The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 1145 - The Trump V DeSantis Fight Heats Up

00:00:00.000 A new poll out from USA Today and Suffolk University shows Florida Governor Ron DeSantis

00:00:04.260 ahead of President Trump for the 2024 GOP nomination. And he is not just up a little bit.

00:00:11.180 The poll shows him up 23 points on the former president in a hypothetical matchup. That's 56

00:00:18.360 to 23. Now, I am as skeptical of polls as anybody. I think that most of them are made up and

00:00:25.620 statistics are totally fake. But there are enough indicators at this point to show that Ron DeSantis

00:00:31.560 poses a serious threat to Donald Trump's perceived hegemony over the GOP. Trump obviously thinks so.

00:00:38.740 That's why he's been attacking DeSantis. And he started up real attacks just before the midterms.

00:00:43.900 And DeSantis has managed to achieve this status in a few different ways. One, he's in office while

00:00:50.760 Trump is out of office. So he can do things. President Trump can't really do things right now

00:00:54.680 because he's in Mar-a-Lago. Two, DeSantis is on social media. Trump is not on social media. All

00:01:00.440 he's on is the truth platform that people don't really go to other than to find his statements.

00:01:05.240 But there is a third distinction that not that many people are talking about,

00:01:09.200 but that DeSantis is clearly hoping to ride all the way to taking Trump's place.

00:01:15.180 President Trump is the candidate of the COVID vaccine. And Ron DeSantis wants to make sure

00:01:22.200 that you know that he is not. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.

00:01:33.760 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday is from Micah Shobi, who says,

00:01:40.240 tweeted, SBF didn't kill himself right after I heard the story. I know. It's really, really sad

00:01:44.980 that those cameras outside of SBF's jail cell are about to malfunction. And the security guards

00:01:52.080 that were supposed to watch him are just, they're going to accidentally take a nap. And SBF, you know,

00:01:57.220 he's really been depressed ever since that whole FTX exchange collapsed. I mean, he probably would be,

00:02:02.700 you know, if you lost $16 billion and your weird hedge fund sex cult in one day, you probably,

00:02:08.220 legitimately would be pretty depressed. So too bad. Too bad that he looks like he might get the Epstein 0.76

00:02:14.460 treatment. Another financial guru and sexual deviant, apparently, who was living down in the 0.97

00:02:20.900 Caribbean. Amazing. History repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce. It's kind of farce both 0.99

00:02:28.460 times, actually. When you want to make sure that you've got a super serious set of personnel at your

00:02:33.400 office, you got to check out ZipRecruiter. Right now, head on over to ZipRecruiter.com slash

00:02:38.100 Knowles. Many businesses are hiring for festive jobs this time of year, like bilingual Santa Claus,

00:02:43.440 Coffee and Nut Gift Basket Assembler, and Reindeer Wrangler. Those are all actual jobs on

00:02:50.000 ZipRecruiter. Sound like a lot of fun, too. If ZipRecruiter can fill those roles, what roles can't

00:02:54.460 they fill? If you're hiring, you should go to ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles. ZipRecruiter uses

00:02:59.260 powerful matching technology. They find and match the right candidates up with your job. You can easily

00:03:05.240 review those recommended candidates and invite your top choices to apply. Additionally, ZipRecruiter's

00:03:09.720 complete suite of tools make it super easy to filter, review, and rate your candidates. Four

00:03:14.960 out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day.

00:03:20.140 Discover a hiring joy with ZipRecruiter. Go to my exclusive web address to try ZipRecruiter for free.

00:03:25.900 That is ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. ZipRecruiter.com slash K-N-O-W-L-E-S.

00:03:31.880 ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire. This is the key that a lot of people don't talk about with

00:03:39.060 DeSantis. And I'm not saying, I am not saying that Trump deserves all of the criticism about

00:03:45.500 COVID and that Ron DeSantis is absolutely 100% clean on the COVID issue. That's not exactly what

00:03:52.280 I'm saying. What I am saying is in the public perception, with good reason, I think, Trump is

00:04:00.720 seen as the guy who gave Fauci a platform, who promoted the vaccine that seems to have some

00:04:07.180 problems with it. Again, I don't know that any other politician in Trump's place would have done

00:04:11.620 anything any differently or would have performed any better. I'm just saying that's what happened

00:04:16.720 when Trump was in office. And Ron DeSantis, although he was a little bit cautious about COVID at first,

00:04:22.860 he reopened Florida really, really quickly. And he has been ever more so anti-COVID, anti-public

00:04:30.980 health establishment, even anti-vaccine. So DeSantis, who made the vaccines available to people

00:04:37.560 who wanted it in Florida, but did not want to mandate the vaccine, he is now impaneling a grand

00:04:43.400 jury to look into the abuses from the vaccine manufacturers. Florida, you know, it is against

00:04:51.560 the law to mislead and to misrepresent, particularly when you're talking about the efficacy of a drug.

00:04:57.240 We see just the other, just recently, Florida got $3.2 billion through legal action against those

00:05:03.980 responsible for the opioid crisis. And so it's not like this is something that's unprecedented. So

00:05:09.340 today, I'm announcing a petition with the Supreme Court of Florida to impanel a statewide grand jury

00:05:17.660 to investigate any and all wrongdoing in Florida with respect to COVID-19 vaccines. And we anticipate

00:05:26.760 that we will get the approval for that. That will be something that will be impaneled, most likely in

00:05:32.580 the Tampa Bay area. And that will come with legal processes that will be able to get more information

00:05:40.580 and to bring legal accountability for those who committed misconduct.

00:05:45.920 Ron DeSantis is a smart, smart guy. I think this is the right thing to do. So I applaud him for doing it.

00:05:53.580 But it's also politically probably the single smartest thing that Ron DeSantis can do.

00:05:59.340 Because Donald Trump's biggest weakness in a GOP primary is not actually his mouth. Oh,

00:06:05.820 he says mean things. No, people actually kind of get a kick out of that. It's not his Twitter. He's

00:06:11.400 not on Twitter. Well, he's on Twitter. He's just not using it now, even after Elon Musk took over.

00:06:15.680 It's COVID. That's the weakness. That's the way that Ron DeSantis can position himself to the right

00:06:24.300 of Donald Trump. That's the way that Ron DeSantis can counter the claims that he's a squish and a

00:06:29.560 moderate and a never Trump candidate and all of the criticisms that are going to come along with him

00:06:33.700 by virtue of his place in the race and as the candidate who isn't Donald Trump and by virtue of

00:06:39.680 the people that DeSantis is attracting, the never Trumpers, the liberals and the squishes. And he's

00:06:45.020 attracting those people and through no fault of his own because he's not Donald Trump. And so he's

00:06:50.280 got to figure out a way to tell the conservatives and the base, no, I'm with you. I'm a conservative

00:06:55.600 guy. The COVID vaccine issue, the fact that we were lied to about safety of the vaccine,

00:07:00.500 we were lied to about the efficacy of the vaccine, we were forced in most of the country to take the

00:07:05.040 vaccine. If he can really go after the people who peddled the vaccine, that's going to go a long

00:07:11.720 way for DeSantis. Speaking of those people, our old pal, Dr. Fauci is back in the news. Dr. Fauci

00:07:21.320 appeared on Chris Wallace's CNN show. You didn't catch it? I'm not surprised. Nobody did. I assume

00:07:28.440 many more people will see this clip on my show than saw it on Chris Wallace's show on CNN. But in that

00:07:34.880 show, Dr. Fauci explained how difficult it was to work for President Trump because Trump was just such

00:07:43.340 an irresponsible purveyor of medical misinformation. What do you think of Donald Trump?

00:07:52.460 Well, I don't want to get into the politics of it. So it is irrelevant what I think of Donald Trump.

00:07:58.540 But what do you think of him from a public health standpoint? Well, as you know, I had difficulty in

00:08:02.920 that administration because what was happening is that it became very clear that things were being

00:08:08.400 said by the president, those around him, which were just not based on any scientific fact and data. In

00:08:15.140 fact, it was contrary to what the data was showing. And I, you know, I felt very uncomfortable about having

00:08:22.240 to publicly get up at the White House press room and being put on the spot to directly disagree

00:08:29.080 with the president. I have such a great deal of respect for the office of pregnant presidency that

00:08:34.720 it just made me very uncomfortable. But I had to do it, Chris, because I couldn't stand there

00:08:39.420 and be complicit in saying hydroxychloroquine works when it doesn't. You know, bleach works. It doesn't.

00:08:46.100 And that's how I evolved essentially in the, you know, public enemy number one of the far right.

00:08:51.560 That's all it is. I heard the president say that we should use bleach to get rid of COVID-19. And I

00:09:00.080 couldn't stand there and allow that to happen. So I'm just a reasonable guy. Except, except.

00:09:07.400 That never happened. That never happened. I know that most people, the liberals in this country,

00:09:15.000 certainly, and even many conservatives, believe that Donald Trump once said that we should treat

00:09:21.100 COVID-19 with bleach. That did not happen. That was just completely made up. It's a lie

00:09:27.380 made up by the media and promoted by Dr. Fauci. Here is what Donald Trump said.

00:09:33.700 Supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light.

00:09:41.760 And I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it.

00:09:45.260 And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through

00:09:49.740 the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you're going to test that too. Sounds

00:09:56.100 interesting. Right. And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute,

00:10:02.120 one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or, or almost a

00:10:11.980 cleaning? Because you see, it gets on the lungs and it does a tremendous number of the lungs. So

00:10:16.140 it'd be interesting to check that so that you're going to have to use medical doctors with, but it

00:10:20.440 sounds, it sounds interesting to me. The new headline is Trump asked people to go outside. That's dangerous.

00:10:26.300 Here we go. Same old group. Here we go. Same old group. Where in there did Donald Trump talk about

00:10:32.460 bleach? Donald Trump said that there's a way to use light to treat these viruses and that you can do

00:10:39.440 it by injection or, and you can tell that he's sort of stumbling around for, for what he means by the

00:10:43.820 injection. But he, he comes back to then the light, you know, I'm telling people to go outside. I'm

00:10:47.940 suggesting this UV light kind of treatment. He never says the word bleach. Even when he's talking

00:10:52.480 about a disinfectant, he's not necessarily, I don't even know why you would jump to

00:10:56.280 think that he's talking about bleach. First of all, people always say light is a great

00:11:00.060 disinfectant, right? That's why that's an idiom in our culture. He's talking about all these

00:11:03.660 different ways to treat COVID that were backed up by studies. When we're talking about the light

00:11:08.060 and inject, you can inject it sort of, it's not that you exactly inject light, but you can direct

00:11:12.340 light down into your lungs to treat cancers, to treat viruses. I mean, there's, in fact, you can use

00:11:19.740 it to treat COVID. There was a study just came out, it was published here on Cedars-Sinai

00:11:24.960 research showing that reduced viral loads are seen in COVID-19 patients treated with UVA light,

00:11:30.900 doing exactly what Donald Trump said. Long after Donald Trump said it, this was published in 2021.

00:11:36.400 In fact, even PolitiFact admits that when Joe Biden says Donald Trump told people to drink bleach and

00:11:41.420 that would make them safe from COVID, that they admit that's mostly false. They said that's not what

00:11:45.580 Donald Trump was talking about. Donald Trump was, did not explicitly recommend ingesting a

00:11:51.280 disinfectant like bleach, of course. And then they go and they admit what Donald Trump said

00:11:56.820 right there. That's PolitiFact. That's a left-wing organization. The whole thing was just completely

00:12:00.620 made up. Donald Trump was advocating a very reasonable medical intervention that actually

00:12:07.960 turned out to work very, very well, even as Cedars-Sinai admitted. He had never used the word

00:12:13.040 bleach, not even once. He wasn't referring to that. It was a total lie from the media that Dr. Fauci

00:12:18.940 today is still peddling. And he wonders why we don't believe him. The reason I bring up that whole

00:12:24.420 story, one, is because whenever Dr. Fauci's in the news, it's a good opportunity to do my Dr. Fauci

00:12:29.700 voice. I miss him, don't you? No, I don't really miss him. But two, it's got to get you thinking

00:12:35.420 about other news stories. And it's got to get you thinking about other genius experts in the lab

00:12:40.960 coats with the neckties. If they can make you believe, not even just make the liberals believe,

00:12:47.200 if they can make you a conservative sort of kind of believe that Donald Trump talked about injecting

00:12:52.780 bleach to treat COVID, they can get you to believe pretty much anything. That had no basis in reality.

00:13:02.880 And even I suspect most conservatives believed that was true. Remember when there was that line back in

00:13:09.820 2008, where the media said, Sarah Palin thinks that she can see Russia from her house. That was

00:13:15.420 made up. It was a joke. It was a joke from Saturday Night Live. And people attributed it

00:13:20.000 to Sarah Palin. If they can get you to believe, if they can get, I'm not putting the emphasis here on

00:13:26.820 what they can get you to believe. I'm saying if they can get you to believe it, think about the sort

00:13:32.480 of trance that the rest of the country is in because of the lives of these very powerful actors.

00:13:40.360 Makes me want to curl up into bed. And when I curl up into bed, you know what I want.

00:13:43.920 I want to be next to my wife wearing her nice cozy pajamagram. Right now, go to pajamagram.com.

00:13:48.900 Tell them that Michael sent you. Women love getting new pajamas at Christmas time. Pajamagram 1.00

00:13:53.620 makes it super easy for us men. This year, I cannot wait to see sweet little Alisa wearing a

00:14:01.000 set of pajamas from their naturally nude line. Even more alluring than lingerie, the texture and

00:14:09.400 feel of these pajamas is so silky and smooth that both you and your wife will love them. If you have

00:14:14.900 no idea what to get your girlfriend or wife this year, trust me, she wants these pajamas. But you need

00:14:20.740 to order today because last year they sold out before Christmas. I actually got caught one year.

00:14:24.060 I wanted to get them and they were sold out before Christmas. I was very, very frustrated.

00:14:27.380 So don't let that be you. Order today and pajamagram will include a free matching naturally nude 0.86

00:14:34.340 nightie with your order. That is $75 savings on their best-selling holiday gift. Pajamagram offers

00:14:41.100 free gift packaging so your present comes ready to put under the tree. Go to pajamagram.com right now

00:14:46.860 and order the naturally nude pajamas. That is pajamagram.com for naturally nude pajamas.

00:14:52.240 Don't forget to tell them Michael sent you. Everybody's blaming Trump. It's Trump's fault for

00:14:56.820 everything. Mitch McConnell was just asked about why the Republicans did so poorly in the midterms.

00:15:04.420 Now that not only is election day over, but the special election, the runoff in Georgia is over.

00:15:11.000 And who does McConnell blame? He blames Trump.

00:15:13.180 We ended up having a candidate quality time. Anybody remember who mentioned that back in

00:15:18.220 August? Look at Arizona. Look at New Hampshire and the challenging situation in Georgia as well.

00:15:27.100 We did, by we, I mean the Senate Leadership Fund, did intervene in two primaries in Alabama and in

00:15:32.700 Missouri. And I do think we had an opportunity to relearn one more time. You have to have quality

00:15:42.420 candidates to win competitive center races. We went through this in 2010, 2012. Christine O'Donnell,

00:15:52.200 Sharon Angle, Todd Aiken, Richard Murdoch, and unfortunately revisited that situation in 2022.

00:16:00.600 Our ability to control the primary outcome was quite limited in 2022 because of the support of the

00:16:12.020 former president proved to be very decisive in these primaries. Did you catch that? No, not the blaming

00:16:20.180 Trump. No, not the candidate quality thing, which to me is quite overstated. In a year where John

00:16:28.200 Federman was sent to the U.S. Senate, I don't really want to hear about candidate quality. I think

00:16:32.700 there were probably some other issues at play. They ran a man who couldn't speak and didn't show

00:16:36.740 up on the campaign trail and had a radical insane record and wanted to shut down fracking in an

00:16:42.100 important Rust Belt state and who wanted to let the murderers out of prison as his first priority.

00:16:47.260 So I don't want to hear about candidate quality. Okay, I think that's really overstated.

00:16:50.340 But that's not the part I'm directing your attention to. Did you hear the part

00:16:53.380 where Cocaine Mitch said that he had a little bit of trouble controlling the primary outcomes?

00:17:03.500 I thought the whole purpose of the primary was so that the people have their voice heard

00:17:09.200 and they pick their nominee and then the nominee goes on and faces the Democrat.

00:17:14.620 Who is controlling the primary outcomes? He says, we're out of a little bit of trouble

00:17:19.700 controlling the primary outcomes because of the presence of the horrible president in the race.

00:17:24.820 So it's Trump's fault because he backed some of the wrong candidates and he did not allow

00:17:29.820 the GOP leadership to pick the primary outcomes. But the GOP, the Republicans are supposed to be

00:17:39.820 largely hands-off in the primaries. You're supposed to let the Republicans at the local level decide

00:17:44.160 this sort of thing. That's not how it works. That's not how it works at all.

00:17:49.340 They want to control the primaries. They don't want conservatives really to have a choice.

00:17:55.360 And Mitch McConnell says, logo, we want to control that so that we have good candidates who can be

00:18:00.380 the Democrats. Yeah, fine. I get it. I want good candidates too. But I don't want just some squish. 1.00

00:18:07.200 I don't want to send some Democrat to Washington with a red tie on. And I'm not convinced. I'm not

00:18:14.140 convinced for one second that candidate quality is the reason that the races didn't turn out well

00:18:19.440 in Arizona, which was bedeviled by election shenanigans. I'm not convinced that election or

00:18:29.480 candidate quality rather was totally the problem elsewhere in the country either. We need to control

00:18:36.180 the party. Okay. Well, speaking of control, the conservatives now are trying to take back a

00:18:40.300 little bit of control, at least in the House. Kevin McCarthy is a moderate sort of establishment type

00:18:46.940 in House leadership. He probably will be the Speaker of the House of Representatives. But he is facing

00:18:51.540 a challenge. The challenge will come from Andy Biggs, a Republican congressman from Arizona. He is

00:18:56.660 running against Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy won the Republican nomination to become Speaker. So they've

00:19:03.340 already had that. He beat Biggs by a vote of 188 to 31. Biggs, though, says that he is going to run

00:19:11.640 anyway in the main race. So it could be very, very interesting to see, because the Republicans will have

00:19:18.080 a razor-thin majority. It will be interesting to see if Biggs' presence will upset the numbers enough

00:19:24.860 that, who knows, you could have maybe a Democrat coming together with some Republicans to try to win

00:19:29.880 the Speakership. It remains to be seen. But the reason Biggs is doing this, Biggs runs the House

00:19:34.060 Freedom Caucus, is he says that McCarthy's leadership as Speaker of the House would entrench

00:19:41.580 the establishment uniparty in Congress, the sense that the Republicans don't really

00:19:48.820 do very much at all. Maybe they yell and they scream and they make a big noise about what they're

00:19:56.280 doing. But when push comes to shove, the really crucial matter is they squish. That remains to 0.98

00:20:01.120 be seen if Biggs can convince enough people to come on over to that side. But you are seeing right

00:20:07.980 now, I think this is what a lot of the anti-Trump rhetoric is about. The establishment squishy

00:20:13.060 lib side of the GOP was cast into the outer darkness in 2016. And they were furious and they hated that

00:20:19.740 Trump was the nominee and they hated that he won the presidency in some cases. And they were just so,

00:20:26.520 so angry to be out of power. And they now see this as their opportunity finally to get rid of Trump.

00:20:32.040 And so DeSantis is looking great right now. And that might be the end of the story. The end of the

00:20:36.780 story might be that Trump had his moment and now he's going to fade away and younger politicians are

00:20:41.460 going to rise up in the form of Ron DeSantis or somebody else. That could be the end of the story.

00:20:45.720 But I suspect a lot of the lingering support for Donald Trump, and I feel it within myself,

00:20:49.980 a lot of it is because all the right people hate Trump. And so it's not really even about

00:20:56.800 this policy or that policy, or this politician was better on this issue, or this guy was,

00:21:01.880 it's not, it's just, it's just this gut sense, which I think is justifiable that all the right

00:21:08.220 people hate Donald Trump and all the right people love Trump's opponents or willing to support

00:21:14.480 Trump's opponents. And that, that does tell you something, whether that is enough to push Trump

00:21:19.260 over the edge, not so sure. But it does tell you something about what Trump represents in American

00:21:25.860 politics. People are, are trying to take things into their own hands and throw off the settled,

00:21:33.340 established political establishment. Speaking of taking things into one's own hands,

00:21:38.000 amazing story. Just saw it today. A Nevada woman was attending a party. She and a friend pull up

00:21:47.840 outside the house that this party is going to take place at. I guess they got there a little bit

00:21:51.660 early. So they're sitting in the car and as they're waiting, two men with guns come up and throw them

00:21:56.780 out of the car and, and try to steal the car. It's, it's a carjacking. So one of the men grabs this

00:22:03.620 lady's shirt, pulls her out of the car, gets into the car and he puts his gun down on his lap. I guess

00:22:08.240 while he's starting the car, putting it into gear. While he does that, the woman takes the gun and 0.98

00:22:13.800 runs off with it. At this point, the man trying to steal the car starts running after her, tackles

00:22:20.680 her, at which point she puts a bullet in his head and the man stops attacking her because he doesn't

00:22:26.040 have a head anymore. And I read this story and a lot of people read that. They say, oh, it's always nice

00:22:31.700 when stories have a happy ending. And this does have a relatively happy ending in the sense that

00:22:35.640 the innocent party was not killed. There was justice done. The woman defended herself and it's

00:22:42.980 not even like she ran away and then took aim and fired at him. He was continuing to attack her. So

00:22:46.780 she was totally justified, obviously, but it's always sad. Crime is sad. I feel sorry for criminals

00:22:51.620 in the way I feel sorry for a sick person is it's just, they're just not doing the right thing and

00:22:56.200 they're harming others and themselves and their own immortal souls. But the reason the story

00:23:01.640 struck me is, why did this guy chase the woman? This guy was lucky to get away with his life.

00:23:08.960 She ran away. He could have just taken the car. But no, he got out and chased her to get his gun back

00:23:14.260 and then tackled her. She's got a gun. He thinks she just doesn't know how to use a gun and then his 0.70

00:23:18.240 head gets blown off because the woman's got a gun. Why? This guy must have felt so confident that 0.84

00:23:26.060 nobody would stop him from doing bad things. And this is what happens when the political order spirals

00:23:32.260 out of control. Much of politics is about managing social expectations. The Second Amendment exists

00:23:41.180 not because of some high-minded philosophy from the Enlightenment in America, not because people want

00:23:50.500 to go hunting or something like that. Not because, that's not the primary purpose or political effect

00:23:58.520 of the Second Amendment. The primary purpose and political effect of the Second Amendment is to keep

00:24:03.480 people polite. To keep the government polite and to keep your neighbors polite and to keep you polite.

00:24:08.960 Because if you are walking around in a country where people can defend themselves, you're going to be

00:24:14.180 less inclined to try to take advantage of people. Okay, if you're walking around in a country where there's

00:24:19.020 strong law and order, you're going to be less inclined to commit crimes because you know you're

00:24:22.000 going to get caught and you're going to pay the price. And what has happened is as our political

00:24:25.720 order has unraveled, you've seen a complete resetting of people's expectations. And that is

00:24:32.400 tragic for everybody. It's tragic for victims. It's tragic for the criminals too. Because these criminals

00:24:37.640 are emboldened to engage in this risky, insane sort of behavior. And the end of that is going to be

00:24:42.420 them getting their heads blown off in a lot of cases. The end of that is going to be our society 0.92

00:24:47.420 getting its head blown off if we don't get serious again. Okay, so call your friends,

00:24:53.620 talk to your friends, make sure that you're politically organized. When you want to talk

00:24:57.420 to your friends, you got to check out Pure Talk. Right now, go to puretalk.com, enter code Knowles.

00:25:02.320 Are you tired of overpaying for your wireless network? Get talk, text, and blazing fast data for

00:25:07.040 just $30 a month. Pure Talk gives you the same network, the same towers, and the same coverage

00:25:11.900 as the other guys at half the price. Merry Christmas, everyone. Pure Talk's U.S.-based

00:25:17.040 customer service team makes the switch incredibly easy. You can feel good knowing that you're

00:25:21.520 supporting a veteran-owned business. Here's the best part. When you go to puretalk.com,

00:25:25.940 enter code Knowles, you will save an additional 50% off your first month. There is no reason to pay

00:25:30.660 Verizon, ATT, and T-Mobile over $80 a month for wireless services when you get the same service on the

00:25:36.540 same network at Pure Talk for half the price. Go to puretalk.com, enter code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S,

00:25:41.840 to save 50% off your first month. That is puretalk.com. Promo code Knowles for 50% off your first month.

00:25:47.600 Pure Talk, simply smarter wireless. Head on over right now. I really love these guys saving me a ton

00:25:55.040 of money. I think you are going to love them too, and you get the same great network, same great stuff

00:26:00.680 right now. Promo code Knowles, 50% off your first month at puretalk.com. Speaking of firearms,

00:26:06.340 there was a major bomb at movie theaters over the weekend. This would be a movie called To the

00:26:12.140 End. It is a documentary about climate change featuring Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. This movie

00:26:21.040 opened in 120 theaters. Do you know how much money the movie brought in? The movie, I've never seen

00:26:30.280 numbers like this before. I've been in Hollywood. I've worked in the media for a long time. 120

00:26:35.880 theaters had the movie. The movie brought in $9,667. That is no money. It brought in statistically

00:26:50.880 zero money. This was directed by a woman named Rachel Lears. Rachel Lears' previous movie was on 0.97

00:26:58.400 Netflix. It's called Knock Down the House. It also featured AOC. The way you knew this movie was a

00:27:04.680 real doozy is if you go to Rotten Tomatoes to look at that movie, her previous movie had a critic score

00:27:10.100 of 99% on Rotten Tomatoes and an audience score of 11%. So especially if you're talking about political

00:27:21.200 content, when a movie has a high critic score, that's usually a bad sign. When a movie has a low

00:27:26.140 audience score, that's usually a bad sign. And when the delta between the critics and the audience score

00:27:30.460 is very, very great, you know that you have got just a primo piece of Democrat propaganda.

00:27:35.820 So for this movie, the climate change movie, to the end, the critic score is 83%. So it's much lower

00:27:42.080 than her previous AOC movie. And as I chose you, man, even the critics couldn't totally get behind

00:27:46.600 this one. And there is no audience score because no one saw it. So there aren't enough people reviews,

00:27:54.380 audience reviews, to figure that out. There's no appetite for this stuff, which is very encouraging.

00:28:00.460 Because if you just read the New York Times and watched CNN and listened to your teachers

00:28:04.300 in your liberal schools and listened to the government, you would believe that people were

00:28:10.940 truly on the edge of their seats, waiting for the nuclear, well, not nuclear, I guess,

00:28:17.860 solar apocalypse, waiting for the environmental disaster. The world's going to end in five years, 0.98

00:28:23.080 but no one cares. No one believes it. Nobody cares. It is contrived. It is a lie that we are being

00:28:29.920 told. It's a bill of goods that we are being told. I'm not even saying it's a bill of goods

00:28:34.000 about the environment stuff. I mean, I don't even know what the story is about the environment.

00:28:37.700 They said that the world was cooling and we were headed for an ice age and all the top scientists

00:28:41.780 said it and all the media said it. And they said it was warming and we're going to all go extinct

00:28:46.080 really soon. And then they said, it's just kind of doing stuff. It's just, it's changing.

00:28:51.260 That's going to kill us. And they keep pushing forward the date of when the world is going to end.

00:28:55.020 And so I don't even know what the thesis is, but the bill of goods that they are selling us

00:28:59.500 is that this is a top issue. This is not a top issue for anybody. Nobody actually cares. Don't be

00:29:07.180 put in that trance, okay? They can convince you, you who watched the clip of Donald Trump,

00:29:12.660 you watched him not tell people to inject themselves with bleach. And they convinced you

00:29:17.620 that he told you to inject yourself with bleach. They put you in a trance. It's a form of hypnosis.

00:29:23.820 Do not let them do that on these other issues. Do not let them do that on climate change

00:29:28.000 or anything else. It's a real, it's a real art, this art of deception. Speaking of the art of

00:29:35.380 deception, it's going to be one of my best transitions ever. Daily Wire is just breaking

00:29:40.240 some news now. We've had an investigator, investigative reporter, Bree Dale on this story

00:29:45.840 for a while now. And it's a really quirky, strange story. One attorney is describing the story

00:29:53.020 is a high-tech heist. And the broad strokes, I encourage you to go to dailywire.com and read

00:29:58.080 the story. The broad strokes of it are that people are stealing, they seem to be stealing

00:30:04.960 the priceless art from the Vatican without taking the physical art. They're doing it,

00:30:10.880 it would seem, through these corrupt kind of licensing deals such that, here's how I'll explain it.

00:30:19.460 If I were to put a book together of all that beautiful art that's owned by the Vatican right

00:30:23.820 now, I would have to license the art from the Vatican or from some intermediary company

00:30:29.980 between me and the Vatican. So there was a company that wanted to print some photos of the Vatican art.

00:30:37.300 They go and they see that the Vatican art was listed in this book. And so they contracted this

00:30:44.960 company that put out the book. It was called Scripta Moneant. And said, oh, okay, how do we

00:30:50.400 get the rights to these pictures? And they said, okay, well, you've got to do it with this collaboration

00:30:54.740 that we've got with the Vatican Museum's director, Monsignor Paolo Nicolini. And so Scripta said,

00:31:00.640 here, don't worry, here's how we'll take care of it. Just send us $550,000 and then send a cash

00:31:08.120 wire in the amount of $82,500 cash wire. And then we'll be able to get you this art.

00:31:15.660 Now, what our reporters seem to uncover is that some of this money looked like it was going directly

00:31:22.720 to the Monsignor. Well, that's kind of weird. And the Vatican didn't seem to know that this was being

00:31:29.300 licensed out. And so anyway, it's a whole convoluted story. Give it a read. I find this sort of thing

00:31:33.140 very, very fascinating because something somewhere here doesn't make a lot of sense. It would seem to

00:31:39.120 be some kind of financial corruption somewhere or gross incompetence. But people are making

00:31:46.500 hundreds and thousands of dollars, probably millions of dollars off of art that is owned

00:31:52.160 by the Vatican. And the Vatican doesn't really seem to be getting that money. It doesn't really seem to

00:31:57.540 care that it's not. And it just, the reason I bring up that story other than it's kind of an

00:32:02.500 interesting investigative piece that Daily Wire uncovered, is to show you how the corruption

00:32:08.760 works. Corruption, use the Catholic Church as an example. The Catholic Church scandals in recent years.

00:32:19.140 What are the scandals? It's the sex scandals, of course. And they're very scandalous. There's no

00:32:23.720 doubt about that. But when you look into the actual abuse that the Catholic Church and members of

00:32:32.440 the clergy engaged in, you will notice that the Catholic sex abuse scandal is no worse, 0.86

00:32:39.280 no more widespread in terms of its numbers than sex abuse among any other religious group.

00:32:48.880 And so you remember the Southern Baptist Convention had a big one just a few years ago,

00:32:52.420 big sex abuse scandal. There have been sex abuse scandals in the Hasidic community. There have been

00:32:57.020 just in every religious group through these scandals. Furthermore, sex abuse in the Catholic Church is 0.95

00:33:03.720 much less prevalent than sex abuse in public schools. So these edgy atheists and leftists and 0.99

00:33:11.240 secularists, they always want to make snickering jokes about those pedo priests, those little child 0.99

00:33:17.200 diddling priests. Well, okay, if you're going to make those jokes, you should make those jokes much more 0.99

00:33:23.460 frequently about public school teachers. People will be very offended. They'll say, that's a horrible

00:33:28.980 thing. There's another plenty of great public school teachers, plenty of great priests, the vast majority

00:33:33.220 of them. It doesn't downplay the abuse. People really have been abused by priests and teachers and

00:33:38.000 everything. But it's just so, that's what people focus on, right? The much more widespread sorts of

00:33:44.920 corruption. These subtle little things. A guy maybe paid off this guy and it was some cash under the

00:33:50.780 table and you better, there was a trend I noticed in recent years of whenever anyone started to look

00:33:58.160 into the Vatican Bank and some of the corruption that was going on at the Vatican Bank, those people

00:34:03.480 would always find themselves on the outs. Maybe they'd get accused of sex abuse, maybe they'd be

00:34:06.880 accused of something else, but it was very hard to look into the corruption at the Vatican Bank.

00:34:11.720 That's the kind of subtle corruption that you see. Here's a great example of this.

00:34:17.320 The New York Times. We know the New York Times is corrupt. We know the press is corrupt. But they're

00:34:21.460 not just corrupt on the big ticket sensationalist top headline items. It's all the little stuff.

00:34:27.300 New York Times just ran a piece on the most stylish people in the country. And do you know who made the

00:34:33.300 list? John Fetterman. John Fetterman, the senator elect from Pennsylvania, this man who is not, I don't

00:34:43.820 want to be mean and sort of make fun of his appearance, but he's, you know, he's a, he's kind

00:34:49.020 of a big, he's an interesting looking guy. And when we talk about his style, the man, you know,

00:34:56.060 he's not a Gucci model. Okay. The guy wears big oversized hoodies and gym shorts and he's generally

00:35:03.900 kind of unkempt and he can wear running shoes and he's not, he's not Marcello Mastroianni. Okay.

00:35:11.840 So why did the New York Times say that he's an icon of style? Do you think he's very stylish? No.

00:35:16.720 Does the New York Times think he's stylish? No. Does John Fetterman think that he's stylish? No.

00:35:22.380 Nobody does. That's why. They are dead set on telling you that John Fetterman is stylish because

00:35:36.380 they are dead set on transgressing and subverting everything that you believe, everything that you

00:35:41.860 know to be true. It's a power play. If they can tell you, this is the end of 1984. I know it's an

00:35:47.640 overused example, but too bad. If they can tell you to say that two plus two equals five and they

00:35:53.280 can make you say that and they can make you even believe that in some cases, then they have total

00:35:58.880 power over you. They're not listing John Fetterman in their stylish collection of people despite his

00:36:09.000 lack of style and fashion. They're doing it because of his lack of style and fashion. They're doing it

00:36:14.160 because they know it's a lie. They're doing it because they call good evil and evil good and

00:36:17.940 truth falsehood and falsehood truth. They call beautiful images and fashion and art ugly and

00:36:27.140 ugly images and fashion and art. Beautiful. They're so dishonest. The Washington Post just had a similar

00:36:34.660 sort of attack. They came out and they were describing the Twitter files releases, which they are doing their

00:36:40.660 best to downplay. And it's why I think Elon Musk is releasing it so slowly and so consistently is so

00:36:47.540 that they can't, that the media can't just come out and shut the whole thing down and say, oh, it's

00:36:52.180 nothing. Look away, nothing to see here. But he keeps it in the news despite them saying it's a nothing

00:36:57.600 burger, nothing to see here, move on, move on. So Washington Post comes out and they say,

00:37:02.440 they're talking about Yoel Roth, former head of safety and trust. And they say, his communications with

00:37:07.980 other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter files,

00:37:11.820 a series of tweets by conservative journalists, Matt Taibbi and Barry Weiss. So they're trying to

00:37:19.240 downplay excellent journalism, much better journalism than anything the Washington Post has put out.

00:37:23.620 They're trying to downplay the journalism by Taibbi and Barry Weiss. But the most insane part of that is

00:37:30.100 they call them conservative journalists. Matt Taibbi is an atheist, former contributing editor

00:37:38.460 to Rolling Stone. Barry Weiss is a lesbian, former staff editor at the op-ed page of the New York Times 1.00

00:37:45.900 and a bunch of other liberal places. I like their work. I mean, obviously they're doing very good work

00:37:50.880 on the Twitter files and I like some of their other work as well. If those two people are conservatives,

00:37:55.980 I don't know what conservative means. They're obviously not conservatives. All that is meant

00:38:02.860 by conservative now, as the Washington Post and the Libs are using it, is just people we don't like.

00:38:08.440 They're saying the Twitter files, a series of tweets by people that we don't like, Matt Taibbi and

00:38:13.980 Barry Weiss. That's all it means. You're all conservatives now. This is how Bill Maher and Joe Rogan

00:38:20.720 and all the rest of these guys, and Elon Musk for that matter, have become conservatives.

00:38:25.400 None of these people are particularly conservative. All of these people voted for Barack Obama.

00:38:30.480 All of these people, by any reasonable measure, would be on the left.

00:38:36.380 But because of the dishonesty of the media, many of them have moved further to the right.

00:38:44.900 And because of the dishonesty of the media, people will refer to them as being on the right.

00:38:49.440 Now, I'm imploring you, do not miss out on our last Daily Wire backstage of the year.

00:38:54.120 That would be tonight, 7, 6 o'clock central. From the red wave that was not, to Elon dropping the

00:39:01.880 Twitter files, the rest of the gang and I will be discussing the most important stories of the day

00:39:07.680 and the year. Witness the festivities and join me, Ben, Matt, Drew, the God King Jeremy Boring,

00:39:13.720 for a very merry backstage. You do not want to miss it. So tune in tonight, 7, 6 central,

00:39:17.440 dailywireplus.com. We will see you there.

00:39:24.980 Speaking of definitions, the Cambridge Dictionary, sort of the younger stepbrother of the Oxford

00:39:33.800 Dictionary. No one ever cites the Cambridge Dictionary. It's always the Oxford English

00:39:37.000 Dictionary. But anyway, the Cambridge Dictionary has just updated its definition of woman.

00:39:40.960 Here we go. You know, I think we all know. Okay, here, what's their definition? Their definition

00:39:49.120 of woman now includes, as one of those subsets, an adult who lives and identifies as female,

00:39:56.420 though they have been said to have a different sex at birth. First problem with this, who's they?

00:40:03.920 You're talking about a single individual, but now you're using they. But the Oxford English

00:40:09.440 Dictionary tells me that he is the single gender-neutral pronoun. So already you see the 1.00

00:40:16.120 transgenderism in the definition. Before they say anything about what a woman, it's just the use of

00:40:20.560 they does that. And they say, what's a woman? A woman is an adult who lives and identifies as female, 1.00

00:40:27.620 though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth. Merriam-Webster did something

00:40:33.880 differently. Merriam-Webster says a woman can be someone who has a gender identity that is the 0.86

00:40:40.960 opposite of male. So it could be a man, but as long as his gender identity is the opposite of male,

00:40:46.240 he is a woman. So what do we do about this? The conservative response to date to the people 1.00

00:40:53.660 changing all the definitions is what? It's to pull out our definitions. So, okay, according to the

00:41:01.040 2022 Dictionary, a woman means a man who thinks he's a woman. But, well, I've got my dictionary 0.85

00:41:07.440 from 1992 or 2002 or even 2012. And that dictionary says that a man is not a woman or whatever. And then

00:41:16.380 we have all these debates. But my dictionary says this. Well, but my dictionary says that. And it is

00:41:21.520 the recourse in argument of a child. This is the sort of thing that you do when you're a freshman in

00:41:29.260 college. And you're having a bull session late at night. And you're arguing over some big question.

00:41:35.420 And you just try to be as pedantic as possible. And you pull up some line. Well, in this textbook,

00:41:40.760 it's, who cares? That doesn't tell me. A woman is not a woman because it says so in the dictionary.

00:41:47.460 Dictionaries can be helpful. They're one piece of evidence to, but that's not, I mean, I've gone back

00:41:52.300 and said this many times when we talk about transgenderism. Because the other strategy we have when we talk

00:41:57.740 about transgenderism is what? We say, well, a woman is, whatever biology says about a woman.

00:42:03.220 A woman is two X chromosomes. And that's a woman. And if you don't have two X chromosomes, you're not 1.00

00:42:07.380 a woman. That's not all a woman is. That presumes that the physical world is the fundamental grounding 1.00

00:42:16.040 of reality. And we know that that's not true. The metaphysical world certainly has something to say

00:42:20.340 about reality too. My soul has something to say about my reality, doesn't it? What is a woman? 1.00

00:42:25.080 Every dictionary in the world could say that a woman is a man who thinks that he's a woman.

00:42:29.100 It still wouldn't be true. The fact of womanhood is more fundamental than the dictionary. 1.00

00:42:36.820 The fact of womanhood cannot be changed by playing word games. And that's what we need to say.

00:42:44.340 Do you think that if you pull out the dictionary, the old dictionary, and you show the liberals,

00:42:48.980 and you say, no, look right here on the dictionary, it says that a woman's not a man,

00:42:52.640 that they will care? They don't care. They don't care. There's no argument to be had there when

00:42:59.800 you're speaking different languages, when you're using language in ways that are totally divorced

00:43:04.660 from one another. Our answer has to be, what is a woman? A woman is a woman. A woman is a woman. 1.00

00:43:11.200 A woman is the complement of a man. A woman is defined by the fact that she is not a man, 0.97

00:43:17.580 but that she complements a man. A polar bear is not a man either, but a polar bear doesn't

00:43:21.380 complement a man. But woman and man are made as complementary beings. And it implies certain

00:43:25.940 roles. That implies certain duties in society. And it implies that men are actually less apt to do

00:43:32.140 certain things than women are, and vice versa. That implies a whole host of political and social 1.00

00:43:39.900 and biological and theological and all these other things, realities that conservatives don't want to

00:43:47.040 say, stop playing their game. Stop playing their stupid little definition game. They don't care. 1.00

00:43:52.400 They don't care about you pointing to a dictionary. We shouldn't care when they point to their fake

00:43:56.240 dictionaries. We just need to say, no, a woman is a woman. You're just wrong. Okay, I'm reminded of

00:44:01.940 the apocryphal legend of St. Nicholas at the Council of Nicaea. And Arius, the Heresiarch at Nicaea,

00:44:12.240 is denying the divinity of Christ. This all according to the legend. And St. Nicholas,

00:44:16.400 what does he do? Does he raise his hand and say, actually, you know, here's my dictionary that shows

00:44:22.560 you what the actual divine nature of Christ is. No, he stands up and gives Arius a smack across the

00:44:28.660 face. And it's a corrective smack. Now, I'm not advocating violence, okay? But I am advocating a

00:44:35.620 sort of rhetorical violence, or at the very least, a rhetorical bluntness. When these libs come to us 1.00

00:44:43.560 and they say, well, look at the dictionary. Well, actually, my professor said that a man can be a

00:44:47.460 woman. Actually, you don't know. Actually, there was a study that shows that the brains of the blah, 1.00

00:44:51.320 blah, blah, whatever. Just say, nah, you're wrong. You're wrong. A man is a man. Well, what do you think

00:44:56.960 a woman is? I think a woman's a woman. And I think we all know what that means. Well, well, how about you

00:45:02.080 prove it? How about I don't? How about I just treat women like women and men like men? And how

00:45:06.080 about you shut up? How about that? You know, I'm all for interesting intellectual scholarly discourse. 0.99

00:45:13.400 I love it. I love it more than most people. I'm all for debating big ideas. But I'm not for babble

00:45:20.120 and nonsense, okay? I'm not for anarchism. There's a great scene of Ronald Reagan. He was giving a

00:45:26.280 speech. Ronald Reagan, as warm, open-minded a guy as you could possibly get, so polite,

00:45:31.800 so chivalrous. But there was some nagging lunatic just belching out some kind of heckling from the 0.93

00:45:39.200 corner, a whole group of these lunatic students, the same sort of people who today would deny that 0.99

00:45:44.920 a woman is a woman. And Ronald Reagan is giving a speech. He says, well, you know, I'm, oh, won't 0.94

00:45:50.220 you just shut up? That's just what you say. There's no winning the debate by shoving different 0.98

00:45:58.160 dictionaries in our faces. A woman's a woman. We all know it. And people who don't understand that

00:46:02.940 should just shut up, okay? Simple as that. It's just crazy, crazy behavior. Reminds me why 0.96

00:46:11.280 the Oxford English Dictionary chose this word of the year. It's really not just a word, it's a phrase.

00:46:17.220 I had never heard this phrase before. Have you heard this phrase before? Goblin mode?

00:46:21.420 Goblin mode. Goblin mode. Which, according to online voters on the Oxford English Dictionary

00:46:29.600 website, what this term means is, quote, a type of behavior which is unapologetically self-indulgent,

00:46:39.200 lazy, slovenly, or greedy, typically in a way that rejects social norms or expectations.

00:46:45.020 Greens. 93% of the votes cast went to goblin mode. The other finalists were metaverse and

00:46:54.280 the hashtag, I stand with. Those are funny terms too. But 93% voted for goblin mode and

00:46:59.920 I'm here for it. I totally agree. I think that is the word of the year. And it won because

00:47:05.580 the voters are recognizing that that actually describes our society today. It's a society that

00:47:11.900 is unapologetically self-indulgent. Everything is just me, me, me. Me, me, me and my subjective

00:47:19.180 reality and my absolute solipsism and my lusts and my desires only to be affirmed constantly by

00:47:26.180 everybody. Me, me, me, me, me. It's a lazy society. I'm not exempting myself from this. I'm not saying

00:47:31.100 I'm holier than thou. I doom scroll on social media apps as much as the next person. But that's lazy and

00:47:36.080 unhealthy. Slovenly society, we don't dress anymore. People just wear athleisure, which should 0.64

00:47:43.520 be absolutely banned from society. I mean, I've owned a pair of sweatpants, okay? I understand

00:47:49.200 this is popular. But we do it now in such a way that's so degrading. We put on these kind of

00:47:53.200 Bertolt Brecht potato sacks. Part of that's because of COVID. We didn't leave the home. But it's

00:47:57.480 degrading. You're a human. You're good looking people, okay? Dress nicely. We're greedy on the left

00:48:03.340 and the right. The left is greedy in that they want to steal all your money. And the right is

00:48:07.880 greedy in that they exalt, or at least in recent decades have exalted, these movies. Wall Street,

00:48:14.740 the greed is good, all the Ayn Rand stuff, everything. And it's in a way that rejects

00:48:18.960 social norms and expectations. Everybody's revolutionary. Everybody's just such a hyper

00:48:22.480 individualist. We're just going to do whatever we want. Society be damned. Our popular art says that

00:48:27.680 institutions are terrible and corrupting. And we need to reject institutions, reject family,

00:48:33.940 reject the social roles that are open for us. That'll make us happy. It doesn't make us happy.

00:48:39.020 Happiness, take this survey for what it's worth, these multiple surveys, take them with a grain of

00:48:44.140 salt, but they show happiness declining. You're seeing life expectancy decline because of deaths

00:48:48.960 of despair. None of this stuff is good. It's because we're all going into goblin mode. And when you're

00:48:54.560 going to goblin mode, you're going to look like a goblin, but you don't want to be a goblin. You're a man.

00:48:58.500 You're a woman. Stand up. Look respectable. Do respectable things. It won't make you feel good 1.00

00:49:08.200 to be a goblin. And this is a good time of year to think about it because no matter how selfish and

00:49:13.100 indulgent and lazy and degenerate people are throughout the year, something about Christmastime

00:49:19.400 brings it into perspective. Because at Christmastime, we at least remember the virtues and charms of

00:49:30.700 family, of doing good, of giving to other people, of selflessness, of worshiping God, of just being

00:49:40.500 put together and nice and not so greedy. You don't want to be Ebenezer Scrooge. You want to be Bob

00:49:44.680 Cratchit, right? And this is especially true at funerals. You go to funerals and all of a sudden

00:49:49.840 people cry at funerals, in part for those who have died, but in part for themselves.

00:49:55.760 As they realize, oh shoot, I'm going to die someday. And are people going to be saying,

00:49:59.940 you know, here lies Michael. He did whatever he wanted. Ah, yes, Michael Knowles. We all loved

00:50:06.480 Michael so because he didn't care about anybody and he did exactly what he wanted all of the time and

00:50:10.040 now he's dead. You don't want people to say that about you. Here lies Michael. What a goblin he was.

00:50:17.160 Ah, he was in goblin mode his whole life. No, you don't want to do that. Goblin mode is the word of

00:50:23.320 the year. Yes, it is. It should not be the word of next year. The rest of the show continues now.

00:50:29.600 Mr. Davies tells me we have a magnificent movie trailer that I have to see. I have to focus all my

00:50:35.540 powers of cultural perception on this to tell you what this is about. You don't want to miss it.

00:50:41.240 If you're not a member, click the link in the description and join us.

00:50:44.320 The Geralt Touch

00:50:50.020 The Geralt To K brainwaded

00:50:52.080 The Geralt To Car

00:50:54.600 The Geralt To K brainwaded

00:50:57.000 The Geralt To K brainwaded

00:51:00.320 The Geralt To K brainwaded

00:51:03.480 The Geralt To K brainwaded

00:51:05.500 The Geralt To K brainwaded

00:51:07.400 The Braingwan 0.59

00:51:07.740 The Geralt To Koo 0.80

00:51:08.640 The K brainwaded 1.00

00:51:10.180 it's a mysterious

00:51:11.240 The com diskut

00:51:12.120 isn't really the Kasper

The Michael Knowles Show - December 14, 2022

Ep. 1145 - The Trump V DeSantis Fight Heats Up

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript