The Yes or No Game, the conspiracy expansion pack, and much more! Yes, No, and Conspiracy theories are back with a vengeance. Plus, a new "Yes or No" game, and a new conspiracy theory about gender ideology.
00:20:22.420While some polling shows that people claim they aren't influenced by celebrity voices when it comes to politics, more rigorous evidence indicates that these voices are incredibly powerful.
00:20:31.820For instance, nonprofits report higher rates of online voter registration or poll worker signups when a celebrity promotes these calls to action.
00:20:38.760This potential impact is why nonprofits, candidates, and elected officials are increasingly seeking ways to engage celebrities.
00:20:45.280Of course, if the celebrity endorsement stuff didn't work, they wouldn't do it.
00:21:01.560Having an entire class of manufactured influencers from Hollywood who you can rely on 99 out of 100 times to endorse you and to work for you for free and to actually give you money during election season
00:21:21.400Conservative doomers, you know, all these doom and gloomers, we think, oh, these, when we want to deny that elections matter, we say, oh, it doesn't matter because they'll just rig it at the ballot box.
00:21:31.420Yeah, the libs can rig things a little bit at the ballot box.
00:21:33.840They can take money from Zuckerberg to put ballot drop boxes that are too far away from the county clerk's office.
00:21:39.300They can change the election process to violate even the state constitution, as in Pennsylvania, and send out widespread mail-ins.
00:21:47.060They can fill in some of those ballot applications in a way that is obviously open to fraud.
00:21:57.860It's a problem, and conservatives need to deal with it.
00:21:59.880But also, they persuade people, and the way they persuade people, it's not all just rigging at the ballot box.
00:22:06.920The way they persuade people is by owning the media, owning the public square, with the exception of X, and owning the celebrities.
00:22:14.780If the libs didn't need to do that, they wouldn't.
00:22:17.440They wouldn't invest so much time in the celeb endorsements and the glowing media profiles and the hegemony in big tech in the public square.
00:22:24.860That stuff really does matter, and they're very successful at it.
00:22:29.980And if we want to win, the good news is we don't need to just try to unrig the ballot boxes or something like that.
00:22:38.100We have to destroy their hegemony in the media and in the big tech and in the public square, and then we need to take some of that power for ourselves.
00:29:11.080And then, as for the men, black men, Hispanic men, Latinx men, indigenous men, all women, including, there's only one group that's not allowed in.
00:29:36.180And the only thing that's going to get these guys to back down is if we threaten to punish them and take away their money and maybe put them in jail if they keep discriminating against white guys or anybody.
00:29:47.120But in this case, specifically white guys.
00:29:48.980White guys, the only group that you can legally discriminate against in the United States and that socially you're encouraged to discriminate against.
00:30:23.740Because last year, the Supreme Court ruled in Students for Fair Admissions versus Harvard that race-based admissions policies in colleges are illegal, unconstitutional.
00:30:36.720How had racial discrimination against white people and Asians been upheld in the past?
00:30:42.940Well, because the Supreme Court has a strict scrutiny standard.
00:30:48.160This is the highest level of legal review under the 14th Amendment, under the Equal Protection Clause.
00:30:54.300And in order to pass the strict scrutiny standard, rules or laws that affect fundamental rights must be deemed to serve a compelling state interest.
00:31:04.380And they must be written to minify their negative effects on these fundamental rights.
00:31:09.400So it's got to have a compelling state interest.
00:31:12.460And the Supreme Court ruled last year that discriminating against whites and Asians did not serve a compelling state interest when we're talking about college admissions.
00:31:19.580So does that mean that Apple would lose a lot of money or be punished?
00:31:31.900But what about race-based scholarships?
00:31:35.480Not race-based admissions to college, but race-based scholarships.
00:31:39.100Technically, I guess they're still legal.
00:31:40.680But if a white guy or an Asian, probably an Asian guy is easier because white guys are just popularly understood to be the worst people on earth.
00:31:47.520And it's just, it's unfortunate, it's unfair, but that's just how our system works.
00:31:51.560So if an Asian guy sued, though, maybe, maybe the Supreme Court would say, yeah, that's unfair.
00:31:58.260It doesn't serve a compelling state interest to just pummel white guys into the ground and deprive them of educational opportunities and jobs.
00:32:06.820What the libs will say is that diversity, diversity with a capital D, serves a compelling state interest.
00:32:12.900And what diversity really means, in practice, as we see at the Apple Entrepreneur Camp and the University Admissions, what diversity means is punishing white guys.
00:32:22.760That it is in the state's compelling interest to punish white guys and to disadvantage them throughout society.
00:32:36.360But maybe there's a chance some of the more reasonable, fair-minded, and conservative judges will not.
00:32:40.860All I know is, you're not going to stop this.
00:32:45.480You're not going to stop de jure and de facto discrimination against anyone merely by angrily tweeting about it or even by holding a rally.
00:32:55.300You're going to change that by hitting these people where it hurts, in their pockets, and threatening them with serious legal penalties if they keep it up.
00:33:04.900The libs are so invested in diversity and equity and inclusion, they are willing to take your kids away to get it, as J.D. Vance pointed out in an interview with ABC's John Carl.
00:33:16.840What President Trump said, John, is that Tim Walz has supported taking children from their parents if the parents don't consent in gender reassignment.
00:36:21.600Because you'll notice that when really important news comes out, the White House brings out John Kirby.
00:36:26.960But they can't fire Corrine Jean-Pierre because the White House has made very clear that they value diversity, equity, and inclusion above all these things.
00:36:36.220I mean, Joe Biden himself said that Kamala Harris is a diversity, equality, and inclusion hire.
00:36:41.720He said that he used those words, okay?
00:37:18.380And there's the scandal about the weird sex stuff with kids that he kept promoting for decades.
00:37:24.220But there's also the stolen valor scandal.
00:37:27.040And so, now, as the stolen valor scandal gets worse and worse and more and more clips come up of Tim Walls misrepresenting his military service,
00:37:36.280the libs are bringing out the big guns.
00:37:38.380I'm talking about Hillary Clinton, who I'm sure has lots of literal guns, you know, and she's waiting, and corners lurking, waiting for you.
00:37:44.880So, Hillary Clinton comes out and says, Tim Walls served honorably for two decades.
00:37:50.100Then he joined Congress and worked to pass a new GI Bill that helped fund the college educations of millions of veterans, among them, J.D. Vance.
00:38:21.900This newly released video debunks Hillary Clinton's recollection of a would-be dangerous encounter as first lady.
00:38:28.900There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles.
00:38:35.660That was last week. Now confronted with new evidence, the New York senator is backpedaling.
00:38:41.080You know, I made a mistake in describing it.
00:38:44.680I have said many times, I have talked about this many times, that we were, you know, very much told by the Secret Service and the military that we were going into a war zone.
00:38:55.760Clinton's campaign rival, Barack Obama, is blasting the remarks, saying they are all part of a pattern in which Clinton tries to exaggerate her role in policymaking during her husband's administration.
00:39:07.400You know, gosh, lighten up, guys. I mean, obviously. Come on.
00:39:10.800I say millions of words every week, and there's a lot more, you know, room for error when you're talking as much as I'm talking.
00:39:22.940That's right. There's a lot of room. You can cut it off there. That's right.
00:39:26.060I say millions of words every week, and at least two or three of them are true.
00:39:30.140Of course. Yikes. Kamala rolling out Hillary Clinton to defend walls against charges of stolen valor.
00:39:40.140Hillary, who stole valor herself infamously, so much so that Obama made it a big point of the 2008 Democrat presidential primary.
00:39:48.740Hillary lied about her experience in a war zone.
00:39:51.560That's exactly the kind of person that you want to attest to your integrity and your honesty.
00:39:55.940The Clintons. So not looking good. Not looking good.
00:40:00.140For Tim Walls. Now, speaking of corrupt politicos, I have to tip my cap to some of the most corrupt people in politics.
00:40:09.820And that would be the Lincoln Project. And I don't tip my cap in an objective way.
00:40:15.000What they're doing is awful, and they're showing themselves to be some of the slimiest people in politics.
00:40:21.080But their scam is so breathtakingly successful, I have to have a grudging respect for it.
00:40:30.140The Lincoln Project, you will recall, was founded by John Weaver, George Conway, Kellyanne Conway's husband, Rick Wilson,
00:40:39.260a few other malcontent GOP operatives who couldn't get jobs anymore after Trump took over the Republican Party
00:40:46.280and tried to chase out some of the rats on the ship.
00:40:49.380So they flipped, and they started working for Democrats, and they took Democrat money to pose as the anti-Trump Republicans.
00:40:58.600The name John Weaver, you might recall, he had to resign in disgrace because he was caught sending lewd messages.
00:41:04.360George Conway ended up resigning, humiliated by the many scandals of the Lincoln Project.
00:41:13.340Rick Wilson stuck it out. He's still scooping up all that money.
00:41:18.120It's just a true basket of deplorables, to borrow a phrase from Hillary Clinton.
00:41:23.940Really slimy swamp creature, you know, the swampy of the swampy in Washington, D.C.
00:41:31.500Well, anyway, they're making an insane amount of money.
00:41:34.960The Lincoln Project, according to recent filings, this is from Rob Pyre, he's got to give a little hat tip.
00:41:42.280But the Lincoln Project has spent $437,000 in the 2024 presidential race.
00:41:50.320The Lincoln Project has spent $11.7 million on overhead and other operating expenditures since January 1st of last year.
00:42:00.640So these guys come out, and a lot of them, even they, even these disreputable people, got so sickened by the scam of it.
00:42:10.200Some of them had said, okay, to keep whatever modicum of a reputation I have left, I'm getting out of here.
00:42:16.080Rick Wilson stuck it out, but, and there are other slimy people all over it.
00:42:21.520They say, hey, Democrats, we're the Republicans with integrity.
00:42:25.260Yeah, us, we're traitors, and we don't really believe anything, and now we work for people who want to murder babies and trans kids.
00:42:30.360But yeah, we have integrity in everything, you know?
00:43:03.340Less than half a million dollars on the election, almost $12 million on themselves, and their offices, and probably their nice new suits, and I don't know, whatever else.
00:43:20.000I hope many more Democrats give these dirtbags even more of their money, and I hope these dirtbags go have a nice vacation in Cabo, or however they're going to spend it.
00:43:28.860Because every dollar that these gullible Dems are giving to these crooks in the Lincoln Project is a dollar that is not being spent effectively by actual Democrat operatives,
00:43:38.040who, because they are actually effective, are effectively worse.
00:43:45.360Meanwhile, speaking of large sums of money in politics, President Trump is planning to sue the Department of Justice for $100 million over the Mar-a-Lago raid.
00:43:57.780Trump, according to reports, is taking legal action against Joe Biden's DOJ because on August 8th of 2022, so almost exactly two years ago, Biden's DOJ raided Trump's house.
00:44:12.300And this was shocking, a president using the power of the state to raid the home of his predecessor and current chief rival.
00:44:22.440Trump is alleging tortious conduct by the United States against President Trump.
00:44:33.500Daniel Epstein, who is Trump's attorney, says,
00:44:37.880What President Trump is doing here is not just standing up for himself.
00:44:41.500He is standing up for all Americans who believe in the rule of law and believe that you should hold the government accountable when it wrongs you.
00:45:40.940We have the kind, we're basically a conservative Supreme Court for now before the libs try to undermine the third co-equal branch of government by packing the Supreme Court.