Ep. 1363 - The Trans-Heuser Busch Boycott May Have Killed Bud Light
Summary
Transgenderism is a winning political issue for conservatives. Is it because it's aesthetic or because it s a moral and political issue? And why is it so hard for liberals to make sense of it? To me, it s obvious that transgenderism works best as a political issue.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
It has now been seven months since Transheiser Bush flipped the bird to its customer base
00:00:04.640
and then doubled and tripled down on the insult in the expectation that the boycott would eventually
00:00:10.220
collapse and the customers would just forget and move on. And I am pleased to report that none of
00:00:16.260
that has happened. AB InBev, better known as Transheiser Bush, is the world's largest brewer.
00:00:23.460
It saw its revenue climb 5% in the July to September period, in line with Wall Street
00:00:29.220
predictions. But AB InBev's revenue in the United States did not grow. It fell. It fell by 13.5%.
00:00:39.420
U.S. sales of Bud Light were down a full 29% over the four weeks ending on October 21st,
00:00:46.280
compared to that same period last year. Which means the boycott has not let up at all. Which means,
00:00:54.160
and this is what matters for us, that transgender ideology is a winning issue for conservatives.
00:01:00.940
When the squishes beg us to lay off the so-called social issues, including and especially LGBT issues,
00:01:09.460
show them these numbers. Remind them that social issues are a pretty important part of society.
00:01:15.920
And point out that no other issue, perhaps in my lifetime, has been a clearer or more reliable
00:01:22.760
winner for persuading people to side with conservatives. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:28.080
Welcome back to the show. The reason that this issue is sticky, the reason that the transgender
00:01:53.640
issue keeps cropping up as a winner for conservatives, I think is as much aesthetic as anything else,
00:02:00.800
which we'll get to in one second. This episode that was brought to you by Good Ranchers.
00:02:03.680
Claim your year of free meat, 15 bucks off, and free shipping with my code Knowles at GoodRanchers.com.
00:02:09.920
I had some juicy Good Ranchers chicken stir fry the other night. It was very, very good.
00:02:13.220
The reason transgenderism works as a political issue for conservatives is, I think, largely aesthetic.
00:02:23.840
The conservative argument on transgenderism from the moral perspective, from the political perspective,
00:02:28.800
from the anthropological perspective, those are all true too. But I think it's aesthetics that is so
00:02:33.300
persuasive. Here's a good example. Here's a trans activist who has gone viral, hat tip to libs of
00:02:39.380
TikTok, as always. A trans activist who has gone viral for saying that not giving kids puberty
00:02:46.300
blockers is tantamount to mutilation. The thing that gets me about the anti-trans
00:02:52.180
conservative rhetoric around puberty blockers for trans kids is that if they really did care
00:02:57.620
about making sure children weren't being mutilated or weren't being coerced, they would be the number
00:03:03.380
one advocates for puberty blockers, not only because they're empirically supported and because they were
00:03:08.000
developed for cisgender people, but because they would realize that forcing somebody to go through a puberty
00:03:13.660
with a dominant hormone that is misaligned with your actual gender, that would be, by their terms,
00:03:20.120
mutilation. Because imagine if we sat a bunch of 13-year-old cisgender boys around and we were like,
00:03:25.100
hey boys, we know that you're boys. And we know that you've been boys as long as you've been alive, and it's very
00:03:29.960
clear to us that you are boys. But we just want to be so sure. So we're actually going to make you go through
00:03:34.900
estrogen-based puberty instead. So that way, like, when you get to the end of that road and you're 18, you can
00:03:40.560
decide if you still wanted to be that boy that you, you know, always showed signs that you were.
00:03:45.060
Can you imagine if we did that? That would be f***ed up. But that's literally what you are doing to trans kids.
00:03:49.900
Because forcing somebody to go through a puberty with a dominant hormone that is misaligned with your actual
00:03:55.400
gender is a forced mutilation by conservative standards. So you would think that they would be the number one advocates
00:04:01.940
for blockers and go, oh my gosh, yeah, why don't we, like, put a pause on this so that way you can decide
00:04:06.880
and, like, in a couple years see how you feel. Like, I just wish they would shut up.
00:04:13.000
Forget about his argument. Obviously the argument is crazy.
00:04:17.320
Would you ever leave your child with that person? Ever? Under any circumstances? No, of course not.
00:04:23.500
He looks deranged and is deranged and his argument is deranged. But it's, people can hear terrible
00:04:32.920
arguments. But when terrible arguments are made by people who seem glamorous, say, or sophisticated,
00:04:39.620
say, or intellectual, say, then those arguments sometimes catch fire. I think of someone like
00:04:46.340
Angela Davis. Angela Davis was a black power activist, an avowed communist, a terrorist, someone who
00:04:52.940
was complicit in murder and terrorism and political assassination. But a lot of people liked her. A lot
00:05:01.180
of people still like her today. A lot of prominent liberals will quote her because she seems intellectual
00:05:05.540
and she seems somewhat sophisticated, glamorous in a radical kind of way. This guy doesn't. The trans
00:05:13.700
activists don't. They look especially off. And we should not run away from that.
00:05:22.940
We should recognize, a friend of mine says that facts don't care about your feelings,
00:05:27.220
which is true, but politics largely cares about your feelings. And your feelings are largely informed
00:05:32.960
by what you see. It's informed by aesthetics. I think of the architect and architectural theorist
00:05:37.700
Christopher Alexander, who said that any space you're in is going to slightly elevate or slightly
00:05:41.900
lower your spirits. We are very, very susceptible to our aesthetic sense. This is really good.
00:05:48.500
So what is it? Why wouldn't you leave your kid with this crazy looking guy? Out of prejudice. You
00:05:56.580
have a prejudice. You look at a guy with five o'clock shadow who's wearing a dress, who's shrieking and
00:06:02.520
shouting and doesn't look put together. And your prejudice kicks in and says, yeah, this is not a great
00:06:08.340
idea. Some ideologues will be so radically pro-leftist that they will reject their prejudices.
00:06:14.820
They will reject their gut instinct that says, probably not a good idea to leave my kid with
00:06:18.600
this person. And that's very imprudent. So much of liberalism is just a rejection of prudence.
00:06:26.000
It occurs to me. You know, prejudice can be bad if we discriminate unjustly against people. That can
00:06:33.280
be very bad. But prejudice broadly is a very good thing. It's something that Edmund Burke, one of the
00:06:37.600
great conservative philosophers, exalted. Russell Kirk, a more recent conservative philosopher,
00:06:42.780
exalted. It's a good thing. It's called prudence. And prudence for Aristotle and every wise statesman
00:06:47.880
since is the paramount political virtue. Now, speaking of aesthetics and politics, I debated
00:06:53.140
even bringing this story up because it's a mean and nasty story. And so I'm not going to play the
00:06:59.580
clip. There was a clip of the podcaster, Patrick Bette David, making fun of Ron DeSantis. And
00:07:07.540
Governor DeSantis is on the podcast and people have been making fun of the governor for wearing boots
00:07:12.340
that seem like they have a little lift in the heel because Donald Trump is very tall.
00:07:18.380
Ron DeSantis, he's not short. He's just a sort of averaged height guy. And, but in presidential
00:07:24.140
elections, usually the taller candidate wins. So some have suggested that the governor, like many
00:07:29.980
politicians before him, is wearing some kind of lift in his shoes. The governor and his team have
00:07:35.480
denied this. And so this podcaster, Patrick Bette David, decided to make fun of him and said,
00:07:40.060
hey man, what's the deal with the shoes? These shoes are weird. You're wearing lifts. Here,
00:07:43.840
I'm going to buy you a pair of Ferragamos. And Governor DeSantis said, I can't accept gifts.
00:07:48.980
You know, shut it down as quickly as he could. Why do the shoes matter? Why do people care
00:07:55.620
that Governor Ron DeSantis, the greatest governor in America right now, maybe the greatest governor
00:08:01.100
in my lifetime? Very serious man who's accomplished a lot. Why do they care if he puts lifts in his
00:08:08.700
shoes? Because people crave confidence. This is always true. And if you put lifts in your shoes,
00:08:16.180
it speaks to a sort of insecurity. Even if it's a well-calculated insecurity, it still shows an
00:08:22.000
insecurity. And so people don't like that. There's nothing new about that. People are always attracted
00:08:25.920
to confident people. But I think they're especially attracted to confident people now.
00:08:31.460
And the reason that they're especially attracted to confident people now is because we live in a
00:08:36.480
time that is pervaded by skepticism. Where we're told that we can't really know anything for certain.
00:08:43.260
We're told that long-established facts, well, that's just your opinion, man. We're taught that
00:08:50.240
basic philosophical premises. Or just, you know, that's just what you think. You can't prove that.
00:08:56.660
How do you know? You don't know. It's just your belief, dude. Come on, man. It's the Big Lebowski.
00:09:02.160
It's, well, that's just your opinion, man. So in this extremely skeptical age, especially in this
00:09:07.460
extremely skeptical age, any show of confidence is very attractive. I think this helped Donald Trump,
00:09:13.600
who may have been wrong a handful of times in his life, but he's never been in doubt.
00:09:17.620
I think that's why people are attracted to Trump. I think it's why people are attracted to AOC.
00:09:21.760
AOC is wrong about almost everything. But she's always so confident about it. And someone simply
00:09:27.040
stating a fact in a time of skepticism is really attractive. And someone who appears to have
00:09:33.860
insecurities, even from the aesthetic perspective, is not going to do as well. And podcasters are going
00:09:40.740
to make fun of him, like Patrick David. Speaking of political confidence, Xi Jinping over in China
00:09:46.120
has reportedly purged 500,000 CCP officials in just the year 2023. And this is being reported
00:09:56.260
as a horrible thing. But it should be clear, when they say he purged these officials, they're not
00:10:02.460
talking entirely about Stalin-esque mass executions. There have been some party members who've gone
00:10:08.760
missing, at least for periods of time. But when they're talking about 500,000 people purged from
00:10:13.880
the Communist Party. They're talking about people who were fired and brought up on charges and punished
00:10:19.360
for corruption. This is... Call me crazy. I don't want to seem like I'm a Xi apologist here or like
00:10:27.800
I'm... But isn't that good? Isn't it good to get rid of and punish? Not like get rid of, but you know,
00:10:36.380
like fire and punish the corrupt people in your government? Shouldn't we be doing that? Wouldn't
00:10:42.700
that be good if we also did that? We never do that. No one who engages in corruption in our
00:10:47.360
government gets in trouble. Republicans get in trouble for not engaging in corruption. Democrats
00:10:51.560
engage in widespread corruption. The President of the United States, along with his son and his
00:10:56.380
brother, shook down leaders around the world for millions and millions of dollars. We have copies of
00:11:02.320
the checks of the payments from the bag men to the big guy up top, the Oval Office occupant,
00:11:08.560
Joe Biden himself, and it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter whatsoever. And forget about the
00:11:13.920
electeds for a second. What about all the bureaucrats? We always are complaining about
00:11:16.920
the deep state, the administrative state. Well, what we need to do is purge the deep state and the
00:11:21.700
administrative state. Not in the Stalin way, but not totally dissimilar from the Xi Jinping way. We need
00:11:27.900
to fire them, get them out of their positions of power. And if they've committed crimes, we need to
00:11:32.020
try them for those crimes. The federal bureaucracy is hundreds of, it's millions of people, actually.
00:11:38.100
Depends on exactly how you count it, but it could be up to 2 million people. Most presidents who come
00:11:42.400
into office are able to swap out 4,000 to 5,000 people in the bureaucracy. In order to have anything
00:11:50.560
even resembling meaningful change, you would have to swap out 40,000 to 50,000, at least. So I look at Xi
00:11:57.360
here, and I think, well, I don't like communism. I'm not rooting for America's adversary over America.
00:12:02.520
I'd like America to be really strong, too. But one way to be strong is when we see our adversaries do
00:12:07.000
things that are effective and that are helping their countries, maybe we ought to learn that lesson, too.
00:12:13.080
Now, if we're going to engage in any kind of serious political action, we're going to want our bodies to
00:12:17.960
be feeling good, which is why we're going to want to check out Good Ranchers. Right now, go to
00:12:21.340
goodranchers.com, use promo code Knolls. There's a lot at stake this November, so don't be chicken
00:12:29.040
and shop at the grocery store like usual. Instead, head on over to Good Ranchers. No,
00:12:35.480
that's not a pun. That's just a great place. Good Ranchers, this is my only problem with being on
00:12:40.660
the road. I like being on the road. I'm in a fun location right now, but it means I eat less Good
00:12:45.380
Ranchers because it's all in my freezer at home, and sweet little Lisa can only, well, she can only make it
00:12:49.940
four or five nights a week, sometimes for breakfast, too. Their Black Friday Your Way sale is live.
00:12:55.680
It's something you don't want to miss. They've got great meat puns. They've got even better meat.
00:12:59.460
This November, you get to pick your favorite meat to get free for a year. Pick a year of free steak,
00:13:05.540
salmon, chicken, or bacon when you subscribe to any box right now. Man, that is crazy.
00:13:09.160
It's a crazy deal. I'm reading this for the first time now. That's outrageous. Better yet,
00:13:13.600
when you subscribe to any box on goodranchers.com, you not only get a free gift of meat worth up to
00:13:19.100
$480, but you also get up to $15 off with code Knolls, K-N-W-L-E-S. They got the best meat out
00:13:26.100
there. You're going to get a year of free meat, $15 off, free shipping with code Knolls.
00:13:30.820
It totally sells itself. It's the number one place in America to get all your meat,
00:13:33.820
and seafood, by the way, and chicken, and pork, and all of it. Goodranchers.com right now,
00:13:37.960
use code Knolls, K-N-W-L-E-S. Speaking of purges, Democrats for years now have been talking
00:13:45.340
about packing the Supreme Court, and they want to pack the Supreme Court because the court has
00:13:50.540
generally ruled in favor of conservatives on at least a handful of important cases.
00:13:57.760
Not all the important cases. The Supreme Court, with the support of allegedly conservative Justice
00:14:03.100
Gorsuch, enshrined transgenderism into civil rights law. That's not very conservative. The
00:14:08.140
Supreme Court redefined marriage. Now, of course, that was before all of the Trump nominees got there.
00:14:15.340
But still, there were conservatives on the court. They redefined marriage in Obergefell.
00:14:20.040
They ratified Obamacare, which was completely unconstitutional. They've done all sorts of
00:14:24.580
things, but they've also overruled Roe v. Wade. They've also ruled in favor of the Second Amendment.
00:14:31.160
So they've done things that Democrats don't like, and Democrats have said, okay, we're going to pack
00:14:34.360
the Supreme Court. But that's politically unpopular because it seems as though Democrats are upending
00:14:40.000
our system of government. And the moderate Democrats and the independents and the kind of just fashionable
00:14:46.180
liberals, they don't like that. That doesn't pull very well or play well in Peoria. So the Democrats have
00:14:51.020
a new strategy. They're going to do reverse court packing. I've got to thank Ken Klukowski over at
00:14:57.460
Breitbart for that phrase. In a recent write-up yesterday or the day before, he pointed out that reverse
00:15:04.920
court packing will have much the same effect as regular court packing, but it will be more
00:15:09.340
acceptable to the public. And what is reverse court packing? Reverse court packing is when
00:15:14.520
the Democrats go in and try to get the conservative judges to recuse themselves from a bunch of cases
00:15:19.700
or ideally to resign. And how are they going to do that? They're going to say that Clarence Thomas
00:15:25.740
went on vacation once and he didn't pick up his breakfast tab. The host of a conference picked up
00:15:31.660
the breakfast tab. And so that's a bribe. And even if Clarence Thomas has never ruled on any cases that
00:15:37.880
really pertain to these people, it's just, it's bribery. It's corruption. Joe Biden is meanwhile,
00:15:45.120
just collecting checks hand over fist, millions of dollars from China, from Ukraine, from all over
00:15:49.720
the world. No, no, no, that's not, forget about that. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
00:15:53.560
Clarence Thomas, he went to a summer camp once. And so he's got to resign from the Supreme Court.
00:15:59.960
They're doing it to Alito too. And how are they going to go after him? They're going to go after
00:16:04.280
Leonard Leo. So Leonard Lear is the head of the Federalist Society, Federalist Society, very
00:16:08.800
important conservative legal organization, which provided a lot of good judges during the Trump
00:16:14.920
administration. And it's, it's important to the conservative legal ecosystem. So Senate Democrats,
00:16:22.920
Dems on the Senate Judiciary Committee have decided to subpoena Leonard Leo and others,
00:16:29.120
even though Leo's attorneys are saying, you have no right to subpoena me. I'm a private citizen.
00:16:33.620
You're not charging me with a crime. You have, there's no reason for you to subpoena me,
00:16:38.020
a private citizen. And you certainly have no right to subpoena Clarence Thomas or, or Sam Alito.
00:16:45.480
Because to do so, to say that the, the U.S. Congress has some ultimate oversight rights over the
00:16:54.320
Supreme Court is to say that the Supreme Court is subservient to the Congress, which is not true.
00:16:59.200
We have three branches of government and we have a separation of powers. We have checks and balances.
00:17:03.040
So it's just completely preposterous. But what else are they going to do? This is Dick Durbin and
00:17:08.040
Sheldon Whitehouse, the two Democrats who are demanding all of these records. Cause they think
00:17:12.460
if they can get Leo, then Leo will probably go to some of these conferences and different
00:17:17.300
nefarious back rooms, smoke-filled room kind of things with, with conservative judges. And then
00:17:23.380
they'll be able to force them to resign, which will be more effective at tilting the court in favor of
00:17:28.780
Democrats than packing it, which is unpopular. So there's more than one way to skin a cat.
00:17:34.480
Democrats are very clever at these kinds of tactics. Unfortunately, if it starts to look like
00:17:39.420
this is going to work, we're going to have to do the same thing to them. I don't want to.
00:17:44.880
I don't want to go digging through Elena Kagan's trash can. I don't want to go hire a private eye
00:17:51.300
to follow Sonia Sotomayor around. I don't want to have Republicans in Congress subpoena private
00:17:56.780
citizens who one time had lunch with any of the liberal judges, but we will have to do that
00:18:03.120
because such a thing would not be immoral. It would be somewhat reckless to our political system
00:18:10.640
when the Democrats initiate this kind of action, but it wouldn't be immoral. It would be perfectly
00:18:15.580
just. It just wouldn't, wouldn't really have a place in our system. But, but that kind of
00:18:22.000
retaliation would be just and not to retaliate in that way would be to concede the political order
00:18:26.880
to the libs, which would be very, very unjust. So they want to go down this road. It looks like
00:18:31.740
they've come to their senses on actually packing the Supreme Court for, positively packing the
00:18:37.220
Supreme Court. So now they're going to try to negatively pack the Supreme Court and we're
00:18:40.460
going to have to hit them if they do it to us. There's, there's no way out of that. The only way
00:18:44.600
out is through. Speaking of the Supreme Court and speaking of the court generally ruling with
00:18:50.320
conservatives on some big cases, even on what has been hailed a conservative win, some conservatives
00:18:55.400
are saying actually constitutes a loss. And Senator Josh Hawley wants to reverse a Supreme
00:19:02.720
Court decision, largely hailed as a Republican victory. And that is the Citizens United decision.
00:19:08.620
So the Citizens United decision is what, 10 years old now, maybe more. And it says that corporations
00:19:14.000
are people. And that is the famous line from Mitt Romney during 2012. One of the real hits
00:19:21.040
from that doomed campaign where he said, ha ha, corporations are people, my friend.
00:19:24.700
Ha ha ha. And there's some truth to that. A corporation is not just a building. A corporation
00:19:29.820
is not, but a corporation is also not an individual. A corporation is a group of people
00:19:34.100
with certain rights and certain restrictions on it. And what Citizens United did, according to Barack
00:19:41.700
Obama and the liberals, is it allowed corporations to spend whatever they wanted on politics and
00:19:46.460
political campaigns. Now, Sam Alito, the conservative judge, said that's not true. In fact,
00:19:50.960
when Obama was haranguing the court for that during the State of the Union, Alito visibly
00:19:55.800
said, not true. But now Josh Hawley has come out and basically sided with Obama. And his
00:20:03.140
reasoning is pretty interesting here. He says, politically connected corporations, quote,
00:20:07.560
have been in favor of almost everything that has been devastating for us beyond economics. He says,
00:20:12.460
what's new in the last two or three years is that those corporations now want to dictate
00:20:16.520
voting laws in the states. They now want to dictate rules on biological men playing women's
00:20:23.260
sports. So the old knock, the old left knock on corporations and politics is, well, they're just
00:20:31.300
going to spend money to buy politicians so that the politicians write the laws so the corporations
00:20:36.200
make more money. That would be bad enough. That happens all the time in politics. That would be bad
00:20:40.400
enough. But what Hawley is saying is, no, no, no, this is even worse. The corporations now want to
00:20:44.800
rewrite the voting laws. Corporations want to rewrite anthropology. They want to rewrite what
00:20:49.080
girls' sports means. They want to upend all of our values and our beliefs. And that's a bridge too
00:20:54.000
far. So then, and this is my favorite answer, someone asks Hawley, is he only going after the
00:21:00.660
corporations now because they're liberal? And I love his answer was, well, actions do have consequences.
00:21:09.340
I love that. He doesn't even try to hide it. He says, yeah. Of course, if the corporations were
00:21:15.380
just being normal and saying men are men and women are women, and we should all live in a normal,
00:21:18.620
flourishing way, I wouldn't really have a problem with it. But if the corporations are going to come
00:21:22.860
in and wield their immense power in this country, especially after many decades of deregulation,
00:21:28.720
largely heralded, largely, largely propelled by conservatives, then we're going to have to rein that in.
00:21:36.320
This is a big difference here between a libertarian and a conservative. Libertarians oppose big
00:21:43.920
government. Conservatives oppose outsize everything, all kind of outsized power.
00:21:54.000
The libertarians, they focus their eye on the state and the statists and the government. And yeah,
00:21:58.540
that's what you don't want the government or the state to have an outsized degree of power. But
00:22:03.260
big corporations can wield power unjustly and can threaten our rights and our way of life
00:22:08.520
just as well as the government. In some cases, the corporations can do it in a more effective way
00:22:13.500
because they're even less accountable very often than the government is. I don't want some bureaucrat
00:22:20.260
in D.C. stomping out my rights and my way of life. I also don't want some weirdo at Google doing the
00:22:24.740
same thing. Speaking of protecting ourselves, when you want to protect your body, you got to check
00:22:29.460
at Bulletproof Everyone. Right now, go to BulletproofEveryone.com. Use promo code
00:22:33.460
Knowles. We'd like to thank the sponsor of today's show, Bulletproof Everyone, because Bulletproof
00:22:39.380
Everyone is a premier American body armor manufacturer and supplier designed and built
00:22:43.540
for everyday wear. Their unique armor systems offer 25% more coverage than standard armor while
00:22:48.860
maintaining flexibility and all-day wearability. Bulletproof Everyone's ultralight armor system
00:22:53.200
is so light and thin, you might just forget you're wearing it. Your safety and discretion is their top
00:22:58.480
concern. Unless someone puts their hands on you, no one will have any clue that you are protected.
00:23:03.780
With Bulletproof Everyone, you are not a walking billboard. There are no visible logos and no
00:23:08.280
flashy designs. Their comfortable tailor-made clothing system goes above and beyond adding
00:23:12.540
additional security by keeping you incognito and under the radar. Work or play, Bulletproof Everyone
00:23:17.520
has got the perfect armor system to fit your everyday lifestyle and everyday budget. Right now,
00:23:22.620
our listeners can get 10% off plus a free Bulletproof backpack with the purchase of any
00:23:26.480
Bulletproof clothing. Just use code Knolls, K-N-W-L-E-S, at checkout at BulletproofEveryone.com.
00:23:32.040
That is BulletproofEveryone.com, promo code Knolls. Speaking of dubious political speech,
00:23:39.400
there was a threat made, multiple threats made to Jewish students at Cornell. And I'm going to
00:23:46.560
Cornell on Monday, so this interested me even more than the usual threats made on campuses.
00:23:51.160
So I look at it. I said, okay, I think this is a legit threat. Meaning, I don't think it's a hoax.
00:23:58.940
I don't think it's the Jewish students sending it to themselves. Students have done that. Usually
00:24:04.360
not Jewish students. But black students have done that many times, which I outline in my book,
00:24:09.720
Speechless. I'm on the road right now, so there's no, there's no bell, sadly. You've seen this on
00:24:16.600
sexual hoaxes. Women claiming to have been raped on college campuses, and then evidence comes out
00:24:22.840
that it just wasn't true. Meanwhile, the men's lives have been ruined by some kangaroo court of
00:24:26.580
professors and diversity deans. But usually Jewish students don't do that. So I said, I think this one
00:24:34.280
is probably legit. It turns out that it is legit. A student from upstate New York has been arrested
00:24:41.040
for making these threats. And the student is ethnically Asian. That's not supposed to be how it works.
00:24:50.900
Hold on. The student, the threat was made against the Jewish students. So the person who made the
00:24:57.660
threat has to be a neo-Nazi white supremacist. So the student has to be white. Ideally for the liberal
00:25:02.900
media, this threat would have been made by a white student. And then we could have had weeks and weeks
00:25:07.100
of a national conversation about white supremacy and how white men with their toxic masculinity and
00:25:15.400
their evil pallid whiteness, they need to be run out of society. So that would have been ideal for the
00:25:21.760
liberals. Second to that, the student was supposed to be Arab. Arabs were considered white for statistical
00:25:30.480
purposes in the US for a long time until it became clear that being white was a disadvantage
00:25:35.180
in politics. So then all of a sudden that kind of went away. And there was a new group, the MENA,
00:25:42.540
the Middle East North Africa group. There were some Arab and Middle Eastern political activists who
00:25:49.300
said, we want a separate category because we're so oppressed. And you think, hold on, wait a second.
00:25:53.380
If you're being oppressed by the evil white man and you're currently being classified as white,
00:25:59.040
shouldn't you want to just keep being classified? Wouldn't that, that would lessen your oppression if
00:26:02.820
what you were saying were true? But it's not. Actually, the opposite is true. So at least the
00:26:07.680
guy was supposed to be Arab and he was supposed to be a Hamas sympathizer, but he's not. He's Asian.
00:26:15.300
What do we do with that? I imagine what we're going to do is that the story is going to disappear
00:26:21.620
because these stories do not make it to the news because of the stories themselves. The stories make
00:26:31.840
it to the news because of the narratives that already existed. And the stories are selected
00:26:37.240
according to the narratives. If they fit the narrative, the stories get selected and you hear
00:26:42.940
about them and they become a cause celeb. And we now think of George Floyd as some kind of secular
00:26:47.820
saint. Even though black men are killed in violent ways every day in the United States and criminals
00:26:56.840
are killed in violent ways every day in the United States and drug addicts who take lethal doses of
00:27:01.620
drugs overdose on those drugs every day in the United States. And people aren't killed by the police
00:27:07.940
quite so constantly as the left says, but policing is a dangerous job and you're dealing with criminals
00:27:12.520
and there are officer-involved shootings. The reason George Floyd made it, of course, is because
00:27:16.760
his story fit the narrative. And all the other stories that don't fit the narrative, you just
00:27:20.660
never hear of. Same is true here. I doubt we're going to hear very much more about this fellow at
00:27:25.600
Cornell. Maybe I'll hear about it though when I go up to Cornell on Monday. Speaking of people
00:27:30.080
threatening to kill the Jews, the Houthis, the Houthis, it sounds like a 50s doo-wop band or something,
00:27:38.160
but it's an Iranian-backed Yemeni terror group has just declared war on Israel. So now we got,
00:27:45.740
we have the state of Israel was attacked by Hamas. Hamas runs the Gaza Strip. Gaza is one of the
00:27:54.600
Palestinian territories. Hamas is funded by Iran. Hezbollah, just north of Israel, runs the south
00:28:03.920
of Lebanon. Hezbollah then gets in on the action pretty quickly. Then you have other terror groups
00:28:09.920
attack U.S. bases because U.S. is allied with Israel in Syria and Iraq. So now then Israel
00:28:17.420
bombs an airport in Syria. So now we got, we got Syria pretty well involved. Now we go down the
00:28:25.720
Arabian Peninsula, we seem to have Yemen involved. And Yemen already was in the midst of a sort of civil
00:28:32.300
war and was already getting bombed by the Saudis. So now they're sending missiles to the Israelis,
00:28:36.700
but their missiles aren't that good. So anyway, I say all of this to underline a point that I've
00:28:43.380
made from the beginning of this war, which is this thing could and very likely will spiral out of
00:28:51.060
control very, very quickly. And different nations have different interests here. The interest of Iran
00:28:58.840
is to obliterate Israel from the face of the earth. The interest of Israel is to prevent Palestinian
00:29:06.840
statehood at the very least and almost certainly to annex Gaza or render Gaza politically neutral and
00:29:12.740
send all the Gazans to Egypt, which the Egyptians don't want to have happen. And another desire of
00:29:20.460
Israel will be to have regime change in Iran. And this person has this wish and this person has that
00:29:27.400
wish and this person has this wish. And the interest of the United States is to contain the war. That's
00:29:33.500
our interest. That's our strategic vital interest is containing this war before it spins out of
00:29:40.040
control. And that's a different national interest than Iran, certainly. It's different national
00:29:45.200
interest than Israel. It's different national interest than the Palestine liberation movement.
00:29:50.500
It's different. Different peoples have different interests. That one is ours. Contain the war
00:29:54.800
because it continues to spin out of control. Containing the war means wrapping it up as quickly as
00:30:03.760
possible without risking that it will erupt again too soon. It's going to erupt again. This kind of a
00:30:11.220
conflict has been going on in this way for well over 100 years. And it's been going on more broadly
00:30:16.760
for millennia. It's not going to end. There's not going to be any final end to this war.
00:30:21.220
So you could say, all right, we want to wrap the war up. So let's just have a ceasefire immediately.
00:30:28.340
Well, is that going to solve the problem? If Hamas continues to rule in Gaza,
00:30:31.780
then Israel can't feel safe in any way. And the war is just going to erupt again in two seconds.
00:30:37.900
So you cannot allow Hamas to continue ruling in Gaza. But then what do you do?
00:30:42.060
Do you then just totally glass Gaza and genocide all the Palestinians or send them to Egypt,
00:30:48.700
No, I don't think that's going to work. I don't see Iran or any of the other Arab states around
00:30:54.360
that were just rolling over for that. What do you do? It's very tricky. If I had the answer,
00:31:00.620
I would, well, I said I would win a Nobel Prize, but they don't give Nobel Prizes to conservatives
00:31:04.940
or people who fix things. They only give Nobel Prizes to people who make things worse and to liberals.
00:31:10.180
But I repeat myself. So if I had the answer, though, I would be the wisest statesman of the last
00:31:17.540
hundred years. So I'll let you know when I come up with it. Speaking of allies, there is a Minnesota
00:31:24.340
school board candidate who is insistent on giving kids, little kids, a way to identify allies to talk
00:31:35.360
about sex without telling their parents. When my wife and I were looking at schools
00:31:41.480
and everything, where we wanted to move, we wanted a place that was affordable. And we wanted a place
00:31:45.740
where we knew they could grow up to be whoever they grew up to be, whoever they loved. And that's why
00:31:50.880
we're in Minnesota, because we knew that whoever our boys would grow up to be, they were growing up in
00:31:56.500
a safe space. And we need to make sure that that happens in our buildings as well. I don't think we
00:32:04.420
can ignore our kids' feelings and just focus on the task at hand. I don't think we can just put our
00:32:09.860
heads down and pretend the world is all about academics when our kids are wrestling with real
00:32:15.240
issues about mental health tied to the changes that they're going through in puberty and who they
00:32:21.200
might be attracted to. We need to ensure that our schools are safe places where our kids can
00:32:27.680
identify allies that they can talk to if they're having a tough time, have conversations they may
00:32:33.220
not be able to have at home, have safe spaces where they can be themselves and know that they're
00:32:39.660
accepted and truly belong. No, no, we don't. We don't need that. We don't need you, Mr. Groomer
00:32:48.400
candidate, talking to any of our children ever about sex. You freak. You pervert. We don't need
00:32:56.000
that. We need a hard drive check at your home immediately. And then we need to kick you out of
00:33:01.580
the race. And we need to have you repent of your wicked and perverse ways or be ostracized from polite
00:33:09.560
society. That's what we need. That would make us all a lot safer. That would be our safe space.
00:33:14.000
What planet are these people living on where they have the temerity to get up in public?
00:33:24.520
I don't know what this man's sexual proclivities are. I don't really want to know. I don't know what
00:33:28.820
his supposed family structure is like. I don't want to know. But for this man to get up there and say,
00:33:35.360
so listen, actually what we need to do is we need little kids to talk about sex with us
00:33:43.480
all the time. And not just normal sex, weird sex. We need the kids in our schools. We need to use
00:33:52.220
the parents' taxpayer dollars to make clubs in the schools where we adults can go there and just chat
00:34:01.460
about really, really weird sex with people who are not our kids. But they're still kids, but not
00:34:08.240
ours. And specifically, we're going to talk about weird sex that they're not going to talk about
00:34:12.560
with their parents. How does that sound? Vote for me. Vote for you. In a sane society, that man would
00:34:21.820
have been tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail by the entire community.
00:34:26.940
That's the age that we're living in. And people are going to hear it. And they're going to hear
00:34:35.120
those words. I mean, look, his aesthetics aren't great either. The way he's dressing in a way that
00:34:39.040
is a little off-putting, I think, to normal-minded people. But it's not quite as bad as the trans
00:34:44.380
activists. So maybe he'll get away with it. But if he dressed even 10% more normal, and if his affect
00:34:50.620
were even 10% or 15% more normal, and he said just those same words, you know, look, we just need to
00:34:55.800
be allies. We need to support kids so that they can be open and inclusive and equitable and diverse
00:35:01.160
and to be supportive of them and allies and support and openness. It would mean the same thing. They
00:35:09.440
would be talking about the exact same thing, but a lot of people would hear it. And they'd say, okay,
00:35:14.220
that's fine. If Joe Biden said that, people would say, oh, that's fine. There's Joe. Joe's normal.
00:35:18.160
He's a normal guy. The chief reason, I think, that we conservatives are now finally winning on the
00:35:25.380
social issues, which we'd been losing on for so long, because that made us look like a bunch of
00:35:29.640
old fuddy-duddies who didn't get with the program. We weren't hip and cool. Well, now that's shifted.
00:35:34.400
It has shifted, I think, largely because the radicals now look like their ideas really are,
00:35:43.260
which is disordered. Now, speaking of crime, Convicting a Murderer, the new 10-part docuseries
00:35:51.820
by Candace Owens and Daily Wire Plus has done an excellent job at convincing even the strongest
00:35:56.020
of Stephen Avery supporters that he is guilty. If you have not seen the full series, all episodes
00:36:00.300
are now available exclusively on Daily Wire Plus. The final episode reveals who the real villains of
00:36:06.020
the story are. Stephen Avery, his family, and the filmmakers who portrayed him as innocent
00:36:10.340
and fooled millions of viewers. Here is a teaser of the series.
00:36:16.180
I'm going to direct your attention specifically to October 31st of 2005.
00:36:24.200
You need to tell us about it so we know you're telling us the truth.
00:36:27.700
So Steve stabs her first, and then you cut her next.
00:36:31.760
We sat at her house and waited for the garage door to open, hoping that she's coming back.
00:36:38.540
It's almost as if she was murdered, and then murdered again by these two documentary makers.
00:36:49.000
I love my sisters, and I hope I love them, of course.
00:36:56.380
You can binge all 10 episodes now, but only if you're a Daily Wire Plus member. So sign up today
00:37:04.800
at dailywire.com slash subscribe to watch the entire series.
00:37:08.800
My favorite comment yesterday, this is actually not even from yesterday's episode. This is from
00:37:14.040
my interview, my spooky Halloween interview with a former witch. You can get that now on YouTube.
00:37:20.080
The name is Seeking Truth in God. The comment is, I was into witchcraft for three decades. I'm now
00:37:26.340
Christian, in part because of the men of the Daily Wire. Thank you. I'm very glad to hear that.
00:37:30.480
That's really terrific. I'm glad that we could be part of that journey of yours. And if you haven't
00:37:36.280
seen the interview, go check it out. It's available now. You can watch it even after Halloween.
00:37:40.600
Now, speaking of leading kids astray, you remember Boston Children's Hospital got caught
00:37:45.480
transing the kids, and then the libs denied that Boston Children's Hospital was transing the kids?
00:37:51.480
Well, now we know not only were they transing the kids, but they got millions of dollars
00:37:55.880
in public funding to do it. The state of Massachusetts gave a one and a half almost,
00:38:02.180
$1.4 million reimbursement to Boston Children's Hospital for providing sex change procedures
00:38:10.220
to minors. This is according to reporting and records obtained by the Daily Caller.
00:38:14.840
The hospital performed 204 gender-affirming surgeries on minors from 2017 to 2020.
00:38:25.560
That included 65 chest surgeries. That's lopping off the healthy breasts of young teenage girls.
00:38:32.280
The youngest patient here was 15 years old. Better than 13, I guess, but a 15-year-old.
00:38:40.220
And it wasn't just one or two. 204 in the span of three or four years.
00:38:47.680
How many doctors are doing this at Boston Children's Hospital? Must be really busy.
00:38:53.060
Well, it's a big moneymaker. That's one of the reasons why they do it. Obviously,
00:38:55.720
they're getting these reimbursements to the tune of $1.5 million.
00:38:57.840
But then you're hooking a patient for life on these drugs and probably more procedures that are going
00:39:07.300
to cost more and more and more. And it brings a lot of money in for big pharma, even as it ruins
00:39:10.500
people's lives and often leads them to kill themselves. It's happening, folks. It's actually
00:39:14.580
happening. And the libs are still going to gaslight. If Joe Biden can get a check for $200,000 from his
00:39:20.860
brother who closes a shady business deal that very day for $200,000. And that's just a little
00:39:28.320
taste for Joe. You know Joe has raked in a lot more than that. In fact, we know that because of
00:39:33.540
Hunter Biden's laptop. If you can do that, if you're going to look at the check and still Democrats
00:39:38.460
will say, oh no, Joe's not corrupt. Then of course, you're going to look at the check. That's
00:39:42.280
$1.4 million. And they're going to look and say, no, Boston Children's Hospital. They're not doing that.
00:39:46.360
They're not doing that. Gets to what we've been talking about from the top of the show.
00:39:52.800
This is why a lot of the House oversight investigations don't really go very far.
00:39:57.800
Because spreadsheets and checks and documents and subpoenas and testimony in Congress is
00:40:05.080
freaking boring. It's boring and it doesn't persuade anybody. And no one watches it. And even if people
00:40:10.540
are forced to watch it, most people don't even know what it means. Most people don't know the first
00:40:14.840
thing about a spreadsheet or how financials work. Most people aren't going to listen to some
00:40:20.000
apparatchik drone in congressional testimony. What is persuasive is blunt language and aesthetics when
00:40:32.260
you can see it. Gets Glenn Youngkin elected in Virginia. Gets Ron DeSantis re-elected in Florida.
00:40:39.460
Maybe it gets Republicans elected in 2024. Speaking of troubled children and speaking of all that
00:40:44.220
boring House oversight. The stuff they're uncovering is good stuff. It's good stuff. Even if it's not
00:40:50.040
going to persuade your average voter on a suite. It will certainly persuade the high information
00:40:56.480
voters who are listening to this particular program. But they got him. You've been hearing
00:41:02.100
from Joe Biden from the beginning. Well, where's the money? Show me the money. Show me where the
00:41:05.940
graft is. Here's where the graft is. In July of 2019, this is according to the House Oversight Committee,
00:41:10.320
this is three months after Joe Biden announced he was running for president. Hunter gets a quarter
00:41:14.780
million dollar loan from a Chinese business associate. This is the wire that goes to Hunter
00:41:20.840
that used Joe Biden's Delaware home as the beneficiary address. So it's, I guess the consolation is
00:41:29.860
they're crooks, but, and they're pretty good at it, but they make elementary mistakes like that.
00:41:35.140
Joe Biden's address is on, listed as the beneficiary address. Well, now we know neither Hunter nor Joe
00:41:43.200
Biden paid back that loan. Instead, Democrat donor and Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris acquired Hunter
00:41:51.020
Biden's stake in Bow High Harvest RST, which is one of these sketchy China deals. And then this guy
00:41:58.220
just assumed the debt for Hunter. He just assumed the quarter million dollars.
00:42:04.480
Why? Why did he do that? Because they were longstanding friends, childhood friends, and he
00:42:10.200
just felt bad for poor old Hunter who, he was struggling with drugs and had a, no, they actually
00:42:16.120
only met in 2019 at a political fundraiser, at a political fundraiser for Joe Biden's campaign.
00:42:23.500
So they meet at this political fundraiser. They say, oh, hey, you're a Joe Biden's son, right?
00:42:30.280
Cool. How can I bribe you? Okay. Oh, cool. I can assume this loan that was never going to be paid
00:42:35.640
back anyway from your crooked counterparts in China. Okay, great. So House Oversight asks,
00:42:41.740
why is a Democrat donor taking in Hunter's China debt? Raises serious ethical questions. Yeah, of course.
00:42:46.580
I love this stuff. I encourage James Comer and the House Oversight Committee to keep digging it up.
00:42:51.220
I like to be able to have proof when people make silly claims, like there's no evidence that Joe
00:42:56.780
Biden took bribes or anything like that. I like to be able to refute that. It's not going to matter.
00:43:04.420
People know Joe Biden. Just like people know Donald Trump, people know Joe Biden. They know that he is
00:43:08.820
a simpering, back-slapping, empty suit of a politician. They know he's dirty. They know he takes
00:43:15.220
bribes. They know it. It doesn't matter. Just like people know Donald Trump. He can be nasty
00:43:23.200
sometimes. He says mean things. He is loose with his language. He's unpredictable politically. Yeah.
00:43:31.820
Yeah, we all know that. This is why it's not going to work. The candidates who are running against Trump
00:43:37.980
in the primary, and they keep pointing out all the problems with Trump that his opponents pointed out
00:43:46.060
in 2016. But we know him. He's one of the most famous men in the world, okay? The guy's been famous
00:43:50.580
since the 80s. And he was the president of the United States. He was the star of a major network
00:43:55.480
TV show for 12 years or something, or more. And he was the president. Yeah, we know. We know him,
00:44:00.440
and we know Joe Biden, and none of this is going to make a difference. When I see these weak attacks
00:44:06.960
on Trump, this, did you see Donald Trump misspoke? This man, he's not the same man as 20. What are you
00:44:13.980
talking? He is exactly the same man. He also misspoke in 2016, and no one cares. Or some people
00:44:19.280
care, but they already don't like him. Did you see Joe Biden took a bribe? Yeah. Uh-huh. I did. I did
00:44:28.320
see that. That's not going to matter. That's not what's going to move the needle. What's really
00:44:31.720
going to move the needle in this election, as far as I'm concerned, is how voter ID, ballot harvesting,
00:44:37.160
and mail-in ballots are orchestrated in the crucial swing states. I think that's going to be the big
00:44:42.700
difference. And I think the candidates are basically already set. Speaking of government payoffs,
00:44:50.340
there is, I'm going to have to tease this. I'm not, I want to, you know me, I'm a tease. I want to get
00:44:56.780
into this story, but it's this trucker who absolutely destroys the liberal argument for why
00:45:04.460
we all need to be driving electrical vehicles in about two seconds. He knocks it down. And the reason
00:45:11.400
I'm teasing this is not just because I think the electric vehicle fad is silly. And, you know, if the
00:45:18.040
technology is going to come about, it can come about over time. But the idea that the government
00:45:21.820
is forcing us all to convert our normal cars into these electrical monstrosities is so,
00:45:27.160
so ridiculous. To what? To stop us from being burned to death by the sun monster in 12, what did
00:45:32.660
AOC said 12 years? How many years ago was that? We'll see. We'll see when the time runs out. But the
00:45:37.680
reason I look forward to playing this clip for you, either tomorrow or sometime the next week, is
00:45:44.700
it reminds us of two things that are really missing in our government and our politics right now.
00:45:50.080
And that would be knowledge and competence. All right. On that note, that's our show. I'm
00:45:55.160
Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show. See you tomorrow.