It s the final week of our "Megan Kelly Live" tour, and it s a big one. On Thursday, Meghan will be joined by Charlie Sheen in Bakersfield, California, and Jack Posobiec in Phoenix, Arizona. Plus, a new report reveals that the man accused of shooting President Trump had a furry fetish and used they-them pronouns.
00:01:18.340Our final week on tour for Megyn Kelly Live.
00:01:21.280Beginning Thursday, we're heading out west with stops in California and Arizona.
00:01:26.700And we will close our tour Saturday with Walter Kern and a powerful conversation with Erica Kirk in her hometown.
00:01:34.520In Anaheim, California on Friday, Maureen Callahan, Jillian Michaels, and the Fifth Column.
00:01:40.520And on Thursday in Bakersfield, California, I'm going to be joined by VDH, Charlie Sheen.
00:01:47.140And we just added Jack Posobiec, who I'm—it's Jack Posobiec.
00:01:51.940I always say Posobiec because I thought it was pronounced that way for a long time.
00:01:55.140But it's Jack Posobiec, who's amazing and who has been so impressive in the wake of our loss of Charlie.
00:02:01.740I mean, when he stood up there with those rosary beads in his hand at the Charlie Memorial, I—it was the first moment I actually felt better.
00:02:10.100Truly, like, he's very Catholic and very connected with God.
00:02:15.040And his faith and renewal of faith in the wake of Charlie and encouragement to the rest of us in this department has been personally inspiring.
00:02:25.120Anyway, I can't wait to meet him again and see him and talk to him.
00:02:28.640Oh, and by the way, Steve Hilton, our pal who's running for governor of California and last we checked was actually in the lead by one point, is going to swing by again.
00:02:36.640So go buy tickets for our last three stops at megankelly.com and sign up for a VIP ticket if you would like so we can meet in person.
00:03:29.440I'm not talking about the Charlie assassin or his boyfriend.
00:03:34.160I'm talking about the Trump attempted assassin in Butler, Pennsylvania, had a furry fetish and used they-them pronouns, reports the New York Post.
00:03:45.480This is just—how many of these are we going to have to see this in?
00:03:48.880How many times does this have to turn out to be the story?
00:03:51.200And where did those websites lead him?
00:06:21.340Tucker has outlined this guy's social media use, which was deeply disturbing, and pointed to this guy being very right-wing up until January 2020.
00:07:18.540You can't not only, well, I'm trying to, this doesn't make sense, but it says, not only was he born here, he also belongs here.
00:07:24.420Ilhan Omar and others are invaders, he wrote, and should honestly be killed and their dead bodies sent back.
00:07:30.800And then Tucker highlights a series of increasingly violent rhetoric used in these texts.
00:07:37.200July 20th, 2019, said Donald Trump was the literal definition of patriotism.
00:07:42.180Seven hours later, says, I hope a quick, painful death to all the deplorable immigrants and anti-Trump congresswomen who don't deserve anything this country has given them.
00:07:53.760Every one of the Trump-hating Democrats deserve to have their heads chopped off, put on stakes for the world to see what happens when you fuck with America.
00:08:00.800This continued for months and became increasingly violent in tone.
00:08:04.320There was one about the squad saying, this will be blatantly racist, but I hope Trump has these people murdered.
00:08:10.740I think Tucker's showing us not only that he used to be pro-Trump, as he explicitly said, but very, very violent rhetoric that would generally get you on the radar of the FBI, given the officials that he was threatening.
00:08:24.600In one comment, he notes, 50 million Americans with AR-15s will make quick work of any blockades the government can put to protect the White House.
00:08:33.340September of 19, most rioters don't bring assault rifles and body armor like we would, and we wouldn't be going to the streets.
00:10:33.380At this point, after around August of 2020, someone who goes by Willie Tepes, T-E-P-E-S, online, introduces himself into the Crooks conversation.
00:10:45.580He started pressuring Crooks to commit violence.
00:10:49.100For example, quote, if a gun and a badge is all that's needed, then authority obviously comes from that barrel of a gun.
00:11:35.720There is no way we can avoid a war at this point, so you better just get used to the idea.
00:11:40.360We have nothing to lose and everything to win.
00:11:42.880And the alternative, a global police state, is unacceptable.
00:11:46.980Nothing in life is simple, but that is no argument against doing it.
00:11:50.940We do know, however, that Crooks' online footprint abruptly ends after his encounter with this mysterious figure, Willie Tepes.
00:11:58.740Regardless of whoever Willie Tepes is or was and what his motives may have been, who he may have been working for,
00:12:04.580there is no doubt that Crooks was ripe for recruitment by someone.
00:12:08.640Okay, Glenn, after that long intro, forgive me for taking so long on it, what do you make of it?
00:12:15.700Because the FBI is now on defense trying to defend the breadth of its investigation, trying to suggest they've done everything one would want them to do,
00:12:25.300and disputing that Thomas Crooks had much of an online footprint, though they're not specifically denying that these are his.
00:12:32.060I think that's the main question, right?
00:12:35.980I mean, we spent many years very critical of the deep state, of the FBI, of the CIA, for their secrecy,
00:12:43.020for their refusal to inform the American people what we have a right to know, of their propagandistic deceit of everybody for political ends.
00:12:51.460And there was a promise that when the Trump administration got elected and Dan Bongino and Kash Patel were in the FBI, everything was going to change.
00:13:00.480And now we're left about one of the most consequential news events that we have, which is this attempted assassination on President Trump's life that almost succeeded.
00:13:09.460We have to be relying on Tucker Carlson and Miranda Devine and the New York Post to piece together little bits and pieces about what they've been able to determine.
00:13:18.720We don't know how much else there is in the FBI's possession that might affect the picture or change the picture.
00:13:25.260And yet we learned more about Thomas Crooks in the last week from Tucker and then from the New York Post than we have in the last 10 months since the Trump administration was inaugurated.
00:13:34.260Why is that? Why haven't they told us about Thomas Crooks? There's no trial. He's dead.
00:13:40.200They've denied that there's any conspiracy, that he worked with anybody, so there's no legal proceeding to impede.
00:13:45.420Why are they keeping all that a secret?
00:13:46.880Why won't they even say if they have this or what else they have?
00:13:49.660I think that's what we ought to be demanding.
00:13:52.060Totally agree. This is very odd that just now Tucker comes out with this information.
00:13:59.000Miranda Devine, I don't know. I have no idea, Glenn.
00:14:02.160My suspicion is that Tucker dropped this bomb on Thursday.
00:14:05.960The FBI was defending itself over the weekend since Thursday.
00:14:09.680And then Miranda Devine gets a big scoop on Monday.
00:14:14.020Do not have anything to back this up other than my suspicion that the FBI probably provided this data to Miranda.
00:14:19.660That's my guess because she just has excellent sources inside the government.
00:14:23.100And to me, this almost seems like a head fake, like a look over here instead of at what Tucker did,
00:14:29.360because it's just too coincidental that, as you point out, we've had nothing on this guy, nothing.
00:14:33.380And now suddenly two big, two big information dumps.
00:14:36.760Tucker's, he's being honest about exactly where he got it.
00:14:40.240Then comes this stuff about he's a furry.
00:14:42.900You tell me, why would the government not have shared that?
00:14:46.780Like, truly, why wouldn't the FBI have been sharing that, the furry thing with us?
00:14:51.280Because this FBI did share that around the Nashville shooter, you know, the young woman who was identifying as male, whereas Biden's FBI wouldn't.
00:15:04.040But this FBI did share those facts about that shooter.
00:15:06.800This FBI did share those facts about the Charlie shooter.
00:15:10.980So I'm a little confused as to what may be going on behind the scenes.
00:15:15.360Right. And also in terms of the political trajectory that Tucker outlined, and that was great reporting,
00:15:23.080because it took you along the way on this political path that this shooter seemed to have traversed by virtue of analyzing his online footprint
00:15:32.540from going from somebody on the far right, you know, ranting or raving against Khalil Omar and Rashida Tlaib
00:15:39.140and the squad need to be murdered and immigrants need to be murdered, you know, to something that resembles some someone more on the left,
00:15:48.020very critical of Trump for his handling of covid by not taking seriously enough and other kinds of progressive rhetoric.
00:15:54.820I mean, it could be that at the end of the day, this is just a very confused person, could be a nihilist.
00:15:59.400But why why don't we have this information in our possession?
00:16:02.520This is also something you would think Kash Patel and Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi and the Trump administration would want the public to know.
00:16:09.140In other words, you know, you could accuse them of acting politically if the person were a conservative or on the right,
00:16:15.940just thought President Trump wasn't conservative enough. Maybe you could say, oh, well, they're on the right.
00:16:19.840They didn't want to have somebody on the right be blamed. But what about all the reporting that undercuts that
00:16:24.700and that suggests that he had a different ideology? What possible motive do they have for hiding that?
00:16:30.760And, you know, I do think that we have to be careful about embracing conspiracy theories.
00:16:34.800But the reason people do so is because of behavior like this.
00:16:38.620You know, Tucker's asking the question, did he go and get trained to the gun range by anybody?
00:16:42.960Who was this person online who seemed to be targeting him?
00:16:46.280How is it possible the FBI didn't know about him beforehand, given how explicit these violent threats were?
00:16:51.520And when you have the FBI hiding information and refusing to answer those basic questions,
00:16:55.780of course, conspiracy theories are going to emerge in that because that's how trust and faith by the American public is lost in these institutions.
00:17:02.280Mm-hmm. The clear implication, in my view, of Tucker's piece is that the guy was recruited by somebody to conduct this horrific act.
00:17:13.100And maybe it began with this character who goes by Willie Tepes. Maybe it was. Maybe it was somebody else.
00:17:22.540Tucker goes on to report that the FBI has made no mention of this Tepes guy in public,
00:17:28.700though they certainly know he exists, he reports.
00:17:31.880He goes on to say, just days after the shooting, somebody screenshotted Tepes' YouTube page,
00:17:37.560despite the fact that he had very few followers.
00:17:41.140And they said, you can now find this guy's username being used on a foreign Antifa website.
00:17:48.140He also reports that Thomas Crooks' online footprint abruptly ends after his encounter with this mysterious figure, Willie Tepes.
00:18:00.580So he seems to me to be clearly implying that perhaps Willie Tepes recruited Crooks for someone,
00:18:08.500alerted someone that this is a hothead who's got some mental problems and is prone to violence.
00:18:14.320And where did it go for there? One of the things Tucker pointed out in this documentary is they cremated his body.
00:18:22.820And it was done, I think, 10 days after he died, thus getting rid of any chance to do any follow-up testing on drugs in the system, etc.
00:18:32.540And he's suggesting that seems awfully quick on a guy you knew was attempting to assassinate the likely next president of the United States.
00:18:43.880I don't know, Glenn, this whole thing stinks.
00:18:46.620I mean, Susan Crabtree, who I really trust, she reports for Real Clear Politics and she covers the Secret Service for them.
00:19:56.980It's not that I don't trust Cash and Dan.
00:19:59.200It's that I think they have something that, for whatever reason, they feel strongly they cannot tell us.
00:20:04.860Right, but that is sort of a metric of trust.
00:20:11.300Whether the people in government do what people in government have long done, which is hide information from the American public,
00:20:18.300and feed us a story that's untrue because they somehow think it's for the greater good that we be deceived or kept in the dark.
00:20:26.360When in a democracy, we're actually supposed to know these things and be treated like adults and we're not supposed to have information kept from us.
00:20:34.800Or they're protecting something that doesn't deserve protection.
00:20:38.520And let's just be very explicit about this.
00:20:40.040The last time there was a president who was murdered and Trump came extremely close.
00:20:43.100It's not like this was a fake assassination attempt or one district, right?
00:20:46.520It was like a millimeter away from blowing his head off.
00:20:49.560The last time that happened to a president, a president who has his head blown off, was John F. Kennedy.
00:20:53.360And because of the secrecy around that, because of the lack of candor in our institutions,
00:20:59.200because of the bizarre way that the Warren Commission was constituted,
00:21:01.980where they had the head of the CIA and others who were the suspects,
00:21:04.860and the minds of a lot of people on that commission decreeing the truth,
00:21:08.16070 years later, people still suspect that our government might have had some role in that.
00:21:11.960And when someone like President Trump, who was so hated by many factions inside the government,
00:21:18.540particularly the deep state, as he himself and his movement has long maintained,
00:21:21.740and I certainly have as well, comes very close to having their head blown off in a way that suggests
00:21:27.020at least malfeasance on the part of those who are supposed to be protecting him, if not worse,
00:21:31.880then people do start wondering, was there the involvement of government agencies or foreign or domestic ones?
00:21:37.800And that's a natural curiosity to have.
00:21:40.960The problem is that gets exacerbated when the FBI does what it's doing in this case,
00:21:45.620which is not just stonewalling us, but even the elected members of our Congress,
00:21:50.560ones from the Republican Party who can't be accused of acting politically or with a motive to get Trump.
00:21:56.000So to the extent their behavior is now under suspicion,
00:21:59.760they really have no one but themselves to blame.
00:55:37.200So we were in the midst of discussing J.D. Vance, Tucker Carlson, and the attempt to take them both out, one via the other,
00:55:46.500or they'd settle for just getting rid of Tucker or just rid of J.D.
00:55:49.500But if they can do it all in one fell swoop, so much the better, Glenn.
00:55:54.180Yeah, you know, what's so interesting, Megyn, and we were talking about Tucker and how he never talked about Israel until October 7th,
00:55:59.380kind of a weird anti-Semitic obsessive, somebody who never talked about Israel until it was basically required when it was front and center in our politics.
00:56:07.660And I've joked with him many times that whenever he does talk about Israel, he constantly, even in private, will say,
00:56:16.460I have a lot of friends who love Israel, who are Jewish.
00:56:18.440I mean, he's worked around and with Jews.
00:56:20.320He's had friends who are Jews his whole life.
00:56:22.340What's going on here is that the tactic that every conservative I know abhorred when it was used by liberals in the left for so many years,
00:56:30.940namely screaming racist and bigot or homophobe or transphobe or misogynist or whatever,
00:56:38.120as a way of destroying somebody's reputation who disagrees with you and shutting down debate is exactly the tactic that is used when it comes to what ought to be our very rational and open conversation about our foreign policy with any country in the world, including this one, Israel.
00:56:52.940But instead, it's always supplanted with screaming anti-Semite and bigot at people and demanding they be destroyed and de-platformed and you have to disassociate yourself with them as though they're racist.
00:57:05.000I thought that's what the conservative movement was against.
00:57:07.760And yet you see these neocons within the conservative movement doing it.
00:57:10.600And now they're saying, oh, no, no, no one's asking for Tucker to be canceled.
00:57:14.160It's like, OK, you're not asking for him to be canceled because he cannot be OK.
00:57:43.800Like, that's why there's all this pressure on me and others to, like, say he's terrible or not platform him or, you know, join on board as one of his bullies or will bully you, too.
00:58:04.800And they're starting to realize that because those of us who are independent are just going to keep being independent and plugging in our microphones and people will have access to us whether they like it or not.
00:58:16.360So it's no defense to say we're not trying to have him canceled.
00:58:22.020They're trying to make him untouchable.
00:58:26.880And, Megan, you're the best proof of that.
00:58:30.220And I don't mean to hold you up as the example, but, you know, I've talked about foreign policy with you many times, including Israel, including Israel-adjacent issues.
00:58:39.320And as you said, I'm a longtime critic of Israel.
00:58:41.440And you and I see most of those issues differently.
00:58:43.820You've been a longtime supporter of Israel.
00:59:05.960But the only reason they're angry at you is because you refuse to disassociate yourself with Tucker and to renounce Tucker and to ban Tucker from your circle or Marjorie Taylor Greene or Candace Owens or anyone else.
00:59:15.780That's the only reason you've become in their crosshairs.
00:59:19.260And I always want to remind people, if you haven't seen this, I'm sure you have, but go back and watch it.
00:59:23.220Just two weeks before Charlie Kirk was killed, he was on your show.
00:59:26.520And this is what Charlie Kirk was saying.
00:59:30.720I'm getting denounced as an anti-Semite, even though I always have been pro-Israel and I still am, said Charlie Kirk.
00:59:38.060The reason they're angry at me is because I allow Tucker to speak.
00:59:42.260Like, how are you going to be in conservative media?
00:59:44.300How are you going to be in conservative politics and disassociate yourself with everybody who has questions about the U.S. relationship with Israel or criticize Israel when, especially for Charlie, who represented young people, but conservatives in general, polls show there's a huge opening now.
00:59:59.740So, where conservatives are opposed to Israel or questioning the U.S., you cannot cut off everybody who has that view or you'll only be talking to Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro every day.
01:00:20.480And I realize a lot of people disagree with me on this.
01:00:22.340But I am not dismissive of or somebody who doesn't want to make room in conservative circles for the debate about this topic.
01:00:31.280I think it's actually a really important debate, you know, especially given everything that's happened over the past couple of years.
01:00:36.940Why can't there be room in the conservative party for people to disagree on this and to make the case that, no, we are too close with Israel and it's dangerous for us and our kids?
01:00:46.240That is a totally legitimate worldview.
01:02:49.620He sounds much more like America First now.
01:02:51.500You know, so I am sure most American Jewish people who are pro-neocon, like, or more neocony, would prefer Marco Rubio to J.D. Vance or somebody else entirely who's totally neocony, like Ted Cruz.
01:03:05.580But this is about to play out right now.
01:03:07.360It's at the podcaster level, but it's about to explode into the actual principal level because, you know, within the next year, we're going to be looking for a 2028 talk more than midterms.
01:03:17.060Well, you have politicians like Ted Cruz clearly positioning themselves for 2028 by just going all in on anybody who's supported Israel as an anti-Semite.
01:03:26.800We have to remove them from the political movement.
01:03:43.500And I have the opposite view and we argued about it.
01:03:46.780And to this day, like whenever I say anything good about you or I go on your show or I promote something of yours, you know, people who are in my audience say, why would you feel good about Megyn Kelly?
01:03:59.080And Candace and I had a very public battle about whether these kids on college campuses who are pulling down the hostage posters should have consequences in terms of their hiring, too.
01:04:09.320She was like, they're, you know, they're moronic college kids.
01:04:11.740Why should we hold? And I was much more like, oh, no, you know, there are people hurting and in captivity right now.
01:04:29.400I think it's important to realize this panic that is emerging from what is, whether you like it or not, a very significant sea change in conservative opinion.
01:04:38.860Netanyahu came to the United States, wrote off the left.
01:04:41.580You know, Israel has always been bipartisan.
01:04:43.180There's still a lot of very hardcore Israel defenders and AIPAC influence within the Democratic Party, too.
01:04:48.180But for the most part, they understood the left was headed toward this position of abandoning Israel.
01:04:52.680They assume that the right wing and conservatives would always be their dependable kind of tools.
01:04:58.580And you look at public opinion and you see not just anecdotally this immense space opening where conservative leaders like Tucker and Candace, with two of the biggest podcasts in the world, are constantly questioning Israel and criticizing Israel.
01:05:09.940But also polls show that young conservatives in particular are starting to wonder, wait, we were told America first, that we have to concentrate on our own country.
01:05:17.880So why are we sending billions over there?
01:05:19.520Why are politicians constantly focused?
01:05:21.000That is, of course, a question that is going to arise.
01:05:23.740And you can try and deal with it in two ways.
01:05:25.580You can try and scream racist and bigot at everybody in the hope that they're going to fear career destruction if they ask it.
01:05:30.600Or you can try and engage it like a rational person and have this discussion about what is nothing really, at the end of the day, more than an American foreign policy like anything else.
01:05:39.300But it's so sacrosanct to them and they feel it slipping away that they're kind of lashing out with this irrationality that's making things worse for them.
01:05:52.520These aren't like Jewish friends, but Jewish pundits who I know and like who come on the show or whatever.
01:05:57.020When this first happened, after I aired that discussion that Charlie and I had, I re-aired after he died because the question of how, where did Charlie stand on Israel came up and I re-aired a portion of it.
01:06:09.320And what these people said to me is, everyone's terrified you're going to start a green with Tucker.
01:06:16.040Like you have been such an ally and they're worried that they're losing you.
01:06:19.720And Glenn, all I could say was, okay, that only makes me want to listen to Tucker more.
01:06:27.120That only, like, I don't owe anybody my never-ending support.
01:06:33.140I will be open-minded to the facts as they develop.
01:06:36.740A lot has happened with Israel since 10-7-23.
01:07:18.700And I actually want to check myself in saying to you, I've been very supportive and I still am supportive just to make sure, like, am I saying that to appease somebody?
01:07:29.600I want to just go where the facts lead me.
01:07:31.760And if Israel was good two years ago but behaved very badly for the last two years and has changed my opinion of them, I'm entitled to that opinion.
01:07:39.000It doesn't change my opinion of American Jews at all, at all, right?
01:07:45.260Like, that's such an unfair leap to make when it comes to you, when it comes to Tucker, when it comes to any of us.
01:07:50.280And that's where we really have to draw the line.
01:07:57.180But I'm far from alone or even a trivial number who are more critical of Israel and Zionism than even Tucker, you know, in his latest expression of his views.
01:08:08.000To conflate Israel and Jews is, I don't want to raise this, but it is kind of anti-Semitic, like, to assume that every Jew has loyalty to Israel.
01:08:21.080I see Israel as a foreign country the way a lot of Jews do.
01:08:24.020And there are a lot of people who are not Jewish who are fervently in favor of Israel.
01:08:27.800So to even make that conflation is so unfair.
01:08:30.520And I do think that it's very much the left-wing tactic.
01:08:34.020Like, people will say, oh, no, you can criticize Israel and still not be an anti-Semite.
01:08:38.960I don't know of a single person in public life with any kind of platform who has ever vocally criticized Israel who hasn't stood accused of anti-Semitism.
01:09:33.300Anyway, I want to move on to the presidential politics of it because it's getting very interesting.
01:09:36.860So J.D. Vance is definitely going to come under withering scrutiny, yes, for his friendship with Tucker.
01:09:41.200And already I mentioned the New York Times piece that you tweeted out that is quite interesting by this nutcase Jamal Bowie, who came out and wrote this long piece about J.D., which is just crazy.
01:10:04.920Enter J.D. Vance, who, as my colleague Ezra Klein observed this week in an interview with my friend John Gantz, is functionally Groyper adjacent.
01:10:14.460The Groypers are Nick Fuentes' followers.
01:10:16.600As the controversy around Fuentes, Carlson, and Heritage grew into a firestorm, Vance stayed quiet.
01:10:26.360Fuentes considers the vice president's triangulation a victory of sorts.
01:10:30.580It is a sign, in other words, that Vance fears the political consequences of an open disavowal, so much so that he won't act on the pleas of some of his closest associates to challenge the Groypers.
01:10:41.620But while the vice president won't say where he stands, it is not hard to sense where his sympathies lie.
01:10:47.540This week, Vance sat for an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News.
01:10:50.600Here he is discussing the housing crisis, quoting Vance.
01:10:54.240A lot of people, this is a quote, quote, a lot of people, a lot of young people, are saying housing is way too expensive.
01:11:00.960Because we flooded the country with 30 million illegal immigrants who were taking houses that ought by right go to American citizens, end quote.
01:11:10.120You can parse all the rhetoric you'd like, but what is the actual practical difference between Vance's call for the removal and potential expropriation of illegal immigrants, defined in terms of ethnic and racial difference, and Fuentes' vision of a white ethno-state in what is now the United States?
01:11:31.720You want the illegals who came in under Biden out?
01:11:34.140You are a Nick Fuentes, white supremacist, neo-Nazi gruyper, and that's mana from heaven as far as the New York Times sees J.D. Vance's presidential prospects.
01:11:47.760You know, so much of this is out of ignorance.
01:11:51.720Nick Fuentes absolutely despises J.D. Vance, and one of the reasons why is that he's married to a woman who's Indian and has Indian children, half Indian descent.
01:12:01.520Kind of a weird white nationalist, isn't it?
01:12:03.280That he would rather support Gavin Newsom because he married a white woman and has white kids than J.D. Vance because he married an Indian woman, an Indian American, and has a son named Vivek.
01:12:15.060Is it an odd form of white nationalism, which is what they want to accuse J.D. Vance of, to decide that the person with whom you're going to build your entire life, who you're going to live next to side by side, with whom you're going to have your children, is not actually white, but of Indian descent, of Indian American, and your own children, as you knew what happened, and love them more than anything, are half Indian.
01:12:39.240That's a very odd white nationalist, isn't it?
01:12:43.560I think, yeah, that's a very poor choice that he made for a white nationalist.
01:12:48.380But the thing is, I think that this is one of the things that people have to realize, and I know you saw this article in Axios about Ezra Klein, who Jamal Bowie referenced, and it's basically about how even for an opinion columnist, he's kind of blurring the line between being an opinion columnist for The New York Times and being an activist and organizer for the Democratic Party.
01:13:09.540A lot of people in media, in these newspapers, The New York Times, The Washington Post, all these networks, have this view that it is their primary mission not to do journalism, but to organize for and win elections for the Democratic Party.
01:13:23.740And one of the ways you do that, there's no real benefit in demonizing Trump anymore is Hitler.
01:13:45.040And so now it's just the next time is to do it is J.D. Vance.
01:13:47.680And that's what this column is all about is you might have thought Trump was bad, but Trump really, he wasn't a racist at the end of the day, the way J.D. Vance is.
01:13:55.040The newest iteration of Republican is always the real Hitler.
01:13:57.920Yes. And then you have, speaking of potential fractions amongst the right wing, you have Senator Ted Cruz, who is definitely pro-Israel and neo-Khani.
01:14:13.480There's an article about him in Axios saying he's going to challenge, he's potentially going to challenge J.D. Vance.
01:14:20.500And we know this from how outspoken he's been about Tucker and, like, he calls Tucker an anti-Semite.
01:14:28.100It's definitely Tucker and Ted Cruz are not fans of one another.
01:14:31.500Ted Cruz went on there and within, you know, the first four minutes basically accused Tucker of anti-Semitism.
01:14:36.020And then it didn't go well, not surprisingly.
01:14:41.680And then do we have the moment when Cruz went on Fox?
01:14:43.920Yes. Cruz went on Fox News today and it was very clear he knew they were going to ask him about the Axios piece, pitching him as, like, the guy who is going to take on J.D. Vance.
01:14:56.000And he demurred, you know, like, oh, you know, focus on the people of Texas or whatever.
01:15:00.760But Ted Cruz has run for president many, many times.
01:15:02.920There's no reason not to believe he will do it again, especially if he thinks the main competition is going to be a J.D.
01:15:11.060Marco ticket, which he'll be able to spin Marco Rubio as more America first J.D.
01:15:19.060Marco is definitely not a neocon anymore.
01:15:20.680So it does make you wonder what's going to happen when we gear up towards 2028 and whether that dream ticket of J.D.
01:15:28.520Marco that Trump has talked about is going to have smooth sailing getting the go ahead or whether you're going to have other contenders who say not so fast.
01:15:37.480We want a primary and we want to be heard.
01:15:40.800I think it's really worth remembering that in 2016, Trump ran against the Republican establishment.
01:15:46.080They were all lined behind Jeb Bush and then Marco Rubio and then Ted Cruz at the end of the day.
01:15:52.080And it was Trump's singular kind of charisma and political force that enabled him to win despite being completely opposed in every way by the Republican establishment, which to this day actually continues to hate him, even if they're more muted about it now.
01:16:07.220And I think Ted Cruz senses that the Republican establishment will be important in 2028.
01:16:11.820They have immense amounts of money and institutional support.
01:16:13.880And they're more on his side of this argument.
01:16:16.540The problem, though, Megan, is like one of the things Ted Cruz said in that interview with Tucker, which I to this day can't believe he said.
01:16:22.340He said, when I ran for Congress, I was determined to wake up every day and be Israel's leading supporter in the Congress.
01:16:29.840And every single day I've woken up to do exactly that.
01:16:32.800Now, good luck reconciling that with the America first politics and ideology that this entire new generation of the one before that has sped on in Republican politics for the last 10 to 15 years.
01:16:45.120I don't think those things are reconcilable.
01:17:05.880But but, you know, as well as I do, that that used to be a safe thing for a Republican that used to be an unassailable statement, no matter where you were in the party on other issues like uniform backing of Israel was required of you.
01:17:22.700So it used to be a very safe thing to say.
01:17:24.720It's only more recent, you know, and because Israel's in a war and this behavior has been controversial and all that that has become even close to controversial.
01:17:37.640But it is one of those things that makes it complicated when you depending on who your donors are, because, you know, they need money to get reelected and they don't want to piss off the donors.
01:17:47.720And it's like, so is there room to change your opinion or isn't there?