Ep. 1430 - Jon Stewart Explains Why Freedom Makes Everything Suck
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
182.4145
Summary
In recent weeks, we ve heard more and more about the degradation of our cities, the filthy, dangerous subways, the drug-ridden streets, the skyrocketing crime. How did things get so bad so quickly? Why is this happening? Lucky for us, Jon Stewart has the answer.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
In recent weeks, we've heard more and more about the degradation of our cities,
00:00:04.100
the filthy, dangerous subways, the drug addict-lined streets, the skyrocketing crime.
00:00:10.500
How did things get so bad so quickly? Do we really have to live this way? Why is this happening?
00:00:21.420
Right. Because the difference between our urinal-caked, chaotic subways and your
00:00:27.400
candelabra-ed, beautiful subways is the literal price of freedom.
00:00:34.820
Urine everywhere is the price of freedom. It's definitely the price of the liberals' version
00:00:41.180
of freedom. That part's true. The problem with Jon Stewart's argument is that we used to have nice
00:00:47.920
things not that long ago. Our subways used to be cleaner. Our streets used to be mostly free
00:00:54.280
from crackheads and criminals. We used to punish criminals and stop them from gallivanting all
00:01:00.400
over our communities and terrorizing us. That wasn't that long ago. Were we really less free
00:01:06.880
then? We were less free seven years ago? Really? We were less free three years ago? I don't think so.
00:01:14.940
I think we all know that we're all much more free when cops arrest criminals and the streets aren't
00:01:23.260
lined with the corpses of drug addicts, which means that what the libs call freedom is in fact the
00:01:29.040
opposite. And we got to fight that false freedom tooth and nail before it makes us all slaves.
00:01:35.160
I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:56.060
Welcome back to the show. There's a girl on TikTok who is finally clearing up the age-old question of
00:02:02.800
what women want. Once and for all, she figured it out. We will analyze her take on it. But first,
00:02:09.120
go to foodforthepore.org slash Knowles. It is important to slow down, think about how we can
00:02:15.360
lift up others. Luckily, Food for the Poor helps us do just that. For over 40 years, Food for the Poor
00:02:21.080
has served communities throughout the Caribbean and Latin America. Through a network of trusted ministry
00:02:25.740
partners and local churches, Food for the Poor supplies non-perishable food items and protein-rich
00:02:30.140
meals to children and families suffering from hunger. Many businesses and informal economies,
00:02:34.660
such as day labor and local markets, have eliminated jobs or closed permanently, leaving many parents with
00:02:39.720
no way to earn money. Local ministry partners feeding centers, hospitals, and schools are experiencing
00:02:46.180
rising numbers of malnourished children. With the help of their generous donors, Food for the Poor is
00:02:50.560
able to provide food, housing, healthcare, education, freshwater, emergency relief, and much more.
00:02:55.160
So how can you help? Thanks to a meal-for-meal match, a donation of $80 can feed two children
00:03:00.380
for an entire year. Your generous gift today changes how families view tomorrow. Donate now
00:03:05.840
by texting Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S, to 51555, or by visiting foodforthepore.org slash Knowles.
00:03:13.540
That is Knowles. Text it to 51555, or go to foodforthepore.org slash Knowles.
00:03:20.120
The liberals are very, very confused about what freedom is. If freedom is criminals running around
00:03:26.060
and dudes going into the girls' room and urine and drugs and excrement everywhere,
00:03:32.360
give me a little more authoritarianism, please. You know, I'll take it, actually. Because,
00:03:38.120
ironically, what the libs are calling freedom is a kind of slavery. It's slavery to the base passions.
00:03:44.140
It's slavery to the irrational impulses of capricious criminals. What liberals are calling
00:03:51.060
authoritarian is much more in line with freedom. It's much more in line with the Founding Fathers
00:03:56.520
conception of freedom. It's much more in line with the classical and Christian conceptions of freedom.
00:04:01.220
Because freedom requires limits, just like a poem requires limits to be beautiful. It needs meter.
00:04:06.120
That rhyme is sometimes helpful. So, too, our societies require some limits.
00:04:12.100
Because there's always just a trade-off. If you give dudes the freedom to go into the women's
00:04:18.120
bathroom, you deprive women of the freedom to have their own bathrooms. If you give drug addicts
00:04:23.080
the freedom to shoot up heroin on the street, you deprive ordinary law-abiding citizens of the freedom
00:04:28.620
to walk their streets in peace, unmolested and unaccosted by vagrants and indigents and criminals.
00:04:35.800
There's always a cost here. There's no such thing as a free lunch. So, what kind of freedom are we
00:04:40.040
talking about? Are we talking about the freedom of the lower passions and the irrational appetites
00:04:44.700
to drive us all completely insane? Or are we talking about true freedom, which involves knowledge?
00:04:50.360
It involves acknowledging reality. Men and women are different. Certain things are crimes. Certain
00:04:55.240
things are not crimes. We do good. We avoid evil. Involves the intellect. And it involves disciplining
00:04:59.940
the will and saying, no, crackhead, don't shoot up or don't smoke your crack on the streets of San
00:05:05.120
Francisco. No, big husky fella, don't go into the girl's bathroom. No, homeless people, don't
00:05:10.360
defecate on the streets. No, you gotta behave, okay? This comes back to a very basic concept
00:05:18.360
which the liberals have forgotten. And I'm not even just theorizing that the liberals have forgotten
00:05:23.420
this. The libs in one of their big house organs admitted they forgot this. The concept is called
00:05:29.280
The Natural Law. Politico has a big hit piece out on Christian nationalism. That's the new boogeyman
00:05:37.700
on the left. Christian nationalism is on the rise. Trump allies prepare to infuse Christian nationalism
00:05:43.420
in a second administration. Spearheading the effort is Russell Vaught, president of the Center for
00:05:47.540
Renewing America, part of the conservative consortium preparing for Trump's return to power. Oh no, here
00:05:53.020
comes Christian nationalism. And what is at the heart of Christian nationalism? At the heart of
00:05:58.680
Christian nationalism, they say, is natural law. Now, let's see, where can I find this beautiful
00:06:07.000
definition that they try to, yes, here we are. In 2019, Trump's then Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo,
00:06:16.480
set up a federal commission to define human rights based on the precepts Vaught described, specifically
00:06:21.660
natural law and natural rights. I like how in this, they don't even seem to recognize the phrase
00:06:29.840
natural rights, which is much more common in modern American parlance. Even that they don't understand.
00:06:36.600
And they certainly don't understand natural law. Politico writes, natural law is the belief that
00:06:40.660
there are universal rules derived from God that can't be superseded by government or judges. While it
00:06:46.340
is a core pillar of Catholicism, in recent decades, it's been used to oppose abortion, LGBTQ rights,
00:06:52.840
and contraception. Okay, well, at least they tried. At least, they didn't try that hard, though.
00:07:00.860
Because what's, I mean, I guess ultimately everything's derived from God, because God's
00:07:03.640
the creator of all things that are created. But the natural law is very specifically
00:07:10.360
the law that can be understood universally, purely by human reason, without divine revelation.
00:07:20.540
I guess they actually kind of got the meaning of natural law, which forms a bedrock aspect,
00:07:27.240
not just of theology and philosophy and morality, but also of American jurisprudence and constitutional
00:07:35.460
law and the common law tradition. They just, they couldn't even get it right. They couldn't even
00:07:39.000
Google it. These are the guys at Politico. They're supposed to be the really smart journalists.
00:07:43.360
They're not these just fringe bloggers. They're supposed to be the mainstream guys. They have
00:07:47.020
absolutely no idea what it is. And it's a core of Catholicism. That's true. Catholicism certainly
00:07:51.740
has quite a lot to do with the natural law. But the natural law being the natural law is,
00:07:58.600
well, it's just kind of part of every civilization. All people can recognize this. What the natural law
00:08:06.160
comes down to most basically is do good and avoid evil. This is something that all human beings have
00:08:13.340
an impulse for, an inclination of, purely through our reason. Even that today, though, the libs will
00:08:20.740
look at you like you've got three heads if you suggest that maybe perhaps we should consider doing
00:08:24.500
good and avoiding evil. I'll say, good and evil? How the hell are we supposed to know what that is?
00:08:30.020
Well, because you have reason, and you have something called a conscience, and you're pretending
00:08:35.980
that you don't, but even you do. We all do. That's part of it. In recent decades, the natural
00:08:41.140
law has been used to oppose a bunch of stuff that's crazy and obviously contrary to human flourishing.
00:08:45.600
Yeah, I guess that's true. I guess it does. Very sad state of American politics that not only
00:08:52.940
does the dominant political power deny the natural law, they don't even know what it is. Not so long
00:08:59.840
ago, though, you had really eloquent defenders and articulators of this. There was a great debate
00:09:05.040
when Barack Obama was running for Senate from Illinois. He was running against Alan Keyes,
00:09:11.960
a wonderful Republican candidate who unfortunately did not make it to hold higher office.
00:09:18.120
Alan Keyes, they were debating gay marriage back in those days. There was a debate over whether or
00:09:23.760
not we would redefine marriage, and Alan Keyes argued against it on the basis of natural law.
00:09:30.700
Mr. Keyes, on the Channel 7 debate last Thursday night, you said, and I'm quoting you,
00:09:35.000
where procreation is in principle impossible, marriage is irrelevant. You went on to say it was
00:09:41.680
irrelevant and not needed. What about marriage between people who are well beyond their childbearing age?
00:09:49.280
No, no, it's simply a misunderstanding. The word in principle means relating to the definition of,
00:09:55.900
not relating to particular circumstances. So if an apple has a worm in it, the worm is not part of
00:10:00.540
the definition of the apple. It doesn't change what the apple is in principle. So the fact...
00:10:06.800
It retains... No, it retains... To act as if concepts are laughable means that you want to be irrational.
00:10:13.640
No, I'm going to put a pause there. Alan Keyes, man, what a prince among men. I really wish this
00:10:21.360
guy had made it to the Senate or higher, because he's looking at the questioner, and you hear this
00:10:26.920
objection all the time. They say, well, hold on, Michael. If you object to radically redefining
00:10:31.100
marriage from what it's always been, just on the basis that a couple of fellows can't have a kid
00:10:34.700
together, why then? Do you think that women past the age of menopause shouldn't get married? Do you
00:10:41.160
think that couples who are likely to be sterile, if, I don't know, the woman has endometriosis or
00:10:46.540
something, that they should not be allowed to get married? And Alan Keyes is just there. He could
00:10:51.460
probably fall asleep. He's so bored with this idiotic line of questioning. By the way, I'm not
00:10:57.380
even sure that the questioner holds to it. The questioner is leading Keyes to this great point
00:11:03.920
about the apple-ness of the apple. But Keyes, he just looks, he says, you just don't understand the
00:11:09.660
phrase in principle. Just because the particular circumstances of something might have a defect
00:11:15.460
in this fallen world doesn't change the reality in principle. In principle, the union of a man and a
00:11:23.380
woman is open to life, and marriage is ordered toward the procreation and education of children.
00:11:31.300
Two dudes, they might be the nicest dudes in the world. We got nothing against them.
00:11:35.320
But the union of two dudes is not in principle open to having children. It is not ordered toward
00:11:44.540
the end that marriage is ordered toward. So it just isn't marriage. It's not that we want to keep
00:11:49.700
them from having the right to marriage or anything like that. It just, at the most basic definition
00:11:54.760
of marriage, it is not and can never be that, he goes on.
00:11:58.600
Reason, excuse me, you said it was irrelevant and not needed.
00:12:02.260
Reason, by means of concepts and definition, we also make laws by means of definitions. And if you
00:12:08.580
don't know how to operate with respect for those definitions, you can't make the law.
00:12:12.120
An individual who is impotent or another who is infertile does not change the definition of
00:12:17.780
marriage in principle. Because between a man and a woman in principle, procreation is always
00:12:24.220
possible. And it is that possibility which gave rise to the institution of marriage in the first
00:12:29.340
place. As a matter of law, excuse me, as a matter of law and government. But when it is impossible,
00:12:36.400
as between two males or two females, you're talking about something that's not just incidentally
00:12:40.380
impossible. It's impossible in principle. And that means that if you say that that's a
00:12:45.200
marriage, you are saying marriage can be understood in principle apart from procreation.
00:12:50.280
Obama just taking notes, completely destroyed by Alan Keyes' argument.
00:12:55.340
...it's definition in such a way as, in fact, to destroy the necessity for the institution,
00:12:59.680
since the only reason it has existed in human societies and civilizations was to regulate from
00:13:04.880
a social point of view the obligations and responsibilities attendant upon procreation.
00:13:12.700
This is a really good argument. I wish that this had been the debate over redefining marriage. There
00:13:19.240
really was no debate over redefining marriage because intelligent and common sense voices like
00:13:26.220
Alan Keyes were pushed out of that debate and it just became a dumb debate over who has the right to
00:13:29.880
do whatever. And really it was a debate not over right. It shouldn't have been a debate over
00:13:34.120
rights. It should have been a debate over definitions. What can we know using our reason
00:13:40.500
from nature? And the answer from the liberals today is not very much at all. The one thing you
00:13:49.120
really learn from this Politico article, not only is that liberals have thrown out even the
00:13:53.780
basic aspects of reasonable argument, but the other thing you learn is Christian nationalism
00:14:00.080
is going to be a huge talking point for the libs in 2024. Here come the Christian nationalists.
00:14:08.460
They want to impose a theocracy or whatever. My rejoinder to them would be if you guys think
00:14:16.460
that Christian nationalism is bad, just wait until you see unchristian nationalism. Trust me,
00:14:22.040
you're going to like that a lot, a lot less. Christian nationalism, if we live in a nation,
00:14:26.960
our nation's going to be animated by something. It can be animated by paganism. It can be animated
00:14:33.400
by atheism. The worst regimes in all of history have been atheist regimes. It can be animated by,
00:14:39.280
I guess it could be animated by Hinduism. We don't have that many Hindus in America.
00:14:42.420
Or it can be animated by Christianity. Which one do you think is going to be better? Which one do you
00:14:46.620
think is going to be more conducive to the flourishing of everybody, Christians and non-Christians
00:14:51.940
alike? I think the answer is pretty clear. There is much more to say. First though,
00:14:56.300
go to gdefy.com, promo code MK30. Good footwear is about more than fashion. Choosing footwear that
00:15:03.260
provides support for your daily routine is important. And now, thanks to G Defy Shoes,
00:15:07.340
it's easier than ever. G Defy Shoes are anything but ordinary. While others have clung to shoes
00:15:12.580
featuring a run-of-the-mill memory foam sole, G Defy offers a patented sole construction meticulously
00:15:18.620
designed to bring the pep back to your step. G Defy Shoes aim to foster healthy body movements,
00:15:23.960
alleviate pain, and prevent further wear and tear. This is not just about absorbing shock.
00:15:28.860
When I wear G Defy Shoes, it is like my shoes are giving me a high five. I really,
00:15:35.120
really love these shoes. Not only because they're extraordinarily comfortable,
00:15:39.020
they also just look great. They have Oxford shoes with broguing. Without broguing too,
00:15:44.500
I really like the broguing. They have running shoes, the only running shoes that I will even
00:15:48.180
consider wearing. They've got great loafers. They're just really excellent shoes. Your feet deserve more
00:15:52.800
than just another pair of shoes. Right now, use code MK30 for $30 off orders of $150 or more at
00:15:59.440
gdefy.com. G-D-E-F-Y.com. Promo code MK30. For $30 off your purchase of $150 or more,
00:16:06.360
experience the miracle that is G Defy, where comfort meets innovation.
00:16:10.440
Speaking of nature, Madonna has fallen off a chair. She's fallen, and she sort of can get up,
00:16:16.960
at least. She was at some concert. You see her on stage. She's being dragged by one of her singers.
00:16:21.840
And the singer trips, and she goes straight down. Madonna's 65 years old. You do not want to be
00:16:29.240
taking falls at 65 years old. She keeps singing while lying on the ground. One of her backup
00:16:36.360
singers comes to help her up, but she actually gets herself up for most of it, which is pretty
00:16:41.740
impressive. And she gets back on the chair, you know, sitting open-legged and dancing around in a
00:16:48.280
pretty sultry way. And then she flips around to a slightly more comfortable position, and they kind
00:16:55.480
of recover. Okay. It's very sad. Very, very sad because Madonna is 65 years old and should not be
00:17:02.640
dancing on stage like she's a 21-year-old stripper. But she's doing that. That has been her act. And she
00:17:08.080
was the best at that act in the 80s when she kind of came onto the scene. And the act has gotten sadder
00:17:15.100
and sadder every year. Not because she's not still good at it. She's actually shockingly good at singing
00:17:19.860
and dancing around and getting up when she falls for a 65-year-old pop star. But it's sad because
00:17:25.140
that's not the sort of thing 65-year-olds are supposed to do. It's a little risque for anyone to dance like
00:17:30.600
that. But it's a lot more normal for a 25-year-old to dance like that than for a 65-year-old.
00:17:39.240
The biggest modern pathology, I think, that affects us is the inclination to deny time.
00:17:48.780
I think this is one of the aspects of liberalism. We want to deny time. We want to deny history.
00:17:53.860
Liberalism is all about denying history. Forget about the past. They were all dumb. They were all evil.
00:17:58.400
They don't know anything. We know everything now. And nothing's ever going to change. No one's ever
00:18:02.200
going to call us immoral. No one's ever going to call us ignorant. No, no, no. We've figured it all
00:18:07.140
out. And now the time and politics is frozen forever in this endless present. You see this
00:18:14.000
in young liberal people. I mean, this is why, in large part, I think millennials in the cities don't
00:18:19.040
want to get married. They don't want to have kids. They want to remain kids themselves forever.
00:18:23.180
This is why you're seeing a perpetual suspended adolescence. This is why you're seeing 35-year-olds
00:18:28.340
brag on social media that they're adulting because they paid a bill or something. It's all about a
00:18:35.640
denial of time. You even see this in some modern forms of religion. A lot of modern religion is
00:18:42.860
very Gnostic. It is inclined to deny the physical world. It's inclined to deny the history of the
00:18:48.720
religion. It's inclined to deny the great people. It's the great saints of the religion. It's inclined
00:18:56.160
toward, away from worship and liturgy. It's just kind of floating in your head. And we all want to
00:19:04.500
be just floating in the air. That's why people are going to put on the Apple Vision Pro, and they're
00:19:08.140
going to deny the importance of their bodies, and they're going to embrace Gnostic ideologies like
00:19:11.680
transgenderism or transhumanism. They're going to try to upload their minds to the cloud so they can
00:19:17.780
deny the reality of time, which has a beginning and a middle and an end, and then you die. And then what
00:19:22.460
happens after you die is something they don't want to think about. It's not particularly new.
00:19:27.960
This is a pathology that's affected us for centuries now. It's not good.
00:19:35.120
The things that were normal for you to do at 20 are not generally normal for you to do at 50
00:19:41.440
or 60 or 70. Boozy and Liss Champagne Brunch. I always attack brunch because brunch is just the
00:19:48.380
sacrament. Brunch is the liturgy of the millennials. But boozy champagne brunch when you're 22 is one
00:19:55.680
thing. Going out every weekend and, you know, that's one thing. Boozy champagne brunch when you're
00:20:02.840
62 is a sadder thing. You should be doing other things. You got to grow. You got to develop. You're
00:20:08.040
going to grow or you're going to die. And we're all going to die someday, even though everyone seems to
00:20:11.860
be trying to deny that. Now, speaking of growing up, there are a father and a daughter who are sniping
00:20:19.720
at each other on social media. And they're both social media influencers, which means that something
00:20:24.160
has gone terribly, terribly wrong in this family. For any of them to be social media influencers,
00:20:28.440
but certainly for both of them to be. The daughter made a video in which she accused her father of being
00:20:35.340
absentee when she was a kid. What's a piece of trauma that you have that's funny? It has to
00:20:41.660
actually be funny. I'll go first. My dad abandoned my family when I was five years old. That is a wife
00:20:48.720
and four kids. He abandoned us and then pursued amateur breakdancing. And he got really good.
00:20:56.700
He like blew up. Like he became like a D-list celebrity status, like viral breakdancer. He became
00:21:01.260
like the oldest actively competing breakdancer in the world. Then he got a Good Morning America
00:21:05.660
and talk shows and Washington Post wrote about him and he went super viral and he did all these
00:21:09.640
interviews and he danced with Paul Abdul. The worst part, damn it, he's good. He should not be able to
00:21:16.900
move his body like that. It's like impossible. It's beautiful. Hey, dad. Thank you, Maddie. Like there
00:21:22.980
was no split custody or anything. Like he just like left four kids to do that. He may not have paid for some
00:21:29.120
of my medical bills growing up, but he did give me this breakdancing merchandise. So that's him.
00:21:34.020
He's on his b-boy name because his name is Ben Hart. You know, I'll get texts like this. Happy
00:21:39.280
birthday question mark. And then like links to his, to his breakdancing video. That's true.
00:21:43.680
Funny trauma, like actual funny ha ha trauma. I need to hear it. Okay. So the daughter airs her
00:21:50.120
grievances. His father, he left me. He wouldn't pay my bills. He forgets when my birthday is. He makes a
00:21:56.100
joke about forgetting my birthday. He wasn't around when I was a kid. But the reason this video is
00:21:59.760
going viral is because the father has responded to her. And I've even seen some conservatives
00:22:04.860
sharing this video of the father as though it's an epic takedown by a father, maybe a right wing
00:22:11.540
leaning father. He's wearing a Bitcoin shirt. It's an epic takedown of this father to his spoiled brat,
00:22:18.560
Gen Z daughter, supposedly. We'll get to that in one second. First though, go to hymns.com slash
00:22:24.460
Knowles. Did you know that 52% of men over the age of 40 experience some form of ED with such a high
00:22:30.580
percentage? It is strange. That's always been a taboo topic. Hymns is changing men's healthcare
00:22:35.140
by providing access to affordable and discreet health treatment, all from the comfort of your
00:22:39.180
couch. All you need to do is visit hymns.com, answer a series of questions on their site.
00:22:44.260
A medical provider will determine the right treatment option for you. If prescribed,
00:22:48.040
your medication will ship directly to you for free and in discreet packaging.
00:22:52.180
Hymns provides access to clinically proven generic alternatives to Viagra and Cialis with options as
00:22:57.740
low as two bucks per dose. No insurance is needed. You will pay one low price for your treatments,
00:23:01.660
online visits, ongoing shipments, and provider messaging. Hymns has hundreds of thousands of
00:23:06.620
trusted subscribers. So if ED is getting you down, it's time to change that. Start your free online
00:23:10.840
visit today at hymns.com slash Knowles, can-a-w-l-e-s, h-i-m-s.com slash Knowles,
00:23:15.920
can-a-w-l-e-s. For your personalized ED treatment options, visit hymns.com slash Knowles today.
00:23:22.060
Rescriptions require an online consultation with a healthcare provider who will determine
00:23:24.360
if appropriate. Restrictions apply. See website for details and important safety information.
00:23:27.440
Subscription required. Price varies based on products and subscription plan.
00:23:30.940
Social media influencer daughter goes viral saying, my dad abandoned the family when we were kids.
00:23:36.180
The father then goes viral. Number of conservatives posting him around because he epically,
00:23:41.680
epically destroyed his daughter on social media with facts and logic.
00:23:45.880
First, I can see that as a five-year-old, Maddie would see her dad as having abandoned the family.
00:23:52.880
One day I was living there. The next day, I wasn't. And that will look like abandonment to a child.
00:23:59.140
But married couples do get divorced about half the time in America. And I was just living a mile or so
00:24:04.860
down the street in LaGrange, Illinois. We just weren't living under the same roof.
00:24:09.540
Now, about not paying medical bills, that's just not correct. Here was the financial arrangement
00:24:15.920
of the divorce. Maddie's mom, my ex-wife, got $2 million at the get-go. Out of the gate.
00:24:23.040
A lump sum payment. Plus, I was paying her $18,000 per month in child support and alimony.
00:24:30.480
This was later reduced to $12,000 per month. And of course, I paid health insurance and out-of-pocket
00:24:36.400
medical costs. I also put $600,000 into the kids' college fund. In all, I paid out about $5 million
00:24:43.380
to my ex-wife to cover costs for her and the kids. And this is in $2,005. So add 50% to account for
00:24:51.800
inflation. In other words, I was not a deadbeat dad at all.
00:24:55.520
I was not a deadbeat dad at all, you see, because I gave my wife a lot of money.
00:24:59.860
Now, he goes on in the video. He has like a 10-minute response here. And he says, yeah,
00:25:04.680
look, the divorce was, it was mostly my fault. It was about 70% my fault. But look, I gave him a
00:25:10.560
bunch of money. And now the kids, most of them have good jobs. So they're making money. So quit
00:25:15.380
complaining. And I thought, not only is that one of the dumbest arguments I've ever heard, not only
00:25:22.320
does that argument completely miss the point that your daughter was raising, but it's one of the least
00:25:27.120
conservative arguments I've ever heard. I cannot understand how a conservative would post this
00:25:33.780
video and say that the father is somehow the good guy here. He's saying, yeah, everything you said
00:25:40.180
is true. I did abandon my family. I did pursue my professional breakdancing career. But hey,
00:25:46.720
you got some money. So isn't that all good? Talk about knowing the price of everything and the value
00:25:52.420
of nothing. He doesn't really apologize for the divorce. He says, oh, my wife and I, we were
00:25:58.380
incompatible. So yeah, I traumatized our four kids. And I did. I literally abandoned them. But hey,
00:26:05.000
you know, they got some money. Isn't that fine? Isn't that? What are you talking about, man?
00:26:12.020
Absolutely pathetic. I have no, look, these people are both social media influencers and they're
00:26:17.880
probably both just absolutely dreadful. But if I had to pick a side here, I'm certainly picking
00:26:23.320
the side of the daughter to say nothing of the fact that this father is taking to social media
00:26:27.560
to destroy his daughter with facts and logic. Are you kidding me for the public, for the amusement
00:26:31.520
of your followers? I don't care how in the wrong you think your daughter is. That is a despicable
00:26:36.300
behavior. And then it gets even crazier because the daughter responded. Her first video was kind of
00:26:40.520
funny. It was in response to this question, name a funny trauma you have. And I say, here's a funny
00:26:43.960
trauma. My dad abandoned me to become a professional breakdancer and he's actually pretty good.
00:26:47.200
But then her response is, actually, now my father's just lying about everything.
00:26:51.960
But I know my dad posted like a 10-minute video or whatever being like, you know, my daughter's
00:26:56.540
lying. We have a great relationship. I have a great relationship with all my kids. That's
00:27:00.020
just objectively not true. Like, guys, we're all freaking out about this in my family group
00:27:03.480
chat right now. We're being like, he's so unhinged and delusional. We don't know if he
00:27:06.940
actually believes his own narrative or if he's lying on purpose, but he's just like a weird
00:27:11.340
guy. He said he lived down the street from us. That's not true. Or like, if he did, it was only
00:27:15.500
for a few months maybe. But actually, for most of my childhood, he lived in Florida with
00:27:20.700
his new wife. Like, basically, like, I don't want to get into this. Like, again, like, my
00:27:24.800
video was basically like sanitizing the situation and like poking fun at the lightest parts of
00:27:29.700
that childhood trauma. But obviously, in real life, it was a lot more like complicated and
00:27:34.080
traumatic. And it was really hard. He left us, immediately married another woman. We didn't
00:27:37.680
hear from him for years. And then he would visit every few months and we'd go out to dinner.
00:27:41.260
But like, he truly had no hand in raising us at all.
00:27:45.520
Yeah, I'm totally on the girl's side here. This is such
00:27:49.020
late 20th century cope from this father. This is just such nonsense to say, well, look,
00:27:57.320
all that really matters is money. You know, I wrote them a big check, so I can't be blamed
00:28:02.180
for anything. That's an error that not only the left has made, but the right has made as well.
00:28:06.800
But that's the primary function of a father actually is not to make a lot of money. There
00:28:11.080
are very excellent fathers who have not made a lot of money. Primary function of a father is to
00:28:15.060
be a father, to be steadfast, to live up to his vows that he made to his wife and the love between
00:28:21.760
him and his wife that is so real that it actually creates other people. And then to fulfill his
00:28:25.320
obligations to those children. That's his job. And those obligations are a lot deeper than money.
00:28:29.620
So he leaves them and the girl's saying, yeah, you gave us a lot of money, but that doesn't
00:28:35.440
matter. She's obviously screwed up from it. I'm not surprised at all. There is just no excuse for
00:28:41.120
this. No excuse. The rot in our politics goes down probably 93% to this one issue of no-fault
00:28:53.980
divorce. And the reason for that is not just that it screws up kids and it's not just that
00:28:58.380
encourages selfish behavior in adults. And it's not just, it's that the family is the basic
00:29:04.860
political unit. Politics, politics is how we all get along together. Politics is, cannot be an
00:29:11.640
individual thing because it involves multiple people. It's, it's the public life. And the basic
00:29:17.260
unit of that, the smallest possible unit is the family. So if you blow up the family, as you do with
00:29:22.380
no-fault divorce, then you blow up all of politics. And then they justify it with all these
00:29:28.740
totally BS expressions. They justify it by saying, oh, kids are resilient. I don't know, that girl
00:29:33.880
hasn't seen that resilient. In fact, most children of divorce I know, they're resilient. They get by,
00:29:37.860
life goes on. You know, there are tough things in life, but it hurts them forever. Even, I know adults
00:29:44.400
whose parents get divorced when they are adults and it totally screws them up. So no, don't give me that.
00:29:50.340
Or what's the other line? They say, well, it's better for the parents to get divorced
00:29:54.580
if they're unhappy in their marriage. It's much better for the children if the parents totally
00:29:58.800
split up and explode their world, you know, so they can be happy chasing some second or third wife.
00:30:04.700
Rather than, you know, suppress their feel-feels for a little bit and learn to make their marriage
00:30:08.820
work. Yeah, no, that's not true either, man. It's just so, ah, it's just unbelievable. No one in
00:30:14.720
history has really thought this. No serious society has ever thought this. But a society
00:30:20.180
that totally turns away from the common good and focuses only on personal interest and selfishness
00:30:27.200
is going to believe this kind of thing. And then when the victims of this profound social disorder
00:30:33.860
come out and say, hey, actually, that was bad. And I don't, I wish you hadn't done that.
00:30:38.920
What's the answer? The answer is, ah, shut up. You made a lot of money. Oh, you made a lot of money.
00:30:43.720
Okay. A lot of money. A lot of money can buy you a cup of coffee, I guess. It certainly won't
00:30:49.560
reassemble society. And now speaking of family, great. Today's a big family and natural law show.
00:30:57.160
I'm just noticing this now. Elon Musk, one of the most influential men in the world,
00:31:02.000
has just come out to destroy contraception with facts and logic. I love it. You know,
00:31:09.340
all of the rich guys basically are big, selfish libs. And Elon Musk is a weirdo who has all sorts
00:31:16.540
of weird companies and weird ideas. And he is, I'm not, I don't know that he's a rock-ribbed
00:31:20.660
conservative. I have no idea what his religious views are. But he does, oddly enough, keep articulating
00:31:28.200
points that are very conservative and even quite Christian and even, even quite orthodox. You know,
00:31:36.200
I mean, he's basically articulating Catholic sexual ethics here, but he's doing it in a funny Elon way.
00:31:43.060
So he tweets out, or he ex-posts out, he says, hormonal birth control makes you fat, doubles the
00:31:49.480
risk of depression, and triples the risk of suicide. This is the clear scientific consensus,
00:31:53.140
but very few people seem to know it. Thank you. Thank you, Elon. And then he cites the NIH.
00:31:57.620
NIH. So when all the dumb scientific libs show up and they say, um, could you please provide your
00:32:03.480
sources? Could I please see a study? Which most studies are just nonsense anyway, but Elon indulges
00:32:09.700
them and he says, okay, here's a study from your favorite institutions. Here you go, the NIH. You
00:32:14.460
all like that, right? Hey, Dr. Fauci works there and you're big fans of him. Anyway, they back up what
00:32:19.000
I'm saying, which is that hormonal birth control is really bad. It makes you fat, doubles the risk of
00:32:22.800
depression, triples the risk of suicide. And he's not even making an argument citing Humanae Vitae or
00:32:27.660
something. He's not citing some bioethical tract. He's just saying, hey, these are the medical
00:32:32.040
consequences that are likely to occur with birth control. Um, and why, so why would you do it?
00:32:38.500
And then this raises the deeper question of, of hormonal birth control, which is why do it? If
00:32:46.960
we know it's got all of these negative effects, if we know that what the libs have told us about
00:32:53.360
contraception for years is not true, and then we say, oh, it's no big deal. It's fine. Yeah,
00:32:57.440
it totally screws up women's hormones for years or maybe decades at a time, but there are no,
00:33:01.760
no negative side effects of that whatsoever. Yeah, absolutely. Put your 12 year old on the pill.
00:33:06.180
Okay. That's all obviously wrong. And Elon is citing the scientific evidence here. So then the
00:33:10.500
question is why use it at all? What's the reason? And the only, the only reason is so that you can
00:33:20.620
have promiscuous sex is promiscuous sex good for you. It may be, it's something you want to do. We
00:33:26.660
all, we all desire things that are naughty and not, not good for our flourishing, but I'm not,
00:33:30.640
I'm not talking about your lower will here. I'm not talking about that lower app, appetitive kind of
00:33:35.860
freedom that the libs are always trying to foist on us. I'm saying we zoom out here. You're just,
00:33:40.600
you're reading Elon's tweets. Elon is like commander data. He's pretty rational guy a lot of the time.
00:33:45.340
And you're saying, okay, what rational reason do I have to take hormonal birth control or to put my
00:33:51.620
child on hormonal birth control? The only reasons you can really come up with are so that I or she can
00:33:58.900
have a promiscuous sex with random dudes. We hope without consequences. Is that going to be good
00:34:05.500
for us? Probably not. So that could be as good for us as finding a good guy and settling down and
00:34:10.520
getting married and then being open to life and having kids. Probably not. So, okay. So that's
00:34:14.460
not a good reason. And then maybe even within marriage, there's some married couples who use
00:34:17.920
hormonal birth control, but why, why do they do it? So that they can prevent having children,
00:34:21.860
but why would they want to not have children? The natural end of marriage, as Alan Keyes was explaining
00:34:26.940
to us earlier, is procreation and the education of children. And when we get married, we give of
00:34:32.200
ourselves, ideally, totally to the other spouse in a lifelong bond that will not be broken, even by
00:34:37.760
absentee dads who want to go breakdance and chase tail. So, so then why wouldn't you want to give of
00:34:44.080
yourself entirely? When you use contraception, you're, you're withholding something. You're
00:34:48.680
withholding something that's actually very important and you're preventing your love with your spouse
00:34:53.480
from really reaching its fullest potential and becoming so real that it becomes another person.
00:34:58.440
So why would you even want to do that? You might say, well, maybe in some grave circumstance,
00:35:03.280
it would present a mortal threat if, if my wife were to get pregnant or something like that. Those,
00:35:10.060
those instances are exceedingly rare and there are more bioethically sound ways to, to deal with
00:35:16.500
those circumstances. If you want, that's sort of a separate conversation, but at the very least,
00:35:20.540
if we're talking about 99% of the time, it's because what they say, well, I don't want to have
00:35:25.360
another kid. I don't want to have to wake up early. Kids are loud and annoying and they, you know,
00:35:29.100
they're messy and they tell, okay, that's one reason. Well, you know, okay, man, what else are
00:35:32.680
you doing? Like play fewer video games, go to the bar a little bit less. But yeah, that's true. Kids
00:35:37.200
are a lot of work, but they're worth it. Or they'll say, well, we can't afford a kid right now.
00:35:42.480
Well, I, okay, it's, it's important to be able to pay for your kids, but it's good to have kids to pay
00:35:46.020
for. And I promise you in, on your deathbed, you're not going to be longing for those thousands and
00:35:52.620
thousands of dollars you spent on the kid. You're more likely to regret not having the kid. Kids are
00:35:59.000
worth more than money, but our civilization doesn't seem to understand that anymore. We seem to think
00:36:04.660
that money just solves everything. Not only the materialists on the left, but many materialists on
00:36:10.860
the right as well. Now this President's Day, we honored the great leaders of our nation with
00:36:17.960
Jeremy's Razors. Jeremy's Razors are made with the finest materials and craftsmanship. They come
00:36:22.280
in a variety of packages to suit your needs. Check out the Founders Kit available in Precision 5,
00:36:26.280
featuring five blades and a Precision flip-back trimmer for superior accessibility around the
00:36:30.580
nose, ears, and sideburns. Or the Smooth 6, with six blades for a smooth, long-lasting shave.
00:36:35.940
Each includes a travel case, matte tungsten handle, ooh, tungsten, green tea and menthol shave cream,
00:36:42.200
and post-shave balm. Jeremy's has 20% off the site-wide during the President's Day sale. Save
00:36:49.220
big and get the best shave of your life. 20% off right now at jeremysrazors.com. And while you're
00:36:54.860
there, while you're typing things into your browser, you might want to pre-order Mayflower Cigars at
00:36:59.660
mayflowercigars.com. At the moment, we are very likely to sell out before they actually hit the
00:37:06.820
store again. We upped the order a lot this time, and it doesn't matter because people are still
00:37:10.840
ordering them. If you want Mayflower Cigars, which a lot of you have written angrily to me and told
00:37:16.640
me that you do, you've got to pre-order now. And I wouldn't just pre-order one box or two boxes.
00:37:21.580
I don't know exactly when the next shipment's going to come in, and if we're going to sell out
00:37:24.640
in the pre-order. Just spare my inbox the angry emails. If you're going to get one box, maybe get
00:37:30.100
two, throw one in the humidor. You're going to get two packs, maybe get four, and then I'm just,
00:37:35.200
or don't, or someone else will order it. But then don't come complaining to me when you can't get
00:37:39.160
your Mayflower Cigars. Mayflowercigars.com. 21 years old or older to order. Some exclusions apply.
00:37:46.040
My favorite comment yesterday is from user MP9R, who says, Joy Reid and her culturally appropriated
00:37:53.740
blonde hair. Stunning that people actually listen to this woman. It is so outrageous that that woman
00:37:58.240
wears Karen face every day. She does. She goes up there. She does a middle-aged suburban white lady
00:38:06.800
minstrel show with her Karen. She's appropriating a culture that is not hers, and she should be
00:38:13.620
canceled for it, I say. Speaking of women's issues, a young woman has gone viral on TikTok
00:38:21.780
for finally cracking an equation that has puzzled men in particular for all of human history.
00:38:32.720
And that is why women break up with them. The question is, what do women want? And this woman
00:38:40.300
with the aid of some kind of whiteboard, maybe it's just a piece of paper, she has broken it all down.
00:38:46.380
Okay, this is you guys. You guys are in a happy relationship, and now all of a sudden you have
00:38:50.140
one simple, fixable problem. For this example, we're going to use no good morning text. And your
00:38:57.300
girlfriend who loves you, she's really happy with you. She comes to you and she tells you, she's like,
00:39:01.080
hey, do you think we could start doing good morning texts? Like, it'd mean a lot to me if you texted me
00:39:04.980
good morning. So you, her loving boyfriend, agree to give her good morning texts. But something
00:39:09.880
happened, and for whatever reason, you stopped giving her good morning texts, so now we have a
00:39:13.760
bigger problem. She now thinks that you don't care enough about her to send her good morning texts.
00:39:21.100
So now your girlfriend, who has never picked fights before in her life, starts picking a bunch of
00:39:25.520
little fights about all these different things because she believes that you do not care enough.
00:39:31.080
Through all of these picking fights with you though, she still loves you and likes you enough to want
00:39:36.200
to be with you, even though you guys have all these little problems now. Until one day these become
00:39:43.100
unattractive to her. She's going to realize that all of these little things that you do that remind
00:39:50.160
her that you don't care about her enough are unattractive. And so now the problem is not these
00:39:55.140
things. It's not even that you don't care enough. It's not even that she never got good morning texts.
00:40:00.980
It's that she literally does not like you anymore. Quod erat demonstrandum. That's breakupology,
00:40:11.540
as she writes at the top of that paper. And I think she's half right. I think she's half right.
00:40:18.480
Her point is that women are kind of crazy and irrational. That's the beginning. The woman
00:40:24.700
wants a good morning text, which is, I think my answer would just be no. I wouldn't break up with
00:40:31.700
a woman who asked me that. But I would say, no, I don't think so. I'll send you texts when I would
00:40:35.680
like to send you texts. But good morning. I always wish you a good morning. But I'm not going to just
00:40:40.900
be at your beck and call to make any kind of silly show that you like. Some things I'll accommodate,
00:40:46.540
but some things I won't. And the way that I'll come to my conclusion about that is using my reason.
00:40:51.160
No, she's half right that women will make these irrational demands. And where she's especially
00:40:55.940
right is that if you agree to them and then renege on that, they're going to lose it. They're going to
00:41:00.320
be really angry and might break up with you. But what she's not quite getting here is that what women
00:41:06.240
also want is for a man to lead them. So the woman makes the demands, sometimes rational,
00:41:17.220
sometimes irrational. And then the man, demonstrating his care for her, does not merely
00:41:22.800
put himself in a subservient position and say, whatever you want, honey, I'll send you a text
00:41:25.940
anytime today. I'm sorry, my text was three minutes late today. The man says, hey, love you. You're
00:41:31.660
great. That's totally crazy. So we're not going to do that. This thing that you've just requested,
00:41:36.300
that's reasonable. That's true. And actually, you're right. I should do that. And then man's
00:41:39.260
got to keep his word, which is part of leadership and caring and romance and a healthy relationship
00:41:45.780
that we hope leads into a real marriage. But it can't be only one side of that equation. She's
00:41:51.920
just getting it. She's just missing the biggest part of the picture. And people will write in.
00:41:57.700
We've been talking about divorce and splitting up a lot today, I guess. People will write in.
00:42:01.960
They'll say, how does one resolve a conflict in a marriage or even boyfriend and girlfriend?
00:42:09.200
How does one, you know, I want this thing and she wants that thing. And men are from Mars and women
00:42:14.260
are from Venus. How are we going to come to any resolution? And the answer ties right back to what
00:42:18.480
we were talking about since the top of the show, ties right back to that natural law, ties right back
00:42:21.780
to reason. Your battles are not just duels of irrational will. You know, I want McDonald's
00:42:30.440
for dinner. You want Burger King for dinner. We're just going to, neither of us is going to give an
00:42:33.940
inch and we're going to duke it out until my will dominates her will or vice versa. That's not going
00:42:39.340
to get you anywhere. That's good. That'll lead you to break up. There is such a thing as reason and
00:42:44.880
you both have it. Even the women. They do, actually. They do. Contrary to what Jack Nicholson
00:42:52.120
says in that famous movie, As Good As It Gets. He writes women so well because he just thinks of a
00:42:58.980
man and then takes away reason and accountability. But women do have some reason, you know, and men
00:43:01.880
have some reason too. And the way that you can resolve a conflict is by saying, okay, what is the
00:43:08.760
principle that's at stake in this debate that we're having, this conflict? And what is good
00:43:14.520
to do? And what is the truth of the matter? And then what is good to do? And some things like
00:43:21.240
Burger King or McDonald's might be a little trickier to resolve. And then in that case,
00:43:25.180
maybe the man just says, honey, you want Burger King? Let's go get some Burger King.
00:43:28.720
But maybe certain issues like what city are we going to live in are a little more reasonable where
00:43:37.020
you say, okay, look, honey, I'm the man of the house and I'm the primary breadwinner and we're
00:43:43.380
following my career and my job took me to a new city. And so we, you just, even though you might
00:43:47.740
not like this city, that I think that's where we're going to go. And I'll try to make this move
00:43:52.880
nice for you and I'll try to accommodate as best I can. And, but this is, I think what we have to do.
00:43:58.460
And then the woman, even if she really likes the place she's living, even if she really doesn't
00:44:01.440
want to go to wherever you're going to go, the woman can say, well, you're right. You're the head of
00:44:05.000
our household. And in order to provide for us and have a roof over our head and to have a person
00:44:11.460
actually leaving the family, it is reasonable for us to go, even if it doesn't necessarily satisfy
00:44:15.960
my preferences at the moment. That's, that's reason. And you can apply that. You don't have
00:44:21.180
to just wait until you're married for 10 years. You can apply that even down to your little good
00:44:25.380
morning texts. Now, speaking of women, Nikki Haley is still in the presidential race and the rubber is
00:44:34.380
about to meet the road, baby, because Nikki Haley's home state primary, South Carolina is on Saturday.
00:44:39.740
The polls are not looking very good for her. They are looking very good for Donald Trump.
00:44:42.920
Nikki is saying, I'm going to stay in to fight through South Carolina. And even if I lose,
00:44:48.240
I'm going to stay in even then. Some of you, perhaps a few of you in the media
00:44:54.100
came here today to see if I'm dropping out of the race.
00:45:01.340
Well, I'm not. We've all heard the calls for me to drop out. We all know where they're coming from.
00:45:07.240
The political elite, the party bosses, the cheerleaders in the commentator world.
00:45:13.960
The argument is familiar. They say I haven't won a state, that my path to victory is slim.
00:45:21.500
They point to the primary polls and say I'm only delaying the inevitable. Why keep fighting
00:45:27.760
when the battle was apparently over after Iowa? That's why I refuse to quit. South Carolina will
00:45:35.620
vote on Saturday. But on Sunday, I'll still be running for president. I'm not going anywhere.
00:45:43.480
Okay. I am not going to voice any opinion on Haley's continuing to stay in the race. You know,
00:45:49.320
I like Nikki very much personally. And so she can stay in the race as long as she wants.
00:45:53.460
This was a bad speech. I don't know who wrote this speech for her. It's not effective.
00:45:57.140
One, she's reminding all of her voters and all of the public that she doesn't have a chance to
00:46:05.200
actually win the nomination. I thought that was unnecessary. She's suggesting that Donald Trump
00:46:12.400
actually did kind of earn the nomination. If she really wanted to make the claim that this is a
00:46:16.680
totally rigged primary and I'm fighting as the voice of the people, she shouldn't have said it
00:46:20.140
was over after Iowa. She should have said there are many people who think this was over before it
00:46:23.240
began. We know that. They thought it was over before it began. This was a sham of a primary.
00:46:27.460
I'm proving to them it's not a sham of a primary. But she didn't phrase it that way. She phrased it
00:46:31.340
almost in a way to say, yeah, Trump proved that he's going to be the nominee because he won in Iowa.
00:46:35.080
Not effective. And then she goes on and she says, you know, it's the political elite
00:46:40.700
who want Trump. And no one believes that because they know that the elite are trying to put him in
00:46:45.480
prison for the rest of his life. So that's never going to be persuasive. Nikki Haley's lane in the race,
00:46:51.240
and she's been very good at running in that lane, is that she is the candidate of more of the Beltway
00:46:56.220
crew. She's more the candidate of the centrists and the political establishment, at least as the
00:47:00.760
Republican nominee. She's got the money from the Koch network. And so I don't know. I'm not saying
00:47:05.980
that's a good thing. I agree. It probably gives her a very narrow lane to win the presidency.
00:47:10.100
But if that's your lane, run in that lane. Don't change strategy at the end. No one's going to
00:47:14.360
believe, you know, you're the voice of the people. You know, you're the populist leader against
00:47:19.780
establishment Donald Trump. That's just simply not credible. But she, I think, is the one thing
00:47:25.600
she's doing properly here is she's managing expectations. She's saying, yeah, I'm almost
00:47:29.340
certainly going to lose South Carolina, but I'm going to stay in the race anyway and hope that a
00:47:33.780
lightning bolt comes down and takes out Donald Trump. That part, at least, is, I think, a pretty
00:47:38.680
accurate assessment of where the race stands. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to
00:47:43.620
miss it. Become a member. Use code NOLSKINNWLAS. So check out for two months free on all annual plans.
00:48:10.700
Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep Jeep