The Michael Knowles Show - December 14, 2022


Ep. 1145 - The Trump V DeSantis Fight Heats Up


Episode Stats


Length

51 minutes

Words per minute

173.55824

Word count

8,890

Sentence count

691

Harmful content

Misogyny

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

21

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A new poll shows Florida Governor Ron DeSantis ahead of President Trump in the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. But is this a good or bad thing? And what does it mean for the future of the country?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 A new poll out from USA Today and Suffolk University shows Florida Governor Ron DeSantis
00:00:04.260 ahead of President Trump for the 2024 GOP nomination. And he is not just up a little bit.
00:00:11.180 The poll shows him up 23 points on the former president in a hypothetical matchup. That's 56
00:00:18.360 to 23. Now, I am as skeptical of polls as anybody. I think that most of them are made up and
00:00:25.620 statistics are totally fake. But there are enough indicators at this point to show that Ron DeSantis
00:00:31.560 poses a serious threat to Donald Trump's perceived hegemony over the GOP. Trump obviously thinks so.
00:00:38.740 That's why he's been attacking DeSantis. And he started up real attacks just before the midterms.
00:00:43.900 And DeSantis has managed to achieve this status in a few different ways. One, he's in office while
00:00:50.760 Trump is out of office. So he can do things. President Trump can't really do things right now
00:00:54.680 because he's in Mar-a-Lago. Two, DeSantis is on social media. Trump is not on social media. All
00:01:00.440 he's on is the truth platform that people don't really go to other than to find his statements.
00:01:05.240 But there is a third distinction that not that many people are talking about,
00:01:09.200 but that DeSantis is clearly hoping to ride all the way to taking Trump's place.
00:01:15.180 President Trump is the candidate of the COVID vaccine. And Ron DeSantis wants to make sure
00:01:22.200 that you know that he is not. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:33.760 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday is from Micah Shobi, who says,
00:01:40.240 tweeted, SBF didn't kill himself right after I heard the story. I know. It's really, really sad
00:01:44.980 that those cameras outside of SBF's jail cell are about to malfunction. And the security guards
00:01:52.080 that were supposed to watch him are just, they're going to accidentally take a nap. And SBF, you know,
00:01:57.220 he's really been depressed ever since that whole FTX exchange collapsed. I mean, he probably would be,
00:02:02.700 you know, if you lost $16 billion and your weird hedge fund sex cult in one day, you probably,
00:02:08.220 legitimately would be pretty depressed. So too bad. Too bad that he looks like he might get the Epstein
00:02:14.460 treatment. Another financial guru and sexual deviant, apparently, who was living down in the
00:02:20.900 Caribbean. Amazing. History repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce. It's kind of farce both
00:02:28.460 times, actually. When you want to make sure that you've got a super serious set of personnel at your
00:02:33.400 office, you got to check out ZipRecruiter. Right now, head on over to ZipRecruiter.com slash
00:02:38.100 Knowles. Many businesses are hiring for festive jobs this time of year, like bilingual Santa Claus,
00:02:43.440 Coffee and Nut Gift Basket Assembler, and Reindeer Wrangler. Those are all actual jobs on
00:02:50.000 ZipRecruiter. Sound like a lot of fun, too. If ZipRecruiter can fill those roles, what roles can't
00:02:54.460 they fill? If you're hiring, you should go to ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles. ZipRecruiter uses
00:02:59.260 powerful matching technology. They find and match the right candidates up with your job. You can easily
00:03:05.240 review those recommended candidates and invite your top choices to apply. Additionally, ZipRecruiter's
00:03:09.720 complete suite of tools make it super easy to filter, review, and rate your candidates. Four
00:03:14.960 out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day.
00:03:20.140 Discover a hiring joy with ZipRecruiter. Go to my exclusive web address to try ZipRecruiter for free.
00:03:25.900 That is ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. ZipRecruiter.com slash K-N-O-W-L-E-S.
00:03:31.880 ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire. This is the key that a lot of people don't talk about with
00:03:39.060 DeSantis. And I'm not saying, I am not saying that Trump deserves all of the criticism about
00:03:45.500 COVID and that Ron DeSantis is absolutely 100% clean on the COVID issue. That's not exactly what
00:03:52.280 I'm saying. What I am saying is in the public perception, with good reason, I think, Trump is
00:04:00.720 seen as the guy who gave Fauci a platform, who promoted the vaccine that seems to have some
00:04:07.180 problems with it. Again, I don't know that any other politician in Trump's place would have done
00:04:11.620 anything any differently or would have performed any better. I'm just saying that's what happened
00:04:16.720 when Trump was in office. And Ron DeSantis, although he was a little bit cautious about COVID at first,
00:04:22.860 he reopened Florida really, really quickly. And he has been ever more so anti-COVID, anti-public
00:04:30.980 health establishment, even anti-vaccine. So DeSantis, who made the vaccines available to people
00:04:37.560 who wanted it in Florida, but did not want to mandate the vaccine, he is now impaneling a grand
00:04:43.400 jury to look into the abuses from the vaccine manufacturers. Florida, you know, it is against
00:04:51.560 the law to mislead and to misrepresent, particularly when you're talking about the efficacy of a drug.
00:04:57.240 We see just the other, just recently, Florida got $3.2 billion through legal action against those
00:05:03.980 responsible for the opioid crisis. And so it's not like this is something that's unprecedented. So
00:05:09.340 today, I'm announcing a petition with the Supreme Court of Florida to impanel a statewide grand jury
00:05:17.660 to investigate any and all wrongdoing in Florida with respect to COVID-19 vaccines. And we anticipate
00:05:26.760 that we will get the approval for that. That will be something that will be impaneled, most likely in
00:05:32.580 the Tampa Bay area. And that will come with legal processes that will be able to get more information
00:05:40.580 and to bring legal accountability for those who committed misconduct.
00:05:45.920 Ron DeSantis is a smart, smart guy. I think this is the right thing to do. So I applaud him for doing it.
00:05:53.580 But it's also politically probably the single smartest thing that Ron DeSantis can do.
00:05:59.340 Because Donald Trump's biggest weakness in a GOP primary is not actually his mouth. Oh,
00:06:05.820 he says mean things. No, people actually kind of get a kick out of that. It's not his Twitter. He's
00:06:11.400 not on Twitter. Well, he's on Twitter. He's just not using it now, even after Elon Musk took over.
00:06:15.680 It's COVID. That's the weakness. That's the way that Ron DeSantis can position himself to the right
00:06:24.300 of Donald Trump. That's the way that Ron DeSantis can counter the claims that he's a squish and a
00:06:29.560 moderate and a never Trump candidate and all of the criticisms that are going to come along with him
00:06:33.700 by virtue of his place in the race and as the candidate who isn't Donald Trump and by virtue of
00:06:39.680 the people that DeSantis is attracting, the never Trumpers, the liberals and the squishes. And he's
00:06:45.020 attracting those people and through no fault of his own because he's not Donald Trump. And so he's
00:06:50.280 got to figure out a way to tell the conservatives and the base, no, I'm with you. I'm a conservative
00:06:55.600 guy. The COVID vaccine issue, the fact that we were lied to about safety of the vaccine,
00:07:00.500 we were lied to about the efficacy of the vaccine, we were forced in most of the country to take the
00:07:05.040 vaccine. If he can really go after the people who peddled the vaccine, that's going to go a long
00:07:11.720 way for DeSantis. Speaking of those people, our old pal, Dr. Fauci is back in the news. Dr. Fauci
00:07:21.320 appeared on Chris Wallace's CNN show. You didn't catch it? I'm not surprised. Nobody did. I assume
00:07:28.440 many more people will see this clip on my show than saw it on Chris Wallace's show on CNN. But in that
00:07:34.880 show, Dr. Fauci explained how difficult it was to work for President Trump because Trump was just such
00:07:43.340 an irresponsible purveyor of medical misinformation. What do you think of Donald Trump?
00:07:52.460 Well, I don't want to get into the politics of it. So it is irrelevant what I think of Donald Trump.
00:07:58.540 But what do you think of him from a public health standpoint? Well, as you know, I had difficulty in
00:08:02.920 that administration because what was happening is that it became very clear that things were being
00:08:08.400 said by the president, those around him, which were just not based on any scientific fact and data. In
00:08:15.140 fact, it was contrary to what the data was showing. And I, you know, I felt very uncomfortable about having
00:08:22.240 to publicly get up at the White House press room and being put on the spot to directly disagree
00:08:29.080 with the president. I have such a great deal of respect for the office of pregnant presidency that
00:08:34.720 it just made me very uncomfortable. But I had to do it, Chris, because I couldn't stand there
00:08:39.420 and be complicit in saying hydroxychloroquine works when it doesn't. You know, bleach works. It doesn't.
00:08:46.100 And that's how I evolved essentially in the, you know, public enemy number one of the far right.
00:08:51.560 That's all it is. I heard the president say that we should use bleach to get rid of COVID-19. And I
00:09:00.080 couldn't stand there and allow that to happen. So I'm just a reasonable guy. Except, except.
00:09:07.400 That never happened. That never happened. I know that most people, the liberals in this country,
00:09:15.000 certainly, and even many conservatives, believe that Donald Trump once said that we should treat
00:09:21.100 COVID-19 with bleach. That did not happen. That was just completely made up. It's a lie
00:09:27.380 made up by the media and promoted by Dr. Fauci. Here is what Donald Trump said.
00:09:33.700 Supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light.
00:09:41.760 And I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it.
00:09:45.260 And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through
00:09:49.740 the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you're going to test that too. Sounds
00:09:56.100 interesting. Right. And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute,
00:10:02.120 one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or, or almost a
00:10:11.980 cleaning? Because you see, it gets on the lungs and it does a tremendous number of the lungs. So
00:10:16.140 it'd be interesting to check that so that you're going to have to use medical doctors with, but it
00:10:20.440 sounds, it sounds interesting to me. The new headline is Trump asked people to go outside. That's dangerous.
00:10:26.300 Here we go. Same old group. Here we go. Same old group. Where in there did Donald Trump talk about
00:10:32.460 bleach? Donald Trump said that there's a way to use light to treat these viruses and that you can do
00:10:39.440 it by injection or, and you can tell that he's sort of stumbling around for, for what he means by the
00:10:43.820 injection. But he, he comes back to then the light, you know, I'm telling people to go outside. I'm
00:10:47.940 suggesting this UV light kind of treatment. He never says the word bleach. Even when he's talking
00:10:52.480 about a disinfectant, he's not necessarily, I don't even know why you would jump to
00:10:56.280 think that he's talking about bleach. First of all, people always say light is a great
00:11:00.060 disinfectant, right? That's why that's an idiom in our culture. He's talking about all these
00:11:03.660 different ways to treat COVID that were backed up by studies. When we're talking about the light
00:11:08.060 and inject, you can inject it sort of, it's not that you exactly inject light, but you can direct
00:11:12.340 light down into your lungs to treat cancers, to treat viruses. I mean, there's, in fact, you can use
00:11:19.740 it to treat COVID. There was a study just came out, it was published here on Cedars-Sinai
00:11:24.960 research showing that reduced viral loads are seen in COVID-19 patients treated with UVA light,
00:11:30.900 doing exactly what Donald Trump said. Long after Donald Trump said it, this was published in 2021.
00:11:36.400 In fact, even PolitiFact admits that when Joe Biden says Donald Trump told people to drink bleach and
00:11:41.420 that would make them safe from COVID, that they admit that's mostly false. They said that's not what
00:11:45.580 Donald Trump was talking about. Donald Trump was, did not explicitly recommend ingesting a
00:11:51.280 disinfectant like bleach, of course. And then they go and they admit what Donald Trump said
00:11:56.820 right there. That's PolitiFact. That's a left-wing organization. The whole thing was just completely
00:12:00.620 made up. Donald Trump was advocating a very reasonable medical intervention that actually
00:12:07.960 turned out to work very, very well, even as Cedars-Sinai admitted. He had never used the word
00:12:13.040 bleach, not even once. He wasn't referring to that. It was a total lie from the media that Dr. Fauci
00:12:18.940 today is still peddling. And he wonders why we don't believe him. The reason I bring up that whole
00:12:24.420 story, one, is because whenever Dr. Fauci's in the news, it's a good opportunity to do my Dr. Fauci
00:12:29.700 voice. I miss him, don't you? No, I don't really miss him. But two, it's got to get you thinking
00:12:35.420 about other news stories. And it's got to get you thinking about other genius experts in the lab
00:12:40.960 coats with the neckties. If they can make you believe, not even just make the liberals believe,
00:12:47.200 if they can make you a conservative sort of kind of believe that Donald Trump talked about injecting
00:12:52.780 bleach to treat COVID, they can get you to believe pretty much anything. That had no basis in reality.
00:13:02.880 And even I suspect most conservatives believed that was true. Remember when there was that line back in
00:13:09.820 2008, where the media said, Sarah Palin thinks that she can see Russia from her house. That was
00:13:15.420 made up. It was a joke. It was a joke from Saturday Night Live. And people attributed it
00:13:20.000 to Sarah Palin. If they can get you to believe, if they can get, I'm not putting the emphasis here on
00:13:26.820 what they can get you to believe. I'm saying if they can get you to believe it, think about the sort
00:13:32.480 of trance that the rest of the country is in because of the lives of these very powerful actors.
00:13:40.360 Makes me want to curl up into bed. And when I curl up into bed, you know what I want.
00:13:43.920 I want to be next to my wife wearing her nice cozy pajamagram. Right now, go to pajamagram.com.
00:13:48.900 Tell them that Michael sent you. Women love getting new pajamas at Christmas time. Pajamagram 1.00
00:13:53.620 makes it super easy for us men. This year, I cannot wait to see sweet little Alisa wearing a
00:14:01.000 set of pajamas from their naturally nude line. Even more alluring than lingerie, the texture and
00:14:09.400 feel of these pajamas is so silky and smooth that both you and your wife will love them. If you have
00:14:14.900 no idea what to get your girlfriend or wife this year, trust me, she wants these pajamas. But you need
00:14:20.740 to order today because last year they sold out before Christmas. I actually got caught one year.
00:14:24.060 I wanted to get them and they were sold out before Christmas. I was very, very frustrated.
00:14:27.380 So don't let that be you. Order today and pajamagram will include a free matching naturally nude 0.86
00:14:34.340 nightie with your order. That is $75 savings on their best-selling holiday gift. Pajamagram offers
00:14:41.100 free gift packaging so your present comes ready to put under the tree. Go to pajamagram.com right now
00:14:46.860 and order the naturally nude pajamas. That is pajamagram.com for naturally nude pajamas.
00:14:52.240 Don't forget to tell them Michael sent you. Everybody's blaming Trump. It's Trump's fault for
00:14:56.820 everything. Mitch McConnell was just asked about why the Republicans did so poorly in the midterms.
00:15:04.420 Now that not only is election day over, but the special election, the runoff in Georgia is over.
00:15:11.000 And who does McConnell blame? He blames Trump.
00:15:13.180 We ended up having a candidate quality time. Anybody remember who mentioned that back in
00:15:18.220 August? Look at Arizona. Look at New Hampshire and the challenging situation in Georgia as well.
00:15:27.100 We did, by we, I mean the Senate Leadership Fund, did intervene in two primaries in Alabama and in
00:15:32.700 Missouri. And I do think we had an opportunity to relearn one more time. You have to have quality
00:15:42.420 candidates to win competitive center races. We went through this in 2010, 2012. Christine O'Donnell,
00:15:52.200 Sharon Angle, Todd Aiken, Richard Murdoch, and unfortunately revisited that situation in 2022.
00:16:00.600 Our ability to control the primary outcome was quite limited in 2022 because of the support of the
00:16:12.020 former president proved to be very decisive in these primaries. Did you catch that? No, not the blaming
00:16:20.180 Trump. No, not the candidate quality thing, which to me is quite overstated. In a year where John
00:16:28.200 Federman was sent to the U.S. Senate, I don't really want to hear about candidate quality. I think
00:16:32.700 there were probably some other issues at play. They ran a man who couldn't speak and didn't show
00:16:36.740 up on the campaign trail and had a radical insane record and wanted to shut down fracking in an
00:16:42.100 important Rust Belt state and who wanted to let the murderers out of prison as his first priority.
00:16:47.260 So I don't want to hear about candidate quality. Okay, I think that's really overstated.
00:16:50.340 But that's not the part I'm directing your attention to. Did you hear the part
00:16:53.380 where Cocaine Mitch said that he had a little bit of trouble controlling the primary outcomes?
00:17:03.500 I thought the whole purpose of the primary was so that the people have their voice heard
00:17:09.200 and they pick their nominee and then the nominee goes on and faces the Democrat.
00:17:14.620 Who is controlling the primary outcomes? He says, we're out of a little bit of trouble
00:17:19.700 controlling the primary outcomes because of the presence of the horrible president in the race.
00:17:24.820 So it's Trump's fault because he backed some of the wrong candidates and he did not allow
00:17:29.820 the GOP leadership to pick the primary outcomes. But the GOP, the Republicans are supposed to be
00:17:39.820 largely hands-off in the primaries. You're supposed to let the Republicans at the local level decide
00:17:44.160 this sort of thing. That's not how it works. That's not how it works at all.
00:17:49.340 They want to control the primaries. They don't want conservatives really to have a choice.
00:17:55.360 And Mitch McConnell says, logo, we want to control that so that we have good candidates who can be
00:18:00.380 the Democrats. Yeah, fine. I get it. I want good candidates too. But I don't want just some squish. 1.00
00:18:07.200 I don't want to send some Democrat to Washington with a red tie on. And I'm not convinced. I'm not
00:18:14.140 convinced for one second that candidate quality is the reason that the races didn't turn out well
00:18:19.440 in Arizona, which was bedeviled by election shenanigans. I'm not convinced that election or
00:18:29.480 candidate quality rather was totally the problem elsewhere in the country either. We need to control
00:18:36.180 the party. Okay. Well, speaking of control, the conservatives now are trying to take back a
00:18:40.300 little bit of control, at least in the House. Kevin McCarthy is a moderate sort of establishment type
00:18:46.940 in House leadership. He probably will be the Speaker of the House of Representatives. But he is facing
00:18:51.540 a challenge. The challenge will come from Andy Biggs, a Republican congressman from Arizona. He is
00:18:56.660 running against Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy won the Republican nomination to become Speaker. So they've
00:19:03.340 already had that. He beat Biggs by a vote of 188 to 31. Biggs, though, says that he is going to run
00:19:11.640 anyway in the main race. So it could be very, very interesting to see, because the Republicans will have
00:19:18.080 a razor-thin majority. It will be interesting to see if Biggs' presence will upset the numbers enough
00:19:24.860 that, who knows, you could have maybe a Democrat coming together with some Republicans to try to win
00:19:29.880 the Speakership. It remains to be seen. But the reason Biggs is doing this, Biggs runs the House
00:19:34.060 Freedom Caucus, is he says that McCarthy's leadership as Speaker of the House would entrench
00:19:41.580 the establishment uniparty in Congress, the sense that the Republicans don't really
00:19:48.820 do very much at all. Maybe they yell and they scream and they make a big noise about what they're
00:19:56.280 doing. But when push comes to shove, the really crucial matter is they squish. That remains to 0.98
00:20:01.120 be seen if Biggs can convince enough people to come on over to that side. But you are seeing right
00:20:07.980 now, I think this is what a lot of the anti-Trump rhetoric is about. The establishment squishy
00:20:13.060 lib side of the GOP was cast into the outer darkness in 2016. And they were furious and they hated that
00:20:19.740 Trump was the nominee and they hated that he won the presidency in some cases. And they were just so,
00:20:26.520 so angry to be out of power. And they now see this as their opportunity finally to get rid of Trump.
00:20:32.040 And so DeSantis is looking great right now. And that might be the end of the story. The end of the
00:20:36.780 story might be that Trump had his moment and now he's going to fade away and younger politicians are
00:20:41.460 going to rise up in the form of Ron DeSantis or somebody else. That could be the end of the story.
00:20:45.720 But I suspect a lot of the lingering support for Donald Trump, and I feel it within myself,
00:20:49.980 a lot of it is because all the right people hate Trump. And so it's not really even about
00:20:56.800 this policy or that policy, or this politician was better on this issue, or this guy was,
00:21:01.880 it's not, it's just, it's just this gut sense, which I think is justifiable that all the right
00:21:08.220 people hate Donald Trump and all the right people love Trump's opponents or willing to support
00:21:14.480 Trump's opponents. And that, that does tell you something, whether that is enough to push Trump
00:21:19.260 over the edge, not so sure. But it does tell you something about what Trump represents in American
00:21:25.860 politics. People are, are trying to take things into their own hands and throw off the settled,
00:21:33.340 established political establishment. Speaking of taking things into one's own hands,
00:21:38.000 amazing story. Just saw it today. A Nevada woman was attending a party. She and a friend pull up
00:21:47.840 outside the house that this party is going to take place at. I guess they got there a little bit
00:21:51.660 early. So they're sitting in the car and as they're waiting, two men with guns come up and throw them
00:21:56.780 out of the car and, and try to steal the car. It's, it's a carjacking. So one of the men grabs this
00:22:03.620 lady's shirt, pulls her out of the car, gets into the car and he puts his gun down on his lap. I guess
00:22:08.240 while he's starting the car, putting it into gear. While he does that, the woman takes the gun and 0.98
00:22:13.800 runs off with it. At this point, the man trying to steal the car starts running after her, tackles
00:22:20.680 her, at which point she puts a bullet in his head and the man stops attacking her because he doesn't
00:22:26.040 have a head anymore. And I read this story and a lot of people read that. They say, oh, it's always nice
00:22:31.700 when stories have a happy ending. And this does have a relatively happy ending in the sense that
00:22:35.640 the innocent party was not killed. There was justice done. The woman defended herself and it's
00:22:42.980 not even like she ran away and then took aim and fired at him. He was continuing to attack her. So
00:22:46.780 she was totally justified, obviously, but it's always sad. Crime is sad. I feel sorry for criminals
00:22:51.620 in the way I feel sorry for a sick person is it's just, they're just not doing the right thing and
00:22:56.200 they're harming others and themselves and their own immortal souls. But the reason the story
00:23:01.640 struck me is, why did this guy chase the woman? This guy was lucky to get away with his life.
00:23:08.960 She ran away. He could have just taken the car. But no, he got out and chased her to get his gun back
00:23:14.260 and then tackled her. She's got a gun. He thinks she just doesn't know how to use a gun and then his 0.70
00:23:18.240 head gets blown off because the woman's got a gun. Why? This guy must have felt so confident that
00:23:26.060 nobody would stop him from doing bad things. And this is what happens when the political order spirals
00:23:32.260 out of control. Much of politics is about managing social expectations. The Second Amendment exists
00:23:41.180 not because of some high-minded philosophy from the Enlightenment in America, not because people want
00:23:50.500 to go hunting or something like that. Not because, that's not the primary purpose or political effect
00:23:58.520 of the Second Amendment. The primary purpose and political effect of the Second Amendment is to keep
00:24:03.480 people polite. To keep the government polite and to keep your neighbors polite and to keep you polite.
00:24:08.960 Because if you are walking around in a country where people can defend themselves, you're going to be
00:24:14.180 less inclined to try to take advantage of people. Okay, if you're walking around in a country where there's
00:24:19.020 strong law and order, you're going to be less inclined to commit crimes because you know you're
00:24:22.000 going to get caught and you're going to pay the price. And what has happened is as our political
00:24:25.720 order has unraveled, you've seen a complete resetting of people's expectations. And that is
00:24:32.400 tragic for everybody. It's tragic for victims. It's tragic for the criminals too. Because these criminals
00:24:37.640 are emboldened to engage in this risky, insane sort of behavior. And the end of that is going to be
00:24:42.420 them getting their heads blown off in a lot of cases. The end of that is going to be our society
00:24:47.420 getting its head blown off if we don't get serious again. Okay, so call your friends,
00:24:53.620 talk to your friends, make sure that you're politically organized. When you want to talk
00:24:57.420 to your friends, you got to check out Pure Talk. Right now, go to puretalk.com, enter code Knowles.
00:25:02.320 Are you tired of overpaying for your wireless network? Get talk, text, and blazing fast data for
00:25:07.040 just $30 a month. Pure Talk gives you the same network, the same towers, and the same coverage
00:25:11.900 as the other guys at half the price. Merry Christmas, everyone. Pure Talk's U.S.-based
00:25:17.040 customer service team makes the switch incredibly easy. You can feel good knowing that you're
00:25:21.520 supporting a veteran-owned business. Here's the best part. When you go to puretalk.com,
00:25:25.940 enter code Knowles, you will save an additional 50% off your first month. There is no reason to pay
00:25:30.660 Verizon, ATT, and T-Mobile over $80 a month for wireless services when you get the same service on the
00:25:36.540 same network at Pure Talk for half the price. Go to puretalk.com, enter code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S,
00:25:41.840 to save 50% off your first month. That is puretalk.com. Promo code Knowles for 50% off your first month.
00:25:47.600 Pure Talk, simply smarter wireless. Head on over right now. I really love these guys saving me a ton
00:25:55.040 of money. I think you are going to love them too, and you get the same great network, same great stuff
00:26:00.680 right now. Promo code Knowles, 50% off your first month at puretalk.com. Speaking of firearms,
00:26:06.340 there was a major bomb at movie theaters over the weekend. This would be a movie called To the
00:26:12.140 End. It is a documentary about climate change featuring Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. This movie
00:26:21.040 opened in 120 theaters. Do you know how much money the movie brought in? The movie, I've never seen
00:26:30.280 numbers like this before. I've been in Hollywood. I've worked in the media for a long time. 120
00:26:35.880 theaters had the movie. The movie brought in $9,667. That is no money. It brought in statistically
00:26:50.880 zero money. This was directed by a woman named Rachel Lears. Rachel Lears' previous movie was on 0.97
00:26:58.400 Netflix. It's called Knock Down the House. It also featured AOC. The way you knew this movie was a
00:27:04.680 real doozy is if you go to Rotten Tomatoes to look at that movie, her previous movie had a critic score
00:27:10.100 of 99% on Rotten Tomatoes and an audience score of 11%. So especially if you're talking about political
00:27:21.200 content, when a movie has a high critic score, that's usually a bad sign. When a movie has a low
00:27:26.140 audience score, that's usually a bad sign. And when the delta between the critics and the audience score
00:27:30.460 is very, very great, you know that you have got just a primo piece of Democrat propaganda.
00:27:35.820 So for this movie, the climate change movie, to the end, the critic score is 83%. So it's much lower
00:27:42.080 than her previous AOC movie. And as I chose you, man, even the critics couldn't totally get behind
00:27:46.600 this one. And there is no audience score because no one saw it. So there aren't enough people reviews,
00:27:54.380 audience reviews, to figure that out. There's no appetite for this stuff, which is very encouraging.
00:28:00.460 Because if you just read the New York Times and watched CNN and listened to your teachers
00:28:04.300 in your liberal schools and listened to the government, you would believe that people were
00:28:10.940 truly on the edge of their seats, waiting for the nuclear, well, not nuclear, I guess,
00:28:17.860 solar apocalypse, waiting for the environmental disaster. The world's going to end in five years, 0.98
00:28:23.080 but no one cares. No one believes it. Nobody cares. It is contrived. It is a lie that we are being
00:28:29.920 told. It's a bill of goods that we are being told. I'm not even saying it's a bill of goods
00:28:34.000 about the environment stuff. I mean, I don't even know what the story is about the environment.
00:28:37.700 They said that the world was cooling and we were headed for an ice age and all the top scientists
00:28:41.780 said it and all the media said it. And they said it was warming and we're going to all go extinct
00:28:46.080 really soon. And then they said, it's just kind of doing stuff. It's just, it's changing.
00:28:51.260 That's going to kill us. And they keep pushing forward the date of when the world is going to end.
00:28:55.020 And so I don't even know what the thesis is, but the bill of goods that they are selling us
00:28:59.500 is that this is a top issue. This is not a top issue for anybody. Nobody actually cares. Don't be
00:29:07.180 put in that trance, okay? They can convince you, you who watched the clip of Donald Trump,
00:29:12.660 you watched him not tell people to inject themselves with bleach. And they convinced you
00:29:17.620 that he told you to inject yourself with bleach. They put you in a trance. It's a form of hypnosis.
00:29:23.820 Do not let them do that on these other issues. Do not let them do that on climate change
00:29:28.000 or anything else. It's a real, it's a real art, this art of deception. Speaking of the art of
00:29:35.380 deception, it's going to be one of my best transitions ever. Daily Wire is just breaking
00:29:40.240 some news now. We've had an investigator, investigative reporter, Bree Dale on this story
00:29:45.840 for a while now. And it's a really quirky, strange story. One attorney is describing the story
00:29:53.020 is a high-tech heist. And the broad strokes, I encourage you to go to dailywire.com and read
00:29:58.080 the story. The broad strokes of it are that people are stealing, they seem to be stealing
00:30:04.960 the priceless art from the Vatican without taking the physical art. They're doing it,
00:30:10.880 it would seem, through these corrupt kind of licensing deals such that, here's how I'll explain it.
00:30:19.460 If I were to put a book together of all that beautiful art that's owned by the Vatican right
00:30:23.820 now, I would have to license the art from the Vatican or from some intermediary company
00:30:29.980 between me and the Vatican. So there was a company that wanted to print some photos of the Vatican art.
00:30:37.300 They go and they see that the Vatican art was listed in this book. And so they contracted this
00:30:44.960 company that put out the book. It was called Scripta Moneant. And said, oh, okay, how do we
00:30:50.400 get the rights to these pictures? And they said, okay, well, you've got to do it with this collaboration
00:30:54.740 that we've got with the Vatican Museum's director, Monsignor Paolo Nicolini. And so Scripta said,
00:31:00.640 here, don't worry, here's how we'll take care of it. Just send us $550,000 and then send a cash
00:31:08.120 wire in the amount of $82,500 cash wire. And then we'll be able to get you this art.
00:31:15.660 Now, what our reporters seem to uncover is that some of this money looked like it was going directly
00:31:22.720 to the Monsignor. Well, that's kind of weird. And the Vatican didn't seem to know that this was being
00:31:29.300 licensed out. And so anyway, it's a whole convoluted story. Give it a read. I find this sort of thing
00:31:33.140 very, very fascinating because something somewhere here doesn't make a lot of sense. It would seem to
00:31:39.120 be some kind of financial corruption somewhere or gross incompetence. But people are making
00:31:46.500 hundreds and thousands of dollars, probably millions of dollars off of art that is owned
00:31:52.160 by the Vatican. And the Vatican doesn't really seem to be getting that money. It doesn't really seem to
00:31:57.540 care that it's not. And it just, the reason I bring up that story other than it's kind of an
00:32:02.500 interesting investigative piece that Daily Wire uncovered, is to show you how the corruption
00:32:08.760 works. Corruption, use the Catholic Church as an example. The Catholic Church scandals in recent years.
00:32:19.140 What are the scandals? It's the sex scandals, of course. And they're very scandalous. There's no
00:32:23.720 doubt about that. But when you look into the actual abuse that the Catholic Church and members of
00:32:32.440 the clergy engaged in, you will notice that the Catholic sex abuse scandal is no worse,
00:32:39.280 no more widespread in terms of its numbers than sex abuse among any other religious group.
00:32:48.880 And so you remember the Southern Baptist Convention had a big one just a few years ago,
00:32:52.420 big sex abuse scandal. There have been sex abuse scandals in the Hasidic community. There have been
00:32:57.020 just in every religious group through these scandals. Furthermore, sex abuse in the Catholic Church is
00:33:03.720 much less prevalent than sex abuse in public schools. So these edgy atheists and leftists and
00:33:11.240 secularists, they always want to make snickering jokes about those pedo priests, those little child 0.94
00:33:17.200 diddling priests. Well, okay, if you're going to make those jokes, you should make those jokes much more
00:33:23.460 frequently about public school teachers. People will be very offended. They'll say, that's a horrible
00:33:28.980 thing. There's another plenty of great public school teachers, plenty of great priests, the vast majority
00:33:33.220 of them. It doesn't downplay the abuse. People really have been abused by priests and teachers and
00:33:38.000 everything. But it's just so, that's what people focus on, right? The much more widespread sorts of
00:33:44.920 corruption. These subtle little things. A guy maybe paid off this guy and it was some cash under the
00:33:50.780 table and you better, there was a trend I noticed in recent years of whenever anyone started to look
00:33:58.160 into the Vatican Bank and some of the corruption that was going on at the Vatican Bank, those people
00:34:03.480 would always find themselves on the outs. Maybe they'd get accused of sex abuse, maybe they'd be
00:34:06.880 accused of something else, but it was very hard to look into the corruption at the Vatican Bank.
00:34:11.720 That's the kind of subtle corruption that you see. Here's a great example of this.
00:34:17.320 The New York Times. We know the New York Times is corrupt. We know the press is corrupt. But they're
00:34:21.460 not just corrupt on the big ticket sensationalist top headline items. It's all the little stuff.
00:34:27.300 New York Times just ran a piece on the most stylish people in the country. And do you know who made the
00:34:33.300 list? John Fetterman. John Fetterman, the senator elect from Pennsylvania, this man who is not, I don't
00:34:43.820 want to be mean and sort of make fun of his appearance, but he's, you know, he's a, he's kind
00:34:49.020 of a big, he's an interesting looking guy. And when we talk about his style, the man, you know,
00:34:56.060 he's not a Gucci model. Okay. The guy wears big oversized hoodies and gym shorts and he's generally
00:35:03.900 kind of unkempt and he can wear running shoes and he's not, he's not Marcello Mastroianni. Okay.
00:35:11.840 So why did the New York Times say that he's an icon of style? Do you think he's very stylish? No.
00:35:16.720 Does the New York Times think he's stylish? No. Does John Fetterman think that he's stylish? No.
00:35:22.380 Nobody does. That's why. They are dead set on telling you that John Fetterman is stylish because
00:35:36.380 they are dead set on transgressing and subverting everything that you believe, everything that you
00:35:41.860 know to be true. It's a power play. If they can tell you, this is the end of 1984. I know it's an
00:35:47.640 overused example, but too bad. If they can tell you to say that two plus two equals five and they
00:35:53.280 can make you say that and they can make you even believe that in some cases, then they have total
00:35:58.880 power over you. They're not listing John Fetterman in their stylish collection of people despite his
00:36:09.000 lack of style and fashion. They're doing it because of his lack of style and fashion. They're doing it
00:36:14.160 because they know it's a lie. They're doing it because they call good evil and evil good and
00:36:17.940 truth falsehood and falsehood truth. They call beautiful images and fashion and art ugly and
00:36:27.140 ugly images and fashion and art. Beautiful. They're so dishonest. The Washington Post just had a similar
00:36:34.660 sort of attack. They came out and they were describing the Twitter files releases, which they are doing their
00:36:40.660 best to downplay. And it's why I think Elon Musk is releasing it so slowly and so consistently is so
00:36:47.540 that they can't, that the media can't just come out and shut the whole thing down and say, oh, it's
00:36:52.180 nothing. Look away, nothing to see here. But he keeps it in the news despite them saying it's a nothing
00:36:57.600 burger, nothing to see here, move on, move on. So Washington Post comes out and they say,
00:37:02.440 they're talking about Yoel Roth, former head of safety and trust. And they say, his communications with
00:37:07.980 other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter files,
00:37:11.820 a series of tweets by conservative journalists, Matt Taibbi and Barry Weiss. So they're trying to
00:37:19.240 downplay excellent journalism, much better journalism than anything the Washington Post has put out.
00:37:23.620 They're trying to downplay the journalism by Taibbi and Barry Weiss. But the most insane part of that is
00:37:30.100 they call them conservative journalists. Matt Taibbi is an atheist, former contributing editor
00:37:38.460 to Rolling Stone. Barry Weiss is a lesbian, former staff editor at the op-ed page of the New York Times 1.00
00:37:45.900 and a bunch of other liberal places. I like their work. I mean, obviously they're doing very good work
00:37:50.880 on the Twitter files and I like some of their other work as well. If those two people are conservatives,
00:37:55.980 I don't know what conservative means. They're obviously not conservatives. All that is meant
00:38:02.860 by conservative now, as the Washington Post and the Libs are using it, is just people we don't like.
00:38:08.440 They're saying the Twitter files, a series of tweets by people that we don't like, Matt Taibbi and
00:38:13.980 Barry Weiss. That's all it means. You're all conservatives now. This is how Bill Maher and Joe Rogan
00:38:20.720 and all the rest of these guys, and Elon Musk for that matter, have become conservatives.
00:38:25.400 None of these people are particularly conservative. All of these people voted for Barack Obama.
00:38:30.480 All of these people, by any reasonable measure, would be on the left.
00:38:36.380 But because of the dishonesty of the media, many of them have moved further to the right.
00:38:44.900 And because of the dishonesty of the media, people will refer to them as being on the right.
00:38:49.440 Now, I'm imploring you, do not miss out on our last Daily Wire backstage of the year.
00:38:54.120 That would be tonight, 7, 6 o'clock central. From the red wave that was not, to Elon dropping the
00:39:01.880 Twitter files, the rest of the gang and I will be discussing the most important stories of the day
00:39:07.680 and the year. Witness the festivities and join me, Ben, Matt, Drew, the God King Jeremy Boring,
00:39:13.720 for a very merry backstage. You do not want to miss it. So tune in tonight, 7, 6 central,
00:39:17.440 dailywireplus.com. We will see you there.
00:39:24.980 Speaking of definitions, the Cambridge Dictionary, sort of the younger stepbrother of the Oxford
00:39:33.800 Dictionary. No one ever cites the Cambridge Dictionary. It's always the Oxford English
00:39:37.000 Dictionary. But anyway, the Cambridge Dictionary has just updated its definition of woman.
00:39:40.960 Here we go. You know, I think we all know. Okay, here, what's their definition? Their definition
00:39:49.120 of woman now includes, as one of those subsets, an adult who lives and identifies as female,
00:39:56.420 though they have been said to have a different sex at birth. First problem with this, who's they?
00:40:03.920 You're talking about a single individual, but now you're using they. But the Oxford English
00:40:09.440 Dictionary tells me that he is the single gender-neutral pronoun. So already you see the 1.00
00:40:16.120 transgenderism in the definition. Before they say anything about what a woman, it's just the use of
00:40:20.560 they does that. And they say, what's a woman? A woman is an adult who lives and identifies as female, 1.00
00:40:27.620 though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth. Merriam-Webster did something
00:40:33.880 differently. Merriam-Webster says a woman can be someone who has a gender identity that is the 0.86
00:40:40.960 opposite of male. So it could be a man, but as long as his gender identity is the opposite of male,
00:40:46.240 he is a woman. So what do we do about this? The conservative response to date to the people 1.00
00:40:53.660 changing all the definitions is what? It's to pull out our definitions. So, okay, according to the
00:41:01.040 2022 Dictionary, a woman means a man who thinks he's a woman. But, well, I've got my dictionary 0.85
00:41:07.440 from 1992 or 2002 or even 2012. And that dictionary says that a man is not a woman or whatever. And then
00:41:16.380 we have all these debates. But my dictionary says this. Well, but my dictionary says that. And it is
00:41:21.520 the recourse in argument of a child. This is the sort of thing that you do when you're a freshman in
00:41:29.260 college. And you're having a bull session late at night. And you're arguing over some big question.
00:41:35.420 And you just try to be as pedantic as possible. And you pull up some line. Well, in this textbook,
00:41:40.760 it's, who cares? That doesn't tell me. A woman is not a woman because it says so in the dictionary.
00:41:47.460 Dictionaries can be helpful. They're one piece of evidence to, but that's not, I mean, I've gone back
00:41:52.300 and said this many times when we talk about transgenderism. Because the other strategy we have when we talk
00:41:57.740 about transgenderism is what? We say, well, a woman is, whatever biology says about a woman.
00:42:03.220 A woman is two X chromosomes. And that's a woman. And if you don't have two X chromosomes, you're not 1.00
00:42:07.380 a woman. That's not all a woman is. That presumes that the physical world is the fundamental grounding 1.00
00:42:16.040 of reality. And we know that that's not true. The metaphysical world certainly has something to say
00:42:20.340 about reality too. My soul has something to say about my reality, doesn't it? What is a woman? 1.00
00:42:25.080 Every dictionary in the world could say that a woman is a man who thinks that he's a woman.
00:42:29.100 It still wouldn't be true. The fact of womanhood is more fundamental than the dictionary. 1.00
00:42:36.820 The fact of womanhood cannot be changed by playing word games. And that's what we need to say.
00:42:44.340 Do you think that if you pull out the dictionary, the old dictionary, and you show the liberals,
00:42:48.980 and you say, no, look right here on the dictionary, it says that a woman's not a man,
00:42:52.640 that they will care? They don't care. They don't care. There's no argument to be had there when
00:42:59.800 you're speaking different languages, when you're using language in ways that are totally divorced
00:43:04.660 from one another. Our answer has to be, what is a woman? A woman is a woman. A woman is a woman. 1.00
00:43:11.200 A woman is the complement of a man. A woman is defined by the fact that she is not a man, 0.97
00:43:17.580 but that she complements a man. A polar bear is not a man either, but a polar bear doesn't
00:43:21.380 complement a man. But woman and man are made as complementary beings. And it implies certain
00:43:25.940 roles. That implies certain duties in society. And it implies that men are actually less apt to do
00:43:32.140 certain things than women are, and vice versa. That implies a whole host of political and social 1.00
00:43:39.900 and biological and theological and all these other things, realities that conservatives don't want to
00:43:47.040 say, stop playing their game. Stop playing their stupid little definition game. They don't care.
00:43:52.400 They don't care about you pointing to a dictionary. We shouldn't care when they point to their fake
00:43:56.240 dictionaries. We just need to say, no, a woman is a woman. You're just wrong. Okay, I'm reminded of
00:44:01.940 the apocryphal legend of St. Nicholas at the Council of Nicaea. And Arius, the Heresiarch at Nicaea,
00:44:12.240 is denying the divinity of Christ. This all according to the legend. And St. Nicholas,
00:44:16.400 what does he do? Does he raise his hand and say, actually, you know, here's my dictionary that shows
00:44:22.560 you what the actual divine nature of Christ is. No, he stands up and gives Arius a smack across the
00:44:28.660 face. And it's a corrective smack. Now, I'm not advocating violence, okay? But I am advocating a
00:44:35.620 sort of rhetorical violence, or at the very least, a rhetorical bluntness. When these libs come to us 1.00
00:44:43.560 and they say, well, look at the dictionary. Well, actually, my professor said that a man can be a
00:44:47.460 woman. Actually, you don't know. Actually, there was a study that shows that the brains of the blah, 1.00
00:44:51.320 blah, blah, whatever. Just say, nah, you're wrong. You're wrong. A man is a man. Well, what do you think
00:44:56.960 a woman is? I think a woman's a woman. And I think we all know what that means. Well, well, how about you
00:45:02.080 prove it? How about I don't? How about I just treat women like women and men like men? And how
00:45:06.080 about you shut up? How about that? You know, I'm all for interesting intellectual scholarly discourse.
00:45:13.400 I love it. I love it more than most people. I'm all for debating big ideas. But I'm not for babble
00:45:20.120 and nonsense, okay? I'm not for anarchism. There's a great scene of Ronald Reagan. He was giving a
00:45:26.280 speech. Ronald Reagan, as warm, open-minded a guy as you could possibly get, so polite,
00:45:31.800 so chivalrous. But there was some nagging lunatic just belching out some kind of heckling from the 0.93
00:45:39.200 corner, a whole group of these lunatic students, the same sort of people who today would deny that 0.99
00:45:44.920 a woman is a woman. And Ronald Reagan is giving a speech. He says, well, you know, I'm, oh, won't
00:45:50.220 you just shut up? That's just what you say. There's no winning the debate by shoving different
00:45:58.160 dictionaries in our faces. A woman's a woman. We all know it. And people who don't understand that
00:46:02.940 should just shut up, okay? Simple as that. It's just crazy, crazy behavior. Reminds me why
00:46:11.280 the Oxford English Dictionary chose this word of the year. It's really not just a word, it's a phrase.
00:46:17.220 I had never heard this phrase before. Have you heard this phrase before? Goblin mode?
00:46:21.420 Goblin mode. Goblin mode. Which, according to online voters on the Oxford English Dictionary
00:46:29.600 website, what this term means is, quote, a type of behavior which is unapologetically self-indulgent,
00:46:39.200 lazy, slovenly, or greedy, typically in a way that rejects social norms or expectations.
00:46:45.020 Greens. 93% of the votes cast went to goblin mode. The other finalists were metaverse and
00:46:54.280 the hashtag, I stand with. Those are funny terms too. But 93% voted for goblin mode and
00:46:59.920 I'm here for it. I totally agree. I think that is the word of the year. And it won because
00:47:05.580 the voters are recognizing that that actually describes our society today. It's a society that
00:47:11.900 is unapologetically self-indulgent. Everything is just me, me, me. Me, me, me and my subjective
00:47:19.180 reality and my absolute solipsism and my lusts and my desires only to be affirmed constantly by
00:47:26.180 everybody. Me, me, me, me, me. It's a lazy society. I'm not exempting myself from this. I'm not saying
00:47:31.100 I'm holier than thou. I doom scroll on social media apps as much as the next person. But that's lazy and
00:47:36.080 unhealthy. Slovenly society, we don't dress anymore. People just wear athleisure, which should 0.64
00:47:43.520 be absolutely banned from society. I mean, I've owned a pair of sweatpants, okay? I understand
00:47:49.200 this is popular. But we do it now in such a way that's so degrading. We put on these kind of
00:47:53.200 Bertolt Brecht potato sacks. Part of that's because of COVID. We didn't leave the home. But it's
00:47:57.480 degrading. You're a human. You're good looking people, okay? Dress nicely. We're greedy on the left
00:48:03.340 and the right. The left is greedy in that they want to steal all your money. And the right is
00:48:07.880 greedy in that they exalt, or at least in recent decades have exalted, these movies. Wall Street,
00:48:14.740 the greed is good, all the Ayn Rand stuff, everything. And it's in a way that rejects
00:48:18.960 social norms and expectations. Everybody's revolutionary. Everybody's just such a hyper
00:48:22.480 individualist. We're just going to do whatever we want. Society be damned. Our popular art says that
00:48:27.680 institutions are terrible and corrupting. And we need to reject institutions, reject family,
00:48:33.940 reject the social roles that are open for us. That'll make us happy. It doesn't make us happy.
00:48:39.020 Happiness, take this survey for what it's worth, these multiple surveys, take them with a grain of
00:48:44.140 salt, but they show happiness declining. You're seeing life expectancy decline because of deaths
00:48:48.960 of despair. None of this stuff is good. It's because we're all going into goblin mode. And when you're
00:48:54.560 going to goblin mode, you're going to look like a goblin, but you don't want to be a goblin. You're a man.
00:48:58.500 You're a woman. Stand up. Look respectable. Do respectable things. It won't make you feel good 1.00
00:49:08.200 to be a goblin. And this is a good time of year to think about it because no matter how selfish and
00:49:13.100 indulgent and lazy and degenerate people are throughout the year, something about Christmastime
00:49:19.400 brings it into perspective. Because at Christmastime, we at least remember the virtues and charms of
00:49:30.700 family, of doing good, of giving to other people, of selflessness, of worshiping God, of just being
00:49:40.500 put together and nice and not so greedy. You don't want to be Ebenezer Scrooge. You want to be Bob
00:49:44.680 Cratchit, right? And this is especially true at funerals. You go to funerals and all of a sudden
00:49:49.840 people cry at funerals, in part for those who have died, but in part for themselves.
00:49:55.760 As they realize, oh shoot, I'm going to die someday. And are people going to be saying,
00:49:59.940 you know, here lies Michael. He did whatever he wanted. Ah, yes, Michael Knowles. We all loved
00:50:06.480 Michael so because he didn't care about anybody and he did exactly what he wanted all of the time and
00:50:10.040 now he's dead. You don't want people to say that about you. Here lies Michael. What a goblin he was.
00:50:17.160 Ah, he was in goblin mode his whole life. No, you don't want to do that. Goblin mode is the word of
00:50:23.320 the year. Yes, it is. It should not be the word of next year. The rest of the show continues now.
00:50:29.600 Mr. Davies tells me we have a magnificent movie trailer that I have to see. I have to focus all my
00:50:35.540 powers of cultural perception on this to tell you what this is about. You don't want to miss it.
00:50:41.240 If you're not a member, click the link in the description and join us.
00:50:44.320 The Geralt Touch
00:50:50.020 The Geralt To K brainwaded
00:50:52.080 The Geralt To Car
00:50:54.600 The Geralt To K brainwaded
00:50:57.000 The Geralt To K brainwaded
00:51:00.320 The Geralt To K brainwaded
00:51:03.480 The Geralt To K brainwaded
00:51:05.500 The Geralt To K brainwaded
00:51:07.400 The Braingwan 0.59
00:51:07.740 The Geralt To Koo 0.80
00:51:08.640 The K brainwaded 1.00
00:51:10.180 it's a mysterious
00:51:11.240 The com diskut
00:51:12.120 isn't really the Kasper