The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 1468 - Iran's Attack On Israel EXPLAINED In 3 Mins

00:00:00.000 Iran has launched its first ever direct attack against the state of Israel.

00:00:04.740 The mullahs launched more than 200 drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles into 0.99

00:00:10.040 Israel on Saturday night. Israel is vowing revenge, sort of. America, for some stupid

00:00:16.660 reason, is funding both sides of the conflict. That was what was really amazing, looking at

00:00:21.140 the photographs of the missiles being launched from Iran and then the defense missiles being

00:00:25.780 launched from Israel, is that every single missile launched from both sides on Saturday

00:00:31.300 night was directly or indirectly purchased by America. And the question on everyone's

00:00:37.220 mind, are we on the brink of World War III? Many talking heads on both sides of the aisle

00:00:43.840 are warning that we are headed into World War III. And my take is probably the most radical

00:00:50.700 one that you will hear today, which is that basically everything is fine. I'm Michael

00:00:56.080 Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.

00:00:57.140 Welcome back to the show. Bill Maher has just admitted what a lot of libs don't want to

00:01:21.980 admit, which is that abortion is murder. Though he added onto that, he said, I'm okay with that. 0.98

00:01:28.660 He said, abortion is kind of murder. I'm okay with that. At least he's honest. I will be addressing 1.00

00:01:32.520 this now very urgent political issue for conservatives as a U.S. Senate candidate is

00:01:38.460 embracing a much more pro-choice position, as even President Trump has been accused of weakening on

00:01:45.100 the issue of abortion. I will be speaking at the University of Illinois, Urbana, Champlain,

00:01:48.900 tomorrow night. That will be on abortion, on what conservatives should be thinking and doing and

00:01:56.060 saying about abortion right now. If you are in the Urbana, is it Urbana-Champaign, like real pain

00:02:02.160 for my sham friends, champagne for my real friends, or Urbana-Champaign? I don't even know. It's such

00:02:07.040 a liberal school. I don't even know, but I will be there tomorrow night. So if you are in the area,

00:02:12.900 even if you're not in the area, drive, get out there. We will see you there. Go to

00:02:16.760 YAF, Y-A-F.org. You get information about how to get tickets, and we will address that big

00:02:21.900 issue. There's so much more to say. First, though, go to policygenius.com slash Knowles.

00:02:28.000 Life is full of surprises, but your insurance should not be one of them. Policy Genius,

00:02:33.740 your trusted partner for navigating the complex world of insurance, is changing the way that

00:02:38.040 we shop for life insurance. Policy Genius has licensed award-winning agents and technology

00:02:42.580 that make it easy to compare life insurance quotes from America's top insurers in just a few clicks

00:02:47.760 to find your lowest price. You can compare quotes from top providers right from your phone or computer

00:02:52.460 all in one place. Plus, Policy Genius has a team of licensed experts ready to answer all your questions

00:02:57.760 and guide you through the process. Getting life insurance for you and your family will give you

00:03:02.280 peace of mind knowing that if something were to happen to you, your family could get back on their feet.

00:03:06.920 With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just $292 per year for $1 million

00:03:13.240 of coverage. Some options offer same-day approval and avoid unnecessary medical exams.

00:03:18.700 Policy Genius works for you, not the insurance companies. Save time and money and provide your family

00:03:24.340 with a financial safety net using Policy Genius. Go to policygenius.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S,

00:03:29.040 to get your free life insurance quotes and see how much you could save. That is policygenius.com slash Knowles.

00:03:35.720 I would probably get many more views and clicks if I were scaremongering right now and saying that

00:03:42.040 we are on the brink of World War III because of the missiles from Iran. And I think that's what 1.00

00:03:46.760 most other talking heads are doing on both sides of the aisle. I don't think that's true. I think

00:03:51.520 actually, basically, it's fine. Which might mean that I get fewer views for my, but I actually believe

00:04:00.160 my view is the most radical of all of them being stated right now. And I think it's the most defensible.

00:04:05.720 Yes, it's very scary on the surface level, 200 drones and cruise missiles and ballistic missiles.

00:04:10.600 But what are we actually looking at here? First of all, as far as I can tell, there was one casualty.

00:04:16.980 It was this poor little Bedouin child. And there was another, there was a military site in Israel that

00:04:22.220 was hit. 99% of the missiles were intercepted. And is this an unprovoked act of aggression? No.

00:04:31.180 Where did this begin? The Iranians would say this began on April 1st when Israel hit the Iranian

00:04:38.740 consulate in Damascus, which is a big no-no. It's not quite a violation of international law,

00:04:46.980 probably, but it's pretty close. Israel went about as close as you can get to violating international 0.74

00:04:52.600 law without actually doing it. Because as a general rule, we all agree not to attack embassies

00:04:59.400 and consulates. And certainly we've all agreed on that since the Vienna Conventions in 1961.

00:05:06.100 So what exactly happened here? According to the Vienna Conventions, quote,

00:05:11.980 the premises of the diplomatic mission shall be inviolable. This is not just when the diplomatic

00:05:18.780 mission is being used for diplomatic purposes, but even if it's being used for military purposes,

00:05:22.840 no matter the purpose that it's being used for, embassies and consulates are supposed to be

00:05:27.100 refuges and are supposed to be safe. But the reason that this might not violate international

00:05:33.820 law is that that mandate applies only to the host country. So you remember when Saudi Arabia

00:05:40.740 went in and they murdered that ex-Saudi spy who sort of was a journalist, like he wrote a couple

00:05:46.680 articles for the Washington Post, Jamal Khashoggi, and all the liberals in the West who were very anti-Saudi

00:05:52.080 Arabia. They said, you know, this was an attack on the free press and this was an attack on journalists,

00:05:57.400 but he wasn't really a journalist. He was a Saudi spy. And I'm not defending the Saudis for killing 0.82

00:06:01.120 one of their own spies, but, you know, play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They have a place called

00:06:04.780 Chop Chop Square in their country. All right. It's a dangerous government to work for. And so what did

00:06:09.120 they do? They lured Jamal Khashoggi into the Saudi embassy in Turkey, and then that's where they murdered

00:06:16.240 him. And when that happened, the Turkish government was not able to get into the embassy to investigate

00:06:21.900 for something like four or five days. Why? Because the host country is not able to violate

00:06:28.280 the embassy. It's the embassy just belongs to the country whose embassy it is.

00:06:36.200 So those rules apply to the host country. In this case, had Syria attacked the Iranian embassy in

00:06:42.820 Damascus, which would not have happened, but had that happened, that would be a clear violation of

00:06:47.580 international law. The fact that Israel, a third country, went in and did it means that it's actually

00:06:53.220 kind of outside the scope of that particular international law protection. But then there's

00:07:01.180 a more obvious way that Israel's actions might have violated international law. And that is that

00:07:05.840 an embassy, a consulate, is a civilian target. It's not a military target, right? Well, the attack that

00:07:14.440 Israel launched on the consulate in Damascus killed one of the top Iranian generals, as well as, I think,

00:07:21.940 six other Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders. So this attack took out a lot of top Iranian military

00:07:28.540 guys. So wait a second, was this really a civilian target? A consulate or an embassy, by definition,

00:07:36.740 I guess, is a civilian target. But obviously, the people who were blown up here were not civilians.

00:07:42.560 So military operations were obviously being planned in this consulate. And so there, I think Israel gets 0.87

00:07:47.960 off the hook, too. I don't think it's a violation of international law. It's pretty close, though. It's

00:07:53.340 pretty close. It's very audacious. And so Iran had to respond. And how did Iran respond? Did Iran

00:07:59.220 respond by a sneak attack that devastated the state of Israel? No. Iran responded by telegraphing for 0.57

00:08:04.820 three or four days, we are going to do this. Hey, heads up, America and the United Kingdom and Israel,

00:08:11.900 we are totally going to attack in these specific places. So, you know, I just want to let you know

00:08:18.680 that. And why did they do that? They did that so that this would not escalate the conflict, so that

00:08:23.600 the Iranian regime could save face to their own people, so the Iranian regime could in some way

00:08:28.580 reestablish deterrence, show that they're not just going to be walked all over. But they don't want

00:08:33.220 to escalate the conflict with a direct war, because Iran is in a pretty good position right now. Iran 0.79

00:08:38.100 doesn't need to directly attack Israel all that often, because its proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah and all 0.81

00:08:44.200 the little terror groups, the Houthis, will attack Israel for them. So we had the first ever direct 0.96

00:08:49.740 attack from Iran, okay. But it was kind of a fake attack. It didn't do very much. Now,

00:08:55.260 how are the Americans reacting? You've got the real war hawks. This guy, Joe Walsh, remember him? He was

00:09:00.960 a never-Trumper. I think he ran for president sort of back in, was it 2016 or 2020? I don't know. 0.98

00:09:07.600 He was one of the big never-Trumpers. And he came out, he said, an attack on Israel is an attack on

00:09:12.420 America, which is not true, actually. An attack on Israel is an attack on Israel. And an attack 0.51

00:09:20.080 on America is an attack on America, because they're different countries, and we have an alliance, but

00:09:24.300 we have different interests sometimes, and that's ridiculous. An attack on Italy is an attack on

00:09:29.380 America. No, it would be an attack on Italy. An attack on Sweden, it's an attack on Sweden. It's not

00:09:35.440 an attack on America. I have no idea even what Joe Walsh and some of the war hawks are talking about

00:09:39.840 here. Joe Biden's response, which he's being criticized for, was to call up Netanyahu reportedly

00:09:45.540 and to say, hey, you got to win. Let it go. Calm down. Don't hit Iran back. And much as it kills 0.96

00:09:51.620 me to say it, I think Biden's instincts are right there. Biden's broader foreign policy has been a

00:09:56.920 complete disaster and has led us to this point, and he's probably the cause of all of these wars.

00:10:00.980 But in this particular moment, his advice to Netanyahu, I think, is basically correct, 0.96

00:10:05.600 at least from the perspective of the American interest. They got a tit for tat here.

00:10:12.040 Israel hits the embassy, hits the consulate. Iran has this fake attack that injures one person,

00:10:20.040 not to downplay this poor little Bedouin child, but 200 missiles, drones, and you get almost no hits.

00:10:28.460 It's not bad. So Biden says, look, Bibi, you got to win. Take the win.

00:10:32.580 Now, Netanyahu doesn't want to take the win because the Israeli interest is to destroy Iran.

00:10:39.360 The Israeli interest is to destroy Iran. Fair enough. If I were the prime minister of Israel, 0.99

00:10:42.600 that's what I would want to do too. The Iranian interest is to maintain and expand regional 0.54

00:10:47.380 dominance, which right now for them means hitting Israel, being a credible threat against Israel, 0.63

00:10:54.220 using its proxy terror groups to attack Israel, but not necessarily escalating the war,

00:10:58.500 which could be devastating to the regime, but still keeping and expanding that regional dominance.

00:11:02.060 Okay, well, I don't really care what the Iranian and the Israeli interests are. I care what the

00:11:05.940 American interest is. What's the American interest? The American interest, as I've said from day one

00:11:10.020 of this conflict, is to contain the war and stop it from expanding. It's good that the United States

00:11:17.920 and the United Kingdom and the Israeli defense agencies were able to stop this massive attack

00:11:23.120 on the state of Israel. It's good. It's probably good that the Israelis weakened the Iranian regime 0.82

00:11:28.260 by hitting those generals, even though it was so audacious to hit a consulate. And now everybody

00:11:34.060 basically just needs to chill. That's kind of my view on it. What is President Trump's view? We'll

00:11:40.420 get to that in one second. First though, go to genusel.com slash Knowles. Gen 90 is the skincare

00:11:46.360 breakthrough from GenuCell that not only addresses those pesky bags and puffiness under your eyes,

00:11:49.960 but does so instantly. No more worrying about the effects of sleepless nights, stress, or seasonal

00:11:56.360 allergies on your appearance. Gen 90 is here to provide immediate relief. Gen 90 instantly reduces

00:12:01.980 the appearance of looking older anywhere you use it. It is a paraben-free, silky smooth solution. You

00:12:06.600 will feel the instant tightening as it touches your skin. Another testament to its effectiveness and

00:12:11.860 your confidence in its results. Right now, you will not only get GenuCell's classic under-eye bags

00:12:16.840 and puffiness serum with every Gen 90 order, but also their luxurious GenuCell XV, a collagen builder

00:12:23.640 moisturizer with vitamin C and hyaluronic acid in a pure natural base for stunning results day after

00:12:29.300 day. Go to genusel.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S right now for incredible packages over 50% off during

00:12:36.080 GenuCell's spring sale. See your results or get your money back, period, exclamation point. Order right now

00:12:44.140 and get a free limited edition spa box with bonus gifts and free shipping. You know, I love the

00:12:48.760 company. I love the owner of this company, a Coptic Christian from Egypt left for the American 0.98

00:12:52.300 dream. Go to GenuCell.com slash Knowles. That is GenuCell.com slash Knowles. You will recall some

00:13:00.020 years ago when the Iranian regime threatened the United States. Trump's response was not to say,

00:13:07.240 well, now listen here. Listen here. I have no problem if Iran wants to have a greater role in

00:13:14.900 its traditional sphere of influence. That was the Obama line about Russia, about Iran, about all of

00:13:20.720 our geopolitical foes. Trump's response was on Twitter, to Iranian President Rouhani, then all caps,

00:13:28.760 never ever threaten the United States again or you will suffer consequences the likes of which few

00:13:33.640 throughout history have ever suffered before. We are no longer a country that will stand for

00:13:37.840 your demented words of violence and death. Be cautious. And you know what happened during the

00:13:44.340 Trump years? Iran just kind of chilled. They just kind of played it cool. Russia just kind of played

00:13:52.140 it cool, man. They had, they invaded a country under George Bush. They invaded another country under

00:13:56.840 Barack Obama. Then they just kind of chilled during the Trump years. And then they further invaded a

00:14:01.140 country under Joe Biden. Why is that? Why is that? There's one reason. And it's not because Trump was

00:14:08.380 pro-Russia or anti-Russia. It's not because Trump is pro-Israel or anti-Israel. On this point, it is very

00:14:13.720 clear in the 2024 election, the pro-Israel candidate is Trump. The anti-Israel candidate is Biden. The pro-Israel

00:14:22.280 party is the Republican Party. The anti-Israel party is the Democrat Party. Maybe you like that. Maybe you don't

00:14:26.260 like that. It doesn't matter. That's, that's what it is. Trump posts on Truth Social immediately after

00:14:31.040 this attack. All caps, America supports Israel, exclamation mark. There's a town in Israel named 0.80

00:14:37.020 after Donald Trump. There's a train station in Israel named after Donald Trump. Donald Trump brought

00:14:40.880 peace to the Middle East, got the Abraham Accords done. He's the pro-Israel candidate. Had Trump been

00:14:45.360 president, this never would have happened. The Iran, the October 7th attack almost certainly would 1.00

00:14:50.800 never have happened. Russia probably would not have invaded Ukraine. That's, that's not just according

00:14:54.940 to me. That's according to President Zelensky of Ukraine. None of these foreign policy crises would

00:14:59.500 have occurred under Trump most likely. But Joe Biden's president, it happens. Here's Trump's

00:15:04.640 reaction to the attack on Saturday. Before going any further, I want to say God bless the people of

00:15:10.980 Israel. They're under attack right now. That's, that's because we show great weakness. This would 0.98

00:15:17.080 not happen. The weakness that we've shown is unbelievable. And it would not have happened if we were in

00:15:23.660 office. You know that they know that everybody knows that. Very true. We all know that. Why would

00:15:29.320 this not have happened? Because look, it's very clear. Trump is clearly in favor of Israel and

00:15:34.860 opposed to Iran. Obama had been against Israel and in favor of Iran and gave Iran pallets of cash and

00:15:41.140 paid obeisance to the Iranian regime. And so that part was clear. But, but remember when Trump came

00:15:45.800 into office, we were told he was pro-Russia. Remember that? It was BS, but, but why then is it the case 0.60

00:15:54.180 that if Trump were ostensibly pro-Russia, Russia would not have invaded Ukraine on his watch?

00:16:00.960 And Trump is pro-Israel, but, but Iran would never have attacked Israel under his watch. Why,

00:16:06.960 why is it? Why is it? It doesn't matter which side he supports that you wouldn't have seen this kind

00:16:10.860 of belligerence under Trump because it's not about, uh, aggression versus meekness. And it's not about

00:16:18.700 supporting this side or that side. The, the brilliance of Trump's foreign policy was unpredictability.

00:16:26.220 That's it. Biden is predictable. Obama was very predictable. George Bush, for that matter,

00:16:32.180 certainly after the first couple of years of his administration was, was predictable.

00:16:35.740 Trump is not. When the mullahs, when the Ayatollah sees this tweet from Trump,

00:16:43.000 all caps, you will suffer consequences, the likes of which few throughout history have ever suffered

00:16:46.640 before. We will no longer stand for your demented words of violence and death. Probably the Ayatollah

00:16:51.920 thinks 5% chance he attacks us. 95% chance he doesn't attack us. We can't take the risk because

00:16:58.140 Trump was a dove in so many ways. And then he drops the Moab. He drops the mother of all bombs.

00:17:03.720 Trump was a dove in so many ways. He wanted peace, peace, peace. He was meeting with Kim

00:17:07.700 Jong-un for, for goodness sakes. And then he takes out the top Iranian general. And you just have no

00:17:13.020 idea what this guy's going to do. He tells Putin, he says, Hey, if you invade Ukraine, I'm going to

00:17:18.840 blow up the Kremlin. And, and I, I think Trump himself said this. He said, you know, probably Putin

00:17:24.200 thought I was five to 10% serious and that's enough. That's enough to deter with, with Biden,

00:17:29.680 you don't get that. And so the world descends into chaos. Now, what does a top Trump advisor,

00:17:37.560 former lawyer for the president, former mayor of New York, a man very well acquainted with terror 0.94

00:17:41.140 attacks. What does Giuliani think about all of this? Giuliani comes out and he says, you know,

00:17:48.840 the way Republicans need to think about an attack like this is to ask themselves the question they've

00:17:52.760 asked themselves for 40 years. WWRD, what would Reagan do?

00:17:59.420 I really do think we're missing an opportunity, a historic opportunity here.

00:18:04.580 If we had a president like my old boss in the White House, every time I was mayor and I had to

00:18:09.720 make a difficult decision, I would say, what would Ronald Reagan do? I know what Ronald Reagan would do

00:18:14.080 right now. He, he, he would have hit Iran before their first missile got to Israel and he would 0.99

00:18:20.180 have taken out every nuclear facility he could. Because he would have been trying to look for

00:18:26.020 an opportunity to do that for years. Now we take out their nuclear facilities. Here's what the

00:18:32.580 traders who run our government said. They say, oh, they'll just build it back up again.

00:18:37.900 Well, that'll take them 10 years to do. Also, if you really know what's going on inside Iran,

00:18:43.300 if we were to hit them before they hit us, it would destroy, it would destroy them.

00:18:49.200 I mean, they obviously are a frightened enemy. You wouldn't do an attack like this unless you

00:18:54.820 were timid. Best thing to do with a frightened enemy is knock them out.

00:18:59.360 Okay. Love Rudy. He's great. Greatest mayor in the history of New York. Really liked the guy.

00:19:04.160 I think his analysis is off base here. I don't think Ronald Reagan would have attacked Iran

00:19:10.520 before the first missile hit. And the reason is because we have seen a similar situation,

00:19:16.680 a far more devastating situation actually, and far more devastating, not just to the Israelis,

00:19:21.320 but to the Americans. And that was the Beirut barracks bombings. When terrorists blew up

00:19:28.460 an American target in Beirut and killed what, 250 troops or thereabouts. And what did Reagan do?

00:19:35.600 Did he just blow them all up? Did he glass the Middle East? No, he did basically nothing. He

00:19:41.100 pulled the troops out, actually, is what he did. Ronald Reagan, through the mists of history and

00:19:46.680 mythology, is seen as this belligerent war hawk. Even at the time, he was viewed as a cowboy.

00:19:54.060 But if you look at his actual foreign policy, he was much more of a dove in practice. If you look at

00:20:02.860 his actual foreign policy, his response to the Beirut barracks bombings was to pull the troops.

00:20:07.340 And then he tried to negotiate away all the nuclear weapons when he was negotiating with Gorbachev.

00:20:14.040 The similarities between the Reagan and the Trump foreign policy are really striking in that both

00:20:19.020 were called cowboys, both were called crazy, both were called belligerent. And yet in practice,

00:20:23.100 they were much more dovish. But they still had that deterrence factor. They still had that

00:20:28.180 speak softly, carry a big stick, or with Donald Trump, you know, speak in all sorts of ways,

00:20:32.320 totally unpredictable ways. But carry the big stick, but don't always use the big stick.

00:20:37.980 Okay? So, you know, there are going to be a lot of calls to escalate this conflict.

00:20:42.580 Seems to me everyone's made it out pretty well here. And we can just kind of keep calm and carry on.

00:20:48.620 I think that's what Reagan would do. I think that's probably what Trump would do.

00:20:51.680 And if either of those guys had been in the office, none of this would be happening in the

00:20:54.580 first place. Speaking of the current state of the American right, Carrie Lake. Another Republican

00:21:01.320 politician that I like very much, Carrie Lake, I think also has her analysis a little bit off. 1.00

00:21:07.360 She just came out as part of her Arizona Senate campaign to advance her new platform on abortion. 0.94

00:21:17.460 Take a listen.

00:21:18.360 This total ban on abortion that the Arizona Supreme Court just ruled on is out of line with where the

00:21:25.880 people of this state are. The issue is less about banning abortion and more about saving babies.

00:21:31.980 I agree with President Trump. This is such a personal and private issue. I chose life,

00:21:37.040 but I'm not every woman. I want to make sure that every woman who finds herself pregnant

00:21:42.840 has more choices so that she can make that choice that I made. I'll never forget the first time I

00:21:49.740 got pregnant, taking that pregnancy test, looking down and I was excited, but I'll be honest. I was

00:21:57.260 afraid as well. I was nervous. I was anxious. It's natural for women to be nervous and anxious when 1.00

00:22:03.880 they're pregnant. I never would ever assume that any woman had the same exact feelings I had

00:22:09.420 or situation I had. Okay. I like Carrie Lake. I hope she wins her seat in Arizona and everything. 1.00

00:22:16.200 I don't know who advised her to change her stance on abortion and adopt this view. This is a terrible,

00:22:23.740 a terrible view, both morally and politically. It is unjust in itself and it will not work

00:22:32.460 politically. It will repel pro-lifers. It won't attract pro-abortion people. Look, people sometimes

00:22:38.200 make mistakes in politics. It happens all the time. Whichever advisor advised Carrie Lake to adopt 0.96

00:22:44.260 this view and to put out this commercial should be fired yesterday. This was a huge, totally unforced

00:22:50.120 error. We'll get to why in just a moment. First, though, I mentioned I'm going to University of

00:22:55.580 Illinois tomorrow. It should be a lot of fun. I was just at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,

00:23:00.520 and you can check out the latest episode of Cross the Line. Here's a short clip.

00:23:04.480 Hundreds of people came in, they filled all the seats, and they were polite for almost the whole

00:23:11.440 time. I'm standing here now, a biological male wearing a dress with a pair of leggings. Do you

00:23:16.040 sincerely believe that I should be subject to punitive justice on the basis of what I'm wearing?

00:23:20.300 And if so, are you willing to turn yourself in for wearing women's panties in your gay college film?

00:23:26.120 I say almost the whole time because a couple students, one who called himself transgender and

00:23:32.100 another who called herself non-binary, became a bit more pointed during the Q&A. I was happy to

00:23:38.540 answer their questions. So happy, in fact, that we all decided to sit down and have a conversation

00:23:44.320 after the event. This series is about finding one or two students who don't just scream and yell and

00:23:51.080 throw explosives at the building, but who actually have the courage to show up while disagreeing and

00:23:56.580 then sit down and have a discussion face-to-face. Watch the full episode now on YouTube. If you are

00:24:01.620 planning to come protest my YAF speech at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign tomorrow

00:24:07.000 night and you want to discuss our difference in viewpoints, well, just find producer Ben Davies and

00:24:14.060 yell at him.

00:24:16.740 Carrie Lake, this is a very unfortunate new policy on abortion. I want to get this out of the way at the

00:24:23.580 top. I understand that it's a controversial issue. I understand that Republicans probably are not going

00:24:32.760 to campaign on this being their number one issue and they're not going to campaign in the clearest

00:24:37.620 moral and ethical terms on this issue. I get it. I'm not even opposed to that. Prudence is the top

00:24:44.220 political virtue and prudence is a really good thing. So if it were the case that Carrie Lake came out 1.00

00:24:51.140 and she said, you know, I'm pro-life and I want more babies to be saved and fewer babies to be killed

00:24:56.560 and that's where I am. This race is going to be won on Joe Biden's terrible economy and on Joe Biden's

00:25:04.280 terrible immigration policies and on the way that Joe Biden has pummeled the American family and she just

00:25:09.120 focused on other issues and downplayed the abortion issue. I would totally get it. I would applaud her. 0.70

00:25:13.860 I would think that's actually pretty prudent and would ultimately, it would be both perfectly just

00:25:19.800 in itself and redound to the benefit of the cause of life in the long run. That's not what she's

00:25:24.880 doing here. What she and I fear some other Republicans are going to end up doing is just

00:25:31.360 moving to the left on abortion and still running on abortion, which is a huge mistake. You know,

00:25:36.840 the reason that the pro-lifer is here, that the conservatives don't want to run on abortion,

00:25:41.460 is it's kind of controversial and pretty much any statement you make about it is going to lose you

00:25:45.820 some votes. So you got to downplay it a little bit. Well, here she's doing the worst possible 1.00

00:25:49.620 thing, which is she's adopting the pro-choice, pro-abortion rhetoric, which means she's going 0.88

00:25:54.080 to alienate her own base, the pro-lifers who are probably the most motivated voters on the right. 1.00

00:25:58.840 So she's going to suppress the foot soldiers in any Republican campaign, the pro-life campaigns. 0.99

00:26:04.340 She's going to suppress enthusiasm from her own side, which she needs every single one of those guys 1.00

00:26:09.680 to come out and vote for. And she's going to totally fail to win over the pro-abortion people 1.00

00:26:14.960 who view her as a surrogate for Trump. She's part of the MAGA wing of the party. They hate her, 0.65

00:26:19.660 especially, even more than they hated, you know, John McCain from her state or Mitt Romney or one of

00:26:26.280 the squishier Republicans. So it's just not going to work. The problem here is the Republicans who

00:26:32.860 advocate talking in this squishier, pro-choice way about abortion, they think they're being really

00:26:37.400 prudent. They're being very imprudent. This is not going to help them at all. And what Carrie

00:26:42.600 Lake said here is not just a kind of downplaying or a kind of prevarication about abortion. These are

00:26:49.620 talking points from the Democrats in 2008. Okay, what did she say exactly? This is such a personal and

00:26:55.960 private issue. It's not. It's a public issue. It's a political issue because the question is, do we have

00:27:02.340 the right to kill innocent people? That makes it political. If it's just about you, first of all,

00:27:08.400 there's really no issue that rises to the level of a national discussion and debate that is purely

00:27:14.260 private. Even doing drugs or something, which seems like it's private. It's not really private

00:27:18.980 because it affects your communities. It affects, you know, your safety while walking down the street

00:27:23.800 or while driving or anything, you know. But this isn't even talking about the legalization of some

00:27:29.420 drug or other. This is about, do you have the right to kill another innocent person?

00:27:33.500 So that's obviously a political issue. The Democrats want to pretend it's a personal issue

00:27:36.720 because they deny that the baby is a baby. So that's a totally adopting the pro-abortion side

00:27:42.080 of the issue. I chose life, but I'm not every woman. Hold on. What? You chose life. That's very 0.87

00:27:49.020 laudable. That's good. You should be proud of that. I chose life, but I'm not every woman. So some,

00:27:53.980 I chose not to murder my precious baby, but you poor people, you should, you can kill your babies if you 1.00

00:27:59.360 want. You black people, you can kill your babies if you want. You people in the inner city, you can 1.00

00:28:03.240 kill your babies if you want. Forget about even the racial and the socioeconomic distinctions. 0.81

00:28:08.000 You Democrats, you can kill your babies if you want. You liberals, you can kill your babies. No,

00:28:12.540 no. The reason it's wrong to kill a baby is not that the baby might turn out to be a Republican.

00:28:20.420 It's not that the baby comes from a certain socioeconomic class or a certain geographic location

00:28:24.720 or a certain race or anything else. The reason it's wrong to kill a baby is because the baby's a 0.95

00:28:28.200 human being, an innocent, totally incoherent line. I chose life, but I'm not every woman. 0.99

00:28:35.260 You chose life because it's good for you and for your baby not to kill the baby. It's good for your

00:28:39.780 soul. It's good for your baby not to die. And it's good for society not to tolerate infanticide. 0.75

00:28:46.600 So why don't you want that good thing for other women too? I want to make sure that every woman 1.00

00:28:52.460 who finds herself pregnant has more choices so that she can make the choice that I made. What? 0.99

00:28:58.780 Oh man, that sentence is one word off from being acceptable and maybe even good. It says,

00:29:06.800 I want to make sure that every woman who finds herself pregnant has more fill in the blank. 1.00

00:29:12.360 resources, has more support, has more, sure, all those words are fine, so that she can make the

00:29:20.940 choice that I made. I mean, I'd also like to make sure that the law supports protecting innocent life

00:29:27.280 so we don't just totally leave it up to the whims of these individuals. But sure, I like that. I want

00:29:32.200 to make sure every woman who finds herself pregnant has support, has love, has care, has resources.

00:29:36.820 Yeah. I want to make sure she has more choices so that she can make the choice that I made. How does 0.97

00:29:43.040 having more choices help her to make the choice that you made? If the choice that she has is

00:29:51.060 have her baby and raise the baby or give the baby up for adoption, then she is going to be more likely 1.00

00:29:57.420 to make the choice that you made. If she has a third choice though, if the choices are have the baby

00:30:01.620 and raise the baby, give the baby up for adoption or murder the baby in the womb, she is going to be 1.00

00:30:06.260 less likely to make the choice that you made. The expansion of the number of choices is not going

00:30:11.600 to incentivize her to make the choice that you made, namely not to kill the baby. Choice, choice,

00:30:18.180 choice. This is the pro-choice position. Totally. I don't want, I don't mean to beat up on Carrie Lake

00:30:24.520 so much. I assume this was just a blunder and campaigns make, every campaign makes a blunder,

00:30:30.420 okay? But whoever advised her to do this should be fired. I hope that person has been fired already.

00:30:35.160 This is completely unacceptable to the pro-life movement, and she will lose if she keeps this up.

00:30:40.940 She will, and it's not because I'm telling people not to vote for her. If I were in Arizona,

00:30:44.840 I would quietly urge her to change her position, but I would recognize that the other candidate is

00:30:53.540 going to be extremely pro-abortion too. And so I would make a political calculation here. I'm not

00:30:59.220 telling people not to vote for Carrie Lake. If she loses, it's not because I'm telling them not to vote

00:31:02.320 for her. But I am making a prediction right now. If she keeps up this line where she's going to be

00:31:07.820 almost totally pro-legal abortion, but not quite the set, she's going to lose. She's going to lose. 0.73

00:31:13.580 She's going to, the pro-lifers are not going to show up and she's going to lose. And she's going to

00:31:17.220 have no one to blame but herself and her advisors. If, if this is her line, completely insane. Let this be 0.94

00:31:23.660 a warning, not only to the late campaign, which I hope fixes the ship and goes on. She's got a ton

00:31:31.240 of political talents. She could make a great Senator. This should be a warning to the other 1.00

00:31:35.680 Republican campaigns too. This way lies madness. Speaking of abortion, Bill Maher, big lib, came out

00:31:42.980 and admitted what the Democrats have denied for a long time, most of them, and what the conservatives

00:31:49.700 have been pointing out, which is that abortion is in fact murder. The idea that you're fighting an 0.71

00:31:55.320 election around this issue, um, seems to be, you know, just strange back to the 19th century.

00:32:04.120 Well, not if you believe it's murder, you know, that's why I don't understand the 15 week thing

00:32:13.980 or the Trump's plan is let's leave it to the States. You mean, so killing babies is okay in

00:32:19.860 some States. Like I can respect the, the absolutist position. I really can. I, I, I scold the left on

00:32:27.180 when they say, Oh, you know what? They just hate women, people who aren't pro life. They do the pro 1.00

00:32:33.400 choice. They just, they don't hate women. They just made that up. They think it's murder and it kind

00:32:39.760 of is I'm just okay with that. I am. I mean, there's 8 billion people in the world. I'm sorry.

00:32:47.100 We won't miss you. That's my position on that. Two cheers for Bill Maher, not three cheers. Cause

00:32:54.760 what he's saying is evil, but two cheers because what he's saying is honest. And it's a lot more

00:33:00.500 honest than what the Democrats are saying. And his views are actually charitable toward, toward the

00:33:04.740 Republicans. He's saying, yeah, look, if you, if you think as murder and you, and you think murder

00:33:10.840 is always bad, uh, then yeah, it's not your, your pro life support is not motivated by misogyny.

00:33:17.620 It's motivated by your care, not to murder innocent people. By the way, you're right that it's murder.

00:33:22.300 I'm just okay with that. We have overpopulation. I remember these views. I held these views when I was,

00:33:27.200 when I was pro choice, I made the same arguments Bill Maher did. I, I did not think it was murder.

00:33:31.800 I don't, I wouldn't have said it was tantamount to murder. He's going a little further, but he's

00:33:35.940 just being clearer than I was when I was a 16 year old idiot. He's, he's articulating the Naomi

00:33:41.820 Wolf argument from the mid nineties, which was that, uh, uh, abortion should be legal. I'm all for 0.87

00:33:50.300 abortion, but we need to recognize that a woman in an abortion is killing the baby in all of its 0.98

00:33:56.480 humanity. That was Naomi. Now she may have changed her position since then. She's become more right 0.98

00:34:00.000 wing since then. But, but that's what Bill Maher is saying here. And this is the practical problem

00:34:06.780 for the, the conservatives and the Republicans running on this. Hey, I'm personally pro life,

00:34:12.820 but I want people to just have choices and please, please don't not vote for me because I support

00:34:18.720 not killing babies or whatever. Any position other than the principled one, which is that it's wrong to

00:34:25.320 murder innocent people is going to make you look like a liar. And it's going to make you look really,

00:34:30.700 really cynical. And it's going to undermine your whole argument. That's why the libs are trying to

00:34:34.460 get us to undermine our argument. They want us to embrace the surrogacy industry, for instance,

00:34:38.880 you know, IVF, where you create a bunch of babies and then in practically speaking, most of them, you

00:34:43.500 either throw in a freezer forever or you just kill them through abortion. They really want to make 0.99

00:34:47.480 Republicans in principle, adopt support for IVF and surrogacy because they know that it undermines

00:34:53.180 our argument on pro life, because it means that we don't really believe that life begins at

00:34:57.260 conception, which by definition it does because conception, it's the beginning. This is the

00:35:03.940 practical argument, the practical problem with trying to squish on this issue. If conservatives

00:35:09.780 don't want to have to run on abortion as the big issue in 2024, good. That's smart. That's prudent.

00:35:17.820 And we need to be wise as serpents and innocent as doves. Okay. And we can have all sorts

00:35:23.140 of language and all sorts of legitimate policies about supporting women, giving them a lot of

00:35:27.720 resources, giving people, giving young families resources, encouraging marriage. We can do all

00:35:33.220 that. That's great. And you can downplay the issue of abortion in a campaign. But if you're going to flip

00:35:43.660 on your support for the fundamental right without which none of the other rights can exist,

00:35:52.040 on which all of the other rights rely, then you have just undercut your entire position in public

00:35:58.980 life. What is the, if we're not even going to defend the basic right, then what's the point of

00:36:05.680 political participation? Then we stand for nothing. Listen, folks, you need to subscribe. You need to

00:36:13.760 ring that bell. Subscribe to the Michael Nolsch YouTube channel. Destroy that like button with facts

00:36:17.980 and logic and mouse clicks. I don't, no one has a mouse anymore with trackpad movements. I don't

00:36:24.160 know, whatever. Ring that bell, subscribe to the channel. That way you'll never miss a video.

00:36:29.560 Speaking of changing views on abortion, according to Pew Research, six in 10 Catholics support legal

00:36:36.920 abortion. This is really shocking because the Catholic church has always been against abortion.

00:36:40.500 From the very beginning of the church, 2,000 years ago, the earliest documents we have from the

00:36:48.080 church, the didache, for goodness sakes, the original kind of catechism of the church,

00:36:53.260 going back what, 1900 years, 1800, 1900 years, opposes abortion. This is as consistent a view 0.81

00:37:01.740 in practical politics as can be held by the Catholic church. And now most American Catholics support

00:37:07.620 abortion. What? What does that mean? Well, by definition, it is not possible for faithful 0.99

00:37:16.380 practicing Catholics to support abortion. It's not, it is not possible. If you support abortion, 0.96

00:37:24.140 you are not a faithful practicing Catholic. You're, you're, you could be a baptized Catholic.

00:37:29.500 You, but you, you cannot be a faithful practicing Catholic if you do that. It's not even like saying,

00:37:35.240 you know, to be Catholic, you have to be perfect all the time and you can never sin. We're not

00:37:38.940 talking about, you know, a failure of continence. You know, you, you, you glutted yourself. You,

00:37:46.780 you said a naughty word. You, I don't know, you did drugs. You looked at porn. You got drunk.

00:37:52.140 You, whatever. Those would be sins, certainly, and you should go and confess your sins and receive

00:37:57.160 absolution. But in this case, what we're talking about is something much more conscious and much more

00:38:01.920 doctrinal. You're saying, I do not assent to the teachings of the church and I will continue. I will

00:38:08.460 persist in defiance of the church, of the 2000 year magisterial teaching of the church on this

00:38:13.880 issue. This is not a negotiable issue. You know, Pope Benedict XVI opposed the death penalty. And he

00:38:19.920 said, look, Catholics can disagree on this. For virtually all of the church's history, the church

00:38:24.700 has defended in principle, the death penalty. In fact, popes, including beatified popes carried it out.

00:38:28.780 Okay. Blessed Pius IX carried out 500 executions in the papal states. All right. So there you might

00:38:35.140 say, okay, there might be some disagreement. Not so on abortion. So what does this mean? What it means

00:38:40.360 in practice is not that the Catholic church is changing its teaching on abortion. It cannot do

00:38:45.800 that. What it means is Catholics are giving up their collective political power. Catholics by, 0.55

00:38:50.880 by breaking with, by breaking ranks and by breaking with the teaching of their church,

00:38:56.180 they're just giving up their, their political power. And so it doesn't, you don't need to win

00:38:59.420 the Catholic vote anymore. If this is the case, because the Catholic vote doesn't mean anything

00:39:03.400 because these Catholics, when it comes down to it, a conflict between the God of the Catholic church

00:39:09.380 and the God of liberalism, they're going to choose the God of liberalism. It's been two years fighting

00:39:14.940 with the libs with great products from Jeremy's razors and all of the, the Jeremy's products. Well,

00:39:21.080 they're only getting better. Jeremy's second gen razors are here. You can notice the reconstructed

00:39:26.740 ergonomic handle for durability and coated stainless steel blades that last longer. Plus

00:39:31.260 you can enjoy more flexibility for a close shave without nicks or cuts. For those who meticulously

00:39:36.520 craft their masculine look, we're introducing Jeremy's new Precision 5 razor with a precision

00:39:44.560 trimmer and enhanced comfort. Experience an exceptionally smooth and close shave with added durability

00:39:49.080 to withstand those accidental drops. And if shaving feels like a chore, meet the brand new Sprint 3

00:39:54.400 with open blade geometry for a swift clean shave, allowing you to get back to your manly pursuits

00:39:58.520 in no time. Head on over to jeremysrazors.com to upgrade to your new second gen razor today.

00:40:03.800 My favorite comment on Friday is from Frank S111, who says, OJ was the original St. Floyd to the BLM

00:40:13.680 community. That's not true. Rodney King was. I don't even know if we say original, but he was

00:40:18.740 certainly one of them. It was Rodney King. Rodney King was this career criminal, wife-beater,

00:40:23.660 druggy lunatic who was viciously beaten by the LAPD. And it was after Rodney King led them in a

00:40:30.160 very dangerous high-speed pursuit that reached 117 miles an hour. And the cops beat up Rodney King

00:40:35.140 in a similar way that Rodney King beat up his wives. And this led to the LA riots, which killed 63

00:40:41.460 people. They had to call in the Marines and the National Guard. And then the jury let OJ off the hook

00:40:47.440 for almost beheading his wife and killing her friend because of that as payback for what they

00:40:53.300 viewed as the poor, innocent Rodney King being beaten up by the LAPD. So that was where it came

00:41:01.020 from. It was similar principles as we saw in BLM and George Floyd, but slightly different characters.

00:41:06.280 I saw the comments from Frank S, by the way, and you know who that must refer to? You guessed it,

00:41:11.280 Frank Stallone. Speaking of changing political views, Mike Pence is going on a tour asking

00:41:21.020 Republicans to do a little soul searching. He's looking at, he's saying, which way,

00:41:26.520 Republican man? And here is the line that he's been repeating at most of his speeches.

00:41:32.440 The essential question facing the Republican Party is this, will we be the party of conservatism

00:41:37.520 and the constitution? Or will we follow the siren song of populism unmoored to conservative

00:41:43.680 principles? That's a fair question. I like Mike Pence. He's probably not in the ascendant wing of

00:41:51.180 the GOP right now is a diplomatic way to put it, but I always liked the guy. What do Mike Pence's

00:41:57.020 friends say about this? According to Tony Perkins from the Family Research Council, he says,

00:42:01.780 I think Mike is stuck in the Republican Party of the past. I think the party has changed,

00:42:08.560 fundamentally changed, and it's not just about Trump. Okay. I think many people share Tony

00:42:13.400 Perkins's view. And what about Newt Gingrich? I just saw Newt Gingrich last week. I was at an event

00:42:17.620 in Florida, a pro-life event, and Speaker Gingrich and his wife, Ambassador Calista Gingrich, were there.

00:42:23.000 Great to see them. Newt Gingrich, one of the great all-time political observers and wielders of power,

00:42:28.880 one of the most important speakers in the history of the U.S. Congress. He said,

00:42:32.880 there are a number of Republicans who, for a variety of different reasons, want to cling to

00:42:36.880 a system which is now basically gone and will be the minority wing of the Republican Party for the

00:42:40.780 foreseeable future. Had he asked me, it is not what I would have advised Mike to do. Okay.

00:42:49.260 The thing that Mike Pence is getting wrong here is not that the new version of the Republican Party

00:42:54.180 is totally perfect. You know, it's not, he's not getting wrong that there are issues with how the

00:43:00.860 Republican Party is evolving. There are some issues. There are some problems. We've addressed

00:43:03.700 some of those problems today. The thing that Mike Pence is getting wrong is not that the old

00:43:12.980 Republican Party didn't have some advantages. I personally am happy to see the way the Republican

00:43:19.240 Party has changed, broadly speaking. I think the Republican Party of today, for all its flaws,

00:43:24.180 is actually healthier than the Republican Party of, say, 2011. So it's not to say that I'm,

00:43:31.500 that's not even totally what he's getting wrong. What he's getting wrong is the fact of change in

00:43:40.440 political life. Conservatism and liberalism will always be changing. That is not hypocrisy. That is

00:43:51.600 not an abandonment of principles. That is how politics works. Politics is the application of

00:43:58.680 some eternal principles to changing political circumstances. If the way that the Republican

00:44:06.220 Party spoke and acted and addressed issues did not change, that would be an abandonment of true

00:44:14.380 conservatism. That would be the abandonment of principles. That would be bizarre and insane and

00:44:18.880 totally ineffective. Because politics is about people and society. It is a practical science and

00:44:24.720 society and people change over time. And you've got to be able to adapt and deal with those new

00:44:30.960 problems. That's what a principled politician does. A principled politician doesn't live

00:44:36.440 in the past and rest on his laurels and say, well, this is, you know, back in 1987, Ronald Reagan had

00:44:44.060 this really great zinger. Yeah, I'm sure he did have a good zinger, but that was 1987. What are we doing

00:44:48.420 now? Reagan's been dead for how many years now? Let the boy rest, you know? He was a good, he was a good

00:44:53.880 man. He was a good president. How about we address our own problems? That's what you got to do.

00:45:01.420 Doesn't make you principled not to meet the moment as new moments arise in politics.

00:45:09.140 You might think it does, but it doesn't. Now, speaking of principles, switching gears a little

00:45:13.100 bit, Billy D. Williams, cool, crisp, Billy D. Williams, Lando Calarissian himself, just told Bill

00:45:21.400 Maher. I don't know why there's so much Bill Maher in the show today. It's really, we're just focusing

00:45:24.660 on Lando here. Billy D. Says that blackface is totally fun. 1.00

00:45:31.000 Olivier was more, more physical. Okay. In fact, he got criticized a lot for being physical and doing

00:45:37.500 things with his voice. That was a bit outrageous. Wow. But when he did Othello, I fell out laughing.

00:45:45.980 He stuck his ass out and walked around with his ass. Problematic. You know, it was like, you know,

00:45:57.220 because black people are supposed to have big asses, right? Oh, I understand. I fell out laughing. 1.00

00:46:02.520 I thought it was. And Bradley Cooper thinks he's got a problem with the nose. I thought it was hysterical.

00:46:08.320 I loved it. I loved it. But see, I love that kind of stuff. Yes. Big asses? Who doesn't? 1.00

00:46:15.180 No, no. No, I know. I agree. Okay. But here's the thing. Today, I mean, they would never let you do

00:46:23.180 that. Why? Blackface? Why not? Because- You should do it. That's, maybe that's your point of view. 0.95

00:46:33.160 If you're an actor, you should do anything you want to do. Totally right. He's totally right. I've said

00:46:39.160 this before. There was one time when one of these blackface non-traverses came up. I was driving in 1.00

00:46:46.520 a car. I was in an Uber in LA with a black driver. And this came up. It was on the radio or something.

00:46:53.240 I said, oh, yeah, yeah. You hear about this blackface thing? And he said, oh, man, you know,

00:46:56.740 blackface, I think that's fine. I said, really? You do? He said, yeah. It's all in good fun.

00:47:01.920 I don't care. I think blackface is totally fine. And it gave me some pause because I was told that

00:47:08.900 black people were terribly offended by blackface. But they're not. White liberals pretend to be

00:47:14.380 offended by blackface. I don't think black people generally are. And whether they are or aren't, 1.00

00:47:19.220 it's totally fine. We're talking about acting. In acting, you're supposed to play people that you

00:47:25.120 are not. Now we're living at a time when we're told that a straight man can't play a gay character.

00:47:31.520 A cisgender, quote unquote, man can't play a trans character. But then we just found out

00:47:36.300 there's a trans identifying actor who no longer wants to play trans characters because the trans

00:47:40.860 identifying actor wants to play women. But he's a man. So a man who thinks he's a woman is allowed 0.97

00:47:46.060 to play a man. But the man who thinks he's a woman shouldn't should no longer play a man who

00:47:50.360 thinks that he's a woman. And a man who knows that he's a man can't play a man who thinks that he's a

00:47:53.080 woman. Does that make any sense to you? It's acting. It's pretend. People shouldn't take it

00:47:56.740 so seriously. But what's the distinction here? Because I do think that there are certain blackface 0.99

00:48:02.540 performances that could be offensive and in very poor taste and should not be done. So what's the

00:48:07.120 difference? What's the difference between Lando Calarissian here, Billy Dee Williams saying,

00:48:14.280 oh, it's fine, man. It's okay if Laurence Olivier wants to play Othello. It's fine if Joy Behar wants to

00:48:20.960 dress up as Diana Ross or whatever she did for Halloween that year. Got her in trouble, 1.00

00:48:24.380 but she's a liberal, so she got away with it. What's the difference between that and some really

00:48:28.220 offensive blackface performance? The difference is charity. If you're doing this performance 0.90

00:48:34.380 and you like black people, you know, and you sort of love black people and you treat them as human

00:48:41.080 beings, it seems totally fine. If you're putting on that makeup and you're doing that performance

00:48:46.340 because you really hate these people and you have no charity for them whatsoever and you just

00:48:49.680 really want to get them, that's what would make it awful. It's not the accident of the shoe polish

00:48:54.720 or whatever. It's not the makeup that Joy Behar wore. The thing that makes it good or bad,

00:49:01.800 acceptable or unacceptable, is the orientation of the heart, which we're not allowed to

00:49:05.640 even discuss anymore because we've adopted a very shallow view of politics and society that ignores the

00:49:12.820 the most fundamental aspects of human nature and the most important of all of the virtues.

00:49:19.380 The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code

00:49:22.560 Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-A-S, at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.

00:49:25.580 Knowles, K-N-A-W-E-Med所 Through Will

00:49:30.880 Now

00:49:32.220 Knowles, K-N-A-E-T 0.84

00:49:33.740 Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-A-S, at checkout for two months.

00:49:34.240 Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-A-M-A-U-L-A-S

00:49:35.580 K-N-A-W-L-A-V-C-T 1.00

00:49:37.580 Knowles, K-N-A-S 1.00

00:49:39.420 K-N-A-W-L-A-L-A-L-U-A-L-L-A-M largewarz. 1.00

00:49:39.580 You

The Michael Knowles Show - April 15, 2024

Ep. 1468 - Iran's Attack On Israel EXPLAINED In 3 Mins

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript