Former Vice President Joe Biden served as Vice President from January 2009 to January 2017. His term was supposed to end in January 2019, but Biden was still in office until the end of his term. Now, new details about his last days in office are emerging about the events leading up to his departure.
00:01:19.080Are you interested in like these details as they come out?
00:01:21.140Now there's a guy coming out saying that what's in the Tapper Thompson book actually may not be true.
00:01:29.880There was a very interesting segment on Mark Halpern's show saying, where this, a guy who was in attendance when Joe Biden met George Clooney,
00:01:38.540who said, I'm telling you, it was Biden's finance chair, who said, I'm telling you right now that they got this story from George Clooney and it's a lie.
00:01:45.940He wasn't defending Biden's mental acuity, but he was like, this is George Clooney being George Clooney.
00:01:51.420Like, oh, he didn't know me, but he was like, he, that's not what happened.
00:01:55.680He walked in and the president's representatives were like George Clooney and Julia Roberts.
00:02:02.720And then he walked in the room and said, hi, George.
00:02:17.800We'll get to all that when the guys from Real Clear Politics join me later.
00:02:21.240But first, a first time guest on the Megyn Kelly show who made big headlines last year when he did something many thought would be impossible.
00:02:30.000He, head of the Teamsters Union, spoke at the Republican National Convention.
00:02:36.160Sean O'Brien is general president of the International Brotherhood of the Teamsters
00:02:40.400and host of the Better Bad Ideas podcast.
00:04:05.980We've been saying it since December of 2023.
00:04:09.600When I first took over the Teamsters Union, our goal was to work bipartisan and work with the people that are going to represent working people,
00:04:16.200whether it's Democrat, Republican, or Independents.
00:04:18.840And when we started down that road, it was ironic how fast the Democrats turned on us, some of them.
00:04:30.240You know, they were very vindictive, very critical.
00:04:33.880But we knew that, you know, President Biden was failing.
00:53:40.900And it's undergirding the argument is whether Trump has the right to end birthright citizenship.
00:53:48.520But it's not really what's coming up today.
00:53:50.860What's really being argued is can federal district courts issue nationwide injunctions as opposed to an injunction that just affects the litigants in front of them or perhaps even the people who are in the jurisdiction of said federal district court, but not something that would stop a presidential executive order or a congressional law from proceeding coast to coast.
00:54:14.940Is that too much power that was never envisioned or intended for federal district court judges?
00:54:20.500So I've been on the air for most of this time, so I haven't been following what's happened since then.
00:54:25.480But what I'm hearing is that there's a shot, which I think is actually quite good news for Donald Trump, that there's a shot of stopping the nationwide injunction thing would be big.
00:54:38.220If Trump can get five justices to say that, he can restart his agenda, which has been held up by these nationwide injunctions.
00:54:46.720I'll play you a couple of soundbites and just listen to, I'll just frame the basic debate.
00:54:51.660You're going to hear in some of these soundbites of them discussing Rule 23, which governs when a class action can be filed.
00:54:57.860And what Trump's lawyer is arguing is basically that, his name is John Sauer.
00:55:03.860Or you'll hear him in these soundbites, he has like a scratchy voice.
00:55:07.960He's trying to say on behalf of Trump, if you're going to get a nationwide injunction, you have to file a class action.
00:55:14.320You have to say, I'm here to represent everybody, everybody who's in this affected class of like people who no longer will have birthright citizenship.
00:55:22.300And then only the U.S. Supreme Court would be able to issue such an injunction for you.
00:55:27.540And the other side is saying, no, there's nothing wrong with nationwide injunctions.
00:55:33.260And at best, at best, you could say maybe they could only be limited, used in certain small limited circumstances.
00:55:41.860So you hear Rule 23, they're talking about class actions.
00:55:44.400Let's take a listen to a little bit of how here in this one, Sonia Sotomayor might be the dumbest one.
00:56:10.540Both the Supreme Court and no lower court can stop an executive from, universally, from violating that holding, those holdings by this court.
00:56:25.240We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an inappropriate case.
00:56:41.500Temporarily, the court may issue, the lower courts may issue injunctions that remediate the injuries to the plaintiffs that appear before them.
00:56:50.120He's saying issue injunctions that apply only to the litigants in front of you.
00:56:54.460But that's a good sign for Trump that John Roberts wanted to hear him out because he's kind of wishy-washy, as people know.
00:57:02.420And what Jonathan Turley tweeted out this morning is that, from what he heard, Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh seem strongly in favor of the administration.
00:57:11.660Roberts also made repeated points that seemed to support some of the arguments of the administration, though it was not clear how he would vote.
00:57:17.740So on the left, you've got, of course, Kagan and Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown-Jackson.
00:57:23.820And the fight is over Gorsuch and Barrett, two Trump-appointed judges.
00:57:28.380Gorsuch has previously expressed criticism of universal injunctions, but asked probing questions on both sides.
00:57:33.820Barrett seemed more accommodating and seeking a way to uphold universal injunctions.
00:57:38.080In other words, Turley writes, this could be a nail-biter.
00:57:41.560But a nail-biter, again, I think for Trump, is maybe better, Tom, than Trump, well, maybe not Trump himself, but his top legal advisors would have expected.
00:57:53.860And, you know, Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960.
00:58:02.720These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017.
00:58:11.300And I think some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75 percent of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years.
00:58:19.860So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with.
00:58:26.160I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.
00:58:33.860Here's that sound in Sot 31 from Justice Thomas.
00:58:38.740General, when were the first universal injunctions used?
00:58:45.520We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wurtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction.
00:58:54.900There's a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940.
00:58:58.840And, of course, we point to the court's opinion that reversed that universal injunction issued by the D.C. Circuit and said it's profoundly wrong.
00:59:06.260So when the court has considered it and addressed this, it has consistently said you have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs who are appearing in court and complaining of that remedy.
00:59:13.360So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.
01:00:18.240And then she said, so what's our remedy?
01:00:19.960So what she's trying to do is remind the judges, is to remind her colleagues, probably the two you mentioned, Megan,
01:00:26.680what this is not just about, it's not a law school exercise.
01:00:29.660It's just not about all these, you know, Democratic judges around the country doing various things to thwart Trump.
01:00:35.820It's about this case, birthright citizenship.
01:00:38.780And what else can the court, what else can these courts do, but just issue an injunction?
01:00:43.780So she was trying to get them back on what she thinks is a safer ground for the liberal bloc,
01:00:50.500which is this birthright citizen question and away from what we're talking about.
01:00:54.840They're definitely not going to go there.
01:00:56.220I mean, you know this as well as I do, Andrew, that the Supreme Court likes to decide things as narrowly as possible.
01:01:03.300And there's no way they're just going to like be like, oh, and also let's take on birthright citizenship while we're all here.
01:01:08.680Yeah, I think I think what's interesting about this to me is also the fact that this is really very important for the for progressives,
01:01:18.620because this is sort of one of the last levers they have left is these courts that they have no control in the hill.
01:01:26.220And, you know, the party's in disarray.
01:01:27.980So they've really relied on the courts to sort of do their do what they want.
01:01:32.000And as you pointed out, this is not just a Trump.
01:01:35.100Trump isn't the first president, I'll put it this way, who doesn't like presidential doesn't like these injunctions.
01:01:39.980So it's not just like this sort of every executive doesn't like the fact that anybody messes with what they're trying to do, let alone sort of local courts.
01:01:49.980So it is being framed narrowly, as you say, about this sort of what seems like a procedural question.
01:02:00.660And it'll be interesting to see when they get to the substance of it, if they ever do get to the substance of it, how they rule,
01:02:05.740because that's a that's a constitutional case that I think would be a lot harder for the president to make.
01:02:09.760Oh, yeah. And that one will get there, too. That's that's going to wind its way up.
01:02:13.220I mean, these these cases are those cases that will come back after they get litigated on the merits to the Supreme Court.
01:02:20.580But they have to get past this first thing about whether the injunctions that were issued in stopping Trump's executive order saying no more birthright citizenship can stand.
01:02:30.120So these are the cases that will put that substantive challenge in front of the Supreme Court at some point next year, probably.
01:02:36.900But they're not there yet. OK, so that's an interesting point.
01:02:40.700I just want to before we leave this time. Andrew's not wrong.
01:02:43.780This is this is resistant to point oh, this is what the lawfare and how they've been doing it.
01:02:48.740I mean, through left wing judges who are they pick selectively, they file in exactly the jurisdictions they know they're going to do well in like D.C.
01:02:57.660And if the nationwide injunction thing is lifted, that is a massive loss for the Democrats.
01:03:03.640Two point oh resistance. Oh, absolutely. There's no question.
01:03:07.500I mean, and you made a really important point there, which is part of how this has gone is that they're shopping.
01:03:13.680They're judge shopping. Right. The Democrats and the progressives, they go around and they find judges who they know are sympathetic.
01:03:18.740To their cases. And so that's part of it. And the argument is that the administration is making is, look, you know, these judges can only issue injunctions for the people who come before them.
01:03:29.660They can't make these blanket statements nationwide. And and that would also curtail this effort that the way the Democrats have have found to effectively use the courts to thwart Trump's agenda nationally.
01:03:43.160And so it is a very important case. It's going to be a very important ruling in that respect.
01:03:49.660I can't wait to find out what they think. And thankfully, since they're hearing it so late in the term, we won't have long to wait.
01:03:55.460You know, we will get this decision before they take off.
01:03:58.460Usually they go all of June and a couple of days into July of history's any indication.
01:04:03.620OK, let's let's turn the page to the book that everybody's been talking about.
01:04:08.480I heard you guys talk about it on your show, which I love, by the way.
01:04:10.920I love the Real Clear Politics podcast. And it's this original sin book by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson of Axios.
01:04:18.460And we reported yesterday, we didn't report, but repeated a report in Politico that the guys had hired a crisis PR agent to help them because, you know, the press for them has been absolutely terrible this week.
01:04:34.240I mean, it's just been an all out assault on them from everyone who's in the independent media or right of the independent media.
01:04:41.140Guys like you, us, everybody, you're not like right wing, you're independent because we all saw Biden's infirmity and we all discussed it for years, for years prior to when these guys are acknowledging it was an issue.
01:04:55.740I mean, like we it's not a cover up if half the country, all the country knew and half the press reported it.
01:05:02.920What really just needs to be examined is why did the other half not report it?
01:05:06.140Because half the this isn't like, you know, a cover up like Watergate style where people didn't know that they were bugging the offices like here.
01:05:13.760We knew we knew we knew it's just such a weird thing to claim cover up.
01:05:16.780OK, but I believe Tapper's PR crisis PR person has gotten to him on maybe how to massage the message around his participation in the cover up or at least absolute lack of curiosity around the issue.
01:05:57.940Look, what we learned through our reporting is that starting in around 2019, 2020, there were two Bidens.
01:06:05.720There was a Biden that was perfectly workable, serviceable, seemed fine.
01:06:09.420And then there was a non-functioning one that couldn't come up with names of top aides that would lose his train of thought to an alarming degree.
01:06:16.480And that non-functioning Biden reared his head increasingly over and over.
01:06:23.140It really seemed to exacerbate and get much worse in 2023, 2024.
01:06:29.680All right, Carl, does that get it done?
01:06:31.700I look back on my reporting with humility.
01:06:35.700I thought that I was struck by that and remarked about it on our podcast.
01:07:21.500What why did the why did the hierarchy of the Democratic Party and this cabal of White House's aides?
01:07:26.540We're talking about dozens and dozens of people, maybe hundreds.
01:07:29.380Think that this was OK to present the president as a person they knew that that wasn't realistic.
01:07:36.180And the second thing is, and this is what you're getting to, Megan.
01:07:39.420Why did why did the media go along with it?
01:07:41.620How do they how they rationalize so much of the media?
01:07:44.540How do they rationalize it to themselves?
01:07:46.280You know, and what and what are they going to do better going forward?
01:07:49.620The Wall Street Journal wrote before that debate a story about Joe Biden's diminished capacity was attacked from like the paper was attacked from the white podium by the White House press secretary.
01:08:01.040You remember this, Megan. And we've talked about on our show.
01:08:05.300Well, what are they saying about that now?
01:08:07.720And they ought to be they ought to be required to answer this on the record.
01:08:12.080And, you know, a woman on CBS thing is that didn't even hit until was it April?
01:09:21.100There is one person at least who is very happy with this week's coverage, and that's the publisher of Jake Tapper's book, because this publicity has been great.
01:09:30.000This is the third book, I think, that's come out just in the last 30 days or so about this topic.
01:09:36.700And it's the one that's getting the most coverage.
01:09:39.940Part of that is because Jake Tapper wrote it and he's so prominent and well known.
01:09:45.100And because of this sort of strange because he's on television, I think, in part, there's a lot of focus on his personal coverage.
01:09:53.960There's this great clip of him talking to Laura Trump on CNN, where Laura Trump is.
01:09:59.840We have it, Andrew. Let me show it. And then you pick it up on the back end.
01:12:21.440This is apparently a strategy they think is going to work.
01:12:25.180And then here was Colorado Democrat Senator Michael Bennett on the Mark Halperin Next Up podcast, which is part of our MK Media Network, in a very awkward exchange on Wednesday.
01:12:38.940He had gotten to a point, I wouldn't say of mental decline, but of decline that put him in a position of not being able to wage a vigorous campaign against Donald Trump.
01:12:51.120And there's no way you can beat Donald Trump unless you can wage a vigorous campaign.
01:13:03.160Well, look, when the first thing that I really saw, other than one visit to the White House on an immigration matter, there was about, I think, six weeks before this, was when I saw his debate with Donald Trump.
01:13:17.660And I think I was the first Democrat to publicly say on network television that we were going to lose in a lance fight if he stayed at the top of the ticket.
01:13:28.160But let me ask you about that, because that's a common answer.
01:13:31.080He once addressed a dead congresswoman at an event meant to honor her as if she were there.
01:13:36.140He was sequestered from the media, talked to the media far less often, even in 2020, including 2024.
01:13:42.720I don't think you need it to see anything secret or private or that debate to see mental decline.
01:14:13.620Look, when her report came out, you know, Democrats and folks in the media, they had people on to rebut that, that Wall Street Journal piece that you talked about.
01:14:23.520Did anyone have those Wall Street Journal reporters on their shows or did they just have the surrogates for Biden come on to say, oh, this is, you know, wave it away.
01:14:31.920And remember, I mean, this is, you mentioned this, the public knew early on that polling on this was pretty, pretty clear that that people were concerned about his age and his mental decline.
01:14:42.280And we all knew it. And so and remember, up until if that debate had not happened or if Joe Biden had not had a bad debate that night, this whole charade would have continued all the way through Election Day.
01:14:55.020I mean, Democrats, you know, the staffers would have kept lying.
01:14:58.360The media would have kept reporting it and saying, oh, he's fine.
01:15:00.820But we know now that he wasn't fine for a long time.
01:15:05.020And oh, by the way, he stayed in the job as president of the United States for six more months.
01:15:10.380And they're trying to argue now that, well, he was just, you know, yeah, he had some mental decline, but but he was really effective at doing the job.
01:15:17.180And I mentioned this the other day. I mean, that just is total BS.
01:15:19.800There's no way that you can cordon off and say, well, you know, he he had these mental decline issues, but, you know, he was on top of the job when he was doing, you know, taking three a.m. phone calls on matters of national security.
01:15:30.620I mean, just it doesn't even pass the smell test.
01:15:32.440So, look, there's a lot that and I know it's fine for Jake Tapper to say he's been humbled and he's going to approach this with humility.
01:15:39.940But I just have no confidence that him or the media writ large would not do this exactly again or wouldn't, as I said, wouldn't have continued it had that debate not happened.
01:15:51.940There are now questions being raised about whether the antidotes in the book have been tested enough.
01:15:59.400And this is an interesting twist to the story for me, because I what I sense as a possibility, I'll ask them about it when they're here on Tuesday, is perhaps in the zeal to now be the ones on the left to own the story, like to try to be first on the left.
01:16:17.840At least they're not, as we discussed, nowhere near first writ large.
01:16:24.680Did they put things in the book that they should have tested more strenuously?
01:16:31.620And the reason I'm asking this is because this guy named Rufus Gifford, who's the finance chair he was for the Biden campaign, went on.
01:16:40.820Here's our friend Mark again. Mark Halpern's everywhere interviewing this guy, Rufus, and watch what happened.
01:16:50.580Were you at the famous George Clooney fundraiser?
01:16:53.460I was. And I was I was one of the eight people in the room when this moment happened.
01:17:00.000Do you think it's true that he didn't recognize George Clooney?
01:17:02.120No, is the answer to the question. And I mean, it's like an absurd thing.
01:17:07.940Hold on. I just want to clarify something. You were there and you were standing right there.
01:17:12.140You weren't over on the side of the room. And you can say without fear of any contradiction.
01:17:16.240And you remember clearly the president did not not know. He knew who George Clooney was.
01:17:21.280It was it's like not knowing someone who someone is in the photo line. You're introduced to them.
01:17:25.860So you're saying, Mr. President, George, this is your host, George Clooney and Julia Roberts.
01:17:30.000And you heard the person say that. Yeah, yeah. He's an advanced guy.
01:17:33.680Yeah, that's what happens. So so so you're saying there was no opportunity for the president not to recognize George Clooney.
01:17:38.400That's right. I mean, so George might have thought he didn't know who he was.
01:17:41.280But I mean, it just that moment didn't exist.
01:17:44.980And what Rufus also said, you guys, was he he'd bet dollars to donuts that their source was George Clooney and that this this the implication was that this is a matter of hubris on his part or inflation of how bad it was.
01:17:59.400Now that he's kind of leaning into being the one who spoke truth to power and journalists on the receiving end of that are supposed to kick those tires and look for secondary sources and get people to go on the record so that they can go back and test these things.
01:18:12.180Right. And none of that that wasn't done here. This book is mostly anonymous sources, Carl.
01:18:16.160Well, that's why you want for real history to have name sources.
01:18:21.000And then you want to talk to, you know, if you're doing a real history of this and not a quick book and I'm not trying to criticize these guys, they're they're not really writing history.
01:18:29.340They're writing the kind of the first draft of this revisionism.
01:18:34.140You talk to everybody in the room and I don't know if George Clooney was the source or not, but but is this guy really trying to say that Biden's fine?
01:18:43.520Because that's not I don't think people I don't think he was sustainable.
01:18:47.680If you listen to him, he wasn't trying to say that, but he was pointing out, you know, like that can't be the excuse.
01:18:54.560Use if this story is wrong. Right. Like that's you have to get rid of a president because he didn't recognize a movie star.
01:19:01.280No, but I'm just saying, like, if the was the book tested, was it was was it double source?
01:19:06.580Did they make sure in the zeal again to get this thing to print and to be the first and to be like the ones of the left who are going to speak the truth?
01:19:13.780Did they skip some important reportorial steps?
01:19:16.980I'll go with you to to you on it, Andrew, because like this guy says he was there.
01:19:22.040And what the book says is Biden came in and, you know, how nice to see you.
01:19:27.580Nice to see you. Nice to see you. And then he kind of breezed up to George.
01:19:31.480Nice to see you. And somebody said, you know, George.
01:19:35.280And it's like, nice to see you. And they were like, George Clooney, you know, the one of your hosts tonight.
01:19:40.660And then he was like, oh, George. Oh, yeah.
01:19:42.720So it's a very different story from the one we just heard from Rufus.
01:19:45.500Yes. Well, I would guess if there were eight people in the room, you'd have eight different stories.
01:19:50.660Well, but let me just say what one of the things what this guy is saying is that, no, it cannot be a difference of opinion,
01:19:57.000because what literally happened, you have to listen to a longer clip, was the president was arriving and his advance team.
01:20:03.820I don't know. I can't remember if he said it was his chief of staff or whoever was on the inside with George and Julia Roberts, like across the doorway.
01:20:10.560And the advanced man came in with the president and said, Mr. President, you know, George Clooney and Julia Roberts, who were greeting him.
01:20:20.500He didn't have a chance to work a rope line and say, nice to see you. Nice to see you.
01:20:24.700Or make any like that's what this guy Rufus is alleging.
01:20:28.060Yeah. And it sounds like a scene out of Veep, you know, like where there's always the aide who's like whispering in her ear, saying, you know, the fact about whoever she's going to meet next.
01:20:37.120So I look, I think it has the ring of truth to it. And he's he's on the record. So you got to give him that.
01:20:42.480I mean, he's so I don't know. I mean, who knows what really happened in the room?
01:20:48.380I haven't read the book, so I can't really comment on.
01:20:51.540I'm going to ask them. I'm going to ask them for sure.
01:20:53.960Can we go back to that stutter thing for a minute? Yeah.
01:20:57.420Do you remember this cropped up, you know, when he was in national office?
01:21:01.380I covered this guy back in the Senate. He spoke. He'd give Fidel Castro length speech.
01:21:05.940I once had a lunch with him and he spoke for thirty five minutes without even breathing.
01:21:10.620I never heard this stutter thing until recently.
01:21:13.340And then it was it was it was sort of offered up as his excuse.
01:21:16.780And then, well, he had and he would have a cold.
01:21:19.620They said in the debate he was still tired from an overseas trip that happened three weeks earlier.
01:21:23.960Right. They just kept coming up with these new excuses.
01:21:27.300And I mean, to step back a minute from that George Clooney anecdote, what you expect from a press corps is to be more skeptical and and they weren't.
01:21:35.220And so Tapper's blowing the whistle on that. And as you point out, he's blowing the whistle himself, too.
01:21:41.200Maybe all these vignettes aren't perfect. And I would have liked to see on the record sources.
01:21:46.160But let's take a step back. You had a president who was compromised and a political party that decided to hide that fact and a mainstream media that went along with it.
01:21:55.760That's the big story here. And I guess I'm glad Jake Tapper wrote this book.
01:21:59.880And in the relative scheme of culpability, I give the media absolutely no pardon, none whatsoever.
01:22:08.060You're like Tom. That's what Tom's been saying.
01:22:09.940I know. This is one of the many reasons I love Tom, not to not to make any judgment about the other two parts of the podcast.
01:22:15.860But can we just say, though, I think I think I think Alex Thompson's was a little better on his coverage than he was.
01:22:24.040Tapper was. He was. But then he got out of the White House Correspondents Dinner and said, we missed it.
01:22:28.200We missed the story, which is not true. But what I was going to say, Tom, is that I'm sorry, if you're assigning relative blame.
01:22:35.160Yes, the media is right. But there's no question that the deepest, worst, most unforgivable sin was by the Biden aides and the Biden family members who actively work to cover this up.
01:22:47.980Absolutely. I mean, there's just no question. And we don't have an understanding of exactly who was running the country, how much Biden was in charge, how much auto pen was used, what was done in his name that he knew or didn't know.
01:23:00.440And that is a massive scandal. I mean, if you just take a step back and you look at the scope of this thing, I mean, this is the biggest scandal maybe in political history, certainly of the modern era.
01:23:09.620I mean, nothing even comes close in my mind. And the media was part of it. I mean, again, remember, you know, that fundraiser, George Clooney comes out and that was the whole cheap fakes thing. Right.
01:23:19.540He's standing there on stage. He has no clue where he is. Barack Obama has to grab his arm, lead him off stage.
01:23:23.720And everybody, again, the entire country watches that and is horrified by it.
01:23:29.600And the White House comes out, said, these are cheap fakes. This is, you know, this is a cheap fake.
01:23:33.900And that was dutifully reported by everyone in the media, including CNN.
01:23:39.060And so they don't get a pass in my book for any of that that happened.
01:23:44.220But it is a there's a lot more that we need to know about exactly what happened, because I think this is just a huge scandal.
01:23:50.560Same. All right. Let's move on to some other news.
01:23:52.420First, we have finally had an awakening on the left, similar to the awakening on the left we just discovered and the press, too.
01:24:00.660But I repeat myself on how refugees may not be that desirable.
01:24:05.600People flocking to America from other countries claiming that they must because their countries are war torn or they're endangered may not.
01:24:12.500We may not want them. It's very late in the game, but they finally discovered it because said people happen now to be white.
01:24:17.780So it's a no. So we're taking in what what the administration is calling refugees from South Africa, white families.
01:24:28.360Some I think it's 59 of them, 49. And the left is upset.
01:24:35.280They're very, very upset that they haven't been vetted. This is the complaint.
01:24:38.960They haven't been vetted. Normally you have to run this by the U.N.
01:24:41.760We haven't we haven't run it by the U.N.
01:24:43.460They get here. They wave American flags. They were wearing American flag T-shirts.
01:25:37.580And that's a real cowardly act, the running away.
01:25:40.040Then they also, through their Congress, put out a statement that reads, in part,
01:25:45.120what the instigators of this falsehood who are fleeing South Africa seek is not safety, but impunity from transformation.
01:25:51.460They flee not from persecution, but from justice, equality and accountability for historic privilege, historic privilege.
01:26:01.160They're taking their land away from them without paying them and just giving it to other people in South Africa who have the right skin color and with no remuneration.
01:26:12.940And so now you have people all over CNN saying, we don't want them and the view, we don't want them because what?
01:26:22.220You tell me, what has changed in this calculation?
01:26:58.920And you've got to give the administration credit for for for understanding the politics of this in a way that the left just doesn't.
01:27:06.120Well, now they're upping the ante because their White House is threatening to pull out of the G20.
01:27:14.600Trump threatened he would not attend the G20 leaders meeting in Johannesburg unless the situation is taken care of.
01:27:20.600That summit is set to be held in November.
01:27:23.140The U.S. is set to host the summer summit next year.
01:27:26.120And the White House National Security Council on Wednesday ordered U.S. agencies and departments to suspend work with the group of G20 conference.
01:27:33.440They're trying to I mean, these are all tools that the left uses to try to punish Republicans who do things or other countries who don't do things the way they want it.
01:27:50.540This character attacking these people.
01:27:53.160They they let in about 50 people or so.
01:27:56.860So that's how many white farmers are killed every year on their own in their own houses in this this campaign to terrorize them.
01:28:06.780And so they want to come here to be safe.
01:28:09.240And you let in in the previous administration, four or five million people who are economic refugees, but not refugees in the sense that the law and envisions.
01:28:20.020And these people are they're afraid for their own safety and for and there are rallies.
01:28:25.260You can find them on YouTube of the of South African, a political party calling to kill the Boers.
01:28:30.380That's what these Afrikaners are called.
01:28:34.200They're told some woman was on MSNBC who used to work in the bond administration say, yeah, they should go back where they came from to Germany.
01:28:42.200Well, of course, they didn't come from Germany.
01:28:43.440They came from Holland about 350 years ago.
01:28:47.020Most of the Afrikaners came to South Africa, you know, 10 generations ago or something.
01:28:52.840They came before the United States was a country.
01:29:22.220OK, you get you get a headline like this from this moronic person over at the website Mediaite.
01:29:28.280And the headline she posts yesterday is white South African refugee in quotes brought to US by Trump says, quote, Jews are untrustworthy and dangerous.
01:29:41.100OK, wait till she finds out how the Palestinians feel about Jews who were brought over here by President Biden in much greater numbers than forty nine or fifty one.
01:29:54.160The numbers beat that in even just one year.
01:32:17.780Trump's the only president in history that his plane that he was using before.
01:32:22.500Air Force One is to step down from that plane.
01:32:25.580But it can't withstand a nuclear blast, which Air Force One is supposed to do.
01:32:30.160But, you know, I even heard the New York Times is the daily podcast yesterday, Andrew, no fans of President Trump talking about how the Air Force One ride is like kind of alarmingly shuddery on takeoff and landing because the planes are 30 years old.
01:33:02.580And here's Qatar with these magnificent, like fleet of planes because they're used to flying around all these, you know, Arab dignitaries saying, hey, you can have this one.
01:33:11.960And Trump's like, yes, I just saved us 400 million bucks.
01:33:16.320Yeah, I think I think the question is what happens to the plane?
01:33:19.460Well, the way the way we've done done this is plane is being given to the Defense Department.
01:33:26.380So it seems to me that with all the aid that we've given everyone in the world taking a 400 million dollar plane or whatever sort of chump change.
01:33:59.640I think, you know, I would just assume that his his the next president get the use of that plane and then president after that until Boeing gets their act together, which looks like it might be a long time.
01:34:59.040government and and it can be used by future administrations, I have much less of a problem with it than I do if it was somehow transferred to his library or to him or his kids or whoever.
01:35:08.460But, you know, Hillary Clinton posted something on X the other day saying, oh, this is amazing.
01:35:20.460And then people immediately posted that, you know, she had received the Clinton Foundation had received, I think, one million, maybe even four million in gifts while she was secretary of state.
01:35:30.960She promised that she was going to, you know, have that looked at and it wasn't.
01:35:35.020And so it was kind of a self-own on Clinton's part.
01:35:37.580Look, there's the people who are talking about this being, you know, grift and graft and corruption on Trump's part, I think, are are out over their skis a little bit.
01:35:46.020There's no indication that Donald Trump's going to do anything, you know, do Qatar's bidding because of this.
01:35:52.560But again, you know, perception is reality.
01:35:55.500And there's there's an appearance of of potential impropriety.
01:35:59.800But again, if it stays, if it stays the property of the U.S.
01:36:01.760government, I think Trump will say it can stay the property of the U.S.
01:36:05.000government if a Republican takes over after him.
01:36:09.620There's no way he's going to he's going to let Gavin Newsom fly around in his Qatar gifted plane.
01:36:38.080Her latest round of complaints don't go away.
01:36:40.940I want to tell you about lean created by a doctor and university researcher to match the goals of those GLP ones.
01:36:48.020But without the injections, lean says the studied ingredients, their product are shown to lower blood sugar, radically reduce appetite and burn fat by converting it into energy.
01:36:58.560If you are struggling to lose weight, lean might be for you.
01:37:02.060Let me share a few testimonials so you can hear about their results.
01:37:05.820One gal named Patty, who's a customer, says it is the first weight loss product that's actually curbed her appetite.
01:37:12.060Two more testimonials emphasize how lean can be a lifesaver after years of weight loss struggles.
01:37:16.880It's even helped one customer increase their energy.
01:37:20.200So consider trying it for yourself if it sounds right for you.
01:37:23.040You can get started with 20% off by using code MK20 at takelean.com.
01:37:33.440These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA and the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease and is not a substitute for care from a health care provider.
01:37:41.980Tax day may have passed, but for millions of Americans, the real trouble is just beginning.
01:37:47.560If you missed the April 15th deadline or still owe back taxes, the IRS is ramping up enforcement.
01:37:53.780Every day you wait might make things worse.
01:37:56.360With over 5,000 new tax liens filed daily and tools like property seizures, bank levies and wage garnishments, the IRS is applying pressure at levels we haven't seen in years.
01:38:06.360The good news, there's still time for Tax Network USA to help.
01:38:10.960Self-employed or a business owner, even if your books are a mess, they've got it covered.
01:38:15.880Tax Network USA specializes in cleaning up financial chaos and getting you back on track fast.
01:38:21.520Even after the deadline, it's not too late to regain control.
01:38:25.200Your consultation is completely free and acting now could stop penalties, threatening letters and surprise levies before they escalate.
01:38:32.500Call 1-800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash megan.
01:38:38.000You may have missed the April 15th deadline, but you haven't run out of options.
01:38:41.960Let Tax Network USA help you before the IRS makes the next move.
01:38:46.840Your business doesn't move in a straight line.
01:38:49.820Some days bring growth, others bring challenges.
01:38:52.880But what if you or a partner needs to step away?
01:38:55.400When the unexpected happens, count on Canada Life's flexible life and health insurance to help your business keep working, even when you can't.
01:39:04.040Don't let life's challenges stand in the way of your success.
01:39:17.000I'm Megan Kelly, host of The Megan Kelly Show on Sirius XM.
01:39:22.620It's your home for open, honest and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political, legal and cultural figures today.
01:39:30.220You can catch The Megan Kelly Show on Triumph, a Sirius XM channel featuring lots of hosts you may know and probably love.
01:39:38.000Great people like Dr. Laura, Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, Dave Ramsey and yours truly, Megan Kelly.
01:39:44.480You can stream The Megan Kelly Show on Sirius XM at home or anywhere you are.