The Megyn Kelly Show - May 07, 2024


Judge Violates Trump's Free Speech, and What Noem's Lies Really Expose, with Vivek Ramaswamy and Buck Sexton | Ep. 784


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 38 minutes

Words per Minute

200.70123

Word Count

19,863

Sentence Count

1,321

Misogynist Sentences

67

Hate Speech Sentences

25


Summary

Former Vice President Joe Biden joins Megyn Kelly to discuss the latest in the Trump trial, including the latest on Kristi Noem's media tour and the possibility of jail time for Donald Trump if he violates an unconstitutional gag order.


Transcript

00:00:00.560 Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East.
00:00:12.220 Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show. It was a, quote, dry but important
00:00:17.520 day at the trial of former President Donald Trump yesterday, according to the New York Times reporter
00:00:22.600 in the courtroom. But what happened before court kicked off has the media so excited
00:00:27.260 the threat of potential jail time. They're so excited about it. If the former president violates
00:00:34.100 his unconstitutional gag order again, that plus Kristi Noem, she's still going. She continues
00:00:40.920 to embarrass herself during her media tour over her ill-fated book. We will get to that later with
00:00:47.240 Buck Sexton, who had it out with Kristi Noem back in 2021 after calling her a phony at the time.
00:00:53.220 Uh, but joining me first today is host of the just relaunched show, the truth podcast available
00:01:00.800 on all podcast platforms and YouTube. And that host is Vivek Ramaswamy. Vivek, welcome back. How
00:01:09.160 you doing? Good to see you, Megyn. How are you? Good to see you too. All right. So now you've,
00:01:12.620 I presumably had a little time to relax, see your family and you're getting back into the show.
00:01:19.260 How's that going? It's good. I mean, it's a part of a portfolio of things I'm doing in the private
00:01:23.740 sector. I, during the campaign did something a little bit unusual, but I enjoyed it actually.
00:01:28.940 And I said that if I was elected president, I was going to continue it from the white house,
00:01:32.200 because I think we need more honest conversation. One of the things I loved in the campaign was just
00:01:36.780 speaking my mind freely and speaking my mind in the open. So after having taken a little bit of
00:01:41.260 a pause and a break from public life and time with family and, and let's just say recalibrating and
00:01:47.280 collecting a year's worth of lost time with the family and kids, I'm now starting a number of
00:01:52.920 activities in the private sector. And this is the first major splash I'm making, which is to
00:01:57.600 relaunch the podcast that we started during the campaign. But I'd like to take to the next level by
00:02:03.060 maybe broaching some frontiers that many other politicians or even others in the conservative
00:02:08.260 media movement haven't really touched. And a lot of the other activities I'm taking on in the business
00:02:12.780 world and otherwise, I'll be able to talk about the reasons why I'm pursuing those through this
00:02:16.960 podcast as well. Great. I love that you're, you're getting back on with it. People want to hear
00:02:22.220 from you now more than ever. And I would like to hear from you on this Trump, this Trump trial and
00:02:27.400 where we are, because this judge continues to find him some $10,000 so far for alleged violations of
00:02:33.300 what is to me clearly an unconstitutional gag order. You went to Harvard undergrad, Yale law school,
00:02:39.400 and have written some great op-eds that I thought were so insightful and really genius,
00:02:45.040 even before you started to run for president. So here's Trump yesterday saying, you know what,
00:02:50.580 because the Trump's, the judge there said, if you violate it again, I don't want to do this to you,
00:02:54.380 Mr. Trump, but I may have to put you in jail. And here was Trump speaking to that yesterday.
00:03:00.700 I have to watch every word I tell you people. You ask me a question, a simple question. I'd like to give
00:03:06.400 it, but I can't talk about it because this judge has given me a gag order and said, you'll go to jail
00:03:12.800 if you violate it. And frankly, you know what? Our constitution is much more important than jail. It's not
00:03:19.520 even close. I'll do that sacrifice any day. But what's happening here is a disgrace.
00:03:27.560 All right. So I'll get to the media reaction to that. But what do you make of the real threat now?
00:03:32.280 It's a real threat that they may put the former president of the United States and likely,
00:03:36.540 you know, certainly GOP nominee back in. Look, I think that it will automatically backfire
00:03:43.500 instantly politically, even though they intend it in the other direction. But the question is,
00:03:47.440 is this a first amendment violation or not? I believe it is because when you have a president
00:03:52.200 in the middle of a political election, a presidential election who cannot defend himself against what are
00:03:58.280 fundamentally political attacks against them or even debates that have major political consequences
00:04:03.840 in the middle of an election. And then you try to stifle that person from speaking, engaging in
00:04:09.260 political speech in the middle of an election. And they've absolutely made this a relevant issue in
00:04:14.100 the election. So the idea that this is not political speech is nonsense. That is an affront to
00:04:18.980 the constitution. And if we are a country that prizes one thing, it is a country that allows you to
00:04:24.040 criticize the government. And if they're saying that this man cannot criticize the government,
00:04:28.700 that would be a first amendment violation no matter who it is. But it's a first amendment
00:04:31.920 violation on steroids when it is a political candidate who is unable to criticize the government
00:04:36.880 led by the political party that he's actually running against. So then the question is, are these entire
00:04:42.520 charges themselves politicized in the first place? Or are we talking about this technical legal sphere
00:04:48.100 that's different from the realm of politics? I think if you look at the merits of this case,
00:04:52.600 Megan, frankly, there are none. That's what actually makes this a political exercise
00:04:56.560 in the first place. Just go to the heart of the legal theory that Alvin Bragg is pushing
00:05:01.720 against Donald Trump. It's just worth taking seriously. What exactly is that legal theory?
00:05:06.860 A lot of people have a lot of trouble saying what Alvin Bragg is even pursuing. And for good reason,
00:05:10.940 because the charges are big. Everybody who's honest has trouble saying it.
00:05:15.560 Nobody has any idea what Donald Trump is exactly being prosecuted for. But I'm going to
00:05:19.520 give the clearest statement that I think I can, because it's worth smoking out. It's even uglier
00:05:24.000 once you see what it is. The basic theory of this case is the underlying crime besides the falsifying
00:05:30.320 business records misdemeanor, the thing that makes it allegedly a felony, is that Donald Trump,
00:05:35.740 according to Alvin Bragg's theory of the case, should have used campaign funds to make a personal
00:05:42.160 hush money payment? Well, let's just try the other foot. If Donald Trump had used campaign
00:05:47.620 funds to make a personal hush money payment, the prosecution would arguably have a stronger case
00:05:53.400 to go after him for that, right? That would be a misuse of campaign funds. People would normally
00:05:58.480 give to political campaigns to advance political causes. Well, if you're using that to advance
00:06:02.420 personal goals, including making personal hush money payments instead, they would be prosecuting him
00:06:07.840 for that. So that's a perfect litmus test for whether a prosecution is politicized or not. If the
00:06:12.640 defendant had done the exact thing that in this case the prosecutor is saying he should have done
00:06:17.040 and could have been prosecuted for it, then that means they were going to get him going or get him
00:06:21.020 going coming. And it does not matter what the actual underlying behavior was. And so that's what
00:06:25.600 we're seeing today. That's what this alleged prosecution is about, is really fulfilling, speaking
00:06:30.160 of campaigns, a campaign promise. And it was a campaign promise made by Alvin Bragg before he was
00:06:35.800 elected to the position that he's in, which is to go after Donald Trump. And so if the whole thing's
00:06:39.940 a political exercise, this is just a cherry on top, saying that he can't even respond to those
00:06:44.640 political attacks at behest of imprisonment. Our founding fathers wouldn't be rolling in their
00:06:49.400 graves. They'd be doing backflips. But the ultimate irony on all of this, Megan, is if that does
00:06:54.100 happen, I think most Americans are poised to see right through it. And this will backfire on steroids
00:06:59.520 as well, just as the prosecutions have in propelling Donald Trump to the presidency.
00:07:03.460 I think you're right. I really think you're 100 percent right. You have a great point about
00:07:08.140 criticizing the government and how that in particular should be allowed as, you know,
00:07:13.020 it is allowed. And this judge recognized that it's allowed. But the thing about the jury was
00:07:18.020 really galling to me because why can't Trump criticize the jury? He didn't say juror number
00:07:23.220 four is a hack. He said he got fined for this. He said, I just pulled it up. That jury was picked
00:07:29.320 so fast. Ninety five percent Democrats. The area is mostly all Democrat. And the latter
00:07:35.820 clause seemed to be a modifier because he realized maybe he shouldn't be technically speaking
00:07:40.220 specifically about these jurors. But why shouldn't he? Why can't he say the jury is mostly all
00:07:45.100 Democrats? That's his opinion, having sat there day after day through one year. And that, too,
00:07:50.020 is an attempt to say you're not allowed to get the public ready for what's going to be a verdict
00:07:56.020 against you, in all likelihood, because they're partisan opponents of yours. He just got fined
00:08:02.560 a thousand dollars for pointing that out. That can't be OK. Yeah. So a lot of people really,
00:08:10.440 it becomes difficult when you're sorting out what is the First Amendment protect and what doesn't it.
00:08:14.160 So I have a simple rule of thumb here, Megan. But let's just take the different things that people
00:08:18.060 will say. Well, yes, the First Amendment protects speech, but it does not protect incitements to violence.
00:08:22.920 It does not protect fraud. It does not protect making false statements in a commercial context.
00:08:28.220 That's fraud. It does not protect interfering in the proceedings of a court. So if you want to
00:08:32.580 distill it down to one thing, what is just from a First Amendment perspective? The First Amendment
00:08:37.180 protects all opinions. That's what it protects, right? An opinion, no matter how heinous it is,
00:08:42.640 no matter how much you disagree with it, no matter how unpleasant it is to hear, no matter the context,
00:08:46.960 the First Amendment protects all opinions. And so so long as Donald Trump is actually
00:08:51.760 expressing an opinion grounded in facts that he's also citing to bolster his opinions,
00:08:57.060 it's protected speech as far as I'm concerned. That's true if it's Donald Trump or anybody,
00:09:01.280 right? Anybody expressing an opinion about a trial during their own defense.
00:09:05.320 Now, against the backdrop of the political context of this trial, it's unambiguous as you're
00:09:09.960 expecting, you're expressing an opinion in the context of a political election where that trial
00:09:14.920 would not have happened but for that election. That makes this a cut and dry case where he should
00:09:19.900 absolutely be able to say anything he absolutely wants about those jurors. And specifically,
00:09:24.460 he was actually talking about the selection process of those jurors that makes this unobjectionable.
00:09:29.200 And so in many ways, is Donald Trump going to be hurt by that fine? No. I mean, if you think about
00:09:33.120 the amount he's paying per second in legal fees, it's probably in excess of those fines.
00:09:38.080 You know what? The judge indirectly may have actually done him and done all of us and done this
00:09:42.140 country a favor by exposing how rotten this entire process is. If he takes that next step and puts him in jail,
00:09:48.800 I think it would be regrettable for this country. I think it would set an awful precedent. I think we
00:09:53.200 should be ashamed as American citizens on the global stage, having other countries looking at us,
00:09:58.780 throwing a former U.S. president in prison for daring to engage in political speech in the middle
00:10:03.300 of an election. If that happened in a different country, we would call that a banana republic or
00:10:06.840 the stuff of autocracy. But happening here as an American citizen, I would be embarrassed as others
00:10:12.920 look at our country. But ironically, I think it will continue to have the effect that all of these
00:10:17.480 sham prosecutions have had, which is to further put Americans on the side of Donald Trump, even the
00:10:22.980 ones who otherwise would not have been. Because it's not that they're on Trump's side even, it's
00:10:27.140 that they're on the side of justice in this country, one standard of the rule of law. And the idea that
00:10:31.880 you get to speak your mind freely, and if you're going to get put in jail for doing that, if they do
00:10:35.540 it to Donald Trump today, they're going to do it to somebody else tomorrow. And I think it's disgusting,
00:10:39.400 and I think that most Americans see through that as well.
00:10:43.040 Well, I don't think the media finds it disgusting. Here's a little example of how they reacted. You're
00:10:50.260 going to be shocked, shocked, watch. And the judge threatening the ex-president with jail time.
00:10:55.100 It is really clear that the judge is, depending on the seriousness of the next violation,
00:11:01.400 contemplating putting him in jail. I mean, and frankly, if that happens, it's not going to be
00:11:05.960 because of anything Judge Marshawn did. It's going to be Donald Trump's own choice.
00:11:10.240 I know from my own reporting, I'm sure you do too, that Trump didn't eat on foreign trips because
00:11:14.880 he was so afraid of germs. There's no way Trump himself wants to go to jail. Certainly not many
00:11:21.220 black defendants who, if they came this close to the line, would have already been held in contempt
00:11:25.980 of court and would have been incarcerated by now. And so he is getting the doest of process.
00:11:31.280 And the idea that Donald Trump actually would want to go to jail is ridiculous. Anyone who knows
00:11:35.760 him knows that. He doesn't even like to stay in a hotel. He won't eat food when he goes on
00:11:39.620 foreign territory. You have to use the bathroom. His hair, his makeup, his skin, like he will be
00:11:47.700 pulled apart. He doesn't have the metal to do it. So Donald Trump is terrified. You've got to
00:11:54.040 believe just by his issues with odors and smells and fear of disease. He threw down the gauntlet.
00:12:03.120 If he doesn't throw Trump in jail, he would look entirely like a paper tiger. And Trump
00:12:08.940 got that message.
00:12:10.400 You know, how much bravado, you know, this is not somebody who's thinking, you know what,
00:12:15.220 I'm going to have a really great time at Rikers.
00:12:17.640 Can I just make this the point in the program when we say, no, this is normal?
00:12:23.120 Oh my God. Honestly, Nicole Wallace is the worst. She's the worst. She barely moves her lips when she's
00:12:28.320 speaking. She barely has. It's just like a little hole that that words come out of. I can't quite
00:12:33.120 get it. And she's so sanctimonious for vacant. She can't. She doesn't know anything. She knows
00:12:38.760 nothing about what Trump's habits are when he travels overseas. None of them does. But they
00:12:43.400 want to pretend like they're in the room with him, in the bedroom, in the bathroom, in the dining room
00:12:48.420 with Trump. And they can tell you exactly how he's going to respond if he gets a day in jail.
00:12:52.260 Yeah. Well, look, she knows nothing about Donald Trump's habits. She probably knows even less
00:12:57.120 about the law or an understanding or care about that as well. That's right. And I think that manner
00:13:01.280 of speech is really funny. I don't like to pick on these minor details, but you actually hit the
00:13:05.620 nail on the head there. It's all part of this air of sanctimony, right? The air, the vibe of authority
00:13:12.100 without actually having any of the content of that authority. And I think that's what so many in the
00:13:16.660 modern media have actually become is the air, the genteel sort of atmospherics of having authority
00:13:22.780 in the manner that you speak, the sanctimony that drips from it, but without having the first basis
00:13:28.040 of an understanding of how the law or the Constitution works. And so it's completely backwards versus
00:13:31.980 somebody who actually didn't speak with the right mannerism, but actually knew what they were talking
00:13:35.340 about. That would be far preferable to me. Now, the schadenfreude, the level of rejoicing in
00:13:41.440 somebody else's suffering. I've never seen something like this, but we know that's exactly
00:13:47.240 what we're to expect here from the media. They've been playing for this for a long time. The entire
00:13:51.000 plot has been to really portray Donald Trump as a criminal. That's been, I think, a big part of the
00:13:56.400 Democratic Party's goal in this objectionable pursuit of prosecutions against him. So it's no
00:14:01.940 surprise that the media has played interference for them on so many other topics is going to run
00:14:06.000 interference here as well. I think that's the less interesting part than to examine what is exactly the
00:14:11.260 consequence here. Let's say Donald Trump is, God forbid, I think it'd be bad for the country,
00:14:15.940 but thrown in jail. I do think that they've kind of put themselves in a box here because Donald
00:14:20.120 Trump believes, I believe correctly, that this is an affront to the Constitution. He has a right to
00:14:24.600 speak in the middle of an election. He's running to lead this country to be the commander in chief.
00:14:29.500 So for him to buckle at behest of what this judge who has no regard for the law or the Constitution
00:14:35.100 on this set of issues, I think would be a bad outcome. So I think Donald Trump should continue
00:14:39.640 to express his opinions because he's running for U.S. president and both he and the country deserve
00:14:45.840 to hear his opinions on a matter of public importance. But the judge has now put himself
00:14:49.980 in a box going out of his way. He didn't have to do this, but going out of his way to be able to
00:14:54.820 threaten jail time. I think that that is something that unfortunately sets this up as a reasonably
00:15:00.260 likely outcome. And you know what? Donald Trump's made a lot of sacrifices for the country,
00:15:04.740 running for president, serving as U.S. president. This wouldn't be the biggest of them.
00:15:08.400 And so I think it would set a terrible precedent. I think it's going to be bad for the country.
00:15:12.080 But I think it is reasonably likely that it does end up there. And as sad as that is,
00:15:17.380 it's exactly what you would predict once you've opened Pandora's box with these prosecutions based
00:15:22.300 on really no figment of the legal theory to back it up against a former president, a man running for
00:15:28.380 U.S. president in the middle of an election. This is just the necessary consequence and all the
00:15:32.740 drama that follows. It's unfortunately what they signed up for in the first place. And I think that
00:15:37.380 this is just the tip of the iceberg of what we're going to see in the next six months.
00:15:40.920 They're thrilled about it because they want his humiliation. That's what you heard them talking
00:15:45.980 about. Well, how, you know, he's not going to be able to have his hair the way he wants it. They
00:15:50.280 want his humiliation. That's why they were so angry that he leaned into his mugshot and went on the mugs
00:15:57.520 and it went on T-shirts. And so they're waiting for him to be humbled, to be humiliated. And they
00:16:04.180 keep waiting for the next chapter. Maybe Judge Marchand will get him there when he throws him
00:16:08.020 behind jail bars. And we can watch that and revel. The media, of course, has been a massive problem.
00:16:13.920 You experienced it when you were running and before and after. This is a small ball story,
00:16:18.860 but it's indicative. There was a reporter for NBC News and she moved on to CNN. Her name is Michelle
00:16:26.160 Kaczynski. And she posted a thread on X last night. She was very well known at both of those
00:16:32.640 outlets. A thread on X last night revealing her horror at a dinner she recently had with people who
00:16:40.920 turned out to be MAGA. At first, she said, they seemed great on the surface for like an hour.
00:16:49.600 And then she says the closeted guests over a few drinks began to slip their true MAGA natures.
00:16:58.100 And she says she marvels at how a, quote, normal group of people could support a politician
00:17:03.500 like Trump, of whom she does not approve, going here from the Daily Mail report. One of the couples
00:17:10.280 attended top Ivy League colleges, she writes. But now that it was university time for their own
00:17:17.980 children, they were adamantly not letting them apply to any Ivies and were weird about explaining
00:17:23.060 why, though the kids were double legacies. OK, moving on. She criticizes their position on,
00:17:30.320 quote, climate change and the fact that they use that term in air quotes, not scientists,
00:17:35.760 clearly and goes on from there. Now, Vivek, this is a woman who I've been around in the media
00:17:41.900 long enough to remember. Left NBC was pushed out, I believe, shortly after the following incident,
00:17:49.440 which went everywhere. She was doing a report on flooding after a hurricane in some American town,
00:17:55.440 and she did the report from a canoe as though she was stranded. This is the only way to get around.
00:18:02.760 And in the middle of her live shot, firefighters walked through the live shot with the water up
00:18:10.480 to their ankles. We actually pulled the clip just to show you. I mean, this is the dishonest media
00:18:15.820 in a snapshot. Watch this. And be she sees Michelle Kaczynski. I guess she's in the canoe is in Wayne,
00:18:22.940 New Jersey this morning. Michelle, good morning to you. Good morning. Well, obviously,
00:18:28.180 we're getting a nice break from the rain, but not the flooding. This is essentially now part of the
00:18:33.840 Passaic River in this neighborhood. I'll take it. Is there some kind of severe drop off there
00:18:37.980 between the foreground? We'll go back. We saw these guys a second ago. Michelle,
00:18:42.960 are these holy men walking on top of water? What's going on here? Why walk when you can ride,
00:18:48.120 you guys? When you have a ride like this, why would you want to walk? Is your oar hitting ground,
00:18:53.940 Michelle? Of course not.
00:18:59.420 That was the end of her career. That's my opinion. At NBC, she was gone shortly there.
00:19:03.200 Now she wants to lecture us all on how evil MAGA is and her horror at being exposed to the closeted
00:19:10.680 Republicans and their views on the IVs and climate change and so on. What do you make of it?
00:19:17.340 You know, the people at that dinner party remind me probably likely of the firemen who were just
00:19:20.700 walking right past her. People who actually probably had something more worthy to do that
00:19:25.140 were actually there for purpose, had little regard for her presence there or whatever antics she was
00:19:29.660 taking on. And, you know, that probably looks like a woman who's been doing this her entire career.
00:19:33.180 So it seems like the same pattern continues. This is a big part of the reason I'm actually,
00:19:38.600 there's a lot of things I'm looking at doing with my time, but launching, relaunching a podcast,
00:19:42.840 why am I going to take the time to do that is this gives me a motivation to exactly engage in the kind
00:19:47.280 of conversations that American people are hungry for, regardless of what the mainstream media is
00:19:52.260 stuffing down their throats. And I think it just typifies how the whole thing has actually become
00:19:57.220 a charade. It's not just a sort of form of lying, Megan. I think mainstream media has lied about a
00:20:01.880 whole range of topics. And I've talked about this extensively during the race. You've talked about
00:20:05.440 it extensively for the last 10 years. Nonetheless, I think it's not just the lie. It's the pageantry
00:20:11.000 around the lie that I think is actually far more bothersome. It's a production. It's almost like
00:20:15.680 it's not just a lie. A lie is anymore pretending to be that you're in the interest of objective news,
00:20:21.280 but you're telling somebody false information. I think it's become closer to like a Broadway production
00:20:26.600 in the same way that she's putting on a show. She recognizes, and they're even talking about it on air,
00:20:31.880 why would you walk when you could instead be pretending to row? That's effectively what
00:20:36.720 they're doing in the totality of their other reporting too. She could just be talking about
00:20:40.500 the actual disagreements, the policy disagreements that she has between Republicans who are in that
00:20:44.740 same room. And there's such a more interesting direction to go. It's like the equivalent of if
00:20:48.760 she had just been reporting and interviewing those firemen. But instead, what they're actually
00:20:52.640 creating is an alternative production that I think historically that business, maybe they think
00:20:58.400 they're entertaining their audience, but it isn't even entertaining anymore. And I think that once
00:21:03.800 you see that, you get closer to the flame of what's going on. It's not just they're spewing
00:21:07.740 falsehood. It's like the equivalent of putting on a theatrical production and one that, like most
00:21:13.500 theatrical productions, is failing. And I think that that's why it's going to come to an end very soon.
00:21:17.040 So you've set up my next clip perfectly, which is of Lawrence O'Donnell speaking of NBC. This is him
00:21:22.800 on MSNBC freaking out about the fact that yesterday at Trump's trial, what they spent most of the day
00:21:29.380 doing was documenting the payments that were ultimately made to Stormy Daniels and the receipts
00:21:36.260 of how that was done. Of course, no one's denying that the payment was made, but they need to get that
00:21:43.380 in front of the jury. It was not an exciting day in court, but it was to Lawrence O'Donnell. Watch.
00:21:50.260 They wrote it down. The conspiracy was written out on paper. That is rare in criminal prosecutions.
00:21:59.980 Prosecutors are usually left explaining to juries that, you know, criminal conspirators don't write it
00:22:06.860 all down. But that is what they did in the Trump office on Fifth Avenue and in the White House.
00:22:15.580 Today, Donald Trump's jury was shown the handwritten conspiracy. Donald Trump's financial mastermind,
00:22:22.800 convicted felon Allen Weisselberg, put the conspiracy in his handwriting on Michael Cohen's
00:22:30.940 bank statement. And then another financial officer in the Trump shop, put the whole thing in his
00:22:37.240 handwriting on Trump company stationery. Final handwriting in the conspiracy presenters of
00:22:42.520 the jury today were Donald Trump's signatures. Oh, my gosh. He had a breaking news, Kyron, up the
00:22:50.160 entire time breaking news. It's no one's trying to hide it. Right. We understood that these payments
00:22:56.180 were made. This was a perfunctory day in court. This was not the apex of the prosecution's case,
00:23:01.340 but the media can't get enough of it. It's like crack to them. That's right. I mean, it's an
00:23:08.200 addiction. It's a breaking news. He's like breaking the news, like breaking the existence of actually
00:23:13.400 distinguishing what is important to report to the public versus not. And it just bothers the heck.
00:23:19.060 I mean, he has no clue when he's describing this to his audience base as they wrote down the
00:23:23.940 conspiracy. Just if you had any first idea of the backdrop of what this case was about,
00:23:28.680 like let's just hear the first clue about this case, this allegation of falsifying business
00:23:34.600 records, right, which is the first and state-based, the New York-based charge that Alvin Bragg is
00:23:39.540 bringing, A, that's outside the statute of limitations, but B, at most, even if that alleged
00:23:45.020 conspiracy, I think a lot of that is actually also false and mischaracterized, but at most,
00:23:48.660 that would be charged and could only be charged under the law as a misdemeanor. Unless you make
00:23:55.240 up all of this other nonsense about this being a constructive campaign contribution that wasn't
00:24:00.820 recorded as a campaign contribution, which, as we talked about before, rests on a completely flawed
00:24:05.700 legal theory on its own, and it's completely misleading their audience of creating, again,
00:24:10.280 that atmosphere. It's all about atmosphere. It's all about vibe of pretending like this is some
00:24:15.780 sort of devious conspiracy, and you put up images of different handwritten documents. The audience
00:24:20.760 doesn't know what to make of it, and the whole point isn't that their audience is too stupid to
00:24:24.660 follow. It's the fact that these people were reporting to them, or actually too stupid to report
00:24:28.700 on it, but have just created this atmosphere, this vibe, the equivalent of that other woman with her
00:24:33.200 theatrical production rowing across that river when, in fact, somebody could have just walked
00:24:37.440 straight across it as we saw in real time. That's the equivalent of what they're doing with their
00:24:42.540 portrayal of these documents, when, in fact, the average viewer, if what you need is actually
00:24:49.080 somebody explaining to them what's actually going on, it's the equivalent of those firefighters
00:24:51.960 walking straight across, and that's what's missing in most of the media today. But, you know,
00:24:56.340 we can't just sit here and complain about what they're doing. They're in the dying business.
00:25:00.020 And, you know, what we need is more alternatives to people to be able to explain to ordinary
00:25:03.320 Americans, hey, here's what's actually going on, and more people are hungry to seek that information
00:25:07.460 out for themselves. They've been lied to systematically for the last 10 years. Most people
00:25:12.160 understand the basic premise that, you know what, you fool me once, shame on me, and fool me twice,
00:25:17.820 fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. And I think that people are hungry for checking
00:25:23.300 what they're hearing through MSNBC or through NBC News or CNN, and I think that's a good thing.
00:25:28.520 And so this is part of, I take it to be a growing up of our culture. We have, I think, in the last 10
00:25:33.960 years growing up, Megan, I think that's why we're seeing the decline and the influence of, of
00:25:38.760 histrionics like this from MSNBC. And, you know, I take that as a mark of progress. It's a good thing.
00:25:43.320 Mm-hmm. All right. One other point on the media. The president of ABC just got booted. She says she's
00:25:50.940 retiring. She was reportedly forced out, Kim Godwin. And as she goes, you've got the National Association
00:25:59.000 of Black journalists criticizing ABC for basically getting rid of a Black woman. Um, they're saying
00:26:07.660 we're concerned over recent media reports that seem to be written with the intention of undermining the
00:26:12.940 leadership of the first Black woman to take the helm of a global news organization. So you're not allowed
00:26:16.980 to criticize her because she's, she's the first Black woman to head a news organization. Many of the latest
00:26:22.000 articles surrounding her leadership fail to demonstrate basic journalism by providing alternative
00:26:27.140 viewpoints. They want more in the articles about how she was actually the greatest thing since sliced
00:26:31.840 bread, even though her bosses didn't seem to think so. And neither did her underlings, according to the
00:26:36.440 reports I've read, including by Oliver Darcy, who claims to have spoken to some dozens of internal
00:26:41.920 ABCers. There seems to be an intentionality to cite anonymous sources as Godwin's detractors,
00:26:49.100 coupled with the use of derogatory or stereotypical terms to describe her. Meantime, these reports are
00:26:55.020 totally ignoring sources and facts that speak to Godwin having significant support inside the
00:26:59.500 organization. Um, now let me tell you what's happened. She's gone now, but this didn't work. Uh, she got
00:27:05.160 canned or she says retired early. Um, this is what this group does. I'll just say for, for background, when I
00:27:11.900 went over to NBC, the same group came out and threw a fit because the woman who had been in my time slot prior to
00:27:17.320 me was Tamron Hall, who happens to be black. And when NBC called the national association of black
00:27:23.680 journalists to say, what do you, why are you giving us such a hard time about this? We have plenty of black
00:27:27.980 prominent faces at NBC. They said, we're just doing a favor. Somebody called in a favor, which is clearly
00:27:35.600 Tamron Hall, right? Causes. So this is what happens now, right? People who ascend to positions of power, whether it's as
00:27:44.320 an anchor or a network executive or a prosecutor, we've seen some of that in the Fannie Willis, Nathan
00:27:50.360 Wade, Marilyn Mosby, uh, who's just got, uh, in trouble. She's just got convicted twice of, uh, fraud
00:27:57.560 related behavior. She was former Baltimore prosecutor. They rise to these positions of power. If they happen
00:28:02.740 to be people of color sometimes, and when it doesn't work out, Vivek, they use the race thing as both a
00:28:09.520 sword and a shield, right? It's something that I'm fine to ride to the top. Like it's fine. If it's a
00:28:14.560 chip for me, it gets me this advanced position, but then if it doesn't work out, I get to play the
00:28:19.860 race card again. You see, and my termination is 100% because of my skin color or your negative reports
00:28:26.420 in the case of the NABG BJ are because of skin color. Meanwhile, as I point out in my case, someone
00:28:33.400 who happens to be black behind the scenes is using skin color as a weapon. Again, it's just,
00:28:38.360 it's everywhere. It's why it's so pernicious and these promotions based on race don't work out.
00:28:44.360 And then when things settle down, um, the natural consequences get ignored by these same cast of
00:28:50.100 actors. What do you make of it? Yeah. I mean, I think you hit the nail on the head. I think it's
00:28:54.580 starting to get a little bit old and I think it is fostering, unfortunately, Megan, a new wave of quiet
00:29:00.040 frustration that manifests as anti-black racism in this country that would not have existed,
00:29:04.660 but for this actual kind of racialized behavior. There was an article, it's a different type of
00:29:10.600 media, but it's the same type of media treatment of is a scientific media. This is back when I was
00:29:14.920 in still in the biotech industry that examined this detailed investigative piece. It was sort of in the
00:29:20.340 healthcare press. It was like, I mean, detailed investigative reporting, bombshell reporting
00:29:23.800 that found that black residents, so resident people in medical residency, those who are black
00:29:29.460 were systematically more likely to be fired than their white counterparts and didn't finish their
00:29:35.760 residency programs at the same rate, revealing a layer of systemic racism in the field of medicine
00:29:40.960 that had not previously been exposed. And it goes through all of the explanations of the data points
00:29:46.220 of how consistently, no matter what geography, no matter what institution, it was black people who
00:29:51.140 were more likely to be fired from their competitive residency programs midway through. I read the whole
00:29:56.520 article, the journalist, she must've been, I don't know if she was in, she was in an early stage of
00:30:00.080 her career. I assume she's a young journalist making a big bombshell story here. I just emailed
00:30:03.860 her afterwards and asked her, had you considered the possibility that systematically the people allowed
00:30:10.200 into med school and the system, systematically people who are allowed into residency programs
00:30:14.160 have lower scores when they're a particular race, in this case, black residents and black med students
00:30:20.180 are admitted systematically at lower scores. Is it surprising then that the people who actually
00:30:26.180 tended on average to have lower scores are the ones that aren't thriving in residency programs and
00:30:32.160 might that play some role, some impact on actually seeing a disparity in the races of people who
00:30:38.040 end up getting fired during residency? And her response was, I think it was genuine. She was just
00:30:42.300 I hadn't considered that. Thank you for pointing that out to me. And I think it shows, I mean,
00:30:46.440 this must be people who are younger in this profession of reporting on this have become so inculcated by the
00:30:52.100 narrative that I think it just takes basic analysis, somebody who points a basic obvious
00:30:58.080 fact that her own editors, her own publisher, her own supervisors should have for any base level of
00:31:04.340 reporting for a journalist at least called out one contrarian hypothesis that didn't have a single
00:31:09.540 mention in a 2000 word investigative bombshell piece. And I think it shows, you know, most people see
00:31:14.880 through that. Right. And so I do think it is fostering this kind of new wave of racism, even
00:31:21.920 anti-black racism that we otherwise wouldn't have seen, because when you tell people you can't
00:31:25.940 criticize somebody, you can't air your opinion that manifests itself in new and more toxic ways.
00:31:32.120 And so I think it's unhealthy across the board. And yes, if you have people systematically put into
00:31:36.500 their jobs that wouldn't have otherwise gotten that job on the basis of their genetic attributes like
00:31:41.380 race or gender or sexual orientation or anything else, then if you apply meritocratic criteria
00:31:46.800 afterwards, you are going to see a disparity in who's fired or not. It's not a controversial thing to say
00:31:52.020 if you've got your job because of race, but then you're measured based on performance. Yes, I think it is
00:31:56.520 likely that people of people of certain demographic attributes may be more likely to get fired from those
00:32:01.600 positions. I think the right answer across the board is forget the attribute of race or gender or sexual
00:32:07.600 orientation in the first place and just hire the best person for the job. If it's in journalism,
00:32:11.660 who's actually going to do the best journalistic work and report that to their audiences? If it's
00:32:15.420 in medicine or in science or engineering or whatever it is. And I think that ironically, then you're going
00:32:19.840 to see less of those disparities and firings on the back end. Most people know this intuitively,
00:32:25.020 but when you force them to bottle it up, I think they start to harbor animus, even racial animus. And
00:32:30.500 the very people who are supposedly fighting racism through these anti-racist efforts are the ones actually
00:32:35.720 throwing the kerosene, throwing the fuel on the final burning embers of racism in the first place,
00:32:40.820 starting the whole cycle all over again. And I sadly, Megan, I think that's where we are.
00:32:45.520 It's so true, Vivek. I feel like we're just in the beginning of this wave where all these DEI
00:32:51.740 programs, which now are being renamed, now they're just changing them to inclusion because DEI has been
00:32:56.840 adequately stigmatized. Now it's just inclusion or our old school in New York has now really renamed
00:33:02.260 DEI to belonging, which it's just about belonging, which is a nicer word for a very problematic thing.
00:33:10.400 So as a result of all these programs, all these folks who were, you know, maybe not qualified
00:33:15.800 were elevated based on skin color or their lady parts or their heritage. And maybe some will make
00:33:22.780 it because they're, they have the merit and, and many won't. And then, and so this is the beginning
00:33:27.660 wave of let's see how they do. And if they don't do well, they're going to blame that too on race.
00:33:31.960 And what's the end result of that going to be a hesitancy to hire these people. So this whole game,
00:33:38.100 it does not in order to the benefit of the very people they hope to elevate.
00:33:42.740 Oh, it's self-defeating of course, Megan, but I think that that's why they're codifying a lot of
00:33:46.720 those on the front end as well. It's an interesting jujitsu move that you described. You now are going to
00:33:51.340 see a retreat in the use of the word DEI, different word, same concept. You actually see that in the
00:33:56.620 corporate sphere as well. You know, ESG has earned itself a negative valence, a negative connotation
00:34:01.620 as well. I founded a firm called Strive that competes against BlackRock. We pushed hard on
00:34:06.500 this. Now, what are we, what are we seeing is a retreat from the use of that term, but they call
00:34:10.940 it sustainable investing or whatever it is. Instead of adopting the same sort of social criteria,
00:34:15.420 but they know this is going to have a discursive effect on stopping the hiring of those people on
00:34:20.760 the front end on the base of democratic demographic attributes. And so that's why those are codified in
00:34:25.820 some senses of quota systems. But where that then goes upstream is it still hurts the very people
00:34:30.180 it was supposed to help, not because they're less likely to be hired necessarily, because there are
00:34:34.860 still effective, hard quota systems to make sure that they're filled, but in the attitudes that
00:34:40.060 people have towards them. And I think that's the most unfortunate aspect of it at all.
00:34:43.880 Yeah. That's the scariest piece.
00:34:46.020 I mean, it's really, it's really sad, actually. I've been in environments that built companies,
00:34:49.540 built organizations where I don't look at, I could care less about what somebody's demographic
00:34:53.820 attributes are. I care how good they're going to be at doing the job, which happens to have resulted
00:34:57.920 in hiring multiple black women in positions of executive power. I didn't hire them for that
00:35:02.920 reason. I hired them because I thought they'd be the best person for the job. But one of the things
00:35:06.580 that happened was you saw a lot of frustration from people around them and would say, you know,
00:35:10.920 and it made me sad. In one of those settings, she happened to be a very highly paid person,
00:35:15.140 high ranking in the organization. And you'd have people scuttlebutt around the people who couldn't make
00:35:20.060 it in the same way that she did saying, oh, she only got her job because of her race and gender.
00:35:23.940 When in fact, in the context that I was operating the company, that was flatly false. And I think
00:35:29.200 that's the sad consequence of this is it does hurt the very people it was supposed to help,
00:35:33.140 not necessarily because they're not going to get the jobs or whatever, but because they're going to
00:35:36.020 be viewed differently. I mean, somebody like Ben Carson has been through this his entire career,
00:35:40.380 ended up graduating at the top of his class, but wasn't regarded in the same way because many of the
00:35:45.240 people who looked like him are known to have gotten that position in the field of medicine or
00:35:49.940 whatever else because of these racial quota systems. And I think that in that sense, it leaves
00:35:54.560 us worse off, literally creating a form of racism. I'm not just talking about the anti-white and anti-Asian
00:36:02.560 racism that's embedded into the entire program of affirmative action and the DI agenda. There's a lot
00:36:08.320 of that anti-white and anti-Asian racism. And, you know, a lot of people will say there's no such thing
00:36:12.360 as anti-white racism. I disagree. Any disagreement, any discrimination on the basis of race is
00:36:17.280 definitionally racism and it's problematic, but it's not just the anti-white and anti-Asian racism.
00:36:21.620 And also illegal. The law recognizes it as illegal. Keep going. Sorry.
00:36:25.080 Yes, it does. It's a good reminder to people. It is illegal. But even worse than that, the net
00:36:30.320 consequence of that is it actually throws, fans the flames of even an anti-black racism that otherwise
00:36:37.500 would have retreated to irrelevance, right? Once you reach the promised land that the civil
00:36:42.540 rights activists wanted in the 1960s, it's precisely that you have this sort of masochistic
00:36:47.960 desire to restart the whole cycle. And that's exactly what's happening, hiding in plain sight
00:36:53.780 before us today. Yeah. I'm going to take a break, but I will say we're on the tail end now of a four
00:36:59.680 year period where the country lost its mind post George Floyd and got rid of SAT scores, started to
00:37:08.380 discount actual grades. Then, you know, went full DEI in terms of its admissions to all these ivies.
00:37:15.480 And now they've inflated the grades. So now these same folks who got into Harvard and Yale,
00:37:21.700 who otherwise would not have been admitted, are just getting A's and A minuses as a gift.
00:37:27.500 It's not because they've earned it. And then there'll be a pathway into med school
00:37:31.320 for based on those same falsities. And at some point they're going to hit corporate America or
00:37:37.040 medical America, God forbid. And the realities of all that puffing up are going to hit them and the
00:37:43.080 rest of us. And that's when the shit's really going to hit the fan. All right, stand by. Vivek stays with
00:37:47.000 me. Quick break. Don't go away. You cannot tell me in the United States in 2024. Shut up. You cannot tell me
00:37:55.540 where I can or can't walk. These are terrorist supporters and they are supporting Hamas. What is worse,
00:38:02.860 me saying the F word or them praising Hamas and Hezbollah and the Ufis? I'm not the problem. No, I'm not the
00:38:08.900 problem. I'm a law abiding citizen. These people support terrorists. Why are you punishing me?
00:38:13.440 Can we get some space, please? Can we just raise your voice?
00:38:15.820 Okay. I'm not going to raise my voice. Okay. I'm not raising my voice. Excuse me. Excuse me.
00:38:20.200 So I can't stop you from coming. Okay. I cannot. And I'm not going to try. Okay. But I don't
00:38:26.800 understand what the purpose would be because I think you know where we're going to let him. And
00:38:32.440 do we want that? Respectfully, I am not the problem.
00:38:35.200 Please, if you need to cover up your face, cover up now.
00:38:40.720 Cover your face, guys.
00:38:41.620 I want to let all of you know you are not going to intimidate Jewish people. You can hide behind
00:38:46.900 your masks as long as you want. We will not be scared. Okay.
00:38:51.160 Unbelievable scenes. That was MIT, according to the Daily Wire. And one Jewish student handling
00:38:57.800 these protests, the anti-Israel protests, like a boss. I have to say it was perfectly done. I refuse
00:39:04.300 to pretend that I am the problem. Why are you telling me to not go on my campus, police officer?
00:39:10.100 Why don't you escort me right across my campus and through this encampment, as is your job?
00:39:15.700 And the cop, I believe, was out of line and saying, you knew you can do it, but you're
00:39:19.540 going to be disruptive. Who cares? It's his right. He's going to disrupt their takeover of
00:39:24.920 his campus. Vivek, what do you make of what's happening on the campuses right now?
00:39:29.420 I mean, what's happening on the campuses, first of all, we're learning a lot of this is
00:39:31.960 manufactured, Megan. These are not actually students. Second thing is, I think what we're seeing
00:39:35.740 is if you look at, I think it was Michigan's graduation, where you saw just the raucous
00:39:40.260 cheer at the commencement, 90 plus percent of people in the audience cheering as a few
00:39:45.060 of the disruptors to the proceedings were removed. I think the reality is most people
00:39:50.200 on the college campuses do not agree with the use of these disruptive tactics to destroy
00:39:56.960 their universities. So I personally think this actually presents a, not to take it to the
00:40:01.260 realm of politics for a second, but a political opportunity for Republicans. If they just have
00:40:05.120 the courage to show up this year on college campuses this fall, I mean, you look at swing
00:40:09.160 states, most of them have great college football teams. People are going to be tinged by what
00:40:12.720 ended up happening this spring. There's an opening to say, you know what, you might not
00:40:16.400 have thought of yourself as a patriotic pro-American conservative or whatever, but many people on
00:40:20.840 those college campuses are hungry for the alternative to what they're seeing set up in these artificially
00:40:25.740 set up encampments and artificially constructed building takeovers on their campuses. And
00:40:30.940 so I think that's the first learning is this is not just a supposedly a tyranny of the majority
00:40:36.440 that these people are standing up against chanting intifada. When in fact, if you listen to the audio,
00:40:41.760 many of them are chanting infitada. They don't even know the word they're supposed to be chanting,
00:40:45.800 but the majority of people on the campus don't agree with that. This is a tyranny of the fringe
00:40:51.060 minority. And that presents an opportunity for conservatives for Republicans this year,
00:40:55.280 if they're willing to step up and seize it. The other thing I would say though,
00:40:58.780 as Megan is even many of those protesters who are supposedly protesting, they don't really know
00:41:04.360 what they're protesting for, especially those who are students, right? That example of people
00:41:08.660 chanting infitada, when in fact they're trying to say intifada, they don't even know what they're
00:41:13.980 saying. Right, exactly. It could be go to stada for all we know. And so I think it's just another
00:41:20.860 symptom of, you know, I think that there's a, I mean, it's so, it's understandable that there's
00:41:25.980 the debate about antisemitism, but I think it's a symptom of something deeper that's going on,
00:41:30.540 which is a generation that is truly lost for purpose. Not the whole generation,
00:41:36.860 but the fringe minority still, even that fringe minority is really just hungering for purpose
00:41:41.960 and meaning and identity. And they are looking for it any place they can find it. It's like the
00:41:47.900 equivalent of, you know, you have these commercial parades in Manhattan and one week you'll have the
00:41:52.400 Dominican Republic parade. And the other week you'll have the Puerto Rico parade. And the next
00:41:55.960 week it'll be the India day parade. And when I used to live in Manhattan, when I was in my early
00:42:00.740 twenties, one of the things you would notice is it was the same people in each of the parades.
00:42:04.520 They were just paid people who were doing, you know, the same music and backflips. And that's fine.
00:42:09.260 There's nothing wrong with that in that context, but that's what it reminds me of here,
00:42:12.920 where the same people who are marching for one cause in the aftermath of George Floyd's death
00:42:17.360 are the same people setting up encampments and quasi violent riots in a different context.
00:42:22.900 They are starving just as other people are doing it for money in the context of commercial parades.
00:42:27.660 In this case, they're doing it in a perpetual search for satisfying their own hunger for purpose
00:42:33.920 and meaning. And I think that in response to it, we have to, if we really want to fix the problem
00:42:39.400 as a conservative movement here, I'll say we got to do better than just pointing out their endless
00:42:45.100 hypocrisies because they'll keep giving us endless hypocrisies. And I think we're going to be in this
00:42:48.980 constant cycling churn unless we offer an alternative vision to say, Hey, you're actually
00:42:54.220 hungering for a purpose. There's one of them represented in that flag right behind me,
00:42:58.200 the American flag. If you have a hunger to be part of something bigger than yourself,
00:43:02.220 that's what America actually offers. If you don't pledge allegiance to that flag,
00:43:07.240 you're going to pledge allegiance to quite a different flag instead. I think that's the
00:43:10.640 genesis of the transgender flag, why you'd see more transgender flags on the streets of
00:43:15.380 Washington DC in the month of June, then you do see American flags. And so if we want to get out
00:43:20.900 of this sort of cycle of psychologically deranged people latching onto causes, showing up to protest
00:43:28.060 when it's one cause today and a different one tomorrow, and the irony of standing for the
00:43:31.540 transgender cause and standing for the Hamas cause is they're fundamentally incompatible with one
00:43:35.560 another either. You know that if you want to try to go to most of the Middle East and hold up an
00:43:39.060 actual transgender flag, see how you're treated, it doesn't even make any sense that you're
00:43:43.920 espousing the same kinds of people espousing fundamentally incompatible causes on different
00:43:48.940 days of the week. It's a deeper hunger for purpose and meaning. And in that sense, I think it's actually
00:43:55.660 a reflection of a failure of the patriotic, pro-American, pro-conservative movement to offer
00:44:02.040 an alternative vision that's actually able to satisfy these people's search for purpose and meaning.
00:44:08.060 And so I think it's not so much that most of them are anti-Semitic as it is that they're
00:44:12.080 psychiatrically deranged, that they're lost. I don't say that in a disparaging way. I say it in a way
00:44:17.860 that reflects a deep-seated kind of mental illness that has really taken a foot of a generation in
00:44:23.480 America that if we're serious about fixing it, we're not going to do it by scolding it out of
00:44:27.920 existence. We'd have to call out these hypocrisies as they occur, but we got to do the harder work of
00:44:33.020 actually addressing the root cause of that mental ailment. And until we do, we're just going to see
00:44:38.400 more of this time and again.
00:44:41.180 That's fascinating. I think you're right about that. We've seen what looks very much like deranged
00:44:46.260 behavior. I mean, the students trying to pretend that they're just like the Selma marchers demanding
00:44:51.260 that we've, you know, ferret out Plan B and dental dams to them on their patriotic march. Like, no,
00:44:58.640 I think, go back to the history books. This is not how it works. We don't have to fund your abortion
00:45:03.240 while you're in the middle of your protest over your cause. But time and time again, we're seeing
00:45:08.720 these absurd examples of this behavior. But of course, as with anything in America, we overreact
00:45:15.100 to the news of the day. And I think you feel as I do about the latest example of that, which is this
00:45:22.460 so-called anti-Semitism bill that passed overwhelmingly in the House, where we're now
00:45:28.060 trying to redefine in the law the definition of anti-Semitism. It passed 320 to 91, 70 Democrats and
00:45:38.780 21 Republicans voted against the measure, but overwhelmingly popular. And the new definition
00:45:44.820 of anti-Semitism is going to recognize a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as a
00:45:52.260 hatred toward Jews. And then there are examples, including accusing Jews as a people of being
00:45:59.640 responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group
00:46:04.420 and making dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews, such as the power of Jews
00:46:09.800 as a collective. This is crazy to me, Vivek, that it is not illegal to be a racist, to be a bigot,
00:46:19.600 to be an anti-Semite, to be a transphobe. In America, it's illegal to make hiring-firing decisions based
00:46:27.260 on that, harassment based on that. But we've lost our way if this thing passed as healthily as it did.
00:46:34.460 Absolutely, Megan. And this brings even some of our earlier discussions full circle. We talked about
00:46:40.060 in the context of the Donald Trump gag order, what does the First Amendment mean? It means you get to
00:46:45.460 express all opinions, right, regardless of the content of that opinion. So then, you know, I see
00:46:51.160 these people on college campuses are hungering for purpose and meaning. There's a great purpose,
00:46:55.360 the United States of America. That's a purpose that can fulfill your hunger to be part of something
00:46:59.520 bigger than yourself. And what is America? It is a place where you get to express any opinion.
00:47:04.800 No, that doesn't mean you get to disrupt the way a college campus operates. No, that doesn't mean
00:47:08.260 that you get to disrupt the way that a commencement proceeding operates so that you're able to be
00:47:11.820 violent. That's not the expression of an opinion. But if you're talking about the basic expression of
00:47:16.380 an opinion, no matter how heinous that opinion is, and I do think it is heinous to be able to make
00:47:20.560 comparisons of Israel to Nazi Germany. It's disgusting, but it is an opinion. And what makes America great,
00:47:26.740 what makes America itself is that you get to express those opinions. And so in many ways,
00:47:31.880 what the conservative movement should be doing is standing for the ideals that this country was
00:47:36.120 founded on and use that to lead the lost, deranged, mentally ill, Gen Z and generationally lost members
00:47:43.340 of the other side to say, hey, here's what it means to be an American. Instead, what we're actually
00:47:48.200 doing in response, many of us, I mean, not us, but many people who have a little R after their name
00:47:53.240 in serving the House of Representatives, is to adopt the same methods of the left in a way that
00:47:59.220 actually erodes our own moral authority to talk about things like free speech, to be able to say
00:48:03.540 there are certain opinions that legally cannot be expressed. And Megan, this is not a bill that was
00:48:08.080 proposed. This is a bill that has passed Congress, the larger of the two chambers of the Congress,
00:48:14.800 now awaiting passage into law in the United States Senate. I think it completely erodes any moral
00:48:21.460 authority that we have to ever preach about free speech if we are literally restricting the content
00:48:26.540 of speech or opinions that can be expressed and codifying that in a federal statute.
00:48:31.980 It's disgusting. And I think that we need, we're at a moment where we actually need more debate within
00:48:38.120 the right. I think that there is a risk of papering over a lot of those disagreements in an era of an
00:48:45.280 election year about foreign funding for wars, even in places like Ukraine or elsewhere,
00:48:49.520 to surveillance state measures, FISA 702, to speech restrictions here at home. That's one of
00:48:54.860 the things I'm hoping to do on my podcast is actually open up into the open, even some of
00:48:58.540 the debates on the right, within the right, that we're not having. I got to leave it there because
00:49:01.800 I'm up against a break. But Vivek, I hope everybody tunes in. It's the Truth Podcast. And as you heard
00:49:06.520 here today, he's always worth listening to. Thank you, my friend. Great to see you.
00:49:10.360 Thank you. All right. Coming up next, Buck Sexton is here. Don't go away.
00:49:18.700 We are getting reports that former porn star and porn director, what I really want to do is direct
00:49:25.020 all of the, well, yeah, you know, Stormy Daniels is expected to testify at the trial of Donald Trump
00:49:32.140 today. So get ready for the media to get excited. This is the most exciting thing to happen to the
00:49:39.380 nerds since Pamela Anderson. Yeah, probably since Pamela Anderson divorced. What's his name? Tommy
00:49:50.520 Lee. Or since Anna Nicole Smith went up to the U.S. Supreme Court. Yes, that's the real thing that
00:49:55.180 came into their world. And Kristi Noem's embarrassing media tour is continuing. My God,
00:49:59.680 why is she doing this to herself? She was like on the shortlist for VP. And now she's a national
00:50:04.240 laughingstock. Her book is officially out today. My next guest called Kristi Noem a
00:50:09.360 phony back in 2021. What did he know then? Buck Sexton is the co-host of the Clay and Buck show
00:50:15.140 and host of the Buck Sexton show. Buck, great to see you. Welcome back. Hey, Megan. Thanks for
00:50:20.720 having me. You, you're like a Nostradamus. I mean, that word in particular, a phony in light of her book
00:50:27.840 claiming originally that she met Kim Jong-un, that she stared him down because she was used to dealing
00:50:35.140 with little tyrants who underestimated her. It's all lies. She tried initially when this came out to
00:50:41.780 say, Oh, it was my team. And I had it corrected as soon as it was brought to my attention. That's
00:50:46.720 also a lie because she recorded the audio of it in her own voice saying the exact alleged lie.
00:50:52.540 Now they've had to pull all that from the audio book. It'll be on the bookshelves and Barnes and
00:50:59.280 Noble and elsewhere today because they couldn't get it out of the written book. Um, but it's out
00:51:03.420 of the electronic. And now she continues to try to dodge and weave around this error. If you want
00:51:12.700 to be super generous, here's just a sample of her on with Jesse waters last night. It's hot 20.
00:51:17.460 So they're also attacking you. I guess you said you met Kim Jong-un. Did you meet him?
00:51:24.380 I've been to the DMZ. I've been to North Korea. You know, people, I don't talk about my conversations
00:51:28.580 with world leaders. And so, uh, when I looked at the book and I saw that excerpt, I decided to
00:51:34.280 make the change to the content of the book and that's been done.
00:51:37.920 So you didn't have a conversation with Kim when you were at the DMZ?
00:51:40.740 I don't have conversations about my conversations with world leaders. I've been working on policy for 30
00:51:45.940 years, Jesse. And that's what most people don't remember about me is I'm old. I'm a, I'm a mom.
00:51:51.580 I'm a grandma. I've got three little grand babies. So maybe you did have a conversation with Kim,
00:51:56.180 but you don't want to talk. I will not talk about my personal conversations with any world leaders.
00:52:00.100 It just won't. And I'm not going to do it. What have you, I know. It's an absurdity. It's
00:52:08.340 infuriating. It's, I have to tell you, like as somebody who cross examined for a living for 10 years,
00:52:12.700 that kind of clip drives me insane, Buck. It drives me insane. There is a way
00:52:17.020 of pinning her down on her nonsense. And I've yet to see anybody do it.
00:52:21.500 Oh, well, this is who she is and who she's always been. I mean, you pointed out,
00:52:26.420 I appreciate you calling me Nostradamus. I just like to think that I have the, the tool set of a
00:52:31.620 CIA analyst from back in the day when we used to obsess over details and specifically veracity.
00:52:38.260 One thing about being an intelligence officer in the good sense, forget about all the deep state
00:52:42.240 stuff and all the things that have happened that people get upset about is that you have to spend
00:52:47.480 a lot of your time sifting through information and then verifying information because you generally
00:52:52.720 get a lot of stuff that is nonsense. And then the stuff that you think is good, you have to really,
00:52:57.340 really be sure. Okay. How does that apply to Kristi Noem? This is the Kristi Noem playbook and it's to
00:53:02.780 get caught being ridiculous and being a fraud and then to stare at people and say, well,
00:53:08.120 this is how we do things on the ranch, sir, and just act indignant. And, and people have been going
00:53:14.500 for this for years. I mean, you mentioned the little incident from a few years ago and people
00:53:19.420 also saw this on Tucker Carlson's TV show on Fox at around the same time. She very openly said she was
00:53:26.360 going to sign a bill that would have protected women when it comes to transgender men pretending to
00:53:31.920 be women in sports. And then she went back on that. And then she tried this whole routine of,
00:53:36.780 oh, it's a trial lawyer's dream. And, oh, you don't understand section 7259 of the South Dakota
00:53:43.200 constitution, sir. No, you lied. We actually just know you lied. We're not all stupid.
00:53:50.080 And, you know, I'll say this people who know me and have known my work, I mean, I've been doing this a
00:53:53.720 while, even back in the day when I was getting started. And Megan was so kind to have me on her
00:53:58.020 massive show on Fox and the A block talking about terrorism. Thank you, Megan.
00:54:01.720 Many, many times. But many times. And I always appreciate that. But, you know, you look at this
00:54:07.780 and you see how she's been doing this for a long time and there's nothing new really here. There's
00:54:14.960 nothing that I think people should understand. She's been pretending to be ultra conservative in a
00:54:22.120 very red state. And what she does is the moment she's challenged on something, she runs the same
00:54:29.120 routine, the same playbook that she always has in the past. And like, for example, on the transgender
00:54:35.180 bill, she tweeted that she was going to do it. And then she just created this whole nonsense about
00:54:40.200 how, well, no, actually, I never said, well, it's in writing. You clearly said it. But she exploits,
00:54:47.100 I think, a sense of identity and a sense of people feeling like they have a connection to her because of
00:54:54.180 her personal story or whatever it might be. And then she always goes on offense. And so she
00:54:58.740 essentially there's like a little mini gnome cult in the moment that you call her to to account.
00:55:05.720 She all of a sudden gets angry at you and she doesn't take accountability for it. And this is,
00:55:11.520 by the way, on COVID. She also decided not to protect people from vaccine mandates, private ones
00:55:16.520 in her state. Ron DeSantis made a different choice, but she got very upset.
00:55:20.620 That's one of the things that you guys, you guys fought over and had to dust up, whatever. Here's
00:55:25.860 a little bit of that from 2021.
00:55:31.680 When I'm not governor anymore, how do I know the next governor won't use that exact same precedent
00:55:36.880 to use it to limit the freedom?
00:55:38.420 But you are the governor now, Governor Noem. And right now we're at a point where there are
00:55:42.740 mandates going. People are having to get shots right now. People are facing losing their jobs
00:55:48.320 right now. Why not be a person who is taking a stand in favor of individual freedom, which I
00:55:54.460 believe is actually the primary purpose of the Constitution. Why not do that?
00:55:58.060 And there is nobody in this country that would say that no other governor took more heat over
00:56:04.700 defending liberty and freedom than I did this last year.
00:56:07.160 I mean, I think Governor Ron DeSantis might disagree, but keep going.
00:56:11.980 Keep going. You keep going, Buck.
00:56:13.560 Oh, it's just so obvious. And the truth is that she always points to not shutting down
00:56:19.540 her state during COVID. I haven't even gotten to the dog shooting, the bragging about the dog
00:56:24.200 shooting. We're going there. And we have the audio.
00:56:27.200 The dog shooting on top of the dog shooting and then making a joke about how she wants to shoot
00:56:31.040 the president's existing dog. This is like sociopathic. I'm sorry. I don't want to jump around
00:56:36.780 too much, but she's like a serial killer. Oh, I mean, on COVID, I sniffed this out because she
00:56:42.260 was playing this whole game and I saw what she did to Tucker on TV and I've seen what she's
00:56:46.380 tried with other people, which is everyone else is dumb, but her, you know, when you're speaking
00:56:51.140 to some of the smartest minds in media and you're speaking to people that have been in this game a
00:56:56.180 while and your response is always, you just don't know enough, sir. This is how we do it on the ranch
00:57:01.580 or whatever. You're the problem. And that's been the case with Christine Ohm for a long time. Her
00:57:06.280 aggressive strategy, uh, the little cult she's built around her and people all go, this is what
00:57:10.660 I wanted to get to before. Um, anyone who's known my work for a long time, I mentioned this to go on
00:57:15.060 your show. I don't attack people on the right. I generally have a no enemies to the right. I don't
00:57:20.380 pick fights with people. I love, I love the success of fellow radio hosts. I mean, I, I applaud the
00:57:27.060 daily wire doing cool stuff. I love Dan Bongino fighting for America. Like I'm on the team,
00:57:32.600 but when I see somebody who's being a fraud and taking advantage of people on my side who are
00:57:39.060 well-intentioned and who will want freedom and who want effective and competent leadership,
00:57:43.120 it does bother me, you know, when they're being lied to in a way that I think affects them.
00:57:47.580 So that's where the original thing with, with known came up and now, yeah, I mean, I was right. I was
00:57:53.100 right all along and I'm right now. And some of the people that have emailed me, you know,
00:57:56.380 years ago, why are you being so hard on her? I was like, because she's a phony and now everyone
00:58:00.720 knows she's actually kind of worse than a phony. She's a phony. She's a poser and she won't be
00:58:07.040 honest about her own shortcomings. Even when she's caught red-handed that exchange with Jesse
00:58:12.540 waters. I don't have conversations about my, my, I don't know about my conversations with world
00:58:16.620 leaders. I don't, no one's asking you about substance. We're asking you, did you meet with
00:58:22.740 him or didn't you? You're the one who brought it up, ma'am. You put it in your book. Did it happen
00:58:28.560 or didn't it? And by the way, when you then claim when it was brought to my, who brought it to your
00:58:33.980 attention? When, why did you read the audio book? When you read out loud, I met with Kim Jong-un and
00:58:38.820 I stared him down. Did it occur to you that you were telling a lie? Because most of us would have a very
00:58:43.060 clear memory if we had met with the leader of North Korea. It's kind of a big deal. Did you correct it
00:58:49.660 then? Were you embarrassed? Did you go back through tooth and comb over your entire ghostwritten memoir
00:58:54.700 to make sure there were no other errors? Because you also appear to have lied about a meeting with
00:58:58.280 Emmanuel Macron. How many lies are there in this book? And why should we believe you on anything,
00:59:03.820 especially now your revisionist history about why you really shot your puppy, which she's now claiming
00:59:08.640 the dog was basically a serial killer and not her. It was a, it was a 14 month old dog of a breed
00:59:16.060 that I'm familiar with and have, and have dealt with in the past. The notion that that kind of a
00:59:21.120 dog is a threat to people. She's again, she's lying. And for anyone who's like, well, why are we spending
00:59:27.160 time on this? She was the number one VP candidate, according to the betting markets. And this is the
00:59:33.920 kind of thing in a super tight election. What do I want? I want Donald Trump to win. I want Republican
00:59:39.680 majorities in the house and the Senate. I do not want some abject fraud to be the difference between
00:59:46.640 victory and defeat for the Republicans. How could I take any pride in my job if I would be silent
00:59:51.760 when I truly believe, and as you pointed out, I believe that for a long time, that this is somebody
00:59:56.300 who is dishonest with her own supporters and is dishonest with the American people and also brings
01:00:01.100 a kind of nastiness. And I haven't even gotten into the personal stuff and I won't because I don't
01:00:05.780 think I need to go there. But we've reported on it. You have reported on it. Yeah. The audience,
01:00:11.480 we reported on this show, the Daily Mail's in-depth reporting about her alleged affair with Corey
01:00:15.160 Lewandowski and the denials of which were absolutely pathetic and transparent. And I believe 100% it
01:00:22.640 happened. That's my opinion. I have excellent sourcing on this and I absolutely agree with you.
01:00:27.540 So I'll just, I'll say that. I mean, I have a lot of people that I know in DC and in political circles
01:00:31.820 and we talk a lot and guess what? But I'll put that aside because honestly, I don't want to be,
01:00:37.040 I don't want to be accused of being, having a double standard because, you know, some male
01:00:41.460 politicians obviously get away with a lot of stuff in that realm, but on the telling people the truth
01:00:46.380 about what you stand for and where you'll actually fight and whether you're a person of any integrity
01:00:50.360 whatsoever, Megan, I mean, I can't help but laugh. She's saying she won't talk about meetings with
01:00:55.200 world leaders based on a section of her book where she's talking about meetings with world leaders.
01:01:00.240 And she thinks this is, she prepared this. She went on Jesse water show and Jesse was, you know,
01:01:06.720 Jesse's a very nice guy. Jesse. I mean, I think he, I mean, I liked, you know, again, see, I don't
01:01:13.100 want to, I don't want to attack people on the right. We have communists. I'm not attacking Jesse. I've,
01:01:18.100 I've known Jesse a long time. I think he would take my, my feedback as Jesse. I didn't mean it like
01:01:24.200 that, but I'm just saying like, even just, you know, I don't, I don't want to call him out for
01:01:27.280 being a little too softer in the interview, but I mean, I think he was, but it's okay. I really
01:01:30.540 like Jesse. But the point is, she thought that was, people are looking to her for an answer on
01:01:35.980 this. She thinks that's a legitimate answer and she's defiant about it. Notice there's no sense
01:01:40.860 of remorse, whether it's the dog shooting story, which she included in the book and people can,
01:01:45.800 I love dogs and I tell everybody that. So I'm very honest with where I'm coming from.
01:01:49.040 She included that in her book because she thought it made her look like she makes tough decisions.
01:01:54.280 So she should possibly lead America, not just as vice president, everybody, the whole game plan
01:01:59.460 is vice president to president. And, and I'm sorry, like that to me, it's just a bridge way too far
01:02:05.700 for a person who has no record of actual legislative achievement to be proud of and lies in a way that
01:02:12.240 makes a mockery of all, it makes a mockery of all of us. Well, we're going to pull the lever and be
01:02:16.540 like, yeah, I'm so excited about the gnome candidacy. Really? Let me let, okay. So we finally have,
01:02:22.580 because the book hit today, including the audio version, Christy Noem in her own words,
01:02:27.360 describing the murder of the 14 month old puppy cricket. Uh, we've condensed it into a two minute
01:02:33.200 clip. Here it is. Cricket was a wire hair pointer about 14 months old. And she had come to us from a
01:02:41.000 home that had struggled with her aggressive personality. I was sure that she'd learn a lot
01:02:45.400 going out with our older dogs that day. I was wrong. Within an hour of walking the first field,
01:02:52.920 cricket had blown past the group, gotten too far ahead. She'd flushed up birds that were out of
01:02:59.360 range. Uh, she was out of her mind with excitement, chasing all those birds and having the time of her
01:03:05.060 life. The only problem was, was no, there was no hunters nearby to shoot the birds that she was
01:03:11.520 gearing up. I called her back to no avail. I hit her electronic collar to give her a quick tone to
01:03:17.820 remind her to listen. I then hit the button to give her a warning vibration that told her to come back
01:03:23.680 to me now. No response. The hunt was ruined and I was livid. Some neighbors who recently purchased a
01:03:33.200 puppy from us asked me to stop and to check on their pup on the way home. Suddenly out of the corner of
01:03:39.520 my eye, I caught a glimpse of cricket launching herself out of the back end of the pickup and
01:03:45.300 racing across the yard. All three of us chased cricket around in circles, flailing after her while
01:03:52.860 she systematically grabbed one chicken at a time, crunching it to death with one bite and then dropping
01:03:59.480 it to attack another. She was like a trained assassin. Eventually I got my hand on her collar and she
01:04:06.280 whipped around to bite me. There were bloodied bodies and feathers everywhere. When I got back
01:04:13.580 into my truck, cricket was sitting in the passenger seat, looking like she had just won the lottery.
01:04:18.760 The picture of pure joy. I hated that dog. As I drove home, I realized that I had no choice.
01:04:26.800 Cricket was untrainable and after trying to bite me, dangerous to anybody that she came in contact with.
01:04:32.880 A dog who bites is dangerous and unpredictable. Are you listening, Joe Biden? She was less than
01:04:40.160 worthless to us as a hunting dog. At that moment, I realized I had to put her down. As I pulled into
01:04:47.460 the driveway, I decided I had to deal with this problem myself. This was my dog and it was my
01:04:52.760 responsibility and I would not ask somebody else to clean up my mess. I stopped the truck in the middle
01:04:58.420 of the yard. I got out my gun, grabbed cricket's leash, and I let her out into the pasture and down
01:05:04.360 into the gravel pit. It was not a pleasant job, but it had to be done. There you have it in her own words.
01:05:14.820 So a few things about this. And I, you know, the people in the, in your audience who are dog lovers,
01:05:20.520 I have a ton of them in my audience. I think they know where I'm coming from. I'll try to get past
01:05:25.820 the horror of thinking that this is some kind of a cool story to show that, you know, you'll make
01:05:31.900 the tough decisions, you know, to shoot your own. As a 14-month-old dog, I want to analyze this as
01:05:36.880 objectively as I can. Why is she including, and people say, oh, this doesn't matter. Really? This
01:05:41.900 person wants to be president of the United States. I think it matters a lot, actually. But put that
01:05:45.680 aside. And then also talking about how she shot the goat because she didn't like the goat and
01:05:49.060 everything else. Same day, by the way. And has video, or has photos of her the same day that she's put
01:05:53.520 horses down? She takes photos of this to commemorate it. Like, does that seem normal?
01:05:57.620 How many people listening to this have photos of them celebrating horse put down day when they
01:06:02.160 shoot their horse? Okay. All right. So those are all facts. Those are not a dispute. She said she
01:06:07.180 brings up all of the issues of it being bad at hunting. So, so were you, are you killing? And she
01:06:13.760 said she hated it before the incident where it tried to bite her. It sounds to me like she thinks the
01:06:18.460 dog isn't worthwhile enough to her as a hunting dog. So she's going to kill it. I mean, that that's the
01:06:22.860 part, or at least she's moving in that direction. And then when she says the dog turned around to
01:06:26.720 bite her, it didn't bite her. I have a puppy. Puppies nip and are playful and get overexcited
01:06:32.800 all the time. Somebody should look up the breed of dog that this is. It's not an 85 pound pit bull.
01:06:38.960 Okay. This is a little bird dog. It's like a midsize sporting dog. The idea that this is a danger to
01:06:44.540 people, any dog would go after chickens. It's a 14 month old dog. And she could have given it away.
01:06:50.020 Megan, this is a true story. I have a friend who is an absolutely avid hunter, sportsman,
01:06:54.800 everything else. He had, I think it was the same breed of dog. It looked very similar.
01:06:59.320 Was not a good bird dog at all. Just, he's like, it was untrainable. He loves his new bird dog so
01:07:04.100 much. He had it cloned, which is a whole other conversation. So he could have the same dog.
01:07:08.760 So this guy's really into his bird dogs. This guy's really, you know what he did when he had a dog
01:07:12.700 that he couldn't train? He said, I hired everybody. He found a single mom who was a family friend who had a
01:07:17.240 little boy who wanted a dog. They love that dog. What is she doing? This whole thing about how she
01:07:24.660 had to put the dog down. She had to go kill it. I don't know. Maybe give it a day. Maybe think about
01:07:29.860 it. This dog had lived with her for 14 months, never bitten anybody before one bite and she kills it.
01:07:35.460 This is horrifying judgment in the act and horrifying judgment to tell the story. And I'm just going to
01:07:42.480 say this. There are people who, unfortunately, and this always happens. If you ask it at the FBI,
01:07:47.660 why aren't frauds reported more? You know why frauds aren't reported more? I mean, monetary frauds,
01:07:51.840 because people are embarrassed that they were taken in by it. So the actual number of fraud that
01:07:56.640 occurs, the monetary number, much bigger than what is officially reported because nobody wants to say,
01:08:02.040 oh yeah, like I sent the fake Prince $10 million or, you know, whatever. They'd probably tell them
01:08:06.080 that, but I sent them 50 grand. You know, nobody wants to admit this. Kristi Noem fooled a lot of
01:08:11.060 people and she fooled a lot of great people, people from rural America, people from South Dakota,
01:08:16.620 people who believed in her. And I understand that there is this sense, look, I voted for Mitt Romney
01:08:21.540 in 2012. Nobody's perfect, right? But let's look at reality and let's see what she has shown us. And
01:08:28.340 let's make a conscious and real decision as Republicans to have some standards of truth
01:08:35.360 and forthrightness and judgment in our politicians. I mean, that's basically where I come down on this.
01:08:41.880 Yes, I agree with all of that. I thought she was great too, I admit. And we really wrestled about
01:08:47.820 whether we would even report the Corey Lewandowski news because I really was her fan, but it was a big
01:08:52.780 story. And my feeling was we would report this if it were about a man, if it were about somebody on
01:08:58.780 the short list, you know, being considered for VP, we would report it and we're not going to treat her
01:09:03.420 differently just because she's a woman. So, and by the way, there are pictures and there's a lot,
01:09:07.660 there's a lot behind that particular allegations. It does. It's not one of those things that was just
01:09:11.660 hurled. Um, but the, there's a lot to digest in here. And I wanted to make a couple of comments as
01:09:16.700 well. So she's upset because the dogs scurried the birds around when there was no hunter nearby.
01:09:22.780 To shoot, he flushed up the birds. She cricket out of range. Oh, dumb ass dog who didn't understand
01:09:30.320 exactly how Christie known wanted it to hunt, even though it was just a puppy. Um, and she several
01:09:35.380 times the dog was having the time of her life. Uh, she talks about how she looked like she'd won the
01:09:42.440 lottery. She was the picture of pure joy. I hated that dog. Why did she hate her? She hated the dog.
01:09:48.700 She didn't hunt right on her first time out. The dog, by the way, had just been shocked. It's
01:09:53.800 fine. I understand the shock collar and she hated her because when the dog was killing chickens,
01:09:59.700 which I'm convinced at least my stradwick would do. And they see chicken the way we see chicken
01:10:04.220 like food. Like they don't understand, you know, the modern niceties of how you're supposed to be
01:10:09.660 around chickens running. They see it's food, it's prey. And it, by the way, it's in the dog's nature.
01:10:13.980 That's why you hire it to help on a hunt to go retrieve the dog. I mean, the, the retrieve the
01:10:18.480 bird. Anyway, I'm sure my stradwick would eat chickens if I put him around and he's the sweetest
01:10:23.540 lug that you'd ever find in your life. Um, and she seemed, if you hear the audio to take delight in
01:10:29.880 it, she wants us to believe that it was a tough decision because it would be a tough decision for
01:10:34.320 anyone else. It would definitely be tough to decide to kill your innocent 14 year old puppy.
01:10:38.420 That is a tough one. Um, but it, it, it shouldn't have, it wasn't for her because she was motivated
01:10:44.900 by anger and she clearly hated her dog. And I would submit is not an animal lover in any way.
01:10:50.980 Absolutely. I mean, I would want, why didn't she include in this memoir, which is all an act of,
01:10:55.180 let's be honest, political memoirs are an act of propaganda, which propaganda is not always bad,
01:11:00.080 but it's meant to, it's meant to be, this was meant to be a launch pad into national,
01:11:05.520 true national politics, a vice presidential or cabinet role and a future run at the presidency
01:11:10.420 for her. Everybody knows it. It's obvious from her little like spokesperson who's running around
01:11:16.020 sharing polls all summer about how she's the VP that they fear most and all this kind of stuff.
01:11:21.580 So this is not some, uh, some theory. We all know what the game plan was here. She's writing this
01:11:27.140 memoir. Why not say, I mean, did she cry? Did she cry after she had to shoot her own dog?
01:11:32.720 Obviously not. Cause she hated the dog. So she shot the dog in anger. Is that the kind of decision
01:11:37.660 that you make when you're in a bad mood? I'm going to go kill the family dog. It had lived with her
01:11:42.060 for 14 months. By the way, depending on who you ask, puppies become adult dogs anywhere from 12 to 18
01:11:48.420 months. So this whole game that some of the gnome supporters play, it's not a puppy. I mean, it's
01:11:53.740 basically a puppy. It's a puppy. Okay. And if you're fighting about whether or not it's a puppy,
01:11:59.260 when you're talking about killing a dog under these circumstances, you're already losing.
01:12:03.380 Um, but I mean, it's, it's interesting to see, I'll tell you, I got a lot of pushback on my show.
01:12:08.820 You know, Clay is not, I have a dog. I grew up with dogs and I love them. And maybe I have an
01:12:13.360 irrational attachment to canines. Like I think that there are family members.
01:12:16.780 My audience is totally with us. There are some who said, all right, maybe,
01:12:19.640 but they could see why this is controversial as well. I mean, the vast majority are with us.
01:12:23.780 And Clay, Clay, you know, my cohost on our fabulous show, uh, Clay tried to be very,
01:12:29.560 he's not a dog guy. Um, so he just took the perspective of to share this story is such
01:12:34.880 political malpractice that that alone, I mean, to think that people, to think that if you're
01:12:39.620 going to win over suburban moms in Pennsylvania and Arizona, which is the only reason you're being
01:12:45.200 considered by the way, that's the only reason you're being considered as VP. Correct. And the
01:12:49.440 only thing here is to get women, married women voters in the suburbs to really go for Trump.
01:12:56.080 Okay. That is your whole life as VP. You had one job and you're telling this story about,
01:13:01.280 oh yeah, on the ranch, we just handle the business ourselves. The whole thing,
01:13:05.540 it was political malpractice, but Clay wasn't coming down on her as hard. I mean,
01:13:09.680 I think it bothered him, but as hard on the shooting of the dog itself, because people say, well,
01:13:13.560 she was doing the whole, it was a danger. And what about old Yeller? I'm like,
01:13:17.100 old Yeller had rabies, everybody. Okay. It was a mercy. It was a mercy killing. Okay. No one's
01:13:23.140 saying that when you put it, and then people say, well, I put my dog down when it was 15. I'm like,
01:13:27.140 yeah, it was a mercy after a long and wonderful life with your family. Everyone does. Why? I don't
01:13:32.420 know people, but there's such a desperation to defend her horrible conduct. I bring it up because
01:13:36.740 with the North Korea thing, now it's fine. Now it's just the people, you know, now it's flat. Now
01:13:43.060 it's flat earther land. Now, if you don't see who we're dealing with here, do you know how many people
01:13:46.600 have met? I mean, again, I worked in the CIA. I ran two presidential briefings. It was me,
01:13:50.600 the president running into the CIA, vice president in the room. I have some idea of how this stuff
01:13:54.940 goes. The number of people who have met with Kim Jong-un who are American, who are senior level
01:14:00.520 officials. I think you could count them maybe on two hands, maybe on one. I mean, it is tiny.
01:14:05.860 It would be a huge deal. And what you're seeing is the governor of South Dakota is not on the list,
01:14:08.860 Buck? I mean, I think this is when she was a congresswoman too. I mean,
01:14:12.500 it's like, I haven't read the book yet, but I'm assuming you're a no-name congresswoman from South
01:14:17.340 Dakota. And you think you're going to be like chilling out with Kim Jong-un and staring him
01:14:21.700 down. It's fantasy land garbage. But the reason somebody could include that in a book like this
01:14:27.860 is they're so used to just having the people who like her. And there are guys and Megan, I can't speak
01:14:34.780 from this perspective there, but you know, there are guys who they see she's attractive. You know,
01:14:41.360 I live in the real world. She's a, she's a good looking woman and they give her more than a little
01:14:46.760 leeway because of it. I'm not saying this is exactly what pisses me off. Some people will accuse me
01:14:52.740 sometimes of being too hard on my own sex. It's not that I'm too hard on my own sex. It's that I have
01:14:56.740 very high standards for them and I know they can meet them. I, I refuse to lower the bar for
01:15:01.900 performance for my own sex. I know what we're capable of. We can be all the things and I don't,
01:15:08.980 her behavior, her stories about herself are as fake as her hair. It's gotten to the point where
01:15:13.680 she's trying to glam herself up. She's trying to, she has to decide whether she wants to be a pinup
01:15:17.100 girl who's like got the guns and it's super tough, or she wants to be a leader who's smart and sober
01:15:21.880 and could take this country into the next generation. She's ruined the second possibility
01:15:26.820 with all of this nonsense. I see her entirely differently than I used to before. And the lying
01:15:31.880 about it has made it even worse. I mean, it, in revising the dog story in the wake of the
01:15:36.200 controversy, she's changed it to the dog had attacked people who that's not what you said
01:15:42.940 in your book. That would have been a detail you should have and would have included. All you said
01:15:46.880 was the dog tried, but didn't to bite you, not people, not a danger to your kids. And by the way,
01:15:53.040 it was when you were trying to take a high value item out of its mouth, a dead chicken,
01:15:57.400 any animal would be reluctant to, to part with it. So she's lying even in the wake of it. And by the
01:16:04.480 way, did you see the reports today? She wanted to include this dog story in her first book about
01:16:11.000 not my first rodeo. That's what we had her on for in 21. And some smart advisors around her said
01:16:16.800 that would be very stupid. That's not going to have the effect you think it is. And apparently now
01:16:23.420 she has a different team. Did you see the, now I will, I will try to be as specific about this as
01:16:27.760 possible because everything that I have said so far about all of this to the best of my knowledge
01:16:31.540 is a hundred percent factual. Uh, I think there was an AP story that said that it has been a now
01:16:36.940 granted coming from, I'm sure I know what they'll say about this. It's democratic oppo. And you're just
01:16:41.700 playing into the left's game or like, I know all the, all the talking, because that's what our team
01:16:45.980 always does. If you ever say anything, you know, you're, you're playing into the left's game and
01:16:50.200 you're holding down or holding down a prominent woman in politics, whatever they've been, they've
01:16:54.360 been dirty fighters the whole way. Um, so there's really a tremendous poetic justice in all this.
01:16:59.140 Like I don't, I don't applaud people's downfalls as a general matter either. I'm breaking a lot of
01:17:03.720 rules here. I will just say, I don't attack people on the right. I don't like being mean. I don't like
01:17:08.320 applauding downfalls. She absolutely richly deserves this. And it's important for the country that
01:17:12.400 everyone sees exactly what's going on. Um, I, I think that, uh, where was I a second ago, Megan? I got so
01:17:18.020 fired up. You were going to reveal some other report that you said you'd see. Oh yeah. Sorry.
01:17:21.360 Thank you. Thank you. Associate, associate impressed that the reason it came out the second
01:17:25.500 time, um, is that there were eyewitnesses to the event and that it was clear or rather to the day.
01:17:32.140 And it was clear to her that she was basically pissed off at her dog because it was bad at hunting
01:17:36.440 and she killed it. And so it was to get ahead of the story that she told the story this time
01:17:42.200 because it would come out. It would come out in oppo. Now I can't verify that other than the AP
01:17:48.220 reporting, but doesn't that make more sense? Because again, how could anyone who has any kind
01:17:55.580 of a job in politics that requires like winning an election be that dumb? Yeah. As to like,
01:18:01.680 how could anyone think, you know, it's, and then, I mean, the Kim Jong-un thing too,
01:18:06.060 the way to handle that for anyone saying I'm writing a book right now, I've got to have the CIA
01:18:10.140 review it. It's a whole, you know, it's going to be a good book though, Megan. We have to talk
01:18:13.300 about it when it comes out. And I'm actually writing it. Unlike people that have all the
01:18:17.580 ghostwriters do it. I'm actually writing, uh, writing my entire book. Um, but, uh, the,
01:18:22.860 the idea that the way to respond to the pressure on this is to almost be indignant and, and act
01:18:30.120 like she's protecting sources and methods. Like I don't, I don't, uh, you know, I don't talk about
01:18:35.120 my meetings with world leaders in the section of my book where I'm talking about my meetings
01:18:38.520 with world leaders. The way to handle it was asking about guys, this was a collaboration.
01:18:43.880 I have numerous people working on it. Somebody misunderstood something totally embarrassing
01:18:47.660 mistake where obviously, but notice she doesn't do that. It's it's, Oh, I meet with a lot of
01:18:52.560 leaders and I'm very important. And I do a lot of good things on the world stage. Really? That's
01:18:57.580 how you respond to the most, honestly, it's the most embarrassing memoir flub I can think of for a
01:19:02.800 politician. And the violates the cardinal rule of do no harm. That's the rule in a, please choose me
01:19:09.160 as VP memoir, right? This is not a new act where somebody who is reportedly on the shortlist
01:19:15.440 releases a book. This is how amazing I am. Look at my long resume. Everyone's going to love me.
01:19:20.000 The first rule, do no harm. Don't you don't need to say anything controversial. Just stick to the farm
01:19:24.480 stories. The story about losing her dad on the ranch is very heart wrenching and, you know,
01:19:29.160 very tough on the whole family. She grew up legit out in South Dakota. I get it. That's a great
01:19:33.600 personal story. Stick to that. Not the puppy killing. But the thing about the story and the
01:19:38.880 puppy killing that makes me suggest, makes me think maybe it wasn't that it was going to come out
01:19:42.620 is I would have written about it differently. Had I been in that position, you'd, you'd expect her to
01:19:47.360 say it did bite me. And if it really did bite other people, it bit all these other people. And it was a
01:19:55.760 very hard decision. I loved the dog and my kids love the dog, which was why it was so hard.
01:20:00.860 Why would she be writing? I hated it. And it was so joyful when I put a bullet between its eyes,
01:20:06.560 like her, something's off on her EQ is what I'm going for here. But yes. Yeah. Well, I mean, I,
01:20:13.320 she also, um, you know, she, like I said, she has a reputation behind the scenes. Uh, unfortunately,
01:20:19.480 uh, the truth is she was able, I think to get away with a lot more, um, than she would have because
01:20:27.420 she had a lot of the Trump base behind her because a lot of people liked her and I can understand why.
01:20:34.860 I mean, you know, I, I just happened to be in a situation. I had people from the South Dakota
01:20:40.300 state house reaching out to me directly. You know what I mean? I, I, I, so I, I got drawn into this a
01:20:46.160 little bit. They're like, this woman's not who she says she is. So it wasn't like I, to be totally
01:20:50.620 honest, it wasn't like I just happened to stumble upon what's going on here. People reached out to
01:20:55.380 me who know state politics, they're much better. And they told me what's going on. Um, but I think
01:20:59.840 she was able to get away with it for a while. You know, Trump has had generally positive things to
01:21:04.440 say about her. And so that shielded her, but it shielded her in such a way that I think she didn't
01:21:10.520 learn some of the key lessons she should have to be at the national level. Right. It's like, you,
01:21:14.020 you don't want to, if you're immune from criticism all the time, you end up as Kamala. You end up as
01:21:19.300 somebody who has no idea what they're doing, isn't competent, has been sort of pushed along.
01:21:25.340 And I think there was a bit of that on the right here. And so it's a, it's a moment for some
01:21:29.620 introspection. Um, and we're learning a lesson and someone is showing us, uh, showing us who they
01:21:35.400 are. And yeah, before it's too late, before it's too late, importantly, right. It's like,
01:21:39.380 there's lots of choices for VP that could really advance Trump's ticket. She's not one of them.
01:21:43.540 All right. There's a lot more to discuss. We're going to get, uh, get to some of that. I,
01:21:48.040 I am going to ask Buck Sexton, this former CIA officer about the Met Gala. Stay tuned for that.
01:21:53.320 That's next. I'm Megan Kelly, host of the Megan Kelly show on Sirius XM. It's your home for open,
01:22:00.440 honest, and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political,
01:22:04.440 legal, and cultural figures today. You can catch the Megan Kelly show on Triumph,
01:22:08.600 a serious XM channel featuring lots of hosts. You may know, and probably love great people like
01:22:14.900 Dr. Laura, Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey, and yours truly Megan Kelly. You can stream the
01:22:21.820 Megan Kelly show on Sirius XM at home or anywhere you are. No car required. I do it all the time.
01:22:28.160 I love the Sirius XM app. It has ad free music coverage of every major sport comedy talk podcast
01:22:35.640 and more subscribe. Now get your first three months for free. Go to Sirius XM.com slash MK show to
01:22:42.940 subscribe and get three months free. That's Sirius XM.com slash MK show and get three months free
01:22:50.760 offer. Offer details apply. So Buck last night was the big Met Gala in New York. And I'm just going
01:23:03.320 to say not for nothing. I have gone to this thing a couple of times when I went to this thing,
01:23:07.880 it was a listers everywhere. It was all of Hollywood's most favored darlings. Now it's like
01:23:15.700 a bunch of social media, online influencers and the Kardashians truly. And like some singers who,
01:23:22.060 who I'd know, but the Hollywood a-lister game is pretty much over at the Met Gala. And so are you
01:23:29.600 Anna Wintour, because you're a bitch and no one likes you anyway. Um, they host this thing. It costs
01:23:36.920 $75,000 a person to attend. The celebs get invited and it gets, you know, comped. They don't pay.
01:23:44.520 They're, they're the lure to get the nerds to pay 75 grand to go sit next to them. And it's the most
01:23:51.540 out of touch event you could ask for in New York. Honestly, it was absolutely painful. Every time Doug
01:23:56.060 and I went to one of these things, we wound up talking like to the accountant who financed the
01:24:00.480 party and could talk to us about New York city waterworks. Like we just, you know, you try to
01:24:04.900 talk to these celebs. It was just too painful. There's just nothing to connect to absolute vapidity.
01:24:10.660 So that's what is happening on the inside there. And I've told the audience before about
01:24:15.800 how the, all these models were smoking in the women's room. Guys were blowing cocaine in the
01:24:20.840 men's room. Very classy. Well, it's gotten no classier because last night what we had was
01:24:26.780 a parade of nudity. They're nudists. It was like they forgot their clothes. The theme was the garden
01:24:34.840 of time, something related to sleeping beauty. And I guess they went all the way back to the
01:24:40.280 garden of Eden because I'll just show you a couple, uh, Rita Ora, uh, Doja cat. And of course,
01:24:48.040 Emily Rajakowski, I don't know how you pronounce her. She's never, she never wears her clothing.
01:24:53.220 Emily's whole thing is, let me show you how naked I can be. I mean, she, she, this is actually pretty
01:24:58.420 clothed up for her, but it's all see-through. And what my first thought on the nudity buck,
01:25:02.600 I'm interested in your feelings on this. I know most red blooded American men approve of nudity,
01:25:08.040 but you also care about our culture. My feeling is if I wanted extra attention and I wanted to just
01:25:15.160 come out on this show one day naked, I could get a bunch of clicks, buck. I could get a bunch of
01:25:21.180 clicks. I'm still capable of getting some clips, clicks, but I don't do that because I have some
01:25:26.560 dignity. And I would really prefer that while my looks are important to me, people know me first and
01:25:31.780 foremost, for my mind, there is a whole section of America now that does not have that value.
01:25:37.720 And these women like that, Emily, I think she's an actress or a model or a model. Okay.
01:25:42.560 Doja cat is a very successful, interesting singer. Rita Ora is an accomplished actress.
01:25:48.520 So what's happening? Because it seems to me they've seen Kanye wife's Kanye West's wife,
01:25:54.640 Rita, or what her name, whatever, Bianca Sensori. And instead of saying, where are her clothes?
01:25:58.760 Why is she just wearing a sofa cushion? They decided to follow suit.
01:26:03.180 Oh, there's so much going on here. I will say this is the first time I've ever been tapped as
01:26:07.500 celebrity nudity expert. I gotta say, I think I'll do okay.
01:26:11.940 You know, I mean, I'm a guy, I'm a guy, I got a pretty wife and I like pretty ladies.
01:26:17.360 So, uh, I'd say this, uh, on the, first off on just like the, the Met Gala, I should tell
01:26:23.960 everybody full disclosure. I feel the way about galas the same way that I do about going to movie
01:26:29.000 theaters, which is that I go once every two years to remind myself that I don't want to go again.
01:26:33.840 And it lasts at least a year or two. Like I'm just not, I don't like sitting next to people that
01:26:38.000 I don't choose to sit next to. I don't like being at a place where I'm with Harvey Weinstein one year,
01:26:42.660 Buck Harvey. Wow. Podcast where I get to ask you questions about that. Cause I'm very curious
01:26:51.300 what he's like. Um, anyway, uh, I, I, so I'm, I'm not a gala person in general. I also, my advice to
01:26:57.600 everybody for weddings is make it shorter, make it easier on your guests, stop being a bridezilla,
01:27:01.820 et cetera, et cetera. So I just, okay. That's my feeling about galas. So I'm not the guy who would,
01:27:07.080 if I had a billion dollars, I wouldn't pay 75 grand to go to the Met Gala because I, I don't care.
01:27:11.540 Um, but I, I would say about the celebrity component of it and the new, the nudity aspect
01:27:16.720 of it. Uh, this is a little bit of what the social media race to the bottom creates. Um,
01:27:23.680 people, I think, and I, and I really mean this. I think that women, uh, in society, um, in America,
01:27:30.180 particularly, I can't speak about what it's like elsewhere. I assume it's pretty similar in Western
01:27:33.480 Europe and other places. Um, they are valued more on appearance than they've ever been. And also there's
01:27:39.500 more value to their appearance as in it's immediate and monetizable in a way that wasn't even really
01:27:46.060 possible a while ago. Um, and so I think that there's a fixation on the dopamine hits that people
01:27:52.460 get from the attention and the clicks and that overrides whatever internal, uh, whatever internal
01:28:00.460 self-esteem, whatever a sense of dignity a person may have, uh, a woman may have in this case,
01:28:06.440 it gets, uh, completely shouted down, you know, in, in their processes, uh, in their, in their
01:28:13.000 thinking about this by, I know this is going to get a lot of attention. I'm going to get a lot of
01:28:17.060 clicks. And if I don't do it, my competitors are doing right. If, if I'm not in the public eye,
01:28:23.960 you know, you can kind of tell like who really wants to be in the public eye because they'll appear
01:28:27.600 in the daily mail, like so-and-so like on their fishing trip, uh, paparazzi isn't really a thing
01:28:34.100 anymore. Okay. We're looking at you. She's the queen of it. Oh, I just happened to get caught
01:28:39.480 on my yacht in this perfectly posed position. I, my love affair is real. Who is it? I didn't hear
01:28:45.560 you. JLo. JLo. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. No, absolutely. That's what I'm saying. Like you can tell who
01:28:50.840 sets up, Oh, like this person just caught going to get coffee. It's like, you actually weren't
01:28:55.880 cause you, your publicist called them and you want to be seen and you want this to be, um,
01:29:00.940 and she would show up to the opening of an envelope. She would never miss a chance to be
01:29:05.320 on camera. The only people, those pictures of those celebrities are real when they're very fat
01:29:09.280 and old and they're like this celebrity looking amazing on her way to Starbucks, which is the
01:29:15.600 daily mails way of just getting the photo on and not being called mean. If ever, if anyone thought I
01:29:20.880 wasn't a Christie gnome fan, let me tell you, I think that Jennifer Lopez is the most overrated
01:29:25.440 celebrity across the board, probably in my lifetime. Like I, she is not a good actor. She is not a good
01:29:30.800 singer. She is from what I can tell, not a very nice person from what I read. I don't know. I've
01:29:35.700 never met her, but in terms of her work, her work is overwhelmingly trash. Her songs are terrible. Her
01:29:40.220 movies, she can't act her way out of a paper bag. And she's famous because she was a Latin star at a
01:29:45.560 time when there you go back and look, you know, you can see there was an explosion of interest in,
01:29:51.040 uh, in sort of like Latin celebrities around the JLo era. Um, and Selena had died.
01:29:56.560 Yeah. I mean, I mean, Selena had good songs, uh, but yes, Selena had, Selena had been killed,
01:30:02.700 I think by her manager, right. It's a horrible story. Uh, but anyway, yeah, I think Jennifer
01:30:06.880 Lopez is, is, uh, the most overrated like actress musician probably since, since I've been alive.
01:30:12.880 And then I would just say on the social media and the getting naked thing. Um, you know, I, I,
01:30:18.260 I do wish that there was a little bit more of a, uh, of a voice. Like, I think that there are people
01:30:24.920 who could weigh in on this that would be listened to, uh, who could say, you know, Hey ladies,
01:30:29.700 like we really don't need to do that. Um, but they don't want the heat from the people that are
01:30:34.700 going to say, this is how it is. Like the degradation of the culture becomes a self-fulfilling
01:30:39.460 prophecy because the people who benefit from it, keep doing it. Other people feel like they have to
01:30:44.840 compete with them. And the people who still maintain their dignity and have a voice are like,
01:30:50.200 I just want to have a peaceful, happy life. And I don't want the lunatics all in my mentions or
01:30:55.220 sending me emails or worse, you know, death threats or whatever it may be. So, uh, I hope that that
01:31:00.600 changes. Um, I think that's true in sports too, by the way. It is one thing to go out and do a saucy
01:31:06.760 picture. This Emily Ratajkowski is incredibly gorgeous. And I'm sure people, there's a reason
01:31:12.160 people pay to look at her, but to just really put your ass on display in public at one of like the
01:31:19.960 seasons events, you know, of the year where you're supposed to be making a, like a legitimate
01:31:24.540 fashion statement. And your statement is, look at my naked ass, look at my naked boobs.
01:31:29.600 It's like an arms race. It's like an arms race, but a butts race. You know what I mean? Like it's,
01:31:35.160 it's if one of them, one of them is showing a little bit of the booty and the other one is
01:31:39.740 showing a little more of the boob. And this is kind of what ends up, what ends up happening.
01:31:43.720 And then, and then leave it to the Kardashians to always take it next level. I cannot stand their
01:31:48.520 influence on American culture. I cannot. So Kim Kardashian, who again, denies that she's had any
01:31:56.040 work done. It's a lie. Oh, of course. I mean, that's like, that's like liver King saying he
01:32:02.980 didn't take steroids kind of alive. But anyway, keep going. Sure. Her waist here has got, hopefully
01:32:09.540 we can get a more clear picture of it because it is like, you could get, it's like this. You could get
01:32:14.580 your hands around it. What two hands could go around the waist. She must have like three corsets
01:32:19.220 on. She had a famous, famous corset on a couple of years ago where she admitted she took breathing
01:32:23.820 classes and how to wear it. And once again, she goes out and creates this image like, Oh, it's just
01:32:31.040 me. You know, I just dieted. I don't believe it. I mean, she looks like she's had a rib removed.
01:32:36.380 I swear something's gone wrong. And she's always looking for the next level of attention.
01:32:41.120 Uh, that is not a healthy image to be projecting to American girls. She doesn't give a shit. She's
01:32:48.380 writing these pictures and her quote image all the way to the bank. So she was there,
01:32:54.200 her sister with like the Madonna breasts, like the pointy bra. That was the younger billionaire one,
01:33:00.640 Kylie. The mom was there and that's perfect for what this event is attention and, and they'll do
01:33:07.780 anything for it. Unfortunately, it's been incredibly lucrative for them. Um, but you know, I have,
01:33:13.400 and I know we're like running short on time, but I live in Miami. Um, and I mean, I'm a pretty,
01:33:19.120 maybe I'm a pretty traditional guy, but you really get, you're on the forefront of some of these very
01:33:25.240 negative trends for women down here. I didn't even know what a Brazilian butt lift was until I moved
01:33:30.220 here. I mean that seriously. And now I will see, you will see. Yeah. I do not watch the real housewives.
01:33:36.180 I will see, uh, women and it's the same. They have the Kardashian, uh, super tiny waist. And I
01:33:41.540 have friends here in the fitness industry. They're just buddies of mine. And they'll talk about, um,
01:33:45.680 and you know, I know guys who are also surgeons, classic surgeons. We'll talk about how
01:33:49.260 they've done procedures there. And then they've made these enormous derrières, sometimes even sort
01:33:55.320 of putting a, an implant under the muscle. It's a dangerous surgery. It's actually has a pretty high
01:34:00.160 compensation risk. And there's something very obtuse about the, about the aesthetics involved in this.
01:34:05.660 Like, why do you have to create a fake artificial butt? I think that I didn't know I was going to
01:34:10.180 be talking about this today, by the way, but also the, uh, the tattoos and the plastic surgery,
01:34:16.140 um, are also for women are out of control. I was going to say it's out of control. I, I, I,
01:34:21.980 I, you know, aesthetics are about moderation at some level. It's about, you know, what's within
01:34:25.700 bounds and it's gotten, I've never, women, they've got little tiny tattoos everywhere.
01:34:30.140 They've got so much done. All they're trying to convince all these women to start doing Botox
01:34:34.760 at like 22. Now I'm sure you, you know, you've heard about this and get cut preventative, but
01:34:40.320 all this stuff. I'm like, what ladies same with guys just being normal. I mean, look at Ben Affleck
01:34:46.000 guys are doing this too. I don't want to make just about women. They're, they're making,
01:34:49.600 they look like freaks. They are paying tens of thousands of dollars to look like freaks.
01:34:54.760 Why Ben Affleck showed up at the Tom Brady roast the other night and he was, I don't know what he
01:35:01.860 did to his face. There was speculation. He either had a facelift or he got heavily Botoxed or he got
01:35:06.960 filler. I don't know, but I really prefer my men to be men and I want to be the pretty one. I don't
01:35:14.060 want my, my man to be the pretty one getting as many procedures as I'm getting. And I really don't
01:35:19.320 want him to be in a dress. And yet, Buck, that leads me to the men last night. They're, look at
01:35:27.840 this. Are these men? What are these? Okay. I'm going to show you on the left. We have a Jordan
01:35:33.480 Roth. Okay. He was in this full length flower gown. Um, I don't know who that is. Is that Jordan
01:35:39.420 Roth? I'm looking at a different picture in my packet. Look at this. Is that a nun?
01:35:44.520 Are men. I don't even know who these people are, but look at this. It looks like a bride. Okay.
01:35:50.520 Look at this guy. Full length flower gown. Where, what happened to the men, Buck? Where are they?
01:35:58.540 Well, the society elevates, um, uh, anti-masculinity. I mean, that's part of our society does pop culture
01:36:06.260 does. Um, and it's, there's, there's a really in-depth conversation that is ongoing. And I think
01:36:12.640 very much worth having about why that is. I think that masculinity is inherently a challenge to,
01:36:18.080 uh, centralized, centralized government and totalitarian control, which I think that the
01:36:23.220 leftist ideology in this country absolutely wants to achieve. So strong men stand in the way of their
01:36:28.720 ability to just make us all, you know, cows that are, are fed and maintained and we're safe and warm
01:36:34.860 and don't ask any questions to borrow from, uh, Solzhenitsyn. Um, and I, I think that, uh, we're seeing
01:36:40.860 that this is something that people are ideologically pushing, even though it doesn't sell. I mean,
01:36:45.560 you know, everyone can see this. Like you make top gun, you make a kick-ass movie about,
01:36:49.680 you know, being, being a bad-ass and doing great things and the heroes and everything else. You
01:36:54.440 make a ton of money. They don't want to do that. They want to do this. They want to have guys.
01:36:58.060 No one wants to see this. They want to have guys. No woman wants to be taken to bed by these guys
01:37:03.140 either. And I don't know that they want to go with women either. Um, it was a disaster. It was a fail.
01:37:07.900 And the big headline out of most of the publications was it was a bore, which is the
01:37:12.600 worst thing you can be. Buck Sexton, you were not. You're the opposite of all those things.
01:37:16.440 It was wonderful to see you. Great to see you. I always have so much fun. Thank you for having me.
01:37:21.200 Same. Okay. Before we go, I want to tell you about Doug Brunt's latest podcast. Speaking of my
01:37:27.080 husband, Doug Brunt, um, it's his latest podcast episode and he's now launched a YouTube. Okay. And he's
01:37:34.320 would love for you to subscribe. If you'd like to see my interview with Doug, you can go subscribe
01:37:39.780 to his podcast, which is called dedicated with Doug Brunt, or you can go to youtube.com
01:37:45.540 slash dedicated with Doug because his podcast is called dedicated. It's about authors and he
01:37:50.880 interviews really fun people and they do drinks and they're quick. I think you find them really
01:37:54.620 interesting. Here's a little bit of my sit down with Doug Brunt person today that you most want to
01:38:01.600 interview. That's easy. There's no one who comes close to this person. Ooh. Yeah. Literally
01:38:06.780 everybody would watch that. They would. Most fun interview you've ever had. You know, when I hear
01:38:11.540 that one of those guys is coming up, one of those shows, I get, I get excited. I get happy. One piece
01:38:15.920 of advice for the audience. Is that like an R rated way to end? Are people picturing something naughty?
01:38:20.700 Thanks for betting me. Good times.
01:38:22.600 I think you'll enjoy it. Doug's always smart and entertaining and does a great interview. And
01:38:31.160 today's was just super fun. And in that interview, you will hear the answer to that tease I gave you
01:38:36.240 a couple of weeks ago, which is which celebrity did Doug mistake at one of these big galas for a
01:38:42.540 homeless person? The answer, you can find it at youtube.com slash dedicated with Doug. We'll see you
01:38:49.420 tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Megan Kelly show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.