The Megyn Kelly Show - December 14, 2021


Real COVID Risk to Kids and Biden's Lagging Leadership, with Charles C.W. Cooke and David Wallace-Wells | Ep. 221


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 41 minutes

Words per Minute

176.67773

Word Count

18,011

Sentence Count

288

Misogynist Sentences

50

Hate Speech Sentences

27


Summary

Charles C.W. Cook of National Review joins us to talk about the latest Supreme Court vaccine mandate ruling, Biden's tough Build Back Better sell, the transgender swimmer making waves in college athletics, and much, much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 When I found out my friend got a great deal
00:00:02.160 on a wool coat from Winners,
00:00:03.760 I started wondering,
00:00:05.440 is every fabulous item I see from Winners?
00:00:08.560 Like that woman over there with the designer jeans.
00:00:10.900 Are those from Winners?
00:00:12.780 Ooh, or those beautiful gold earrings?
00:00:15.260 Did she pay full price?
00:00:16.600 Or that leather tote?
00:00:17.620 Or that cashmere sweater?
00:00:18.840 Or those knee-high boots?
00:00:20.280 That dress?
00:00:21.060 That jacket?
00:00:21.740 Those shoes?
00:00:22.780 Is anyone paying full price for anything?
00:00:25.720 Stop wondering.
00:00:26.980 Start winning.
00:00:27.920 Winners.
00:00:28.500 Find fabulous for less.
00:00:30.580 Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:32.520 Your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations.
00:00:42.160 Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly.
00:00:43.960 Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:45.380 We are diving into COVID reality today
00:00:47.840 with David Wallace-Wells of New York Magazine.
00:00:50.320 Later this show, how worried should we be about Omicron?
00:00:54.180 And what's the path out of the fear
00:00:56.480 and toward a life of living with the pandemic,
00:00:59.560 the left needs a plan, needs to get on board with a plan,
00:01:04.540 and he can speak to that.
00:01:06.560 But first, our good friend Charles C.W. Cook of National Review
00:01:09.880 is here on the latest Supreme Court vaccine mandate ruling,
00:01:13.560 Biden's tough Build Back Better sell,
00:01:16.280 the transgender swimmer making waves in collegiate athletics,
00:01:19.580 and much, much more.
00:01:20.980 Charles, welcome back.
00:01:21.660 Good to see you.
00:01:22.480 Thanks for having me.
00:01:24.060 Okay, so where to begin?
00:01:25.340 Let's start with Build Back Better,
00:01:26.480 which I know is one of your favorite topics.
00:01:28.080 And the last time you were on,
00:01:29.640 the last thing I said to you was,
00:01:31.080 I love your love-hate relationship with Joe Manchin,
00:01:34.240 depending on the day,
00:01:35.300 depending on how the tea leaves read,
00:01:38.120 on whether he's going to vote for this thing or not.
00:01:40.320 The administration's saying
00:01:41.400 they want it done by Christmas.
00:01:43.400 You know, it's pretty late.
00:01:45.680 I mean, that's pretty soon to get this thing passed.
00:01:48.060 And Joe Manchin has been turning on them
00:01:50.560 on a couple of other pieces of their agenda.
00:01:53.980 So how are you reading said tea leaves right now?
00:01:57.640 Well, I think that the conditions have led Joe Manchin
00:02:03.320 to become more skeptical than he was,
00:02:06.260 and that at the very least,
00:02:08.760 that's going to push this past Christmas.
00:02:11.540 Two things have happened since we last spoke.
00:02:13.260 One, inflation has got worse,
00:02:15.300 and it's been confirmed in the numbers.
00:02:17.620 I think there are very few people now
00:02:19.300 who are denying that this is here,
00:02:21.720 maybe not permanently,
00:02:23.520 but on more than a transitory basis.
00:02:26.520 That worries Joe Manchin.
00:02:28.520 And the other thing is that the CBO
00:02:31.700 has scored the bill on the assumption
00:02:35.200 that its provisions will be made permanent.
00:02:38.100 Now, Democrats are complaining about that.
00:02:40.060 Basically, that's not what the bill does.
00:02:41.780 But, you know, we know that
00:02:43.260 Republicans, too,
00:02:44.300 when political parties make big changes,
00:02:46.680 they don't want them for a couple of years.
00:02:49.580 They want them forever.
00:02:51.400 And it's not unreasonable for Republicans to say,
00:02:55.420 what would this bill do if they got their wish?
00:02:58.400 Well, what this bill would do
00:03:00.420 if the Democrats got their wish
00:03:02.600 is add $3 trillion to the deficit.
00:03:05.300 And Joe Manchin has been quite clear
00:03:07.260 that he opposes any bill of that size
00:03:11.000 that is unpaid for
00:03:12.320 and that will eventually increase America's indebtedness.
00:03:16.440 So it's looking better for the bill's opponents.
00:03:20.100 The bill is also fairly unpopular now.
00:03:22.040 But you never know.
00:03:25.080 When parties have an incentive to pass something
00:03:29.660 to avoid media headlines saying that the president's tenure
00:03:34.840 and momentum is over,
00:03:36.840 they often find the votes.
00:03:38.000 True, but Biden's approval rating
00:03:41.500 in West Virginia is dreadful.
00:03:44.100 And so Joe Manchin has other things to worry about.
00:03:47.880 It's not like this is an incredibly powerful,
00:03:49.980 popular president
00:03:51.260 who he'll get credit for supporting.
00:03:54.160 I mean, it feels like his voters
00:03:56.120 might give him credit for tanking this bill,
00:03:59.320 this huge spending bill
00:04:00.760 at a time we have record inflation.
00:04:02.160 And I wonder,
00:04:03.440 because what he said earlier this week
00:04:05.400 was he's repeating his calls
00:04:07.240 for a political pause,
00:04:09.700 echoing something he first said in September.
00:04:11.680 He wants a pause on this.
00:04:13.440 And that's at the time when the CBO is saying
00:04:15.940 it's going to add $3 trillion.
00:04:17.520 The number's even bigger,
00:04:18.540 depending on who you ask.
00:04:20.700 The Penn-Wharton budget model,
00:04:23.140 according to the Wall Street Journal,
00:04:24.060 has scored the 10-year cost around $4.6 trillion.
00:04:27.640 And people are feeling
00:04:29.480 the already staggering inflation
00:04:31.680 in their pocketbooks.
00:04:33.140 So I do wonder,
00:04:33.840 if you're sitting in West Virginia
00:04:34.880 and you're paying more for your eggs,
00:04:37.020 for your used car,
00:04:38.180 for your milk,
00:04:39.020 for your electronics,
00:04:40.560 and you see your guy
00:04:42.200 as pretty much the last stalwart
00:04:44.940 between more spending,
00:04:47.240 which you know will come back to haunt you,
00:04:48.960 and a pause,
00:04:50.800 don't you want him,
00:04:51.660 aren't you calling his office
00:04:52.680 saying don't do this?
00:04:54.100 I think so.
00:04:54.880 And I've been arguing for a while
00:04:57.660 that in one sense,
00:04:59.680 Joe Manchin has played this perfectly
00:05:01.460 for West Virginia
00:05:03.140 and for Joe Manchin.
00:05:04.980 Joe Manchin is not a Republican.
00:05:06.840 I know he's a thorn in the side
00:05:07.940 of the Democrats,
00:05:08.680 but he is a Democrat.
00:05:09.900 He's a moderate one.
00:05:11.640 And West Virginia,
00:05:12.940 although once Joe Manchin retires,
00:05:15.020 it will be a Republican state
00:05:16.600 for a while,
00:05:17.560 still has a slightly different character
00:05:19.400 than a state such as, say, Texas.
00:05:21.620 And you can see this
00:05:23.040 in that the Build Back Better bill
00:05:26.920 we're discussing
00:05:27.780 is extremely unpopular.
00:05:30.500 It has 26% support in West Virginia,
00:05:32.780 but the bipartisan infrastructure bill
00:05:36.540 that passed last month
00:05:39.500 is extremely popular.
00:05:41.100 that in turn has 74% support.
00:05:45.240 In other words,
00:05:45.880 West Virginia is the same to Joe Manchin,
00:05:47.520 we don't like the president.
00:05:49.340 We like the bipartisan bill you did,
00:05:51.780 which the Republican senator
00:05:53.260 from West Virginia,
00:05:54.860 Shelley Moore Capito,
00:05:55.620 also voted for.
00:05:56.560 We don't like this monstrous
00:05:58.080 Build Back Better bill.
00:05:59.420 Well, that's actually where
00:06:00.540 Joe Manchin is politically.
00:06:02.740 So he doesn't have to do very much
00:06:04.860 to keep on the right side
00:06:07.180 of his voters.
00:06:09.480 Whether he will do it, though,
00:06:11.660 is hard to predict
00:06:13.540 because doing what West Virginians want
00:06:16.960 and what I think he thinks is right
00:06:18.280 would, it's undeniable,
00:06:20.140 exact a real cost
00:06:21.620 from his party
00:06:23.640 and the president of that party.
00:06:27.820 Meanwhile, you've got Bernie Sanders
00:06:29.600 doing what Bernie Sanders does.
00:06:31.780 I mean, we've talked about him before,
00:06:33.000 about how he thinks
00:06:33.780 there's some obligation
00:06:34.780 for Manchin and others
00:06:36.820 to vote the way
00:06:37.920 he wants them to vote.
00:06:39.780 And he sent out a tweet
00:06:43.300 that reads as follows.
00:06:45.480 While the majority
00:06:46.160 of the American people
00:06:47.300 have expressed overwhelming support
00:06:49.940 for the Build Back Better Act
00:06:52.080 and delivering for working Americans,
00:06:55.180 Republicans continue to oppose it.
00:06:57.420 Maybe, just maybe,
00:06:58.760 that's why they have to resort
00:07:00.460 to voter suppression.
00:07:03.520 What?
00:07:04.700 Wait, wait, what?
00:07:06.820 Look, so everything in there
00:07:08.780 is wrong.
00:07:10.980 This is of a piece with,
00:07:12.560 and you mentioned this,
00:07:13.800 Bernie's argument
00:07:14.920 that what really matters
00:07:17.120 is whether there is a majority
00:07:19.360 for this bill
00:07:20.600 within the Democrats' caucus,
00:07:22.500 not within the Senate.
00:07:25.400 Bernie keeps saying
00:07:26.460 that two senators
00:07:27.460 are holding up this bill.
00:07:29.480 He's referring to Joe Manchin
00:07:30.680 of West Virginia
00:07:31.340 and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
00:07:33.080 But actually 52
00:07:34.440 out of 100 senators
00:07:36.420 are holding up this bill.
00:07:38.820 It is true
00:07:39.780 that Manchin and Sinema
00:07:41.140 are out of step
00:07:42.180 with their party,
00:07:42.920 but that's irrelevant.
00:07:44.320 I am strongly in favor
00:07:46.360 of the filibuster,
00:07:47.080 and I like the structure
00:07:47.860 of the Senate.
00:07:49.540 But irrespective of one's view
00:07:51.240 on that,
00:07:51.700 there is no theory
00:07:52.760 of the Senate
00:07:53.280 in which major bills
00:07:54.660 can be passed
00:07:55.260 by 48 out of 100 voters.
00:07:57.260 Bernie doesn't grasp that.
00:07:58.860 And then on the bill itself,
00:08:00.080 what he's doing here
00:08:02.240 is something you hear a lot
00:08:04.800 from progressives
00:08:05.900 and Democratic socialists,
00:08:07.340 and that's taking
00:08:07.980 one side of the ledger only.
00:08:10.340 If you remember back
00:08:11.160 with Obamacare,
00:08:13.220 Democrats would insist
00:08:14.280 during the Obamacare debates
00:08:15.740 that the individual
00:08:17.220 discrete provisions
00:08:18.120 within the bill
00:08:18.840 were popular,
00:08:19.720 but the bill itself wasn't.
00:08:21.000 And therefore,
00:08:21.780 there must be something
00:08:22.460 sinister going on.
00:08:23.800 The media must be running
00:08:24.940 interference for Republicans,
00:08:26.380 Republicans must be lying,
00:08:27.500 Americans must be ignorant,
00:08:28.800 and so forth.
00:08:29.260 But of course,
00:08:30.160 that's not what happens
00:08:31.260 when you get a bill.
00:08:32.800 When you get a bill,
00:08:34.260 people have to combine
00:08:36.280 what they think
00:08:37.360 of the proposal,
00:08:38.840 be that gun control
00:08:40.120 or spending
00:08:41.160 or reforms
00:08:42.100 to the healthcare system,
00:08:43.900 with the cost
00:08:44.980 which is put in the bill.
00:08:46.800 They also have to consider
00:08:47.940 the circumstances,
00:08:49.220 the context
00:08:49.900 within which the bill
00:08:50.860 is being proposed.
00:08:52.960 It's really quite silly
00:08:54.400 to do what Bernie is doing,
00:08:55.740 both implicitly
00:08:56.520 and explicitly,
00:08:57.720 to say,
00:08:58.040 well, if you ask people,
00:08:59.460 do you think
00:09:01.080 we should give seniors
00:09:02.320 prescription glasses
00:09:03.920 at no cost?
00:09:05.560 Do you want to do that?
00:09:06.840 They'll say yes.
00:09:08.340 Fine.
00:09:09.320 Until they're told
00:09:10.180 about the tax increases
00:09:11.400 and increases in debt
00:09:12.480 and inflationary
00:09:13.440 consequences
00:09:14.940 of doing so.
00:09:16.500 This bill exists
00:09:17.780 as it exists.
00:09:18.860 It has a set of provisions
00:09:20.180 in it
00:09:20.660 that if passed
00:09:21.520 would go into law.
00:09:22.660 And according to NPR,
00:09:23.940 that wild-eyed
00:09:24.780 right-wing outlet,
00:09:25.860 it has 41% support.
00:09:29.580 And, you know,
00:09:30.340 I think for Bernie Sanders
00:09:31.620 to keep saying
00:09:32.440 this has overwhelming support
00:09:33.680 or that it has
00:09:34.280 majority support
00:09:35.140 is flat-out dishonest.
00:09:37.220 And the theory
00:09:37.760 on which he's basing that
00:09:39.040 is silly.
00:09:40.760 It's one side
00:09:42.820 of the ledger accounting.
00:09:45.060 Meanwhile,
00:09:45.720 it has overwhelming
00:09:47.200 majority support
00:09:47.960 in his backyard,
00:09:49.100 maybe,
00:09:49.360 in his house,
00:09:50.040 but across the country
00:09:51.000 not so much
00:09:51.560 and less
00:09:52.420 as the economy
00:09:53.140 gets worse and worse.
00:09:54.620 The numbers
00:09:55.460 for Joe Biden
00:09:56.400 continue to go down.
00:09:57.960 When you look at it
00:09:58.840 state by state,
00:09:59.740 it's very bad.
00:10:02.000 In West Virginia,
00:10:03.220 Biden's approval rating
00:10:04.180 19%.
00:10:05.520 And you had a piece
00:10:07.380 recently talking about
00:10:08.120 how the Democrats
00:10:08.740 just keep saying
00:10:09.400 he's just got to do
00:10:10.500 more to lead.
00:10:11.880 That's what we need.
00:10:12.480 We just need Biden
00:10:13.580 to do more to lead.
00:10:14.820 And what we need
00:10:15.360 is to get together,
00:10:16.480 get this BBB
00:10:18.680 pushed through
00:10:19.700 so we can show everybody
00:10:20.580 how amazing our agenda is.
00:10:22.300 Meanwhile,
00:10:22.640 all the bad things
00:10:23.340 that are happening,
00:10:24.120 like with the economy,
00:10:25.360 they say isn't happening.
00:10:26.720 Same way they said
00:10:27.360 to us about CRT.
00:10:28.620 It's just not happening.
00:10:29.780 Don't believe your lying eyes.
00:10:31.820 Notwithstanding
00:10:32.220 all the testimonials,
00:10:33.160 notwithstanding
00:10:33.560 what people see
00:10:34.160 at the grocery store
00:10:34.860 and so on.
00:10:35.640 So he's got a 19%
00:10:36.800 approval rating
00:10:37.400 in West Virginia.
00:10:38.500 In Arizona,
00:10:39.640 35.
00:10:40.260 Montana,
00:10:40.780 31.
00:10:41.240 New Hampshire,
00:10:41.800 43.
00:10:42.340 Colorado,
00:10:42.880 40.
00:10:43.500 In Virginia,
00:10:44.260 38.
00:10:45.500 Kansas,
00:10:46.060 Michigan,
00:10:46.460 27 and 39.
00:10:48.400 I mean,
00:10:48.760 on and on it goes
00:10:49.860 down below 40%.
00:10:51.860 He has no mandate.
00:10:54.580 He does not have
00:10:55.260 a groundswell of support.
00:10:57.200 And you tell me
00:10:58.060 in what way
00:10:58.840 the Democrats expect him
00:11:00.060 to, quote,
00:11:00.740 lead at this point
00:11:02.200 to turn around
00:11:03.100 their electoral fortunes
00:11:04.620 as we have,
00:11:05.840 I don't know,
00:11:06.720 11 months now
00:11:07.980 until the midterm elections.
00:11:09.240 I don't think he can.
00:11:12.460 And the reason
00:11:13.260 I mentioned the states
00:11:14.340 that you just read off
00:11:15.980 was that those are states
00:11:17.100 whose U.S. senators
00:11:18.680 or Democratic governors
00:11:20.280 have started to
00:11:22.880 defy him.
00:11:25.160 The last week
00:11:26.780 was particularly bad
00:11:27.900 for Joe Biden,
00:11:29.640 Joe Manchin
00:11:30.560 and John Tester.
00:11:31.860 So that's West Virginia
00:11:32.680 and Montana
00:11:33.420 got together
00:11:34.300 to vote
00:11:35.060 with all Republicans
00:11:35.920 to reverse
00:11:36.860 the federal vaccine mandate.
00:11:38.820 That probably won't
00:11:39.580 become law
00:11:40.060 because Biden will veto it,
00:11:41.420 but the gesture
00:11:42.080 is interesting nevertheless.
00:11:43.740 Five Democrats
00:11:44.900 without Joe Manchin.
00:11:47.880 So you have
00:11:48.360 Virginia, Colorado,
00:11:49.400 two in Arizona,
00:11:51.060 one in Montana,
00:11:53.360 got together
00:11:54.140 to end
00:11:56.100 the nomination
00:11:57.260 of Saul Omorova,
00:11:59.200 who he wanted
00:11:59.560 as controller
00:12:00.240 of the currency.
00:12:01.240 and you have
00:12:03.580 Joe Manchin
00:12:04.720 continuing to oppose
00:12:06.760 key parts
00:12:07.440 of Biden's agenda
00:12:08.520 and trashing
00:12:09.740 parts of that agenda
00:12:11.060 in the press.
00:12:12.900 And I think
00:12:13.760 it's a little unfair
00:12:14.840 of people to say,
00:12:16.000 well,
00:12:16.180 Biden needs to lead.
00:12:18.540 Biden is the last thing
00:12:20.120 that is going
00:12:22.420 to change this equation
00:12:23.600 because,
00:12:24.160 as you said,
00:12:24.660 he's unpopular.
00:12:25.720 He can't go into
00:12:26.460 those states
00:12:27.320 over the heads
00:12:28.200 of the representatives
00:12:29.420 who are more popular.
00:12:30.460 and say,
00:12:32.380 these guys
00:12:33.020 are doing the wrong thing.
00:12:34.400 First,
00:12:34.700 it would be counterproductive.
00:12:36.200 But secondly,
00:12:36.920 that's actually
00:12:37.380 what they must want.
00:12:38.660 And if you're Joe Manchin,
00:12:39.680 what you want right now
00:12:40.680 is for Joe Biden
00:12:42.020 or Kamala Harris
00:12:42.760 or anyone else,
00:12:43.440 frankly,
00:12:43.680 to come into your state
00:12:44.740 and say,
00:12:45.240 you're the problem.
00:12:46.660 It makes you look
00:12:47.220 independent,
00:12:48.000 makes you look
00:12:48.540 probably stronger
00:12:50.180 than you are.
00:12:51.340 So there's really
00:12:52.240 no chance
00:12:53.140 for Joe Biden
00:12:54.400 to turn this around.
00:12:56.840 What he needs
00:12:58.020 is a lot of good news.
00:13:00.860 But I will say,
00:13:01.760 I think he's making
00:13:02.500 a big strategic mistake
00:13:03.720 and this is perhaps
00:13:04.520 a mistake
00:13:05.360 that Democrats
00:13:05.880 and progressives
00:13:06.720 make inevitably
00:13:08.280 because of their worldview.
00:13:10.480 You may remember this.
00:13:11.520 Two weeks ago,
00:13:12.380 the DCCC
00:13:13.380 put out one
00:13:14.360 of the silliest tweets
00:13:15.300 I think any of us
00:13:16.080 had ever seen
00:13:16.900 and it showed
00:13:17.960 gas prices
00:13:18.760 going down
00:13:19.440 about one and a half cents
00:13:20.820 over two weeks.
00:13:22.400 And the caption said,
00:13:24.160 thank you,
00:13:25.100 Joe Biden.
00:13:26.660 And I wrote at the time,
00:13:27.780 that was a huge mistake
00:13:28.760 because the correct argument
00:13:30.720 that Biden should be making,
00:13:33.060 and when I say correct,
00:13:33.800 I mean true,
00:13:34.560 not just politically efficacious,
00:13:36.540 is that he's not
00:13:37.280 in control of gas prices.
00:13:38.520 Yeah, that's right.
00:13:39.020 The high gas prices
00:13:39.780 are by and large
00:13:40.640 not Biden's fault.
00:13:41.760 Now, he is in some ways
00:13:43.060 making them worse
00:13:43.820 and he's doing
00:13:44.480 not that much
00:13:46.140 to make them better,
00:13:47.160 but they're not his fault.
00:13:48.740 But if you go on Twitter
00:13:49.900 and your party
00:13:50.680 starts taking ownership
00:13:51.900 of negligible marginal drops
00:13:54.500 in prices,
00:13:56.880 what do you think
00:13:57.480 people are going to conclude
00:13:58.680 when they go up?
00:13:59.740 As of course
00:14:00.240 they did immediately.
00:14:01.760 They're going to think,
00:14:02.540 well, if the tiny decrease
00:14:04.220 was Joe Biden's doing,
00:14:05.540 then this 10 cent increase
00:14:06.980 must be Joe Biden's doing as well.
00:14:08.540 It was really silly
00:14:09.340 and it did the president
00:14:10.240 no favors whatsoever.
00:14:12.400 And now the White House
00:14:13.180 watching the press coverage,
00:14:14.600 even the left wing press,
00:14:15.700 has to be somewhat honest
00:14:17.960 about these inflationary numbers.
00:14:19.520 I mean, the latest is
00:14:20.340 highest levels,
00:14:22.060 highest levels
00:14:22.860 in nearly 40 years.
00:14:25.440 The strongest inflationary
00:14:26.720 burst in a generation.
00:14:29.420 And they say,
00:14:30.860 OK, so it's basically
00:14:31.620 a 6.8 percent pace
00:14:33.020 on a year over year basis.
00:14:34.520 That's the fastest rate
00:14:35.600 of growth in inflation
00:14:36.460 since June 1982.
00:14:38.840 Energy prices up 33.3 percent
00:14:41.360 since November of 2020.
00:14:43.800 Gasoline up 58.1 percent.
00:14:46.680 Food prices jumped 6.1 percent.
00:14:49.200 And up and up they go.
00:14:50.780 And so what does
00:14:51.200 the White House do?
00:14:52.100 They gather the reporters,
00:14:53.840 their favorite reporters together
00:14:55.260 to say what we really need
00:14:56.980 is better coverage
00:14:57.920 because we swear the story
00:14:59.600 is better than it looks
00:15:01.080 right there.
00:15:01.860 And that's what leads us
00:15:03.640 to people like Don Lemon,
00:15:05.980 who in seeing gas prices
00:15:07.740 go down a few cents,
00:15:09.640 did the following on CNN.
00:15:11.560 Listen to this.
00:15:13.420 Big economic relief
00:15:14.440 for millions of Americans
00:15:15.420 who have been dealing
00:15:16.500 with soaring energy prices.
00:15:19.120 Cost of the pump
00:15:19.780 finally easing up
00:15:21.380 with the national average
00:15:22.720 for a gallon of regular
00:15:23.720 falling to $3.35,
00:15:26.220 the lowest since October.
00:15:28.960 Just look at that.
00:15:33.500 OMG, Charlie.
00:15:37.260 Yeah, the Biden's response,
00:15:40.100 Biden team's response to this
00:15:41.700 has just baffled me.
00:15:43.240 I mean, the first thing
00:15:44.940 they should be doing
00:15:45.640 is completely reorienting
00:15:47.540 his presidency
00:15:48.320 to meet this challenge.
00:15:50.900 It is not largely his fault
00:15:53.340 that we are seeing
00:15:54.380 these inflationary pressures.
00:15:55.700 Although I will say
00:15:56.500 spending trillions of dollars,
00:15:57.980 as the party did again
00:15:58.860 in March,
00:16:01.360 $2 trillion of unnecessary spending,
00:16:03.440 has not improved things.
00:16:05.220 But it's not mostly his fault.
00:16:07.460 And yet he's not
00:16:09.140 reoriented himself
00:16:11.060 to fighting it.
00:16:12.460 And I think that's
00:16:13.460 what people want.
00:16:15.340 What they don't want
00:16:16.260 is for him to carry on
00:16:17.660 pursuing a bill
00:16:19.440 that the party
00:16:20.540 would have tried
00:16:21.580 to pass
00:16:22.620 in 2018
00:16:23.440 or 2016
00:16:24.300 or 2014
00:16:25.860 as if nothing
00:16:27.100 is happening.
00:16:28.860 And so there is
00:16:29.620 a real disconnect here
00:16:31.640 between what we're seeing
00:16:32.980 on the ground,
00:16:33.740 which again,
00:16:34.260 it's not really Biden's fault,
00:16:36.020 and what he's talking about.
00:16:37.460 To the point at which
00:16:38.780 he and his party
00:16:40.680 are saying some incredibly
00:16:41.960 silly things.
00:16:43.360 Like, well,
00:16:44.180 if you're worried
00:16:44.860 about inflation,
00:16:45.720 then you really should
00:16:47.160 get behind the
00:16:47.800 Build Back Better bill.
00:16:48.960 That's what will
00:16:49.700 nix inflation.
00:16:51.160 No, it won't.
00:16:52.340 It won't.
00:16:53.180 And it will probably
00:16:54.040 make it worse
00:16:54.900 because flooding the economy
00:16:56.420 with trillions more dollars,
00:16:58.460 printing more money,
00:16:59.680 is not how you
00:17:01.020 get rid of inflation.
00:17:02.760 In terms of the media,
00:17:03.720 I think this is where
00:17:05.600 Democrats suffer
00:17:06.540 from their domination
00:17:07.800 of the media,
00:17:09.400 the academy,
00:17:10.260 the entertainment industry,
00:17:11.560 and so on.
00:17:12.380 Most of the time,
00:17:13.820 they benefit.
00:17:14.660 They can run interference
00:17:16.020 for the party
00:17:17.840 through the press.
00:17:19.920 They can use push polls.
00:17:22.180 They can change perceptions.
00:17:25.700 What they can't do here
00:17:27.720 is convince people
00:17:29.280 that what they're seeing
00:17:30.200 with their own eyes
00:17:31.540 isn't real.
00:17:32.440 You might be able
00:17:34.100 to alter
00:17:35.460 the perception
00:17:36.960 of a candidate
00:17:37.720 using the newspapers.
00:17:39.920 You might be able
00:17:40.760 to bury
00:17:41.400 inconvenient stories
00:17:42.720 just by
00:17:43.720 the process
00:17:45.080 of picking
00:17:45.720 and choosing
00:17:46.180 what you print
00:17:46.960 and what you air.
00:17:48.420 But telling people
00:17:49.600 that inflation
00:17:50.300 is actually not bad,
00:17:52.320 telling people
00:17:52.980 that the economy
00:17:54.000 is healthier
00:17:54.600 than it's ever been,
00:17:56.420 telling people
00:17:57.060 that the labor market
00:17:58.620 is fine,
00:18:00.020 and as David Leonhardt
00:18:01.740 pointed out
00:18:02.180 in the New York Times,
00:18:03.220 telling people
00:18:03.920 that this is normal America,
00:18:05.980 an America
00:18:07.000 with messed up schools
00:18:09.080 and empty airports
00:18:10.640 and supply chain problems.
00:18:13.600 It's just bizarre
00:18:15.560 because people can see it.
00:18:17.780 People know
00:18:18.420 whether their wages
00:18:19.700 are in line
00:18:22.200 with their outgoings,
00:18:23.160 and they know
00:18:24.240 whether it's easy
00:18:25.080 to find a job,
00:18:25.980 and they know
00:18:27.020 whether they can
00:18:27.880 travel in the way
00:18:29.600 that they used to,
00:18:30.440 and they know
00:18:30.960 how their children's
00:18:31.800 schools are operating.
00:18:33.120 And, you know,
00:18:33.640 you can make as many calls
00:18:35.080 to Don Lemon
00:18:35.800 or Dana Milbank
00:18:37.980 or Jennifer Rubin
00:18:38.900 as you like
00:18:39.520 and implore them
00:18:40.700 to tell people
00:18:41.780 that actually
00:18:42.300 on paper
00:18:42.820 it's fine,
00:18:44.040 but come on.
00:18:44.700 Yeah, that doesn't work,
00:18:46.680 and they might have
00:18:47.380 benefited from somebody
00:18:48.480 who could push back
00:18:49.760 on them
00:18:50.180 and say
00:18:50.720 that's a bad strategy.
00:18:52.960 The people know
00:18:54.620 they have wallets,
00:18:55.960 they have bills to pay,
00:18:57.240 it's Christmas season,
00:18:58.420 they feel all of it
00:18:59.720 on an intimate level,
00:19:01.020 but instead
00:19:01.560 he's got sycophants,
00:19:03.220 and I refer to the press
00:19:04.480 here around him,
00:19:05.800 who are as desperate
00:19:06.600 as he is
00:19:07.640 to make the narrative
00:19:08.960 about Biden
00:19:09.740 be better.
00:19:10.800 I mean,
00:19:11.120 you have reporters
00:19:12.180 like Milbank
00:19:13.040 openly suggesting,
00:19:14.500 you know,
00:19:14.660 this is a battle
00:19:15.360 of good versus evil,
00:19:17.780 and so
00:19:18.480 we need to be
00:19:19.640 on the side of good,
00:19:20.460 that would be Joe Biden
00:19:21.320 to defeat the Republicans
00:19:22.720 or Trump,
00:19:23.920 who embodies evil,
00:19:25.840 and therefore
00:19:26.300 you better shape up
00:19:27.200 that coverage
00:19:27.860 and get on board
00:19:29.020 in trying to
00:19:29.940 shove down the throats
00:19:31.360 of the American people
00:19:32.060 this lie
00:19:32.680 because, you know,
00:19:34.220 it's an existential crisis
00:19:35.660 for the United States.
00:19:36.540 It's crazy to hear
00:19:37.300 reporters
00:19:37.820 openly talking like this
00:19:40.420 and taking the marching
00:19:41.360 orders in this way,
00:19:43.280 and then, of course,
00:19:44.680 Charlie,
00:19:45.040 they turn around
00:19:45.740 when you see an event
00:19:46.560 like January 6th,
00:19:48.080 right,
00:19:48.300 or like COVID,
00:19:49.580 where they'd really like
00:19:51.720 to have the attention
00:19:52.600 and trust
00:19:53.120 of the American people,
00:19:54.380 and they're baffled
00:19:55.820 as to why they don't have it.
00:19:58.060 Why are people
00:19:58.760 down the internet
00:19:59.320 rabbit holes?
00:20:00.280 Why won't they believe
00:20:01.160 Dr. Fauci and us
00:20:02.340 when we tell them
00:20:03.040 the, quote,
00:20:03.820 truth, capital T,
00:20:04.940 about COVID, right?
00:20:07.080 These little death
00:20:08.460 by a thousand cuts
00:20:09.560 moments
00:20:10.280 are why.
00:20:13.320 Yeah,
00:20:14.020 I've written about this
00:20:15.020 recently in two contexts.
00:20:16.300 One was the Dana Milbank
00:20:17.600 column in the Washington Post
00:20:19.160 in which he said
00:20:19.960 that some artificial
00:20:21.240 intelligence algorithm
00:20:22.620 had determined
00:20:23.440 that the press
00:20:24.120 is as mean
00:20:24.940 to Biden
00:20:25.640 as it was to Trump.
00:20:27.320 I mean,
00:20:27.580 this is silly.
00:20:28.540 It's not just silly
00:20:29.400 on its face,
00:20:30.600 but it's silly
00:20:31.120 because that AI technology
00:20:32.940 isn't particularly good.
00:20:34.920 It's quite difficult
00:20:35.900 to judge sentiment
00:20:37.000 and tone
00:20:37.540 and scope,
00:20:38.360 sarcasm,
00:20:38.860 irony,
00:20:39.720 and so forth.
00:20:41.720 And the other was
00:20:42.420 in response to David Frum
00:20:43.640 who essentially said
00:20:44.600 that if you are critical
00:20:45.620 of President Trump,
00:20:46.580 then you have to
00:20:47.360 remain on board
00:20:48.460 with all of the
00:20:50.320 Russiagate conspiracy theories
00:20:51.920 that we spent
00:20:53.020 two years
00:20:53.880 obsessing over.
00:20:55.800 And in both cases,
00:20:57.380 I made the same point
00:20:58.640 and that is that
00:20:59.220 if you want to
00:21:00.320 limit the number
00:21:01.740 of lies in our politics,
00:21:03.120 then you just need
00:21:03.800 to tell the truth more.
00:21:05.560 And it is entirely possible
00:21:07.160 both to think
00:21:08.640 that President Trump
00:21:10.440 lied relentlessly
00:21:12.840 about the 2020 election
00:21:15.100 and that Joe Biden's economy,
00:21:17.980 or at least the economy
00:21:19.140 that Joe Biden
00:21:21.200 is president for,
00:21:24.080 is bad.
00:21:25.000 And the idea
00:21:26.320 that you're beginning
00:21:26.900 to see in certain quarters,
00:21:28.240 sometimes explicitly,
00:21:29.840 there was a piece yesterday
00:21:30.640 making this case
00:21:31.460 explicitly
00:21:32.700 in the New Republic,
00:21:34.500 that the press
00:21:35.620 should be bolstering Biden
00:21:37.220 even when it knows
00:21:38.740 either that he's lying
00:21:40.240 or that his policies
00:21:42.200 are harmful,
00:21:43.740 is counter to everything
00:21:47.200 that we should expect
00:21:48.360 from journalism,
00:21:49.660 but also from each other
00:21:50.880 as citizens.
00:21:52.060 That's not how
00:21:53.520 you vanquish
00:21:55.480 people who cheat
00:21:57.300 or tell falsehoods.
00:22:00.140 That's how you get
00:22:00.880 more of them,
00:22:01.460 as you say.
00:22:02.080 That's how you prompt
00:22:03.240 people to conclude
00:22:04.160 that no one is trustworthy,
00:22:06.160 that all of politics
00:22:07.120 is one great staged battle
00:22:09.420 between partisan interests
00:22:11.460 and that the truth
00:22:12.920 doesn't factor in,
00:22:14.100 and eventually
00:22:14.900 to go down
00:22:15.800 those rabbit holes
00:22:16.720 and find themselves
00:22:19.560 under the sway
00:22:21.000 of people
00:22:21.400 who are far,
00:22:22.220 far less responsible
00:22:23.640 than, you know,
00:22:25.380 Kevin McCarthy
00:22:26.240 or your media
00:22:27.540 and right-of-center
00:22:28.500 journalists.
00:22:29.820 I think this is
00:22:30.400 a terrible idea
00:22:31.480 that in some ways
00:22:33.580 indicates just how
00:22:35.080 out of touch
00:22:35.740 many people in the press
00:22:36.780 are with those
00:22:37.380 they ostensibly serve.
00:22:39.720 Well, and you know
00:22:40.480 what else?
00:22:40.980 It's indicative
00:22:43.320 of why
00:22:44.360 so many Republicans
00:22:45.940 in particular
00:22:46.560 believe that the election
00:22:48.400 was stolen.
00:22:49.560 It's not that they believe
00:22:50.680 in the Kraken
00:22:51.420 or the Sidney Powell thing.
00:22:52.880 It's that they think
00:22:53.620 the system is rigged
00:22:54.820 against the Republican.
00:22:56.620 And now you have
00:22:57.560 the press openly
00:22:59.080 acknowledging that,
00:23:00.560 though that's not
00:23:01.160 their goal.
00:23:01.680 But that's why
00:23:02.460 I think Republicans
00:23:03.240 look at it and they say
00:23:04.020 big tech is 100%
00:23:05.580 against Republicans.
00:23:06.940 So are the media.
00:23:08.160 These are two
00:23:08.760 really important organizations.
00:23:10.140 And when you have people
00:23:11.360 like you point out
00:23:12.320 from talking about
00:23:13.140 how you have to,
00:23:14.760 like this is,
00:23:15.140 again,
00:23:16.240 it's an existential thing.
00:23:17.940 They don't find it
00:23:18.960 all that hard to believe
00:23:19.960 that Democratic poll workers
00:23:21.760 were up to some funny business
00:23:24.060 on the night of the election,
00:23:25.140 right?
00:23:25.280 Because the ends
00:23:25.940 would justify the means
00:23:26.980 Trump had to be disposed of.
00:23:29.580 They had to do
00:23:30.240 what they had to do.
00:23:31.080 You know,
00:23:31.220 this is sort of
00:23:31.860 because the press
00:23:32.780 paints the Republicans
00:23:33.600 as a bunch of lunatics
00:23:34.860 for holding on to
00:23:36.060 their doubts
00:23:36.620 about the election.
00:23:37.760 That's my own take on it.
00:23:38.920 It's not about Kraken.
00:23:40.160 It's about stuff like this.
00:23:41.520 I think one of the
00:23:43.420 difficult things
00:23:44.300 in recent years
00:23:45.820 has been that
00:23:46.800 many of the criticisms
00:23:49.020 that the press
00:23:50.040 leveled
00:23:50.980 at President Trump
00:23:52.340 were true.
00:23:54.700 They were also
00:23:55.640 the same things
00:23:56.380 that they'd said
00:23:56.860 about every Republican president.
00:23:58.720 And as a result,
00:24:00.000 it was quite hard
00:24:00.960 to convince people
00:24:02.160 that, no,
00:24:03.000 this time
00:24:03.560 it's true
00:24:04.540 because people
00:24:06.220 would say,
00:24:06.780 well,
00:24:07.440 yeah,
00:24:07.840 but they said that
00:24:08.360 about Reagan
00:24:08.940 or they said that
00:24:09.660 about George W. Bush
00:24:11.480 and they said that
00:24:12.300 about Mitt Romney.
00:24:13.820 And you would have to say,
00:24:14.540 yes, I know,
00:24:15.120 but in this case,
00:24:15.920 Trump actually did do it.
00:24:17.600 He actually is lying
00:24:18.940 and he,
00:24:20.040 you know,
00:24:20.760 and I think
00:24:23.480 that there's obviously
00:24:24.440 a lesson in there
00:24:25.440 for anyone
00:24:26.040 who defends Trump
00:24:27.760 to the hilt.
00:24:28.480 This is not a guy
00:24:29.460 who is trustworthy.
00:24:30.820 There's also a lesson
00:24:31.780 in there about
00:24:32.520 crying wolf.
00:24:33.760 It's an old fable
00:24:34.860 for a reason.
00:24:36.060 You do not want
00:24:37.020 to create
00:24:37.760 reflexive distrust
00:24:39.140 in people
00:24:39.620 such that
00:24:40.180 if there is
00:24:41.040 the very threat
00:24:42.500 that they've been
00:24:43.240 warned about,
00:24:44.060 they dismiss it.
00:24:45.420 And we're already
00:24:46.480 beginning to see
00:24:47.600 the same people
00:24:49.720 get up
00:24:52.100 on the top
00:24:52.800 of the mountain
00:24:53.600 and shout
00:24:54.580 about Ron DeSantis.
00:24:55.960 We're already
00:24:56.520 seeing pieces
00:24:57.380 saying,
00:24:58.320 well,
00:24:58.540 Trump was one thing
00:24:59.340 but that Ron DeSantis
00:25:00.380 is another.
00:25:01.500 No,
00:25:01.920 he's not.
00:25:02.760 And if you do that,
00:25:03.900 you will drive people
00:25:04.820 into the hands
00:25:05.460 of irresponsible politicians.
00:25:07.060 and make it
00:25:08.240 much harder
00:25:08.920 for them
00:25:09.320 to police
00:25:10.140 their own side.
00:25:12.220 Okay,
00:25:12.820 up next,
00:25:13.440 we're going
00:25:13.700 to get into
00:25:14.480 time,
00:25:15.520 picking its
00:25:15.940 person of the year,
00:25:17.200 transgender swimmer
00:25:18.480 crushing all
00:25:19.400 the women's records
00:25:20.340 at the University
00:25:21.600 of Pennsylvania
00:25:22.240 and the latest
00:25:22.880 on COVID vaccine
00:25:24.120 mandates
00:25:24.540 at the U.S.
00:25:25.220 Supreme Court
00:25:25.860 right after this.
00:25:27.600 More with Charles
00:25:28.200 C.W. Cook
00:25:29.100 in two minutes.
00:25:30.040 Don't go away.
00:25:30.500 Don't go away.
00:25:37.740 So Charles,
00:25:39.100 speaking of
00:25:40.000 the lamentations
00:25:41.680 about 2016
00:25:42.920 on the right
00:25:44.060 and the left,
00:25:45.240 Hillary Clinton
00:25:46.280 weighed in recently.
00:25:47.340 I've been dying
00:25:48.060 to ask you about this
00:25:49.440 and decided
00:25:50.920 for some reason
00:25:51.640 it might be a good idea
00:25:52.640 for her to read
00:25:53.500 what would have been
00:25:54.640 her victory speech
00:25:56.200 on camera.
00:25:58.400 I actually hadn't
00:25:59.520 even seen it
00:26:00.100 until my team
00:26:00.620 played it for me
00:26:01.240 last week
00:26:02.300 and I was stunned
00:26:03.960 at like the shaking,
00:26:05.400 crying version
00:26:06.320 of Hillary.
00:26:07.340 I'm not sure
00:26:08.180 what was going on here
00:26:09.160 but I'm more interested
00:26:10.300 in your take.
00:26:10.940 Here's a clip.
00:26:11.620 I dream of going up
00:26:12.700 to her
00:26:13.140 and sitting down
00:26:15.040 next to her
00:26:15.800 taking her
00:26:17.940 in my arms
00:26:18.820 and saying
00:26:20.320 look at me
00:26:21.060 listen to me
00:26:22.740 you will survive
00:26:25.200 you will have
00:26:27.020 a good family
00:26:27.880 of your own
00:26:28.700 and three children
00:26:30.500 and as hard
00:26:32.280 as it might be
00:26:33.320 to imagine
00:26:34.000 your daughter
00:26:35.620 will grow up
00:26:36.440 and become
00:26:37.200 the President
00:26:38.520 of the United States.
00:26:41.580 I am as sure
00:26:43.100 of this
00:26:43.580 as anything
00:26:44.400 I have ever known.
00:26:46.820 America
00:26:47.500 is the greatest
00:26:48.500 country
00:26:49.200 in the world
00:26:50.080 and from tonight
00:26:52.400 going forward
00:26:53.400 together
00:26:54.480 we will make
00:26:56.160 America
00:26:56.740 even greater
00:26:58.040 than it has
00:26:58.960 ever been
00:26:59.740 for each
00:27:00.980 and every
00:27:01.980 one
00:27:02.660 of us.
00:27:04.100 Thank you.
00:27:05.440 God bless you
00:27:06.500 and may God bless
00:27:08.080 America.
00:27:11.960 Your thoughts?
00:27:14.500 Well,
00:27:15.400 I think that it
00:27:16.660 demonstrates
00:27:17.820 a lack of judgment
00:27:18.940 and self-control.
00:27:20.520 I understand
00:27:21.480 how difficult
00:27:22.220 it must be
00:27:22.800 to lose
00:27:23.400 a presidential race
00:27:25.600 and if you
00:27:26.580 had wanted
00:27:27.040 to be president
00:27:27.740 for your entire
00:27:28.400 life
00:27:28.900 it must be
00:27:30.380 crushing
00:27:30.840 to lose
00:27:31.600 a race
00:27:32.040 that you
00:27:32.440 believed
00:27:33.040 throughout
00:27:33.840 you were
00:27:34.480 destined to win
00:27:35.360 as Hillary
00:27:36.140 did in 2016.
00:27:38.140 So on a human
00:27:38.740 level
00:27:39.100 I comprehend
00:27:40.880 her
00:27:42.060 grief
00:27:43.380 but there are
00:27:44.880 a lot of people
00:27:45.540 in American history
00:27:46.460 who have been
00:27:47.200 in her position
00:27:48.580 and who
00:27:50.140 have borne
00:27:51.500 their
00:27:52.100 failure
00:27:53.520 with
00:27:54.680 distinction
00:27:56.760 who have
00:27:58.500 declined
00:27:58.920 to do
00:27:59.440 what we
00:28:00.400 just saw.
00:28:02.180 One of them
00:28:03.040 just died
00:28:03.680 Bob Dole
00:28:04.720 who lost
00:28:05.440 badly
00:28:05.860 to Hillary
00:28:06.580 Clinton's
00:28:07.040 husband
00:28:07.320 in 1996
00:28:08.860 who I think
00:28:10.800 coped with
00:28:11.280 his own loss
00:28:12.160 by joking
00:28:12.900 about it.
00:28:13.700 He was a
00:28:14.480 funny man.
00:28:15.740 Others
00:28:16.100 are of the
00:28:17.440 stalwart
00:28:18.060 type
00:28:19.220 I find
00:28:21.020 that embarrassing
00:28:21.680 I think
00:28:22.140 perhaps
00:28:22.580 I find
00:28:23.160 that
00:28:23.420 slightly
00:28:24.160 more
00:28:24.440 embarrassing
00:28:24.800 than even
00:28:25.220 you do
00:28:25.600 because
00:28:25.980 I'm
00:28:26.700 originally
00:28:27.060 English
00:28:27.560 that's
00:28:28.860 number
00:28:29.240 one
00:28:29.700 on the
00:28:30.020 list
00:28:30.240 of
00:28:30.380 things
00:28:30.660 you
00:28:30.840 don't
00:28:31.120 do
00:28:31.320 as
00:28:31.500 an adult
00:28:31.920 stiff
00:28:32.120 upper
00:28:32.560 lip
00:28:33.000 right
00:28:34.640 well you
00:28:35.600 know
00:28:35.720 can I
00:28:35.920 tell you
00:28:36.180 watching it
00:28:37.180 again
00:28:37.500 I don't
00:28:38.200 I
00:28:38.480 actually
00:28:38.980 question
00:28:39.700 the
00:28:40.600 emotion
00:28:41.140 in
00:28:41.660 I
00:28:42.000 don't
00:28:42.320 question
00:28:42.640 that it
00:28:42.860 was
00:28:42.980 difficult
00:28:43.240 for her
00:28:43.580 to
00:28:43.740 lose
00:28:44.040 and
00:28:44.220 that
00:28:44.340 she
00:28:44.460 felt
00:28:44.740 all
00:28:45.020 of
00:28:45.140 that
00:28:45.300 acutely
00:28:45.700 in
00:28:45.940 16
00:28:46.360 but
00:28:47.300 in
00:28:47.960 my
00:28:48.180 experience
00:28:48.520 when
00:28:48.680 somebody
00:28:48.960 is
00:28:49.120 crying
00:28:49.500 or
00:28:49.720 holding
00:28:50.040 back
00:28:50.320 tears
00:28:50.660 because
00:28:50.980 they're
00:28:51.220 reading
00:28:51.400 something
00:28:51.680 difficult
00:28:52.100 or going
00:28:52.440 through
00:28:52.580 a
00:28:52.680 difficult
00:28:52.920 memory
00:28:53.320 that's
00:28:54.160 not
00:28:54.320 how
00:28:54.480 it
00:28:54.620 looks
00:28:54.800 and
00:28:54.980 sounds
00:28:55.300 you
00:28:55.440 don't
00:28:55.720 constantly
00:28:56.500 have
00:28:56.900 the
00:28:57.080 voice
00:28:57.380 like
00:28:57.660 that
00:28:57.900 you
00:28:58.040 have
00:28:58.240 bouts
00:28:58.580 of
00:28:58.760 it
00:28:59.240 breaks
00:28:59.680 you
00:28:59.940 try
00:29:00.160 to
00:29:00.380 recover
00:29:01.040 it
00:29:01.360 breaks
00:29:01.640 again
00:29:01.880 you
00:29:02.000 try
00:29:02.160 to
00:29:02.260 recover
00:29:02.580 to
00:29:03.180 me
00:29:03.360 it
00:29:03.560 seemed
00:29:03.940 affected
00:29:04.780 and
00:29:05.940 it
00:29:06.200 also
00:29:06.540 seemed
00:29:06.880 affected
00:29:07.320 to
00:29:07.560 me
00:29:07.700 because
00:29:08.000 Hillary
00:29:08.340 Clinton
00:29:08.700 is
00:29:09.240 whatever
00:29:09.960 your
00:29:10.200 criticisms
00:29:10.600 of
00:29:10.880 her
00:29:11.000 a
00:29:11.200 very
00:29:11.500 tough
00:29:11.840 woman
00:29:12.180 and
00:29:13.200 I
00:29:13.860 feel
00:29:14.200 like
00:29:14.400 this
00:29:14.620 was
00:29:14.940 intentional
00:29:15.700 she
00:29:16.100 was
00:29:16.340 trying
00:29:16.780 to
00:29:17.020 show
00:29:17.420 a
00:29:18.160 softer
00:29:18.620 side
00:29:19.140 of
00:29:19.300 herself
00:29:19.620 she
00:29:19.920 thought
00:29:20.180 that
00:29:20.340 that
00:29:20.520 would
00:29:20.740 somehow
00:29:21.340 connect
00:29:21.840 with
00:29:22.020 people
00:29:22.380 just
00:29:22.680 proving
00:29:23.240 once
00:29:23.480 again
00:29:23.680 that
00:29:23.820 she
00:29:23.900 just
00:29:24.080 doesn't
00:29:24.320 get
00:29:24.560 it
00:29:24.760 authenticity
00:29:25.520 is
00:29:25.960 what
00:29:26.180 connects
00:29:26.740 you
00:29:26.980 with
00:29:27.220 other
00:29:27.540 people
00:29:27.820 not
00:29:28.100 fake
00:29:28.500 tears
00:29:28.960 if
00:29:29.640 you're
00:29:29.860 not
00:29:30.080 that
00:29:30.300 person
00:29:30.720 and
00:29:31.580 it
00:29:32.020 did
00:29:32.220 lead
00:29:32.440 me
00:29:32.540 to
00:29:32.660 wonder
00:29:32.880 is
00:29:33.120 she
00:29:33.340 getting
00:29:33.760 ready
00:29:34.120 to
00:29:34.380 you
00:29:35.620 know
00:29:35.740 with
00:29:35.920 Joe
00:29:36.160 Biden
00:29:36.420 so
00:29:36.640 weak
00:29:36.960 and
00:29:37.140 Kamala
00:29:37.460 Harris
00:29:37.740 so
00:29:38.000 unpopular
00:29:38.560 and
00:29:38.760 Pete
00:29:38.960 Buttigieg
00:29:39.460 just
00:29:39.780 a
00:29:40.020 far
00:29:40.740 left
00:29:41.100 dream
00:29:41.720 that's
00:29:42.360 never
00:29:42.560 going
00:29:42.820 to
00:29:42.940 materialize
00:29:43.680 is
00:29:44.020 she
00:29:44.260 getting
00:29:44.540 ready
00:29:44.840 to
00:29:45.100 throw
00:29:45.280 her
00:29:45.440 hat
00:29:45.620 back
00:29:45.820 in
00:29:45.940 this
00:29:46.080 ring
00:29:46.300 I
00:29:48.660 think
00:29:48.960 about
00:29:49.240 it
00:29:49.520 I
00:29:50.300 think
00:29:50.780 it
00:29:50.900 would
00:29:51.020 be
00:29:51.380 insane
00:29:52.280 for
00:29:53.140 her
00:29:53.360 to
00:29:53.600 do
00:29:53.800 so
00:29:54.120 the
00:29:55.240 story
00:29:56.840 of
00:29:57.020 Hillary
00:29:57.240 Clinton
00:29:57.640 I'm
00:29:58.000 afraid
00:29:58.360 is
00:29:59.480 the
00:29:59.660 story
00:30:00.120 of
00:30:00.540 a
00:30:00.700 politician
00:30:01.220 that
00:30:02.180 the
00:30:02.400 public
00:30:02.780 doesn't
00:30:03.220 like
00:30:03.600 and
00:30:04.500 who
00:30:05.060 in
00:30:05.920 her
00:30:06.140 various
00:30:06.760 incarnations
00:30:07.620 has
00:30:08.360 had
00:30:08.560 to
00:30:08.700 be
00:30:08.860 pushed
00:30:09.180 over
00:30:09.680 any
00:30:10.780 finish
00:30:11.180 line
00:30:11.560 she
00:30:12.000 managed
00:30:12.420 to
00:30:12.700 traverse
00:30:13.160 she
00:30:14.660 should
00:30:16.320 have
00:30:16.680 blown
00:30:17.040 out
00:30:17.420 the
00:30:17.760 senate
00:30:18.120 race
00:30:18.460 she
00:30:18.640 ran
00:30:18.880 in
00:30:19.060 2000
00:30:19.600 she
00:30:20.740 did
00:30:20.940 she
00:30:21.640 won
00:30:21.960 but
00:30:23.240 she
00:30:23.480 didn't
00:30:23.760 do
00:30:23.920 as
00:30:24.100 well
00:30:24.280 as
00:30:24.440 you
00:30:24.600 would
00:30:24.780 have
00:30:24.980 expected
00:30:25.500 in
00:30:25.840 New
00:30:26.140 York
00:30:26.460 which
00:30:26.700 was
00:30:26.800 a
00:30:26.940 reliably
00:30:27.260 democratic
00:30:27.760 state
00:30:28.220 with
00:30:28.620 her
00:30:28.760 husband
00:30:29.120 as
00:30:29.380 president
00:30:29.920 for
00:30:30.320 the
00:30:30.500 race
00:30:30.920 she
00:30:31.940 lost
00:30:32.280 to
00:30:32.540 Barack
00:30:32.900 Obama
00:30:33.300 in
00:30:33.520 2008
00:30:34.040 which
00:30:34.280 shocked
00:30:34.620 everyone
00:30:35.140 Barack
00:30:36.120 Obama
00:30:36.380 obviously
00:30:36.760 very
00:30:37.180 talented
00:30:37.760 politician
00:30:38.460 but he
00:30:38.740 came from
00:30:39.140 nowhere
00:30:39.460 and managed
00:30:40.180 to beat
00:30:40.560 her
00:30:40.780 and then
00:30:41.500 she lost
00:30:41.920 in 2016
00:30:42.780 to Donald
00:30:44.060 Trump
00:30:44.420 which was
00:30:45.580 also
00:30:45.960 unexpected
00:30:46.740 the idea
00:30:47.720 that the
00:30:48.820 democratic
00:30:49.300 party
00:30:49.820 would look
00:30:51.160 to Hillary
00:30:51.560 Clinton
00:30:52.000 as its
00:30:53.000 salvation
00:30:54.040 I think
00:30:55.800 is a
00:30:56.060 strange
00:30:56.360 one
00:30:56.640 that said
00:30:57.360 it is
00:30:57.800 in dire
00:30:58.200 straits
00:30:58.780 Joe
00:30:59.900 Biden
00:31:00.300 is a
00:31:01.180 matter
00:31:01.380 we've
00:31:01.940 talked
00:31:02.140 about
00:31:02.420 that
00:31:02.700 Kamala
00:31:03.120 Harris
00:31:03.420 is
00:31:03.600 even
00:31:03.800 worse
00:31:04.260 she's
00:31:04.760 less
00:31:05.060 liked
00:31:05.420 than
00:31:05.840 Joe
00:31:06.160 Biden
00:31:06.500 and
00:31:07.560 she
00:31:07.800 seems
00:31:08.360 to be
00:31:08.780 exposing
00:31:09.220 herself
00:31:09.740 for
00:31:09.980 what
00:31:10.200 she
00:31:10.360 is
00:31:10.640 which
00:31:10.960 is
00:31:11.260 an
00:31:12.540 authoritarian
00:31:13.000 who
00:31:13.620 believes
00:31:14.200 in
00:31:14.400 nothing
00:31:14.740 so
00:31:15.100 I
00:31:15.520 can
00:31:15.680 understand
00:31:16.040 why
00:31:16.220 Hillary
00:31:16.440 Clinton
00:31:16.720 might
00:31:16.980 look
00:31:17.380 at
00:31:17.580 the
00:31:17.840 race
00:31:18.120 and
00:31:18.320 say
00:31:18.640 there's
00:31:19.860 my
00:31:20.040 opening
00:31:20.400 but
00:31:20.720 I
00:31:21.340 think
00:31:21.500 it
00:31:21.600 would
00:31:21.700 be
00:31:21.820 a
00:31:22.080 profound
00:31:22.440 mistake
00:31:22.960 for
00:31:23.500 her
00:31:24.080 and
00:31:24.660 for
00:31:25.020 the
00:31:25.140 party
00:31:25.520 I
00:31:25.880 mean
00:31:26.660 at
00:31:26.880 this
00:31:27.120 rate
00:31:27.400 Charles
00:31:27.680 we
00:31:27.900 could
00:31:28.060 get
00:31:28.320 a
00:31:28.520 2024
00:31:29.040 campaign
00:31:30.500 that's
00:31:31.340 once
00:31:31.680 again
00:31:32.120 Clinton
00:31:32.620 v
00:31:33.200 Trump
00:31:33.600 I
00:31:34.320 mean
00:31:35.620 it's
00:31:35.860 possible
00:31:36.300 it's
00:31:36.880 possible
00:31:37.220 Trump
00:31:37.800 would
00:31:37.960 win
00:31:38.180 that
00:31:38.440 and
00:31:38.700 I
00:31:39.220 think
00:31:39.480 if
00:31:39.680 you
00:31:40.040 don't
00:31:40.360 want
00:31:40.700 Donald
00:31:41.000 Trump
00:31:41.180 to be
00:31:41.460 president
00:31:41.820 again
00:31:42.240 as I
00:31:42.720 don't
00:31:43.040 I
00:31:43.200 would
00:31:43.340 like
00:31:43.500 the
00:31:43.640 Republican
00:31:44.060 Party
00:31:44.440 to
00:31:44.660 move
00:31:44.940 on
00:31:45.220 and
00:31:45.760 nominate
00:31:46.520 one
00:31:46.740 of
00:31:46.840 its
00:31:47.020 talented
00:31:47.580 forward
00:31:48.100 looking
00:31:48.500 younger
00:31:49.160 candidates
00:31:49.840 you
00:31:51.040 should
00:31:51.680 hope
00:31:52.640 that
00:31:53.340 the
00:31:53.480 Democratic
00:31:53.980 Party
00:31:54.500 isn't
00:31:55.320 weak
00:31:55.660 enough
00:31:56.080 to
00:31:56.920 that
00:31:57.600 outcome
00:31:58.080 because
00:31:58.600 at
00:31:59.200 the
00:31:59.360 moment
00:31:59.780 I
00:32:00.300 have
00:32:00.520 to
00:32:00.680 say
00:32:01.020 it
00:32:02.020 looks
00:32:02.300 to
00:32:02.460 me
00:32:02.640 as
00:32:02.820 if
00:32:02.960 Trump
00:32:03.140 would
00:32:03.280 have
00:32:03.400 a
00:32:03.500 good
00:32:03.660 shot
00:32:03.960 if
00:32:04.120 he
00:32:04.240 ran
00:32:04.380 again
00:32:04.680 against
00:32:05.720 any
00:32:06.280 of
00:32:06.500 these
00:32:06.760 folks
00:32:07.180 Biden
00:32:08.040 Kamala
00:32:09.240 or
00:32:10.180 Hillary
00:32:10.740 or
00:32:10.960 Buttigieg
00:32:11.540 there's
00:32:12.260 no
00:32:12.440 savior
00:32:12.820 for
00:32:13.020 the
00:32:13.160 Democratic
00:32:13.480 Party
00:32:13.880 right
00:32:14.120 now
00:32:14.320 unless
00:32:14.540 they
00:32:14.700 can
00:32:14.860 get
00:32:15.140 Oprah
00:32:15.920 or
00:32:16.540 The
00:32:16.840 Rock
00:32:17.180 or
00:32:17.820 George
00:32:18.200 Clooney
00:32:18.660 to
00:32:19.180 run
00:32:19.500 they're
00:32:20.320 in
00:32:20.400 a
00:32:20.500 lot
00:32:20.640 of
00:32:20.740 trouble
00:32:21.000 and
00:32:21.320 sadly
00:32:21.840 the
00:32:22.080 grip
00:32:22.400 of
00:32:22.580 celebrity
00:32:22.960 in
00:32:23.140 our
00:32:23.260 society
00:32:23.660 remains
00:32:24.060 so
00:32:24.260 those
00:32:24.500 actually
00:32:25.100 would
00:32:25.320 be
00:32:25.460 potential
00:32:25.840 threats
00:32:26.240 all right
00:32:26.940 on the
00:32:27.360 subject
00:32:27.680 of
00:32:28.040 women
00:32:28.520 powerful
00:32:29.140 women
00:32:29.480 I've
00:32:30.500 been
00:32:30.600 paying
00:32:30.760 attention
00:32:31.060 to
00:32:31.200 this
00:32:31.420 University
00:32:31.860 of
00:32:32.000 Pennsylvania
00:32:32.300 story
00:32:32.720 with
00:32:32.960 this
00:32:33.240 swimmer
00:32:33.780 and
00:32:34.760 at
00:32:35.120 first
00:32:35.360 it
00:32:35.460 was
00:32:35.580 like
00:32:35.740 wait
00:32:35.920 what's
00:32:36.200 happening
00:32:36.480 and
00:32:36.620 now
00:32:36.780 the
00:32:36.960 more
00:32:37.160 I
00:32:37.320 read
00:32:37.520 about
00:32:37.720 it
00:32:37.820 the
00:32:37.920 more
00:32:38.100 I
00:32:38.220 find
00:32:38.440 it
00:32:38.560 deeply
00:32:38.800 disturbing
00:32:39.260 and
00:32:39.660 I
00:32:39.780 think
00:32:39.980 it's
00:32:40.640 it's
00:32:40.860 the
00:32:41.000 future
00:32:41.400 and
00:32:42.140 I
00:32:42.260 really
00:32:42.520 think
00:32:42.800 people
00:32:43.040 have
00:32:43.240 an
00:32:43.360 obligation
00:32:43.720 to
00:32:43.960 jump
00:32:44.180 up
00:32:44.360 and
00:32:44.500 down
00:32:44.720 and
00:32:44.900 say
00:32:45.120 no
00:32:45.560 no
00:32:45.880 it
00:32:46.040 isn't
00:32:46.400 going
00:32:46.600 to
00:32:46.760 be
00:32:46.860 our
00:32:47.000 future
00:32:47.280 we
00:32:47.520 have
00:32:47.720 to
00:32:47.840 stand
00:32:48.060 up
00:32:48.240 for
00:32:48.400 women
00:32:48.660 and
00:32:49.980 if
00:32:50.320 that
00:32:50.540 leads
00:32:50.980 to
00:32:51.160 bad
00:32:51.400 names
00:32:51.660 being
00:32:51.880 called
00:32:52.160 so
00:32:52.400 be
00:32:52.560 it
00:32:52.740 you
00:32:53.140 know
00:32:53.260 what
00:32:53.560 doesn't
00:32:53.920 these
00:32:54.160 days
00:32:54.420 but
00:32:54.620 there
00:32:54.840 is
00:32:54.980 a
00:32:55.120 swimmer
00:32:55.640 named
00:32:56.880 Leah
00:32:57.420 Thomas
00:32:57.900 now
00:32:58.300 and
00:32:59.720 she
00:33:00.120 has
00:33:00.540 been
00:33:00.960 identifying
00:33:01.800 as
00:33:02.040 a
00:33:02.160 woman
00:33:02.360 as
00:33:02.520 far
00:33:02.640 as
00:33:02.740 I
00:33:02.820 can
00:33:02.920 tell
00:33:03.080 for
00:33:03.220 about
00:33:03.480 a
00:33:03.660 year
00:33:03.900 and
00:33:04.780 she
00:33:13.040 was
00:33:13.180 doing
00:33:13.380 pretty
00:33:13.600 well
00:33:13.960 as
00:33:14.520 a
00:33:14.660 male
00:33:14.860 on
00:33:15.400 the
00:33:15.560 swim
00:33:15.760 team
00:33:16.020 but
00:33:16.960 decided
00:33:17.460 to
00:33:17.680 transition
00:33:18.180 and
00:33:18.960 was
00:33:19.200 allowed
00:33:19.740 after
00:33:20.100 the
00:33:20.380 very
00:33:20.620 next
00:33:20.880 season
00:33:21.220 to
00:33:21.620 swim
00:33:21.840 as
00:33:21.980 a
00:33:22.400 woman
00:33:22.620 and
00:33:23.260 now
00:33:23.540 is
00:33:23.920 crushing
00:33:24.860 it
00:33:25.180 on
00:33:25.760 the
00:33:25.920 UPenn
00:33:26.440 women's
00:33:26.980 team
00:33:27.240 and
00:33:27.800 a
00:33:27.960 couple
00:33:28.220 of
00:33:28.480 the
00:33:28.660 female
00:33:29.200 teammates
00:33:29.960 have
00:33:30.780 under
00:33:31.140 the
00:33:31.300 cloak
00:33:31.500 of
00:33:31.620 anonymity
00:33:32.100 because
00:33:32.380 they
00:33:32.580 are
00:33:32.760 worried
00:33:33.080 as
00:33:33.300 they
00:33:33.440 said
00:33:33.640 to
00:33:33.820 outkick
00:33:34.260 they've
00:33:35.060 spoken
00:33:35.280 to
00:33:35.420 outkick
00:33:35.800 what
00:33:36.800 they've
00:33:37.020 said
00:33:37.200 is
00:33:37.340 I
00:33:37.700 would
00:33:37.880 like
00:33:38.040 to
00:33:38.160 get
00:33:38.240 a
00:33:38.360 job
00:33:38.660 when
00:33:38.860 I
00:33:39.000 finish
00:33:39.500 college
00:33:40.280 so
00:33:40.820 I
00:33:41.000 cannot
00:33:41.260 give
00:33:41.560 you
00:33:41.660 my
00:33:41.840 name
00:33:42.020 on
00:33:42.160 the
00:33:42.280 record
00:33:42.520 because
00:33:42.860 if
00:33:43.060 I
00:33:43.220 say
00:33:43.580 as
00:33:44.220 an
00:33:44.380 accomplished
00:33:44.740 swimmer
00:33:45.120 at an
00:33:45.860 Ivy League
00:33:46.220 school
00:33:46.520 that I
00:33:46.840 don't
00:33:47.060 want
00:33:47.280 this
00:33:47.520 I
00:33:47.980 will
00:33:48.120 be
00:33:48.260 unhirable
00:33:48.780 but
00:33:51.060 they
00:33:51.300 are
00:33:51.720 not
00:33:51.940 in
00:33:52.100 support
00:33:52.380 of
00:33:52.540 this
00:33:52.800 and
00:33:53.340 what
00:33:53.520 they
00:33:53.720 told
00:33:54.040 outkick
00:33:54.540 was
00:33:54.740 that
00:33:55.020 while
00:33:55.440 they
00:33:56.000 feel
00:33:56.340 like
00:33:56.540 they
00:33:56.680 have
00:33:56.900 no
00:33:57.080 choice
00:33:57.400 but
00:33:57.580 to
00:33:57.760 say
00:33:58.000 to
00:33:58.300 Leah
00:33:58.600 as
00:33:58.860 she's
00:33:59.060 swimming
00:33:59.320 you
00:33:59.600 go
00:33:59.980 good
00:34:08.040 there
00:34:08.920 was
00:34:09.380 they
00:34:09.520 were
00:34:09.620 talking
00:34:09.800 about
00:34:09.960 how
00:34:10.080 this
00:34:10.260 one
00:34:10.500 race
00:34:10.880 she
00:34:11.820 Leah
00:34:12.300 raced
00:34:13.300 they
00:34:13.820 said
00:34:14.000 usually
00:34:14.480 everyone
00:34:14.800 claps
00:34:15.220 everyone
00:34:15.500 yells
00:34:15.780 and
00:34:15.940 cheers
00:34:16.160 when
00:34:16.360 someone
00:34:16.580 wins
00:34:17.300 a
00:34:17.480 race
00:34:17.740 Leah
00:34:18.200 touched
00:34:18.480 the
00:34:18.620 wall
00:34:18.840 and
00:34:19.020 it
00:34:19.100 was
00:34:19.240 just
00:34:19.500 silent
00:34:20.200 in
00:34:20.820 there
00:34:21.040 in
00:34:21.220 the
00:34:21.340 arena
00:34:21.640 when
00:34:22.800 the
00:34:23.460 UPenn
00:34:24.320 swimmer
00:34:24.760 Anna
00:34:25.220 Kellen
00:34:26.000 finished
00:34:26.960 second
00:34:28.260 then the
00:34:28.920 crowd
00:34:29.160 erupted
00:34:29.560 in applause
00:34:30.080 understanding
00:34:30.580 that
00:34:30.840 that
00:34:31.620 woman
00:34:31.840 Anna
00:34:32.160 should
00:34:32.420 have
00:34:32.540 been
00:34:32.680 the
00:34:32.820 rightful
00:34:33.100 winner
00:34:33.340 if
00:34:34.040 Leah
00:34:34.640 had
00:34:34.840 been
00:34:35.040 swimming
00:34:35.400 in
00:34:35.560 the
00:34:35.680 properly
00:34:36.180 gendered
00:34:36.880 race
00:34:37.220 here
00:34:38.440 is
00:34:38.640 a
00:34:38.780 clip
00:34:39.120 I'm
00:34:39.400 going
00:34:39.460 to
00:34:39.580 play
00:34:39.900 I'm
00:34:40.020 going
00:34:40.080 to
00:34:40.160 keep
00:34:40.280 my
00:34:40.440 mic
00:34:40.660 up
00:34:40.800 so
00:34:40.940 that
00:34:41.080 the
00:34:41.240 listening
00:34:41.500 audience
00:34:41.900 can
00:34:42.080 understand
00:34:42.340 what's
00:34:42.560 happening
00:34:42.880 but
00:34:43.560 this
00:34:43.980 was
00:34:44.580 Leah
00:34:45.360 Thomas
00:34:45.960 swimming
00:34:46.940 at
00:34:47.380 a
00:34:47.500 recent
00:34:47.800 meet
00:34:48.060 and
00:34:48.360 I
00:34:48.640 mean
00:34:48.980 crushing
00:34:50.180 crushing
00:34:51.040 everyone
00:34:51.800 else
00:34:52.200 by a
00:34:52.800 mile
00:34:53.060 let's
00:34:53.340 watch
00:34:53.560 it
00:34:54.120 okay
00:34:54.520 so
00:34:54.760 there's
00:34:55.800 no
00:34:55.940 sound
00:34:56.240 but
00:34:56.380 you
00:34:56.460 can
00:34:56.600 see
00:34:56.780 one
00:34:57.160 swimmer
00:34:57.700 miles
00:34:58.760 ahead
00:34:59.000 of
00:34:59.120 the
00:34:59.240 others
00:34:59.540 here
00:35:00.620 you
00:35:00.740 can
00:35:00.840 see
00:35:00.980 a
00:35:01.060 arrow
00:35:01.560 that's
00:35:01.840 going
00:35:01.920 to
00:35:02.000 show
00:35:02.240 where
00:35:02.460 she
00:35:02.660 is
00:35:02.980 and
00:35:03.840 I
00:35:03.940 mean
00:35:04.040 it's
00:35:04.200 not
00:35:04.340 even
00:35:04.480 close
00:35:04.840 Charles
00:35:05.160 she's
00:35:05.460 just
00:35:05.660 that
00:35:06.260 no
00:35:06.400 one's
00:35:06.580 even
00:35:06.800 no
00:35:07.180 one's
00:35:07.340 even
00:35:07.500 in
00:35:07.720 it
00:35:07.820 now
00:35:07.960 she's
00:35:08.240 done
00:35:08.480 and
00:35:09.280 the
00:35:09.440 other
00:35:09.620 swimmers
00:35:09.900 are
00:35:10.140 you know
00:35:10.520 still
00:35:10.720 trying
00:35:10.960 to
00:35:11.080 catch
00:35:11.240 up
00:35:11.440 and
00:35:11.600 I
00:35:11.780 mean
00:35:11.880 it's
00:35:12.040 not
00:35:12.180 even
00:35:12.320 close
00:35:12.540 and
00:35:12.780 indeed
00:35:13.180 not
00:35:14.000 only
00:35:14.200 is
00:35:14.380 she
00:35:14.500 breaking
00:35:14.840 records
00:35:15.240 right
00:35:15.460 now
00:35:15.800 but
00:35:16.600 she
00:35:16.860 broke
00:35:17.160 some
00:35:17.440 records
00:35:17.920 even
00:35:19.120 as
00:35:19.300 a
00:35:19.400 man
00:35:19.700 so
00:35:20.360 you
00:35:20.540 tell
00:35:20.820 me
00:35:21.240 whether
00:35:31.560 at
00:35:31.740 the
00:35:31.860 same
00:35:32.080 time
00:35:32.380 the
00:35:32.580 international
00:35:33.020 olympic
00:35:33.460 committee
00:35:33.720 is
00:35:34.500 saying
00:35:34.860 we're
00:35:35.160 changing
00:35:35.540 our
00:35:35.780 rule
00:35:36.060 that
00:35:36.660 would
00:35:36.840 have
00:35:36.940 required
00:35:37.320 at
00:35:37.560 least
00:35:37.740 one
00:35:38.200 year
00:35:38.480 of
00:35:38.620 testosterone
00:35:39.120 suppression
00:35:39.720 for
00:35:40.500 all
00:35:40.760 athletes
00:35:41.200 who
00:35:41.620 are
00:35:41.740 transitioning
00:35:42.280 we're
00:35:42.900 now
00:35:43.080 going
00:35:43.240 to
00:35:43.320 leave
00:35:43.500 it
00:35:43.620 up
00:35:43.740 to
00:35:43.880 each
00:35:44.160 individual
00:35:44.700 sport
00:35:45.240 and
00:35:46.360 I
00:35:46.500 predict
00:35:46.840 most
00:35:47.180 of
00:35:47.280 those
00:35:47.400 sports
00:35:47.680 are
00:35:47.800 going
00:35:47.880 to
00:35:47.940 feel
00:35:48.080 the
00:35:48.260 same
00:35:48.440 as
00:35:48.580 these
00:35:48.760 U Penn
00:35:49.100 swimmers
00:35:49.500 and
00:35:50.160 say
00:35:50.380 I
00:35:50.620 don't
00:35:50.780 want
00:35:50.900 to
00:35:50.960 be
00:35:51.060 the
00:35:51.180 one
00:35:51.320 to
00:35:51.460 say
00:35:51.620 that
00:35:51.800 they
00:35:51.960 can't
00:35:52.280 do
00:35:52.460 it
00:35:52.660 and
00:35:53.560 basically
00:35:54.160 you can
00:35:55.180 transition
00:35:55.560 into
00:35:55.820 women's
00:35:56.180 sports
00:35:56.480 just
00:35:57.200 by
00:35:57.380 declaring
00:35:57.720 yourself
00:35:58.040 a
00:35:58.200 woman
00:35:58.420 you
00:35:58.800 can
00:35:58.940 be
00:35:59.060 a
00:35:59.180 gold
00:35:59.340 medalist
00:35:59.840 you
00:36:00.220 can
00:36:00.340 get
00:36:00.480 all
00:36:00.600 the
00:36:00.720 scholarships
00:36:01.120 you
00:36:01.360 can
00:36:01.460 get
00:36:01.580 the
00:36:01.740 prize
00:36:02.060 money
00:36:02.340 and
00:36:03.080 if
00:36:03.360 any
00:36:03.720 of
00:36:03.860 these
00:36:04.000 women
00:36:04.220 speak
00:36:04.560 up
00:36:04.840 they'll
00:36:05.480 be
00:36:05.600 labeled
00:36:05.920 bigoted
00:36:06.680 and
00:36:06.860 lose
00:36:07.040 jobs
00:36:07.300 to
00:36:07.580 me
00:36:07.780 it's
00:36:07.980 outright
00:36:08.300 misogyny
00:36:09.020 your
00:36:09.740 thoughts
00:36:10.040 I'm
00:36:11.140 happy
00:36:11.460 to
00:36:11.860 say
00:36:12.080 it
00:36:12.220 I
00:36:12.320 understand
00:36:12.600 why
00:36:12.860 they
00:36:13.040 weren't
00:36:13.600 this
00:36:14.520 person
00:36:14.880 is
00:36:15.080 an
00:36:15.200 imposter
00:36:15.700 and
00:36:16.720 funnily
00:36:17.200 enough
00:36:17.660 I
00:36:18.000 don't
00:36:18.220 think
00:36:18.480 that
00:36:18.660 that
00:36:18.840 is
00:36:18.980 a
00:36:19.140 controversial
00:36:19.760 view
00:36:21.220 I
00:36:22.040 think
00:36:22.220 the
00:36:22.420 success
00:36:22.820 of
00:36:22.980 this
00:36:23.160 movement
00:36:23.520 has
00:36:23.880 been
00:36:24.040 to
00:36:24.220 take
00:36:24.460 over
00:36:24.680 certain
00:36:25.000 institutions
00:36:25.760 such
00:36:27.280 that
00:36:27.720 those
00:36:28.700 who
00:36:29.180 are
00:36:29.380 the
00:36:29.600 closest
00:36:30.060 to
00:36:30.520 it
00:36:30.700 feel
00:36:30.960 unable
00:36:31.360 to
00:36:32.760 object
00:36:33.420 but
00:36:33.980 I
00:36:35.280 would
00:36:35.620 be
00:36:35.800 shocked
00:36:36.240 if
00:36:36.540 80
00:36:36.840 90
00:36:37.200 percent
00:36:37.580 of
00:36:37.740 Americans
00:36:38.180 didn't
00:36:38.680 look
00:36:39.000 at
00:36:39.140 this
00:36:39.440 and
00:36:39.660 instinctively
00:36:40.340 understand
00:36:41.140 the
00:36:41.940 problem
00:36:42.360 and
00:36:43.220 oppose
00:36:43.840 this
00:36:44.720 practice
00:36:45.160 there
00:36:46.100 is
00:36:46.280 a
00:36:46.500 reason
00:36:46.880 that
00:36:47.840 we
00:36:48.220 as
00:36:48.960 a
00:36:49.120 matter
00:36:49.380 of
00:36:49.640 habit
00:36:50.020 separate
00:36:50.740 out
00:36:51.320 men
00:36:52.060 and
00:36:52.440 women
00:36:52.800 in
00:36:53.660 sport
00:36:54.160 it's
00:36:55.640 not
00:36:56.000 bigotry
00:36:56.760 it's
00:36:57.720 biology
00:36:58.260 men
00:36:59.740 on
00:37:00.640 average
00:37:01.320 are
00:37:02.100 stronger
00:37:02.680 and
00:37:03.520 taller
00:37:03.940 than
00:37:04.900 women
00:37:05.440 are
00:37:05.900 and
00:37:06.540 because
00:37:06.920 we
00:37:07.760 like
00:37:08.080 to
00:37:08.260 see
00:37:08.440 competition
00:37:09.120 in
00:37:09.620 our
00:37:09.820 sports
00:37:10.280 we
00:37:11.480 don't
00:37:11.740 have
00:37:11.980 a
00:37:12.100 great
00:37:12.320 deal
00:37:12.580 of
00:37:12.720 interest
00:37:13.320 in
00:37:14.480 watching
00:37:15.360 mixed
00:37:17.220 competitions
00:37:18.460 where
00:37:19.340 one
00:37:20.520 person
00:37:21.080 with
00:37:21.440 different
00:37:21.940 immutable
00:37:22.520 characteristics
00:37:23.440 than
00:37:24.260 the
00:37:24.580 other
00:37:24.900 is
00:37:25.820 bound
00:37:27.760 to
00:37:28.000 dominate
00:37:28.440 is
00:37:29.720 predicted
00:37:30.160 to
00:37:30.400 dominate
00:37:30.700 is
00:37:31.080 in
00:37:31.220 this
00:37:31.400 case
00:37:31.620 guaranteed
00:37:32.300 to
00:37:33.440 dominate
00:37:33.820 I
00:37:35.580 suspect
00:37:36.480 that
00:37:36.860 over
00:37:37.080 the
00:37:37.320 long
00:37:37.600 run
00:37:37.920 this
00:37:39.520 will
00:37:39.820 change
00:37:40.440 because
00:37:40.920 there
00:37:41.580 are
00:37:41.740 millions
00:37:42.100 of
00:37:42.360 people
00:37:42.640 out
00:37:42.900 there
00:37:43.240 whose
00:37:44.120 daughters
00:37:44.760 have
00:37:46.200 made
00:37:46.620 great
00:37:47.060 sacrifices
00:37:47.720 parents
00:37:48.420 who've
00:37:48.640 made
00:37:48.780 great
00:37:49.040 sacrifices
00:37:49.620 too
00:37:50.040 in
00:37:50.660 all
00:37:50.920 sorts
00:37:51.240 of
00:37:51.420 sports
00:37:51.860 to
00:37:53.140 get
00:37:53.440 them
00:37:53.620 up
00:37:53.800 to
00:37:53.960 a
00:37:54.140 collegiate
00:37:54.620 or
00:37:54.900 professional
00:37:55.640 level
00:37:56.160 and
00:37:57.340 no
00:37:57.620 one
00:37:57.840 wants
00:37:58.200 to
00:37:58.860 arrive
00:38:00.360 at
00:38:00.580 an
00:38:00.740 event
00:38:01.180 and
00:38:01.720 understand
00:38:02.320 from
00:38:02.580 the
00:38:02.740 get
00:38:02.920 go
00:38:03.120 that
00:38:03.340 they're
00:38:03.560 competing
00:38:04.000 for
00:38:04.420 second
00:38:04.680 place
00:38:05.120 which
00:38:05.880 is
00:38:06.040 what
00:38:06.220 we're
00:38:06.460 watching
00:38:06.780 in
00:38:06.980 that
00:38:07.140 video
00:38:07.480 we're
00:38:07.880 watching
00:38:08.200 a
00:38:08.400 group
00:38:08.640 of
00:38:09.420 well
00:38:10.100 trained
00:38:10.480 and
00:38:10.700 disciplined
00:38:11.420 women
00:38:11.900 competing
00:38:12.440 for
00:38:13.540 second
00:38:14.160 place
00:38:14.580 and
00:38:15.200 I
00:38:15.460 think
00:38:15.700 there
00:38:15.960 is
00:38:16.140 a
00:38:16.280 big
00:38:16.460 difference
00:38:17.040 between
00:38:17.860 the
00:38:18.540 initial
00:38:19.080 claim
00:38:19.600 of
00:38:20.960 the
00:38:21.260 transgender
00:38:21.840 rights
00:38:22.340 movement
00:38:22.720 and
00:38:23.720 the
00:38:24.280 sort
00:38:25.760 of
00:38:26.080 radicalism
00:38:26.880 that
00:38:27.200 has
00:38:27.440 led
00:38:27.620 to
00:38:27.780 this
00:38:28.040 the
00:38:28.300 initial
00:38:28.640 claim
00:38:29.020 is
00:38:29.280 some
00:38:30.100 people
00:38:30.500 and
00:38:31.000 put it
00:38:31.720 however
00:38:31.900 you
00:38:32.100 want
00:38:32.280 believe
00:38:32.740 they
00:38:32.980 are
00:38:33.280 or
00:38:33.580 metaphysically
00:38:34.440 are
00:38:34.840 I'm
00:38:35.880 more
00:38:36.020 in
00:38:36.140 the
00:38:36.260 belief
00:38:36.520 camp
00:38:36.840 but
00:38:37.020 that's
00:38:37.200 a
00:38:37.320 separate
00:38:37.580 debate
00:38:38.020 of
00:38:39.520 the
00:38:39.760 opposite
00:38:40.220 sex
00:38:41.100 and
00:38:41.680 it
00:38:41.800 is
00:38:42.000 polite
00:38:42.420 to
00:38:43.180 treat
00:38:43.700 them
00:38:44.000 as
00:38:44.480 such
00:38:44.840 to
00:38:46.040 refer
00:38:46.820 to
00:38:47.080 them
00:38:47.360 as
00:38:47.760 such
00:38:48.160 not
00:38:49.240 to
00:38:49.500 mock
00:38:49.760 them
00:38:50.080 if
00:38:50.260 they
00:38:50.400 dress
00:38:50.960 as
00:38:51.420 such
00:38:51.840 to
00:38:52.520 for
00:38:52.760 all
00:38:52.940 intents
00:38:53.320 and
00:38:53.520 purposes
00:38:53.940 believe
00:38:55.340 their
00:38:55.660 claims
00:38:56.060 the
00:38:57.180 second
00:38:57.660 part
00:38:58.560 of
00:38:58.740 the
00:38:59.500 case
00:38:59.900 is
00:39:00.260 you
00:39:01.100 have
00:39:01.360 to
00:39:01.600 restructure
00:39:02.100 your
00:39:02.320 society
00:39:02.800 around
00:39:03.600 the
00:39:03.840 idea
00:39:04.240 that
00:39:04.520 they
00:39:04.720 are
00:39:04.940 in
00:39:05.040 a
00:39:05.180 concrete
00:39:05.540 sense
00:39:06.020 what
00:39:06.860 they
00:39:07.060 say
00:39:07.280 they
00:39:07.440 are
00:39:07.560 change
00:39:07.980 the
00:39:08.160 birth
00:39:08.400 certificate
00:39:08.900 and the
00:39:09.340 passports
00:39:09.920 and so
00:39:10.280 on
00:39:10.420 and
00:39:11.100 be
00:39:12.620 treated
00:39:13.160 in all
00:39:14.020 cultural
00:39:14.600 contexts
00:39:15.420 as a
00:39:17.000 woman
00:39:17.220 or a
00:39:17.700 man
00:39:17.940 and I'm
00:39:18.780 afraid
00:39:19.000 that bit
00:39:19.440 gets
00:39:19.960 crazy
00:39:20.560 at the
00:39:21.660 bleeding
00:39:21.960 edge
00:39:22.320 it is
00:39:24.020 crazy
00:39:24.480 here
00:39:24.880 a man
00:39:26.200 saying
00:39:26.700 he's a
00:39:27.080 woman
00:39:27.320 still has
00:39:28.100 the
00:39:28.260 athletic
00:39:28.660 prowess
00:39:29.280 of
00:39:29.920 man
00:39:30.280 and
00:39:31.700 I
00:39:32.380 don't
00:39:32.860 think
00:39:33.260 there's
00:39:34.180 a lot
00:39:34.480 of
00:39:34.620 craziness
00:39:35.060 in our
00:39:35.440 society
00:39:35.860 but I
00:39:36.340 don't
00:39:36.600 think
00:39:36.980 that
00:39:37.320 Americans
00:39:37.800 are going
00:39:38.080 to
00:39:38.200 tolerate
00:39:38.520 that
00:39:38.760 in the
00:39:39.020 long run
00:39:39.360 because
00:39:39.680 it is
00:39:40.040 self
00:39:40.400 evidently
00:39:41.340 counterproductive
00:39:42.760 you know
00:39:43.280 Christine
00:39:43.640 Rosen
00:39:43.960 over at
00:39:44.340 Commentary
00:39:44.720 Magazine
00:39:45.040 had a
00:39:45.380 great
00:39:45.560 piece
00:39:45.800 this
00:39:45.980 week
00:39:46.180 and
00:39:46.280 they
00:39:46.360 were
00:39:46.460 talking
00:39:46.640 about
00:39:46.820 on
00:39:47.000 their
00:39:47.120 podcast
00:39:47.660 about
00:39:48.520 how
00:39:48.960 it's
00:39:49.300 not
00:39:49.500 just
00:39:49.800 you
00:39:50.000 have
00:39:50.160 to
00:39:50.260 accept
00:39:50.660 that
00:39:50.880 they
00:39:51.060 are
00:39:51.360 in fact
00:39:52.040 biological
00:39:52.740 women
00:39:53.180 which
00:39:53.440 is
00:39:53.560 a
00:39:53.720 lie
00:39:54.080 you
00:39:55.360 you
00:39:55.980 now
00:39:56.240 need
00:39:56.440 to
00:39:56.580 change
00:39:57.000 the
00:39:57.140 way
00:39:57.240 you
00:39:57.360 refer
00:39:57.600 to
00:39:57.740 yourself
00:39:58.240 as
00:39:58.560 a
00:39:58.660 woman
00:39:58.840 you're
00:39:59.000 not
00:39:59.140 allowed
00:39:59.320 to
00:39:59.480 say
00:39:59.600 that
00:39:59.740 you
00:39:59.860 breastfeed
00:40:00.360 it's
00:40:00.580 now
00:40:00.780 chest
00:40:01.100 feed
00:40:01.400 right
00:40:01.960 it's
00:40:02.360 people
00:40:03.120 who
00:40:03.400 get
00:40:03.600 pregnant
00:40:03.960 as
00:40:04.160 opposed
00:40:04.380 to
00:40:04.560 women
00:40:04.900 thus
00:40:05.760 taking
00:40:06.440 away
00:40:06.740 something
00:40:07.020 that's
00:40:07.460 really
00:40:07.820 special
00:40:08.500 and
00:40:08.780 incredible
00:40:09.220 about
00:40:09.820 women
00:40:10.440 and has
00:40:10.820 been
00:40:11.040 from
00:40:11.220 time
00:40:11.480 in
00:40:11.620 memoriam
00:40:12.000 and has
00:40:12.360 been
00:40:12.500 something
00:40:12.720 that
00:40:12.900 we've
00:40:13.080 dealt
00:40:13.240 with
00:40:13.480 when
00:40:14.200 used
00:40:14.420 against
00:40:14.780 us
00:40:15.060 as
00:40:15.300 somehow
00:40:15.560 a
00:40:15.800 weakness
00:40:16.160 but
00:40:16.760 now
00:40:17.120 now
00:40:17.480 it
00:40:17.620 gets
00:40:17.840 co-opted
00:40:18.380 now
00:40:18.500 that
00:40:18.620 it
00:40:18.680 can
00:40:18.780 be
00:40:18.880 something
00:40:19.140 that's
00:40:19.420 wonderful
00:40:19.680 but
00:40:19.900 a
00:40:20.020 biological
00:40:20.360 man
00:40:20.640 cannot
00:40:20.920 do
00:40:21.200 it
00:40:21.340 and
00:40:21.500 not
00:40:21.700 nor
00:40:21.920 can
00:40:22.080 a
00:40:22.220 trans
00:40:22.520 woman
00:40:22.760 and
00:40:24.560 in
00:40:25.000 the
00:40:25.440 case
00:40:25.680 of
00:40:25.900 Leah
00:40:33.600 because
00:40:33.760 she's
00:40:34.040 at
00:40:34.140 a
00:40:34.240 clear
00:40:34.480 physical
00:40:34.840 advantage
00:40:35.240 after
00:40:35.560 having
00:40:35.820 gone
00:40:36.180 through
00:40:36.520 male
00:40:36.900 puberty
00:40:37.360 we had
00:40:38.100 experts
00:40:38.380 on the
00:40:38.640 show
00:40:38.780 who
00:40:38.920 talked
00:40:39.120 about
00:40:39.280 that
00:40:39.500 if
00:40:39.640 you
00:40:39.760 take
00:40:39.960 two
00:40:40.640 nine
00:40:41.020 year
00:40:41.180 old
00:40:41.400 kids
00:40:41.720 a
00:40:41.920 boy
00:40:42.200 and
00:40:42.320 a
00:40:42.400 girl
00:40:42.600 they'd
00:40:42.960 be
00:40:43.060 evenly
00:40:43.360 matched
00:40:43.700 up
00:40:43.920 because
00:40:44.180 before
00:40:44.480 puberty
00:40:44.860 the boy
00:40:45.640 has
00:40:45.880 no
00:40:46.040 natural
00:40:46.360 advantage
00:40:46.720 over
00:40:46.900 the girl
00:40:47.240 physically
00:40:47.780 after
00:40:48.500 years
00:40:48.900 of
00:40:49.060 testosterone
00:40:49.600 which
00:40:50.040 you
00:40:50.160 get
00:40:50.320 during
00:40:50.540 puberty
00:40:50.880 as
00:40:51.040 a
00:40:51.160 boy
00:40:51.400 it's
00:40:52.000 a
00:40:52.100 different
00:40:52.260 story
00:40:52.580 that's
00:40:52.880 why
00:40:53.060 my
00:40:53.260 husband
00:40:53.580 who's
00:40:53.880 six
00:40:54.040 two
00:40:54.300 has
00:40:54.560 very
00:40:55.060 long
00:40:55.400 femurs
00:40:55.940 and
00:40:56.240 big
00:40:56.500 muscles
00:40:56.980 and
00:40:57.580 I
00:40:57.780 at
00:40:57.900 five
00:40:58.080 seven
00:40:58.400 do
00:40:58.620 not
00:40:59.000 and
00:40:59.620 if
00:40:59.900 he
00:41:00.080 took
00:41:00.360 a
00:41:00.520 year
00:41:00.780 of
00:41:00.960 testosterone
00:41:01.520 suppression
00:41:02.100 therapy
00:41:02.560 he would
00:41:03.560 still
00:41:04.040 have
00:41:04.300 those
00:41:04.500 advantages
00:41:04.940 perhaps
00:41:05.280 not
00:41:05.660 to
00:41:05.820 the
00:41:05.940 extent
00:41:06.180 he
00:41:06.400 did
00:41:06.620 before
00:41:06.900 he
00:41:07.080 started
00:41:07.360 it
00:41:07.600 but
00:41:08.120 there's
00:41:08.380 no
00:41:08.620 getting
00:41:08.900 rid
00:41:09.220 of
00:41:09.420 the
00:41:09.540 natural
00:41:09.860 advantage
00:41:10.240 that
00:41:10.460 inures
00:41:12.120 to a
00:41:12.400 man
00:41:12.580 in
00:41:12.760 having
00:41:12.960 gone
00:41:13.140 through
00:41:13.300 puberty
00:41:13.580 and
00:41:14.260 her
00:41:14.420 other
00:41:14.600 point
00:41:14.800 was
00:41:15.080 that
00:41:16.040 Leah
00:41:16.340 Thomas
00:41:16.880 essentially
00:41:18.360 got
00:41:18.780 to
00:41:18.980 train
00:41:19.540 with
00:41:19.920 testosterone
00:41:20.600 for
00:41:21.580 years
00:41:22.060 right
00:41:22.520 which
00:41:22.700 the
00:41:22.880 women
00:41:23.060 are
00:41:23.220 not
00:41:23.440 allowed
00:41:23.640 to
00:41:23.780 do
00:41:23.960 but
00:41:24.440 can
00:41:24.620 I
00:41:24.720 just
00:41:24.900 play
00:41:25.140 for
00:41:25.300 you
00:41:25.440 Charles
00:41:25.800 what
00:41:26.820 Leah
00:41:27.160 Thomas
00:41:27.680 sounds
00:41:28.320 like
00:41:28.600 in
00:41:28.780 talking
00:41:29.120 about
00:41:29.540 her
00:41:30.300 many
00:41:30.800 victories
00:41:31.480 because
00:41:31.980 there's
00:41:32.220 absolutely
00:41:32.620 no
00:41:32.860 sensitivity
00:41:33.360 as far
00:41:33.680 as I
00:41:33.880 can
00:41:34.000 tell
00:41:34.200 for
00:41:34.720 what
00:41:35.020 this
00:41:35.320 is
00:41:35.460 doing
00:41:35.760 to
00:41:36.240 the
00:41:36.340 other
00:41:36.480 women
00:41:36.700 listen
00:41:37.040 you
00:41:38.500 did
00:41:38.780 break
00:41:39.280 Penn
00:41:39.880 school
00:41:40.200 records
00:41:40.860 on the
00:41:41.420 women's
00:41:41.880 side
00:41:42.160 what
00:41:42.580 can
00:41:42.940 you
00:41:43.060 describe
00:41:43.540 what
00:41:43.900 that
00:41:44.380 sensation
00:41:45.260 was like
00:41:45.840 for
00:41:46.060 you
00:41:48.780 being
00:41:49.260 on
00:41:49.440 the
00:41:49.560 women's
00:41:50.080 team
00:41:50.560 and
00:41:50.820 I'm
00:41:51.400 guessing
00:41:51.720 you
00:41:52.060 know
00:41:52.220 just
00:41:52.620 feeling
00:41:54.100 in a
00:41:55.560 good
00:41:55.740 place
00:41:56.140 with
00:41:56.360 your
00:41:56.500 transition
00:41:57.100 um
00:41:59.180 I'm
00:42:02.120 very
00:42:02.480 proud
00:42:02.840 of
00:42:03.320 my
00:42:03.620 times
00:42:04.460 and
00:42:05.040 um
00:42:06.320 my
00:42:08.580 ability
00:42:09.340 to
00:42:09.860 keep
00:42:13.020 swimming
00:42:13.360 and
00:42:13.820 continue
00:42:15.160 competing
00:42:15.640 and
00:42:16.300 you
00:42:18.320 know
00:42:18.460 there
00:42:18.660 suited
00:42:19.320 up
00:42:19.580 times
00:42:20.100 and
00:42:20.360 I'm
00:42:23.440 happy
00:42:23.720 with
00:42:23.900 them
00:42:24.140 my
00:42:24.420 coaches
00:42:24.860 are
00:42:25.020 happy
00:42:25.240 with
00:42:25.440 them
00:42:25.640 and
00:42:25.940 that's
00:42:27.680 what
00:42:27.980 matters
00:42:28.240 to
00:42:28.400 me
00:42:28.660 I'm
00:42:31.280 sure
00:42:31.480 I'm
00:42:31.760 sure
00:42:31.960 she
00:42:32.180 is
00:42:32.380 very
00:42:32.680 proud
00:42:33.040 of
00:42:33.640 herself
00:42:33.980 and
00:42:34.600 her
00:42:34.800 new
00:42:35.420 non-stop
00:42:36.560 record
00:42:37.020 breaking
00:42:37.380 performances
00:42:37.960 that's
00:42:38.760 not
00:42:38.980 really
00:42:39.260 the
00:42:39.480 issue
00:42:39.820 don't
00:42:41.920 you
00:42:42.600 feel
00:42:42.780 a bit
00:42:43.000 crazy
00:42:43.400 just
00:42:43.660 watching
00:42:44.000 that
00:42:44.320 yes
00:42:45.480 that's
00:42:45.720 a
00:42:45.820 man
00:42:46.160 right
00:42:47.280 that's
00:42:47.960 a
00:42:48.140 man
00:42:48.480 with
00:42:49.360 a
00:42:49.520 man's
00:42:49.860 voice
00:42:50.240 and
00:42:50.440 a
00:42:50.600 man's
00:42:50.960 physique
00:42:51.340 talking
00:42:51.760 about
00:42:52.160 competing
00:42:52.660 in
00:42:52.900 swimming
00:42:53.180 in
00:42:53.420 a
00:42:53.580 female
00:42:53.820 competition
00:42:54.420 and
00:42:54.900 whenever
00:42:55.980 you
00:42:56.220 read
00:42:56.420 a piece
00:42:56.740 defending
00:42:57.140 it
00:42:57.320 it
00:42:57.480 has
00:42:57.660 to
00:42:57.820 abstract
00:42:58.500 out
00:42:59.000 to
00:42:59.360 such
00:42:59.740 a
00:42:59.900 degree
00:43:00.400 all
00:43:01.780 of
00:43:02.020 the
00:43:02.380 things
00:43:02.840 that
00:43:03.020 we
00:43:03.140 can
00:43:03.320 see
00:43:03.620 with
00:43:03.880 our
00:43:04.100 own
00:43:04.320 eyes
00:43:04.780 in
00:43:05.700 order
00:43:05.900 to
00:43:06.160 overcome
00:43:06.520 them
00:43:06.940 and
00:43:07.240 as
00:43:07.420 I
00:43:07.540 say
00:43:07.660 I
00:43:07.860 just
00:43:08.060 don't
00:43:08.300 think
00:43:08.520 in
00:43:08.660 the
00:43:08.800 long
00:43:08.980 run
00:43:09.120 that
00:43:09.300 can
00:43:09.500 fly
00:43:10.040 I
00:43:11.200 also
00:43:11.780 think
00:43:12.320 that
00:43:13.180 the
00:43:13.720 people who
00:43:14.620 are
00:43:14.740 advancing
00:43:15.160 this
00:43:15.640 theory
00:43:16.420 are
00:43:16.740 going
00:43:17.120 to
00:43:17.220 have
00:43:17.340 to
00:43:17.460 at
00:43:17.560 some
00:43:17.740 point
00:43:18.000 pick
00:43:18.420 a
00:43:18.640 lane
00:43:19.020 it
00:43:20.160 was
00:43:20.560 very
00:43:20.880 interesting
00:43:21.420 listening
00:43:21.980 to the
00:43:22.360 oral
00:43:22.600 arguments
00:43:23.200 in
00:43:23.700 the
00:43:24.060 Dobbs
00:43:24.420 case
00:43:24.840 at
00:43:25.060 the
00:43:25.200 Supreme
00:43:25.500 Court
00:43:25.840 which
00:43:26.060 is
00:43:26.220 the
00:43:26.540 abortion
00:43:27.460 case
00:43:27.900 that
00:43:28.060 could
00:43:28.280 plausibly
00:43:28.960 overturn
00:43:29.420 Roe v
00:43:29.720 Wade
00:43:29.960 and
00:43:30.220 Casey
00:43:30.880 and
00:43:32.500 hearing
00:43:33.080 about
00:43:34.220 women
00:43:34.720 relentlessly
00:43:36.600 women
00:43:37.400 giving
00:43:38.000 birth
00:43:38.400 women's
00:43:39.180 place
00:43:39.600 in
00:43:40.100 society
00:43:40.840 gender
00:43:42.440 gaps
00:43:43.500 equality
00:43:44.840 under
00:43:45.160 the
00:43:45.320 law
00:43:45.560 as
00:43:45.920 it
00:43:46.080 relates
00:43:46.560 to
00:43:47.020 sex
00:43:47.760 when
00:43:50.700 we've
00:43:51.400 been
00:43:51.580 told
00:43:51.900 simultaneously
00:43:52.640 by many
00:43:53.180 of the
00:43:53.420 same
00:43:53.580 people
00:43:53.980 that
00:43:54.640 men
00:43:55.740 can
00:43:55.960 give
00:43:56.200 birth
00:43:56.680 and
00:43:57.280 to
00:43:58.580 the
00:43:58.760 point
00:43:59.040 at
00:43:59.220 which
00:43:59.380 the
00:43:59.540 ACLU
00:44:00.020 is
00:44:00.140 scrubbing
00:44:00.900 Ruth
00:44:01.160 Bader
00:44:01.400 Ginsburg
00:44:01.760 speeches
00:44:02.400 of
00:44:03.480 their
00:44:03.860 explicit
00:44:05.000 and
00:44:05.480 deliberate
00:44:05.940 references
00:44:07.080 to
00:44:08.000 women
00:44:08.500 and
00:44:09.200 women's
00:44:09.740 place
00:44:10.080 in
00:44:10.440 society
00:44:11.040 and
00:44:11.660 the
00:44:11.780 19th
00:44:12.260 amendment
00:44:12.620 and
00:44:13.760 equality
00:44:14.240 under
00:44:14.640 the
00:44:14.820 law
00:44:15.120 and
00:44:17.400 I
00:44:18.240 don't
00:44:18.460 know
00:44:18.580 how
00:44:18.700 you
00:44:18.820 can
00:44:18.960 really
00:44:19.160 reconcile
00:44:19.700 these
00:44:20.540 two
00:44:21.060 things
00:44:21.900 but I
00:44:22.220 think
00:44:22.360 they
00:44:22.500 will
00:44:22.660 have
00:44:22.860 to
00:44:22.980 be
00:44:23.100 reconciled
00:44:23.760 yeah
00:44:24.020 well I
00:44:24.880 recommend
00:44:25.180 that
00:44:25.360 commentary
00:44:25.720 podcast
00:44:26.260 of
00:44:26.440 John
00:44:26.640 Podoritz
00:44:27.100 was it
00:44:28.140 today
00:44:28.440 I'm losing
00:44:28.840 track of
00:44:29.220 the days
00:44:29.500 yesterday
00:44:30.000 but John
00:44:30.860 Podoritz
00:44:31.160 was making
00:44:31.500 a good
00:44:31.760 point too
00:44:32.160 which is
00:44:32.560 look at
00:44:33.460 how
00:44:33.780 sort of
00:44:34.280 the
00:44:34.400 left
00:44:34.880 and
00:44:35.580 their
00:44:36.740 advocates
00:44:37.280 rained down
00:44:37.840 on people
00:44:38.160 like
00:44:38.380 Rachel
00:44:38.700 Dolezal
00:44:39.260 right
00:44:39.560 a white
00:44:40.000 woman
00:44:40.340 who
00:44:41.020 darkened
00:44:41.740 her skin
00:44:42.160 and tried
00:44:42.480 to pose
00:44:42.980 as a
00:44:43.260 black
00:44:43.520 woman
00:44:43.840 and they
00:44:45.380 thought that
00:44:45.720 was
00:44:45.920 appropriation
00:44:47.220 right
00:44:47.460 like the
00:44:47.940 black
00:44:48.260 experience
00:44:48.920 he was
00:44:49.820 pointing out
00:44:50.140 you can't
00:44:50.620 even write
00:44:51.100 a book
00:44:51.600 as a
00:44:52.000 white
00:44:52.200 person
00:44:52.700 about
00:44:53.680 a
00:44:54.060 Hispanic
00:44:54.520 person
00:44:54.960 because
00:44:55.280 that's
00:44:55.720 appropriation
00:44:56.420 you can't
00:44:56.980 possibly
00:44:57.420 understand
00:44:57.900 the
00:44:58.040 Hispanic
00:44:58.400 experience
00:44:59.280 without
00:44:59.520 having
00:44:59.860 lived it
00:45:00.400 such that
00:45:01.100 you could
00:45:01.340 profit off
00:45:01.860 of a
00:45:02.120 novel
00:45:02.420 right
00:45:02.880 about
00:45:03.420 it
00:45:03.620 but
00:45:04.280 this
00:45:04.840 you can
00:45:05.640 completely
00:45:06.420 co-opt
00:45:07.000 the
00:45:07.160 experience
00:45:07.680 of
00:45:07.940 being
00:45:08.280 a
00:45:08.580 woman
00:45:08.940 just
00:45:09.220 by
00:45:09.440 declaring
00:45:10.040 it
00:45:10.440 so
00:45:10.820 you can
00:45:11.480 cross
00:45:12.000 right
00:45:12.460 over
00:45:12.800 and not
00:45:13.580 only that
00:45:14.080 you will
00:45:14.760 then
00:45:15.060 be able
00:45:15.800 to
00:45:15.980 change
00:45:16.780 the way
00:45:17.680 biological
00:45:18.500 women
00:45:18.960 think about
00:45:19.940 themselves
00:45:20.520 refer to
00:45:21.240 themselves
00:45:21.740 and some
00:45:22.900 of the
00:45:23.220 things that
00:45:23.660 make them
00:45:24.100 extraordinary
00:45:24.780 like
00:45:25.400 childbearing
00:45:26.300 like
00:45:26.640 breastfeeding
00:45:27.300 you know
00:45:27.760 the bond
00:45:28.340 between
00:45:28.540 mother and
00:45:28.860 child
00:45:29.060 and so
00:45:29.380 on
00:45:29.540 it's
00:45:30.460 insane
00:45:30.960 and unless
00:45:31.840 we
00:45:32.200 stand up
00:45:33.180 and push
00:45:34.100 back against
00:45:34.880 this nonsense
00:45:35.780 we're going
00:45:36.960 to lose
00:45:37.500 this war
00:45:38.140 I don't care
00:45:39.020 how many times
00:45:39.580 they go after
00:45:40.040 the JK Rowling's
00:45:41.000 of the world
00:45:41.480 and dox her
00:45:42.200 she's been
00:45:42.860 incredibly brave
00:45:43.620 it could happen
00:45:44.520 to you
00:45:44.740 it could happen
00:45:45.080 to me
00:45:45.400 okay
00:45:46.460 you know
00:45:47.080 that's fine
00:45:47.620 because I think
00:45:48.200 they're exploiting
00:45:49.300 people's natural
00:45:50.540 and admirable
00:45:51.940 instinct for
00:45:52.980 tolerance
00:45:53.640 to take
00:45:55.140 advantage of it
00:45:55.820 to a dark
00:45:56.420 and dangerous
00:45:56.900 place
00:45:57.300 and we don't
00:45:57.800 have to sit
00:45:58.280 back and take
00:45:58.960 it
00:45:59.140 all right
00:45:59.500 I stole the
00:45:59.920 final word
00:46:00.340 on that
00:46:00.700 more with
00:46:01.280 Charles coming
00:46:01.760 after this
00:46:02.360 quick break
00:46:03.220 and don't
00:46:03.940 forget that
00:46:04.500 you can find
00:46:04.940 the Megan
00:46:05.280 Kelly show
00:46:05.740 live on
00:46:06.240 Sirius XM
00:46:06.800 Triumph
00:46:07.360 Channel 111
00:46:08.160 every weekday
00:46:09.160 at noon east
00:46:09.940 the full video
00:46:10.680 show and clips
00:46:11.460 by subscribing
00:46:12.500 to our
00:46:12.880 YouTube channel
00:46:14.140 check it out
00:46:14.620 youtube.com
00:46:15.300 slash
00:46:15.640 Megan Kelly
00:46:16.620 there you'll
00:46:17.560 find an
00:46:17.820 interesting
00:46:18.060 monologue
00:46:18.440 from Friday
00:46:18.920 on Jussie
00:46:19.700 Smollett
00:46:20.260 if you prefer
00:46:21.400 an audio
00:46:21.860 podcast
00:46:22.240 you can
00:46:22.660 subscribe
00:46:23.000 and download
00:46:23.500 on Apple
00:46:24.000 Spotify
00:46:24.380 Pandora
00:46:24.760 Stitcher
00:46:25.080 or wherever
00:46:25.560 you get
00:46:25.820 your podcast
00:46:26.260 for free
00:46:27.500 and there
00:46:28.300 you can find
00:46:28.700 our full
00:46:29.020 archives
00:46:29.440 including
00:46:29.960 well more
00:46:30.820 than 220
00:46:31.440 shows
00:46:31.820 but also
00:46:32.500 including our
00:46:32.960 great
00:46:33.240 transgender
00:46:33.780 athletes
00:46:34.420 debate
00:46:34.800 with the
00:46:35.200 runners
00:46:35.580 in
00:46:35.820 Connecticut
00:46:36.220 who'd been
00:46:37.460 losing to a
00:46:38.520 transgender
00:46:39.000 athlete
00:46:39.540 and a
00:46:40.040 transgender
00:46:40.540 athlete
00:46:40.960 herself
00:46:41.480 who argued
00:46:42.580 the other
00:46:43.120 love that
00:46:44.180 that's episode
00:46:44.700 101
00:46:45.120 if you want
00:46:45.520 to check
00:46:45.760 it out
00:46:46.000 we'll be
00:46:46.620 right back
00:46:46.960 Charles I know
00:46:54.420 that you're
00:46:54.680 living a very
00:46:55.200 busy life
00:46:55.920 and you don't
00:46:56.620 get to listen
00:46:57.060 to the show
00:46:57.400 every day
00:46:57.760 but my
00:46:58.600 audience knows
00:46:59.300 what a huge
00:46:59.760 fan I am
00:47:00.520 of yours
00:47:00.960 because I'm
00:47:01.580 quoting you
00:47:02.100 all the time
00:47:02.740 even when
00:47:03.120 you're not
00:47:03.380 here
00:47:03.700 the other
00:47:04.420 day Abby
00:47:04.860 and I
00:47:05.080 were laughing
00:47:05.500 my assistant
00:47:06.000 because we
00:47:06.620 realized that
00:47:07.080 you and she
00:47:07.600 are the same
00:47:08.180 age
00:47:08.620 and you think
00:47:09.900 I feel so
00:47:11.000 old
00:47:11.420 I'm like
00:47:12.040 how am I
00:47:12.380 ever going
00:47:12.740 to come
00:47:13.080 close to
00:47:13.520 acquiring
00:47:13.900 the amount
00:47:14.240 of wisdom
00:47:14.680 Charles C.W.
00:47:15.500 Cook has
00:47:15.920 when I've
00:47:16.620 already missed
00:47:17.300 the first
00:47:17.700 35 years
00:47:18.420 of intense
00:47:19.240 reading and
00:47:19.780 education he's
00:47:20.520 had
00:47:20.800 I'm lost
00:47:22.080 but then I
00:47:23.780 get the happy
00:47:24.360 news that
00:47:24.980 I may not
00:47:26.220 be entirely
00:47:26.760 lost because
00:47:27.500 you're willing
00:47:28.160 to share it
00:47:29.020 not just as you
00:47:30.180 do at National
00:47:30.780 Review every day
00:47:31.500 and on the
00:47:32.000 editors podcast
00:47:32.720 and on the
00:47:33.340 Mad Dogs
00:47:33.740 and Englishmen
00:47:34.280 podcast but
00:47:35.740 through something
00:47:36.680 called the
00:47:37.540 chapter app
00:47:38.800 where you
00:47:39.720 are going
00:47:40.200 to start
00:47:40.940 with the
00:47:41.640 second amendment
00:47:42.300 I gather
00:47:42.860 and teach us
00:47:44.080 what you know
00:47:45.120 can you
00:47:45.460 what is this
00:47:46.180 thing
00:47:46.420 yeah so this
00:47:47.120 is a startup
00:47:48.060 they approached
00:47:49.160 me and some
00:47:51.540 other writers
00:47:52.340 most of whom
00:47:53.000 are on the
00:47:53.640 left and
00:47:54.880 asked if I
00:47:56.520 would teach
00:47:56.920 a four-week
00:47:57.700 course on
00:47:58.800 something
00:47:59.500 chapter describes
00:48:01.200 its system
00:48:03.060 as like a
00:48:03.560 book club
00:48:04.000 but more fun
00:48:04.820 and that's how
00:48:06.020 the website
00:48:06.840 is set up
00:48:07.660 the topic
00:48:08.880 I chose
00:48:09.400 was the
00:48:09.860 history of
00:48:10.140 the second
00:48:10.440 amendment
00:48:10.760 which is
00:48:11.120 something
00:48:11.340 I've written
00:48:12.240 about a
00:48:12.560 great deal
00:48:12.940 since I
00:48:13.340 moved to
00:48:13.740 the US
00:48:14.200 but also
00:48:14.640 I wrote
00:48:14.920 my thesis
00:48:15.520 on this
00:48:16.060 when I
00:48:16.840 was at
00:48:17.080 Oxford
00:48:17.420 and I
00:48:19.480 thought it
00:48:19.700 would be a
00:48:19.840 good topic
00:48:20.180 so I'm
00:48:20.760 going to
00:48:21.020 do that
00:48:21.460 starting
00:48:21.960 next year
00:48:22.800 on January
00:48:23.460 24th
00:48:24.980 the course
00:48:26.240 will be
00:48:26.460 four weeks
00:48:27.200 it will
00:48:28.580 go from
00:48:29.080 the colonial
00:48:29.620 era
00:48:30.160 all the way
00:48:31.180 through
00:48:31.520 the revolution
00:48:32.640 the civil
00:48:33.160 war
00:48:33.420 Jim Crow
00:48:33.960 and then to
00:48:34.860 modern
00:48:35.440 jurisprudence
00:48:36.480 tracking the
00:48:37.680 right to
00:48:38.300 bear arms
00:48:39.000 this had
00:48:39.340 existed in
00:48:40.080 England
00:48:40.460 was brought
00:48:41.380 to the
00:48:42.120 new world
00:48:42.640 and was
00:48:43.100 then codified
00:48:43.780 into American
00:48:44.780 law
00:48:45.120 and this
00:48:47.140 will all be
00:48:47.440 done online
00:48:47.920 it will be
00:48:48.260 done what
00:48:48.500 they call
00:48:48.780 asynchronously
00:48:49.740 and that
00:48:50.060 means there
00:48:51.060 won't be a
00:48:51.440 set time
00:48:51.920 where I'll
00:48:52.240 give lectures
00:48:52.740 or anything
00:48:53.160 like that
00:48:53.720 it's all
00:48:54.260 done through
00:48:54.880 the website
00:48:56.120 and so I'll
00:48:57.420 give out
00:48:57.840 reading and
00:48:58.580 videos and
00:48:59.280 the podcast
00:49:00.140 and original
00:49:00.580 source material
00:49:01.300 with notes
00:49:02.220 instructions
00:49:02.700 and then
00:49:03.900 there'll be
00:49:04.220 a community
00:49:04.760 forum and
00:49:05.720 a Q&A
00:49:06.360 with me
00:49:06.920 that you
00:49:07.240 can dip
00:49:07.620 into at
00:49:08.080 any time
00:49:08.540 so I mean
00:49:08.980 if you're
00:49:09.660 busy during
00:49:10.160 the day
00:49:11.380 you can do
00:49:11.960 it in the
00:49:12.340 evening or
00:49:13.020 at the
00:49:13.600 weekend
00:49:13.960 as I say
00:49:15.860 it starts
00:49:16.220 on January
00:49:16.740 24th
00:49:17.360 I'm pretty
00:49:17.680 excited about
00:49:18.360 it
00:49:18.700 and you can
00:49:19.580 sign up
00:49:20.040 over at
00:49:20.600 chapter
00:49:20.840 probably the
00:49:21.480 best thing
00:49:22.080 to do
00:49:23.220 is go to
00:49:23.980 my website
00:49:24.560 which is
00:49:25.020 charlescwcook.com
00:49:27.820 and there's a
00:49:29.300 link on there
00:49:29.940 if you're
00:49:30.380 interested in
00:49:30.840 that and
00:49:31.580 hopefully I'll
00:49:32.400 see you next
00:49:32.780 year
00:49:33.020 so this is a
00:49:34.120 great way to
00:49:34.560 become a
00:49:34.940 university
00:49:35.340 professor
00:49:35.860 without actually
00:49:36.840 having to
00:49:37.280 deal directly
00:49:37.900 with the
00:49:38.240 students and
00:49:38.820 the nonsense
00:49:39.660 on campus
00:49:40.640 or leave the
00:49:42.260 house even
00:49:42.880 I think I can
00:49:43.920 do it all
00:49:44.340 through my
00:49:45.400 computer
00:49:45.760 I will be
00:49:46.680 dealing with
00:49:47.820 people because
00:49:48.620 I'll be answering
00:49:49.380 questions on
00:49:50.260 the website
00:49:52.320 and also I
00:49:53.440 think by
00:49:53.940 video but
00:49:54.780 it's not
00:49:55.440 as you say
00:49:56.620 it's not that
00:49:57.280 I'm going to
00:49:57.600 be called into
00:49:58.300 the dean's
00:49:58.980 office and
00:49:59.520 told that I
00:49:59.980 said something
00:50:00.600 outrageous
00:50:01.360 in class
00:50:02.100 and I've
00:50:02.400 been reported
00:50:02.940 for at least
00:50:03.480 I hope not
00:50:03.960 that will be
00:50:04.760 a unique
00:50:05.180 experience in
00:50:06.280 dealing with
00:50:06.760 quote unquote
00:50:07.780 college students
00:50:08.580 that I love
00:50:09.340 the idea I
00:50:10.040 hope you take
00:50:10.600 on many more
00:50:11.100 subjects after
00:50:11.700 this one
00:50:12.160 love learning
00:50:13.200 from you on
00:50:13.700 this show
00:50:14.080 and on yours
00:50:14.740 Charles thank
00:50:15.240 you for being
00:50:15.620 here
00:50:15.900 thank you so
00:50:17.300 much for
00:50:17.600 having me it
00:50:18.000 was a pleasure
00:50:18.440 coming up
00:50:19.760 David Wallace
00:50:20.780 Wells of New
00:50:21.540 York magazines
00:50:22.160 joins me to
00:50:23.000 talk about some
00:50:23.700 COVID reality
00:50:24.520 including the
00:50:25.320 ruling we just
00:50:26.180 got from the
00:50:27.240 US Supreme
00:50:27.800 Court on
00:50:28.400 mandates
00:50:28.940 don't go
00:50:29.420 away
00:50:29.620 David Wallace
00:50:35.680 Wells is editor
00:50:36.500 at large for
00:50:37.320 New York
00:50:37.580 magazine and
00:50:38.280 author of
00:50:38.920 The Uninhabitable
00:50:40.640 Earth and he
00:50:41.920 joins me now
00:50:42.640 David such a
00:50:43.360 pleasure thank you
00:50:43.840 for coming on
00:50:44.460 no really the
00:50:45.120 pleasure is mine
00:50:45.600 great to talk to
00:50:46.180 you so you
00:50:47.360 have been
00:50:48.000 somebody who I
00:50:48.960 just said this to
00:50:50.160 David Leonhardt but
00:50:50.860 it's true of you
00:50:51.420 too you're sort of
00:50:52.100 of the left
00:50:52.800 you've been
00:50:53.580 speaking you've
00:50:55.000 been a voice of
00:50:55.580 reason when it
00:50:56.160 comes to COVID
00:50:57.080 policy I
00:50:57.720 think and
00:50:58.580 therefore I
00:50:59.060 see you as
00:50:59.380 very powerful
00:51:00.100 you know like I
00:51:00.960 think people on
00:51:02.400 the left I
00:51:03.020 really hope they
00:51:03.680 listen to you
00:51:04.500 because you've
00:51:05.940 been like a
00:51:06.640 beacon of light
00:51:07.680 in the darkness
00:51:08.480 saying wait a
00:51:10.140 minute what are
00:51:10.740 we doing like
00:51:11.320 what wait why
00:51:12.520 are we doing this
00:51:13.100 to children and
00:51:13.700 in particular the
00:51:14.440 children thing
00:51:15.080 drives me nuts
00:51:16.720 it was an
00:51:17.540 article that you
00:51:18.300 had in July
00:51:19.580 that really got
00:51:20.580 my attention
00:51:21.060 called the kids
00:51:21.740 are all right
00:51:22.340 that was how
00:51:22.800 it's titled
00:51:23.780 why now is the
00:51:24.540 time to rethink
00:51:25.160 COVID safety
00:51:25.840 protocols for
00:51:26.500 children and
00:51:27.780 talked about how
00:51:28.700 the kids are
00:51:29.720 not at risk
00:51:30.560 themselves and
00:51:31.900 never were but
00:51:34.100 it is one of the
00:51:35.200 lies we continue
00:51:36.140 to tell as we
00:51:37.220 keep them masked
00:51:37.980 all day and now
00:51:38.880 require vaccines of
00:51:40.120 all of them
00:51:40.900 including five-year-olds
00:51:42.080 because we can't
00:51:43.740 quote get back to
00:51:44.500 normal until we
00:51:45.980 do these things
00:51:46.920 do you do you
00:51:48.480 feel the same as
00:51:49.160 you did in July
00:51:49.760 well the age
00:51:50.680 skew of the
00:51:51.140 disease hasn't
00:51:51.900 changed and that's
00:51:52.880 not to say that
00:51:53.800 kids are at
00:51:54.560 absolutely no
00:51:55.640 risk it's just
00:51:56.500 that compared to
00:51:57.140 the population
00:51:57.720 as a whole
00:51:58.480 they face a
00:51:59.780 vanishingly small
00:52:00.600 chance of severe
00:52:01.420 illness and really
00:52:02.600 mortality so you
00:52:04.020 know we know all
00:52:04.700 of us following the
00:52:05.880 news even casually
00:52:06.880 that old people are
00:52:08.020 more at risk and
00:52:08.680 young people are
00:52:09.200 less at risk but I
00:52:10.300 think very few
00:52:10.840 Americans even now
00:52:11.860 almost two years
00:52:12.540 into the pandemic
00:52:13.180 really appreciate
00:52:14.120 just how dramatic
00:52:15.600 that age skew is
00:52:16.680 which is you know
00:52:17.320 someone in their
00:52:17.920 80s faces a
00:52:19.280 mortality risk from
00:52:20.120 COVID 10,000 times
00:52:22.320 the size of someone
00:52:23.300 who's age 10 and
00:52:25.060 even people who
00:52:25.860 are vaccinated you
00:52:26.840 know vaccination is
00:52:27.640 the equivalent of
00:52:28.500 maybe 25 years of
00:52:30.300 your age so people
00:52:31.960 who are you know
00:52:32.880 vaccinated 40 year
00:52:34.740 olds are still
00:52:35.380 considerably more at
00:52:36.840 risk than
00:52:37.260 unvaccinated 10
00:52:38.180 year olds personally
00:52:39.800 I actually I do think
00:52:40.860 the vaccinating case
00:52:41.600 is a good idea I
00:52:42.360 think we need to do
00:52:43.120 what we can to sort
00:52:43.720 of slow the spread
00:52:44.400 and I think the
00:52:44.840 risks are quite
00:52:45.960 small but I think
00:52:47.060 that when we think
00:52:47.740 about the sorts of
00:52:49.080 risks that our
00:52:49.640 children are facing
00:52:50.380 we should really
00:52:51.660 understand that
00:52:52.420 almost all of it
00:52:53.940 is is in our
00:52:54.860 heads and in total
00:52:56.080 in the American
00:52:56.920 pandemic we've got
00:52:58.000 something like 800
00:52:58.940 children which is to
00:52:59.960 say people under the
00:53:00.920 age of 18 and not
00:53:01.860 true children 800
00:53:03.260 people under the age
00:53:04.360 of 18 who've died
00:53:05.180 from COVID that's
00:53:06.220 not nothing each of
00:53:07.080 those deaths is a
00:53:07.880 tragedy but as a
00:53:09.020 country we're facing
00:53:09.840 800,000 deaths and
00:53:11.640 I think that gives
00:53:12.400 you just a sense of
00:53:13.260 you know the
00:53:14.640 relatively small risk
00:53:15.900 faced by by you
00:53:17.600 know all the kids
00:53:18.200 in our lives
00:53:19.200 man now we of
00:53:20.540 course some of
00:53:21.740 those people as
00:53:22.480 with the grown-ups
00:53:23.220 are I think
00:53:24.900 grown-ups is a
00:53:25.460 term only parents
00:53:26.280 use I don't know
00:53:26.960 but some of those
00:53:29.020 kids died with
00:53:30.240 COVID as opposed
00:53:31.140 to from COVID
00:53:32.200 it's been one of
00:53:32.780 the frustrations in
00:53:33.600 the reporting to
00:53:34.340 try to discern
00:53:35.500 those two things
00:53:36.540 David Zweig has
00:53:37.720 been making that
00:53:38.260 point you know
00:53:38.620 like it's an
00:53:38.980 important thing to
00:53:39.540 know with COVID
00:53:40.540 versus of COVID
00:53:41.520 matters in the
00:53:42.560 numbers but we
00:53:43.080 haven't been able to
00:53:43.600 get it straight
00:53:44.140 in your piece you
00:53:45.400 talked about an
00:53:46.060 eye-opening report
00:53:47.060 in Nature
00:53:48.580 magazine looking
00:53:50.800 at 90,000 in
00:53:52.340 school pupils
00:53:53.440 learning in North
00:53:54.540 Carolina last fall
00:53:55.880 researchers would
00:53:57.120 have expected based
00:53:57.900 on local
00:53:58.340 transmission rates
00:53:59.200 about 900 cases
00:54:00.720 of COVID there
00:54:01.900 were as it turned
00:54:02.860 out only 32
00:54:04.400 again quoting from
00:54:05.360 your article in
00:54:06.360 another study you
00:54:07.100 write among 20,000
00:54:08.460 Nebraska students
00:54:09.240 attending school all
00:54:10.080 year there were in
00:54:11.520 total two cases
00:54:13.480 so what does that
00:54:15.900 tell us?
00:54:16.460 well you know
00:54:18.460 there are other
00:54:18.820 cases showing some
00:54:20.240 higher risk of
00:54:20.860 transmission in
00:54:21.440 school than those
00:54:22.080 but in general I
00:54:23.260 think that our
00:54:23.620 policies have been
00:54:24.560 excessive here that
00:54:26.240 you know especially
00:54:27.060 the very beginning of
00:54:28.120 the of the pandemic
00:54:28.920 in the spring of
00:54:29.940 2020 when we knew
00:54:31.420 not all that much
00:54:32.440 about spread dynamics
00:54:33.340 when we knew not
00:54:34.020 all that much about
00:54:34.880 the sort of mortality
00:54:36.200 risks at play and
00:54:37.080 that risk for severe
00:54:37.840 illness I think it
00:54:38.880 was perfectly sensible
00:54:39.720 to be quite cautious
00:54:41.000 and to operate from
00:54:42.320 the precautionary
00:54:43.260 principle at least as
00:54:45.240 until we really got a
00:54:46.620 handle on on the
00:54:48.260 disease and how it
00:54:49.000 was moving through
00:54:49.640 the population I
00:54:51.040 think at that point
00:54:51.760 it was not you know
00:54:53.040 a bad idea it was
00:54:53.760 not crazy to close
00:54:54.860 schools or to lock
00:54:56.920 down in general but
00:54:58.440 especially as we got
00:55:00.100 to the fall of that
00:55:00.980 year 2020 which is
00:55:02.560 now more than a year
00:55:03.320 ago I think by that
00:55:05.660 point we knew well
00:55:06.860 that kids were not
00:55:07.900 just much less at risk
00:55:09.000 of the of severe
00:55:10.080 illness but also much
00:55:11.760 less likely to
00:55:12.480 transmit not zero
00:55:13.780 you know that that
00:55:15.200 that risk was not
00:55:15.920 zero that could still
00:55:16.700 transmit that could
00:55:17.360 get still get
00:55:18.440 infected but the risk
00:55:19.260 was much lower and
00:55:20.540 probably if we had
00:55:21.400 been operating
00:55:22.060 sensibly and really
00:55:23.380 thinking clear headedly
00:55:24.400 about the issues we
00:55:25.680 would have done much
00:55:26.800 more to make sure
00:55:27.440 that all schools were
00:55:28.580 open for in-person
00:55:29.380 learning by last
00:55:30.980 fall and you know
00:55:33.060 without getting caught
00:55:34.340 up in all of the
00:55:35.100 quarantine and you
00:55:36.440 know classroom closures
00:55:38.380 that have sort of
00:55:40.440 afflicted even those
00:55:41.220 schools that have
00:55:41.800 tried that did try
00:55:42.540 to be open last
00:55:43.500 year they've done
00:55:44.360 so much damage
00:55:45.200 we've imposed a real
00:55:47.280 cost on a generation
00:55:48.520 of kids we don't
00:55:50.220 know exactly what
00:55:50.920 that will look like
00:55:51.560 or what its impact
00:55:52.560 will be ultimately
00:55:53.160 on their lives but
00:55:53.960 most of the social
00:55:54.660 science suggests it
00:55:56.160 will be meaningful and
00:55:57.020 it'll be especially
00:55:57.640 dramatic in the kids
00:55:59.580 with least advantage
00:56:00.600 you know poor kids
00:56:02.680 minority kids who
00:56:03.540 who are you know
00:56:05.340 less advantaged in
00:56:06.700 their home lives
00:56:07.680 well you know I was
00:56:08.520 just making this
00:56:08.980 point the other day
00:56:09.560 I'm curious what you
00:56:10.240 think normally you
00:56:12.620 know people on the
00:56:13.500 political left would
00:56:14.440 be jumping up and
00:56:15.180 down if you saw that
00:56:15.860 kind of a disparity
00:56:16.660 between rich kids kids
00:56:18.800 of privilege who are
00:56:20.180 able to work around
00:56:21.140 these restrictions and
00:56:22.160 lockdowns and
00:56:22.860 quarantines and poor
00:56:24.660 kids who tend to be
00:56:26.040 minority kids black
00:56:27.780 kids Hispanic kids in
00:56:28.880 the inner city they're
00:56:29.900 not getting anywhere
00:56:30.580 near the exposure to
00:56:32.020 information and
00:56:32.660 education that those
00:56:34.260 with with means are
00:56:35.520 normally that would be
00:56:36.840 a big thing highlighted
00:56:37.880 by the left but I was
00:56:39.180 saying the other day
00:56:39.760 it almost seems like
00:56:40.780 the covid fear
00:56:41.680 trumps everything it
00:56:43.020 trumps worries about
00:56:44.680 race socioeconomics
00:56:46.800 even politics I don't
00:56:50.040 know though maybe
00:56:50.700 politics will change it
00:56:52.200 David Leonhardt was
00:56:53.060 saying he does think if
00:56:54.640 democrats start losing
00:56:55.640 elections that'll get
00:56:57.020 their attention on
00:56:57.720 covid policy but what
00:56:59.340 do what do you think
00:57:00.140 because it is surprising
00:57:01.180 to see them not paying
00:57:02.040 more attention to those
00:57:03.040 disparities well yes it's
00:57:05.920 been a fascinating saga
00:57:07.560 that's a watch unfold
00:57:08.220 generally I think our
00:57:09.220 our tribal partisan
00:57:10.820 nature has colored a
00:57:12.020 huge amount of the
00:57:12.760 way that all Americans
00:57:13.600 see this pandemic and
00:57:16.180 you know I think that's
00:57:17.320 really unfortunate it's
00:57:18.160 meant some some really
00:57:19.080 bad policy in the end
00:57:20.580 the way I see it is
00:57:22.340 that actually among the
00:57:23.540 sort of professional
00:57:24.940 class left you know the
00:57:26.900 the well-educated well
00:57:29.300 off sort of caricature you
00:57:31.800 know bankers lawyers that
00:57:34.460 sort of person has
00:57:35.760 actually been quite eager
00:57:36.760 to see schools reopen for
00:57:39.400 about a year now it's
00:57:41.600 actually the parents who
00:57:43.800 are much less well-off who
00:57:45.200 last year were much less
00:57:47.100 open to that much more
00:57:48.200 more scared now that may
00:57:49.920 be a fault of the public
00:57:51.020 health messaging it may be
00:57:52.760 because we haven't been
00:57:54.040 clear enough in signaling
00:57:55.920 the relative low risk faced
00:57:57.340 by children and so it's
00:57:58.880 only those people who are
00:57:59.760 really really paying
00:58:00.400 attention to the news who
00:58:01.480 understand that well but I
00:58:03.480 think there are a lot of
00:58:03.980 other dynamics as well
00:58:05.120 it's of course also the
00:58:06.920 less well-off the less
00:58:07.720 well-educated who have
00:58:08.980 been so resistant to
00:58:10.080 vaccination and I think
00:58:11.500 that there's you know
00:58:12.240 there's a sort of a
00:58:12.960 similar dynamic there in
00:58:15.460 general you know I think
00:58:16.480 the fact that Donald
00:58:17.400 Trump was president when
00:58:18.260 this pandemic started
00:58:19.160 meant that much of our
00:58:20.920 understanding of public
00:58:22.360 policy was filtered
00:58:23.760 through through how we
00:58:25.160 felt about him and that
00:58:27.100 meant that many liberals
00:58:28.000 in 2020 felt that we had
00:58:30.060 to do more at all costs
00:58:31.320 because he was doing so
00:58:32.600 little and I do think
00:58:33.800 that he sort of really
00:58:34.940 failed there but I also
00:58:36.940 think that the failure is
00:58:37.860 much larger than Donald
00:58:39.020 Trump when you look at
00:58:39.680 all of our peer countries
00:58:41.000 around the world the U.S.
00:58:42.580 did probably less well
00:58:43.980 than we would have
00:58:44.520 expected but we're not in
00:58:45.860 a category worse than
00:58:47.020 most of the rich countries
00:58:48.200 of Europe in fact we're
00:58:49.180 right in the ballpark of
00:58:50.300 them and I think that
00:58:51.840 tells you that this is a
00:58:53.020 really hard challenge
00:58:54.060 it's really hard to
00:58:55.160 govern through all of
00:58:55.840 this it's not always just
00:58:57.860 a matter of doing more
00:58:58.840 or doing less it's not
00:58:59.680 just a matter of believing
00:59:00.520 in science or hitting the
00:59:01.720 science button and I
00:59:02.940 think the experience of
00:59:03.820 the of the Biden year so
00:59:04.860 far shows us exactly that
00:59:06.740 I think by the end of
00:59:07.460 this year almost certainly
00:59:08.880 there will be a more
00:59:10.140 American deaths on Joe
00:59:11.580 Biden's first year as
00:59:12.400 president and then there
00:59:13.640 were under Donald on
00:59:14.920 Donald Trump's last year
00:59:16.080 now that's not to say
00:59:18.140 that Biden is more at
00:59:19.180 fault that Trump was he
00:59:20.100 was handed up a worse
00:59:21.020 hand by the time he took
00:59:22.380 office the disease was
00:59:24.120 already you know all
00:59:25.720 spread through the
00:59:26.220 population there was very
00:59:27.100 little chance of truly
00:59:28.080 suppressing a vaccine
00:59:29.140 though too you also had
00:59:30.660 the vaccines and you
00:59:32.180 know it's hard to know
00:59:32.820 exactly how much to
00:59:34.320 credit or discredit him
00:59:35.880 for our sort of you
00:59:38.320 know not not totally
00:59:41.020 successful vaccine rollout
00:59:42.260 but I think again that's
00:59:43.640 just a sign that many of
00:59:44.740 these things are beyond
00:59:45.960 direct political control
00:59:47.860 and that we've sort of
00:59:48.940 failed as I think he's
00:59:50.920 paying a price for having
00:59:51.880 said he would shut down
00:59:52.980 the virus he didn't need
00:59:54.000 to say that he didn't need
00:59:55.180 to guarantee that you
00:59:56.200 know when he was running
00:59:57.540 and now people are
00:59:58.380 looking at yet another
00:59:59.780 variant and more
01:00:00.900 possible lockdowns and
01:00:02.200 renewal of the mask
01:00:03.400 mandates and thinking
01:00:04.580 okay this doesn't feel
01:00:05.600 shut down the latest
01:00:07.280 ABC Ipsos poll shows
01:00:08.740 Biden's approval rating
01:00:10.040 on COVID response it's
01:00:12.140 the highest of his
01:00:13.280 approval ratings in other
01:00:14.540 words inflation he has a
01:00:16.240 28 percent approval on
01:00:17.620 dealing with that gun
01:00:18.460 violence 32 percent crime
01:00:20.240 36 percent COVID
01:00:21.880 response he gets a 53
01:00:23.000 percent approval but
01:00:23.960 that's down from 72
01:00:25.120 percent in March because
01:00:26.860 I think just people have
01:00:27.820 had it and they're going
01:00:28.700 to blame whoever's in
01:00:29.580 power and and given his
01:00:31.560 promise but you you used
01:00:33.420 a term just a second ago
01:00:34.380 that I really wanted to
01:00:35.220 ask you about because you
01:00:36.060 raised such a good point
01:00:37.500 that we haven't been
01:00:38.600 talking about fear
01:00:39.880 mongering okay the fear
01:00:41.480 mongering that we see from
01:00:42.500 the media and some of those
01:00:43.740 in charge it has genuinely
01:00:46.620 negative effects in
01:00:48.460 particular on kids for the
01:00:50.520 reasons you just pointed
01:00:51.280 out but also we're we're
01:00:53.400 forgetting the elderly and
01:00:56.220 how they they really do
01:00:59.620 get scared when you talk
01:01:01.380 about Omicron as the next
01:01:04.180 devil incarnate and
01:01:05.960 everything's got to shut
01:01:07.060 down because Omicron they
01:01:08.980 really are at risk they have
01:01:10.880 very high death numbers
01:01:12.500 alarmingly high and I can
01:01:15.100 speak to this personally just
01:01:16.140 from my mom who's 80 and my
01:01:17.860 husband Doug's mom who's 85
01:01:19.620 they live alone they get
01:01:21.960 scared and they're already
01:01:23.420 isolated it is irresponsible
01:01:25.820 to treat every variant or
01:01:27.580 every new tweak in the
01:01:29.280 covid narrative as
01:01:30.760 devastation awaiting
01:01:32.860 well I you know I think that
01:01:36.060 as you as you suggested I
01:01:37.760 think that people in your in
01:01:39.860 your parents in your in-law
01:01:40.800 situation have good reason to
01:01:42.900 be scared still the disease is
01:01:44.780 still circulating it's still
01:01:45.940 quite deadly and while
01:01:47.780 vaccination and other social
01:01:49.600 behaviors can protect the
01:01:50.840 elderly they can't protect
01:01:52.220 them perfectly we're still
01:01:53.680 seeing some relatively large
01:01:56.040 number of deaths among the
01:01:57.900 among the vaccinated most of
01:02:00.020 whom are old because as I
01:02:01.220 mentioned earlier vaccination
01:02:02.700 while it can reduce your risk
01:02:04.200 of mortality a factor of 10
01:02:06.960 or 12 that's really the
01:02:08.320 equivalent of just taking a
01:02:09.380 couple of decades off your
01:02:10.320 life so if your father-in-law is
01:02:12.120 85 and he's vaccinated fully
01:02:14.100 vaccinated he's still at risk as
01:02:16.500 at risk as an unvaccinated
01:02:18.120 60 year old was and we know
01:02:19.940 a year ago an unvaccinated
01:02:21.220 60 year old was quite scared
01:02:22.720 of the disease I think there's
01:02:24.840 there's good reason for those
01:02:25.880 people to be to be worried and
01:02:27.720 to take precaution the question
01:02:29.480 is why aren't we doing more
01:02:31.180 targeted protection of them why
01:02:33.900 did we why have we throughout
01:02:35.500 the pandemic talked about this
01:02:37.400 issue and this this challenge as
01:02:39.940 a universal and even sort of
01:02:41.320 uniform challenge that we needed
01:02:42.820 to do we needed to protect the
01:02:44.700 society as a whole in order to
01:02:46.660 protect our most vulnerable
01:02:47.760 rather than doing taking action
01:02:50.200 interventions that are much
01:02:52.320 more targeted to those who may
01:02:53.580 actually suffer I think that's
01:02:55.260 especially glaring now when we
01:02:58.960 have a large you know a large
01:03:00.600 chunk of the population it's not
01:03:01.960 perfect but about 60 percent of
01:03:03.820 the population is quote-unquote
01:03:05.940 fully vaccinated we we have an
01:03:08.700 opportunity to really you know
01:03:10.500 focus on the people who are who
01:03:11.940 are most at risk with a variety
01:03:14.160 of interventions and now
01:03:16.300 heading heading into facing down
01:03:17.560 Omicron with with a really short
01:03:19.580 timeline to do so I would like to
01:03:21.420 see public policy focus more on
01:03:23.200 those who are really likely likely
01:03:25.440 us to suffer most but we've taken
01:03:27.140 this sort of we're all in this
01:03:29.360 together approach all year and as I
01:03:31.500 mentioned earlier about school
01:03:32.440 closures I do think that there was
01:03:33.620 some wisdom in being so cautious
01:03:35.520 right at the start of the pandemic
01:03:36.920 yeah we didn't know what we were
01:03:37.960 dealing with understand that you
01:03:39.660 know there's you know a 25 year
01:03:41.540 old simply does not need the same
01:03:43.160 kind of public policy as an 85
01:03:44.500 year old and an approach that
01:03:47.000 treats them as equivalent is going
01:03:48.600 to alienate the young people and
01:03:50.240 also exhaust us without actually
01:03:51.860 offering nearly as much protection
01:03:53.420 to the truly vulnerable as we
01:03:55.060 could have and there seems to be a
01:03:56.920 head-in-the-sand mentality when it
01:03:58.360 comes to new information that we've
01:04:00.680 learned since March of my god I
01:04:03.340 can't even it's 2020 March of 2020
01:04:05.240 it's like that you lose time when it
01:04:07.340 comes to this pandemic like and the
01:04:10.420 New York Times had a piece on this
01:04:11.580 on December 11th the editorial board
01:04:13.000 came out with a piece saying we can
01:04:14.720 live better lives while being smart
01:04:16.240 about COVID one of the things they
01:04:17.660 pointed out was this is from their
01:04:20.180 piece do away with with COVID theater
01:04:22.640 the coronavirus is airborne and any
01:04:25.640 money spent on deep cleaning would be
01:04:28.000 better put toward improved building
01:04:30.480 ventilation they say these plastic
01:04:32.920 barriers can actually impede airflow and
01:04:35.260 exacerbate viral spread there was a
01:04:37.440 report just this week about the
01:04:38.560 teachers in Michigan who were saying
01:04:40.440 or maybe it was last week saying they
01:04:41.920 needed Fridays off because their
01:04:43.680 burnout you know and it's like most of
01:04:45.460 us parents are like get to work you
01:04:47.360 know like the kids are the ones who we
01:04:48.600 have to worry about not the teachers
01:04:49.620 but I understand it can be real and
01:04:52.140 part of the problem we looked into it
01:04:53.580 in Michigan is they have to still
01:04:56.420 clean all of the classrooms as if COVID
01:05:00.540 is still super easy you know we
01:05:02.500 believed at one point to pick up from a
01:05:04.520 desktop they do have these plexiglass
01:05:07.340 barriers we have that in our school our
01:05:09.180 sons can't speak to their little
01:05:10.660 buddies at school and during lunch
01:05:12.620 because they're all separated by
01:05:13.880 plexiglass you know how much did those
01:05:15.560 cost that those researchers could have
01:05:17.420 been directed someplace where it matters
01:05:20.080 so all of that plus I know you've been
01:05:22.540 talking about this the push to vaccinate
01:05:24.980 you know AOC was like I got my
01:05:26.920 vaccination she's like they're a 31 year
01:05:28.800 old very healthy woman fine it's fine
01:05:31.720 for her to get boosted but what about
01:05:33.520 the you know people in Africa where we
01:05:35.580 have a 10 percent vaccination rate from
01:05:37.540 which Omicron came and we just put our
01:05:41.240 heads in the sand didn't didn't hear the
01:05:42.740 news about plexiglass didn't hear the
01:05:44.060 news about the surfaces didn't hear the
01:05:45.820 news about Africa yeah I mean I think in
01:05:48.580 a lot of these cases we just have an
01:05:51.320 incredibly slow-moving policy bureaucracy
01:05:53.820 and so the things that we thought we
01:05:56.660 knew in March or April of 2020
01:05:58.700 essentially governed our approach for a
01:06:01.100 period of six or nine months and by the
01:06:02.680 time we had the opportunity to sort of
01:06:05.480 you know rethink a lot of those policies
01:06:07.680 a lot of people were just sort of
01:06:09.660 exhausted and were comfortable just
01:06:11.740 sticking with the status quo which is a
01:06:14.300 terrible recipe for response and as a
01:06:16.780 result we've seen you know a really
01:06:18.680 dramatic bad especially experience with
01:06:23.700 the Delta wave and I do think as we talk
01:06:25.960 about where you know we're heading we're
01:06:27.600 heading into an Omicron phase I do think
01:06:30.020 it's worth doing just some level setting
01:06:31.520 about how bad the Delta wave really has
01:06:34.140 been most people in my life in you know
01:06:37.460 relatively liberal relatively well-off New
01:06:39.640 York have been essentially acting as
01:06:41.960 though the pandemic is not totally gone
01:06:43.680 but more or less behind us over the last
01:06:45.560 few months but we've had basically a
01:06:48.360 thousand or more Americans dying every
01:06:50.000 single day now for a period of several
01:06:51.460 months and that's an annualized rate of
01:06:54.400 about 400,000 Americans which is more
01:06:56.840 people than died in 2020 September and
01:06:59.200 October of this year where the peak
01:07:01.100 Delta wave months they were aside from
01:07:04.080 the winter surge the worst two-month
01:07:05.660 period in the entire pandemic in terms of
01:07:07.980 deaths and that's with 60 percent of
01:07:10.000 the population vaccinated on top of all
01:07:12.260 that even though we have 60 percent of
01:07:15.020 the population vaccinated and probably
01:07:16.440 something like 80 percent of seniors
01:07:17.940 fully vaccinated although the CDC numbers
01:07:20.120 are not so reliable so it's a little
01:07:21.480 hard to tell even though we have that
01:07:23.840 many people vaccinated even though we
01:07:25.240 know those vaccines are effective
01:07:27.240 nevertheless the relationship of cases
01:07:29.940 to hospitalizations and deaths across
01:07:31.780 the country is unchanged from before
01:07:34.320 vaccinations which is to say the same
01:07:36.420 number of cases now as we would have
01:07:40.760 had last January or February has been
01:07:43.460 producing the same number of
01:07:44.580 hospitalizations and deaths and that's
01:07:46.760 I think in part because Delta is has
01:07:48.760 been a bit more severe it's also because
01:07:50.540 we just happen to have so many
01:07:51.680 vulnerable people but I think it's
01:07:53.320 really a sort of a mind-bending fact
01:07:55.480 for most people who are following this
01:07:56.900 closely even to know that at the
01:08:01.060 national level we have not reduced
01:08:02.900 mortality risk from the disease a single
01:08:06.440 case has the same mathematical
01:08:07.740 relationship now to a hospitalization
01:08:10.120 and a death as it did before mass
01:08:12.400 vaccination and that means that there
01:08:14.020 is still quite a lot of suffering and
01:08:16.400 dying going on today that many Americans
01:08:18.760 are just turning away from out of
01:08:20.200 exhaustion which is an understandable
01:08:21.600 reaction yeah yeah but it's also a
01:08:24.020 tragedy and a sort of a moral
01:08:25.700 indictment of of us that we prefer to
01:08:28.400 ignore a thousand Americans dying a day
01:08:30.600 rather than treating it like we did a
01:08:32.280 year or so ago when it was considered
01:08:33.780 really the front and center you know
01:08:36.340 fact of our lives I would say you know
01:08:39.380 the part of the problem is this refusal
01:08:42.420 to acknowledge new realities and and like
01:08:45.920 for me I'm so sick of sending my eight
01:08:49.160 year old off to school wearing a mask
01:08:50.440 all day I would do anything to get the
01:08:51.900 masks off my kids I really would I would
01:08:53.640 do anything I will vaccinate them
01:08:55.420 tomorrow I will do whatever you but I
01:08:57.360 can't because the CDC and my schools
01:08:59.640 are both saying go ahead and vaccinate
01:09:00.820 your children and they'll have to wear
01:09:02.160 the mask and there's no off-ramp they
01:09:04.040 may have to wear them forever and it's
01:09:05.300 like you know it's just so frustrating
01:09:08.540 and then the other thing that's very
01:09:09.660 frustrating is natural immunity and the
01:09:11.780 refusal to acknowledge you know that
01:09:14.160 it does have preventative effects of
01:09:17.240 getting COVID again and then we we
01:09:19.720 understood that during the height of the
01:09:21.400 pandemic when we let nurses and doctors
01:09:23.220 who had had COVID have access to very
01:09:25.380 vulnerable patients understanding that
01:09:27.240 they were not going to get it you know
01:09:29.640 their nurses and doctors weren't going
01:09:30.720 to get it again but I mean it we're in a
01:09:32.360 situation now in New York City thanks to
01:09:33.820 de Blasio's new order which I'm sure you
01:09:35.740 saw as a New Yorker where like the kids
01:09:38.020 can't come into New York they can't they
01:09:39.520 can't go to the restaurants or the
01:09:40.880 arenas or so on unless they've been
01:09:43.060 vaccinated if you're 5 to 11 well what
01:09:45.060 if your five-year-old has just had
01:09:46.240 COVID what if your five-year-old had
01:09:47.860 COVID in November why on earth would
01:09:50.320 you say he can't go into a restaurant in
01:09:52.360 New York City right like it makes no
01:09:54.500 sense and even for adults who have had
01:09:57.700 COVID especially more recently there's no
01:10:00.720 acknowledgement like there is in
01:10:01.840 Europe that that does provide you with
01:10:04.300 immunity and the Israel study says 27
01:10:06.360 times better immunity than the vaccine
01:10:08.060 so it makes people resistant to some of
01:10:11.480 these other pushes on vaccines and so
01:10:13.560 on yeah I'm you know I think the data on
01:10:16.640 the relative strength of the protection
01:10:18.600 is sort of all over the map the Israel
01:10:20.160 study you mentioned is the one that
01:10:21.920 suggested the strongest protection but
01:10:23.480 there are other ones that suggest that
01:10:24.780 vaccines are a little stronger in any
01:10:26.780 event we know that prior infection
01:10:28.360 provides some amounts of protection
01:10:29.740 it's not you know it's probably roughly in
01:10:32.440 the ballpark of vaccination but you know
01:10:34.840 that as I say the data is a little bit
01:10:36.480 messy on that I think it's you know
01:10:39.040 especially as we were looking at new
01:10:40.640 data on Omicron it's sort of you know
01:10:43.700 what's what that's telling us is that
01:10:45.160 neither two-dose vaccine protection or
01:10:49.360 immunity from prior exposure is sufficient
01:10:52.260 to protect against infection against
01:10:55.040 Omicron and probably we want to have at
01:10:57.920 least a three-dose vaccination program or
01:11:00.220 a combination of prior infection and
01:11:03.620 vaccination to really protect us against
01:11:07.440 this new variant now in the past I think
01:11:10.560 you're right that we've been sort of
01:11:13.100 reluctant I think essentially for
01:11:14.660 bureaucratic reasons it's just sort of
01:11:16.060 easier to track vaccinations and ask for
01:11:18.000 people's vaccination cards than it is to
01:11:20.040 ask for their you know positive positive
01:11:22.860 COVID test from a few months ago or their
01:11:25.000 antibody test or however you'd want to
01:11:26.540 check it is just sort of easier and it
01:11:28.280 also helps in the effort to promote
01:11:30.220 vaccination which I think is at the
01:11:31.960 forefront of most public health
01:11:34.060 officials minds at the moment but
01:11:36.060 heading into Omicron I think it is
01:11:37.340 actually useful to say as well
01:11:40.220 protected as you may have felt from your
01:11:41.660 two doses or your prior infection two
01:11:43.800 months ago probably you want to do a
01:11:45.740 little bit more get it get a booster
01:11:47.400 shot get vaccinated if you aren't
01:11:49.260 already and ideally accumulate as much
01:11:52.800 protection as you can possibly muster
01:11:54.680 against this new variant because it is so
01:11:56.900 infectious so transmissible there does
01:11:59.820 seem to be some significant amount of
01:12:01.300 immune escape there are also indications
01:12:02.880 that it's less severe although that's
01:12:04.900 sort of tentative but that's a big point
01:12:07.200 that's a big point that's why a lot of
01:12:08.760 people who are vaccine hesitant right for
01:12:11.340 whatever reason they don't want to get a
01:12:14.060 booster and they don't want to get the
01:12:15.180 vaccine in response to Omicron because
01:12:16.620 they're like if I'm going to get this
01:12:17.620 anyway which we're all going to wind up
01:12:19.080 getting it so it's so contagious why
01:12:22.160 don't I just get this version because this
01:12:24.280 one seems less deadly that is what their
01:12:26.340 authorities are saying this one seems less
01:12:28.080 deadly than Delta for example and it's
01:12:31.660 incredibly contagious even to people who
01:12:33.660 have been vaxxed and boosted even boosted
01:12:36.100 so I can see the calculation of all right
01:12:39.200 if I got to get one I'll get this one
01:12:40.700 well we don't know what protection it
01:12:44.000 will offer against future variants so
01:12:45.680 that's a little bit of a wild card we if
01:12:47.720 Omicron can reinfect you if you just had
01:12:50.060 Delta then possibly the next variant will
01:12:52.160 will be able to reinfect you even if you
01:12:53.900 had Omicron and it might be deadlier but
01:12:56.820 beyond that at the population level these
01:12:59.480 dynamics play out in sort of
01:13:01.020 counterintuitive ways which is to say if
01:13:03.240 Omicron is you know three four or five
01:13:06.360 times as infectious as Delta which is what
01:13:08.620 a lot of the early data is suggesting and
01:13:11.360 it's 30 percent less severe or even 80
01:13:14.320 percent less severe some people have
01:13:15.620 suggested those are sort of the range
01:13:17.620 that I've seen you're still talking at the
01:13:20.720 population level of much more death and
01:13:23.980 severe illness than you would have seen
01:13:26.440 with Delta because the disease is going
01:13:28.840 to reach let's say in the same amount of
01:13:30.720 time six times as many people four times
01:13:33.020 as many people even if it's 30 percent
01:13:34.920 less severe you're still seeing a huge
01:13:37.800 accumulating toll of death and suffering
01:13:39.960 and in a context when because we're
01:13:42.900 expecting the wave to be quite compressed
01:13:44.540 because the transmission rates are so high
01:13:46.460 there really is a risk of hospital systems
01:13:49.240 being overrun I think there is an argument
01:13:51.700 for just trying to you know what we used
01:13:54.020 to say a year and a half ago flatten the
01:13:56.220 curve and try to stop it stop it right now
01:13:59.520 I get that everyone's like and by like
01:14:03.360 we're so over two weeks to stop the spread
01:14:05.640 I mean that I realize that the thing has
01:14:07.620 changed and we've had new variants and all
01:14:09.420 that but you know that's part of the problem
01:14:11.960 is in setting expectations that you cannot
01:14:14.560 meet is people wind up getting a boy who
01:14:16.740 cried wolf reaction of like uh-huh right
01:14:19.720 um in any event listen there's so much
01:14:21.660 more to go over I really want to talk
01:14:22.940 about what the Supreme Court just did
01:14:24.180 um and we'll talk about the role of
01:14:26.540 therapeutics right why aren't we focused
01:14:28.120 more directly and and ubiquitously on a
01:14:32.060 cure right on a cure plus I'll show you
01:14:35.180 New York City's guilt-ridden new ad
01:14:37.580 pushing vaccines vaccines for teens we'll
01:14:40.420 pick it up there in two minutes don't go
01:14:41.660 way so David the U.S. Supreme Court um
01:14:48.800 refusing to hear a challenge to New York
01:14:52.640 State's mandatory vaccination program for
01:14:55.220 health workers said the rule covers workers
01:14:58.600 in hospitals and nursing homes home health
01:15:00.420 agencies adult centers as well as hospices
01:15:02.740 um three nurses and a group called we the
01:15:05.260 Patriots USA Inc challenged the mandate
01:15:07.160 arguing it allowed exemptions for those with
01:15:09.340 medical objections but not for people with
01:15:11.840 religious objections and uh the justices are
01:15:15.580 are basically siding as they have in general
01:15:18.920 so far on the side of the state mandates
01:15:21.880 they've they've upheld them or refused to
01:15:23.920 get involved in Indiana Maine now New York
01:15:26.560 um suggesting a tolerance for these types of
01:15:29.660 things uh Gorsuch interestingly Amy Coney
01:15:32.660 Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh sided with the
01:15:34.480 liberals on this uh Alito Gorsuch and
01:15:37.420 Clarence Thomas were in the dissent Gorsuch
01:15:39.960 saying he would have granted the request to
01:15:41.860 take a look at this case noting that doctors
01:15:43.960 and nurses have gone to great lengths to serve
01:15:45.640 their patients during the pandemic and saying um
01:15:48.500 we should know the costs that come when this
01:15:51.260 court stands silent as majorities invade the
01:15:53.620 constitutional rights of the unpopular and
01:15:56.280 unorthodox but these vaccine mandates for the
01:15:59.200 most part are being upheld including at the very
01:16:02.420 highest level I know you're pro-vaccine I'm pro-vaccine
01:16:05.920 too though I have to confess I've been a little
01:16:08.140 disappointed with the number of breakthrough
01:16:10.080 infections and how severe they are in cases like
01:16:12.460 Colin Powell it's like oh my god um so they're not
01:16:16.560 they're less exciting they're less I just thought
01:16:18.780 they were a complete miracle when they first came
01:16:20.600 out I feel a little differently about them now
01:16:22.660 however I'm definitely against vaccine mandates and I
01:16:26.280 know in some corners that makes you an anti-vaxxer I
01:16:28.560 don't agree with that at all I think it should be up to
01:16:30.680 parents with their pediatrician when it comes to the
01:16:33.280 kids and and grown-ups adults with their with their
01:16:35.840 doctor when it comes to themselves but what do you
01:16:38.460 make of it because legally these things are being
01:16:40.160 upheld well you know I wish more people in the
01:16:42.600 country were vaccinated rather than less and it seems
01:16:45.660 like most of the sort of soft tools that we have to
01:16:48.920 encourage that we've sort of maxed out on that and we've
01:16:51.900 maxed out at a relatively low level which means that
01:16:54.400 the U.S. is much less protected than most of its peer
01:16:57.340 countries who are not themselves perfectly protected
01:17:00.100 it's not like all the countries of Europe are not
01:17:03.440 seeing um you know adult adult wave followed by a
01:17:06.280 nomocron wave they're all going through the same thing
01:17:08.080 we are we're a much bigger country with many many more
01:17:11.780 unprotected people and that means that we're we're much
01:17:14.940 more at risk um the thing I I think I agree with about um
01:17:18.720 your perspective about vaccine mandates although in
01:17:21.360 general I'm supportive of them is that we talk about um the we
01:17:26.700 talk about these dynamics as though the primary obligation of
01:17:31.200 individuals is to the society as a whole and I think that
01:17:34.100 there's wisdom in that in that pro-social perspective but I
01:17:36.920 think it's also worth keeping in mind that every individual who
01:17:39.880 chooses to become unvaccinated is assuming a much larger risk to
01:17:44.320 him or herself than they are imposing on those around them
01:17:47.880 now vaccination does reduce your risk of infection and
01:17:51.360 transmission and so there is some social cost that's imposed but if
01:17:55.140 you're putting yourself out there as essentially you know um being
01:17:57.940 comfortable vulnerable to death from covid um you are assuming the
01:18:02.500 lion's share of the the um the sort of hardship there um with
01:18:06.620 risk there and to some degree I think um I understand why why
01:18:10.920 why we might want to be deferential to that calculus like I said I think
01:18:14.680 we'd be in a much better position if the right the country as a whole was
01:18:17.760 better vaccinated personally I'd like to see 100% of the country
01:18:20.960 vaccinated um you're right that there have been um there are a lot of
01:18:24.580 breakthroughs there are some serious breakthrough cases but even among the
01:18:28.040 elderly vaccination um reduces mortality risk by at least tenfold and
01:18:32.960 while that's not perfect and I feel like most of the elderly are getting it you
01:18:35.980 know I mean as you cited in your numbers earlier most the vast majority of
01:18:39.580 people over 65 are the ones at highest risk and are getting it um not all
01:18:44.980 though but you know to me when I look at like the teenagers I think oh my god their
01:18:49.000 lives have been ruined you know these these poor kids they're never going to get
01:18:52.240 these years back of their lost proms and their lost graduations and in a world
01:18:56.760 it's already isolated for them thanks to the damn iPhones and social media it's
01:19:00.940 progressively so right we just get the report from the surgeon general saying
01:19:04.000 teenage anxiety and depression and stress and suicidal idea ideations are at all
01:19:09.760 time highs and then I see because I hear it from my friends who are still in the
01:19:13.520 city talking about how their kids can't do anything unless they've been
01:19:16.980 vaccinated and some parents have legit worries about things like myocarditis
01:19:22.380 depending on their family history then you see this New York City commercial
01:19:25.420 can I just show you this because I'm like oh my oh my lord um to me it seems a
01:19:30.720 little tone deaf to what parents legit concerns are but I'll ask you your opinion
01:19:33.940 watch ready for your teenagers to be teenagers again then get them vaccinated for
01:19:38.560 COVID-19 today without the vaccine when your child's teammates take to the field
01:19:43.000 they'll miss out or when their friends go off to the movies a concert or get a
01:19:47.360 bite to eat your team will miss out because in NYC kids 12 and up must be
01:19:51.840 vaccinated to participate in many school sports extracurricular activities and
01:19:55.740 indoor events so let your team start being teens again get them vaccinated today
01:20:00.440 visit nyc.gov slash COVID vaccine
01:20:03.520 ah see that infuriates me like showing the kids celebrating in their masks yay and
01:20:09.760 anybody who doesn't have the vaccine has to sit on the sidelines just to do
01:20:13.100 something that they've been doing since the beginning of time you know play in a
01:20:16.120 sport outside PS on a field I just like to me it's galling it's galling that they
01:20:23.360 would celebrate something like that but what do you think well to me the striking
01:20:27.140 thing is that it's not focused on the disease risk to teenagers it's not saying
01:20:31.840 you you can breathe easy your kids are going to be safe right it's saying you can
01:20:37.680 breathe easy because your kids will be able to participate in the social
01:20:40.320 activities that they're otherwise barred from so it's setting up the challenge the
01:20:44.980 difficulty not as the disease itself but the public health policies that have
01:20:48.580 been put in place to to limit its spread that's a really interesting play in my
01:20:53.220 experience you know parents who are really worried about their a lot of
01:20:58.260 parents are really worried about their kids I think it's you know to some degree
01:21:00.580 irrational but it's also understandable in the sense that we are all worried
01:21:04.800 about the vulnerable people in our lives and it's hard not to think of our
01:21:07.640 children as vulnerable even whatever the data say but that's not a commercial
01:21:12.260 that's aimed at addressing that anxiety at all it's aimed at you know addressing
01:21:17.180 the the sense of burden or exhaustion that we have with sort of pandemic living
01:21:22.160 yes right burden and exhaustion and I just hate seeing like all the pictures of
01:21:26.800 the kids in the masks as if they're having a great time they're really happy the
01:21:30.780 kids don't want to be wearing these masks they don't want to be dealing with this
01:21:33.360 at all they want to go back to their normal lives they want to be safe I'm
01:21:36.760 sure but I mean this normalization of non-stop covering your face in a way
01:21:41.860 that's really damaging to these kids socially and their well-being
01:21:44.880 psychologically that we need to stand up against that that's not normal normal is
01:21:49.180 a bare face that's normal yeah I mean I you've touched on masks a few times I
01:21:54.400 think it's maybe worth spending just a minute on it you know personally I think
01:21:57.140 that the costs of mask wearing are a bit smaller than you do I'm you know if I could
01:22:02.680 snap my fingers and make it make a policy I wouldn't have my my three-year-old
01:22:07.180 wearing a mask in her in her nursery school but I also don't think that the
01:22:11.020 cost has been enormous to her do you think I think most pro mask people don't
01:22:15.660 understand is that the benefits of mask wearing are relatively small as well the
01:22:20.100 big celebrated Bangladesh randomized control style randomized control trial
01:22:25.280 study from a few months ago which was really celebrated as proof that masks
01:22:30.620 worked found that in those areas where pro mask messaging increased mask wearing
01:22:37.020 by something like 300 percent the spread of the disease was reduced by something
01:22:42.860 like 11 percent so you had a full-on tripling of mask usage which only had a
01:22:47.460 pretty trivial effect on the spread of the disease they only found it was
01:22:51.480 effective at all among those people who were wearing surgical masks and almost
01:22:55.980 no kid I know wears surgical masks they all wear off masks and the effect was
01:23:01.240 again concentrated in the elderly which is again a sign that you know this is
01:23:05.280 perhaps a policy that should be better targeted towards those who are really
01:23:09.580 vulnerable and who could really benefit rather than being imposed universally on
01:23:13.660 the population as a whole so I'm a little less worried about the downsides of masks
01:23:17.340 than you are but I also think that the upsides the benefits are
01:23:20.100 considerably smaller than we've been led to believe what what do you make of
01:23:24.080 Governor Hochul's order now it was on Friday it took it took effect on Monday
01:23:29.660 that workers at companies sitting at their desks if you're at a company that
01:23:35.760 doesn't have a vax mandate and you are unvaxxed while sitting at your desk inside
01:23:42.800 all day you have to wear a mask I look oh like I can't imagine how
01:23:49.580 frustrating that is for the workers of New York what if you have natural immunity
01:23:54.940 right you're sitting there now thanks to Governor Hochul who you know she's never
01:23:59.140 got her mask on I've yet to see a picture of her with her mask on I just think
01:24:03.160 they're they're going to overplay they are overplaying their hand to where even my
01:24:08.140 leftist friends in New York are getting sick of this and I'll give you one other
01:24:10.760 line my one friend he's hilarious he's a diehard liberal guy and he said to us the
01:24:15.980 other night at dinner he was like I don't get it he's like I look at my side and I'm
01:24:19.320 like wasn't this all just to get rid of Trump like that's over we did that like
01:24:23.160 why are we continuing the theater now your thoughts on your order on the mandate in
01:24:29.600 particular I think the most interesting part of it is that she's already said
01:24:34.040 that the state won't be enforcing it against local counties who choose not to
01:24:37.960 enforce it which means that it's really it is a theatrical gesture more than a
01:24:41.840 directed policy one and you know personally I think a lot of the dynamic
01:24:46.740 that you're talking about was not strategic like your friend suggested in
01:24:50.500 sort of ousting Trump but it was formed in a political era in which liberals were
01:24:57.220 or you know processing all of their feelings about the world through their
01:25:01.160 animus for Donald Trump and that meant that because he was callous and indifferent
01:25:06.660 to the disease in general not all that interested in doing anything beyond
01:25:10.140 helping develop the vaccines which was really significant not really interested
01:25:13.720 in doing much more than that liberals developed in response an idea that doing
01:25:18.100 more was always going to be better and preferable and being more vigilant was
01:25:22.540 always better than being less vigilant and I don't think that that was like we
01:25:27.300 need to get Trump out I think it was because Trump is doing X we believe in Y and I
01:25:32.700 think it's a really ugly dynamic although I would say the same the same thing is
01:25:37.740 playing out now with vaccines where all through 2020 whatever we saw about you know
01:25:43.440 red state behavior with masks and social distancing we heard a lot through the
01:25:47.900 media that there was really irresponsible behavior going on all through red
01:25:51.480 America in fact the data show that there was not much difference at all
01:25:55.040 between the behaviors of red states and blue states there was just about
01:25:58.580 exactly as much social distancing going on in red states mask wearing at the peak
01:26:02.600 of the winter surge was above 90% in the whole country I mean it was it was quite
01:26:07.560 uniform whatever we heard from the media but in 2021 with the vaccine rollout we've
01:26:13.000 seen this huge partisan divide opening up I think in part because conservatives are
01:26:17.140 quite skeptical of you know public health bureaucracy that's led by Democrats and
01:26:22.360 Joe Biden and that is you know it's the same dynamic that led liberals to rail
01:26:26.460 against Donald Trump for his indifference last year both both phenomena are
01:26:30.340 really terrible and catastrophic both politically socially and also in terms of
01:26:34.480 public health I would like to believe that we could engineer a sort of a you know a
01:26:39.080 public health consensus on a lot of this stuff but when I look around the world I
01:26:42.400 also don't see all that many countries doing all that much better than we are which
01:26:45.980 means we may not even be dealing with sort of provincial American political
01:26:49.560 problems we may be dealing with sort of much deeper social and political
01:26:53.900 issues which you know the pandemic has raised and almost no one around the
01:26:57.760 world has has engineered a solution to yeah well that's the that's the most
01:27:01.660 profound point of all right what if the truth is there's very little we can do
01:27:06.140 there's there's very little that we can do to stop this this disease this virus from
01:27:12.260 changing our lives and and that if that's true then to me it comes down to your
01:27:17.980 level of risk tolerance because you can't live in a society like America right where we
01:27:22.760 have freedom in our blood and just keep the thumb of big government on people's
01:27:28.480 behavior forever it's just not going to work we're not built that way it's been
01:27:31.900 two years and already you're seeing the patience wane even amongst some on the
01:27:36.420 left so that's the real that's the real rub what if there's really not much we can
01:27:41.560 do and as we all age and get closer to the most vulnerable you know sort of phase
01:27:47.100 of our lives you got to be more and more scared right it's it's not just a problem for
01:27:51.680 the elderly it's if your life goes the way you hope it will you will be elderly
01:27:55.780 at one point you probably have elderly people you love so we do need to pay
01:28:00.040 attention to it and that's the that's why I'd love to see more therapeutics it's
01:28:03.540 like I spent so much time worried about the vaccines and not nearly enough
01:28:07.120 worried about the cure right I mean do you think the Merck pill is that the cure
01:28:11.420 the other pill I can't remember who's making the other one are those the answer
01:28:15.260 yeah okay it's Pfizer well just to start I would say vaccines are already an
01:28:19.660 incredibly powerful tool that do prevent you know if you're well vaccinated
01:28:23.540 something on the order of 90 percent of of your risk of severe disease that is a
01:28:29.160 really quite significant difference if you can be vaccinated it will change your
01:28:33.120 risk calculus profoundly and the country as a whole if it was fully vaccinated the
01:28:37.280 same would apply but I think that therapeutics are really underappreciated and
01:28:42.000 under emphasized tool in our toolkit and I'm I'm really disappointed to see I mean
01:28:47.700 there are many points of disappointment I've had with the FDA along with the
01:28:51.680 CDC throughout the pandemic and how slowly their bureaucracy has been moving
01:28:55.460 but on therapeutics it's it's especially distressing so actually so there are these
01:28:59.840 two drugs that are being talked about right now one has been approved by Merck
01:29:02.860 one is pending approval by Pfizer it's actually the Pfizer drug I think that is
01:29:07.080 much much more powerful and enticing and exciting and as a result I'm really
01:29:11.400 disappointed that the FDA approved the Merck drug first so the Merck drug they their
01:29:16.740 initial data suggested it reduced severe illness by about 50 percent which was
01:29:22.420 exciting although not a total game-changing number their second round of
01:29:26.780 data suggested it had fallen to 30 percent which is starts to get into the
01:29:30.800 zone of the therapeutics we already have it's not that much better than than the
01:29:34.200 tools been using already on top of which it has what's called this is going to be a
01:29:38.420 little technical but it has what's called a positive aims test which means that
01:29:42.240 there is some risk at least measured by this one test in the laboratory that it
01:29:47.220 can change your genetic material putting you at higher risk of cancer now I think
01:29:53.040 that Merck has done relatively good due diligence showing that there is not
01:29:57.420 meaningful risk of cancer for those who take this drug they've they've put in
01:30:02.160 some you know they've studied it they've also put in some aspects of the drug to
01:30:05.460 prevent that but all across the world in all of the OECD countries there's only one
01:30:11.220 drug that's been approved in one country that has a positive aims test and so
01:30:15.860 this is a drug that has a relatively small efficacy measured efficacy and
01:30:21.000 some if not true medical risk it is at least has you know the things about it
01:30:26.980 that are going to make people uncomfortable about taking it the Pfizer
01:30:29.840 drug has an 89 percent measured efficacy so it's three times as effective as the
01:30:36.340 Merck drug and it doesn't have this issue with a positive aims test which means
01:30:39.880 there's considerably less there would be considerably less reluctance for patients
01:30:44.020 to take it I also think that the window in which you have to take it after a
01:30:47.500 positive test or after symptoms show up is a little longer which makes it a
01:30:50.940 little easier to roll out so for all these reasons it seems really really clear to
01:30:55.320 me that of the therapeutics sort of that we're looking at considering right now the
01:31:01.240 Pfizer drug Paxlovid is a much much much much much more preferable one which the FDA
01:31:06.600 should be approving rapidly and which the government should be you know purchasing
01:31:10.840 on mass and rolling out to hospitals and doctors throughout the country rather than
01:31:15.340 going just through the standard protocol where they happen to get the Merck
01:31:18.960 application first so they approve Merck first so now we're in this whatever it's
01:31:22.640 going to be maybe six or eight or 12 week period maybe even longer where we're we're
01:31:27.400 only allowed to give a drug that we know is considerably less effective than
01:31:31.280 another one that's available and has some you know you're not crazy to think
01:31:35.220 there may be some risks associated with it this is just another sign if we needed
01:31:38.680 one that the FDA has really really bungled this pandemic from the start from the
01:31:43.260 first days when they insisted that they had to approve the diagnostic tests that
01:31:47.380 were being used in the U.S. which cost the U.S. a period of about a month when we
01:31:51.460 really that was the one window of time we really could have conceivably you know
01:31:56.300 prevented you know prevented a true true catastrophic nationwide outbreak and the
01:32:01.920 drug the the FDA basically got in the way introduced a test that didn't work and
01:32:06.340 told us we couldn't use any other tests until they figured it out which meant
01:32:09.360 that we were flying blind for that first period of six or eight weeks in the
01:32:12.460 pandemic which proved you know truly catastrophic especially in New York where
01:32:16.840 the wave was that first wave was hardest but there have been failures
01:32:20.420 throughout of the FDA you know the approval process on the vaccines was
01:32:25.120 accelerated and that's valuable but the truth was we knew that they were safe
01:32:30.160 they had demonstrated their safety through clinical trials all the way back
01:32:33.900 in May of 2020 now we didn't know the efficacy exactly but we waited all the way
01:32:39.480 until December to start rolling out the drug which meant that we missed the
01:32:42.980 opportunity to use vaccines to blunt the winter surge last winter and as a
01:32:49.300 result probably you know an additional hundred or two hundred thousand
01:32:52.020 Americans may have died than if it would have been the case if we had approved
01:32:57.060 the drugs in say September and started rolling out right at the beginning of fall
01:33:01.620 you know I know you're saying the left is very critical of how Trump handled all
01:33:06.220 this and and now the right with respect to Biden same I mean from where I stand
01:33:11.820 both these guys had a very hard job on their hands especially I will say
01:33:17.080 especially Trump because he was there at the beginning when we didn't know what we
01:33:19.940 were dealing with the Chinese weren't being totally honest with us about their
01:33:23.500 situation and showing us the data when we needed it and he did get the vaccine
01:33:27.460 done so I mean credit to Trump for all of that did he handle it perfectly no did
01:33:32.660 Biden no but sadly this is a this is a it's a mean virus and it's hard to predict
01:33:39.860 what it's going to do next and they've you know politicians should be making
01:33:43.220 making promises about things like that because they it's going to be hard to live up to
01:33:46.840 it I will say though neither neither administration has prioritized sort of the
01:33:52.940 world vaccination problem you know that's how we got Omicron what what about Africa
01:33:56.820 right I know you've been you've been pointing this out the reason I was thinking
01:34:00.580 about it is you know time came out with this person of the year yesterday and it
01:34:03.620 was Elon Musk and you know you've got you've made the point I think I think it
01:34:08.320 was you that you took sort of what Elon Musk made in a year or Jeff Bezos made in a
01:34:12.980 year whatever they could easily easily have funded the 50 billion dollars that
01:34:18.040 you say it would have cost or the International Monetary Fund estimated it
01:34:21.320 would cost to fully vaccinate the whole world and we haven't done it so why not
01:34:29.720 like I see the White House saying oh here's another 100 million vaccines for
01:34:32.880 this country there's that but like I didn't realize 50 billion was the number
01:34:36.420 that to me seems very doable and yet it's not getting done yeah I mean I in that
01:34:41.880 particular report is I think really really clarifying so it's not just the
01:34:47.000 cost which is so low 50 billion which for a government like the US even going
01:34:51.160 at single-handedly it's it's nothing I mean that's a rounding error in our
01:34:54.440 budget it's that the returns on that investment would be so large so the IMF
01:34:58.980 estimated that a 50 billion dollar investment starting in 2021 would pay off
01:35:04.000 by 2025 just four years down the road to the tune of nine trillion dollars which is a
01:35:10.740 180 fold return on investment now that's globally the benefits would be felt
01:35:16.220 globally but even if the US decided to fund this project entirely on its own
01:35:20.820 enough of that money would come back to the US economy that we would be
01:35:24.240 considering a major economic victory not to mention the obvious humanitarian
01:35:28.860 benefits not to mention the huge diplomatic opportunity that there would be for
01:35:33.620 the US to be a true global leader here China throughout the vaccination phase of the
01:35:39.180 pandemic has tried to use vaccine diplomacy distributing their vaccines around the
01:35:43.680 world but their vaccines aren't nearly as good as ours which means that we have a
01:35:46.880 natural advantage here and could really really use it to our you know geopolitical
01:35:51.220 benefit I think you know we haven't done it for a number of reasons but I think
01:35:55.000 it's basically because we're not all that interested at the political level but
01:35:59.820 also at the sort of level of the individual citizen the level of the
01:36:02.900 individual voter in the lives of people living in sub-Saharan Africa I think we see
01:36:07.620 this you know I write a lot about climate I think we see this dynamic play out very
01:36:10.760 clearly in climate where there's just very little attention paid to the
01:36:14.160 suffering of people in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia whose lives we
01:36:17.720 define as essentially naturally full of suffering rather than being
01:36:22.760 opportunities for humanitarian intervention well I mean not to diminish the
01:36:26.240 value of those lives but I think in terms of the sales pitch you don't even
01:36:30.260 necessarily need to go there you know you need to talk about how look at
01:36:34.140 Omicron you know look at how everyone's gonna have to get another booster now
01:36:37.420 another shutdown a new mask mandate like if we could manage to get the rest of
01:36:42.040 the world vaccinated we would like to believe if we if there's reason exercised
01:36:47.480 by the politicians and so on in control we we can get a handle on this thing
01:36:52.040 finally we won't keep having variant after variant or at least we'll have fewer yeah
01:36:58.160 no I think it's I think even the most cynical calculation says that we should
01:37:02.600 absolutely be rushing ahead with this kind of thing immediately and instead we've
01:37:06.400 done this very gestural theatrical you know donating a few million doses here and
01:37:11.780 there kind of thing which I think you know it's an indictment of not just the US
01:37:16.560 but all the wealthy nations of the world because as you know as we were saying
01:37:19.920 just a minute ago that the ultimate cost of such a project is is really trivial
01:37:23.780 compared to I mean you know some estimates are that the US has spent 10 trillion
01:37:27.840 dollars on pandemic relief so far so we're talking about you know 200 times
01:37:32.040 one one one two hundredth or one half of one percent of the amount of money that
01:37:35.900 the US has spent on pandemic relief and as as you point out it's an investment it's
01:37:40.320 an investment that will return somebody like Elon with the logic that we've used
01:37:44.880 with the pandemic relief that this is not just to you know that it will keep the
01:37:49.060 economy running it will you know it will pay us back and we just are unable to
01:37:53.840 extend that same logic internationally all right so I at another point I would love to
01:37:59.380 have you back on to talk about your thoughts on climate change you've literally written
01:38:03.540 the book on it and there's a movie being made of your book I would love to go there
01:38:06.920 another another time and I also at that time would love to talk to you about your marriage
01:38:12.880 because I love this my team always finds like personal details about the folks coming
01:38:16.400 on okay that just a parting thought for our for our audiences audience David used to do
01:38:22.640 New York magazine's sex lives podcast he is married to Risa founder of an art gallery
01:38:28.300 they started dating at 19 when they were studying abroad in Paris he says they are
01:38:32.540 obsessed with each other I love that and I want to know more there's a tease for our
01:38:38.580 next segment with David Wallace Wells thank you so much for being here thanks for having
01:38:43.800 me great to talk to you and want to tell the audience up next by popular demand we're
01:38:49.200 bringing back asked and answered remember I told you that if you go to Apple podcast you
01:38:53.460 subscribe to the show and download and you leave a thought there or a question or comment
01:38:57.540 I read them all and most recently there was somebody saying where's asked and answered I
01:39:02.100 missed that segment where the listeners submit written questions via email or on social media
01:39:06.740 and some of you have some personal questions for me which I will address next
01:39:11.400 now it's time for our feature called asked and answered this is where our listeners or viewers
01:39:22.020 submit questions usually via email if that's the easiest way for us to get them to questions
01:39:28.760 questions at devilmaycaremedia.com questions at devilmaycaremedia.com as I stated you can also
01:39:36.560 post them in comment or question form on the Apple podcasts link when you download and subscribe to the
01:39:42.240 show that also helps us right with the downloads and the subscribers because unlike Michelle Obama
01:39:47.860 and Hillary Clinton we get no love from Apple they're constantly pushing those podcasts but not ours
01:39:52.640 okay I'm going to read the questions myself usually Steve Krakauer does it but he's in a
01:39:57.080 studio today so he can't here's number one this is from they didn't put their real name right turn
01:40:03.960 to hell is their their moniker what do you do to maintain a successful relationship with your
01:40:11.580 husband that is a good question because you know 50% of marriages end in divorce it's tough during the
01:40:17.680 pandemic times you know you're all over each other in terms of time together and so on even still you
01:40:23.040 know there's a lot more time together and I will say I've said this before but it's true
01:40:26.680 the number one most important thing to a good relationship is using your most generous lens on
01:40:34.400 your partner and that's really more than half the battle you just put those sort of rose-colored
01:40:38.600 glasses on and they will endure to your benefit to interpret every piece of behavior through the most
01:40:44.780 generous lens instead of the least generous lens and it winds up coming back to you and when your
01:40:50.340 least generous instincts kick in remind yourself rose-colored glasses are not bad try it again
01:40:55.440 um here's another one how do you maintain this is from emma how do you maintain your peace of mind
01:41:01.400 when you're being attacked similar from shara who wrote what's something you do to feel supported
01:41:07.400 amid all the hostility um i tried not to take that stuff in i try to avoid it and if it comes my way
01:41:14.040 um to then sort of go seek out some love i mean there's way more love out there than there is hate for
01:41:19.440 me and for you it's actually one of the things i love about the comments over on apple they're so
01:41:24.160 lovely and uplifting that's you know you go there if you if you need a little ego boost it's nice
01:41:28.740 and you have to remember the people who are writing the the nasty things there's a saying
01:41:32.900 haters hate up um they wouldn't be taking those shots at you if they didn't feel threatened or
01:41:37.600 powerless in response to you there's some satisfaction in that don't forget to watch the
01:41:42.000 show tomorrow download the show via podcast and watch us on youtube.com slash megan kelly and tomorrow
01:41:48.080 dave ramsey is here don't miss that thanks for listening to the megan kelly show no bs no agenda and no fear