Ep. 1406 - Can Christians Vote For Trump？
Episode Stats
Words per minute
169.15474
Harmful content
Misogyny
18
sentences flagged
Hate speech
18
sentences flagged
Summary
ABC News and WMUR cancel the next Republican primary debate because only Ron DeSantis agreed to participate. A porn actress is insulted in public, Mia Khalifa goes viral, and a woman who supports Palestine goes viral in public.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
ABC News and WMUR have canceled the next GOP presidential primary debate
00:00:04.960
after only Ron DeSantis agreed to show up. Four candidates, Trump, Haley, DeSantis,
00:00:12.200
and Chris Christie, remember him, they qualified for the debate. Christie has already dropped out.
00:00:17.840
Now, Nikki Haley is refusing to debate unless Trump shows up, which he's not going to do
00:00:23.020
because he hasn't gone to any of them because he's leading the pack by just under 50 points
00:00:28.080
nationally. Haley is smart not to debate, only DeSantis, because debates are always a risk
0.99
00:00:34.400
and she has nothing to gain. Nikki Haley is currently leading DeSantis in the next state,
1.00
00:00:39.640
New Hampshire, by almost 23 points. The numbers are 23 point, I'm sorry, 29.3 percent to six and a half
00:00:48.260
percent for DeSantis. A debate before New Hampshire would be all downside for Haley with no upside.
1.00
00:00:53.980
Haley also has no incentive to debate before the following state, Nevada, because she's not
0.94
00:01:00.240
even competing there. A few years ago, Nevada legislators moved to replace the state's caucus
00:01:05.260
system, which is similar to what we saw last night in Iowa, with a primary system, which is more in
00:01:10.960
line with what the rest of the country does. The Nevada GOP opposed the move, so it's holding a
00:01:16.380
caucus anyway and says that anyone who participates in the primary can't participate in the caucus.
00:01:21.400
But while all the rest of the GOP candidates opted for the GOP-run caucus, Nikki sided with the state
00:01:27.660
and filed for the primary, so Nevada doesn't even matter to her. And Trump is currently polling at
0.98
00:01:33.160
69 percent there, nice, so doesn't matter anyway. Next up is South Carolina. That's obviously Haley's
1.00
00:01:40.180
home state, where she is currently in second with double the support that DeSantis has. So no reason for
00:01:47.040
her to debate before that one. And then finally, there's Michigan, where DeSantis has a slight lead
00:01:51.820
over Haley, but it's doubtful that the governor will even still be in the race at that point.
00:01:56.560
And even if he is, Trump currently has over 61 percent support in Michigan. That's all before Super
00:02:02.140
Tuesday, when 16 states and territories will vote, most if not all of which are certain to go to Trump.
00:02:07.980
All of which is to say, we're not getting an ABC News debate before New Hampshire. And we're probably
00:02:13.840
not getting a CNN debate either. And we're probably just not getting any more debates at all because
00:02:20.900
the 2024 GOP primary is, for all intents and purposes, over. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:02:43.840
Welcome back to the show. Breaking news. A porn actress, Mia Khalifa, was insulted in public.
1.00
00:02:56.140
She's gone viral for this. She usually goes viral for promoting the Palestine liberation movement
00:03:02.700
and supporting terrorists and things like that. But she's gone viral here for a different reason.
00:03:08.380
Shockingly, she was insulted in public. We'll get to that very important story in just a moment.
00:03:13.120
First, though, the fact that the political media are still reporting on the primary as though it were
00:03:22.940
some hot, contentious thing is crazy. I'm happy to talk about the primary a little bit because it
00:03:29.400
does matter who the nominee is and who's going to be the next president and whether or not we're going
00:03:33.940
to send the next nominee of the Republican Party to prison and whether we're going to fall into civil
00:03:39.700
war and whether the American republic is going to cease to exist. All of that stuff matters.
00:03:44.080
But most of the political media are still reporting on this GOP primary as though it could go another
00:03:53.140
way. It can't. Unless a bolt of lightning comes out of the sky or out of the hands of a Democrat,
0.60
00:04:01.740
it's over. It's Trump. But here's how they're reporting on it. The libs and some places on the
00:04:09.220
right even are trying to suggest that Trump's win in Iowa doesn't mean all that much. And what they
00:04:15.540
point to is they say there was low turnout in Iowa. Only something like 110,000 people caucused.
00:04:22.460
That was down from an all-time high back in 2016 that I think was around 170,000 or 180,000 people
00:04:31.020
caucusing. So they're saying only 14% of the Iowans came out and only half of them voted for Trump. So
00:04:39.120
it's not really a big victory. And 14% is a pretty low number, sure. But I don't think it's really a
00:04:48.080
knock on Trump. I think it's probably more a knock on the other campaigns. Trump already seemed to have
00:04:55.500
the state locked up. Also, it was negative nine degrees outside. So the fact that anyone showed
00:05:00.800
up at all is pretty impressive. Negative nine degrees is bad. It's currently 10 degrees here
00:05:04.960
in Nashville. And we're still not allowed to go back to work at Daily Wire because there's a little
00:05:10.020
bit of snow on the ground and the whole city is shut down. So negative nine degrees, that's pretty
00:05:15.420
intense. And more to the point, people are not really that incentivized to vote if they think
00:05:22.080
that the thing is already done. Trump was polling at 52% in Iowa before the caucuses. So the incentive
00:05:29.300
for anyone to show up, for a Trump voter certainly, or even some of the supporters of the other campaigns,
00:05:35.220
is going to be greatly diminished. This was the story in 2016. Do you remember? The Democrats said,
00:05:39.500
well, the reason Trump won in 2016 is because everyone thought Hillary was going to win.
0.99
00:05:44.760
So the Democrats thought that they didn't have to go vote. And Democrats who would have supported
00:05:48.860
Hillary stayed home because they thought there was no reason to do it. And then the Republicans
00:05:53.960
were more motivated and the Republicans won. So using that logic, then what that would suggest is
00:05:59.460
the other candidates would have had much more of an incentive to show up. The fact that the turnout
00:06:07.420
was low is actually a knock on the other campaigns for not getting out the vote. Because the Trump
00:06:13.980
supporters would have already thought that they had it in the bag, if you're going to compare it to
00:06:17.580
something like 2016. But I think probably what happened is that a lot of GOP voters, one, didn't want to
00:06:26.700
go out and freeze, but a lot of GOP voters are treating this as though the primary is just fake, that
00:06:34.260
it's a fait accompli. It's been done from the beginning. As some of us perhaps predicted early on,
00:06:40.420
I hate to say I told you so, I think a lot of GOP voters are just treating Trump as the incumbent in
00:06:47.920
this primary. And that's how it turned out last night in Iowa. All of the other candidates could
00:06:53.740
have consolidated around one, one anti-Trump candidate. Every single campaign just put all
00:06:58.920
their resources, all their voters, all their money, put it together, gone up against Trump. Trump still
00:07:02.600
would have won Iowa last night. And I'm not saying it's good. I'm not saying it's bad. I'm not saying
00:07:08.280
anything about who should win. I'm just saying the guy is basically an incumbent. And the polls were
00:07:16.160
proven correct in Iowa, which to me implies that the polls are likely to be about right in the other
00:07:21.680
states, which implies that the primary is over. So now we turn our attention away from the GOP
00:07:28.140
infighting and we focus our attention on beating the left. And there's a clip of a very prominent
00:07:33.880
left winger that is going around now. Bernie Sanders, Bernie, the leader of the socialist wing
00:07:40.680
of the Democrat party, at least for decades now, maybe some of the young guns and the squad are
00:07:46.320
taking that position from him, but still he's probably the most prominent socialist on the left.
00:07:51.760
And the clip is going viral because Bill Maher tricked him in a debate over equality versus equity.
00:07:59.560
You've got that equality, which a lot of people agree with versus this new leftist socialist view
00:08:06.660
of equity, you know, which is, which is everyone having the same outcomes, not just the same
00:08:11.860
opportunity. And even that socialist Bernie Sanders said that he supports equality.
00:08:18.580
DEI, are we confusing equality of opportunity with trying to guarantee equity and outcomes? Okay.
00:08:24.660
That's interesting because I think this word equity has come into the language in the last few years.
00:08:29.520
And before that, we didn't hear it a lot. And I think a lot of people hear equity and they hear
00:08:34.460
equality that it's the same word and it's not the same word in the same concept. So how would you
00:08:40.780
differentiate between equity and equality? Well, equality, we talk about, uh, I don't know what the
00:08:49.740
answer to that is. Come to think of it, you know, uh, equality is equality of opportunity. All right.
00:08:56.700
We live in a society. We want all people to have whatever color your skin is. Equity, I think, is more
00:09:02.840
guarantee of outcome. Is it not? Yeah, I think so. I think that's okay. So which do you come, which side do you
00:09:09.200
come down on? Uh, equality. Equality. Yeah. Okay. Ha ha. They got him. That liberal is a classical
00:09:20.140
liberal though, Bill Maher. You know, he's the good kind of liberal, Bill Maher. He supports equality.
00:09:25.220
A lot of people support equality of opportunity. But Bernie is a socialist. He's supposed to support
00:09:30.260
equity, equality of outcome. But, but even Bernie, even a radical like Bernie says, that's too much.
00:09:37.120
And so those DEI people, those woke people, the squad, the ones arguing for equity, therefore
00:09:42.700
meaning equality of opera, of, of outcome rather, they're, they're crazy. And you know what I say?
00:09:49.960
I actually don't think there's much difference between the two, which we'll get to in one second.
00:09:54.200
First though, we're talking about our economy. We got to talk about ramp right now. Go to ramp.com
00:10:00.860
slash Knowles. When you are running a business, time is money. That is why I am so excited to have
00:10:05.860
ramp as a new sponsor on the show. If you're a finance professional looking for a better way
00:10:10.120
to maximize productivity and cut wasteful spending, then ramp could be for you. Ramp is the corporate
00:10:15.420
card and spend management software designed to help you save time and put money back in your pocket.
00:10:21.420
With ramp, you can issue cards to every employee with limits and restrictions, automate expense
00:10:25.980
reporting, and stop wasting time at the end of every month. Ramp's accounting software automatically
00:10:30.820
collects receipts and categorizes your expenses in real time. So you don't have to, you will never
00:10:35.780
have to chase down a receipt again, and your employees will no longer spend hours submitting
00:10:40.360
expense reports. The time that you'll save each month on employee expenses will allow you to close
00:10:44.940
your books eight times faster. Ramp is easy to use. Get started in less than 15 minutes, whether you have
00:10:50.720
five employees or 5,000, get 250 bucks. When you join ramp, go to ramp.com slash Knowles,
00:10:56.380
that is ramp.com slash Knowles, that is ramp.com slash Knowles, cards issued by Sutton Bank and
00:11:05.820
Celtic Bank members, FDIC, terms and conditions apply. The conservatives, we support equality of
00:11:14.420
opportunity. It's those crazy leftists. They support equity, by which they mean equality of outcome.
00:11:23.000
I don't think those are actually opposites. I don't think that's much of a debate at all.
00:11:30.080
I actually think they're kind of the same thing, ultimately. It's a battle between liberalism
00:11:37.280
and communism. And in recent decades, the conservatives have made common cause with the liberals.
00:11:46.500
Some have gone so far as to say that we conservatives were the true liberals or were the classical liberals
00:11:50.900
or whatever. I'm not a liberal. I'm not a modern liberal. I'm not an old liberal. I'm not a middle
00:11:58.120
ground liberal. I'm not a liberal. I don't, I don't believe in liberalism. So I don't, I'm certainly not
00:12:04.020
a communist. So I actually think they're both kind of wrong. I think equality of opportunity and equality
00:12:11.580
of outcome. They're both just fantasies and they're both ultimately wrong. I want people to
00:12:18.040
have their just do. I want people to have every good opportunity they possibly can have. But there's
00:12:26.240
no such thing as equality of opportunity. Some people are born a little smarter than others.
00:12:33.600
And it's, and there are people who are born with a high IQ who squander their natural advantages
00:12:39.220
and totally neglect their education. And they might end up worse off than someone who's maybe born with
0.54
00:12:46.160
a little bit of a lower IQ, but they work really hard and they're really diligent. They cultivate good
00:12:50.240
habits. That, that's certainly true. But they still started from a different place. There is no actual
00:12:57.560
equality of opportunity. Let's talk about something that might be more important than IQ.
00:13:05.040
Having two parents who are married to one another in a loving, stable household. Not everyone gets that
00:13:12.380
equality of opportunity. What are we going to do? How are we going to level out that playing field?
00:13:18.140
There are a lot of people who are born at a wedlock, who are born with absent fathers, who are born in bad
00:13:23.780
family circumstances, who are born without a mother or father. Maybe that's two fathers, three fathers
00:13:30.240
now, five fathers and a billy goat, whatever. They're suffering from a natural disadvantage
00:13:37.160
compared to someone who's born to a loving mother and father, married in a stable household. What are
00:13:43.980
we going to do? Are we going to, in order to level that playing field so everyone has the same equality
00:13:48.960
of opportunity? Are we going to break up the stable marriage? Probably the left would like to do that
0.98
00:13:52.740
now. No, that doesn't seem like a good idea. Are we going to force the, the couple that had the kid
00:13:58.040
out of wedlock to get married? I would be fine with that, but the liberals, the classical and otherwise
00:14:02.820
who push for equality of opportunity, they're not going to do that. There's no one's calling for that.
00:14:11.360
Some of these are, are more socially constructed. Some of these are just natural, like IQ.
00:14:15.580
Two. So what are we going to do then? Well, what's going to happen is because equality of
00:14:20.720
opportunity is a fantasy that can never exist in real life, then there are going to be inequalities
00:14:27.880
that persist. Equality of opportunity is going to be shown to be a failure. And then guess what's
00:14:32.620
going to happen? People are going to demand equity. They're going to demand equality of outcome because
00:14:38.700
equality of opportunity is an impossibility. And they're going to be right when they, when they point
00:14:43.160
to that. But equality of outcome, well, that's just communism. That's not going to work either.
00:14:47.100
That's going to be a monstrosity. That's going to be a terrible injustice. So then what do we
00:14:52.280
really want? We don't want equality or equity in the liberal sense of the term. I mean, for goodness
00:14:58.720
sakes, equality is part of the motto of the French Revolution. Liberté, égalité, fraternité,
00:15:07.160
fraternité, au mort, you know, liberty, equality, and fraternity or death. And then they lop off
00:15:14.460
everybody's heads. That's, that's extreme liberalism. That's, that's not, we don't want
00:15:19.920
either of those things. The, the true equality that exists is a spiritual equality before God
00:15:26.980
because there is neither Jew nor Greek nor slave nor free nor male nor female, but all are one in
00:15:32.840
Christ Jesus. That's a true equality and equality before God because there is human solidarity.
00:15:38.220
We all descend from a common ancestor. We are all made in the image and likeness of God and we are
00:15:41.940
redeemed by the very same God, the only begotten son of God who comes down to earth. God sends his
00:15:48.200
son to die so that whoever believes in him might not perish, but have eternal life. That's true equality.
00:15:55.500
It's an equality of opportunity for everlasting life. It is not an equality of opportunity for everyone
00:16:01.060
to go become a CEO someday. Anyone can be president. Anyone can be an astronaut. That's not true. I'm not
00:16:05.920
going to be a basketball player. I never really wanted to be a basketball player and I won't be one.
00:16:10.240
And I never had a chance to be one. And it drives me crazy. No, it doesn't drive me crazy, but that's
00:16:14.720
just my, my state in life. The conservative view is not the liberal view and it's not the communist view.
00:16:21.480
It's a view that respects natural limits and is diligent and pursues good and wants all sorts of
00:16:30.180
good stuff, but recognizes that there are natural limits and there are natural inequalities in the
00:16:35.420
world. And we can either bury our heads in the sand, we can deny that. But when you deny truth,
00:16:40.620
when you deny reality, it just leads to more radicalization. The liberal law, liberalism is
00:16:46.760
going to lead to communism. In fact, that's exactly what happened in the history of ideology and the
00:16:50.380
history of politics. So if you, if you want to avoid that, it's much better to ally yourself with
00:16:56.580
reality and with the truth. Quality before God is a good thing. It's much more important. Now,
00:17:02.340
speaking of God, Mr. Meathead, Rob Reiner, most famous for one, having a very famous and talented
00:17:09.420
father in Hollywood and two, playing a guy named Meathead on All in the Family, one of the great
00:17:13.860
sitcoms of all time. Rob Reiner, who's a big lib, has just come out and he's asked how a Christian
00:17:19.320
could possibly vote for Trump. Reiner says, Jesus told us to do unto others as you would have them
00:17:28.320
do unto you. How in God's name can anyone who believes in the teachings of Jesus support Donald
00:17:33.120
Trump? We hear this line all the time. Rob Reiner is not the first guy to bring it up. You hear it all
00:17:40.280
the time. But what is he really asking? Is, is Rob Reiner and all these libs, are they asking
00:17:49.340
how a Christian can vote for a sinner? Are they saying that Donald Trump fails to live up
00:17:56.720
to the Christian ideal of life? He's a sinner. And so therefore you can't vote for him? Well,
0.97
00:18:04.240
that doesn't make a lot of sense. The, the central insight of the Christian is that we're all sinners,
00:18:11.280
all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. And therefore we're not going to save
00:18:14.660
ourselves and we're in need of a savior, not a political savior either. It's kind of nice to
00:18:19.800
have good politicians every now and again, but we need a savior who is not just king of a country,
00:18:24.240
but king of the whole universe. That doesn't make sense. If we can't vote for sinners,
00:18:29.160
we can't vote for anybody. But does Rob Reiner mean how can a Christian vote for a non-Christian?
0.80
00:18:38.100
Is he not just saying that Trump is a Christian, but he's a sinner, but he's saying Trump isn't a
00:18:43.020
real Christian. He's not a Christian at all. So how can a Christian vote for a non-Christian?
0.95
00:18:49.220
I don't know. Rob Reiner is not a Christian. That mean we can't vote for him? Vivek Ramaswamy
0.90
00:18:55.160
is not a Christian. That means we can't vote for him. We, we, in our very constitution
1.00
00:19:01.100
learn that there is no religious test for public office. Is he going to throw that out the window?
00:19:09.360
I don't know. That's pretty extreme. Rob Reiner is saying he should only vote for Christians. I mean,
00:19:15.100
it'd be not, be good to have a, a more, uh, Christian informed government. I'm all for that,
0.93
00:19:23.040
but that, that seems pretty extreme. Is Rob Reiner a Christian nationalist now? I don't think so.
00:19:27.480
Now, you know what I think he is? I think he's engaging in a typical leftist tactic from Saul
00:19:34.320
Alinsky. He probably doesn't even know he's doing this, but it just comes as second nature to the
00:19:38.880
libs. He is forcing his opponent to live according to their own principles and their own ideals,
00:19:47.000
principles and ideals that they would never cause themselves to live up to.
00:19:53.740
And that's a very effective tactic. But in this case, it's totally incoherent because he is
00:19:59.080
insinuating that Christians should live up to ideals and principles that are not intrinsically
0.86
00:20:04.540
Christian. It's just totally bogus in this case. It can be very, very effective when the libs and the
0.99
00:20:11.700
Alinskyites do this, but it's just not effective in this case. There is no Christian principle that says
00:20:16.620
you can't vote for a sinner. We wouldn't have a government anymore.
1.00
00:20:22.200
Can't vote for a sinner. You can't vote for a non-Christian. All right, who are we going to vote
1.00
00:20:25.860
for? I don't know. Some Republicans are still not sold on Trump. And I understand why. A lot of,
00:20:32.440
a lot of Republicans don't like him. I like the guy a lot, but some, some Republicans don't like him.
00:20:37.920
Even the Republicans though, who are not sold on Trump seem to be sold on who they will not vote for.
00:20:44.880
Enter Rand Paul, who, who says he has a major political announcement to make with regard to
00:20:51.280
2024. It's not who he's going to endorse, but who he anti-endorses, who he condemns.
00:20:58.360
I've had a long relationship with Donald Trump and there's a lot to like there. I'm also a big fan
00:21:04.240
of a lot of the fiscal conservatism of Ron DeSantis. I think Vivek Ramaswamy has been an important voice.
00:21:11.760
I also have listened to and met with the independent Bobby Kennedy. I'm not yet ready to make a decision,
00:21:18.320
but I am ready to make a decision on someone who I cannot support. So I'm announcing this
00:21:22.800
morning that I'm never Nikki. And if you go to never Nikki.net, you can let her know that you're
00:21:27.920
not a supporter either. I don't think any informed or knowledgeable libertarian or conservative
00:21:34.240
should support Nikki Haley. I've seen her attitude towards our invent our interventions overseas.
00:21:40.640
I've seen her involvement in the military industrial complex, $8 million being paid to become part of
0.99
00:21:46.880
the team. But I've also seen her indicate that she thinks you should be registered to use the internet,
00:21:53.280
that people posting ideas anonymously. I think she fails to understand that our republic was founded upon
00:22:00.080
people like Ben Franklin, Sam Adams, Madison, John Jay and others who posted routinely for fear of the
00:22:08.640
government. They posted routinely anonymously. Rand Paul's anti endorsement of Nikki Haley tells us two
00:22:18.400
things about the state of the GOP right now in the 2024 race. The first one is Nikki Haley has to be
00:22:27.680
the establishment candidate. She has to be the neocon candidate. She has to be the never Trump candidate.
00:22:34.800
Even if she were not so inclined, she would have to be that candidate because that is her role in the race.
00:22:41.600
That's the only avenue available to her. But the second thing it teaches us, and this is something
00:22:47.040
that is a little bit weird and surprising. Donald Trump is a strangely unifying figure on the right.
00:22:58.080
We'll get to why in a second. First though, fellas, this is a no-brainer. If you want to protect your
00:23:02.560
kids from the leftist indoctrination that is rampant in the mainstream media, this is how you do it.
00:23:06.800
Start a 14-day free trial into BentKey. This is the new kids entertainment app from Daily Wire.
00:23:12.720
BentKey is the only streaming app that offers high-quality, family-friendly shows that reflect
00:23:16.640
your beliefs. BentKey features amazing characters and timeless stories that will spark your kids' imagination
00:23:21.920
and curiosity with hundreds of episodes that your kids will love and that you can trust. With
00:23:26.160
new episodes streaming every Saturday morning. Do you remember Saturday morning cartoons? Well,
00:23:32.000
they're back. And they're better than ever. But don't take my word for it. See for yourself,
00:23:35.520
you can try BentKey for free for 14 days. No catch, no gimmick, no hidden fees,
00:23:40.240
just phenomenal content that your kids will love and that you can trust.
00:23:43.280
All you've got to do is use code UNLOCK at BentKey.com. You will get 14 days of unlimited
00:23:49.280
access to BentKey's world of adventure. Go to BentKey.com, use code UNLOCK at sign up to start your
00:23:55.600
trial today. Rand Paul's anti-endorsement of Nikki Haley shows that Trump is a weirdly unifying figure on
00:24:04.480
the right. Rand Paul is probably the most prominent libertarian in national politics. Mike Lee has a
00:24:13.680
chance at that title too. Mike Lee has already endorsed Trump. Rand Paul is effectively endorsing
00:24:21.040
Trump because he's saying he's not going to vote for Nikki. He's never Nikki. And Governor DeSantis right
00:24:28.700
now has no path to the nomination. And Christie's out of the race. I don't think Rand Paul would like
00:24:33.560
Christie very much and Vivek's out of the race. So by default, that leaves, that leaves this, Rand Paul
00:24:42.140
is Trump's guy. But, but Trump is also popular among the not libertarian parts of the right.
00:24:50.500
Trump is also pretty popular among the traditionalists. He's, he's popular among the
00:24:56.940
post-liberals. He's, you know, it's been said that obscure political monikers are the right-wing
00:25:02.100
version of gender pronouns. You know, everybody's got their own kind of weird version. But the, the,
00:25:07.080
the part of the right that is, I think, unfairly maligned as authoritarian or more will, let's put
00:25:12.660
it in a nicer way, more willing to use state power, I think, in line with the American tradition. Those
00:25:18.080
guys like Trump too. Compact Magazine, founded by So Rabah Mari, post-liberal outlet, says that
00:25:26.160
Trump's the man. Trump's still the guy for 2024. The American post-liberal, another
00:25:33.000
post-liberal and more traditionalist type outlet. They came out and endorsed Trump the other day.
00:25:39.380
And Trump gets the libertarians here. The people that he doesn't get are the establishment. He
00:25:45.760
doesn't get the Chamber of Commerce. He doesn't get the interventionists who want to bomb every country
00:25:52.000
on earth. Or to put it in a nicer way, the foreign policy hawks. He doesn't get them. He actually gets
00:25:58.360
some of them because of his tough talk and good track record on ISIS. We're going to go kill ISIS.
00:26:03.620
And he did. He destroyed ISIS. Or the fact that he took out Iran's top general. But, but in other
00:26:09.400
ways, he's kind of a dove. So the, the people who are more skeptical of intervention, they can like
00:26:14.740
him too. You know, he, he goes and says nice things about Kim Jong-un. Or he says that we need to stop
00:26:22.140
intervening everywhere overseas all the time and focus on the American homeland. He, he's a, he's a
00:26:27.240
weirdly unifying candidate. I don't know. Again, you might hate him, but we haven't seen a candidate
00:26:33.400
able to unify the GOP despite his mean tweets, despite the, the agita that he inspires in people.
00:26:41.320
We haven't seen that in a very long time. Now the establishment still does hate him. The head of
00:26:46.780
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Suzanne Clark has just come out and implicitly, but I think not so
00:26:52.820
subtly attacked Trump for his economic proposals heading into 2024. Let's be very clear in a global
00:27:03.100
economy and in fragile geopolitical times, it is in America's best interest for other economies to grow
00:27:10.940
and succeed through free markets. Prosperous nations are stable nations. They become partners,
00:27:18.340
allies, and ballasts against authoritarianism. Like the free markets, the global economy is not a zero
00:27:25.300
sum game. Someone else does not have to lose for us to win. On the contrary, the rise of the rest means
00:27:33.200
new customers, new markets, and new allies for us. Okay. What about China? Is it true? If, if you're
00:27:45.000
telling me that it's always in our best interests to open up new markets and tear down barriers to trade
00:27:52.100
and build up other countries, what about China? We're on the brink of World War III. Xi Jinping,
00:27:59.660
who I think has actually been fairly responsible in his more aggressive stance toward the U.S., he said
00:28:06.440
as much just a month or two ago. He said, look, we don't want war, but you got to recognize this is
00:28:11.840
about to be a bipolar world. China is on the rise. Our economy is on the rise. Our national strength is
00:28:18.500
on the rise. He's insinuating we are going to take Taiwan. We are going to exert more influence
00:28:25.220
around our country. And if you try to impede that, we're headed for war. This is what the
00:28:32.280
Harvard political scientist, Graham Allison refers to as the Thucydides trap, that when a rising power
00:28:37.500
challenges a hegemon, three quarters of the time, major conflict ensues.
00:28:44.500
What does the head of the chamber of commerce have to say to that? Well, yeah, sure. We might go to
00:28:49.020
World War III, but we get a bunch of cheap electronics from China at the cost, by the way,
00:28:55.020
of losing our intellectual property because they steal our IP and then rip off the products.
00:28:59.660
And then when they have all of our manufacturing, it weakens us as a matter of national security and
00:29:04.020
we become very vulnerable. And oh, by the way, when China becomes really rich and buys up all of our
00:29:08.680
debt, it's much harder for us to maintain our status as a global hegemon. We lose a lot of leverage
00:29:15.900
to China. What do you mean? You really think a rising tide lifts all ships all the time? We
00:29:20.640
always need to reduce tariffs? And Trump is the big threat. She's obviously talking about Trump here
00:29:25.200
because Trump broke with what many people consider to be GOP orthodoxy, which is that free trade is
00:29:31.020
always great. Trump said, no, I want some more tariffs. Trump has gone much further in this campaign
00:29:36.040
and said he actually wants mercantilism in the 21st century. And Trump's been inconsistent on this.
00:29:42.780
Back in the 80s, he's got a longstanding track record of being in favor of tariffs. But then
00:29:49.500
within the last 10 years, he was publishing op-eds. I don't know if he actually wrote them,
00:29:53.780
but they were published under his name, calling for more globalization. But then he'd also say,
00:29:58.320
we need more tariffs again and we need more protectionism. But then he would sometimes say
00:30:01.400
as president, well, we want to use tariffs as a negotiating chip so that ultimately we can get
00:30:07.260
more free trade so that the tariffs are really just a means to an end and the end is more free trade.
00:30:11.740
But then in 2024, he's come out and said, no, actually the tariffs are good in and of themselves.
00:30:15.680
So look, the guy, like all major politicians, doesn't have perfect philosophical consistency
00:30:22.940
here. And people can try to read the tea leaves of what he really believes. I think the track record
00:30:27.700
is clear. He is much more favorable to tariffs and protectionism. He's much more skeptical of free
00:30:33.040
trade than any Republican in my lifetime. But that's not throwing out our principles as some
00:30:41.860
of the modern Republicans would have you believe. Ironically, Trump's position is much more in line
00:30:47.900
with the historical position of the Republican Party. The Republican Party was founded on tariffs.
00:30:53.020
Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president said, give me a protective tariff. I'll give you the
00:30:56.560
greatest nation on earth. It's not only, economic nationalism and protectionism is not only more
00:31:04.240
in line with the historical GOP, which only adopted free trade in the middle of the 20th century. And
00:31:08.860
it really only rose to the fore with the presidency of Ronald Reagan, who I will mention instituted
00:31:14.720
major steel tariffs. So even Reagan, even St. Reagan of free trade also was a protectionist when it suited
00:31:22.320
him. But it's also in line with the American tradition. America was founded on protective
00:31:28.380
tariffs. Our founding fathers were economic nationalists. Some of our most right-wing
00:31:34.620
founding fathers, I'm thinking especially of Hamilton, were very pro-tariff. Probably
0.90
00:31:41.760
the GOP should take note. I guess the GOP voters have taken note. Some of the interests of the GOP,
00:31:48.640
Chamber of Commerce used to be allied with the GOP. They haven't taken note yet. Maybe
00:31:51.980
they should, because the happy platitudes of the last 30 years don't really hold up to the exigencies
00:31:59.800
of 2024. And they don't really hold up to historical scrutiny either. I'm not saying that free markets
00:32:05.640
are always bad. Far from it. I think free markets can be a wonderful instrument for economic growth.
00:32:11.160
But we don't want to let the tail wag the dog here, okay? We're not an economy with a nation attached.
00:32:15.920
We're a nation that needs to have a thriving economy in order to remain strong and vibrant.
00:32:20.600
But the economy is there to serve the political community, not the other way around.
00:32:27.560
Speaking of trade wars in China, China seems to be pretty bullish on Trump's chances in 2024.
00:32:36.060
The Chinese state-run newspaper, the Global Times, just came out and told the world,
00:32:42.500
this was before the Iowa caucuses actually, to quote,
00:32:45.300
prepare for the possibility of Donald Trump being re-elected as president.
00:32:49.900
And you might say, well, this is propaganda. If you don't like Trump, you'd probably say,
00:32:53.340
see, China is pulling for Trump. Though they're not really pulling for him. They're just saying,
00:32:56.700
there's a real chance the guy's going to be re-elected. And that might be the case.
00:33:03.380
Foreigners sometimes have a better sense of our politics than we do.
0.99
00:33:07.680
I remember back in 2016, Vladimir Putin, America's foe, Vladimir Putin came out and he said,
00:33:14.400
in the early days of the primary, he said, there's no question Donald Trump is the leader in the
00:33:18.860
Republican race. And I thought, oh, that's crazy propaganda, or he's just trying to get in our
00:33:22.660
heads, or he's completely misreading the situation. This was back when all the really smart people
00:33:27.320
thought Trump didn't have a chance. But Putin was right. Which makes sense. I mean, you'd think that
00:33:33.540
the dictator of a nuclear reformer superpower might have a little bit of insight into politics.
00:33:38.980
A guy who came up as a KGB communist in the Soviet Union, he probably understands a little
00:33:45.540
bit about politics, probably more than your average keyboard warrior pundit. He was right. And China
1.00
00:33:52.240
might be right here too. The reason that foreigners sometimes have better insight into our politics than
1.00
00:33:56.620
we do is the same reason that you have great insight into all of your friends' problems. Don't you?
00:34:03.980
You have really, really good insight. Me too. We all. We have really good insight into all of our
00:34:09.380
friends' problems and everything that they're doing wrong and everything that they're missing.
00:34:13.500
But we don't have quite as much insight into our own problems, do we? No, that's a mystery.
00:34:18.900
We're befuddled by that. Put in a pithier way and a more profound way, we're really good at seeing
00:34:26.720
the speck in our neighbor's eye. We're not so good at seeing the plank in our own eye. And I think
00:34:32.140
that's what's going on here. I don't think China is running this headline because they're really
00:34:37.400
eager for Trump to get back in the driver's seat. Don't forget, before COVID, we were in the midst
00:34:41.400
of a trade war with China and we were winning, contrary to what the smart set said would happen.
00:34:45.700
Speaking of problems happening in our families and our communities, Jelly Roll, who I don't really
00:34:52.380
know anything about. I take it that he is a musician. He has a lot of face tattoos. He's a really
00:34:56.380
interesting looking guy and he's an interesting sounding guy. Jelly Roll just testified before
00:35:01.220
Congress about the drug crisis overtaking the country. He's a former drug dealer himself.
00:35:08.580
And the way that we talk about that crisis and the way that we talk about crime broadly.
00:35:13.860
I also understand the paradox of my history as a drug dealer standing in front of this committee.
00:35:19.080
But equally, I think that's what makes me perfect to talk about this. I was a part of the problem.
00:35:25.800
I am here now standing as a man that wants to be a part of the solution. I brought my community down.
00:35:31.780
I hurt people. I was the uneducated man in the kitchen playing chemists with drugs I knew absolutely
00:35:37.220
nothing about. Just like these drug dealers are doing right now when they're mixing every drug on
00:35:41.940
the market with fentanyl and they're killing the people we love. I'll be honest with y'all. My desire
00:35:50.920
is to only get older and only do better and be better. I believed when I sold drugs genuinely that
00:35:56.860
selling drugs was a victimless crime. I truly believe that y'all. My father always told me what
00:36:03.140
doesn't get you in the wash will get you in the rinse. Now I have a 15 year old daughter whose mother
00:36:07.420
is a drug addict. Every day I get to look in the eyes of a victim in my household of the effects
00:36:12.960
of drugs. Every single day. And every single day I have to wonder if me and my wife, if today will
00:36:19.000
be the day that I have to tell my daughter that her mother became a part of the national statistic.
00:36:24.160
What doesn't get you in the wash will get you in the rinse. I really like that line. I'm going to
00:36:29.940
have to use that line I think. That's a great insight. But the best insight that Jelly Roll has
00:36:37.100
there is this term victimless crime. Because first he says, you know, actions have consequences. What
00:36:45.680
doesn't get you in the wash will get you in the rinse. Today we think that actions don't have
00:36:49.180
consequences. We think that we will totally be immune to the logical and natural consequences of
00:36:58.080
our actions. There's a great meme that was going around for a while. The meme was me sowing. Yeah,
00:37:07.180
yeah, this is awesome. I love sowing. Yeah, yeah, this is, I love just sowing and planting all these
00:37:12.380
little things and then me reaping. Ooh, yikes. How did this happen? Yeah, I don't want to, I don't want
00:37:18.180
to reap what I sow. I just want to keep doing all the sowing. That's really fun. We know it. We know
00:37:22.200
this about ourselves that we try to, we try to divorce. I mean, the clearest example is in sex
00:37:28.420
stuff. We divorce the end of sex from the, from sex itself. But we do it in everything, man. We do
00:37:35.180
it in everything now. We just, I don't know if it's because of a failure of long-term planning
00:37:41.300
or because of a denial of logic. I guess that's probably what it is. Because in logic,
00:37:47.120
things have consequences. We deny logic these days. And so we end up with phrases, and this is
00:37:53.440
the key phrase that Jelly Roll used. We end up with phrases like victimless crime. We, people on the
00:38:00.340
right use that phrase, especially the segments of the right that, that want to go squishy on the
00:38:05.220
social issues. They say, oh, who cares about a victimless crime? Do you hear yourself? Do you hear
00:38:10.100
that phrase? That's a, that's a meaningless phrase because by definition there can be no such thing
00:38:17.060
as a victimless crime. We'll get to why in a second. First of all, my favorite comment yesterday
00:38:22.040
is from Bo E. Lute, who says, how is it summarized in two minutes if this is a 49-minute video?
00:38:30.420
Mr. Davies, they're onto us. They're onto all those videos that we titled such and such summed up
00:38:37.800
in two minutes, and it's about 50 minutes, isn't it? I'm not, I'm not talking to Mr. Davies. I don't
00:38:41.360
even have a earpiece in right now. But you're onto us. That's true. Maybe, look, the summary is two
00:38:46.880
minutes, and then you get a little extra. You get 47, 48 minutes of extra.
00:38:56.060
I hate the phrase victimless crime. The libs use it. The libs coined it. The libs popularized it,
00:39:02.900
of course. But now everyone uses it. People on the right use it. Libertarians who argue for
00:39:10.360
the decriminalization of drugs or prostitution or all sorts of weird social stuff. They
00:39:16.820
say, oh, it's a victimless crime. We should stop prostitution. There can't, there's no such
1.00
00:39:21.060
thing as a victimless crime. Do you know where that phrase comes from? The phrase comes from
00:39:24.740
1965. The 1960s, when many, many bad things were coined and popularized. This is one of them.
00:39:32.760
It was coined in an academic paper by a guy named Edwin Schur, and the title of the paper was
00:39:38.260
Crimes Without Victims, Deviant Behavior and Public Policy. And you know what his examples are? This is what
00:39:43.680
comes after the colon. Abortion, homosexuality, drug addictions. Specifically drug addictions.
00:39:49.480
Exactly what Jelly Roll's talking about. It says it's a victimless crime. Oh yeah? Tell that to the
00:39:54.120
parent who lost a kid to drugs. Tell that to the many, many mothers and fathers in America right now
00:40:00.200
whose kids are dead because of fentanyl and drugs. Victimless crime. Not only are the kids victims,
00:40:05.940
the parents are victims. The brothers, the sisters, the whole political community.
00:40:11.040
Are you kidding me? Drugs are a victimless crime? It's one of the greatest examples of victimization
00:40:18.280
going on in our whole country right now. We have an overdose epidemic that is so colossal that
00:40:25.460
basically everyone, I think everyone that I know, knows someone or knows someone who knows someone
00:40:32.180
who has died because of this. What about the other ones? Forget homosexuality.
1.00
00:40:39.500
We talked about that enough on the show yesterday, two days ago. Abortion is a victimless crime?
00:40:46.520
You murder a little innocent baby, that's a victimless crime? I don't think so.
00:40:50.300
And those are the best examples they could come up with, by the way. Crazy. Because there's no such
00:40:55.060
thing as a victimless crime. Because crime is by definition an injustice. It's an act of violence
00:41:02.760
against someone. It can be an act of violence against your neighbor. It can be an act of violence
00:41:08.180
against the self. It can be an act of violence against our nature and God. But there's an injustice
00:41:14.300
there. There is a victim there. You can't, unless you just deny sin, unless you deny that anything is
00:41:24.580
better than anything else, you know, which I guess some people do. They don't really mean it because
00:41:29.060
it's obviously nonsensical. The moment someone says, there's no such thing as sin. There's no
00:41:34.480
such thing as morality, man. The question I always ask is, oh yeah, would you say it's better to bake
00:41:40.660
a pie for a widow than it is to kick an orphan in the head? And they look at me and say, oh, that's a
00:41:47.760
stupid question. Now why is it a stupid question? Do you have an answer for it? The smart ones among them,
00:41:52.040
they don't want to answer. But the answer, yeah, of course it's better to bake a pie for a widow than it
0.98
00:41:55.400
is to kick an orphan in the head. Okay, so if some things are better than other things,
00:42:01.340
then there is a moral order, and there's good, and there's bad.
00:42:06.840
If you would go so far as to say it's a crime to kick an orphan in the head,
00:42:12.420
you are describing that kind of injustice in political terms. You're describing victimhood.
00:42:22.640
Of course. Now, this phrase, what doesn't get you in the rinse will get you,
00:42:31.940
what doesn't get you in the wash will get you in the rinse. This applies to a video that's just
00:42:35.740
gone viral from the porn actress Mia Khalifa. Don't worry, you don't necessarily need to
00:42:42.460
take your children out of the room if they're watching this right now. It's not one of those
00:42:45.900
videos. This woman goes viral all the time for political reasons, which I guess is better than
1.00
00:42:54.620
presumably her other videos on the internet. I don't know though, actually, because the content
00:43:00.560
of her political activism is so awful that I can only imagine what her actual obscene content looks
00:43:05.960
like. Mia Khalifa has gone viral in this case, not for her pro-terrorism activism, but because she was
00:43:14.580
recounting a very ugly incident that happened to her at a restaurant, here in her own words.
00:43:21.380
And I get come up to by this guy and his girlfriend, and we were interrupted in the
00:43:25.960
middle of talking and eating. And he said, hey, Mia Khalifa, can I get a picture with you? And
00:43:29.940
I looked up at him and I'm like, no, we're eating. And I said it just like that. It was a rude way,
00:43:34.940
but it was also very rude for him to come up while someone was actively in the middle of a
00:43:38.860
conversation. And after I said that, his girlfriend, who was standing next to him,
00:43:42.620
grabbed him by the arm and said, I told you that wasn't her. There's not enough on her face. Let's
00:43:47.260
go, babe. And I went into the bathroom and cried. And I didn't really know how to handle it,
00:43:55.580
especially because it came from a woman. And especially because I was, like, I was there for
00:44:01.120
business. And it was something that had nothing to do with the adult industry. And I was just very
00:44:07.720
dejected and embarrassed and felt like they would never want to work with me again.
00:44:13.360
I kind of feel bad for Mia Khalifa here. Now, obviously, every single person involved in this
00:44:20.120
story is just terrible. It's just everyone involved here is doing something wrong and
00:44:27.740
disreputable. But I feel bad for her. That's a really nasty thing. I mean, first of all, as she
1.00
00:44:33.700
says, it was the woman. So think about how many things had to go wrong for this situation to take
00:44:38.820
place. A guy would walk up to a porn performer in public and admit that he watches pornography.
00:44:51.700
So degrading, so creepy, so weird. The guy would do it in front of his girlfriend.
00:44:59.720
And she's apparently okay with it. So weird, so depraved, so creepy. And then the girlfriend is
00:45:07.180
the one who makes the obscene comment at the porn lady. Now, Mia Khalifa admits, she says,
00:45:16.320
I was very rude to them. They come up to me, they ask for a picture, they're fans, I guess,
00:45:20.860
and they're willing to admit that. Then I was rude to them. That was wrong. She shouldn't do that.
0.79
00:45:25.980
If anyone is going to come up to you and be nice to you and compliment you in public,
00:45:28.900
you ought to be gracious about that. That's a good thing to do. And then what? They were
00:45:34.280
rude back to her. And she was upset by this because she felt shame because they pointed out
00:45:41.860
that she's a hooker. And they described the shameful actions that she boasts about and publicizes.
1.00
00:45:54.300
And that they are so encouraging of that they would actually approach this woman in public and talk
00:46:02.440
about how great it is. But the moment that they became hostile toward one another, the gal
00:46:09.760
pointed out the shameful acts that this girl does. And the girl felt shame for those shameful acts.
1.00
00:46:15.820
What doesn't get you in the wash will get you in the rinse.
00:46:24.820
Believe it or not, even in the year of our Lord, 2024, even in modern society, actions still have
00:46:32.980
consequences. What she's really upset about, she says she's upset that a woman would say this to her
00:46:39.080
in public. What she's really upset about is the shame of prostituting herself and degrading herself
00:46:45.640
and treating herself, she's a human being with a soul made in the image and likeness of God,
00:46:51.540
treating herself as nothing but flesh to be transformed into glittering pixels on a screen
00:46:58.480
that can then incite the lusts of men and women, apparently, and become fodder for other shameful
0.68
00:47:07.920
sexual acts. That's what really bothers her. But she can't admit that. Even as she's speaking openly
00:47:17.120
and vulnerably about this, she can't admit that. We can't admit in our culture that actions have
00:47:24.660
consequences. And so we're always surprised. We're always surprised when we reap what we sow.
00:47:32.060
And when we're talking about politics, there's that great line from H.L. Mencken, which is that
00:47:38.000
democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.
00:47:44.640
And we're shocked. We're shocked when the totally predictable results of our actions
00:47:51.480
turn out to be true. Wow. Shocking. Totally. What else did we expect? You know what I expect? I expect
00:48:03.980
to see you tomorrow. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show. See you then.
00:48:09.020
I'm Michael Knowles, actually. I'm Michael Knowles. I'm Michael Knowles, and