The Michael Knowles Show - March 20, 2024


Ep. 1450 - My Trip To Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago Event


Episode Stats

Length

49 minutes

Words per Minute

170.22485

Word Count

8,388

Sentence Count

587

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

22


Summary

Trump's victory in the Ohio primary is a reminder that he owns the Republican Party. Plus, a new report from the Guttmacher Institute shows that abortion use is on the rise, and a new invention from Luxblocks.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Bernie Moreno, the Trump-endorsed candidate in last night's Ohio Senate primary, has defeated
00:00:05.780 his two more establishment-friendly foes. And despite a brutal campaign fight,
00:00:11.940 the results were not even all that close. Moreno bested his opponent, State Senator Matt Dolan,
00:00:19.120 and Secretary of State Frank LaRose with over 50 percent of the vote. Moreno credited much
00:00:24.540 of his victory to Trump's last-minute rallying for him, which is just another reminder that Trump
00:00:31.820 owns the GOP. Coincidentally, I'm coming to you now not from Mar-a-Lago, but I was at Mar-a-Lago last
00:00:37.280 night. Now I'm staying at the much cheaper hotel near Mar-a-Lago. But I saw it up close, and you
00:00:43.920 don't need to see it up close. You can just see it from the results in these elections. Trump owns the
00:00:48.500 GOP. Trump did not just win the 2024 presidential nomination because of high name recognition. He
00:00:55.900 didn't just win his presidential nomination because he had a major head start over the
00:01:02.100 other Republican candidates. He started campaigning earlier than the other governors say. Trump won
00:01:08.060 because he controls the GOP. His candidates win their primaries. His issues occupy the minds of
00:01:15.900 Republican voters. It's not just that he's brash. It's not just that he's funny. He's the undisputed
00:01:20.320 leader of the party, and everyone other than the Republican Party elites seems to know it.
00:01:26.240 I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:45.900 Welcome back to the show. Really distressing report coming out of the Guttmacher Institute,
00:01:52.320 which is the think tank wing of Planned Parenthood, basically, which shows that 60% of abortions
00:01:58.480 these days are carried out by the abortion pill, and the pro-abortion movement is making it easier
00:02:05.000 and easier to access that pill. We'll get into what that means because it has political implications
00:02:09.200 even beyond the issue of abortion. First, though, go to luxblocks.com. Use promo code
00:02:16.240 Michael25. Easter is just around the corner. I'm sure you're going to put a lot of candy and stuff
00:02:20.980 in your kid's Easter basket. You know what else you should put in? Luxblocks. The other day,
00:02:26.520 my little boys were feeling a little sick. They were under the weather, and I said, okay,
00:02:30.880 I'm going to give them a present that I'd been holding off on for a little while, and it was
00:02:35.640 some new cylinders of cool luxblocks, including their very cool American flag design, and the
00:02:42.660 boys absolutely loved it. They loved throwing the blocks at my head, but they also loved building
00:02:47.580 the American flag. It was just very, very cool. It's not just Luxblocks' innovative design. It's
00:02:51.960 the story of its creators, Heather and Mike. They wanted to create something that positively empowers
00:02:55.540 kids to think, create, and dream big, so they invested their savings into this venture and their
00:02:59.860 vision for a better future. Whether you're looking for a gift for a child who loves to build or just a
00:03:04.920 unique addition to your family game night. That's the other thing. I love these things. I kind of
00:03:09.340 get jealous if my boys want to play with them because I want to build them. Luxblocks is the
00:03:13.160 perfect choice. Check them out at luxblocks.com. That is L-U-X-B-L-O-X dot com. Promo code
00:03:20.220 Michael25 for 25% off. Luxblocks.com. Promo code Michael25 for 25% off. What were the Ohio Republican
00:03:31.420 primary voters voting on? According to CBS News, the top issue in Ohio was, can you guess?
00:03:38.820 Maybe you can. I probably would have guessed this, or it would have at least been in my top two.
00:03:43.720 It's immigration. It's not the economy. It's not the war breaking out. It's immigration. It's that
00:03:48.120 open border, and it's all of the myriad political effects that come about as a result of a broken
00:03:53.380 border and a system of mass migration, which we've had even legally in our country for 60 years.
00:03:57.480 A plurality of voters, 45%, say that immigration was their number one concern. Then the economy
00:04:05.480 only came in at 29%. So there's that old line from James Carville, the famous Democrat campaign
00:04:12.340 consultant, who said, it's the economy, stupid. People vote with their wallets. It's always about
00:04:16.840 the economy. I just don't think that's really true at this moment. I don't think it's been true
00:04:22.560 for quite a number of years now. If that were true, then a lot of Tea Party candidates would
00:04:28.160 have done a lot better because they were just focusing on economic issues at a time when the
00:04:31.700 economy was terrible because of Barack Obama. The misery index was very high, and it didn't really
00:04:36.160 matter. Obama got reelected. A lot of his allies got reelected. And this poll seems to reflect that.
00:04:42.560 45% immigration, 29% say the economy. 13% said abortion, which is frankly probably good news
00:04:50.400 for Republicans. I vote on abortion. It's not the only issue I vote on, but it's a big one.
00:04:59.640 I'm pro-life. I'm going to be much more inclined to vote for the pro-life candidate.
00:05:04.160 There aren't all that many people who vote largely or primarily on pro-life, on the abortion issue,
00:05:11.700 on the right. There are, it seems to me, a lot of people, or at least as many people as there are
00:05:18.500 pro-lifers who are pro-abortion, who go out to the women's march and they wear the dumb pink hat and
00:05:22.460 they scream about how important it is to kill babies. If that number is very high, we're going
00:05:29.400 to lose. The Democrats keep saying that abortion is a major issue motivating Democrat voters,
00:05:36.020 and that's why in the wake of the overruling of Roe v. Wade, Republicans are going to get shellacked
00:05:40.540 unless they run away from the abortion issue and endorse infanticide and stop protecting babies
00:05:44.380 because Democrats vote on abortion. And it's just not true. A little bit they do. A little bit they
00:05:49.280 do. What's the number? 13%? Okay. Nowhere near the degree to which people vote on the economy.
00:05:56.260 And that itself is nowhere near the degree to which people vote on immigration. And the Democrats are
00:06:01.720 cartoonishly awful on immigration. They call on illegal aliens to surge to the border. They insist on
00:06:10.260 giving illegal aliens not only the same rights as Americans, but even further privileges. They're
00:06:15.020 going to put them up in really nice hotel rooms in New York that you can't afford. They insist on
00:06:21.400 flying these people all around the country to politically convenient areas. Crime goes up.
00:06:28.160 Drugs go up. You have a major mass, I can't even call it a mass drug problem. It's a mass poisoning
00:06:33.300 problem through the fentanyl epidemic, all of which is coming across the southern border, all of which
00:06:38.820 it's leading to all these awful overdoses. They do nothing. And the moment you object,
00:06:45.880 they call you a racist. And still, the Democrats win. So I don't want to hear it. I really don't
00:06:51.720 want to hear it about abortion. Oh, you Republicans, you just got to stop protecting life. Yeah,
00:06:56.420 I don't know. All the data show that it's not a major issue driving voters. And even if it were,
00:07:01.540 by the way, the biggest issue is immigration. And you guys still keep winning some issues there.
00:07:06.780 So maybe what's going on in these races is a little bit more complex. In any case, 73% of
00:07:13.340 respondents in Ohio said that illegal aliens who have crossed Biden's wide open border should be
00:07:18.000 deported. 23% said they should be offered a chance for legal status. So that's a scary number,
00:07:26.720 too. Which is, you got, okay, almost three quarters say, yeah, deport these people who are unvetted,
00:07:32.960 who, many of whom now aren't even coming from Latin America. They fly in from places like the
00:07:37.600 Middle East. They fly in from places like China. Then they walk across that border totally unvetted.
00:07:42.880 A number of them are committing murders and even larger violent attacks. So three quarters saying,
00:07:50.220 get them out of here. But then you got 23% of Republican primary voters saying they should be
00:07:54.920 offered a chance for legal status. Which is a reminder that if you are listening to this show,
00:08:01.800 if you tune in to all the latest political news, you watch all of the speeches from the candidates,
00:08:08.440 maybe you show up to some political events, you are so much more tuned in to American politics,
00:08:16.260 not just than your average Joe blow on the street, but even compared to primary voters,
00:08:21.640 people who are actually going to go register, show up, put it on your calendar, maybe research
00:08:28.520 the candidates. You are so much more informed on these issues because the, well, they should maybe
00:08:34.800 have a path to citizenship vote is just the vote of, well, I'm kind of a nice person. I know illegal
00:08:41.480 immigration is bad, but you know, come on, what's the big deal? It's, it's the gut reaction of people
00:08:47.240 who have not reflected on politics. It's the gut reaction of people who don't think about how
00:08:52.620 second and third order effects work, how incentives work, that if you give illegal aliens mass amnesty,
00:09:00.860 then you're going to get a lot more illegal immigration. The people who say, well, we got to
00:09:05.020 stop this illegal immigration, but we don't want to be mean to the people who were here.
00:09:08.180 Yeah. No one wants to be mean to anybody, but you, you, you can't incentivize the very behavior
00:09:16.280 that you're attempting to disincentivize. Ronald Reagan tried that in the eighties. It didn't
00:09:19.700 work. He gave a mass amnesty. The Democrats didn't close the border. And now we have many,
00:09:23.660 many multiples, probably over an order of magnitude, more illegal immigration than we had all those years
00:09:28.900 ago. That's a quarter of the Republican primary vote. So we can't afford to get locked in our own
00:09:37.740 bubble. Yes, it's true. If people paid attention to politics as closely as you do, and they were
00:09:42.320 thinking totally logically about politics, they would say, oh my goodness, amnesty, that's crazy.
00:09:47.140 But they don't. And so Republican candidates, particularly as we move toward the general
00:09:51.000 election, are going to have to keep that in mind and adjust the way that they're speaking.
00:09:54.340 There's that old line, as goes Ohio, so goes the nation. Good news when it comes to the primary,
00:09:59.320 I suppose. But it's really only going to matter when we get to the general election.
00:10:06.540 That's it, because the winners go to Washington and the losers go home, to quote Cocaine Mitch.
00:10:10.820 Speaking of common sense issues, really sad case coming out of the Supreme Court, or not coming out
00:10:17.200 of the Supreme Court, I guess. The Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeal of an Indiana couple
00:10:23.500 whose son was taken from them because they refused to believe a man can be a woman.
00:10:30.000 So the Indiana Child Services took Jeremy and Mary Cox's son from them at the age of 16 because
00:10:38.060 they refused to lie. They refused to lie to their kid. They refused to subject their kid to harmful
00:10:45.260 medical experiments. They told their kid the truth, and the truth will set you free, and that's why the
00:10:50.180 libs can't have that. I discussed this case at Mar-a-Lago last night in the context of parental
00:10:57.160 rights, which are obviously very much under attack. What is the court doing here? The court's not
00:11:03.900 ruling and saying, yeah, it's good. Get all of the kids out of their parents' homes so they can be
00:11:09.160 indoctrinated in weird sex stuff. The court just doesn't want to hear it. Oopsie-daisy, Indiana Child
00:11:15.500 Services took the kid away because the parents think that men and women are different and
00:11:20.160 one cannot become the other. Ah, well, sorry, we're a little busy. We have a tea time.
00:11:24.780 This court decision or non-decision seems to be quite contrary to a major Supreme Court decision
00:11:32.900 that was almost 100 years ago, 99 years ago, which declared that, quote, the fundamental liberty
00:11:39.360 upon which all governments in the union repose excludes any general power of the state to standardize
00:11:46.180 its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. Now, the court goes on
00:11:53.360 and says, the child is not the mere creature of the state. Those who nurture him and direct his
00:11:59.060 destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to educate him. So that comes from a case called
00:12:03.860 Pierce versus Society of Sisters, 1925. It was a case that pertained to an Oregon law forcing kids into
00:12:10.540 public education. I'm not saying that these two cases are identical, but they pertain to the exact
00:12:17.460 same thing because education is not just reading, writing, and arithmetic. Education means the raising
00:12:24.600 of a child, the upbringing of a child. It's everything. You start being educated the moment that you become
00:12:30.080 even somewhat conscious, probably even before you're conscious. Human beings are mimetic and, you know,
00:12:35.100 little kids are like sponges. They pick up all the behaviors and all the attitudes of the people and the
00:12:40.020 things around them. So 100 years ago in Oregon, they had a law that said you got to send your kid to
00:12:46.580 public education. The court said, no, the state doesn't have a right to do that because the child
00:12:54.460 is part of the family before the child is part of the state. The family unit, owing to subsidiarity
00:13:01.400 and many other principles that we hold dear, the child is part of the family first. The parents have
00:13:08.540 rights that the state cannot take away because the child is not merely a creature of the state.
00:13:15.720 The communists might say the child is a creature of the state first, but the first political society
00:13:21.900 he's a member of is the family. And that's why the parents have those rights. And what's so absurd is
00:13:28.580 today? We're not discussing some, some right of parents that was controversial for most of human
00:13:35.000 history. I guess, I guess now it is controversial. We're asking, do parents have a right to tell their
00:13:42.040 kids that men can't become women? Do parents still have that right? Supreme court implicitly says
00:13:49.260 no. Which then leads to the next question. Do parents have any rights at all anymore? We did
00:13:57.060 for a lot of American history and the court spelled it out in really clear, downright philosophical terms,
00:14:03.340 legal terms, but downright philosophical terms. Now, if a parent doesn't have the right to tell his kid
00:14:09.320 a man can't become a woman, does a parent have any right at all? There's so much more to say.
00:14:15.500 First though, go to pepperdine.edu slash Knowles. If you are passionate about pursuing a political
00:14:21.760 career and want to take the next step, apply to the Pepperdine School of Public Policy.
00:14:27.240 Pepperdine School of Public Policy stands out among the 200 plus graduate policy programs in the country
00:14:32.020 as one of the few that is based out of a Christian university. This program equips leaders to apply
00:14:38.700 America's timeless principles to today's policy issues. The unique curriculum balances a rigorous study
00:14:43.680 of history and philosophy with the latest tools of economics and research analytics. By joining
00:14:48.800 Pepperdine School of Public Policy, you'll become part of a powerful alumni network. These alumni are
00:14:52.900 making a difference around the country and the world, serving in diverse positions such as Capitol
00:14:57.500 Hill staff, diplomats, think tank analysts, and charter school founders. This is a testament to the
00:15:02.540 program's effectiveness in preparing students for great political careers. Pepperdine School of Public
00:15:08.440 Policy sits at the top of Malibu, California, in probably the most beautiful part of the
00:15:13.220 continental United States, certainly in the top five. Campus is nestled in the rolling foothills
00:15:18.440 of the Santa Monica Mountains and overlooks scenic beaches along the Pacific Ocean. For our listeners
00:15:24.040 only, the School of Public Policy is offering a guaranteed $2,000 scholarship on top of normal
00:15:29.860 scholarship offerings. When you go to pepperdine.edu slash Knowles, pepperdine.edu slash Knowles to request
00:15:35.880 more information and start your application. The event that I was at last night where we discussed
00:15:41.200 parental rights and a number of other rights was for a group called Catholics for Catholics,
00:15:46.420 which I love that name. It's a great, blunt political name. This is a political organization
00:15:52.920 to advance a Catholic political vision, specifically in 2024. Obviously, everyone in that room last night
00:16:01.000 is supportive of Trump. Now, this is kind of weird, isn't it? It's kind of weird because Joe Biden
00:16:06.940 is ostensibly Catholic and our second Catholic president. But in practice, Donald Trump advances
00:16:16.540 a much more Catholic political vision than Joe Biden does. Why is that? It's kind of weird.
00:16:23.720 And why are Catholics all that involved in politics at all? Well, there is a strange fact that's cropped up
00:16:29.680 nowadays in American politics, which is it seems a president can't win the election without the
00:16:35.680 Catholic vote. The Catholic vote is notoriously not exactly monolithic, but it does sway here and
00:16:41.080 there. And it seems to be decisive in presidential elections. As goes Ohio, so goes the nation.
00:16:48.080 We used to say, now maybe we would say, as goes the Catholic vote, so goes the nation. Why is that?
00:16:53.580 You'll notice, I've noticed this, especially traveling all around the country, a lot of young people
00:16:58.200 who are kind of interested in that more traditional faith. Why is that? Why is that? I think it's
00:17:05.900 because, putting all theological and doctrinal points aside for a moment, just looking at the
00:17:12.760 social and political phenomenon, why do Catholics seem to have a bigger voice right now? I think it's
00:17:18.360 because we are living in an age that's really wishy-washy and relativistic and subjectivist,
00:17:23.320 where everything is becoming unmoored, where the most basic settled questions of society
00:17:28.600 are now up for debate, apparently, where the settled rights that we've all enjoyed for so long
00:17:34.440 apparently seem to be up to debate based on the sheer tyranny of will of the leftists and the
00:17:41.380 lack of confidence and the lack of courage and the inability to articulate strong moral arguments on
00:17:49.320 the right. I think in that world, people are going to be attracted to something that has some inertia,
00:17:55.740 that has some weight, that has some historical permanence. So I think that's why people are
00:18:00.900 attracted to that. Donald Trump articulates that view because he's just kind of old-fashioned.
00:18:07.600 You know, when Donald Trump comes out in 2016 and he says, look, what's my vision? I want to make
00:18:16.100 America great again. And I want, I'm running for president because I want good neighborhoods,
00:18:21.160 okay? And I want, I want the people who are weakening America, I want them to be weaker,
00:18:26.040 okay? And I want the, the good people and the workers and the families, I want them to be stronger
00:18:30.240 and I want to make America great again. And all the smart set, all the Beltway people made fun of him.
00:18:34.720 This dumb idiot, he doesn't even understand that presidents aren't supposed to make neighborhoods
00:18:38.860 better. This dummy, this, this crazy nostalgic man, he wants to make America great again. We don't,
00:18:45.280 why do you want to go make America great again when you could have it be weak and weird and creepy and
00:18:49.400 falling like it is right now? And they all kind of mocked him. But that simplicity actually reveals
00:18:56.260 some profound truths. We know that the civil law derives from the natural law, which is man's
00:19:03.600 participation in the eternal law. And we know the basic precept of the natural law is do good and
00:19:08.460 avoid evil. So all of a sudden, Donald Trump, who doesn't have three PhDs and hasn't worked in
00:19:14.140 politics his whole life, when he comes out and he says, yeah, I want more good stuff and less bad
00:19:17.780 stuff, which is basically what his politics comes down to, that actually reveals a profound political
00:19:22.820 truth. So then when you get to the practical aspects of the policy, you know, the bishops will
00:19:29.540 sometimes say there are non-negotiable issues. The right to life is a non-negotiable issue. Pope
00:19:35.160 Benedict XVI famously said that on a question such as the death penalty, there can be reasonable
00:19:40.840 disagreement among Catholics. The Catholic tradition obviously is pretty much totally in favor and
00:19:47.700 defends the death penalty. But some people argue that now, because of the development of modern
00:19:51.740 technology, we actually don't need in practice to implement it. Okay, Pope Benedict says reasonable
00:19:56.260 people can disagree. On an issue like, can you kill babies? Is it right to murder innocent little
00:20:00.540 babies? That's a non-negotiable. Reasonable people can't disagree over that. Look at that issue.
00:20:06.000 Trump, pro-life, most pro-life president of my lifetime. Joe Biden, apparently fanatically in
00:20:13.800 favor of killing babies. So I think that's in part why you're seeing the Catholic vote shift a little
00:20:19.120 bit. The second one, though, why Catholics are having this larger voice now in politics, it goes back to
00:20:27.040 the greatest observer of American politics, probably in history. That would be Alexei de Tocqueville,
00:20:32.640 who wrote one of the most famous works on American politics, Democracy in America. And everybody across
00:20:39.060 the political spectrum quotes Alexei de Tocqueville. But they leave out an important observation he made,
00:20:44.040 which is, he said, America, it's really religious. It's one of our most charming qualities, actually.
00:20:49.100 Now, you know, some of my ancestors, who were some of the earliest people in the country on the
00:20:53.180 Mayflower, they were fanatically Protestant, you know, very zealous Protestants. The pilgrims actually
00:21:00.060 weren't exactly Puritans. They were separatists. And there's a whole long, long history to discuss
00:21:07.240 there. But then you had Massachusetts Bay Colony. You had a lot of Puritans in New England. You had
00:21:11.660 all sorts of Protestant church and political movements crop up around America. So we say
00:21:17.920 America is a Protestant country. And in a certain sense, that's true. But you got to remember,
00:21:24.180 it was the Catholic Church that existed unchallenged in the West for over 1,500 years.
00:21:29.980 So the wiring tends to have a Catholic aspect to it. The very fact that natural law is so
00:21:36.900 important in the way that we view our politics seems to come from some natural wiring. The fact
00:21:41.900 that we have the system of government with an executive and a legislature and a judiciary
00:21:45.520 that balance each other out, that represent a kind of monarchical element, plus an aristocratic
00:21:51.760 element, plus a democratic element, that comes basically right off the pages of St. Thomas
00:21:56.560 Aquinas. Whether the framers of the Constitution read him directly or read him mediated through
00:22:01.580 other philosophers, that stuff, it's kind of there. And so anyway, all of that is prefaced
00:22:05.760 to say, Alexei de Tocqueville, observing as a Frenchman, as a foreigner, just traveling around
00:22:12.020 America, he said, okay, America's really religious, but the religion is going to change over time.
00:22:18.360 And America is either going to become more Catholic, or it's going to become more atheist.
00:22:26.020 It's either going to move in those, one of those two directions, though. It's going to become
00:22:31.220 Catholic or it's going to give up religion altogether. So when you see this sort of stuff
00:22:35.060 happening, it really shouldn't be all that surprising. If you just read the surface level
00:22:39.780 of the history, it might be kind of surprising. What are these macro-snapping papists doing
00:22:43.820 at Mar-a-Lago advocating for another Trump presidency? But below the surface, I think
00:22:50.580 that's probably been waiting there, certainly since at least Alexei de Tocqueville was writing
00:22:53.940 probably a little bit longer. MSNBC is not so happy with all the people complimenting Trump.
00:23:01.000 They're not so happy with his positive poll numbers. They're not so happy that he's looking
00:23:05.440 stronger than Biden in all the swing states. They don't like that. So they've got to convince
00:23:11.620 people that Donald Trump poses an historic threat to the country. And it's not going to be enough
00:23:17.300 to have their usual talking heads. No, they need to give their fanatical opposition to Trump
00:23:23.400 some patina of scholarly, academic, historical legitimacy. So they invite on one of the two or
00:23:32.040 three liberal court historians. He's a pop historian who goes on all the liberal channels. Michael
00:23:37.680 Beschloss. And here is Michael Beschloss's take on the dangers of Trump. I want to ask you about
00:23:44.360 Donald Trump increasingly sounding like a fascist, a dictator, mimicking them and using words that are
00:23:51.140 clearly out of the pages of some of the most powerful autocrats or dictators of our time.
00:24:00.580 That's how fascism and totalitarianism and in Germany's case, the Holocaust came to Germany,
00:24:07.320 which had been a country where there were big institutions of democracy until, as you well know,
00:24:13.640 the early 1930s. When he tells you he'll be a dictator for a day, we all know that dictators don't resign
00:24:19.920 after a day when he uses the word bloodbath. Yes, it was in the context of an automobile industry
00:24:25.620 speech, but he knew exactly what he was saying. We have never seen anything remotely like this
00:24:30.940 in American history. A major party candidate is saying, you elect me, there's going to be
00:24:36.680 dictatorship, bloodbath, violence, retribution against my political enemies. That equals what
00:24:43.320 we saw in Italy and Germany and other places. I'm bringing on Michael Beschloss now, the historian,
00:24:50.180 very super serious academic historian. Mr. Beschloss, Trump is evil, super duper Hitler. It seems very
00:24:59.260 much, much fascism. What's your take? Well, yes, Mika, thank you for having me. Very, very Hitler. Very,
00:25:07.900 very super duper fascist Hitler. He will do many war crimes. He is very, very Holocaust, is Trump.
00:25:19.100 Hitler. He is Hitler. Thank you. Do you have any other questions? Yes. Could you say Hitler again?
00:25:24.660 Hitler. He's Hitler. Yes. Wow. Boy, that historian, he really just presented a new idea. I'm seeing Trump
00:25:34.020 in a totally new light. Thank you so much for shedding light on the Trump presidency by pointing
00:25:43.140 to one of the two historical events that most people have ever heard of, those two being the Second World
00:25:48.220 War and the fall of Rome, neither of which compare to Trump. If either of those two, if either of those
00:25:55.500 two historical events, which tend to be the only historical events that anyone's ever even heard
00:26:00.600 of, if either of them apply to Trump, I would imagine it's probably more the fall of Rome, the fall of the
00:26:06.340 Roman Republic when Donald Trump crosses the Rubicon and establishes the empire. But I don't think he's
00:26:10.620 going to do that, actually. And I don't think he's Hitler. And I don't think he's Mussolini.
00:26:14.440 And the irony, too, when this guy Beschloss says, we've never seen anything like this,
00:26:20.500 an autocrat, a dictator in America. I think we have. His name was Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He was
00:26:26.920 actually the dictator. And he, unlike Donald Trump, who served one term, and then the Democrats rigged
00:26:33.840 the election, changed all the voting rules, and he lost. And he just left power. And then they tried to
00:26:40.380 destroy him and take all his property and imprison him. And then he ran for election again. We'll see
00:26:45.700 if he gets it. FDR just stayed in office for four terms until he died and would craft policy totally
00:26:54.000 out of keeping with the constitutional tradition on a whim as a dictator. Like, he would just say
00:26:59.960 things and they would happen. And then when the courts would try to stop him, he threatened to
00:27:03.420 destroy the Supreme Court and they'd finally just kind of go along with him. We had a dictator.
00:27:07.000 The dictator was from Mika Brzezinski's and Michael Beschloss's political party.
00:27:11.980 That same dictator interned Japanese Americans. You remember that? It's actually kind of a complex
00:27:16.680 historical circumstance because the Japanese admitted that they had spies in America. And
00:27:21.260 this was reported many decades later in the mainstream press. And it came as a result of
00:27:26.740 declassified CIA files. So I'm not even totally knocking Franklin Roosevelt for prosecuting a war when he
00:27:32.360 was president. But nevertheless, every single thing, every single thing that they are accusing Trump of
00:27:38.360 not only has some precedent, but was done by not only a president of their own party, but one of their
00:27:46.800 very favorite presidents ever. That all happened. But you see, Trump, super duper Hitler is what he is.
00:27:54.280 And I don't think that's going to play. I'm not saying that never works. Usually accusations of racism
00:28:01.760 are extremely effective. Usually accusations of a threat to democracy and, you know, being outside the
00:28:08.520 pale of mainstream political discourse. Usually that is effective and it works to cancel people. But
00:28:14.880 they didn't cancel Trump. And then he became president. And we all saw that he didn't do a
00:28:22.260 super duper Hitler. And then he lost after they changed all the rules. And we saw that he didn't
00:28:29.240 cling to power and shred the constitution and refuse to leave off. He just kind of left.
00:28:34.060 And then they tried to destroy him and he ran for president again. So I just don't think that
00:28:40.000 persuades anyone, not because their, their accusations of racism and this ism and that ism
00:28:46.220 don't, don't carry weight. They, they do. It's just with Trump, we already, we're already past that.
00:28:53.140 We're already past that. They're going to need to get some, some better arguments from the fancy
00:28:58.360 Thai historians on MSNBC. Speaking of president Trump and the ways they're trying to destroy him,
00:29:04.820 there is a decision, a civil decision in New York to take away a lot of Trump's money.
00:29:13.540 That was for 300 million some odd dollars. It's now up to $464 million in this civil business fraud
00:29:20.480 judgment because they keep adding interest to it. And the lawyers representing president Trump
00:29:25.840 obviously are observing that he can't just come up with half a billion dollars.
00:29:31.440 Nobody can. Elon Musk couldn't come up with half a billion dollars overnight. Richest man in the
00:29:36.400 world couldn't do it. It's just not possible. So to secure this bond, they're trying, they're going
00:29:43.740 to all these different places, but they're just coming up short. It's just not possible, which is
00:29:48.440 exactly what New York wants. New York wants Trump not to be able to come up with this absurd figure
00:29:55.400 based on a ridiculous ruling saying that Trump misstated the value of his properties. Let me tell you,
00:30:00.840 they tried to argue that Mar-a-Lago is worth $17 million. I've had the privilege to visit Mar-a-Lago
00:30:06.760 twice now. It is an amazing property. It is absolutely beautiful. It is one of, if not the
00:30:15.640 most beautiful single piece of property I've ever been on in the United States, certainly in the
00:30:22.500 continental United States. Maybe Hawaii has got a couple of legs up. It is water to water property
00:30:28.760 and some of the most valuable real estate in the United States in Palm Beach. The buildings are
00:30:33.780 beautiful. The art is beautiful. The property alone is worth many, many multiples, probably an
00:30:40.660 order of magnitude and then some multiples of what New York was arguing it's worth. And that doesn't
00:30:46.640 factor in the business, which every year makes $25 million, which is significantly more than they're
00:30:51.080 saying the whole thing is worth. Completely absurd. They want to accuse Trump of, of getting a little
00:30:57.100 creative with, with the numbers of his property. Look at, he never, he never got anywhere near as
00:31:02.740 ambitious as these guys are. But what's this about? This is about them wanting to take a piece of that
00:31:08.640 property. That's why they're, they're going after it. Letitia James said that. Letitia James came out.
00:31:15.160 He said, if he does not, Letitia James is the attorney general in New York who's, who ran on,
00:31:20.400 I'm going to destroy Trump and who has spent every waking moment in office on this jihad to destroy
00:31:26.320 the man. She says, if he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek judgment
00:31:32.060 enforcement mechanisms in court. And we will ask the judge to seize his assets. We are prepared to make
00:31:37.340 sure that the judgment is paid to New Yorkers. And yes, I look at 40 Wall Street each and every day.
00:31:41.640 40 Wall Street is one of Trump's buildings downtown. I used to live right near it.
00:31:45.580 Beautiful building. And she's saying, let's go. So I'm going to go into court and I'm just going to,
00:31:53.000 I don't know, throw a bunch of spaghetti at the wall. And I know that we got a bunch of liberal
00:31:57.000 judges, so they hate Trump too. And they'll do whatever to, to destroy him. And then we're going
00:32:03.500 to come up with some ridiculous figure that no one on earth could possibly pay. And then,
00:32:08.080 you know what we're going to do? Take his nice building that I like. Yeah, that's right. Give me
00:32:12.900 that building. All of the arguments that Letitia James is presenting in court, pretty much all the
00:32:21.680 arguments around the country in the four prosecutions that are being presented against
00:32:25.660 President Trump are just flimsy facades over raw political interest. That's what it is. I'm not
00:32:34.900 saying that there is no basis whatsoever for any of these prosecutions. In the case of the documents,
00:32:43.580 yeah, Trump had classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. He had classified documents that were in a place
00:32:49.500 that I guess they shouldn't have been. That's been true for most recent presidents. It's true for the
00:32:58.480 current president who improperly stored those documents when he was not president, actually,
00:33:05.060 and when he did not have ultimate declassification authority. So his version of the crime was much,
00:33:10.160 much worse than anything you could accuse Trump of. I don't even think you could, you could call
00:33:15.280 what they're accusing Trump of in the documents case even to be a crime. And they let Biden off the
00:33:20.780 hook. And they try to destroy Trump. That's what I'm talking about. Sure, I get, in principle,
00:33:26.200 it's true. One should not mishandle classified documents. And in principle, I actually, in
00:33:32.200 principle, don't think a president can mishandle classified documents. But as a matter of political
00:33:36.460 prudence and tradition, I suppose the president should work with this or that organization,
00:33:42.360 the National Archives, to deal with them. Oh, yeah, okay. I guess I could go along with that in
00:33:46.460 principle. But that's not what this is about. This is about selectively prosecuting one guy for a
00:33:54.280 crime that you've really never gone after anyone for in a circumstance where you probably don't
00:34:00.040 have any right to prosecute it to begin with. Did Trump inaccurately state the value of some of his
00:34:07.840 properties? I don't know. They're saying he undervalued them. Did he undervalue them nearly
00:34:16.480 as much as they did in New York? I don't think so. But even so, this is what we go after presidents
00:34:23.780 for? This is what we go after the leader of political opposition for? No. Like, maybe in
00:34:28.960 principle, you could say, well, you know, you actually, sorry, Buster, you had a comma on form
00:34:35.740 372BZ5. And that was really supposed to be a semicolon. Lock him up, 700 years in the can,
00:34:42.820 the most popular presidential candidate in America. The people just can't vote for him.
00:34:46.740 Whoopsie-daisy. No, you didn't file your TPS report on time. Off with his head. That's what
00:34:52.720 this is really about. Very flimsy arguments, when they are arguments at all, to mask raw political
00:35:00.560 interest. And this is pretty ancient. There were a number of really interesting people at this event
00:35:06.320 last night. General Mike Flynn was there. And Roger Stone was there. It was a lot of fun. Tim
00:35:13.460 Ballard, Jim Caviezel. So anyway, we're chatting with all these people. But because General Flynn
00:35:18.180 was there, there were a lot of people who had some national security expertise. We ended up talking
00:35:24.960 about Mexico. We ended up just talking about how politics works in Mexico. And one fellow I was
00:35:31.220 talking to said, well, you know, in Mexico, it used to be the case that after you left office,
00:35:36.440 you would leave the country. Why is that the case? Well, because your political opponents who took
00:35:42.480 office would prosecute you. So you just leave the country. This is true in a lot of places in Latin
00:35:47.560 America. It's been true throughout history. What they're doing to Trump right now, we say it's
00:35:56.240 unprecedented. It is in American history. But in history, history, it's quite precedented. This is
00:36:01.460 this is how a less civilized form of politics used to work, which is when you got beat, you would be
00:36:09.080 exiled. You would have your property taken from you. You might be killed. And I don't think we ought
00:36:14.460 to return to that. I thought we had a kind of a nice system here where we don't throw our opponents
00:36:18.220 into prison. Even Trump, you know, he had that line at the campaign rally, lock her up, lock away.
00:36:22.680 You'd be in jail if I got elected. No one really believed it, though. Least of all Trump. He never
00:36:27.580 lifted a finger to prosecute her, nor should he have. She deserved to be prosecuted, but it's just
00:36:32.900 bad for the American political order to throw Hillary Clinton, even Hillary Clinton, into prison.
00:36:39.440 Now we're there. And so they'll take his property. They'll try to throw him in the can. They might try
00:36:45.480 to kill him. That's a return to a less civilized age. Jeremy's razors is very civilized, and it's
00:36:54.240 doing the unthinkable. This is a sale you cannot miss out on. Jeremy's razors is lowering all prices
00:36:59.580 for every razor. You want a trial set? Lower price. You want the starter set that comes with more
00:37:04.320 cartridges? Lower price. Smooth six, precision five. You guessed it, baby. Lower price. Take advantage
00:37:11.280 of Jeremy's march of madness now. You get it? Not madness. It's madness. Go to jeremysrazors.com.
00:37:18.860 Get your razor at a discount today. My favorite comment yesterday is from Enkidus Purpose.
00:37:25.360 Smokey Mike, you should hire Kristi Noem to promote Mayflower cigars. That's a great idea. What's she
00:37:31.920 doing dentistry commercials for? Why is she promoting insoles for shoes when she could be plugging
00:37:39.100 Mayflower cigars? We did all have, we'll tell some tales out of school. Some of us who were at the
00:37:46.820 event last night did end the evening with a delicious Mayflower cigar. I realized I should
00:37:53.540 have gotten pictures. It actually would have been good to promote this, you know, get all these kind
00:37:57.940 of cool political and film stars all have, but they all, I'm not, I am not making this up. You can ask
00:38:04.460 the speakers who had the cigar. They told me it was magnificent. They loved it. They said,
00:38:12.800 they said things about it. I'm not, some of them said it was like the greatest cigar they'd ever had.
00:38:18.040 Anyway, I think we still have some stock. Not positive because we, not only do we overorder,
00:38:24.120 but we, we kind of secretly ordered more even than it seemed that we had. I know most of it sold out.
00:38:30.840 And I think some of like the samplers and things are sold out, but there were still some to get
00:38:34.860 at MayflowerCigars.com. You must be 21 years old or older to order. Some exclusions apply.
00:38:42.760 Speaking of dubious legal arguments, Washington state is ditching the bar exam requirement to
00:38:49.440 practice law. You know, usually if you're a lawyer, usually you would go to law, you'd take the LSAT.
00:38:55.880 Then based on your LSAT score, you'd get into law school. Then you'd take your law school exams and
00:39:02.300 papers and things. And then really all of that was just the appetizer. That's the amuse-bouche. The one
00:39:08.240 thing that matters for practicing law is passing the bar exam. But this is a problem. And the problem is
00:39:19.220 diversity, equity, and inclusion. According to Washington state, there is insufficient equity
00:39:29.380 brought about by the bar exam. And so in a pair of orders on Friday, the Supreme Court of Washington
00:39:35.800 approved, quote, alternative pathways to lawyer licensure in this press release. Okay. What does
00:39:43.540 this mean? It means that the white people are doing pretty well on the bar exam and the black people are
00:39:48.380 doing worse? Pretty much is what it means. And I'm sure there are different racial breakdowns. Just
00:39:56.240 judging by other standardized tests, probably the Asians are doing better than the whites and, you
00:40:00.280 know, the Hispanics are doing a little bit. They're somewhere kind of in the middle. And, but in any case,
00:40:05.560 it's true. Different groups have different outcomes and different things. That's true. That's true.
00:40:12.140 So if you begin looking at the issue with the conclusion, we need more lawyers of XYZ race,
00:40:22.000 then you're going to come to the conclusion that, oh, wow, this bar exam is not serving the purpose.
00:40:26.700 The purpose of the bar exam is to get us the exact racial breakdown of lawyers that I want.
00:40:32.680 And the bar exam is not doing that. So we got to get rid of the bar exam or at least the requirement
00:40:37.700 to take the bar exam. But is that really the purpose? Is that the purpose of the bar exam? Is
00:40:42.420 that the purpose of law school and the legal profession? Is the purpose of the legal profession
00:40:48.320 to make certain racial groups feel good about themselves or even to generate income for certain
00:40:56.500 racial groups? Is the, is the purpose of the legal profession to have more lawyers or is the purpose
00:41:07.060 of the legal profession to serve clients, to give people the opportunity to defend themselves in
00:41:14.900 court, to give the state, the opportunity to prosecute criminals, to exact justice. What's the point
00:41:21.940 here? Seems to me we're putting the cart before the horse and we do this in so many other places in
00:41:28.140 life. I, I, when I flew out to Florida yesterday, I had a female pilot and some of my producers,
00:41:37.580 including Professor Jacob over there, were making some jokes about this because of the DEI policies.
00:41:42.260 They said, uh-oh, get off the plane. Get off. Run. This thing, man, you ain't going to make it to Palm
00:41:48.120 Beach. And the flight was just fine and the female pilot was, was great. But even though it was a little
00:41:54.420 bit delayed actually and we almost missed our connection. Anyway, anyway, as I'm getting too
00:41:57.980 in the weeds here. That particular pilot was great. But why did Professor Jacob have that reaction? Is
00:42:02.880 it just because he's a malignant, vicious sexist? I'm sure that's part of it. I'm sure that's part of
00:42:09.140 it. But the main reason is because the liberals tell us we now are implementing a policy according
00:42:15.960 to which less qualified people are going to get these jobs. And the reason we know they're less
00:42:21.580 qualified is because the companies are saying, we are going to hire not based on merit. We are
00:42:27.740 going to prioritize something, be it race or sex or sexual behaviors or I don't know, whatever,
00:42:32.320 the cut of your jib, over merit. But the moment that you prioritize something over merit in a profession
00:42:38.840 that is supposed to serve me, the customer, well, I get a little bit worried, especially when that
00:42:43.820 profession is keeping me in a tin can in the air at 30,000 feet long enough so that I can make it to
00:42:48.900 whatever city I'm going to. And the same principle holds in the legal profession.
00:42:55.640 If you are a client in Washington state, as a result of this ruling, you are going to be less
00:43:03.680 likely to hire a black lawyer. You just are. Clarence Thomas wrote about this many years ago.
00:43:10.760 And he wrote about this because he, Clarence Thomas, one of the great jurists and legal minds
00:43:14.780 in our country, one of the great public figures, actually, a graduate of Yale Law School, the best
00:43:19.240 law school in the country. But he had trouble getting a job after law school. And he writes
00:43:23.180 about this in his memoir. He says, the reason I had a tough time getting a job is not because I
00:43:28.020 didn't have good grades. It's not because I didn't go to a good law school. It's because I am black
00:43:33.420 and people assumed I was just an affirmative action case. And that's actually a decently rational
00:43:39.560 conclusion to come to. If you have a policy that says, hey, we're going to give unqualified black
00:43:43.980 people access to this institution. If you have a policy that says we're going to give qualified
00:43:50.040 black people access to this institution, then that's great. No one would have batted an eyelash
00:43:53.980 about hiring Clarence Thomas. If the policy at the airlines was, we're not going to prohibit female
00:44:02.680 pilots. We're going to hire the best person for the job. Maybe it's a female. Then Professor Jacob
00:44:07.120 wouldn't have made his vile, misogynistic comment to me on the airplane. But that's not the way it
00:44:13.660 is. So just the practical conclusion of this is, if you've got your life on the line, whether we're
00:44:20.020 talking literally on an airplane or we're talking legally, someone could throw you in prison for the
00:44:24.100 rest of your life, you're going to be more likely in Washington now to hire a straight white male or
00:44:32.360 whatever Asian guy or whatever group historically does best on the bar exam, you're going to hire
00:44:37.340 that group because you're going to assume that everyone else is just there as an affirmative action
00:44:43.820 case, as a D-E-I hire. Speaking of what things are for, really troubling study out of the Guttmacher
00:44:53.320 Institute. More than 60% of U.S. abortions in 2023 are done by the abortion pill. We already
00:45:02.300 knew this as of last year. We knew that most abortions, it seemed, were done through a pill
00:45:09.760 rather than through surgery. I thought the number was about 51 to 53%. It's 60%. And the Guttmacher
00:45:16.920 Institute, even though they are affiliated with just about the most evil organization in America,
00:45:22.280 they actually have pretty reliable numbers. 60%. This follows a dramatic decline in surgical
00:45:31.860 abortion access after Roe v. Wade was overruled where states then finally got to pass their own
00:45:36.100 laws and a lot of them restricted abortion. So now it's about the abortion pill. This to me,
00:45:41.860 put abortion aside for a second, this to me is similar to in the 90s and 2000s, the proliferation of
00:45:49.720 internet porn. In the sense that before the 90s and 2000s, if some guy wanted to look at pervy
00:45:58.640 images or videos, he would have to go to that seedy block in New York City, you know, right around
00:46:05.260 Times Square, 8th Avenue. He'd have to go into some really gross little movie theater or something in
00:46:11.680 Times Square. He would have to, if he wanted to get his jollies off in a really immoral way, he would
00:46:18.940 have to maybe go to a bar and pick up a woman and cheat on his wife. Or he'd have to go drive down the
00:46:24.280 street and pick up a hooker or something like that. But he'd have to do something that involved
00:46:29.760 public shame. Then the internet comes around and internet porn proliferates and the Supreme Court
00:46:37.480 and other liberal judges gut the regulations on pornography. And all of a sudden, he doesn't
00:46:46.460 have any of that shame. And so the engaging in that perverse act just spreads everywhere,
00:46:51.840 becomes basically ubiquitous. I think that's what we're seeing here. Even today in our shout your
00:46:56.160 abortion, kill your baby kind of culture, there is a great deal of just unavoidable shame involved in
00:47:02.160 walking to go into the bad part of town and then walking into the abortion clinic and just seeing it
00:47:08.800 and seeing the faces of the women and these demoniac doctors and actually, you know, going in and
00:47:14.920 saying, yes, I'd like to kill my kid. I'm going to sign this form. That is a disincentive to do it.
00:47:20.800 But if you just, if you're a girl and you're in trouble and you are really scared and you just
00:47:26.020 want this problem, the baby to go away and you're getting pressure from your boyfriend, you're getting
00:47:30.180 pressure from your family and you can just go to a drugstore and just get that abortion pill and just
00:47:36.620 no big deal. I mean, it could really harm your body. It obviously kills your kid. You're going to
00:47:42.180 live with all that same psychological trauma. But if you just feel that you can kind of do it in
00:47:46.500 private, now you can cheat on your wife in private thanks to pornography. Now you can kill your kid in
00:47:52.060 private. You don't even have to look at the abortionist in the face. You don't even have to look at the
00:47:55.240 women in the waiting room or walk down the sidewalk to do it. That's going to greatly increase the
00:48:00.660 likelihood that you will do that. I'm not surprised at all that the number of pill abortions keeps going
00:48:05.620 up. So as with the other problem, as with porn, as with so many of our social pathologies, the key is to
00:48:11.780 reinstitute a little bit of shame. The key and the way you do that is by making the things that have
00:48:16.960 been totally privatized, making them a little bit more public again. Because when we see people and
00:48:21.660 we recognize that we live in a society, we have some sense of the consequences of our actions. The
00:48:27.480 fact that it's not just a glittering screen, that it's not just a clump of cells that comes out of you
00:48:31.780 as a result of a pill, but these are real people who are real proper subjects with real consciousness and
00:48:37.200 real moral worth. Then you're going to be less inclined to be so selfish. It's Woke Wednesday,
00:48:44.400 baby. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code
00:48:48.580 Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.
00:49:07.200 Thank you.