Ep. 1340 - 2nd Republican Debate Goes Off The Rails
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
176.7078
Summary
The latest Republican primary debate is in the books, and it's a doosey one. Which one of you should be voted off the island? Which one should you vote for? Who's your choice?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Last night's cacophonous and chaotic Republican presidential primary debate ended with one of the
00:00:05.220
wildest questions ever posed in any presidential debate. None of you have indicated that you're
00:00:12.020
dropping out. So which one of you on stage tonight should be voted off the island?
00:00:20.600
Please use your marker to write your choice on the notepad in front of you.
00:00:25.020
15 seconds starting now of the people on the stage who should be. I'm absolutely serious.
00:00:31.120
With all due respect. I mean, we're here like we're happy to debate. I think that that's
00:00:35.220
disrespectful to my fellow competitors. Nobody wants to. Nobody wants to participate.
00:00:38.680
Let's do some questions. Let's talk about the future of the country.
00:00:43.440
There's a good answer from DeSantis. That was the smart way to play it.
00:00:47.180
What's funny is Christie then went along and he said, yeah, we don't want to participate.
00:00:50.560
But he was the first one when she said it. He just starts writing down on his board. But OK,
00:00:54.440
then they said, no, we don't want to participate at all. It's a terrible, terrible question.
00:00:59.480
And everyone now is attacking Dana Perino for that game show question. I, however,
00:01:06.960
thought the question was basically appropriate. It's not appropriate for a presidential debate,
00:01:12.720
but it is appropriate for whatever last night was. Because last night was not a presidential primary
00:01:19.320
debate because nobody on that stage is likely to be the Republican nominee for president.
00:01:24.440
The front runner, the far and away front runner, the front runner by 40, maybe 50 points
00:01:30.300
was absent. And so the entire debate was a little bit more than a mildly entertaining
00:01:38.480
sideshow. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:41.460
Welcome back to the show. AOC is fired up. I'm here in our nation's capital. I spent some time with
00:02:06.000
some members of Congress yesterday. And one of those members of Congress was not Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
00:02:11.860
She was too busy being fired up on immigration. We'll get to that in one second. First, though,
00:02:16.560
I'm going to give you the entire summary of what has been called a debate by some people
00:02:23.640
in about 60 seconds. I was on Tim Pool's show last night. We actually all had forgotten that the
00:02:28.740
debate was even on. So when I get there, he said, hey, man, we got to change the order of this show
00:02:34.060
because we got to react to the debate, I guess. So we watched it together. And I did find it mildly
00:02:39.020
entertaining. And I did find some of the answers pretty good. I thought DeSantis did very, very well.
00:02:44.760
DeSantis was the winner of the debate. He did better than he did at the first debate.
00:02:49.400
It was good. Vivek was the most under fire. Everybody was attacking Vivek. He did very,
00:02:57.380
very well. Not unexpectedly. You know, he's a sharp guy. He's able to think and speak very clearly.
00:03:03.100
But he was extremely under attack last night. And he did pretty well. Nikki Haley, I felt hurt
00:03:11.260
herself. She started out the debate pretty strong. And then she became angry. She seemed angry and
00:03:18.540
even somewhat insulting later on into the debate. So I think she sort of hurt herself. In fact,
00:03:23.580
one of the defining features of the debate was Nikki and Vivek just attacking each other.
00:03:29.800
This is infuriating because TikTok is one of the most dangerous social media apps that we could
00:03:35.820
have. And what you've got, I honestly, every time I hear you, I feel a little bit dumber for what you
00:03:40.440
say, because I can't believe they hear you've got a TikTok situation. What they're doing is these
00:03:47.020
150 million people are on TikTok. That means they can get your contacts. They can get your financial
00:03:52.620
information. They can get your emails. They can get your text messages. They can get all of these
00:03:56.940
things. This is very important for our party. This is very important for our party. And I'm going to
00:04:01.300
say you've gone and you've helped China make medicines in China, not America. You're now wanting
00:04:06.580
kids to go and get on the social media that's dangerous for all of us. You and you were in business
00:04:11.300
with the Chinese that gave Hunter Biden $5 million. We can't trust you. We can't trust you.
00:04:16.440
That was pretty much it. That was basically the whole debate. And I think Nikki believed that she
00:04:28.040
looked good at the last debate when she went after Vivek. That was her best part of the last
00:04:32.920
debate performance. This I felt was too much though. And it was cacophonous. And some of the attacks
00:04:38.180
there, she seemed to suggest that Vivek was involved in paying off Hunter Biden or something. I don't think
00:04:44.480
that's the point she meant to make, but that's kind of what it sounded like. And it just didn't
00:04:48.400
look good for either of them, but it really didn't look good for Nikki. But other candidates were
00:04:53.340
interrupting too. Tim Scott interrupted throughout basically the entire debate. Anytime anyone was
00:05:02.120
asked a question on that stage, Tim Scott would try to respond so much so that they cut his microphone
00:05:07.620
and you could only hear Tim on everyone else's microphone through the ambient noise.
00:05:11.940
These are good people who are tainted by a broken system. And it's not the fault of anybody who's
00:05:18.180
involved. Thank you for speaking while I'm interrupting.
00:05:22.720
I learned so much, you know, that really showed me a new side of all of the candidates. I think
00:05:24.720
that's really going to affect my vote. Don't you? No, no, that was it. And
00:05:28.960
I learned so much, you know, that really showed me a new side of all of the candidates. I think
00:05:48.580
that's really going to affect my vote. Don't you? No, no, that was it. And Tim Scott was frustrated
00:05:54.880
because he felt he wasn't getting enough questions. But Tim Scott's not polling very high. So when he
00:05:59.720
kept trying to interject, it just seemed desperate. And the debate seemed desperate for
00:06:07.100
basically everybody. And the reason for that is because the guy who has had the commanding lead for
00:06:13.700
the entirety of the primary, going back 14 months now, didn't even bother to show up. That's how
00:06:19.460
inconsequential he felt the debate to be. And some voters, especially if you don't like Trump,
00:06:23.920
might say, well, that was wrong of him not to show up. And he owes us the respect of showing up.
00:06:29.800
But if you believe any of the polls, certainly if you believe all of the polls taken together,
00:06:35.240
which haven't really changed very much, Trump didn't have to do that. And nothing has moved
00:06:40.100
the needle. And I'm skeptical that anything is going to move the needle now. The one answer of the
00:06:44.740
night that I felt did land a real blow on Trump was given by Ron DeSantis. And it was in response
00:06:51.580
to Trump's attacks on Ron DeSantis's pro-life policies. How are you going to win over
00:06:57.620
independent pro-choice voters in Arizona? Same way we did in Florida. We won the
00:07:02.920
greatest Republican victory in a governor's race in the history of the state, over 1.5 million votes.
00:07:08.580
We were winning places like Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach that nobody thought was possible
00:07:12.580
because we were leading with purpose and conviction. I reject this idea that pro-lifers
00:07:17.620
are to blame for midterm defeats. I think there's other reasons for that. The former president,
00:07:23.620
you know, he's missing in action tonight. He's had a lot to say about that. He should be here
00:07:28.040
explaining his comments to try to say that pro-life protections are somehow a terrible thing.
00:07:34.000
I want him to look into the eyes and tell people who've been fighting this fight for a long time,
00:07:38.680
we're better off when everybody counts. And I think we should stand for what we believe in.
00:07:44.000
I think we should hold the Democrats accountable for their extremism, supporting abortion all the
00:07:50.340
way up until the moment of birth. That is infanticide and that is wrong.
00:07:55.460
This was basically a flawless answer. And it was a flawless answer because he rejected the premise of
00:08:01.600
the question. The premise being that pro-life policies and pro-life advocacy turn off moderate,
00:08:10.520
centrist, liberal voters. And he says, I don't think that's true. I think that we persuade people
00:08:16.060
when we lead with courage and conviction. So actually, if you've got a pro-life policy that is
00:08:21.840
consistent and coherent and you can explain your reasoning for it, that's going to persuade more
00:08:27.220
people than some middle of the ground, literally split the baby kind of policy where you say,
00:08:32.060
okay, we're going to kill babies who are this old, but we're not going to kill babies who are that old.
00:08:37.020
So I thought that was good. And then he pivoted off of it. And then he got his attack on Trump in,
00:08:41.680
which is the point of these debates is to articulate your view and be persuasive and then
00:08:46.780
attack your opponents. I thought he did that pretty effectively. And then he pivoted it to
00:08:51.080
Democrat extremism. So he didn't just leave himself at the very early part of the abortion
00:08:55.500
debate, which is harder to win. He brought it all to the end and he said, these Democrats want to
00:08:59.340
kill babies at the moment of birth or later. And that's completely insane. And that's out of step
00:09:04.060
with voters. And so we're going to keep articulating pro-life. It was a really good answer. Even that
00:09:09.620
answer, I don't think moves the needle. And the reason is because Trump has already served as
00:09:14.780
president. This is why Trump sees no need to go to the debate. I think he has no need to go to the
00:09:21.020
debate. This is why his poll numbers don't really seem to move after the debates because Trump
00:09:25.180
has a track record. So what Trump can do is if people don't like what he said about pro-life and
00:09:31.300
don't like him attacking Ron DeSantis' pro-life policies, even if he was probably only doing
00:09:36.700
that because he's attacking everything about Ron DeSantis and sometimes because DeSantis can sound to
00:09:40.880
the right of him on certain issues, he's going to attack him. Trump is going to attack DeSantis from
00:09:44.960
the left and that's going to irritate conservatives. But even then, Trump can just point to his record
00:09:49.880
and say, I got Roe v. Wade overruled. And that is going to be persuasive for most people, I think.
00:09:56.780
And my proof of that is his polls haven't moved, according to any of them. And now I know some
00:10:02.780
people are saying, well, Michael, did you believe the polls in 2016 when it showed Hillary Clinton was
00:10:08.540
leading Trump? When it showed that Hillary had a 99% chance of winning the election? And we have to
00:10:15.160
remember what actually happened in 2016. The polls showed Hillary was consistently up over Trump,
00:10:20.220
but that 99% number was a meta-analysis of some wonk sitting in an ivory tower somewhere saying,
00:10:27.680
well, given all of the data here, I just think the likelihood that Hillary wins, not the percentage of
00:10:31.800
people who are going to vote for her, but the likelihood that Hillary wins is 95, 97, 99%. And then
00:10:37.420
Trump outperformed the polls and Hillary underperformed. But we're talking about, in this case,
00:10:43.580
literally every poll that shows Trump up at least 20 points. And every poll in all these battleground
00:10:52.440
states where Trump has a significant advantage. So the conspiracy, the pro-Trump conspiracy among
00:11:01.700
pollsters and political scientists would have to be so pronounced that they've created a 30 or 40 or
00:11:08.740
more than 40 point mirage of support for Donald Trump. What is more likely? That or that Trump has
00:11:18.800
many of the advantages of an incumbent because he's running sort of practically as an incumbent? I think
00:11:23.420
probably the latter. The most surprising candidate, I think the one candidate who might actually really
00:11:29.760
have helped himself in the debate last night was North Dakota governor, Doug Burgum.
00:11:35.180
I think that the liberal left is, seems to be just completely bent on prosecuting law abiding
00:11:42.040
citizens that are gun owners, because every solution they have to this is take away the
00:11:46.920
second amendment rights of Americans. And somehow that's going to solve the problem. But all these
00:11:50.420
cities that we're talking about that showed the videos of tonight, they have some of the strictest gun
00:11:54.980
laws in the country. So we know that that's not what's working, but we have to do is get back to the
00:11:59.360
core issues about the family. We have to get back to behavioral health and mental health. We've got
00:12:04.640
to get back to actually enforcing the laws these people talked about. And like we've done in North
00:12:08.780
Dakota, where we're that we've got the goal and we're on the track to be in the most military friendly
00:12:12.460
state in the nation. We've got the most military and the most support of what we're doing in terms
00:12:16.740
of law enforcement, because the morale is down because we've been defunding the police because
00:12:22.000
they've been attacked in the press. The police have become the bad guys when they're the one they
00:12:25.860
there's all these jobs available in America. Why would you be a policeman if people only respect
00:12:29.760
them? Every time I see a policeman, the first thing I say is thank you. And so does everybody
00:12:33.820
else in my family and most of the people in our state, because they know we have to respect the
00:12:38.260
people that are out there defending us every single day. Doug Burgum, are you feeling the Burgum
00:12:43.180
momentum? Burgum momentum? Are you feeling it? Are you a Burgum maniac? Burgum probably not not
00:12:51.320
going to be the nominee. Burgum is pretty liberal on the social issues. But his numbers might improve
00:12:56.940
because I think he's somewhere around one percent. So he might double or triple or quadruple. He
00:13:00.700
actually did pretty well introducing himself to the people last night. So how did it end? It ended with
00:13:06.160
Vivek being bold and taking bold stances. He came out against birthright citizenship. I thought that was
00:13:11.400
very cool. Vivek takes a lot of bold stances and he's pursuing something similar to the Trump path
00:13:18.460
in 2016 in terms of ways to stand out. Maybe it will benefit him. He was so severely attacked last
00:13:24.460
night at the debate. I'm not I'm not sure which way it goes or if his numbers move at all. DeSantis,
00:13:29.700
he did a great job doing the DeSantis performance, which is to seem very disciplined, very competent,
00:13:36.220
have a clear political vision and just not be that sexy. You know, being Trump with perhaps more
00:13:42.180
discipline and less sexiness, which to some people sounds great, but to a lot of people,
00:13:46.700
it doesn't doesn't do very much. Nikki, I think probably hurt herself. Tim, I think probably hurt
00:13:50.540
herself a little bit. Was there anyone else on stage? Oh, Chris Christie. Chris Christie was not
00:13:55.900
did not have a good performance, did not look good, tried a few zingers out at Trump, didn't they didn't
00:14:00.040
quite land. So where does that leave us? In basically the exact same place that we were before the debate
00:14:06.580
happened, okay? These candidates, the ones who are not polling very well, need an off-ramp. And I would
00:14:14.920
encourage you also to check out Ramp. Right now, head on over to ramp.com slash Knowles. Are you looking
00:14:21.940
for a better way to simplify your business finances across expenses, vendor payments, and accounting? If so,
00:14:27.300
Ramp could be a complete game changer for your business. Ramp is a corporate card and expense
00:14:32.080
management software designed to help you save time and money. With Ramp, you can issue cards to every
00:14:37.380
employee with limits and restrictions and automate expense reporting so you can stop wasting time at
00:14:43.000
the end of every month. Ramp's accounting software automatically collects receipts and categorizes your
00:14:48.120
expenses in real time so you don't have to. The time that you will save each month on employee
00:14:52.900
expenses will allow you to close your books eight times faster. Businesses that use Ramp save an average
00:14:58.360
of 3.5% within the first year. Ramp is easy to use. Get started in less than 15 minutes,
00:15:03.640
whether you have five employees or 5,000. Right now, get $250 when you join Ramp. Just go to
00:15:11.120
ramp.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. That is R-A-M-P dot com slash Knowles. Cards issued by Sutton Bank
00:15:18.460
and Celtic Bank members FDIC. Terms and conditions apply. Now, there's another debate that's going to take
00:15:24.140
place. Not with the primary contestants yet. That one will be in a little bit. The next debate coming
00:15:29.040
up is going to be between the California governor, Patrick Bateman, doing business as Gavin Newsom,
00:15:35.320
and Florida governor, Ron DeSantis. And Newsom is already trash talking DeSantis a month out from
00:15:42.320
the debate. Why are you doing that and what is your strategy? Well, I don't know if that's the right
00:15:47.780
question. Why is he doing it is the right question. He's running, I think, I'm not sure, after tonight.
00:15:54.140
But currently, he's running for president of the United States. Do you think he's still going to be,
00:15:58.880
do you think he'll still be a candidate in November 30th? That's an open-ended question. Part of me
00:16:02.300
wonders if, you know, the fact that he took this debate, the fact that he took the bait in relation
00:16:10.620
to this debate shows that he's completely unqualified to be president of the United States. That's my humble
00:16:15.320
first question. Why is that? You're baiting him with the debate offer? Of course. I mean, why is he
00:16:18.180
debating a guy who's not even running for president when he's running for president? He's showing up at the
00:16:21.920
Reagan Library, hollowed ground, and he puts out an ad today, not for his presidential campaign,
00:16:26.880
to promote a debate against the governor of California? I mean, this guy's distracted. So
00:16:32.940
I don't know that he has it in his heart. I think, here's my personal opinion about Ron DeSantis,
00:16:37.420
he regrets running for president. He made a huge mistake.
00:16:41.120
So he keeps going on like this, just taunting DeSantis, and it reminds me of a WWE match.
00:16:52.640
Or even in an actual sport that isn't just show business, like a boxing match, when they're
00:16:59.420
trash talking before boxing, you know, this guy, I'm gonna wipe the floor with him. This guy is a
00:17:04.020
complete joke. He, you know, my, I think he regrets running. He's a, he's unfocused. He's undisciplined.
00:17:08.900
He's just mocking him relentlessly. This too, is a sideshow. I mean, that, unfortunately,
00:17:17.000
that's the point that Gavin Newsom is right about, is that this debate probably will not determine
00:17:22.900
the 2024 presidential race. The thing that he's being dishonest about here is that he's not running
00:17:28.440
for president. Gavin Newsom is obviously trying to run for president. He's not willing to put himself
00:17:32.800
up against Joe Biden because he thinks that then Biden would grind him up in the way that Donald
00:17:38.560
Trump is attacking Ron DeSantis right now. But he obviously wants to run for president. And this
00:17:42.860
DeSantis versus Newsom debate is the undercard debate. If Joe Biden's marionette strings collapse
00:17:49.460
and, you know, he falls to the ground, or if Donald Trump is sent to Elba or St. Helena and, and,
00:17:55.900
or, or he's, you know, taken out with the Hillary special, then there'll be an opening and,
00:18:00.180
and DeSantis perhaps could fill that gap. But as of now, even that, and I think that could be a
00:18:05.940
substantive debate about two different visions for America. Do you want America to be like
00:18:09.780
California? Do you want America to be like Florida? Which way are the U-Haul trucks moving?
00:18:13.860
I think it could be a great substantive debate, but once again, don't shoot the messenger here,
00:18:19.360
folks. I'm just the one who has to see things clearly past the event through to the election.
00:18:25.880
I don't see how this moves the needle. Now, speaking of Republicans engaging with corrupt
00:18:33.620
Democrat politicians, Bob Menendez still under fire. A lot of people calling on him to resign,
00:18:42.600
but oddly enough, not, not very many Republicans calling on Menendez to design and to resign rather.
00:18:49.060
And Mediaite has this headline. Mediaite says, why are no Senate Republicans calling for Menendez to
00:18:58.260
resign? Senate Republicans, Democrats have all attacked him, called on him to step down,
00:19:05.040
but the Republicans won't do it. What's that about? Why won't they do it? Two reasons. One,
00:19:10.600
because the DOJ is corrupt and the corrupt DOJ has been weaponized against Republicans in recent years.
00:19:17.580
So we are just generally more willing to give the accused the benefit of the doubt than Democrats are
00:19:22.960
when it comes to the DOJ. But that said, Menendez is obviously corrupt and we've all known it for a
00:19:28.760
decade. So why, why won't the Republicans call on him to resign? The simple answer is because
00:19:34.500
the longer this drags out, the longer Menendez holds onto that seat, the better chance a Republican
00:19:40.140
has of replacing Menendez once the seat eventually and inevitably opens up. So Menendez is holding on
00:19:47.020
because he wants to get a sweetheart deal so he doesn't spend the rest of his life in prison.
00:19:51.660
Democrats are clamoring for him to resign because they don't want this continued scandal and they
00:19:57.780
don't want to lose the seat. And Republicans, we're just going to sit back and watch the show.
00:20:01.460
I guess that's, that's the moment of politics that we're in right now is just sort of sitting back and
00:20:06.580
watching the show because there's not very much that we can do to alter the course of events in
00:20:12.560
politics. I don't think there's very much that we can do in the 2024 presidential primary. I think
00:20:17.640
it just is what it is. And it has been for 14 months. And I don't think there's much we can
00:20:21.560
do with Menendez. He's going to resign or he's not going to resign. But if we, if we at least don't
00:20:26.560
push him to resign, then this scandal is going to drag on and Republicans can win in New Jersey.
00:20:32.640
We have one in New Jersey. Even Chris Christie managed to get himself elected and we might be looking
00:20:36.700
at a Republican Senator. So keep it up, Mr. Menendez. We, you are innocent until proven guilty.
00:20:45.040
Now the, the political health of our country, not so great. Uh, when you're thinking of your
00:20:50.520
own personal health, you might want to go check out MediShare right now, go to MediShare.com slash
00:20:57.240
Michael. As a daily wire listener, you are not only informed you're handsome and pretty. You're also
00:21:01.340
engaged and value your freedom and responsibility. That is why we think that you will like MediShare.
00:21:07.620
MediShare is a community-based approach to healthcare that lines up with the principles
00:21:11.300
you believe in. Your values matter. And with MediShare, your healthcare dollars won't be
00:21:15.920
used for medical procedures that don't line up with your beliefs. MediShare is the highest rated
00:21:20.240
healthcare sharing ministry with a 30-year proven track record. It's not health insurance. It's a
00:21:24.940
community of 400,000 believers committed to caring and sharing with one another. Members save up to
00:21:31.020
50%, 5-0% or more on their monthly healthcare costs. For a limited time, Daily Wire listeners
00:21:36.440
will receive a $150 gift card when you join MediShare. To find out more, go to MediShare.com
00:21:42.060
slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L. That is MediShare.com slash Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L. Terms and conditions
00:21:50.580
apply. Make sure you head on over right now. So a Daily Wire listener will receive $150 in
00:22:01.020
I tell you all the time. I'll say it again, even though I hate to say it. And it pains
00:22:05.900
me. But don't say I didn't tell you so. The yes or no game has sold out over at DailyWire.com
00:22:13.880
slash shop. Again, you know it would. It will come back in stock, but you need to secure your
00:22:18.080
game if you have not already. If you already have the classic game, be sure to get the all
00:22:21.460
new Conspiracy Theory expansion pack in time for the spooky season. And speaking of my collection
00:22:26.700
and the rapidly approaching change of season, if you are even mildly familiar with this show,
00:22:31.240
you're probably aware of my autumnal affinity for a certain seasonal beverage. I am, in fact,
00:22:37.680
the PSL king of the Daily Wire, the pumpkin spice latte. So what better way to bring the fall
00:22:43.500
atmosphere into your home than with the all new Michael Knowles pumpkin spice candle, the pumpkin
00:22:48.380
spikele Knowles candle available now in my collection. I think that one sold out too,
00:22:53.620
but we've managed to get more in stock. Don't wait. Order your candles and your yes or no game
00:22:57.680
now. DailyWire.com slash shop. Speaking of Hispanic Democrats, AOC has a brutal accusation for Republicans,
00:23:09.800
which is that we run our mouths about the immigration problem all the time,
00:23:14.500
but we don't have any solutions. I didn't hear in your testimony,
00:23:19.160
the alternative sites you've advocated for. Could you remind me of which those are?
00:23:24.620
Well, in the conversation, as we know, as we've heard- I'm sorry, I only have 18 seconds. Which
00:23:30.580
are the sites that you propose as an alternative? I don't have a proposal. So you don't have a
00:23:35.540
proposal alternative? No proposed alternative. No solutions here. No ideas here. But Democrats,
00:23:46.280
we're authorizing 500,000 work permits so people can get on their feet and support themselves.
00:23:50.900
Democrats, we're proposing comprehensive immigration reform. Democrats, we're talking about saying,
00:23:55.820
let's reassess our foreign policies so that people aren't fleeing, you know, making sure that we
00:23:59.860
aren't participating in the destabilization of what's happening abroad. And all I'm hearing right
00:24:04.820
now is that we're not being met in the middle. No support, no path to citizenship, no identified
00:24:10.480
alternatives, just grievances. We need to get it together and make sure that we're getting on the
00:24:16.440
right page. And if the ideas being presented here in this committee are being disagreed with,
00:24:21.220
I'd like to see some actual functional alternatives that center and preserve the dignity of both people
00:24:25.940
who are coming here to fulfill an American dream and the American citizens here who want to support
00:24:29.800
them. That was a whole lot of words without any particular solutions that I heard from AOC either.
00:24:37.400
So this is her clip. AOC, she's taken a page out of the Daily Wire facts and logic clips where she got
00:24:44.220
the fast cuts and it goes on to the speaker and onto the questioner. And then she gets the nice 60
00:24:50.920
second zinger out there pioneered by Young America's foundation and other right-wing groups. And she's
00:24:55.520
flipping it. She said, you have no solutions. You have no solutions. And then she babbles and blathers
00:24:59.960
for 60 seconds without offering any solutions herself. The accusation isn't even legitimate.
00:25:07.260
Republicans have very clear solutions. Here is my solution. I got two of them for immigration.
00:25:13.120
We should restrict immigration and we should expand deportations.
00:25:20.160
I solved it. Do I get a prize from AOC? I did it.
00:25:23.660
But we should restrict it. We should restrict all immigration. Obviously, illegal immigration,
00:25:31.920
but also legal immigration because we have way too many people coming into the country. And it's
00:25:36.300
no knock on the people. But the movement of foreigners into the United States over the last
00:25:40.340
65 years is the largest movement of human beings ever in recorded history. And it's led to social
00:25:46.140
breakdown because there's no longer a coherent, cohesive society. So we got to slow that down
00:25:51.400
drastically. I'm not saying we totally seal up the border and don't let a single human being in.
00:25:55.820
I don't think that's practicable. I don't think, but we could drastically reduce all immigration,
00:26:01.040
illegal and legal immigration. And we could do it pretty easily. We've done it before in American
00:26:05.780
history. And then what about deportations? Am I saying we're going to deport every single
00:26:09.220
illegal that's in the United States? No, I don't think it's practical. I don't think most people
00:26:13.060
would want it. It's not going to happen. But we could drastically expand deportations.
00:26:19.380
You've got criminals now who go around, who kill people, who sell drugs, who sell flesh,
00:26:25.920
who are pimps, who are working for the cartels. And then they get arrested and they get let off the
00:26:29.540
hook. So we could just reduce the threshold for which someone is deported drastically. That would
00:26:37.240
drastically increase the deportations while not going after the really sweet, innocent little
00:26:42.900
person who's just following his or her lights, who doesn't commit all that many crimes other than
00:26:48.460
the crime of entering the country illegally. And the kind of person who most Americans don't want
00:26:52.880
to see deported, okay, they're going to be at the bottom of the deportation list. So it's probably
00:26:56.460
not going to happen. But why can't we do that? Why can't we just directionally enforce laws that
00:27:01.460
are already on the books and drastically restrict immigration and drastically expand deportation?
00:27:06.940
That seems simple. That's my solution. Yet they won't do it. The Democrat, AOC is not going to do
00:27:12.320
that. She wants to open the border completely and flood the country with foreigners. But the Republicans
00:27:16.620
don't want to do it either. The Chamber of Commerce Republicans don't want to do it. But don't tell
00:27:22.040
me we don't have solutions. I got a simple solution. We've used it many times in American history and
00:27:25.800
it worked out great. And now that we're not following my solution, things are not working.
00:27:29.100
You know what I love about our partnership with Helix Sleep? They understand that better sleep
00:27:32.760
means better days. I've been sleeping on mine for months now and the difference is incredible.
00:27:37.040
No more tossing and turning, just pure restorative sleep. Take advantage of their incredible
00:27:41.380
4th of July sale. Right now you can get 27% off site-wide at Helix. Just visit helixsleep.com
00:27:47.120
slash dailywire. That's helixsleep.com slash dailywire for 20% off site-wide. Make sure you enter our
00:27:52.700
show name at checkout so they know we sent you. Start sleeping better tonight.
00:27:56.800
Now speaking of transporting people, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, he decided to do his job
00:28:04.420
for a little bit. He took a break from the breastfeeding and the paternity leave. And
00:28:11.000
Mr. Buttigieg has gone on TV to say that we have got to shift to electric cars because the electric
00:28:19.240
cars are coming. It's going to happen. Whether you want it or not, whether we do anything or not,
00:28:25.480
cars are going to become electric, so get on board.
00:28:27.800
That concern in terms of the transition and who would suffer during that transition,
00:28:36.960
Well, it's absolutely right. Look, I come from South Bend, Indiana. It's the home of UAW Local 5
00:28:42.580
and UAW Local 9. I saw how the past generation of union auto jobs helped build the middle class and
00:28:50.860
build communities like the one that I grew up in. I also saw what happened when those factories closed.
00:28:57.280
What the UAW is trying to do right now is to make sure that this next chapter of the auto industry,
00:29:04.560
which let's be very clear, these cars are going electric with or without us.
00:29:09.460
Look, they're going electric. And so the union workers who are protesting because all these
00:29:14.380
mandates, mostly climate change BS mandates from the Biden administration to stop building normal
00:29:20.260
cars and shift everything, often with government subsidies, to this electric stuff that many people
00:29:25.100
don't really wind. It's just going to happen. It's just happening, okay? So you got to just get on
00:29:31.020
board with it. I don't really care about Pete Buttigieg or the cars or what's going on in the strike
00:29:38.400
here. This story to me is about all of the progressive technocrat project. Progressive technocrats
00:29:47.560
thrive on depoliticizing human beings. What they thrive on is, oh, look, it's going to happen.
00:29:54.300
It's just going to happen. You have no say over it. You have no say over your own life.
00:29:57.760
You can do, you can cry and you can whine and you can vote and you can organize politically,
00:30:02.360
but it doesn't matter. It's happening because progress demands it. Progress with a capital P
00:30:07.600
demands my very, very specific political program that the Biden administration is spending a lot of
00:30:14.400
money and power to enforce. It's obviously not true. If it were true, the Biden administration
00:30:20.000
wouldn't need to mandate all this stuff. If it's just going to happen naturally, they wouldn't need
00:30:24.520
to spend so much political capital and actual capital money to push this. Electric vehicles are
00:30:34.220
spreading now because of a particular government focus and because that's what they want. And okay,
00:30:42.200
but maybe some of us don't want that. Maybe some striking workers don't want that. Maybe some
00:30:46.680
ordinary citizens don't want that. And maybe we're going to voice our opinion. And even if Pete
00:30:50.840
Buttigieg insists that history and progress or the capital H and capital P demand that we get rid of
00:30:55.880
our gas guzzling cars, maybe we want to keep them. And so what, what are we going to do then?
00:31:02.020
Well, what the progressives do then, what the liberals do then is they say, well, you don't have a right
00:31:05.820
to say that. You don't have a right. And what we respond is, well, we, this is government of the
00:31:12.840
people, by the people, for the people. What do you mean? I can't set my own environmental standards
00:31:16.020
and my own manufacturing standards. They say, no, no, this is a liberal democracy. Meaning we're going
00:31:23.620
to do liberalism. And when the democracy goes along with that, we're going to celebrate. And when the
00:31:27.340
democracy opposes liberalism, we're going to tell that democracy to shut up. So it's a constant
00:31:34.020
process of deep politicization, even beyond what Buttigieg is talking about here. You see this
00:31:39.240
in the constant pointing to science. When, when the liberals and the progressives and the technocrats,
00:31:44.180
they say, no, the science says that we have to do this, this, and that. It's not me. It's not my
00:31:48.600
political desire. It's not people debating how to live together, coming from perhaps different first
00:31:53.340
principles and different chains of thought. No, no. It's just the science says that. The history says
00:31:58.520
that. The textbook says that. The computer says that. The progress says that. So you got to do it.
00:32:04.020
And you lose your political. Did you know that over 85% of grass-fed beef sold in U.S. grocery
00:32:09.960
stores is imported? That's why I buy all my meat from GoodRanchers.com instead. Good Ranchers products
00:32:16.160
are 100% born, raised, and harvested right here in the USA from local family farms. Plus, there's no
00:32:21.840
antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient. That's meat. Best of all,
00:32:28.420
Good Ranchers delivers straight to your door for added convenience. So lock in a secure supply of
00:32:32.620
American meat today. Subscribe now at GoodRanchers.com and get free meat for life and $40 off with code
00:32:38.060
DailyWire. That's $40 off and free meat for life with code DailyWire. Good Ranchers, American meat
00:32:43.520
delivered. Right. Now, speaking of depoliticizing, this is my favorite. We'll have to refer back to
00:32:48.720
the debate for just one brief second. The New York Times was fact-checking the debate,
00:32:53.040
and they fact-checked a statement from Vivek Ramaswamy. Am I allowed to quote Vivek from the
00:32:58.960
debate on a certain social media platform that doesn't like when you say true things? Okay,
00:33:03.400
well, I'll just do it. Vivek said, transgenderism, especially in kids, is a mental health disorder.
00:33:10.900
Obviously true. And then the New York Times, this woman, Azeen Grayson, a part of it got cut off,
00:33:22.440
says, this is her fact-check of it. She says, this is false. This is false. Transgenderism,
00:33:29.040
especially in kids, is a mental health disorder. No, it's not. Boom. Fact-check. Roasted. 17 Pinocchios.
00:33:35.760
Science. Fact. Fact-check. That's not my opinion. It's a fact-check. And the fact says
00:33:41.400
transgenderism is not a mental health disorder. It's totally normal and healthy when you think
00:33:46.840
you're the opposite sex and chop your body up and lower your life expectancy. Totally normal.
00:33:52.360
Which reminds me of something that I've known for many years now, and you have probably known for
00:33:56.260
many years, but people who are not very political, who don't pay close attention, are beginning to
00:34:01.800
realize, which is these fact-checks are just deceptive left-wing opinion columns. That's all
00:34:09.180
they've ever been. The fact-checks is just a way of saying, it's just the progressive, liberal way
00:34:17.120
of cramming their opinion, often completely insane opinions like this lady at the New York Times'
00:34:23.480
opinion, down our throats without having to take ownership of their opinions. They'll say, no,
00:34:29.780
this is just a fact. A lot of people don't understand the distinction between a fact and
00:34:34.720
an opinion, because a lot of people don't understand the distinction between an opinion
00:34:38.860
and a preference. So they'll say, well, look, everyone's entitled to his own opinion, but
00:34:43.660
he's not entitled to his own facts. But an opinion is a statement of fact from your perspective.
00:34:51.360
An opinion is not like a preference where you'd say, well, do you prefer vanilla ice cream
00:34:57.440
or chocolate ice cream? Oh, I prefer vanilla. But that's just my opinion. No, that's your
00:35:02.780
preference. If it were your, you could say, I think that vanilla is objectively a better
00:35:07.960
ice cream than chocolate, and that is my opinion. And that would be you stating a fact from your
00:35:12.640
perspective, a fact that is controversial with which people might disagree. But you're
00:35:16.960
still making a statement of fact. And so what they do here with the liberal fact-check,
00:35:22.100
so-called, is they just aren't honest about what an opinion is. They probably don't even know what
00:35:26.820
an opinion is. And what's especially ironic about the liberal fact-check is that the opinions that
00:35:32.640
they express are almost always wrong. They're doing this today, even on the most obvious issues,
00:35:40.180
like can a man become a woman? Can a little boy become a little girl? Speaking of scandalizing
00:35:45.100
kids, a federal judge in Texas, in Texas, what the hell is going on in Texas? A federal judge
00:35:51.420
has blocked the implementation of a Texas law banning sexually oriented performances in front
00:35:57.400
of minors. This is Judge David Hittner of the Southern District of Texas said that the law violated
00:36:02.200
the First Amendment and chilled free speech in the state. And this rule, we've seen similar rulings.
00:36:07.380
This blocks a law signed by Greg Abbott and the Republicans. And the judge says,
00:36:14.400
not all people will like or condone certain performances. This is no different than a person's
00:36:19.540
opinion on certain comedy or genres of music. But that alone does not strip First Amendment
00:36:25.700
projection. However, in addition to the pure entertainment value, there are often political,
00:36:29.680
social, and cultural messages involved in drag performances which strengthen the plaintiff's
00:36:34.480
position. So this judge was appointed by Ronald Reagan. And you know I love Reagan. I'm as big
00:36:41.420
a Reagan fan as there can be. But the Reagan era wasn't totally perfect. You know, Reagan addressed
00:36:46.560
his problems of his day in the way that he thought was best. But there have been some issues with that,
00:36:51.260
one of which is a focus in order to win the Cold War on maximizing individual autonomy and individual
00:36:59.360
choice and a skepticism, if not even a neutrality, in the face of good and evil or true and false,
00:37:05.900
right and wrong, beautiful and ugly. And so this judge says that drag shows, including ones that
00:37:13.200
little kids can walk up to, those are protected speech. That has never been the case in the history
00:37:18.720
of the United States until maybe 50 years ago. And this is the issue. This is what I was talking about
00:37:25.820
a couple years ago when I wrote my book, Speechless Controlling Words, Controlling Minds, which had a
00:37:29.880
thesis at the time, somewhat controversial, I think now less controversial, which is that,
00:37:33.620
thank you, which is that we like free speech in practice. We like the American tradition of free
00:37:40.040
speech, but there is a risk of people making an idol out of free speech. And if they make an idol out
00:37:46.540
of free speech, they're going to take it out of its historical context, out of all semblance of prudence
00:37:51.080
or the traditional American way of life. And we're going to end up with judges saying that
00:37:55.900
James Madison enshrined the sacred right of perverts to twerk around in front of little kids and that
00:38:01.100
this was the purpose of the First Amendment, which it obviously never was. That what's so smart about
00:38:05.300
what the judge did here is the judge said, he didn't just say, look, it's kind of entertaining and
00:38:10.360
I really like drag shows, so everyone should be allowed to see them. He said, no, this speech could be
00:38:14.980
political speech. So he's acknowledging that the purpose of the First Amendment is to protect
00:38:19.260
political speech, not appeals to the prurient content, not appeals to the prurient interest,
00:38:23.860
not appeals to obscene content. He's saying, no, it's obviously about political stuff, but
00:38:27.980
there are often political, social, and cultural messages involved in drag performances.
00:38:34.660
Sure, but by that standard, then you could say that any speech is political speech. By that standard,
00:38:40.080
you can say that any performance, any expression, any pornography is political speech. If the political
00:38:46.320
speech intended is that bans on pornography are bad, you could have the most disgusting degenerate
00:38:54.580
pornography, which is similar to what happens at a lot of these drag shows. And it could be obviously
00:39:00.300
only about appealing to people's lusts and the prurient interest and spreading obscenity. But then
00:39:05.960
the moment that it's under attack, the people behind the drag shows and the porn can very easily make the
00:39:14.100
claim. Well, no, the very act of putting the porn out there into the world is a political act,
00:39:18.720
because my political point is that we shouldn't have bans on these things. So now we've got two
00:39:25.660
options. We either get rid of all limitations on obscenity and gross stuff and public indecency,
00:39:32.780
even in front of little kids, or we return to the just and prudent and normal limits that have
00:39:40.440
surrounded the First Amendment and our understanding of political speech for all of American history and
00:39:44.840
all of the history of our civilization. But it's going to be one of those two things. And right
00:39:49.380
now, conservatives want to sound like absolutists on the First Amendment, but they obviously want to
00:39:54.300
live in the world where we're not having indecent, disgusting performances in front of little kids.
00:39:58.480
Well, what I'm saying is, and what I've said for a few years now is, I hate to say I told you so,
00:40:02.440
you got to pick one. Now, everyone, everyone is talking about convicting a murderer and how it
00:40:09.120
has completely blown up making a murderer's narrative of Stephen Avery being falsely convicted
00:40:13.120
for the murder of Teresa Hallbach. There are already so many people from around the country
00:40:17.680
commenting about how they've changed their minds about Stephen Avery after watching convicting a
00:40:21.480
murderer. Take a look at the series. Coming up on convicting a murderer. The key was the biggest
00:40:28.020
piece of evidence that viewers to this day believe was planted. It was a story that was really
00:40:33.240
tailor-made for Hollywood. It was on TV constantly saying, it's Manitowoc County, they're framing me.
00:40:39.040
It's got to be a setup. Because if I didn't do it, they had to plant the stuff.
00:40:43.320
It seemed like almost everyone believed these filmmakers.
00:40:50.080
His body language comes across as very suspicious.
00:40:55.980
And that is exactly what the filmmakers led you to believe.
00:41:05.160
I started to realize more and more that this was an entertainment piece.
00:41:08.620
This wasn't a piece of journalism like I thought it was going to be.
00:41:11.400
New episodes of Convicting a Murderer are released every Thursday exclusively on Daily Wire Plus.
00:41:24.300
If you're not a member, head on over to dailywire.com slash subscribe to sign up for access to this
00:41:28.840
groundbreaking series and the rest of Daily Wire's content.
00:41:32.320
My favorite comment yesterday is from Dirk at Work 33, who says,
00:41:35.340
Why is it that only Democrats hear these racist dog whistles?
00:41:40.820
What does it say about you if you're the one who hears the dog whistles?
00:41:44.120
The biggest story of the day I'm just getting to now,
00:41:46.400
which is that a judge in New York has ordered Trump's businesses to completely shut down.
00:41:54.240
They tried to lock Trump up for rape or something because of this imagined fantasy of this woman in Bergdorf Goodman or whatever.
00:42:06.000
They tried to lock him up for donating to his own campaign in the Stormy Daniels case.
00:42:10.860
They tried to lock him up for, as president, calling the Georgia Secretary of State and asking what was going on in the election.
00:42:16.080
They tried to lock him up for this, that, and everything else.
00:42:21.320
Now they're trying to take away all of his property.
00:42:27.040
This judge ruled that Trump had inflated the value of his properties and thereby gotten sweetheart bank loans.
00:42:37.160
And he said this constitutes fraud, and so Trump's going to have to forfeit all of his companies.
00:42:43.200
Which sounds completely insane, just in general.
00:42:46.820
But then when you zoom in on what the judge is even talking about, you see that the details are crazy, too.
00:42:54.440
This judge said that Mar-a-Lago, this is Trump's Palm Beach resort, is worth $18 million.
00:43:06.540
So the judge says that the entire Mar-a-Lago business is worth significantly less than one year's revenue from Mar-a-Lago.
00:43:18.900
But then it gets even crazier because that's not taking into account the real estate, which, where Mar-a-Lago is situated, is some of the most expensive real estate in the entire country, in the world.
00:43:34.680
There's water on both sides of it because it stretches across the entire island.
00:43:37.260
And the island is extremely valuable, and it's in one of the most valuable parts of the island.
00:43:42.680
If you look on Google Maps, I was doing this with Tim Pool last night.
00:43:46.120
If you look at the tiny little property just north of Mar-a-Lago, which obviously only has access to the water on one side, and it's much smaller.
00:43:57.940
That property was worth between $50 and $100 million.
00:44:06.640
You're telling me—so the property that's very tiny and north and not nearly as built up and not nearly as cool and storied and the buildings are not as nice, you're telling me that is worth double, more than double what Mar-a-Lago is worth?
00:44:23.100
Mar-a-Lago is probably worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars.
00:44:25.820
One expert put the value of Mar-a-Lago at over $1 billion, which is reasonable, actually.
00:44:35.540
Trump's own estimate of the market value is $612 million, which I think is perhaps even conservative.
00:44:45.500
But we've got to stop trying to make this make sense.
00:44:54.440
In the olden days, when a political leader was a threat to another political faction, that political leader would be ostracized, would be physically removed, could be assassinated, would be sent to a prison island somewhere, would be kicked out of the polity for 10 years, and they would just get rid of him.
00:45:14.060
Now we don't do that, because we pretend that we live in this totally normal, neutral political order where it's all fine.
00:45:23.260
None of these cases are about Trump raping a woman in Bergdorf Goodman's.
00:45:28.280
None of these cases are about Trump paying off Stormy Daniels and making an in-kind campaign contribution to his own campaign, which he's allowed to do.
00:45:35.300
None of these cases are about a president of the United States calling the secretary of state of Georgia.
00:45:39.900
None of these, none of it is about any of that.
00:45:45.800
None of it's about Mar-a-Lago being worth less than some apartments in New York City.
00:45:50.600
This is about getting Trump, and it will never stop.
00:45:55.420
He is literally Hitler, and they will stop at nothing to prevent him from being president again.
00:46:00.660
This is an argument both for and against Trump in 2024.
00:46:04.860
The people who prefer other candidates in 2024 are saying, the GOP is suicidal by picking Trump because the Democrats will never let him win again.
00:46:18.160
And the pro-Trump people are saying, yeah, because he's right over the target, because he's obviously a threat to the Democrat political order in a way that previous Republican presidents and presidential candidates have not been.
00:46:32.840
And furthermore, are we just going to let the Democrats now pick our candidates?
00:46:35.800
Because they say, no, that one's unacceptable, so you can't have him.
00:46:51.480
I, who I guess I'm the last conservative in America who really likes Donald Trump and really likes Ron DeSantis and likes Vivek and likes a lot of these other candidates, and I'm not endorsing in the primary.
00:47:02.560
But my observation from that is, regardless if you love him or hate him, Trump is sui generis.
00:47:18.820
There's probably been nobody like him in American history.
00:47:22.720
And so if you're trying to impose him on the ordinary rules of politics, it ain't going to work.
00:47:37.580
I have a whole plan for Theology Thursday given to me by Professor Jacob, who's sitting right across from that camera wearing a wife beater, looking like, you know, Fredo Corleone over here, maybe Sonny Corleone.
00:47:54.140
Use code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S, at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.