The Megyn Kelly Show - December 05, 2024


MAGA vs. Establishment Over Hegseth, and Key SCOTUS Case About Protecting Kids, with Michael Knowles and AG Skrmetti | Ep. 958


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 40 minutes

Words per minute

172.73853

Word count

17,346

Sentence count

1,206

Harmful content

Misogyny

31

sentences flagged

Toxicity

39

sentences flagged

Hate speech

32

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Pete Hegseth is now in a political dogfight to become President Trump s next defense secretary nominee. Is he a good fit for the job? Or will he be replaced by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a fellow conservative who has long been a supporter of the president-elect?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Your business doesn't move in a straight line.
00:00:02.800 Some days bring growth, others bring challenges.
00:00:05.940 But what if you or a partner needs to step away?
00:00:08.820 When the unexpected happens, count on Canada Life's flexible life and health insurance
00:00:13.680 to help your business keep working, even when you can't.
00:00:17.020 Don't let life's challenges stand in the way of your success.
00:00:20.460 Protect what you've built today.
00:00:22.500 Visit canadalife.com slash business protection to learn more.
00:00:26.280 Canada Life. Insurance. Investments. Advice.
00:00:31.000 Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East.
00:00:42.540 Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:45.820 Well, 24 hours ago, literally this time yesterday, I was in Washington, D.C.
00:00:49.620 for an exclusive sit-down with President-elect Trump's nominee to lead the Defense Department,
00:00:54.100 Pete Hegseth. As you know, Pete's now in a political dogfight to save his nomination.
00:00:59.060 At this point, his future remains unclear. If you believe some in the media, he's done enough now
00:01:04.360 to secure Trump's continued support. Others suggest he does not have the votes and say Trump could pull
00:01:12.200 a switcheroo and name Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in Hegseth's place.
00:01:18.880 Our pal Mark Halperin, who has excellent sources and has been right on just about everything this year,
00:01:24.540 said the following this morning on his show, The Morning Meeting.
00:01:28.880 I heard from a very good source today that by the weekend, Ron DeSantis will be the nominee
00:01:33.480 for Defense Secretary. One source, so I'm not telling you it's definitely true,
00:01:37.300 but that's certainly the case. However, if you go on X, you will see another cavalcade
00:01:42.560 of strong supporters for Hegseth who are making this a test of Donald Trump's fidelity to MAGA,
00:01:52.560 and they find it insulting that someone who MAGA has turned on bigly, Ron DeSantis,
00:01:57.960 would possibly replace someone who casts himself, at least, as full-on MAGA.
00:02:03.380 Mm-hmm. Whatever the case may be, Hegseth is not going down without a fight.
00:02:07.520 This morning, he posted the following on X, quote, Maybe it's time for a Secretary of Defense
00:02:12.840 who has led in combat, been on patrol for days, pulled a trigger, heard bullets whiz by,
00:02:21.080 called in close air support, led medevacs, dodged IEDs, and understands to his core the power of this
00:02:28.820 photo because he's been on that knee before. For those listening to this show on SiriusXM or via
00:02:34.340 podcast, the photo shows two soldiers kneeling in front of a rifle and helmet, honoring a fallen
00:02:40.460 friend. Joining me now, Michael Knowles, host of The Michael Knowles Show.
00:02:45.380 The Tuttle Twins' biggest sale of the year is about to end. You know what makes these books
00:02:49.880 special? They've sold millions of copies to families across the country because they tackle
00:02:55.040 big ideas like free markets, individual liberty, and limited government, explained in a way that kids
00:03:00.780 actually get. This is not just another gift that gets lost in the pile after a month. It's a fun way
00:03:06.760 to make a lasting impact on your children or grandchildren by teaching them principles that
00:03:11.240 truly matter. These books are not just fun to read. They're tools that will help shape how kids
00:03:17.000 see the world, teaching them about entrepreneurship and American values when they need it most.
00:03:22.160 Think about it. Wouldn't you love for your kids and your teens to understand how things really work
00:03:26.740 beyond what they're taught in school? Grab these books now. Check them out at
00:03:30.780 Tuttle, T-U-T-T-L-E, twins.com slash MK. You can even get their entire library right now for 75%
00:03:38.420 off. Just go to TuttleTwins.com slash MK and do hurry because these prices will not last.
00:03:45.960 Michael, welcome back. Great to see you. So if you believe the New York Post,
00:03:50.680 not a single senator is a hard no. But most of the rest of the media is supporting
00:03:58.180 the notion that he right now does not have the votes. And if you believe Senator Blumenthal
00:04:05.060 of Connecticut, he is a Democrat and he is claiming that between five and 10 Republican senators
00:04:14.120 have told him it's a no and they're just waiting for the right time to say that it's a no,
00:04:18.520 which is a weird way to phrase it between five. Was it five or was it 10? I'm not sure what he's
00:04:24.020 trying to do other than tank Pete. But where do you think this stands? And do you think by Monday
00:04:30.800 we're going to have a different nominee? I'm not surprised that the media and Democrats want to
00:04:36.160 tank Pete Hegseth. And to me, that's a real mark of confidence in his nomination. I really like Pete
00:04:42.520 Hegseth. I have known Pete. Pete is one of the first guys that I met when I got into political media.
00:04:48.040 I've known him for years and years. I've been on air with him. I have been off air with him.
00:04:52.960 Every interaction that I've had with this guy is that he's a really terrific guy. And so the knocks
00:04:58.800 on him that have come from the press are that years ago he was a bit of a Casanova and he's never
00:05:04.180 really hid that, I don't think. But if that's the best that they can come up with, they've got some
00:05:09.520 really insane allegations that there's no evidence for whatsoever. If that's the best they can come up
00:05:13.960 with, he seems, I'm going to try to be objective here like I don't know him, he seems like a really,
00:05:19.200 really solid pick. I think it is great for the military. I think it's great for morale to have
00:05:24.680 someone who looks like Pete, who talks like Pete, who thinks like Pete, has Pete's experience to be
00:05:29.980 at charge of the Pentagon. I think it's probably already helping military recruitment and military
00:05:35.300 morale. And so I think he's a solid pick. Now, could Ron DeSantis do the job? Sure. I think Ron
00:05:43.420 DeSantis could do basically any job in the government. So it's really no reflection at all
00:05:47.220 on Ron DeSantis. But I do think there is real political risk here for President Trump. I understand
00:05:53.520 why he accepted Matt Gaetz's removal from the AG nomination. I totally get it. But now there's a
00:06:01.420 little bit of blood in the water as a result of that. And so it seems to me there is a major risk
00:06:06.480 if the defense sec nominee goes down as well, no matter who you replace him with. I don't think
00:06:12.980 that's going to make the sailing any smoother for the Trump administration. I think it's going to
00:06:16.920 bloody up the water even more and make it even tougher to get some of these nominees through.
00:06:21.200 Because if Hegseth were to go down, you know all the attention is next going to be on Bobby Kennedy.
00:06:26.960 Then it's going to be on Tulsi Gabbard. Who knows? It's going to be on Ron DeSantis. If they put
00:06:30.420 Ron DeSantis up for defense secretary, I don't think that ends the problem. I think in many ways
00:06:34.960 it would exacerbate it. I think that's a very interesting point because if you don't think
00:06:40.440 they're going to do this to RFKJ, you haven't been paying attention. I realize that Pete has,
00:06:46.480 you know, his belly is exposed. He has not led a perfect life. And there's plenty if you want to
00:06:51.980 start attacking his character in terms of his marital history and so on. But as he said to me
00:06:57.100 yesterday, he found around 20, I think it was 18 or so, he found his two J's, his wife, Jen,
00:07:04.640 and Jesus, and started changing his life in a profound way. And, you know, by all accounts,
00:07:11.380 since then has really been on the straight and narrow when it comes to the fidelity
00:07:15.000 toward his wife. And, you know, on the drinking, he says, I do drink socially, but I don't have a
00:07:20.900 drinking problem. And I will not let a drop of alcohol touch my lips in this role. Oh, we have
00:07:26.760 that. Okay, let's play it. So if you're in Iraq and Afghanistan in a combat zone, you're not allowed
00:07:31.360 to drink. That's how I view this role as secretary of defense is that I'm not going to have a drink
00:07:36.900 at all. That's not hard for me because it's not a problem for me. But I need to make sure the senators
00:07:41.540 and the troops and President Trump and everybody else knows when you call me 24 seven, you're getting
00:07:47.300 fully dialed in Pete, just like you always did in Iraq and Afghanistan. So this is the biggest
00:07:52.020 deployment of my life. And there won't be a drop of alcohol on my lips while I'm doing it.
00:07:58.760 Okay, so that's Pete now. But here's the thing. Let's say they get Pete's scalp,
00:08:04.220 like they got Matt Gaetz's scalp. Bobby Kennedy's history makes Pete look like the consummate Boy Scout.
00:08:13.240 He looks like he's ready to enter the priesthood. He's a lot older with a lot more of a checkered
00:08:22.100 past. I mean, even Maureen Callahan, who we love and who comes on this show regularly of the Daily
00:08:28.900 Mail, wrote a whole book about the Kennedys, Ask Not, it's called. And she does not spare RFKJ. And she 0.63
00:08:35.700 goes into some detail about the suicide of his first wife, if you just want a little preview for where
00:08:42.280 this is going. It's not going to be pretty at all. So we are really at a crossroads here about whether
00:08:49.540 we are going to sacrifice these nominees because of checkered personal pasts or not. It's not going
00:08:58.700 to get easier after Pete. This is the real issue. And so you hear Pete there come out and he say,
00:09:05.340 I won't drink in the role, which is admirable. But to his point, again, I don't really see any
00:09:11.420 evidence that the man has ever had a serious problem with alcohol, other than that he would
00:09:16.560 drink sometimes, like every member of the military. And well, pretty much just every single person in
00:09:22.460 the country has done at some point. So again, I think that attack was really, really weak. Some of
00:09:26.880 the really ridiculous stuff, I don't even want to state it here, some of the tabloid nonsense without 0.97
00:09:32.700 any evidence. You know, that's crazy. And so, OK, you know, the guy had a lot of girlfriends in the 0.98
00:09:37.700 past. If that is now the standard to tank down nominees, then President Trump might find himself
00:09:44.340 in the same situation. He found himself the first go around, which is that it could take months or
00:09:48.960 years to get even top nominees through. And I don't think we have the time for that.
00:09:54.740 Can we can we talk about it specifically, though? OK, so I'll take them in reverse order.
00:09:58.100 You know, the allegations about Pete and the women forget that bogus rape allegation. I mean,
00:10:04.400 they may try to make some hay out of that on Capitol Hill. Good luck. Good luck, because
00:10:07.520 at some point or another, the Republican senators will read the police report and ideally listen to
00:10:13.780 the hour long in-depth piece we did on this show so they can hear just how this story fell apart.
00:10:19.140 It fell apart. And that's why it wasn't charged. So I'm really not kind of worried about that piece
00:10:22.940 of it, frankly, with with Pete. But the womanizing is admitted. So that's fair game. And they're going
00:10:29.720 to come for him on it. He's cheated on all three of his wives multiple times, according to the reports
00:10:34.120 by on at least one of the wives. And when he got together with his current wife, he was still with
00:10:40.880 his second wife and he impregnated his current wife while still married to the second. And it wasn't
00:10:47.080 until I think she gave birth that the second wife filed for divorce from Pete. That's when things
00:10:52.420 went really south. And those two had an acrimonious divorce proceeding. OK, so that's going to be
00:10:57.820 discussed. It's not great. But Pete's point is that's in the past. And I admit it. I'm not proud
00:11:03.180 of it. So so that's the the cheating. OK, but the the RFKJ, like there was literally a news report,
00:11:14.200 multiple news reports a couple of months ago about him having a digital affair, you know,
00:11:20.600 like a virtual affair with a reporter who was covering him for New York magazine that they
00:11:26.940 were allegedly sexting, that they were having phone sex and that Bobby kept trying to block
00:11:32.860 her in an attempt to be faithful to Cheryl Hines. But they never physically did anything together.
00:11:39.260 But, you know, that is an infidelity. Mediaite reported on other women who Bobby Kennedy was
00:11:45.420 allegedly cheating on Cheryl with like recently. So honestly, to the members of the audience,
00:11:51.920 we need to decide right now, is this fair game or isn't it? Because if we're going to do this,
00:11:57.640 we're going to start knocking nominees out because, as Rich Lowry said, they're Tomcats.
00:12:03.420 It's such a cute colloquial term that we better get used to them all getting knocked out. If this is
00:12:09.820 the then no one's going to be left. I mean, like maybe Ron DeSantis could withstand. But I mean,
00:12:14.600 there are a lot of these guys will have had problems in this lane. Yes. The strangest aspect
00:12:20.060 of the Bobby Kennedy, Olivia Nuzzi digital sexting story is and the part that would seem the least
00:12:27.860 credible to me is the man's a Kennedy. OK, I don't think Kennedy's need to have digital affairs.
00:12:33.240 Last I checked, the Kennedy's have full on blown affairs. And so this is very bad. It's always
00:12:37.620 inexcusable. She lived in New York. I know. Maybe that was I don't know. Don't they have
00:12:42.840 airplanes? It was just strange, given the 70 year history of the Kennedy family. But regardless,
00:12:49.000 it's always bad. It's always inexcusable. There's no there's no defending it in any way.
00:12:53.560 But I think your point, Megan, is is really apt, which is what what is the standard here? First of
00:12:59.320 all, five seconds ago, the Democrats were telling us that marriage doesn't even exist and everything's
00:13:03.260 fluid and we all need to have throuples and quadruples. And Bill Clinton's a paragon of
00:13:07.520 moral virtue and what, you know, stay out of our bedroom and whatever nonsense they were saying. 0.57
00:13:12.100 Now, of course, the situation's totally changed. And I don't know. It seems to me that if we're
00:13:17.940 going to have a standard, it needs to be a consistent standard. And just from practical politics,
00:13:23.140 how much chum are we going to throw into the water for these guys? Because it's going to be a really
00:13:28.900 tough fight in any administration. A president needs to replace about 5000 people in the government.
00:13:36.080 If you really want to make serious changes to a bureaucracy that counts into the millions,
00:13:40.160 you probably need to swap out 40 to 50,000 people. Now, a relatively small number needs Senate
00:13:44.660 confirmation. But a lot of those people are going to get a lot of publicity. So how high are we going
00:13:49.920 to set these standards and how much higher are these standards going to be than the Democrats set
00:13:54.280 them? To me, I think the real reason they're going after Pete Hegseth with such intense fervor is
00:13:59.380 because the guy's good on TV. Somehow being good on TV is now considered a negative in some
00:14:04.780 quarters. I don't think that's a negative. I think it's very important if you're in senior
00:14:08.300 administration roles to be able to communicate in a way that is persuasive, that gets the message
00:14:13.540 out there, that moves the ball down the field. And so the guy's got a great military background,
00:14:19.580 seems important for running the Pentagon. The guy has very prestigious degrees from even if you think
00:14:25.960 the schools don't matter anymore. He is a graduate of Princeton and Harvard. He's very good at
00:14:30.560 communicating on air. He's worked with veterans. I don't know. What more do you really want? If
00:14:35.500 we're going to set these standards impossibly high, then don't be surprised when you can't staff your
00:14:40.120 administration. I think the media is going after him for a couple of reasons. Number one, yeah,
00:14:46.800 Fox News personality, good looking guy who's a conservative, never mind white guy, F you. The media is
00:14:53.440 already like, we don't like you. We're jealous that you've been tapped for a massive position of
00:14:58.600 power, notwithstanding your disgusting work over on Fox and friends weekend, which we loathe with a 0.91
00:15:03.840 passion. Right. And, um, they're not that pro military. Most of these media members anyway. So 0.95
00:15:10.360 they're, they're inclined to dislike him, but I also think it's just, they're still reeling the media
00:15:15.500 and the Democrats, um, from the loss in the presidential race. And they would love to punish Trump and anyone
00:15:21.720 around him. And so, uh, any scalp will do that. It's they, they, if they could do this to Tom
00:15:27.540 Homan, who's going to be border czar, which is not, doesn't require Senate confirmation, they would
00:15:31.700 do it to him. If they, if they could do it to the press secretary, they would do it to her. But Pete's got
00:15:36.960 personal vulnerabilities, which they're really enjoying, you know, uh, exploiting. Um, the, the thing
00:15:44.180 that's so insane though is every single allegation against Pete, every single one, it has been
00:15:51.200 anonymous. There is not one on the record attack against him. There's no, not one name saying he
00:15:59.800 did this to me, or I saw him do X. I was the eyewitness who saw him fall down drunk and, you
00:16:04.620 know, require assistance getting into the hotel room, whatever, not one. And on the other hand,
00:16:09.220 you have medal of honor recipients, war heroes, guys who spent time with him at the veterans
00:16:15.100 charities. He spent his middle 10 years working at saying, this is a man of character. We were
00:16:20.900 actually present for a lot of these events and they did not go down as is being alleged. He wasn't
00:16:25.680 even at the strip club. Sean Parnell, Parnell, who's been on this program many times, um, ran for
00:16:30.740 Senate in Pennsylvania has said, I was the, I was at that strip club. He wasn't there. That's not,
00:16:34.720 he wasn't there. Um, he was there on that trip. I think is what he said. I'm not sure if he was at
00:16:39.620 the strip club, but he was saying that that didn't happen. Um, so you have anonymous and then on the
00:16:45.560 record saying not true and refuting a lot of the points point by point, or at least challenging them.
00:16:50.740 So how possibly can you tank a nomination as important as this, Michael based purely on anonymous
00:16:57.260 accusations that we don't know where they're coming from. We have no way of assessing their credibility.
00:17:02.700 Exactly. And this is what's so dangerous about these kinds of allegations is it, it's not just
00:17:10.780 when, when people throw out a total falsehoods, those that's actually pretty easy to knock down
00:17:16.580 what, what political operators do, which is much different, more difficult to, to knock down
00:17:22.420 is they mix a lot of falsehood with a little bit of truth. So we know that Pete has this checkered
00:17:28.260 marital history. So then they're going to start saying, and you know, he, he showed up drunk to
00:17:33.480 the morning show. Now this one should be easily disproven because there's footage, there's video.
00:17:39.540 He's never appeared drunk on the morning show to me. I've done Fox and friends during the weekend,
00:17:43.900 on the weekend, many, many times. I've been in studio with him many, many times, never seemed
00:17:48.700 drunk to me. I don't know. And there are others who have been on that couch with him every day.
00:17:52.380 They come at, Will Kane came out and said, I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm with
00:17:55.500 them every day. And this isn't true, but because they mix it in with a little bit of things that
00:18:00.780 are, you know, demonstrably true. The guy's been married multiple times. Then it just gives this
00:18:05.520 patina of credibility. But I think your point is really good, Megan. You know, if, even if there
00:18:11.860 were accusers who are putting their names on this, who are coming out and saying, it was me on this
00:18:16.700 day. And then here's my Sheila Jane, you know, Smith, even then there's a good chance that it's
00:18:21.960 nonsense, like the Christine Blasey Ford attacks on Brett Kavanaugh, which were totally without
00:18:25.940 credibility. But, but in this case, the fact that it's all anonymous, all at the most convenient
00:18:31.580 time, I think it's, it's enough to say that at least 90% of this stuff is bunk.
00:18:39.020 And you know, it's so galling. So now, you know, Pete got accused of rape by this woman. He had
00:18:46.620 an interlude with in a hotel room in 2017. And this woman, the media, I mean, they've abandoned
00:18:53.380 now reporting that she was married and her husband was in a hotel room down the hall. They're not even
00:18:57.220 pointing this out. The woman had a reason to make up the rape charge people. The reason was a man 1.00
00:19:01.900 with two legs and two arms and two kids with him who happened to be her spouse. Um, it, you know,
00:19:07.820 it's not a great thing to go bang Pete Hegseth when your husband and kids are down the hall. It's,
00:19:14.060 you know, even the loosest of women might have some guilt returning to the marital bed after that. 1.00
00:19:20.600 And so, so that, that woman, that happens. And the woman claims, oh, I was raped. And she comes
00:19:27.940 back a couple of years later wanting money and he pays her off as I think most men would like Pete
00:19:33.180 was married to Jen at the time. I'm sure it was an embarrassment. He was at Fox. He didn't want that
00:19:38.620 to hit the news. Who would want that to hit the news? True or not true. Either way,
00:19:43.580 he wouldn't want that in the news. So he pays her off. So now, uh, Senator Rick Scott of Florida
00:19:49.680 goes on CNN with Jake Tapper and he's defending Pete saying all this stuff is anonymous. This is
00:19:55.240 ridiculous. We can't tank people based on this. And Jake Tapper says, well, shouldn't he release her 0.99
00:20:01.940 from the NDA? Then she won't have to be anonymous anymore. What in the actual F?
00:20:07.680 What? No, this is so, this is such bullshit, Michael. Yes. And to his credit, Senator Scott 1.00
00:20:13.240 said, no. So you see how it works. So like Pete's got to pay the money to stop the professional
00:20:19.580 embarrassment, which he does. Then a friend of the accuser leaks a memo to the Trump transition team
00:20:26.880 saying he's a rapist. And Pete has to say, that's not true. So the woman has clearly violated the NDA 0.89
00:20:32.700 through a friend. Uh, so he's not getting the benefit of his bargain anymore. She's,
00:20:37.700 she's blown it, but he's still paying because he's upholding his contractual obligations.
00:20:42.400 And now the next media line is we'll release her from her obligations. If you don't like
00:20:46.640 anonymous allegations, if you don't then tell her all the money he's paid flushed down the toilet.
00:20:52.300 And I, you know, presumably might still have to pay. And just, unless you give her a national
00:20:56.920 forum to say all the terrible things about you that she said before that you say are made up,
00:21:00.600 then you're guilty. You're guilty. And you can't raise the anonymous thing,
00:21:04.420 which by the way, applies not just to this woman, but to the whatever 10, 15, who knows how many of 0.96
00:21:09.520 these people are leaking in the media about his drinking. And that's pretty much what it is. It's
00:21:13.640 drinking. Well, and of course, Megan, I don't know what Pete paid in this NDA, but, uh, the publicity,
00:21:20.660 the book deals, the podcasts, the lecture tour that she's going to get. If she becomes the center
00:21:25.780 of a defense secretary confirmation hearing, I guarantee it's going to blow whatever Pete signed
00:21:31.560 off out of the water. So this seems so deeply cynical to me. It seems so deeply opportunistic.
00:21:37.980 It's so obviously hypocritical for the Democrats who consistently mock marriage, mock monogamy,
00:21:45.340 mock fidelity, try to redefine all of these things or abolish them outright. It's just, it's so,
00:21:51.620 it stinks to high heaven. And so I, I really hope for, uh, for a number of reasons pertaining to
00:21:59.800 justice, but also just pure practicality. I hope that Republicans don't take the bait here because,
00:22:05.700 uh, it's, it's a trap. And it's going to be really hard to get out of on the drinking front.
00:22:14.260 That one is a legitimate concern. I mean, I think that's a fair thing to inquire about. If Pete
00:22:21.420 can't handle his alcohol, if he's got an alcohol problem, even if it's short of being an alcoholic,
00:22:26.640 he shouldn't be sec deaf. That's true. So it is fair game to ask questions about whether some of
00:22:33.600 that behavior is ongoing and whether there's any reason to believe, you know, he'd behave like that
00:22:38.640 as a secretary of defense. If so, yeah, it's a no. So I think all that's fair game and they should
00:22:44.720 probe that. And even if Trump is satisfied that that's a problem, he should not pursue this
00:22:50.040 nomination. What I've seen is the only thing that's saying it's anything close to recent
00:22:54.720 is this anonymous NBC news report with 10 current and former staffers, seven former three current
00:23:02.320 who say they smelled alcohol on his breath. Sometimes when he showed up at set now at Fox and
00:23:08.000 friends weekend in, in the morning, right? Like either he was hung over or he went on the air
00:23:13.360 drunk, show us the tape, right? Show us the tape. Because let me tell you, I've been on air for 20
00:23:20.280 years. It's very hard to go on the air and, and I hide drunkenness. You know, I've only ever been
00:23:27.660 drunk once on the air and it was two Fridays ago, right here on the show, the audience watched it
00:23:32.820 happen. It wasn't a secret. It's, I, I can't imagine trying to hide that. I think even the most,
00:23:39.540 you know, the biggest drinker, the, the, the most familiar with alcohol can't do it because even an
00:23:46.660 alcoholic, they may think they're still in control, but the rest of us sober people are looking at them
00:23:51.060 like you're drunk. Yeah. If, if one could hide drunkenness, then people would get out of speaking,
00:23:58.540 speeding tickets much more frequently, you know, but the thing is even the most practiced drunk,
00:24:03.540 when he gets pulled over and says, what seems to be the officer problem, everyone knows exactly
00:24:07.560 what's going on. So I, I find that allegation about Pete to be totally without credibility.
00:24:13.420 And to your point, Megan, it's a fair enough question. And I'm, I'm sure for basically any guy
00:24:18.520 in the country, you could find some example of them being drunken in college or in their twenties
00:24:23.120 or something and, and, uh, say that this is evidence of some big problem, but, uh, well,
00:24:29.060 show me the proof that this has been a problem anytime in the past, I don't know, decade, half
00:24:34.920 decade. I don't show me any evidence of that. I don't really see it. And for a guy who's on TV for a
00:24:40.320 living, it would seem to me there would be any evidence whatsoever. So once again, even on this
00:24:46.520 front, you know, the, the lady charges didn't totally take him out. So now they're trying to call
00:24:51.100 him a booze hound. Okay. Provide one shred of evidence right now. The charges just seem so thin.
00:24:57.620 Mm-hmm. Um, well on the anonymous front, want to follow up on something that happened in my Pete
00:25:05.200 interview yesterday, where we talked about this one document based on Pete's time at Concerned
00:25:10.760 Veterans for America, a pro veterans, uh, group that was trying to, uh, endorse candidates and do
00:25:16.540 things for candidates who would support veterans causes while he was there. Um, Jesse Jane Duff was
00:25:22.860 there in some capacity to his, uh, side says that Pete fired her and that she then became embittered
00:25:30.460 and started attacking him in the media and elsewhere, like quietly though, behind the scenes.
00:25:36.140 And ultimately someone wrote a seven page letter, uh, complaining about Pete that was sent to Fox
00:25:45.180 news. And it was about his time at Concerned Veterans for America. Just a small clarification
00:25:50.360 yesterday. I said that the whistleblower letter was sent to Concerned Veterans for America. That's
00:25:55.780 not the case. It was sent to Fox complaining about Pete. And we said that the whistleblower,
00:26:03.620 as far as we understand it, if you want to use that term was Jesse Jane Duff, because that's what
00:26:08.460 CBS news had reported that she'd been found to be behind the letter. We said, we talked to Jesse
00:26:13.380 Jane Duff about it and we did reach out to her. And here's the statement she gave us. I am not the
00:26:18.120 whistleblower. I cannot come on your show because I invited her to come on too. She added, I am the
00:26:22.920 executive director of veterans for Trump and still a paid member of the Trump team. I work at the
00:26:28.640 behest of president Trump and my loyalty lies there. Now we sent her several follow-up questions
00:26:36.360 that, you know, we wanted to clear up because what they're saying on Pete's side is that it was her
00:26:45.320 that she sent the letter and that she forgot to remove the metadata. And they were able to identify,
00:26:52.140 forget the term whistleblower, but her as the one who wrote that letter to Fox complaining about Pete.
00:26:57.140 And, um, so we asked her in a follow-up, did you complain about Pete Hegseth? And did you, do you
00:27:05.760 deny that you wrote an email complaining about Pete Hegseth in the 1516 timeframe, the metadata of which
00:27:12.680 was later traced back to you? We did not get an answer from her on that. Uh, we did hear from her, from
00:27:21.020 Pete's lawyer who told us standby. I want to make sure I've got it that, uh, he says she was the one
00:27:30.060 behind the letter that was sent to Fox news. He said it was anonymous, but she did not remember
00:27:35.880 to scrub the metadata and that she was the person behind that. Now she's over on Newsmax trying to
00:27:42.600 say nice things about Pete now, like supportive of his nomination, backing his position about women
00:27:50.120 in combat. And if she is working for team Trump in any capacity, I'll bet she does have some worries
00:27:57.380 about being identified as somebody who's trying to bring him down either then or possibly right now.
00:28:03.900 But this is what I will say. If any of the media are using Jesse, and if it's true that Jesse was
00:28:12.260 fired by Pete, that needs to be disclosed. You cannot just take random complaints about a man
00:28:21.020 and not figure out the bias of the people making the complaints. And if you're going to say anonymous
00:28:29.080 person anonymous here, then you have an obligation to say this anonymous person was terminated by Pete
00:28:36.720 Hex. Like it's so effing dishonest, Michael. I, I can't, I've got nothing against Jesse,
00:28:43.380 nothing whatsoever. But if this is all true, that it's just a microcosm of how dishonest this media is.
00:28:50.500 And don't forget, Megan, we've been viewing this as a lens, uh, through a lens that pits the Trump
00:28:57.200 team against the liberals and the liberal media. But a lot of this fight can also take place within
00:29:03.660 the Trump team. This is not particular to Trump. This is true of any political organization.
00:29:08.020 There is all sorts of infighting. Mar-a-Lago is Versailles because Trump is the great figure in
00:29:14.480 the party. And so not everyone is always on board. There are always factions vying for power,
00:29:21.960 vying for influence, rival nominees who want the spot. We're talking about one of the most desirable jobs.
00:29:27.200 In the country, you're leading the U S military. So there's going to be all sorts of fighting and
00:29:33.280 backstabbing and trying to hold positions within Trump world. Well, maybe stabbing people in the 0.81
00:29:38.100 back who are in a different part of Trump world. That is how politics works. The fundamental things
00:29:42.540 apply as time goes by. Uh, but we, we need to take that for what it is there. There is a lot of
00:29:49.620 cynical jockeying that goes on in any political organization. And it's, it's why we, we need to be,
00:29:56.540 uh, asking questions, not, not merely about the motives for people in the liberal media or in
00:30:01.940 the Democrat party or in some Democrat Senator's office, but maybe the motives for different
00:30:06.980 factions within the Trump umbrella, because those are in many ways going to be more relevant to the
00:30:13.020 fight that's going on than, than even what we're seeing on the left. So let's talk about Joni Ernst
00:30:19.620 and Ron DeSantis because, well, first one, just one quick point. Will Kane put out a tweet on X
00:30:26.840 yesterday saying, just got off the phone with, um, Bill Brown, a former Navy seal, a combat vet and
00:30:34.140 leader in the seal community right now, over 100 Navy seals are organizing and committed to march on
00:30:39.720 Washington in support of Pete Hegseth, just a heads up at GOP Senate. So it will be very interesting
00:30:46.240 if the rank and file stand up on Pete's behalf and say, no, we're not going to let you pull this 0.99
00:30:53.200 bullshit on him. He, we want him. We, we actually really want a war fighter. Who's one of us. Who's 0.99
00:31:00.240 not an administrator. Who's not worried about the next star on his shoulder, but who's worried about
00:31:06.120 us. That's going to put these GOP years in a very tight spot because so far what they're saying is
00:31:11.160 forget what Blumenthal said about five to 10 secretly confessing to this Democrat, their plans.
00:31:16.340 They will answer to Trump and to Elon who will unleash his pack on them. So they can tell Dick
00:31:22.000 Blumenthal, whatever they want, by the way, he's a known liar. Um, what, what, what's going to matter 0.93
00:31:28.300 is voting day. And let's just see if they really do have the balls to stand up to Elon super PAC. 0.81
00:31:32.440 That's going to primary all of them. That's going to spend ad dollars to try to hurt them. Right? 1.00
00:31:36.880 So we'll see. But so far the reports are right now. It's of course, Murkowski, of course, Collins,
00:31:41.820 McConnell and maybe Joni Ernst, who is a Senator from Iowa red state served herself. She met with
00:31:51.100 Pete yesterday and came out with some anodyne statements. They were not critical, but they
00:31:54.900 were not positive either. And, um, I don't know where she stands, but there are some reports now
00:32:01.620 by the federalist and elsewhere that she is vying for the role that she, she wants to knife Pete 0.91
00:32:08.860 because she would like to be that of DOD. And then there's DeSantis who was minding his own
00:32:15.380 business governing Florida. And I mean, I suggested him as a possible fill in if Pete fell. I mean,
00:32:21.820 I don't want him to replace Pete actively, but if Pete goes, I think he'd be great. But it's
00:32:29.260 complicated with him because like, if it looks like he's replacing Pete, MAGA will not accept him
00:32:36.340 because he was not a Trump loyalist. And in fact, it was very critical of Trump toward the end of
00:32:40.420 that primary campaign campaign. So what do you make of these, of, uh, the senators, including Joni?
00:32:44.960 Because if they lose four, they're toast, they can lose three and JD Vance can cast the deciding
00:32:50.380 vote. If they lose four, he's toast and of DeSantis as a possible next bet. Don't forget who was at
00:32:58.400 the top of George W. Bush's vice presidential search committee. You know, the, the man, uh,
00:33:04.020 himself who just, he kept finding problems with every nominee who came up until, well, alas,
00:33:10.980 Mr. Bush, if you're asking Dick Cheney to be your VP, I guess I have to serve my
00:33:14.960 country. One gets some of those vibes from Joni Ernst right now, uh, though that's, it's
00:33:21.060 unfortunate. And I, I hope that, uh, if Trump really does want to stand by his nominee, that
00:33:27.360 they, uh, impress upon Joni Ernst and any other senators that there, there could be problems
00:33:32.920 for their political careers and legacies if they, if they don't get on board, uh, in terms
00:33:38.700 of DeSantis, DeSantis would be great in any part of the government, but I think your fears
00:33:42.400 are quite, uh, right, Megan, which is that the, the, the way that DeSantis could enter
00:33:47.840 into a Trump administration has to be delicate. One of the things I really love about Trump
00:33:53.400 is that everyone mistakenly believes that for him, it's all personal and he holds grudges
00:33:58.260 and he's petty and, but really I think the opposite is true. He fights in a very personal
00:34:02.860 way, but I I've really never seen anyone in politics, forgive his enemies and bring them
00:34:08.560 back in quite as much as Trump. I mean, he just put up Marco Rubio with whom he fought
00:34:14.260 a bitter primary contest in 16, put him up as secretary of state. It's one of the most
00:34:18.300 important roles in the government. He's now buddies with Lindsey Graham. He's now buddies
00:34:22.880 with Rand Paul. He made fun of Rand Paul's face during a presidential debate in 16. Now they're,
00:34:28.340 they're chummy, chummy. He's now pals with Ted Cruz. He's now, you know, all of these guys,
00:34:32.200 he does bring them back in. It's not to quote Michael Corleone. It's not personal. It's strictly
00:34:37.440 business. Yeah. It's strictly business. Um, Lindsey Graham is annoying to put it mildly. I, 1.00
00:34:46.500 I think he's trying to tank this nomination right now. I think he's against Pete Hegseth. He,
00:34:50.680 I've never seen somebody so desperate to like thread the needle to like play both sides, uh,
00:34:56.440 of defense at once. Right. To me, it seems clear based on his statements so far, you know, like
00:35:00.680 I'm very concerned about the latest reporting. We're going to have to get to the bottom of these.
00:35:03.500 He is not pro Pete. He's a, he's a more Neo Connie kind of guy, but he's bent the knee to Trump.
00:35:08.920 So he knows like he's got to check his Neo Connie instincts and try to seem a little bit more
00:35:14.020 appealing to MAGA. But to me, it seems clear. He doesn't like Pete. I'm sure he'd much rather have
00:35:18.020 a Joni Ernst who, by the way, I really liked Joni Ernst. I like her. So I don't think we should
00:35:22.660 completely throw her under the bus as like, this is necessarily true until we have
00:35:26.300 proof that it's true. Um, but if it's true, if it's true, she's about to lose a massive amount
00:35:31.160 of support because if there's an active undermining and knifing of Pete without, you know, really
00:35:36.120 giving him a fair hearing, that's not going to go well. And I will tell you this, Charlie Kirk just
00:35:40.400 tweeted out. We're learning a lot about Joni Ernst and the Senate establishment right now.
00:35:45.620 Trump faithful are talking about finding a primary challenger. This is getting very serious.
00:35:50.800 The first response is absolutely. We need to Liz Cheney her. So there's a lot of risk. There's a
00:35:57.700 lot of risk. There's no risk for Collins, Murkowski, McConnell. There's risk for Joni Ernst and any
00:36:02.960 other Senator. When you mentioned that Lindsey Graham is a little bit more Neo Connie and there's 0.99
00:36:08.560 part of that establishment is really opposed to Pete Hegseth. All you got to remember that the story
00:36:15.040 that tells you this whole story is that after Pete was named as the SECDEF nominee, Politico ran a
00:36:21.660 piece about all the opposition to him and their chief source was a defense industry lobbyist who said,
00:36:28.200 who the hell is Pete Hegseth? We don't like this guy. That to me tells you everything. Yes, he hasn't
00:36:35.260 worked in the defense industry lobbies. He's not really part of the military industrial complex and
00:36:40.220 they don't like him. And that is one of the chief recommendations of Pete Hegseth for this job.
00:36:45.960 So, yeah. Well, wait, can I, let me ask you a question. Let me ask you a question on the heels
00:36:49.500 of that yesterday mentioned it in passing yesterday with Pete, but why on the report that came out of
00:36:56.140 NBC about alleged Fox news, current and former staffers, who's that Gretchen Carlson? I mean, 1.00
00:37:03.760 honestly, who, who tell us who give me the names. Cause let me tell you something. I will be able to
00:37:09.440 tell you right away, whether they are credible and whether they know anything about Pete Hegseth.
00:37:13.980 Tell me who they are. Okay. Because I was there many years with the guy and I know the scuttlebutt
00:37:19.960 on Pete. It was that he was a philanderer, which we now know is true. That's what people were saying.
00:37:25.780 There wasn't a whiff, not a whiff of he's a drunk. And there were whiffs along those lines about other
00:37:32.040 people drunk or drugs, depending on the person, never anything about Pete. Okay. So anyway, that NBC news report
00:37:38.980 that allegedly has all these current and former Fox news support staff are saying this stuff about
00:37:44.040 him. One of the lead reporters on it was the NBC Pentagon reporter. Why would the Pentagon reporter
00:37:53.460 be penning that story? I realize he's, you know, being nominated to be defense chief, but if you're
00:37:59.980 looking for sources at Fox news who know about Pete's alleged drunkenness, then you want your media
00:38:06.780 reporter. That would make some sense. Um, they have an entertainment reporter that that made some
00:38:12.580 sense, but the Pentagon reporter would have very different sources. Sometimes presidents get elected
00:38:20.720 to just keep things going and make modest improvements. Other times, as in this election,
00:38:27.240 presidents are elected to radically shake things up. Uh, and when you want to radically shape,
00:38:33.540 shake things up, people are going to come out with the knives for you. So to your point, Megan,
00:38:38.860 I think it just backs up the political point, which is that if, if the Pentagon, if some of the corrupt
00:38:46.060 top brass who spend more time whining about white rage and seeking to instill critical race theory into
00:38:53.940 cadets, uh, then they do focus on winning wars. If those guys oppose Pete Hegseth, that is a great mark
00:39:00.860 in Pete Hegseth's favor. Even to your point, Megan, on the anonymous sources at Fox past and present,
00:39:09.040 you've spent a lot more time around Fox news than I have, but I've spent a little bit of time around
00:39:12.520 there and there, as in many political organizations and media organizations, there are factions. There are
00:39:19.560 people who don't like the other people there and they want to get the other people fired and they're
00:39:24.080 jockeying for influence and power. And they whine about each other, sometimes even on the record,
00:39:28.720 but usually off the record to other media that always happens. And so it seems to me that what's
00:39:34.640 going on here is not an honest vetting of a defense secretary nominee in the interest of the common
00:39:41.580 good of the American people. I think what you're seeing is a lot of people trying to settle scores,
00:39:46.640 scores that go back decades that have nothing to do with the job and nothing to do with the
00:39:51.020 administration, scores within old political nonprofits, scores within campaign apparatuses and
00:39:57.100 scores within media organizations. Okay. That is to be expected, but no serious statesman should
00:40:03.460 allow that to distract them from the actual job that is before them, which is putting the common
00:40:08.840 good of the American people first and making America great again. Here is Democratic representative
00:40:15.740 Jim McGovern of Massachusetts on the Trump picks so far. Listen to this guy.
00:40:24.660 It looks like the requirements to be in the Trump White House are that you have to, that you either 0.96
00:40:29.820 abuse women or you're an out of touch billionaire. What's next? Are they going to replace FBI background
00:40:36.960 checks with a Fox News screen test? I mean, forget about a White House cabinet. Donald Trump is making it
00:40:44.160 into a junk draw. His commerce secretary, a billionaire, a billionaire, big surprise. His education 0.98
00:40:52.920 secretary, yet another billionaire. What's her qualification? She ran WWE. The person he tapped
00:41:00.900 to lead health and human services, he thinks tap water turns kids gay. His defense secretary, I mean, 0.97
00:41:07.980 this guy is probably dropping out momentarily. Apparently he drinks on the job and paid to cover
00:41:14.160 up his sexual assault allegations. Even his mom doesn't like him. Now, do we want people who
00:41:20.380 understand our struggles? People who will fight for regular folks? Or do we want billionaire trust fund
00:41:27.040 weirdos who just prop up the same broken rigged system?
00:41:31.820 Okay. I mean, where to begin? First of all, Pete should sue him for saying he drinks on the job.
00:41:40.440 He should sue his ass. That's defamatory. Um, there's absolutely no proof of that. There's 1.00
00:41:44.960 only anonymous source saying that Pete has denied. So sir, be careful. Um, secondly, the, the ties to
00:41:51.020 billionaires. You've got to be kidding me from these Democrats with their, you know, Pritzker,
00:41:55.500 the role and Cuban look what, let's just look at the election we just had who they Stephen Colbert
00:42:00.860 asked Kamala Harris, who's your favorite billionaire. It's Oprah. Like, would you just spare me your
00:42:05.800 indignation over these politicians surrounding themselves with billionaires? Uh, and also just
00:42:10.640 on the premise, Megan, the premise to me seems a little weird. I'm not saying that we should have
00:42:15.300 billionaires fill up every position in the government. And I think there are legitimate
00:42:18.060 questions about economic inequality and blah, blah, blah. You know, I'm all for it. But when we're
00:42:22.160 talking about the commerce department, I don't know, call me crazy. I don't think we should have
00:42:27.860 a poor guy running the commerce department. Like if your job is to run trade and commerce,
00:42:33.420 I would be more inclined to trust a rich guy to do that than I don't know, someone like me.
00:42:38.920 Right. What are we going to do? Get, get somebody from the coffee kiosk at the corner of, you know,
00:42:42.540 56 and Broadway. I'm like, there are some roles that we want somebody who's seen some financial success
00:42:47.340 having. And then the womanizing charge from that Democrat. I mean like, Oh, they're,
00:42:51.440 they're abusers of women over on the Republican side. Hello. I mean, Joe Biden, do we have to go 0.96
00:42:57.380 through the number of allegations against him? Not to mention Bill Clinton, not to mention Doug
00:43:02.640 Emhoff, which is the final cherry on top of the Sunday, because all these same media that are
00:43:07.680 running to print these anonymous allegations against Pete, despite the fact that they're
00:43:12.360 anonymous, totally ignored the Doug Emhoff allegations, both that he cheated with his last
00:43:18.920 girlfriend or with this, I'm sorry, his last wife before Kamala with the nanny and impregnated her. 0.99
00:43:25.400 And according to the daily mail did something that that woman, the nanny affair partner said,
00:43:32.120 caused her to miscarry their baby and then wailed on another woman out in the open public
00:43:38.300 in France. And that woman is very successful, credible attorney who made these allegations
00:43:43.900 anonymously. So they couldn't cover them. Michael, you see, because we don't go with anonymous
00:43:50.380 reports like this, unless you're a Republican. Hello, Republican senators get into the game or keep 0.96
00:44:00.060 losing. Yeah, precisely, precisely right. When, when Charlie Kirk comes out there and makes these not
00:44:07.900 so veiled threats at members of the Senate who don't want to give President Trump his, his nominees,
00:44:13.020 you know, he's, he's actually educating them. You know, he's making an important lesson, which is,
00:44:17.420 look, some of you guys here in the Senate, in the GOP establishment, it's like you want to lose. And I
00:44:23.820 think there are people in the GOP establishment who are comfortable being the junior party in the
00:44:29.420 governing coalition. The Democrats are the major party, the Republicans are the minor party. In some ways,
00:44:35.660 those Republicans, they're, they're like court jester conservatives, their chief role is to be present,
00:44:42.220 put up the facade of opposition, and therefore to legitimize the liberal regime. And they like doing
00:44:48.780 it, and they're paid relatively well, and they have their positions of prestige. But if you actually want
00:44:53.740 to go in and change things, if you want to improve the situation, you're going to ruffle a lot of feathers,
00:44:59.260 you're going to get a lot of bullets flying at you politically, and, and you're going to have to
00:45:03.660 fight. And so if there are Republican senators who are not up for the fight, you know, that that's a great
00:45:10.300 pity, and probably they should face consequences the next time they're up for election.
00:45:16.900 Yeah, and you know what, Trump has been reasonable, like Matt Gaetz fell because there were these
00:45:21.020 allegations about paying 17 year olds for sex. And he didn't put on some big campaign to save him. You
00:45:26.700 know, he called some senators and said, gee, it's too bad. I'd really like to keep him. And they said, the votes
00:45:31.880 aren't there, Mr. President, Matt Gaetz went away, and Pam Bondi came. So it's not that Trump's going
00:45:37.240 to be unreasonable on this, but that this can't go on. Like, there's, like I say, if you, when we get
00:45:44.600 to Tulsi, they're going to be telling us she is a Russian foreign agent. They're going to be tens of
00:45:51.880 of anonymous sources in news articles saying she's got this connection to Bashar al-Assad and this
00:45:59.480 connection to Putin, and she's compromised, and the no-fly list. And like, this is a, these
00:46:04.920 Republicans are going to have to find their steely spines. Or he's right, they will be
00:46:08.920 primaried. They will be primaried thanks to Charlie, they will be primaried thanks to Elon, and thanks
00:46:13.320 to all of us who are sick of losing like this. Yes, you know the letter is already being written.
00:46:20.200 51 former and present intelligence officials know that Tulsi Gabbard is a secret KGB agent and the leader
00:46:27.800 of ISIS. And we're, we have proof because this whole charge came to us first from Hillary Clinton.
00:46:34.040 People forget that. This whole Tulsi is a Russian asset nonsense. That was just a line from Hillary
00:46:39.160 Clinton in 2020. It's totally, well, I suppose the Russia hoax against Trump was also a line from
00:46:45.000 Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she was, ironically enough, colluding with the Russians to get that 0.53
00:46:50.280 Steele dossier. So it's just such bunk, Megan, and it's not going to stop. By the way, it's not going
00:46:56.520 to stop with Tulsi Gabbard. Whoever the next person they put up, that person's going to have a whole 1.00
00:47:01.160 dossier of mostly nonsense thrown at them too. So it really, it's not a question.
00:47:05.720 Then they'll get to Marco Rubio and Elise Stefanik and say, oh yeah, they're acceptable. And then
00:47:12.600 they're going to say, see, we're so reasonable. We said he could have a couple of them. It's fine with us
00:47:18.040 because they're more establishment types. And so it's all the core MAGA that do come with, you know,
00:47:24.120 some colorful resumes and histories in some cases. It's kind of, I don't know. I just feel like the
00:47:28.680 rebel strain within MAGA produces that, but also produces a willingness to bust things up,
00:47:34.920 which is why he got elected. So they're going to be just, just fine with establishment types and try
00:47:40.000 to look like the grownups in the room. But when the true MAGA acolytes get in there, it's going to be
00:47:45.520 bloody. Okay. I wanted to show you this. Something very weird happened about Hegseth over on MSNBC.
00:47:53.300 David Frum goes on there and makes a comment on Morning Joe on Wednesday. I mean, it was kind of,
00:48:01.000 it wasn't a nice comment. It was kind of a stupid throwaway. Well, here's, there's a story around 1.00
00:48:04.960 it. Watch Thought 9. David, I'll start with you on this. What's your sense of where the Hegseth 0.60
00:48:10.960 pick is headed here? Well, just given what one sees on camera, if you're too drunk for Fox News,
00:48:17.380 you're very, very drunk indeed. Okay. Well, whatever, right? Like who cares,
00:48:25.420 right? He writes for the Atlantic, by the way. So he comes out and says that, and then here's
00:48:30.120 what happens next. Thought 10. Before we go to break a little bit earlier in this block,
00:48:35.080 there was a comment made about Fox News in our coverage about Pete Hegseth and the growing number
00:48:42.080 of allegations about his behavior over the years and possible addiction to alcohol or issues with
00:48:49.240 alcohol. The comment was a little too flippant for this moment that we're in. We just want to
00:48:54.340 make that comment as well. We want to make that clear.
00:48:58.080 Um, we have differences in coverage with Fox News and that's a good debate that we should have,
00:49:05.520 uh, often. Um, but right now I just want to say there's a lot of good people that work at Fox News
00:49:10.740 who care about Pete Hegseth and we'll want to leave it at that. What? Right. So she comes out,
00:49:16.900 said like, I'm so sorry. What's happening. Then from comes out and says, we know what's happening
00:49:21.460 here is they're afraid. They're afraid of Trump. And this is very dangerous that they're already
00:49:27.580 bending the knee to Donald Trump. Um, because all, you know, freedom requires us to express
00:49:32.900 our opinions. What's happening here? Like what's actually, why is Mika Brzezinski trying to be nice
00:49:39.040 to Fox news? And why are they now trying to act offended at about a joke about a Trump nominee?
00:49:46.280 I think there are three layers of varying degrees of seriousness. One, if David from was making some
00:49:53.760 kind of accusation, I think they want to protect themselves from any claims of defamation to Mika
00:49:59.540 and Joe spent a lot of money on those airplane tickets to go grovel at Trump's feet at Mar-a-Lago.
00:50:04.080 That was only a couple of weeks ago. So, you know, I don't even think the polish is off the shoes yet
00:50:08.360 and they don't want to have wasted that trip. And then three, MSNBC doesn't have any viewers anymore.
00:50:14.220 They're probably going to be spun off. They're on the chopping block. Their demo gets fewer viewers
00:50:19.500 than local public access. You know, the main demo 18 to 54. So, you know, they're, they realize
00:50:25.980 they're in trouble. And I think in part they're sucking up to Trump and Fox news really just to
00:50:31.360 appeal to viewers beyond even some of the other considerations. Those old things that they used
00:50:37.160 to have called viewers. Michael Knowles stays with us. Don't go away. Well, we're all feeling pretty
00:50:41.860 good about where our country's headed right now, aren't we? I am. But it's when we let our guard down
00:50:47.100 that bad things can happen. This is why you always want to prepare for emergencies, no matter how good
00:50:52.160 you're feeling. And for that, there is My Patriot Supply. They have emergency food kits, solar power
00:50:58.720 generators, and water treatment systems. And right now you can get their four-week emergency food kit
00:51:03.620 for 50 bucks off. Their four-week emergency food kit includes some of my favorite meals like
00:51:08.900 creamy Alfredo pasta. Yes, this would be a comfort in an emergency. And snacks like sweet banana chips
00:51:15.580 with warehouses located across America. My Patriot Supply can send your four-week
00:51:20.800 emergency food kit in as little as one day. Go to preparewithmegan.com to get your four-week
00:51:28.300 emergency food kit now. But don't wait. Emergencies can happen anytime. That's preparewithmegan.com to
00:51:34.320 get your four-week emergency food kit now. All right, Michael, we got to spend just another
00:51:41.440 minute on that Scarborough, David Frum of the Atlantic story because my team will correct me
00:51:47.340 if I didn't think it was interesting enough. We've been laughing the last few minutes in the break
00:51:54.000 about what's actually happening here. We've got a couple of good things lined up for you. All right.
00:51:58.280 So they really wanted me to play the Scarborough reaction to David Frum's responsive attack,
00:52:05.040 which I'm going to get to. But first, I'm going to have to read you more of what David Frum
00:52:08.040 wrote. So he says this comment about, if too drunk for Fox News, oh, that's bad.
00:52:12.440 Then Mika goes out there like she's Queen Elizabeth. It's like, oh, we don't talk like
00:52:16.480 that here. This is MSNBC. And then David Frum goes to the Atlantic and writes a piece about what
00:52:27.220 just happened to him, right? Like he got called out and treated like he was some sort of a cad.
00:52:32.000 And he writes the sound of fear on air, the sound of fear on air. This morning, I had an
00:52:38.560 unsettling experience. I was invited, invited onto MSNBC's Morning Joe to talk from a studio. I was
00:52:43.880 asked about Hegseth, blah, blah, blah. I told this, I said this thing. Uh, I told the story. Oh, I
00:52:49.500 answered by reminding viewers of some history. Then he compares Hegseth, whatever it goes on. Then he
00:52:54.620 says, um, at the next ad break, a producer spoke in my ear. He objected to my comments about Fox and
00:53:00.320 warned me not to repeat them. I said something noncommittal and got another round of warning.
00:53:04.880 Shortly afterward, co-host Mika Brzezinski read an apology for my remarks. Here we go.
00:53:09.620 It is a very ominous thing. If our leading forums for discussion of public affairs are already feeling
00:53:16.740 the chill of intimidation and responding with efforts to appease. I write these words very aware
00:53:24.120 that I'm probably saying goodbye forever to a television platform that I enjoy and from which I
00:53:29.520 have benefited as both viewer and guest. I have been the recipient of personal kindnesses from the
00:53:34.980 hosts that I have not forgotten. I do not write to scold anyone. I write because fear is infectious.
00:53:43.600 Let it spread and it will paralyze us all. The only antidote is courage and that is infectious too.
00:53:52.720 Boom. Boom. That's David Frum. Okay. Mic drop. I'm the courageous one. Man up you P words over there
00:53:59.940 on MSNBC. So then Joe Scarborough, it's so fun to watch them fight. It's like these internal Democrat
00:54:05.800 fights. They're all mad at each other. Everyone's very, very sensitive after the Trump victory.
00:54:11.480 Here's Joe Scarborough responding to that on the air. Watch.
00:54:17.700 What was the headline? The sound of fear. No, that wasn't the sound of fear. That was the sound of
00:54:24.200 civility. I would recommend that if we're at a stage where a comment like this causes a meltdown,
00:54:31.420 and I saw George Conway, another guy we have on the show.
00:54:34.160 Who we love.
00:54:34.760 We love George saying, oh, read this article. It's going to make you very sad, but you must read it
00:54:41.520 all. Oh, because of the fearful times we're in. Well, there's some problem with the times that we're
00:54:50.000 in. Let me tell you something. You can talk to anybody that's worked in the front office of NBC and
00:54:56.400 MSNBC over the past 22 years. I'll tell you, I'm not fearful. You talked to anybody who served with me
00:55:03.660 in Congress. They will tell you, not fearful of leadership. Yeah. Not fearful.
00:55:11.820 Rambo. Rambo of morning Joe horned ring glasses wants you to know he doesn't eat. It's no for breakfast,
00:55:20.580 just like Kamala. He's like, who is he? You guys are chickens. No, you're a chicken. You're the big
00:55:27.460 buck, buck, buck. No, you're a buck, buck. This is one of the great examples of an observation by 1.00
00:55:35.380 Henry Kissinger. When you are watching the Iran-Iraq war, you're really just hoping that they 1.00
00:55:42.240 both lose. I could not find more delight in this. Yes. Okay. So now I have a fun follow-up for you
00:55:50.080 because the media really, it's not going well for them. In fact, I should tell you about the MSNBC
00:55:55.460 ratings before I move on. Problematic to put it mildly. Here it is. On November 26th, last week,
00:56:07.440 MSNBC had the lowest rated non-holiday weekday among that advertiser coveted demo of 25 to 54-year-olds
00:56:15.420 in 20 years. Lowest numbers in 20 years. The audience has heard me talk about the slashies. 1.00
00:56:23.360 That's devastating. That's the last thing you do. We never got a slashie on Fox News ever. 1.00
00:56:27.660 And that's when you get under 50,000. You'd never get it in the overall at Fox. You might get it on
00:56:32.460 MSNBC. But sometimes the MSNBCers were flirting with slashies in the demo, 25 to 54-year-olds getting 0.98
00:56:38.640 less than 50,000. I mean, the shame, the shame of getting slashies. Well, this was back 15 years ago.
00:56:44.600 And they sometimes got them, but then they started doing better and they did better under Trump and
00:56:48.300 so on. They're back. The slashies are back. 25 to 54-year-old demo, 38,000. The average in the demo 0.91
00:57:00.080 was 38,000. It's smallest non-holiday audience among the viewers since July 19th, 2004. Slashies,
00:57:10.900 Michael Knowles. So that, you're right, is why they're like, we don't talk like that here about
00:57:18.320 Trump cabinet nominees or our friends over at Fox News. They're begging Republicans to give them a
00:57:26.300 try. Please, please forget everything we said and did. Please, if you have a Nielsen box, give us a
00:57:33.640 chance. That number is really shocking, Megan, especially cable and network TV. The numbers are
00:57:42.340 a little murkier based on Nielsen ratings or whatever. It's a little vaguer. If you exist in
00:57:48.300 the new media, as we do, you've worked in all of it, but I came up in the new media, you know your
00:57:53.720 numbers right down to the man. And you know a lot of data about your audience. You know not only the
00:57:59.860 age demo, you know men, women, this race, that race, over here in this part of the country,
00:58:05.400 you get a lot of information. To be posting those kinds of numbers, that is like a weak,
00:58:11.480 weak podcast. Forget about a cable news show on what was once a pretty sizable channel.
00:58:19.240 I have never felt more bullish on the new media, specifically right-wing or center-right new media,
00:58:26.360 which is almost repetitive because the popular alternative media tend to be center-right or
00:58:32.800 further-right. And that's because it's an alternative to the liberal media, which took over and had a
00:58:37.640 monopoly in the old ways. This is looking really, really good. And further evidence, I called some
00:58:44.840 weeks ago for the next White House press secretary, now Caroline Levitt, to tear up the press room seating 1.00
00:58:49.920 chart, not only because we don't like these people, but even more so because the chart doesn't make
00:58:54.480 sense. The fact that MSNBC has a seat at all on any day is pretty crazy. The fact that CNN is up there
00:59:00.820 by the front row, I mean, just doesn't make any sense. But now you see so much more evidence for
00:59:06.260 that. And I think you see a sign that President Trump will be doing it because, you know, the job
00:59:11.560 of the White House press room is to mediate between the American people and the White House, get the
00:59:16.480 White House's message out and get the questions from the people to be asked. Nobody is watching MSNBC.
00:59:22.280 Nobody is watching these old outlets. So a time to keep up with the times. And if we got to say
00:59:27.540 goodbye to Joe and Mika, now so be it. It's amazing. 38,000 on MSNBC. They probably have
00:59:34.280 100 staffers over there, you know, per show, at least 50. Like that's the average of my Instagram
00:59:39.300 clips from this show. Okay. Good luck to you. We have six staffers. So it's not going well,
00:59:49.060 particularly over there. And then they're feeling it. And it's not just MSNBC, the leftist
00:59:52.340 media in general. Esquire magazine decides what would be really fun is to embarrass ourselves
00:59:57.480 even more. And so they put out this article. Oh my God, where is it? Why can I never find
01:00:04.280 anything? I just have so much. Here it is. Hold on. I'm going to pull it up for you. They put
01:00:08.800 out this article that tries to, um, rip on the controversy over the pardons, right? Is
01:00:18.580 that what it is? Hold on a second. I got to find this. Why can't I find it? What page is
01:00:22.520 this? Oh yeah, here it is. Page two. Okay. So they, this was the headline that they published
01:00:28.480 on Tuesday, Hunter Biden. I was like Hunter Biden. Isn't the first presidential son caught
01:00:34.900 up in controversy. Anyone remember Neil Bush? And it goes on to say, uh, let's see. No,
01:00:45.100 no, nobody defines Poppy Bush's presidency by his son's struggles. This is Neil Bush was the brother
01:00:52.260 of George W. Bush and the son of George H W. Bush. Nobody defines Poppy Bush's presidency
01:00:57.020 by the son's struggles or the pardons he issued on his way out of the white house. The morals
01:01:03.660 shut the fuck up about the moral is shut the fuck up about Hunter Biden, please. And, um, 0.99
01:01:10.880 this gentleman, the type is so tiny on here. I'm too old for this tiny type. Charles Pierce
01:01:17.360 is the person who published this. Then they wound up removing the article saying this column has
01:01:24.540 been removed due to an error. And what the article had been about was all about how George H W. Bush
01:01:31.220 pardoned Neil Bush on his way out of office. So why are we bitching about a president pardoning his
01:01:38.120 son? Well, they had to pull it and issue that statement saying we pulled the article due to an
01:01:43.660 error because the original article stated incorrectly that what did they get like a supporting fact wrong?
01:01:49.260 Did they take a left turn someplace? No. President George H W. Bush did not give a pardon to his son,
01:01:56.540 Neil Bush. Esquire regret. They wrote a whole thing about how he pardoned a son and the whole thing was
01:02:06.280 wrong. It was all made up. But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how'd you like the play? It's not surprising
01:02:13.780 at all. Also, even when it says anybody remember Neil Bush, first of all, the answer to that question is
01:02:20.100 obviously no. But but even if one did, even if one did have some awareness of Neil Bush, do you remember
01:02:26.660 Neil Bush recording himself with tons of crack and hookers and even more importantly, selling American 0.66
01:02:34.180 state influence, potentially with the permission of his father, the president or vice president to foreign actors to get 0.94
01:02:41.540 bribes? He was never tried criminally. He never faced any criminal charges. He had some civil case that he got
01:02:46.660 caught up in. There was never, unlike Hunter, he was never convicted of crimes.
01:02:51.100 Absolutely high-larious. It is, you know, really, you saw this broadly with the whole 2024 election.
01:02:59.400 The argument for the 2024 election was that Trump is a threat to democracy. And to stop the threat to democracy,
01:03:07.300 they kept trying to prevent people from being able to vote for Trump. And then they justified
01:03:12.120 murdering Trump. And then they tried to imprison Trump. And they did they did all of these things.
01:03:16.740 And now Trump's elected. And what do you know, we still have democracy, a really full expression of
01:03:21.480 democracy because Trump even managed to win the popular vote. And so but other than that, you know,
01:03:26.100 Mr. President, your campaign went great. It's it's so sad. You know, Esquire at least claims to have
01:03:33.840 some kind of credibility. Before I sent a tweet like that, I would at least make a Google search
01:03:41.380 to make sure that my central thesis was correct. Good Google. He's he's your friend. Here's this
01:03:47.000 same writer. A couple of a couple of recent articles by him. Hunter Biden's pardon has all the idiots
01:03:53.940 riled up. Here's another one. Remove Kennedy from RFKJ from his name. And what do you get? A guy who 1.00
01:04:00.400 shouldn't be allowed to mop the floors at HHS, let alone run the joint. Then he calls Jane Mayer, 0.80
01:04:06.720 who wrote the latest hit piece on Pete Hegseth and all the alleged women's troubles, etc. A national
01:04:12.660 treasure, etc., etc. So that's the article. The article's author K file, which is Andrew Kaczynski over
01:04:19.840 at CNN, who I mean, truly, this guy may be the best thing at CNN. I really like what the turn he's
01:04:24.760 taken. He's he's really gotten a lot more fair. I quite like he writes as follows. Right. He writes
01:04:31.140 as follows about Esquire. Esquire wrote an entire piece saying that people should shut the fuck up 0.99
01:04:36.220 about Hunter Biden's pardon, claiming that George H.W. Bush pardoned his son, Neil. The entire story 0.97
01:04:41.520 has now been corrected to note this is not a thing that happened. Quote, Esquire regrets the error.
01:04:47.740 I love it. You know, in a way, we're being unfair, Megan, because given the current state
01:04:59.480 of journalistic standards, the fact that they even wrote the correction rather than just
01:05:04.820 stealth deleted the entire piece. I'm not even being facetious. The fact that they even copped to
01:05:10.720 their error is a surprising display of ethics in an era when the mainstream journalists have no ethics
01:05:18.900 whatsoever. You're right. Like Nicole Hannah-Jones at Project. That's right. 2020. Sorry. 1619.
01:05:28.140 1619. Project 1619 over the New York Times, where they took out all of her historical references and
01:05:33.100 didn't tell us that they were doing it. Just totally dishonest. All right. Now that leads me to this
01:05:37.260 lovely little nugget. Speaking of being embarrassingly wrong. This is so good. The
01:05:45.160 news cycle right now is so delicious. Anna Navarro over at The View is also trying to defend the Hunter 1.00
01:05:53.560 Biden pardon. And she decides to send out a tweet to defend the pardon, showing all the others who have
01:06:01.920 pardoned relatives. And it reads as follows. I'm going to get it. Woodrow Wilson pardoned his
01:06:11.460 brother-in-law, Hunter DeButts. Bill Clinton pardoned his brother, Roger. Trump pardoned his
01:06:17.560 daughter's father-in-law, Charlie Kushner, and just appointed him ambassador to France. But tell me
01:06:22.320 again how Joe Biden is setting precedent. That's all great. Hunter DeButts is also not a thing.
01:06:30.920 Doesn't exist. At least not in the public eye. There is one we found just like some rando. We
01:06:38.140 googled it and who's, you know, someplace doing something who has nothing to do with Woodrow
01:06:42.740 Wilson, who died a hundred years ago. So I don't think she's referring to this Hunter DeButts who's
01:06:49.300 alive and well today. So I think the internet piled on immediately and somebody community noted her on
01:06:56.340 X where the community writes, you're an idiot. Here's the actual facts. And her defense was, 1.00
01:07:03.300 hey, Twitter sleuths, thanks for taking the time to provide context. Take it up with chat GPT.
01:07:10.080 And then she shows how she asked chat GPT, have any U.S. presidents pardoned relatives or in-laws?
01:07:16.980 And chat GPT decided to have some fun with Anna Navarro and said Woodrow Wilson pardoned Hunter DeButts.
01:07:30.200 Also, if you really check the history ledger, Abraham Lincoln pardoned Mike Hunt.
01:07:35.980 Oh, yes. The, the, the famous, the famous Seymour Butts pardon, the Homer sexual. Yes, of course.
01:07:44.680 They all, you know, I, I love that her rejoinder is, hey, hey, internet sleuths. I don't do my job
01:07:55.360 ever. Hey, internet sleuths. Um, I plagiarized a robot. Oh, um, sorry. Am I not? Does that? I don't
01:08:07.100 know. You think it is. It's so funny. I mean, truly Debbie Murphy, my producer, she's like, I mean,
01:08:13.060 honestly, when somebody gives you back Hunter DeButts, who doesn't know not to do an extra search?
01:08:18.380 Just to make, like, triply sure. I, I just also love now, I love that chat GPT's historical archive
01:08:29.200 is just like old Simpsons jokes. That, that actually gives me much more respect for chat GPT. I'll have
01:08:35.220 to use it more. I don't know. I, I can't get enough of what's happening. People are being very,
01:08:41.080 very well true to form. Okay. I can't let you go without talking to you. Up next, we're going to
01:08:46.300 have the attorney general of Tennessee and a very, very important case went up to SCOTUS yesterday,
01:08:52.680 Supreme Court of the United States, and it involves this Tennessee law. It's a ban on the totally
01:08:58.360 misnamed gender affirming care that these States are trying to give to minors, puberty blockers into
01:09:06.180 cross-sex hormones. And Tennessee also banned surgeries for minors. Great. Good for you, Tennessee. 0.99
01:09:10.940 Tennessee. Well, some 24 States have similar bands and in Tennessee, there was a challenge filed to
01:09:18.140 not the surgeries piece of it. Not yet. That's not an issue, but the, um, puberty blockers in the
01:09:22.680 cross-sex hormones being denied to minors who say they're quote transgender. And it was a very
01:09:27.840 interesting argument where we'll get into it. And as I said, in about, well, a few minutes,
01:09:31.780 but I wanted to ask you about it. Michael knows this is something near and dear to your own heart
01:09:35.600 as well. Um, and it's been pretty remarkable to watch, you know, people covering this, especially
01:09:45.580 CNN, which has gone all in, in favor of doing this to children, of sterilizing them, of depriving them
01:09:55.900 of any sexual pleasure, which is what puberty blockers into cross-sex hormones does. And of
01:10:00.520 trying to make it seem like everyone who opposes this is an evil mouth breather who wants to hurt
01:10:07.420 children. So first Jake Tapper did an interview with the trans lawyer. It's a woman pretending to 1.00
01:10:15.920 be a man unconvincingly and was using all of the so-called terms, you know, like it was just, you
01:10:24.540 know, he's taken too many lessons from the AP style book on how we're supposed to talk about this.
01:10:28.580 And then CNN airs a segment with a so-called trans child. That's not a thing. Uh, talking about
01:10:36.480 her fear of being murdered. Watch this. It's not 25 or 15. Concerns have you had about speaking out?
01:10:45.860 Yeah. I'm going to be like murdered. Like one day I'm going to be walking down the street and 0.97
01:10:53.840 somebody's going to come up and like shoot me or something. That's a really scary thing to be
01:10:58.700 worrying about at 10 years old. Yeah. That should not be a worry.
01:11:05.960 And the lower third is anti-transgender laws and their mental health effect. The poor children
01:11:12.460 who need their gender affirming care, Michael, and the evil states that are denying it. 0.63
01:11:19.820 That's awful. And that, that child's parents should be arrested. It's just, and the, and
01:11:25.460 frankly, the journalists should be fired if not, if not brought up on charges for exploiting a child
01:11:31.180 this way. It's just so. She's an LGBTQ activist too. Absolutely disgusting. First. And now the 1.00
01:11:38.020 premise of course is false as well. The, the, the notion that there is some kind of violent attack on
01:11:43.800 trans identifying people. It does not exist. Every year there's some list published of the dozen or
01:11:48.980 two dozen trans identifying people who died in any sort of, of these circumstances that year.
01:11:54.020 And usually it's because their prostitutes are involved in other kinds of crime that are 0.99
01:11:57.660 already increasing the likelihood of danger. And the, the number one reason that, uh, uh,
01:12:03.420 trans identifying people die in unfortunate circumstances is suicide. And it's because 1.00
01:12:08.340 they've been affirmed and encouraged in this kind of, uh, delusion. So it's really total fake news
01:12:14.720 there. Uh, it's wonderful. Jonathan Scrimetti's done, done a great job here, the attorney general
01:12:19.900 of Tennessee. And so many, so many people have spoken out and, and called attention to this grave
01:12:25.780 injustice of the transgender ideology, especially on children. I listened to the oral arguments 0.88
01:12:30.820 yesterday. I thought the conservative justices, notably Alito and Thomas did a masterful job of just
01:12:37.320 totally destroying the, the pro-trans side of the argument, even with simple questions, you know,
01:12:43.360 the, the scientific rationale, uh, justice Alito completely ruined that the legal rationale,
01:12:48.760 uh, justice Thomas destroyed that. Uh, the, the best that the liberal justices could muster
01:12:53.900 was Sotomayor comparing the castrating a little child to taking an aspirin. I mean, it was laughable.
01:12:59.700 And then you had that, you had that lawyer that the first ever trans identifying lawyer to argue
01:13:04.540 a case at the Supreme court is providentially named strangio. What, what an amusing fact that is.
01:13:11.120 But if you read the transcript, something that was disturbing is that the transgender ideology 1.00
01:13:15.360 was, was set up in the premise of the whole case, that the transcript referred to this lawyer,
01:13:20.780 who's a woman as Mr. Strangio. So they were already accepting the premise that a man can be a woman or
01:13:25.840 vice versa. And this, Megan, I think is the real problem here. I am quite confident after the oral
01:13:31.320 arguments that Tennessee's law is going to be upheld and that kids are going to be protected,
01:13:35.780 at least in some States. Uh, however, uh, this is not the sort of issue that really can be argued
01:13:43.820 and, and present, have evidence presented for, and then some conclusion drawn about what is a man?
01:13:50.560 What is a woman is a premise. It's, it's goes back to first principles of practical reason. Okay. 0.96
01:13:56.060 You can't, you just have to kind of know, you gotta know certain things. Like in math,
01:14:00.440 you have to know a equals a and, and, uh, uh, if a equals B, then B equals a, you gotta know
01:14:05.540 axioms and premises. And so the fact that this case would even make it to the Supreme court
01:14:11.300 is such a damning indictment of our country and the state of our, our affairs. I'm confident that
01:14:17.900 we're going to get a win here, but we have a lot of work to do.
01:14:21.020 I've got to end on this exchange that I referenced that Jake Tapper had with this
01:14:26.220 strange geo on the air yesterday. And for the listening audience, you tell me whether this
01:14:31.800 sounds like a woman or a man. And you know, I mean, I have already told you it is a woman 1.00
01:14:36.120 pretending to be a man. It is a woman with facial hair and a man's suit. She looks slight in the 0.92
01:14:42.240 shoulder. This is not a fucking, sorry, man. It is a woman masquerading as one. And you, 1.00
01:14:47.420 the voice of course, gives it up. This is one of the lawyers who argued in front of the Supreme
01:14:51.760 court yesterday saying we should do all this stuff to the children to listen.
01:14:56.320 You heard some of the more deranged things that Donald Trump said on the campaign trail about
01:15:00.660 kids going off to school and the school changes the gender of the kid, uh, you know, at school
01:15:06.160 that day, parents don't, I mean, just wild claims. He, he, uh, he has also more directly,
01:15:13.060 um, well, let's just play some of what he said to get your response.
01:15:17.420 I will revoke Joe Biden's cruel policies on so-called gender affirming care. I will sign
01:15:26.720 a new executive order instructing every federal agency to cease all programs that promote the
01:15:32.860 concept of sex and gender transition at any age. I will then ask Congress to permanently
01:15:39.240 stop federal taxpayer dollars from being used to promote or pay for these procedures and pass
01:15:46.220 a law prohibiting child sexual mutilation in all 50 states.
01:15:51.480 Is this case that you are going to argue before the U S Supreme court involving Tennessee
01:15:56.520 relevant to what president Trump, president-elect Trump says he wants to do there?
01:16:01.580 Yeah. He obviously says a lot of things and it's causing people a lot of panic for, for a good reason.
01:16:07.820 Oh, Michael, I can't, I know Jake and I would like to talk to him personally and explain to him,
01:16:15.660 there is nothing deranged or wild about the claim that schools are changing quote the gender
01:16:23.760 of children without parental consent. It's happening all over New York city, including at the schools
01:16:29.460 that I attended where the policy in both public and private is to let the child change his or her
01:16:34.960 gender and to keep it a secret from the parent. And once you socially transition the child,
01:16:40.600 it is almost impossible to stop the trans ball from rolling into the cross sex hormone, 1.00
01:16:47.000 the puberty blockers, the cross sex hormones, sterilization, no more sexual pleasure for the 0.98
01:16:51.100 rest of your life. An absolute outrage for a school to do without parents, not to mention the rest
01:16:56.680 of those policies that Trump promised, which are the reason many of us voted for him.
01:17:02.360 Yes. What happened at the Supreme court yesterday was a decadent circus. The sort of thing you would
01:17:08.120 expect out of late empire Rome. Uh, I don't know if Jake Tapper is just woefully ignorant here, 0.98
01:17:14.780 or if he's lying to try to spin for the pro trans side, but that was absurd. And there was a time in 0.99
01:17:20.700 this country when in order to practice law, you had to demonstrate a basic, uh, working faculty of
01:17:26.940 reason, uh, having relatively intact judgment and perception. And if a person thinks that he is the
01:17:33.260 opposite sex, or if a woman thinks that she is the opposite sex, that would seem to be pretty clear 0.94
01:17:39.040 evidence that there was a severe defect of reason and judgment. Uh, yesterday during the, the oral
01:17:45.520 arguments, chief justice Roberts asked miss, miss Strangio, uh, if she had anything that she could add,
01:17:52.180 any different arguments than the solicitor general had previously made. And her answer was no. So she was
01:17:57.940 really just there. It seemed to, uh, be the first trans identifying lawyer as a token. Yeah. And, uh, 0.52
01:18:04.700 which was unfortunate for the federal government's case because she did a very poor job defending what 0.97
01:18:09.740 is admittedly an, an indefensible action, which is to castrate a little kid in, in the defense of
01:18:16.180 perversions and fantasies. So it's, it's really depressing to why it's depressing to watch that clip
01:18:22.200 earlier of a, of a little child being exploited by lunatics and perverts. It's depressing to watch 0.94
01:18:27.660 the Supreme court have to be degraded to the level of debating whether or not we should castrate 0.90
01:18:32.740 little kids. It's just sad and it's degrading to watch the media take it seriously. Oh, that is so
01:18:39.360 well said. It is degrading. It's galling to have to watch them deal with this and engage in this
01:18:43.880 fantasy of pretending this woman, because she's got facial hair is somehow a man and call her Mr.
01:18:51.060 and talk about this. Yes, you're right. Castration, both actual castration through surgeries of little
01:18:56.220 boys and chemical castrate castration through these medicines. Oh, he's just going to take estrogen.
01:19:02.900 It's going to make him feel more like the body that he thought he was born in. Yes. That is a
01:19:08.140 chemical castration of your son. He will not perform as a man should for the rest of his life. And you
01:19:15.500 make this decision for him when he is a minor and incapable of understanding what this means.
01:19:22.440 It is abuse. How are we debating whether it can still happen in any state? I mean, I don't see
01:19:30.360 this as abortion where it's like, all right, we've got the 50 state experiment. Now, you know,
01:19:34.560 Mississippi is going to do something other than California. This Trump should pass a federal ban 0.99
01:19:40.280 if if there's the basis for it so that it stops in all 50 states. And the states that are not banning
01:19:46.580 this must be brought to heel. They must have the cast review and other research shoved down their 0.92
01:19:53.660 throats so they stop hurting minor children and letting parents who are either deranged themselves 0.95
01:20:01.080 or fooled by this dishonest, disgusting medical establishment trying to slip its hands into their 0.96
01:20:07.740 pockets into believing that there is such a thing as transing a kid that would somehow be a benefit to 1.00
01:20:14.800 them. Michael, always a pleasure with you. Love talking to you. Thanks for coming on.
01:20:19.700 Great to be with you, Megan. Thanks for having me.
01:20:21.640 Well, you heard Michael mention Scrimetti and that's the that's the attorney general. Jonathan
01:20:26.500 Scrimetti is here. He's here next. The attorney general of Tennessee. We'll ask him what he thought
01:20:30.680 of yesterday. Is the education system the cause and solution to the biggest problems facing America?
01:20:36.560 Check out a fantastic podcast from PragerU that's tackling difficult topics and conversations
01:20:40.940 through the lens of education. Real talk with Marissa Streit. As a mother, former educator and
01:20:47.600 the CEO of PragerU, Marissa believes that education got America into the mess we're in and that it will
01:20:53.300 get us out. This is why she built the pro-American nonprofit PragerU into a disruptor in education 1.00
01:20:58.940 with videos that reach millions of young people every single day. During her show, Marissa interviews
01:21:04.360 leaders in business, education, mental and physical health and world affairs. Her guests include
01:21:09.440 Tulsi Gabbard, Douglas Murray, Michael Knowles, and many more. Together, they cut through the noise and
01:21:13.800 get to the heart of complex issues all from the perspective of an educator and parent.
01:21:18.600 Join PragerU's fastest growing podcast. Subscribe to Real Talk with Marissa Streit on your favorite
01:21:24.180 podcast platform or just watch PragerU.com slash Real Talk.
01:21:29.600 I'm Megan Kelly, host of the Megan Kelly Show on Sirius XM. It's your home for open, honest,
01:21:35.820 and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political,
01:21:39.540 legal, and cultural figures today. You can catch the Megan Kelly Show on Triumph,
01:21:43.960 a Sirius XM channel featuring lots of hosts you may know and probably love. Great people like Dr.
01:21:50.480 Laura, Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey, and yours truly, Megan Kelly. You can stream the Megan
01:21:57.100 Kelly Show on Sirius XM at home or anywhere you are. No car required. I do it all the time. I love the
01:22:04.220 Sirius XM app. It has ad-free music coverage of every major sport, comedy, talk, podcast, and more.
01:22:11.720 Subscribe now. Get your first three months for free. Go to SiriusXM.com slash MK show to subscribe
01:22:18.460 and get three months free. That's SiriusXM.com slash MK show and get three months free. Offer details apply.
01:22:27.620 Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the Biden administration's challenge to a Tennessee law.
01:22:36.920 This is the biggest case of the entire term to a Tennessee law that bans hormone treatments and
01:22:42.920 puberty blockers for minors who are gender confused. By almost every account, it seemed to be a very good 0.93
01:22:49.980 day for supporters of the law. In other words, yay. Listen to this exchange where Justice Alito,
01:22:56.940 God bless him, forced the first trans identifying lawyer to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court 1.00
01:23:02.600 to admit that so-called gender affirming treatments, that's not what these are, are not as effective
01:23:11.180 as they want you to believe. On page 195 of the Cass report, it says there is no evidence
01:23:18.300 that gender affirmative treatments reduce suicide.
01:23:24.920 What I think that is referring to is there is no evidence in some in the studies that this treatment
01:23:31.520 reduces completed suicide. And the reason for that is completed suicide, thankfully and admittedly,
01:23:36.800 is rare. And we're talking about a very small population of individuals with studies that
01:23:41.940 don't necessarily have completed suicides within them. However, there are multiple studies,
01:23:48.000 long-term longitudinal studies that do show that there is a reduction in suicidality, which I think
01:23:54.900 is a positive outcome to this treatment. That lawyer, Chase Strangio, is representing the families
01:24:01.860 that originally brought the lawsuit. And the left is getting so desperate, they went back to their
01:24:05.540 favorite tactic, making everything, even this, about race. Here's Justice Katanji Brown Jackson 0.59
01:24:13.260 comparing Tennessee statute to an overturned Virginia law that banned interracial marriage
01:24:19.440 over 50 years ago. You know, as I read the statute here, excuse me, the case here, you know,
01:24:26.800 the court starts off by saying that Virginia is now one of 16 states which prohibit and punish
01:24:31.240 marriages on the basis of racial classifications. And when you look at the structure of that law,
01:24:36.700 it looks in terms of, you know, you can't do something that is inconsistent with your own
01:24:41.860 characteristics. It's sort of the same thing. So it's interesting to me that we now have this
01:24:46.280 different argument. And I wonder whether Virginia could have gotten away with what they did here by 0.97
01:24:51.720 just making a classification argument the way that Tennessee is in this case.
01:24:56.940 Yes, I think that's exactly right, that there is absolutely a parallel.
01:25:01.380 That second woman you heard there was Biden's solicitor general agreeing with Justice Jackson.
01:25:06.500 This case is called United States versus Scrimetti. So who better to bring on than
01:25:10.600 Jonathan Scrimetti himself? He's the attorney general of Tennessee. Good for you, sir,
01:25:14.820 for defending this. And this is a hugely important case. So how do you think it went yesterday?
01:25:21.220 I think it went great. You never want to prognosticate that justices will spend months
01:25:25.620 talking through this. And, you know, you just never know how it's going to turn out. But we put
01:25:30.400 on a very strong case. I thought the questions were probing in a way that gets to the truth of
01:25:36.820 the matter. And I'm looking forward to the court's decision. We heard in that soundbite, we just played
01:25:44.740 with Justice Alito. The other side, admit, admit that gender affirming care, again, this is a misnomer,
01:25:51.320 does not reduce suicides. It does not reduce suicide. So this is what they've been telling.
01:25:57.100 The truth comes out in court. But what they've been saying everywhere in the public eye is we
01:26:02.660 have to allow these puberty blockers and these cross sex hormones because these kids will kill 0.99
01:26:07.960 themselves. They will kill themselves. They use this to manipulate parents. And there in front of 0.99
01:26:13.080 the U.S. Supreme Court, it's admitted right there by a so-called trans attorney that this so-called
01:26:20.600 care does not reduce suicides. What a moment. I think it's the most important thing that happened
01:26:26.620 in the oral argument. You know, usually the briefing is what really drives the outcome in the case. And
01:26:31.900 the argument is just to cover a few little loose ends. But we've heard for years, you can either have
01:26:38.540 a live son or a dead daughter. And parents have been essentially threatened. And kids have kept
01:26:44.700 hearing over and over again that suicide was the appropriate reaction to not transitioning.
01:26:51.380 And of course, suicide is a social contagion phenomenon. The more kids hear it, the more
01:26:56.500 risk there is. And so to have the truth out there for everybody to hear on the record that suicide is
01:27:03.320 not, in fact, the expected outcome, that this treatment, so-called treatment, does nothing
01:27:09.900 to address the instances of suicide was huge. That's going to make a lasting difference in this
01:27:17.720 conversation. And then you've got Sonia Sotomayor comparing the castration of little boys to
01:27:26.300 there are risks in taking an aspirin. Here's that. And the question of how many minors have to have
01:27:33.180 their bodies irreparably harmed for unproven benefits is one that is best left?
01:27:38.300 I'm sorry, Counselor. Every medical treatment has a risk, even taking aspirin.
01:27:46.960 There is always going to be a percentage of the population under any medical treatment that's going
01:27:53.220 to suffer a harm. So the question in my mind is not, do policymakers decide whether
01:28:03.180 one person's life is more valuable than the millions of others who get relief from this
01:28:10.060 treatment. The question is, can you stop one sex from the other? 1.00
01:28:16.440 Let me ask you something in general. There'd be no question that you could pass a law in Tennessee
01:28:20.320 saying you can't sell fentanyl in pill form over the counter right next to Band-Aids. There'd be no
01:28:26.320 question that you would be allowed to do that in Tennessee and every state. So clearly there is the
01:28:30.780 ability to regulate certain medications and drugs, even, even something as, as gentle potentially as
01:28:37.880 an aspirin. So this is a sliding scale. You know, the fentanyl would be a no, the aspirin can be on
01:28:42.560 the shelf. And the question is where, where does the gender affirming so-called care proceed, uh,
01:28:48.200 medications and so on fall? Can you explain to the audience why those, the puberty blockers and
01:28:53.780 cross-sex hormones are closer to the fentanyl than they are to the aspirin? Be my pleasure. So every
01:29:00.460 systematic review of the evidence has shown little to no benefit for kids from these procedures,
01:29:07.920 from puberty blockers, from hormone treatments, from surgeries. Uh, it's, it's still relatively new.
01:29:14.420 Uh, most of the cases have been coming up recently. The numbers have exploded, but all the research out
01:29:20.060 there when systematically reviewed and analyzed shows no benefit. And meanwhile, the risks are huge.
01:29:26.660 Kids on these, on these drugs face the permanent loss of their fertility, the permanent loss of their
01:29:33.280 sexual function for the rest of their lives. Uh, they face, depending on which treatment we're
01:29:38.340 talking about, uh, tumors, blood clots, uh, cognitive impairment for the rest of their lives, uh, bone
01:29:45.580 density disorders. So these are serious conditions and children are not in a position to make those
01:29:51.400 big decisions. We don't let them get tattoos. We don't let them use alcohol. We don't let them, 0.91
01:29:55.940 uh, consume tobacco products because they're too young to fully appreciate the effect that will have
01:30:01.980 on their future. Meanwhile, these are incredibly consequential, uh, drug regimes that will affect their
01:30:08.800 body forever and ever. The research shows that it's not actually treating the condition it's purported
01:30:15.280 to, to, to treat. And the risks are enormous. And that is why Tennessee outlawed these for kids.
01:30:22.520 There was, this is a lengthy exchange, but I am going to play it an exchange between Justice Alito
01:30:26.500 and the solicitor general for the Biden administration. Biden administration is on
01:30:30.020 the trans team, not the Tennessee team. That's about to change when Trump takes over. But right now
01:30:36.180 we are where we are. So he really went after her on what I think he believed was a misrepresentation
01:30:42.680 in their brief to the court. Take a listen to this. So 36. Well, can I ask you a question about the
01:30:49.340 state of medical evidence at the present time in your petition, you made a sweeping statement,
01:30:56.780 which I will quote overwhelming evidence establishes that the appropriate gender affirming
01:31:02.720 treatment with puberty blockers and hormones directly and substantially improves the physical,
01:31:08.360 psychological well-being of transgender adolescents with gender dysphoria. That was in November
01:31:15.200 2023. Now, even before then, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare wrote the following.
01:31:24.280 They currently assess, quote, that the risks of puberty, puberty blockers and gender affirming
01:31:29.840 treatment are likely to outweigh the expected benefits of these treatments, which is directly
01:31:36.480 contrary to the sweeping statement in your petition. After the filing of your petition, of course,
01:31:43.260 we saw the release of the Cass report in the United Kingdom, which found a complete lack of high-quality
01:31:53.320 evidence showing that the benefits of the treatments in question here outweigh the risks. And so I wonder
01:32:04.140 if you would like to stand by the statement that you made in your petition, or if you think it would
01:32:11.320 now be appropriate to modify that and withdraw the statement that there is overwhelming evidence
01:32:17.300 establishing that these treatments have benefits that greatly outweigh the risks and the dangers.
01:32:24.420 I, of course, acknowledge, Justice Alito, that there is a lot of debate happening here and abroad about the
01:32:30.380 proper model of delivery of this care and exactly when adolescents should receive it and how to identify
01:32:35.740 the adolescents for whom it would be helpful. But I stand by that there is a consensus that these
01:32:40.740 treatments can be medically necessary for some adolescents, and that's true no matter what source
01:32:45.380 you look at. So she didn't disavow her clearly false statement to the court about the alleged
01:32:52.440 overwhelming evidence that the benefits outweigh the harms.
01:32:57.920 So what we're looking at in this situation is a conflict between what the evidence tells us
01:33:03.040 and what the consensus tells us. So we've got this manufactured consensus where very biased activists
01:33:09.900 have managed to get all of the major medical organizations to buy in to their approach through a very
01:33:16.800 circular process. Meanwhile, they're suppressing research showing the actual efficacy of this for
01:33:23.420 kids, and they are ignoring developments in countries that have pioneered these procedures
01:33:31.440 that used to make them very available to kids and now are restricting them because they looked at the
01:33:37.000 evidence. And Steve Marshall, the Alabama Attorney General, had an amicus brief in this case that really laid out
01:33:43.620 the process. And that showed that the medical guidelines that are being used here were written not by
01:33:49.020 doctors, but largely by policy advocates, by social justice lawyers, and by people within the Biden
01:33:55.820 administration who are lobbying for the most ideologically aligned outcomes rather than
01:34:02.640 delving into the evidence and making an evidence-based decision about what's best for kids.
01:34:07.740 It's truly horrifying how our medical organizations have been captured by these activists who are trying to
01:34:19.680 set policy for our children, for the chopping off of body parts for the most vulnerable among us, and then 0.91
01:34:28.560 confused parents go to a psychiatrist, a child psychiatrist or psychologist for help, and they are put on a path of
01:34:37.260 severe danger.
01:34:40.740 Yeah. I mean, it's just, it goes to a broader problem with America's elite, which maybe is outside the scope of
01:34:48.680 this conversation, but they are just divorced from reality. We're supposed to embrace evidence-based
01:34:56.200 medicine. We're supposed to look at the evidence when making those determinations. And this is,
01:35:02.500 this is kind of a Trojan horse. It's, it's, you know, they, they dress it up to look legitimate in
01:35:10.340 every possible way. But it's empty in the middle. I guess it's not like the Trojan horse at all,
01:35:16.540 actually, but, you know, they're, they're, they're transporting these radical ideological beliefs
01:35:23.400 in the guise of legitimate medical research. And that is having a really profound impact on
01:35:31.360 thousands of kids. The numbers have gone up spectacularly, very dramatically, a 4,000% increase
01:35:38.540 in adolescent girls looking for hormone treatments, according to one researcher.
01:35:43.340 And as the numbers go up for unexplained reasons, more and more evidence comes out showing that this
01:35:50.060 is harmful. Other countries have pumped the brakes. And here we are with the White House,
01:35:55.720 with the major medical associations, with the American Bar Association, with all sorts of very
01:36:02.460 powerful institutional players in this country, pushing in the other direction, essentially trying
01:36:08.520 to get everyone to ignore the evidence and pursue this ideological end at great cost to children.
01:36:14.900 They, they are the enemy. They are the ideological enemy. And their, their so-called expertise
01:36:22.460 must be challenged because it is not coming from a factual or trustworthy place. Thank God you're,
01:36:29.200 you see that. And so do these other States, almost half the union is on board. So, uh, one thing it does
01:36:35.460 look like, I mean, for sure, when the Trump administration begins, the support of the government
01:36:42.260 for the trans argument will go away. That could cause some procedural snafus that could be to your
01:36:48.400 benefit. We'll have to see, but it doesn't look like the case will go away. I agree with you.
01:36:52.300 It looks like you're going to win. Um, good justice Gorsuch who gave us boss doc, which said you can't
01:36:58.040 discriminate in hiring when it comes to trans people. Didn't say anything yesterday. Interesting, 1.00
01:37:03.160 potentially troubling, but I think you got him. I'm going to guess you got him because boss doc said,
01:37:07.340 we're not making any pronouncements beyond hiring of trans people, but what's going to happen now?
01:37:13.360 Because if, if you win, will it make it easier for sanity to prevail in cases involving boys in girls
01:37:21.760 sports, um, or any of the other fights that we're seeing on the trans front right now?
01:37:26.400 So if we win, it really depends how we win, uh, depending on what the court does here. There,
01:37:32.040 there are just many different outcomes, but the, the biggest win would be if the court says,
01:37:37.600 uh, transgender gender identity issues do not receive any heightened scrutiny, rational basis
01:37:44.520 applies, which essentially means the democratically elected representatives of the people are allowed
01:37:50.000 to make the choices about what our policies are. That would impact sports that would impact bathrooms 1.00
01:37:55.600 that would have, uh, a significant impact on the volume of litigation because we're being sued in
01:38:01.240 Tennessee, uh, on a number of different cases involving gender identity as people try to use
01:38:07.160 existing sex discrimination laws to force policy changes on the state. That's what they're trying
01:38:13.240 to do. They're trying to say this is sex discrimination. I got, I gotta be honest. I
01:38:16.240 listened to the whole thing. I didn't follow how it's sex discrimination. Even arguably, I really
01:38:19.460 didn't. She kept saying like, well, a girl who wants puberty blockers because she has precocious
01:38:24.380 puberty can get the puberty blockers, but a girl who wants them because she thinks she's a boy 0.99
01:38:28.960 can't. And so somehow this is sex discrimination. I don't get it. I don't think the court is going
01:38:33.080 to buy it. The three libs will because they're ideologically driven. But I really think you tell
01:38:38.780 me it's been, it's a boon to you that this case went up. You think you would have won anyway, but it
01:38:43.540 went up in the, on the heels of an election in which this issue was front and center. And the American
01:38:48.740 electorate overwhelmingly said, we've had enough of this. Do you think it will embolden the more
01:38:53.980 potentially wobbly justices? Yeah, it's hard for me to say. Um, they, there, there's a counter
01:39:00.520 narrative that maybe they're concerned about, uh, excesses in reining this in. I mean, I really don't
01:39:07.060 know which way they're going to go, but it is clear that this was an issue in the election. If you look
01:39:11.400 at the coalition of people that were pushing back against these treatments, it's not just your
01:39:17.000 traditional conservatives. I mean, there were these, uh, LGB groups out there. There are, uh,
01:39:23.200 sort of insurgent medical organizations of doctors horrified at the lack of evidence-based practice
01:39:29.440 in this area. Uh, so there's, there's a broader group concerned about this than just the ideological
01:39:35.440 right. Uh, I, I certainly hope that as the country takes a hard look at these policies and where
01:39:42.640 they've gotten us, uh, that the court is paying attention to what seems to be the pendulum
01:39:47.900 swinging back. It got pretty far out there in the last couple of years. God bless you for fighting
01:39:54.540 the fight. Attorney general of Tennessee, Jonathan Scrimetti, please come back on. We have a ruling.
01:40:00.780 Thank you. I will. All the best. Wow. This is so important. You guys, this is so important.
01:40:07.980 And we have to win this. And thanks to Jonathan and, and men and women like him in there.
01:40:14.660 Looks like we will pray God. Uh, okay. See you tomorrow.
01:40:20.300 Thanks for listening to the Megan Kelly show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.