Ep. 1169 - They Put BugsĀ In The Food
Summary
For months, we ve warned that the liberal elites want to make us all eat bugs. And now they ve finally got their wish. The EU has passed a law allowing food producers to incorporate cricket powder into flour-based products like bread, crackers, cereal bars, biscuits, and other items.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
This time, I truly hate to say I told you so. For months, years at this point, some of us on
00:00:06.760
the right have warned that liberal elites want to make us all eat bugs. The World Economic Forum
00:00:12.140
in particular has pushed this agenda. Eat the bugs, live in the pod, all nothing and be happy.
00:00:19.520
But lots of other people have done it too. Public health figures, celebrities, the establishment
00:00:24.660
media, and many people laughed this off as some sort of crazy conspiracy. Well, what do you know?
00:00:34.500
Europe is now officially eating the bugs. The European Union has officially enacted a statute
00:00:42.480
allowing food producers to incorporate cricket powder into flour-based products. Bread, crackers,
00:00:50.400
cereal bars, biscuits, beer-like beverages, chocolate, soups, sauces, a bunch of other
00:00:56.920
items. They just grind up the crickets, guts, and excrement and all, and then pack them into your
00:01:04.280
food. Now, it is not exactly mandatory. But it kind of is. Because many, if not most people,
00:01:13.120
are going to end up eating the bugs without even knowing it. Think about all the bizarre junk that
00:01:18.860
is already packed into your food. Seed oils, preservatives, polysyllabic chemicals that
00:01:24.340
most people can't even pronounce, let alone identify. Well, now they're adding ground up
00:01:30.520
crickets. And there isn't much most people can do about it. And not only are the crickets gross,
00:01:36.560
but some people might be allergic to them. Some people might be extremely allergic to them.
00:01:41.320
Evidence on allergic reactions has been inconclusive according to the studies,
00:01:45.320
but the political elites don't care. They're going to go ahead with the plan anyway.
00:01:50.200
No surprise there. These are the same sort of people who spent 22 years pumping little kids
00:01:54.760
full of puberty blockers before thinking that maybe it might be a good idea to test those chemicals
00:01:59.700
on animals. That's what we discussed yesterday on the show. These are the same people who pumped
00:02:04.120
over five and a half billion people with an experimental drug on the promise that it was safe and
00:02:10.960
effective at stopping COVID, neither of which claim was true. Now they insist that everybody
00:02:16.080
eat bugs because the bugs are allegedly more nutritionally efficient than grains and meats
00:02:23.860
and normal stuff. They claim it's better for the environment. We got to do it.
00:02:29.580
But of course, food is about more than efficiency because human beings are more than just meat
00:02:35.780
sacks in need of calories. Food is about taste, tradition, ritual, family. Food is one of the
00:02:45.500
most basic aspects of culture, which is precisely the reason the libs are so eager to change it.
00:02:52.820
I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:03:01.560
Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday is from Rustman, who says,
00:03:05.060
someone should let Stephen King know that the Bible is banned in schools so he can let all the kids
00:03:10.240
know to run out and read it. It's true. They always want you to read the banned books,
00:03:13.700
but only the gay porn stuff, only the really bad banned books. Whenever you point out that some good
00:03:18.500
books are banned in very important places like public schools, then they say, oh, no, never mind.
00:03:23.360
Forget about that. No, don't read that. That's bad. You got to read the gay porn. It's very,
00:03:27.720
very important. It's hard to keep up. You know, when I want to read anything for a long period of time,
00:03:32.140
I need some energy. So you got to check out Black Rifle Coffee. Right now, go to BlackRifleCoffee.com,
00:03:36.880
use promo code Knowles. Black Rifle Coffee Company set out on a mission to make the best cup of coffee
00:03:41.900
that ever could fill your mug. They wanted to sell enough premium coffee to be able to build a
00:03:47.140
support network for veterans, first responders, and law enforcement. Thanks to your support,
00:03:51.520
that dream has become a reality. This year alone, your support has helped Black Rifle Coffee
00:03:56.200
expand their team of active duty service members, veterans, and veteran family members.
00:04:01.200
They were able to donate over 120,000 bags of coffee to veterans and first responders,
00:04:06.300
all thanks to you. If you want to continue supporting this incredible company,
00:04:09.780
go to BlackRifleCoffee.com, use promo code Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-A-S at checkout for 10% off your first
00:04:15.000
purchase and your first coffee club order. Black Rifle Coffee is roasted by a veteran-led team of
00:04:21.520
brilliant coffee graders here in the U.S. The coffee is truly one of a kind, but it's your support
00:04:26.300
that gets gear funding and supplies into the hands of those on our front lines. Go to BlackRifleCoffee.com,
00:04:31.100
use promo code Knowles for 10% off. You can also find Black Rifle Coffee in grocery and convenience
00:04:35.500
stores near you. Black Rifle Coffee, America's coffee. People have misunderstood the bugs push from
00:04:42.820
the beginning. A lot of people didn't believe the bugs thing would happen because bugs are gross and
00:04:47.560
nobody wants to eat them. But one, they're not going to just serve you bugs right away. They're
00:04:52.580
going to grind them up into little powder and just put them into your cookies and your breads and not
00:04:56.800
even probably tell you about it. Or if they'll list it on the ingredients list on the back in the tiny
00:05:03.760
font, you're not going to know about it in many cases. But then the other reason they said that a lot
00:05:09.940
of people have resisted this idea that we're going to eat the bugs is they say, well, I don't know.
00:05:15.240
So the bugs are such a taboo in our culture. Sure, other cultures around the world eat bugs,
00:05:20.800
but we in the West, we don't do it. And so what? The libs, they think it's more nutritionally
00:05:26.800
efficient. They think it's better for the environment. So they're going to try to make
00:05:29.260
us eat bugs despite how much eating bugs would violate our taboos. That misses the point too.
00:05:36.640
The libs are not trying to get us to eat the bugs despite the fact that that violates our taboos.
00:05:41.020
They're trying to get us to eat the bugs precisely because it violates our taboos.
00:05:46.860
They're doing it because taboos and standards and norms define culture. And the libs project
00:05:52.400
is to completely upend our culture. And so the most direct way to upend our culture
00:05:57.180
is to reorder the taboos. And one of the most basic aspects of culture is food.
00:06:03.380
They're doing it because it's gross. They're doing it because it's gross. And they're going to wield
00:06:08.820
power over you. And they're going to change the very definition of the culture that you hold dear
00:06:14.700
that they don't like. Speaking of food, a conservative commentator, Jono Caldwell,
00:06:21.420
was just booted out of a restaurant. Now, Jono happens to be black. Was he booted out because
00:06:26.420
he's black? No. This isn't the Woolworths lunch counter. This isn't the 1950s or 60s. No.
00:06:32.260
Was he booted out because he's a man? I don't think so. Now, these days, men can go anywhere.
00:06:39.480
They can go to the women's locker room. They can go to the girls' bathroom. No, you know why he was
00:06:42.960
booted out. He was booted out because he's conservative. Yesterday, as we were having
00:06:48.680
breakfast at this particular location, which I had never been to, it was the suggestion to them
00:06:54.100
to visit this particular place. One of the owners came over to the table and told us
00:06:59.720
how she had been listening to our conversation. We were not welcome there. And I said to her,
00:07:05.400
I said, did I say something that was triggering to you? She said, no. She said, our politics aren't
00:07:11.900
aligned. I'm one of the owners. I'm an owner here. I don't feel comfortable. You have to leave.
00:07:16.780
So then I stood up, I walked out, and so did the rest of my group. She told me that I needed to get
00:07:23.020
out of her establishment. If this was not the Jim Crow South, I couldn't tell much of a difference.
00:07:28.720
Ron DeSantis said, in Florida, discrimination is not allowed, and I hope that they're going to look
00:07:33.580
closely to what happened here at this restaurant.
00:07:37.360
So he's booted out because he's conservative. A lot of people are asking, how is this legal?
00:07:41.300
Well, the reason it's legal is there is no civil rights protection for a political point of view.
00:07:47.260
You can't go to a court and say, I was discriminated against on the basis of my political
00:07:52.020
views. It's not protected. Race is protected. Religion is protected. Sex is protected.
00:07:57.420
Protected sexual orientation and gender identity in the wake of the Vostok decision.
00:08:02.620
Thank you, Neil Gorsuch. That is protected. But political views are not.
00:08:10.260
This is a reminder that one of the big stories about the civil rights revolution is not true.
00:08:18.840
The big line about the civil rights revolution, and you might consider this a positive,
00:08:23.220
you might consider this a negative. You might say, well, it had some good effects,
00:08:25.800
but it actually had some bad effects too, is that it gets rid of freedom of association
00:08:30.120
as an essential part of the American political order. Prior to the civil rights revolution,
00:08:37.760
if you didn't want to let somebody into your store, if you didn't want to let somebody into
00:08:41.980
your hotel, if you didn't want to let somebody to your lunch counter, you didn't have to do it.
00:08:46.000
And in the 1960s, people looked at that and said, oh, that's kind of ugly because some people are
00:08:51.620
keeping black people out of the lunch counters, and that doesn't seem right. So we're going to get
00:08:55.800
rid of that. And most people said, okay, that's a good thing. But there's a cost to everything in
00:09:01.800
this world. And so when you get rid of freedom of association, you are, maybe you're improving
00:09:07.280
certain social situations, but you might be eroding some of the principles that all Americans hold very
00:09:17.700
dear. And you might not even be totally getting rid of freedom of association. Right now, a black guy
00:09:27.420
can't be kicked out of a lunch counter. That's a good thing. But a black guy who's a conservative can.
00:09:32.280
A conservative of any stripe can be kicked out of a lunch counter. A white male could be kicked out of a
00:09:43.180
public accommodation. It has been known to happen. You saw this especially during BLM and all the George
00:09:49.600
Floyd riots. People saying this is a black space, white people not allowed here. You're seeing this crop up
00:09:55.120
on universities, black only dorms, black only spaces, white people not allowed. How's that legal?
00:10:02.080
Well, it's not legal by the letter of the law, but nobody's going to enforce it. If any restaurant
00:10:07.780
kicked out a lib, you know there would be a major lawsuit and the litigant would probably win.
00:10:13.660
And the way that they would win is they would pretend that they were being booted out for some
00:10:18.160
other reason. Be some lib, you know, with purple hair and crazy piercings and an Antifa shirt screaming
00:10:25.380
about burning down the establishment. You say, hey, lib, can you please get out of here? This is,
00:10:29.040
you're creating a nuisance. And you know what the lib would say. The lib would say, well, you're only
00:10:33.020
doing this because I'm trans or I'm a lesbian or I'm this color or I'm that race or I'm whatever.
00:10:38.920
And you know that they would win because the system is set up that way where there are just two tracks
00:10:45.800
here. If you attack anything that is conservative, traditional, pushing back against the cultural
00:10:55.180
revolution, you can and usually will be punished. If you're the one pushing that revolution, you're good.
00:11:02.960
You're safe. We talked about this yesterday when Stephen King, it was invading against banning books.
00:11:09.060
And everyone seems to think that they're against banning books. That's not true.
00:11:13.220
We ban books in this culture. We ban the most important book. We ban the Bible in public schools.
00:11:17.580
Well, that's different. We kick people out of our lunch counters if they're conservative.
00:11:27.040
The Daily Wire, we were booted out of a restaurant. We'd put a deposit down on this restaurant to have
00:11:32.840
a dinner before our company Christmas party. And then they found out who we were and they said,
00:11:37.660
you're not welcome here. You guys, because you're conservative. You're not allowed into the
00:11:41.660
restaurant. And our protest, our big standing up against the man was Jeremy and Ben and Drew and
00:11:47.380
I forget if Candace was there. Spencer, a number of us went in afterward and just had a drink.
00:11:54.300
They were too cowardly to actually kick us out. But this happens, okay? This sort of thing happens.
00:11:59.760
This reordering of the political order, it didn't create justice for all. It just created
00:12:06.800
an opportunity to attack conservatives of any race, of any geography, of any kind of background.
00:12:17.600
If they oppose the revolution, they're going down. The revolution has been televised. And the revolution
00:12:24.380
can be communicated across all various media, including phone to phone. That's why you got to
00:12:31.020
check out Pure Talk. Right now, head on over to puretalk.com, use promo code Knowles. If one of your
00:12:35.040
goals this year is to do business with companies that share your beliefs, then you got to check out
00:12:40.320
Pure Talk. Pure Talk is the antidote to woke wireless companies. It is proudly veteran-owned,
00:12:45.460
employs a US-based customer service team, and absolutely refuses to spend money on fake news
00:12:50.040
networks. Not to mention, Pure Talk service is fantastic. They are one of the largest networks
00:12:54.940
in the country. You can get blazing fast data, talk, and text for as low as $30 a month. That's
00:12:59.460
probably half of what you're paying Verizon, ATT, or T-Mobile. Switch over to Pure Talk in as little
00:13:03.740
as 10 minutes while keeping your phone and your phone number. Your first month is guaranteed
00:13:08.360
risk-free. Try it. If you're not completely happy with the service, you will get your money back.
00:13:12.480
This year, make it a goal to support companies that support you. Go to puretalk.com and enter
00:13:17.580
promo code Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to save 50% off your first month. That is puretalk.com,
00:13:23.860
promo code Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. Pure Talk is simply smarter wireless. Speaking of bands,
00:13:32.380
I have been banned by another university. You know, every year I speak at a number of college
00:13:40.880
campuses. I do this with Young America's Foundation. I've done this for years at this
00:13:45.400
point. And if I got a little more time, sometimes I'll do, I don't know, I could do up to 10 schools
00:13:51.520
a semester. If I've got more work here at DW, they don't want to let me out, I'll do, I'll at least
00:13:56.900
do four or five schools a semester. Well, I guess I'm doing one fewer this year because Penn State
00:14:01.800
says that I'm not coming. Even though the students invited me, they submitted their proposal to the
00:14:07.060
school. I actually didn't know that I had been invited to Penn State until after they told me
00:14:12.160
that I couldn't come. This is Penn State University, Harrisburg. They claim that they have the exclusive
00:14:18.280
right to deny a campus lecture from me. Yours truly, they say, any event considered potentially
00:14:24.480
harmful to the public image of Penn State, Harrisburg will be rejected. Me, they want to
00:14:29.580
ban me whom everybody loves so. Can you imagine that? Shocking, absolutely shocking. This is
00:14:36.840
illegal. Penn State is a public university. They have no right to do this. The students do have a
00:14:42.100
right at this public university to invite me to the school. And what they wanted me to speak on
00:14:46.700
is my book, Speechless, Controlling Words, Controlling Minds, which is, there we go, thank you.
00:14:50.780
Number one national bestseller, very mainstream book. It's a book on the history and meaning of
00:14:55.000
language. Not exactly a bomb-throwing kind of topic, is it? If anything, it's a little bit dry.
00:15:01.620
They said, no, it's too much. This could harm the image of the university. Okay, so does Penn State
00:15:10.480
have any speakers come? They do. Who are some of the other speakers that have come on campus recently
00:15:15.660
that have not harmed the public image of the university? Well, let's see. We've got Drag
00:15:21.020
Bingo, the Student Engagement Office and Student Government hosted Drag Bingo. They hosted an LGBTQ
00:15:28.840
panel hosted by Mix, not Mr. or Mrs. or Miss, Mix Jacob Kelly, who is a queer inclusive sex educator.
00:15:37.860
That didn't harm the public image of the university. It's not even that they won't have
00:15:43.780
explicitly political events. There was a lecture by Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!, which is a far-left
00:15:50.460
TV and radio program. That was totally fine. So I think I've figured out what we're going to do.
00:15:56.840
We're going to have to reapply. I mean, I didn't apply at all. It was the students who applied on my
00:16:00.000
behalf. So if they're listening right now, what I want you to do, I want you to just change my pronouns
00:16:05.400
in the application. Instead of Mr. Michael Knowles, you say Mix, Mix, Michaela, Michelle Knowles. And
00:16:13.760
then I'll just show up there and I'll wear some stilettos. And I'll say this is an inclusive event.
00:16:18.960
And then I can give my lecture on the history of language. And I think then everybody, it'll totally
00:16:22.340
work out, right? Sounds great to me. They're still keeping this up. That's a public university.
00:16:29.040
It's a public university. Last year, a Catholic university banned me. I had been invited to St.
00:16:36.300
Thomas University in Minnesota. They banned me because I espouse Catholic dogma. I'm not joking.
00:16:45.880
Because I don't think that boys can become girls, because I hold to unchangeable Catholic beliefs on
00:16:53.600
a basic question of human nature. They said I'm not welcome at the Catholic university.
00:16:59.040
Not only are we booted out of the weird liberal private schools, we're booted out of the nominally
00:17:06.020
Catholic and conservative schools, and we're booted out of public accommodations. Expect more of that.
00:17:11.060
Expect, if you haven't already, expect to be in John O. Caldwell's position or the Daily Wire's position
00:17:16.160
soon enough. Freedom of association for them, but not for us. That's how it's going to go.
00:17:23.200
And they are going to ostracize us as much as they can. And until conservatives recognize
00:17:28.500
that it's probably a little pastime for us to wield political power through the same sort of
00:17:35.480
processes that the left wielded political power, albeit we should do so in a just and moral way.
00:17:41.680
Until we recognize that, as long as we just keep saying, well, you know, come on, this isn't fair.
00:17:46.880
Look at this double standard. This is hypocrisy. Imagine if the shoe were on the other foot. As long
00:17:50.760
as we keep doing that, we're going to lose. And we're not going to get to go to universities,
00:17:54.740
which might be a blessing in disguise. And we're not going to get to go to restaurants,
00:17:58.260
and we're going to be forced to eat the bugs, and things are not going to turn out very well
00:18:01.720
at all. Speaking of education, perfect timing on this story. This story is so delightful to me.
00:18:08.420
I mentioned yesterday that ChatGPT, which is a very mainstream AI, artificial intelligence program,
00:18:14.240
was able to get a pretty good grade on a Wharton business school exam. This is an exam from
00:18:22.360
probably the top business school in the country. And ChatGPT was able to get a B or a B minus on the
00:18:29.020
exams. So ChatGPT took some other exams. They took a medical license exam and the bar exam to become a
00:18:35.620
lawyer. And ChatGPT passed. Got a passing score or a very close to passing score on both tests.
00:18:45.200
That was true on all three components of the United States medical licensing exam,
00:18:50.020
which is a test that physicians holding doctor of medicine degrees must pass for medical licensure.
00:18:57.060
The app passed it without, quote, any specialized training or reinforcement.
00:19:01.380
It also passed multiple bar exams for different states. Humans with seven years of post-secondary
00:19:11.080
education and bar exam-specific training were able to get 68% of questions right on these bar exams.
00:19:20.960
ChatGPT, which is just a computer with no specific training, got 50.3% of the questions right.
00:19:26.740
And then if you looked at the top two or three choices that the model selected for these questions,
00:19:34.340
they were right 71% to 88% of the time, which what that tells you is that it's not just that
00:19:42.260
the machine was randomly guessing because 71% and 88% far surpasses the baseline guessing rate.
00:19:49.220
I love this. I love this because it contradicts the whole World Economic Forum elite Davos line,
00:19:55.580
which is that in the future, all you useless people, you poor people, you manufacturers,
00:20:01.060
you service people, you're going to be useless. We'll give you drugs and video games. You won't.
00:20:06.840
You don't. Just go away. We'll pay you to go away. Robots are going to do it.
00:20:11.540
Uh-uh. It's not the waiters who are going to get replaced by the robots. It's you. It's the
00:20:15.500
accountants. It's the CFOs. It's the lawyers in many cases. It's the white-collar workers.
00:20:24.940
It's the middle managers. Those are the people who will in many cases be replaced, but not in all
00:20:30.400
cases. And this is the other takeaway, I think, from this. And it's a really important takeaway
00:20:35.500
as we think about artificial intelligence, which has proven itself much more impressive than even
00:20:40.640
I thought it would be. The way that artificial intelligence can render art, can render paintings
00:20:47.200
and drawings and images. On some of the public programs, it's not extremely impressive. On the
00:20:52.720
private programs, it's unbelievable. Some of my friends work in artificial intelligence. They've
00:20:58.240
shown me some of what they're working on. The way that a computer now can write a poem,
00:21:03.060
can paint a picture, it is shocking. And so it's been very impressive.
00:21:06.440
But that doesn't mean it's the end of the line for human beings. And in fact, the advances
00:21:13.280
of AI, I think, show us something really important about what it means to be human. Because are
00:21:19.680
you going to hire a robot to be your lawyer or to be your doctor? In some cases, maybe you
00:21:26.920
would. If you've just got to write up a basic legal document, maybe you would get a robot to
00:21:31.900
do that. If you just need a kind of basic checkup or some really simple aspect of medicine,
00:21:38.460
maybe you would have a robot do that. But when it comes to, I don't know, a negotiation,
00:21:43.880
contract negotiations have been in the news recently. When it comes to a contract negotiation,
00:21:48.280
when it comes to establishing a legal framework for your business, when it comes to deciding between
00:21:54.900
one course of action for your business or another, or for a lawsuit or for another,
00:21:59.640
when it comes to sophisticated medical decisions that require real ethical consideration,
00:22:07.240
end of life decisions, maybe decisions for children. Do you get vaccinated? Do you not get
00:22:13.240
vaccinated? Do you have this procedure? Do you not? You probably don't want a robot making those
00:22:17.500
decisions. And the reason for that is that law and medicine are not just about facts and science.
00:22:26.740
The libs want us to believe that everything is just about facts, facts and science and statistics
00:22:34.400
and the whole world. If we just got to plug the whole world into a computer, it'll make all our
00:22:39.240
decisions for us, and then we can just lie back and do nothing. But no, there is more to life than
00:22:43.760
facts. There is more to life, much more to life than science. You hear me say it on the show a lot,
00:22:50.080
statistics are fake. Statistics are, at least 175% of statistics are completely made up and ridiculous
00:22:56.380
and pointless. Even when it comes to the law, conservatives have fallen into this facts-only,
00:23:02.740
science-only, scientistic view of the world, but it's a mistake. You see this in the obsession with
00:23:08.200
textualism and originalism in law, all of which derive from legal positivism, this obsession with just
00:23:16.200
the ink on the paper of a statute. But that's not all there is to the law. There is the lex of the
00:23:22.720
law. There is the statute as it's written and the constitution as it's written. But then there is the
00:23:27.960
use, to use the Latin. Then there is the background principles of the law. Then there is the natural law.
00:23:36.620
Then there is our moral intuition. Then there is the fact that judges are judges precisely for their
00:23:40.840
judgment, to apply prudence and wisdom. That doctors are supposed to have a bedside manner and are
00:23:46.600
supposed to use their judgment and they have to take ethics courses. They don't take nearly enough
00:23:50.340
ethics courses. That there is a human component here that necessarily is missing from a computer.
00:24:00.960
That it's not all, you can't just plug life into a computer and expect a perfect outcome at the end.
00:24:08.280
Life is too chaotic and complex and transcendent of merely physical, scientistic considerations.
00:24:16.900
There's more to life than just atoms and facts. Speaking of transcending scientism,
00:24:25.700
middle-aged white guys are killing themselves at a very high rate, at an increasingly high rate.
00:24:30.480
We've talked about this for years. This has led in large part to the decline in the American life
00:24:39.920
expectancy. We've now had several years in recent memory where the life expectancy has decreased.
00:24:47.480
This really just started for the first time, not that long ago. Why? Because of deaths of despair
00:24:53.460
among middle-aged white Americans. Well, now there's a study. It's a new study. And so,
00:25:00.040
when there's a study, then we can finally believe it. There's a study out that shows that a major
00:25:07.960
driver of these deaths of despair for middle-aged white guys is loss of religion. In other words,
00:25:14.020
there's now a scientific study to prove what normal people have intuited the whole time.
00:25:20.820
What anybody with two brain cells and any even iota of common sense has known from the very beginning.
00:25:28.300
When you lose hope, you despair. Because despair means a loss of hope.
00:25:37.000
Shocking, but stop the presses. This paper was just circulated by the National Bureau of Economic
00:25:41.980
Research, found that the increase in deaths of despair among middle-aged white Americans, which
00:25:45.720
started in the early 90s, was the aftermath of a declining religiosity in the United States,
00:25:51.340
specifically by the same group. It's true that religion in general has declined, but especially
00:25:55.360
for these now middle-aged white guys, they left the church in very large numbers. You might be able
00:26:01.300
to think of your own memories, depending on how you were raised, of maybe you went to church as a
00:26:07.080
kid, maybe you didn't. And even if you did, did daddy always go to church? I bet in a lot of cases,
00:26:13.360
it was just mommy took the kids to church and daddy stayed home and watched football.
00:26:17.560
That phenomenon exploded over the last 30 years. Why did this happen? Why did this group
00:26:24.020
leave the church? I think in large part, that group left the church because of supposed reforms
00:26:30.920
of the churches that went on during the 1960s. You certainly saw this in the mainline Protestant
00:26:37.260
churches, which at this point are basically like LGBT far-left morning tea hour. I think of the
00:26:45.400
poor Episcopalians or the Methodists, and certain shades of Presbyterians have gone completely over
00:26:53.380
the edge. You saw this in the Catholic church too, even with the weight of 2,000 years of inertia
00:26:58.200
in the magisterium and divine institution, certainly in my view. Even then, you saw in the wake of the
00:27:05.560
Second Vatican Council liturgical deformations that made even the Holy Mass kind of effeminate
00:27:16.100
and shallow, much more shallow than the tradition. You completely changed the orientation of the Mass.
00:27:24.620
You now have the priest facing away from the altar, facing the people, frequently telling jokes,
00:27:29.280
as a priest friend of mine once described, telling jokes like a ham actor in a dying vaudeville show
00:27:34.660
who would do well to limit his repertoire to the little barbs that St. John told the Blessed Mother
00:27:39.540
while her son bled on the cross. I think it drives the point home pretty well. You replaced beautiful
00:27:45.280
singing and serious chanting and elevating music with a bunch of mariachi bands and these lame,
00:27:51.580
insipid ditties from the 1970s that weren't even cool 50 years ago. And then you expect a man to go
00:27:57.700
there, a man who had previously been singing good old proper hymns, good old English hymns or older
00:28:06.540
chanting. And then he goes there and he's got to sing these 70 songs, I will raise you up on eagle's
00:28:14.380
wings. And it's just so lame. And the only people that that kind of deformation appeals to are squishes
00:28:21.120
and libs and women, you know, and, and only a specific subset of women who, who do not speak
00:28:29.400
to a traditional and certainly not to a masculine culture. So for these reasons and more, men leave
00:28:34.240
the church and now they're, they're depressed and killing themselves. There's a political aspect to
00:28:39.660
this as well though. This group of economists looked at the impact of blue laws across the country
00:28:44.500
and how the increased repeal of blue laws are followed by a loss in church attendance and an
00:28:52.120
increased secularization. So we all agree, I think we could, even if you're an atheist or an agnostic,
00:28:57.040
you don't go to church. You can, it's very easy for people to see how a change in the culture of the
00:29:02.880
church can lead people to leave the church. What's a little harder for people to accept is how political
00:29:11.840
changes, changes in the government and the political order, even outside of the church can drive this
00:29:18.040
sort of thing. But it does, as I have tried to make clear for years. Politics is downstream of
00:29:25.700
culture. Sure, that's true. Movies and songs and rituals and things certainly affect the kind of laws
00:29:32.700
that we're going to pass. But I do find that phrase to be a little bit of a libertarian cope
00:29:38.220
and an excuse not to engage in the political order, not to wield just political power on the
00:29:43.400
happy occasions that people give it to us. Because politics, though downstream of culture in some
00:29:49.500
ways, politics can also lead the culture. Culture can be downstream of politics as well.
00:29:55.880
East Germany is atheist today. West Germany is mostly religious, though of a kind of confused
00:30:02.740
religiosity. Nevertheless, more than half of West Germans would call themselves religious. Why is that?
00:30:07.900
Is that because of regional variations in Bratwurst? No. It's because godless communism was the
00:30:13.800
dominant regime in East Germany for much of the last century. And even after the Berlin Wall falls
00:30:20.500
down, there are after effects of that from the political order onto the culture. So what do we do
00:30:27.140
about it? I think we've got to take on both issues. Yes, well, at a personal level, yes, we should work on our
00:30:34.740
own inner spiritual life. Of course, I'm not, I don't mean to diminish that. And then from the cultural
00:30:40.440
level, cult referring to cults referring even at a deep level to religion, we need to reform the
00:30:47.340
churches so that they are more serious and reverent and conducive to men going to church. And we've got
00:30:56.840
to change the political order such that the incentives in our political order are to go to
00:31:05.060
church, are to have belief, are to have hope, are to be good citizens, are to perform acts of charity
00:31:10.300
for one another, are oriented toward the common good. There's no neutrality here. The government is
00:31:16.440
always going to be creating incentives and disincentives to different actions. For all of
00:31:20.720
American history, we had incentives toward all of those good things and disincentives toward the
00:31:26.020
opposite. We had, we had blue laws. We had, we had laws against adultery. We had blasphemy laws for
00:31:33.140
goodness sakes. Okay. So don't tell me that it's out of the American tradition to take these kinds of
00:31:37.880
issues seriously. That is the American tradition. But now what do we have? We don't have a neutral
00:31:41.620
political order. Now we've just got incentives for all the opposite stuff. We've got incentives for
00:31:45.520
people to leave their families. We've got incentives for people to do a bunch of drugs
00:31:49.620
and get involved in weird sex stuff and, and ignore the common good and only pursue their
00:31:55.540
own selfish interests. We've got interest. We've got incentives for that on the left and the right.
00:31:59.380
We've got it throughout the whole culture. We've got incentives for during the COVID lockdowns,
00:32:03.420
we shut down the churches. We keep the pot dispensaries open in California. Okay. Those,
00:32:08.260
those are completely skewed incentives and disincentives. And they're, it's having real effects.
00:32:13.580
I know that a lot of people who are a little, a little more skeptical of religion or they just,
00:32:20.300
that's, religion's not their thing. They say, oh, you know, Michael, come on, who cares? We've got
00:32:24.860
bigger issues to talk about. I don't know. Do you think there's a bigger political issue than
00:32:29.060
Americans dying than the average life expectancy decreasing that a huge group of Americans,
00:32:35.620
middle-aged white guys just killing themselves and ODing on drugs because of a loss of hope?
00:32:40.000
Is there any bigger political issue than the loss of hope, than the loss of faith and the loss of
00:32:47.640
charity, love, philia, central to any political order? Is that, I don't think there's anything,
00:32:53.900
I don't think tax rates are a bigger issue than that. I don't think deregulation is a bigger issue
00:32:57.900
than that. I don't, I don't, I don't think immigration is a bigger issue. Immigration is a big issue.
00:33:02.440
That the loss of faith, hope and charity, that it's kind of the whole game. And I think we ought
00:33:10.800
to pay a little bit more attention to it. Speaking of middle-aged white men, a couple of middle-aged
00:33:17.740
white men just lost their jobs. And that's a good thing. Generally, it's bad when middle-aged white
00:33:22.380
guys lose their jobs in America, but this time it's pretty good. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell just
00:33:28.580
lost their jobs on the House Intelligence Committee. This because the Republicans took
00:33:33.700
over the House. Kevin McCarthy is the Speaker of the House. Kevin McCarthy said, listen, jerks,
00:33:37.460
both of you guys are off the Intel Committee. You shouldn't have security clearances. You shouldn't
00:33:41.560
be around any kind of sensitive information. Schiff, you're a liar who has mishandled classified
00:33:48.340
information for the entire Trump presidency. And Swalwell, you were doing weird stuff with a
00:33:53.780
Chinese spy. So neither of you guys can be trusted. Hakeem Jeffries, who's the Democrat
00:33:59.520
minority leader in the House, he came out. He said, this is a shocking upsetting of precedent.
00:34:04.660
You can't do this. The tradition, the precedent in the House is that the minority party gets to name
00:34:10.840
the people that it wants to the committees. And then the Speaker of the House is supposed to accept
00:34:16.860
that. This is awful. He says, it's my understanding that you intend to break with the longstanding
00:34:23.160
House tradition of deference to the minority party. You should honor past practice.
00:34:32.240
I'm glad to hear Hakeem Jeffries and the Libs mention honoring past practice for once in their
00:34:40.020
entire lives. This rings so hollow. Do the Libs honor anything about the past? The Libs hate the past.
00:34:48.640
The Libs spend all their time tearing down statues of the past and talking about how evil the past was.
00:34:52.960
And how anything that is traditional or conservative is just terrible. And we need to upend the whole
00:34:58.020
thing. Except for this. Except for Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell staying on the Intel committee. That's
00:35:03.400
just, that's the one historical precedent that we need to keep. I don't think so. I think this is
00:35:10.360
chickens coming home to roost, is what I think this is. And I think that when the Democrats, when Pelosi
00:35:17.180
set up the preposterous January 6th committee to investigate the worst thing that ever happened in
00:35:23.960
American history. And the Republicans said, okay, we're going to send some Republicans to this
00:35:28.340
committee then. We're going to name Jim Jordan. I forget who the other Republican congressman who
00:35:32.340
was going to go to that committee were. The House said, nope. Pelosi said, no, you're not going to do
00:35:39.860
that. We're not going to let you have any actual Republicans. We're going to name the Republicans.
00:35:42.800
It's going to be, it's going to be Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger who aren't real Republicans.
00:35:47.760
Who are, for all intents and purposes, Democrats. Oh, but now this is the great upsetting of, oh no,
00:35:53.820
this is terrible. Okay. Well, I guess Hakeem Jeffries just made a slight progressive out of
00:35:57.940
me because I think that's one historical tradition that that's gone. And even if it was a good
00:36:02.960
tradition, the Democrats are the ones who blew it up. And now I don't want to hear them whining
00:36:06.540
about the chickens coming home to roost. This month, we are celebrating the anniversary of one of
00:36:11.740
the greatest moments in Daily Wire history. After months of us leading the legal battle against
00:36:16.580
the federal government and a national do not comply campaign, the Supreme Court ruled in our favor
00:36:21.580
and blocked the Biden administration's outrageous vaccine mandate. This mandate would have set a
00:36:26.820
dangerous precedent, giving the unelected OSHA power over the personal medical decisions of Americans.
00:36:32.580
The Supreme Court recognized this gross power grab and made the right decision. We are so proud to have
00:36:37.980
led the charge in this fight. Could not have done that without you. Thousands of you joined the Daily Wire
00:36:43.260
and over a million Americans signed our petition against the mandates. To celebrate, we're offering 40%
00:36:49.080
off our annual memberships with the code DO NOTCOMPLY. So celebrate one of the greatest moments in Daily Wire
00:36:54.360
history with 40% off your annual membership. Dailywire.com slash subscribe. Join the winning team as we continue
00:37:00.380
to crush the libs. Do not comply is the code. Do not comply for 40% off. Speaking of committees,
00:37:09.580
Republican Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene is set to get new committee positions. This is a big
00:37:16.020
comeback for MTG because she had previously been kicked off of the committees. Now the GOP House Steering
00:37:25.540
Committee voted to give Marjorie a seat on the House Homeland Security Committee. This is a minor
00:37:31.440
personnel issue, so I don't want to spend too much time on it. But it's an important one because it
00:37:38.200
shows you how politics works. The nitty gritty nuts and bolts of politics. The reason that Marjorie
00:37:44.600
made a comeback is because she backed Kevin McCarthy. And she backed Kevin McCarthy in that House fight
00:37:51.500
over her fellow conservatives in the Freedom Caucus who were opposing McCarthy. And it was a real tough
00:37:59.960
fight here. And a lot of people wondered, they said, why is Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is one of the
00:38:04.640
more conservative members of the House, certainly one of the more outspoken conservatives, why is she
00:38:09.480
backing a guy who's being called establishment? This is why. Because it was the only way that she could
00:38:18.340
get any even marginal power back in the House of Representatives. And some people have attacked
00:38:25.500
her for it and said, well, that's unprincipled. But I don't know that it's totally unprincipled.
00:38:30.500
Kevin McCarthy was likely going to win anyway. She realized this was her only path back. Now she's
00:38:37.200
on a committee. I'm almost certain Kevin McCarthy said the only way that you were getting on a committee
00:38:43.120
ever again is by backing me and whipping some votes for me. And it brings me back to a principle
00:38:48.000
that old cocaine Mitch McConnell, love him or hate him. He made a very good point.
00:38:53.540
He said, the way politics works is the winners go and make laws and the losers go home.
00:39:05.040
Say hello to my little friend. That's what he said. He said, at least the first part is what he said.
00:39:09.440
And that's true. That's how politics works. Now Marjorie Greene, she's got a little bit of power
00:39:14.680
back. Hope she uses it. Well, I trust that she will use it. Well, speaking of inclusion,
00:39:19.100
Facebook has decided to lift a ban that it had had for some years now on the Azov regiment.
00:39:28.720
The Azov regiment is a military regiment in Ukraine that has a bunch of Nazis in it.
00:39:39.180
And when I say it has a bunch of Nazis in it, I'm using that term in at least a slightly more precise
00:39:46.780
way than the Libs do when they call all of us Nazis. It's a battalion that uses Nazi symbols
00:39:54.960
and signs and wears Nazi symbols on their uniforms. And so because of this, they had been kicked off
00:40:01.820
of Facebook. In fact, the Azov regiment is one of the justifications that Putin made in his initial
00:40:08.880
speech outlining the reason for the war in Ukraine. He said, we're going to go in and de-Nazify
00:40:14.420
Ukraine. And in the Western press, they reported this and said, this is a completely baseless charge.
00:40:19.320
No, there is a basis for this charge. The basis is the Azov regiment, which does use Nazi-like
00:40:25.620
symbols and signs. And Facebook had kicked the Azov regiment off because of this Nazi association.
00:40:32.620
But now they've lifted that ban because Facebook supports Ukraine against Russia. And so all of a
00:40:38.640
sudden, the Nazis aren't so Nazi anymore and they get to go onto Facebook. All of which I mentioned
00:40:44.300
not to say anything about the war in Ukraine, not to say anything about Russia or Zelensky or the
00:40:51.600
American side, because we are essentially fighting this war with Russia and we're just using Ukraine
00:40:56.400
as a proxy. I mention it because it shows you that political alliances are circumstantial,
00:41:03.480
not eternal. Let's not forget in the Second World War, we teamed up with the communists. We teamed up
00:41:14.080
with Stalin, one of the worst communists ever, a truly evil, evil empire. And we created an alliance
00:41:22.820
with them to defeat Hitler and Nazi Germany. And then immediately after the war, then we fight a
00:41:30.040
decades-long war with the Soviet Union and the Cold War. I mention this to show that even the
00:41:36.400
meaning of a word like Nazi is constantly in flux. Three days ago, the Azov regiment was a bunch of
00:41:43.500
Nazis. Today, oh, they're not Nazis at all. That's propaganda. You're a Putin apologist if you say that.
00:41:49.840
Well, but hold on. Five days ago, you were the ones telling me that they were Nazis. Yeah, no,
00:41:52.980
forget that. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. These are not the droids you're looking
00:41:56.280
for. They're not Nazis. You're a Nazi. No, you're a Nazi. No, you're a Nazi. The word Nazi is in flux
00:42:02.660
because there are no Nazis anymore. The Nazis are over. Nazis refer to a specific political movement
00:42:13.080
in a specific place at a specific time in the 20th century in Europe. It doesn't, if you, even at the
00:42:22.680
same time, if you were to call Italians Nazis, followers of Mussolini Nazis, that is not true.
00:42:27.680
They were not Nazis. They were fascists, but they weren't Nazis. You call the followers of Francisco
00:42:33.600
Franco Nazis. That's not true. They were not Nazis. They were right-wing. They were authoritarian,
00:42:38.600
but they were not Nazis. That refers to a specific thing. And the fact that the Nazis are gone and there
00:42:43.680
are no Nazis anymore and there cannot be Nazis anymore is the reason that this word can be in flux.
00:42:48.440
Because now that it has a specific referent is gone, it can mean anything at all. And it will
00:42:56.140
mean all manner of things. Yes, they call you a Nazi today. They call Ben a Nazi. They call Shapiro,
00:43:04.960
a man who wears a yarmulke every day of his life, they call him a Nazi. They call all sorts of people
00:43:09.820
Nazis because it is just a word that is in flux. The Azov Regiment used to be Nazis. Today,
00:43:15.180
they're not Nazis. They will be Nazis again at some point. Mark my words. Speaking of warfare,
00:43:21.640
the Libs are trying to ban our guns. They specifically are trying to ban AR-15s. You're
00:43:25.680
seeing a big move among the House Democrats to ban the AR-15, one of the most popular guns in the
00:43:29.540
country. And their arguments are not totally persuasive. Nina Turner, who is some lady from
00:43:35.600
the Young Turks, she typified a left-wing argument against the AR-15. She said,
00:43:41.160
if you need an AR-15 to hunt, you're probably not a great hunter.
00:43:48.360
I promise you this is a woman who has never handled an AR-15. She's probably never seen an
00:43:52.140
AR-15 in person. She has no idea how the gun works, what kind of caliber round it takes. She
00:43:57.120
doesn't know anything about it, as is true of almost all of the Libs, including the Libs who
00:44:01.200
writing the laws on guns. For starters, you can hunt with an AR-15, but an AR-15 would not be a
00:44:11.480
wise choice for lots of hunting. If you're hunting small deer or you're hunting rabbits, AR-15, fine
00:44:17.080
choice. If you're hunting a bear, if you're hunting a lion, hunting an elephant, I would not recommend
00:44:21.880
the AR-15. I don't think that is going to end very well for you. But this argument is not really
00:44:29.760
even an argument. It's a moving of the goalposts in the way that the Libs always move the goalposts.
00:44:36.540
Nina Turner and the Libs are not making this argument. The AR-15 is the worst, most lethal,
00:44:43.740
most powerful gun ever made. It's not. It's obviously not. That's why, sure, you can hunt
00:44:47.300
some deer with the AR-15, but you would want a much more powerful weapon to hunt something like
00:44:51.540
a bear or a bigger animal. So they're not making that argument. They can't make the argument that
00:44:56.580
the AR-15 is totally, completely different from any other bolt-action .223 rifle, or even a
00:45:04.900
semi-automatic rifle that is not an AR-15. They can't make these distinctions. So what do they
00:45:10.600
say? It's this kind of snide remark. Oh, you know, you're probably just not a good hunter. They did this
00:45:17.040
with torture. Do you remember, during the debates on torture and enhanced interrogation during the Bush
00:45:21.680
years? The Libs said, torture is terrible. It's cruel and unusual punishment. The argument against
00:45:29.540
that would be, well, no, it's not all that unusual, and it's not punishment. Torture here in the
00:45:38.020
American experience of the war in Iraq was to get information out of people. Antonin Scalia made this
00:45:44.900
point. He said, when you're torturing someone to get information out of them, you're not punishing that
00:45:48.160
person. It probably doesn't feel that great, but you're not actually punishing them. They say,
00:45:55.500
well, but torture, it's torturing foreign combatants. It's against the law by the Geneva
00:46:01.780
Conventions. No, and not really, not when you're talking about terrorists. The whole point of the
00:46:05.220
Geneva Convention protections is to protect civilians in times of war. So if you extend Geneva
00:46:11.800
Convention protections to terrorists who specifically target civilians, you undermine the entire Geneva
00:46:16.240
Convention. Okay, well, no, but the, well, you know what I say? I say torture just doesn't work.
00:46:21.580
It doesn't, it's evil and terrible, and it doesn't even work. Well, hold on. That's a, that's just a
00:46:26.800
separate point. So which is it? Is the problem that it doesn't work, or is the problem that it's evil
00:46:32.120
and cruel and unusual punishment? They don't have an answer to it, so they're just trying to throw
00:46:35.520
spaghetti at the wall. Speaking of the wall, you remember during the controversy over the wall during
00:46:39.440
Trump. They said, my problem with the Trump wall is that it's evil and it's inhumane, and it doesn't
00:46:45.260
work. Well, if it's evil and inhumane, presumably that is because it works, because it's evil and
00:46:53.220
inhumane to keep the illegal aliens out, or it's evil and inhumane to make them try to crawl up a
00:46:57.880
wall, and that's very dangerous, or it doesn't work. But if it doesn't work, it's not evil and
00:47:02.880
inhumane, because it doesn't do anything. You just get right across it. That's what they're doing on the
00:47:06.580
guns. It shows you how little argument they have. They might still ban them anyway.
00:47:11.540
They're going to do their best to ban them anyway, but they're not going to ban them by
00:47:15.180
persuading you. They're going to ban them in the same way they're going to get you to eat the bugs.
00:47:17.980
They're just going to do it outside of the realm of public debate. They're just going to do it because
00:47:22.380
they have the power and they're willing to wield it. You know what today is? Today is Woke Wednesday.
00:47:27.180
The rest of the show continues now. There is a very thought-provoking, woke reaction
00:47:33.780
that Mr. Davies and the other producers want me to process and give my expert analysis on.
00:47:41.440
You only get that on the member segment. So to become a member today, use code Knowles at checkout,
00:47:46.580
K-N-A-W-L-E-S. That's dailywire.com slash Knowles. Use code Knowles. You will get two months free on all