GOP Debate Stakes, and Progressives Refusing to Condemn Hamas, with Charles C.W. Cooke, Michael Brendan Dougherty, Josh Hammer, and Seth Mandel ｜ Ep. 679
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 36 minutes
Words per minute
170.69054
Harmful content
Misogyny
21
sentences flagged
Toxicity
31
sentences flagged
Hate speech
59
sentences flagged
Summary
With the Iowa caucuses less than six weeks away, tomorrow s debate provides a crucial opportunity for the presidential hopefuls to set themselves apart from the pack. We ve got a great lineup of guests this week, including a few on-set surprises, including Michael Brendan Doherty and Charles C.W. Cook.
Transcript
00:00:00.560
Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East.
00:00:11.860
Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, coming to you live from the University of Alabama,
00:00:17.920
where tomorrow night I will be co-moderating the fourth Republican presidential debate.
00:00:22.440
And frankly, this could be the fourth and last Republican debate.
00:00:26.380
It could be the fourth and last debate entirely in the entire election season.
00:00:31.900
We are here in The Spin Room, where The Megyn Kelly Show will be live today, tomorrow,
00:00:35.720
and then also with a special post-debate election show tomorrow night.
00:00:40.180
We've got a great lineup of guests for you this week, including a few on-set surprises.
00:00:44.980
With the Iowa caucuses less than six weeks away,
00:00:47.960
tomorrow provides a crucial opportunity for the presidential hopefuls to set themselves apart.
00:00:57.180
And it is the smallest number of candidates to date,
00:00:59.500
meaning you can expect a much more substantive conversation.
00:01:14.460
We do not expect former President Trump to attend,
00:01:31.720
Yesterday, long-shot candidate and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum
00:01:39.360
He actually could have a shot in future elections.
00:01:41.580
I think a lot of people opened their eyes to this guy in a way that they hadn't prior.
00:01:45.300
But for now, he's gone back home to North Dakota and is not thinking about presidential politics.
00:01:51.440
Joining me now to discuss it all, two of my favorites from National Review,
00:01:54.920
Charles C.W. Cook, senior writer and host of the Charles C.W. Cook podcast,
00:01:59.440
and Michael Brendan Doherty, also a senior writer at National Review.
00:02:07.280
It's getting kind of exciting now, 24 hours out from the next big debate.
00:02:11.300
And I'll tell you, here in Tuscaloosa, you can feel the energy already.
00:02:17.740
They're peppering, you know, all of us here on the rules and where everybody's going to stand.
00:02:22.280
And we at the debate team, I'm co-partnering with News Nation and the Free Beacon,
00:02:30.160
Thankfully, now we have four candidates, so there's no exact center.
00:02:32.960
But there are all these sort of power dynamics in setting up the stage and getting ready that
00:02:38.360
So, Charles, let me ask you, because a lot of people will be asking themselves going into this
00:02:48.900
Obviously, I've got my own thoughts on it because I'm here.
00:02:56.200
I think that the race at the moment has been frozen for a long time.
00:03:03.420
And as I've suggested before, the big question now is whether or not that freezing is real.
00:03:12.380
If it is the case that Trump is 60 points to the good and that everyone else is fighting
00:03:20.560
for scraps, then no, the debate's not going to matter.
00:03:23.760
But if people aren't paying attention or there's an incumbency factor for Trump, then, yeah,
00:03:32.820
we need to know who's going to be left standing.
00:03:35.560
And in that scenario, people are still going to be looking for answers to questions in
00:03:44.620
It also matters in the sense that it has been a useful winnowing exercise.
00:03:48.780
And the debates have obviously changed the way that people see the candidates.
00:03:55.460
Tim Scott, for example, was just not really there at the other debates.
00:04:07.520
The fact that you still have, especially Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis on the stage,
00:04:13.480
shows you that whether or not they can beat Trump, they have some sticking power.
00:04:18.140
I'll tell you another reason why it could matter, MBD, and that is, you guys know in National
00:04:22.840
Review, our mutual pal Andy McCarthy just posted a big piece on how Trump has been denied for
00:04:29.440
now an argument that he's immune from this criminal prosecution by the federal government
00:04:35.780
in Washington, D.C. in front of Judge Chutkin, who is not a Trump fan, it is safe to say.
00:04:48.640
And he's going to try to take it up to the U.S. Supreme Court saying, I can't be put through
00:04:52.800
There's a question about presidential immunity.
00:04:54.740
These are for acts I took as president and so on.
00:04:56.480
And the point I'm getting to about Andy's piece is he points out that Judge Chutkin might very well,
00:05:05.080
if Trump gets convicted in that D.C. federal case, he does not think it's likely that she
00:05:17.320
So if if he gets tried in D.C., and this is a federal case, but you're still pulling from D.C.
00:05:22.260
for all of your jurors, a town that went over 92 percent for Joe Biden in the last election,
00:05:27.820
the odds of him being convicted in front of such a jury are extremely high for obvious reasons,
00:05:32.820
You really are looking at a scenario where the likely Republican nominee could not only
00:05:38.040
be a convicted felon by Election Day 2024, but thanks to this judge could be sitting in
00:05:46.120
And that really could be a break glass in case of emergency moment for the Republican Party,
00:05:52.420
especially if that happens prior to the Republican National Convention this summer at a point where
00:05:58.720
potentially they could still switch out the nominee.
00:06:04.440
There's it's strange that for many months we've been proceeding as if this were going
00:06:11.420
And there's like a, you know, an even lower level of interest, I think, than there had
00:06:15.320
been in the last two presidential election cycles, when in fact, this one is by far potentially
00:06:21.080
the most explosive where you as you point out, you could have someone in prison.
00:06:27.620
You could also have someone in the morgue by Election Day.
00:06:33.260
You know, these are highly unusual circumstances.
00:06:40.660
I mean, Joe, people that are prosecuting Trump under bogus legal theory should cease doing so.
00:06:48.860
And perhaps, you know, candidates who are under so many indictments should, you know, get out.
00:06:55.360
We may need a break, break an emergency option.
00:06:59.840
We also, you know, these debates matter because these debates are a time for people to hash
00:07:12.920
Even if you think Trump has got the nomination sewn up, perhaps he's going to look at Nikki
00:07:18.320
Haley and decide this person is a good vice presidential candidate for me that has enough
0.98
00:07:23.100
appeal to suburban voters or to women voters that I need to make up for in 2024.
00:07:28.440
The debate, you know, we're talking about real issues that affect Americans, the border, inflation,
00:07:36.220
seeing how the audience responds to these questions and these candidates can shape the
00:07:42.600
race next year, even if the four participants you have tomorrow night are not among the candidates
00:07:55.480
So, you know, this is a public service and I'm glad you're the one doing it.
00:08:02.320
Co-moderating with Elizabeth Vargas of News Nation and Eliana Johnson, our pal from the
00:08:12.460
It's going to be a spicy couple of hours as long as the candidates show up ready to play,
00:08:20.880
Charles, the reason I said this could be actually the last debate entirely is you've
00:08:25.840
got not only, you know, if Trump keeps going up, right, if this debate does nothing to change
00:08:30.320
the trajectory and let's say Trump goes from 50 to 60 percent up on these folks to 70 to
00:08:37.480
I mean, at some point, the RNC is going to say we're not doing this anymore because at
00:08:41.640
that same time, the votes are going to start to come in in Iowa, in New Hampshire, in South
00:08:47.300
So all those those two points could come together at the same time.
00:08:50.600
So let's assume just for purposes of argument that nothing happens to change the early races
00:09:01.220
There's no way Joe Biden's going to going to debate Donald Trump.
00:09:04.000
I think some people disagree with me, but I just don't think Biden can do it.
00:09:11.540
You know, you will get to some of his latest snafus, but at the Kennedy Center Honors, but
00:09:18.360
So I really think he'll say I'm not debating an insurrectionist.
00:09:21.400
I'm not debating a convicted felon, an accused felon, an imprisoned felon, whatever, wherever
00:09:28.520
And so we may actually have an election in November 24 without either candidate having
00:09:33.560
sat for even one debate the entire cycle, which feels deeply wrong.
00:09:43.700
I'm not sure it feels deeply wrong if the two candidates next year are Joe Biden and Donald
00:09:48.840
I would like to see an election in which ideas were batted around.
00:09:54.140
But if you remember back to the 2020 election, the debate that we got between Biden and Trump
00:10:03.140
It really involved them throwing pies at each other and disgracing the nation.
00:10:09.400
If we could have two different candidates, then a debate would be fruitful.
00:10:13.020
I was somewhat dismissive, at least in its effects, of the contest between Ron DeSantis
00:10:22.740
But actually, that is the sort of debate that Americans ought to have.
00:10:27.600
That is a fight between two different visions, between people who have taken dramatically different
00:10:36.140
And within reason, I thought DeSantis did a much better job than Newsom, are willing to hash
00:10:43.040
But I don't think we would get that from Biden and Trump, even if both Biden and Trump were
00:10:54.360
He's going to use any excuse he can not to have to debate Trump because he can barely get
00:10:58.120
through a press conference or a gaggle at the moment.
00:11:02.160
Trump doesn't seem to want to debate anyone either.
00:11:03.980
I wouldn't be too surprised if Trump tried to underscore the advantage he has in virility by
00:11:20.280
But I think it's more the product of it being a contest potentially between Biden and Trump
00:11:29.400
That DeSantis-Nusom debate reminded me, did you guys ever see the movie Sliding Doors
00:11:34.300
with Gwyneth Paltrow where she kind of has the opportunity to see what life would have
00:11:39.760
been like in another set of an alternate universe?
00:11:45.920
We could have had two young, vibrant leaders hashing out policies for the future of the country.
00:11:52.540
Um, I honestly, I thought Newsom came across just so grating and irritating, but fine.
00:12:02.980
We have two very probably elderly men who are going to maybe hash something out, maybe not,
00:12:11.420
And the American voters, if you look at the overall numbers, they don't want this.
00:12:16.140
On the subject of Joe Biden, he, they were the Kennedy Senator honors the other night
00:12:22.540
and, uh, they honored Billy Crystal, Queen Latifah, Barry Gibb, Dionne Warwick, and Renee
00:12:29.720
And Joe Biden couldn't make it through without multiple mistakes.
00:12:36.020
He continued to refer to Dionne Warwick as Diane.
00:12:40.360
Now, guys, we're like, I think I'm, I know I'm older than Charlie and MBD and I are a little
00:12:47.420
closer, but this, we all know who Dionne Warwick is, but Joe Biden really knows or should know
00:12:57.380
This is not like Taylor Swift or, you know, one of these, Olivia Rodrigo, like somebody who
00:13:04.640
Dionne Warwick, he should know, repeatedly called her Diane, Diane, truly a gift to us all, Diane.
00:13:10.360
To where that poor White House transcript man or woman had to continue like doing strike
1.00
00:13:15.880
throughs, Diane and put in brackets, Dionne, same thing happened with Barry Gibbs.
00:13:22.380
Um, he continued to call him Billy of the Bee Gees.
00:13:29.480
Joe Biden still was like somewhat vibrant back then.
00:13:42.480
Then there was the moment he paused to honor Queen Latifah.
00:13:46.360
And we have a little bit of what happened there.
00:13:50.520
And by the way, with other movies and movies, she's earned a golden globe and a primetime
00:14:11.680
At the Kennedy Center Honors, how on earth could they put him out there for a debate?
00:14:18.500
Well, I mean, how on earth are they putting him out there as president of the United States?
00:14:25.380
I mean, the debate is a courtesy to the voters, but, you know, in an election.
00:14:31.360
But we have him serving in the toughest job of all at a time of international crisis.
00:14:38.760
We have a war in Eastern Europe, and we're asking a guy who cannot read the word Emmy
1.00
00:14:45.180
to negotiate potentially with Putin to handle Bibi Netanyahu to prevent a war in Gaza from
00:14:56.380
becoming a regional war across the Middle East.
00:14:59.020
I mean, he has grave responsibilities beyond being a host of a little award show.
00:15:06.460
So I, I'm just astonished at how this is going on.
00:15:11.360
And I'm waiting, you know, for years, years from now, we're going to get real journalism
00:15:16.560
about what the Biden White House was like, how it operated day to day.
00:15:21.740
And, and I am waiting for that, you know, the way that Americans had to wait for Woodrow
00:15:26.300
Wilson, you know, the revelations about Woodrow Wilson and how his wife basically was running
00:15:33.260
I mean, this is an astonishing scandal altogether.
00:15:37.820
And yet it's held, you know, just as, you know, in a way, Biden is holding up Trump.
00:15:45.820
And, you know, it's these two old men leaning on each other.
00:15:48.940
And that's the only reason that they're still standing as far as, as candidates for next year,
00:15:54.100
because people are so afraid of what it would be like to have four more years of the guy
00:16:00.140
Um, I mean, it is seriously afraid that leads me to the Atlantic.
00:16:06.640
So the Atlantic, their January slash February, 2024 issue has 24 contributors, 24 contributors
00:16:14.520
considering what Donald Trump could do if he were to return to the White House, his second
00:16:21.160
term, they conclude you'll be shocked to learn would be much worse than the first term.
00:16:28.200
Um, however, it's no surprise that Jeffrey Goldberg's Atlantic is saying it will be trust us all
00:16:34.380
while trolling, trying to tell us that they are a nonpartisan magazine.
00:16:38.320
Um, here's just a little, it's not a sure thing that he could win the Republican nomination
00:16:43.300
But as I write this, he's the prohibitive front runner, which is why we felt it necessary
00:16:46.740
to share with our readers, our collective understanding of what could take place in
00:16:51.580
I encourage you to read all of the articles in this special issue carefully, though perhaps
00:16:55.880
not in one sitting for reasons of mental hygiene.
00:17:02.280
Our term of brilliant writers makes a convincingly dispositive case that both Trump and Trumpism
00:17:06.200
pose an existential threat to America and the ideas that animate it.
00:17:10.800
Um, the concern is that the Republican party has mortgaged itself to an anti-democratic demagogue,
00:17:21.240
Now, these are points that you could read from a lot of Republicans who don't like Trump,
00:17:26.060
but this is what we're in for, for the next, what, 15, I don't want to do the math, months.
00:17:32.320
Um, if one of these guys on stage tomorrow night does not unseat Trump in this nomination,
00:17:39.920
I mean, they've, they've already thrown out terms like Hitler and Charles, I know you don't
00:17:43.920
like Trump, but you know that it's going to go so sky high on the rhetoric.
00:17:50.900
And I really do think, you know, we're, we're in a, we're going to be in a world of hurt.
00:17:54.940
We're going to be looking at riots if Trump were to win, but even in the next year,
00:17:59.120
and maybe even from the MAGA right, if Trump is convicted, if he's thrown in jail, like
00:18:05.080
this, all of this is at stake in some way here in Tuscaloosa.
00:18:15.520
And I think he should have been impeached, but that doesn't mean every criticism that is
00:18:24.840
And I think one of the problems in reading through some of the essays in the Atlantic,
00:18:28.220
which I did yesterday, is that the authors, they make three mistakes as far as I can see.
00:18:35.200
The first one is they level their criticisms of Trump, many of which are true, but they
00:18:43.360
For example, McKay Coppins wrote an essay in which he suggested that Trump's desire to
00:18:50.680
have people around him who are willing to implement his agenda is somehow sinister, that Trump's
00:18:58.700
desire to be able to fire people within the executive branch that he heads up, which is
00:19:03.440
the only elected member as a president, is sinister.
00:19:09.580
We need to keep our criticisms of Trump, and I have many within the right frame.
00:19:15.060
The second thing is there is a profound inability on the left, and you see this in the Atlantic's
00:19:22.940
package, to reckon with the anti-democratic or illiberal behavior of their own friends.
00:19:30.380
And we have seen this with Biden over and over again.
00:19:35.700
He has ignored his own lawyers who have told him his behavior is illiberal.
00:19:38.720
He's reversed himself on court packing, on the filibuster.
00:19:43.780
He has tried to stage a federal takeover of elections.
00:19:49.260
This is not a purely Republican problem, and yet there's nothing in there about that because
00:19:54.580
it is apparently only the case that Donald Trump is a threat.
00:19:59.200
And then the third problem I have is, while I think that Trump has disqualified himself from
00:20:03.640
consideration and should have been impeached, I think that our system works.
00:20:09.700
Trump did not succeed after he lost the election in staying in power.
00:20:15.300
The vast majority of Trump's initiatives in office that went beyond his authority under the
00:20:23.780
He's not Hitler because America is not Germany.
00:20:27.920
And this is a problem that I have with progressives in general, is that they simultaneously describe
00:20:34.720
figures such as Donald Trump as Hitler while trying to get rid of the guardrails in our
00:20:39.740
system that prevent anyone from pushing it too far.
00:20:43.660
All of the institutions that checked Trump, as they've checked Biden and Obama and Bush
00:20:49.120
and everyone else, are anathemic to progressives and have been since the time of Woodrow Wilson.
00:20:54.880
So I find it very, very odd that you get this sort of hyperbole at the same time as the one
00:21:01.440
thing that prevents it from becoming a reality, remain under attack from the same people who
00:21:08.100
You know, to that point, so true, Charles, to that point, some of the things that they're
00:21:13.380
predicting under, you know, a Trump presidency, MBD, the things that are really upsetting some
00:21:19.560
of the left and these think pieces that we're starting to get now is the following.
00:21:24.000
I'll give you a couple of the, this is from the New York Times, the radical agenda that we
00:21:35.580
He'll order the military to attract, to attack the drug cartels in Mexico.
00:21:40.560
He'll use the military on domestic soil to keep law in order.
00:21:50.660
To the point Charles just made, he's going to be the culprit who does that.
00:21:57.080
They are very concerned at the New York times that Trump would use the justice department
00:22:00.620
to wreak vengeance against his adversaries in a naked challenge to democratic values.
00:22:11.080
Were they alive during the first Trump administration?
00:22:14.160
I ask seriously because I remember the first Trump administration.
00:22:18.080
And the problem was that half the time Trump wasn't president.
00:22:21.160
Trump would go out, he would tweet something like, we're putting a ban on transgender persons
00:22:30.080
And then the Pentagon would announce, we're providing services for transgender persons serving
00:22:38.780
Trump would announce, we're withdrawing all troops from Syria.
00:22:42.200
And then the White House, quote unquote, would announce weeks later, actually we're putting
00:22:49.180
When Trump was in the White House, everyone knew Trump kind of wanted to reopen the country
00:22:57.420
He talked about reopening by Easter, but no, Dr. Fauci decided the terms on which most Americans
00:23:04.580
And the implicit threat was, and you better elect someone else other than Donald Trump, or
00:23:14.760
And so, to me, the problem is not that Trump was a dictator.
00:23:19.600
The problem was Trump was hardly in charge at all after 2016.
00:23:25.360
And that kind of lack of oversight by him and lack of control through the White House is
00:23:33.360
a danger, but it's the exact opposite danger of what they're warning against.
00:23:39.060
And so I just don't know what planet they're living on.
00:23:42.300
Robert Kagan wrote a similar op-ed in the Washington Post saying, the chances of a Trump
00:23:46.600
dictatorship are rising and we have to pay attention to it.
00:23:51.460
I mean, the guy could not dictate to his own chief of staff at the White House without being
00:23:59.020
And it's going to continue being a problem going forward.
00:24:01.820
I mean, like you both said, I mean, if Trump is elected again, I expect not only will Congress
00:24:09.540
check him, as they did before, they didn't pass all of the MAGA agenda, they passed the
00:24:17.280
The courts, they blocked his immigration orders, sometimes under pretty shoddy legal reasoning.
00:24:24.040
But worst of all was that the executive branch itself was in rebellion against the president.
00:24:32.600
And I don't know if Trump is the one to, you know, lead a kind of draining of the swamp,
00:24:39.760
like he said, because he was swallowed by it in his first term.
00:24:46.800
I was just going to say that the list that you read prior to Michael's answer is a perfect
00:24:51.760
example of what I mean when I say that the criticisms of Trump fail to distinguish between
00:24:56.700
the things that he actually did wrong and policy disagreements.
00:25:08.020
That is actually well within the political range.
00:25:14.280
In fact, the vast majority of Americans are not.
00:25:22.860
If the Congress decided to, it could open the borders.
00:25:26.880
If it decides not to open the borders, then we're supposed to have border enforcement.
00:25:31.240
But that is a question that should be debated by the people.
00:25:34.040
It is within the plenary powers of the federal government.
00:25:37.000
The idea that that is equivalent to dictatorship or is equivalent to the things that Trump actually
00:25:42.700
did do wrong, like trying to rewrite the electoral count act in the 12th Amendment so he could
00:25:50.320
And it makes it sound as if all they're trying to do, which many of them are, is stop a Republican
00:25:58.000
That speech he gave with the weird red lights behind him, where he looked angry and almost
00:26:04.040
He made some good points about the things that Trump did wrong.
00:26:06.560
And then he said that pro-lifers were equivalent to this attack on America.
00:26:14.200
And I hope that those arguments against Trump, that win the day, if they do, in the Republican
00:26:21.580
primary can distinguish between those two things because they really need to be separated.
00:26:26.920
It jumped out at me that half of this list are things that Republicans would like to see Trump do,
00:26:34.080
but that he didn't when given the chance as president.
00:26:40.020
But, you know, it's one of the complaints Ron DeSantis has been raising about Trump when he says,
00:26:45.560
I'll use the military on domestic soil to keep law and order.
0.64
00:26:48.640
DeSantis and his supporters have said repeatedly, what you really did in office when we had BLM
00:26:53.800
anarchy all over the streets was tweet law and order, law and order, without actually doing anything.
00:26:58.740
It was Senator Tom Cotton who wrote an op-ed in the New York Times saying, we do need to
00:27:06.140
And then that led to a complete meltdown inside the Times, which cost one senior editor his job.
00:27:11.240
But MBD, you know, a lot of Republicans looking at this same list that the Atlantic, the nonpartisan
00:27:15.820
magazine wants us to believe that actually that's the New York Times wants us to believe is,
00:27:20.180
you know, cause for alarm that he's he's going to be a dictator, a fascist, whatever.
00:27:31.340
And, you know, meanwhile, by the way, the same people that want this list, if they're empowered
00:27:37.560
again in a second Biden administration, what are they going to do?
00:27:41.140
They're going to try to rebuild the disinformation project that sicked the intel agencies on Americans
00:27:47.800
who disagreed with COVID policy or had a different idea about the origin of the COVID-19 virus or who
00:27:56.060
have the wrong views on any other subject that matters that day.
00:28:05.400
I mean, you point out, obviously, the idea of weaponizing the Justice Department.
00:28:09.240
I mean, what is what do you think Merrick Garland is doing right now?
00:28:12.040
Um, you know, they are they are putting Trump, the the, you know, nominal leader of the Republican
00:28:18.380
Party, the person who's most likely to be the nominee into a situation where they can withdraw,
00:28:24.860
they can draw testimony from him according to a political schedule that benefits them.
00:28:30.440
I mean, this is just and and they have no compunction about it, that that this is going to stir up in
00:28:37.840
people, crazed feelings, both left and right. And as you said, Megan, the biggest fear is that
00:28:44.760
what these what the elite journalists are doing and elite opinion makers are doing is creating a
00:28:51.220
permission structure for extra legal and violent political action around the election next year.
00:28:59.280
And you you're going to see it if Trump is elected, even if he gets a popular vote majority,
00:29:05.180
you will see the city of Washington, D.C. occupied for months on end by scores of thousands of
00:29:13.300
activists trying to bring him down or prevent him from being inaugurated. If you see Trump in jail,
00:29:20.880
I'm sure you're going to see slightly more disorganized and crazed action on the right on the
00:29:27.960
far right. This is a very dangerous and heady time. It requires real leadership. And we have total
00:29:34.500
absence of it, both politically and intellectually. Well, I'll tell you one thing. If you're I know,
00:29:42.320
as we discussed, you're not a huge fan of Trump. You should be rooting for him to win. Charles,
00:29:46.560
in particular, you should be rooting for this, because if Trump doesn't get the nomination or
00:29:52.060
if he does get it and runs and loses, he's probably going to try again in four years.
00:29:57.720
And we're going to go through this whole thing over and over and over again. There's only so much
00:30:06.040
the country can take of this storyline. I think we'll see. All right, let's take a quick break
00:30:11.900
and we'll be right back. Charles and MBD, stay with us.
00:30:14.560
My guests this hour, National Review's Charles C.W. Cook and Michael Brendan Doherty. We are here in
00:30:24.780
advance of tomorrow's big Republican presidential debate. It should be very spicy. We're trying to
00:30:30.880
keep it spicy as we come up with these debate questions. And I've said to the press interviewing
00:30:35.080
me on it, you guys, that I think what you'll see different in this debate versus the other debates is
00:30:39.960
we've worked very hard to make the questions, you know, 90% of the questions, A-plus level questions
00:30:45.700
that are hard questions, as opposed to just, what would you do about this? What would you do about
00:30:50.020
that? Right? We're trying to make it tough for them to just give us talking points that we've heard
00:30:55.160
them say a million times before. And especially because we're the fourth debate that we've heard
00:30:59.280
them say on the debate stage multiple times before. And we're trying to foster actual debate.
00:31:04.400
You know, one of my biggest frustrations with that NBC debate was it wasn't a debate. It was
00:31:08.840
Kristen Welker and Lester Holt. And at times Hugh Hewitt asking questions that they wanted the
00:31:13.500
answers to, which there's room for that, but there was no debate. And when debate broke out,
00:31:18.020
they stifled it. So it's like, I can, I can see Kristen Welker do this on meet the press every
00:31:23.120
Sunday. I don't need to tune into a debate to watch it, you know, get, get her questions answered.
00:31:27.520
I need to hear them fight because by the way, they're not allowed to do this in between the debates.
00:31:33.000
Vivek, DeSantis, Nikki, they're not allowed to, to debate each other on Fox news or any
00:31:38.740
place else in between the debates. So this is literally their only chance to have it out with
00:31:43.740
one another. So you'll see that on our, on our debate tomorrow night. Um, join, not find join
00:31:50.560
nn.com. My apologies to news nation. I always forget that join nn.com join nn. Okay. So going
00:31:57.060
into tomorrow night, let's talk about who's got the most to gain. I think it's probably all of them
00:32:03.240
and who's got the most to lose and how you think it's likely going to go down between them. Because
00:32:07.520
you know, these are some silverback gorillas going out there who need to sort of take down
1.00
00:32:11.720
a couple of the other ones who are costing them points in various States. Kristen Welker,
0.99
00:32:16.680
speaking of her at NBC, had DeSantis on meet the press this past Sunday and really, really,
00:32:22.020
really wanted to know when he's going to drop out. Take a listen.
00:32:27.980
Are you committed to staying in this race through the Iowa caucuses?
00:32:32.240
So I don't think anyone's ever done an Iowa caucus, uh, with this amount of institutional
00:32:37.400
and grassroots support. And it's only going to build for here. And we look forward to being
00:32:42.340
victorious on January 15th. So just to be clear, you are committed to staying in the race through
00:32:47.820
the caucuses. Of course I am. And I mean, it's absurd that I wouldn't be on caucus night. If you
00:32:54.400
don't come in at least second, would you then drop out of the race? How critical is Iowa?
00:33:01.420
Well, we're going to win the caucus. We were doing everything that we need to do it.
00:33:05.400
But what if you don't, governor? What if you don't? And I've said from the beginning, we are,
00:33:09.280
we are, we're going to win. We're going to win the, we're going to win the caucus.
00:33:12.960
Bottom line is Iowa do or die for you, governor.
00:33:15.820
We're going to win Iowa. I think it's going to help propel us to the nomination.
00:33:20.120
Okay. I will tell you my own take on that is it was rude. You can ask once. You can definitely
00:33:27.460
ask him, you know, are you getting ready to drop out? Your poll numbers don't look so good,
00:33:30.460
whatever, however you want to put it. To badger him like that is you're pushing your agenda.
00:33:35.320
You're, you're desperate to make a news headline to the disrespect of the candidate. Charles,
00:33:39.460
what did you make of it? Well, I agree with you. I think it's rude. I think it's agenda driven.
00:33:44.980
I also think it's pointless because what's he supposed to say? Unless he's going to drop out now,
00:33:49.320
of course, he's going to stay in until Iowa and his aim is to win Iowa. And if he wins or does
00:33:55.520
really well in Iowa, then he's going to continue. I mean, as you say, maybe you could ask that once
00:34:00.320
just to see what his reaction is. It makes more sense to ask that of, say, Chris Christie,
00:34:05.340
who really does seem to be competing for just one state, but okay, ask Ron DeSantis if you have to,
00:34:11.120
but what is he supposed to say after that? The way she asked it too was really irritating.
00:34:18.020
It's this sort of smug, knowing way of asking that suggests to me, once again, that the press
00:34:27.960
really would love for Donald Trump to be the nominee and for everyone else to drop out. That does seem
00:34:33.380
to be a narrative they're interested in developing. Either way, I agree with you.
00:34:39.100
The latest narrative, MBD, is that Nikki Haley, some have described it as a boomlet,
00:34:44.740
you know, she's having a boom, a boomlet, that she is, you know, the favorite. There was a piece
00:34:53.620
suggesting he, DeSantis, can't recover now because of her surge. I'm trying to find it in front of me,
00:35:00.520
but suggesting that it's a death knell to the Ron DeSantis campaign, that he's not going anywhere in
00:35:09.420
the polls. She's now giving him a run for his money, even in Iowa, where his lead has been cut
00:35:14.320
to, I think, three points and suggesting that that's not recoverable for Ron DeSantis. But
00:35:19.940
the truth is, while Nikki Haley is beloved by a certain wing of the party, she's loathed by a
00:35:28.380
separate wing, right? So I don't know that her boomlet is the death knell of anyone. What do you think?
00:35:35.400
So the New York Times and Siena College did a poll of the GOP earlier this year, and it showed that
00:35:43.880
there was like a 20 to 25 percent portion of the GOP that were implacably anti-Trump, right? They're
00:35:51.720
anti-MAGA. One of the other notable things about them was they were super pro-supportive of Ukraine
00:35:58.300
and arming Ukraine and defeating Russia. And what you're finding is Nikki Haley is the candidate of
00:36:05.560
that passionate minority in the party. But the fact is, when you dig deep into the polls,
00:36:14.400
she doesn't seem to have strong appeal beyond that yet. Whereas Ron DeSantis, when you look in
00:36:19.360
the polls, you find out, oh, well, half of his supporters are looking at Trump. And well, gee,
00:36:25.240
half or more than half of Trump supporters are looking at DeSantis as potentially their second
00:36:29.820
choice. So, you know, what you're really looking at is so far, she's been able to activate that
00:36:36.440
passionate anti-populist pro-Ukraine sector of the party, which is real and which has real muscle and
00:36:44.060
organization. You know, even Americans for Prosperity and the GOP organization came through
00:36:51.240
and endorsed her, which means, you know, a gusher of money coming through. But that doesn't mean the
00:36:57.840
voters are there. And so far, she hasn't shown an ability to appeal very far beyond that core.
00:37:06.180
And the rest of the party can sniff it. They detect in her that her rise is somehow a rebuke of them.
00:37:14.460
So I just don't think it's going to fly. You know, she might win. Maybe she can win New Hampshire
00:37:20.500
if Chris Christie got out of the way. You know, I do think one of these early states wants to give
00:37:26.520
Trump a spanking, you know, for not doing the debates, for not working as hard as the other
0.79
00:37:31.820
candidates are working. But I just don't see her appeal nationwide, you know, what she's offering
0.93
00:37:38.140
other sectors of the country, you know, outside of Northern Virginia.
00:37:44.080
We talk about win New Hampshire. I mean, all these are after Trump. Win New Hampshire amongst
00:37:49.440
the undercard. I mean, no one has a great chance of beating Trump in any state. I understand DeSantis
00:37:55.280
is hoping, thanks to the endorsement of the governor there and of Bob Vander Plaats, that he actually
00:38:00.320
could leapfrog Trump in Iowa. And Trump is stiff-armed Iowa. So yeah, we're talking about maybe
00:38:07.480
beating the rest of the undercard. But what about that, Charles? Does Nikki Haley need to try to take
0.93
00:38:13.080
out Chris Christie at this debate tomorrow night? Because she actually is potentially in a position
00:38:19.180
to, again, win, in air quotes, behind Trump, in both South Carolina and New Hampshire. But it would
00:38:27.640
be much easier for her in New Hampshire if Chris Christie were no longer there.
00:38:31.140
Yes and no. I mean, obviously, he is an impediment to her in New Hampshire. And as we saw in 2016,
00:38:39.640
when you have too many people going for the same votes, it helps Trump. But the ultimate problem is
00:38:45.980
that Trump's polling at 50 or 60 percent. So I think really what Nikki Haley needs to try to do is take out
0.98
00:38:53.600
Ron DeSantis in the long run, because the race, if it's not going to be Trump, is going to be
00:39:01.020
not Trump, because it came down to Trump and a not Trump, if that makes sense. That was very
00:39:06.040
Monty Python-ish. But you're going to have to have a head-to-head at some point where people are clear
00:39:12.180
as to what their alternative choice is. And they're making the decision to back someone else because
00:39:18.260
Trump's in legal trouble, or they're tired of him, or he's too old, or they're just bored of all of the
00:39:24.660
drama, or they don't think he can win. So, you know, yes, I suppose if we're getting down into that level
00:39:32.440
of detail, then she should want to take out Chris Christie. But the two candidates that have a chance
0.98
00:39:38.980
of becoming the not Trump are DeSantis and Haley. And that's why we're seeing so much money being spent
00:39:47.380
by Nikki Haley going after Ron DeSantis, because she understands that. And also why DeSantis MBD took
00:39:55.000
a shot at Nikki Haley on Newsmax, I think yesterday, saying she's not conservative. He said she
00:40:02.840
opposed protecting girls in bathrooms and locker rooms when a bill on the trans issue came up when
00:40:10.200
she was governor of South Carolina. He said she opposed me on Disney, inviting Disney to move to
00:40:15.740
South Carolina when I tried to push back on them for criticizing the sexualization of children in
00:40:21.220
school. And his third example was, she said Hillary Clinton was her inspiration to get into politics.
00:40:27.500
Now, she said she disagreed with Nikki Haley, I mean, with Hillary on policy, but she did say she was her
00:40:32.420
inspo. So he's coming right out with it. She's not a conservative and has no business becoming the GOP
00:40:38.840
nominee. But it's my point is, there's an escalation for sure between those two.
00:40:42.780
Absolutely. And there needs to be, I mean, DeSantis needs every type of voter he can get
00:40:50.900
if he wants to challenge Trump. Any Trump challenger needs every type of vote. And if,
00:40:56.380
you know, Nikki Haley's support is primarily because she's like the full package anti-Trump,
00:41:04.580
well, if she's ever knocked out of the race, those people will be searching for someone who is not
0.65
00:41:10.260
Trump. And they may settle for DeSantis if they can, if that's the best that they can get. So
00:41:16.380
of course that makes sense. I mean, I would be worried if I were Nikki Haley, though,
00:41:20.900
that if I knock out Ron DeSantis too early, that the bulk of his supporters go to Donald Trump and
00:41:27.840
Trump just romps through these early states by unbelievable margins. I mean, you know, nearly half
00:41:34.720
half or more of Ron DeSantis' supporters would go to Trump if DeSantis is out. So, you know,
00:41:42.520
if she manages to somehow, you know, sneak up on him in Iowa, I mean, I think in a way it could be
00:41:49.820
a disaster for her. You know, it would be the end.
0.68
00:41:53.300
That's interesting. That's such an interesting point. You're right. If she takes him out,
00:41:58.640
who benefits, not necessarily Nikki. So she does need to, I mean, she's smart. I'm sure she's doing
00:42:05.340
all this calculus behind the scenes herself, but that'll be one of the most fascinating things
00:42:09.800
because, you know, you can tell these debates, who's ganging up on whom, who's trying to take who
00:42:14.660
out and for what reason. You know, we saw that, I mean, who could forget Chris Christie and Marco
00:42:20.160
Rubio Charles. It's like, it's very obvious when one of them makes up their mind that the other is
00:42:25.300
their prime target. I have to say, I'm a little bit of a skeptic of this sort of thinking, as you
00:42:31.360
may know. And I think Donald Trump illustrates why. You remember back in 2016, we heard so much about
00:42:39.680
lanes, these lanes in the Republican primary. And we were told that this poll, if you dig down the
00:42:47.500
third choice in this state, that person. And so this will break that way. And look, Donald Trump
00:42:53.160
is unique. He's sui generis. He was, before he became a politician, one of the most famous people
00:42:58.660
in the world. He's probably the most famous person in the world now. So he is a little different. But
00:43:03.660
I think that momentum has a great deal to play in our politics. And I'm just not convinced that the
00:43:13.260
minutiae of polling represents accurately how people actually think. I think people get excited
00:43:20.100
about candidates. I think that they tend to follow the herd. And I think that if Ron DeSantis or Nikki
00:43:27.460
Haley were to break away and make it a two-person race, then a great deal of the analysis that we're
1.00
00:43:33.800
seeing would be rendered moot and replaced by much more human instincts, such as a desire to follow the
00:43:41.340
crowd or back the right horse or get excited about someone who's different or move on, or perhaps just
00:43:46.600
to vote for Donald Trump once again, as Republicans have done now for eight years. So I'm a little bit
00:43:52.040
of a skeptic. I do agree with you that you can tell at a debate what each candidate thinks they have to
00:43:57.200
do to win by who they're attacking and on what grounds. I'm just not convinced that that's actually
00:44:05.340
I mean, there's no question the debates have had an effect, at least for Haley. Her numbers have gone up
00:44:10.440
in a way they hadn't even come close to doing prior to the beginning of this thing. She's been
00:44:15.320
very animated and active out there. DeSantis hasn't. That's one of the things I want to see is he is he
00:44:22.100
more aggressive on the debate stage than he's been. All right, let's take a look in the time we have
00:44:26.120
left at what's happening on the other side of the aisle, because I mean, what's going on with John
00:44:31.860
Fetterman? I feel like those of us who have been very critical, it's not like people hate John
00:44:38.560
Fetterman, but just, you know, the fact that he's in this office, notwithstanding his multiple
00:44:43.740
challenges, I think are paying new attention to this guy as he's proving very willing to cross
00:44:50.740
factions of his own party on certain things. Number one, Israel. Number two, he's now going after
0.50
00:44:58.240
Bob Menendez, U.S. Senator from the state of New Jersey, who's involved in yet another alleged
00:45:04.040
corruption scandal. And he went, Fetterman did, on The View on Friday and said this, hot six.
00:45:11.580
We have a colleague in the Senate that actually did much more sinister and serious kinds of things.
00:45:18.740
Senator Menendez, he needs to go. And if you are going to expel Santos, how can you allow to somebody
00:45:27.100
like Menendez to remain in the Senate? And, you know, Santos is kind of lies were almost, you know,
00:45:33.200
funny. And like, you know, he, you know, landed on the moon and a guy kind of stuff. Whereas,
00:45:38.520
whereas, you know, I, you know, I think, you know, Menendez, I think is really a senator for Egypt,
00:45:43.640
you know, not New Jersey. Pretty bold. What did you make of it, MBD?
00:45:49.500
I loved it, to be honest. I mean, he's dead right. I mean, George Santos is a comical
00:45:57.320
fact, you know, person. And some of his scandals, like fencing puppies or whatever, you know, like,
00:46:03.900
it is the strangest stuff. And he goes, he was expelled from Congress because he annoyed his
00:46:09.000
colleagues. But Fetterman is right that Bob Menendez is being charged with really grave
00:46:14.660
crimes of corruption of office. And he's, he's right to go. I think the Babylon Bee joked,
00:46:21.560
weird, man becomes more conservative as he gains brain function. And I think that's about where it
00:46:30.660
is. I'm excited to see this Fetterman. I mean, maybe he just has decided he's his own brand and
00:46:38.760
can get away with whatever he wants to and become a little bit of a legend in politics in the meantime.
00:46:43.460
He also, Charles, hired, you know how you can pay certain people to do these cameo videos?
00:46:49.860
He hired George Santos, Fetterman did, to do a cameo video for Menendez. I'll show you just a
00:46:55.400
little bit. Let's, let's check it out. Stop seven. Hey, Bobby. Uh, look, I don't think I need to tell
00:47:02.780
you, but these people that want to make you get in trouble and want to kick you out and make you run
00:47:09.000
away. You make him put up or shut up. You stand your ground, sir. And don't get bogged down by all
00:47:15.360
the haters out there. Stay strong. Merry Christmas. Oh my God. Charles. I'm sorry,
00:47:23.680
but that's a brilliant move. That's the best $200 he's ever spent. Yeah. I admire the fact that he
00:47:30.320
is willing to buck the trend, be it the partisan trend or, uh, normal political behavior. I don't
00:47:39.760
want to be churlish, but he is going to annoy the hell out of conservatives most of the time.
00:47:45.120
And we, we ought to forget that, uh, when it comes to judicial nominees, legislation,
00:47:49.680
we're having a moment of levity, sir. We're not endorsing. Yeah, I know. No, I know. But I,
00:47:54.200
I just sometimes think we ought to remember that on the right. Cause we were very quick. Anyone who
00:47:57.520
says anything that remotely aligns with what we believe we jump on the yes. Oh my goodness. You,
00:48:02.280
you, you are great. You're president. I still going to annoy the hell out of us.
00:48:06.420
Well, it's like RFK jr. You know, people like, yes, I agree with him on the vaccine madness or on the
00:48:12.000
military industrial con complex. And then you get a look at his social policy. Wait, what? Wait. Okay.
00:48:18.020
Guys, such a pleasure to see you. Uh, we'll talk after the debate and thanks for coming on.
00:48:22.400
Good luck. Uh, thank you. And, uh, don't forget, we are going to come back right in two seconds.
00:48:28.820
We're going to catch up on a lot of the madness that's happening on campuses and in the country,
00:48:32.560
on Israel with Josh hammer and Seth Mendel. In the meantime, subscribe to the show at youtube.com
00:48:37.360
slash Megan Kelly and at rumble. Can I tell you in advance of the big debate tomorrow,
00:48:46.440
uh, on news nation, it will air live at 8 PM Eastern. I'm freezing. I'm always so cold.
00:48:54.640
They keep these events just like the tundra. It's gotta be 50 degrees here in this little spin
00:49:00.940
alley tomorrow. There'll be, this'll be filled with reporters trying to get interviews with the
00:49:05.000
candidates and their surrogates and all that. But why must it always be so freezing? I'm telling you,
00:49:09.640
uh, it's some sort of either. I'm just getting too old for this crap or, um, they're trying to
0.99
00:49:14.600
freeze me out. I don't know. Either way, I cannot be frozen out. I will be here. You're going to be
0.99
00:49:18.600
able to see my breath shortly. However, all right, now back to the news. Anti-Semitism on college
00:49:23.760
campuses is the focus of a hearing today on Capitol Hill. And it's really interesting. One of the
00:49:29.260
university leaders called to answer questions, Harvard university's Claudine Gay. This woman's been
00:49:35.200
a nightmare. She's been an absolute disgrace. She's been getting criticized by former presidents
1.00
00:49:41.080
of Harvard, like Lauren Summers. Um, a bunch of donors have pulled. She's all over the board on
00:49:47.060
her messaging. She's in love with DEI unless you're a Jew. That's the bottom line with Claudine. Uh,
0.73
00:49:52.100
well, she testified that she has seen a dramatic and deeply concerning rise in anti-Semitism. Okay.
00:49:58.720
First of all, that's obviously just window dressing from her because she clearly did not give two
0.91
00:50:02.620
shits about rise in anti-Semitism until she was made to by their rich donors. But in any event,
0.78
00:50:09.020
questioning continued in particular from Republican Congress, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik. And she
00:50:15.720
refused to say students calling for the genocide of Jewish people is against Harvard's code of conduct.
00:50:22.940
Now watch this. Let me ask you this. You are president of Harvard. So I assume you're familiar
00:50:28.000
with the term intifada, correct? I've heard that term. Yes. And you understand that the use of the
00:50:35.020
term intifada in the context of the Israeli Arab conflict is indeed a call for violent armed resistance
00:50:40.740
against the state of Israel, including violence against civilians and the genocide of Jews. Are you
00:50:46.120
aware of that? That type of hateful speech is personally abhorrent to me. And there have been
00:50:53.100
multiple marches at Harvard with students chanting, quote, there is only one solution intifada revolution
00:50:58.620
and quote, globalize the intifada. Is that correct? I've heard that thoughtless, reckless and hateful
00:51:07.900
language on our campus. Yes. So do you believe that type of hateful speech is contrary to Harvard's
00:51:15.160
code of conduct or is it allowed at Harvard? It is at odds with the values of Harvard. Can you not say
00:51:22.540
that it is against the code of conduct at Harvard? We embrace a commitment to free expression,
00:51:30.180
even of views that are objectionable, offensive, hateful. It's when that speech crosses into conduct
00:51:39.800
that violates our policies against bullying, harassment. Does that speech not cross that barrier?
00:51:46.100
Does that speech not call for the genocide of Jews and the elimination of Israel?
0.90
00:51:49.980
When you testify that you understand that is the definition of intifada?
00:51:58.620
Is that speech according to the code of conduct or not?
00:52:06.480
Wow. Joining me now, Josh Hammer. He's editor at large for Newsweek and a host of the Josh Hammer show
00:52:13.840
and Seth Mandel, who is now senior editor at Commentary and doing a great job over there.
00:52:19.480
Guys, welcome. Great to have you. That it's she's been honestly among the worst. Is there somebody like
00:52:26.400
is there a university president? Maybe Liz McGill of UPenn, who was also there. But Claudine Gay
0.96
00:52:31.120
has been an absolute disgrace. And the irony of listening to this woman talk about her commitment
0.96
00:52:37.100
to free speech when Harvard ranks, I pulled it up, number one for the worst. So it is the worst
00:52:45.200
in FIRE's college free speech rankings. Unless you're saying kill all the Jews, in which case it's
1.00
00:52:53.260
very important to be able to express yourself, because I don't know. Josh, you tell me.
0.99
00:53:00.840
Yeah. I mean, how many examples do we need, Megan, over the past 10, 15 years of conservatives being
00:53:05.780
shouted down on university campuses for saying such anodyne things as, you know, maybe if you are a
00:53:12.240
biological male that you should not be able to compete in women's sports that, oh, maybe the unborn
1.00
00:53:17.300
child in the womb might actually have an inalienable right to life. So obviously, these universities,
00:53:24.080
the Claudine Gay's, the Liz McGill's of the world, their recent rediscovery of this absolutist
00:53:29.800
commitment to free speech, which, you know, by the way, isn't actually necessarily what the First
00:53:34.260
Amendment says. That's actually a whole nother kind of constitutional conversation. But even taking that
00:53:38.840
at fixed value there, the timing of it obviously stinks to high heaven and reeks of hypocrisy.
00:53:43.960
It ultimately is nothing whatsoever about procedure. It is not about neutrality. It is
00:53:49.080
not about free speech for all. It is about free speech for some, but lack of free speech for others.
00:53:54.560
And unfortunately, you know, in your remarks there, Megan, you alluded to DEI, which is the reigning
00:53:59.820
orthodoxy on prestigious, you know, I wouldn't even call them prestigious on the most expensive
00:54:04.480
university campuses these days. According to the tenets of DEI, the Jews are an oppressor class.
1.00
00:54:10.540
Therefore, they get less privilege. They get fewer rights than the other groups get. And what that
1.00
00:54:16.260
translates to, what that cashes out to in concrete terms, is that when you call for genocide of them
00:54:21.620
as these Intifada revolution moral cretins, these pro-Hamas jihadist sympathizers are doing at Harvard,
00:54:27.900
Penn, Princeton, elsewhere, ultimately then you get free speech. But, you know, dare you say, of course,
00:54:33.600
that, you know, Riley Gaines is correct, University of Kentucky swimmer, that biological men should not
1.00
00:54:39.240
compete against her when it comes to NCAA swimming. Oh, then you're a transphobe and you have no right
00:54:45.120
Wait, before I go to Seth, you actually, you had a piece on this, was it? No, it was actually, this was Seth.
00:54:51.460
I will go to you on it, Seth. You had a piece on commentary, which I saw, a truly terrible idea on campus
00:54:55.900
anti-Semitism, which was about this issue that we just teed up, which is the answer to this is not to file
00:55:01.620
the Jews inside of the DEI protocols and to have them latch on to these people who are running these
00:55:08.440
programs at these universities. The answer is to break these DEI monopolies in our schools,
00:55:13.940
which are pernicious, rabid forces that only foster
00:55:17.960
difference and fighting and division. That's the word I'm looking for. Go ahead, Seth.
00:55:23.860
Yeah. Look, the piece that I wrote was after Hillel International and the Anti-Defamation League
00:55:32.280
put out a report saying all this anti-Semitism has been going on on college campuses. It's as bad
00:55:40.000
as you think it's been. Half the survey was from before the October 7th Hamas attacks and part of
00:55:46.420
the survey was after. And it showed that was their way of showing the spike in what they call incidents,
00:55:53.840
but the end of the report, none of that was surprising. I think we've all seen this going
00:56:00.980
on, but the end of the report asked one question about what to do about it all. And the question
00:56:07.280
was not multiple choice and it was not open-ended. It was, should DEI include Jews? So there's one
1.00
00:56:15.460
solution you're giving to students here and you're saying, do you want this too? And so of course,
00:56:21.160
70% or whatever it was said, yes, but this is, uh, this is precisely the wrong way to go because
00:56:27.480
DEI, first of all, it can't be molded to include Jews on campus because Jews are considered by DEI,
00:56:38.380
by animating ideology to be white or white adjacent or white enough, whatever it is. Um, and as Josh said,
00:56:47.180
that makes them the oppressor. Um, so there's no way to have, you, you can't have the two coexist DEI
00:56:55.200
ideology and the idea that Jews are considered to put upon minority, the two cancel each other out.
00:57:02.360
And, but the other point that I will, I made in the piece is that why would you want that anyway?
00:57:07.600
Let's say DEI could be expanded somehow. The umbrella could be expanded. So Jews could stand under it,
1.00
00:57:13.960
but why would you want that? And look what it's doing to campuses across the country. It's tearing
00:57:19.240
them apart. It's completely resetting our idea of higher education. It's, uh, infiltrating, um,
00:57:27.480
it's infiltrating studies that we have normally nothing to do, uh, with any of these social issues.
00:57:34.180
And they're being made into, these courses are being made into requirements. So everybody has to
00:57:38.720
go through it and it's like a programming and it's teaching people to see those around them based on
00:57:45.600
the shade of their skin color and therefore to put them in a specific box on what that means for
00:57:51.940
their privilege and how many minutes they should be allowed to talk versus how many minutes you should
00:57:56.500
be allowed to talk. And it just creates this hierarchy and it completely obliterates the entire
00:58:01.880
point of education and especially a liberal arts education, which is to learn, to be open to ideas,
00:58:08.440
to hear new things, to be challenged and to challenge others. Uh, this is just sort of a racial hierarchy
00:58:15.220
spoiled system and it's contrary to education. And I can't imagine the Jewish community, people of the
1.00
00:58:22.100
book wanting to be part of this, you know, opting in to essentially, uh, help deconstruct real education
00:58:29.980
and replace it with, um, you know, some sort of, of, of racial protection racket, no matter which
00:58:36.020
of it they're on. And it's too late. It's too late. Anyway, the DEI crew has already branded the Jews
00:58:43.280
whites and that's the end of the game for them. It's too late. You saw that Gallup poll that came out
0.56
00:58:49.200
more than six in 10 Democrats, 63%. Um, let's see, hold on. I want to get it. Um,
00:58:58.540
okay. Disapprove of Israel's military action in Gaza, 63% of Democrats. And you, you break it down.
00:59:05.040
You know who it is? It's adults younger than 35, 67% of the younger adults under 35 oppose Israel,
00:59:12.800
64% of people of color, 64% uh, disapprove. And so do the slight, the slight majority of women,
00:59:21.800
52% uh, are not in favor of Israel's actions in, um, in Gaza. So it's too late. Those are the groups
00:59:32.100
most affected by the DEI ideology. They've been captured and there's no battling it once it's
00:59:39.120
sunk in. So I really, I, I think the move is the Chris Rufo position. You don't go DEI light. You
00:59:46.560
don't try to get more groups included in DEI. DEI must go away. It must be crushed at every level.
00:59:52.280
Even at my daughter's school, she's in seventh grade. You can run for next year for, you know,
00:59:57.000
various positions, you know, president, class president, vice president of this, right? There's
01:00:00.980
vice president of DEI. I mean, this is starting at very young ages. You can get PhDs and bachelor's
01:00:07.200
degrees and so on in DEI. It's become a whole cottage industry and you can guarantee virtually
01:00:12.080
all of them are against the Jews because as I said, you've been classified as white. I do want
0.98
01:00:18.640
to raise this, this issue though, um, Josh on the question of the intifada chance. Cause to me,
01:00:24.120
as somebody who is generally a free speech advocate, it doesn't mean there are no consequences to your
01:00:28.660
free speech, but generally in America, you're allowed to say hateful things. Hate speech is allowed.
01:00:33.860
Now college campuses, uh, it gets a little trickier because any place where you can disrupt
01:00:40.220
education, the schools are allowed to crack down more though. That's generally more of a K through
01:00:44.800
12 thing. So what's your position on that? Should the, should students be able to march across a
01:00:49.360
campus given at least Stefanik's definition of intifada and shout that they're in favor of it?
01:00:55.240
No, Claudine Gay is dead wrong in saying that Harvard university students have either a first
01:01:03.180
amendment right or a Harvard code of conduct rights to chant for the mass slaughter for the genocide
01:01:09.280
of others. First of all, I mean, it is well-established first amendment case law that you do not have
01:01:13.680
a first amendment right to imminently incite violence. Now that goes back to 1960s and the court
01:01:19.600
has kind of watered it down a little bit. So you really have to kind of directly try to incite violence,
01:01:24.160
which is one of many reasons that I and others have tried to dismiss the allegations that Trump
01:01:30.420
himself on January 6th imminently incited violence because his speech was not literally calling for
01:01:35.240
a certain action, but it gets a little lawyerly. But when you are literally using the word intifada,
01:01:39.860
there is one solution intifada revolution. Well, first of all, I mean, just the first half of that
01:01:45.460
phrase, the one solution. I mean, where does the mind go, Megan? When you hear one solution,
01:01:49.680
what do you think of? You're obviously thinking of Hitler and the final solution. And then you
0.93
01:01:53.540
finish that phrase with intifada revolution. Well, Israelis paid the price of the first intifada
0.99
01:01:59.200
and the second intifada in, and that price was the deaths and the maiming and the slaughter,
01:02:04.480
the Sbarro pizza bombing in Jerusalem in 2000, thousands of Israelis dead. The biggest modern
1.00
01:02:10.360
slaughter pre-October 7th was the second intifada. So you don't have a first amendment right to save
01:02:16.760
these things. And again, what's good for the goose has to be good for the gander. So there
01:02:21.500
is an element of hypocrisy here too. But I think it's a dangerous road to go down to say that you
01:02:26.560
have a first amendment right to imminently call for the slaughter of others. That is not our
01:02:30.780
tradition. That certainly is not what the free speech clause, the first amendment, which is
01:02:34.920
ultimately there to have an exchange of ideas to ultimately arrive at the truth. That is what
01:02:40.060
Aristotle would have called the telos, kind of the overarching purpose of the free speech is to
01:02:44.500
get at a conversation to arrive at truth. If you're chanting for the death of others,
01:02:49.240
you are not contributing to a principled discourse, a principled discussion, ultimately arriving at
01:02:54.360
truth. I think that can be said for sure. So I, this one is, is bothering me because I'm very pro
01:03:02.100
Israel and absolutely want them to annihilate Hamas. However, when it comes to saying controversial
01:03:08.100
things, I'm, I'm in favor of saying controversial things and I'm in favor of then the Jewish group
0.98
01:03:13.060
shouting right back, you know, F off. Um, it's, it's different though. If the college code says
01:03:21.420
all students have a right to feel safe on campus, which is the way they've been approaching free
01:03:25.380
speech till now, safe spaces, you can't say hateful things. Otherwise you can't even join the university.
01:03:30.520
Nevermind march around the quad saying the things. And it's not that I have any empathy for the message
01:03:35.720
about intifada. It's just, this is America and you are hate speech is constitutional. Incitement is a
01:03:42.920
very, very, very high bar and almost no speech reaches it. So I don't know, Seth. I mean, I,
01:03:48.240
I recognize what a hypocrite Claudine Gay is. I don't believe one word of her out of her mouth was
0.99
01:03:53.140
sincere. She couldn't give two shits about free speech, but I also wonder, is it the right place to go
0.96
01:03:59.820
to start cracking down on the words coming out of people's mouths, even if they're really awful?
0.98
01:04:07.140
Generally of the opinion that you want to hear what awful people have to say.
1.00
01:04:11.540
So I err on the side of letting people be idiots, um, in part because this conflict,
0.99
01:04:18.740
especially this conflict and its aftermath have been revealing, right? I mean, this has been,
1.00
01:04:24.400
this really tells you who cares about what or anything at all. And so if you're, you need to
01:04:31.840
know who people are and what they think in order to move through the political world. And in order to
01:04:38.780
navigate your life, you have to know who you can trust. And we got a lot more information about a
01:04:45.060
lot of people and a lot of organizations since October 7th that tell you who you can and who you
01:04:50.620
can. And I think it's illuminating. And I also think that there's strategically, you don't really
01:04:55.900
want to be in the dark. And that's one thing. Another is that when you push speech underground,
01:05:01.400
it doesn't go away. It just sort of ferments and, um, grows in an environment that has no sunlight.
01:05:10.780
Uh, and that's, you know, less healthy than leaving it open air and debating those ideas. Um, and also
01:05:19.540
in terms of constitutional, what's constitutional, I just think that on campuses, if you have rules,
01:05:26.120
they should be applied to everybody. And if they're bad rules, you should get rid of them.
01:05:31.080
So what this may be showing is not that people shouldn't be allowed to chant their Israel slogan,
01:05:38.900
slogans, but maybe that the rules that are preventing others from chanting what they want to chant,
01:05:46.000
maybe all of these rules are bad to begin with, right? I mean, it's telling you that if you can't
01:05:50.640
apply them evenly, then, uh, perhaps we should move far beyond this idea that your comfort on college
01:05:59.420
campus is paramount and that the rules should be structured around people not hearing things they
01:06:06.580
don't want to hear. And so the frustration with college presidents is that nothing actually changes.
01:06:13.000
They don't enforce the rules that they have in place evenly, and they don't get rid of the rules
01:06:20.160
that they see obviously needs to be changed. And so there's no, there's, there's no solution. They
01:06:26.060
don't actually do anything. They don't take steps in either direction. I would prefer in general,
01:06:32.860
the direction that they take would be in the direction of free speech, but they don't actually
01:06:38.140
take that direction and they don't actually take the anti-free speech direction. They just kind of sit
01:06:44.220
on their hands and say, Oh, well, this is really too bad. And what it's exposing is that the way these
01:06:50.020
college rules and norms are structured is a complete and total mess and completely at odds with, in some
01:06:58.200
cases, constitutional speech, in some cases, just, you know, the general academic project and academic
01:07:03.400
freedom. So do something about the rules. If you don't want to, if you don't want to apply the
01:07:08.440
rules. Yeah. We have seen person after person shouted down at Harvard. I'm just looking at a
01:07:13.560
quick list from fire, which is a great organization. They fight for free speech, no matter your partisan
01:07:18.240
connection. Um, just a couple in 2022, Harvard disinvited feminist philosopher, Devin Buckley from an
01:07:27.020
English department colloquium on campus over her views on gender and trans issues. So that's one
1.00
01:07:34.580
person who was going to go to a little gathering in the English department and offer her views on
01:07:41.420
gender. It's a no, no said Harvard, but the whole masses out on the quad shouting about intifada.
01:07:50.680
We're really committed to free speech. So I, you know, I can't stand the hypocrisy and we see right
01:07:55.500
through her. Um, but I look forward to going, I really want to get Kelly J Keene and I want to get,
01:08:00.200
uh, Rebecca. I mean, and I want to get, uh, Riley, Riley Gaines and, uh, Helen Joyce. And I want to go
01:08:06.480
to the Harvard quad and I want to chant a man cannot become a woman, make women female again. There's no
1.00
01:08:13.660
such thing as chest feeding. And anyone who tries it is a sick child abuser. I'm going to say all of that.
1.00
01:08:19.120
And I can't wait to see Claudine's protection of my free speech. Um, let's meander from Harvard over
01:08:26.840
to Cornell, which I don't, surprisingly to me, I don't know. I just kind of am surprised that Cornell
01:08:33.100
is like one of the hotbeds of the antisemitism movement. Um, I went to Syracuse, which is 45 minutes
01:08:40.820
away. It was a stone throw away. And, uh, it's many of the same people. It's not just like,
01:08:45.740
I'm surprised they've lost their mind to this extent. So the students, uh, there,
01:08:50.300
the pro-Palestinian students have decided to protest now while their fellow students are
01:08:55.940
trying to study. My information is that you pay $62,000 a year to go to Cornell and Ivy League
01:09:01.740
school these days. And this is what you're going to have to deal with. Take a listen to SOT 14.
01:09:15.740
Okay. So this is once again, students for justice in Palestine, which is truly just the most
0.65
01:09:31.900
abhorrent group of, uh, the things that they stand for are absolutely horrific to me,
01:09:36.780
but they're everywhere and they are walking into the buildings. They're disrupting the students who
01:09:41.480
you can see at the cubicle studying for their finals. And this is according to David Bernstein
01:09:45.440
reporting on Twitter saying, um, that when complaints were lodged with the Dean's office
01:09:51.420
about this, the response was that the protesters have the right to express themselves so long as
01:09:57.280
they don't get too disruptive. So you can disrupt, you just can't get too disruptive. They said with
01:10:04.360
20 to 30 minutes being considered acceptable. Can you believe this Josh?
01:10:11.520
Well, unfortunately I can believe it Megan, because I literally lived it three weeks ago.
01:10:15.640
I was speaking at the university of Michigan. I was giving a YAF young America's foundation talk
01:10:19.800
on this conflict. The title of my talk was Israel's righteous fight against jihadism.
01:10:24.400
And within three minutes of my talk, it was shouted down by 20 to 25 well-organized pro Hamas
01:10:30.500
protesters. And there were university of Michigan campus police and building administrators standing
01:10:35.220
right there in the room. And what did they do? They did absolutely nothing. So you had the guy
01:10:40.460
who was the university's man who was in charge of the building, went up to the podium. He kind of
01:10:44.220
shoved me aside and he tried to remind them of this, of the code of conduct. You couldn't hear a word
01:10:48.900
he was saying because they were shouting so loud, shouting all the things that you would expect them to
01:10:52.720
say from the river to the sea, blah, blah, blah. So long story short, what happened to me was
01:10:57.280
this whole thing lasted about 35 minutes. If I had to guess maybe 40 minutes at the most,
01:11:02.200
at which point they went outside, they were banging on the doors, by the way, they had painted all their
01:11:06.520
hands in red. And it's a very nice lecture hall at university of Michigan, beautiful campus. So you
01:11:10.820
kind of get outside the hall and they, they, they left these filthy red handprints on the wall.
01:11:15.480
So this literally happened to me. So what you're reading, you know, you have 30 minutes to go
01:11:20.120
with your heckler's veto. That's exactly what happened to me. Unfortunately, Megan though, I'm not,
01:11:25.080
I'm not surprised that this is happening at a school like Cornell. Actually, I was just there. I was,
01:11:29.160
I was there at both Cornell and Syracuse in, in late September. I spoke at the federal society
01:11:33.480
chapters of the law schools on both campuses. I actually took an Uber ride from Mythica to
01:11:36.880
Syracuse. It's very pretty in that part of New York, but a university like Cornell, they're drawing
01:11:41.720
so heavily from these elite prep schools in New York city, in Boston, Philadelphia, and cities like
01:11:47.340
that. You're going to have kids who have been indoctrinated their whole lives. I think one of the
01:11:51.460
great fallacies that many, you know, you know, conservative people,
01:11:55.080
people who are center right tend to think is that, oh, the kids are totally fine until they're 18
01:11:59.620
years old. And then they go to these universities and they're totally brainwashed. That's totally
01:12:03.540
nonsensical. Look, my mother was an elementary school teacher, a third, fourth grade teacher for
01:12:08.180
20 to 25 years or so. I have it from firsthand experience or secondhand, I guess from her,
01:12:13.540
the extent to which these kids these days are being brainwashed the entire time. Just yesterday,
01:12:17.840
actually, I was speaking with Jason Rance out in Seattle on his radio show. He had this 47 slide
01:12:23.980
elaborate PowerPoint presentation from a local high school out there in Washington state. And he
01:12:29.300
wanted to bring me on to talk about it. It was, well, they called it a history of the Israeli
01:12:33.600
Palestinian conflict. I will tell you that it was one side's history. It was one side's truth. It
0.99
01:12:39.120
didn't bear much of a resemblance to the actual truth. It was a lot about the Nakba, not about,
01:12:44.020
not a lot about the 1929 Hebron massacre where the Arabs murdered the Jews of Hebron and things like
01:12:49.580
that. But again, they don't care about the facts whatsoever. They will never let stubborn facts
01:12:54.440
get in the way of their pernicious ideology, which ultimately is all downstream of the Christopher
01:12:59.320
Rufo woke capture of the institutions and all of that. My God, these are annoying snot nosed kids who
1.00
01:13:05.560
came from exactly the institutions you just suggested. You see their behavior at Cornell and
01:13:10.500
you know it. So the greater context of what I just showed you for the audience watching is they
01:13:16.040
decided to have like an occupation of Cornell. They're mad that the president of Cornell
01:13:21.080
isn't entirely on the side of Hamas and they want certain concessions. Otherwise they're going to
01:13:29.400
continue their occupation or they decided to have a quote trial for Cornell president Martha Pollack.
01:13:35.380
By the way, the, by the way, the Cornell son, the university on campus in reporting on their antics
01:13:41.520
quote, chose to blur the faces of participants in the photos due to safety and doxing concerns.
01:13:48.320
They blurred the faces. We're not going to blur their faces, but they blurred their faces
01:13:53.880
because they don't think that they should have any accountability for what they're doing.
01:13:58.640
It's completely non-journalistic that decision, Cornell son. So you really need to work on your
01:14:03.640
journalism before you proceed with your activism on the Palestinian side. So they decided to hold this
01:14:09.800
mock trial for the Cornell president and not surprisingly, they, I think, found her guilty.
01:14:16.060
Yeah, they did. They found her guilty on a bunch of things, including genocide and apartheid.
01:14:20.140
She's guilty of genocide just sitting in her office because she hasn't given them
0.93
01:14:24.140
all the things they want when it comes to Cornell's position. They want divestment from Israel.
0.90
01:14:30.800
They want Cornell to support disarming the apartheid, freeing Palestine. And ultimately they were
0.62
01:14:40.200
somewhat satisfied that they got what they wanted because she, the executive vice president of
01:14:46.520
Cornell promised that they would at least discuss pathways to divestment through revisions and
01:14:52.780
alterations to the endowments at Cornell. Unbelievable. So they, they're getting what they want with these
01:14:58.400
antics, Seth. And on top of all that, back to the snot nose piece, they, after their little protests
01:15:05.620
and occupations were asked by the administration to move so that they could close the building for
01:15:10.420
the night. And guess what they did? They went to Willard straight hall where they met and posted
01:15:16.140
everyone's in good spirits. And some of us have started playing super smash brothers, allies in the
01:15:22.720
community, super smash brothers, allies in the communities and from the university have donated pizza,
01:15:27.820
sandwiches, chips, drinks, drinks, and even homemade cookies to us. That's, I mean, we are,
01:15:34.380
we're a far cry from the civil rights movement where African-Americans had to face down dogs in the
01:15:41.720
street while they just tried to stand up for their rights. They're playing Mario, whatever, super smash
01:15:47.220
brothers and having pizza and cookies while they want us to see them as these fierce social justice warriors.
01:15:53.140
Well, look, we don't, we don't know if Martin Luther King had access to a Nintendo switch,
01:15:59.480
if he would have played it, maybe he would have played too. So, you know, you can't really judge
01:16:03.740
based on that. I was too harsh. You know, this is, this is just, this is progress. We just have more
01:16:08.780
technological improvements since then it's innovation, but yeah, the thing that, that really
01:16:13.960
comes out of me when you talk about that specific situation is that let's go back to the, I should
01:16:21.200
feel comfortable on campus thing. And my comfort is paramount. The presence of Jews, presence of people
01:16:30.500
who support Israel, that's, what's making them uncomfortable. They have, they need someone to bake
1.00
01:16:36.600
them cookies and to play Nintendo switch, uh, late into the night, just to get over the fact that
01:16:44.200
they share a campus because they're not running from a counter protest. They didn't duck into Nintendo
01:16:50.580
hall, um, you know, on the campus to, uh, escape, uh, you know, some sort of like angry Jews, you know,
1.00
01:16:59.360
pitchforks and torches or something like that. No one's actually getting in their face. They have no
01:17:04.100
threat. Nothing's making them feel uncomfortable except literally the existence of Israel, the
0.98
01:17:09.200
Jewish state. And that is part of the key problem here, which is that it really does fit into the
0.74
01:17:16.360
comfort mold because it's just not speech. It's just our existence that makes them uncomfortable.
01:17:23.780
And they have somehow arranged the situation in a way that they get sympathy for it. I'm sorry,
01:17:29.600
you have to share, uh, the campus and your state and the planet and the universe with people who
01:17:36.700
support Israel. And of course, Zionism is at its core, essentially a civil rights, you know,
0.61
01:17:43.500
movement itself. I mean, that's an oversimplification, but Zionism at its core just asks for Jews to have
0.88
01:17:49.160
the same rights as everybody else. And so what you're seeing is a counter civil rights protest
01:17:55.980
protest that is so upset by the fact that the, the school is not, uh, totally on their side,
01:18:04.140
that they have to, you know, eat cookies and play video games and stuff like this. So the tantrum is
01:18:09.120
beyond just, you know, it's one thing if somebody were making them feel unsafe, but they're the ones
01:18:14.700
making others feel unsafe. They're the ones, you know, a lot of these protests, you know, receiving
01:18:20.420
reports of, I know people of kids in the city who've, you know, had to run the other way when a,
01:18:25.120
when a smoke bomb comes, you know, they're like shooting off smoke bombs and stuff like that.
01:18:29.400
These protests, I mean, I guarantee you, you know, the nine year old kid on the upper West side is
01:18:34.960
not chasing 500 pro Palestine protesters. It's, you know, it's surely the other way around. So the
01:18:42.000
people who have been taking in some places, virtually every day or every other day, the opportunity to
01:18:49.160
make people feel unsafe, uh, are the ones saying, you know, I don't feel safe or I don't feel
01:18:55.960
comfortable because I'm not allowed to. Yeah. I need, I need my cookies after a long march of
01:19:02.000
throwing smoke bombs at nine year olds. You know, that on the, the point about anti-Zionism,
0.83
01:19:07.500
one of the things they're upset about that their last demand that was not quote, 100% met
01:19:14.500
and they're mad about this, but they're feeling like they can go back on it was for the university
01:19:20.940
to publicly recognize the clear theoretical and political distinction between anti-Zionism and
01:19:28.460
anti-Semitism. But they believe that, um, they might make progress because Cornell has promised
01:19:35.360
negotiations are in process on that. And I know very well from listening to commentary and I'm reading a
01:19:42.660
lot that, that that's a hard no to, to separate anti-Zionism from anti-Semitism. And there's a
01:19:51.820
reason, Josh, that they're making this a requirement for Cornell in order for these snot nose brats to
1.00
01:19:58.140
get out of the lecture halls and let the students who just want to work, get their expensive education
01:20:03.820
that they're paying for. So look, the gold standard for the definition of anti-Semitism nowadays is what's
0.75
01:20:10.140
known as the IRA definition. That's I-H-R-A, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
01:20:15.540
And according to them, according to Natan Sharansky, according to U.S. State Department
01:20:19.560
policy for many, many years now, applying a double standard from the rest of the world,
01:20:25.100
as you would apply to Israel, which is one definition we might say of so-called anti-Zionism,
01:20:30.600
that is itself anti-Semitism. Obviously, these campus radicals, these progressives,
01:20:34.860
these stot-nose brats, as you are accurately describing them, they want to redefine anti-Semitism
1.00
01:20:40.100
so as to not include this one particular component of it. But modern anti-Zionism is,
01:20:45.820
there's simply no other way of viewing it as anti-Semitism. The exact same way that hundreds
0.98
01:20:50.700
and hundreds of years ago, you know, whether it was for the communists or the fascists or anyone in
01:20:55.240
between, the Jews were the scapegoat of all. They were the one kind of tiny minority group that was
01:21:00.580
the root of all the world's evils. That is exactly the exact same framework that these
01:21:06.040
idiots applied to the state of Israel today. If Israel has to kill Hamas in Gaza, and because
1.00
01:21:11.840
Hamas, you know, ever the cynical jihadist outfit, they hide themselves within civilian
0.99
01:21:16.600
infrastructure. They are complicit with UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency there.
01:21:21.620
They fire rockets from schools, from mosques, from inside hospitals for God's sake there.
0.98
01:21:26.180
So because of the way that Israel is forced to conduct war fighting, that there are, you know,
01:21:31.160
I'm not sure what the exact number is, because we don't have reliable statistics, obviously,
01:21:34.480
but call it 8,000 to 12,000, somewhere in that range, innocent civilian deaths.
01:21:39.080
Because there are tragically some civilian deaths that under international law are solely attributable
01:21:43.760
to Hamas, therefore Israel is the root of all evils. Well, you know, where are these same people
0.86
01:21:48.380
over the past decade in Syria, where Bashar al-Assad and the result of the Syrian civil war has killed
01:21:53.680
half a million Syrians? Where have these same people been in Yemen over the past nine years
01:21:58.000
as the Saudi-backed faction and the Iranian-backed faction have had a horrific civil war there in
01:22:03.120
Yemen with tens, hundreds of thousands of deaths? You know, back in Iraq, Saddam Hussein,
0.97
01:22:07.800
obviously gassing his own people. I mean, like, where does this stop? Obviously, when the Arabs
1.00
01:22:11.640
killed the other Arabs, we default to no one in these campuses caring anymore, but somehow you get
1.00
01:22:16.960
some Jews involved and, oh, they care a lot. And if that's not anti-Semitism, I'm not sure what is.
0.89
01:22:21.540
Yeah, suddenly they're very clear on who's to blame.
01:22:51.540
The NewsNation Republican Primary Debate, moderated by SiriusXM's Megan Kelly and
01:22:56.600
NewsNation's Elizabeth Vargas, December 6th, 8 p.m. Eastern. Watch it on NewsNation,
01:23:01.880
America's fastest-growing cable news network. Find NewsNation on your screen at joinnn.com
01:23:07.680
or listen on SiriusXM Triumphs Channel 111. Go to siriusxm.com slash mkshow to subscribe
01:23:14.200
and get three months free. Offer details apply. The NewsNation Republican Primary Debate.
01:23:19.480
See you on the debate stage. To find NewsNation on your TV, go to joinnn.com.
01:23:24.960
I have busted out the hand warmers. If you could only feel how cold it is in here. My nose is so
01:23:36.740
cold. I'm just going to do the show like this. It's freezing. Thank God I have long sleeves for
01:23:42.780
tomorrow night's debate because I don't think it's going to be any warmer in the debate hall.
01:23:46.520
All right, guys. Taking a more somber shift in the coverage, it's been absolutely dark to watch
01:23:55.120
some of these, in particular, squad members come out with their messaging on the horrors coming out
01:24:00.540
of Israel and the reporting. And this Representative Jayapal, my God, I'm sure you saw it, went on with
01:24:10.340
Dana Bash on CNN and, like so many of her Democratic colleagues, seemed to want to refuse to acknowledge
0.96
01:24:19.540
the use of rape as a weapon of war and the atrocities, the sexual violence that was unleashed
01:24:25.860
against Israeli women. I mean, this is just a bridge too far. It's one thing to be Claudine Gay
0.81
01:24:31.360
and finally find free speech, right, on your campus. This is something else entirely. It's just, what kind
01:24:40.620
of a person can't look at the reports of what was done to those women in Israel and say anything other
01:24:46.040
than, I am horrified, horrified. This will be condemned immediately. But it took the UN two months, the UN
01:24:54.240
women's group, to say anything. And now Dana Bash tried to get Representative Jayapal to say something
0.97
01:25:00.260
about it and watch her resist. I've seen a lot of progressive women, generally speaking,
1.00
01:25:07.720
they're quick to defend women's rights and speak out against using rape as a weapon of war. But
01:25:14.540
downright silent on what we saw on October 7th and what might be happening inside Gaza right now to
01:25:22.240
these hostages. Why is that? I mean, I don't know that that's true. I think we always talk about the
01:25:29.000
impact of war on women in particular. And I've condemned what Hamas has done. I've condemned
0.68
01:25:33.760
specifically all of the actions. Absolutely. The rape, the, of course. But I think we have to
01:25:40.420
remember that Israel is a democracy. That is why they are a strong ally of ours. And if they do not
01:25:48.000
comply with international humanitarian law, they are bringing themselves to a place that makes it much
01:25:53.540
more difficult strategically for them to be able to build the kinds of allies, to keep public opinion
01:25:59.240
with them. With respect, I was just asking about the women and you turned it back to Israel. I'm
01:26:05.760
asking you about Hamas. In fact, I already answered your question, Dana. I said it's horrific. And I
0.97
01:26:11.040
think that rape is horrific. Sexual assault is horrific. However, I think we have to be balanced about
0.59
01:26:17.860
bringing in the outrages against Palestinians. And it's horrible, but you don't see Israeli
1.00
01:26:24.260
soldiers raping. Well, Dana, I think we're not, we're not, I don't want this to be the hierarchy
0.83
01:26:30.440
of oppression. Oh, my God, Seth. My God. Now, now we don't want this to be the hierarchy of oppression.
01:26:39.820
Convenient timing. You know, there was years ago, there was a, there was an article written,
01:26:47.840
in academic ease, that was making the point that the lack of Jews, lack of Israelis raping their
01:27:00.140
victims, among the Palestinians was actually a kind of bias in itself. And so, you know, this is,
0.75
01:27:08.180
that's what it makes me think of that you really, there's literally, there's literally nothing you
01:27:12.220
can do. But also that you have to understand how people decide, find a way to bring it back to
01:27:20.300
criticism of Israel, absolutely, no matter what. And I think it's horrified a lot of people who,
01:27:26.540
they can't, you can't actually defend anything that Hamas did, right? So you have two options,
0.94
01:27:33.580
you can deny it, or you can, what about? So what abouting it is very tough, which is what she tried to do
01:27:41.300
there? Because, you know, well, Israel is going to have to build alliances, and it's not going to
01:27:51.380
build those strategic alliances, if people don't think it can fight fairly, and stuff like that,
01:27:56.600
not a question about rape. And, and I think that what you're seeing is, there's just a total loss for
01:28:05.320
words. Because what do you do? If you are part of a progressive movement that holds that Hamas
0.94
01:28:14.320
represents the oppressed, and the Jews represent the oppressors? And what did you think decolonialism
0.50
01:28:23.060
meant? Did you think it was just a theory, you know, as these, as people like to say? So if you,
01:28:28.360
if you believe- That tweet endorsed by the Washington Post's Karen Atiyah, this is what
01:28:34.780
decolonization looks like. Endorse, it is not some fringe, the Washington Post's Karen Atiyah, keep
01:28:39.900
going. Yeah, it's not, it's not fringe. That's right. And so if you believe that, if you believe
01:28:45.900
that the uprising itself is justified, then you have to be able to pass whatever they do off as part of
01:28:53.780
legitimate resistance. And, you know, it's all completely insane, because then you get asked on
01:29:01.500
live TV, about the rape of, of Jewish civilians, in a terror attack, and you have to hem and haw and
01:29:11.040
um and um your way around to Israel's conduct and its need to build alliances. And you saw something
01:29:17.920
almost similar, not to change the topic, but you saw something similar with the UNRWA,
01:29:21.600
the United Nations Relief and Works Agency official, who was asked about the fact that we got a report
01:29:28.680
that a United Nations, a member of that agency, a teacher, held a hostage in Gaza. So he was asked
01:29:39.480
on national TV, seems like one of your guys may have been involved in holding Israeli hostages.
01:29:45.920
Your teachers hold hostages. And he kept bringing the question back to bringing flour and other
01:29:53.120
essential goods to the Gazans. And all I could tell you is how we keep track of the flour and
01:29:58.760
providing the flour. And it looks absurd, because there's no way you could possibly answer the question
01:30:05.300
itself. You have to just completely change topic and make excuses and, and all of that, because
01:30:12.000
you're defending the indefensible and all you need, if you're a member of Congress and you're
01:30:18.140
being asked on TV, something like that, what you need is for the person sitting across from you to
01:30:23.020
stop saying what Hamas actually did, because you don't want to, uh, you don't want to condemn it and
01:30:31.280
you want to put it back on Israel. And so like the people who tear down the posters and the people who
0.91
01:30:37.660
disrupt screenings of the Hamas atrocities on account of, uh, the idea that it's somehow Israeli
01:30:45.100
propaganda, even though a lot of the video Hamas actually took and disseminated themselves while
01:30:50.980
they carried out the attacks. These people are trying to stop you from learning what's actually
01:30:57.340
happening and seeing what's going on. If you can't see posters of hostages, if you can't see
01:31:02.560
the footage of what Hamas did, then you can deny it, or you can say, I'll wait for an investigation
01:31:08.480
or something like that. And so what you realize is that their entire response to this rests on
01:31:15.520
preventing the public from actually knowing public information about, and verifiable information about
01:31:23.620
what Hamas has been doing to Israelis. It's, it's unbelievable. These are obvious war crimes.
01:31:29.560
There should be absolutely no hesitation, even if they are at war, even if you accept in their view
01:31:35.700
of the world, that the war has been ongoing and that 10 seven wasn't a terrorist attack. It was an
01:31:41.360
act of war against someone who's unleashed war on you. That does not include putting babies in ovens.
01:31:49.620
It does not include raping women, cutting off their breasts and playing with them before the woman has
1.00
01:31:56.060
died. This is sick effing stuff. And for an American woman, a representative from the state of
1.00
01:32:03.640
Washington to have any reaction other than I am horrified by this period. No, but no, however,
01:32:12.660
to try to contextualize human torture through the use of sexual violence of women. Josh is absolutely
01:32:21.440
disgusting and is a game changer. I knew they were radical in the squad. This is a game changer in
0.98
01:32:28.500
the way I see all of them. So Congresswoman Jaipal is the chairwoman of the House Progressive Caucus.
01:32:36.680
So I think we can reasonably infer from that, that she roughly speaks on behalf of the Progressive
01:32:43.360
Caucus. She speaks, if we can extrapolate perhaps just a little bit, she speaks on behalf of what's the
01:32:49.620
modern progressive elite like to think. Now, if you go back to September 2018, when Brett Kavanaugh was
01:32:55.820
going through his trials and tribulations, Congresswoman Jaipal had a very straightforward
01:33:01.220
stance on the Christine Blasey Ford allegation. She literally put the hashtag, believe all women.
0.70
01:33:06.780
That was the hashtag of the day. Apparently, in retrospect, they should have added an asterisk to
01:33:12.040
the end of that tweet. And the asterisk on the bottom would have said, except for the Jews. But this
01:33:15.760
just gets back to what we were saying earlier about the DEI construct. They don't actually believe in
01:33:20.460
liberal rules of neutrality. They do not believe in a free speech construct that actually applies
01:33:24.660
to all Americans. They do not believe all women, no matter what their race, creed, color, ethnicity,
01:33:30.380
religion, or so forth. They only support free speech for some, and they only believe some women.
01:33:35.960
How do you decide who to protect free speech-wise? How do you decide who to believe, who to give due
01:33:40.280
process to? Well, it gets back to the oppressed versus oppressor status. It's really ironic,
01:33:45.060
as Seth pointed out, that she began her response to Dana Bash by saying that I don't want to get
01:33:48.980
into this hierarchy of oppression. That's all these people actually believe in at the end of the day.
01:33:53.660
Mm-hmm. And in part, it's what got our country and its bizarre reaction to what happened to the
01:33:58.900
Israelis into this mess to begin with. Josh, Seth, thank you both so much. Really appreciate you being
0.67
01:34:04.600
here. Thanks so much. Thank you, Lincoln. All the best, guys. All right. And before we go,
01:34:09.660
I want to tell you some exciting news. And that is, you guys remember when my husband,
01:34:15.100
Doug Brunt, came on the show to promote his book, The Mysterious Case of Rudolph Diesel,
01:34:20.080
the guy who invented the diesel engine that requires your diesel gasoline. You see his name every day when
01:34:25.360
you fill up your gas tank. Well, guess what? Diesel is crushing it. I'm super proud of Doug,
01:34:31.100
and I'm super grateful to all of you because I know a ton of you went out and bought his book.
01:34:35.360
You can see the Amazon rankings go way up after he came on, and he was so thankful.
01:34:40.780
So just a word of what's happened with Diesel since Doug came on. Diesel, of course, made the
01:34:45.820
New York Times bestseller list repeatedly. Diesel, happy to tell you, has now sold, Doug has sold the
01:34:53.740
book to film rights. Yay! So it looks like Diesel is on its way to potentially becoming a movie.
01:35:00.500
You know, Hollywood, it takes like 20 yeses before that actually happens. But the first round went
01:35:06.880
well, and it was in much demand, and he sold the rights for it to go book to film. So it'd be super
01:35:12.040
fun to see. And I wrote down so I wouldn't forget a couple of things that have happened to Diesel.
01:35:16.480
It was just voted one of Apple's best books of the year. One of the top 20 books of the year,
01:35:23.500
says Apple, which is a high honor. Audible, same. One of the best, best books of the year.
01:35:29.120
Four rave reviews from the New York Times, from the Wall Street Journal. A starred review in
01:35:33.620
Publishers Weekly called The Greatest Caper of the 20th Century. Equal parts Walter Isaacson
01:35:39.640
and Sherlock Holmes. Love that one. Superb biography, an indispensable book. So the reason I'm mentioning
01:35:46.200
it to you is to thank you and to say that your efforts in supporting it have worked. It's been
01:35:50.880
doing really well. And to remind you, as we go into the holiday season, it really does make a great
01:35:56.120
gift. So if you're wondering, what do I get mom or dad or nan or pop or aunt and uncle or a friend
01:36:02.780
or your boss, it's a great book because you learn a lot about history. It's nonfiction, but it reads
01:36:08.640
like a thriller. And it really is a mystery that Doug has solved. So all the best to all of you and
01:36:14.740
all the best to Duggar. Go Diesel! Mysterious Case of Rudolph Diesel. Thanks to all of you for joining
01:36:20.700
me today. We're going to be back with full coverage in advance of the big debate tomorrow night. We'll
01:36:25.660
see you then. Thanks for listening to The Megyn Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.