RFK and Tulsi Coast Toward Confirmation, and Trump's Legal Fights Ahead, with Dave Aronberg, Mike Davis, and Sean Stone | Ep. 999
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 39 minutes
Words per Minute
175.32259
Summary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is confirmed to be the next Health and Human Services Secretary, which is a huge victory for President Trump. But there are still some who are concerned about his anti-vaccine views. Megyn explains why this is a good thing.
Transcript
00:00:00.520
Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111 every weekday at New East.
00:00:12.080
Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:19.900
And the news cycle is still moving at a frantic pace.
00:00:23.020
The Finance Committee just approved Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s nomination
00:00:27.840
to be secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
00:00:32.220
This means it will go to the full floor of the U.S. Senate, where now he's expected to be confirmed.
00:00:38.360
The big question was whether he would make it out of committee.
00:00:40.960
And with every single one of the 14 Republican senators falling in line,
00:00:50.700
he appears at this point to have the votes he needs to get through.
00:00:58.320
They're melting down over him, not just on the left, but at some more conservative,
00:01:04.920
traditional Republican places, because they cannot get over his, quote, anti-vaccine positions.
00:01:16.920
Go listen to the two hours I did with him on the vaccines.
00:01:26.800
and whether some of the questions he's been raising about them make sense.
00:01:30.420
And then, no matter what your answer is to that,
00:01:33.420
push you to the side and come to terms with the fact that Trump has said
00:01:41.200
He's not going to be banning any of these vaccines.
00:01:43.840
He will object to some of them if he finds some to be problematic.
00:01:48.020
Obviously, he's on record as funneling a lawsuit,
00:01:51.040
a couple of lawsuits to law firms against Gardasil, the HPV vaccine,
00:01:56.960
We did a whole show about that with a fair and balanced debate, pro and against.
00:02:03.540
But he's made clear it's really not about his personal views.
00:02:06.380
But in that position, would he be in a position to say,
00:02:08.940
you know what, you might want to take a second look at this one?
00:02:13.600
That doesn't mean your kid won't have access to it or you won't have access to it.
00:02:18.140
But some of us have become a little bit more vaccine skeptical in the wake of COVID
00:02:28.740
Like, you know, the end conclusion of that HPV vaccine thing that we did was
00:02:34.220
the one woman was saying she landed on doing one shot instead of two shots.
00:02:38.960
Whatever. You make your own decision. But the point is, you can have a debate.
00:02:42.080
You can have a debate. And the fact that the the news media, the left and this portion of the
00:02:48.700
right that's so pro vaccine has shut down any discussion of it.
00:02:53.060
I told you when I was on Fox, you were not allowed to entertain
00:02:56.280
any claims that there was something wrong with the MMR vaccines.
00:03:02.240
I gave them all to my kids. Thank God all my kids are fine.
00:03:04.440
Wonderful things happened. They gained some immunity and they didn't have any adverse reactions.
00:03:11.200
But why can't we talk about the people who had a different result?
00:03:16.540
How is that dangerous? People can make up their own minds.
00:03:20.820
RFKJ is going in there to deal with the public health crisis that is happening in this country
00:03:25.860
right now. It's not about vaccine. Would you just zoom out from your obsession
00:03:29.660
with vaccines? RFKJ critics, would you spend two seconds looking at the way we eat,
00:03:37.180
the way we treat patients who get disease, who get obese, who who we funnel through a lifetime of
00:03:46.180
pharmaceuticals and additional medical procedures without pausing to say what's making you ill?
00:03:52.680
Why do children have autism now at a one in 30 rate as opposed to one in 10,000 30 years ago?
00:04:02.260
Why do children have so many allergies? Why are children getting ADHD in record numbers?
00:04:08.040
Why are children suffering from ticks? Why are all these children getting Tourette's?
00:04:13.820
We're just not supposed to ask those questions. We're just supposed to go about our business
00:04:18.920
and consume all the dyes and the chemicals in our food that's not in the Europeans.
00:04:26.060
Eat the pasta that has the wheat that's been sprayed with this toxic chemical as a pesticide.
00:04:33.560
Just ignore the farmers who are dying from cancer from the pesticides potentially that they're
00:04:40.920
spraying. All that should be looked into. Should it not? Is it not fair to actually kick the tires
00:04:48.080
on public health and figure out whether not only have we just accepted living this way,
00:04:54.780
which is totally unhealthy? I mean, literally unhealthy, making us sick, but it's being pushed
00:04:59.360
on. It's it's it is an active part of the game for too many of these industries. Do you think big
00:05:07.760
pharma wants us all to get better like that? Do you think big ag really wants any sort of mandate
00:05:14.780
that requires them to change the way they do business? RFKJ had to promise that he would work
00:05:19.460
with farmers and ranchers to push regenerative agriculture, which is better for you, retilling
00:05:25.820
the soil and so on. And he said he would. But why can't we have the discussion? That's on the
00:05:30.400
Republican side. They protect the farmers and the ranchers and the Dems and everybody else wants to
00:05:34.300
protect big pharma. That big pharma ads were all over Fox when I was there. It's not just a leftist
00:05:39.120
thing. The point is this gone on for too long, too long. Stop with your obsessive focus on vaccines,
00:05:45.920
which are not in danger. Listen to what he actually wants to do. And on that front, thank you. Thank you
00:05:53.060
to the Republican senators who got him through this committee vote. It's not done yet again, but who
00:05:58.380
got him through this committee vote. Thank you to Senator Cassidy, whose office we targeted. There's
00:06:04.080
no question in a totally legit way. You guys all called. You made it so that that line, that phone
00:06:09.740
line was basically no longer good because you just kept calling. I called personally. I called
00:06:14.960
myself. I didn't do anything I didn't ask you to do and emailed and said to him, please, please do
00:06:21.880
this. We hear your concerns, but we're not worried about the same things you are. Please hear us on this
00:06:27.460
guy. And if he turns out to be the kook that the critics say he is, Trump will fire him. All right.
00:06:35.080
Have you ever seen a president more comfortable with firing bad actors or people who turn out to
00:06:39.840
disappoint him? Fear not. He's not afraid of firing and replacing. So there's always that backstop.
00:06:46.000
Just relax. He's trying something different. That's why he was elected. And you can make exactly the
00:06:54.440
same argument on Tulsi Gabbard, who appears to have the votes as well. Her committee vote is today at
00:07:01.580
2 PM and the news is all good. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who seems somewhat skeptical. Remember,
00:07:08.400
we talked about her answer. Like I'm happy with her answers. What does it mean? We took it as a
00:07:12.300
positive. Well, she's, she's going to vote yes. And so is Senator Young. Something bizarre happened
00:07:19.300
though. Senator Todd Young. He, he gave it to her pretty good at her confirmation hearing. He was
00:07:25.120
clearly not a fan. Clearly he's a Republican. And in the interim between last week's hearing and today
00:07:32.480
she had to write him a letter. I mean, it's amazing the hoops they make these candidates go through.
00:07:36.880
They basically have to genuflect and tell him all the things I'll, I'll give you everything you want on
00:07:41.380
your Santa's wish list. Here it is. So she wrote him this letter. I'm honored. Um, okay. I'm,
00:07:47.800
I'm committed to working to restore trust in the intelligence community. And then she says as
00:07:52.240
requested below are the list of commitments you asked that I make to you in this letter.
00:07:56.860
You wanted it in writing. I commit to holding accountable and seeking justice against any
00:08:00.900
Intel community, employee contractor, or subcontractor contractor who is suspected of
00:08:05.580
making or facilitating an unauthorized disclosure of any Intel program. I will not advocate for any
00:08:11.400
protections, which should only be extended to lawful and legitimate whistleblowers. So this is basically
00:08:19.000
saying, if we have another Snowden, are you going to run cover for him? And she's saying no. Okay,
00:08:23.920
fine. And she said at her confirmation hearing over and over, what I'm going to do as soon as I get in
00:08:28.480
there is create a meaningful Avenue for any would be Snowden to come to me to say, this is what we're
00:08:35.780
doing. And I will make sure it is meaningful and we won't have to have another Snowden. And this is
00:08:41.740
the second piece of it saying, and then if somebody doesn't obey this process and goes outside of it
00:08:48.580
and goes to the news media in the way Snowden does, I will commit to holding them accountable.
00:08:54.380
Then she, the second paragraph, I commit to working with the committee to evaluate whether existing laws,
00:08:59.440
regulations, and policies are sufficient to deter an Intel community employee, contractor, or
00:09:06.080
subcontractor from making an unauthorized disclosure of any Intel program. I will have confirmed
00:09:12.080
communicate explicitly to the Intel community, my commitment to holding accountable and seeking
00:09:16.080
justice against any violator of existing laws, regs, et cetera. They're really, really focused
00:09:21.220
on Snowden that I will not contrary to a statement on X on June 3rd, 2019, protect any Intel
00:09:27.880
community employee, contractor, or subcontractor who commits an unauthorized disclosure. They do not
00:09:33.440
want any alleged whistleblower getting any sort of protection. I mean, the truth is it's more
00:09:40.820
complicated than they're making. I mean, of course you're sitting here thinking, well, I don't think
00:09:43.700
I want that. I don't want to blow our secrets. I don't want to endanger our spies. But as you know,
00:09:48.820
it's more complicated than that. You know, some of what Snowden revealed or turned over to journalists
00:09:54.420
is very controversial. We talked about that with Glenn, but some of it was exposing a
00:09:57.820
program that we had our top officials lying about that did capture within its net Americans and our
00:10:05.640
metadata, things about like where we were and so on. Very controversial. And you had, you know,
00:10:10.140
people like, um, James Clapper under oath lying about it. So that's what, you know, the Snowden
00:10:16.760
situation is, is complicated. Uh, they're wanting assurances from her that would apply to a case
00:10:26.520
that's extremely clear cut, right? Where the, the person's about to violate our confidences and
00:10:31.140
endanger our spies. And there's no reason to do it. I'm not sure about these assurances. I know she had
00:10:36.760
to give them. I am believe me. I'm, I'm probably more against Snowden than I am on the Glenn Greenwald
00:10:43.460
side of things. And I, you know, Tucker and Glenn and all these people have been advocating for a
00:10:46.620
Snowden pardon. I'm not there. Um, but I'm, I understand Tulsi's position and I understand
00:10:52.800
why he did what he did. And I don't know that there should be this hardcore rule that we're never
00:10:58.580
going to consider like the real whistleblower status of somebody. If they want to do a Snowden,
00:11:06.640
if they want to pull a stone again, I'm not on his side for the record, but whatever. Uh, and then
00:11:11.660
they go on from there. The bottom line is Tulsi looks like she's got the votes. We're going to know
00:11:15.420
in a couple of hours. And this is all great because Trump is trying to do things differently. Again,
00:11:20.200
it just goes back to Trump is trying to do things differently. Tulsi's right. They do not trust the
00:11:24.740
Intel community. The American people do not trust the Intel community that they've proven themselves
00:11:30.800
to be extremely political in their operations and their maneuvers. And we need an Intel community
00:11:38.540
that we actually do trust and believe in. Like why did the CIA in, in the course of 24 hours change
00:11:43.680
from the COVID virus came from a pangolin to, it came from a lab over the course of 24 hours from
00:11:52.060
Biden's presidency to Trump's. Why'd they do that? Why were they saying they believed it came from an
00:11:56.500
animal, from a natural resource. And then 24 hours later after Trump takes office, they say, okay,
00:12:00.540
come from a lab. Hello. We don't trust you. We know you're being manipulated. You're pushing somebody
00:12:05.380
else's business. I mean, there's been a lot that's happened with our Intel services. And if we can get
00:12:12.380
somebody in there who is almost slightly adverse to them, okay, she's not, but in a way she is,
00:12:18.120
she's, she's not on bended knee to them and she's not above questioning them, then good, good. Maybe
00:12:26.160
that will lead to real reform. And again, if, if, if it doesn't, if Trump is dissatisfied with his
00:12:32.200
presidential daily brief, if he thinks Chelsea's falling down on the job, he will fire her. So just
00:12:36.580
calm down. Okay. Um, I'm thrilled. I'm thrilled that these two look like they're in cash Patel's
00:12:43.320
obviously going to get in. And that means Trump should have all of his nominees and it should
00:12:48.040
happen pretty quickly because he needs them in place. You know, we're, we've already seen confusion
00:12:52.460
over at, um, OMB, you know, we saw the terrible plane crash. Thank God, Sean Duffy had been confirmed,
00:12:58.360
but it's like, he'd been confirmed earlier that day. If something were to happen in the Intel field,
00:13:02.420
God forbid, we had a terrorist attack. He needs his people in place. We all know that he's going to get
00:13:06.120
his people. Republicans should not drag their feet. He has a mandate. Let's go. All right,
00:13:10.840
let's go. Uh, Trump's been firing off these executive orders by the day. As you know,
00:13:16.100
they're beautiful. Love, love the Trump EOs. But, um, as a lawyer, you get paid not to look at a
00:13:23.800
situation and say, ah, that'll never happen. But to look at a situation and say, that's absolutely
00:13:28.680
going to happen. And how do I protect against it? And that's the purpose of the next discussion we're
00:13:33.820
going to have. What, how are the Democrats going to challenge these executive orders and how will
00:13:40.900
team Trump protect against it? The ban on DEI, his order against gender transition procedures and end
00:13:48.860
to birthright citizenship. That's already been challenged in court, uh, and more. And for all
00:13:54.020
of that, we've got two of our favorites back with us in a whole new era of political legal news.
00:13:58.740
Dave Ehrenberg, former state attorney for Palm Beach County, Florida, managing partner of Dave
00:14:03.520
Ehrenberg law and host of court authorities on YouTube and Mike Davis founder and president of
00:14:09.660
the article three project. Okay. Listen up football fans. It's super bowl time and it's now or never
00:14:15.940
don't miss out on football action with prize picks, the best place to win cash while watching and to
00:14:21.940
have a little extra fun while you do, especially when your team's out of the hunt prize picks is a way
00:14:26.180
to get involved and have a rooting interest, pick some of your favorite players to score and enjoy
00:14:30.320
the game on the edge of your seat. If you sign up today, you will get $50 instantly. When you play
00:14:35.400
with five bucks, you don't even need to win to receive the $50 bonus. It's guaranteed. Then you
00:14:41.120
can make your prize picks. Doug and I are going to be at the super bowl this weekend, rooting for the
00:14:45.260
Eagles. That's his team. So maybe he will pick some players on Philly to score touchdowns in the game
00:14:51.180
prize picks as a little spice to the viewing experience, whether you're there or not download
00:14:56.600
the app today and use the code Megan to get 50 bucks instantly. After you play your first $5 lineup
00:15:02.780
again, download the prize picks app today and use code Megan play five bucks and instantly get 50
00:15:10.280
from this promotion. Guys, welcome back. Thank you. So Dave now, former Palm beach, uh, DA what's what
00:15:19.040
happened? Did you lose an election or did you step down? What happened? No, I'm the rare Democrat who
00:15:23.660
did not lose an election this cycle. Megan, I decided, I decided not to run again. It's been 12
00:15:29.160
years. I believe in term limits. So I self-imposed one after 12 years at this job. Also, I got married,
00:15:36.120
as you know, and, uh, you know, I wanted to buy a house. So you need some money. Yeah. Yeah. So I went
00:15:43.400
to the private sector and you know, that it doesn't mean I can't do more TV and, and, uh, shows like
00:15:49.320
yours. I love doing it. So I'm excited about the next chapter. Uh, just means I'm no longer state
00:15:54.460
attorney, more of a has been, but, uh, excited about what I'm doing next. Awesome. Well, good for
00:15:59.680
you. And thank you for your service. Uh, Dem side or not, I very greatly appreciate you doing the job
00:16:04.940
because it's not easy. Certainly not easy to be a DA, a lot of responsibility. Okay. So great to see you
00:16:09.960
both. You're the perfect team to talk about this with. I confess Mike Davis that with each EO, I'm
00:16:15.920
like, yes. And then I'm like, cause you can, you can feel the filings coming down against them. And
00:16:23.040
that's where they're all, they'll all play out, right? Like each one of these is going to get
00:16:26.620
challenged. All right. So where to begin? Let's start with the Trump executive orders that target
00:16:32.620
DEI. Um, that's the most sweeping one. It's the January 21 ending illegal discrimination
00:16:39.880
and restoring merit-based opportunity, which by the way, is the perfect name for it because
00:16:44.040
we already have laws on the books that make it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race.
00:16:48.780
And that doesn't mean you can discriminate against whites. It means you can't discriminate against
00:16:55.120
anyone based on their skin color, based on the race period, which is why I've been saying from the
00:17:00.280
beginning, all this DEI stuff is illegal. This is illegal. You cannot make hiring promotion,
00:17:07.020
firing decisions based on the fact that somebody is a white guy or a black woman. It's not okay.
00:17:12.880
So what he's really saying to me, Mike is he's just now going to enforce this. He's going to now go
00:17:17.020
around and find the places who have been flouting the law and threaten them, potentially deprive them
00:17:22.500
of their federal money. Um, okay. Trump ordered agencies under his control in the executive branch to
00:17:28.460
apply the civil rights laws of which I speak against private sector DEI programs. He also ordered the
00:17:35.200
attorney general to issue a report within 120 days that includes strategies and policies to combat
00:17:41.200
DEI in the private sector, including possible litigation and identifying larger organizations
00:17:46.400
to target for investigation. The order specifically allows for teachers at federally funded institutions
00:17:52.760
of higher education to still advocate for DEI. They can, um, they can, I want to get the right
00:18:00.640
words. Uh, they can advocate for DEI, endorse DEI and promote DEI, but they cannot use race and sex
00:18:08.440
based preferences at these universities for hiring, for admissions, for promotions, et cetera, but they
00:18:15.920
can still have classes on DEI. Um, so you tell me whether this is going to withstand legal challenges
00:18:26.140
that say it's, it's somehow a crackdown on free speech or, you know, a factor of race that may
00:18:36.400
or may not be the determinative factor and whether this is likely to stand at the end of whatever
00:18:41.480
litigation comes, Mike. Well, what, remember what president Trump did with this executive order
00:18:47.260
on DEI is he repealed president Biden's day one executive order on DEI where president Biden
00:18:55.860
essentially ordered these executive branch agencies to promote this Marxist ideology called
00:19:02.520
diversity, equity, and inclusion. And the problem, as you said, Megan, is DEI runs, uh, directly
00:19:10.200
contrary to our federal civil rights statutes. It is illegal. It is a federal crime. It's a
00:19:17.200
uh, it's a civil violation as well to discriminate based upon, uh, based upon race, right. And so
00:19:25.420
and sex. And so what you're seeing with DEI is, is that you have the federal government under Joe Biden
00:19:32.600
intentionally discriminating, which is clearly illegal. So president Trump's executive order
00:19:39.400
is very carefully crafted. And it essentially tells his, uh, his executive branch officials,
00:19:47.620
like the director of the office of management and budget, his director of, uh, personnel management,
00:19:53.960
his attorney general to, to find these programs and, uh, and eliminate these programs to the maximum
00:20:01.000
extent that a law that, that law allows. Right. So it's not just, he's not just waving a wand and making
00:20:07.620
all DEI go away. He's telling his executive branch, uh, officials that they have to follow the law to do
00:20:15.480
it. So within the executive branch, that's why we're seeing, um, video or that picture, for example,
00:20:22.300
at the Pentagon of them taking down the DEI mural on the wall, like within the, you know, the, the, um,
00:20:30.820
executive branch and the agencies that Trump has control over, he's saying, remove the DEI paraphernalia,
00:20:38.100
remove the DEI classes, remove the DEI language. And then in the private sector, he's saying in
00:20:44.980
particular, when it comes to large corporations and nonprofits, I want my attorney general to submit a
00:20:52.500
report within 120 days with recommendations on who needs to be sued basically to force compliance
00:21:02.600
with the civil rights laws, publicly trade corporations, large nonprofit corporations,
00:21:07.360
foundations with assets of $500 million or more state and local bar and medical associations and
00:21:14.540
institutions of higher learning with endowments over $1 billion, Dave. So he's saying for those groups,
00:21:21.080
he wants the DOJ to actually start enforcing the civil rights laws. If they are unlawfully
00:21:27.780
discriminating on the basis of race or gender. Yeah, Megan, he has more power when it comes to
00:21:34.160
the purse, when it comes to title six of the civil rights act, that's where universities get financial
00:21:39.880
assistance. And that's where the federal government does have a lot of power. And the universities thus far
00:21:46.740
have been slow in responding to the Supreme Court's decision. Because there's a loophole that Chief
00:21:54.760
Justice Roberts allowed that you can talk about race and how it has affected you in your essays. And
00:22:01.640
you have universities like Harvard and others that said, okay, Johns Hopkins actually asked you that
00:22:06.380
very question, how has race impacted you? And so you're so so universities know that as long as it was
00:22:14.160
the Biden administration there, that the anti-DEI would not be pursued, that the Supreme Court's
00:22:20.980
decision would not be aggressively enforced. Now, there's a new sheriff in town. And I would think
00:22:26.880
the universities are now going to start erring on the side of being more careful than they perhaps
00:22:31.540
need to be because they don't want to get sued. They don't want their title six funding
00:22:35.940
revoked. I think it's a tougher question when it comes to private institutions. I saw that Roger Goodell,
00:22:41.360
the NFL, said that they're going to continue with their own DEI practices of the Rooney rule to
00:22:47.040
interview a black candidate for a head coaching position. They don't have strict quotas. And so
00:22:51.500
you're going to see individual institutions like Costco to continue to proudly have DEI.
00:22:56.760
I don't think there's a lot that the federal government can do on that. They can, though.
00:23:00.220
The federal government can wield a big ax when it comes to colleges and universities.
00:23:05.600
Here's the other thing, though, Mike. I've mentioned this on the air before. I've never named the bank out of
00:23:10.100
respect for my friend, but my friend is a senior guy at a very large bank in Manhattan. And he told
00:23:16.660
me that he needed to get rid of some people because, you know, they were cutting back and
00:23:22.020
whatever, finding efficiencies. And he was specifically told it has to be three white guys.
00:23:27.400
And he was upset because the three people who were the weakest on his team were either black or women.
00:23:35.920
And those if he had to turf people, he wanted to turf the weakest ones. And it just happened in
00:23:40.960
this case that they had been DEI hires and they were not strong and that his best performers happen
00:23:48.520
to be white guys. But he was told by his boss, the three that you have to pick amongst the white men.
00:23:54.260
That's illegal. That's exactly the kind of person who should call Team Trump in a whistleblower or
00:24:02.440
anonymous situation and say, you need to come investigate my bank. And this has happened to
00:24:08.140
me. And then they come and kick those tires because there is a way of the federal government
00:24:12.100
coming and involving itself, you know, against a bank if it's if it's violating the civil rights
00:24:17.400
laws in this way. Yeah, I mean, Harmeet Dillon is President Trump's nominee to lead the civil rights
00:24:25.360
division in the Justice Department. And she is very well versed on all of these federal civil rights
00:24:31.940
statutes. And not only are these private institutions potentially exposing themselves to tremendous
00:24:40.600
civil liability for violating the federal civil rights statutes, you also have a criminal component
00:24:47.980
to the federal civil rights statutes. And so these, these, these banks, these institutions
00:24:57.000
that think they're going to be woke and discriminate based upon race, even though the executive branch is
00:25:05.020
making it very clear that they're going to enforce the laws, I think they're doing this at their own
00:25:10.700
peril. And I would say to these executives at these publicly traded companies, remember, you have
00:25:17.200
duties to your shareholders to make sure that you're not running your company in violation of federal
00:25:24.560
civil rights statutes and exposing the company to astronomical civil liability, along with criminal
00:25:31.880
liability. Okay, let's talk about the next one, because it's getting, it's getting interesting
00:25:39.240
already. Protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation. That's the name of the EO.
00:25:46.420
This speaks to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries on minors in the name of so-called
00:25:53.560
gender affirming care, which is a complete misnomer. I believe this should be banned nationwide. This is
00:25:59.760
child abuse. This should not be allowed on any child. I don't care if the parents consent to it.
00:26:03.720
A parent can't consent to take out a child's, you know, healthy stomach because it would kill them.
00:26:09.920
Um, it would be child abuse. And so like they shouldn't be allowed to do this either. Absolutely
00:26:15.000
not. This should be banned on a nationwide level. This is barbaric that it's happening anywhere.
00:26:18.800
And so what Trump is saying is it is the policy of the United States to not fund or promote child
00:26:26.560
gender transitions. It will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called transition
00:26:31.980
of a child from one sex to another. And it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or
00:26:37.140
limit these destructive and life altering procedures. Organizations that receive federal
00:26:41.660
education or research grants can no longer perform these procedures. He writes the head of each
00:26:50.260
executive department or agency that provides research or education grants to medical institutions,
00:26:56.640
including medical schools and hospitals shall dot, dot, dot, dot, end the chemical and surgical
00:27:03.700
mutilation of children. And it goes on to say the HHS secretary is also to use the following tools to
00:27:10.120
end this, including Medicare or Medicaid conditions of participation, meaning you can go ahead and continue
00:27:16.660
performing these procedures on children, uh, random hospital. You just won't be able to take any
00:27:21.900
Medicare patients anymore. Medicare will no longer be available at your hospital, nor will Medicaid.
00:27:26.120
I mean, that's, they're all going to comply that that's their bread and butter. Um, it also
00:27:33.300
prohibits coverage for child gender transitions in insurance plans that federal workers have,
00:27:40.140
including any military worker. And here again, it has a directive to the department of justice.
00:27:45.300
The attorney general shall convene all States attorneys general and other law enforcement officers to
00:27:52.500
coordinate the enforcement of these laws, uh, of laws against female genital mutilation across American
00:27:59.000
states. So that speaks to the red States that have already banned this, um, shall prioritize
00:28:03.800
investigations and take appropriate action to end deception of consumers by any entity that may be
00:28:09.940
misleading the public about the long-term side effects of chemical and surgical mutilations.
00:28:13.960
That's through, um, like advertising through medical disclosures. If you don't tell the people,
00:28:20.700
tell the families, tell the children explicitly what exactly is going to happen to them,
00:28:24.000
then we can privatize investigations against you. And it goes on from there. So, Oh, and by the way,
00:28:30.260
there's one in here for Tim Wallace in Minnesota. He says the department of justice shall prioritize
00:28:34.980
investigations and take appropriate action to end child abusive practices by so-called sanctuary states
00:28:40.720
that facilitate stripping custody from parents who support the healthy development of their own
00:28:45.160
children. That's a complete reference to Tim Wallace and what he did in Minnesota, making his
00:28:49.700
state a so-called sanctuary where they will remove custody from parents who don't believe in these
00:28:54.300
procedures, put the child in the care of the state, and then have a stranger act as their guardian
00:28:59.820
while they chop off their healthy body parts. It's sick. Okay. So likely challenges to this one, Dave.
00:29:08.160
Yeah. Megan, I think a lot will be told in, uh, when the Supreme court rules on that,
00:29:14.680
that case that came before it in December, this is the case out of Tennessee where there was a
00:29:21.160
challenge to Tennessee's Republican back law that banned the transgender, uh, surgeries for young
00:29:30.080
people, for underage people. In fact, uh, the conservative courts seem to be very skeptical
00:29:35.100
of the challenge, meaning that they were likely to uphold the law in Tennessee. And I think that if
00:29:42.500
they do uphold Tennessee's law, which is not just banning medical treatments, um, but also the
00:29:49.520
hormones for people under 18 who are experiencing gender dysphoria. And so if that is upheld by the
00:29:57.120
Supreme court, then I think all the other States will have their laws upheld. I think Dave, I think it's,
00:30:03.240
I think if I'm not mistaken, that case is about the hormones and not the surgical procedures.
00:30:08.160
Right. But if you can have a law that says that parents are not even allowed to let their children
00:30:13.860
take the hormones, then certainly you're allowed to have a law that says parents are forbidden from
00:30:19.180
having their children get the surgery. So that's why this case is so important. I think that the Supreme
00:30:24.940
court is going to resolve this matter for us. And it looks like they're going to allow
00:30:29.140
bans to take place. Um, here. Okay. So here's, here's, what's already happening though. Today
00:30:37.340
in New York, you have, um, there's news that NYU Langone, which is a great hospital. Um,
00:30:47.360
unfortunately they've been doing these procedures or at least the hormones because there's a report,
00:30:52.420
I think it was in the New York times yesterday that they, in the wake of this executive order,
00:30:57.320
because they are an institution that does receive some federal funds, um, denied or canceled to
00:31:04.600
scheduled injections of puberty blockers. It's, I guess you get like a thing in your arm,
00:31:08.360
almost like a birth control pill as a woman. And, uh, they were about to do these on two 12 year olds,
00:31:15.300
which is not a surprise because that's when you start puberty. It's disgusting. Like a 12 year old
00:31:20.480
could ever possibly consent to what these drugs do to him or her. In any event, NYU Langone,
00:31:26.900
um, canceled two of the procedures. And then there was a protest outside of the hospital last night
00:31:33.560
by these far left loons led by Cynthia Nixon, who is as far left as that. Yeah. It was the group,
00:31:41.360
the democratic socialists of America, the ones who were cheering all the dead Jews after 10, seven,
00:31:47.060
right in the middle of Manhattan. Like, yeah, yeah, yeah. Dead, right. Burned babies. Yeah. We're in
00:31:51.780
favor. That's the democratic socialists of America. So she parades out there with them
00:31:56.700
and I'll show you her soundbite, but more important than Cynthia Nixon is Letitia James,
00:32:04.440
the attorney general of, of the state of New York who responded to NYU Langone saying,
00:32:11.440
you better do these procedures because if you offer puberty blockers for so-called cis kids,
00:32:18.740
which is a disgusting term to just kids to any kids, you can't deny them to quote trans kids,
00:32:26.720
or you have violated our anti-discrimination laws, Mike. So that's now Letitia James is putting NYU
00:32:33.980
Langone and all of our other hospitals who are trying to comply with the Trump EO in a very difficult
00:32:38.780
position. Yeah. I I'm, I'm trying to figure out what these Democrats are trying to accomplish here.
00:32:47.220
Democratic socialists, Mike, democratic socialists. There you go. There you go. I mean,
00:32:51.920
think about this. They want to create an industry where children have their healthy genitals cut off
00:33:01.000
and they're giving life destroying pills and surgeries at a very young age, 12 years old,
00:33:08.460
13 years old. And then they want to have patients for the rest of their lives where you're spending
00:33:15.500
several hundred thousand dollars trying to maintain the, the, this gender affirming care that these
00:33:24.540
pills and surgeries that destroy the lives of kids. I look, gender dysphoria is a very sad,
00:33:32.760
tragic mental illness, but we're not seeing an explosion of gender dysphoria in this country.
00:33:40.480
This is a social contagion where these kids think it's cool to be trans and then their psychotic
00:33:48.180
parents are actually going forward and allowing them to, to have these life destroying pills and
00:33:55.200
surgeries. I'm with you, Megan, that this should be outlawed across the country and it should be
00:34:00.700
criminalized. And if you're a doctor or a parent and you're doing this to a kid, you should go to
00:34:06.100
prison. Yes, a hundred percent. These doctors are, are the problem. What these doctors are making
00:34:12.000
money, hand over fist, performing these bizarre surgeries. And if you want to do that as an adult,
00:34:17.040
there's that weird clinic down in Texas where you can get all of your genitals removed. You can get
00:34:21.600
your belly button removed. You can turn yourself into some sort of cyborg if you want. I don't support
00:34:27.300
it. I don't like it. I think you're weird and gross, but it's really not my business. But when it's
00:34:32.500
children, it's a totally different matter. But Dave, I think you put your finger on it because
00:34:37.680
what Tish James is saying is if you comply with the Trump executive order hospitals, you are behaving
00:34:44.600
in it. You're discriminating between, between sort of regular kids and these kids who say that they're
00:34:50.680
trans. And that's exactly what they argued before the Supreme court in the case that you referenced,
00:34:57.400
challenging the Tennessee ban on these surgeries for minors. They, they tried to argue that the
00:35:01.800
proponents of these procedures, the people who don't want it banned, they tried to say it's,
00:35:07.880
it's sex discrimination to go in there and say that you can get a puberty blocker if you're an
00:35:15.360
actual girl, but you can't get one if you're a quote, trans girl, meaning like fake girl, meaning boy,
00:35:23.640
that it's somehow sex discrimination. And the Supreme court did not seem at all inclined to buy that.
00:35:29.820
And so Tish James's objection really could be dismissed summarily depending on how the Supreme
00:35:36.340
court rules within a matter of months. You know, it's interesting, Megan, because they did make an
00:35:40.980
equal protection argument under the 14th amendment. And I think it is a legitimate legal argument to
00:35:46.980
make that if the hormone drugs are available to juveniles who are not trying to transition or don't
00:35:55.240
have gender dysphoria, but they are not available to juveniles who do have gender dysphoria,
00:36:00.700
then that is an interesting equal protection argument to make. And I guess then it's a question
00:36:05.820
of, do we as judges put ourselves in the position of being medical experts, or do we put ourselves in
00:36:14.620
the position of being judges where we defer to the legislators? And right now, the judges are saying
00:36:21.300
the latter, we are not going to try to know what's best and put ourselves in the shoes of
00:36:27.860
doctors. We're just going to defer to the legislature because we don't want any part of this. And I think
00:36:33.280
that's where it's going to fall. I agree. But I think this same type of argument was scoffed at
00:36:39.380
in open court when they tried to make it. And Mike, it's like, you can't, you know, take,
00:36:45.580
take Ozempic, um, any adult, you know, maybe Lizzo wants to use Ozempic. I don't think most people
00:36:51.900
will give her a hard time on that. But if you want to give Ozempic to a six month old baby,
00:36:56.080
that's abuse. You'll be in prison. You will be behind bars very quickly. Like we have different
00:37:01.540
formulations based on who wants the medicine and for what purpose. And this is, this is, I mean,
00:37:08.480
for some, it could be in essence a vanity project to have these puberty blockers and cross-sex
00:37:13.680
hormones injected into their child. For some, it could be a form of conversion therapy because in
00:37:18.000
too many cases, they don't want a gay boy. They don't want an effeminate gay son. And they're
00:37:24.820
bigots. They tend to be leftist bigots who would rather have a girl. You're not a gay boy. You're a
00:37:31.360
girl. And they push their kids down this road and their son would have grown up to be a totally fine,
00:37:37.740
well gay man, but they manipulate him into doing. So it's just, it's sick. It is like giving the
00:37:43.440
Ozempic to a six month old. So I think Tish James will lose her challenge. And that leaves me though
00:37:50.980
with Cynthia Nixon, who we all agree democratic socialists of America is a disgusting vile group.
00:37:58.460
And they, they think they have the moral high ground here, Mike. She went out, she was of course,
00:38:02.940
one of the stars of sex in the city. She, um, had the following to say.
00:38:06.840
Most importantly, I am here today as the mother of a proud trans man.
00:38:20.380
I am here today as the aunt of a proud trans man.
00:38:28.140
My best friend's kid is trans. And my kid's best friend is trans. My trans kid had his top
00:38:38.540
surgery at NYU a number of years ago. His top surgery. Her breast removed at NYU, she said.
00:38:45.760
His doctors were fantastic. His surgeon was the best we could have imagined.
00:38:51.240
And the idea that this city is filled with young people who thought they had a place to go where
00:39:01.540
they could receive the highest care. And that place has now been shut to them. Sickens me. Sickens
00:39:08.040
me to my core. I'll tell you one thing. She's right about one thing. She is sick. She is sick.
00:39:15.600
And to your point, Mike, about social contagion. Did she not just make your point?
00:39:22.600
Yeah. I mean, it's, it is truly sickening. Again, gender dysphoria is a severe mental illness.
00:39:31.200
We should, we should protect them. We should treat them with compassion. We shouldn't celebrate this
00:39:36.960
and turn it into a social contagion where kids think it's cool to go be trans and then have their
00:39:44.620
psychotic parents like that woman move forward with transgender surgeries, these life destroying
00:39:51.380
pills and surgeries that changed them forever. I mean, these kids can't even get Tylenol at their
00:39:58.580
schools, but their parents think they can get transgender surgeries. I mean, is it, what would
00:40:05.220
happen if a mother said, we're going to cut off the arms and legs of my healthy child? People would say,
00:40:13.180
you can't do that. That is, that is butchering your child. You can't do that. So how the hell do we let
00:40:19.580
these crazy parents cut off the genitals of their healthy children? Yeah, exactly right. But what do
00:40:28.560
you make of it, Dave? Because it just, I mean, it's barbaric. And for her, you know, as well as I do 30
00:40:33.200
years ago, it's not that there were all these trans people in hiding. She's like my, my, it's her
00:40:39.000
daughter. When you say trans, if you substitute in the word fake, it actually gets you to the right
00:40:42.980
result. It's, it's very confusing for people. So she has a daughter who had her breast chopped off
00:40:47.680
at NYU. And like so many other people, she wants to feel validated in her choice and her kid's choice
00:40:54.040
by having other kids do the same thing. And so she's going to go out there with the Democratic. It's no
00:40:59.480
accident that she could only find those loons to go march with her, Dave, um, in trying to make her
00:41:05.320
point. Megan, she ran for governor against Andrew Cuomo in a democratic primary, and she got 35%
00:41:11.520
of the vote. That was a left-wing challenge. That was probably 34% more than she deserved to get.
00:41:17.300
She's spoken out against Israel and seems to care more about Hamas than the dead Israeli children that
00:41:23.500
are the victims of, of terrorism. But as far as on this issue, look, I am, I'm glad that Mike said what
00:41:29.180
he said too, because I did gender dysphoria is a real thing. And I think that it's, it's important to
00:41:33.820
treat these children with compassion. I do agree that it's different when you're a child is when
00:41:38.740
you're an adult. And, but at the same time, about like 1%, about one and a half percent of our country
00:41:44.400
is identified as trans. And I do think that a lot of the conversation we have is inflating that number
00:41:51.060
to make it seem like they're in every corner alley, every, they're coming to get you. And I think that
00:41:56.100
it's important to realize we're talking about a very, very small group of people. I worry about
00:41:59.660
discrimination against them. At the same time, I hear you. I think when you're a juvenile and you
00:42:04.120
can't make the decisions for yourself under the law, that perhaps we shouldn't be allowed. Children
00:42:09.100
should be allowed to have that surgery. Now the hormone blockers are a little different. I get it
00:42:13.400
that parents should generally have the say in their child's health and lawmakers may want to curtail
00:42:19.060
that when it comes to this area. But that one's a little more confusing to me. I just think it's clear
00:42:24.760
though on the surgery that should be when you're an adult. And just, just FYI, because a lot of
00:42:29.580
people don't know this, but if your child goes from puberty blockers right into cross-sex hormones,
00:42:34.200
he's sterilized or she is sterilized and absolutely no hope of sexual function. So you have basically
00:42:40.860
chemically castrated your child and they, they will never achieve sexual pleasure ever. I mean,
00:42:47.320
how can you argue that an 11 year old could ever consent to that? They have no idea what that
00:42:54.340
means, what, what that pretends for their life. And they'll, you know, it's like people sue over
00:42:58.760
this, the lack of consortium from a spouse because they're no longer able to perform because they got
00:43:03.180
so depressed after the car accident. You're, you're guaranteeing lack of consortium for your child
00:43:08.540
for the rest of his or her life, just by the, the, the hormones, forget the surgeries.
00:43:13.420
You know, Megan, it's interesting. You bring up 11 year olds as a prosecutor. We do differentiate
00:43:17.480
under the law and 11 year old from a 17 year old. We're not even allowed to direct file
00:43:22.440
an 11 year old into adult court in Florida. You can direct file, obviously a 16, 17 year old. And so
00:43:28.800
perhaps that's where it should be, where there could be different rules in place
00:43:32.920
for an 11 year old compared to a 17 year old. But I get it. I understand as a parent,
00:43:37.500
why you are concerned. I just think I, since the gender dysphoria is real, I, and I'm not a doctor
00:43:43.340
that I just wish we could come to some sort of, uh, common ground on this rather than where we are
00:43:49.080
right now. All right. One quick question for you, Mike on, um, Trump's order that transgender people,
00:43:55.320
you know, so-called I honestly, I don't, I just, I really don't think there's any such thing.
00:43:59.680
There's people who have gender dysphoria who say they're a sex other than the one they are,
00:44:04.620
but that's just too much of a mouthful. Anyway. Um, he says they can't serve in the military
00:44:08.540
anymore, like at all, not even a desk job. And I was asking myself, you know, in light of
00:44:15.600
the opinion by the Supreme court, that it's illegal to discriminate against trans people
00:44:21.720
in hiring, you know, they've been given protected status when it comes to hiring and job and firing
00:44:27.620
at the job site on at the workplace. Could this be challenged? But then you hear you can keep
00:44:34.560
somebody out of the military if they have asthma, you know, like there's a whole bunch of things that
00:44:38.720
you can keep, like if they have the wrong tattoos. So is there any question that that is a legal order
00:44:44.080
by Trump? Well, I mean, there's going to be a challenge that there, there will be a challenge
00:44:48.740
under the equal protection clause of the constitution. Uh, we, you know, we fought a civil
00:44:54.400
war and we passed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to outlaw slavery, to free the slaves and to provide
00:45:04.220
equal protection and due process to the freed slaves. And you know, the, this, the 14th amendment,
00:45:11.020
the equal protection clause has been interpreted since then more broadly than freed slaves. I guess
00:45:17.860
the question is going to be for the Supreme court, whether, uh, we fought a civil war over transgender
00:45:24.720
surgeries on kids. Oh man. Okay. Let's do birthright citizenship because this is a big one. Uh, it's in
00:45:34.060
the constitution. It's, uh, in the 14th amendment, speaking of the equal protection clause, and it reads
00:45:40.240
as follows, all persons born or naturalized in the United States. Okay. So if you're born here,
00:45:45.340
just go with that and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States,
00:45:53.340
et cetera. If you're born here and you're subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, you're a
00:45:59.740
citizen. So Trump issued an executive order saying, no, you are not a citizen. You don't get citizenship.
00:46:08.580
Um, he says, if the mom is here unlawfully when she gives birth or the mom is here lawfully,
00:46:20.040
but she's not a citizen and she's only here temporarily. So he's basically just trying to
00:46:26.380
get it. Mostly he's trying to get it. Illegals who come across the border, they have their kid. And
00:46:29.900
then their kid is an American anchor baby, uh, with all the benefits of citizenship. Now, Dave,
00:46:35.140
there is precedent as I understand it saying that subject to the jurisdiction does not create some
00:46:45.000
loophole. That's as big as the one Trump claims and that we've been doing it right. Illegals who
00:46:51.560
sneak in and have a baby, their kids do get to be American citizens, but there are at least two cases,
00:46:57.860
um, on the other side suggesting maybe not, maybe it's not as clear. So walk me through your analysis
00:47:07.500
Trump is hoping that the U S Supreme court overturns, uh, centuries of precedent here and
00:47:13.640
redefines the 14th amendment. And he's got a six, three conservative majority on the Supreme courts.
00:47:19.720
It's always possible, but they liken themselves to originalists. And if you look at the plain language
00:47:25.020
of the 14th amendment, it says what it says, birthright citizenship is there. And if you want
00:47:29.520
to undo it, you got to amend the constitution. Now I understand that conservative lawyers are
00:47:33.960
saying, well, it's, this is like foreign diplomats. Foreign diplomats are not entitled
00:47:39.760
to citizenship either. That's what an undocumented immigrant is and their children therefore are not
00:47:45.440
citizens. But that's not the way that the courts have been interpreting the 14th amendment
00:47:50.020
for many, many years. Let me just jump in. Like if a diplomat commits a crime while he's in New York
00:47:54.520
city for the UN, uh, you know, meeting, we don't arrest him. Right. Cause he's got diplomatic
00:47:59.460
immunity. Cause he's not really subject to the jurisdiction. That's so, and if a diplomat has a
00:48:05.120
baby while she's on us soil, her baby does not become a us citizen. It's still a citizen of whatever
00:48:10.220
country the diplomat is from. So you're just saying you cannot analogize between an illegal person
00:48:16.720
who's here and diplomats like Trump is doing. Right. Right. Because yet the 14th amendment
00:48:21.820
has been interpreted since 1898 in a case by the Supreme court that says exactly what we've been
00:48:29.120
saying, which is if you're born here, you get citizenship. And the only way to undo it is to
00:48:33.280
change the constitution. And as for what happens to diplomats and their kids, if they commit crimes,
00:48:39.120
according to my sources, which is the movie lethal weapon three, I think, uh, you get all diplomatic
00:48:44.540
immunity, unless a Mel Gibson shoots you to death. That's that is my legal authority as well. Mike,
00:48:49.840
do we all concur? Uh, no, I actually disagree. I just wrote an opinion piece on this and the
00:48:55.100
federalist. If you look at that Supreme course, that, that was, uh, that I'm talking about,
00:49:00.300
about the joke on the film, not, not about Mike, you just walked right over our joke.
00:49:06.460
You just, I'm sorry. I missed your joke. I'm sorry. I'm such a nerd. I apologize, but,
00:49:11.040
all right, stand by. I know you have a, you have a very strong argument on the substance that you
00:49:15.620
want to offer. And we're going to do that right after this quick break. We'll pick it up. This is
00:49:19.660
actually a really good, this is a juicy one. Um, I thought it was kind of a joke. And the more I
00:49:24.920
looked into it, the more I was like, Hmm, Trump does have a legal leg to stand on. And this one's
00:49:30.680
going to be very interesting as they really get into it. I've got some good news for you and it's
00:49:35.000
called firecracker farm, hot salt. This small family business is making waves. And if you have not yet
00:49:40.780
tried it, it is time to change that. This was the gift to give and receive this past Christmas.
00:49:46.460
It's delicious and it elevates everything. It touches eggs, avocado toast, grilled chicken,
00:49:51.360
and more. It's got a kick, but it's not overwhelming. The flavor enhances food without
00:49:55.800
overpowering it. The best part, it comes in sleek, stainless steel grinders that are easy to take with
00:50:01.380
you anywhere. Unlike messy hot sauce that runs out quickly. Firecracker farm, hot salt lasts and lasts
00:50:07.860
providing hundreds of servings from just one grinder way more bang for the buck. There are plenty of
00:50:13.100
blends to choose from and refills are available. So for those who find it a bit too spicy, keep this
00:50:17.760
in mind. If you mix it with some regular sea salt, you will tame the heat perfectly. Do yourself a
00:50:23.040
favor and head on over to firecracker.farm. And here's the kicker. Use code MK at checkout for 10%
00:50:28.960
off your order. Don't wait. This offers only for a limited time. Firecracker.farm and use code MK for 10%
00:50:35.700
off. Okay. So just to reset, we have the 14th amendment, which reads in part, all persons born
00:50:44.220
or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the U.S.
00:50:49.900
and of the state wherein they reside. Okay. So Trump comes out with his executive order that says,
00:50:54.900
well, your kid is not a citizen. If he is born here, if you, the mom, let's assume the dad doesn't
00:51:01.900
have citizenship. If you, the mom, are here unlawfully or if you're here lawfully, but
00:51:08.100
temporarily. So if you're over here on some visiting student visa and you have a baby, doesn't apply to
00:51:13.720
your kid. And certainly if you sneaked into this country or overstayed your visa, does not apply to
00:51:18.000
your kid. Well, 22 states immediately sued along with some pregnant ladies to say that executive order
00:51:27.060
needs to be halted and that it violates the 14th amendment. And on January 23rd, they got what
00:51:32.600
they wanted. The U S district court judge, John Koffenauer, uh, temporarily blocked the EO. He's
00:51:39.760
based in Seattle, but he's a Reagan appointee. And he wrote, there's a strong likelihood that the
00:51:44.140
plaintiffs will succeed in the merits of their claims that this executive order violates the 14th
00:51:47.880
amendment. The New York times reports that he said in court, this is a blatantly unconstitutional
00:51:52.820
order. Frankly, I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar would state unequivocally
00:51:58.740
that this is a constitutional order. It just boggles my mind. Now the debate is what does that term
00:52:05.920
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States mean? And Trump's DOJ argues, it does not mean
00:52:12.400
you're simply here and subject to our regulatory power. Like you'd have to obey our laws. It means
00:52:19.160
you're here and you're subject to our quote, political jurisdiction and have quote, direct
00:52:26.080
and immediate allegiance to the United States. So you're subject to our political jurisdiction.
00:52:33.320
I don't know what that means. Does that mean you can vote here and you have direct and immediate
00:52:38.640
allegiance to the United States? Now go ahead, Mike, because before we get to this 1898 case,
00:52:47.300
Wong Kim arc, there were two other cases that are in this Claremont Institute's John Eastman
00:52:53.000
article in which the Supreme court seemed to be suggesting, albeit in dicta, meaning not in the
00:52:59.180
relevant sort of holding the important part of the case that Trump's interpretation is correct.
00:53:05.960
But then, as I understand it, we had a case in 1898 that while not exactly on point to those two
00:53:12.660
pieces of his executive order provides the best fodder for the other side saying, no, it's a
00:53:17.800
sweeping interpretation of who gets citizenship. You go. President Trump's executive order is not
00:53:24.760
only right, it's clearly constitutional. He has this power to interpret the constitution under article two
00:53:31.440
to make sure that the laws that he is enforcing as the president of the United States are constitutional.
00:53:38.160
And essentially what he's saying in this order is, is if you are, if you are here lawfully,
00:53:48.720
if you're here as a lawful permanent resident, you can get birthright citizenship. But if you're here
00:53:56.940
illegally, if you're here temporarily, you cannot. And that is exactly where the Supreme court should land
00:54:04.680
on this case that that Chinese exclusion case from over a hundred years ago dealt with lawful
00:54:11.800
permanent residents. Right. And that was back before we really had the distinction between legal
00:54:17.680
immigration and illegal immigration that we have today. But if you, even if you follow that Supreme
00:54:23.860
court precedent, it, uh, that remember that this clause was passed in the 14th amendment to,
00:54:29.840
to overturn the infamous Dred Scott decision, right? It was, it dealt with citizenship for, uh,
00:54:37.700
freed slaves and their children. And it is, it was expanded in that case over a hundred years ago
00:54:44.640
to lawful permanent residents. But it's very clear that you do not have birthright citizenship
00:54:51.380
for ambassadors and their kids. You don't have birthright citizenship for invading armies
00:54:57.840
and their kids. So why the hell would you have birthright citizenship for, for example,
00:55:03.080
Mexican cartel members who came here or Venezuelan prison gangs who came here? You, you wouldn't,
00:55:09.100
it's, it's a silly argument. And I think the Supreme court is largely going to side with
00:55:13.740
president Trump. Here is president Trump, uh, opining on some of what you just outlined in
00:55:19.240
saw 12. I think so. Yeah. Look, birthright citizenship was, if you look back when this was
00:55:39.700
passed and made, that was meant for the children of slaves. This was not meant for the whole world
00:55:45.560
to come in and pile into the United States of America, everybody coming in and totally
00:55:50.500
unqualified people with perhaps unqualified children. This wasn't meant for that. This
00:55:56.840
was meant when it was originally done for the children of slaves. And that was a very good
00:56:03.600
and noble thing to do. And I'm in favor of that a hundred percent, but it wasn't meant for the entire
00:56:10.720
I just think that we'll end up winning that court in the Supreme court. I think we're going to win
00:56:17.960
that case. And I look forward to winning it. This has been going on. We're at that level. We're the
00:56:23.100
only country in the world that does this. There's no other country at this level. There's no other
00:56:28.560
country in the world that does it. It's crazy. So Dave, there, here are the two cases that precede
00:56:36.060
that 1898 Wong Kim arc case, which will be used by the president's challengers, Wong Kim arc. Um,
00:56:43.880
but as Mike points out, that case is distinguishable because it involved two permanent resident aliens.
00:56:49.880
They, they were not temporary lawful, but they were not lawful, but temporary. And they were not
00:56:55.300
unlawful. Those are the two things that Trump's order covers. So even in that case that went to the
00:57:01.000
Supreme court, they wouldn't have been bothered by Trump's department, uh, department of Homeland
00:57:04.720
security. They would not have been, um, told that their son was not an American citizen.
00:57:10.340
Okay. But here are the two cases that are cited in that Claremont Institute piece.
00:57:13.680
They say, first of all, it all comes down to what does it mean subject to the jurisdiction thereof?
00:57:19.640
And the, the argument is, is it a partial temporary jurisdiction that applies to anyone here
00:57:26.180
temporarily, except for diplomats who are subject to our laws while within our borders? Or do they mean,
00:57:32.560
if you're in order to qualify as like subject to the jurisdiction, do they mean just those who are
00:57:38.400
subject to a more complete jurisdiction, one which manifests itself as owing allegiance to the United
00:57:45.400
States and not to any foreign power. And they say that we don't have to guess because the drafters of
00:57:52.540
the 14th amendment unambiguously stated that they meant complete jurisdiction. Um, and they say the
00:57:59.880
following the Supreme court confirmed that understanding, albeit in dicta, meaning not the
00:58:04.680
actual holding of the case in the first case, addressing the 14th amendment, noting in the
00:58:09.080
slaughterhouse cases in 1872, that quote, the phrase subject to its jurisdiction was intended to exclude
00:58:15.280
from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within
00:58:23.600
the United States. It then confirmed that understanding the 1884 case of Elk versus Wilkins, holding that
00:58:29.920
the subject to the jurisdiction phrase required that one be quote, not merely subject in some respect or
00:58:36.320
degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction
00:58:41.980
and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And he points out that the Supreme court has never
00:58:50.460
held that the children of illegal immigrants or even temporary, temporary lawful visitors are
00:58:59.240
constitutionally entitled to automatic citizenship merely by birth by virtue of their birth in the U S.
00:59:06.840
So, uh, Megan, there's a couple of factual things since this is the show about facts facts. First,
00:59:12.460
uh, president Trump says that we're the only country that has this, there are 35 countries
00:59:17.080
who have birthright citizenship, including Mexico and Canada. Uh, number two, I made a mistake earlier
00:59:23.120
when I said that it was lethal weapon three and Mel Gibson who shot the diplomatic community was
00:59:28.640
actually lethal weapon two. And it was Danny Glover who then said immunity revoked. So the facts first
00:59:35.000
appreciate that. We are relentlessly factual here on the MK show. Appreciate it.
00:59:38.860
Yes, we are. So here's the thing, Mike, and everything I said so far is right. President Trump's
00:59:45.340
right that this, uh, debate stretches from the time of slavery and the 14th amendment passed because
00:59:51.680
they wanted to make sure the children of slaves are citizens because they're born here, they're
00:59:55.980
citizens. And then later on in the 19th century, we have the question that doesn't include the
01:00:01.240
Chinese. And that's when the Supreme court ruled in 1898, which is after the ruling you cite
01:00:06.960
in that case, Wong Kim Ark, that yes, Chinese too. If you're born here, you are a citizen here.
01:00:14.820
And I'm just coming at this from a legal matter where you have that Reagan appointed judge saying
01:00:19.800
that if you make this argument in court, you perhaps should have your bar license revoked because
01:00:24.780
the constitution says what it says. And therefore you'd have to get the Supreme court to either
01:00:29.240
overturn hundreds of years of precedent, or you gotta have a new constitutional amendment that undoes
01:00:35.440
the 14th amendment. I'm not sure. I've got to be honest about this. I started off when I interviewed
01:00:41.460
Trump back in September of 23, I, I can't remember actually whether I raised this or didn't, it was on
01:00:47.920
my list of questions. I know that. And I remember kind of laughing at the argument. Like I was like,
01:00:53.440
this is so clear. It's so clearly against Trump being able to do this. Um, I think I did ask him
01:01:00.460
about it. I have to go back and look. Anyway, my point is I started off where you are, Dave,
01:01:03.760
but I wound up where Mike is like the more I looked at it, the more I'm like, this actually
01:01:08.060
is not that clear. And you say there's hundreds of years of precedent. There's really only that one
01:01:12.560
case that's been on the books since 1898, but they haven't been like re reaffirming this over and
01:01:19.060
over and over. This is the case. But other federal courts have, I mean, the other federal courts have
01:01:24.580
ruled consistently with that case. And until that case is overturned, then that's the law. That's the
01:01:31.080
rule. But the Supreme court. That's, that's correct. That's correct. But the, the, that case
01:01:35.840
has through other federal courts, appellate courts has been reaffirmed that way. They have recognized
01:01:41.700
that there's not a conflict amongst the circuit. There's no current conflict amongst federal courts
01:01:46.600
that say, right. But there's about to be, as you know, there's going to be because somebody's going
01:01:51.460
to, you know, they've got these challenges filed in Seattle and that'll go up. And probably team Trump
01:01:58.060
will potentially orchestrate a different challenge in a more favorable jurisdiction
01:02:01.620
that will go their way. And then you'll have a conflict or maybe they'll just ride it up through
01:02:07.220
the Seattle system, which I think is ninth circuit. And they'll get an adverse ruling to them. And
01:02:11.820
then they'll appeal to SCOTUS hoping that, you know, they've got enough, they got four who will say
01:02:16.600
that they should hear it. I, I just, what, what does the term subject to the jurisdiction thereof
01:02:23.240
mean? Like what's it doing in there? If they just wanted to give citizenship to everybody,
01:02:30.640
you know, who was, who was born here, why wouldn't they have just said all persons born
01:02:37.140
or naturalized in the U S are citizens of the U S why did they put in and subject to the jurisdiction
01:02:44.820
thereof? Sorry, they're, they're trying to exclude the foreign diplomats and their children. So if you are
01:02:50.900
a child of a foreign diplomat, you also get immunity and that's what they're trying to separate. That's
01:02:56.720
different from a child of someone who is in this country illegally, they still get the privileges
01:03:03.480
and immunities. They still get protection under the law. You know, you, they still get due process
01:03:07.620
at the same time they get citizenship. So they're trying to carve out this exception from children
01:03:13.760
of foreign diplomats who may be born here, but they get diplomatic immunity who are not subject to our
01:03:20.040
laws. They retain the citizenship of the country that sent them. So that's the difference. Now,
01:03:25.400
if you want to try to say now they're all the same, that would be a dramatic change in the
01:03:29.300
interpretation. Well, I just don't know. I mean, if I, if you look back at the Supreme court's actual,
01:03:33.520
like we have to look, what did the Supreme court say closer to the time that the constitution was
01:03:36.740
enacted and the 14th amendment. And you know, you go back to that 1872 case and they say
01:03:42.220
in its dicta again, but they say that phrase subject to its jurisdiction intended to exclude
01:03:49.180
children of ministers, consuls. Those are like foreign diplomats and citizens or subjects of
01:03:56.360
foreign States born within the United States intended to exclude citizens of foreign States
01:04:04.340
born within the United States. I mean, that's, it wasn't so clear to the Supreme court in 1872
01:04:10.760
that they were talking about more than diplomats, children. They, they were saying you're born
01:04:15.600
to parents from another country. You don't get the provisions of this. And then again,
01:04:20.740
1884, a similar case. And then you had that case that's problematic for Trump, but that,
01:04:24.700
that did not have the same fact pattern that had two, two people who are here legally and permanently.
01:04:30.820
I just think, anyway, if you, if you come at it the way I came at it and you've just been told
01:04:36.520
over and over and over again, this is no brainer. I guess I just want people to know maybe not.
01:04:41.080
I don't know whether this judge in Seattle has gotten neck deep in it either, but he's going to.
01:04:45.880
Okay. Speaking of illegal immigration, New Jersey governor, Phil Murphy, who is disgusting.
01:04:53.800
I'm sorry, but the COVID overreach and the destructive, awful windmills are reason enough to dislike Phil
01:05:01.760
Murphy. Um, he made this announcement just casually the other day that he's harboring an illegal.
01:05:08.980
Now he didn't say it explicitly, but there's really no other conclusion to reach from what
01:05:13.200
he did say. I'll play it again. Here he is on Saturday.
01:05:17.600
Tammy and I were talking about, I don't want to get into too much detail,
01:05:21.740
but there's someone in our broader universe whose immigration status is not yet at the point that they
01:05:31.000
are trying to get it to. And we said, you know what, let's have her live at our house above our garage.
01:05:37.260
Uh, and, and good luck to the feds coming into, to try to get her.
01:05:42.980
Okay. So you tell me why the feds would come to get her. If she's not an illegal, it's, it's a very
01:05:50.040
clear admission. He's harboring an illegal whose immigration status is not yet at the point that
01:05:55.740
she's trying to get it to, but it's at a point at which the feds would try to get her. So he,
01:06:01.740
it's an admission. He's definitely harboring, harboring an illegal, in my opinion, based on
01:06:05.740
what he said. Now you, you tell me who in their right mind, Mike Davis would take a look at Tom
01:06:14.160
Homan and say, that's a guy I would like to mess with. I, I would really like to tempt Tom Homan
01:06:21.840
to come after me because I think he's a weak, feckless man. This man that just for those of you
01:06:27.320
playing at home, here's Tom Homan. We have seen one estimate that says it would cost $88 billion
01:06:34.660
to deport a million people a year. I don't know if that's accurate or not.
01:06:41.840
Is that what American taxpayers should expect? What price do you put on national security? Is
01:06:46.460
that worth it? Is there a way to carry out mass deportation without separating families?
01:06:52.740
Of course there is. Families can be deported together.
01:06:56.840
Who looks at him and says, I love, I love to tempt the bull. I'm just going to take out my red cape
01:07:04.800
and I'm going to wave it to see if Tom Homan's paying attention. Well, he is because he responded.
01:07:11.920
Um, this is on Hannity Monday night. It's not 13.
01:07:16.560
Well, I think the government's pretty, uh, foolish saying what he said, because
01:07:20.740
I got an old of it. Won't let it go. We'll look into it. And if he's gnawingly, gnawingly
01:07:27.000
harbor and concealing an illegal alien, that's a violation of title eight, United States code 1324.
01:07:32.480
I would seek prosecution or the secretary would seek prosecution. So maybe he's bluffing. If he's
01:07:38.380
not, we'll deal with that. And as far as to the sanctuary cities, we'll get in line because
01:07:42.220
the Trump administration is going to do that already. Sanctuary cities are sanctuary for criminals.
01:07:46.400
Mike thoughts. I would not mess with Tom Homan. If I were anyone, he's probably the only person
01:07:55.660
on the planet who I fear. Uh, and so I would, I would, I wouldn't mess with that guy. He's deadly
01:08:01.360
serious. And I, I would say to these Democrat governors who want to go on and admit that they're
01:08:07.940
committing a federal felony by harboring illegal immigrants. That's probably not the wisest thing
01:08:12.540
you should be doing. He, he really is one of those guys who you wake up like, am I legal? I'm legal,
01:08:18.800
right? I'm good. I'm fine. I'm definitely legal. I don't have to worry about Tom Homan trying to get
01:08:24.000
me out. Cause he's getting you out if you're here unlawfully. Um, now a Phil Murphy aid, Dave
01:08:29.760
tells the New York post that the governor was misinterpreted, that Murphy was just referring
01:08:37.160
to a legal resident who's in his circle of friends and was worried about president Trump's return to
01:08:43.280
the white house. That's all totally legal in the circle of friends. And I guess maybe not in the
01:08:49.900
apartment over the garage and with an immigration status, not yet at the point that they're trying
01:08:53.880
to get it to and worried about being deported by Tom Homan. Well, Megan, of course, if that were the
01:08:59.660
case, why did he dare Tom Homan to go get him? Why did he dare them if she wasn't living in his house?
01:09:04.660
Correct. Right. So this is why pencils have erasers. The governor just made a little mistake
01:09:12.100
and now he's doing cleanup on aisle nine to mix a metaphor. No, what do you mean? The mistake was
01:09:19.040
the admission. He's screwed and so is his upstairs neighbor. I'm advising the governor to cease using
01:09:27.720
his mouth to talk about this any longer because it's not helping him. I think, you know,
01:09:34.660
there's a lot of emotion on my side of the aisle and a lot of anger. And I think that he just got
01:09:39.480
caught up in the moment and was saying this stuff. Now, if it really is an undocumented immigrant
01:09:43.940
living above his home, then he's going to be in trouble. And you don't want to mess with a felony.
01:09:50.780
Well, you don't want to mess with a guy that even Mike Davis fears. I got that. So I'd say that he
01:09:55.740
needs to backtrack and make it clear as his aid is that there is no such person living in the house.
01:10:00.360
There's nothing to see here. He misspoke. He was referring to a friend in his circle who's legal
01:10:05.400
and was worried about getting caught up in the deportation. He's so dumb. He already flagged it.
01:10:11.760
He already read flagged it for Tom Homan. It's too late. Tom Homan's going to see what's in that
01:10:16.020
upstairs apartment. I have no doubt of it. And honestly, if he finds an illegal in there,
01:10:20.660
apparently she'll flee. I imagine she'd flee by the time Homan gets there. He's going to find out
01:10:24.740
who was it? You can't avoid this. He's going to find out who it was. The governor probably just
01:10:29.620
ensured that woman's deportation. And guess what else, Mike? The governor could potentially face
01:10:35.540
felony charges. Here's the statute. 18, no, sorry, eight U.S. Code section 1324, bringing in and
01:10:43.420
harboring certain aliens, a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. Quote, any person who
01:10:49.640
knowingly or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to entered or remains in
01:10:56.500
the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors or shields from detection or attempts to
01:11:02.300
conceal harbor or shield from detection. Any such alien in any place shall be in prison, not more
01:11:08.500
than five years. So pretty good argument there admitted by the New Jersey governor that he knowingly
01:11:15.320
or in reckless disregard of the fact that he had an alien there, an illegal alien had entered the
01:11:22.000
United States in violation of law or remained in the United States in violation of law, either one
01:11:25.820
was concealing, harboring and shielding from detection. One of those, anyone harboring, he
01:11:32.020
harbored, that's it. Or attempting to harbor is has to be in prison for more than five years. You tell me
01:11:38.300
where the governor should be hiring a lawyer right now. I would advise the governor to hire a lawyer
01:11:42.700
because, again, Tom Holman's not messing around. And I imagine there will be ICE agents knocking on
01:11:49.580
the door of that garage to see if there are illegal immigrants in the governor's garage. And that's so
01:11:57.360
not smart for him to do this. But you're raising a more important point, Megan, which is this statute,
01:12:03.380
this federal harboring statute. This applies to a lot of people who are aiding, abetting, harboring
01:12:10.120
illegal immigrants in this country, including corporations that hire them.
01:12:15.320
He harbored. He admitted to the harboring. He was proud of the harboring. He tried to show a little
01:12:21.340
swagger against Tom Holman and his illegal friend, and he are going to pay the price.
01:12:32.640
Oh, he's going to be like, she's my illegal from Canada, George Glass.
01:12:36.880
Yes. She's not living there anymore. If she ever lived there, I'm sure she's gone. You'd have to
01:12:41.440
actually find her on his property. The fact that he said it isn't enough to prosecute him.
01:12:46.260
Which is more pathetic, Dave Ehrenberg? He had an illegal up there, and he had this stupidity to
01:12:52.200
threaten Tom Holman, or he never had an illegal up there, and he's just tried to act like a badass,
01:12:57.780
making up an imaginary illegal to try to look like a tough guy in front of Tom Holman.
01:13:01.800
I think it's probably the latter. I think that he was trying to get some street cred by saying,
01:13:06.980
yeah, come and get it, Holman. You'll get in my property over this dead body or something like
01:13:11.920
that. You know how they say with the Second Amendment, you have to pry my cold, dead hands
01:13:15.220
off this gun if you're going to get it from me. So I just think that was too much bluster.
01:13:22.240
Oh, my gosh. Either one is a humiliation for him. But my money's on there's an illegal up there.
01:13:28.700
I don't know if she's still up there, but they'll find out who she is. I mean, I think
01:13:32.660
you and I could, in about an hour, make a few phone calls at this point and figure out
01:13:36.780
who's up there, who was up there, where'd she go. And certainly if they ever got him interviewed
01:13:42.480
by an FBI agent or somebody who has the authority to prosecute you if you lied to them, and Philip
01:13:47.400
Murphy would be giving her up like that, like a New Jersey ice cream cone on an August day,
01:13:53.320
gone. Guys, thank you both so much. A pleasure as always.
01:14:00.460
All right. Let me ask the audience that. Do you believe Phil Murphy is harboring an illegal
01:14:05.340
immigrant in the apartment above his garage? Or do you think he made it up to sound tough,
01:14:14.260
like he could challenge Tom Homan? I am 100 percent in favor of he's harboring. He appears to have
01:14:21.420
committed a felony. And now we should just get our popcorn to see what happens from here.
01:14:27.660
Megan at megankelly.com. That's how you email me. Coming up next, filmmaker Sean Stone is here. He
01:14:34.700
has made a really interesting series, and it is about the deep state. He happens to be the son of
01:14:41.520
Oliver Stone, a filmmaker in his own right. He was in some of your favorite movies as a child.
01:14:48.000
We'll show you some of that. And he is blowing the whistle on just how deep the rot runs in his
01:14:54.760
government when it comes to the hatred for Donald Trump and those around him. And frankly, what Trump
01:14:59.240
is going to be up against in trying to clean house second time around. Stand by for that.
01:15:03.580
The IRS is the largest collection agency in the world, and it just stepped up enforcement for
01:15:08.380
2025. If you owe back taxes or have unfiled returns, don't wait for the IRS to come to you.
01:15:15.200
Simply avoiding your tax troubles is the worst thing you can do. Getting ahead of this is the
01:15:19.300
smart move, but you might not want to contact the IRS alone. You could turn it over to the team
01:15:24.760
at Tax Network USA. Why? Because not all tax resolution companies are the same. Tax Network USA has
01:15:30.720
a preferred direct line to the IRS, which means they know which agents to deal with and which to
01:15:36.360
avoid. Tax Network USA has proven strategies that are designed to settle your tax problems in your
01:15:42.040
favor, whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million. Their attorneys and negotiators have resolved over
01:15:47.340
$1 billion in tax debt. Speak with one of their strategists for free and stop the threatening letters,
01:15:53.060
stop looking over your shoulder, and put your IRS troubles behind you once and for all. Call 1-800-905-8000
01:16:00.320
or visit tnusa.com slash Megan. That's tnusa.com slash Megan.
01:16:07.960
I'm Megan Kelly, host of The Megan Kelly Show on Sirius XM. It's your home for open, honest,
01:16:14.060
and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political, legal,
01:16:17.960
and cultural figures today. You can catch The Megan Kelly Show on Triumph, a Sirius XM channel
01:16:23.140
featuring lots of hosts you may know and probably love. Great people like Dr. Laura.
01:16:28.920
Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey, and yours truly, Megan Kelly. You can stream The Megan Kelly
01:16:35.520
Show on Sirius XM at home or anywhere you are. No car required. I do it all the time. I love the
01:16:42.360
Sirius XM app. It has ad-free music coverage of every major sport, comedy talk, podcast, and more.
01:16:49.260
Subscribe now. Get your first three months for free.
01:16:52.860
Go to SiriusXM.com slash MKShow to subscribe and get three months free. That's SiriusXM.com
01:17:00.740
slash MKShow and get three months free. Offer details apply.
01:17:05.760
We've talked a lot about RFKJ, Tulsi Gabbard, and Kash Patel over the past week. Their status as
01:17:15.940
disruptors is a key component in the reasons why the D.C. establishment cannot stand them.
01:17:22.400
And that brings us today to filmmaker Sean Stone. Sean's latest documentary series is called
01:17:27.840
All the President's Men, The Conspiracy Against Trump. It is streaming right now on our pal Tucker
01:17:35.240
Carlson on his network, The Tucker Carlson Network. Here's a clip from the series showing Kash Patel.
01:17:41.760
When did you realize the first time that the government was not what you were taught?
01:17:49.240
Honestly, you know, I grew up and I'm still that way. You know, cops are frontline workers
01:17:54.820
are firefighters and military. All of them are the greatest people on earth and we'll do whatever
01:17:59.360
we can to support them. But I also learned as a public defender that not all of them are
01:18:05.600
incorruptible. Unfortunately, some of them, and a very small number, lie. And some of them break
01:18:12.240
the law. And so as a public defender, I would come into this courtroom and I'd be like, wait a second,
01:18:18.460
this cop just lied on this affidavit. What are you doing? You're a police officer. You know,
01:18:21.540
it was inconceivable to me. And that sort of started the path, the conversation to
01:18:27.280
the level of corruption in Washington, D.C. was not wholly new to me, but I also didn't expect it
01:18:35.580
at that level. The series is a deep dive into the coordinated efforts by administration insiders
01:18:43.220
and the media to take down Donald Trump during his first presidential term. Provides great insight
01:18:49.720
into Kash, Tulsi and RFKJ's agendas. Sean, welcome to the show. Thank you, Megan. It's a pleasure to
01:18:56.720
meet you. What a great idea and obviously very timely. So what was the biggest surprise to you
01:19:04.280
in going after the story? I mean, how can I say I was surprised having lived through what we did
01:19:10.940
to the first administration? And actually, the series goes actually all the way up to after January
01:19:17.860
6th and the fallout from that event. So I started this project in 21, but in many ways, I was
01:19:25.000
tangentially connected to it since 2015 and 16. I was actually working for Russia Today in 2015.
01:19:31.660
I went to Moscow. I was there with Michael Flynn, General Flynn, when he was at a dinner
01:19:37.260
for a celebration of RT's news channel. And that famous dinner became part of the basis for the
01:19:44.980
whole accusation that Flynn was a Russian agent. So because I was working for Russia Today with great
01:19:50.940
journalists and hosts like Jesse Ventura and Chris Hedges and Tom Hartman and so many others,
01:19:57.080
Abby Martin, I understood like this whole narrative of Russian collusion is pretty thin because you're,
01:20:04.520
you know, they're out there. The intelligence community's assessment is saying that RT, which
01:20:08.820
is a bunch of Americans like myself doing news and journalism and, you know, giving our perspective
01:20:14.180
on matters. You know, we are the Russian agents. I mean, that's how I understood that there was
01:20:20.500
something very wrong with the narrative. And obviously, as we dug deeper into the stories that we
01:20:25.640
focused upon, we were able to show how the conspiracy was not Russian collusion. It was really
01:20:31.340
U.S. and Five Eyes intelligence conspiracy to try to paint a picture of Trump as a Russian puppet.
01:20:41.380
Can we talk about the Five Eyes situation? Because in about a half an hour, we're taping,
01:20:45.620
well, we're live right now on SiriusXM at 133 in the East. We're going to get, I believe,
01:20:50.500
a positive vote on Tulsi Gabbard out of committee, which is great. But some of the things that
01:20:57.380
she's spoken out about when it comes to the distrust of the intelligence committee right now
01:21:04.000
amongst the American public did not go over well with the senators in that room, left or right.
01:21:10.560
They all seemed adverse to her. They all seemed like, you know, I think they'd all wish that Trump
01:21:17.080
had nominated somebody else. But can you just give people a flavor for what you're talking about?
01:21:22.300
And so they know why. Why did Trump go with such a nontraditional pick?
01:21:26.740
Yeah. Yeah. Well, you know, Tulsi's, as you know, a lot of us have shifted political
01:21:33.920
positions over these years because we're trying to find, you know, I think what might be more of
01:21:40.100
what traditionally would be kind of a traditional American centrist position,
01:21:44.220
trying to figure that out in this insane time that we've been living through, where a lot of us
01:21:48.860
were critical during the Obama years, all of a sudden found ourselves outside the democratic fold,
01:21:54.820
you know, who at one moment were criticizing the Bush administration for unwarranted surveillance
01:22:01.920
of Americans, the Patriot Act, things like this, right? The endless war agenda. We went from
01:22:08.220
criticizing that to then the Democrats supporting it under Obama. And a lot of people being disenchanted by
01:22:13.840
that, I think Tulsi, who served, you know, her served her country, served abroad, you know,
01:22:19.880
came back, she was Democrat, she was basically kicked out of the party for not going along with
01:22:25.000
the rigging that went on in 2016, when the Democrats gave the nomination to Hillary, right?
01:22:31.040
So she then basically says, well, I'm standing on principle here, and kind of gets isolated from the
01:22:36.020
party. I mean, she stays with it, obviously, until 2020, if I recall, she, she was part of that
01:22:41.240
primary debates. But essentially, she realized the party's gone in a different direction. It's gone
01:22:46.960
extreme pro military industrial complex, national security state, endless war agenda. The only person
01:22:52.840
who's come out swinging against that since 2016 is Donald Trump. And he's Donald Trump has reshaped
01:22:58.160
the Republican Party around that, you know, what people call America first, right, but American
01:23:03.160
interests first principle, which really is an old, you know, it's an old Republican principle. And
01:23:08.980
something I don't think I don't know if it was ever a Democrat principle, because the Democrats are
01:23:12.120
always actually the ones who started the wars. World War One is Democrat, World War Two is a
01:23:15.460
Democrat, Vietnam was a Democrat. So people forget this. And I think that Trump took it back more to
01:23:20.720
this Republican route of, hey, let's focus on our country. Tulsi obviously rallied around that. So
01:23:25.400
yeah, giving perspective, when you're talking about a massive military industrial national security
01:23:31.560
state apparatus, that is costing trillions of dollars, I don't know about annually, but certainly
01:23:39.160
over the course of years, then, you know, you're talking about a lot of money, and it's circling through
01:23:43.780
what General Flynn talks about with, you know, this sort of this, this, why Washington, and it's the
01:23:49.540
counties around Washington are in the top 10 wealthiest counties in the country, right? Because you're
01:23:54.760
talking about massive contracts and things like this. So those that have been there, like Flynn and Tulsi,
01:24:00.040
who've seen it firsthand and said, hey, I want to stand on principle, not on profit, they end up
01:24:05.120
becoming targeted and accused of being, you know, I don't know, Russian puppets, because they're
01:24:11.300
opposed to an endless war. That's what happened in Tulsi. So one of the interesting characters, I mean,
01:24:15.940
we play that soundbite of Kash Patel. But one of the things I've, I've just made a mental note of is
01:24:21.260
he was working with Devin Nunes. They were looking at this Russian collusion nonsense saying like,
01:24:28.220
this isn't right. This is, this stinks. And Kash is like this firebrand, you know, fighter. He's a
01:24:37.500
very colorful character. If you talk to him, he's just kind of fun to talk to. And he's, he doesn't
01:24:41.860
mince words. I like him. But he's, he's kind of fun. And he's got flair, I guess is what I'm trying
01:24:47.520
to say. And on the other side really was like, Robert Mueller, you know, James Comey, like these
01:24:54.800
distinguished, respected, old school prosecutors, right? And so when, when there was this battle of
01:25:02.580
like, who's telling the truth, you know, like, is Trump a spy? Is Trump, does he have a server from
01:25:08.940
Russia in Trump Tower where they, as Don Jr. said, we couldn't even figure out how to order French
01:25:13.780
fries, nevermind how to order the Russians around. Um, and then you see cash who's like this, like,
01:25:19.060
yeah, this is bullshit. What's happening. Like in Devin Nunes, he was kind of like a low level
01:25:22.560
congressman. He was never even that, you know, high up. It's like, but they were right. They were
01:25:27.640
right. And it's really the reason why cash Patel is about to be our next FBI director. You have
01:25:34.140
something in the, in one of the episodes about cash figuring out who is behind the vaunted steel dossier.
01:25:40.700
You know, the one that talked about Trump's ties to Russia and how he had the, the prostitutes
01:25:45.820
urinate on the bed. Trump, the germaphobe wanted somebody to pee in front of him. Okay. There
01:25:51.320
was a time where we were believing all this or at least asked you. And here's, here's a bit of that,
01:25:56.460
about how that went down episode from episode four, South 29.
01:26:00.760
To break through the walls of DOJ, literally to go and get access to a FISA. When I heard that
01:26:06.680
through our sources, that a Trump campaign official was being monitored. And I was like, what?
01:26:11.360
I was like, are you kidding me? I was like, I gotta go read this thing. When we first read the
01:26:15.180
FISA, half of it was blacked out. And then we had to go and fight for the redactions to be lifted
01:26:19.280
just to read it. And then we figured it out. I was like, dude, this steel dossier is in this thing.
01:26:25.440
So the steel dossier was the basis of FISA? The whole basis of FISA. It wasn't just the FBI. You can
01:26:30.680
read the dossier and read the FISA and know there's no way it was just these guys. Somebody else is in on it.
01:26:35.700
And so we actually were running a separate investigation or outside of the DOJ FBI
01:26:42.240
bubble into how this thing was put together. And we had our own sources. And one of them told us
01:26:48.940
the money for this thing came from the Hillary Clinton campaign. And this is one of those like
01:26:55.020
moments where you're like, never forget. So I run into Devin's office. It's like nine in the morning.
01:26:59.320
I was like, dude, I figured out who paid for this. And he's like, huh?
01:27:02.240
I'm like, the steel dossier. He's like, I figured out who paid for it. And I was a Hillary Clinton.
01:27:06.200
And he goes, if you're going to start drinking at this early in the morning, get out of my office.
01:27:10.980
So just for the people who haven't been consuming Russiagate recently,
01:27:15.300
they're talking about how the steel dossier, this made up piece of alleged intelligence,
01:27:21.620
was the basis for getting a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. It was like they used this
01:27:27.940
made up piece of intel to get a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. Yet another
01:27:32.220
reason why these FISA warrants became controversial and were mentioned repeatedly in the Tulsi Gabbard
01:27:36.520
hearing as though they're totally vaunted. They're above reproach. You have to love them. You have
01:27:40.180
to support them. You know, she's expressed some reservations about how we've used FISA in the
01:27:44.300
past. So have many others. Anyway, this is all the background to that in part. And then him asking,
01:27:50.260
well, who's behind the dossier? I don't trust that. I definitely don't like the warrant. And I don't
01:27:54.780
trust the dossier that was the basis of the warrant. And oh my God, it's the Hillary Clinton campaign.
01:27:58.760
Like he says, the aha moment, the moment you will remember where you were.
01:28:04.060
Yeah. Well, so it's so interesting with the steel dossier and we actually get into the Giuliani's
01:28:09.020
Rudy Giuliani episode. He talks a bit about his sources in the Ukraine saying that the dossier
01:28:15.380
that steel cooked up was cooked up in the Ukraine. And it kind of this, now you start to understand,
01:28:19.900
like when you watch the series, you start to get the part of the bigger picture, not the full picture,
01:28:23.220
but part of the bigger picture of why Ukraine has played such a key role in our foreign policy the
01:28:28.320
last 10 years, come back to 2014 in the Maidan coup, right? And how we've basically escalated
01:28:35.520
that conflict to the place where it now is in war with Russia. But you see how this dossier was part,
01:28:43.320
how do you say, it was concocted through channels and allies of the Democrats there in Ukraine,
01:28:49.520
and basically then steel himself being a former Russian Intel guy, I'm sorry, former British Intel
01:28:55.500
on the Russia desk, but had not been to Russia for a long time. The steel quite steel and the fact of
01:29:01.360
also Papadopoulos, who was also targeted by the FBI's investigation, having this meeting with an
01:29:08.340
Australian ambassador in London, a lot of real cross, how do you say the cross channels going,
01:29:14.500
going through this investigation, all indicate that there's not just CIA, you know, US intelligence,
01:29:21.340
there's also British intelligence having its fingerprints on this, this setup of Trump.
01:29:28.280
And why British intelligence? Well, this is an old game, as far as we have to recognize the British
01:29:33.580
are not our friends, the British strategically use America, they've been using America for over 100
01:29:39.420
years, going back to before the First World War. But you think about it, they use America, just going
01:29:45.400
to think about the Iraq invasion, most recently, when it was British intelligence that was handing us
01:29:50.400
the allegations, remember, about the enriched uranium coming from Niger, things like this,
01:29:57.480
that was a lot of British intelligence was handing that over. The British are very dangerous. I think
01:30:03.040
American patriots have to recognize, just like we are now recognizing, hey, maybe Canada is not
01:30:08.420
necessarily like our friend, you know, it's Trudeau and company are not necessarily on the same page
01:30:13.200
as we are. The British, likewise, you have to be very careful about because they will use us to play
01:30:18.300
their games to be the instrument of their war agenda to preserve what, you know, was formerly their
01:30:23.440
empire. Now, we, you know, we are sort of the champions of it, right, in terms of these zones of
01:30:29.700
influence and trade and economics. But again, I just, you know, caution Americans to recognize that
01:30:35.920
this special relationship already conveys a globalist or New World Order agenda, which has
01:30:42.440
been talked about for decades. Openly, I think, you know, people have said, like Biden, have said New
01:30:46.920
World Order and called it that. And so the fact that the British intel guy, Steele, was the basis of this
01:30:52.560
dossier should be an indicator for those that are paying attention. Very interesting. Very interesting
01:30:57.880
perspective. I, I know that. So we, I mentioned in the intro, you are a stone, you are the son of Oliver
01:31:03.180
Stone. And I just permit me this one moment because your dad has made some of the greatest
01:31:08.920
movies, including Wall Street. I loved Wall Street. We'll talk about JFK, but I didn't realize you were
01:31:15.360
in Wall Street, little, little you, uh, as an actor and you played Gordon Gekko's son, Rudy. Here you are
01:31:22.760
in this clip. Bonjour, monsieur, buddy. Bonjour, brother, buddy. Ah, speaks French already. Kid at the highest
01:31:32.640
four in his IQ test. It is so difficult to get into a good nursery school now. You've got to park Keldar
01:31:37.500
with third party. Now, why would your dad include in the final cut a take of you picking your nose at
01:31:48.620
the beginning and then throwing a strawberry in somebody's face at the end? It's action, you know,
01:31:54.840
directors, you know, we're interested by actions, right? So they're, they're different actions that
01:32:00.420
give, give some dynamic to the scene. Do you have any conscious memory of that movie being in that
01:32:05.800
movie? I have memories of being on set. Yeah. Like very, very early memories of being on the sets and,
01:32:12.860
you know, starting from, I don't remember, maybe even it's hard to remember because it blurs
01:32:17.080
together. We were in Philippines for platoon and then for born on the 4th of July. We were in,
01:32:21.960
you know, New York and Dallas on talk radio, Wall Street, born again, born JFK. You know,
01:32:28.540
it was just, it was a wonderful time in life to go between going to school, you know, having some
01:32:35.020
level of normalcy, right? Elementary school. And sorry, my do not disturbs on, but anyway, so going to
01:32:43.520
elementary school and then going from that to a film set, you know, it's, it's, it's kind of a
01:32:48.060
fantasy life, right? Yeah. Oh, that's a sweet picture of the two of you together. And you're
01:32:52.380
over the camera one more, and then I'll stop with this torture, but you also played the son of Kevin
01:32:58.940
Costner's character, Jim Garrison in JFK. And in this following scene, you are, you're being held by
01:33:06.200
Sissy Spacek. No lines, but you're in this. Watch. Show this world that this is still a government of
01:33:13.200
the people, for the people and by the people. Nothing as long as you live will ever be more
01:33:21.960
important. It's up to you. Okay. So who do you remember as nicer, Kevin Costner or Michael Douglas?
01:33:32.060
Well, you know, honestly, they're, they're both very nice to me still to this day. You know,
01:33:41.960
it's funny because, uh, it's like my two fathers, um, both very sweet, very sweet people. Uh, at the
01:33:48.340
time, uh, I was, you know, I would play a little bit like Michael's, you know, with his son and we
01:33:53.560
played tennis and the, you know, in his house in Santa Barbara. And then, you know, we played baseball
01:33:57.400
with, uh, Kevin and his daughter, um, or daughters. I can't remember how many kids he had at the time,
01:34:02.740
but I remember like playing baseball with them in the backyard in New Orleans. So,
01:34:06.060
you know, it's one of those, it's one of those things where you just think of, yeah, it's,
01:34:09.320
it's just life, right? These are people. And then for other, you know, for others, they never met
01:34:13.700
them. They look at them as almost like, you know, the modern, uh, aristocracy, you know, Kings and
01:34:18.220
Queens. Um, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's frankly, it's bizarre living the way I've lived on both sides.
01:34:23.800
Well, you know what, but it's, if you like them, it's a very good testimony on their behalf because
01:34:27.840
kids, they have a radar for disingenuous people, people who are, you know, pretending to be cool
01:34:35.040
or like be good with kids. They just sense, they can see right through it. So if you have a good
01:34:40.000
feeling about them, they probably are good guys. Um, your dad, obviously there's a reason he made JFK.
01:34:46.760
And this has been, I mean, one of the preeminent films of the past 50 years. It's just one of the
01:34:51.320
biggies. It's legendary. It got so many people reconsidering the JFK assassination. And now one
01:34:56.660
of his first acts as president by Trump was to order the release of the remaining JFK files.
01:35:02.960
They say maybe there's 3% that has yet to come out. There's a reason it's been withheld. I imagine
01:35:08.660
you're very curious to see what's in there, but you tell me. Yeah. I mean, it's, it's one of those
01:35:15.540
things where no one's whole, I don't think my dad or anyone's holding their breath expecting to find
01:35:20.080
smoking guns within the documents at the same time, as you said, why have they been withheld
01:35:24.820
for this long? What is that going to indicate? Because when you, when you are, you know, people
01:35:30.200
that are doing this professionally, researching, looking at all the connections, right? It's,
01:35:35.500
you need as many puzzle pieces as possible. We're never going to get all the puzzle pieces to fill
01:35:39.320
it in. I don't think. But you will, we will at least have more to hopefully indicate what went
01:35:47.340
down that day. It's, it's one of those things where I wonder, you know, if there was, if there
01:35:53.160
was, was there ever a meeting that took place or was it really more operational orders, things that
01:36:00.080
are kind of implied, you know, chain of command type of things, you know, only one person knows what
01:36:06.520
they're supposed to do and where they're supposed to be. Right. And one person above them knowing to
01:36:10.680
tell them that information. I mean, it's, it's really difficult, right. To fathom how this went down
01:36:14.920
because those of us that don't operate as conspirators have a hard time understanding how
01:36:20.820
conspiracies work. And yet they do work. They have worked. Conspiracies are part of life. And I think that
01:36:26.620
if nothing else, uh, I just hope that this doesn't become like, Oh, and all the files are out. You
01:36:32.260
can't, we don't have a smoking gun. We can put this, we can shut the door on this. That's my only
01:36:36.540
fear of the establishment. The smoking gun down in writing and keep it in a record. They usually hide
01:36:42.500
the smoking gun. Um, last but not least, I must ask you, cause looking at your bio facts, I love this.
01:36:49.800
Sean Stone starred in and directed his first feature film, Greystone Park in 2012, based on his real life
01:36:55.520
paranormal experiences in a haunted mental hospital. What? What? You know what? You've never,
01:37:01.880
you've never been to Jersey. Come on. Jersey's full of haunted stuff. I can't remember you over there.
01:37:06.560
Well, then you should know. You were, you were a patient in a haunted mental hospital or you went
01:37:11.560
to document what was happening and you experienced the paranormal. So it was, it was an abandoned place
01:37:18.340
called Greystone Park. And if you've seen the new Bob Dylan movie, um, complete unknown, the opening of
01:37:23.600
the film, he goes to visit Woody Guthrie, who was a patient at, at Greystone. Greystone was a very
01:37:28.980
famous establishment. It was there since right after the civil war. And they, they finally shut it
01:37:34.460
down. After over a hundred years, there were 3000 plus, plus people that were buried there. There
01:37:40.520
were tens of thousands of patients that had come up to come through the doors and it was notoriously
01:37:45.900
haunted. So we went ghost hunting. My friends and I, we broke in one night, we kept going back and
01:37:52.520
documented a lot of stuff. And some of, some of it is in the film, you'll even see like moments that
01:37:58.660
are genuine. It's a fictional reenactment. You know, you say it's a docu, a docu drama,
01:38:04.100
it's a mockumentary, I guess you call it. Like it's styled like a documentary. Um, but, uh, no,
01:38:08.820
we had a lot of paranormal experiences. That would be a whole show in itself.
01:38:11.360
So that's the whole other one that we have to, that we have to consume. That actually
01:38:15.380
really sounds fascinating, but first you've got to check out his latest venture for Tucker
01:38:20.920
Carlson on the Tucker Carlson network. I mean, it's, it's doing what's been out there for a while,
01:38:26.180
right? And it's called all the president's men. Of course, a take on the famous, uh, other film by
01:38:31.660
that name, all the president's men, the Tucker Carlson network. Congratulations, Sean. That's
01:38:35.900
awesome. Appreciate it, Megan. Yeah. You know, it's been out for a couple months now,
01:38:39.340
but it's still relevant. Cause as you mentioned, cash Patel, our next FBI director, you know,
01:38:44.300
tell us who we talk about and just the overall conspiracy. If we don't understand how conspiracies
01:38:48.980
work, right. Then we can't understand. And he said, we can't really understand the nature of our
01:38:53.960
reality when it comes to politics. If we're not willing to look at real conspiracies,
01:38:58.140
you can't be so dismissive of them that you miss the ones that are real and are there before your
01:39:03.660
very eyes. Sean Stone. Thank you. See you soon. Appreciate it. Fascinating. Check it out. All the
01:39:09.700
president's men over on the Tucker Carlson network. We're back tomorrow with the fifth column. We'll
01:39:14.320
see you then. Thanks for listening to the Megan Kelly show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.