00:07:32.200A lot to unpack here. We're going to bring in our Kelly's Court panel in a moment. But first,0.99
00:07:37.620someone who knows more about this case than just about anyone, Howard Bloom,
00:07:41.500the author of When the Night Comes Falling, which is all about this case.
00:07:45.640when it comes to supplements there are two things that matter that it works that you can trust it
00:07:53.080rather than just tell you about relief factor we often bring you what their real customers have to
00:07:58.100say about them one jim said he ran out of relief factor twice and both times his aches stiffness
00:08:03.600and pain came back once he restarted it he says he felt better again as jim puts it quote you know
00:08:09.500something's working when you run out of it they make it easy to find out if you will be the next
00:08:14.020person telling Relief Factor about how much it helps you tackle your daily aches and pain.
00:08:18.300Three weeks for just $17.76. Simply go to relieffactor.com or call 1-800-4-RELIEF.
00:08:27.480That's 1-800, the number four, RELIEF. You'll connect with their friendly local team and they
00:08:32.160will do everything they can to help you. And maybe you'll be sharing your Relief Factor story with
00:08:37.480them soon too. Howard, welcome back. It's great to see you. Nice to see you too. Are you surprised
00:08:43.160to see Kohlberger's own hand writing this motion to get his guilty plea withdrawn.
00:08:50.840Not really. It was just a matter of time before he wanted to get back into the spotlight. And
00:08:56.820we all saw the pleadings last year. He was just setting the stage for this. The chickens have
00:09:03.140come home to roost. When the prosecutor didn't ask for an allocution, when they didn't have
00:09:08.500the questions that still remain demand answers as to why did this happen? Why this house? Why
00:09:15.060these kids? Well, it just sets the stage for Kohlberger's next move. I believe at this moment
00:09:21.560he's sitting in his cell laughing and planning out his next move after this.
00:09:28.260What do you think led to this? I mean, do you think he's been in prison for a year now? He
00:09:32.340just can't stand the conditions? Or what do you think? I think, yes, he clearly can't stand the
00:09:37.460conditions, and that's pretty good. At least that's somewhat gratifying, I would think,
00:09:42.940to the families of the victims. But he's been playing this very carefully. He cozied up to his
00:09:50.880defense team. He let them put their hands around him in court, and then he pleads guilty. And yet
00:09:58.160he now is able to turn on them. He's able to say that they betrayed him. He has no compunctions
00:10:05.580about this. And I think he's waiting very carefully. As I said before, he has a real
00:10:11.720power. He's the only one, the only one who knows what happened that night. And he's going to play
00:10:18.120that power for what it's worth. The time will come when he reveals more. It will be a slow process.
00:10:25.080He's going to let it all spill out carefully until he gets up to his big reveal. And what's
00:10:30.440his big reveal? Well, it's something you and I have discussed before. I believe that there was
00:10:35.240an accomplice. And I think the facts point in that direction. I mean, this this would be such
00:10:40.720a huge bombshell. It would rattle the country if that were true. But I know this isn't just
00:10:46.420Howard Bloom speculation. You have very good reasons for believing he actually may have had
00:10:52.980somebody commit this crime with him. And Brian Kohlberger may even have been in the assistant
00:11:00.300position when it came to these four murders as opposed to the lead.
00:11:04.720Yes, I believe that, you know, Kohlberger didn't have an accomplice. He, in fact, was the
00:11:10.680accomplice. But, you know, how do I come to that conclusion? I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm
00:11:16.920a reporter by training, worked at the New York Times for many years. I believe in facts. And
00:11:22.880these facts just don't add up. This is what brought us to this present juncture. Let's look
00:11:29.900for starters, quite simply, at the timeline. Four people were killed, two different floors of the
00:11:36.000house, within nine to ten minutes. And then you get the forensic reports. One person was stabbed
00:11:42.16054 times, another one 32 times. Two people fought back. Noses were broken. There was real carnage.
00:11:51.620It would be impossible for one person to have done that within the nine to ten minute frame
00:11:56.660in a dark house on two floors, a house where he had never been in before, according to the
00:12:02.280prosecutor. There was also a question about whether there had been attempts to clean up
00:12:07.500the crime scene. And if that had happened, there's a serious question about how on earth
00:12:13.720he possibly could have done that in that limited time frame.
00:12:17.300Exactly. I mean, there's also a question of where the bodies stage. There's questions that
00:12:22.100bodies were actually moved. Who did that? Could he have killed these poor four young victims and
00:12:28.340then move bodies, clean up afterwards? There's so many unanswered questions. And this case
00:12:34.460should not have gone to a plea deal without these questions being resolved. And as I said,
00:12:39.560now these chickens are coming home to roost and Koberger is going to try to exploit it as best he
00:12:45.000can. Howard, you reported that the knife sheath, which has been the subject of so many reports and
00:12:51.620so much speculation, did have Kohlberger's touch DNA on the snap, as we've known for quite some
00:12:57.600time. But you reported not long ago that there was another person's DNA on the knife sheath
00:13:07.340and that there was another person's DNA throughout the house in a couple of spots,
00:13:13.540male DNA, unknown DNA. We have never compared, but go on, explain what you're talking about.
00:13:19.240There is a spot of male DNA. That was never followed up by the authorities because, well,
00:13:25.940you don't ask questions when you don't want to know the answers. They had zeroed in
00:13:29.540on Koberger. They thought he was their man, so they did not want to find out what this
00:13:34.600possibly could mean. It might complicate their case. Then there was other male DNA found in the
00:13:41.520house on a stairwell and also on a glove outside the house. And again, these have never been
00:13:48.200examined. And there's been never a very convincing, at least to me, explanation about why these weren't
00:13:54.280examined. And this sets the stage for doubts. We have a large vacuum. And the prosecution before,
00:14:02.440as I said at the beginning of this, could have cleared everything up at the beginning
00:14:06.840by demanding answers if Kohlberger wants his plea deal. Now Kohlberger will drag this all out,
00:14:13.000Dropping pieces of information, I believe, over the over the years ahead, bit by bit, as he builds up to his great reveal when he gets completely bored.
00:14:23.440I mean, it's really like we're getting into this now because he's demanding to withdraw his guilty plea.
00:14:28.800He wants a trial. He says he understands that puts the death penalty back on the table.
00:14:32.600He doesn't care. And of course, we're going to bring in our lawyers in a minute.
00:14:36.940And many lawyers responded with a laugh to this petition, saying this is a this is a frustrated, unhappy life sentence guy who's just trying to get a get out of jail free pass for a few weeks or maybe even a day for a hearing.
00:14:51.160But we we would like to actually look at whether the guy has a shot, you know, whether he does have evidence that could be considered if he if he's able to convince the court he does deserve another shot.
00:15:04.700And that's where you come in, because you've been taking a fair look at what's out there.
00:15:08.740What he's claiming in his motion, Howard, is that Ethan Chapin, one of his victims, had a clump of hair in his hand at the time he was killed and that this was not shared with him, Brian Kohlberger, by his counsel.
00:15:25.300Now, we have reason to dispute that, but that's one of the main reasons he's claiming he deserves a new trial.
00:15:30.240Right. And that the clump of hair was, they never tested the DNA of that hair, but they did make a presumption based on scientific evidence that that bit of hair belonged to Ethan, had come from his sheets or whatever.
00:15:46.180But again, this is one of the many questions that the government, the prosecution, never tried to answer because they did not want to know the answers.
00:15:55.820They had their case. And from the very beginning, they wanted it just to go away. Just the way they tore down the murder house. They couldn't wait to get it leveled, turn that house into a concrete lot. They wanted to concrete this whole thing over. And now Brian Koberger, stuck in jail, bored, unhappy with his surroundings, unhappy with the choices, is now going to torment them once again. Bit by bit, I believe he's going to start revealing things.
00:16:22.100there is an author named christopher whitcomb a former fbi agent who came out with a book
00:16:27.960in april about the kohlberger case and he highlighted this issue of the hair in ethan's
00:16:34.240hand when ethan died and he reported that ethan had a closed fist that had relaxed slightly
00:16:42.180and that they found this hair in his hand about six inches in length that it was dark blonde
00:16:49.240light brown with a reddish tint, that Brian Kohlberger's hair does not fit any of these
00:16:54.420characteristics, and that more of the same hair was found by a defense expert in blood
00:16:59.760on a bed frame two years after the murders.
00:17:03.740It was never even taken as evidence by authorities and tested at all, ever.
00:17:08.800What appears to have happened is a defense expert named Brent Turvey apparently was going
00:17:17.700to testify to this or found this. He's spoken, we believe, to Christopher Whitcomb, who's written a
00:17:23.800book based in part on what Brent Turvey, the would-be defense expert, told him. And Brian
00:17:29.140Kohlberger has clearly read this book or heard Christopher Whitcomb on his press tour because
00:17:34.200now he comes forward saying, oh my God, there was hair in Ethan Chapin's hand that didn't match me
00:17:39.400or Ethan or anyone at the crime scene. So how could I not have been told this? And yet, Howard,
00:17:45.580what we have is an affidavit that was submitted by the defense in this case prior to the plea.
00:17:53.980It was dated June 6th, 2025. A stipulated motion to the admission of additional exhibits as
00:18:01.400evidence at trial comes now Brian Kohlberger by and through his attorneys of record and hereby
00:18:06.620submits to the court stipulation to the defense's admission of two additional exhibits described for
00:18:10.700the record as Exhibit D-1062 and FBI Lab Report 4. And what item number three is, is debris from
00:18:20.300right hand of Ethan J. Chapin. So he's going to have a tough time, Howard, convincing a court
00:18:25.880that he didn't know anything about that hair since he submitted it to the court in an exhibit
00:18:32.180dated June 6, 2025. And also the defense mitigates that hair. The defense introduced evidence by one
00:18:40.440of their experts saying that hair could be traced to Chapin. But there is a lot in that book that
00:18:46.320needs to be addressed. There's a lot in that book that is important. It raises many questions. It
00:18:52.440raises, again, questions about the timeline. It raises, again, the lack of motive. The prosecution
00:18:59.580would like you to believe that he just picked this house at random. You don't go into a house
00:19:04.900and random when you see five cars parked in front. You've just seen a delivery of food at 4 a.m. so
00:19:11.100you know someone's awake. You don't go up the staircase that isn't where it wouldn't be your
00:19:19.260natural entry into the house. You're going to a specific bedroom. He does all this and we don't
00:19:25.040know why. There's one person who does know why and that's Brian Koberger and in time he's going to
00:19:30.220reveal this. But again, it's going to be a steady drop of information. He's going to torment us,
00:19:35.800play with us. He's going to play with the families of the victims.
00:19:41.000Howard, on the subject of the timeline, you know, according to the prosecution,
00:19:45.580he entered the second floor sliding glass door when he committed these murders at approximately
00:19:50.8804.07 a.m. His car was seen speeding away from the neighborhood at 4.20 a.m., which left him
00:19:57.26013 minutes. You reported that Moscow police performed two reenactments of this, two test
00:20:05.500runs, if you will. And on each occasion, the officers demonstrated that one killer could
00:20:10.060indeed accomplish four fatal stabbings within the allotted time. But you write, this does not take
00:20:15.680into consideration the time that would have elapsed after the killer walked out of the sliding
00:20:21.840kitchen door, that the timeline is actually shorter than 13 minutes and does leave us with
00:20:28.540questions about whether one person could have committed the crimes in that time.
00:20:32.360Also, the Moscow police who did this test, they had been in the house before. They knew the house.
00:20:38.320There's no proof the Coburg was ever there. They did the house in daylight, not in darkness. And
00:20:43.780they certainly, the test they did just involved stabbing the victims once or twice, not the 54
00:20:50.980times in one case, the 32 times in another case, and then beating the person so severely that her
00:20:58.080face was unrecognizable. And also the prosecutor has said that it's very likely another weapon
00:21:03.580was used. They didn't do any of this in their tests. Their tests were really not sufficient.
00:21:11.240They raised more questions than they answered. Right, because you, in a piece you've done,
00:21:17.000all you're reporting is at airmail and it's excellent. And, and you dropped this not a few
00:21:21.400months ago, but you, you went through how Zanna was stabbed more than 50 times and had many
00:21:27.900defensive wounds. She fought back. Kaylee Gonsalves was stabbed more than 20 times. Her family says
00:21:32.96034 times. She also fought back and that his response was ferocious and brutal. There was
00:21:39.160evidence of asphyxia injuries, meaning she had been strangled, perhaps gagged. There were blunt
00:21:44.780forced trauma injuries. Her nose had been broken, her face beaten beyond recognition.
00:21:49.520Madison Mogan and Ethan Chapin were both stabbed multiple times. And there's a question about
00:21:54.620whether that level of carnage could have been done by one person in nine minutes or whether
00:22:01.920there was somebody else potentially involved. And Howard, did you ask somebody connected with
00:22:09.500the case about whether there was an accomplice? You reported about one knowledgeable official who
00:22:16.080did not want to be identified in what this person told you. I've asked many people involved in the
00:22:20.920case, do you think there is an accomplice? And what they'll say on and off the record,
00:22:25.260the closest you'll get on the record is, we just don't want to revisit it. This is over and done
00:22:30.660with. And yet they will say off the record, there are a lot of doubts. We still have doubts,
00:22:36.600but we just wanted it to go away. I mean, the people of Idaho, the taxpayers have paid $8.5
00:22:42.480million, according to the estimates in the local newspapers for this case. And yet they really
00:22:48.540have not got the answers they deserve or that the families deserve.
00:22:54.380Right. I mean, you were reporting that the guy said, quote, if we said there was an accomplice,
00:22:59.940we'd look like fools for negotiating the plea bargain. The truth is we made a deal to avoid
00:23:04.660the time and expense of a trial, but there is a lot we don't know or that we will ever know.
00:23:11.920Okay. Thank you so much, Howard. We appreciate all of your great reporting. We're going to bring in
00:23:16.560our legal panel in one second, but I just want to tell you, let me give you a little highlight of
00:23:20.220what he writes. First of all, he gave this statement to the New York Times and it reads
00:23:24.200as follows. Over a year later, this is Brian Kohlberger writing. It is self-evident that in
00:23:29.380state v. Kohlberger, justice was not served. Unanswered questions seem to multiply with each
00:23:35.160piece of discovery unsealed, and the public demands the truth. Unfortunately, the truth
00:23:40.280shall never be derived from the state's myopic narrative, a work of fiction which has yet to
00:23:45.520evolve since the PCA, that's the probable cause affidavit, was released nearly four years ago,
00:23:51.160and its faulty premises were never challenged at trial. I mean, why was that again? Why was the
00:23:58.800state's premise, not challenged a trial. Oh yeah, because you pleaded guilty. You decided to waive
00:24:03.440your right to a trial. You had that right and you decided not to do it. You didn't want to take the
00:24:07.500risk. This is ridiculous. He makes it sound like someone forced the settlement upon him, which is0.99
00:24:11.860in fact what he seems to be suggesting happened. Circumnavigated, as I read this earlier, by a
00:24:17.020broken plea, suggesting that it was broken, I guess, by the prosecution. The trial never provided
00:24:23.500the public the clarity conducive to closure, and justice shall remain abjectly miscarried
00:32:47.780No, but if he's going to then amplify that, it is not.
00:32:52.040But the way you read it, it was described as debris.
00:32:56.100If he then kind of fleshes that out and starts to talk about, look, they didn't tell me there was a hair.
00:33:04.000They didn't tell me it was an unknown origin.
00:33:06.040They didn't tell me and nobody tested that hair to see whether or not it was for, you know, on something that is basically mitochondrial DNA, which is what the hair is.
00:33:19.520If they had tested that and they had excluded him to the point that that suggested somebody else, he's got some he's got some things to talk about.
00:33:31.040But as right now, as drafted and right now in this kind of rambling nature, no judge is going to grant anything he's needs.
00:33:41.080And I suspect and I was also speculated last night, I think, by Steve, that he has money on the books and that maybe he's attempting to get some lawyer to parachute in to potentially kind of flesh this out.
00:33:57.060But it is. He is asking for he's asking for a court appointed lawyer. He's saying that they ask, are you requesting the appointment of counsel? He says, yes. Are you seeking to proceed in former pauperous? In other words, are you too poor to afford a lawyer? Yes. And since he seems to be suggesting Ann Taylor was ineffective, right? He doesn't use the words ineffective assistance of counsel. That's clearly where he's going.
00:34:21.340what will happen now, Ashley? Will the judge, before he denies this out of hand, say,
00:34:28.860okay, here's a new lawyer to properly raise these claims for you before I deny them?
00:34:35.360Most likely the judge will give him a new lawyer. He's not constitutionally entitled to a new
00:34:39.480lawyer. This is a collateral plea. This is a collateral post-conviction matter. You're only
00:34:44.740entitled to counsel on the actual direct appeal. And he waived that. So he didn't have an appeal.
00:34:49.180He's not entitled to a lawyer, but oftentimes judges in cases like this that are complex,
00:34:53.700they will appoint a lawyer, quite frankly, to make their job easier because it is difficult
00:34:58.200to communicate with someone who's in custody. You see these pro se filings, it's just much
00:35:02.880easier to deal with a lawyer. So we could probably see that. I also think what we'll see is we'll see
00:35:07.440a petition to have this hair tested because right now he's saying, oh, well, it's exculpatory
00:35:11.580evidence. No, it's not. It's potentially exculpatory evidence, if it even is. And so
00:35:16.760he's got the burden in this post-conviction. Brian Koberger has the burden. So he's got to
00:35:20.900get this evidence tested to see if it actually is exculpatory. And, you know, I don't even see
00:35:25.960how, if it was someone else's DNA, how that would even be exculpatory. But the first thing I would
00:35:31.060do, if God forbid I was appointed to represent him at this point, is get that hair tested.
00:35:36.260Well, it does say it was tested. It says in the defense motion, like that his lawyer filed on
00:35:44.680June 6, 2025, as they stipulate to the admission of this exhibit, which includes debris from
00:35:51.700right hand of Ethan Chapin, they write items submitted from Ethan Chapin, and they list
00:35:56.800a few items from Kaylee, from all the victims.
00:35:59.280And then they write that these exhibits were examined for hairs, microscopically consistent
00:36:07.280with hairs in the head hair sample from Brian Kohlberger.
00:36:13.220so they're saying in this motion his lawyer that that hair was examined that it did not match
00:36:21.240brian kohlberger's hair so like yeah this was already done he the best he could be alleging
00:36:26.440here ashley is that ann taylor his lawyer didn't tell him that one of the victims had a clump of
00:36:32.760hair in his hand and it didn't match you which is potentially exculpatory right who did it match
00:36:38.220Like the description of those hairs, as I read from that guy, Christopher Wickholm, who was speaking with a defense lawyer or sorry, an offense, a defense witness who was going to take the stand, describes short, like reddish blonde hairs, six inches in length, which don't match anyone involved in this case.
00:36:56.220So I can see how they would be potentially exculpatory. But Ann Taylor told him to take the plea. That seems to be his beef. Like she didn't tell me. And I would have liked to have had the chance to argue this.
00:37:07.460Right. And that's what he's saying and that's what he's hoping to hang his hat on. But at best, let's say that this hair is someone else's. Let's say it's not one of the victims, which is what I would test for immediately. I would test it against the victims because most likely it's from one of them. Maybe, you know, maybe they Brian Koberger had it on his body from another victim. And so this this victim got it on his body. There are a lot of different ways that it could happen. It's not necessarily exculpatory if it's someone else's hair. All it means is he had an accomplice, which doesn't mean that he didn't do it.
00:37:35.780It just means that maybe there's more to the story.
01:00:42.340Officials say he had linked with the Islamic State militant group and was known to domestic intelligence.
01:00:49.320But the motivation for this attack remains unclear.
01:00:52.820We do not want this deed to be instrumentalized for political ends.
01:00:59.160We don't want any groups to be placed under suspicion for this.
01:01:02.940Trump is showing us how easy it is to stampede on our rights.
01:01:08.220And this is something that we have to avoid.
01:01:11.000What I can say is the people who were celebrating about this were all white men, young white men, with crosses in their profiles.0.82
01:01:21.540My immediate thought when I saw the news was that it was a right-wing, white supremacist extremist.0.89
01:01:28.740To queer people, there's no real difference whether you're Muslim or you're Christian.0.99
01:01:34.840There's no difference between Muslims and Christians when it comes to gays, Dan.1.00
01:01:39.900I mean, yes, it's true. You can't get married in the Catholic Church. It's really not the same0.97
01:01:44.620thing as running through Paris, stabbing everyone to death in the name of Allah.
01:01:49.660No, I'm Christian and I'm actually Catholic, Megan. So yeah, I can't get married in the
01:01:55.640Catholic Church. Guess what? I'm okay about that. What I'm not okay about, Megan, is these Islamists
01:02:03.160who now surround me every time I leave the house being taught within a mosque that it is okay.1.00
01:02:09.900to push me off the top of the building. I'm okay with that. But I look at those people and I just1.00
01:02:13.960think, oh my God, they're straight from central casting, aren't they? You know, the mustache,
01:02:18.120the pink hair. They probably have a set to piercing.
01:02:20.440That guy that Freddie Mercury wannabe at the end.
01:02:22.520Yeah. And it's like, I'm sorry, are you okay with your sisters being raped by Pakistani Muslim men1.00
01:02:30.120and then that being covered up? Are you okay with your mom being at risk of being killed at the1.00
01:02:35.080local supermarket i cannot understand it i cannot understand it and for me this has just become0.98
01:02:41.960such a fundamental issue because as i say the islamists are not trying to hide the desire to0.95
01:02:47.000take over the united kingdom i mean do you really think americans would be okay if for the fourth
01:02:53.140year running the number one baby name in every state of america was muhammad well that is the
01:03:01.180situation we are in in the united kingdom and it's like this willful blindness to not understand0.51
01:03:07.620what's happening and because of demographic change and just the reality of the muslim people in this0.98
01:03:14.040country megan they are breeding like rabbits and white christian people are not so this takeover0.98
01:03:20.800is not a fantasy it's not it's not a conspiracy it is a demographic reality and you're not allowed0.64
01:03:28.380to fight for your own culture. It's like, if you say, look, I actually think it's good to have
01:03:33.980Great Britain be a Christian country or America be a Christian country. You're a bigot. If you say,0.95
01:03:38.300I don't really want to be taken over by Muslims who view the world very differently than we do.0.98
01:03:43.140You're a bigot. It's like, you know what? Who cares? You have to get to the point where you0.96
01:03:46.760clearly are. And I am too, which is, I don't care if you're offended. I have nothing against regular
01:03:51.800Muslim people. I have Muslim friends. They're darling, absolutely darling. They're not political.
01:03:56.940They're not that observant. I'm going to be honest. And there is a very clear distinction between your run of the mill Muslim citizen and capital I Islam, because it does come in with an agenda and it includes some of the things that you said.
01:04:11.680And the more radical and the more political and active that they are, the more danger certain people are, whether it's Christians or gays, what have you.
01:04:21.440Yeah, but this is, and this is not a, I mean, I completely agree with you, but this is not a fantasy anymore that we are at threat for talking about this.
01:04:29.680I mean, I saw your episode with my friend Alex Phillips talking about the assassination of Anne Whittakam, but I was also good friends with Anne Whittakam.
01:04:38.580You remember when I launched my GB News show, Megan, and I was very, very determined to bring a small pool of people who were going to be on the show every week.
01:04:45.380You were one of them and you very kindly agreed to do that from the launch of the show.
01:04:50.740But the other Megan was Anne Whittakin.
01:04:53.880And so we became very close over the course of my three years on GB News.
01:04:58.940She appeared on the show once or twice a week.
01:05:01.700You know, a bit of a grandmother figure, really, to me.
01:05:04.860She was one of the only people alongside you who actually stood up for me when I was sacked by GB News.
01:09:11.980I mean, Allah sent me seems pretty seems pretty on the nose.0.83
01:09:16.500I'm not officially a detective, but I can get there.0.98
01:09:19.380So what happens now? Because I know that there is a push by some to say all those immigrants who came when Angela Merkel opened the doors of Germany to anyone and everyone who then migrated everywhere throughout Europe.
01:09:34.500And it wasn't just Germany in her defense, but they were the worst. We're going to strip them of their if they have dual citizenship as a result of coming here and trying to, like, you know, get into the UK and get a UK passport.0.89
01:09:46.200We're going to take it away, like actually go back to Syria, actually get out like we don't want you in this country anymore.0.99
01:09:54.220You didn't assimilate. You didn't join us. You tried to take us over. And it's a no.1.00
01:22:03.640Harry knows that in five years time, it is over for him.
01:22:09.280Because at that point, Prince George steps out of school, becomes the most eligible bachelor in the world,
01:22:15.920the most famous member of the British royal family and Harry knows there is a small and closing
01:22:21.960window in order for him to be able to capitalize on the remaining fame and popularity he has now
01:22:27.940this is not a sort of uh theory this is something that Harry has voiced to a number of allies and
01:22:36.320friends and biographies so he knows that this window is closing he knows he has five years
01:22:43.560He also knows, Meghan, that if Prince William were to come to the throne tomorrow as King William, none of this opportunity for return would be there.
01:22:55.100So he's aware that there is a tight window.
01:22:58.480And it's a tight window for two reasons.
01:23:00.400The health of King Charles, but also the rise of Prince George.
01:23:04.360Because William and Catherine are very clear.
01:23:06.300They want Prince George to have a sheltered childhood.
01:23:09.400so even though we're going to see a little bit more of him the next five years Megan one of the
01:23:13.600reasons that they chose to send him to Eton is because it's the poshest school in the country
01:23:18.040it's where William attended and it's protected right so it's in Windsor they have massive police
01:23:23.980protection I mean one of my friends actually her son is there at the moment so I know a little bit
01:23:28.300how it works at Eton it is a very very controlled place where even the parents Megan don't get the
01:23:35.020opportunity to just go and visit their kids everything is organized and structured so
01:23:40.000basically for the next five years we're only going to see prince george in very small moments like
01:23:45.640william and catherine are slowly introducing him you might uh remember they took him and charlotte
01:23:49.980to the final day of wimbledon but it's going to be gradual the show and they did didn't they but
01:23:56.100we're not going to see a lot of him i noticed then they left little louis at home oh yeah
01:23:59.580He can't sit through a tennis match yet, yet.
01:24:04.800He would have known more than J-Lo did.
01:24:07.300We wouldn't be celebrating America 250 if it weren't for a strong foundation set by the framers.
01:24:13.540Hamilton built America's financial foundation on the principle of sound,
01:24:17.140stable money, a principle later embodied by the gold standard.
01:24:21.720But we abandoned that discipline in 1971, infamously,
01:24:25.880and have since seen inflation erode the dollar's value.
01:24:29.580So what's the foundation of your savings?
01:24:31.860Is it gold or is it something that can be shaken, disrupted, or devalued?
01:24:37.220Birch Gold Group has been helping Americans solidify their savings with gold for the past
01:24:41.38015 years, and they will help you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered