The Michael Knowles Show - January 29, 2024


Ep. 1414 - Taylor Swift May Destroy President Trump


Episode Stats


Length

47 minutes

Words per minute

173.32729

Word count

8,281

Sentence count

631

Harmful content

Misogyny

22

sentences flagged

Toxicity

35

sentences flagged

Hate speech

46

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A new poll suggests that Taylor Swift could sway the presidential vote of nearly one in five Americans if she endorsed Joe Biden in 2020. Is this a good or bad thing? And what does it mean for the future of the country?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Taylor Swift could sway the presidential election votes of nearly one in five Americans.
00:00:07.300 A new poll from Newsweek has found that 18% of voters would be more likely or significantly
00:00:13.980 more likely to vote for a candidate if that candidate were endorsed by Taylor Swift.
00:00:19.140 Taylor Swift, for those who don't know, is famous for writing songs specifically
00:00:24.760 about her terrible judgment in men. So, for a decadent and crumbling republic, 0.98
00:00:31.440 that seems to fit the bill perfectly. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:54.760 Welcome back to the show. We might go to war with Iran. We'll get to that in a second. 1.00
00:00:59.640 Obviously, pretty urgent news. We'll get to that because I have a take on the whole situation that
00:01:04.920 I haven't heard from anyone on the left or the right. But first, we got to get to something more
00:01:09.720 important, which of course is the Taylor Swift conspiracy theory. I am not a big fan of the
00:01:16.760 Taylor conspiracy theories, not because I don't believe in some conspiracies these days. Obviously,
00:01:25.040 the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth is about six months now. But the reason I
00:01:31.380 don't really buy the Taylor conspiracy theories is because I am inclined to like Taylor. I know she's
00:01:37.000 kind of a lib. I know that her songs are not for me. I don't think I would ever intentionally put on
00:01:43.720 a Taylor Swift song. But I kind of like her because she's normal and she's just kind of pretty and she 0.59
00:01:51.840 doesn't have all sorts of crazy tattoos and mutilations. And she doesn't, you know, I don't
00:01:58.220 know. She's just like pretty and she's dating a football player and she sings about completely banal 1.00
00:02:02.460 and ordinary subjects. And I like that. In a culture such as ours, where you have Lil Nas X twerking on the
00:02:10.000 devil himself and you got that other rapper lady who's singing about being a demon and you got that
00:02:15.480 other rapper dude reenacting a Hieronymus Bosch painting where people are walking into the mouth
00:02:20.620 of the devil and people are dying at his concerts and all. And that kind of insanity and that depraved
00:02:27.280 culture to just have a pretty little blonde girl who goes out and sings about breaking up with her 0.99
00:02:31.940 boyfriend and then shows up to a football game and kisses her football player boyfriend on the cheek 0.99
00:02:36.540 or whatever. That's great. I'm all about it. But she also might hand the country over to the 0.77
00:02:41.740 Democrats, according at least to the conspiracy theorists. And it's not just on the right. It's
00:02:46.240 not the fringe tinfoil hat people who are very conservative. It's the left to MSNBC ran a headline
00:02:53.760 not that long ago. This is on Christmas Day. Taylor Swift could save Joe Biden in 2024. No, seriously,
00:03:02.320 the musical megastar may be the rare celebrity with the cultural influence to shift the political
00:03:06.360 tides. A number of people on the right have said that Taylor is really famous and popular because
00:03:10.860 the liberal establishment is trying to blow her up into being the most influential woman in the world 1.00
00:03:16.480 so that she can sway the election. Now, I didn't find that persuasive. Peachy Keenan, however, who is a
00:03:23.580 wonderful right-wing writer, she pointed out yesterday, if you look at Taylor Swift's tour dates,
00:03:30.300 you got basically just a constant slew of performances. I'm just looking at her upcoming
00:03:38.640 performance, February 7th, February 8th, February 9th, February 10th, February 16th, February 17th,
00:03:43.180 right, goes on and on and on. Then all through February, all throughout March, all throughout,
00:03:49.680 she doesn't seem to be working much in April. Then you go straight May, all throughout May,
00:03:54.340 all throughout June, all throughout July, all throughout August. And then there's a big break.
00:04:06.360 August 20th is her last tour date scheduled. And then she doesn't appear again until November 14th,
00:04:13.220 just what, a week and a half after the 2024 election. So Peachy Keenan suggested, she said,
00:04:19.940 oh, good, that's, there's a gap in Taylor's tour schedule here so she can go stump for Democrats 1.00
00:04:24.280 around the country. And I, I don't know. Peachy Keenan's a very, a very thoughtful conservative
00:04:31.380 writer. It might be the case that that's just a coincidence and maybe she's going to go marry 0.95
00:04:35.980 this football player and go on a honeymoon. I hope she does. It might, it could be the opposite.
00:04:40.780 It could mean she doesn't want to be touring during the election season because she doesn't want to be 0.73
00:04:45.520 asked for comment and, and she just wants to kind of lay low. In fact, I think that's probably the 1.00
00:04:50.780 most likely scenario. Taylor endorsed Joe Biden back in 2020, but it was very, very mild. It was
00:04:58.120 something like one Twitter post and she was holding a cookie that said Biden 2020, 2020. So I don't know
00:05:03.600 it, it, by the standards of Hollywood, she seems to be among the least enthusiastic left wingers. 1.00
00:05:10.700 I think that's so much of her appeal. She's just nice and pretty and inoffensive. So that's kind of
00:05:16.380 what I'm hoping for. I remain a cautious Swifty, not because I listened to her music, but I like that
00:05:22.840 she's normal and gives people an alternative in our culture to the particularly crazy brand of popular 1.00
00:05:30.420 entertainment. But I could be proven wrong. I don't know. We'll just, we'll keep these tour dates
00:05:34.420 over on the side. Speaking of artists on the left, a group of climate wackos threw soup on the Mona Lisa 0.99
00:05:43.220 yesterday.
00:05:52.100 They're speaking some sort of barbaric tongue. I don't know if that's, are they channeling demons
00:05:58.280 or something? I can't quite make out what they're saying, but they are the climate, the climate action
00:06:05.560 maniacs who keep traveling all over the world and throwing soup on priceless works of art.
00:06:14.560 And there's cops there, but the cops, oh, those, oh no, those are activists too.
00:06:20.580 Where are the, where are the cops? Where are the, where are the museum guards? Where are the docents even?
00:06:25.420 Why won't someone tackle these people and get them away from a priceless work of Western art?
00:06:32.680 These people, these climate cultists are like the Taliban blowing up the ancient Buddha statues, 0.87
00:06:39.600 the Buddhas of Bamiyan in Afghanistan, except they're less justified. At least when the Taliban 0.98
00:06:46.300 blew up the Buddha statues, they were blowing up idols. I'm not defending it. I'm not, I don't think
00:06:52.160 the Taliban is justified in almost anything it does, but at least, at least I can understand why 1.00
00:07:00.700 a monotheist might get rid of pagan idols. Here though, these climate cultists are blowing up
00:07:07.860 beautiful pieces of Western art, or at least trying to, or at least trying to ruin them with soup.
00:07:13.220 Why? Because the climate cult has always been about punishing our civilization.
00:07:21.680 The climate cult, I call it a cult because it's like a cultus, you know, it's, it's, it's a form
00:07:26.360 of religion, a perverted and false religion, but it's a form of religion that has all the hallmarks 1.00
00:07:31.120 of religion. It has the notion of original sin. It has the notion of redemption. It has an apocalypse 0.59
00:07:38.620 and it has an eschatology. It has everything. And in the climate religion, our civilization is the
00:07:48.480 cause of the fall. In, in the, the climate cult, it's we in the West who have industrialized,
00:07:54.500 we have polluted our earth and set the earth on a course for utter destruction. And so only we
00:08:01.820 can save ourselves. We need to stop driving cars and stop having babies and stop eating meat and stop
00:08:09.560 doing anything. We need to stop living and growing and developing in order to, I don't know, save the
00:08:17.360 world. So that's why they're not going to destroy indigenous art. They're, they're also not going to
00:08:22.060 destroy modern art because modern art also is about punishing our civilization. Modern art also
00:08:26.460 is about, is about feeling shame and guilt and, and, uh, looking at ourselves, uh, as, as, uh,
00:08:35.840 decadent objects. It's, it's about degrading us. So of course, no surprise there whatsoever.
00:08:42.880 They want to punish our civilization and a great way to do it beyond telling us not to have families
00:08:47.760 anymore and, and destroying what we eat and destroying how we move and how we live is destroying
00:08:52.200 beauty. Destroying beauty is, is perhaps the most efficient way to demoralize a civilization.
00:09:01.160 Now, when you want to remoralize a civilization, right, when you want to encourage a civilization
00:09:07.140 right here in the, in the West, you're going to need to check out woke tears water right now,
00:09:12.560 go to woke tears, water.com. Are you sick of companies trying to turn you into a lib?
00:09:17.040 It seems that wokeism is everywhere. It's the air that we breathe. It's the water that we drink.
00:09:23.500 That is why woke tears water has a mission to save America from the brave new woke world
00:09:29.840 one sip at a time. Woke tears water is an American brand that is making hydration great again. Woke tears
00:09:36.800 water is a legitimate brand of drinking water bottled here in the United States by people who know what a
00:09:42.460 woman is. While everyone else's water is just water, you know, take it or leave it. Woke tears 1.00
00:09:47.580 provides a refreshing gulp of laughter in a world thirsty for sanity. I also like that it's clearly
00:09:54.280 inspired by the Leftist Tears Tumblr. It's great. If you want to try woke tears water, visit
00:09:58.500 woketearswater.com. You can hand one out to your friends. You can take it to class. I love it. It's
00:10:04.200 just so brazen and audacious and in your face. It's terrific. Indulge today in laughter and hydration.
00:10:09.600 The two things that make life possible, that is woketearswater.com today. Speaking of punishment,
00:10:16.420 President Trump's trade advisor, Peter Navarro, has just been sentenced to four months in prison
00:10:22.160 for doing exactly what Hunter Biden did. Well, no, I'm sorry, not exactly what Hunter Biden did.
00:10:28.660 You've probably seen those clips, you know, with the hookers and the drugs and the guns. Peter 0.92
00:10:31.660 Navarro never did any of that stuff. Not exactly what Hunter Biden did in that Peter Navarro never shook
00:10:36.880 down foreign oligarchs and sold American influence for millions and millions of dollars. He never did
00:10:41.180 that. Peter Navarro just didn't show up to testify before Congress. That's why he's going to the clink
00:10:49.920 for four months. The exact same thing that Hunter Biden did, Hunter Biden gets off scot-free. Peter
00:10:55.740 Navarro was asked to appear before the January 6th committee in March of 2022. He was ordered to
00:11:02.580 provide documents to that committee one month prior. He didn't do either of those things,
00:11:06.880 citing executive privilege. This is a top advisor to the President of the United States,
00:11:11.560 and the Congress has absolutely no right to drag him before them. That would be a major weakening of
00:11:19.480 the separation of powers. Congress is not absolute. Congress is not supreme in the United States.
00:11:27.340 Congress is one of the three branches of government, and they have no right to do that.
00:11:31.200 So now the judiciary has sentenced Peter Navarro to four months in prison. He was ordered also to
00:11:37.540 pay a fine of $9,500, which is a reduction, by the way. The U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta wanted
00:11:43.660 to sentence him to six months in prison and fine him $200,000. That was what the Justice Department
00:11:52.540 requested. Actually, I'm being unfair to Judge Amit Mehta. Judge Amit Mehta was the one who heard this
00:11:57.240 request and then reduced that. But it's still ridiculous. The guy sentenced him to prison and 0.92
00:12:02.060 charged him a bunch of money for what Hunter Biden did. Hunter Biden also defied a subpoena to appear
00:12:07.220 before the House Oversight Committee for a closed-door deposition. He didn't do it. He held a big press
00:12:11.200 conference in front of the Capitol about how he wasn't going to do it. Then he made a big hullabaloo
00:12:14.660 inside the Capitol later on about how he wasn't going to do it. And he gets off scot-free,
00:12:18.220 completely lawless. What's the point of this? The point of putting Peter Navarro, a very amiable
00:12:23.540 economic advisor, into prison is to demoralize the right. It's to discourage people ever from
00:12:31.060 working for Donald Trump, even in senior White House positions. It's to discourage anyone from
00:12:36.240 ever contradicting the liberal ruling class. Because they'll say, yeah, if you have a difference of
00:12:41.500 opinion on trade, I mean, think about this. Peter Navarro, he's a protectionist. Peter Navarro was
00:12:47.860 the pro-tariff advisor in the Trump White House. And the liberal establishment is globalist. A lot of
00:12:55.860 the Trump election was about opposition to globalism, just as the Brexit was about opposition
00:13:01.180 to globalism, just as Viktor Orban in Hungary, his election was about opposition to globalism,
00:13:05.320 just like George Maloney's election in Italy was about opposition to globalism. And the libs,
00:13:10.560 they love globalism. They hate national borders. They hate national sovereignty. They want to break all
00:13:15.220 of that down and have us all just be governed by the blob. And so they go after this guy in particular,
00:13:20.980 Peter Navarro. And Navarro has stood very firm. He just went on TV to explain that throwing him in
00:13:29.900 the clink is about a lot more than just him. If anybody thinks they're not trying to put Donald
00:13:36.660 Trump in prison for 700 years, they just need to look at what they did to me yesterday.
00:13:43.140 They're not messing around. Four months in prison. They even want to put me in prison
00:13:49.040 before I can have my appeal in this case. And they want Trump in prison and out of the Oval Office.
00:13:58.600 And they want folks like me not to be able to help him out. And here's the thing. Here's what I'd ask
00:14:05.260 your viewers to understand. I am. It's not rare. I am the first senior White House advisor with a
00:14:12.200 alter ego to the president ever, ever to be charged with this alleged crime. And the irony here, Sean,
00:14:18.280 the irony is that the Department of Justice itself has maintained a policy for more than 50 years
00:14:25.300 that says that senior advisors like me absolutely cannot be compelled to testify before Congress. Why?
00:14:33.320 Because it violates the constitutional separation of powers and interferes with the ability of
00:14:39.120 executive privilege to provide effective presidential decision making.
00:14:45.340 Totally right. If the Congress can jail senior presidential advisors for refusing to give them
00:14:53.740 whatever they want and show up whenever they want, that is an obliteration of the separation of
00:14:58.860 powers. Rather than having three co-equal branches of government, the legislature, the executive,
00:15:04.340 and the judiciary, now we've just got a supreme legislature. And the executive works for the
00:15:10.240 legislature. The president works for the Congress. That's not what I learned in civics class. But no one
00:15:14.360 learns anything in civics class anymore. Peter Navarro's point, really brilliant here. So how do you make
00:15:19.280 sense of that? How could the DOJ, which for 50 years has maintained this policy of saying that
00:15:24.520 the senior White House advisors can't be compelled to testify before Congress and provide documents to
00:15:30.580 them, how could the DOJ then simultaneously prosecute a Trump senior White House advisor for doing that?
00:15:36.680 Because they don't view the Trump White House as legitimate. That's why. You want to talk about
00:15:41.560 election deniers and deniers of the legitimacy of our sacred democracy. It's the Biden White House.
00:15:47.820 It's the DOJ that's doing that. They don't view Peter Navarro as a normal senior White House advisor
00:15:53.300 because they don't view Donald Trump as a normal president. They don't view any of them as
00:15:56.860 legitimate. So anything can be done to Trump. And in their minds, it won't upset the norms of our
00:16:02.680 sacred democracy. Yeah, in our sacred democracy, we usually don't jail the opposition leader,
00:16:08.840 but Trump's different. We can't normalize him. Yeah, in our democracy, we usually don't jail
00:16:13.660 former presidents, but Trump's different. He's not a real president. He's a fake president.
00:16:17.820 His voters, they're not real Americans. They're deplorable, irredeemable Americans. They don't 1.00
00:16:21.340 deserve any rights. Jail them too. You know, any of them, if any of them happen to be walking even
00:16:26.540 within five miles of the Capitol that day, you know, maybe they were going to go get a drink at
00:16:30.120 Old Ebbets Grill. But yeah, just go round them up too. Some Midwestern granny was taking pictures 1.00
00:16:35.520 on the National Mall. Yeah, get her too. None of these people are legitimate. You, you're not
00:16:39.380 legitimate. You're a deplorable, irredeemable. You oppose Joe Biden. You're a threat to democracy. 1.00
00:16:46.160 That's what this is about. That's the way it does make sense is the problem. It, it makes sense if
00:16:53.160 you accept they're very dangerous premises that half of the country is not, not legit or entitled
00:16:58.540 to political rights. Now, speaking of law and order, a clip from a law and order episode has just gone
00:17:05.220 viral. This is, law and order has been on the air, I think for 150 years at this point. I think law and
00:17:10.440 order predates the invention of the television. Law and order has gotten consistently more and more
00:17:14.960 woke as the culture has gotten more and more woke. There's a scene that's gone viral of a woman 1.00
00:17:21.680 being interviewed by cops and she's been raped. She was raped by a black man, 0.99
00:17:28.860 but she doesn't want to prosecute him because of her white privilege. 1.00
00:17:32.940 But Natalie, Jay Watson raped you. Do you think I forgot? How could I? This entire trial 0.99
00:17:43.360 has been an exercise in reminding me. And this is your chance to do something about it.
00:17:48.320 I'm going to believe me because I can, I can afford therapy. I have that luxury and maybe one day
00:17:57.780 I'll be okay. But if that teenager goes to prison, he may not be ever.
00:18:18.320 I don't want that. Natalie, wait. Everyone's making fun of this clip. I don't know why they're
00:18:27.820 making fun of this clip. That seems very accurate to me. That's, that is exactly how liberal white 0.61
00:18:34.480 women think. Yes. I think it was Robert Frost who said a liberal is a man who can't take his own
00:18:42.200 side in a quarrel. Absolutely. That's how a lot of liberal white women in New York city would think. 1.00
00:18:49.340 Yes, I've been victimized, but, but the, the man who victimized me is black and I'm white. And so I
00:18:55.760 must've done something wrong. I must've been asking for it. Even if I wasn't, I've got so much privilege.
00:19:00.240 We can never punish anyone. Certainly not. If that person is black, you can't punish them.
00:19:05.180 They're great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, 0.98
00:19:10.060 great grandparents might've been slaves or something. So we can't punish criminals. If,
00:19:16.160 if we send that man to prison, he, he, what, he, what, he might be reformed. That's, that's the
00:19:24.960 thing that might happen. Of course the, the woman, the character is wrong in what you, but I actually
00:19:31.100 think that law and order episode is pretty accurate on how white liberals talk about race and justice
00:19:36.160 and crime and all that stuff. Of course. Now in real life, what would happen is this woman would 1.00
00:19:41.940 say, no, don't prosecute this man or probably the DAs or someone say, no, don't prosecute him. 0.97
00:19:45.940 He's black. He lives in the inner city. He can't, we can never hold anyone accountable for crime there. 1.00
00:19:50.720 And so he would be released and then he would immediately rape someone again. And he'd probably 0.98
00:19:55.900 do it like 10 or 20 more times. And then maybe he'd go to prison for about five minutes, but then he'd
00:20:01.560 get out on parole and he'd go do it a bunch more times too. That's what would really happen.
00:20:04.560 So it wouldn't help anyone. If, if he were punished, there's a chance he might be reformed.
00:20:11.340 I know people who've gone to prison for more serious crimes than that, actually,
00:20:15.200 and who have been reformed and lived good lives. So you can do it. It's called a correctional
00:20:18.340 facility. The point is to correct you. But, uh, what, what we're told now by the libs is the
00:20:23.760 complete opposite. What we're told now by the libs is that, uh, if you're held responsible for your
00:20:29.640 crimes, uh, you will, it will destroy your life. And if you're not held responsible, you'll somehow
00:20:35.960 magically clean up. Of course, of course that is not the case, but that is an accurate reflection
00:20:40.540 of the culture. Good job. Good job, law and order. You got it right. Speaking of white guilt, Senator 0.61
00:20:44.560 James Langford, who is a Republican ostensibly, uh, is very upset about the GOP killing a, killing
00:20:54.580 potential border deal with the Biden administration. It would be absolutely absurd for me to agree to
00:21:02.340 5,000 people a day. This bill focuses on getting us to zero illegal crossings a day. There's no
00:21:09.000 amnesty. It increases the number of border patrol agents, increases asylum officers. It increases
00:21:13.640 detention beds so we can quickly detain and then deport individuals. It ends catch and release. It
00:21:20.080 focuses on additional deportation flights out. It changes our asylum process so that people get a
00:21:25.820 fast asylum screening at a higher standard and then get returned back to their home country. 0.89
00:21:31.100 This is not about letting 5,000 people in a day. This is the most misunderstood section of this
00:21:36.220 proposal. Okay. We'll get into what he's talking about here with 5,000 in just a second, but it
00:21:41.740 sounds pretty good. Doesn't it? It sounds good. Oh no, it's going to reduce the crossings and it's
00:21:46.140 going to increase deportations. This bill, it's so misunderstood. This is the bill.
00:21:49.820 That Mitt Romney is pushing. Mitt Romney is complaining that that mean old Donald Trump,
00:21:54.260 he's encouraging Republican senators to kill the bill and all the squishy Republicans are pushing
00:22:00.000 this kind of bill. But some of them, you know, James Lankford here, I don't want to just write
00:22:06.040 him off as a squish. He's saying, no, it's really good. It's going to reduce illegal immigration. 0.95
00:22:11.300 Oh man, it's Lucy with the football all over again, isn't it? Isn't it? I don't care what the
00:22:17.620 bill says. And we'll get into what it says in a second. I don't care what it says. There can be
00:22:22.920 no deal with Democrats on the border because the Democrats are currently breaking the law.
00:22:30.800 Okay. It'd be one thing if this problem just popped up out of nowhere and, you know,
00:22:34.840 the Republicans and Democrats have different sort of interests, but we're going to come together and
00:22:38.640 come to a compromise. And no, there is a law already on the books. There are lots of immigration 0.58
00:22:43.540 laws already on the books that the Democrats are intentionally violating. And we're supposed
00:22:48.220 to negotiate with them. There can be no good faith negotiation there. There can be absolutely no
00:22:52.860 trust that they'll fulfill any of their obligations in this bill. They're not fulfilling their obligations
00:22:57.760 under the current law. There can be no deal. The deal is completely dead on arrival. Any Republican
00:23:03.920 who votes for this bill should be thrown out of Congress, should be thrown out of the Republican
00:23:08.220 Party. It's a joke. If these, I don't want to ascribe to malice that which is explained by
00:23:13.380 stupidity, but I don't want stupid senators either. If you seriously believe that the Democrats 1.00
00:23:18.320 currently breaking the law are going to magically start enforcing the law with all the promises that 0.98
00:23:23.300 they're making you, if you just sign one more bill, then you're useless. Get out of Congress,
00:23:27.540 get out of the Republican Party. Speaking of the border crisis, America is currently experiencing
00:23:33.700 an invasion with millions of illegal aliens flooding our border under the Biden administration.
00:23:39.600 As Texas fights the surge, Arizona's governor remains silent as Biden pursues his perverse
00:23:45.420 agenda. Ben Shapiro traveled to America's southern border to reveal the depths of the crisis. What he
00:23:49.840 discovered is shocking. It is criminal. It is our duty at the Daily Wire to share the truth. Take a look
00:23:54.220 at the invasion on the southern border. America is currently experiencing an invasion. A lot of people
00:24:00.000 coming in from Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria. Is there a fair bit of gang affiliation among
00:24:05.460 them? Always. These people are just crossing the border illegally, waving their hands in the air at
00:24:09.280 our cameras saying, hey, here I am. Come get me. We're no longer the border patrol. We're the welcome
00:24:13.940 patrol. The number one site in America for fentanyl trafficking across the border. And if Joe Biden
00:24:18.540 remains in office, it's only going to get worse. I'm Ben Shapiro, and this is The Divided States of
00:24:22.960 Biden. Invasion on the southern border. Watch now on Daily Wire+.
00:24:26.320 Our southern border is wide open. The blame rests squarely with Joe Biden. Join Ben on the ground as
00:24:31.960 he uncovers the truth of one of the most destructive presidencies in American history. Watch Invasion on
00:24:36.800 the southern border streaming now on Daily Wire+. What's in this deal, this supposedly wonderful deal
00:24:43.420 that the Republicans are going to reach with Joe Biden to solve the problem on the border? Well,
00:24:48.620 Senator Lankford and Democrat Senator Murphy have a deal to expand legal immigration levels by an
00:24:57.520 additional 50,000 green cards annually. And then to expedite work permits for illegal aliens who have
00:25:04.440 been released into our nation's interior. And then to provide taxpayer-funded lawyers for unaccompanied
00:25:11.960 minors, illegal alien minors. And then this is the part that Senator Lankford is disputing, but other
00:25:20.580 senators are celebrating, which is allowing up to 35,000 illegal aliens to arrive at the border every
00:25:29.320 week before imposing border controls, among other aspects. Forget the 35,000 a week. Let's say Senator
00:25:37.700 Lankford's right. Forget about anything having to do with illegal immigration in this bill. The bill
00:25:46.000 expands legal immigration levels by 50,000 green cards and expedites work permits for current illegals.
00:25:52.240 That's bad. That's bad. We have too much immigration, period. I have nothing against immigrants. Some of my 1.00
00:26:00.120 family were immigrants. Some came here before the immigrants, but some were immigrants. And so I have
00:26:05.840 nothing against them personally, but we have too many of them. We take a million legal immigrants a 1.00
00:26:10.260 year, and now we're taking millions and millions of illegal immigrants. Three million illegal immigrants
00:26:16.000 a year, probably. It's too much. Since 1965, when the Democrats blew open our immigration policy,
00:26:24.100 between 1965 and 2015, we took 60 million people in. Legal, illegal, doesn't matter. That's the largest
00:26:32.780 movement of people ever in recorded history. Since 2015, the numbers have spiked. We've got 6.2 million
00:26:39.100 minimum, according to the CBO, during Biden's presidency. Illegal, plus another three million
00:26:44.940 legal. So now we're at what? Upwards of nine and a half migrants? It's just too many people. It's a 1.00
00:26:49.820 country of 320 million people. It's too much. No polity could take that many people in from different 1.00
00:26:55.780 cultures and assimilate them, and we don't even try to assimilate them. It's the end of the country.
00:26:59.600 This is not some modern, nativist, racist, hillbilly, yokel kind of stuff. This is perennial
00:27:07.840 political philosophy going back to Plato. It just doesn't work when you let a ton of foreigners into 1.00
00:27:11.740 your country. So no, sorry, guys. I know for a long time, Republicans have maintained this position
00:27:17.200 on immigration. They say illegal immigration is bad. I mean, we're going to squish to the Dems and
00:27:22.140 give a lot of amnesty usually, but it's bad. We're at least going to say in principle it's bad,
00:27:26.080 but legal immigration is always good. We're all for as much legal immigration as possible.
00:27:31.440 Even President Trump, who has been the best on the immigration question of any Republican
00:27:35.600 president in my lifetime, even he said, we want to kill illegal immigration, but we want more legal
00:27:39.880 immigration than ever. Well, he's half right. We do want to kill illegal immigration. Obviously, 1.00
00:27:45.240 of course, we want to enforce the law, but we also have too much legal immigration.
00:27:48.680 And it's not the immigrants' fault. It's not the current immigrants' fault. It's just that the 1.00
00:27:54.760 Democrats let way too many people in. It's caused a ton of social problems, and we need to assimilate
00:27:58.200 people before we can let anyone else in, or before we can let anywhere near these kinds of levels of
00:28:02.640 people in. Sorry, it's just too much. It's called prudence. You know, it's the number one political
00:28:09.180 virtue. It's prudence, okay? Being wise here. So it's a terrible bill all around. Any Republican who votes
00:28:17.000 for it is a total joke and should be thrown out of politics. Speaking of foreign affairs, we've got
00:28:22.480 the most disturbing story of the weekend. Three American service members were killed over the
00:28:29.020 weekend, and many more were wounded in a drone strike by Iran-backed terrorists in Jordan.
00:28:36.980 President Biden explained what happened on Sunday. Awful attack, and now you've got a lot of people
00:28:44.120 banging the drums for war with Iran. And of course, it wasn't Iran directly, but it was Iran-backed
00:28:52.920 militants used a drone to attack and kill some of our service members. That's very serious.
00:29:00.340 So the question is, what do we do now? Do we retaliate at all? How do we retaliate? Some people
00:29:05.440 are calling for a strike on Tehran, on the capital of Iran. Is that what we're going to do?
00:29:11.400 I don't know that that's a wise idea. I don't know that that's a wise idea at all. Because what's
00:29:17.820 going to happen, it's probably happening already, is the U.S. is going to blame Iran for its terrorists
00:29:27.120 that it has funded attacking U.S. troops. And Iran is going to blame the United States for the war in
00:29:33.480 Israel. And the reason for that is that we fund the Israeli military. Something like six and a half
00:29:39.400 percent of the entire Israeli military budget comes from the United States. It's, what is it,
00:29:44.000 $3.8 billion in military funding per year? Now, then people will say, well, yeah, we back Israel 0.88
00:29:50.840 because Israel's surrounded by terrorists, and they got attacked, and there was a major pogrom on
00:29:54.440 October 7th, and so we're going to back them. Sure. But I'm not talking about anything of the morality
00:30:01.100 of the war or the attack. I'm talking about who the belligerents are. If the United States blames Iran
00:30:09.520 for what its proxies do, then Iran and a lot of other Arab states are going to blame the United
00:30:15.820 States for what its proxy Israel does because we're the ones funding the war. Without American funding, 0.52
00:30:20.940 there is no war. So the hawks say, bomb everyone. And the doves say, never go to war ever. 0.96
00:30:27.240 And what I say, I guess, is the least popular view of all because I'm not a hawk and I'm not a dove.
00:30:34.620 I try to follow prudence in foreign affairs. My view, as I've said from the very beginning of this
00:30:40.720 conflict, is we need to contain the war so it doesn't escalate to the point that we will be
00:30:45.720 impelled to intervene. We're already there. The longer the war drags on, the more likely it is that
00:30:51.760 Iran is going to attack American troops because we have bases all around the world because we're a
00:30:56.440 global empire. We have bases in the region and we're funding Israel. So just as we know that 0.79
00:31:04.000 the way to stop all of these little terror cells, these jihadis who keep attacking us,
00:31:09.200 is to go after Iran, Iran knows that if they really want to stop the state of Israel, 0.53
00:31:13.680 not drawing any equivalence between the state of Israel and the jihadi terror cells,
00:31:17.220 but they know that the way to get people is to go after their backers and they know that we're the
00:31:20.480 biggest backer of Israel. So the likelihood of attacks on American troops in that region,
00:31:24.860 it's going to continue to escalate the longer this war drags on. So the question
00:31:29.480 for the Israeli government is, how does this war end? What does victory look like and when is that
00:31:35.480 going to be? The annexation, the Israeli annexation of Gaza is not a matter of US strategic interest.
00:31:44.060 It is a matter of Israeli strategic interest. If I were Bibi Netanyahu, I would recognize that the only
00:31:49.140 way to have a real security guarantee in that region is for Israel to annex Gaza. There's not going to be a
00:31:54.420 two-state solution. The Gazans are not going to have some thriving polity. Hamas is not suddenly 0.93
00:32:00.780 going to become a responsible government. It's never going to happen. So from the Israeli perspective,
00:32:09.880 the greatest security guarantee would be to annex Gaza. But if they're going to do that, 0.90
00:32:16.200 then they've got to just do it. I don't even really have any problem with that in principle,
00:32:20.660 in that I don't think Hamas is particularly good for the Gazans. So, okay, if they're going to do it, 1.00
00:32:25.960 though, they have to do it. The question from the American perspective is, when will this war end
00:32:31.380 and therefore thereby reduce the likelihood of more and more attacks on American troops?
00:32:39.340 Is it in the US strategic interest to just attack Iran? That's what Lindsey Graham seems to think,
00:32:44.060 Republican senator from South Carolina. He says, hit Iran now, hit them hard. 0.98
00:32:47.400 John Cornyn, Republican senator from Texas, says, target Tehran. Now, let's say, let's say 0.98
00:32:54.960 that you are of the opinion that war with Iran is in America's strategic interest. You've convinced 0.99
00:33:02.440 yourself that if we go in, hit them really hard, maybe push for regime change, maybe escalate this
00:33:08.020 conflict in the Middle East, that somehow that's going to serve the American interest, not only protect
00:33:12.480 US troops, but protect the American homeland. Okay, then you got to ask yourself another question.
00:33:16.840 Do you trust Joe Biden to conduct such a war? Let's say you're really bought in and you think,
00:33:22.720 no, we just need to project a massive amount of strength in the region and that's going to
00:33:28.540 protect us. You really trust Joe Biden to do that? I don't. And then you might say, well, Michael,
00:33:35.520 we can't just have our entire foreign policy be contingent upon the men who are leading the
00:33:42.000 country. Yes, we can. You go to war, not with the army you want, but the army that you've got.
00:33:46.060 And the army is doing great. Unfortunately, the top brass at the Pentagon are not so great. And
00:33:50.420 the commander in chief doesn't know what his name is. Let's check in for a second as we mull a war
00:33:54.980 with Iran and expanding this conflict in the Middle East into potentially a major regional or a global
00:34:00.520 conflict. Let's check in and see how the commander in chief is doing. Beer brewed here. It is used to
00:34:06.380 make the brew beer. Oh, earth rider. Thanks for the great legs. Thank you, Mr. President. Really
00:34:13.320 interesting. That's not even some old clip that I pulled up just to take a cheap shot at him. That
00:34:17.240 was three days ago in Milwaukee. I don't see how any reasonable person can convince himself
00:34:24.380 that an expanded war in the Middle East attacking Iran, the major regional power is smart right now. 0.68
00:34:31.720 I just don't see it. I don't. If you figure it out, please, please explain it to me. If you figure
00:34:39.660 out what Joe Biden just said there in Milwaukee, please explain to me what he said. I'd love a
00:34:43.360 translation. Now, the foreign policy hawks, just even to further undercut their credibility,
00:34:51.700 don't seem to be the brightest bulbs in the shed. They don't seem to really know what's going on.
00:34:56.360 Adam Kinzinger. You remember him, former congressman, whose Twitter page now says his
00:35:01.440 name is Adam Kinzinger, parentheses, Slava Ukraini, and then the American flag and the Ukraine flag
00:35:10.140 and the Israel flag. I guess I was about to say that makes him one of the few pro-Israel
00:35:15.880 Democrats. I forgot, though, that he's not actually a Democrat. He's a Republican who just sides with
00:35:20.440 the Democrats a lot. Very confusing stuff. He responds to Attorney General Ken Paxton in Texas
00:35:28.120 who said, there's no way that Texas would have joined the union if that meant we couldn't protect
00:35:33.240 ourselves from the invasion of the southern border. Kinzinger says, you didn't join the union.
00:35:38.860 You lost the war, idiot. 1.00
00:35:40.880 A little history lesson for Adam Kinzinger. Texas most certainly did join the union. Texas was a 1.00
00:35:51.580 republic before it joined the union. Before that, Texas was a Habsburg territory. But for 10 years,
00:35:57.140 from 1836 to 1846, Texas was a republic and then was annexed and then became a state.
00:36:04.400 It reminds me of this line from the Bakke by Euripides, which is, 0.99
00:36:07.920 talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. The people most likely to volunteer their insults 0.96
00:36:15.740 and call you a big dummy and an idiot and a fool are the people who themselves don't know anything. 1.00
00:36:20.460 This guy doesn't know anything about very recent history of the United States. 1.00
00:36:26.000 This reminds me of a great piece of advice from Norm MacDonald, which I'll get to in one second.
00:36:31.280 First, though, my favorite comment yesterday is from Mural Emperor 5639, who says,
00:36:37.920 can't wait to watch some Mike's Tom McDonald reviews. Yes, last week, my producer said,
00:36:45.740 Michael, you got to review this new song by Tom McDonald. And I said, okay, well, when did my
00:36:50.520 channel become a Tom McDonald review channel? I don't know. Sometimes then we changed the channel
00:36:56.020 and everything. But then they played the song and I finally, I realized Ben Shapiro is rapping
00:37:01.560 in the song. And I thought it was AI. It's not AI. So we've got my reaction to their song totally
00:37:09.320 without any foreknowledge that is up on my YouTube channel right now.
00:37:13.640 The late, great Norm MacDonald once had a bit where he was turning to his sidekick and he said,
00:37:23.140 you know, I was reading this history textbook and you're not going to believe it. It turns out
00:37:28.120 the good guys have won every single war ever. And if you read a history textbook, that's true.
00:37:34.600 That's true. Because famously, history is written by the winners. And when someone like Adam Kinzinger
00:37:43.480 or any of these liberal establishment supporters in the Democrat party or in the Republican party,
00:37:52.760 they'll mouth off on history a lot. They'll give you their grand view of history and the history of
00:37:58.480 the United States. And then they will occasionally reveal that they don't know very much about history.
00:38:04.420 Most people don't know very much about history. It's okay. I don't know very much about history.
00:38:07.800 We don't, we don't learn history anymore. We haven't for some time in America.
00:38:12.380 They won't know basic facts like Texas was a Republic before it joined the union.
00:38:16.660 They won't know basic things because
00:38:18.400 perspectives on history change over time. If you asked an average American,
00:38:28.480 a hundred years ago, describe the history of the United States, they would give you a completely
00:38:33.060 different story than an American today. It'd probably be a lot more positive, frankly. You 0.99
00:38:38.480 ask, you ask the average American today, talk about American history. They'll say, well, first we killed
00:38:42.240 all the Indians. Then we enslaved all the blacks. Then we were really mean to the women. Then we were, 1.00
00:38:46.380 I think we were mean to the homosexuals too. And we're just rotten and terrible. Give me a can of 1.00
00:38:49.800 soup so I can throw it on some artwork. That's what they would say today. You asked them a hundred years
00:38:53.680 ago, probably would be a little different. You asked them a hundred years before that, it would be a little
00:38:56.660 bit different still. And in a hundred years from now, our perspective, not on just history,
00:39:01.960 but on ourselves, who we are, is going to change. People will see the past and the present and the
00:39:08.160 future quite differently. The people banging the drums for war, just like the people banging the
00:39:14.400 drums to throw Trump in prison, just like the people banging the drums to delegitimize the
00:39:20.480 deplorable, irredeemable half of Americans who are not liberal. Those people have a highly
00:39:28.120 polemicized view of history. They're going to justify it by history, but it doesn't mean their
00:39:33.260 history is correct. Even this phrase, liberal democracy, we're a liberal democracy. That's a
00:39:37.540 term that basically no one ever used until the 1930s. It didn't at all become even slightly popular
00:39:43.180 until the 40s. It didn't take off until the 1980s. Okay. None of our founding fathers considered us a
00:39:47.840 liberal democracy. None of the statesmen who built our country up until the middle of the 20th century
00:39:52.380 called us a liberal democracy. Now we're told that's what it is. And that colors the way that
00:39:57.480 we behave and the way we treat our government. These things are greatly subject to change.
00:40:03.080 And there are going to be people in the future who make fun of us for believing what we do now
00:40:06.260 about history and government. Now, speaking of local government, a Rhode Island school board
00:40:12.940 has just made an audacious claim that would make all of our founding fathers roll over in their
00:40:18.540 graves, which is that parents should not be notified of their children's sexual behavior in schools.
00:40:27.400 I don't think parents should be notified simply because society assumes that every child has a well
00:40:36.020 meaning family culture that is accepting of this. Sometimes the worst thing you can do is involve a parent
00:40:45.080 in some of these issues based on their own beliefs and their own culture. And that...
00:40:51.340 Put a pause right there.
00:40:53.900 Sometimes the worst thing you can do is involve a parent in some of these decisions based on that
00:41:01.000 parent's own belief and culture. So she's speaking very vaguely here. She doesn't quite express that
00:41:07.980 she's talking about LGBTQ issues until a little bit later. But that view is very, very popular among
00:41:13.340 the liberals. And it's at least an admission that there's a difference between the culture of the
00:41:18.880 public school, culture meaning like to cultivate, like how your kid is going to be raised. There's a
00:41:24.680 difference between that culture and the culture that many parents have at home. There's a big
00:41:29.680 difference between the beliefs being pushed in public schools where your children are being
00:41:34.980 indoctrinated by these beliefs and the beliefs held by those kids' families. There's a big
00:41:40.360 difference here. And when a conflict arises, they're going to go with their own beliefs and
00:41:44.800 they're going to override the beliefs of parents. Keep going.
00:41:47.560 Will cause that student to commit suicide. 0.99
00:41:50.200 And there it is. Put a pause right there again. 0.98
00:41:53.580 This is the second thing we hear, especially in the transgender debate. We hear, if you don't, 0.61
00:41:59.680 side with the liberals, if you don't suppress the conservative beliefs, the traditional beliefs, 0.95
00:42:06.360 your kid's going to kill himself. The worst kind of emotional manipulation I've ever heard, 0.69
00:42:11.120 but it's effective. Even me, I'm pretty immune to this. God forbid I ever heard this from a teacher
00:42:16.460 or something. I don't think I would for reasons that we'll get to in just a moment. But if I did,
00:42:21.400 that would scare the daylights out of me. I would have to take a place and say, am I totally wrong?
00:42:26.020 Should I totally cave on my beliefs? I don't. You've threatened me with the scariest thing I can
00:42:29.960 imagine. And that's what they do. They say, yes, you got to side with us. You can't ever side with
00:42:36.700 the parents. If you side with the parents, you're going to kill a kid. Keep going.
00:42:39.340 If you tell a student who's trusted you, who has come out to say that I'm a lesbian,
00:42:46.120 and you now go back and tell the parent that child has no faith in that school system ever again
00:42:54.400 and will never come forward with any information. And his second recommendation, or the third
00:43:01.300 recommendation... Put a pause. This is a little subtle point, but she says, and if that student
00:43:05.680 says she's a lesbian. But that's not really what we're talking about here, is it?
00:43:08.960 When we talk about LGBTQ, LMNOP, we're not talking about the 16-year-old girl who kisses a girl at a
00:43:18.360 party after truth and dare and thinks she's a lesbian for three days. That's the most anodyne version of 1.00
00:43:24.280 it, which is why this is what this manipulative liberal woman is doing. She won't say what we're 1.00
00:43:29.460 really talking about, which is homosexual men who engage in far riskier behaviors than lesbians. 0.95
00:43:34.900 And we won't talk about the real thing that everyone's talking about, which is transgenderism. 0.99
00:43:38.900 A kid who wants to mutilate himself, castrate himself, chop off his body parts, 0.98
00:43:43.520 sterilize himself, give himself bone diseases, give himself a 40% chance of suicidality and anxiety
00:43:51.400 and depression, and likely reduces life expectancy either because of suicide or just because of
00:43:56.520 the diseases that come about from taking these powerful drugs to pretend to be the opposite sex. 0.97
00:44:00.600 She doesn't talk about that. She knows those things are far riskier, certainly transgenderism, 1.00
00:44:07.260 far scarier. So she says, oh, it's just some girl wants to be a lesbian that week or something. 1.00
00:44:12.560 The fact that that's the example she uses tells you she realizes just how controversial what she's
00:44:18.380 saying should be. Keep going.
00:44:20.100 Or where is it here that they should have documentation from their parent or their physician or their
00:44:28.220 guidance counselor? I can tell you for a fact, as a medical provider, I would never have provided
00:44:35.020 that documentation to the school because it does appear that now you're segregating out this child
00:44:41.280 and you're trying to say that this is a disability. This is who they are. And this is not like to set up
00:44:52.080 even an IEP for them or anything. You're now saying that what you're doing has a stigma to it and it's wrong.
00:45:01.740 Put a pause there. You're saying that if you're a man who thinks he's a woman, that there's something
00:45:06.900 wrong about that. Yes, that's true. That's what virtually everyone for all of history has thought
00:45:12.400 because it is wrong because it's not true and it's not normal and it's not conducive to human
00:45:16.340 flourishing. Yeah, you can't do that. How dare you do that? Well, I don't know because I have a reason
00:45:23.080 and I hope that as an educator, I hope that the children will flourish in my school. And yeah,
00:45:28.640 you can't. How dare you? You got to encourage them to trans themselves. Well, that's also, 1.00
00:45:34.100 isn't that also a moral judgment that has carries? Yeah, but it's mine and my moral judgment's right,
00:45:38.220 even though it's contradicted by, you know, all of ethics and philosophy and anthropology and all
00:45:44.080 of history. But it's still, but mine's right and yours is wrong. Keep going. Look at what the disabled 1.00
00:45:48.120 students go through for normalization. These kids are normal. There's, this is just who they are.
00:45:56.000 This is who they are. I mean, that's just the way it is.
00:45:58.440 Okay. I've heard enough. Enough of this woman. I don't think I can take any more this early in 1.00
00:46:01.300 the morning. This is who they are. That's one claim. You look at a boy, the boy says he's a
00:46:06.640 girl and you say, that's who he is. He's a girl. So says you, there's no evidence of that.
00:46:13.900 So, and what if you're wrong as you are lady, you've ruined a kid's life. You've ruined that 1.00
00:46:20.000 kid's life. And you have, ironically, you say the reason you have to do this is so they don't kill
00:46:24.220 themselves. You have statistically greatly increased their risk of all sorts of harms
00:46:31.700 and injuries on every front. You have not ameliorated a single thing. And also, even beyond
00:46:38.940 the kind of consequentialist views here, calculus, it's just not true. It's obviously not true.
00:46:44.840 When you send your kids to a public school today, you are signing that kid up for the possibility of 1.00
00:46:52.480 having his genitals chopped off. Simple as not being hyperbolic, not being provocative just for 0.99
00:47:00.880 the sake of doing so. That's what they think. That's what the liberal schools think. That's what
00:47:06.520 the broader liberal culture thinks. That's what the federal government thinks, is that that's just
00:47:10.620 who they are. If he's a boy and he thinks he's a girl, that's just who he is. And the schools and
00:47:14.620 the government institutions have a right and a responsibility to keep that information from
00:47:18.940 the parents, to hide this information from the parents, and to encourage the kids to harm
00:47:23.220 themselves. That's what they're all saying out in public. You can't say you weren't warned. And we
00:47:28.060 all saw this during COVID too. That's what it means today. Maybe you went to public school. I went to
00:47:33.400 public school. Doesn't mean what it used to mean. That's what it means today. They're telling you that
00:47:38.220 risk. When they tell you who they are, you got to believe them. The rest of the show continues now.
00:47:42.060 You don't want to miss it. Become a member. Use code NOLSKIN at WLAS at checkout for two months
00:47:45.060 free on all annual plans.