The Michael Knowles Show


Ep. 1048 - They Said It Wouldn't Affect Her Body


Summary

A new study out of Washington University has found that a full 42% of women who have received COID vaccines have experienced changes to their menstrual cycle, which is of course impossible. We re going to turn now to our Dr. Jen Ashton, who has some answers to some of your more pressing medical questions.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 A new study out of Washington University has found that a full 42% of women who have received
00:00:07.040 COVID vaccines have experienced changes to their menstrual cycle, which is of course impossible
00:00:13.280 because the public health authorities assured us that the vaccines could not in any way affect
00:00:20.980 women's cycles. We're going to turn now to our Dr. Jen Ashton, who has some answers
00:00:25.420 to some of your more pressing medical questions. We'll start with the first one, Dr. Jen,
00:00:29.640 is there a relationship between the vaccines and menstrual cycles? We've definitely talked
00:00:35.620 about this. Oh, we sure have, you guys. And this is really spreading like wildfire on social
00:00:39.260 media with zero scientific or medical basis for this. Remember in medicine, every time
00:00:45.400 we talk about a study, a finding, what is the first thing we say? Big difference between
00:00:49.820 association and causation. So yes, women can get the vaccine and then experience changes
00:00:56.460 in their menstrual cycle. That does not mean that one causes the other. And in fact,
00:01:01.560 if you look at the biology of how these vaccines work, there is zero hormonal interaction. So
00:01:08.120 please let's put that to rest.
00:01:10.440 Yes. This got a lot of attention because a school actually in Florida was telling teachers
00:01:13.980 that they used sighted this as a reason for not being vaccinated.
00:01:17.380 defies science. So defies science. So let's, let's put that to rest because it defies science.
00:01:25.540 Not only did the vaccines not affect menstruation, according to the public health establishment,
00:01:31.480 but it was scientifically impossible for them to affect menstruation. Social media companies
00:01:38.420 censored and deplatformed people for suggesting that they did. And then something really weird
00:01:44.260 happened. Women started noticing that the vaccines were in fact affecting their menstrual cycles.
00:01:51.280 And eventually enough women noticed that phenomenon that it became undeniable. So the
00:01:56.700 establishment completely changed its tune, loosened up the language a little bit. And starting in January
00:02:02.340 of this year, they started to admit small changes. Here we go. This is, this is from ABC. It's funny.
00:02:08.700 This is from the same network as Good Morning America that we were just watching. COVID-19 vaccine
00:02:13.620 linked to small temporary changes in menstrual cycles, study finds. So the very same outlet,
00:02:20.640 the very same network, the very same show went from scientifically impossible defies science to
00:02:26.680 yeah. Okay. Some small changes, very small, very temporary, nothing to see here. Move along,
00:02:33.880 move along. Now, of course, they're admitting to slightly larger changes. The researchers behind the
00:02:41.260 Washington University study observed that many of the study participants experienced changes to their
00:02:46.580 cycles lasting more than a week after vaccination, which is important because that is beyond the period
00:02:52.840 in which adverse symptom reporting is closely monitored during vaccine trials. How much longer
00:02:58.600 than a week? We just don't know. Now, the medical establishment insists, okay, fine. The menstrual
00:03:06.320 changes do occur, but they won't have any long-term consequences. And of course, the public health
00:03:12.160 gurus don't have any proof to back up this claim because the vaccines have only existed for a year
00:03:17.380 and a half and there are no long-term data period. They just don't exist. So now you've got a choice to
00:03:23.180 make. You can either believe the fancy credentialed genius, powerful public health officials in the white
00:03:30.660 lab coats. You know, the people who told you that the vaccines would prevent infection and would prevent
00:03:36.140 transmission and could not possibly affect women's menstrual cycles and on and on. In other words, the people
00:03:42.440 who've gotten pretty much everything about COVID wrong from the start. Or you can believe the knuckle-dragging
00:03:49.860 conspiracy theorist deplorables who urged caution from the beginning. And though they don't generally possess
00:03:57.720 fancy medical degrees or positions of public authority, have pretty much gotten everything
00:04:02.600 right. That's your choice. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:04:13.660 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment Friday is from DettsSlimJim12. What a name.
00:04:18.700 Who says, speaking of child abuse, the CDC is definitely a top-tier Michael Knowles transition. Yes,
00:04:25.280 thank you. I appreciate that. I'm sorry that that is a top-tier transition, but that's what we've come
00:04:30.540 to expect because nobody has any respect whatsoever anymore for the CDC and the rest of the public health
00:04:36.680 authorities. It's very difficult. It makes us anxious to think about these people lying to us.
00:04:41.980 So when I want to try to get some sleep at night, you know what I need. I need my Helix mattress.
00:04:46.780 Right now, go to helixsleep.com slash Knowles. I have had my Helix mattress for a little under a year
00:04:53.180 and a half, and I absolutely love it. I adore it. One, it's super easy to unbox. They bring it right
00:04:59.640 to your house. Boom, boom, boom. It opens up super easy. You sleep like never before. It's just so
00:05:06.220 wonderful, tailored exactly to your sleep preferences. The way they do that, they've got
00:05:11.700 a quiz that takes two minutes to complete, matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect
00:05:16.980 mattress for you. With Helix, you're getting a mattress that you know will be perfect for the way that you
00:05:21.780 sleep. Everyone's unique. Helix knows that. They have several different mattress models to choose
00:05:26.800 from. Soft, medium, and firm mattresses. Mattress is great for cooling you down if you sleep hot.
00:05:31.980 Mattress is great for spinal alignment to prevent morning aches and pains. I just love it.
00:05:37.280 Absolutely cannot recommend these guys enough. You do not need to go to the mattress store ever
00:05:41.820 again. Go to helixsleep.com slash Knowles. Take their two-minute sleep quiz. They will match you to
00:05:46.440 a customized mattress, give you the best sleep of your life. They've got a 10-year warranty. You can try it out
00:05:51.460 for 100 nights risk-free. They'll even pick it up if you don't love it, but you will love it. For a
00:05:55.740 limited time, get up to $350 off all mattress orders, plus two free pillows. For our listeners,
00:06:02.460 it's their best offer yet. Hurry over to helixsleep.com slash Knowles. I have such little respect at this
00:06:10.160 point for the public health establishment that if I were sick or a family member were sick and I were
00:06:15.380 given two choices of doctors. Let's say that the choice is between Dr. Harvard Yale Princeton,
00:06:21.160 Dr. Harvard Yale Princeton with his stethoscope and his white lab coat, and Dr. Alex Jones,
00:06:27.080 who is standing naked eating vitamin supplements with a tinfoil hat on. And those are my two choices.
00:06:33.100 It's not even a question. It's not even a question. I go to Dr. Jones 10 times out of 10.
00:06:40.420 Again, because legitimately, if you're comparing someone like Alex Jones, I mean, I use him because
00:06:46.720 he's the most clear example of this. Someone derided as a crazy and a kook and deplatformed
00:06:52.300 and everything for raising questions about what the establishment is saying with regard to COVID and
00:06:56.460 all the rest of it. You look at that guy and then you look at Dr. Fauci. Fauci has a way worse record.
00:07:02.400 It's all of them. It's the whole public health establishment. Why? Why do you think people might
00:07:07.480 be losing some faith in the public health establishment? One picture tells you the whole
00:07:12.520 story. This is a picture from over the weekend. This is a picture of Dr. Richard Levine, who calls
00:07:20.120 himself Rachel, and Sam Brinton. These are two dudes showing up to a party at the French ambassador's
00:07:27.480 residence. Richard Levine is the assistant secretary of health. Sam Brinton is in charge of nuclear
00:07:35.920 materials at the Department of Energy. And both of these men showed up wearing dresses and women's
00:07:43.660 shoes. And then they took a photo together. Sam Brinton posts week four on the job, champagne
00:07:51.200 and celebration with the French ambassador and his residence for Bastille Day.
00:07:56.440 Also amazing opportunity to connect with one of the only other transgender government officials,
00:08:01.060 Admiral Levine. Not going to lie, it felt great to commiserate with a fellow trans person facing the
00:08:07.820 hate. I don't know that they get hate. I don't think that Levine and Brinton get hate. They do get
00:08:14.620 criticism, legitimate criticism, which is, hey, you're men. You shouldn't dress up like women. Hey, you're men.
00:08:20.040 You shouldn't pretend to be women. Hey, Admiral Levine, Dr. Levine, you shouldn't be promoting the use of
00:08:30.460 puberty blockers and cross sex hormones and mutilation surgeries for tiny little kids. It's
00:08:35.160 very abusive and wrong. That's criticism. It's not hate though. It's legitimate criticism because
00:08:40.720 they're doing bad things and they're doing wrong things. And in the case of Sam Brinton, he has not
00:08:46.140 just committed private sexual sins that got out. He has made a big show of his sexual degeneracy. He's
00:08:52.340 apparently a puppy fetishist, which apparently is different than bestiality, but it's where he and his
00:08:59.880 homosexual lover dress up like dogs and then do all sorts of strange things and leather and whatever,
00:09:05.960 whatever it is. It's not like this is some private sin and scandal that was uncovered.
00:09:09.740 He gives lectures about this. He goes around and parades these kinds of behaviors in public.
00:09:16.520 And the consequence of that is that these guys are a national embarrassment. It is embarrassing.
00:09:23.280 These guys are representing the United States. They are a public face of our country and they're doing
00:09:29.560 things that are shameful and embarrassing. And I don't even mean to wag my finger and blame them
00:09:35.600 and try to humiliate them or anything like that or expose some private sins. They're doing this
00:09:40.760 publicly. They're the ones humiliating us. Okay. It's not that it's not the conservatives who are
00:09:46.340 being graceless and cruel here and harsh and, and mean spirited. We would, we would be more than happy
00:09:53.700 to live and let live and whatever, you know, if you're, if they want to do weird puppy stuff in
00:09:58.320 the bedroom and don't tell anybody about it, I guess that's not our business. We're not going to
00:10:02.120 find out about it. But when you parade all of this stuff in public, and then when you take it even
00:10:07.040 further, like Richard Levine does and says that my own disorders and perversions, I'm now going to
00:10:11.260 foist on little kids and advocate transing the kids. Well, that's a big problem. That's a national
00:10:16.100 embarrassment. It's a national scandal and we don't want it. And I know that there,
00:10:20.380 I think probably the vast majority of America feels this way. When they see this as the public
00:10:25.000 face of America, they feel humiliated and ashamed. You know, the rest of the world is laughing at us,
00:10:29.720 but a lot of people don't feel that they ought to express that, that legitimate sentiment because
00:10:35.960 they feel that it's phobic or mean or something. It's not, it's not, there's nothing phobic about
00:10:40.080 that. We're talking about politics. We're talking about public life. Okay. And these people
00:10:43.900 in public life are an embarrassment and it's, there's nothing wrong with people
00:10:48.420 not wanting to be embarrassed at the national level. Okay. There's, there's absolutely nothing
00:10:53.480 wrong or phobic or irrational with saying, Hey fellas, you're clearly going through something
00:10:59.020 right now. And so you need to go deal with your own problems. And then if you want to come back
00:11:03.780 into public life, maybe you can, but you've got to make a choice. You can either engage in very
00:11:08.880 degrading actions that are humiliating. And for whatever reason, they get your rocks off,
00:11:13.380 or you can suppress those degrading and debasing behaviors and be a public face for the United
00:11:19.200 States. But you can't do both. You've got to choose. We as Americans have a right to some
00:11:26.040 national honor. We have a right to some national dignity. We have a right to some integrity from
00:11:30.600 our public health officials. And if we're not going to get that, the criticism is totally
00:11:35.080 legitimate. It's not hate. It's not mean. I don't think any, any one of us wishes these people
00:11:39.840 ill or harbors some deep seated hatred for them. We just want our public officials to make us proud,
00:11:47.240 to make us stand a little straighter, to look at them and say, yes, I'm glad those guys are
00:11:50.940 representing us. And it's not just Sam Brinton. And it's not just Richard Levine. The problem of
00:11:56.300 national embarrassments representing us goes all the way up to the top. And the guy at the top,
00:12:02.380 one of the big problems with him is that he's extremely old. And when you get old, you get close to
00:12:08.300 shaking off this mortal coil. And when you do that, you want to make sure you have a will. That's why
00:12:11.320 you got to go check out Epic Will. Right now, head on over to epicwill.com. Use code Knowles
00:12:17.220 because you will die. I have news for you, my friend. You will die. Do you go skydiving? You will
00:12:23.360 die. Do you breathe oxygen? You will die. No one here gets out alive. Not in this world, my friends.
00:12:30.900 So you need to have a will, okay? A will is not about you. It's about your loved ones. It's about the
00:12:35.640 really difficult decisions they will face if something happens to you. Excuse me,
00:12:39.880 when something happens to you. Do yourself a favor. Do your family a favor. Make those decisions
00:12:44.860 now so that they don't have to face them later without you. Epic Will makes it so, so easy to
00:12:52.280 get your affairs in order. I just finished up my will about a month or so ago. Epic Will is taking
00:12:58.260 care of a ton of people here at The Daily Wire. Go to epicwill.com. Use promo code Knowles,
00:13:02.060 K-N-A-W-L-E-S. Save 10% on Epic Will's complete package. Right now, you can get a will in as little
00:13:08.800 as five minutes. Super duper easy. Well worth the $119 to secure your family's future. Without a will,
00:13:14.720 you might as well wrap up all your money and your assets and your kids. Hand them over to the state.
00:13:18.960 Do not do that. You probably don't want that to happen. Right now, go to epicwill.com. Use code
00:13:25.280 Knowles. Take you five minutes. Square away the rest of your life, and you can move on.
00:13:30.440 Epicwill.com, code Knowles. You want to talk about a national embarrassment.
00:13:37.360 Joe Biden. Joe Biden is making his beg for oil tour around the Middle East,
00:13:44.400 and Biden really irked a lot of people, not just on the right, but especially on the left
00:13:49.360 over the end of last week, because he shows up to Saudi Arabia and basically just begs the crown
00:13:55.340 prince for oil. The reason for this is that Joe Biden shut down new oil and gas production in the
00:14:01.520 United States and shut down new oil pipelines, even though he gave the green light to an oil pipeline
00:14:05.760 for Vladimir Putin. He's giving the green light. He's actually begging the Middle Eastern oil states
00:14:10.940 to produce more oil, but he's just not producing American oil. I guess Saudi Arabian oil doesn't
00:14:15.840 pollute the environment in the way that American oil does. It doesn't make sense to me, but that
00:14:20.480 must be the premise here. I don't know why it's okay for Saudi Arabia to produce oil and profit from
00:14:25.660 that, but it's not okay for Americans to do the very same. So he's going around. He's begging people
00:14:30.060 to get more oil, and the thing that really irked the left was he goes to Saudi Arabia, and he gives
00:14:34.640 a fist bump to the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman. Now, this is embarrassing. I want, again,
00:14:42.860 it gets to this issue of national dignity. I want my leaders to not behave like teenagers. You know,
00:14:49.860 it'd be nice. Handshake would be good. Sturdy handshake. But okay, he gives the fist bump. Fine.
00:14:54.900 Whatever. The reason the Libs are upset by the fist bump is that for the past three, four years or
00:15:00.680 longer, they have been painting Mohammed bin Salman as the worst, terrible, murderous, monster,
00:15:07.800 barbarian in the entire world. And the reason they've done that, or the reason that they've
00:15:13.940 been able to make this argument is because the head of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman,
00:15:19.260 killed, assassinated that disinterested symbol of journalism, Jamal Khashoggi. Do you remember
00:15:28.880 Jamal Khashoggi? Jamal Khashoggi. Maybe you don't remember it. I mean, the news cycles move so fast now.
00:15:33.560 Jamal Khashoggi. Here's, here is the story that was presented about Jamal Khashoggi. He was a
00:15:39.340 journalist, a reporter, a columnist for the Washington Post who was just minding his own
00:15:44.680 business in Turkey. And the Saudi crown prince sent his thugs, his assassins to the, to the
00:15:52.200 residence where Jamal Khashoggi was staying. And they chopped him up and they tortured him and they
00:15:55.960 killed him because he was speaking truth to power. And he was a disinterested journalist. And this was an
00:16:01.300 attack on the fourth estate and the free press everywhere. And that's not what happened. That's
00:16:06.380 not what happened at all. The Jamal Khashoggi story was just complete propaganda. Jamal Khashoggi
00:16:13.260 was a political operative and a spy. He was not in any reasonable use of the term, a journalist.
00:16:20.940 Jamal Khashoggi had been a spy for Saudi Arabia. He had been a spy for Saudi Arabia's enemies. He had
00:16:26.180 paled around and worked with Osama bin Laden back in the early days of Al Qaeda. He was on the payroll
00:16:32.220 of Qatar. He would have these foreign interests draft, sometimes write whole portions of the
00:16:39.020 columns that he would submit to the Washington Post and other publications. He was an influence
00:16:43.660 peddler. He was a political operative. He had been on the good side of parts of the Saudi royal family.
00:16:49.080 Then he fell on the bad, bad side of parts of the soil, Saudi royal family. And he was working for
00:16:53.020 some of the Saudi enemies. So the Saudis did what the Saudis do, what a lot of states do. And they
00:16:58.260 went out and assassinated their enemies. I'm not defending the assassination of the enemies of
00:17:03.680 Saudi Arabia. But I am saying this is kind of par for the course. And it's very different than the
00:17:08.760 story that had been presented, which is that Saudi Arabia was attacking the free press. That's not it
00:17:12.840 at all. What you saw playing out there with the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi and really the
00:17:18.560 subsequent media spin around it is you saw two competing interests, especially in the United
00:17:24.940 States. The libs went crazy over the killing of Jamal Khashoggi because the libs hate Saudi Arabia.
00:17:30.860 They want us to back away from Saudi Arabia and our relationship there. And they want us to cozy
00:17:34.900 up to Iran. The conservatives tend to think that we're better with the devil we know than the devil
00:17:42.000 we don't. And they prefer that we remain allies with Saudi Arabia and that we don't cozy up to Iran.
00:17:47.940 And we don't give Iran pallets of cash and we don't give Iran a nuclear weapon.
00:17:52.640 And so, and there are a lot of other regional powers at play there as well. So the libs pounced
00:17:58.060 on the Jamal Khashoggi killing to try to generate worldwide opposition to Saudi Arabia and to get
00:18:05.560 people to cozy up more to Iran. It was just, it was just a propaganda operation to shift certain
00:18:14.780 geopolitical alliances. And the reason I mentioned it is because a lot of people fell for it.
00:18:18.920 The Washington Post is still going crazy over the killing of Jamal Khashoggi as some attack on the
00:18:25.000 press. And a lot of people fell for it because they violate the first rule when you are reading
00:18:30.060 any news story. I talked about this a couple of weeks ago, but it's really important to keep in
00:18:34.420 mind. When you are reading a news report about any story, domestic, foreign, economic, crime,
00:18:42.440 immigration, whatever, the first question you have to ask yourself before you even get to the
00:18:47.300 facts, the who, what, where, when, why, you have to ask, you have to ask a why question about the
00:18:54.740 story itself. You have to ask, what is the angle? When you're reading the New York Times, when you're
00:19:00.200 reading the Daily Wire, when you're reading anything in between, you need to ask yourself,
00:19:03.880 okay, what is the angle here? Why is this story being reported now by this news outlet? Why?
00:19:14.180 Journalism costs money. People are putting their resources in a certain place. So people are going
00:19:20.220 to make decisions on how to deploy those resources. And there are always political considerations that
00:19:24.760 come into that. So you've got to ask yourself, and it's just particular, it's true across the
00:19:29.240 political spectrum, but it's particularly egregious when we're talking about the Washington Post
00:19:32.500 or the New York Times, where there are huge, entrenched, corrupt interests that fund these
00:19:37.540 papers. What is the angle? Why is this being reported now? Why am I being told that the,
00:19:44.380 the assassination of an ex-Saudi spy is the worst attack on a free press in the history of the world?
00:19:51.420 And you realize it actually has nothing to do with Jamal Khashoggi. It has nothing to do with the
00:19:55.300 press. It has nothing to do with the Washington Post. It has everything to do
00:19:58.160 with giant political forces trying to restructure the world order. Speaking of death, there's a,
00:20:05.880 there's a new BLM idol that's out there. You might, you might've missed this one. If you were at having
00:20:09.840 a barbecue with your family this weekend, you might've missed that a new BLM idol dropped.
00:20:13.640 This person is Teklay Sundberg. Teklay Sundberg was a young man who, according to investigators,
00:20:22.300 fired multiple gunshots inside a Seward neighborhood, uh, in Minneapolis, uh, and inside this apartment
00:20:30.100 building on Wednesday night. And so the police were called, they were trying to talk this guy down.
00:20:35.760 They were trying to get the guy to surrender. The guy just would not surrender. And eventually the
00:20:39.300 cops killed him. And now there are BLM demonstrations, people showing up, justice for Teklay. He was killed
00:20:46.620 by the racist Minneapolis cops. Cause he's a black man. And they were making their demonstrations,
00:20:52.180 which were interrupted by a really inconvenient person for the BLM crowd. The inconvenient person
00:20:58.620 would be the victim who was almost murdered with her two little kids by Teklay Sundberg.
00:21:04.340 hit me on my idols cause you guys are celebrating his life.
00:21:07.900 It was a terror. I'm sure it was a terror.
00:21:09.900 This is not okay.
00:21:10.900 It's not okay.
00:21:11.900 You're alive.
00:21:12.900 It's not okay.
00:21:13.900 You're alive.
00:21:14.900 Shut up.
00:21:15.900 You're alive.
00:21:16.900 Shut up.
00:21:17.900 It's silence.
00:21:18.900 This is not okay.
00:21:19.900 This is not a George Floyd situation. George Floyd was unarmed. He was unarmed.
00:21:27.900 You're alive.
00:21:28.900 I'm sorry.
00:21:29.900 This is not okay.
00:21:30.900 You're alive. The bullet missed you, so stop complaining.
00:21:32.900 The kids have to deal with this and probably have a mental illness now because they almost
00:21:37.300 lost their life.
00:21:38.300 Of course the kids are traumatized.
00:21:39.300 There's bullet holes in my kitchen because he sat in the f***ing hallway watching my move.
00:21:44.300 No bullet holes in you dying, sir.
00:21:46.300 Stop complaining. You didn't die. You almost did, but...
00:21:49.300 I wish I never happened either. I don't have no place to call home. I can't do that night.
00:21:54.300 She's obviously going through a moment.
00:21:56.300 This is not okay.
00:21:57.300 Going through a moment, yeah. She and her two kids were almost killed.
00:22:00.300 This is obviously going through a moment.
00:22:01.700 Now you're complaining that the guy who shot him got shot.
00:22:04.100 Go home!
00:22:05.100 Go home!
00:22:06.100 Because none of you guys knocked on that man's door to check his house.
00:22:10.100 Shut up.
00:22:11.100 Shut up.
00:22:12.100 Shut up.
00:22:13.100 Shut up.
00:22:14.100 You guys did not come.
00:22:15.100 What do you mean?
00:22:16.100 You guys did not come and visit that man.
00:22:18.100 This is not the time.
00:22:19.100 This is not the time.
00:22:20.100 This is not the time.
00:22:21.100 This is not the time.
00:22:22.100 This is not the time.
00:22:23.100 Now this woman is, this woman comes up, gets in the car.
00:22:31.500 My kid's in the car.
00:22:32.500 My black kid is in the car.
00:22:34.500 Look at what you're doing.
00:22:35.500 He tried to kill me in front of my kids.
00:22:38.500 He tried to kill me in front of my kids.
00:22:40.500 And you say, I mean, you, you really, you've totally feel for this when she's saying this
00:22:43.900 guy tried to kill me and my children.
00:22:48.900 But me in front of my kids or my children in front of me or all of us at once.
00:22:52.900 And you are all crying because this guy was taken out by police before he could successfully
00:23:02.500 kill me and my children.
00:23:04.100 And now you're really upset that he wasn't allowed to keep shooting.
00:23:07.700 Do you, do you see how that's kind of offensive to me?
00:23:10.500 And BLM doesn't care.
00:23:12.900 You heard the, the, the, the protesters out there say, shut up.
00:23:15.800 You're fine.
00:23:16.400 There's bullet holes in my wall.
00:23:17.600 Yeah.
00:23:17.900 There's not bullet holes in you.
00:23:18.900 Shut up.
00:23:19.400 It's not about you.
00:23:20.600 It's about our narrative.
00:23:21.800 Our, and our, according to our narrative, this guy who was shooting you through your
00:23:26.000 walls and almost killed your kids, he was a poor, innocent victim.
00:23:29.200 He was probably unarmed.
00:23:30.200 I don't know where those bullets came from.
00:23:31.700 And you need to shut up and stop contradicting our narrative or else.
00:23:35.900 If you ever thought to yourself, I bet working at the Daily Wire is a fantastic experience.
00:23:41.400 You're insane.
00:23:42.100 What are you talking about?
00:23:42.900 No, I'm joking.
00:23:43.400 You're in luck.
00:23:44.400 We are growing.
00:23:45.400 We are hiring.
00:23:46.400 Legitimately.
00:23:47.400 I walk around this place.
00:23:49.200 I've always prided myself on being pals with most people around the Daily Wire.
00:23:52.900 You know, I've been here since pretty much the very beginning of the company.
00:23:55.600 We're hiring so many people.
00:23:57.600 I look every two hours.
00:23:58.600 They say, when, when did you get here?
00:23:59.600 Oh, you got here 20 minutes ago.
00:24:00.600 Okay.
00:24:01.600 All right.
00:24:02.600 Nice to meet you.
00:24:03.600 You might be the next person to join us.
00:24:04.600 We are expanding our in-house ad sales team.
00:24:06.600 There were several new open positions, including digital sales representative, senior ad operations
00:24:11.700 manager, and client success manager.
00:24:13.800 Prior experience in digital and audio sales is a must.
00:24:17.000 This is an incredible opportunity to be a key player in the Daily Wire business.
00:24:20.400 These positions are based here in Nashville.
00:24:23.000 For more details and to apply, visit dailywire.com slash careers.
00:24:27.000 We'll be right back with a lot more.
00:24:40.600 What's most interesting about the Tekle Sundberg story, which is he's the new newest BLM idol
00:24:46.000 in Minneapolis, which is epicenter for BLM.
00:24:49.400 What's most interesting is not the divergence between reality and, and the BLM narrative.
00:24:55.400 BLM narrative, he was this poor man, this poor innocent man.
00:24:58.100 The cops shouldn't have shot him.
00:24:59.400 The reality is he was shooting at his neighbors, almost killed a woman and her two kids.
00:25:04.400 The cops came in and put him down like old yeller, and they even gave him a long time
00:25:07.800 to surrender, but he had to be put down.
00:25:09.600 He was put down.
00:25:10.600 The cops did the right thing.
00:25:11.600 Okay.
00:25:12.600 Easy enough.
00:25:13.600 What's most interesting to me is not that BLM lies, BLM always lies.
00:25:17.400 What's interesting to me is when that woman who was almost killed with her kids by Tekle
00:25:21.960 Sundberg, when she was justifying her anger at the demonstrators, when she was trying to
00:25:29.000 persuade them not to protest the cops for saving her life and her kids' lives, she, she had
00:25:37.800 to justify it on racial lines.
00:25:40.200 She kept saying, this is not a George Floyd situation.
00:25:43.900 As though the cops were completely, had no right to interfere in, in George Floyd.
00:25:48.460 George Floyd, totally innocent victim, right?
00:25:50.460 She's, it seems to be implicitly buying into the BLM narrative on George Floyd.
00:25:54.400 And then she says, my kids were almost killed.
00:25:56.500 My kids were traumatized.
00:25:57.640 My kids are in the car.
00:25:58.640 And that's not working.
00:25:59.640 She says, my black kids.
00:26:02.460 They're not like those evil white kids.
00:26:04.640 They're not like those terrible white kids.
00:26:05.860 If they got shot, that'd be fine.
00:26:07.060 Or if the white kids were traumatized, who cares?
00:26:08.740 We hate those white kids.
00:26:09.740 They're black kids.
00:26:11.460 And because they're black kids, surely then you have to have some sympathy with me.
00:26:15.560 And it's really, it's really sad and ugly that that's the place we're at.
00:26:21.060 But it does seem to buttress something that we've talked about on this show for a long time,
00:26:26.300 which is that the civil rights racial narrative is the narrative in American politics.
00:26:35.660 Everything has to fit into that narrative.
00:26:37.660 One of the primary arguments in the pro-life movement, in the anti-abortion movement, has
00:26:41.760 been that abortion, one, was begun as a political program in America, largely to target blacks,
00:26:48.440 and that it disproportionately kills blacks, and it's racist.
00:26:52.400 They make abortion about race.
00:26:54.500 So many of the economic arguments we make about taxes, about economic growth, we make on
00:26:57.780 racial lines.
00:26:58.780 This disproportionately hurts black people.
00:27:00.720 This disproportionately is racist.
00:27:03.720 So many of the arguments we make about education come down to race.
00:27:06.500 So many of the arguments we make about immigration come down to race.
00:27:09.340 This is, mass migration reduces wages for people at the lower end of the income spectrum, which
00:27:13.820 disproportionately affects racial minorities.
00:27:16.320 So almost all of the arguments come down to that.
00:27:20.000 This has been building for a long time in American politics.
00:27:24.120 But even here, you just see it at its most absurd extreme.
00:27:26.720 A woman who is justifying anger that her kids were almost killed by guns, by this maniac just
00:27:36.700 popping off bullets through the wall, and then the cops take them out.
00:27:39.600 And she's trying to justify why she thinks the killing of the shooter was okay.
00:27:43.260 And she has to justify even that on racial lines.
00:27:46.200 Oh, my kids are black.
00:27:47.500 They're not white.
00:27:49.100 Come on.
00:27:49.520 You'd have a point if they were white, but they're black.
00:27:51.180 Really, really bizarre and really, really sad.
00:27:54.600 And you see it not even just in America, this racial political narrative as the dominant
00:28:01.380 thread in Western politics.
00:28:03.560 It's true in Britain, too, on a completely different sort of story, but the same theme
00:28:08.580 here.
00:28:09.580 A British dance school has just dropped ballet from its audition process.
00:28:14.800 And it's dropped ballet from the audition process because it's, quote, built around white European
00:28:20.980 ideas.
00:28:23.540 Britain, historically one of the whitest countries ever, is not allowed to have ballet at its
00:28:31.200 dance school because ballet is too white.
00:28:35.520 One, non-white people can dance ballet, last I checked.
00:28:38.960 But two, why are white dances terrible?
00:28:43.960 Why are we not allowed to have white dances?
00:28:46.280 Britain's Northern School of Contemporary Dance dropped ballet from that process because
00:28:51.220 not only is it too white and European, but it's too gendered as well.
00:28:55.600 And this is being reported by the Telegraph.
00:28:57.180 It's got a potentially contentious nature.
00:28:59.620 Here is what the head of undergraduate studies at the dance school says.
00:29:03.260 It is essentially an elitist form.
00:29:06.600 Young people need to pay to take ballet classes as a general rule.
00:29:09.780 And for a vast number of potential students, they've not had access to ballet.
00:29:12.940 And so we've got to get rid of ballet when we're considering who should come into the
00:29:16.560 dance school.
00:29:18.000 And she's saying it's elitist.
00:29:19.580 You have to pay, you have to train.
00:29:21.200 It requires a lot of skill.
00:29:22.620 And so we've got to get rid of that.
00:29:24.420 One, the argument is kind of racist, right?
00:29:26.940 They're saying, oh, this thing that requires a lot of skill and time and effort, and it's
00:29:31.340 really beautiful and intricate and sophisticated.
00:29:33.520 Yeah, that's just for white people.
00:29:35.260 That's just for white people.
00:29:36.360 All the non-white people, they can just kind of stomp around without any skill whatsoever.
00:29:39.820 That's fine for them.
00:29:41.140 But we, you know, listen here, we're so progressive.
00:29:44.740 We're so woke that we're going to get rid of all of the sophisticated, beautiful dances
00:29:49.140 because those are clearly just for white people.
00:29:51.380 The black people could never dance ballet.
00:29:53.060 That's crazy, crazy talk, don't you think?
00:29:54.860 So there is a kind of irony here that they are embodying the very thing that they're pretending
00:29:59.380 to attack.
00:30:00.420 But two, I like ballet.
00:30:03.520 I like nice things.
00:30:04.340 I like things that require skill.
00:30:05.820 I like things that require training.
00:30:07.080 I don't think that only white people can do things that require skill and training and
00:30:11.080 that are beautiful.
00:30:12.680 Why is it that in the name of racial equity, we have to bring everything down?
00:30:19.860 Why can't we bring everyone up?
00:30:21.960 I have faith that we can bring people up regardless of their race.
00:30:25.780 I have faith that we can train people and teach people to look for the good, the true,
00:30:31.160 and the beautiful and do all the sorts of stuff.
00:30:32.600 I have faith that that can happen.
00:30:34.060 I think there's quite a lot of evidence that that has happened in the past.
00:30:38.620 What here, though, is they say, nope, sorry, because of racism, because of racial politics,
00:30:44.460 you no longer get ballet.
00:30:45.660 I think this really doesn't play for the libs who are pushing it.
00:30:49.420 In the long run, it's been an effective strategy for them.
00:30:53.240 But when people see it too clearly, when in the short run, when they go a little too far,
00:30:58.880 a little too fast, there's a huge amount of backlash.
00:31:01.760 I mean, you're getting this right now, you can see it.
00:31:04.300 You don't have to take my word for it.
00:31:05.440 You're seeing it in the public opinion polls.
00:31:07.400 And you're not just in public opinion polls, but public opinion polls from the libs.
00:31:11.420 One of the national teachers unions just did a battleground state survey asking what people
00:31:18.680 thought about Ron DeSantis' education policy positions, and specifically on critical race
00:31:23.780 theory, racial lessons in schools.
00:31:25.240 And they realized this stuff is a total loser.
00:31:28.780 By a 32 percentage point margin, the poll said, voters rather, in the poll said that
00:31:35.420 they were more likely to vote for candidates who believe public schools should focus less
00:31:39.820 on teaching race and more on core subjects.
00:31:43.420 32 points.
00:31:44.640 That's a poll pushed by the libs.
00:31:47.400 By 27 points, voters said schools should be banned from teaching sexual orientation and
00:31:52.200 gender identity to kids in kindergarten through third grade, which like, duh, of course, it's
00:31:57.040 pathetic that we even need to frame the question that way.
00:31:59.740 Fourth graders, let's, you know, teach them about ball gags and puppy play with Sam Brinton
00:32:04.080 and the rest of the weirdos in our national sexual revolution.
00:32:09.220 But no, no, no.
00:32:09.940 But third grade, that's a little too young.
00:32:11.700 And then by 28 percentage points, they say that transgender athletes should be banned from
00:32:16.300 competing in girls' sports.
00:32:18.260 This is an obvious loser for the libs.
00:32:23.540 And it's why DeSantis is being talked about as a major Republican presidential candidate
00:32:29.360 for 2024, if not very nearly the presumptive nominee.
00:32:34.300 Trump really throws a wrench into all of those plans.
00:32:36.640 But DeSantis is being talked about at the presidential level in a way that I have rarely seen candidates
00:32:42.640 talked about, and it's because he's just doubling down on this message.
00:32:47.800 He did it again earlier this month.
00:32:49.800 You can't put a price tag on opportunity for kids and making sure parents have the ability.
00:32:55.320 And, of course, separate from the budget, you know, we believe that when parents send their kids to school,
00:33:00.780 it's for education, not for indoctrination.
00:33:03.300 And we're going to hold that line in Florida.
00:33:05.560 Now, this line literally is not the most meaningful line in the world.
00:33:11.640 When people say this, it's for education, not for indoctrination.
00:33:15.120 They're really saying, we support my kind of education, not their kind of education.
00:33:20.200 Education and indoctrination mean essentially the same thing.
00:33:23.760 It's just that one has a positive connotation and one has a negative connotation.
00:33:26.840 It's a little more complex than that because education involves freeing people up,
00:33:31.940 making them more human, teaching them to make sense of their freedom and their rational will,
00:33:35.760 whereas indoctrination is considered less thoughtful and, you know, more akin to brainwashing.
00:33:41.780 But broadly speaking, what we're really talking about is the substance here.
00:33:45.220 You know, we think kids should be taught good and true things and they shouldn't be taught
00:33:49.700 critical race theory and weird sex stuff and puppy play and transgenderism.
00:33:54.280 That's what we're really saying.
00:33:56.000 But I get why Ron DeSantis is using the line.
00:33:58.160 I think it's a very effective line.
00:33:59.280 It is true that slogans are always wrong and shallow and they can never get to the entirety of a political view.
00:34:08.020 But, you know, when you're in politics, you've got to use slogans.
00:34:12.220 That's politics is made of slogans and Ron DeSantis has hit on a good one.
00:34:16.120 And when you look at what that means in practice for Ron DeSantis, he's done an excellent job on the issue and the libs are losing on that issue.
00:34:22.860 Speaking of the sexual revolution, my friend, my favorite taco, Senator Ted Cruz, got in big trouble over the weekend.
00:34:32.860 And it was actually on my show with Senator Cruz, Verdict, but it was on a little bonus content.
00:34:37.960 You know, we have our friend Liz Wheeler come in and do some bonus content for the super duper inner circle subscribe to the verdict plus community type crowd.
00:34:49.080 And so they did they did a bonus video and Liz asked Senator Cruz about the Obergefell decision, which redefined marriage.
00:34:56.600 And Senator Cruz made what I thought was a perfectly ordinary, unsurprising observation about that.
00:35:02.440 And the libs lost their minds.
00:35:03.740 In Obergefell, the court said, no, we know better than you guys do.
00:35:07.900 And now every state must must sanction and permit gay marriage.
00:35:14.120 I think that decision was clearly wrong when it was decided.
00:35:18.220 It was the court overreaching.
00:35:21.260 Of course, this is obviously true.
00:35:23.600 He's saying that the court's decision in Obergefell was wrong.
00:35:29.360 And the libs lose it.
00:35:31.200 They start they start tweeting about it.
00:35:33.460 They start big headlines everywhere.
00:35:35.300 Oh, my gosh.
00:35:36.540 Ted Cruz opposes the Obergefell decision.
00:35:40.340 Of course, of course, that is the conservative position.
00:35:45.000 Conservative believes that the thing that everyone believed until seven years ago is still true and doesn't believe the wild, radical redefinition and innovation that took place seven years ago because Anthony Kennedy wanted to write romantic poetry on the Supreme Court.
00:36:01.740 Oh, my gosh.
00:36:02.560 Shocking.
00:36:02.940 Can you believe that?
00:36:03.820 The libs really have no idea what we believe.
00:36:06.980 Of course, Obergefell was wrongly decided.
00:36:08.860 Of course, there is no constitutional right to gay marriage.
00:36:12.660 Let's say you support redefining marriage.
00:36:14.660 Let's say you support all.
00:36:15.800 And you're even happy about the court decision.
00:36:17.360 Do you really believe that gay marriage was hiding out in the Constitution through the end of the 19th century?
00:36:28.060 I'm sorry, through the end of the 18th century, through the entirety of the 19th century, through the entirety of the 20th century, and then only 15 years into the 21st century did we realize that it was there all along?
00:36:38.560 You really believe that there was a definition of marriage in the Constitution that no one had seriously considered until like five minutes ago, that that just happened to be there all the time?
00:36:50.400 No, nobody believes that.
00:36:52.320 Nobody believes that James Madison put gay marriage into the Constitution and it just laid dormant for 200 years, 250 years.
00:37:00.760 No, nobody believes that.
00:37:02.360 What about the other decisions?
00:37:04.620 If you guys are shocked, if you libs are shocked by what conservatives believe about Obergefell, just wait until you hear about what we think about other Supreme Court cases.
00:37:12.960 Other Supreme Court cases like Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 finds a constitutional right to homosexual sodomy.
00:37:19.060 You might like homosexual sodomy.
00:37:20.780 You might think it's a perfectly fine thing to do.
00:37:22.600 You might think that we ought to have a legal right to it.
00:37:24.480 Do you really believe that that right is in the Constitution?
00:37:27.840 Show me the right to homosexual sodomy in the Constitution.
00:37:31.320 You're not going to find it.
00:37:33.220 And conservatives and honest liberals were united in that opinion until at the very least 2003, really much later than that.
00:37:42.120 Go back a little further.
00:37:43.820 The Griswold and Eisenstadt cases, those were the cases that found a constitutional right to condoms in the Constitution.
00:37:50.940 Griswold was 1965, found a constitutional right to condoms, but only for married couples in the Constitution.
00:37:56.780 And then seven years later, 1972, you have the Eisenstadt case, which found a constitutional right to condoms for everybody, including unmarried couples.
00:38:05.600 Maybe you like condoms.
00:38:07.340 Maybe you think condoms are perfectly fine.
00:38:09.340 Maybe you don't even like them for sex.
00:38:10.920 You just like to use them to blow up and make balloon animals.
00:38:12.960 I don't know.
00:38:13.320 Whatever you think.
00:38:14.200 Do you seriously believe that condoms are in the Constitution somewhere?
00:38:19.340 Especially when you're talking about Griswold, where it was only condoms for married couples.
00:38:23.260 Can you please point to me to the clause of the Constitution, which is the condoms, but only for married couples clause of the Constitution?
00:38:31.260 Where is that?
00:38:32.620 Just show me that text wherever you can find that.
00:38:35.820 And then explain to me how the Supreme Court took them seven years, but then they discovered, no, it's actually not just, there's condoms for everybody, not just for married couples.
00:38:43.540 Where is that clause in the Constitution?
00:38:46.380 Not everything that people want is in the Constitution.
00:38:52.420 Not everything that even some people think is right is in the Constitution.
00:38:57.060 No, of course not.
00:38:58.320 Of course there's no right to that.
00:39:00.440 And some people, I'm so pleased to see that Senator Cruz said this, because it's just so obviously true.
00:39:05.820 Of course conservatives should oppose the Obergefell decision.
00:39:08.620 I have liberal friends who oppose the Obergefell decision.
00:39:11.400 I have gay friends who oppose the Obergefell decision.
00:39:13.840 I have gay friends who get gay married, who nevertheless, because they're honest, believe that the Obergefell decision was ridiculous.
00:39:23.060 Because of course it was ridiculous.
00:39:24.880 And some people, the one that drives me the craziest is some people try to get out of the question entirely.
00:39:30.060 And you know what they say?
00:39:30.700 They say, listen, when it comes to marriage, I just think government should get out of the marriage business entirely.
00:39:36.240 And they say this as though this is some noble or clever third way on the issue.
00:39:40.180 It's not.
00:39:41.660 It's not.
00:39:42.240 Government, quote unquote, government, has always and everywhere regulated marriage in every single society ever.
00:39:53.120 And the reason for that is that marriage is the fundamental political institution.
00:39:59.760 It's not just a private institution.
00:40:01.700 It's not just one person.
00:40:02.800 It's multiple people.
00:40:04.080 And it's the bedrock of all political society.
00:40:06.720 Which is why all governments, all political communities have had something to say about marriage inevitably.
00:40:12.820 When you hear people say, well, listen, I don't, please stop asking my opinion on gay marriage.
00:40:17.700 I just want to get government out of the marriage business entirely.
00:40:21.080 That is not some noble or clever third way.
00:40:23.360 That is a surrender.
00:40:25.120 That is a surrender of the institution to the people and the radicals who want to redefine that institution.
00:40:31.380 That's all that it is.
00:40:32.160 You have to stand up for something.
00:40:34.440 You have to have some vision of marriage.
00:40:36.500 The government is going to say something about it.
00:40:38.560 The only question that matters is not, will the government say something about it?
00:40:41.760 It inevitably will.
00:40:42.600 Well, the only question that matters is, what is marriage?
00:40:45.880 What is it?
00:40:46.400 That was always the question.
00:40:48.160 It wasn't, do we hate gay people?
00:40:49.900 Should people have the right to get married?
00:40:51.660 No.
00:40:52.540 I believe that everyone has always had the right to get married.
00:40:56.740 Because marriage necessarily involves someone from the opposite sex.
00:41:01.400 So the question that you have to ask is now, do you have the right to get married?
00:41:04.600 The question you have to ask is, what is marriage?
00:41:06.180 That's going to be the next Daily Wire hit film.
00:41:07.700 I got to go walk into Jeremy's office today and pitch that because it's an important movie.
00:41:13.360 We already did what is a woman.
00:41:14.540 Now I guess we have to do what is marriage.
00:41:16.940 That's the debate that should have been had.
00:41:18.620 That's the debate that should be had right now.
00:41:20.500 I think it was so great that Senator Cruz made this totally common sense.
00:41:26.240 I haven't even talked to him about this yet.
00:41:28.780 Don't tell him I'm complimenting him, please.
00:41:30.980 Listen, I don't want to make a habit out of this.
00:41:33.060 But this was a really, really important thing.
00:41:38.580 And watch the squishes now.
00:41:40.760 The people who run away from this point, to me, they are not worth their salt as conservatives or Republicans.
00:41:47.020 Someone asked, by the way, on this issue, okay, so even if people like condoms and even if people like gay stuff
00:41:53.400 and even if people like some legal recognition of gay unions or whatever,
00:41:56.940 even if we can grant that none of that stuff is in the Constitution, all those cases were wrongly decided,
00:42:00.720 what about Loving versus Virginia?
00:42:02.860 Loving v. Virginia is the case that recognizes a constitutional right to interracial marriage.
00:42:11.240 Why isn't that one going to disappear too?
00:42:13.260 And in the Dobbs decision, Clarence Thomas, who is himself in an interracial marriage,
00:42:17.220 said we need to revisit Griswold, we need to revisit Eisenstadt, we need to revisit Obergefell.
00:42:21.980 But he left out Loving v. Virginia.
00:42:24.440 So someone wrote in to me and said, I'm in an interracial marriage.
00:42:27.240 Why is this line of thinking not going to threaten my marriage?
00:42:33.140 It's because Loving v. Virginia is based on different constitutional principles than those other cases.
00:42:40.840 All of those other cases rely on what's called substantive due process, which is a contradiction in terms.
00:42:46.440 Due process is a process.
00:42:47.920 It's a procedure.
00:42:49.340 You know, you go, you commit a crime and you're brought up and you have your right to due process in the justice system.
00:42:55.080 Substantive due process is this idea that you have certain rights to process that don't involve a process.
00:43:02.880 And it's just a bunch of legal gobbledygook, made up legal gobbledygook that was mentioned a little bit in the early 20th century
00:43:10.080 and really, really exploded in the middle to late 20th century when our legal system went kind of kooky with all of these cases.
00:43:17.520 And they said, well, certain rights that you can't see anywhere and you can't find them in the Constitution, you've got them.
00:43:23.980 They're in between the emanations and the penumbras.
00:43:25.960 And those rights are going to include condoms and weird sex stuff and abortion and all the rest of it.
00:43:31.820 Substantive due process is very silly.
00:43:33.840 And Clarence Thomas made fun of it in his Dobbs concurrence.
00:43:37.880 Loving v. Virginia is, one, is based on the equal protection clause.
00:43:43.740 It doesn't hinge on substantive due process.
00:43:46.200 It hinges largely on the equal protection clause.
00:43:49.440 And also it observes, just as in historical matter, that prohibitions against interracial marriage, against miscegenation, come out of the institution of slavery.
00:43:57.600 And you can see this in the law.
00:43:59.020 You can see this in the earliest arguments and statutes prohibiting interracial marriage.
00:44:03.640 So they come out of this issue of slavery.
00:44:05.680 Slavery is abolished.
00:44:06.820 That makes a very good historical case to abolish those kinds of arguments for anti-miscegenation laws as well.
00:44:16.400 They're not the same.
00:44:17.140 You're going to see the libs try, as conservatives become more aggressive, keep pushing the envelope a little bit further now.
00:44:24.600 You're going to see the libs try to make this about race.
00:44:26.780 Because, as we mentioned earlier, race is the dominant theme in Western politics.
00:44:31.140 Not even just American politics, but Western politics entirely.
00:44:34.000 Don't fall for it.
00:44:34.740 It's just completely made up.
00:44:36.700 And the libs are making really, really bad arguments.
00:44:41.580 You're seeing this too before we go.
00:44:42.820 There's this last story.
00:44:44.560 Jennifer Gray, who is this actress from the 80s, she wrote in the LA Times.
00:44:49.780 She gave them an interview.
00:44:51.220 And she was lamenting the Dobbs decision, the overruling of Roe v. Wade.
00:44:55.520 She said, it doesn't feel real.
00:44:57.800 She says, I wouldn't have my life.
00:44:59.820 I wouldn't have had the career I had.
00:45:01.120 I wouldn't have had anything if she, and she acknowledges, she had an abortion.
00:45:04.940 Had she not had the abortion, she says, I wouldn't have anything.
00:45:07.500 Wouldn't have my career.
00:45:09.480 Wouldn't have all of it.
00:45:11.880 To which I would ask, what career?
00:45:14.620 What career?
00:45:15.180 Jennifer Gray.
00:45:15.820 A lot of people listening to this show probably have no idea who Jennifer Gray is.
00:45:18.520 Jennifer Gray was in three movies.
00:45:24.060 Three popular movies.
00:45:26.100 One of which was Dirty Dancing, which people don't even really watch anymore.
00:45:29.540 And the main line from Dirty Dancing is nobody puts baby in a corner.
00:45:32.340 How ironic that she says, in order to have the Dirty Dancing movie, I had to kill my baby.
00:45:37.640 Nobody puts baby in a corner, except for me.
00:45:39.280 I do a lot worse than that.
00:45:40.420 She was in Ferris Bueller.
00:45:41.340 She was in Red Dawn.
00:45:42.440 That's kind of it.
00:45:43.780 Was it worth it?
00:45:44.600 It was worth killing your kid?
00:45:45.600 And Jennifer Gray would say, I've had a great, amazing Hollywood career.
00:45:48.560 I'm famous.
00:45:49.300 I'm rich and all this.
00:45:50.340 Then she got a nose job and no one ever heard from her again.
00:45:52.660 But she says, I got everything for this abortion.
00:45:56.860 I say, was it worth it to be in three notable movies 35 years ago and then to be completely
00:46:03.160 forgotten that was worth killing your kid?
00:46:04.640 I don't think so.
00:46:06.080 That seems like some pretty medical misinformation to me.
00:46:09.140 At the top of the show, we were talking about all the lies that you've heard from the
00:46:12.480 medical establishment.
00:46:13.500 Well, how about this one?
00:46:14.280 The lie that a baby's not a baby.
00:46:17.060 A political medical establishment.
00:46:19.700 Don't forget, public health is necessarily political.
00:46:22.380 That's what the word public means.
00:46:24.020 Public and political mean the same thing.
00:46:26.460 A public health establishment that tells you boys are actually girls and that got everything
00:46:31.180 about this pandemic wrong and that tells you even more basically that a human being,
00:46:35.960 a little baby, is not a baby.
00:46:37.820 That is not a public health establishment that is ever going to inspire trust.
00:46:41.340 I'm Michael Knowles.
00:46:42.160 This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:46:43.320 See you tomorrow.
00:46:49.480 If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe.
00:46:52.840 And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends
00:46:56.940 to subscribe.
00:46:58.360 We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.
00:47:03.440 Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show,
00:47:07.980 The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show.
00:47:10.240 The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies, executive producer Jeremy Boring,
00:47:15.260 supervising producer Mathis Glover, production manager Pavel Vidovsky, editor and associate
00:47:20.560 producer Danny D'Amico, associate producer Justine Turley, audio mixer Mike Coromina, and
00:47:26.900 hair and makeup by Cherokee Heart.
00:47:29.080 The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2022.
00:47:32.820 Today on The Ben Shapiro Show, after promising that their expertise would guide Americans
00:47:37.600 through economic hardship, foreign policy chaos, and global pandemics, the experts have
00:47:41.500 destroyed their own credibility, but they still insist you mimic their values.
00:47:45.300 That's today on The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:47:46.480 Give it a listen.
00:47:46.820 Thank you.
00:47:49.300 Bye.
00:47:50.060 Bye.
00:47:50.580 Bye.
00:47:51.640 Bye.
00:47:51.960 Bye.
00:47:52.420 Bye.
00:47:53.580 Bye.
00:47:54.200 Bye.
00:47:54.640 Bye.
00:47:56.660 Bye.
00:47:57.220 Bye.
00:47:57.640 Bye.
00:47:58.620 Bye.
00:47:58.640 Bye.
00:47:59.760 Bye.
00:48:00.700 Bye.
00:48:06.020 Bye.
00:48:06.700 Bye.
00:48:06.720 Bye.
00:48:06.800 Bye.
00:48:07.760 Bye.
00:48:08.760 Bye.
00:48:09.860 Bye.
00:48:10.040 Bye.
00:48:10.760 Bye.
00:48:10.900 Bye.
00:48:12.900 Bye.
00:48:13.000 Bye.
00:48:14.020 Bye.
00:48:14.740 Bye.
00:48:14.920 Bye.
00:48:14.980 Bye.