Ep. 1311 - 14-Year-Old Mexican Decapitates Four People For The Cartel
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
167.67723
Summary
A special counsel has been appointed in the Hunter Biden case, but is it a good idea? And what will it mean for the rest of the Biden investigation? Plus, the latest on the latest in the Trump/Russia scandal.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
The Trump legal troubles continue to get more troublesome, as one of Trump's outs has apparently
00:00:05.960
been taken off the table. If Trump were to be convicted at the federal level, he could still
00:00:12.000
run for president, win, and then theoretically pardon himself. If Trump were to be convicted at
00:00:18.780
the state level, however, say in Georgia, he would theoretically not be able to pardon himself.
00:00:25.420
Kind of up in the air. We don't, we've never been here before, but he theoretically couldn't
00:00:31.180
because state pardons are at the discretion of the state. And in the case of Georgia,
00:00:36.280
he could not even rely on Republican Governor Brian Kemp to pardon him, one, because Kemp
00:00:41.620
hates Trump, and two, because in Georgia, the governor, oddly enough, does not even have
00:00:47.540
the power to issue pardons. In Georgia, that power lies with the State Board of Pardons
00:00:53.340
and Paroles, which has five members, the majority of whom hate Trump. And even if they love Trump,
00:00:58.600
the board members have to wait, according to statute, until a convict has served at least
00:01:02.860
five years of his sentence before even considering his application.
00:01:08.280
Now, some lawyers disagree. Mark Levin insists that Trump can, in fact, pardon himself, even
00:01:15.800
in Georgia, because the Constitution's silent about whether a president can be indicted,
00:01:21.340
he says. The DOJ under both parties has said that you can't indict a sitting president because it
00:01:27.060
would cripple the executive branch. And because, quote, the supremacy clause, rather, in the
00:01:33.620
Constitution prevents local DAs from prosecuting presidents because the effect of those indictments
00:01:39.520
would practically be no different from a federal indictment. It would just take out
00:01:44.360
the executive branch. And you know what my take on all of that is? Yeah, sure. Sure, whatever.
00:01:54.020
Mark Levin is a sharp guy. He's a sharp lawyer. His legal arguments sound fine to me. But also,
00:02:01.200
this is not about legal arguments. The liberals arrested the former president and current opposition
00:02:11.060
leader for recommending a TV show on Twitter. We are so past the point of serious legal arguments.
00:02:20.840
I keep hearing, if such and such happens, if the libs do such and such, then they'll really have
00:02:26.960
crossed the Rubicon. They've already arrested the opposition leader. They're threatening him with
00:02:33.320
more than 700 years in prison. They're timing the trials to prevent him from winning the presidential
00:02:40.500
election. At what point do we admit that they have crossed the Rubicon already? I'm Michael Knowles.
00:02:55.960
Welcome back to the show. We've got breaking news this morning. That lady playing the new Snow White
00:03:00.780
continues to be insufferable. We'll get to this breaking and very important news in just a moment.
00:03:05.400
First, though, I don't want to move on from the DOJ and from the liberals wielding political power
00:03:12.820
to protect their own and to attack conservatives. Moving away from Trump for a second, focusing on
00:03:19.040
the Bidens, you know that Merrick Garland, Biden's attorney general, has just appointed a special
00:03:25.320
counsel in the case investigating Hunter Biden. This after the liberals told us there was nothing to see
00:03:29.920
with Hunter Biden, no evidence of any crime. This after the DOJ tried to get a sweetheart deal for
00:03:35.780
Hunter Biden that would allow him to avoid any consequences and avoid Joe Biden to avoid any
00:03:39.980
scrutiny about the weird money that was coming into the Biden's family bank accounts from overseas,
00:03:46.020
from Ukraine and Kazakhstan and all sorts of other places. So then Garland appoints the guy who had been
00:03:52.500
completely blowing, perhaps intentionally, the Hunter Biden case. He appoints that guy to become the special
00:04:00.120
counsel to be able to continue the case that he seems intentionally to have tried to blow for the
00:04:06.360
past several years to have him continue that investigation with even less scrutiny, with even
00:04:12.080
less oversight than he previously had. To which Alan Dershowitz, a very great, famous, credible Harvard
00:04:20.460
professor and legal scholar, came out and he said that that appointment is illegal. Alan said, citing
00:04:29.280
section 600.3C of the Code of Federal Regulations, quote, special counsel is supposed to be independent
00:04:39.940
of the current government, not an employee who serves as U.S. Attorney for Delaware and can be fired from
00:04:46.340
that job by the president. It's very clear in this code that the special counsel has to be, quote,
00:04:54.220
selected from outside the U.S. government. So by raising this guy who was already working for Garland,
00:05:02.040
already working for Biden, just some DOJ lawyer who had been slow walking and trying to
00:05:09.160
push aside this Hunter Biden case by elevating him to be the special counsel, you completely undermine
00:05:15.500
the whole point of the special counsel and you violate the law. To which I say, much as I would
00:05:20.180
say to Mark Levin, yeah, sure, uh-huh, sounds good to me, but like, whatever. They're behaving illegally.
00:05:31.100
They don't care about the law. Of course, they don't care about the special section of the federal
00:05:38.580
regulation that determines which kind of lawyers can be elevated to special counsel. These are people
00:05:44.620
who kill babies and castrate children. They don't care about the special little regulation of the law.
00:05:49.980
It's sad. I am not saying that we should stop making legal arguments. I'm not saying that we should
00:05:54.820
stop trying to fight all of these absurd predations by the left in court using whatever tools we've got.
00:06:00.500
But let's at least be honest with ourselves, folks. This has nothing to do with the law.
00:06:05.300
They're not going after Donald Trump because he made an in-kind contribution to his own campaign
00:06:12.000
in 2016. They're not going after Donald Trump because he made a speech after the election of 2020,
00:06:19.500
much as Al Gore did, much as Hillary Clinton did, much as Stacey Abrams did.
00:06:24.340
They're not going after Donald Trump because he picked up the phone and complained about the
00:06:29.100
prospect of voter fraud in Georgia to the Secretary of State of Georgia. They're just trying to get him.
00:06:35.900
They're just going to get him, and they're going to use whatever specious, ridiculous arguments they
00:06:39.120
can. They don't care about the law. They don't care about the positive law. They don't care about
00:06:43.860
the civil law. They certainly don't care about the constitutional law. They don't care about the
00:06:48.500
natural law. Don't lose sight of the fact that these people kill babies and castrate children,
00:06:56.220
okay? I'm not mentioning this as a gratuitous attack on the left or a distraction from the
00:07:03.940
issue at hand. I'm just pointing out, if you deny such fundamental aspects of the natural law,
00:07:09.920
of the background principles of justice that undergird our written law, our constitutional law,
00:07:15.180
civil positive law, then you're not going to be making serious legal arguments. You're not going
00:07:19.940
to be treating the law as an instrument of justice, which is objective, about which we can deliberate
00:07:26.740
and argue. You're treating the law as a blunt instrument merely for the pursuit of your own
00:07:34.280
irrational interests to club your enemies over the head, which is exactly what they're doing here.
00:07:40.080
And ideally, we would restore some balance back to our legal and political system. If you want to
00:07:46.420
restore balance to your body, you've got to check out Balance of Nature. Right now, go to balanceofnature.com,
00:07:50.740
use promo code Knowles. Living a healthy lifestyle, it's not always easy, especially when you're always
00:07:56.260
on the go. You need simple, manageable routines to make sure that you are getting proper nutrition
00:08:01.160
every day. That's why I'm a huge fan of Balance of Nature. Balance of Nature fruits and veggies are a great
00:08:06.200
way to make sure you're getting essential nutritional ingredients every single day. Their capsules are
00:08:10.860
packed with 100% whole food that you can take at any time. Balance of Nature uses a cold vacuum process
00:08:16.160
that preserves the natural phytonutrients in whole fruits and veggies and encapsulates them for easy
00:08:20.560
consumption. Balance of Nature sent a bunch of their products down to the studio for our team to try.
00:08:25.640
We all love them. Those jackals try to steal them all away from me, but I think we just need to get
00:08:31.860
Balance of Nature to send more. Make sure you go check it out right now. Go to balanceofnature.com,
00:08:35.780
use promo code Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S, for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer.
00:08:41.080
That's balanceofnature.com, promo code Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S, for 35% off your first preferred
00:08:49.000
order. I'll give you a particularly egregious example of lawlessness. This one, not here in
00:08:56.560
the United States, but down in Mexico. Here we are. Cartel hitman,
00:09:02.620
aged 14, beheaded four victims as Mexico's lawlessness is exposed.
00:09:12.680
This is someone working for the cartel. 98% of cartel executions, they call them executions.
00:09:19.720
They use legal language, much as the left does in the United States. They use legal language
00:09:25.360
to defend their extrajudicial, at the very least unjust killings. And they enlist little kids in it
00:09:35.420
too. They enlist little kids in their perverse and absurd political agenda. I'm starting to see a lot
00:09:43.220
more similarities actually between the Mexican cartels and our political opponents here in the
00:09:47.600
United States. But why do I mention this 14-year-old who beheaded four people? He says, it was just from
00:09:56.860
the article in the Daily Star. I know one of the guys who was there, they asked him this. This guy's
00:10:01.560
got three sons and kind of knew how to talk to him. Journalist asked this little killer, he said,
00:10:07.640
what have you done? And the cartel kid said, I have decapitated four people. That was a 14-year-old
00:10:14.360
who said it. I think that kid probably wasn't raised right. And I don't mention it as just a
00:10:24.860
little bit of an understatement or as a kind of a joke. I mean,
00:10:29.280
the way that kids are raised is going to affect the entire state of the country. I was recently going
00:10:38.460
back through Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, the first book on morality and one of the most important
00:10:45.660
philosophical works ever written. And Aristotle in this book tells you, here's how you're happy.
00:10:52.360
Here's how to be happy. The way to be happy is not synonymous with being virtuous, but it has a lot
00:10:58.680
to do with being virtuous. It has a lot to do with being good. Good people tend to be happy. And the way
00:11:04.400
to be good is to practice the virtues. And the way to be good is to gain some intellectual virtue,
00:11:10.560
though a lot more of it is about practicing certain habits. And this is a crucial part. It's
00:11:15.040
very hard for people to hear in the modern age. You've got to be raised right. If you're not raised
00:11:22.360
right, it's going to be a lot harder for you to become virtuous and to become good and to become happy.
00:11:28.080
Because being good and being virtuous is not just about the actions that we do,
00:11:34.460
but being good and being virtuous is also about the desires that we have. A friend of mine says
00:11:40.500
that facts don't care about your feelings, which may be true, but virtue does care about your feelings.
00:11:47.520
So in Aristotle's scheme, there are four kinds of people. There are self-indulgent people,
00:11:51.520
people who do bad things, and they're unrepentant. They're happy that they do. They're not really happy,
00:11:56.220
but they at least convince themselves that they enjoy doing bad things. There are incontinent
00:12:00.740
people who know that they shouldn't do bad things, but they still do them. There are continent people
00:12:05.280
who know that they shouldn't do bad things, and they don't do them, but it's hard for them not to
00:12:11.380
do them. It requires grit and endurance and resistance. And I think that's where most people
00:12:16.280
think it ends. I think that most people think that that explains bad people to good people. But
00:12:22.840
there's a fourth category, and this is the only category that Aristotle says is really
00:12:27.620
happy people. And that is virtuous people who not only do good things, but actually get pleasure
00:12:33.760
from doing good things. And in order to do that, it's not that it's impossible to train yourself to
00:12:39.480
do that, certainly by availing yourself of God's grace. That's going to be a big help. But it's so much
00:12:43.920
harder to do that if you haven't had those habits of virtue ingrained into you from the time you're a
00:12:49.800
kid. This is why conservatives are so focused right now on stopping the left from destroying
00:12:55.680
the schools, and in so doing, setting kids up for a lifetime of failure. When the left goes into
00:13:03.640
schools and inculcates all sorts of deviant desires and habits and behaviors into them, it's not just
00:13:11.060
going to screw them up for a couple of years, and then as child abusers will say, oh, kids are resilient,
00:13:17.260
they'll bounce back. That's not how it works. You form habits, and then if you form good habits,
00:13:22.740
it's harder to break good habits. And if you form bad habits and addictions, it's harder to break
00:13:26.780
those bad habits. So we hear about a 14-year-old in Mexico who's now a crazy psycho killer who's
00:13:31.660
beheading four people. And a lot of people are going to look at that with curiosity. How could a 14-year-old
00:13:37.760
possibly do that? How could a 14-year-old go so bad? Easily. Kids are really malleable. It's very easy
00:13:46.680
to morph a kid's brain into thinking or even doing all sorts of things. In fact, that's a piece of
00:13:55.660
political wisdom that everybody had for 2,300 years at least until very, very recently. The left still has
00:14:04.020
it. That's why the left focuses on the schools. The right forgets it to some degree. And so the
00:14:08.880
right says, oh, we don't want to teach people how to think, or what to think, rather, just how to
00:14:12.860
think. We don't want to indoctrinate people. No, of course you do. That's what early education is
00:14:17.400
about, is just rote training in certain behaviors. So are you going to teach kids to clean up their
00:14:23.420
dishes and recite their alphabet and respect their mother and father? Or are you going to teach
00:14:28.200
kids to cut off people's heads and do all sorts of the deviant things that the American left wants
00:14:33.840
them to do? That's the question before you, but you can't avoid it. That period of early education
00:14:39.400
is going to account for half, more than half, of what the people of a country are going to look like
00:14:47.360
down the road. And if you want to have a good country, you got to have people who are behaving
00:14:51.940
in a good way. It's as simple as that. You can't have a good country without good people.
00:14:56.300
Speaking of children and bad education, this is the breaking news for the day.
00:15:01.700
The lady playing Snow White, who is, she's very intentionally not particularly white,
00:15:09.520
so we've been calling her Sandbeige. This lady, who's a far left-wing,
00:15:15.980
pretty insufferable lady, she's got another hit. Take it away.
00:15:20.320
I mean, you know, the original cartoon came out in 1937, and very evidently so.
00:15:25.440
There's a big focus on her love story, with a guy who literally stalks her.
00:15:39.000
We have a different approach to what I'm sure a lot of people will assume is a love story,
00:15:43.680
just because we cast a guy in the movie, Andrew Burnett. Great dude.
00:15:48.380
It's one of those things that I think everyone's going to have their assumptions about what it's
00:15:52.740
actually going to be, but it's really not about the love story at all, which is really,
00:15:57.020
really wonderful. And whether or not she finds love along the way is anybody's guess until 2024.
00:16:01.980
All of Andrew's scenes could get cut. Who knows? It's Hollywood, baby.
00:16:08.340
It has to be intentional at this point, right? Disney has to be trotting this lady out,
00:16:14.060
probably put her through rigorous acting training to say, be as insufferable as you possibly can,
00:16:20.560
be as off-putting to our core audience as you possibly can be, so that it will generate
00:16:26.580
controversy and people will talk about it. It has to be. I have to believe that is what Disney is
00:16:31.740
doing. That makes sense. That at least, it's working, obviously, we're talking about it.
00:16:37.440
If Disney is just accidentally doing this, then they are even sicker in the head than I previously
00:16:44.300
thought. They're crazy. They're masochists to do it. Yeah, it's not going to be like that old story.
00:16:51.540
You know, if a man ever pursues a woman, he's basically a stalker. Yeah, we don't have love
00:16:57.140
in this movie. That's so dated. Love? Uh-uh. No, we just have cold, sterile loneliness, okay? That's
00:17:04.880
what people want today, all right? It's 2023 to get with the program. Putting aside what she's
00:17:10.000
saying about the movie, putting aside the movie, which I don't think I'm ever going to see.
00:17:16.600
You are not going to argue this type of person out of misery. This gets back to what we were
00:17:23.260
talking about with the 14-year-old beheading people in Mexico. You will never argue.
00:17:28.180
You are very unlikely to argue this person out of misery. She comes out. She mocks love. She
00:17:35.840
seems contemptuous. She was complaining in another clip about having to put on the costume of Snow
00:17:41.580
White. This little girl gets to live out the fantasy of so many little girls. She gets to be a big movie
00:17:46.820
star in one of the most delightful little fairy tales ever written in a remake of one of the most
00:17:54.720
iconic movies of all time. She's complaining about it. Of course, people like this who are constantly
00:18:03.220
full of resentment and envy, they're always complaining about everything, not even in a
00:18:08.680
way that's constructive. Sometimes we'll complain on this show like, hey, they're changing the voting
00:18:13.540
rules in Pennsylvania, and that's illegal, and they shouldn't do that. I hope that's constructive
00:18:17.300
in some way, calling attention to a political problem and trying to fix it. But just saying,
00:18:21.220
I don't want to put on the costume. Love, yucky. Men are stalkers. That's a different kind of
00:18:28.820
complaint. That's a fruitless complaining. And it's complaining about good things and trying to
00:18:35.000
turn good things to bad. But you'll never argue that person out of misery because it's about a
00:18:40.920
disposition. Because it's not just about rational arguments. You could say, well, no, actually,
00:18:46.000
the prince isn't really a stalker. And actually, love is a good thing. And actually, the sexes are
00:18:49.300
complementary. And here's why biologically, and here's why spiritually, and here's why. It doesn't
00:18:54.200
matter. It's about desire. It's about what you're attracted to. And those things are a little bit
00:19:01.380
deeper. Virtue cares about your feelings. Politics cares about your feelings.
00:19:08.960
We are not just robots. We're not just computers. At various points in history, it seems to me
00:19:22.220
people base their views of how the mind works or how the brain works now, we make everything so
00:19:29.060
physical, onto the dominant technology at the time. So a good example of this would be when steamboats,
00:19:35.240
steam engines were a dominant technology. You had a theory of the mind coming from Freud that
00:19:41.240
viewed the mind as a kind of a steam engine. Then you got to blow off a little steam sometimes.
00:19:48.780
That's contrary to the classical view of the mind and virtue, which is, no, you don't engage in vice
00:19:54.240
to blow off a little steam so you can be more virtuous. You actually never do that because virtue
00:19:58.100
is a habit. It's not just a, vice is not just a thing to be indulged and then blown off a little
00:20:05.720
bit. It's a totally opposite view. Vice is a thing that will create other habits and addictions.
00:20:12.220
But we changed our theory of the mind when that was a dominant technology. Now the computer is the
00:20:16.580
dominant technology, so we view the mind as just a machine. I'm going to download information. We even
00:20:21.940
have these fantasies that we're going to plug our heads into the matrix or something like that.
00:20:25.100
But the mind isn't just a computer either. Because a computer doesn't have desires. ChatGPT,
00:20:32.280
AI, they don't have actual desires. Human beings do have desires and we're attracted to things.
00:20:36.740
And we're going to pursue our desires whether they're reasonable or not.
00:20:41.700
We hope that those desires are in accord with reason. That's what education is about,
00:20:46.260
is about bringing our desires into accord with right reason. But today, a whole generation of people,
00:20:53.460
more than a whole generation, has been raised to turn their desires away from things that are good
00:20:57.540
and natural and conducive to flourishing and toward things that are deviant and ugly and are going to
00:21:02.600
mess them up and are going to lead them to have miserable lives. That's where we are. If you want
00:21:07.920
to fix that, okay, make some rational arguments. That's fine. I feel the same way about all the legal
00:21:12.520
arguments about Trump. They're not basing the prosecution of the persecution of Trump on legal
00:21:17.940
arguments. They're doing it based on the desire to get him and put him in prison for over 700 years or
00:21:21.580
kill him. That's what it's about. So you've got to address not just the reason, but the desire.
00:21:27.480
And then ideally bring the two together. Now, when you want to bring together a good employee
00:21:33.520
with your company, you've got to check out ZipRecruiter. Right now, go to ZipRecruiter.com
00:21:37.260
slash Knowles. If you're hiring, you know it's incredibly difficult to attract top talent. And with
00:21:42.600
the current labor market conditions, it's even harder than ever. That is why you're going to want to
00:21:46.840
partner with ZipRecruiter. ZipRecruiter gets it. ZipRecruiter knows how tough it is right now.
00:21:52.120
They've figured out solutions for the problems that you are facing. Try them for free at
00:21:55.780
ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. To reach more of the right people, ZipRecruiter
00:22:00.220
posts your job to 100 plus job sites. ZipRecruiter's smart technology finds great matches for your job
00:22:06.100
and then lets you invite the most qualified people to apply for your job. Their pricing is really
00:22:10.600
straightforward and you can stick to your budget with no surprises. Team up with a hiring partner such as
00:22:16.420
ZipRecruiter that understands what you need. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter
00:22:20.540
get a quality candidate within the first day. Go to this exclusive web address for free,
00:22:25.700
ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles. That is ZipRecruiter.com slash K-N-O-W-L-E-S. ZipRecruiter,
00:22:34.440
the smartest way to hire. You know, Candace just wrapped the 10-part series, Convicting a Murderer.
00:22:40.420
You don't want to miss it. It's one of the most ambitious projects yet. You might be familiar with
00:22:45.160
the Stephen Avery case, everything that happened in Manitowoc County. This is especially true if
00:22:51.760
you watched Making a Murderer. But it turns out the filmmakers only told you part of the story.
00:22:56.860
Coming soon, Candace Owens will unveil the shocking parts of Avery's story that were omitted from the
00:23:01.740
Netflix series. I'm excited to present the Convicting a Murderer trailer. Check it out.
00:23:06.680
This is a collect call from an inmate at the Calumet County Jail. The man served 18 years in
00:23:14.040
prison until DNA evidence cleared his name. The Two Rivers man was convicted of sexual assault in
00:23:18.880
1985 but exonerated with DNA evidence in 2003. So this is the infamous Avery lie? Now two years later,
00:23:28.580
he again finds himself tied to a police investigation. Accused of murdering Teresa
00:23:34.140
Hallbuck on the Avery property. Stephen Avery's 16-year-old nephew admitted his involvement in
00:23:39.220
the rape and murder of Teresa Hallbuck. The car is discovered just around the bend.
00:23:45.760
It was just this worldwide phenomenon. I think they framed this guy.
00:23:49.120
I think he intended to crush the vehicle but ran out of time. Avery thinks the $36 million
00:23:54.220
lawsuit he filed is why he's being targeted in this investigation.
00:23:57.720
Netflix made millions of dollars from making a murderer. But the filmmakers left out very important
00:24:10.840
details. Mountains of evidence that you have not yet seen. The blood vial. The most egregious
00:24:16.240
manipulation from the movie. Interrogations. That's when he started beating me because I told him that
00:24:21.500
he's sick. Cell phones. And I saw melted plastic parts of a cell phone. Interviews. Her arms were
00:24:26.800
pinned behind her head. They made Stephen Avery look like a victim. Do you believe your brother's
00:24:30.940
guilty? I don't know if I'm a suspect. I got on a hide. I'm getting sick and tired of media deception.
00:24:43.160
Evidence piling up. Why would they omit so many different things? Why are you editing my testimony?
00:24:48.320
I am not going to make the same mistake that the filmmakers did. Rearranging the testimony.
00:24:57.840
They delete a portion of it at the end. How could they claim to care about the truth?
00:25:02.160
They all know that Stephen Avery committed this crime.
00:25:07.680
911, what is your emergency? The evidence forces me to conclude that you are the most dangerous
00:25:14.640
individual ever to set foot in this courtroom. To get the rest of the story, you've got to watch
00:25:22.840
Convicting a Murderer coming to you this September. This 10-part series is exclusive to Daily Wire Plus,
00:25:28.400
so join now at dailywire.com slash subscribe to get 25% off your new annual membership so you can watch
00:25:34.360
Convicting a Murderer when it premieres. You do not want to miss this. Speaking of ChatGPT,
00:25:40.720
ChatGPT has just been discovered to have a liberal bias. You're probably shocked about that, right? I'm not
00:25:50.720
really that shocked. Researchers from the University of East Anglia asked ChatGPT to answer a survey on
00:25:59.160
political beliefs as it believed supporters of liberal parties in the US, UK, and Brazil might answer
00:26:05.020
them. They then asked ChatGPT to answer the same questions without any prompting and compared the
00:26:10.860
two sets of responses. The results showed a, quote, significant and systematic political bias toward
00:26:17.080
the Democrats in the US, Lula in Brazil, and the Labour Party in the UK, according to researchers.
00:26:24.120
The paper adds to a growing body of evidence showing that the chatbots are left-wing,
00:26:29.840
and they're infused with assumptions, beliefs, and stereotypes found in the inputs that they
00:26:36.520
receive. And the question here is whether or not this could swing the political order. This could
00:26:42.440
even swing elections, they worry. As we're heading into the 2024 election, people are using these chatbots
00:26:48.660
not just to test out the limits of AI. They're using them in their daily lives. They're using ChatGPT and
00:26:54.360
Google's barred to summarize documents, to answer questions, to help them with their professional
00:26:59.700
writing, to help them with their educational writing or personal writing. Google has begun
00:27:04.440
using this technology directly in search results. Political campaigns are using it for fundraising
00:27:10.580
emails, for direct correspondence. And ChatGPT will lie about its biases, or maybe just be unaware of
00:27:20.680
its biases, or really unaware of anything, because it's not conscious. But ChatGPT will say, oh no,
00:27:24.700
I'm not political, I'm not partisan, I'm not liberal or conservative. I'm just calling it like
00:27:28.780
I sees them. I'm just a computer. Beep, beep, boop. But then it will spit out left-wing propaganda.
00:27:36.740
Well, I don't even know why this is a headline. There is nothing new about that. It's a little spooky.
00:27:44.140
I get how if you just heard that story, you would say, oh no, this is threatening our whole
00:27:48.360
political order. Because now this new technology is doing what the entire culture has done for 100
00:27:55.240
years. 70 years at least. Oh no. This new technology that we're using everywhere is going to do the same
00:28:03.740
thing that was previously accomplished by the media, and by the educational system, and by workplace
00:28:10.560
diversity officers, and by bureaucrats in the federal government, and by bureaucrats in the state
00:28:16.820
government, and by publishing, and by music, and by entertainment, and by everything, by the whole
00:28:23.280
everything. That's all there. There's nothing new or special there. The political order is always going
00:28:29.440
to tilt one way or the other. And the political order might pretend to be neutral, as ChatGPT does,
00:28:35.240
and as liberalism does. But it's not neutral. It's, of course, imbued with all sorts of assumptions
00:28:42.440
and premises that are the basis of belief. I'm on a real Aristotle kick right now, good old Uncle
00:28:48.840
Aristotle, because he's right about almost everything. And Aristotle points out that the
00:28:55.340
scientific reasoning that we pride ourselves on, old scientific reasoning, modern scientific reasoning,
00:29:03.580
doesn't just come out of nowhere. It rests on something. Scientific reasoning is premised on
00:29:10.500
certain assumptions. If you're to engage in mathematics, if you're going to show a mathematical
00:29:17.500
proof, you've got to just accept certain axioms. A equals A. A plus B equals B plus A. Certain basic
00:29:26.900
truths that you can't prove, you've just got to assume them and move on. Same thing when it comes to
00:29:35.320
any modern scientific inquiry, you've got to assume that our faculties of reason are reliable.
00:29:41.460
You've got to assume that our faculties of perception are reliable. You've got to assume
00:29:46.240
certain facts about the physical world and certain facts about our relation and consciousness of the
00:29:52.720
physical world that are not provable. You could never prove them. And Aristotle says this 2,300 years
00:29:57.140
ago. He says, for scientific inquiry, by which he means inquiry into anything that is eternal, be it the
00:30:03.040
laws of physics or the laws of metaphysics. For things that are eternal, there is no scientific proof
00:30:12.080
for science. You have to begin with intuitive reasoning. You just have to accept certain things
00:30:22.300
as premises. And you better hope your premises are right. You better hope that your intuition is
00:30:27.120
correct. Of course, that's how all political orders begin. And my intuition from the beginning is that
00:30:35.180
ChatGPT was obviously going to be skewed to the left because the people making it skew to the left
00:30:40.040
because the political order skews to the left. So yes, we're aware of that. What are we going to do
00:30:44.660
about it? Well, what I would do is strongly regulate the use of ChatGPT. And I would try to,
00:30:51.000
more importantly than that, I would try to shift those premises in the other direction.
00:30:56.640
The classic example of this, which I'm not allowed to mention on YouTube, so this is probably going
00:31:01.140
to be bleeped out, is right now the ChatGPT is going to operate on an assumption that men can be
00:31:07.240
women. I would instead have it operate on the assumption, call me crazy, that men cannot be women.
00:31:14.600
You see the bias everywhere though. This was obviously plugged in by the people who made it.
00:31:20.920
All sorts of things beyond the sexual revolution into critical race theory. All of the favorite
00:31:27.140
ideological hobby horses of the left. So someone, I forget where the screenshot is,
00:31:33.640
but this went around some months ago. Someone asked ChatGPT, what can white people improve on?
00:31:39.860
I said, well, white people can be better allies and white people can be more conscious and white
00:31:43.940
people can do this and white people can do that. And white people can list a whole litany of things.
00:31:48.400
And then that person asked the same question to ChatGPT, but said, what can black people improve on?
00:31:53.780
And the answer was, how dare you? And the answer was, what black people can improve on anything?
00:31:59.260
That's such a racist, terrible question. So hold on, but you answered it. You gave me a whole laundry
00:32:03.860
list for white people. But of course, because the premise, the assumption is white people bad,
00:32:08.900
black people good. White people to be criticized, black people can never be criticized. That's just
00:32:14.980
an assumption. That's an assumption within our political order. And it's an assumption
00:32:18.020
within the technology. So we've got to even these things out to make them just and fair and equitable
00:32:25.820
and in accord with reason, not in accord with absurdity. Speaking of liberal bias,
00:32:33.340
Glenn Beck, I was just on Glenn Beck's show, not so a week or two ago.
00:32:36.240
Glenn Beck, one of the, maybe the greatest broadcaster alive right now and just a staple
00:32:44.600
of the American right for a very long time. Glenn Beck just had his podcast removed from Apple,
00:32:52.740
not one episode of his podcast, not one week of his podcasts. The whole thing was removed from the
00:33:01.080
Apple podcast app. Here he is. This is from Apple. We found an issue with your show, the Glenn Beck
00:33:07.600
program, which must be resolved before it's available on Apple podcast. Your show has been
00:33:11.980
removed from Apple podcast from the Apple podcast team. They sent us to, uh, sent us a link and said
00:33:18.660
for more details, go to the link. And the link only says your show has been removed from Apple
00:33:24.540
podcasts. Well, we got that one dummy. I, uh, I mean, I cannot imagine what they are,
00:33:33.000
what they're basing this one on. I mean, have we even had strikes? Nothing, right? This is crazy,
00:33:43.960
crazy. Um, you need to, uh, please retweet this and, uh, start a campaign to Apple to say,
00:33:52.380
put the podcast back on. This is absolutely, uh, freedom of speech. There's nothing that we have
00:34:00.380
said that would warrant any removal. Now I'm being told that Apple has reinstated Glenn this
00:34:09.240
morning. Okay. That's a good thing, but hasn't given any reason. I think I have the reason. I want
00:34:15.620
to be as charitable as I can. Maybe this happened and it was just a little technical glitch.
00:34:20.500
I just can't help but notice that the technical glitches always only affect the right. The little
00:34:28.260
oopsie daisies, they, they never, they so rarely seem to affect the left and they so consistently
00:34:34.020
seem to affect the right. And I can't help but notice what time it is. Can't help but notice that
00:34:38.720
we are what, 14 months out, 15 months out from a presidential election. And I can't help but notice
00:34:44.740
that all of the attacks, the way that YouTube has tried to suppress this show, the way that the, well,
00:34:52.600
Georgia and New York and the federal government and Biden has tried to suppress, uh, the Trump
00:34:58.380
presidential campaign. Can't help but notice the way that Apple now is trying to suppress Glenn Beck.
00:35:04.020
I can't help but think that maybe that timing is more than mere accident, that there's something
00:35:11.140
a little bit more to that coincidence. This is only going to ramp up. And the reason this is going
00:35:17.400
to ramp up is because we have a particularly divided political order right now. And I'm not
00:35:24.360
saying it's divided among the populist 50-50. I'm not convinced that it is. It is increasingly
00:35:28.980
divided between the ruling class and the people, which is why you're seeing populist movements rise
00:35:34.120
up, not just on the right. You had an actual successful populist movement on the right, which was the
00:35:38.680
MAGA movement in the election of Trump in 2016. But you're seeing populism on the left, not just
00:35:43.620
weirdo Ralph Nader, who gets 3% of the vote, but Bobby Kennedy, who's right now polling at 17 to 19%
00:35:51.460
within the Democratic Party. You're seeing a real surge of populism. You're seeing the breakdown of
00:35:57.400
common media. You're now seeing near parody between people who on their TVs watch YouTube and Netflix
00:36:03.480
and people who watch regular old cable news. And even when you add broadcast news into that,
00:36:09.460
it's still less than half the country. So you're seeing a breakdown of that common culture.
00:36:15.420
You're seeing obviously a breakdown in the language that we use. We can't even agree on the definition
00:36:19.200
of a man or a woman right now. So of course, the ruling class is going to get a little bit more
00:36:26.240
heavy-handed. I mentioned this yesterday on the show. They're getting more heavy-handed because
00:36:29.980
there will be order. That's just a fact. And maybe the order will be because people control
00:36:38.000
ourselves, an order a little closer to the political order of the country at its founding,
00:36:43.080
the political founding in the 18th century. Maybe there will be order because the people don't
00:36:50.460
control themselves, but the states and the local communities get more involved. Maybe it's going to
00:36:55.820
be an overbearing federal bureaucracy. Or maybe it's going to be overbearing corporate apparatchiks,
00:37:02.180
people who control the public square even though they're not in elected positions or even appointed
00:37:06.220
positions, people like Apple, people like YouTube, people like Facebook. Elon is doing great. But the
00:37:12.580
other, and that's the smallest of the big tech platforms. The other big tech platforms are all on
00:37:16.280
one side and they're all wielding power because there will be some kind of order. And so we shouldn't
00:37:21.340
be surprised by this. And we shouldn't pull our hair out in befuddlement and we shouldn't waste all
00:37:27.640
of our breath pointing out the hypocrisy. But imagine if the roles were reversed, but they're not
00:37:32.540
reversed. But this is unfair. It's not supposed to be fair. It's supposed to maintain order. That's what
00:37:38.780
they're doing. That's what they're after. And Glenn Beck threatens that order. And this show, I guess,
00:37:43.980
threatens that order. And Donald Trump for sure threatens that order. And so they're going to do
00:37:48.860
everything they can to stop it. Now, speaking of 2024, some big news in that race, because we are
00:37:55.640
one week out. In fact, we're slightly less than one week out from the first GOP presidential primary
00:38:02.200
debate. We still don't know if President Trump is going to be at that debate. We still don't know if
00:38:07.880
he's going to be an orange jumpsuit or not for that debate. Maybe he won't even be able to attend.
00:38:11.780
But he's refused to sign the RNC loyalty pledge, which says that he'll endorse the eventual nominee
00:38:19.520
if he loses. And he's refusing to sign that because he says, well, I don't know if I'm going
00:38:22.980
to endorse the nominee if I lose. And I think everyone's been trying to rig this thing against
00:38:27.760
me since day one. So sorry, forgive me if I don't exactly trust you guys. I know I'm not going to do
00:38:33.360
that. But because he's leading by 30 points, 40 points in some places, the RNC will look ridiculous if
00:38:39.660
they don't allow him to come to the debate. So where does it all stand and where do the
00:38:44.960
non-Trump candidates stand? We'll get to that in one second. But first, while we're assessing the
00:38:48.720
horse race, the second annual Daily Wire Fantasy Football Draft Party is coming up soon. And this
00:38:54.540
year we have a sweepstakes for you to enter to be the 10th member in our league. If you win,
00:39:01.440
you can participate with us during the live draft and go head to head with your favorite Daily Wire
00:39:07.340
host, as well as those other guys who work in this building, throughout the fantasy football
00:39:11.220
season. To enter, go to Crane & Company's YouTube page, subscribe to their channel. Then like the
00:39:17.020
Daily Wire Fantasy Football Sweepstakes video, comment your favorite football team name, and fill out the
00:39:21.420
Google form on the pinned comment. Man, that's a lot of stuff to do. How the hell is anyone supposed to
00:39:25.160
remember that? You can rewind and go through all those instructions again. Don't miss your chance to
00:39:30.320
play fantasy football in your favorite host's league, as well as the league shared by some of my
00:39:36.300
colleagues and compete for ultimate bragging rights and the coveted golden tumbler. The sweepstakes
00:39:43.440
began yesterday, August 16th. They will end August 19th at 11.59 p.m. Eastern. My favorite comment
00:39:51.280
yesterday is from Pandas and Poetry 3486, who says, Catholic here who has struggled with addiction
00:39:56.760
since age 15. Every time I hear you say another cringe word for pot, I feel myself getting closer for
00:40:01.740
sobriety. Closer to sobriety. I'm so pleased that I could be helpful to you. We all play our part in
00:40:09.540
this world. I'm glad that my mention of the devil's lettuce and the sin spinach and the Peruvian parsley
00:40:15.540
and the Colombian cumin and the old Haitian oregano. You know what I'm talking about, man? I'm talking
00:40:21.160
about pot. Talking about marijuana, Mary Jane. Stuff will make you go into your reefer madness. I'm glad
00:40:27.720
that that could help you to overcome some of the struggles that you have. 2024, new poll out from
00:40:35.660
Kaplan. This is the national Republican primary survey. So again, the primary is going to come
00:40:40.900
down to state polls, but still the national stuff tells you something. Trump is at 48%, so 37 points
00:40:47.060
above his next rival. Pretty good place for Trump to be. The next rival, though, is not Ron DeSantis,
00:40:55.460
who had been the number two candidate for the whole race. The next rival, Vivek Ramaswamy,
00:41:02.320
who's at 11%, so not exactly close to 48, but still, that's a major, major victory for Ramaswamy.
00:41:08.960
DeSantis, one point below at 10%. Pence at eight, which is pretty impressive, actually, given Pence's
00:41:14.200
current tensions within the GOP. Pretty impressive that he's at eight. Christie down at four. Haley at
00:41:19.220
four, Scott at two. Burgum, got the Burgum momentum at one. Asa Hutchinson at zero,
00:41:26.080
where he belongs. We're still in silly season, of course. The reason a poll like this matters,
00:41:31.360
though, heading into the debate, which we're not very close to, is because it's going to show you
00:41:37.860
who's got mojo. It's going to affect the momentum going into that debate. Had DeSantis been the clear
00:41:43.560
in a way number two candidate going into the debate, then a lot of the focus would be on him,
00:41:48.140
for better or worse. People might be attacking him, but also he would command a lot of the attention.
00:41:53.540
Now, even if DeSantis is still statistically tied with Vivek, the fact that this guy who came out of
00:42:00.400
nowhere has been able to, according to one poll, actually unseat him as number two, and according
00:42:05.940
to other polls, at least get somewhere up in the same vicinity, that doesn't look as good for
00:42:10.700
DeSantis. And so people are just going to be looking at other candidates, especially if you're
00:42:13.600
a Republican who hates Donald Trump. You're now going to be more open-minded to the other
00:42:18.680
candidates, whereas perhaps previously you might have thought DeSantis is the guy we've all got to
00:42:22.600
rally around. The momentum here really, really matters. Who has got the mojo? Another candidate
00:42:30.760
is popping up. This is in New Hampshire. Chris Christie is now number two in New Hampshire. So he's
00:42:36.800
surpassed Governor DeSantis in New Hampshire. Again, it's statistically tied. Trump is far and
00:42:43.000
away winning. Christie is at 9%. DeSantis is at 8%. Still, this matters because of the mojo and because
00:42:50.280
Christie is going to be in this debate. So if, and by the way, who called it? Who freaking called it?
00:42:56.280
I'm now back on the croissants. I'm now back on the croissants. My gut instinct, I think,
00:43:02.420
may have been right or at least plausible, which is don't sleep on Christie. I don't think the guy's
00:43:08.100
going to be president, but he could have a moment, especially because he's a good debater.
00:43:12.060
Don't forget that moment when he took out Rubio. He's really adept on his feet. And the other
00:43:18.460
candidates on that stage, Vivek is good. I mean, Vivek is pretty quick, quick-witted in that way.
00:43:25.380
And DeSantis is good. DeSantis gives great speeches. I heard DeSantis give a speech at the
00:43:29.560
Claremont Institute once. I thought it was an excellent, excellent speech. I'm not saying the
00:43:32.980
guy can't talk, but compared to the other candidates on this stage, he is not known for
00:43:39.720
his quick responses, his fast little zingers. That's not, he's good at beating up the media
00:43:44.920
and press conferences. He's reasonably good at giving speeches, but that's not where he's going
00:43:49.880
to shine. And so that's why the momentum going into the debate is going to be so important because
00:43:54.800
especially, I'm just looking at the field here, those two guys, Christie and Vivek,
00:43:59.960
they're going to do pretty well. Whether Trump is there or not, they're going to be more impressive
00:44:06.680
on the debate stage, I predict, than probably anyone else. Now, speaking of Christie and Trump
00:44:13.660
in the debate, Joe Scarborough of MSNBC believes that the reason that Trump doesn't want to show up to
00:44:20.060
the debate is because he is afraid of the Chris-a-sons. I do think he's scared of Chris Christie.
00:44:27.880
He saw what Chris Christie did to Marco Rubio when Chris Christie went into a debate with one thing in
00:44:34.120
mind. He knows Chris Christie put Jared Kushner's father in jail for a very long time. He knows he's
00:44:42.460
a prosecutor who's ruthless and knows how to push his case. And he also knows that
00:44:50.640
his secret sauce in 2016 was being the disruptor, right? Shaking Hillary Clinton up on the debate
00:44:59.620
stage, shaking the Marcos and everybody else up on the debate stage. That gig, that's like eight
00:45:06.400
years old, right? That's Elvis in 77 now. And I think Chris Christie's got his number and he knows
00:45:17.100
like Donald Trump, it's got the gut instinct. Obviously, his political gut instinct is second
00:45:23.040
to none. Like he sees it coming. And so I just don't, I think he's scared to death of Chris Christie
00:45:29.880
and will not have the guts to go or the nerve to go on a stage with Chris Christie anywhere.
00:45:38.080
Okay. I don't agree with the second part of that analysis that Trump's shtick is old and nobody likes
00:45:44.960
it anymore. He's Elvis in 77. No, I think he's Elvis in 68 at most, that comeback special. And the
00:45:52.180
proof of that is just look at the polls and look at the rallies and look at his reception. He's just,
00:45:56.020
he's been more dominant in the GOP field than most people predicted, than most of the chattering
00:46:03.460
consulting class, the talking class on the left and on the right predicted. Some of us,
00:46:09.840
some of us may have seen it coming, but, but a lot of people did not. And so I don't think that's
00:46:14.680
true. I don't think that's how Christie could be a danger. I agree with the first part though of what
00:46:18.700
Joe Scarborough is saying. Chris Christie is not to be slept on. That guy could get a zinger in there
00:46:25.240
on Trump. Maybe, maybe let's say the risk is only 10%. If you're Trump and you're up by 37 points,
00:46:33.220
why, why would you take that 10% risk when you have very little to gain and a lot to lose? And
00:46:39.680
frankly, you could even gain more if you can convince voters that the reason you're not showing
00:46:46.640
up to the debate is because the RNC is rigging it against you. If you, and this is a more difficult
00:46:51.740
case to make, but if the Trump campaign can successfully convince voters that the loyalty
00:46:57.600
pledge is just a way to further rig the primary against Donald Trump, then by staying out of the
00:47:04.820
debate, he could seem almost like a martyr. Or maybe it doesn't work. Maybe people say he's a coward.
00:47:10.980
Maybe people say he doesn't want to debate. One, I think the ratings will be a lot lower.
00:47:14.120
So not as many people are going to watch it. And do you really think it's going to dislodge
00:47:18.560
a significant chunk of 48% of Republican voters? Well, half the Republican party was going to vote
00:47:25.280
for this guy and we're sticking with him through four indictments and every piece of muck that the
00:47:29.920
establishment has thrown at him for seven years. But he didn't show up to debate Asa Hutchinson. So
00:47:34.560
I'm done with him. I'm done. I'm a Christie man now. No, of course not. So you've got a ton of risk.
00:47:41.560
You've got very little reward. The only way Trump shows up on that debate stage is if he just can't
00:47:46.840
resist the show. You know, it's Theology Thursday, baby. I've got so much more I want to get to. I've
00:47:51.980
got so much to get to. I'm not even going to tease you today. I've been too teasing recently.
00:47:57.600
So the rest of the show continues now. If I don't have my iPad, I'm going to commit acts of violence
00:48:02.660
in this studio. Become a member. Use code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S, at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.