Zaid Jilani and Andy Ngo on COVID Truth and Censorship, Antifa's Tactics, and Failings of the Corporate Media | Ep. 112
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 14 minutes
Words per minute
196.96391
Harmful content
Misogyny
37
sentences flagged
Toxicity
22
sentences flagged
Hate speech
18
sentences flagged
Summary
Andy Ngo, an independent journalist and author of the best-selling book, Unmasked: Inside Antifa s Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy, was brutally attacked by an Antifa group in Portland, Oregon on May 28th.
Transcript
00:00:00.540
Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, your home for open, honest, and provocative conversations.
00:00:12.280
Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
00:00:15.480
Oh, great program for you today. Great, great, great, great.
00:00:21.420
You know Andy, he's an independent journalist and author of the bestseller Unmasked,
00:00:27.500
Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy.
00:00:31.580
We had him on not long ago talking about his book and so on, Antifa,
00:00:35.000
but he's been attacked by this group, Antifa, in Portland, Oregon, again.
00:00:40.360
It happened on May 28th, and the backlash against Andy has been bizarre and very telling.
00:00:49.800
No one seems to want to do anything about this.
00:00:52.260
The police don't seem to care. Certainly the local politicians don't care.
00:00:58.820
Why? How could Trump call us the enemy of the people? He's endangering us.
00:01:03.100
They couldn't care less that Andy Ngo was beaten by this anarchist group.
00:01:07.980
So he's going to walk us through what happened and what it means.
00:01:13.540
And then we're going to get to a guest I've been looking forward to speaking to.
00:01:17.740
Zed writes on Substack now for, it's called Inquire More,
00:01:21.040
and that's where you can go read him, but he's been pretty much at left-wing publications
00:01:26.500
since he got out of school, The Intercept, Think Progress, and I'm going to talk to him about that.
00:01:31.400
How did he go from being at those organizations to being with me on the advisory board for the
00:01:37.480
Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism, which is a group that's fighting back against this critical
00:01:43.700
He is not a woke liberal, but he is somebody who's of the left, who's been very bold and brave in
00:01:52.760
And we are going to get into this incendiary report out of Vanity Fair on what's happened
00:02:01.400
It's so much deeper and more tentacled and disturbing than you know how these scientists were working
00:02:08.540
behind the scenes to shut up anybody who was going to say that it came from a lab as opposed to
00:02:13.220
directly from an animal into, you know, some human in a wet market about how the journalism
00:02:17.940
community completely fell down on the job, accepted that that was just a racist thing to pursue
00:02:26.280
And now Vanity Fair has State Department employees on the record by name talking about how they were
00:02:31.760
told by the State Department in open meetings to say nothing.
00:02:37.420
This is a can of worms you do not want to open.
00:02:39.200
Let's not go into whether research in a lab, gain of function research, as it's called,
00:02:44.160
where you try to make the bat coronavirus more dangerous.
00:02:47.600
We've funded too much of it to really be opening that can of worms.
00:02:53.520
A lot of news in this podcast, and I know you're going to enjoy it.
00:03:06.180
Thank you so much for the opportunity to speak to you again.
00:03:18.140
And the injuries this time are to the body, so it's more painful.
00:03:22.960
Two years ago, it was brain, which was more serious, but no pain in the brain.
00:03:28.260
Um, but, you know, having support of you and other journalists and friends have been, have
00:03:45.760
And she's somebody who, like you, has a history of running toward the danger to cover stories
00:03:50.580
and understands sometimes reporters take risks and sometimes it goes south.
00:03:56.120
Um, let's start with what happened, just in case our audience is not up to speed.
00:04:03.900
So I have been out of the country for about half a year now.
00:04:07.240
I went on record earlier this year to state that I had fled Portland because of escalating
00:04:17.920
I returned home recently, uh, temporarily for family matters.
00:04:23.380
I have, uh, elderly parents and, um, I, it's been six months since I've been on, uh, the
00:04:31.420
ground to do observations about this violent extremist movement known as Antifa.
00:04:37.840
And, um, I was beaten two years ago, severely given a brain hemorrhage and, um, my, I was
00:04:46.860
never reckless going back out and I've been out many, many times and diversify the ways
00:04:53.180
And, and the result of that is my book on maps.
00:04:57.380
Um, but, uh, I think what I underestimated is that their strategies and sophistications
00:05:04.280
has also evolved in the past six months in ways that I wasn't prepared for, unfortunately.
00:05:12.360
So I was incognito walking amongst them in their, uh, weekly violent protests that's
00:05:22.080
Towards the end of the night, they became suspicious of me.
00:05:24.760
And I believe it's probably because of the fact that I was not engaging in any of their
00:05:29.720
criminal acts, such as shutting down the roads or throwing projectiles at police or, um,
00:05:35.600
trying to, um, uh, break into the central police station, any of those things that they were
00:05:42.280
Um, how many people were you with just to help set the scene?
00:05:46.760
The Antifa that night was around a hundred people.
00:05:50.740
It was to mark the one year anniversary of when their rioting began.
00:05:56.780
So, and, and the reason that you can blend in is because they wear masks, right?
00:06:02.300
So you can, you can just put a mask on and kind of pass.
00:06:09.860
So, uh, I, what, what is their strength in their anonymity is their, the black block.
1.00
00:06:17.580
And that, that means dressing head to toe in black, sticking together as a group, but so
00:06:22.380
that when some of them engage in criminal activities, they can easily run back into the
00:06:27.760
crowd, the, the block and blend it in and make it nearly impossible to be identified.
00:06:33.600
Um, that's their strength, but it's, it cannot, can also be a weakness in that.
00:06:38.260
That means other people can show up in that same uniform.
00:06:41.940
However, they develop certain protocols to develop, um, to try to weed out outsiders.
00:06:51.200
The, the press have been intimidated into not recording any of their activities.
00:06:55.600
That's why you're not seeing a lot of the video footage coming out because they've actually
00:06:59.520
have, um, assaulted and beaten, uh, the other local journalists.
00:07:05.180
And so the media reporting we have, um, there's a small media crew.
00:07:09.440
They stay about half a block away and they follow the orders and instructions of the
00:07:14.780
antidote, which is that they do not photograph or record them, even though it's in public.
00:07:22.240
So what were they doing when you say they were running around committing crimes?
00:07:25.360
And it, to me, this reminds me of like a gang where you've got an undercover officer there
00:07:31.280
and that guy's got to commit some crimes if he doesn't want to be outed to the gang as
00:07:37.720
There you are not wanting to do the stuff they're doing, but what kind of rebel rousing were they
00:07:44.100
So that night was actually rather tame compared to previous events, which is usually involving
00:07:54.020
That night they were shutting down the roads of downtown Portland and they were throwing
00:07:58.620
projectiles such as eggs and other things at the central police station and screaming in
00:08:06.860
They were driving by standing in front of their vehicles.
00:08:09.340
So that's, for Portland, that's a good night, you know, when you don't have buildings set
00:08:19.760
Now, are you, when you are reporting on this, are you doing it just visually or are you trying
00:08:27.500
That night I was observing visually and taking mental notes.
00:08:31.520
Anytime you take out a camera that people notice.
00:08:35.400
And, um, the only time they allow people to take out cameras, this is one of the explicit
00:08:44.220
So, um, it's to, it, it puts out disinformation.
00:08:48.900
For example, if one of the people gets arrested and all the cameras come out, including the
00:08:54.340
local journalists, then that's when they run in with the cameras and they, they try to
00:08:58.280
portray the police as a arresting peaceful protesters.
00:09:04.180
I mean, that's what most, most reporters don't, we're so used to viral videos.
00:09:07.680
Now we forget that most reporters that they're just there as a person observing with their
00:09:12.960
eyes and ears, and then they'll go report based on the knowledge that they acquired.
00:09:16.580
You don't have to have a video camera with you.
00:09:18.980
And especially if you're in this operation, which is essentially a undercover, you're, you're
00:09:23.200
intentionally not identifying yourself as a reporter, certainly as Andy know who they
00:09:28.300
know and hate and have been a very open about threatening.
00:09:31.840
So, I mean, that this is an undercover reporting situation.
00:09:36.900
And, you know, uh, some people have asked me like, why didn't you, why don't you stay
00:09:42.820
Like what some of the local broadcasting would do and they'll use a zoom lens.
00:09:47.520
I've done all that before, but to really like hear their conversations and get a kind of
00:09:53.000
an understanding of how the organized nature of the group, as they're moving, you really
00:10:01.180
So, you know, I'm hearing these things like the different monikers that they're referring
00:10:06.260
They don't use, they don't call each other by the real names.
00:10:09.680
Um, they pay attention to things such as, um, uh, are you socializing with the group?
00:10:17.780
Why are you not engaging in the same activities as them and all that?
00:10:21.540
So towards the end of the night, as the night went on is when this suspicion grew, um, one
00:10:28.460
of the Antifa members, um, and I recognized him because he was only partially unmasked and
00:10:37.520
He had assaulted me two years ago and I, uh, reported that to police and I have an ongoing,
00:10:47.040
He asked me a rather innocuous question, but it sent shivers down my spine.
00:10:51.540
And he looked at me and he said, can you actually see through those goggles?
00:10:55.960
And the point of asking me that was so that he could hear my voice.
00:10:59.880
Um, I didn't respond, but I knew that it was time to go.
00:11:04.060
If they're sending people to ask questions, it's time to go.
00:11:06.940
Um, I made it one block away and, uh, uh, another group of them, uh, we're following now.
00:11:13.700
And, uh, they asked the next question they asked.
00:11:17.900
Um, I didn't want to take off running because I, you know, I was thinking if I immediately
00:11:22.680
do that, I mean, there's no police around, you know, it is in the middle of downtown,
00:11:28.160
Um, it's, uh, it's a dead part of the city because of the rides for that's been going
00:11:35.200
Um, they said the question that I was asked was, why did you look so nervous tonight?
00:11:41.200
And, and at this point now I'm, I'm panicking and I'm really trying to speak or run.
00:11:49.560
And I, uh, my decision was to form a, um, I spoken a fake voice, what I, I tried to put
00:12:17.060
Um, thinking now, okay, what, what, what is my exit?
00:12:27.680
Um, they were now saying, take off your mask, take off your mask.
00:12:32.520
So one of them reached for my face, grabbed off my mask and my goggles, and then I was
00:12:38.840
And then that's when I took off sprinting, running for my life.
00:12:43.640
And I had this mob pursuing me and the fastest one in their group was able to tackle me to
00:12:53.240
All the meanwhile, when I was sprinting down the street, I'm trying to flag down the cars
00:12:58.740
Cause this was a Friday night in downtown Portland.
00:13:03.920
In fact, the drivers just ignored me maybe because there's been, you know, Portland, there's
00:13:08.640
so much dysfunction in the city that having screaming, crazy looking people in the street,
00:13:19.360
And then I was tackled, um, and punched repeatedly on the head and pinned down.
00:13:25.220
And, uh, I could hear in the background, this, the footsteps and the yells of the mob pursuing.
00:13:31.020
And this is the mob that has been calling for my blood for two years.
00:13:38.500
Just, just to refresh our audience's memory, you are public enemy number one of Antifa because
00:13:44.860
you've been fearless and reporting on them where I know you, I think you're actually being kind
00:13:50.320
and saying the press has been intimidated into ignoring them.
00:13:53.520
I think many in the press simply have no interest in them because they're not, they're not outraged
00:13:59.640
by what they're doing and they have similar ideologies and they think, you know, they,
00:14:04.120
they cover Antifa a lot differently than they would cover a proud boys rally or, uh, some
00:14:09.920
rally of a group, you know, known to be affiliated with white supremacists, right?
00:14:14.060
Like they think these guys are anti-Trump, I guess, and, and, you know, sort of pro-Black
00:14:19.720
Lives Matter and they can, they can stand for that cause.
00:14:22.320
So this is a group that you've been covering for a while and that hates you.
00:14:25.840
I mean, the death threats, we don't have to take your word for it.
00:14:28.540
The, the spray painted murder, Andy, no signs are all over the internet.
00:14:34.540
And another thing they do to try to intimidate me is to release my, the address of where
00:14:41.980
So the, you know, I have two dozen reports of the Portland police, nothing's ever done.
00:14:46.580
And the, the, in addition to the instances of violence and sometimes deadly violence carried
00:14:52.600
out by Antifa, such as when they, one of their members shot dead a man in downtown Portland last
00:14:57.980
year, like what the, what empowers them and what I, you know, really appreciate, appreciate
00:15:04.640
about you as you're a straight shooter and you call that as it is, you have a media establishment
00:15:10.660
since 2016 has thrown their lot in essentially with the far left for the cause of so-called, uh,
00:15:18.260
resistance against the previous administration by any means necessary.
00:15:22.500
So that, that Antifa is a fringe extremist movement.
00:15:26.600
Any, any liberal, any person on the left or right can recognize that.
00:15:30.560
But when you're of, when the public has been fed day in, day out, this propaganda of America
00:15:39.040
America is, is a fascist regime now that was the most powering, um, empowering aspect for
00:15:45.800
Antifa and that they had now mainstream recruit, recruiting, um, propaganda that was being put
00:15:52.840
out by legacy media and print and in broadcast and radio everywhere.
00:15:58.120
So, um, you know, my, my job is to rec, recognizing that they're not anti-fascist or anti-racist.
00:16:08.380
This is by their own admissions, anti-government, insurrectionary, anarchist, communist ideology
00:16:15.640
movement, and they organize acts of criminality that manifest in, um, at his, at his mildest
00:16:23.700
form, property destruction, all the way to Austin, to, uh, assault and robbery and killing.
00:16:30.780
And it's not, it's not just in Portland, right?
00:16:32.740
I mean, it's Portland's just been an ongoing nightmare, notwithstanding what Nick Christophe
00:16:37.360
of the New York times says, his tweet tweets out.
00:16:41.340
We're all, you know, I love the, the helicopter reporters who just helicopter in say, I had
00:16:45.900
a delightful lunch and try to essentially diminish your reporting that you've done on
00:16:51.880
But it isn't just in Portland for people who are thinking this is a Portland problem.
00:17:00.040
Seattle is another place that's particularly bad.
00:17:02.200
There's also Antifa cells in Seattle, Philadelphia, New York, there's New York City Antifa, and
00:17:08.320
they all operate in these rather large, um, Twitter accounts, these groups, and that's how
00:17:14.920
You know, when I was on the ground, I was paying attention to what they were saying.
00:17:18.660
And one of the women, uh, in the group who was using the moniker mama, which suggests
00:17:24.460
to me that she was in a more like leadership type role.
00:17:28.060
She said that we, we're, we can't do what we're doing.
00:17:38.720
You know, they, this is how they blast out like their crowdfunding links.
00:17:42.560
That's how they get funding through cash app and Venmo to pay for the bails.
00:17:46.700
That's how they organize and announce when and where to go.
00:17:50.220
And I've been trying to bring the attention to, to big tech that, hey, your platform is
00:17:57.060
being exploited and used by violent extremists to carry out criminal activities.
0.99
00:18:02.020
It says so on these flyers, uh, fuck shit up, no, no, no cameras, uh, and things like
0.99
00:18:09.800
that, or, um, uh, or set fires to the precincts and inciting violence day in and day out.
0.99
00:18:16.700
Um, primarily on Twitter, but also Instagram and Facebook and really, um, very, very little
00:18:28.980
It's back now, but it went away for a long time because it was supposedly used by extremists
00:18:37.900
Now, you know, forget the fact that Facebook was also used and they're up and running and
00:18:43.460
Um, so if, if, you know, the inner, if Amazon, for example, really cares about this, if Twitter
00:18:48.960
really cares about, about stopping violence, stopping organized violence against innocents,
00:18:56.660
Why wouldn't they crack down on, on the use of their platforms for this kind of organization?
00:19:02.200
Yeah, it's because many of the people who work in, in Twitter and these companies are
00:19:09.720
That's why you can have groups like the Youth Liberation Front, which by the way, was involved
00:19:13.840
for organizing the, the riots in Portland and Seattle and other cities.
00:19:17.540
They still have their account operating the Pacific Northwest Youth Liberation Front.
00:19:22.940
You have Rose City, Antifa, they're still on Twitter.
00:19:25.620
So, um, and this is the issue with the, the, the, the mainstreaming of the far left is
00:19:34.240
really what, um, kind of the key arguments and what I'm, I write in, in Unmatched.
00:19:40.460
It's like, they're not, they would not be able to do what they're doing without this
00:19:45.660
critical mass of support that comes through, um, uh, complicit locally elected politicians,
00:19:54.740
Or even right down to the president of the United States and his debate with Donald Trump.
00:19:58.060
He said, you know, they're just an ideology partially quoting the FBI director without really
00:20:02.980
espousing what was actually said, which is they are organized at a local level and they've
00:20:06.640
done a lot of damage and continue to, um, but they get a shoulder shrug because they
00:20:13.760
Um, I want to get more to the reaction to what happened to you in particular by the press,
00:20:18.280
the press that is so upset at any nasty Donald Trump tweet about the press is the enemy of
00:20:24.320
Then when an actual person who's trying to do real reporting gets attacked, it's like,
00:20:30.520
That's basically been their reaction, but, but before we do, let's, let's finish up the
00:20:39.320
I'm sure it's unpleasant to actually go through it again, you know, just reciting it.
00:20:43.140
But I want people to understand this is not, you know, it's not, it's not just a bunch
00:20:47.680
of people who sort of tried to scare you, tried to scare you and backed off.
00:20:52.760
You saved yourself by getting into a hotel and even then they didn't leave.
00:20:57.420
So they caught up with you and then what happened?
00:21:02.000
When I was pinned to the ground, all the adrenaline just left my body in that moment.
00:21:06.100
As I was hearing the, the mob coming closer and closer, I was, my thought was this, this,
00:21:15.060
Uh, and, and, and either through, um, the, the miracle is that the person who pinned me
00:21:24.060
down and was beating me, he became either distracted or intimidated by the fact now that
00:21:29.880
there were several journalists who were recording and taking pictures of this assault.
00:21:34.620
And he let off enough of his weight that I was, I crawled forward and was able to take
00:21:43.420
The nearest thing I, the only thing I saw open was the hotel.
00:21:45.820
And I ran in screaming erratically, call police, call police, call police.
00:21:50.440
And the first thing that the hotel staff said to me was, you need to put on a mask.
00:21:57.140
And then they said they, they would not call police.
00:21:59.820
And they said that I needed to leave the property.
00:22:02.280
And by this point now, there's a mob gathering outside the hotel.
00:22:06.800
One of the Antifa had run inside the hotel lobby and was live streaming, threatening me
00:22:12.800
on her live stream and saying, come to the hotel, come to the Nines Hotel now.
0.88
00:22:22.880
You thought the milkshakes were bad last time.
1.00
00:22:24.860
We're going to beat the fuck out of you, bitch.
1.00
00:22:27.960
Y'all, Andy knows here at the Nines Hotel.
1.00
00:22:30.880
Andy knows inside the hotel called the cops on everyone saying he's going to get killed
00:22:34.420
out here at the Nines Hotel right here by Tynor Square.
00:22:39.320
He's hiding right here on the phone with the cops.
00:22:45.540
That's what they all wanted was for you to get kicked out.
00:22:47.820
By the way, if that hotel, the Nines had kicked you out and your assault had continued,
00:22:54.180
They are very lucky that somebody there finally listened and didn't push you out of that building.
00:22:59.920
Well, actually, up to the very moment, how I escaped from that lobby was I ran into the
00:23:10.760
Because it seemed the hotel staff were telling me, you need to stand up now.
00:23:19.580
And I didn't know if they were going to push me out or what.
00:23:29.340
He probably thought I was a crazy person, but swiped the hotel card.
00:23:34.540
And I went up to a high level in the building and hid and dozens of SWAT police responded.
00:23:43.760
At this point, I looked at video later to secure the front of the hotel because of the mob was
00:23:51.760
I was eventually led out by through a discreet exit to the back where staff are.
00:23:57.600
And there was an ambulance there and the police and they took me to hospital.
00:24:00.440
And just so the audience knows, since this is just an audio program, there's visual
00:24:11.620
We've seen the actual pictures of your injury, your bloody eye, your bloody side.
00:24:15.860
We have audio of them banging on the hotel windows.
00:24:19.300
In fact, let's play that so you can hear that, too.
00:24:58.820
this is crazy they're screaming nazi scum at you i mean this not that anybody is going there but
0.99
00:25:10.580
just for the record this is not a justice malay situation this happened and there's been no
0.97
00:25:16.500
accountability for it you point out i didn't realize andy until just now even though i've
00:25:22.120
interviewed you before that you knew the name of the person who attacked you in 2019 and put you
00:25:26.760
in the hospital with a brain hemorrhage i did not know that i he hasn't been arrested no one's been
00:25:32.920
arrested for that attack and now here we are a week after this attack and have the police even
00:25:37.780
contacted you uh well one week out i have not heard from a detective at all not a single phone call so
00:25:45.800
you know if this wasn't my second go around dealing with assault uh in in portland police um i would be
00:25:55.060
angry but in 2019 i i had absolutely no support from uh the local authorities uh or the district
00:26:02.740
attorney or the state attorney general so uh in the conditions i've just gotten worse now we have a
00:26:08.800
district attorney who's even worse than the one that was there before so why don't the cops care i can
00:26:14.820
see the da and elected politician you know these far left wingers not caring but i it seems odd to me
00:26:20.640
the cops don't care so last year in response to uh george floyd dying the city council uh abolished
00:26:28.540
the gun violence reduction reduction team which is a unit of the portland police that deals with
00:26:33.380
shootings and homicides and portland is now at record levels of shootings and homicides and police are
00:26:39.680
overwhelmed uh the department also was defunded by the millions and officers have been quitting in
00:26:46.840
record numbers so they're the detectives um and this is a charitable take the detectives are just
00:26:54.120
swamped with all these murder cases so anything else is just much much lower priority this is this is the
00:27:03.580
same the murder rates up in portland it's up in all major cities in america that have at least a million
00:27:07.960
people by at least one third this well um i saw you tweeted about this not not long ago the portland
00:27:14.240
politician the city commissioner joanne hardesty can you tell folks she wants to defund the cops
0.91
00:27:19.460
very badly um until she needed them for something absurd can you tell the audience what we're talking
00:27:26.500
about right so uh late last year this is a woman who uh weaponizes her race she she was the first black
1.00
00:27:35.520
woman elected portland city council and she used that as a bludgeon against her political opponents
1.00
00:27:42.680
and uh at the forefront of that has been the portland police she's repeated all the same
00:27:47.860
talking points that everybody's familiar with uh she says that uh as a as a black woman she is
00:27:54.000
endangered by police she wants to defund police um she spread conspiracy theories during the riots
00:28:00.780
last year at one point telling in an interview to uh marie claire magazine that uh she believed portland
00:28:08.180
police were behind the arsons at the riots and were using it to blame protesters and when the police
00:28:14.380
chief asked her what's your evidence for this very serious allegation she had none and she was forced
00:28:21.460
to apologize anyways this is her background you know uh we found out um through um public information
00:28:29.900
requests of uh her call to police late last year is that after a gambling trip that she took to a nearby
00:28:36.860
city on the way back to portland uh she had a lift right uh lift ride home uh she called police
0.98
00:28:43.440
on her lift driver when he asked her to uh close her window or to keep the window open because of
00:28:50.160
covet uh rules for the company she wanted him to close the window and he wouldn't right yeah she made
00:28:56.740
a scene so he canceled the ride and then she called the cops on him it's fantastic that's that that is how
00:29:04.200
it goes right all these politicians who want to defund the police they don't want cops until they
00:29:09.020
need cops and then they say oh let me call the cops and they don't think about the people who
00:29:13.900
actually live in crime ridden areas who need the cops every day and they don't most normal people
00:29:20.660
don't involve the police over a dispute about a window with a lift driver you know it's it's just
00:29:25.820
absurd and yet when somebody like you actually gets assaulted actually gets assaulted it's a shoulder
0.65
00:29:31.540
shrug and i think the reaction has been yeah he asked for it you know he asked for it and so before
00:29:36.360
i get to that because i do want to ask you some of the criticism i watching this even though i admire
00:29:40.860
your your courage and getting in there and shining a light on something nobody else will i also think
00:29:46.540
get out of there you know like get out stop doing this because you already documented what they did and
00:29:53.840
this is getting really dangerous for you yeah you know uh two years ago that that was the same advice
00:30:00.500
i was given and my uh my intuition is that if i if i stop covering this uh then they've won
00:30:09.240
you know everything that antifa does is about deception and they are able to mean that deception by
00:30:17.120
um making sure that there's no record of what they do whether it's their criminal actions on the
00:30:24.300
streets that rise or um uh their mugshots and names and things that they post their social media accounts
00:30:32.580
that tie them explicitly to antifa they don't want that and out and known and so um you know i constantly
00:30:41.620
did risk assessment i mean i you know i just want to remind you know the those critics who have my best
00:30:47.200
interest at heart that you know i went to nearly two years going forward without um other injuries
00:30:54.180
maintaining and constantly thinking of new ways you know and as an independent journalist um you know i
00:31:00.840
don't have access to like a corporate media backing that could potentially give a lot of resources
00:31:05.640
in terms of security and all that so i have to make do with what um what limited resources i have
00:31:12.440
street smarts but but my concern is i i don't want to be doing a podcast months or a year from now
00:31:20.640
playing this soundbite saying he's gone they got him they will kill you they're obviously very
00:31:29.880
serious about it and i i just think is it time now to say this situation's gotten too dangerous for me
00:31:37.480
uh it's this is what i'm thinking about a lot this past week has been uh extremely difficult for me
00:31:48.920
and um i mean i i made the decision to leave portland last year and returning um recently last week
00:32:01.120
uh was a mistake yeah you're you know you you're right that this beat is important but um not
00:32:09.960
important enough to die over um so and you've exposed them you know you've you've accomplished
00:32:16.520
the mission and now it's crossed over to this point where you're you in particular really are their
00:32:23.600
perceived enemy and it doesn't make it right or wrong you know you're just trying to report what
00:32:28.620
they do but i i worry about you i do not want to be running andy no soundbites saying oh my god
00:32:33.760
it happened you know please please make sure that doesn't happen right like to the to your point you
00:32:40.460
don't have security if i went out there for fox news they'd have a team of people around me and i'd
00:32:45.280
have a camera and a light and they'd know they couldn't attack me but the way this reporting has to
00:32:49.440
be done given the nature of that group is very different and on top of all that andy i feel like
00:32:56.460
people like places like the intercept in a way they've put a target on your back a new target
00:33:02.460
on your back you know this that's the organization that glenn greenwald founded and then it morphed
00:33:06.960
into something totally different from what he envisioned and he left in a with a great screed
00:33:13.220
about how unfair they'd become and how ideological they'd become and he'd been going off on them about
00:33:18.720
a month ago because they did this long hit piece on so-called riot squad over at daily caller and it's
00:33:25.700
people like shelby talcott people like yourself richie mcginnis who go into these riots and try
00:33:32.700
to document what's happening for the rest of us and it really does put a target on their back and i feel
00:33:37.540
like you're swept up in that too you know it's just fever pitch right now yeah you know uh people like
00:33:43.380
myself expect um to be targeted by antifa and all that we don't expect other journalists and media
00:33:49.520
organizations to put the targets on our backs uh for to make it easier for antifa and that that's what
00:33:56.540
that intercept piece did and actually um surprisingly or not um when i was um in this past week when i was
00:34:06.800
recovering i saw tweets from a writer self-described journalist named aaron gupta he wrote adding a
00:34:14.300
fucked around and found out on his twitter in response to what happened to me and then he also
0.93
00:34:18.740
wrote another tweet that asked from an operational standpoint why did why did you let andy know escape
00:34:24.500
after you caught him and this is somebody who contributed to the intercept as well as washington
00:34:30.240
post at one point in the guardian and other places so you have really extreme political actors who
00:34:38.720
work in the world of media and journalism who um you know it's really like i don't know what we can do
00:34:49.360
but it's like you have these extremists who are in these institutions of um of press and media and
00:34:59.380
putting out poisoning the minds of the public with disinformation or disinformation or inciting violence
00:35:05.800
yeah i mean we we there was something you were trending on twitter as you know journalist andy no
00:35:13.260
independent journalist andy no and and the left wingers complained and and twitter changed it to author
00:35:20.020
andy no like they bowed to the mob in calling you that meanwhile journalism has so evolved to the point
00:35:27.660
now where it's you don't have to be in the nightly news chair as the anchor to be considered a journalist
00:35:34.040
we have a lot of citizen journalists out there doing really great work and that one of the reasons
00:35:39.440
i was so surprised tim pool came after you is because he's one of those guys you know he's been
00:35:44.520
in the middle of a lot of dangerous situations himself as a citizen journalist you know he sort of
00:35:49.120
he came on the show and talked about how he kind of looked looked around one day and realized i'm a
00:35:53.240
journalist you know that this is what i'm doing and let me just read i know you've seen it but so the
00:35:57.900
audience knows this is what he tweeted about your situation quoting what purpose was served by trying
00:36:05.960
to infiltrate antifa some journalists can't cover certain topics women he says were barred from
00:36:11.920
reporting from her tahrir square by some outlets due to violence against women specifically about you
0.99
00:36:17.700
he says this was pointless and unbelievably stupid and then he says andy going into the fray with no
0.98
00:36:23.540
security no plan is not reporting it's tribal spectacle what do you make of that yeah well with respect to
0.99
00:36:33.020
tim um you i'll say this um journalists who um go into dangerous areas who challenge power who go into
00:36:46.120
war zones and do that type of coverage and put themselves at risk and may be injured blown
00:36:53.480
uh killed or have limbs um blown off uh they they need solidarity and support not condemnation
00:37:04.020
and um just respect to what he does now um i i wouldn't be able to we wouldn't know much about
00:37:15.820
antifa if myself and other people have the comfort and luxury of just of sitting in a room behind a
00:37:22.720
computer all day so um this work is dangerous and you yes you have to come up with ways to mitigate
00:37:30.620
risk and i was able to outrun the the death threats and all that for two years and it caught up to me
00:37:38.540
but um i wise up and i'm not gonna ever give them that opportunity again to pin me down again
00:37:47.060
to make me beg for my life like they did last friday um but they they won't have the antifa won't have
00:37:55.580
the last word in the select because if i don't continue to cover them in different ways then they
00:38:01.400
will have won have won so um uh there are other things that i uh i won't disclose at this point of
00:38:09.460
what uh you know i'm brainstorming and all that but um yeah i take i take the criticisms that i get
00:38:16.300
in stride and uh you know i at the same time i stand by my decisions for being on the field because
00:38:25.520
um that's there's no other way do it you it's crazy to me as you know in an under the trump
00:38:35.160
administration trump said the press is the enemy of the people trump went after many reporters
00:38:39.460
can speak to that personally it was fine what did he do he sent out some mean tweets right it's like
00:38:44.840
i think we can handle that that's not in the same league as what you've just been through or many
00:38:49.520
reporters have and yet we were lectured by cnn and others about what a terrible time it was to be a
00:38:57.240
journalist and how we have to stand up for safety of the press and just how the environment had gotten
00:39:05.460
so dangerous silence from those people in response to this attack on you in fact what it felt like to
00:39:13.420
me was there was a pile on against you trying to attack you for i mean you know i don't understand
00:39:22.480
i know tim says that you purposefully escalated escalated risk and danger i don't see that i
00:39:28.080
will say i like tim i just i don't see that you were there you were with them that that is risky
00:39:33.160
it is dangerous but it's not like you were poking the bear you know showing them who you were getting
00:39:39.320
in their faces yelling things at them you know sort of doing something for a camera to create a
00:39:44.140
situation i i don't see that um and so these same journalists not tim but others who are just so
00:39:50.460
sanctimonious under the trump administration i almost felt like it was gleeful andy the reaction
00:39:58.120
of what happened to you yes uh it's very painful to see that i um you know i wish i could say that
00:40:06.200
seeing all that from peers and who do similar work to what i do but at publications and networks and
00:40:15.360
that would uh uh never see me they don't see me as an equal and which is why i was in 2019 and as
00:40:24.040
now the one of the first things is to always say and he's not a journalist and i think they do that
00:40:30.180
because um any decent person can see that attack assault or intimidation of a member of the press
00:40:38.820
um is wrong they they want to take away that sympathy that um that outpouring of support that
00:40:46.260
comes to me from both the left and the right so they want to cast me as a agent provocateur
00:40:52.040
uh somebody who i just went through this with laura logan i we just talked about how this disgusting
00:40:58.700
piece that was written about her in new york magazine after it was about her the the attack on
00:41:04.240
her the gang rape in tahrir square part of the piece referenced it but the actual piece was
00:41:09.660
written after her reporting on benghazi uh which was critical of hillary clinton and barack obama
00:41:14.780
and the reporter diminished the gang rape by saying she'd been subjected to some groping and she was just
00:41:23.180
on this show saying that and her belief was done intentionally to take away the image of her as any sort of a
00:41:30.600
sympathetic figure or somebody who was willing to face down danger to get the story who who paid a
00:41:35.440
very high price for trying to bring that reporting to the people i mean i see a parallel here yeah um
00:41:41.520
and uh you know it's disgusting but um it's to be expected all these it's all um a charade about all
00:41:51.180
these people who talk about how press are under attack in the in the united states and when actual
00:41:58.340
uh journalists face violence in the far left and it's not just me it's many many people including
00:42:03.560
people at cnn and other um liberal um news places you know the silence because it's like
00:42:11.340
there's this effort to make the public not aware of the extremism of the far left you know we have
00:42:21.540
all these organization media um report organizations and reporters who are focused full-time
00:42:28.000
full teams uh focused full-time on the far right and you're not two-point supremacists you don't have
00:42:34.160
any equivalence of that on the far left so the because there's so few of us covering it it makes
00:42:40.980
the risk to each one of us individually much higher yes that's right there's no safety in numbers for you
00:42:47.300
so can you i saw the pictures of the injuries i saw your bloody eye i saw your bloody side i saw a
00:42:55.220
bloody leg what have i missed anything what can you just tell us about your injuries yeah it's so
00:43:02.500
primary injury uh was to the leg i was giving uh crutches after i was discharged um actually after i
00:43:11.800
get off this podcast and get heading to a medical appointment for a one-week checkup um and there's
00:43:18.280
injury to my wrist as well uh from when i was tackled there was contusions to the back of my head
00:43:24.720
uh and then uh bleeding in the eye um so uh physically um this time has been a lot more painful and quite
00:43:38.300
unbearable times um then two years ago even though two years ago was um physically um much more
00:43:46.780
dangerous than that i had a brain uh brain hemorrhage i could have died from that um so i'm just i i i left
00:43:54.940
portland um as soon as uh i was discharged and i've just been focused on recovering and um trying to
00:44:06.700
remind myself that i'm not alone because people who say that i am a provocateur i'm not a journalist
00:44:15.220
i'm an agitator i'm a far-right agitator all that is meant to isolate me to make it so that people
00:44:21.460
don't want to express support for me and um you know i'd be lying if i said that all that stuff didn't
00:44:29.900
bother me it does you know well and i i mean they've said it before and you continue to do it
00:44:36.360
but i i would say as somebody who you know is rooting for you now might be a good time to to
00:44:41.820
do a realistic assessment of the danger and the benefits because we've gotten so many benefits from
00:44:48.620
you already we've got the book unmasked and we can't lose you this is they are not worth dying for
00:44:55.620
i appreciate your courage and your effort but they're these these losers are not worth dying for
00:45:00.280
this has gotten so dangerous for you you know it's it is somebody else's turn to take up this mantle and
00:45:06.840
you know local news desks are dying for reporters andy you could be sitting on a desk you could be
00:45:11.860
filing reports on like a crime on city hall someplace maybe you don't have to go quite to that extreme
00:45:18.800
but um you got to take care of you as they say and i hope you do i really do i have great people
00:45:25.120
around me they're taking care of me good all right well stay well and we'll stay on uh the the police
00:45:32.920
to see what happens and whether they're going to make any arrests in this case it's always good
00:45:38.100
talking to you thank you so much up next zed jelani uh and we're going to start with this piece
00:45:44.400
from barry weiss's blog on and i quote what happens when doctors can't tell the truth
00:45:51.660
essentially because of wokeism that's right after this
00:45:55.520
zed how are you great megan how are you i'm good thanks for being here oh no problem i'm a big fan
00:46:05.160
of this show i listen to it all the time so i'm happy to be here oh i'm honored um all right so let
00:46:09.460
me just start where i just left off which is i just spoke to andy know about the attack that he
00:46:13.980
suffered at the hands of antifa out in um portland and the reaction from the vast majority of the
00:46:22.120
twitterati which was basically well you're no journalist you asked for it and too bad on you
00:46:28.080
the same crowd that got so upset about mean trump tweets doesn't seem to much care that this guy now
00:46:33.900
twice has been beaten uh to a pulp by this group your thoughts on it yeah i mean i think it's sad i
00:46:41.000
i talked to andy actually after this happened the first time because uh a few years ago he was also
00:46:47.420
attacked by some folks in in antifa and in portland and i think he was hurt so badly that he had to
00:46:53.740
have repeated doctor visits brain scans things like that um and you know that that kind of brutal assault
00:47:00.940
over politics i mean that's not the kind of thing that you generally would expect to happen in the
00:47:05.680
united states right it seems like uh something you'd see in maybe like a civil war or you know the
00:47:10.560
weimar republic or or something like that right um and yeah i think so many people have been warped by
00:47:16.240
the the algorithms of these social media apps through you know silicon valley to basically see
00:47:23.020
people who disagree with them politically as actual uh combatants or enemies in some kind of conflict
00:47:28.560
right um and so i think if the exact same thing had happened and he had a different political
00:47:33.160
orientation people would disapprove of it right they would see it as uh you know that's one of ours it's not
00:47:38.400
one of theirs right and that's generally how we view conflicts in an actual war right like in a
00:47:43.180
shooting conflict uh it's not generally how we viewed politics but unfortunately so much of our
00:47:47.980
politics has turned uh virtually sectarian right like uh we have different tribes and they're at war
00:47:53.620
with each other and hey if it happened to one of theirs it's not the same thing as if it happened to
00:47:57.720
one of ours and i'll say this about andy you know i think i disagree with him about i don't know
00:48:01.400
maybe 75 or 80 percent of the things that he says are rights but that doesn't that's no excuse for
00:48:06.020
hurting anybody and the only human response to that say that's unacceptable and the people who
00:48:10.940
are doing it should be arrested and it doesn't matter what the political orientation of the
00:48:14.760
journalist or the or of the human being who they're who they're hurting is and it's sad that so many
00:48:19.000
people i think have become what they what they despise they haven't realized it but that's
00:48:25.200
unfortunate what happened here that tribalism infects everything and this is one of the things
1.00
00:48:30.580
that i i feel like has bound you and me together both being on the advisory board for fair foundation
00:48:36.640
against intolerance and racism which is a group trying to push back against this insanity um but
00:48:42.720
the tribalism grows by the day and it's not just k through 12 education or universities or sports or
00:48:47.840
news media there was an extraordinary piece um in on barry weiss's substack and she it's sort of you
00:48:55.720
know it's her column it's her it's her place to write now having left the new york times um i say
00:49:01.180
like you know just sort of like daenerys targaryen with everything on fire she was great she just lit
00:49:06.140
it on fire and walked out now she's killing it on substack and she'll turn her column over to people
1.00
00:49:10.960
for reporting or pieces of their own and she did to katie herzog katie herzog who actually has come on
00:49:16.160
the show as she's a co-host of blocked and reported with jesse signal and um they're both great they're
00:49:21.160
fine well she's i think kind of like you correct me if i'm wrong ideologically sort of of the left
00:49:26.760
but intolerant of the intolerance being born on on issues when it comes to identity and so she does
00:49:34.920
this long piece it's 17 pages i read it this morning on barry substack about the medical community
00:49:43.600
and it's titled what happens when doctors can't tell the truth going on is that about how doctors
00:49:50.660
aren't allowed to push back against unsound or quote shoddy as hell uh publications about
00:49:57.840
you know alleged bias in the medical community uh that's just basically being made up they can't
00:50:05.500
push back on it because they're going to get fired they can't push back on affirmative action which
0.89
00:50:09.480
even a majority of black people don't support uh in the medical community because they'll get fired
00:50:15.420
and she's got all these examples of how now even the young doctors are are saying openly that their
00:50:22.800
plan is to confront their patients on their perceived racism and they may even prioritize people for
00:50:28.660
treatment based on the color of their skin yeah i mean it's this is actually one of the i would say
00:50:35.900
biggest like civilizational threats right which is this is the cornerstone of i think any society is to be
00:50:43.180
able to have open and free inquiry about any number of topics i think it's very very important
00:50:47.960
in stem in particular because these are the people who are designing our vaccines to end pandemics
00:50:53.440
uh people who are designing our airplanes that fly around and cars we drive around in and computers we use
00:51:01.000
technology uh they have to be able to to pursue questions with an open mind and not foreclose avenues
00:51:07.180
of inquiry based on any kind of political orientation or religious belief or any kind of taboo and i think
00:51:14.020
once these fields start being hemmed in and being told you know you can't ask that question no you
00:51:18.480
can't come to that conclusion even if all the data shows you that it comes in this direction you just
00:51:22.600
you can't come to the conclusion because it's not acceptable uh we're going to start seeing people i
00:51:27.640
think actively work against their own expertise you know work against in some cases their own
00:51:32.360
conscience and i think something like what was happening with the vaccine i mean we know that a
00:51:37.120
virus does not discriminate by quote unquote racial groups because race race is not a biological fact
00:51:42.100
right it's a social construct um of course depending on the geography and the region some of the things
00:51:47.860
that may actually impact whether or not you're susceptible to a virus may be correlated to race but
00:51:52.500
sure they could be correlated to whether you're catholic or protestant whether you're southern or northern
00:51:56.280
you know it could be correlated by gender but that doesn't mean that we should start
00:52:00.040
using those single categories to start distributing a vaccine rather than looking
00:52:03.780
in a more i think specific and nuanced way as to the factors that were actually driving um how people
00:52:09.700
were being infected and how they were falling ill from the virus and but i think that once you have
00:52:14.540
the obsession on a single variable like race uh you start blowing up its importance right and i think
00:52:19.360
when all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail uh and that's of course not only in medicine
00:52:24.880
but it's across our our entire country right now i think every field is being pressured
00:52:29.380
to center their work around certain racial narratives which i think honestly often just don't hold up to
00:52:35.860
to scrutiny when you put them under a magnifying glass but again if you if you create a culture that tells
00:52:42.140
you you're not allowed to even question those narratives or you're not supposed to be uh you know
00:52:47.400
you can't even you can't even get to that conclusion in the first place that the narratives are flawed
00:52:51.100
right and it's one thing and it's bad enough in news media where we're supposed to be brokers of
00:52:56.120
of information but in medicine you know in medicine we really need people to be able to speak
00:53:01.840
honestly and openly her piece talks about uh one of the one of the publications that that many of
00:53:09.500
these doctors who are apparently meeting quietly secretly one time a month on zoom to it's like a support
00:53:15.320
group for those who are concerned about the spread of deep deeply illiberal ideology uh one of the articles
00:53:22.120
that they were taking issue with was a quote black newborns are more likely to die when looked after
00:53:26.780
by white doctors they were saying it was so method methodologically flawed that it was impossible
00:53:32.520
to extrapolate any conclusions from this thing at all but no one wanted to criticize it um and in an
00:53:38.960
article like that is the bar is very low for it to get published and articles that would push back
00:53:43.160
against it the bar is very high and then when you have a doctor like this norman wang mentioned in the
00:53:48.700
he's from the university of pittsburgh cardiologist try to say hey maybe not everything needs to be
00:53:56.540
viewed through the lens of race uh they get punished so this guy he published a paper in the journal of
00:54:02.820
the american heart association critical of diversity initiatives in cardiology he looked at 50 years of
00:54:08.120
data he argued that affirmative action has failed to meaningfully increase the number the percentage of
00:54:13.060
black and hispanic clinicians or improve patient outcomes and he argued for race neutral policies
00:54:17.980
saying quote long-term long-term academic solutions and excellence should not be sacrificed for short-term
00:54:24.240
demographic optics well norman went right into the buzzsaw of our social justice press and social
00:54:33.100
justice young folks in medicine and soon thereafter uh the editor-in-chief of that publication issued an
00:54:40.860
apology and retracted it apparently only two pieces have ever even been retracted one was just totally
00:54:45.700
medically unsound and now his piece um this dr wang has been removed from his position as a director
00:54:52.220
of fellowship program in clinical cardiac electrophysiology at university of pittsburgh he's
00:54:57.500
been banned from having any contact with students being told his classroom is quote inherently unsafe
00:55:03.760
because of his piece i i could go on she has a bunch of examples in here where doctors are publicly
0.51
00:55:09.300
flogged punished they lose positions just for pushing back on this obsessive focus on race
00:55:15.620
look this is actually very important but i i think one thing that everyone has to remember is that the
00:55:21.780
field of science relies on people sort of attacking pre-existing notions uh the consensus the status quo
00:55:29.040
science is entirely about taking a hypothesis and trying to rip it apart right that's how we advance in
00:55:34.740
the field when you're in a science classroom they're telling you okay this is all the things we believe
00:55:38.020
now but you know what's wrong with this and all the students get to work you're trying to figure out
00:55:41.780
how to change it how to fix it uh it's never supposed to be that you arrived at a conclusion
00:55:46.480
the conclusion is unassailable right if you did that scientific progress would basically end
00:55:51.060
and i think that's it's just terrifying that there are people who think that they basically they they
00:55:57.100
possess the truth and in an almost religious fashion and it can't be questioned in any way shape or
00:56:01.540
form because it's actually anti-scientific it's actually anti-intellectual to do that now of course there
00:56:05.800
should be standards in terms of how you're doing that and that's why we have a peer review process
00:56:09.200
when we publish things uh in journal and academic journals for instance and yeah there is shoddy
00:56:14.120
science out there but the way to tackle that is again to question it to go through that process to
00:56:18.420
lay out the evidence the facts data if you're suppressing that you're preventing science from
00:56:22.600
working right because science is always a process it's never it's never going to be a time when we
00:56:26.880
reach the ultimate truth and then we've got it right and there's no reason to ever to check it
00:56:31.100
against any facts or do any more new research um and i you know when you try to subsume everything
00:56:37.040
to an ideology that's exactly what happens and i think that's it's a wonderful piece uh you know
00:56:41.160
i haven't gotten all the way through it but everything katie writes is wonderful so i i would
00:56:45.480
i would definitely check it out if the listeners haven't well and it sort of dovetails nicely into
00:56:51.560
this explosive piece of reporting just out from vanity fair on whether covid came from a lab in
00:56:58.120
wuhan china as opposed to a wet market where some random animal just naturally wound up there and
00:57:04.500
spread it to a human the latter theory has absolutely no proof they've been able to find
00:57:09.020
absolutely no evidence and no animal that would back it up and yet there's a lot of evidence for a lab
00:57:14.220
leak now the thing that we haven't been allowed to talk about to your point we're not allowed to
00:57:19.680
talk about it for the past year silicon valley has decided that is a quote conspiracy theory that must
00:57:26.400
not be discussed and more and more now i mean we had josh rogan on from the washington post who wrote
00:57:32.560
a great book about this there was a new york times reporter who wrote a long piece about this
00:57:37.020
now vanity fair i mean i hate to be so i don't know deferential to the or or complimentary of
00:57:44.680
mainstream publications getting in on this but the truth is we need that in order for people to start
00:57:50.500
taking this stuff seriously because if it's in right-wing echo chambers people don't listen you know
00:57:55.860
you need a wide swath of the public to to listen and this report i mean it's a it's on fire it it
00:58:05.300
it basically says the state department employees were told explicitly early on not to explore the
00:58:15.020
thought that the wuhan institute of virology which is one of the only three places in the world where
00:58:21.700
they study bat coronaviruses um that their gain-of-function research specifically how you
00:58:27.200
take the bat and make the coronavirus even more dangerous for humans you know ostensibly to help
1.00
00:58:33.520
humans survive it if it if it gets unleashed but you know there's a question about that um they were
00:58:38.480
specifically told don't go there don't explore it because it's going to bring unwelcome attention to
00:58:44.600
the united states government's funding of it and here's just a detail from the piece officials at the
00:58:49.100
meeting were advised by christopher park director of state's biological policy staff not to say
00:58:54.120
anything that would point to the u.s government's own role and gain-of-function research according to
00:58:58.400
documentation obtained by vanity fair members of the group were repeatedly advised not to open a
00:59:02.920
pandora's box according to four former state officials smelled like a cover-up said one state
00:59:08.580
employee who's on the record thomas denano speaking to vanity fair he wrote a memo saying staff from
00:59:14.580
his bureau were warned not to pursue this investigation into the origin of covet 19 because it would quote
00:59:19.040
open a can of worms and it goes on to say we were we were funding gain-of-function research on back
00:59:26.060
coronaviruses and the the very doctors who benefited from it who did it who supported it who devoted
00:59:32.280
their life's work to it were the ones who later orchestrated article after article in the press
00:59:37.280
saying anything that says it came from a lab is a conspiracy something that was supported by silicon
00:59:45.260
valley shutting all of us up for a year yeah i mean this was this was a prime example of all the
00:59:52.840
different like pathologies that are involved in in the media right now coming together you know to
00:59:57.420
to suppress i think what was a legitimate line of inquiry and a legitimate story uh on the one hand i
01:00:02.160
think so many people in the media you know they they see themselves intentionally or maybe even
01:00:07.700
subconsciously as i think arms of the democratic party right and i say this as someone who has worked
01:00:12.520
in many democratic party aligned institutions or over the course of my life but it's it's it's galling
01:00:17.180
and it's it's shocking and surprising to the extent which has happened and i think when you saw early on
01:00:22.900
people like senator tom cotton who's a conservative republican from arkansas raising the possibility that
01:00:28.180
there was a lab leak uh you had mike pompeo who's secretary of state under president trump raising that
01:00:33.600
possibility i think there was a reflexive reaction among a lot of reporters saying you know that that can't be
01:00:38.260
right you know trump if it's trump if it's the republicans saying this no they're wrong
01:00:42.440
uh we don't want to be seen as on their side again they're saying they see themselves as
01:00:46.900
in an activist role or an activist position right taking a position rather than than taking
01:00:51.480
a line of inquiry or actually looking into the truth and then at the same time as the vanity fair
01:00:56.720
reveal peace revealed and you just read off uh there was this institutional incentive to to look the
01:01:01.960
other way because it might reflect poorly on a lot of what the united states was funding right and a lot of what
01:01:06.660
uh doctors and public health professionals and scientific researchers here in the united states
01:01:13.240
had invested and decided to to pursue and to forego so i think that the reality is that
01:01:19.140
we had just a massive failing of i would say not just the institutions of the media maybe even the
01:01:28.840
culture of the media because what you'll notice is that like all of a sudden this is like an okay thing
01:01:32.940
to discuss right like facebook actually unbanned people from talking about the possibility this
01:01:38.100
was like a man-made virus right recently so infuriating that is so infuriating who is mark
01:01:43.180
zuckerberg to tell us we can't talk about this it shouldn't have to be that when the the leader of
01:01:49.280
your political faction in this case joe biden decides okay it's an okay line of inquiry or when
01:01:53.160
mark zuckerberg decides okay then okay then it's okay it's okay if the facts lead you there right it's okay
01:01:58.480
because we need to know where it came from because that'll help us prevent future pandemics like this
01:02:02.980
in the future and also it may bring accountability to the chinese government or to the the u.s uh
01:02:08.640
researchers or or the institutions and bureaucracies that set up this funding and this research uh that's
01:02:13.780
why we should have been pursuing this line of this line of inquiry and yet it seemed to be foreclosed
01:02:18.200
entirely for political and institutional you know for turf protection reasons right yeah yeah well
01:02:23.480
that's what's so messed up about it because it is not a new phenomenon to have partisans or parties
01:02:32.300
who have done wrong try to cover it up and try to mislead the public about you know the true origins of
01:02:37.820
whatever the problem winds up being it is a new relatively phenomenon to have the media join in on the
01:02:43.800
cover-up soup to nuts you know across the board except for a couple of random politicians or publications
01:02:50.180
and and when you read this piece what you see is that there's this guy he was featured on the 60
01:02:56.080
minutes report on this whole thing after the who came out with its bs report saying oh we think it
01:03:00.760
didn't come from the lab and even the head of the who had to say well you know we should keep
01:03:04.580
investigating because the people in his piece the guy the people who are running that report were
01:03:09.560
totally conflicted they're in bed with this wuhan lab and what the vanity fair piece shows is that in
01:03:15.640
particular this guy peter dasik who's a zoologist um who's this is his life work trying to show that
01:03:21.560
these viruses come out of bats they come out of pantalons whatever you call them these animals and
01:03:26.400
go directly to humans this guy had been had had had had a ton of money from us and other people to
01:03:33.020
to help with this gain of function research and so on this guy uh was running around organizing the
01:03:39.340
articles to say it came from an animal it came from an animal and vanity fair has proof that dasik and
01:03:44.880
another scientist this guy dr ralph barrack who's from unc uh had collaborated with you the wuhan lab
01:03:51.960
lady they call her the bat lady she's the the expert on these viruses and may have in fact been
1.00
01:03:56.360
the person who inadvertently or otherwise released this one um they'd been collaborating with her that
01:04:02.020
that they they they organized this statement early on in the lancet saying it it didn't come from a lab
01:04:09.120
and there's an email that reads and i'm quoting from vanity fair you me and him should not sign this
01:04:13.840
statement in the lancet so it has some distance from us and therefore it doesn't work in a
01:04:17.660
counterproductive way if if this guy was looking for a validation of his life's work because if it
01:04:24.620
was a lab leak says vanity fair it had the potential to do to virology what three mile island and
01:04:30.800
chernobyl did to nuclear science and so they kept it quiet that they they had very good reason to
01:04:37.440
believe that this was a lab leak that this virus had been made more dangerous by human beings
01:04:42.520
with funding from the united states they wanted to cover their asses their life's work and the press
0.66
01:04:50.180
bought it hook line and sinker that right there is exactly what the problem is right they
01:04:58.180
institutional actors always have some sort of incentive to kind of shape a narrative to pursue
01:05:04.060
their particular interests or objectives right the news media shouldn't have that right the news media
01:05:08.920
should have one objective right primarily of course there's always going to be activist journalists
01:05:12.540
there's going to be more partisan outlets but primarily their objective should be to seek the
01:05:16.920
truth right the implications of the truth are secondary if it makes republicans look good okay fine
01:05:22.520
that's not the point that's not what your objective as a journalist should be to decide who looks good
01:05:27.260
or who looks bad if it has certain implications for for researchers in the united states who are tied up
01:05:31.800
with china and tied up with this field of research fine but that shouldn't be your first objective your
01:05:36.360
first objective should be to find out what's true and report it out to the public right it shouldn't
01:05:42.260
be to to cover somebody's turf it shouldn't be to defend somebody's interests or objectives and it
01:05:47.280
shouldn't be to take a partisan side and yet all that was happening and it was happening in concert
01:05:51.640
and aligned with uh the the very people here in the united states and honestly a lot of people in
01:05:57.160
the chinese government who i think have the same exact interest right yeah um and that's what corrupted
1.00
01:06:01.560
this process and i think we've seen that exact same storyline as exact same confluence of factors
01:06:07.300
play out in story after story after story over the past few years which has been really really bad
01:06:11.540
for the news media's credibility but and i mean that this one is so egregious though like this is not
01:06:17.000
one of those we can just we can just dismiss and say oh they're biased yeah of course they thought
01:06:22.840
it was racist to say it might have been released from a chinese lab that's what the media does
01:06:28.340
this is so much more pernicious than that because there was an incuriosity an unwillingness to
01:06:35.960
challenge these this piece in the lancet which said no not from a lab and anything to the contrary
01:06:41.140
is conspiracy theory right like at something remember dr fauci joined on and that and the same guy peter
01:06:46.040
dasik sent him a note we now know thanks to the buzzfeed foyer request that got fauci's emails
01:06:50.500
he sent him a note saying hey thanks anthony thanks so much for saying that meanwhile we were being
01:06:56.160
fed misinformation but but my point is over three million people are dead we're going on six hundred
01:07:03.280
thousand people dead in the united states all the people who have lost loved ones deserve answers on
01:07:11.400
how this deadly thing became a such a major factor in our lives and even those of us who didn't lose a
01:07:19.520
family member but have given up a year of our lives people who have lost businesses people whose
01:07:23.580
children who still have masks on their face and and people who have been fearful to leave their
01:07:29.460
apartments right because they're immunocompromised what have you they deserve answers a press that had
01:07:35.360
a shred of decency or honesty would have been fighting for them for real answers for a year instead they
01:07:43.120
took these broad brush assertions that you couldn't say that and bowed at the altar of silicon valley
01:07:51.400
to snuff out any intellectual curiosity never mind investigative reporting it's a travesty
01:07:58.180
it is a travesty and it also you know it also demonstrates another factor which is that
01:08:03.240
i think that there are corners of the media who don't entirely understand what expertise is right so
01:08:09.560
like the lancet letter for instance right oh it's signed by a bunch of people who have uh some kind of
01:08:15.080
medical background research background they have fancy degrees so on and so forth they must be correct
01:08:20.100
right that's not really how it works as we were discussing earlier science is a process right
01:08:24.120
there's been plenty of times when there was a legitimate scientific consensus that was blown
01:08:27.220
apart by a new discovery right the fact that a bunch of people with some form of of clout or or assigned
01:08:34.320
expertise can sign on to something and express their will doesn't mean that they're automatically right
01:08:38.700
uh we saw that during covet 19 when you had uh we had two people forget this we actually had two sets
01:08:44.960
of mass protests um during covet 19 the first came from the right those were the anti-lockdown
01:08:50.180
protests right they were conservative libertarian protesters we saw article after article about how
01:08:54.420
those protests are dangerous how maybe they could be spreading covet outside blah blah blah then when we
01:08:59.820
had the uh protest after george floyd's death from the left we had so many people who are medical
01:09:05.440
professionals signing letters saying oh this is totally okay it's completely fine the media echoed it you
01:09:09.780
know there's no risk to this the fact that these people were signing these letters uh was not
01:09:15.340
necessarily an expression of their expertise right they have interests themselves they have ideologies
01:09:19.040
themselves right yes exactly this guy this guy dasik had a very clear conflict of interest that
01:09:26.380
any reporter could see had they bothered to look into it funding from the nih and this non-profit
01:09:33.380
called eco health alliance had parceled out grant money from the u.s government and
01:09:39.320
eco health is run by peter dasik this zoologist who helped organize that lancet piece early on
01:09:45.740
saying this came from an animal and anything else is a conspiracy theory dasik to the end featured you
01:09:54.040
know one of the guys handpicked by china and the who to go over to china to tell us once and for all
01:10:00.660
whether this came from a lab or from an animal surprise he said it was an animal and we're still
01:10:06.840
listening to this guy who was manipulating us by by trying to get well-known scientists to put their
01:10:12.000
names on that lancet thing to try to keep some distance between him and the organization behind
01:10:16.140
the piece um meanwhile he was he was compromised he he his organization had been funding gain of
01:10:23.780
function research he for all i know this guy's been coordinating with bat lady on how to make it as
0.94
01:10:29.240
dangerous and deadly as humanly possible and had an oh shit moment right before before he organized
01:10:35.440
that piece so that he didn't have the death of three plus million people on his hands yeah and
0.93
01:10:42.180
that's that's something that we have to recognize and see i think in every story that i try to write as
01:10:48.980
a journalist is i try to think what the person's interests their objectives their ideology are and how
01:10:55.160
those could influence what they're telling me and how they're how i'm interpreting the facts right and
01:10:59.320
i think that when people stop doing that when they start deferring to a group of bureaucrats or a group
01:11:03.700
of experts because they think oh they have all the answers maybe they do have a lot of answers but they
01:11:08.000
also have their own personal objectives right and once we stop seeing that layer of conflicts of
01:11:12.940
interest then we're very uh easy easily manipulated i think we're very prone to be manipulated
01:11:17.600
well and what one of the things that concerns me is and i i tip my hat to vanity fair i really do it's a
01:11:23.520
great piece of reporting and it's not the first as i point out you know people like josh rogan and
01:11:27.080
others have been reporting on it too but this one's an explosive piece by any measure um but
01:11:31.880
one thing i do have issues with is they seem to spend a fair amount of time excusing the lack of
01:11:39.660
interest by the press based on trump's toxic racism trump's toxic racism contributed to an alarming wave of
01:11:46.380
anti-asian violence quoting here in the united states and that's one possible answer to this all
01:11:52.300
important question remaining largely off limits until the spring of 2021 i mean i'm sorry he said
01:11:58.820
but bullshit i i don't i'm not taking a position on trump or any of the stuff he said or didn't say
0.90
01:12:04.080
it's no excuse you don't just say oh it's racist to say it came from a wuhan lab and i'm going to be on
0.98
01:12:11.720
the side of the anti-racists as a journalist and not do my job that that is not an okay excuse
01:12:18.080
one it's not it's not an okay excuse in any in any factor you know if it no matter who says something
01:12:24.220
if it's if it's true or if it's worth investigating it's worth investigating right he doesn't it it has
01:12:28.760
no bearing on you know if trump says water is wet i can't out he can't automatically disagree just
01:12:34.340
because uh someone who i maybe i have some political disagreements with says it uh but second i don't
01:12:39.600
know their timeline is even necessarily correct uh in early in early february 2020 i don't think trump
01:12:46.700
was actually even proposing this as a theory i think it was coming more from tom cotton is coming
01:12:52.200
from some sort of populist right-wing smaller publications and outlets i think blaming trump
01:12:57.600
on it is almost kind of lazy like they don't even know the the timeline of the events in and of
01:13:01.840
themselves actually at the beginning of the pandemic look at it because they did at the beginning
01:13:05.040
trump was downplaying they they quoted trump at some press conference and i don't have the date
01:13:09.880
in front of me um saying something like it came from will on lap but i can't say anything more so
01:13:14.740
i don't know the date that he did that i think a little bit later in the spring he was getting some
01:13:18.880
intelligence that was saying that so he mentioned it but he really did just mention it he didn't he
01:13:22.820
didn't even pursue it that much really and it would be remarkable just trump just mentioning this
01:13:27.400
means it's automatically verboten right that would just be right that's extreme journalistic
01:13:31.840
malfeasance so by the way so my crack team has just forwarded me you're right um trump uh trump
01:13:38.120
and his allies rallied around the wuhan lab theory early on in the pandemic as he sought to direct
01:13:42.180
uh blame for the pandemic onto china during a white house briefing on april 18th 2020 trump said that so
01:13:47.740
you're right on your timing coming up next we're going to get into silicon valley censorship and why
01:13:53.320
zed thinks you know the tide may turn on that and and how he thinks we need to turn it and you know
01:13:59.900
specifically who's working on the side of the angels to try to rein in mark zuckerberg from
01:14:04.000
putting tape over your mouth so we'll get to that next but first we're going to do a feature we have
01:14:08.760
here on the mk show called asked and answered where we answer some of our listener questions
01:14:14.220
and steve krakauer our ep has got today's question of the day hey steve hey megan yeah this one came to
01:14:20.020
us from questions at devilmaycaremedia.com where anyone who's listening can get their question answered as
01:14:26.120
well uh like this one who is from anna maria petrov although it actually really comes from anna maria's
01:14:31.580
sister uh she says that she likes to listen to the podcast with her husband and her sister but her
01:14:36.180
sister wanted to know that uh why do you hate chelsea clinton even more than hillary this was
1.00
01:14:41.580
something you mentioned i think in the episode with andrew gutman um and she says she's curious this
01:14:46.440
is not the most important question in the universe but she wouldn't have asked it if it wasn't for
01:14:50.620
her sister's curiosity so spill the beans she says i got i got thoughts anna maria and sister i do um
01:14:57.780
because i don't understand why this person has a voice at all why why is anybody listening to what
01:15:01.740
the hell chelsea clinton has to say what has she ever accomplished that makes her somebody we should
1.00
01:15:06.240
be listening to right i mean honestly so she is the daughter of a president and a presidential nominee
01:15:12.580
okay that doesn't entitle her to know anything that doesn't qualify her as an authority and the
01:15:17.960
problem is she acts like she is one and so does the media they also treat her like she has some
1.00
01:15:22.560
sort of authority which she doesn't now the mother i get it you may not like the mother's politics but
01:15:27.840
at least hillary clinton has had a lifetime of accomplishment you know she was a very successful
01:15:32.260
lawyer she went to yale she became a united states senator she became the secretary of state
01:15:37.020
um she's done some things you may not like the things on paper and i there's plenty that i don't
01:15:42.160
but she is a woman of accomplishment you can't deny that chelsea clinton's done nothing
0.83
01:15:47.120
she's done nothing and yet she's out there she's a part of the cancellation brigade which is where we
0.79
01:15:51.740
first sort of got crossed with each other i'll give you one example when i was at nbc i interviewed
01:15:57.080
alex jones and chelsea clinton led the campaign to have me canceled she wanted me to get fired
0.99
01:16:05.140
she wanted my show to be boycotted because i interviewed alex jones are you kidding me i mean
01:16:11.620
her mother has actually made decisions that have had people killed alex jones hasn't done that
01:16:16.800
and yet she's out there defending her mom but i can't interview alex jones as a news person does
01:16:21.020
she understand how journalism works oh wait she doesn't you see chelsea clinton worked at the today
0.96
01:16:27.420
show for a short time why because of a family connection not because of any talent which she
01:16:32.840
has none it's just none of i'm sorry i know she took a lot of beatings when she was young for her
1.00
01:16:38.360
looks and saturday night live that wasn't nice maybe she's still bitter because of that experience
01:16:42.540
but i don't really care you should grow up get over it and go get some real credentials do
01:16:47.680
something on your own before you start casting the cancellation net projecting yourself as an
01:16:51.940
authority because your parents accomplishments and fame say nothing about you okay and that today is
01:17:01.140
the lovely episode of asked and answer i don't know steve i feel like um this is a place for me to be
01:17:08.480
my meanest self so are we should not book chelsea clinton then i guess should we just cross her oh
0.99
01:17:12.900
my god didn't i tell you i told you i have a perfect record of never of never booking her and i don't
01:17:17.720
plan on breaking it i if she came on the show i'd have nothing to ask her honestly what what's in that
01:17:23.620
head i got no idea i gotta she married somebody very rich good for her um i mean i might want to
01:17:28.660
ask her how she felt when her dad was stupping the white house intern that's interesting i'm gonna
01:17:32.280
know she thinks about galane maxwell at her wedding oh good point right did you look into that at all
01:17:38.520
like her with the young girls and the massages i just i'm so tired of this know nothing mouthing
01:17:44.200
off about everything she can on twitter and then trying to play herself like she's kate middleton who's
01:17:48.880
above it all she's not kate middleton she's in it she's a bomb thrower and she has no basis to be in
01:17:55.800
there slinging those arrows until she's gone off and actually done something and frankly you know
01:18:00.580
before ivanka trump got to the white house and got all the important roles that trump gave her
0.99
01:18:03.920
i would have said a lot about her too i don't i don't dislike ivanka the way i dislike chelsea
01:18:07.980
but i also wondered what the hell ivanka was doing at you know the g7 mingling with these leaders as
1.00
01:18:13.700
though she belonged there she didn't right like i appreciate that she did some stuff while working
01:18:18.660
for trump that helped people and i'll give her that but that didn't make her upon entry into the
01:18:24.440
white house a qualified person for that just because she ran some business that focused on women's
1.00
01:18:28.580
clothing i don't think you have to be supportive of these outsized roles for these daughters or
1.00
01:18:37.640
children of politicians just because you're pro woman right like look i could get started on megan
1.00
01:18:44.340
mccain too but at least megan mccain has gone on to actually make something of herself in journalism
0.82
01:18:48.140
you know she talks about her dad a lot a lot i understand that for me i would confess it's a little
01:18:53.440
too much um but she's been out there offering opinions based on fact and can will argue her
0.79
01:18:59.960
point on the view in a way that's persuade what has chelsea clinton done nothing she failed she
0.95
01:19:04.320
failed in the one role she got because of her dad which was the today show role that's it uh okay i'm
01:19:10.400
sorry but i'm showing my really snarky shot side today but i'm feeling it so there you go asked and
01:19:15.940
answered steve how do you like it we're just alienating people left and right i love it
01:19:21.360
i know this has been one of your things you know the growth in the power of silicon valley which
01:19:33.620
to me it's almost like the opioid crisis where you know so many millions of americans fell into it
01:19:39.960
without realizing they were part of something bigger you know they just thought they got addicted to a
01:19:43.960
drug and i think that's kind of what's happened for our millions of americans when it comes to big
01:19:48.440
tech they they didn't realize that they were getting addicted to it that they were being
01:19:52.520
manipulated by it that their every decision that everything they've purchased over the past 10 years
01:19:56.300
they've purchased because big tech put it in front of them and now one of the good things about the
01:20:01.700
past presidential cycle is i think a lot of people were forced to realize it you know they're looking
01:20:07.480
around and they see the swamp around them now in the same way you can see oh opioid crisis that was
01:20:11.620
a thing that wasn't just me that was a thing we see it now with big tech and and yet the danger
01:20:17.300
it hasn't been corrected you know for the first step is awareness but nothing's been done to curb the
01:20:24.040
danger yeah i think that there is greater awareness though as you said there is a growing consciousness
01:20:30.800
among the american public and i think publics around the world that tech is a monopoly power right
01:20:37.880
we have maybe four or five companies that control most of the communications across the world you
01:20:42.140
know we're talking about google facebook you know apple uh to a lesser extent twitter but of course
01:20:48.200
it's very powerful as the former president showed uh these companies are basically controlling access
01:20:53.400
to information and how we get the information because you know i i'm more or less a free speech
01:20:58.720
absolutist so i often get dragged into debates about speech and you know i want people to be able to
01:21:02.640
speak their mind because sending adults be able to speak their mind to each other no matter what they say
01:21:05.540
but actually it's it's a bigger problem than that because it's an economic problem right
01:21:09.700
like something like the majority of digital advertising in some countries now is like
01:21:13.540
controlled by facebook and that actually feeds into the speech problem because it means people
01:21:17.840
have a very hard time starting up alternatives to these companies because you know amazon web services
01:21:22.860
controls uh an enormous amount of your web storage and they can just take off uh an app they can
01:21:28.460
take down parlor right they can take down the twitter alternative uh basically on a whim with zero
01:21:33.760
deprocess or zero accountability if they want to um and this economic power i think is what these
01:21:39.760
companies are really scared that we'll we'll be paying attention to because i think facebook's
01:21:44.240
current strategy for dealing with criticism is saying okay we'll censor more you know they'll
01:21:48.640
we'll slow down the new york post during a crucial election where you know the democrats
01:21:53.280
are likely to win like you know we'll take down these qadon pages we'll suppress uh vaccine
01:21:58.760
theories that maybe end up or a virus theories that maybe will end up being true later who knows
01:22:02.680
um they're happy to do all that because then they feel like it'll help them avoid regulation because
01:22:07.820
what they really fear i think is actually being treated the same way that i think big telecom
01:22:12.640
companies were treated in the past or oil companies or railroad companies which is that
01:22:16.480
they were actually broken up and i think that the the most insightful people about this are
01:22:20.720
actually on the right and the left i think elizabeth warren in early 2019 was talking about
01:22:24.400
breaking them up and i think now josh holly on the right is speaking i think very charismatically
01:22:29.080
and incorrectly about how this is primarily an economic problem they built an attention economy
01:22:34.140
that monetizes basically us staring at screens all day scrolling through screens all day us fighting
01:22:39.940
with each other mark zuckerberg internally in meetings shows a graph where no matter what their
01:22:45.640
prohibited content is content that goes right up against that line always does the best because
01:22:50.380
his product is basically created to make people fight with each other right or to argue or to be
01:22:55.020
to be as incendiary with each other as possible that's how the algorithms are gamed and that's how
01:23:00.220
how the product is designed and no matter how much censoring they'll they'll do it'll always be
01:23:05.780
conflict driven products because they need your eyes on those screens they need you addicted to
01:23:09.900
those products right and i think that it is possible to have communication platforms that don't do that
01:23:14.680
open source uh digital platforms i think the post office could probably run one that just shares
01:23:20.240
photos with with your family members or addresses or helps you meet people you knew in high school
01:23:24.540
uh that wasn't built around algorithms that are there to addict you and make you fight with other
01:23:28.880
people and be contentious and i think that also small independent companies would be happy to step up and
01:23:35.040
make those platforms should the overwhelming monopoly power of the the current ones be reduced through
01:23:41.500
antitrust action through legislative solutions about breaking them up and through imposing things like
01:23:46.960
interoperability through common carriage laws i think it's within the power of global governments
01:23:51.660
to do something about this problem it's always been within the power it's just we haven't had the
01:23:55.860
consciousness to really look at them as a problem until i think barely the past four three or four
01:24:01.060
years and now that we do have that consciousness i do think both the right and the left in this
01:24:05.760
country at some point will converge on some type of solution the same way we tackled the railroad the same
01:24:10.480
way we tackled oil these are the monopoly powers of our time they are among the most powerful
01:24:15.660
corporations on planet earth and they are monopolizing the most basic thing which is our human attention
01:24:20.980
and our human connection with each other right and should that really be controlled by jack dorsey
01:24:25.760
and mark zuckerberg should these like weird kind of techno libertarian bros out in silicon valley
01:24:30.840
really be controlling the the the minds of billions of people have you seen jack dorsey i mean i'm like there's
01:24:37.120
no way that man should be in charge of my life and you know it's it's sad because when i listen to you talk
01:24:41.840
about it it does remind me i confess of my time in cable news i mean one of the reasons i left cable
01:24:47.100
was i was so sick of the outrage machine i i remember saying when i launched the show at mbc
01:24:52.100
i want my audience to feel something something other than outrage you know that was really it was a simple
01:24:58.260
goal and and that's what the cable news industry is i'm i mean i'm just going to be honest it is it's
01:25:04.160
to stoke fear and outrage and that's what makes people tune in and that's what makes the numbers pop
01:25:08.820
and it's a cynical cynical business but at least cable news you know it's not necessarily in your
01:25:16.080
pocket you know people don't generally watch cable on their iphones but the iphone is there with you
01:25:21.100
all the time social media is there tapping you on the shoulder all the time and you know that that
01:25:28.220
movie the social dilemma shows you know sort of a fictional version of where the the brain at
01:25:34.060
facebook is like hey he's awake hey he's looking oh you know pump something onto the phone
01:25:38.740
that'll lure him on and keep him engaged for hours and hours and when you see it like that
01:25:43.880
you recognize those behaviors in yourself right you just went on to check the time you're just
01:25:48.400
going to look at an email or you're going to make a note before you know it three hours have passed
01:25:52.980
and you're all over amazon ordering shit you don't need and like on instagram looking at pictures that
0.91
01:25:58.820
are not real yeah and and i think the really important thing to recognize here is that you know these
0.90
01:26:03.900
things are all designed to be as profitable as possible and that's why they're designed around
01:26:07.640
addiction that's why they're designed around conflict i think we can have perfectly we can
01:26:12.480
certainly have very similar services that connect people from across the world i think it's it's
01:26:16.340
wonderful that i can talk to you i can talk to someone who's living in india or malaysia or kenya
01:26:21.020
it's awesome that we have the technology to do that but it doesn't have to be used this way it
01:26:26.040
doesn't have to be owned by people who are interested in basically addicting us right we it doesn't have
01:26:31.100
to be that way i think it just happened to develop progression exactly exactly and i just you know
01:26:37.880
every new product that we've had that revolutionized society has at some point um come up against public
01:26:45.320
regulation you know so for instance automobiles automobiles used to be much more dangerous we
01:26:49.320
used to have far more people dying in car crashes every year you know before ralph nader came around
01:26:53.520
and wrote unsafe at any speed and started actually getting regulations for these things of course
01:26:58.480
regulation can be done poorly and we should look very we should look very closely at any time the
01:27:01.960
government regulates anything but i do think that this is when you have corporations that are this
01:27:06.440
powerful they're profoundly impacting public life they can't say okay mark zuckerberg can't say he
01:27:11.700
just owns a website somewhere that's like you know 12 people are on it it's like a web forum about
01:27:15.580
flowers or something and like you know it's a huge it's a big government imposition to have the
01:27:19.900
government come in and inspect it and do things with it like no like this is these are services with
01:27:23.660
billions of people they are literally in some cases they are driving newspapers out of business
01:27:28.260
with their monopolies over advertising they have profound uh public implications with the work
01:27:34.820
they do once once a company becomes so big that its actions are impacting the lives of billions of
01:27:39.820
people i think those billions of people have a right to go to their governments and petition uh for
01:27:46.240
for inspections for accountability and for regulations uh when it's warranted and i think it is it is
01:27:51.700
warranted in this case and i think i think thankfully we are starting to see both the right and the left
01:27:55.700
the u.s get interested in that and in other countries as well yeah so can i pick up on
01:28:00.680
something you said because i like you also consider myself a near free speech absolutist i wouldn't say
01:28:06.380
i am an absolutist but i'm i'm close um and what you'll get i did i recently did a seminar with um
01:28:12.680
some students out at a very very well known one of the top three universities in the in the country
01:28:16.800
and uh they accept that words can be violence they accept that speech needs to be censored because
01:28:27.000
it's hurtful that hate speech shouldn't be constitutional and that facebook uh twitter
01:28:33.840
every other publication for that matter ought to be cracking down on hurtful speech and certainly on
01:28:41.060
speech like let's go to the capitol and fight for our rights you know not like let's let's you know
01:28:49.280
take guns and shoot people right now which is much closer to actual incitement uh but you know
01:28:55.520
stuff that doesn't actually right now currently cross a legal line they want it to
01:28:59.040
and i'm concerned that the young generation is so willing to censor speech that they they really
01:29:07.360
believe that words are violence i mean it is it is concerning to me and i think the the two
01:29:12.840
individuals who wrote the book about this are jonathan height and greg lukiano you know the
01:29:16.320
coddling of the american mind um really brilliant guys i've done some a little bit of work with them
01:29:21.120
in the past and you know what what i would say is that there is a i think there's a real danger
01:29:26.240
that you have more and more americans who simply don't know how to really interact with ideas they
01:29:34.160
don't agree with right like for me it was it almost comes naturally because you know i was in a weird
01:29:39.460
position right i i grew up the the son of immigrants uh a religious minority a racial minority in the
01:29:45.720
deep south you know outside atlanta at a time when the south was going through a lot of changes and i
01:29:50.080
would say i don't know 80 80 90 of my friends were like super conservative uh probably very problematic
01:29:56.600
by today's standards um you know this was when georgia was in a big fight over the confederate
01:30:02.720
the confederate battle flag was our state flag and zamila was trying to get it changed and like
01:30:06.320
i think i just had so much interaction with people i didn't agree with on various things
01:30:10.340
that it it's kind of lowered my my anxiety levels around it right like i had so much immersion like
01:30:16.340
when when psychologists work with people who have anxiety disorders the way the the main uh angle of
01:30:22.700
attack the main treatment is basically slowly uh exposing them or immersing them in the things that
01:30:28.160
give them anxiety not all at once but over time right um and same thing getting over an allergy
01:30:33.440
exactly exactly it's actually very similar medically um so the same as that thing applies to politics
01:30:40.400
right if you have people i think many of these people who you're talking about if i had to guess
01:30:46.600
they probably come from very well-to-do families who tend to curate their social circle tend to curate
01:30:51.220
uh who they live around who they work with um the ideology probably they're exposed to in their
01:30:56.760
their homes in that circumstance if you've never been exposed to anything that's remotely different
01:31:02.000
from you you're going to freak out when you hear it or you see it right to me it's not like a huge
01:31:06.500
deal to hear somebody say something that's like a little bit racist or offensive like yeah i've heard
01:31:11.780
it a million times growing up you know people would tease me i'd tease them back it would be rough
01:31:15.800
housing uh you know i'd see something it's very very normal particularly for people from working
01:31:20.940
class backgrounds or like middle income backgrounds where they're moving around a lot exposed to a wide
01:31:25.440
group of people to see that and to understand it to internalize it and to not catastrophize it right
01:31:29.980
to not blow it up into something much bigger than it is and i think many of the students here talking
01:31:34.100
to you if i had to guess they just haven't had that exposure that helped the amount of exposure
01:31:38.240
and i know some people probably going to freak out hearing me say that i should be exposed to
01:31:42.480
someone saying something racist blah blah actually yeah you probably should be exposed to some mild
01:31:46.420
you should be exposed to some mild adversity in your life because it'll help you deal with things in
01:31:50.260
the future right it's it's literally impossible to go with go throughout your entire life and no one
01:31:55.240
will ever say anything ugly to you right no this is my dream this is my dream is to go in i i've told
01:32:01.620
a story about the the head of school at my daughter's school was saying uh i was telling her she needed to
01:32:06.840
work on the girls grit because they have so much diversity and in a sensitivity training that she needs
01:32:12.020
to remember at some point they may meet somebody who hasn't had the training not everybody is getting
01:32:16.480
the training that they're getting at this school and she said you should teach that class and i said
01:32:20.440
i'll do it but i'm gonna show up in an inappropriate halloween costume you know like yeah i'm gonna
01:32:25.120
my dream is to make all the people show up the kids whatever they all have to sign waivers saying
01:32:30.640
abuse will follow and i accept it and then i'm gonna call them the worst names i could possibly think
01:32:34.880
of i'm gonna say terrible things to them i'm gonna offend them at every turn and you know what
0.72
01:32:38.600
they're gonna learn they can handle it they're fine exactly um of course you know there are times
01:32:45.740
when this this turns into like sustained harassment or bullying and i think you know school should step
01:32:51.020
in in that circumstance and so on and so forth but yeah the the mere you know explication the mere
01:32:56.860
the mere expression of certain ideas or words shouldn't really drive people to depression or
01:33:02.440
anxiety or freaking out or crying or so on and so forth that is really a fairly new pathology i think
01:33:10.480
in the united states and it's really an upper class one again because i think the people who are
01:33:14.040
experiencing it in the most harsh ways just have very little interaction with the rest of the world
01:33:18.520
like if you go into any like low-income community in america like you know i've done a lot of work
01:33:22.140
with the homeless and volunteering i've done work with immigrants uh i just you know keep myself busy
0.99
01:33:26.980
um you're gonna expose yourself to all kinds of things and generally it's people not even trying to be
01:33:32.040
offensive to each other but they just come from different cultural backgrounds right and they don't
1.00
01:33:34.860
have the same ideas about what's what's offensive and what is it and over time i think you learn
01:33:39.240
there's no tolerance for any amount of discomfort now right is that i mean like not like the the the
01:33:45.860
story this week with the tennis player naomi osaka like she's being there was a piece by jemele hill
01:33:51.100
like talking about her empowerment of women and you know because this woman who made 55 million
0.96
01:33:56.240
dollars last year just last year alone never mind the years prior she's the number i think four number
01:34:00.720
four best paid athlete in america behind like betterer lebron i mean she's in a very nice class of
1.00
01:34:07.560
athletes earning earning income um because she doesn't want to talk to the press she doesn't they
0.56
01:34:12.840
get in her head because they ask her questions about how she's not so good on clay that's literally
01:34:17.240
the complaint that she's not so good on clay and they ask about it it's not that she gets bullied
01:34:22.740
because of her race her gender they call her mean it's it's none of that and yet we're supposed to
0.69
01:34:29.020
be looking at her saying right on she stood up for mental health you know in this case silence would
0.89
01:34:34.440
be violence no i don't sit to see her as a heroine here i see her as weak and i don't even want my
0.91
01:34:40.580
daughter being exposed to this story you know this this is also a new phenomenon which is that it seems
01:34:45.980
like everybody who not everybody but a lot of people who are at elite levels in america they're like
01:34:52.340
showing us they're showing themselves bleed to the rest of the world right like they're they're showing
01:34:58.240
their weaknesses they're showing they're trying to portray themselves as victims that's very like weird
01:35:02.980
and unusual typically people who are in leadership positions they try to show strength they try to
01:35:07.580
show confidence and pride they want to show that they can stand up for other people they can they
01:35:11.340
can be models to emulate right we're getting a lot of like you know what i would associate with like
01:35:17.540
victorian monarchs or something like that where like they're not really accountable to anybody so
01:35:21.900
they're they're free to talk about how hard they have it even if they're earning tens of millions of
01:35:25.360
dollars we literally have a model doing that right like it's it's actually very very strange and
01:35:31.400
like it would be very difficult for me to take this story what you just described to me and like
01:35:35.200
tell it to my parents right who came to the united states dirt poor who faced a lot of i think harsh
01:35:40.360
conditions discrimination who grew up in a certain you know countries that at times were at war like
01:35:45.440
it's would be almost impossible for me to tell this story to my parents or for them to actually believe
01:35:50.260
all this was happening because like they wouldn't think this is how a normal human being functions
01:35:54.440
right they would be like yeah she okay maybe she'll just she won't do this interview or whatever and then
1.00
01:35:59.900
she'll get a little bit of flack for it and then she'll move on with all her money and her riches
1.00
01:36:03.300
and her fan base like it's not a it's not really something for public concern right like it's
01:36:08.320
but again i think so much of this is driven and you know my my colleague and i uh shant
01:36:13.620
misrobian is a really really uh cool progressive political consultant we have a sub stack at
01:36:19.280
inquiremore.com where we write about these issues you know our thesis is that so much of this is because
01:36:23.540
of the class cleavages in america right the upper class in america talks about themselves as if
01:36:29.480
they're not upper class right they talk about themselves as if they're the biggest victims in
01:36:32.760
the world but the irony of it is that actual victims don't ever have a voice almost definitionally
01:36:36.700
right you were never hearing the stories about you know the homeless woman who survived domestic abuse
01:36:41.680
and her life and her true travels you know where we're hearing about the actors the celebrities that
01:36:47.120
as you said literal monarchs and how hard their life is apparently because they had some family
01:36:51.160
foibles let me tell you as someone who comes from an immigrant background anyone who's in some kind of
01:36:55.840
interracial marriage has a ton of drama around it right particularly minorities particularly
01:37:00.120
minority parents often have a ton of drama they give you if you marry outside the community right
01:37:04.640
that's an extremely normal thing i imagine at the monarch level it's a little bit different maybe but
01:37:09.100
it's probably not going to drive you to suicide she probably was not telling the truth when she said
01:37:13.080
that um it probably was a manufactured press thing but you know the point is that i think that
01:37:18.920
a good society is led by people who are standing up for others i want these people with all this
01:37:24.220
power with all this privilege with this fame this fortune the riches i want them to use that for
01:37:29.340
other people i don't want them spent all day telling us how hard they have it because they don't have it
01:37:33.260
that hard they can afford really good therapists to go and tell about whatever problems they have
01:37:37.400
but i don't want them begging about themselves and crying about themselves and even at my level and
01:37:41.940
i'm a middle class person i'm not not rich or famous i you know i have a decent journalism career
01:37:46.080
i don't spend a whole lot of time complaining about myself because i view it as a facet of narcissism
01:37:50.740
and maybe that's just my cultural background i think where my parents are from pakistan and in the
01:37:55.940
indian subcontinent it's very much looked down upon to do that um so maybe i just inherited that
01:38:00.400
cultural trait but i think it's a very very kind of nasty narcissism that's taken over the american
01:38:05.600
upper class and it's not just left-leaning people i think our former president on the right
01:38:10.160
had a little bit of this bug as well um but i want our leaders to stand up for other people
01:38:14.500
you think trump was a narcissist is that what yeah i know it's a very controversial assertion but
01:38:21.000
you know and yeah in the saddest part about it is that when you engage that mindset you're actually
01:38:26.780
hurting your own happiness a lot like i don't think trump was a very happy person he never struck
01:38:30.660
me as a very happy person which is insane because the guy has like hundreds of millions of dollars and
01:38:35.100
he was the literal president of the united states like if i had that i feel like i'd be kind of happy
01:38:38.700
um but because yeah but i think he had an abusive father i think he i think he had a
0.98
01:38:43.020
a pain in the ass father i don't know you know who knows i don't have that he did have a lot he did
0.97
01:38:48.680
have a lot of family troubles with his brother as well uh with the alcohol addiction and yeah and
0.99
01:38:53.060
honestly a lot of times i looked at him and i felt sorry for him but the thing is like i don't want
01:38:57.220
to feel sorry for our leaders right i want our leaders to be standing up for us i want to feel
01:39:00.460
pride you know pride in them i want them to feel like they're leading people right and i think having a
01:39:05.640
leadership class across the board left and right you know in arts culture celebrity finance politics
01:39:11.720
who are constantly talking about how hard they have it i think that's a really pathetic situation
01:39:15.660
for a country to be in because it shows that those people are self-obsessed and it shows that they
01:39:19.680
aren't thinking about the homeless woman they aren't thinking about the low-income family they
01:39:23.440
aren't thinking about the refugees and the immigrants and the person working at walmart you know 12 hours a
01:39:27.800
day to get by because they're thinking about themselves with their 55 million dollars and i'm like why would
01:39:32.120
you do that that's not that's not right it's not morally no one cares that that you have
01:39:35.520
some social anxiety and going out to speak to the press get over it that's what everybody does i mean
01:39:40.200
i think about myself can you imagine if i if i just didn't want to i just wouldn't speak to people who
01:39:44.840
asked me hard questions or didn't think i was on my a game all the time or might say something mean
01:39:50.320
about me i'd be sitting like a loser on my couch that's what i'd be doing i wouldn't have achieved
01:39:54.280
anything in my life we have to get over these challenges rather than leaning into them and saying
01:39:58.320
for my mental health i'm going to avoid one of my favorite soundbites was serena williams who she was
1.00
01:40:03.760
one of the ones to come out and be like i feel for her i get it i was like oh she's supporting her
01:40:07.640
and then you listen to the whole soundbite and she's like some people are thick i'm thick some
01:40:12.420
people are thin you know it's like totally throwing shade at her but she's right toughen up is really i
01:40:17.720
think what she was trying to telegraph and that's what you know america could use as its message all
01:40:22.760
right let me shift gears with you because i do have to ask you about your former uh place of
01:40:28.200
employment from 15 to 18 the intercept as i mentioned this um earlier with andy but these
01:40:34.220
guys they're they're so i just feel like they're a shadow of their former selves it's not like
01:40:39.420
america cares about the intercept but i do think it's interesting that now they're at war with glenn
01:40:44.980
greenwald they're calling out sort of reporters in the street who are doing you know fearless
01:40:51.040
journalism uh you know sort of independent citizen journalists who are trying to get stories at the
01:40:56.240
intercept i i think would normally have celebrated but now will not and um this week there was a big
01:41:02.880
hit piece on the guy who founded the intercept but left it because it changed glenn greenwald
01:41:07.100
saying is he the new master of right wing media and heavens to betsy prepare yourself zed because
01:41:13.900
they talk about how he's been on fox news 72 times he writes a headline and it gets put on fox news
01:41:21.620
and now he's basically the the new assignment editor for right wing media your thoughts on all of it
01:41:28.140
uh well full disclosure i also occasionally go on fox news uh so i i am also tainted in this way
01:41:34.580
apparently um but yeah i think look i when i joined the intercept in 2015 i think a lot of what attracted
01:41:42.400
me to it was that it wasn't super partisan right like i think most people who are associated with
01:41:46.860
were left-leaning for sure um but it didn't you know my editor at the time dan frumkin who no longer
01:41:53.220
works there i think he said something like we're anti-partisan uh he we we had no intention of rooting
01:42:00.340
for a political party of trying to get behind a candidate uh so on and so forth and i think in the years
01:42:06.660
since it had more and more of that attitude the more and more of the people that they were hiring i think
01:42:11.500
were in left-wing social cliques like particularly in like new york city like that brooklyn crowd
01:42:16.720
um gentrified brooklyn crowd i should say uh and i think that they viewed a lot of honestly a lot of
01:42:24.060
what i was writing a lot of what glenn was writing when we were there which was journalism like i was
01:42:28.420
not an opinion guy at the intercept every article i wrote was almost every article i wrote was reporting
01:42:32.940
you know generally i tried to be fair and and and see things down the middle but they viewed a lot of
01:42:38.800
it as just being i think unhelpful to the democratic party and unhelpful to liberals right like as if
01:42:44.920
i had a mission as if i worked for the dnc or as if i should be working for i guess i would say the
01:42:50.260
left wing of the dnc since they don't they don't really like the mod the moderate democrats very much
01:42:54.480
and i think that's just a big mission change over at the intercept and i think glenn felt very
01:42:58.940
uncomfortable with that um of course glenn is a friend of mine so again i'm biased but i think glenn
01:43:03.680
you know he has almost this like constitutional like inability to like lie or like to hide what
01:43:09.340
he thinks and i don't think that he thought that the intercept should try to go soft on one political
01:43:15.420
faction or another in in the service of any kind of political goal whereas i do think the people who
01:43:19.560
work there do think that it should and they do think and they do think that it should serve an
01:43:25.640
explicit like left-wing ideology and even though i'm sympathetic to a lot of left-wing ideology
01:43:29.740
i'm very uncomfortable with news outlets that are trying to serve one ideology over another i
01:43:34.100
i understand that everyone has their own bias their own point of view and i don't think anyone
01:43:38.300
can have zero bias but i don't think you should lean into it right you shouldn't like go out of
01:43:42.340
your way to say to just actively reject storylines that might harm some kind of political objective
01:43:48.760
or political goal and that's a lot of what the intercept was doing it felt almost like a super
01:43:52.300
pact for the left wing of the democratic party and that's a lot of why i ended up leaving so
01:43:57.160
this is where you're different from the average person this is where i think i'm different from
01:44:00.620
the average person is you may have political views on different issues you may you may be
01:44:05.680
consider yourself a liberal but it's not your ideology it's not it's not your identity it's
01:44:10.760
not your identity you're able to befriend people across the aisle you can talk about issues with
01:44:15.440
people who have divergent views from you i've heard you talk about this i heard you on the
01:44:19.660
federalist recently and i know you you went kind of studied how to do this how to bridge
01:44:24.480
differences for a couple of years at all of all places berkeley which confuses me but that's what
01:44:30.540
makes you different and i think a better journalist i actively push myself like if you know we had a
01:44:39.100
round of a very bloody fighting in the middle east recently you know there's a lot of people who i think
01:44:43.620
i would disagree with who i'm friendly with like you know barry weiss is one of them i'm very friendly
01:44:47.660
with barry i think we disagree very hard hard very hard on this issue but i actively push myself to say
01:44:54.120
that if somebody disagrees with me internally within their mind they think they're just as morally
01:44:58.940
justified as i am right they think they're doing the right thing and i can only hold that so much
01:45:05.240
against them right it may be they're misguided maybe they don't have the right facts or whatever
01:45:08.700
or maybe they just have a different value set but they really do think they're doing the right thing
01:45:11.680
if they're a true believer in what they have to say so once i come to that realization even if i have
01:45:15.880
an emotional impulse to really dislike someone for their their point of view i have to check myself and say
01:45:20.620
you know it's not doesn't you know it's not entirely rational to do that right like they
01:45:24.260
their their brain is telling them that this is how the world works and my brain is telling them
01:45:29.220
this is how the world works and maybe maybe they're right maybe i'm wrong i i have changed my mind over
01:45:32.940
uh over the years on a few things so maybe who knows maybe i'll come around to their point of view one
01:45:37.520
day but i do everything i can to actively not dislike the person right even in extreme cases like if i
01:45:44.680
meet someone who i think is really very off base or very extreme i tell myself well they've had certain
01:45:49.400
cultural influences they have certain upbringing they probably have a certain information stream
01:45:52.980
they have uh that's probably why they came to that conclusion i shouldn't try to hate them
01:45:56.820
personally for doing that um you had daryl davis on your show to me he's one of the biggest heroes
01:46:02.020
in america because he came to this conclusion and brought it to some of the most extreme circumstances
01:46:07.360
anyone ever could you know meeting with ku klux klan people as an african-american man right
01:46:11.560
and actually persuading them uh to to leave these racist beliefs and ideologies behind and he's done
01:46:16.920
that with hundreds of people um i aspire to be i aspire to be somebody like him and i don't i don't
01:46:23.140
think i'm anywhere close to it now i don't think i i'm at the point where i can be like him but he is
01:46:28.600
my he is one of my role models in my life and that's what i want to do with politics and there's
01:46:33.120
there's a professor at university of maryland liliana mason she's wrote she wrote a book about
01:46:37.520
this based off some research she did called uh i think something like where politics becomes identity
01:46:41.320
or something like that it actually it turns out that being very left-wing or being very right-wing
01:46:48.160
in your actual like policy beliefs is not what actually polarizes us for the most part right
01:46:51.940
like you can like i can be extremely left-wing in some areas but still not hate people on the right
01:46:56.300
what really polarizes you is when you elevate politics to identity when you personally identify
01:47:01.740
very strongly with the label of like liberal or conservative or democrat or republican or something
01:47:05.940
like that once that becomes a core part of your identity you start seeing disagreements as a threat
01:47:10.420
to your identity as a threat to yourself personally it's the fight or flight you know stuff in your
01:47:14.620
brain starts to activate from our like evolutionary path right once you start doing that that's the
01:47:19.060
most dangerous thing and so what i do is you know i have a lot of hobbies i do i do improv comedy
01:47:23.640
uh i'm in a happy marriage i i play guitar like these these these are my identity right my identity is not
01:47:29.700
some gaggling of political solutions i have in my mind that i you know i i advocate for sometimes
01:47:34.780
or write about uh journalistically like that's not my identity that those are just that that's to me
01:47:40.140
that's like building your identity around how to fix your car you know how to fix your country is a
01:47:43.900
series of things we need to be doing it's very important just like fixing your car is important
01:47:47.560
or going to the doctor is important but it's not the core of who i am as a person right that's a
01:47:51.560
much more i love everything you just said yes i completely relate to all of that my audience has
01:47:56.160
heard me say similar things all the time i just you know the the things that matter to you are
01:47:59.980
generally within what 20 feet of you it's it's not and it's not the internet you know it's the people
01:48:04.520
it's the people who love you and who you love and and the way you choose to spend your time
01:48:08.360
this limited time we have on this earth and that doesn't include obsessing over donald trump
01:48:12.220
you can be interested in politics you can cover it you can get excited about it but it can't be
01:48:16.280
your identity and that's something you said about the ideas that i like that it a long time ago when
01:48:22.900
i was practicing law i had a case for harry winston the jeweler you know the famous fancy jeweler where
01:48:28.400
you get all the diamonds it's on fifth avenue here in manhattan and we were representing harry winston
01:48:33.100
i had to try a case for them and you'd go into harry winston and since we were representing them
01:48:37.640
sometimes they would let me try on one of the beautiful jewels you know i'd put on like the
01:48:42.680
necklace or the earrings which i could never afford but it's like icing you know it's it's a lovely
01:48:48.940
experience and if somebody is espousing an idea who somebody who's not hateful right you don't want
01:48:55.120
to listen to somebody who you know hates you or you're right you know your your ideas but somebody who's
01:49:00.380
a genuine idea broker um even if i don't agree with them right like it could be on anything to me
01:49:08.440
it's like trying on the beautiful diamond necklace you just try it on it it could sparkle if it flows
01:49:14.200
in terms of its logic and its presentation it can be a really pleasant experience doesn't mean you're
01:49:19.860
going to buy the necklace but you can enjoy the experience of different ideas or in my case
01:49:25.660
unattainable ideas just by trying the stuff on every once in a while and seeing how it looks
01:49:31.200
yeah i mean there's all sorts of benefits that come from it one is that you learn to just understand
01:49:36.640
other people right even if you'll never agree with their idea i think you'll get a much better
01:49:40.420
understanding of where the person is coming from and you might even understand like better counter
01:49:45.180
arguments you know you'll you'll be able to what's called steel manning arguments you'll be able
01:49:49.440
to explain someone's argument almost better than they can um so that way you can really yeah that way
01:49:54.920
you can really persuade people um i think that that's very helpful and that can be very useful
01:49:59.140
for you i think that uh so much of social progress is based on just having someone in the room who can
01:50:07.060
say hmm i'm not sure that's quite right here's you know a b and c points that we should consider
01:50:11.800
right so many disasters have happened when someone wasn't in the room to do that right like the bay of
01:50:16.280
pigs was that way right like nobody was around kennedy pointing out any of the many huge kind of
01:50:22.140
logical errors they were making and planning the bay of uh pigs a disaster uh the challenger space
01:50:27.640
shuttle right like there were people who knew that there were problems uh with the shuttle but they
01:50:31.540
were just being shut out because of the the kind of climate of conformity at nasa at that point
01:50:35.480
um there are many examples throughout history i think this is why dictators don't make very good
0.97
01:50:39.440
decisions right they often do very stupid things because everyone's too afraid to tell them they
01:50:43.220
disagree right though the the safest thing to say to a dictator is you're absolutely right that sounds
01:50:47.920
great right yeah yeah so you know i think it's very very important even just to have a few people
01:50:53.540
around you who disagree with you even sharply disagree with you or majorly disagree with you
01:50:57.580
because they can help you point out flaws in your own logic if anything else so that's um your point
01:51:02.360
on nasa is well espoused by adam grant who's been on the show and he writes about how that nasa really
01:51:08.180
they had so many no well not so many but they had quite a few uh catastrophes as a result of this
01:51:13.840
culture that was more of a yes man or yes ma'am um that they really made a conscious decision to try
01:51:19.260
to challenge that and started getting better results um and something on trump you know you
01:51:24.340
might think i totally agree with you on the narcissist point but for for people who are
01:51:29.380
thinking he might want be one of those guys who doesn't want feedback i know for a fact it's not
01:51:33.820
true i know for a fact that at least one person who was in a high up position there was demoted
01:51:39.100
because trump was complaining the guy was just a yes man you know that the guy was not bringing
01:51:43.360
fresh ideas he wasn't challenging him um i think that's some of what trump did that was good in
01:51:49.420
terms of policy i think came from his willingness as a businessman to not be too identity driven to
01:51:55.840
listen to the best idea in the room yeah i think there's there's certainly a part of trump i think
01:52:00.680
that was pragmatic that wasn't as ideological as certain parts of the gop um for instance you'll
01:52:05.860
notice that what he did he did on trade was actually popular enough that democrat most democrats
01:52:10.060
and congress supported it or enough to actually to get it through uh through the congress right
01:52:14.380
because i think he took a less ideological look at what the trade issues were and he was able to
01:52:19.280
actually go outside the box and bring in advisors like peter navarro who aren't your typical like gop
01:52:23.500
go-to's and he appointed a trade a trade rep i think who would have been perfectly at home in a
01:52:27.780
democratic administration because again trump was willing to look outside the the normal right-wing
01:52:32.200
bubble um so yeah i do think that's one of his more positive qualities and i think it's a it's a
01:52:36.620
positive quality in any leader right any leader who's just assigning people who agree with them
01:52:41.080
all around themselves they're going to end up making huge mistakes uh i think if you go back
01:52:45.760
to president lincoln i mean lincoln understood this more than anybody right i mean he's the
01:52:49.660
classic example of someone who built a team around him who in many ways were rivals and who had
01:52:55.820
ideas i'm sure he i'm sure ideas that he found at times to be crazy but he's probably glad to have
01:53:01.400
them there to make the counterpoints to him um and yeah i do think i do think that it's it's not
01:53:06.980
only important for presidents right it's important for everybody if you're uh one thing that corporations
01:53:11.560
often do is they build what's called a red team what a red team's job is basically to look at your
01:53:16.260
like plans and projects and proposals and poke holes in them right uh here's everything that could go
01:53:20.960
wrong um and i think that that's something that should all kinds of organizations should host i think uh
01:53:27.460
any any kind of social organization business religious organization uh civic group could have
01:53:34.680
a sort of red team or at least just have people in the room who will tell you honestly when they feel
01:53:39.400
like maybe something could be a little bit different or maybe something something's off so
01:53:43.080
so let me ask you somebody who is and you don't sound particularly ideological but you did work
01:53:49.120
for think progress progressive news website um funded by the center for american progress right
01:53:55.080
is that john podesta who is center for american progress yes so podesta founded it uh for sure
01:54:00.580
he wasn't he he left for a while so he wasn't always the president but yeah he did found it
01:54:04.820
okay so what i mean what made you join that organization what what is it in your own ideology
01:54:12.200
that makes you lean left enough that you would work for think progress yeah so this was um this was
01:54:17.920
actually my first job out of college this was in 2009 it was the first term of the obama administration
01:54:22.160
and yeah at that point i think i was i was definitely a fairly left-leaning guy i i felt
01:54:28.480
strongly that particularly on a few issues like universal health care i still feel pretty strongly
01:54:33.360
about universal health care uh it's just way too expensive in the u.s compared to everywhere else
01:54:37.460
we could probably do it better in some way um and you know i wanted to i guess i wanted to be at an
01:54:45.060
organization where i felt like i could get my start in doing journalism that was designed around
01:54:52.040
kind of promoting certain uh promoting and uncovering certain kind of ideological agendas
01:54:59.260
or causes in a way that honestly is a little bit different than what i didn't have because i think
01:55:03.980
we've spent the last however number of minutes criticizing media for being ideologically slanted or
01:55:08.940
narrative based um but honestly i don't think i think the problem is not so much that think
01:55:14.280
progress existed but that like a big portion of the media turned into think progress right like i don't
01:55:19.040
think that it's a problem for there to be ideological media that does have a certain kind of agenda
01:55:23.340
but you need to make sure that all the media doesn't turn into that right because then you
01:55:27.380
really aren't getting anyone to disconfirm your biases you aren't getting the other side at all
01:55:31.080
and you're not getting like a bigger search for truth so i think at that point in 2009
01:55:34.460
i was a very i was a little bit more activist oriented like i really wanted to do something on
01:55:38.320
health care i i thought that we needed to start moving out of afghanistan i thought we need to do
01:55:42.320
something about income inequality after the great recession and so i think think progress was a good place
01:55:46.460
for that although not a perfect place because something unfortunately um it was unfortunate
01:55:51.900
that was controlled by center for american progress right because center for american progress was a
01:55:55.300
very kind of like you know it's a political it's a political fixture aligned to the democratic party
01:56:00.240
even though it's technically non-partisan and so you know if you wrote something too critical of
01:56:04.600
obama the white house might yell at you for a day which was what happened to my boss one time when
01:56:09.500
i wrote something about afghanistan and how they weren't meeting their commitments there
01:56:12.580
um so like there was a lot of stuff like that and also stuff with corporate donors to cap
01:56:16.760
interfering a lot of think progress and so there were things like that happening which were which
01:56:21.140
was a good introduction to me about how dc politics works and how you know a lot of it is not how we
01:56:26.460
imagine philosopher kings talking to each other about you know what is the most moral or best idea
01:56:30.980
but it's a lot of like politicians protecting their turf and donors protecting their turf and
01:56:34.580
cynicism and horse trading and so it was it was a good education and all of that at the end of the day
01:56:39.740
um but yeah basically i and i think i ended up there because in college i was just a left-leaning
01:56:44.660
activist type who had done some journalism and i wanted to continue that through my career path
01:56:49.260
and that's sort of how i started so i definitely i would say 10 11 years ago i was in a more i was
01:56:55.260
definitely in a more partisan trajectory i think uh than i am today for sure don't leave me now we got
01:57:00.980
more coming up in 60 seconds when i see you into uc berkeley's greater good bridging differences i'm
01:57:11.420
like berkeley who goes to berkeley to to get rid of their bias and figure out a bridge differences but
01:57:17.840
that could be my own bias speaking no it's it's a really good question so i i was at cap and think
01:57:23.800
progress in 2009 up until 2012 i went on i worked for a few other non-profits and political action
01:57:29.340
committees i worked for progressive pack i worked for a few other progressive publications i went to
01:57:33.560
the intercept finally um thinking that it was maybe a little bit less partisan although it became
01:57:38.000
increasingly partisan and honestly i got i got frustrated because i was like i just feel like
01:57:43.920
i can't write super honestly here right i can't report stories out because i feel like i have to be
01:57:47.840
promoting a certain agenda all the time uh it was ironic honestly that i felt that way at an outlet
01:57:52.680
founded by glenn greenwald who's a very independent-minded person uh but that's just how it turned out
01:57:57.900
did you know at the time he was having the same feelings uh i didn't really know because i think
01:58:02.940
one of the one of the things people don't understand about the intercept is that glenn did not like run
01:58:06.620
it with an iron fist right he's actually a very like chill guy like he did not he did not manage
01:58:11.320
the day he did not edit people he kind of let people do what they wanted to do right uh which is kind
01:58:16.400
of the problem honestly because a lot of the editors really ended up sucking so you know they didn't they
0.54
01:58:20.440
didn't know what they were doing um but uh yeah so basically what happened was i saw a job opening uh
01:58:27.900
uc berkeley has a center that works on basically psychological wellness and well-being called
01:58:33.020
greater good science center and what they wanted to do is they wanted to hire somebody to come in
01:58:37.320
and write about how uh basically write a series of articles based on interviewing researchers
01:58:44.240
about how we tackle social and political polarization in the united states like the stuff that's tearing us
01:58:49.680
apart um there's i would say a small but growing number of non-profits dedicated to this to this
01:58:55.820
problem like braver angels when america foundation open mind platform um i think that
01:59:01.340
the basically the goal my my goal at berkeley was it was an 18-month fellowship so it was a time
01:59:07.600
limited fellowship funded by by a grant uh was basically to write a series of articles really
01:59:11.600
looking at like what was driving us apart um in terms of a polarization in the united states and
01:59:15.900
also what can we do about it like what people to people skills what skills can communities use
01:59:20.200
faith organizations use schools and universities businesses so on and so forth so i wrote a series of
01:59:24.860
articles i put together a guidebook along with my team about skills we can use it was actually a
01:59:29.440
really great experience i think that yeah berkeley does have a reputation for being a very left-leaning
01:59:33.660
place but my team there was fantastic i think they were all probably left-leaning people but they were
01:59:38.440
all you know they were all kind of a similar mindset right that like okay but that's what i was going
01:59:42.520
to say now if megan kelly showed up there right and i'm not some dyed-in-the-wool conservative but i'm
01:59:46.400
perceived as such given my time at fox and i'm my own thinking is center-right for the most part
01:59:51.500
how would i be treated would they would i have a good experience there uh i think they're they're
01:59:57.240
such nice people and the center is literally based around psychological wellness so like if they were
02:00:01.860
just mean they would be it would be very weird because they know they like know all they know
02:00:06.640
they know all the like mindfulness techniques and they they spend all this time writing about it
02:00:11.080
like you know they it would be weird i think they would treat you well but yeah i do think that
02:00:15.380
that is probably something i would say about the depolarization space like like jonathan
02:00:20.160
height and greg lucianoff are both liberals right like they're both left-leaning liberals
02:00:23.600
but they're also like very open-minded they treat conservative as well so on and so forth
02:00:27.300
um i do think a lot of people in this space do happen to be left-leading i don't really know why
02:00:31.420
that is i think it could use more conservative people there should be more conservative people
02:00:35.180
in the depolarization movement um john wood at braver angels he comes from a republican background
02:00:41.460
he's great um so the people who are is he a trump leader because in my experience you're only allowed
02:00:46.040
in those crowds of you you can be conservative but you can't support trump you know what's what's good
02:00:50.180
about him is i don't think he is actually like i think he he he plays it pretty straight with them
02:00:54.740
he he he does everything he can to engage with people who voted for trump which is which is pretty
02:01:00.240
crazy honestly this is one of my beasts with the media is that like you're absolutely right it does
02:01:04.980
sound like there's a certain segment of like cnn and msnbc approved republicans who just like hate
02:01:11.200
everything about the republican party and almost all republicans and it's just like that's right
02:01:14.640
especially why are you brought on as the republican representative if you're not representative at
02:01:21.040
all of these people right like just as a practical matter you need to bring on someone who probably
02:01:24.960
doesn't agree with trump on everything which i think most republican voters don't agree with him on
02:01:28.040
everything but who probably voted with him because they they on balance they agree with him more than
02:01:32.480
they agree with the democrats that's a representative person right and like for some reason across the
02:01:37.560
media and a big part of the ngo world you have like people who represent maybe five percent of
02:01:42.200
republicans right people who voted for evan mcmullin or so on and so forth um but yeah i do think i do
02:01:48.080
think this depolarization space was really good for me i worked there for 18 months a little bit longer
02:01:53.260
than that and it really helped me i think center myself into a place where yeah i think i still have a
02:01:58.900
lot of left-leaning commitments ideologically but i feel like when i do my journalism i can do it much
02:02:04.700
more objectively much more straight and i can also just orient myself in a way to where i don't feel
02:02:10.480
i i try really hard not to scare any political faction away and sometimes it's hard because sometimes
02:02:14.780
i think that there i sometimes i think i write something and someone will just automatically think
02:02:20.300
oh i'm i'm the most conservative person in the world or vice versa right but if they read my breadth
02:02:25.460
of writing these days if they read the you know sub-second inquiremore.com or they read my columns
02:02:29.660
at newsweek or the reporting i've done elsewhere i think you'll see that i'm kind of doing what i
02:02:35.920
imagine cnn was doing in the 1990s right like they are i'm trying my best to appeal to everyone and
02:02:42.620
actually get at the truth in as many directions as possible because i think it's really very important
02:02:46.660
to get outside of narrative journalism i think narrative journalism taking everything over has been
02:02:50.920
i'll go ahead i'll give you an example to back you up here's here is uh well i'm just looking at a
02:02:55.140
couple american this is you may 27th american journalists shielded china and erased the wuhan
02:03:00.060
lab leak theory may 27th oh you were busy that day um we need to talk about anti-semitism among the west's
02:03:09.180
muslims now that's it i mean you're a muslim and you're talking about anti-semitism among muslims so
02:03:14.120
i'm just i'm just sort of saying like you're not you're not afraid to counter program right to sort of
02:03:20.900
go to the place people don't expect you to go yeah and i think i guess it's just because i don't
02:03:25.400
think anyone has a monopoly on truth right like i think that traditionally speaking i mean
02:03:30.860
yeah they're there i i think that there is just so much information out there that
02:03:36.480
thinking that one political faction can give you everything you need it's just it doesn't make any
02:03:41.460
sense right like they're they're obviously going to be there are going to be so many issues where
02:03:46.060
like if i if i just read left-leaning media i don't even know if i would recognize that there
02:03:51.020
were like riots last year enormous riots thousands of businesses destroyed people some people even
02:03:55.820
killed in them i don't know if i even realize those things even existed because left-leaning media
02:04:00.060
almost never talked about it right like i don't know as a phenomenon i would even like intellectually
02:04:05.860
understand that this happened right uh and if i only read right-leaning media i don't know if i'd
02:04:10.740
get a very good sense about like how does health care work and and uh honestly work in like a
02:04:15.760
country like germany or france or japan or or the uk or taiwan like i think there's some issues the
02:04:21.200
right just doesn't engage enough on now i think it's improving in some regards i think senators like
02:04:25.460
josh holly are getting more interested in kind of using uh you know using government and public policy
02:04:31.740
tools to promote the common good and also i think some challengers like jd vance and some people
02:04:37.040
at the more grassroots level like who write at places like the american conservative or the federalist
02:04:41.820
are i think they're getting more interested in that but i i guess my point is that
02:04:45.260
both the right and the left tend to have a lot of insight in particular areas and if you're only
02:04:50.400
reading one side you're gonna you're gonna end up being blind you know like a bird can't fly with
02:04:54.080
one wing right and like i think it's the same principle here and just a note on how that's going
02:05:00.140
for cnn uh their their hard turn they were lifted up like all the other cable channels during trump
02:05:05.440
by trump the ratings machine uh there was a report out this week cnn's most watched show just take
02:05:11.060
tuesday for example was cuomo prime time which notched 873 873 000 total viewers that's nothing
02:05:21.740
he didn't pull a million in households in america on his prime time show and 162 000 in the demo that's
02:05:31.500
the 25 to 54 year old that's the only number that matters because that's what we look at for advertising
02:05:35.800
revenue 162 000 in the demo in prime time i i said this before it's still true we're crushing that
02:05:43.420
here on my podcast and i think there's a reason that no one's going there and by the way fox is
02:05:48.480
down msnbc is way down they're all down but no one's down as low as cnn um people are finding
02:05:53.840
alternative ways of getting their information that don't constantly pit them against one another that
02:05:58.960
don't assume a team jersey that try to bring actual information in an honest way that's not
02:06:03.880
completely colored by ideology i feel like this alternate system is growing and it's working
02:06:09.620
yeah and honestly like when i see the defensiveness about it like i think many people in mainstream
02:06:15.280
media like they don't like joe rogan's show right they think it's terrible it's just some guy riffing
02:06:20.080
he doesn't have editors or fact checkers and all that's true but like right that piece is true what
02:06:25.800
it reminds me of is that um in the early 2000s we had the same kind of backlash against bloggers right
02:06:31.700
like newspapers i i think i remember when huff post got its first question in the white house
02:06:36.660
press uh room like people were laughing at them like mocking the white house for even calling on
02:06:41.720
them now it's like seen as a fairly like you know respectable left-leaning you know news outlet and i
02:06:46.580
think that a lot of this backlash against podcasts against alternative media it's going to be the same
02:06:51.280
way like people are going to initially have their backs up against it and they're going to throw a lot
02:06:56.540
of criticism at it and you know some of the criticism maybe is merited and it'll help those those
02:07:00.080
platforms and those mediums improve but i think that it's just how people tend to react to change
02:07:06.180
right i think they they they find it to be weird and they find it to be disorienting and yeah like
02:07:12.420
rogan's show is interesting because rogan does not claim to be cnn right like rogan correct he he tells
02:07:18.220
you like i'm not here to tell you the news like don't trust my view on politics i'm not here to tell
02:07:21.980
you exactly what to do on covid and i think it's good that he says that because he's not you know an
02:07:25.700
expert in any of those areas or he's not he's an entertainer he's a commentator and an entertainer
02:07:30.140
but he's he's yes he's admitting to you that he hasn't done the fact checking a fact screening
02:07:35.580
but people should think about why is it this man is getting hundreds of millions of people
02:07:40.000
across the world by the way tuning into him listening to a show watching it i think it's
02:07:46.400
because he's just like an average guy trying to figure things out he's not talking down to you he's
02:07:50.560
not kind of something he's extremely open-minded and it finally feels like there's someone out
02:07:55.300
there who's kind of like on the level of the average person kind of trying to move through
02:07:58.800
the world the same way they are right and i think if people understood that he would get a lot less
02:08:03.720
criticism because they're not he's not trying to be jake capper right i don't i don't agree with you
02:08:07.660
i don't agree with you because there are attacks on his you know when he makes a mistake on the fact
02:08:11.180
on the facts it's not really based on that it's based on the fact that he's anti-woke he's he doesn't
02:08:15.740
believe in all these identity politics which you need to if you want to be covered favorably by the
02:08:19.880
mainstream press and they'll never forgive him for that so they'll jump on all of his mistakes and
02:08:25.180
so on as if he's pretending to be lester holt right but i and it's all just a false game but i think
02:08:33.200
the two things are related right the fact that he's an average guy trying to figure things out is the
02:08:37.020
reason why he's anti-woke in a way because to be woke you know like wokeness is like a narrow
02:08:42.800
ideological niche right that has to be constantly reinforced through basically public shaving and
02:08:48.980
conformity inducing procedures and processes and society right like if you're just an average
02:08:55.300
person like talking to people across the political spectrum talking to celebrities and culture and
02:08:59.540
change makers blah blah you can't really be woke right because woke is like it's like a religious
02:09:05.420
formation right it's like it's like a church or something right you're not allowed to be joe rogan
02:09:10.640
when you're doing that so i think you're correct but it also it also like goes into the into the
02:09:16.220
category of where he is basically talking like an average joe uh trying to figure out the world
02:09:21.220
because an average of figuring out the world can't be a militant in a political movement it's certainly
02:09:26.640
not one as militant as wokeness so well and i also think you know we just had dennis prager on talking
02:09:31.680
about meaning in one's life and how these sort of elitist it tends to be rich you know hollywood
02:09:37.180
people or news people whatever they don't have a lot of meaning they've gotten rid of religion in
02:09:40.200
their lives right they um they don't have to work that hard right it's not like that the woman to your
02:09:44.680
point earlier who suffered domestic violence and is working two jobs to put meals on the table she
1.00
02:09:48.640
doesn't have time to worry about this bs she's got real problems to worry about right she doesn't have
1.00
02:09:53.020
too much time on her hands and joe rogan lives a full life not only you know in his interests that
02:09:58.240
he talks about all the time mma and all that stuff but he's interviewing really interesting people you
02:10:02.900
know i'm i feel like i have the privilege of doing that now too it keeps you busy keeps your mind in a
02:10:07.540
in a healthy place as opposed to somebody who's got nothing to do other than think about other
02:10:12.620
people's failings and as you as you say uh conduct conformity inducing procedures on others which
02:10:19.040
really captures the unpleasantness of being subjected to the woke yeah i mean i think this this point about
02:10:25.800
religion i i think you know john mcwater makes this point there's other people who make this point
02:10:30.220
um and i don't want to make it disparagingly because you know i come from a religious background
02:10:33.900
myself i i wouldn't say i'm super religious today but i'm also not secular i'm probably more in the
02:10:39.060
middle um but i think that being given that foundation by like my parents by my family by
02:10:46.660
community was really really helpful to prevent something else from sub from subsuming it or
02:10:52.580
something from replacing it that would be similar to something like political fanaticism right because
02:10:57.520
i think political fanaticism is basically there to fill a hole in somebody right if somebody doesn't
02:11:03.200
have a sense of meaning a sense of belonging family ties social ties i think thinking that they are a
02:11:11.100
militant for a cause or even a martyr for a cause can be a very like hopeful or meaningful thing to
02:11:16.080
them i honestly i'm not i'm not saying woke people are isis so no one say i said that but like a lot of
02:11:20.720
the people in the west who are like educated wealthy muslims who went to syria who went to iraq to join
02:11:27.540
isis i think a lot of them just felt like they didn't have meaning in their life otherwise right
02:11:32.460
they felt alienated in some way right so they and i think there's always been particularly young people
02:11:37.460
throughout society who have joined things like cults right or who have joined these kind of mass
02:11:43.260
revivals religious religious movements uh because they felt like they needed something to drive them
02:11:48.960
right and i think that the rapid secularization of the united states particularly among upper class people
02:11:55.380
particularly among probably more white people uh than other people which is why so much of wokeness
02:12:01.320
is upper class white liberals um i think that's that's created a big hole in a lot of people and
02:12:05.820
i understand why people are trying to go and fill it with something i think having this idea that like
02:12:10.400
the united the united states is one long struggle against like white supremacy right like that's and that
02:12:15.260
we need to be part of this struggle and we need to like shed our guilt and we need to be constantly
02:12:19.800
agitating and mobilizing to do something about this problem as it manifests in
02:12:25.380
every single part of our society in our lives i think it really does give someone some drive or
02:12:31.400
some kind of mission in life that maybe in the past maybe going to church or being active in their
02:12:37.320
community in some way could have done and i totally understand it and i'm sympathetic to somebody who's
02:12:42.460
jumped into this because they didn't have anything else right even if i'm not sympathetic to the
02:12:46.840
ideology i find the ideology be very corrosive and sectarian but if i i'm sympathetic to the person i
02:12:51.640
understand why they're doing it i know that you live it because i know you're you're part of this
02:12:57.300
fair uh organization that i am too and i encourage everybody to check out because we need sort of a
02:13:01.880
central repository for fighting back against some of this madness and it's a bipartisan group that i'm
02:13:06.940
very proud to be associated with i think what we're building over there is really special and it's
02:13:11.200
going to have a huge impact and be and while while you're online searching for fair for all.org um you
02:13:17.760
should also go and check out zed's inquire more sub stack uh which i highly recommend to you and read
02:13:24.340
anything that zed jelani writes because whether it's on twitter or it's on your sub stack it's always
02:13:28.100
thoughtful reasonable well informed and i know a lot of our audience is looking for that from the left
02:13:34.260
they want they want different inputs right they don't want to just have all affirming views
02:13:38.240
you're a great guy for it thank you for being here thanks began it was a great time
02:13:42.140
all right don't forget to subscribe to the show go there subscribe and leave a five-star review and
02:13:51.840
leave a comment would you i love to read the comments i am reading them they're so fun and i'd love to know
02:13:56.780
what you think about that crazy ass vanity fair report i'm just like i'm just so fired up about it i
0.55
02:14:03.760
just it's such a shameful moment in american journalism anyway go ahead and do that and
0.94
02:14:08.240
don't forget our to tune into our next show where we have a jam-packed day of news for you we've got
02:14:13.200
some really smart news people who are going to come on and break down for you what is happening in
02:14:16.560
this country don't miss it five stars see you then thanks for listening to the megan kelly show
02:14:21.880
no bs no agenda and no fear the megan kelly show is a devil may care media production