go to Alvin Bragg and then we'll use Jack Smith or whether
00:35:22.300
they're just that vindictive that on a case by case basis, they see outrageous things and
00:35:26.980
they say, oh, that that one, too, that one, too, as opposed to like the master plan.
00:35:30.180
Anyway, there's a poll out today, Pennsylvania, interactive polls showing now Biden up eight
00:35:39.340
over Trump in Pennsylvania, which was one of the states, one of the critical swing states
00:35:43.680
that we've been watching where Trump had actually gone up over Biden by a couple of points.
00:35:47.900
Now already he's down by eight, at least in this poll.
00:35:50.760
And there were already some DeSantis supporters online saying we're doing the wrong thing.
00:35:55.840
Like this is get used to it because we're going to get a lot more polls like this.
00:36:00.900
And the this, you know, the air and the sale of Trump and his supporters is about to die
00:36:10.920
So, by the way, this is, again, talking about what went wrong in the primary, the two main
00:36:14.540
things that hurt DeSantis that were exogenous to his campaign, the indictments and the polling
00:36:18.680
showing Trump beating five, which destroyed the electability argument, which was going to be
00:36:23.040
one of the main props that that of DeSantis' case against Trump.
00:36:27.880
So I'm more bullish about Trump's chances than Andy is.
00:36:31.660
He mentioned earlier than Charlie, as we'll hear in a in a minute.
00:36:36.340
And I think it's probably going to be a 50 50 proposition in November.
00:36:41.380
But the case you couldn't make, which I think is true, is that this polling should polling
00:36:47.200
showing you slightly ahead of Joe Biden, given his enfeebled state in every single sense,
00:36:53.480
physically, mentally and politically, the weakest incumbent running for reelection since
00:37:01.740
It's just being a little bit ahead is not great before they've started the onslaught,
00:37:05.820
before trials might start and before you might get a conviction.
00:37:09.940
And a lot depends on how accurate polling is on a conviction.
00:37:14.460
Now it's catastrophic, you know, basically says everyone would would leave Trump or be
00:37:20.820
I kind of wonder if there'll be like the Access Hollywood tape and for three weeks be the biggest
00:37:25.420
thing ever and destroy his campaign and everyone absorbs it and forgets about it.
00:37:31.900
He's obviously the candidate Democrats want to run against.
00:37:36.960
And just a last thing on these trials, whether there's a conspiracy or, you know, they're
00:37:47.640
But I am certain that if the polling showed the opposite and three quarters of people would
00:37:52.960
be more likely to vote for Trump if you were tried and convicted of a felony, these would
00:38:01.740
Oh, it's inappropriate to do it so close to election.
00:38:03.940
Oh, this legal theory we're advancing is a little too adventurous.
00:38:07.500
The Supreme Court has been kind of down on it lately.
00:38:12.340
Whatever it would would be, they would find a reason.
00:38:18.080
Does Jack Smith think that Trump should be nailed to the wall for January 6th?
00:38:22.940
But he'd find a reason not to do it if he thought by doing this he would actually help
00:38:29.540
And everyone on the other side thinks that it will hurt Trump's chances.
00:38:34.020
And just the last thing, I think it's a total distortion of the legal process.
00:38:39.280
And we'll give Trump, if he loses, if he's convicted and loses, the excuse, the rationale
00:38:51.820
But this will be a significant distortion of our process that he'll have a legitimate claim
00:38:57.300
to scream bloody murder about if he's convicted and he loses in the aftermath.
00:39:04.000
I was just having a friend, a talk with a friend, a woman who was saying, no matter what, before
00:39:11.520
Because she's really scared that if Trump wins, the Democrats are going to riot, you know,
00:39:19.020
are going to see Antifa everywhere plus, and that if Trump loses, his core supporters
00:39:25.680
are going to be so outraged at the lawfare and it having had an effect that they too will
00:39:33.900
Having said that, in general, putting January 6th to the side, Republicans don't normally
00:39:43.480
But you never know, Charlie, because tempers are going to be so charged going into this
00:39:52.840
And do you think these other swing states are likely to go move from that Trump into that
00:39:57.200
Biden column as the Democrats really unleash what they're capable of unleashing politically
00:40:05.800
I have been encouraging people for months to step back for a moment outside of the bubble
00:40:15.860
that the three of us inhabit and say out loud the sentence, and of course, once Trump
00:40:24.500
had been indicted multiple times, his nomination was guaranteed.
00:40:28.360
And just think about it in any normal circumstance.
00:40:35.860
I'm not saying it's not true within the highly politicized bubble that we occupy, in which
00:40:45.040
Trump is a star, that Republican primary voters and influencers live in.
00:40:56.660
Now, I don't know whether this was some grand plan or whether it's various prosecutors or
00:41:03.420
groups acting on their own volition or whether there's a little bit of contact, whatever it
00:41:12.160
is, you cannot force the Republican primary electorate to nominate someone.
00:41:26.320
But there's no mechanism that guarantees that outcome.
00:41:32.740
People in Iowa and today in New Hampshire, and if the primary continues, subsequently in
00:41:39.660
South Carolina and Nevada and everywhere else, have to acquiesce to the impetus that they
00:41:46.760
have been given, they have chosen of their own free will to pick the guy who lied when he
00:41:55.680
lost last time around, whose candidates flamed out in 2022 and wasted what should have been
00:42:02.320
a much better year for Republicans, who is only marginally winning when he is winning against
00:42:08.720
Joe Biden, who is effectively dead in 2024, and who is very, very likely, whether it's legitimate
00:42:18.240
or not, this is a fact, who is very, very likely to be indicted and prosecuted for crimes, as
00:42:28.740
well as the civil suits, that will carry punishments of some sort.
00:42:34.380
Republicans knew that this was coming, and they were privy to the polls that showed, as
00:42:42.340
Rich says, that if Trump is convicted, his support in the middle among moderates, independents
00:42:49.980
and suburban voters who turn out, falls off a cliff.
00:42:57.520
One of the reasons, Megan, that I'm a conservative is that I try to live in the real world.
00:43:05.920
I like to take the evidence that is in front of me as it is, not as I wish it were.
00:43:12.200
And I see no sign that Republican primary voters have done that over the last year.
00:43:20.640
They are so convinced that Joe Biden is weak and beatable, which in a vacuum he is, that
00:43:26.120
they can't imagine any other outcome than a loss.
00:43:29.860
So, yeah, I think we're about to see the ramping up of the Democrat media industrial complex.
00:43:38.680
I think we're about to see the fruits of those court cases yielding consequences that Republicans
00:43:48.420
will not like and bleeding out into the real world where no one actually cares how you became
00:43:55.100
They just care whether or not you've taken the oath and are able to exercise the powers
00:44:02.060
And we're all going to have to live with the results of it.
00:44:06.780
Well, that's the risk, of course, is that I think the Republican base will stay motivated.
00:44:11.380
I do believe the indictments motivate them in a special way.
00:44:16.780
They're so angry that the law system is being used in this punitive way.
00:44:23.180
But the independents are less diehard when it comes to Trump.
00:44:30.340
And they're saying right now to the pollsters, the big question is whether they mean it, that
00:44:36.240
they won't vote for him if he gets convicted before November.
00:44:39.280
They are saying that the only real question we have, again, is do they mean it when push
00:44:45.900
comes to shove after a year of, yes, the Democrats unleashing their best when it comes to ads
00:44:53.820
And Joe Biden, you guys know as well as I do, he could fall.
00:45:00.120
At the end, with an open border, and we'll get to what's happening in Texas, where the
00:45:05.220
feds are not only allowing complete chaos at the border, but they're fighting the efforts
00:45:09.820
states like Texas are making to try to protect the citizenry.
00:45:13.480
Could they actually say, I'm voting for this guy?
00:45:19.600
Or might they stay home when it comes down to animated Republicans and semi-animated Democrats?
00:45:27.960
Rich, they do hate Trump on the Dem side, but they don't love Biden.
00:45:32.200
And already we're seeing that lack of enthusiasm show up in places like the Black vote.
00:45:37.920
So as a colleague of mine pointed out a while ago, if Trump had just said after the 2020
00:45:42.500
election, I hate this, I don't think it was fair, I think it was wrong.
00:45:45.920
In fact, I think it was stolen from me, but I understand I'm never going to be able to
00:45:49.520
prove that to the satisfaction of any legal or political authorities that matter.
00:45:57.380
He'd be a heavy favorite in this race, or at least a favorite.
00:46:02.620
He disgraced himself, helped bring disgrace on the country on January 6th.
00:46:07.900
And this is the main vulnerability, the stop the steal stuff, which they haven't really
00:46:15.440
And again, I'm relying on Andy McCarthy's thinking here, but the Alvin Bragg thing may
00:46:22.220
Fannie Willis, that case is also a real stretch.
00:46:25.940
Classified documents, the timing is not going to work.
00:46:29.840
And there are signs that that is not going to get off on the dime.
00:46:32.260
And actually, it may be delayed into July or August if they wait for a Supreme Court decision
00:46:37.020
that's highly relevant to about half the case on the meaning of the instruction statutes.
00:46:40.820
So is she going to start that case in July or August and go into September or October?
00:46:46.440
So there's a chance he tips those through the raindrops the way Trump always assumes
00:46:52.040
These trials actually don't come off before the election.
00:46:55.140
But the feeble state of Joe Biden, the economic numbers, they're just horrible.
00:47:00.040
And 75 percent of people not thinking that he's suited to be president again or can serve
00:47:06.480
They can they can try to disqualify Trump and they did it in 2020.
00:47:09.980
But then there's that huge thing about people thinking he's disqualified, too.
00:47:18.020
Well, that's actually where we're going to pick it up right after this.
00:47:20.460
I want to get to what's happening in Texas in the Supreme Court ruling.
00:47:22.780
But I there's a very interesting bit in the New York Post today about Michelle Obama
00:47:34.540
So, guys, we saw Michelle Obama surface for what seemed to me to be a totally
00:47:43.120
pointless interview on a podcast the other week in the past two weeks.
00:47:51.980
It was a real question about why she got out there.
00:47:53.960
She mentioned she's terrified at the prospect of Trump being reelected.
00:47:57.620
And on the heels of that, the New York Post through Cindy Adams reporting today.
00:48:02.460
And this is following up in another report that she had about a few days ago that there is a plan
00:48:14.700
What she says is reportedly I'm being told that Obama has pulled donors.
00:48:19.820
This is Barack Obama for his wife and that the plan is around May, Joe Biden announces he's not
00:48:28.200
running. And this this will that allow the August convention for Michelle to get nominated at the
00:48:38.140
August convention, that they don't want to do it any earlier than May because it would make
00:48:44.600
But sometime between May and August, their thought is that Mrs.
00:48:49.380
Obama will become the nominee, that she will be subbed in and that her team has already sent a survey
00:48:55.460
to the top heavy duty donors asking how they would feel about her as the candidate.
00:49:01.140
Now, I can't imagine an answer from top Democratic donors to that question other than we feel great
00:49:14.960
I mean, it would be a total game changer, Rich.
00:49:20.600
Yeah, I'm not a fan of Michelle Obama, but have huge respect for her political skills,
00:49:25.640
which she developed. You can see her growing as a communicator and speech giver during her time in
00:49:30.140
office. She is not going to fall down. Right. She she can speak cogently, but I'd be shocked if
00:49:38.320
she wants to do it. She's been there. She's a world celebrity. You know, why would you want to
00:49:43.460
go through this? And I just don't believe in the switcheroo scenario. Yes. If Biden suffers,
00:49:48.840
something terrible happens to Biden. Yes. And there that's not there is some serious risk to that.
00:49:56.360
Right. He could have a terrible fall at any time. But he spent his whole adult life wanting this,
00:50:02.260
thinking about how to get there, trying to get there, usually failing. And then he caught his
00:50:06.320
break in 2020. There's no way he's going to give it up voluntarily unless he and Jill really take a
00:50:12.780
serious look and realize he's not up for it physically or mentally. There's no sign they're
00:50:19.080
going to do that. And if he doesn't want to do it, doesn't want to go, there's no way to leverage
00:50:22.740
him out because I was talking to a Democrat about this a while ago. He said, you can send
00:50:27.540
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, James Clyburn, you know, who made him as a 2020 candidate or resurrected
00:50:32.940
his campaign and say, Joe, great job. You know, you saved democracy. You've transformed our economy.
00:50:39.140
You're going to save the planet through your electric car initiatives. But it's time to go.
00:50:43.620
And you'll just say, no, no, make me. How are you going to make me? And their option at that point
00:50:47.660
would be to go out and at a press conference say he's not fit to be president anymore. And he has to go.
00:50:51.660
Are they going to do that? Because you can still not go. And now you've fundamentally damaged him.
00:50:55.400
He's going to lose to Trump. No, they're not going to do it. So the way to switch by now
00:50:58.820
would have been to run someone serious against him. They weren't going to do that. They never
00:51:03.220
had any interest in doing that. And now they're stuck with them and may, you know, even though
00:51:08.360
I think they're aware of his weaknesses, may think there's there's no good alternative because
00:51:13.220
Michelle Obama is not going to do it. So maybe Kamala Harris is going to do it if you're going to
00:51:16.180
switch him out. Is that really an improvement? And what does what would this convention look
00:51:19.880
like unless you have a consensus candidate? It'd be a huge risk, hugely complicated at a time when
00:51:25.880
he's running against this guy they consider a threat to democracy. So I think they're there.
00:51:30.420
They're in with him and into the end for better or worse.
00:51:35.440
If it's true, Charlie, that the Obamas are polling big money donors on whether they would like to see
00:51:41.020
Michelle run, then it does telegraph some interest. If it's true, we don't know.
00:51:45.940
This is what the Post is reporting. Then it does telegraph some interest by the Obamas, which I do
00:51:51.960
think many Democrats, if not most, would see as a huge lifeline. I don't know. I don't see Joe Biden
00:51:57.840
voluntarily ceding power either. I've said that all along. But if you have a scenario in which the New
00:52:03.280
York Times, the Washington Post, NBC, MSNBC, CNN are all piling on with he has to go save America,
00:52:13.660
your final patriotic duty, cede the mantle to the next generation. And also it's anti-black if you
00:52:22.240
don't. They'll add that in too. I could see a scenario in which he gets effectively forced out.
00:52:27.960
Well, I can't. I think that the Democrats are in a difficult position here because Joe Biden is weak
00:52:38.820
and senile and regarded by the vast majority of the electorate as too old to be president.
00:52:49.240
In fact, majorities say that they suspect he will die in the second term, which is a situation voters
00:52:58.280
haven't been asked to contend with since at least Franklin Roosevelt. But the alternative is not
00:53:05.020
necessarily better. And that's because the Republican coalition is a mess and the Democratic
00:53:11.700
coalition is a mess. The Democratic coalition, in some sense, is more of a mess than the Republican
00:53:17.760
coalition. It makes less sense. The Democrats have done OK in recent years, but they've done OK with
00:53:24.900
a hodgepodge of voters that consists of extremely educated, increasingly woke, upper middle class
00:53:34.660
white people and poorer people and minorities who don't have that much in common, except that they
00:53:41.980
don't like Republicans. Now, if you are running against Donald Trump as a party, not liking Republicans
00:53:48.520
and not liking Donald Trump in particular might be enough. If you are holding a convention to decide
00:53:54.420
who should replace the one guy you could find to satisfy the coalition in 2020, you've got a bit of a
00:54:02.280
problem on your hands, especially when to get to Michelle Obama, even if she wants to be president, which I
00:54:08.420
doubt, but you said suppose it's true. To get to Michelle Obama, you have to remove Kamala Harris. You have to get
00:54:15.100
rid of her. You have to tell her she's not allowed to be president. That inspiring story of hers only goes so far.
00:54:22.500
Michelle Obama is going to be appealing to some parts of the Democratic coalition, but not to others. So is Kamala Harris.
00:54:30.940
So is Pete Buttigieg. So is anyone you can think of. Joe Biden's actually their best candidate, paradoxically.
00:54:37.500
That's how much of a mess the party is in. It's why it is, in my view, so irresponsible of Republicans to put up their
00:54:43.940
weakest candidate against him. But it's true. Nevertheless, Joe Biden is their best shot. That's why he's there.
00:54:50.100
And that's why he's probably going to stay there. Now, if he were to say, have a terrible public undeniable
00:54:58.000
fall, something that you just could not spin away in the press, something that everybody saw
00:55:04.700
and agreed was enough to prompt him to step down. Well, at that point, the situation I've just described
00:55:13.180
becomes inevitable. And maybe it is true that Michelle Obama wonders whether she would make
00:55:18.420
a good candidate. And maybe she declares and maybe she tries to get enough people on her side.
00:55:23.100
But I don't think there are going to be too many people in the Democratic Party who are going to
00:55:26.980
try and bring that about in January 2024, because the unknown is potentially much more alarming than
00:55:35.520
the known. They're banking right now on the lawfare. They're banking on Jack Smith, Fannie Willis,
00:55:42.380
who I will get to as well in one sec. Let's talk about Texas, because what's happening at the
00:55:47.700
southern border is absolutely dreadful. And there was a very disturbing, but I can see the legal
00:55:54.480
positioning for it, ruling out of the Supreme Court yesterday, in which Texas, because we really are
00:56:01.640
facing a true crisis at the southern border and Texas is dealing with the brunt of it, just fed up,
00:56:07.620
fed up at the total inaction at the feds. I mean, inaction would probably be a blessing. It's more like
00:56:12.700
action to invite people in. So they decide to launch this operation. It included busing the
00:56:19.420
illegals to sanctuary cities all over the country. That's working out very well. I think it's making
00:56:24.140
the point brilliantly. But it also included trying to fortify the border to the extent Texas can.
00:56:29.240
They put up razor wire. They put out sort of a barricade, these sort of big flotilla things in the
00:56:35.340
water down there, which remain up. And then rather than just leave well enough alone, rather than say,
00:56:41.960
this is a win for us at the federal level, Texas is going to take on this burden and we don't have
00:56:45.920
to get it through Congress and we don't have to say it was us. The Biden administration goes in and
00:56:50.780
sues them. They sued them over it, saying you got to take them down, take down the razor wire,
00:56:56.380
take down the flotilla. Allegedly, we can't perform our duties of getting to the illegal immigrants as
00:57:02.520
they're coming across the border. Three died recently, but there's been testimony that they had died long
00:57:09.000
before the feds ever could have gotten to them. In any event, they're trying to exploit it.
00:57:14.000
And the Fifth Circuit, which is a more conservative federal court of appeals, voted in favor of Texas.
00:57:20.960
And that's playing out. The government has now appealed to the Supreme Court. But while the appeal
00:57:27.860
is pending, the government asked the Supreme Court to say the feds could take down the razor wire,
00:57:35.080
that the razor wire had to come down, that these measures had to come down while they're
00:57:39.200
litigating. And the Supreme Court just agreed. They just agreed 5-4. The three libs, Chief Justice
00:57:46.020
Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett voted together to say, yeah, you can take down those things while the
00:57:51.360
case pens. Now, Texas could still win on the merits when this thing gets heard this term. But there's no
00:57:57.440
question. It was a blow. And it doesn't bode well for Texas that Barrett and Roberts voted this way,
00:58:06.040
Rich. Yeah, I don't see this as a politically good thing for Joe Biden at all. But it's just so far
00:58:12.220
beyond the politics of it. I mean, really, the country's changing by the second. And there are
00:58:17.200
there's already a crisis in city after city that's affecting kids. They're not doing anything about it.
00:58:23.060
Yeah. So on the legalities here, I need to read the circuit opinion. I have it. But
00:58:30.160
to the extent I follow this, the Supreme Court has been pretty adamant and pretty clear that just the
00:58:36.180
federal government has total authority in the area of immigration enforcement. Now, what's perverse,
00:58:41.000
right, is this is immigration non-enforcement or active lack of enforcement. But the federal
00:58:47.740
government be able to make the case, you know, what do they say? Like these barbed wires obstructing our
00:58:52.260
border patrol agents. And whether that's BS or not, I think that if the federal government says
00:58:58.260
that, the court is likely to accept it. But going back to the scenario that we're talking about with
00:59:03.400
Biden, you know, for the good of the party, if they were a clear successor, if Michelle Obama was
00:59:08.700
willing to run, he should step aside. If he thinks the country's system of government is at stake in
00:59:17.080
this election, he should do everything he can to defeat Trump. And the first thing should be removing
00:59:20.880
himself from the equation. If he's not going to do that, the second thing he should do is enforce
00:59:25.740
the border, right? This is a yawning political vulnerability that he totally created out of
00:59:32.060
discretion when he first came to office by removing all the Trump controls, and he could reinstate them,
00:59:39.640
right? Or at least say, yeah, you know what, it is a crisis, and we're going to deal with it.
00:59:43.880
And his poll numbers in immigration, which are totally in the toilet, understandably,
00:59:47.860
and is the main issue for Trump, or one of the main issues. And according to polling was the
00:59:52.460
biggest issue in the Iowa caucus, the biggest issue in the New Hampshire primary coming up
00:59:57.960
here today, it would at least minimize the political vulnerability, but he won't do it.
01:00:05.380
Now, there are some indications and numbers have been going down, because the Mexicans have been
01:00:09.740
discouraging people from coming over, apparently, in reaction to talks that the Biden folks had with
01:00:15.000
them in December. So that, I mean, that's better than the alternative. But why not do it yourself?
01:00:19.640
You're in the United States government. This is what you're signed up to do. You took an oath of
01:00:23.080
office to do. It's wrong, one, not to enforce the law. Two, it's straining jurisdictions all across the
01:00:30.560
country. And it never should have just been on Texas. Yeah, Chicago should have part of this
01:00:35.080
burden in New York and Washington, D.C. Why not? It's a national problem. And three,
01:00:40.900
there's a political element. So everything says, enforce it, you know, do your duty, but is not.
01:00:48.500
The problem is where the feds have legislated, the states aren't allowed to. I mean, it's basically
01:00:55.600
a matter of federalism. And the feds are saying, we're trying to enforce this, how they're arguing
01:01:02.720
it. The solicitor general went in there and said, we're trying to perform our duties. We're trying to
01:01:08.760
get to the illegal migrants as they're in the waters. And these fences and other barriers are
01:01:14.200
stopping us from performing our federal duties. So you can't have a Texas law that creates a barrier
01:01:19.620
between us and our federal responsibilities. And in the abstract, that's true. It just ignores the
01:01:26.180
realities, Charlie, of what's actually happening at the southern border, which is, in all honesty,
01:01:33.320
almost nothing from the feds. The border patrol would like to do more, but they don't have the
01:01:38.480
go ahead from Joe Biden. In fact, the Biden administration is all but given a green light
01:01:42.240
for people to run across the borders as long as they scream, asylum, asylum.
01:01:46.860
Well, I think it's slightly more perverse than that. And you mentioned legislation. It is true
01:01:51.900
under our system of government that the federal government in this area trumps the states.
01:01:58.720
That's a foundational principle within this area, which is covered by an enumerated power.
01:02:05.900
But the executive branch is not following the law that Congress has written. And so what the
01:02:13.040
executive branch is asking the states to do is not follow the law as it has been determined by the
01:02:19.940
federal legislature, but follow the law as it is being interpreted, and in my view misinterpreted or
01:02:25.960
not enforced by the executive branch. That's a really weird problem to grapple with. It's a problem
01:02:34.300
that starts in the White House that is also, to some extent, on Congress's shoulders, because if
01:02:40.360
Congress grew a pair, it could start to deprive the executive branch of things that it wants
01:02:47.060
in exchange for enforcement. I'm actually less critical of the Supreme Court on this than others,
01:02:58.040
especially of Amy Coney Barrett. I have seen a great deal of slings and arrows lobbed her way.
01:03:05.400
I think they're premature. As you noted, this is not a decision on the merits. The merits were never
01:03:10.720
reached. The question here is what happens before the merits are reached. I know that Amy Coney Barrett
01:03:17.040
has criticized what she calls the shadow docket and the changing of policy without any explanation.
01:03:25.580
We don't actually know what it is that she thinks or John Roberts thinks or the conservative justices
01:03:33.500
on the other side think, yeah, if it is the case that they ignore the law and give carte blanche to the
01:03:39.860
Biden administration, I'll be disappointed. But until that happens, I think we just have to
01:03:43.880
wait and see and reserve our oppobrium to where it belongs, which is Joe Biden, who, as Rich said,
01:03:51.640
came into office and explicitly decided that he was going to open up a border that had been largely
01:03:59.820
closed and that has not been dissuaded from this course of action by anything, including inexplicably,
01:04:05.420
his own self-interest. It's obviously in the interest of the Biden administration politically
01:04:10.440
to fix this. The public hates Joe Biden on immigration and the broader Democratic Party on
01:04:16.000
immigration. It's not just a presidential election year. It's also an election year in the Senate
01:04:22.220
in many places. Texas has a Senate election. Arizona has a Senate election. If you look at the last round
01:04:29.700
of House races in 2022, Republicans did pretty well in California. If they do pretty well in California
01:04:36.680
again in 2024, it'll be more difficult for Democrats to take back the House. This is one of those examples
01:04:43.000
of where fringe ideology has captured the Democratic Party to such an extent that it just can't act in
01:04:51.060
its own interests. It can't get out of its own way. I blame Joe Biden for that. To a slightly lesser
01:04:56.280
extent, I blame Congress. I'm not ready yet to blame the Supreme Court.
01:04:59.920
Hmm. Here's the problem. You can't have what's happening now in some pockets of the Republican
01:05:09.260
Party, which is folks like Chip Roy saying, ignore it. Ignore the Supreme Court ruling.
01:05:16.300
And even Governor Abbott of Texas saying, he's suggesting to me, you tell me how you read this,
01:05:24.000
that he's not going to follow it. He posted on his X account, this is not over. Texas is razor-wise.
01:05:29.900
is an effective deterrent. I will continue to defend Texas's constitutional authority to secure
01:05:36.120
the border and prevent the Biden administration from destroying our property. Now, I don't know
01:05:45.380
exactly what he's saying there, but if the feds, the way I understand it is the feds have just been
01:05:50.180
given the green light to go destroy their property, to go get those fences down while this case is
01:05:55.860
pending until we have a Supreme Court final decision. And as much as I understand how important
01:06:01.340
this issue is to Republicans, you can't have individual governors or lawmakers saying to the
01:06:09.160
U.S. Supreme Court, this is an extremely slippery slope. Rich, this is what the Democrats have been
01:06:15.040
threatening to do since Dobbs. Yep. You know, we just have to place our faith in the laws and court
01:06:23.100
decisions, even if we hate them and want to argue against them. All that's fine. But what's going to
01:06:28.620
happen? Are the Texas Rangers going to fight, you know, actively federal forces over this barbed wire?
01:06:36.180
Yeah, it is a slippery slope. You don't want to go there. I think Greg Abbott has done a great job on
01:06:41.080
this. If nothing else, just highlighting it for the entire country and making all these
01:06:45.140
Democratic mayors squawk. And my understanding, you know, these buses and flights, people are asked,
01:06:49.200
do you want to go to Michigan? You know, migrants are asked, do you want to go to Chicago? You want
01:06:52.880
to go to New York? And they say, yes, there they go. And if they want to go there, they're going to
01:06:56.540
make it there anyway. In New York, at least, and I assume this is true of other cities, that the number
01:07:01.780
of illegal immigrants who are coming in through buses and flying flights from Texas are a minuscule
01:07:07.500
percentage of the overall flow of illegal immigrants, because it's a great destination
01:07:11.560
for illegal immigrants. It's always been a destination for illegal immigrants. New York
01:07:14.740
has always welcomed them and said more. And then now you have, you know, numbers showing up that
01:07:20.180
strain the system. And all of a sudden, wow, illegal immigration isn't such a great thing.
01:07:24.140
Illegal immigrants should go someplace else or stay in Texas.
01:07:28.520
Charlie, the Texas Department of Public Safety also weighed in. The spokesperson saying the state of Texas
01:07:34.640
will maintain its current posture in deterring illegal border crossings by utilizing effective
01:07:39.880
border security measures, reinforced concertina wire, and anti-climb barriers along the Rio Grande.
01:07:46.260
The logical concern should be why the federal government continues to hinder Texas's ability
01:07:50.140
to protect its border. Correct on that second part. And I get it. I mean, I get it. You can feel
01:07:56.440
the Republican ire right now saying, F yes, Texas, don't comply. But if we start blowing off Supreme
01:08:07.020
Court decisions, like it's just kind of up to us whether those will be the rule of the land,
01:08:13.140
we're not going to like the country we'll be living in in about four or five years.
01:08:17.740
I couldn't agree more. I'm for the law. And so must be anyone who's taken an oath.
01:08:24.980
I don't quite know what those messages mean. They are somewhat ambiguous. I'd feel a lot more
01:08:29.780
comfortable with them if they ended with, but of course, we will respect the decision of the
01:08:35.440
Supreme Court. Until such time as Texas does anything, it's okay. You're allowed to talk about
01:08:43.360
ignoring court decisions or pretend that you're going to ignore court decisions, but you shouldn't.
01:08:50.700
I don't think that we want to go down this road. Just to interject quickly, there's nobody better
01:09:02.640
on guns than you are. Think of what the Democrats will do in the wake of the next Supreme Court
01:09:08.000
decision on guns. If you can just blow off the order, the ones you don't like, where do you think
01:09:13.500
this is going to go? Right. And look, the institutional right has been really good about
01:09:19.360
following bad Supreme Court decisions. And pro-lifers believe, as I do, that killing unborn
01:09:25.940
children is tantamount to murder. That law obtained for 50 years. And although it was challenged and a
01:09:35.260
movement was built to overturn it, it was followed. There was no insurrection against it. So if that's
01:09:43.900
possible, then it's possible to weather this storm. You really do not want to destroy your
01:09:49.500
constitutional order over a bad decision, especially when, as I'll say again, that bad decision
01:09:54.240
is not forthcoming yet. We have a not on the merits decision that deals with what happens until
01:10:01.700
a ruling comes down. It's temporary bad news. It's temporary bad news. And no, if the decision
01:10:08.740
is bad, then you also have to follow the law. But you especially don't want to be talking about
01:10:13.000
ignoring the law when there is no law yet. Right. What a principle to sacrifice for the
01:10:18.260
next six months. I mean, we're going to have a decision by June. You got to hold the line on
01:10:23.620
following the law. The Republicans have had the moral high ground when it comes to this for the
01:10:28.200
very reasons you point out. We haven't had the Supreme Court in conservative control for the
01:10:32.980
better part of my lifetime. And it's now is not the time to start saying you can ignore Supreme
01:10:38.000
Court decisions just as there is a conservative majority. Just wait, just hold the line. I don't
01:10:43.920
know what those statements mean either. I can read the Chip Roy one pretty clearly. Don't comply
01:10:48.400
means don't comply, though. So far, as you point out, no one's no one's done anything. Here's the
01:10:54.520
thing that is pretty galling about all of this, Rich. The Biden administration, you know, Biden
01:11:01.680
came out and he was just asked, is the border secure? And he said, no, it's not secure. And
01:11:05.560
I've been saying for 10 years, it's not secure. Karine Jean-Pierre was asked about it this week,
01:11:09.300
too. You know, is it secure? And her messaging is, you know, it's just such a problem. And like
01:11:16.120
those Republicans, they just they won't do anything. They just you know, we've proposed deal
01:11:20.720
after deal. And they just they won't do anything. And it's really unfortunate that we don't have
01:11:26.700
willing partners. I'm actually doing a pretty good imitation. And the Santa's will be laughing
01:11:33.520
at your impression. Yeah, Megan. When you run for president, that one's gonna kill.
01:11:38.760
I'll make sure you guys are in the audience. So this is what they're going to start. They're
01:11:46.580
going to do more of this. It's all the Republicans fault. The Republicans control the House right now.
01:11:50.440
You know, they wouldn't do anything about it. And and already they're trying to tie it
01:11:54.260
to this border bandaid that was tacked on by Republicans to the demand for aid, 60 billion to
01:12:02.720
Ukraine and 11 billion to Israel. And in response to that, the board, the House Republicans said,
01:12:07.820
well, give us something. We don't want to give you any of that, really. But how about some border
01:12:12.840
security if you want us to agree to that? And they got some agreements, which really aren't going to do
01:12:18.080
much, but they got something. And now Corrine Jean-Pierre is basically like, look at us. We have
01:12:23.100
a border plan and these losers are kind of stopping it. And so what do you make of this effort? And will
01:12:29.400
it work politically? Yes, they've been saying this all along, right? They've been blaming Trump when
01:12:34.300
Trump controlled it and the genius and cleverness of of what the Trump people did. And there are a couple
01:12:39.060
of things where the Trump administration was was really creative. This would be one Abraham Accords,
01:12:45.700
which totally blew up the conventional thinking about the Middle East. Another Operation Warp Speed,
01:12:50.880
which no one wants to take credit for anymore, was another one. But what they figured out was you look
01:12:55.620
at the laws and the authorities existed to actually implement programs that would really end this
01:13:01.920
problem. And that's how you get returned to remain in Mexico, because the name of the game is not
01:13:08.020
letting them in the country in the first place, because once they claim asylum and get in, they're
01:13:11.880
not going to show up for all their hearings. They're certainly not going to show up for a
01:13:14.200
deportation hearing. They'd be morons to do that. So once they're here, they stay and everyone knows
01:13:18.860
that. So you got to keep them out. That's the point of remain in Mexico, state third party
01:13:22.940
agreements. You know, if you're really being politically persecuted, which is supposed to
01:13:27.440
be the standard in Guatemala and Honduras, as soon as you walk into another country, you're not going
01:13:32.900
to be politically persecuted in that country. So you're supposed to claim asylum there, not walk
01:13:36.720
through three or four countries and come here for some reason to claim asylum, which is because you
01:13:41.160
want a job here. So they figured all that out, had a system that worked. And, you know, Title 42 played
01:13:46.660
a role, obviously, but arguably not necessarily the most important. And they blew it up. They ripped it up.
01:13:52.080
They don't need Congress to tell them to do it. They don't need Congress to give them more money
01:13:55.920
to do it. They could do it, right? They could do it right now. And they don't want to. And that's
01:14:00.760
Charlie got to this. They've become ideologically extreme on this question. Bill Clinton used to be
01:14:05.380
anti-illegal immigration, you know, Barack Obama. They were kind of BS, but their deportation numbers
01:14:12.080
that were supposedly really high because they changed the accounting on them to make them seem high
01:14:16.380
because they realize that's something you should do. Biden's the opposite because a de facto
01:14:21.400
open border has become democratic orthodoxy, like being pro-choice on abortion or pro-affirmative
01:14:27.580
action. It's something that you just don't want to cross the left on. At least Joe Biden
01:14:32.020
does it. So this whole idea that Trump messed it up or it's been a problem for 20 years. No,
01:14:37.100
Trump figured out a way to fix it. They ripped it up. They don't need permission from Congress or
01:14:41.560
anything from Congress. They could drastically alleviate this problem on their own and they don't
01:14:47.420
want to do it. This is like, this is like where they tried to say that Republicans were the ones
01:14:52.500
who wanted to defund police. This is not going to work. Yeah. Right. Yeah. It's that level of argument.
01:14:57.120
Reality is too in your face, no matter where you are for people to buy this lie that this is a Trump
01:15:02.640
problem. Just look at the numbers of crossings and people are experiencing it in a personal level
01:15:07.160
now at their schools, in their towns. You know, you look at this Brooklyn school where they kicked
01:15:12.460
out the students for a night so that the illegals could be moved in. They're just feeling it. You
01:15:18.120
got the governor of Illinois begging for mercy now, even though he's a sanctuary guy. Like, no,
01:15:23.580
there'll be no mercy. There's no mercy until Texas gets some mercy. How about the southern border
01:15:28.260
states? And Bill Malugian of Fox News has been doing a great job with all of his reporting on it.
01:15:33.000
And he's he's bringing home the reality of, yes, of course, the fentanyl deaths, which is not
01:15:38.300
it's largely illegals, but it's also American citizens. But the problem is the border wide
01:15:43.440
open and being smuggled in. And then you've got the crimes. This was just one example he tweeted
01:15:50.020
last week about Virginia, a Honduran illegal immigrant charged with the sexual abuse and
01:15:55.640
quote, carnal knowledge of a child in Virginia. The guy was caught and then released from a Fairfax
01:16:03.640
County, Virginia jail without notice to the feds because it's a sanctuary jurisdiction.
01:16:08.820
They ignored the ICE detainer request on this child molester because being a sanctuary city
01:16:15.020
is more important to them. So they released this guy who likes to rape little children
01:16:22.040
back into the community. I mean, that's insane. Not the only one, of course. Actually,
01:16:28.540
Peter Doocy asked Karine Jean-Pierre about this case on Monday. Let's take a listen to that.
01:16:32.820
It's at 14. They released an illegal immigrant from Honduras who's charged with sexually assaulting
01:16:38.200
a Virginia minor and production of sexual abuse material. Doesn't that go to show that as record
01:16:45.540
numbers of people appear at the border, you guys have no idea what kind of people are coming into
01:16:51.060
this country? Let me just say, first of all, this is why the president is having negotiations with
01:16:57.860
the Senate, senators, Republicans and Democrats, right, for the past couple of weeks to deal with
01:17:03.240
what's going on with the border security, right? As it relates to border security. This is why the
01:17:09.200
president on day one put forward a comprehensive immigration plan that more than three years now,
01:17:15.620
Congress didn't do anything about. There's more work to do. There's more work to do. We understand
01:17:20.880
that. We have said that. You've heard that from the president on Friday. We understand that
01:17:24.560
there's more work to do. We need more resources. We need more funding.
01:17:28.800
There's more work to do. You're talking about the rape of a child. Okay. No one wants to hear
01:17:33.380
you're stupid. There's more work to do. Right. Right. There's like a lot of, and it's,
01:17:37.660
there's another report. Um, this is bill plus daily wire, uh, illegal immigrant from Haiti
01:17:43.560
charged with raping a developmentally disabled person in Boston, released from the jail back into
01:17:50.380
the community because it's a sanctuary jurisdiction that will not cooperate with ice. So they do not
01:17:56.240
honor ice's detainer notification saying this is a criminal. Let us know when this person gets,
01:18:02.500
they won't honor it. And these are the cities that are begging for mercy. Now it's a, no,
01:18:07.480
you'll get no mercy. Why should we have mercy on them? This is becoming an issue that people
01:18:12.760
understand on a gut level, rich. I just think they're playing with fire right now.
01:18:17.760
Yeah. I mean, releasing someone like that, sexually abusing it, developmentally disabled
01:18:24.740
person. I mean, it's infernal. It's, it's, uh, you can smell the sulfur. What's wrong with
01:18:31.060
these people? It's disgusting. And you're right. You know, as we've talked about, it's,
01:18:35.540
it's been felt in every community and there's a sense community, people feel invested in their
01:18:41.720
community, right? We've, we've seen really, um, moving statements from African-Americans in Chicago.
01:18:47.400
That's our community center, right? Now, are they hateful people? Cause they feel a sense of
01:18:51.840
ownership about it. Are they hateful because they, they think, um, their neighborhood in some sense
01:18:57.580
belongs to them? No, that's a deeply human instinct. And everyone feels wronged. If you, you think you,
01:19:04.120
the community belongs to you and your community has problems and it's, you know, trying to take care of
01:19:09.200
itself and people from who don't belong here, who violated every rule to get here, all of a sudden
01:19:15.500
are bust in and it's given to them. That that's just deeply offensive to people naturally. Right. And
01:19:21.560
people are going to feel that in Martha's vineyard. They're going to feel it in the South side of
01:19:26.280
Chicago. And this is not just, this has been a border problem for a long time and not just a border
01:19:32.180
problem. You know, these legal immigrants, they go to, you know, other places in California,
01:19:35.280
New York and big cities, but it's been felt immediately in numbers that are impossible to
01:19:41.180
ignore such that you have sanctuary city mayors and governors saying no mosque, no more. We can't
01:19:47.120
handle this, which goes to the point that there's a cost to illegal immigration, right? Which is what
01:19:51.960
immigration hawks or restrictionists, the argument they made for a very long time. You got to pay for
01:19:56.300
the medical care. You got to educate their, their, uh, kids there, there, uh, they have more kids
01:20:02.280
when they're here, they they're eligible for welfare. So the cost to all this, and they've
01:20:06.560
been considered also hateful people and wrongheaded people for pointing that out. But now, uh, all
01:20:11.700
these, uh, progressors are feeling it in real time. Plus Charlie, she didn't answer the question.
01:20:16.440
His question was, doesn't this show, you don't know who's coming in. Yeah, we don't, we don't know
01:20:21.300
who's coming in. Then we set them off under the community. And then when they commit additional
01:20:26.380
crimes, these sanctuary cities don't cooperate with federal authorities who would like to actually
01:20:31.860
potentially deport them. So the whole system is meant to endanger. That's how it looks meant to
01:20:37.160
endanger actual Americans. Yeah. You know what I don't understand about this just strategically strip
01:20:43.800
out for a second, the moral questions and just look at it purely apolitically. I don't understand
01:20:49.480
why they can't even concede that. So the sanctuary city set up is the product of a Supreme court decision
01:21:00.180
from the 1990s called Prince versus United States. It was actually about guns. The question in that
01:21:05.680
case was, do local or state, uh, authorities have to enforce federal law? In other words, can
01:21:14.860
Washington DC say that the state of Florida, uh, police officers have to enforce federal gun laws? And
01:21:23.200
the answer to that question in that case, it was written by Justice Scalia was no. He said,
01:21:27.940
if you look at the structure of our constitution, although, uh, the federal government can enforce
01:21:33.300
federal law in the States, the States don't have to help them do it with their own treasure and
01:21:38.960
personnel. And so on what became a gun case has, has also been used, um, to, to justify sanctuary
01:21:45.800
cities. Now, I don't think there's anything wrong, uh, with that decision, but the decision didn't say
01:21:50.840
that the States can't help. I mean, if the States want to help the federal government,
01:21:55.820
they're allowed to do it. And I don't understand why, even if you have some weirdo ideological
01:22:02.540
reason for not wanting to help enforce, uh, the immigration laws, I don't understand why
01:22:09.500
jurisdictions that have in their possession, uh, a rapist or a murderer don't say, all right,
01:22:15.860
but in this case, we're going to help the federal government. We're going to have this guy over to
01:22:20.540
ice. And I don't understand why, when she's asked about it from the white house podium,
01:22:25.360
Karine Jean-Pierre, even if she is completely in hock to that same weirdo ideology, can't say,
01:22:31.100
do you know what? This is a good example of the sort of immigration enforcement that we really
01:22:37.780
need. Why can't she concede that to me? It makes them look so zealous that I just don't trust them on
01:22:44.880
anything. Yeah, you shouldn't. I agree with you. All right, stand by. We're going to take a break
01:22:50.180
and then we're going to come back and talk about the latest with Fannie Willis, because, uh, there
01:22:53.940
have been a couple of developments in that case. Fascinating. She's in a lot of trouble. Stand by.
01:23:00.440
I'm Megan Kelly, host of the Megan Kelly show on Sirius XM. It's your home for open, honest,
01:23:06.460
and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political, legal,
01:23:10.360
and cultural figures today. You can catch the Megan Kelly show on Triumph, a Sirius XM channel
01:23:15.640
featuring lots of hosts you may know and probably love. Great people like Dr. Laura, Glenn Beck,
01:23:22.260
Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey, and yours truly, Megan Kelly. You can stream the Megan Kelly show on Sirius XM
01:23:29.040
at home or anywhere you are. No car required. I do it all the time. I love the Sirius XM app.
01:23:36.240
It has ad free music coverage of every major sport, comedy, talk, podcast, and more subscribe.
01:23:42.680
Now, get your first three months for free, go to Sirius XM.com slash MK show to subscribe and get
01:23:49.760
three months free. That's Sirius XM.com slash MK show and get three months free offer. Details apply.
01:23:58.260
All right, guys. So an update in this Fannie Willis investigation. She's the DA prosecuting Trump for
01:24:09.000
alleged RICO violations in the Atlanta area, and she's under fire herself now for allegedly hiring
01:24:15.500
a special prosecutor with whom she was sleeping. Her quote paramour is the allegation in legal papers
01:24:21.740
and paying him more than she's paying the other special prosecutors. That's the allegation. And
01:24:28.180
then going to places like Aruba, Jamaica. Ooh, I want to take it. And he allegedly did. He took her,
01:24:36.180
took her to Aruba and to Napa and to Miami, and they cruised Royal Caribbean and some other line and
01:24:42.780
on and on it goes. All while he was getting paid by the taxpayers, thanks to her and getting paid a lot,
01:24:49.900
a lot more. I mean, $650,000 so far in the same time that she was earning only 200,000. So the
01:24:56.160
allegation is that it's a sort of like a vendor kickback scheme where I hire this vendor and I
01:25:01.360
give him a pretty paycheck. And then before you know it, he's giving me extras that let me go to
01:25:06.760
Aruba when I normally couldn't afford that on my DA's salary. So they had a hearing yesterday in which
01:25:12.380
the judge did unseal the marital divorce records that Nathan Wade, the special prosecutors going through
01:25:18.040
right now. As far as I can tell so far, though, not all of it has come out. Nothing new was learned.
01:25:23.360
We already had received the headlines from the credit card receipts that his soon-to-be ex-wife
01:25:30.620
released to the public, showing him buying the tickets for Fannie Willis to Aruba on Royal
01:25:36.420
Crown. As evidence goes of an affair, it's pretty dead to rights. It doesn't actually show them
01:25:41.140
sleeping together, but it's as close as you can get. And neither Fannie nor Nathan Wade has denied an
01:25:47.580
affair. Now, all of this, as you get even the New York Times weighing in with a report pointing out
01:25:54.840
Fannie Willis ran for DA with the slogan, Integrity Matters, frequently pummeling the incumbent, her
01:26:02.080
former boss, with accusations of ethical lapses. In a letter to Fannie Willis just this past Friday,
01:26:10.260
the county commissioner, quoting here from the Times,
01:26:12.120
Bob Ellis demanded documents from her in an effort to determine whether county funds paid to Nathan
01:26:18.380
Wade were converted to your personal gain in the form of subsidized travel or other gifts.
01:26:24.540
On Saturday morning, Norman Eisen, special counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first
01:26:29.340
Trump impeachment, who's been vocal in supporting this Georgia prosecution, called on Mr. Wade to step
01:26:35.280
down, saying this whole thing has become a distraction. And the New York Times adding,
01:26:40.380
at the very least, the revelations have raised questions about Ms. Willis's motivation for hiring
01:26:44.480
Mr. Wade, a legal generalist who appears to act as a sort of player manager for the prosecution's team.
01:26:51.120
A review of his more than two decades as a lawyer by the New York Times also raises the issue of his
01:26:56.480
qualifications. And they go through page after page of how he's never tried a Rico case. He's never
01:27:01.780
been a prosecutor pushing felony cases. He's been a criminal defense lawyer.
01:27:07.160
They have real questions about what he's doing on this team, besides the fact that he appears to
01:27:11.000
have been stupping Fannie Willis. So ask a different legal expert, and you'll get a different answer.
01:27:17.000
But I'll tell you, they started with Stephen Gillers, who's the god of legal ethics, Rich.
01:27:20.880
And he's the one who said, if all of this is true, she's in a world of hurt and trouble.
01:27:25.540
So I don't know that she's committed a crime. I don't know that the case against Trump or the
01:27:30.200
others falls apart. But I really don't see a way in which Fannie Willis stays as the prosecuting
01:27:36.300
Yeah, I mean, obviously, I don't know the legal niceties, but it's grotesquely unethical
01:27:41.160
on its face, right? And another Trump enemy bites the dust who's been celebrated. Maybe
01:27:48.280
she wasn't celebrated at the level of Robert Mueller or Michael Evanotti, but it's that sort of
01:27:53.100
flame out. Robert Mueller knew everything. You couldn't mess with Robert Mueller. We don't know
01:27:57.160
what Robert Mueller has, you know, that hasn't been revealed. He's going to nail Trump to the
01:28:02.380
wall. The walls are closing in. Then you get his congressional testimony. It's like, this
01:28:06.140
is an old, confused man. There's no way he was making the decisions here. He doesn't understand
01:28:10.900
the intricacies of his own investigation. Avenatti, of course, wall to wall on CNN. No one knows
01:28:16.740
how to combat Trump. You know, like Michael Avenatti, he's in Trump's head, you know, that this
01:28:21.860
case could bring Trump down. And then, you know, he's in jail. And I don't know whether
01:28:25.340
Fannie Wills is going to go to jail. But what an embarrassment. What a clown and a moron
01:28:31.200
she is. And, you know, does the case collapse because of this? I don't know. Maybe not. But
01:28:38.440
it should never have been broad. I mean, this thing is a sprawling stretch of this RICO
01:28:43.620
statute, which is broad, I think, ridiculously broad. But you shouldn't be taking advantage
01:28:49.100
of the law and trying to stretch it to nail one guy. And in this case, obviously, there's
01:28:53.340
more than one guy, but it's all at the end of the day about one guy. And that's what we're
01:28:57.160
seeing. I think the classified documents case, they have Trump dead to rights. Maybe you don't
01:29:01.800
get them on the documents, possessing the documents themselves, because, you know, Hillary did it and
01:29:06.460
Joe Biden did it and others have done it. But the obstruction related to that, if any of us did
01:29:12.620
that, you'd be in big trouble. So that's totally fair game. But you bring that, it's a complicated
01:29:16.580
case, and it's going to happen after the election, right? Instead, there's a rush to be the hero,
01:29:21.140
to be the one that brings Trump down and nails him to the wall. And that's just not how the law is
01:29:25.900
supposed to work. And now we're learning there are other ways in which the law is not supposed
01:29:30.320
to work, but it has in her office. No, a prosecutor under the ethical guidelines that govern us all
01:29:36.700
as lawyers is supposed to behave in a way that avoids even the appearance of impropriety,
01:29:42.100
even the appearance. She's clearly violated that legal ethic and more given the kickback scheme.
01:29:48.840
I mean, just bringing in a special prosecutor with whom you're having a sexual relationship
01:29:53.200
would violate the appearance of impropriety. And even she ran for office saying she wouldn't do
01:29:57.740
that. And that doesn't even count the money that she's been paying him as compared to the other
01:30:01.900
prosecutors and him giving her what appear to be kickbacks with all these trips, Charlie.
01:30:07.160
Just one other detail that I wanted to offer. They want to take her deposition in this divorce case,
01:30:12.480
Fanny's. She's saying that's an attempt to oppress me. I am oppressed by your motion to take my
01:30:18.280
deposition. The court has said, look, you haven't taken Nathan Wade's deposition in this divorce case,
01:30:23.840
and he's the husband. So let's do that first. And if Fanny Willis has particular information she can
01:30:28.960
bring to or add to what we get from him, then I'll handle that then. And there's just an interesting
01:30:35.600
detail. An attorney for Jocelyn Wade, who's going to be the ex-wife, took issue with the fact that now
01:30:44.240
they are Willis's team, Fanny Willis's team submitted in a recent court filing, they don't want her to be
01:30:50.920
deposed, saying Wade's marriage was irretrievably broken long before Fanny Willis entered the picture,
01:31:00.420
suggesting his estranged wife, quote, confessed to her own adulterous relationship. And this is so Fanny
01:31:07.120
Willis is the first one to raise this in Nathan Wade's divorce case, not Nathan Wade. And the lawyer
01:31:15.120
for Jocelyn Wade came out and said, this is the first this has been raised after 783 days that this
01:31:21.220
case has been pending. Fanny Willis is the first to raise it, quote, I have questions. It's all getting
01:31:27.140
very unseemly, doesn't reflect well on Fanny. But is it anything more than interesting grist for the
01:31:34.960
GOP media mill? Well, Trump is certainly very lucky with his enemies, many of whom start behaving like
01:31:44.080
him. And this is the great story of this Trump saga is how many of the people who go after Trump
01:31:53.120
end up picking up his worst habits and traits and exhibiting them themselves. She is not, in my view,
01:32:03.920
getting very far with her defenses. I think Ruth Marcus ripped her apart in the Washington Post
01:32:11.100
today. Fanny Willis tried to play the race car, didn't really make a great deal of sense.
01:32:17.180
She said that she was being oppressed. If so, I'm in favor of oppressing her. It sounds fairly routine.
01:32:25.040
She, well, don't you always think that when, you know, it's like when you get told that if you don't,
01:32:29.840
you don't want to have a sexual relationship with a trans person, that's transphobic.
01:32:33.080
Fine. Well, I'm transphobic then. What am I supposed to say to that? Okay, I'll do it.
01:32:36.980
I mean, if normal legal procedures are oppression, then I'm for oppression.
01:32:42.680
But she's not going to get very far with it because it's just so transparently
01:32:46.920
grotesque. Now, does it end up derailing the legal proceedings? I don't know. I do think there's a bit
01:32:55.100
of hope here from the Trump people that it will work like offsetting penalties do in the NFL,
01:33:01.140
that the referee will end up saying, well, Trump did what he's been accused of. Fanny Willis is also bad.
01:33:06.340
Those penalties offset, no yardage lost. That's not what's going to happen. Politically, though,
01:33:11.000
it's going to help. I mean, again, I'm not defending Trump here. I think that it's a disaster that Trump's
01:33:17.500
going to be the nominee. And I think Trump's done a lot of what he's been accused of. But you do not want to be in a position
01:33:23.240
as a government or as a Democratic Party pointing to these allegations, where the guy who has been
01:33:30.820
in trouble can say, look at the person who is going after me. She did all of these terrible things.
01:33:40.080
That is politically disastrous. And it actually, oddly enough, plays into Trump's central conceit,
01:33:45.420
which is that everyone in America is on the take. Everyone in America is corrupt. He's just
01:33:50.700
the guy who will say it out loud. That is not true. That is nihilism. But you want, if you're a
01:33:58.440
prosecutor or a prosecutor's office or a federal government or a state to be able to say, no,
01:34:04.460
that isn't true. Look at the person who is in charge of this process. They are cleaner than clean.
01:34:15.180
She's got skin in the game now. And I don't think this is a case of her taking on Trump's bad
01:34:20.700
it's the reverse. The reason she went, she came up with this cockamamie prosecution is because she
01:34:26.500
appears to be a bad person who will act on her politics. Rich, I listen to you and Andy every
01:34:30.900
Friday discuss Jack Smith, how he's got the pedal to the metal on every motion, totally unnecessary for
01:34:36.940
just trying a normal criminal case. These are partisan hacks trying to disguise themselves as
01:34:43.300
objective prosecutors just trying to uphold the law. Yeah. So just on the timing, routine January 6th
01:34:51.880
cases have taken much longer from indictment to trial date than Jack Smith wants to do with this
01:34:58.580
hugely complicated, novel case that actually might not pass Supreme Court muster at the end of the day.
01:35:06.720
It makes no sense unless he's looking at a political calendar. And of course,
01:35:09.880
he's looking at a political calendar, which he's not supposed to do.
01:35:13.480
There's no reason to be rushing all the motions that he's rushing, the appeals that he's rushing,
01:35:18.220
unless your only goal is to get Trump and get him quickly. Make sure he's got a conviction
01:35:23.820
before November that these are not good people. This is not how a normal prosecutor behaves.
01:35:29.440
And they're they're showing their true colors. Guys, thank you so much for showing yours as well.
01:35:34.840
It's always a pleasure to see them here. It's like two beautiful peacocks
01:35:38.160
right here on the Megyn Kelly show. First time we've been called peacocks. We've been
01:35:42.660
caught a lot of other things, but never peacocks. First time I've been called beautiful as well.
01:35:48.120
Great to see you. See you soon over on the editors.
01:35:51.520
Okay. Don't forget, we'll follow New Hampshire tonight. We'll have full analysis for you
01:36:01.820
Thanks for listening to the Megyn Kelly show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.