Ep. 1468 - Iran's Attack On Israel EXPLAINED In 3 Mins
Summary
Bill Maher says abortion is murder. Iran launches a missile attack on Israel. Does this mean we are on the brink of World War III? Michael Knowles explains why everything is fine, and why we should be worried about it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Iran has launched its first ever direct attack against the state of Israel.
00:00:04.740
The mullahs launched more than 200 drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles into
00:00:10.040
Israel on Saturday night. Israel is vowing revenge, sort of. America, for some stupid
00:00:16.660
reason, is funding both sides of the conflict. That was what was really amazing, looking at
00:00:21.140
the photographs of the missiles being launched from Iran and then the defense missiles being
00:00:25.780
launched from Israel, is that every single missile launched from both sides on Saturday
00:00:31.300
night was directly or indirectly purchased by America. And the question on everyone's
00:00:37.220
mind, are we on the brink of World War III? Many talking heads on both sides of the aisle
00:00:43.840
are warning that we are headed into World War III. And my take is probably the most radical
00:00:50.700
one that you will hear today, which is that basically everything is fine. I'm Michael
00:00:57.140
Welcome back to the show. Bill Maher has just admitted what a lot of libs don't want to
00:01:21.980
admit, which is that abortion is murder. Though he added onto that, he said, I'm okay with that.
00:01:28.660
He said, abortion is kind of murder. I'm okay with that. At least he's honest. I will be addressing
00:01:32.520
this now very urgent political issue for conservatives as a U.S. Senate candidate is
00:01:38.460
embracing a much more pro-choice position, as even President Trump has been accused of weakening on
00:01:45.100
the issue of abortion. I will be speaking at the University of Illinois, Urbana, Champlain,
00:01:48.900
tomorrow night. That will be on abortion, on what conservatives should be thinking and doing and
00:01:56.060
saying about abortion right now. If you are in the Urbana, is it Urbana-Champaign, like real pain
00:02:02.160
for my sham friends, champagne for my real friends, or Urbana-Champaign? I don't even know. It's such
00:02:07.040
a liberal school. I don't even know, but I will be there tomorrow night. So if you are in the area,
00:02:12.900
even if you're not in the area, drive, get out there. We will see you there. Go to
00:02:16.760
YAF, Y-A-F.org. You get information about how to get tickets, and we will address that big
00:02:21.900
issue. There's so much more to say. First, though, go to policygenius.com slash Knowles.
00:02:28.000
Life is full of surprises, but your insurance should not be one of them. Policy Genius,
00:02:33.740
your trusted partner for navigating the complex world of insurance, is changing the way that
00:02:38.040
we shop for life insurance. Policy Genius has licensed award-winning agents and technology
00:02:42.580
that make it easy to compare life insurance quotes from America's top insurers in just a few clicks
00:02:47.760
to find your lowest price. You can compare quotes from top providers right from your phone or computer
00:02:52.460
all in one place. Plus, Policy Genius has a team of licensed experts ready to answer all your questions
00:02:57.760
and guide you through the process. Getting life insurance for you and your family will give you
00:03:02.280
peace of mind knowing that if something were to happen to you, your family could get back on their feet.
00:03:06.920
With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just $292 per year for $1 million
00:03:13.240
of coverage. Some options offer same-day approval and avoid unnecessary medical exams.
00:03:18.700
Policy Genius works for you, not the insurance companies. Save time and money and provide your family
00:03:24.340
with a financial safety net using Policy Genius. Go to policygenius.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S,
00:03:29.040
to get your free life insurance quotes and see how much you could save. That is policygenius.com slash Knowles.
00:03:35.720
I would probably get many more views and clicks if I were scaremongering right now and saying that
00:03:42.040
we are on the brink of World War III because of the missiles from Iran. And I think that's what
00:03:46.760
most other talking heads are doing on both sides of the aisle. I don't think that's true. I think
00:03:51.520
actually, basically, it's fine. Which might mean that I get fewer views for my, but I actually believe
00:04:00.160
my view is the most radical of all of them being stated right now. And I think it's the most defensible.
00:04:05.720
Yes, it's very scary on the surface level, 200 drones and cruise missiles and ballistic missiles.
00:04:10.600
But what are we actually looking at here? First of all, as far as I can tell, there was one casualty.
00:04:16.980
It was this poor little Bedouin child. And there was another, there was a military site in Israel that
00:04:22.220
was hit. 99% of the missiles were intercepted. And is this an unprovoked act of aggression? No.
00:04:31.180
Where did this begin? The Iranians would say this began on April 1st when Israel hit the Iranian
00:04:38.740
consulate in Damascus, which is a big no-no. It's not quite a violation of international law,
00:04:46.980
probably, but it's pretty close. Israel went about as close as you can get to violating international
00:04:52.600
law without actually doing it. Because as a general rule, we all agree not to attack embassies
00:04:59.400
and consulates. And certainly we've all agreed on that since the Vienna Conventions in 1961.
00:05:06.100
So what exactly happened here? According to the Vienna Conventions, quote,
00:05:11.980
the premises of the diplomatic mission shall be inviolable. This is not just when the diplomatic
00:05:18.780
mission is being used for diplomatic purposes, but even if it's being used for military purposes,
00:05:22.840
no matter the purpose that it's being used for, embassies and consulates are supposed to be
00:05:27.100
refuges and are supposed to be safe. But the reason that this might not violate international
00:05:33.820
law is that that mandate applies only to the host country. So you remember when Saudi Arabia
00:05:40.740
went in and they murdered that ex-Saudi spy who sort of was a journalist, like he wrote a couple
00:05:46.680
articles for the Washington Post, Jamal Khashoggi, and all the liberals in the West who were very anti-Saudi
00:05:52.080
Arabia. They said, you know, this was an attack on the free press and this was an attack on journalists,
00:05:57.400
but he wasn't really a journalist. He was a Saudi spy. And I'm not defending the Saudis for killing
00:06:01.120
one of their own spies, but, you know, play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They have a place called
00:06:04.780
Chop Chop Square in their country. All right. It's a dangerous government to work for. And so what did
00:06:09.120
they do? They lured Jamal Khashoggi into the Saudi embassy in Turkey, and then that's where they murdered
00:06:16.240
him. And when that happened, the Turkish government was not able to get into the embassy to investigate
00:06:21.900
for something like four or five days. Why? Because the host country is not able to violate
00:06:28.280
the embassy. It's the embassy just belongs to the country whose embassy it is.
00:06:36.200
So those rules apply to the host country. In this case, had Syria attacked the Iranian embassy in
00:06:42.820
Damascus, which would not have happened, but had that happened, that would be a clear violation of
00:06:47.580
international law. The fact that Israel, a third country, went in and did it means that it's actually
00:06:53.220
kind of outside the scope of that particular international law protection. But then there's
00:07:01.180
a more obvious way that Israel's actions might have violated international law. And that is that
00:07:05.840
an embassy, a consulate, is a civilian target. It's not a military target, right? Well, the attack that
00:07:14.440
Israel launched on the consulate in Damascus killed one of the top Iranian generals, as well as, I think,
00:07:21.940
six other Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders. So this attack took out a lot of top Iranian military
00:07:28.540
guys. So wait a second, was this really a civilian target? A consulate or an embassy, by definition,
00:07:36.740
I guess, is a civilian target. But obviously, the people who were blown up here were not civilians.
00:07:42.560
So military operations were obviously being planned in this consulate. And so there, I think Israel gets
00:07:47.960
off the hook, too. I don't think it's a violation of international law. It's pretty close, though. It's
00:07:53.340
pretty close. It's very audacious. And so Iran had to respond. And how did Iran respond? Did Iran
00:07:59.220
respond by a sneak attack that devastated the state of Israel? No. Iran responded by telegraphing for
00:08:04.820
three or four days, we are going to do this. Hey, heads up, America and the United Kingdom and Israel,
00:08:11.900
we are totally going to attack in these specific places. So, you know, I just want to let you know
00:08:18.680
that. And why did they do that? They did that so that this would not escalate the conflict, so that
00:08:23.600
the Iranian regime could save face to their own people, so the Iranian regime could in some way
00:08:28.580
reestablish deterrence, show that they're not just going to be walked all over. But they don't want
00:08:33.220
to escalate the conflict with a direct war, because Iran is in a pretty good position right now. Iran
00:08:38.100
doesn't need to directly attack Israel all that often, because its proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah and all
00:08:44.200
the little terror groups, the Houthis, will attack Israel for them. So we had the first ever direct
00:08:49.740
attack from Iran, okay. But it was kind of a fake attack. It didn't do very much. Now,
00:08:55.260
how are the Americans reacting? You've got the real war hawks. This guy, Joe Walsh, remember him? He was
00:09:00.960
a never-Trumper. I think he ran for president sort of back in, was it 2016 or 2020? I don't know.
00:09:07.600
He was one of the big never-Trumpers. And he came out, he said, an attack on Israel is an attack on
00:09:12.420
America, which is not true, actually. An attack on Israel is an attack on Israel. And an attack
00:09:20.080
on America is an attack on America, because they're different countries, and we have an alliance, but
00:09:24.300
we have different interests sometimes, and that's ridiculous. An attack on Italy is an attack on
00:09:29.380
America. No, it would be an attack on Italy. An attack on Sweden, it's an attack on Sweden. It's not
00:09:35.440
an attack on America. I have no idea even what Joe Walsh and some of the war hawks are talking about
00:09:39.840
here. Joe Biden's response, which he's being criticized for, was to call up Netanyahu reportedly
00:09:45.540
and to say, hey, you got to win. Let it go. Calm down. Don't hit Iran back. And much as it kills
00:09:51.620
me to say it, I think Biden's instincts are right there. Biden's broader foreign policy has been a
00:09:56.920
complete disaster and has led us to this point, and he's probably the cause of all of these wars.
00:10:00.980
But in this particular moment, his advice to Netanyahu, I think, is basically correct,
00:10:05.600
at least from the perspective of the American interest. They got a tit for tat here.
00:10:12.040
Israel hits the embassy, hits the consulate. Iran has this fake attack that injures one person,
00:10:20.040
not to downplay this poor little Bedouin child, but 200 missiles, drones, and you get almost no hits.
00:10:28.460
It's not bad. So Biden says, look, Bibi, you got to win. Take the win.
00:10:32.580
Now, Netanyahu doesn't want to take the win because the Israeli interest is to destroy Iran.
00:10:39.360
The Israeli interest is to destroy Iran. Fair enough. If I were the prime minister of Israel,
00:10:42.600
that's what I would want to do too. The Iranian interest is to maintain and expand regional
00:10:47.380
dominance, which right now for them means hitting Israel, being a credible threat against Israel,
00:10:54.220
using its proxy terror groups to attack Israel, but not necessarily escalating the war,
00:10:58.500
which could be devastating to the regime, but still keeping and expanding that regional dominance.
00:11:02.060
Okay, well, I don't really care what the Iranian and the Israeli interests are. I care what the
00:11:05.940
American interest is. What's the American interest? The American interest, as I've said from day one
00:11:10.020
of this conflict, is to contain the war and stop it from expanding. It's good that the United States
00:11:17.920
and the United Kingdom and the Israeli defense agencies were able to stop this massive attack
00:11:23.120
on the state of Israel. It's good. It's probably good that the Israelis weakened the Iranian regime
00:11:28.260
by hitting those generals, even though it was so audacious to hit a consulate. And now everybody
00:11:34.060
basically just needs to chill. That's kind of my view on it. What is President Trump's view? We'll
00:11:40.420
get to that in one second. First though, go to genusel.com slash Knowles. Gen 90 is the skincare
00:11:46.360
breakthrough from GenuCell that not only addresses those pesky bags and puffiness under your eyes,
00:11:49.960
but does so instantly. No more worrying about the effects of sleepless nights, stress, or seasonal
00:11:56.360
allergies on your appearance. Gen 90 is here to provide immediate relief. Gen 90 instantly reduces
00:12:01.980
the appearance of looking older anywhere you use it. It is a paraben-free, silky smooth solution. You
00:12:06.600
will feel the instant tightening as it touches your skin. Another testament to its effectiveness and
00:12:11.860
your confidence in its results. Right now, you will not only get GenuCell's classic under-eye bags
00:12:16.840
and puffiness serum with every Gen 90 order, but also their luxurious GenuCell XV, a collagen builder
00:12:23.640
moisturizer with vitamin C and hyaluronic acid in a pure natural base for stunning results day after
00:12:29.300
day. Go to genusel.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S right now for incredible packages over 50% off during
00:12:36.080
GenuCell's spring sale. See your results or get your money back, period, exclamation point. Order right now
00:12:44.140
and get a free limited edition spa box with bonus gifts and free shipping. You know, I love the
00:12:48.760
company. I love the owner of this company, a Coptic Christian from Egypt left for the American
00:12:52.300
dream. Go to GenuCell.com slash Knowles. That is GenuCell.com slash Knowles. You will recall some
00:13:00.020
years ago when the Iranian regime threatened the United States. Trump's response was not to say,
00:13:07.240
well, now listen here. Listen here. I have no problem if Iran wants to have a greater role in
00:13:14.900
its traditional sphere of influence. That was the Obama line about Russia, about Iran, about all of
00:13:20.720
our geopolitical foes. Trump's response was on Twitter, to Iranian President Rouhani, then all caps,
00:13:28.760
never ever threaten the United States again or you will suffer consequences the likes of which few
00:13:33.640
throughout history have ever suffered before. We are no longer a country that will stand for
00:13:37.840
your demented words of violence and death. Be cautious. And you know what happened during the
00:13:44.340
Trump years? Iran just kind of chilled. They just kind of played it cool. Russia just kind of played
00:13:52.140
it cool, man. They had, they invaded a country under George Bush. They invaded another country under
00:13:56.840
Barack Obama. Then they just kind of chilled during the Trump years. And then they further invaded a
00:14:01.140
country under Joe Biden. Why is that? Why is that? There's one reason. And it's not because Trump was
00:14:08.380
pro-Russia or anti-Russia. It's not because Trump is pro-Israel or anti-Israel. On this point, it is very
00:14:13.720
clear in the 2024 election, the pro-Israel candidate is Trump. The anti-Israel candidate is Biden. The pro-Israel
00:14:22.280
party is the Republican Party. The anti-Israel party is the Democrat Party. Maybe you like that. Maybe you don't
00:14:26.260
like that. It doesn't matter. That's, that's what it is. Trump posts on Truth Social immediately after
00:14:31.040
this attack. All caps, America supports Israel, exclamation mark. There's a town in Israel named
00:14:37.020
after Donald Trump. There's a train station in Israel named after Donald Trump. Donald Trump brought
00:14:40.880
peace to the Middle East, got the Abraham Accords done. He's the pro-Israel candidate. Had Trump been
00:14:45.360
president, this never would have happened. The Iran, the October 7th attack almost certainly would
00:14:50.800
never have happened. Russia probably would not have invaded Ukraine. That's, that's not just according
00:14:54.940
to me. That's according to President Zelensky of Ukraine. None of these foreign policy crises would
00:14:59.500
have occurred under Trump most likely. But Joe Biden's president, it happens. Here's Trump's
00:15:04.640
reaction to the attack on Saturday. Before going any further, I want to say God bless the people of
00:15:10.980
Israel. They're under attack right now. That's, that's because we show great weakness. This would
00:15:17.080
not happen. The weakness that we've shown is unbelievable. And it would not have happened if we were in
00:15:23.660
office. You know that they know that everybody knows that. Very true. We all know that. Why would
00:15:29.320
this not have happened? Because look, it's very clear. Trump is clearly in favor of Israel and
00:15:34.860
opposed to Iran. Obama had been against Israel and in favor of Iran and gave Iran pallets of cash and
00:15:41.140
paid obeisance to the Iranian regime. And so that part was clear. But, but remember when Trump came
00:15:45.800
into office, we were told he was pro-Russia. Remember that? It was BS, but, but why then is it the case
00:15:54.180
that if Trump were ostensibly pro-Russia, Russia would not have invaded Ukraine on his watch?
00:16:00.960
And Trump is pro-Israel, but, but Iran would never have attacked Israel under his watch. Why,
00:16:06.960
why is it? Why is it? It doesn't matter which side he supports that you wouldn't have seen this kind
00:16:10.860
of belligerence under Trump because it's not about, uh, aggression versus meekness. And it's not about
00:16:18.700
supporting this side or that side. The, the brilliance of Trump's foreign policy was unpredictability.
00:16:26.220
That's it. Biden is predictable. Obama was very predictable. George Bush, for that matter,
00:16:32.180
certainly after the first couple of years of his administration was, was predictable.
00:16:35.740
Trump is not. When the mullahs, when the Ayatollah sees this tweet from Trump,
00:16:43.000
all caps, you will suffer consequences, the likes of which few throughout history have ever suffered
00:16:46.640
before. We will no longer stand for your demented words of violence and death. Probably the Ayatollah
00:16:51.920
thinks 5% chance he attacks us. 95% chance he doesn't attack us. We can't take the risk because
00:16:58.140
Trump was a dove in so many ways. And then he drops the Moab. He drops the mother of all bombs.
00:17:03.720
Trump was a dove in so many ways. He wanted peace, peace, peace. He was meeting with Kim
00:17:07.700
Jong-un for, for goodness sakes. And then he takes out the top Iranian general. And you just have no
00:17:13.020
idea what this guy's going to do. He tells Putin, he says, Hey, if you invade Ukraine, I'm going to
00:17:18.840
blow up the Kremlin. And, and I, I think Trump himself said this. He said, you know, probably Putin
00:17:24.200
thought I was five to 10% serious and that's enough. That's enough to deter with, with Biden,
00:17:29.680
you don't get that. And so the world descends into chaos. Now, what does a top Trump advisor,
00:17:37.560
former lawyer for the president, former mayor of New York, a man very well acquainted with terror
00:17:41.140
attacks. What does Giuliani think about all of this? Giuliani comes out and he says, you know,
00:17:48.840
the way Republicans need to think about an attack like this is to ask themselves the question they've
00:17:52.760
asked themselves for 40 years. WWRD, what would Reagan do?
00:17:59.420
I really do think we're missing an opportunity, a historic opportunity here.
00:18:04.580
If we had a president like my old boss in the White House, every time I was mayor and I had to
00:18:09.720
make a difficult decision, I would say, what would Ronald Reagan do? I know what Ronald Reagan would do
00:18:14.080
right now. He, he, he would have hit Iran before their first missile got to Israel and he would
00:18:20.180
have taken out every nuclear facility he could. Because he would have been trying to look for
00:18:26.020
an opportunity to do that for years. Now we take out their nuclear facilities. Here's what the
00:18:32.580
traders who run our government said. They say, oh, they'll just build it back up again.
00:18:37.900
Well, that'll take them 10 years to do. Also, if you really know what's going on inside Iran,
00:18:43.300
if we were to hit them before they hit us, it would destroy, it would destroy them.
00:18:49.200
I mean, they obviously are a frightened enemy. You wouldn't do an attack like this unless you
00:18:54.820
were timid. Best thing to do with a frightened enemy is knock them out.
00:18:59.360
Okay. Love Rudy. He's great. Greatest mayor in the history of New York. Really liked the guy.
00:19:04.160
I think his analysis is off base here. I don't think Ronald Reagan would have attacked Iran
00:19:10.520
before the first missile hit. And the reason is because we have seen a similar situation,
00:19:16.680
a far more devastating situation actually, and far more devastating, not just to the Israelis,
00:19:21.320
but to the Americans. And that was the Beirut barracks bombings. When terrorists blew up
00:19:28.460
an American target in Beirut and killed what, 250 troops or thereabouts. And what did Reagan do?
00:19:35.600
Did he just blow them all up? Did he glass the Middle East? No, he did basically nothing. He
00:19:41.100
pulled the troops out, actually, is what he did. Ronald Reagan, through the mists of history and
00:19:46.680
mythology, is seen as this belligerent war hawk. Even at the time, he was viewed as a cowboy.
00:19:54.060
But if you look at his actual foreign policy, he was much more of a dove in practice. If you look at
00:20:02.860
his actual foreign policy, his response to the Beirut barracks bombings was to pull the troops.
00:20:07.340
And then he tried to negotiate away all the nuclear weapons when he was negotiating with Gorbachev.
00:20:14.040
The similarities between the Reagan and the Trump foreign policy are really striking in that both
00:20:19.020
were called cowboys, both were called crazy, both were called belligerent. And yet in practice,
00:20:23.100
they were much more dovish. But they still had that deterrence factor. They still had that
00:20:28.180
speak softly, carry a big stick, or with Donald Trump, you know, speak in all sorts of ways,
00:20:32.320
totally unpredictable ways. But carry the big stick, but don't always use the big stick.
00:20:37.980
Okay? So, you know, there are going to be a lot of calls to escalate this conflict.
00:20:42.580
Seems to me everyone's made it out pretty well here. And we can just kind of keep calm and carry on.
00:20:48.620
I think that's what Reagan would do. I think that's probably what Trump would do.
00:20:51.680
And if either of those guys had been in the office, none of this would be happening in the
00:20:54.580
first place. Speaking of the current state of the American right, Carrie Lake. Another Republican
00:21:01.320
politician that I like very much, Carrie Lake, I think also has her analysis a little bit off.
00:21:07.360
She just came out as part of her Arizona Senate campaign to advance her new platform on abortion.
00:21:18.360
This total ban on abortion that the Arizona Supreme Court just ruled on is out of line with where the
00:21:25.880
people of this state are. The issue is less about banning abortion and more about saving babies.
00:21:31.980
I agree with President Trump. This is such a personal and private issue. I chose life,
00:21:37.040
but I'm not every woman. I want to make sure that every woman who finds herself pregnant
00:21:42.840
has more choices so that she can make that choice that I made. I'll never forget the first time I
00:21:49.740
got pregnant, taking that pregnancy test, looking down and I was excited, but I'll be honest. I was
00:21:57.260
afraid as well. I was nervous. I was anxious. It's natural for women to be nervous and anxious when
00:22:03.880
they're pregnant. I never would ever assume that any woman had the same exact feelings I had
00:22:09.420
or situation I had. Okay. I like Carrie Lake. I hope she wins her seat in Arizona and everything.
00:22:16.200
I don't know who advised her to change her stance on abortion and adopt this view. This is a terrible,
00:22:23.740
a terrible view, both morally and politically. It is unjust in itself and it will not work
00:22:32.460
politically. It will repel pro-lifers. It won't attract pro-abortion people. Look, people sometimes
00:22:38.200
make mistakes in politics. It happens all the time. Whichever advisor advised Carrie Lake to adopt
00:22:44.260
this view and to put out this commercial should be fired yesterday. This was a huge, totally unforced
00:22:50.120
error. We'll get to why in just a moment. First, though, I mentioned I'm going to University of
00:22:55.580
Illinois tomorrow. It should be a lot of fun. I was just at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,
00:23:00.520
and you can check out the latest episode of Cross the Line. Here's a short clip.
00:23:04.480
Hundreds of people came in, they filled all the seats, and they were polite for almost the whole
00:23:11.440
time. I'm standing here now, a biological male wearing a dress with a pair of leggings. Do you
00:23:16.040
sincerely believe that I should be subject to punitive justice on the basis of what I'm wearing?
00:23:20.300
And if so, are you willing to turn yourself in for wearing women's panties in your gay college film?
00:23:26.120
I say almost the whole time because a couple students, one who called himself transgender and
00:23:32.100
another who called herself non-binary, became a bit more pointed during the Q&A. I was happy to
00:23:38.540
answer their questions. So happy, in fact, that we all decided to sit down and have a conversation
00:23:44.320
after the event. This series is about finding one or two students who don't just scream and yell and
00:23:51.080
throw explosives at the building, but who actually have the courage to show up while disagreeing and
00:23:56.580
then sit down and have a discussion face-to-face. Watch the full episode now on YouTube. If you are
00:24:01.620
planning to come protest my YAF speech at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign tomorrow
00:24:07.000
night and you want to discuss our difference in viewpoints, well, just find producer Ben Davies and
00:24:16.740
Carrie Lake, this is a very unfortunate new policy on abortion. I want to get this out of the way at the
00:24:23.580
top. I understand that it's a controversial issue. I understand that Republicans probably are not going
00:24:32.760
to campaign on this being their number one issue and they're not going to campaign in the clearest
00:24:37.620
moral and ethical terms on this issue. I get it. I'm not even opposed to that. Prudence is the top
00:24:44.220
political virtue and prudence is a really good thing. So if it were the case that Carrie Lake came out
00:24:51.140
and she said, you know, I'm pro-life and I want more babies to be saved and fewer babies to be killed
00:24:56.560
and that's where I am. This race is going to be won on Joe Biden's terrible economy and on Joe Biden's
00:25:04.280
terrible immigration policies and on the way that Joe Biden has pummeled the American family and she just
00:25:09.120
focused on other issues and downplayed the abortion issue. I would totally get it. I would applaud her.
00:25:13.860
I would think that's actually pretty prudent and would ultimately, it would be both perfectly just
00:25:19.800
in itself and redound to the benefit of the cause of life in the long run. That's not what she's
00:25:24.880
doing here. What she and I fear some other Republicans are going to end up doing is just
00:25:31.360
moving to the left on abortion and still running on abortion, which is a huge mistake. You know,
00:25:36.840
the reason that the pro-lifer is here, that the conservatives don't want to run on abortion,
00:25:41.460
is it's kind of controversial and pretty much any statement you make about it is going to lose you
00:25:45.820
some votes. So you got to downplay it a little bit. Well, here she's doing the worst possible
00:25:49.620
thing, which is she's adopting the pro-choice, pro-abortion rhetoric, which means she's going
00:25:54.080
to alienate her own base, the pro-lifers who are probably the most motivated voters on the right.
00:25:58.840
So she's going to suppress the foot soldiers in any Republican campaign, the pro-life campaigns.
00:26:04.340
She's going to suppress enthusiasm from her own side, which she needs every single one of those guys
00:26:09.680
to come out and vote for. And she's going to totally fail to win over the pro-abortion people
00:26:14.960
who view her as a surrogate for Trump. She's part of the MAGA wing of the party. They hate her,
00:26:19.660
especially, even more than they hated, you know, John McCain from her state or Mitt Romney or one of
00:26:26.280
the squishier Republicans. So it's just not going to work. The problem here is the Republicans who
00:26:32.860
advocate talking in this squishier, pro-choice way about abortion, they think they're being really
00:26:37.400
prudent. They're being very imprudent. This is not going to help them at all. And what Carrie
00:26:42.600
Lake said here is not just a kind of downplaying or a kind of prevarication about abortion. These are
00:26:49.620
talking points from the Democrats in 2008. Okay, what did she say exactly? This is such a personal and
00:26:55.960
private issue. It's not. It's a public issue. It's a political issue because the question is, do we have
00:27:02.340
the right to kill innocent people? That makes it political. If it's just about you, first of all,
00:27:08.400
there's really no issue that rises to the level of a national discussion and debate that is purely
00:27:14.260
private. Even doing drugs or something, which seems like it's private. It's not really private
00:27:18.980
because it affects your communities. It affects, you know, your safety while walking down the street
00:27:23.800
or while driving or anything, you know. But this isn't even talking about the legalization of some
00:27:29.420
drug or other. This is about, do you have the right to kill another innocent person?
00:27:33.500
So that's obviously a political issue. The Democrats want to pretend it's a personal issue
00:27:36.720
because they deny that the baby is a baby. So that's a totally adopting the pro-abortion side
00:27:42.080
of the issue. I chose life, but I'm not every woman. Hold on. What? You chose life. That's very
00:27:49.020
laudable. That's good. You should be proud of that. I chose life, but I'm not every woman. So some,
00:27:53.980
I chose not to murder my precious baby, but you poor people, you should, you can kill your babies if you
00:27:59.360
want. You black people, you can kill your babies if you want. You people in the inner city, you can
00:28:03.240
kill your babies if you want. Forget about even the racial and the socioeconomic distinctions.
00:28:08.000
You Democrats, you can kill your babies if you want. You liberals, you can kill your babies. No,
00:28:12.540
no. The reason it's wrong to kill a baby is not that the baby might turn out to be a Republican.
00:28:20.420
It's not that the baby comes from a certain socioeconomic class or a certain geographic location
00:28:24.720
or a certain race or anything else. The reason it's wrong to kill a baby is because the baby's a
00:28:28.200
human being, an innocent, totally incoherent line. I chose life, but I'm not every woman.
00:28:35.260
You chose life because it's good for you and for your baby not to kill the baby. It's good for your
00:28:39.780
soul. It's good for your baby not to die. And it's good for society not to tolerate infanticide.
00:28:46.600
So why don't you want that good thing for other women too? I want to make sure that every woman
00:28:52.460
who finds herself pregnant has more choices so that she can make the choice that I made. What?
00:28:58.780
Oh man, that sentence is one word off from being acceptable and maybe even good. It says,
00:29:06.800
I want to make sure that every woman who finds herself pregnant has more fill in the blank.
00:29:12.360
resources, has more support, has more, sure, all those words are fine, so that she can make the
00:29:20.940
choice that I made. I mean, I'd also like to make sure that the law supports protecting innocent life
00:29:27.280
so we don't just totally leave it up to the whims of these individuals. But sure, I like that. I want
00:29:32.200
to make sure every woman who finds herself pregnant has support, has love, has care, has resources.
00:29:36.820
Yeah. I want to make sure she has more choices so that she can make the choice that I made. How does
00:29:43.040
having more choices help her to make the choice that you made? If the choice that she has is
00:29:51.060
have her baby and raise the baby or give the baby up for adoption, then she is going to be more likely
00:29:57.420
to make the choice that you made. If she has a third choice though, if the choices are have the baby
00:30:01.620
and raise the baby, give the baby up for adoption or murder the baby in the womb, she is going to be
00:30:06.260
less likely to make the choice that you made. The expansion of the number of choices is not going
00:30:11.600
to incentivize her to make the choice that you made, namely not to kill the baby. Choice, choice,
00:30:18.180
choice. This is the pro-choice position. Totally. I don't want, I don't mean to beat up on Carrie Lake
00:30:24.520
so much. I assume this was just a blunder and campaigns make, every campaign makes a blunder,
00:30:30.420
okay? But whoever advised her to do this should be fired. I hope that person has been fired already.
00:30:35.160
This is completely unacceptable to the pro-life movement, and she will lose if she keeps this up.
00:30:40.940
She will, and it's not because I'm telling people not to vote for her. If I were in Arizona,
00:30:44.840
I would quietly urge her to change her position, but I would recognize that the other candidate is
00:30:53.540
going to be extremely pro-abortion too. And so I would make a political calculation here. I'm not
00:30:59.220
telling people not to vote for Carrie Lake. If she loses, it's not because I'm telling them not to vote
00:31:02.320
for her. But I am making a prediction right now. If she keeps up this line where she's going to be
00:31:07.820
almost totally pro-legal abortion, but not quite the set, she's going to lose. She's going to lose.
00:31:13.580
She's going to, the pro-lifers are not going to show up and she's going to lose. And she's going to
00:31:17.220
have no one to blame but herself and her advisors. If, if this is her line, completely insane. Let this be
00:31:23.660
a warning, not only to the late campaign, which I hope fixes the ship and goes on. She's got a ton
00:31:31.240
of political talents. She could make a great Senator. This should be a warning to the other
00:31:35.680
Republican campaigns too. This way lies madness. Speaking of abortion, Bill Maher, big lib, came out
00:31:42.980
and admitted what the Democrats have denied for a long time, most of them, and what the conservatives
00:31:49.700
have been pointing out, which is that abortion is in fact murder. The idea that you're fighting an
00:31:55.320
election around this issue, um, seems to be, you know, just strange back to the 19th century.
00:32:04.120
Well, not if you believe it's murder, you know, that's why I don't understand the 15 week thing
00:32:13.980
or the Trump's plan is let's leave it to the States. You mean, so killing babies is okay in
00:32:19.860
some States. Like I can respect the, the absolutist position. I really can. I, I, I scold the left on
00:32:27.180
when they say, Oh, you know what? They just hate women, people who aren't pro life. They do the pro
00:32:33.400
choice. They just, they don't hate women. They just made that up. They think it's murder and it kind
00:32:39.760
of is I'm just okay with that. I am. I mean, there's 8 billion people in the world. I'm sorry.
00:32:47.100
We won't miss you. That's my position on that. Two cheers for Bill Maher, not three cheers. Cause
00:32:54.760
what he's saying is evil, but two cheers because what he's saying is honest. And it's a lot more
00:33:00.500
honest than what the Democrats are saying. And his views are actually charitable toward, toward the
00:33:04.740
Republicans. He's saying, yeah, look, if you, if you think as murder and you, and you think murder
00:33:10.840
is always bad, uh, then yeah, it's not your, your pro life support is not motivated by misogyny.
00:33:17.620
It's motivated by your care, not to murder innocent people. By the way, you're right that it's murder.
00:33:22.300
I'm just okay with that. We have overpopulation. I remember these views. I held these views when I was,
00:33:27.200
when I was pro choice, I made the same arguments Bill Maher did. I, I did not think it was murder.
00:33:31.800
I don't, I wouldn't have said it was tantamount to murder. He's going a little further, but he's
00:33:35.940
just being clearer than I was when I was a 16 year old idiot. He's, he's articulating the Naomi
00:33:41.820
Wolf argument from the mid nineties, which was that, uh, uh, abortion should be legal. I'm all for
00:33:50.300
abortion, but we need to recognize that a woman in an abortion is killing the baby in all of its
00:33:56.480
humanity. That was Naomi. Now she may have changed her position since then. She's become more right
00:34:00.000
wing since then. But, but that's what Bill Maher is saying here. And this is the practical problem
00:34:06.780
for the, the conservatives and the Republicans running on this. Hey, I'm personally pro life,
00:34:12.820
but I want people to just have choices and please, please don't not vote for me because I support
00:34:18.720
not killing babies or whatever. Any position other than the principled one, which is that it's wrong to
00:34:25.320
murder innocent people is going to make you look like a liar. And it's going to make you look really,
00:34:30.700
really cynical. And it's going to undermine your whole argument. That's why the libs are trying to
00:34:34.460
get us to undermine our argument. They want us to embrace the surrogacy industry, for instance,
00:34:38.880
you know, IVF, where you create a bunch of babies and then in practically speaking, most of them, you
00:34:43.500
either throw in a freezer forever or you just kill them through abortion. They really want to make
00:34:47.480
Republicans in principle, adopt support for IVF and surrogacy because they know that it undermines
00:34:53.180
our argument on pro life, because it means that we don't really believe that life begins at
00:34:57.260
conception, which by definition it does because conception, it's the beginning. This is the
00:35:03.940
practical argument, the practical problem with trying to squish on this issue. If conservatives
00:35:09.780
don't want to have to run on abortion as the big issue in 2024, good. That's smart. That's prudent.
00:35:17.820
And we need to be wise as serpents and innocent as doves. Okay. And we can have all sorts
00:35:23.140
of language and all sorts of legitimate policies about supporting women, giving them a lot of
00:35:27.720
resources, giving people, giving young families resources, encouraging marriage. We can do all
00:35:33.220
that. That's great. And you can downplay the issue of abortion in a campaign. But if you're going to flip
00:35:43.660
on your support for the fundamental right without which none of the other rights can exist,
00:35:52.040
on which all of the other rights rely, then you have just undercut your entire position in public
00:35:58.980
life. What is the, if we're not even going to defend the basic right, then what's the point of
00:36:05.680
political participation? Then we stand for nothing. Listen, folks, you need to subscribe. You need to
00:36:13.760
ring that bell. Subscribe to the Michael Nolsch YouTube channel. Destroy that like button with facts
00:36:17.980
and logic and mouse clicks. I don't, no one has a mouse anymore with trackpad movements. I don't
00:36:24.160
know, whatever. Ring that bell, subscribe to the channel. That way you'll never miss a video.
00:36:29.560
Speaking of changing views on abortion, according to Pew Research, six in 10 Catholics support legal
00:36:36.920
abortion. This is really shocking because the Catholic church has always been against abortion.
00:36:40.500
From the very beginning of the church, 2,000 years ago, the earliest documents we have from the
00:36:48.080
church, the didache, for goodness sakes, the original kind of catechism of the church,
00:36:53.260
going back what, 1900 years, 1800, 1900 years, opposes abortion. This is as consistent a view
00:37:01.740
in practical politics as can be held by the Catholic church. And now most American Catholics support
00:37:07.620
abortion. What? What does that mean? Well, by definition, it is not possible for faithful
00:37:16.380
practicing Catholics to support abortion. It's not, it is not possible. If you support abortion,
00:37:24.140
you are not a faithful practicing Catholic. You're, you're, you could be a baptized Catholic.
00:37:29.500
You, but you, you cannot be a faithful practicing Catholic if you do that. It's not even like saying,
00:37:35.240
you know, to be Catholic, you have to be perfect all the time and you can never sin. We're not
00:37:38.940
talking about, you know, a failure of continence. You know, you, you, you glutted yourself. You,
00:37:46.780
you said a naughty word. You, I don't know, you did drugs. You looked at porn. You got drunk.
00:37:52.140
You, whatever. Those would be sins, certainly, and you should go and confess your sins and receive
00:37:57.160
absolution. But in this case, what we're talking about is something much more conscious and much more
00:38:01.920
doctrinal. You're saying, I do not assent to the teachings of the church and I will continue. I will
00:38:08.460
persist in defiance of the church, of the 2000 year magisterial teaching of the church on this
00:38:13.880
issue. This is not a negotiable issue. You know, Pope Benedict XVI opposed the death penalty. And he
00:38:19.920
said, look, Catholics can disagree on this. For virtually all of the church's history, the church
00:38:24.700
has defended in principle, the death penalty. In fact, popes, including beatified popes carried it out.
00:38:28.780
Okay. Blessed Pius IX carried out 500 executions in the papal states. All right. So there you might
00:38:35.140
say, okay, there might be some disagreement. Not so on abortion. So what does this mean? What it means
00:38:40.360
in practice is not that the Catholic church is changing its teaching on abortion. It cannot do
00:38:45.800
that. What it means is Catholics are giving up their collective political power. Catholics by,
00:38:50.880
by breaking with, by breaking ranks and by breaking with the teaching of their church,
00:38:56.180
they're just giving up their, their political power. And so it doesn't, you don't need to win
00:38:59.420
the Catholic vote anymore. If this is the case, because the Catholic vote doesn't mean anything
00:39:03.400
because these Catholics, when it comes down to it, a conflict between the God of the Catholic church
00:39:09.380
and the God of liberalism, they're going to choose the God of liberalism. It's been two years fighting
00:39:14.940
with the libs with great products from Jeremy's razors and all of the, the Jeremy's products. Well,
00:39:21.080
they're only getting better. Jeremy's second gen razors are here. You can notice the reconstructed
00:39:26.740
ergonomic handle for durability and coated stainless steel blades that last longer. Plus
00:39:31.260
you can enjoy more flexibility for a close shave without nicks or cuts. For those who meticulously
00:39:36.520
craft their masculine look, we're introducing Jeremy's new Precision 5 razor with a precision
00:39:44.560
trimmer and enhanced comfort. Experience an exceptionally smooth and close shave with added durability
00:39:49.080
to withstand those accidental drops. And if shaving feels like a chore, meet the brand new Sprint 3
00:39:54.400
with open blade geometry for a swift clean shave, allowing you to get back to your manly pursuits
00:39:58.520
in no time. Head on over to jeremysrazors.com to upgrade to your new second gen razor today.
00:40:03.800
My favorite comment on Friday is from Frank S111, who says, OJ was the original St. Floyd to the BLM
00:40:13.680
community. That's not true. Rodney King was. I don't even know if we say original, but he was
00:40:18.740
certainly one of them. It was Rodney King. Rodney King was this career criminal, wife-beater,
00:40:23.660
druggy lunatic who was viciously beaten by the LAPD. And it was after Rodney King led them in a
00:40:30.160
very dangerous high-speed pursuit that reached 117 miles an hour. And the cops beat up Rodney King
00:40:35.140
in a similar way that Rodney King beat up his wives. And this led to the LA riots, which killed 63
00:40:41.460
people. They had to call in the Marines and the National Guard. And then the jury let OJ off the hook
00:40:47.440
for almost beheading his wife and killing her friend because of that as payback for what they
00:40:53.300
viewed as the poor, innocent Rodney King being beaten up by the LAPD. So that was where it came
00:41:01.020
from. It was similar principles as we saw in BLM and George Floyd, but slightly different characters.
00:41:06.280
I saw the comments from Frank S, by the way, and you know who that must refer to? You guessed it,
00:41:11.280
Frank Stallone. Speaking of changing political views, Mike Pence is going on a tour asking
00:41:21.020
Republicans to do a little soul searching. He's looking at, he's saying, which way,
00:41:26.520
Republican man? And here is the line that he's been repeating at most of his speeches.
00:41:32.440
The essential question facing the Republican Party is this, will we be the party of conservatism
00:41:37.520
and the constitution? Or will we follow the siren song of populism unmoored to conservative
00:41:43.680
principles? That's a fair question. I like Mike Pence. He's probably not in the ascendant wing of
00:41:51.180
the GOP right now is a diplomatic way to put it, but I always liked the guy. What do Mike Pence's
00:41:57.020
friends say about this? According to Tony Perkins from the Family Research Council, he says,
00:42:01.780
I think Mike is stuck in the Republican Party of the past. I think the party has changed,
00:42:08.560
fundamentally changed, and it's not just about Trump. Okay. I think many people share Tony
00:42:13.400
Perkins's view. And what about Newt Gingrich? I just saw Newt Gingrich last week. I was at an event
00:42:17.620
in Florida, a pro-life event, and Speaker Gingrich and his wife, Ambassador Calista Gingrich, were there.
00:42:23.000
Great to see them. Newt Gingrich, one of the great all-time political observers and wielders of power,
00:42:28.880
one of the most important speakers in the history of the U.S. Congress. He said,
00:42:32.880
there are a number of Republicans who, for a variety of different reasons, want to cling to
00:42:36.880
a system which is now basically gone and will be the minority wing of the Republican Party for the
00:42:40.780
foreseeable future. Had he asked me, it is not what I would have advised Mike to do. Okay.
00:42:49.260
The thing that Mike Pence is getting wrong here is not that the new version of the Republican Party
00:42:54.180
is totally perfect. You know, it's not, he's not getting wrong that there are issues with how the
00:43:00.860
Republican Party is evolving. There are some issues. There are some problems. We've addressed
00:43:03.700
some of those problems today. The thing that Mike Pence is getting wrong is not that the old
00:43:12.980
Republican Party didn't have some advantages. I personally am happy to see the way the Republican
00:43:19.240
Party has changed, broadly speaking. I think the Republican Party of today, for all its flaws,
00:43:24.180
is actually healthier than the Republican Party of, say, 2011. So it's not to say that I'm,
00:43:31.500
that's not even totally what he's getting wrong. What he's getting wrong is the fact of change in
00:43:40.440
political life. Conservatism and liberalism will always be changing. That is not hypocrisy. That is
00:43:51.600
not an abandonment of principles. That is how politics works. Politics is the application of
00:43:58.680
some eternal principles to changing political circumstances. If the way that the Republican
00:44:06.220
Party spoke and acted and addressed issues did not change, that would be an abandonment of true
00:44:14.380
conservatism. That would be the abandonment of principles. That would be bizarre and insane and
00:44:18.880
totally ineffective. Because politics is about people and society. It is a practical science and
00:44:24.720
society and people change over time. And you've got to be able to adapt and deal with those new
00:44:30.960
problems. That's what a principled politician does. A principled politician doesn't live
00:44:36.440
in the past and rest on his laurels and say, well, this is, you know, back in 1987, Ronald Reagan had
00:44:44.060
this really great zinger. Yeah, I'm sure he did have a good zinger, but that was 1987. What are we doing
00:44:48.420
now? Reagan's been dead for how many years now? Let the boy rest, you know? He was a good, he was a good
00:44:53.880
man. He was a good president. How about we address our own problems? That's what you got to do.
00:45:01.420
Doesn't make you principled not to meet the moment as new moments arise in politics.
00:45:09.140
You might think it does, but it doesn't. Now, speaking of principles, switching gears a little
00:45:13.100
bit, Billy D. Williams, cool, crisp, Billy D. Williams, Lando Calarissian himself, just told Bill
00:45:21.400
Maher. I don't know why there's so much Bill Maher in the show today. It's really, we're just focusing
00:45:24.660
on Lando here. Billy D. Says that blackface is totally fun.
00:45:31.000
Olivier was more, more physical. Okay. In fact, he got criticized a lot for being physical and doing
00:45:37.500
things with his voice. That was a bit outrageous. Wow. But when he did Othello, I fell out laughing.
00:45:45.980
He stuck his ass out and walked around with his ass. Problematic. You know, it was like, you know,
00:45:57.220
because black people are supposed to have big asses, right? Oh, I understand. I fell out laughing.
00:46:02.520
I thought it was. And Bradley Cooper thinks he's got a problem with the nose. I thought it was hysterical.
00:46:08.320
I loved it. I loved it. But see, I love that kind of stuff. Yes. Big asses? Who doesn't?
00:46:15.180
No, no. No, I know. I agree. Okay. But here's the thing. Today, I mean, they would never let you do
00:46:23.180
that. Why? Blackface? Why not? Because- You should do it. That's, maybe that's your point of view.
00:46:33.160
If you're an actor, you should do anything you want to do. Totally right. He's totally right. I've said
00:46:39.160
this before. There was one time when one of these blackface non-traverses came up. I was driving in
00:46:46.520
a car. I was in an Uber in LA with a black driver. And this came up. It was on the radio or something.
00:46:53.240
I said, oh, yeah, yeah. You hear about this blackface thing? And he said, oh, man, you know,
00:46:56.740
blackface, I think that's fine. I said, really? You do? He said, yeah. It's all in good fun.
00:47:01.920
I don't care. I think blackface is totally fine. And it gave me some pause because I was told that
00:47:08.900
black people were terribly offended by blackface. But they're not. White liberals pretend to be
00:47:14.380
offended by blackface. I don't think black people generally are. And whether they are or aren't,
00:47:19.220
it's totally fine. We're talking about acting. In acting, you're supposed to play people that you
00:47:25.120
are not. Now we're living at a time when we're told that a straight man can't play a gay character.
00:47:31.520
A cisgender, quote unquote, man can't play a trans character. But then we just found out
00:47:36.300
there's a trans identifying actor who no longer wants to play trans characters because the trans
00:47:40.860
identifying actor wants to play women. But he's a man. So a man who thinks he's a woman is allowed
00:47:46.060
to play a man. But the man who thinks he's a woman shouldn't should no longer play a man who
00:47:50.360
thinks that he's a woman. And a man who knows that he's a man can't play a man who thinks that he's a
00:47:53.080
woman. Does that make any sense to you? It's acting. It's pretend. People shouldn't take it
00:47:56.740
so seriously. But what's the distinction here? Because I do think that there are certain blackface
00:48:02.540
performances that could be offensive and in very poor taste and should not be done. So what's the
00:48:07.120
difference? What's the difference between Lando Calarissian here, Billy Dee Williams saying,
00:48:14.280
oh, it's fine, man. It's okay if Laurence Olivier wants to play Othello. It's fine if Joy Behar wants to
00:48:20.960
dress up as Diana Ross or whatever she did for Halloween that year. Got her in trouble,
00:48:24.380
but she's a liberal, so she got away with it. What's the difference between that and some really
00:48:28.220
offensive blackface performance? The difference is charity. If you're doing this performance
00:48:34.380
and you like black people, you know, and you sort of love black people and you treat them as human
00:48:41.080
beings, it seems totally fine. If you're putting on that makeup and you're doing that performance
00:48:46.340
because you really hate these people and you have no charity for them whatsoever and you just
00:48:49.680
really want to get them, that's what would make it awful. It's not the accident of the shoe polish
00:48:54.720
or whatever. It's not the makeup that Joy Behar wore. The thing that makes it good or bad,
00:49:01.800
acceptable or unacceptable, is the orientation of the heart, which we're not allowed to
00:49:05.640
even discuss anymore because we've adopted a very shallow view of politics and society that ignores the
00:49:12.820
the most fundamental aspects of human nature and the most important of all of the virtues.
00:49:19.380
The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code
00:49:22.560
Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-A-S, at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.
00:49:33.740
Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-A-S, at checkout for two months.