On this episode of The Michael Knowles Show, host Michael K. Knowles talks about the surge in illegal immigration across the southern border, and why it's not because the Democrats opened the border, but because the Republicans pointed out that it's open.
00:00:00.000Federal agents encountered more than a quarter million illegal aliens at the border last month,
00:00:05.160251,487 to be exact, the highest number ever recorded in US history. And that is just the
00:00:13.720number that were detected. Many people are blaming Democrats who opened the border.
00:00:20.220Some are blaming the squishes who let the Democrats get away with it.
00:00:23.860But the Democrats are blaming the Republicans for noticing the problem. According to one Biden
00:00:31.380administration official, quote, of course the numbers will be higher when Republican elected
00:00:36.720officials like smugglers falsely proclaim the border is open because of a court order to lift
00:00:42.580Title 42. In other words, the border is open, not because the Democrats opened it, but because
00:00:52.000the Republicans pointed out that it's open. This is a weird sort of quantum politics in which
00:01:00.200observing the political problem supposedly creates the political problem in the first place.
00:01:07.720But the libs make this kind of claim all the time. Democrats, for instance, encourage men to identify
00:01:15.040as women, even though men cannot be women. And even though men who think that they're women
00:01:21.480have all sorts of problems, depression, anxiety, and they kill themselves at extremely high rates.
00:01:27.720But according to the libs, the reason that men who think they're women are depressed and suicidal
00:01:33.500has nothing to do with the fact that they're not really women, has nothing to do with the problem
00:01:38.980itself. Rather, it only occurs because conservatives observe that fact, and that apparently results
00:01:45.920in transphobia. Another example, poor black people in the inner cities disproportionately do poorly in
00:01:52.800school and then don't graduate, or they do graduate, but without much of an education, and then often
00:01:59.040fail to get good jobs and ascend the socioeconomic ladder. And according to libs, the reason that that
00:02:05.540group often doesn't learn very much in school has nothing to do with political, cultural, and pedagogical
00:02:10.520failures, but rather occurs because the mean old conservatives observe that fact, which then
00:02:17.740results in racism, which is why the problem perpetuates itself. Now we are being told that
00:02:24.720illegal aliens are crossing the border, not because the Democrats opened it, but because conservatives
00:02:28.860observe the open border. But the classical mechanics version of politics, I think, provides the better
00:02:35.460explanation. The political problems exist in the real world, and the only reason the libs want us
00:02:42.360to stop noticing is so that we don't do anything to stop them. I'm Michael Knowles. It's The Michael
00:02:47.580Knowles Show. Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment from Friday is from Brett, who says,
00:03:00.720quote, I don't follow sports. Then Michael proceeds to call a hockey player a basketball player. We
00:03:06.780appreciate the honesty, Michael. I will tell you the truth as I see it. That is all I can do.
00:03:11.840I will not pretend to be something that I am not. And I sincerely did not know that that hockey player
00:03:17.660was not a basketball player. I do know the difference between hockey and basketball, but that is pretty
00:03:22.000much where my knowledge of those sports end. Okay, when I want to know about sports, I got to call
00:03:25.920buddies of mine who pay attention. I got to call the Crane Brothers. I got to call David Cohn.
00:03:28.980I got to use PureTalk. Right now, go to puretalk.com. Use promo code Knowles. If one of your goals this
00:03:34.420year is to do business with companies who share your beliefs, then you got to check out PureTalk.
00:03:39.760PureTalk is the antidote to woke wireless companies. It is proudly veteran-owned, employs a U.S.-based
00:03:45.100customer service team, and absolutely refuses to spend money on fake news networks. Not to mention,
00:03:51.000PureTalk service is fantastic. They're one of the largest networks in the country. You can get blazing
00:03:56.180fast data, talk, and text for as low as $30 a month. That's probably half of what you're paying
00:04:01.060Verizon, ATT, or T-Mobile. Switch over to PureTalk in as little as 10 minutes while keeping your phone
00:04:06.300and your phone number. Your first month is guaranteed risk-free. Try it. If you're not completely happy
00:04:11.980with the service, you will get your money back. This year, make it a goal to support the companies
00:04:17.200that support you. Go to puretalk.com, enter promo code Knowles to save 50% off your first month.
00:04:23.440That is puretalk.com, promo code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. PureTalk is simply smarter, wireless.
00:04:32.860Speaking of the southern border, Congressman Dan Crenshaw has a plan for how to deal with the
00:04:39.720problem at the southern border. And that plan involves guns and bombs.
00:04:45.600We recently introduced AUMF, an authorized use of military force against the cartels and any other
00:04:51.400organizations that traffic fentanyl specifically. So why now and why not? Why not years ago? These
00:04:57.240Mexican drug cartels have been around for a while. But the difference now is fentanyl. This is not a
00:05:02.280drug problem. This is not a war on drug problem. This is a poisoning problem. And they're killing about
00:05:08.02080,000 Americans a year. And the Mexican government does very little to thwart this.
00:05:13.060And I think there should be bipartisan efforts in Congress to pass an authorized use of military
00:05:17.480force to deal with them. If anything, that simply gives our president more leverage when trying to
00:05:22.620get the Mexican government to do its job. And that's its job on thwarting immigration, which the
00:05:28.000cartels also control, and thwarting fentanyl coming north across our border and killing American
00:05:34.360citizens. You know, these people are a lot more like ISIS than they are the mafia.
00:05:40.200I know Dan Crenshaw gets a lot of flack and people think that he is too quick to use military
00:05:45.720force or to advocate using military force. On the question of the Mexican cartels at the southern
00:05:51.260border though, in principle, does anybody object to this? Plenty of people can object to sending
00:05:59.560American dollars and weapons and troops even to go fight the war in Ukraine against Russia. Plenty
00:06:04.840of people can and I think ought to object to things like that. Or to adventurism in Libya and all sorts
00:06:11.520of wars of empire that the U.S. has fought. But if the situation at the southern border does not call
00:06:19.760for the U.S. military, what does? We are being subject right now to what is essentially an invasion
00:06:28.140and have been for many decades. And when I say invasion, I'm not just talking about mothers with
00:06:34.100their kids crossing the border or even the economic migrants, the young men who want to come over
00:06:38.500and get better jobs and send money back to their families and whatever. I'm talking about the Mexican
00:06:45.640drug cartels, some of the worst people on the face of the earth, who control 100% of border crossings
00:06:52.880from the Mexico side, who are shipping in tons of drugs, specifically fentanyl, which is killing
00:06:59.460Americans in the worst drug crisis we've ever had in our nation's history, which traffics women and
00:07:04.360girls across that border. And according to certain studies, rapes 60 to 80% of them, according to Fusion
00:07:10.400and Amnesty International. I mean, these guys are just demons. And so if the U.S. military would not
00:07:17.200be justified in repelling an invasion of that sort, then what's the point of the military?
00:07:23.180So I think in principle, Dan is actually making a very good point here. There's one caveat, though.
00:07:28.440I would not, if I were the president today, I would not today sign off on having the military go down to
00:07:33.400the southern border. And the reason for that is, I might have them be on our side of the border to stop
00:07:39.180people from crossing. But I wouldn't have them go into Mexico and actually destroy the cartels just
00:07:42.920yet. The reason I wouldn't do that is the drug cartels in Mexico constitute a fair bit of what
00:07:52.520could be called the Mexican government. By which I mean, there's an analogous situation in Italy for
00:07:57.760a long time. In Italy, the Italian government, for most of that nation's history, has not been the only
00:08:03.800or even necessarily the dominant force in Italian politics. There are a couple other forces.
00:08:08.960There's obviously the church. The church, you know, the Vatican is right there, the Holy See.
00:08:13.000That's been a big force in Italian politics. And the mafia. The mafia is a big force in Italian
00:08:17.960politics. Okay, there's a great show that came out fairly recently called Subura about these three
00:08:23.820powers that control Rome. The government, the church, and the mafia. The mafia is a big part of it.
00:08:28.460And a similar situation is true in Mexico. The mob plays a huge role down there. And so if you destroy
00:08:33.440the cartels, if you launch a war against the cartels, you're going to completely destabilize that
00:08:36.760country. And then what's going to happen? If you have an open border, then you're just going to
00:08:39.620have millions more people pouring across that border if that border is not secure. So the first
00:08:44.060thing you would have to do is secure the border. First thing you would have to do is build the wall,
00:08:50.000get the enforcement down, send more border patrol agents, deport more illegal aliens. You'd have to do
00:08:55.540all of that. But then at that point, should we use military force against the cartels? Well,
00:09:00.560if the drugs and the traffic humans keep coming through it, yeah, I see no problem with that
00:09:04.700whatsoever. Speaking of the failures of the Biden administration, Senator John Kennedy,
00:09:12.860Senator Foghorn Leghorn himself, one of my absolute favorite figures in all of American politics,
00:09:19.180he says that the US is headed for a debt ceiling standoff and that we shouldn't be all that worried
00:09:27.040about the US actually defaulting on its debt. And here's why. The federal government spends too
00:09:33.260much, particularly the last two years, and has too much debt. And if we don't stop it,
00:09:39.560we're going to end up in a deep recession. And Google may have to lay off up to 25 members of
00:09:48.560Congress. That's how bad it'll be. I don't know who does Kennedy's writing for him. Maybe he writes
00:09:54.540these lines himself. Reagan used to do this. Reagan used to have a whole treasure trove of zingers
00:09:59.620just ready to go. But that's a really good one. That there are many people in our politics who are
00:10:06.000in bed with big tech and that Google might have to lay off those members of Congress if it defaults.
00:10:12.940So I don't think that the US is going to default. But I agree with Kennedy that, one, there are a lot
00:10:18.000of members of Congress who are beholden to big tech. And two, the debt situation has spiraled so out of
00:10:24.420control that, frankly, at this point, it seems almost hopeless. It's very hard to dig out of
00:10:31.140$32 trillion of debt when the debt is, what, roughly 100% of GDP or something or more.
00:10:36.640Speaking of being in bed with big tech, there is an issue that I have tried to avoid talking about
00:10:42.800because I think it's extremely petty and tedious. But I feel somewhat impelled to talk about it.
00:10:49.960You know, I was on the road last week. I didn't have much of an opportunity to get involved in the
00:10:53.120high school squabble of Stephen Crowder and making all sorts of claims about the Daily Wire hosts and
00:10:58.600the like. I generally find conversation about political commentators negotiating contracts
00:11:08.860with media companies to be the single most boring thing on the planet, basically like chloroform on a
00:11:16.340screen. But I was perfectly willing to take the personal insinuations on the chin, even though
00:11:24.020it's not true. But just after I filmed my last show of the week last week, Stephen, our friend of many
00:11:33.420years, lobbed an attack at Jeremy that really, very, very few things get me angry. You know, I'm like the
00:11:44.320least angry guy in all of politics. It's probably hampered my career, frankly. And I've said on the
00:11:48.780show before, I get angry like twice a year. And I guess we started early this year. I guess we started
00:11:53.580in January. I was going to launch into a succinct but comprehensive monologue on why the allegations
00:12:05.380that have been made about the Daily Wire hosts and the company itself are not true, manifestly not true.
00:12:12.860I was going to, I had a lot to say on this subject. And, but actually, I mentioned this today to
00:12:21.000Jeremy. And he said, you know, just be magnanimous and let it go. And that was my instinct in the
00:12:27.740first place and to kind of stay above the fray and not get involved in these squabbles. I felt that what
00:12:32.040was done to Jeremy was very, very unjust, very, very unjust. And I'm someone who sees behind the
00:12:37.840scenes, you know, I've been around this crew for a very long time now. And, but I guess his
00:12:44.900inclination is to be even more magnanimous than I. So all of that, just to say, Jeremy Boring gets a
00:12:50.760lot of flack. That guy is, and don't tell him I said anything nice about him. You know, men are not
00:12:58.220supposed to say nice things about one another, especially buddies or, you know, it's, it's not
00:13:01.380how we really operate around here. There are very, very few people in politics who are as generous
00:13:09.460and loyal and principled as Jeremy Boring. And in deference to his magnanimity, I will leave it at
00:13:17.540that. I'll leave it at that. But it's important. Loyalty is an important thing. And integrity is an
00:13:23.240important thing. And I'll just leave it at that. Okay. Speaking of employment, the World Economic Forum,
00:13:33.620the World Economic Forum, which just concluded last week in Davos, Switzerland, had a panel on the
00:13:41.000future of work. And the, the future of work looks really pleasant for the elites, if you ask the
00:13:51.280World Economic Forum. The, the World Economic Forum panel on the future of the work week suggested that
00:13:59.440perhaps the elites need more time off. Not everybody needs more time off, but the elites need more time
00:14:07.480off. There was an international study that showed that revenues actually rose for companies that cut
00:14:15.000down their work week from five days to four days. And this is true really only for the upper class.
00:14:21.340The Dutch employment minister, Karian van Geniep, acknowledged that the four-day work week
00:14:26.580conversation remains, quote, very much a discussion for the upper class.
00:14:33.500The, this is now a year after virtual commutes became commonplace for white-collar employees.
00:14:40.28067% of these white-collar employees were able to work from home exclusively.
00:14:45.320Now, this would be compared to, say, teachers. 48% of educators were able to work from home exclusively.
00:14:51.76035% of healthcare professionals were able to work from home exclusively,
00:14:54.840which seems kind of high to me, but I guess people do telemedicine.
00:14:59.440And then, basically, 0% of service employees are able to work from home exclusively because
00:15:04.280they have to do real jobs with their bodies in time and space so that all the white-collar people
00:15:07.880can stay at home. As a technical matter, I guess this makes sense. But as a spiritual matter,
00:15:18.640this is a very, very bad idea. And the reason it's a bad idea is not because white-collar workers
00:15:22.700who are telecommuting on their laptops while they're in their pajamas. It's not because that
00:15:28.360is necessarily going to diminish profits for a company or tick down GDP for a country. The reason
00:15:34.480that this is a very bad idea is because idle hands are the devil's playground. The reason this is a bad
00:15:40.240idea is because it accelerates a very bad trend that we've been seeing in our culture now for years,
00:15:45.400which is a trend away from physical reality. It's a trend away from acknowledging that we are bodies
00:15:53.640as well as souls. You see that particularly expressed in transgenderism. Transgenderism says
00:15:58.660my body has nothing to do with who I am. I'm purely metaphysical, so I might look like a boy,
00:16:02.920but I'm really a girl. You see this in the move away from real social contact. During the lockdowns,
00:16:11.020we weren't allowed to hug our loved ones. Well, that's okay. We can just Zoom with them. Let's
00:16:14.840have Zoom drinks and Zoom dinner. That's obviously not as satisfying. And because when people work
00:16:21.040from home, maybe they're more efficient in some ways, but they've got a lot of downtime and they
00:16:26.080don't get dressed. And they say, well, what does it matter if I get dressed? I can wear sweatpants
00:16:29.520and socks all day because no one really cares. Well, it matters because you are in part a body and you
00:16:36.700live in time and space. And so if you treat yourself like a big, just lunk of meat, then you're going to
00:16:41.740behave like a big lunk of meat and not like a dignified human being as you should.
00:16:48.180This is especially worrisome for the elites because the elites are extremely decadent.
00:16:52.000Their idea of fighting injustice around the world is to fly to an Alpine Swiss resort and go skiing for
00:16:58.840a few days and eat fancy meals and drink fancy drinks, hobnobbing with the richest and most powerful
00:17:03.440people on earth. Decadence is an occupational hazard for these sorts of people. And now they're
00:17:11.240saying, we need to be a little bit more decadent. Well, you poor little people go out there. You
00:17:15.760bring me my filet mignon. You deliver it on Uber Eats and then you go back and you eat your bugs.
00:17:20.440I don't know what accent that is. I'm not sure exactly, but it's just a vague kind of cosmopolitan
00:17:25.300accent. It's a very bad idea. Everybody, especially the elites, need to be actively involved.
00:17:31.400There's no neutrality. This is something we've talked about on the show a lot. There's no
00:17:35.040neutrality in speech. There's no neutrality in politics. There's no neutrality in the physical
00:17:38.680world. You've always got to be doing something. The question is, what are you doing? Are you
00:17:43.380spending time playing with your kids? Are you spending time working, building up a business?
00:17:47.040Are you spending time fixing up the house? Or are you spending time loafing around and just getting
00:17:53.740drunk and indulging your lusts? There was an article that showed that there were apparently hundreds
00:17:59.640and hundreds of high-class prostitutes who were descending on Davos for the conference.
00:18:04.960What are you doing? What are you doing? If anybody needs to remain more occupied, not less, I think
00:18:13.680it is those elites. Now, speaking of what the elites were eating in Davos, there's one video that really
00:18:22.460seemed to go viral from the whole World Economic Forum conference. This year, the elites played it a
00:18:27.560little bit closer to the chest. George Soros did not show up. I don't think Bill Gates showed up.
00:18:35.960They weren't totally as wild as they often are in their commentary with all the clips because they
00:18:41.240know that we're sort of onto them and we're paying more attention. But there was one clip that went
00:18:45.520viral. And this was the chairman of, how do you pronounce this company, Simons? Is that the name?
00:18:50.260Let's choose to pronounce it that way. Who said that people need to stop eating meat and that in the
00:18:57.560very different types of proteins than meat? It's a very important point that you are addressing.
00:19:04.380My daughter, 24, inspired me and said that, how can you advocate for these zero carbon value
00:19:15.960change if you still eat meat? And so I stopped eating meat. Now the math would say, well, you need to
00:19:25.100stop eating meat for 11 years to compensate for a flight to Thailand. Yes. But if a billion people stop eating meat, I tell you, it has a big impact.
00:19:38.860Not only does it have a big impact on the current food system, but it will also inspire innovation of food systems.
00:19:45.920And I predict that we will have proteins not coming from meat in the future. They will probably taste even better. So why are we trying to mimic meat if we can have a better taste?
00:19:59.780They will be zero carbon and much healthier than the kind of food that we eat today.
00:20:05.400So this is the main clip that's gone viral from the World Economic Forum. And what's amazing to me is no one has pointed out what this answer was in reaction to.
00:20:18.120The question, and I haven't really found a clip of the question as well, but I did get to see it as it was happening.
00:20:25.520Because you can stream all of those. This is one of the odd things about the World Economic Forum. We think of it as this highly secretive sort of cabal of people.
00:20:33.600They live stream most of their events. And the question that was asked specifically referenced eating bugs.
00:20:41.740And the question that was asked was about how we can get people to move away from eating meat and go toward more vegetarian or vegan or even edible insects diets.
00:20:57.260And his answer, the CEO of this company, or chairman rather, a very important company, was, oh yes, of course, that's what we have to do.
00:21:06.320We need a billion people to stop eating meat. And the proteins of the future, they're not going to come from meat. They're going to taste much better.
00:21:14.400Specifically in reaction to a question that mentions edible insects.
00:21:17.820So when we hear that the Davos set is talking about, you will eat the bugs. You will live in the pod. You will owe nothing and be happy.
00:21:30.140Even at the conference where they were clearly trying to downplay a lot of their more ambitious projects, that is clearly something that they have in mind.
00:21:40.300And if you listen to that guy, I don't think that that guy has bad intentions.
00:21:44.080I think that guy probably has very good intentions.
00:21:45.980I think he genuinely believes that is a virtuous thing to do.
00:21:50.720This is the other fact of the great reset and the plans of the liberal elites who want to remake the world after their own image.
00:21:57.880They believe that they are doing the right thing.
00:23:29.680This is a study that was done on animals, and it found out that these puberty blockers might have all these problems.
00:23:37.320All decades after doctors began to give these puberty blockers to children, this study was the first of its kind to use an animal model to examine the potential neurological and psychiatric effects of the puberty blockers.
00:23:53.320And they found that they had profound effects of increased depression in female mice, and then male mice increased stress and a loss of interest in female mice.
00:24:17.700This has happened throughout all of history.
00:24:19.820And you know this because of now how we look at scientific procedures from the past.
00:24:26.740We look at things like lobotomies, and we say, wow, that's ghastly.
00:24:31.020When women seemed to be a little bit hysterical and eccentric, we used to just scramble up their brains.
00:24:36.580That was the consensus medical procedure from all the fancy people in the white lab coats.
00:24:42.360Before that, when people had various ailments, we would put leeches on their body.
00:24:47.480Or we would cut them open a little bit and just get some blood to come out because we thought, if you get rid of the bad blood, then they might improve.
00:24:55.660We've had all sorts of quack procedures for all of human history.
00:24:59.460And so if you observe that from the perspective of history, you're a sophisticated, educated person.
00:25:05.220But in my experience, it's always the very same people who can look back at the history of medical science and mock it or be aghast at the kind of procedures that were conducted.
00:25:17.180They're the very same people who pretend that now we've figured everything out and that you can't question the science.
00:25:24.200It went viral with this medical student, Bronte Remzik, who's a kind of TikTok pro-abortion activist.
00:25:29.360And her argument for abortion consistently boiled down to, well, the American Association of Obstetricians says that abortion is good.
00:25:39.420So that's the science and that's why we need to do it.
00:25:42.340I said, okay, well, if you're just deferring to the authority of the scientists, in the 1950s, the scientific consensus was that performing lobotomies on hysterical women was good.
00:25:51.980Would you have performed a lobotomy if you were a doctor or a medical student in the 50s and that's what the trade associations of the doctors told you to do?
00:26:01.380And this girl, got to give her credit for honesty, she kept contradicting herself a little bit, but she did say, yes, I would have.
00:27:11.620I said, I don't know, I'm not a biologist.
00:27:14.320Ketanji Jackson has two degrees from Harvard, not one but two, an undergraduate and a graduate degree.
00:27:20.860And I thought, of course, of course, any random Joe on the street could tell you what a woman is.
00:27:27.620It takes two degrees from Harvard to not know what a woman is, of course.
00:27:32.780Any random Joe on the street could have told you pumping little kids full of drugs to stop them from going through puberty probably wasn't going to be the best thing we've ever done.
00:27:43.26022 years later, the guys in the lab coats realize, huh, maybe this isn't the best idea.
00:28:02.520I tried to talk about this over a week ago, and I just kept running out of time.
00:28:06.500But I think it fits in very well with what we're talking about right now.
00:28:09.280So Anna Kendrick, the actress, recently went on a podcast to lament a breakup that she just had with some guy that she was really in love with.
00:28:18.360But they never got married, and then they broke up.
00:34:32.640If you do it in a natural and orderly flow of life where you make a decision,
00:34:39.100go on, enter into society, have kids, play around, do all the stuff that people are supposed to do,
00:34:44.100then it's nice and it's nice and it makes sense and it's good
00:34:47.640and you're not stuck in this grotesquerie where you're like a hamster spinning on a wheel.
00:34:52.900You're like a hamster that was pumped with puberty blockers spinning on a wheel
00:34:55.800and you don't go into maturity and then you end up whining on podcasts about how you don't seem to be going anywhere.
00:35:04.900This month, we are celebrating the anniversary of one of the greatest moments in Daily Wire history.
00:35:11.780After months of us leading the legal battle against the federal government and a national do not comply campaign,
00:35:17.040the Supreme Court ruled in our favor and blocked the Biden administration's outrageous vaccine mandate.
00:35:21.920This mandate would have set a dangerous precedent giving the unelected OSHA power over the personal medical decisions of American citizens.
00:35:29.140The Supreme Court recognized this gross power grab and made the right decision.
00:35:32.640And we are so proud to have led the charge in this fight.
00:35:35.880But we could not have done it without you.
00:35:38.200Thousands of you joined the Daily Wire and over a million Americans signed our petition against the mandates to celebrate.
00:35:42.580We are offering 40% off our annual memberships with the code do not comply.
00:35:48.160Had we not won that Supreme Court case, the Daily Wire would have had to either mandate the vaccine or shut down.
00:36:59.340And I really just loved the whole act, and I thought she was really, really talented and stood up for important things at a consequential moment in American history
00:37:10.820and very courageously endorsed Donald Trump, which at the time was not really smiled upon by the powers that be.
00:37:21.920And so Trump has come out with statements about this lady, wonderful lady, and said there's going to be a celebration of life, and you should all say prayers for her.
00:37:32.640Sunday, January 8th, 2023, the world lost an angel and true friend, Lynette Diamond Hardaway.