A Supreme Court ruling affirms a longstanding, albeit largely untested legal tradition: that presidents enjoy substantial, though not absolute, legal immunity for actions relating to their official duties in office. So naturally, Democratic congressmen have responded by proposing that President Joe Biden drone strike the court s conservative justices.
00:00:21.280Best of all, Good Ranchers delivers straight to your door for added convenience.
00:00:24.760So lock in a secure supply of American meat today.
00:00:26.980Subscribe now at GoodRanchers.com and get free meat for life and $40 off with code DAILYWIRE.
00:00:32.400That's $40 off and free meat for life with code DAILYWIRE.
00:00:35.700Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.
00:00:37.580U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 yesterday to affirm a longstanding, albeit largely untested legal tradition,
00:00:44.440that presidents enjoy substantial, though not absolute, legal immunity for actions relating to their official duties in office.
00:00:51.420So naturally, Democrat congressmen have responded by proposing that Biden drone strike the court's conservatives.
00:00:59.840I guess, you know, theoretically, President Biden, acting within the scope of his official duties,
00:01:07.520could dispatch the military to take out the conservative justices on the court, and he'd be immune.
00:01:13.820Democrats have been threatening conservatives on the court with violence for some years now.
00:01:17.740Back in 2020, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer infamously screamed outside the court, quote,
00:01:23.580I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.
00:01:29.240You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
00:01:34.420Since Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, this could not have been a political threat that they wouldn't be reelected or something.
00:01:40.560It could only have been what it was, a literal threat of violence, which the justices have endured.
00:01:46.780Justice Kavanaugh was nearly assassinated by a leftist in 2022 after other leftists leaked the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
00:01:54.980Justice Sam Alito was forced to move out of his house for a time.
00:01:58.040The threats from the left became so intense.
00:02:00.920Now, Congressman Zoe Lofgren is suggesting that the court's decision means Biden can and perhaps should murder them all.
00:02:08.000But that's not what the court ruling says.
00:04:25.000What did the Supreme Court say yesterday?
00:04:28.580According to the Libs, the Supreme Court said that if Joe Biden wants to, he can and perhaps should drone strike the conservatives on the Supreme Court.
00:04:36.180I don't think that's what the court said.
00:04:38.520I downloaded the decision to read it almost immediately after it came out.
00:05:09.320And so the president has a lot of power, and the Congress doesn't get to take all that power away, and the courts don't get to take all that power away, and the next president doesn't get to take all that power away, and miscreant libs running around the streets don't get to do it either.
00:05:26.660So you can't say it's just a total reaffirmation of legal precedent.
00:05:31.520But the reason you can't say that is because Joe Biden is the first president in American history who's trying to lock up his predecessor and chief rival.
00:05:39.360So the Democrats brought us to a point.
00:05:42.320The Democrats did something that was unthinkable in American history, imprisoning your predecessor and top rival.
00:05:48.840And so now the court has to deal with that.
00:05:51.240But the way the court dealt with that is very much in keeping with legal precedent.
00:05:55.760So the court found that the president has absolute immunity for acts within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.
00:06:07.020So the things that a president does that are clearly laid out in the Constitution, if the president somehow falls afoul of the law while performing those specific acts, he's good.
00:06:25.700The president also has presumptive immunity.
00:06:29.440So it's not absolute immunity, but it's presumptive immunity for all official acts as president.
00:06:37.020And the court also found, this is why this is a pretty moderate decision that shouldn't raise any eyebrows anywhere, that the president does not have immunity for unofficial acts.
00:06:46.240So if the president decides on a Friday night he's going to invite over a bunch of drug dealers and hookers to the White House and they're going to have a giant EDM music pumping, you know, coke-fueled orgy in the East Wing, he does not have immunity for that.
00:07:02.520That does not, if, to use this example from this lunatic Democrat Congress lady, if the president decides he wants to drone strike some judges on the Supreme Court that he doesn't like, that would not be within his official duties.
00:07:16.360And so he would not have immunity for that.
00:07:44.740And the court finds, no, the president has the right to fire people who work for him.
00:07:51.080The president has the right to do a lot of things in his official capacity.
00:07:54.560And Nixon doesn't need to personally pay some schmuck a bunch of money because the guy's upset that while Nixon was president, he did his job and fired this guy from his job.
00:08:06.660Now, here, obviously, we're talking about a civil liability, not a criminal liability.
00:08:15.200But that's why I would say this is a development.
00:08:17.340This is very much in keeping with the tradition that was established in this case.
00:08:21.140An important reminder, too, by the way, we're talking about 1982.
00:08:25.420Okay, we're talking about Warren Berger, who was a huge lib.
00:08:31.740In the sense that his court was probably the most liberal court we've ever had in the history of the United States.
00:08:39.020And yet, we see this recognition that the president doesn't just go to jail because he jaywalked while he was carrying out his official acts.
00:08:50.260The other upshot, and this might irritate some of the libertarians, the decision is driving the liberals crazy.
00:08:55.300And the libertarians and the conservatives are probably basically happy about this because it means that Biden doesn't get to just throw Trump in jail with total ease.
00:09:04.320You know, it'll be a little trickier for Biden to throw Trump in jail.
00:09:08.100But the reason some libertarians might not love this decision in principle is it's a decision that beefs up the presidency.
00:09:16.020Or rather, in my view, properly restores some of the power that is due to the presidency.
00:09:22.460This decision says that there is a greater threat posed by a weak executive than by an executive that's too strong.
00:09:33.580And this is very much keeping in the American tradition.
00:09:40.560Chief Justice John Marshall, who establishes doctrines such as executive privilege, for instance, or recognizes the president doesn't need to just turn over every document that Congress asks for.
00:09:53.380The president doesn't work for Congress, and the president doesn't work for the judiciary.
00:10:09.420This is explicitly what the framers of our Constitution called for.
00:10:12.960You see this throughout the Federalist.
00:10:14.800You see this in the text of the Constitution itself.
00:10:18.080And you see this in the very fact that they had to call for a constitutional convention because the initial version of the American Republic, the Articles of Confederation, didn't really have an executive.
00:10:27.340And it was too weak, and it didn't work.
00:10:31.860I know this offends a lot of sensibilities, certainly in a liberal age, but in our democratic or egalitarian age, there is a greater risk posed by a president that's too weak than by a president that is too strong.
00:10:45.260This is a very moderate decision that says the president has his traditional rights, but he can still be liable if he steps way too far out of line.
00:10:53.680Joe Biden, of course, not understanding this decision, not understanding when people say hello to him in the morning, not understanding which end is up or what his own name is.
00:11:03.620The president, Joe Biden, has come out and said this court decision makes the president king.
00:11:10.520Justice Sotomayor's dissent today, she hears what she said.
00:11:14.460She said, in every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.
00:11:21.300With fear for our democracy, I dissent.
00:12:47.460In the president's brief remarks on the Supreme Court decision that was a real blow to his ability to imprison his rival who's currently outpolling him and is likely to take his job,
00:12:59.280Joe Biden said that he, unlike Trump, he is the sort of president who respects the limits of the office.
00:13:07.280I know I will respect the limits of the presidential powers I have for three and a half years.
00:13:11.540Supreme Court blocked me from relieving student debt, but they didn't stop me.
00:13:40.580And Biden has done this again and again.
00:13:43.620Biden is now trying to do this with executive amnesty.
00:13:46.440When Biden was the vice president, his president, Barack Obama, big lib, said, hey, I know a lot of you liberals want me to give out an executive amnesty with the stroke of a pen, but that's not how our constitution works.
00:15:24.240Biden apparently is wearing bronzer now.
00:15:27.360So you look at this picture of Biden, and she says, she says, somebody at the White House finally applied bronzer to the president.
00:15:35.100And you realize he's dressing like Trump.
00:15:38.280Trump, for how long have the Democrats made fun of Trump's bronzer?
00:15:42.340He puts foundation on his face, and it makes him look a little bit orange.
00:15:46.480Joe Biden is now doing the exact same thing.
00:15:49.900Why? What this signifies to me is that Joe Biden, having exhausted every other method of beating Trump, trying to out-argue him, trying to prosecute him, trying to calumniate him, trying to do this, trying to do that,
00:16:06.420he's now decided the only way he can maybe even have a shot at beating Trump is to imitate him, to just be like him, to even dress up in the power tie and the orange makeup.
00:19:22.240This exchange between the lady from BET and our half-Indian, I think, what, quarter-Irish, maybe quarter-African-Jamaican vice president exhibited far less fluency in the black colloquial English than the old white lady did in Airplane.
00:41:09.280And we don't want to establish that principle.
00:41:10.760We don't want people driving like maniacs and doing donuts and everything.
00:41:14.120But the pardon power exists for a reason.
00:41:17.260And the punishment that is being inflicted on this young man is obviously excessive.
00:41:22.340The political protest that this kid was making is not only the sort of thing that were he protesting something like the American flag the liberals would hail as the essence of the First Amendment and his rights to peacefully protest.
00:41:41.640And he's actually standing up for something that's good and worth standing up for, namely proper sexual ethics and normal behaviors and the traditional American way of life.
00:41:50.880And he's opposing a movement that seeks to castrate and sexually abuse little children by scandalizing them and convincing them that they're the opposite sex and putting them into all sorts of bad behaviors and habits.
00:42:06.260And very likely shortening their lives even when you just statistically kind of look at how those stories turn out when people go down the LGBT LMNOP rabbit hole.
00:42:16.840This kid's standing up for something good.
00:42:18.640And the pardon power exists for a reason.
00:42:20.780But the pardon power is not contrary to justice.
00:42:26.360Because we recognize that there is an important role in society for justice.
00:42:30.440But there's also an important role for mercy.
00:42:32.400And there's an important role for the dead letter of the law lying on paper.
00:42:35.760And there's an important role for the thematic and spirited executive to enforce and apply those laws, as well as a role for the judiciary and the legislature, which I guess is the broad topic today.
00:42:46.800Since we're talking about presidential immunity and the separation of powers and co-equal branches of government, this would be a great opportunity for the governor of Florida to say, hey, you're good.
00:43:20.740You can go to angel.com slash Michael for it.
00:43:22.460But Biden's Health and Human Services Department has come out and said that foster kids can only go to families that are willing to scandalize and traumatize the children.
00:43:36.660Because Biden's HHS has said that foster kids can only go to families who are on board with the LGBT LMNOP nonsense.
00:43:47.780And they can only go to families that believe in transgenderism and that will call the kids by the wrong pronouns.
00:43:54.780You know, a little young man is confused and thinks he's a woman that the parents have to pretend that he's a woman and maybe even put him on the path to doing the transgender transition.
00:44:06.020Which means that what Biden is saying is if you're a Christian, you can't adopt foster kids.
00:44:13.200If you're a Christian who believes in anything even resembling Christian orthodoxy, certainly if you're a Catholic, if you're Eastern Orthodox, if you adhere to any kind of traditional, more traditional Protestant denominations, you just can't adopt out of the foster system anymore.
00:44:28.860Jews, Orthodox Jews, sorry, you're out of luck.
00:44:31.500Muslims who take their religion seriously, nah, you're probably out of luck too.
00:44:36.580Only radical leftists willing to traumatize and scandalize kids.
00:44:40.060They're the only ones who can adopt out of the foster system.
00:44:42.640Now, this rule is not scheduled to take effect until 2026.
00:44:56.000This would be one of the reasons I think that Democrats and Biden are having such a hard time in this election cycle.
00:45:02.500But a majority of American voters believe the foster care system is in significant need of reform.
00:45:08.340Over two-thirds of American voters believe it is a benefit for a foster child to be adopted by a faith-based family.
00:45:15.380Not only is it not a negative, it's actually a great positive.
00:45:18.960The family that prays together stays together.
00:45:21.280It's become cliche, but it's become cliche because it's true.
00:45:24.300The majority of Americans believe it is more beneficial for a foster child to be adopted by a family that believes in traditional gender norms.