The Michael Knowles Show - July 29, 2024


Ep. 1540 - Disgusting Olympic Ceremony Mocks Christians


Episode Stats


Length

48 minutes

Words per minute

169.46024

Word count

8,260

Sentence count

637

Harmful content

Misogyny

30

sentences flagged

Hate speech

28

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A parody of the Last Supper, in which the Apostles are replaced with drag queens and a bunch of other deviants, and one of them has his genitals hanging below his costume next to a child. What does that have to do with religion?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 You know how much I hate to say I told you so. I have never been more vindicated in not watching
00:00:07.360 the Olympics than I was on Friday night when the Olympic ceremony kicked off in Paris by mocking
00:00:12.540 God. The ceremony culminated in a parody of the Last Supper, replacing the Incarnate Lord with 0.69
00:00:19.140 some sort of astral witch and replacing the Apostles with a bunch of drag queens and similar 1.00
00:00:24.580 deviants, one of whom had his genitals hanging below his costume next to a child. Unlike the
00:00:30.740 television networks, I have decided to blur this image because it's sacrilegious and also just
00:00:37.160 generally revolting. The homosexual leftist who put the display together, Thomas Jolly, denies that
00:00:43.240 the tableau was meant to evoke the Last Supper. Instead, we are now told by the scene's apologists
00:00:49.060 it was meant to call to mind the Feast of the Gods by the 17th century Dutch painter Jan van
00:00:57.060 Billiart. Or else it was meant to call to mind preparations for the wedding banquet of Cupid
00:01:03.460 and Psyche by the 16th century Italian engraver Diana Scultori. These alternative interpretations
00:01:09.840 are pretty weak. One, because no ordinary person would recognize those paintings, whereas everyone
00:01:18.900 recognizes the Last Supper. But two, because the tableau clearly bears greater resemblance to the
00:01:24.180 Last Supper. One of the most distinctive features of which is that the dinner guests are all seated,
00:01:29.360 like in the tableau, but unlike in those other works, on one side of the table. The fact that the
00:01:34.460 tableau's defenders can't even agree on which work it was supposedly based on tells you the whole
00:01:39.840 defense is disingenuous. Now, the sacrilegious depiction certainly was pagan. The Olympics is
00:01:46.940 a late 19th century revival of ancient pagan games, and it includes lots of pagan imagery. As I mentioned
00:01:53.480 last week, the Olympic torch relay begins with a reenactment of vestal virgins worshiping at the
00:01:58.900 temple of Hera. But this modern pagan imagery is sacrilegious in a way that ancient paganism wasn't,
00:02:06.960 because modern paganism has to grapple with Christianity. Ancient paganism, at its worst,
00:02:14.180 was fables and demon worship. But at its best, the paganism of Plato and Aristotle, for instance,
00:02:20.280 it was a kind of vague intuition of Christianity, a deduction through natural reason of the one true
00:02:26.400 God. Modern religion can't ignore Christianity. The incarnation is the central event in history.
00:02:34.360 Whether you think that's good or bad, whether you believe in the meaning of the incarnation,
00:02:40.640 it just is the central event. It changes everything. Islam grapples with Christianity. 1.00
00:02:46.320 Christ is mentioned in the Quran. Even Judaism, which seems to have come before Christianity,
00:02:51.660 grapples with the person of Christ in the Talmud. France was Christian by the end of the 5th century.
00:02:57.460 It's the home of countless saints and cathedrals. It's been known as the eldest daughter of the church.
00:03:02.460 Ancient Athens can innocently, or at least ignorantly, celebrate the pagan gods. Modern
00:03:09.420 France can only do so by rejecting the true God. I, for one, think we ought to leave pagan worship to 0.99
00:03:16.960 the past. And I am inclined to leave the Olympics there, too. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show.
00:03:32.460 Welcome back to the show. You know I was at the Bitcoin conference last week. The audio on the show
00:03:46.420 was a little weak. It was a very loud conference. I'm glad we're back in the studio where the audio
00:03:51.240 is much better. But it was a really important conference, and President Trump addressed the
00:03:55.220 Bitcoin conference. And Bitcoin might end up playing a decisive role in the 2024 election.
00:03:59.860 There's so much more to say. First, though, go to LaundrySauce.com slash Knowles. There's not
00:04:05.480 much that I love more than smoking a delicious Mayflower cigar. Though, while I, like so many
00:04:11.680 of you, adore the aroma of my delicious cigars, when it comes to your clothing, you probably want
00:04:16.240 it to smell like fresh laundry. That is where our friends over at Laundry Sauce come in. Laundry
00:04:20.440 Sauce has created the world's best-smelling laundry detergent in simple-to-use, high-performance
00:04:24.460 pods. Were you bored of the chemical-smelling scents in most detergents? Well, the creators
00:04:31.960 of Laundry Sauce partnered with the world's number one fragrance house, the same team behind many of
00:04:35.760 your favorite designer scents, to put beautiful complex aromas made from high-quality natural
00:04:39.840 ingredients into powerful stain-fighting laundry pods. It smells phenomenal. One is better than
00:04:46.580 the next. You think you will pick up your array of Laundry Sauce fragrances, and you'll say,
00:04:51.680 oh, that's the one for me. No, then you'll try the next one. It's even better. They're all
00:04:55.760 superb, really elegant scents with seven bold, soulful aromas to choose from. How do you choose
00:05:02.280 your signature scent? Check out Laundry Sauce's sample pod box so you can try their top four
00:05:06.760 best-selling scents before committing to a full-size box. I know you're going to be convinced
00:05:09.960 that you should just pick one and go, no, don't. You have to try them all because you're going to go
00:05:15.060 in thinking, I want this one. But no, actually, you might want a different one. Check it out right
00:05:18.740 now. LaundrySauce.com slash Knowles. Promo code Knowles for 15% off. Best offer you will find. You
00:05:24.840 have to use my code Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. 15% off your order. LaundrySauce.com slash Knowles. Promo
00:05:29.620 code Knowles for 15% off. The sacrilegious tableau was my least favorite part of the opening ceremonies
00:05:36.720 of the Olympics, but there was other insane stuff too. We also had, as part of the French Olympics,
00:05:42.820 a depiction of the beheading of France's queen, Marie-Antoinette.
00:05:48.700 Marie-Antoinette.
00:05:52.700 So you have the queen holding her head, followed by fire blasting out of the ground,
00:06:01.680 and heavy metal musicians playing devilish-sounding music while the French celebrate beheading their 1.00
00:06:11.160 queen. This too, by the way, has a religious aspect to it. So what do we know about the
00:06:17.440 organizer, the artistic director of these ceremonies? We know that he's a touch light in
00:06:23.160 the loafers. We know that he's a leftist. But, you know, it's France, so doesn't that describe
00:06:29.380 everybody? We know that the scene was meant to call to mind. In fairness, I think this part is true.
00:06:35.940 It was meant to call to mind the pagan basis of the Olympic Games. But because it's happening in 0.99
00:06:43.600 2024 rather than, I don't know, you know, 24 BC or centuries earlier BC, we know that it's,
00:06:52.800 in order to be pagan, it's got to reject millennia of development, specifically after the incarnation.
00:06:59.580 So it's a rejection of Christ. It's a rejection in that tableau of the Last Supper. It's a rejection
00:07:05.960 of the Christian civilization that once was France. You know, it's a celebration of the 0.99
00:07:12.680 French Revolution, which beheaded Queen Marie-Antoinette, and which has religious overtones to
00:07:17.680 that too. The beheading of the queen, one of the worst events in the history of Europe. I mean,
00:07:27.300 the French Revolution was a kind of return of paganism, a rejection of Christianity. They 0.78
00:07:32.820 went into Notre Dame, turned it into a temple to reason. They remade everything after secularism 0.71
00:07:39.340 and atheism and tried to destroy the last vestiges of Christianity in France. But one of the most famous
00:07:46.980 descriptions of all this came from Edmund Burke, an Englishman, in his book, Reflections on the
00:07:51.040 Revolution in France. And the most famous passage of that work refers to Marie-Antoinette.
00:07:57.300 There was a time when I knew this by heart, but I'll make sure I don't miss a word here.
00:08:00.660 Burke writes,
00:08:01.660 It is now 16 or 17 years since I saw the Queen of France, then the Dauphinus at Versailles,
00:08:06.360 and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision.
00:08:11.140 I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move 1.00
00:08:16.120 in, glittering like the morning star, full of life and splendor and joy. Oh, what a revolution,
00:08:22.000 or what a heart must I have to contemplate without emotion and elevation, that elevation and that fall.
00:08:28.540 Little did I dream that, when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant,
00:08:33.840 respectful love, that she should ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed
00:08:39.440 in that bosom. Little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her 0.98
00:08:45.460 in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honor and of cavaliers. I thought 10,000 swords
00:08:51.820 must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult.
00:08:57.680 But the age of chivalry is gone. It goes on to the even more famous parts of that passage.
00:09:02.200 I read all of this because he's obviously not just writing about Queen Marie Antoinette here.
00:09:08.840 There's something deeper going on. This passage has been mocked, even at the time,
00:09:13.340 as being so over the top. The Queen of France was a nice lady, but why is it over the top?
00:09:18.400 Because obviously, he is referring literally to Queen Marie Antoinette, but he's referring by way
00:09:25.560 of allegory to Mary, the Queen of Heaven. Mary, Mary. One's the Queen of France, one's the Queen of Heaven.
00:09:32.860 Listen to this language. Yes, the most delightful vision. She hardly seemed to touch the earth.
00:09:42.380 She's glittering like the morning star, full of life, splendor and joy. This is the language of prayer.
00:09:49.580 Hail Mary, full of grace. The Lord is with thee. What a revolution. She added titles of veneration.
00:09:54.480 Of course, we traditionally and famously venerate Mary.
00:09:58.580 And you would imagine that 10,000 swords would leap from their scabbards to avenge even an insulting
00:10:05.020 look. What is France? Paris is the city of Notre-Dame de Paris, Our Lady of Paris. It's
00:10:11.760 the most famous church there. So the French Revolution was so evil in part because of the 0.67
00:10:19.060 literal action of beheading the Queen, but also in the figurative action, in what that means by way
00:10:27.460 of allegory, that it was an overthrow of Christianity in favor of atheism, in favor of a new kind of
00:10:33.440 paganism. The worship in Notre-Dame de Paris of the goddess Reason, a statue of the goddess Reason.
00:10:41.320 That new paganism is even worse than the old paganism. You think of the new pagan cults like the new age 1.00
00:10:46.640 cults. They refer to Christ. They refer to Christianity. They're a perversion of Christianity. 0.73
00:10:52.000 Modern liberalism is a perversion of Christendom. The civilization that gave rise to liberalism was
00:11:00.080 Christendom. And then liberalism attacks that which begat it. It's a violation of it, as you see in the
00:11:10.200 French Revolution. Very much in keeping with France's modern history. The Olympics has always been super
00:11:19.000 lib. That's one of the reasons I never really watched it. It's this very kumbaya. We have to
00:11:24.220 pretend that all the nations of the earth are equal. And even though all the best athletes just
00:11:29.180 train in America, and then we let them go back to their countries and compete against us. And 0.99
00:11:32.780 you know, it's all, you know, we are the world kind of nonsense. You know, it even comes about the
00:11:38.520 modern games at the end of the 19th century. This age of advancing liberalism. And it's the libs.
00:11:44.980 I know some conservatives like the Olympics too, but it's generally libs who like the idea of the
00:11:50.000 Olympics. Well, now we're seeing the darker meaning of that liberalism, which is that it is explicitly,
00:11:54.880 overtly a rejection of Christianity. That's always been what it is. Now, speaking of belligerent 0.90
00:12:00.520 liberalism, I got some tea to spill. Get your saucers out. I got tea to spill. The Murdoch family is at war
00:12:08.880 with itself. Because Rupert Murdoch, the billionaire tycoon behind Wall Street Journal and the New York
00:12:16.340 Post and especially Fox News, is going to war with his family to keep Fox News right wing. Some of us
00:12:24.940 would say Fox has moved a little bit to the left in recent years, but Rupert wants to stop that,
00:12:30.200 according to a report out of the New York Times. Because Rupert Murdoch is a man of a certain age.
00:12:36.500 I think he's 93 now or something. He knows that time is short. And one of his kids seems pretty
00:12:44.080 conservative, Lachlan Murdoch. The rest of the Murdoch kids seem pretty liberal. And so Murdoch
00:12:49.020 is trying to go in and change a trust that was established years ago, 25 years ago or so,
00:12:54.980 to make Lachlan the head of Fox News, the head of News Corp, so that he can keep Fox News right wing.
00:13:01.480 And his argument is this will benefit all of the heirs. The other kids are still going to get
00:13:05.740 their piece of the pie. They're just not going to have control because Rupert fears that they're
00:13:09.900 going to make Fox News even more liberal than it's become in recent years. Now, will this work? The
00:13:16.120 trust was supposed to be totally unchangeable, but a Nevada probate commissioner has found that Murdoch
00:13:21.360 would be able to edit the trust if he can prove that he's acting in good faith and for the sole
00:13:25.760 benefit of his heirs. So he's got to prove, and I think he can prove this, that keeping Fox News
00:13:33.800 right wing is in the financial benefit of these shareholders, of these beneficiaries, which is
00:13:40.500 obviously true. If Fox News goes left, it's going to lose its audience and it's not going to be any
00:13:47.180 good to anybody. But the family is still fighting Rupert Murdoch on this point. They don't want him
00:13:54.040 to take the steps necessary to keep Fox News right wing, meaning the Fox News heirs, the Murdoch
00:14:02.640 kids, the other Murdoch kids, are actively working in court against their own financial interest.
00:14:09.460 That is how much pressure there is to be liberal in the elite spheres of our society. They would
00:14:15.820 rather lose money. They would rather lose their inheritance than be scorned at cocktail parties.
00:14:24.040 Then be considered a right winger, heaven forfend a Trumper. That's the pressure in our culture. 1.00
00:14:32.000 Even when billions of dollars are on the line, people who move in the elite circles of our culture
00:14:38.100 would still rather be on the side of the liberals and forego their inheritance.
00:14:45.060 So much so that the tycoon, the paterfamilias, has to go to court
00:14:49.240 to protect the financial well-being of his progeny. That's where we are. You think it's tough
00:14:58.600 to be a conservative in this culture? You think it's tough to score some cultural wins? Yeah. Yeah,
00:15:04.700 you're right. People would forego billions for it. So yes, you, all of us, we're going to have to
00:15:10.300 fight very hard. The wins are against us. There's so much more to say. First, though,
00:15:13.780 go to balanceofnature.com, promo code Knolls. Balance of Nature fruits and veggies is the most
00:15:18.300 convenient way to get whole fruits and vegetables daily. Balance of Nature takes fruits and vegetables,
00:15:22.560 they freeze-dry them, turn them into a powder, and then put them into a capsule. Balance of Nature
00:15:26.440 is just one ingredient of a balanced lifestyle, has no intention to replace a healthy diet, exercise,
00:15:31.580 sleep, or any other healthy habits. It is intended to be used in concert with other healthy habits.
00:15:37.260 I really strongly recommend it, especially if you're like me, you're on the road a fair bit,
00:15:40.780 you're not always getting the most balanced diet. Well, make sure that you're getting those fruits
00:15:45.500 and veggies. You just have to make sure that your producers aren't like hyenas who try to
00:15:49.680 just steal them when they're sent to the office. You got to get them sent to your home, and then
00:15:53.000 you don't need to worry about that. Balanceofnature.com, use promo code Knolls for 35% off your
00:15:56.840 first order as a preferred customer, plus get a free bottle of fiber and spice. That is balanceofnature.com,
00:16:02.680 promo code Knolls, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. Do not wait another second. Whatever you're doing, 1.00
00:16:08.840 stop. Pull over if you're driving. Pull out your phone. Go to balanceofnature.com,
00:16:14.200 promo code Knolls. Speaking of conservatives on the march, President Trump addressed the
00:16:21.500 Bitcoin conference. Here's what he had to say. You need tremendous amounts of electricity.
00:16:27.860 You need double the electricity of the entire electricity that we have right now in the United
00:16:34.200 States to dominate, and we'll get that done. Who would think we can get that done? But we're
00:16:40.260 going to get it done. We'll be having power plants built at the sites. We'll be releasing people from
00:16:47.420 certain ridiculous requirements, and we'll be using fossil fuel to make electricity because we're going
00:16:54.820 to have to. We'll be using nuclear. We'll be doing it in an environmentally friendly way. But we will be
00:17:00.720 creating so much electricity that you'll be saying, please, please, President, we don't want any more
00:17:06.900 electricity. We can't stand it. You'll be begging me, no more electricity, sir. We have enough. We have
00:17:13.560 enough. This afternoon, I'm laying out my plan to ensure that the United States will be the crypto
00:17:19.660 capital of the planet and the Bitcoin superpower of the world, and we'll get it done.
00:17:25.040 I love that President Trump has like five lines, and he just applies them to different
00:17:32.020 circumstances. So here we see the application of the, you're going to win so much, you're going to
00:17:36.760 say, please, I'm tired of winning. We don't want to win anymore. So he's saying, look, crypto requires
00:17:41.880 a lot of electricity. That's one of the reasons that the libs are against crypto, and you need a lot
00:17:46.240 of electricity. We're going to give you electricity. We're going to give you so much, you're going to
00:17:49.960 say, please, no more. I've got too much electricity. I love it. I love it. And the crowd goes wild
00:17:55.880 there. Now, President Trump stopped short. He made all sorts of promises about crypto. He said
00:18:02.120 that he's going to establish a presidential Bitcoin advisory council. He said he was going to keep all
00:18:08.240 the Bitcoin jobs in the United States. He said that there would be no central bank digital currency,
00:18:14.580 which would be a way for the government to go in and gut Bitcoin while he was president.
00:18:20.000 He stepped a little bit short of a promise that was made on his behalf the day before
00:18:24.140 by Bobby Kennedy Jr., who also addressed the Bitcoin conference.
00:18:28.540 Has the potential to return monetary discipline to the Fed and to restore the dollar as the
00:18:34.140 unchallenged global reserve currency. And just as Bitcoin can fortify the dollar,
00:18:39.460 it can also secure America's position in cyberspace. I understand that tomorrow President Trump may
00:18:47.820 announce his plan to build a Bitcoin Fort Knox and authorize the U.S. government to buy a million
00:18:55.520 Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset. And I applaud that announcement and we should all applaud it.
00:19:02.100 Now, Trump didn't actually do that. So what's going on here? Is Bobby Kennedy Jr., who is running
00:19:14.180 against President Trump, is he trying to take the wind out of Trump's sails by claiming this
00:19:20.720 announcement for himself? Is he working on behalf of Trump to float this idea, see how it plays,
00:19:28.100 not just in the room, but how it plays in the markets and the broader public opinion?
00:19:32.100 I don't know exactly what he's up to. We know that Trump stopped short of that,
00:19:36.400 but Trump did go pretty far to say, look, I'm going to do everything that I can to support Bitcoin
00:19:42.120 and crypto digital currencies. And Bobby Kennedy, also running, so now we've got two of the three
00:19:48.480 who are running for president. He says, I too am going to support Bitcoin as much as I can.
00:19:53.820 The Democrats are quite opposed to Bitcoin. Kamala Harris maybe was going to show up to the 1.00
00:20:02.100 there was a rumor she was going to make it. And then at the last minute, she did not make it. 0.81
00:20:05.900 At first, I thought that she declined to show up because she didn't want to be booed back into
00:20:10.760 Kentucky. The people in that room were not the most favorable to her. I heard some scuttlebutt on
00:20:16.060 the floor of the Bitcoin conference that Kamala Harris didn't show up because she was disinvited,
00:20:20.860 because she wouldn't agree to certain terms laid out by the Bitcoin organizers. So I don't know.
00:20:25.660 I don't know where the reality of that really lies. I do know that Trump has made this a point
00:20:30.480 to see his light. The Dems have come out strongly against Bitcoin.
00:20:37.740 Trump has said, okay, Bitcoiners, hey, all you people who are fanatically passionate about your
00:20:43.420 subject and who have a ton of money, you're welcome in my party. Yeah, come on over here. 0.84
00:20:48.460 Send that Bitcoin over here, baby. That's I'm for you. And this is actually scaring the Democrats. 0.99
00:20:54.060 So Democrats just came out. A number of Democrat lawmakers sent a letter to prospective presidential
00:21:01.200 candidates and to the chairman of the Democrat National Committee asking that the party change
00:21:06.680 its position on Bitcoin. We respectfully call on you, they write, to include pro-digital asset
00:21:12.640 language in the party's platform. It's imperative that the party's platform reflects the potential
00:21:17.040 benefits of digital assets and blockchain technology. Select a VP candidate sophisticated in digital
00:21:21.720 asset policy. Select a pro-innovation SEC chair. So for the Securities and Exchange Commission,
00:21:26.720 not someone who's going to be reflexively anti-Bitcoin and crypto, but who's going to be
00:21:30.780 open to it. And engage with industry experts. What all these people, we're talking about Congressman
00:21:35.340 Colin Allred, Nikki Budzinski, Angie Craig, Don Davis, Dan Goldman, the Ro Khanna's list goes on and 1.00
00:21:42.400 on and on. A lot of Democrat lawmakers here saying, hey guys, you're missing the boat. We need you to be
00:21:49.540 pro-crypto. But the DNC is not. That's why they have to write this letter. The Democratic Party is the
00:21:56.940 anti-Bitcoin party. It's the anti-crypto party. And the Republican Party is the pro-Bitcoin party and the
00:22:02.140 pro-crypto party. And what do I think about Bitcoin? I don't think very much about Bitcoin. I went to the
00:22:06.320 conference. I still don't really totally get what it is. It owes more to my ignorance and, you know,
00:22:13.120 nature as a stunad than to Bitcoin necessarily. But all I know is, from a political perspective,
00:22:21.840 this makes the Republicans look like the party of the future. And this makes the Democrats look like
00:22:27.100 the party of the past. And that didn't used to be the case. It used to look like the Republicans
00:22:32.600 were the party of the past. We just want to go back to the 1950s or something. And the
00:22:36.220 Democrats are the party of the future. But for the past at least three or four years,
00:22:41.660 and maybe more than that, maybe eight or nine years now, the Republicans have looked like the
00:22:46.100 party of innovation. Trump shaking up the party platform, looking ahead, shaking up foreign policy.
00:22:51.200 There was a foreign policy under Bush. It was pretty much the same foreign policy under Obama.
00:22:54.860 Trump shakes that up. There was a trade policy under Bush. It was pretty much the same trade policy
00:22:58.920 under Obama. Trump shakes that up. And then, obviously, the Democrats have a presidential
00:23:03.240 candidate, then president, who was a walking cadaver. That didn't make them look like the
00:23:07.560 party of the future. Even now, they have a younger candidate. Trump is chronologically older than she
00:23:13.380 is. But he seems to have younger ideas. He seems more vibrant. With Kamala, because she's an empty
00:23:18.420 suit, she just regurgitates whatever the Democrat party platform is. And the party platform is out of 1.00
00:23:23.240 date. Whatever you think of Bitcoin, whatever you think of crypto, it is exciting, and I think
00:23:28.220 politically wise for Republicans, where they can, without sacrificing their principles,
00:23:33.320 to put themselves on the side of innovation, of hope, of the future.
00:23:38.220 Those sweltering summer nights that leave you tossing and turning, desperately kicking off the
00:23:41.820 covers, don't have to ruin your sleep. Crafted from the finest 100% organic cotton, Bowling Branch's
00:23:46.600 premium sheets feature a soft, breathable weave that's built to last. Get the best savings of the
00:23:51.280 season during Bowling Branch's annual summer event. Get 20% off, plus free shipping, on your first set
00:23:55.980 of sheets, at bowlandbranch.com slash dailywire. That's bowlandbranch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D branch.com
00:24:03.080 slash dailywire to save 20% off and unlock free shipping. Limited time only, exclusions do apply.
00:24:09.020 After more than two years, Daily Wire Backstage Live is making its triumphant return to the legendary
00:24:13.480 Ryman Auditorium. August 14th, join us live in Nashville, Tennessee. I will be there, along with
00:24:18.640 Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Andrew Klavan, Jeremy Boring, and a whole lineup of surprise guests.
00:24:22.180 You do not want to miss it. Now, here's the catch. The Ryman only holds about 2,000 people.
00:24:28.540 This will sell out. It has been two years since our last Backstage Live at the Ryman.
00:24:32.880 Who knows when we'll do it again? Go to dailywire.com slash Ryman. Grab your tickets now.
00:24:40.160 The libs are not looking good right now. Their policies are not popular generally. Their record
00:24:47.700 over the past three years is really unpopular. Their nominee until a couple of weeks ago was
00:24:53.660 really unpopular so much so that they had to ditch him, and they get this new lady who's also not
00:24:57.300 popular. So the best they can do right now is lie. I don't mean that as a cheap political shot.
00:25:04.420 I'll give you an example of it, a pretty clear one. CBS News. Trump falsely accuses VP Harris of
00:25:13.520 donating to the Minnesota Freedom Fund. What's the Minnesota Freedom Fund? The Minnesota Freedom Fund
00:25:20.680 is this jailbreak organization that came to prominence during the George Floyd riots.
00:25:26.960 So Trump has mentioned this. He's mentioned that Kamala Harris has been supportive of this
00:25:31.020 organization that bails out violent criminals. And just here's the headline. I'm not going to go into
00:25:37.000 the nitty-gritty details of the article or the video or even the subheader that contradict the
00:25:42.860 headline. This is the headline. This is what most people are going to see. Trump falsely accuses
00:25:47.400 VP Harris of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund. I'm going to show you a tweet from VP Harris.
00:25:55.860 June 1st, 2020. If you're able to, chip in now to the Minnesota Freedom Fund to help post bail for
00:26:05.000 those protesting on the ground in Minnesota with a link to donate. The link comes from Act Blue,
00:26:11.380 which is probably the most prominent left-wing organization in the country.
00:26:19.260 Trump falsely accuses VP of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund. Please donate now to Minnesota Freedom
00:26:24.360 Fund. Now, I guess you could say, hold on, let me see. I guess you could try to say
00:26:29.500 that Kamala Harris, while she encouraged others to donate to the millions of people
00:26:35.880 whom that tweet reached, she encouraged them to donate, but she was hypocritical. She didn't 1.00
00:26:40.280 really donate herself. I guess you could say that. But even so, I don't think that gets her off the
00:26:44.980 hook. If I'm a political bundler and I host a dinner for all my rich friends, and I bundle $5 million
00:26:56.140 for a presidential candidate, but I don't really give money myself other than my work,
00:27:02.700 other than my effort, other than an in-kind contribution, like Kamala's tweet, which would
00:27:07.000 constitute an in-kind contribution. She's turning her political apparatus to raise money for this 1.00
00:27:11.940 group. But other than the in-kind, even if I don't explicitly write a check, am I not a donor to
00:27:16.440 that candidate? I just raised him $5 million. I'd probably be appointed the ambassador to the
00:27:20.660 court of St. James. You're telling me I'm not really a donor in that case? That's the kind of
00:27:25.020 sophistry that the left is trying to engage in right now. To lie, because this woman is extremely 0.99
00:27:33.840 radical. She raised money to bail out very violent, nasty, evil people who committed all sorts of
00:27:40.600 crimes. She wanted to bail them out of jail. She was the most left-wing Democrat. Well, obviously, 0.98
00:27:46.860 if you're the most left-wing Democrat senator, you're the most left-wing senator while she was in the 0.93
00:27:51.280 Senate, she has a terrible, terrible record. And we've got 98 days till the election or something 1.00
00:27:59.960 like that. So the best the libs can do is just lie. They're going to look you right in the eye 1.00
00:28:04.940 and they're going to lie to you about all of the unfortunate aspects of her record. And there are
00:28:09.780 many of those. They're going to lie to you about a lot of other stuff too. Remember last week,
00:28:14.300 Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI, appears before a congressional committee.
00:28:19.860 And Chris Wray floats a conspiracy theory that Trump was not actually shot by a bullet.
00:28:25.640 Where did all eight bullets go is, I guess, my question.
00:28:30.480 I don't have that in front of me. I'm happy to circle back and get that to you. It's assuming
00:28:35.840 we have that information yet. As I said, I think with respect to former President Trump,
00:28:44.400 there's some question about whether or not it's a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear.
00:28:51.060 So it's conceivable. Although, as I sit here right now, I don't know whether that bullet
00:28:54.820 in addition to causing the grazing could have also landed somewhere else. But I believe we've
00:29:01.680 accounted for all of the shots and the cartridges. So let us get that in circle.
00:29:05.740 It's my understanding that the very first one was the one that hit the president. Is that
00:29:09.240 the very first shot or is that not accurate?
00:29:12.200 I don't, as I sit here right now, I don't know the answer to that. I believe we know the answer
00:29:15.860 to that. I just don't have it in front of me.
00:29:17.420 Okay. Yeah, it's just, it's a little unclear. You know, when that guy, after we spent, you know,
00:29:23.360 we in the liberal establishment spent the last eight years calling Trump Hitler and an existential
00:29:28.320 threat to democracy. And then that guy went out and tried to blow his head off and came within a
00:29:32.460 hair's breadth just a nanosecond earlier, Trump moved his head about 20 degrees. And it really,
00:29:37.240 the clearest explanation is that it was a miracle because natural explanations fail. Yeah,
00:29:42.260 I just don't know if it was really a bullet. You know, it's like, is it really a big deal?
00:29:46.420 Yes. I just don't know. I'm the director of the FBI. Why am I supposed to know anything? I don't
00:29:49.520 know anything. Huh? Is it a bullet? So the FBI clarified this, by the way, the FBI issued a
00:29:55.200 statement said, quote, what struck former president Trump in the ear was a bullet. Christopher Wray,
00:30:04.700 whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces fired from the deceased subjects rifle.
00:30:09.060 No, no blue anon, no tinfoil hat FBI director. No, it wasn't, it wasn't a piece of a, I don't know,
00:30:20.140 a teleprompter or something. It was, it was a bullet that hit him, buddy. That was the FBI that
00:30:24.560 acknowledged that Trump had a field day with this dishonesty. In fact, my chart that I looked over to
00:30:32.480 the right, that chart, you know, the famous chart that showed we had the best numbers in history,
00:30:38.080 at least recorded history on the border. That chart probably saved my life. Can you believe it?
00:30:44.720 Because I looked over. If I didn't look over, I got a problem.
00:30:52.860 Wasn't too good anyway. Did you see the FBI today apologize? They said, well,
00:30:58.020 it might've been a bullet, but it might've been glass. Oh really? Where did the glass come from?
00:31:01.780 Or it might've been shrapnel. Where did the shrapnel come from? No. They then said it was a
00:31:08.760 bullet. They just try and do it. It just never ends with these people. They raid Mar-a-Lago. They
00:31:13.420 do things so bad, so bad. Our country is so sick, but they apologize. We accept their apology.
00:31:19.900 I love everyone. But look, we accept their apology, okay? This is what they're going to do.
00:31:27.320 The FBI director is going to, with a straight face, he's going to look Jim Jordan in the eye and say,
00:31:33.920 yeah, well, we don't know if it was a bullet. I mean, you all saw the bullet go through his ear
00:31:37.800 and very nearly through the back of Trump's head. Yeah, we don't know though. Don't believe your
00:31:41.460 lying eyes. CBS News is going to look at you and say, oh, Kamala, she never raised a lot of money for 1.00
00:31:46.580 this jailbreak fund to bail violent criminals out of jail, who then would go on to commit
00:31:52.740 more violent crime. No, she never did that. That tweet she sent, she didn't really send that.
00:31:58.140 You're not reading that tweet. That's not real. Don't believe your lying eyes. Put your fingers
00:32:02.940 in your ear and go, la, la, la, la, la. That's what they're going to do. What's their alternative?
00:32:09.220 They can't gin up any more scandals about Trump. I've pretty much exhausted that, I think,
00:32:14.220 over the last eight or nine years. They can't point to the good stuff that Kamala's done. She 0.78
00:32:18.780 has not accomplished anything. The things she has done have been failures. The borders are. She
00:32:28.320 was put in charge of the borders. She failed on that. She failed on every other assignment that
00:32:32.260 she was given. We'll get to that in a moment. And the policies she's advocated are deeply unpopular 0.98
00:32:38.760 and extremely left wing. So they just have to distract from her. The way they're going to do
00:32:45.440 that is just, they're just going to lie. I just mentioned Kamala has failed on everything she was 1.00
00:32:52.480 put in charge of. So we know that Biden put her in charge of the border. I read his words verbatim
00:32:59.340 from the White House transcript on the show and on Piers Morgan's show when a Democrat columnist
00:33:04.480 was desperately trying to deflect attention from Kamala's role as the borders are. 0.80
00:33:11.440 But that's not the only area of White House policy she was put in charge of. Kamala was also 0.95
00:33:16.880 put in charge of connecting people in rural areas with high-speed internet.
00:33:22.040 So here's Biden's own words. Again, I'm not putting any words in Biden's mouth. Here's Biden at the
00:33:27.900 2021 State of the Union address, giving a task to Kamala Harris.
00:33:32.860 And the process will create thousands and thousands of good-paying jobs.
00:33:39.400 It creates jobs connecting every American with high-speed internet, including 35 percent
00:33:45.400 of the rural America that still doesn't have it. It's going to help our kids and our businesses
00:33:52.780 succeed in the 21st century economy. And I'm asking the Vice President to lead this effort,
00:33:59.660 if she would. Because I know it'll get done.
00:34:03.940 How many people do you think Kamala Harris connected with high-speed internet? 0.99
00:34:10.220 Biden, he turns to her. During the State of the Union, she responds. She goes, yes, of course.
00:34:14.320 Of course I'll do it. I know it'll get done if I put Kamala Harris in charge of this. 0.99
00:34:18.340 Guess how many people were connected with high-speed internet, thanks to Kamala Harris?
00:34:26.000 None. Not a single person. Not one.
00:34:30.020 $42.5 billion from this supposed infrastructure bill. It was not an infrastructure bill.
00:34:37.420 Not one person was connected with high-speed internet as a result of this.
00:34:43.020 Kamala Harris did not get the job done. She didn't get even one iota of one fraction 1.00
00:34:47.780 of one tiny, teensy, weenie little percent of the job done. She did nothing.
00:34:53.640 Her record is absolutely terrible.
00:34:59.120 The Kamala Harris campaign, I guess is what we would call it now, tweeted out yesterday,
00:35:03.860 said, you know, all of these attacks on Kamala, they're so disgusting. She's an historically 1.00
00:35:08.120 accomplished Vice President. But in that social media post, they didn't name any accomplishments.
00:35:14.940 I don't want to be overly tough on Vice President Harris. So I'd ask her supporters.
00:35:24.320 What has she accomplished? You have the floor. You got the comments section here on all the
00:35:31.520 different platforms that this show will be broadcast on. What? Name me one thing she did.
00:35:37.620 She prosecuted people, some people that were worth prosecuting, many people who she should not have 0.99
00:35:43.660 prosecuted when she was AG of California. Okay, that's something. Probably doesn't play very well
00:35:49.440 in the Democratic Party. She did the bare elements of her job, usually poorly when she was the Attorney
00:35:55.480 General of California. What did she accomplish as a member of the U.S. Senate? Give me one thing.
00:36:00.860 What did she accomplish as the Vice President of the United States? Name me one thing. What did she 1.00
00:36:05.500 accomplish in her czar roles, the specific areas of public policy that she was put in charge of by
00:36:10.520 the President of the United States very publicly? What did she accomplish? Nothing. She didn't accomplish
00:36:18.560 anything. She's been things. One thing that she has been, and this has gone under the radar,
00:36:27.300 but my friend Steve Guest pointed this out to me the other day. She's the daughter of a Marxist
00:36:33.020 professor, and I'm beginning to notice a pattern here of people in the Biden administration who are
00:36:39.440 the children of Marxist professors. We'll get to that in one second. First, though, my favorite comment
00:36:43.820 yesterday or Friday is from Diana Arcee. No one is above the law, says Kamala Harris in her new campaign ad, 1.00
00:36:52.120 except people who are here illegally. Yeah, it's kind of a funny one. It's funny that the libs, 1.00
00:36:57.400 while they're trying to prosecute Trump on unprecedented and obviously trumped up charges,
00:37:03.320 they will simultaneously argue that no human being is illegal, and it's not a crime to enter the
00:37:09.080 country illegally. Well, hold on. And they'll try to ban use of the term illegal alien. If you're
00:37:13.580 watching this show on a certain video social media platform right now, probably my audio is dipping out
00:37:19.040 when I use the technical phrase illegal alien. I have been told by my producers that we are no
00:37:27.400 longer permitted by one of these big tech platforms to use the phrase illegal alien. Illegal alien is 0.83
00:37:32.940 technical language advised for a very long time by the federal government. It just means a foreign
00:37:39.960 national who is in the United States criminally illegal alien. It doesn't mean someone from the planet
00:37:47.320 Neptune. I mean, you know, it just means a foreigner who's here against the law. You're not allowed to 1.00
00:37:53.240 use that phrase. No one is above the law except for about 11 to 20 million people who either themselves
00:38:01.180 or at least their children will likely vote for Democrats. Those guys, they are in fact above the
00:38:06.100 law. Who is Kamala Harris? My friend Steve Guest, very observant man in politics, pointed out
00:38:13.960 her father is a Marxist professor. And I knew, I think I knew that her father was some kind of
00:38:19.860 economist or professor. So his name is Donald J. Harris. It's kind of funny that the first part of
00:38:24.140 his name is Donald J. Donald J. Harris. He's a Marxist economist who for many decades taught at
00:38:31.300 Stanford. When I say he's a Marxist economist, I don't just mean that as some term of derision.
00:38:37.620 I mean that as a technical term. This is the same language that is used by left-wing outlets to
00:38:42.980 describe him, by the New Yorker, by the economist. That's just what he is. He's an economist in the
00:38:48.780 tradition of Karl Marx. That got me thinking, okay, so the VP for Biden, who was one of the
00:38:55.640 presidential candidates who ran against him in 2020, she's the daughter of a Marxist professor.
00:39:02.280 Kind of like the transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg. Pete Buttigieg's dad was a very,
00:39:07.420 very famous Marxist literary scholar, Joseph Buttigieg. I encountered Joseph Buttigieg because
00:39:13.520 in my book, Speechless Controlling Words, Controlling Minds, I devote, thank you, I devote a fair bit of
00:39:18.240 time to Antonio Gramsci, who is an Italian Marxist philosopher and political activist. Really important.
00:39:26.260 A lot of his work inspired leftists in the United States. And happily, I can read Italian. 0.92
00:39:35.180 There aren't many practical applications of reading Italian in the world. It's not like
00:39:39.380 French or Spanish. But one of them is you can read these Italian communists from the 20th century.
00:39:44.520 A lot of people in the West were not able for a long time to, at least to read the whole corpus of
00:39:51.620 Gramsci until Joseph Buttigieg, Pete Buttigieg's dad, translated the prison notebooks into English.
00:39:59.340 He was, I think he was the president of the Gramsci Society. This guy was a hardcore committed Marxist.
00:40:08.860 And he was, he was a literary scholar at Notre Dame. So what does this mean? So some grand conspiracy?
00:40:16.400 Well, in a way it is, it's a, it's a really broad conspiracy, which is this, we are now seeing the
00:40:21.420 fruit of the left's long march through the institutions. Another Marxist who, who inspired
00:40:28.840 the left-wing campus movements, Rudy Dutschke, you coined that phrase, the long march through
00:40:35.220 the institutions. And it was obviously a viewing the West's leftward march in light of Mao's cultural
00:40:43.700 revolution in long march. So the work of people, well, not, not just Gramsci, but people like
00:40:51.360 Herbert Marcuse, the scholars of the Frankfurt school, and then their, their followers and the
00:40:57.740 left-wing activists, they said, we're going to, we're going to take the long view of how to transform
00:41:02.420 American. We're going to do it not just by winning elections. We'll win some elections, but we're going
00:41:06.920 to take over the classrooms. We're going to take over the entertainment media. We're going to take over
00:41:11.920 the news media. We're going to tilt everything very far to the left. And then the fruit of that is going
00:41:16.640 to be a political order in which the, the frame of the debate is set by us. So people, it's not just
00:41:26.160 that we're going to win the arguments for leftism. We're going to exclude alternative views. So the only
00:41:33.580 way that people can think is in a fundamentally liberal and even more than liberal leftist socialist
00:41:41.020 Marx-tinged way. We're seeing the fruit of that. Now, the kids of these two Marxist scholars are
00:41:48.680 serving at some of the highest levels of government. Now, one of them is the presidential nominee for
00:41:53.360 the Democratic Party. The long march through the institutions works. It's, the conservatives get
00:41:59.980 impatient. Sometimes we want to see immediate results or we lose interest and move on. The left
00:42:04.820 doesn't move on. The left, whatever virtues they lack, I think they lack most of them, they are patient.
00:42:09.960 And they are persistent. And now we're seeing the fruit of that. Now, speaking of progeny,
00:42:16.940 weird story just hit the news. A sperm donor has just won over custody of his child from a couple
00:42:24.100 of lesbians. And actually it was the sperm donor and the lesbian girlfriend who's not the biological 0.99
00:42:30.780 mother of the kid. The two of them have won the rights over the biological mother of the child. 0.62
00:42:36.800 What does all of this mean? A ruling was just handed down by the Federal Circuit and Family
00:42:41.960 Court of Australia. And it pertains to a nine-year-old boy, this poor little boy. How did
00:42:48.440 this poor little boy end up in this predicament? He was conceived via IVF. Of course, he was conceived
00:42:54.600 by commoditizing human life, establishing the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of human
00:43:01.440 life and establishing the legal space for baby stores. So he was purchased at the baby store,
00:43:08.420 conceived at the baby store. And the female couple, these two lesbians, chose donor eggs 0.99
00:43:14.260 and donor sperm. So I guess in that way, you wouldn't even say the biological mother was the
00:43:20.040 biological mother, though it does appear that she carried. So she was at least, I guess, the surrogate
00:43:24.300 mother. All the parties were known to each other. That's what makes this a little bit weird. The eggs
00:43:28.660 were donated by a mutual friend of the birth mother, though not the biological mother, and her
00:43:34.540 then-lesbian partner. And the sperm donation was by a man that the boy refers to as daddy and the man
00:43:40.460 who donated his sperm with the agreement that he would have a role in the boy's life, albeit not
00:43:47.660 the role of a proper father living at home with a mother and raising the kid in a family. But he would
00:43:53.920 still be involved somehow. Okay. The birth mother lost her parental rights. Presumably, she was 0.95
00:44:01.300 involved in all sorts of terrible things. And she wanted sole responsibility of the child. But now it's
00:44:05.620 the lesbian ex-girlfriend and the sperm donor get the kid, which I guess is, I guess it's a relatively 0.82
00:44:12.360 better outcome here. But I don't know. The whole thing is really sad. And it fills one both with
00:44:19.720 sadness for the boy and anger at these extremely selfish degenerate people who insisted on a
00:44:27.780 commoditizing human life and purchasing a child at the baby store. It's even dark creating a child
00:44:34.440 at the baby store. But it's a reminder that we have to pay close attention to our language here.
00:44:41.160 That was the whole point of my book, Speechless Controlling Words, Controlling Minds. And we got to
00:44:44.880 thank you. We have to focus on this a lot because the left sets the boundaries of debate by controlling
00:44:50.980 language, by setting the terms of language. If an illegal alien, if you can't say illegal alien
00:44:55.380 anymore, as I'm apparently not allowed to say on certain big tech platforms, then we have to use
00:45:01.120 what phrases like undocumented American. Well, undocumented Americans should get to stay in 1.00
00:45:05.760 America. They're Americans after all. They just don't have some documents. Illegal aliens have no right 1.00
00:45:09.840 to stay in America. Depending on how you describe that person, you will be able to persuade people
00:45:18.700 much more easily of your own position. So what's the operative phrase here? Sperm donor. That's the
00:45:25.800 operative phrase. There's no such thing as a sperm donor. That's not real. There are only fathers.
00:45:32.100 There are fathers and mothers. And there are good fathers and bad fathers. And there are some fathers who
00:45:36.880 do the right thing and get married and raise their kids and act like fathers. And there are some fathers
00:45:42.380 who go to a store and get paid money to do intrinsically evil and depraved actions into a cup
00:45:49.480 or something, and then have no responsibility for the child. And I guess this guy lies somewhere in
00:45:55.320 the middle. He's kind of a good father in the sense that he wants to be involved in the kid's life and
00:45:59.820 in some ways protect the kid. But he's certainly a bad father in that he abandoned the child and allowed
00:46:04.360 the child to be raised in this very disordered way with these two ladies. Regardless, he's a father.
00:46:12.300 I remember when I was in college, I remember hearing that one could make $1,000 a week
00:46:18.320 donating sperm or whatever, selling sperm, I guess. And I'd be lying to you if I said the thought didn't
00:46:25.200 cross my mind. I was an atheist. I was a libertarian. I wasn't seriously inclined to do it,
00:46:30.280 but I thought $1,000 a week. Say I do it 50 weeks a year. Maybe I'll take a little vacation
00:46:38.260 two weeks. Maybe I don't do it. And that could be, what, $200,000 over the course of four years.
00:46:47.380 And actually, it might have been more than $1,000 a week. Because in my recollection, I did the math
00:46:51.740 and I could have made about $400,000 over the course of my time in college. So I don't know,
00:46:56.080 let's say it was $2,000 a week, whatever it was. I'm obviously very glad I didn't do that because
00:47:01.260 I would have all these children that I would have abandoned. My own flesh and blood who I would have
00:47:05.640 abandoned. And when you look at something like the sperm donation or whatever, you're abandoning them
00:47:10.280 to people who are at the very bottom of the list of those who should be parents. Because it's people
00:47:15.940 who would commoditize human life by buying them at the baby store. Often in very disordered
00:47:22.160 kinds of relationships or single parents who are intentionally creating a child for that
00:47:28.440 environment that is not conducive to their flourishing. Really, really bad stuff. There's
00:47:34.100 no such thing as that though. There's mothers and there's fathers. No matter how we want to change
00:47:37.420 the language, no matter how we want to redefine marriage or redefine human life, we actually don't
00:47:43.120 have the power to do that with our words. We only have the power to lie and deceive. Very often lie
00:47:47.940 and deceive ourselves. Not good. Not going to give you a good political society if you're
00:47:53.400 constantly lying and deceiving yourself. It's Music Monday. The rest of the show continues
00:47:58.080 now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member. Use code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S, and check
00:48:00.940 out for two months free on all annual plans.
00:48:17.940 Who is an audience?
00:48:19.800 Who is easier at those. I feel to take part of this постоянно. And stay here for sure.
00:48:20.240 The прост顔 for making search 교 прям understands that ongoing
00:48:36.260 you'll be a good.
00:48:37.080 Who is the hero?
00:48:39.260 How that is.
00:48:40.780 Who is the hero?
00:48:42.720 Good- Governments.
00:48:43.320 Why?