A man who was apparently dead, who was being wheeled in to have his organs harvested, woke up. And it's even creepier than that because he showed signs that he was alive long before the doctors finally gave up on taking all of his organs.
00:05:18.800Here's just one piece of testimony before our government committee by just one expert.
00:05:25.320It's not infrequent that something comes up around the donor and whether or not the donor's dead.
00:05:30.100And the problem is that we've got 40 years where there's been no oversight at all of the OPOs.
00:05:35.340The Kentucky Attorney General's office says they are now looking into this case.
00:05:40.340So the OPO is the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations.
00:05:45.160Dr. Robert Cannon, you just heard, that guy who you just heard from is an expert at Vanderbilt.
00:05:50.220Dr. Robert Cannon is a transplant surgeon at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
00:05:53.740He described a similar incident during a congressional hearing.
00:05:57.840Quote, we actually were in the operating room.
00:06:00.080We had actually opened the patient and were in the process of preparing their organs, at which point the ventilator triggered.
00:06:06.480And so the anesthesiologist at the head of the table spoke up and said, hey, I think this patient might have just breathed.
00:06:11.740If the patient breathes, that means they're not brain dead.
00:06:15.940Now, at this point, according to Cannon, a representative from the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations wanted to proceed anyway.
00:06:25.740He said, yeah, maybe he breathed or whatever, but go get those organs out before he breathes too much.
00:06:30.120So he goes on, he says, we were kind of shocked that an OPO person would have so little knowledge about what brain death means that they would say, oh, you should just go ahead.
00:06:39.920And we thought, no, we're not going to take any risk that we murder a patient because that's what it would be if the patient was alive.
00:06:46.140So what's at issue here is this question of brain death.
00:07:18.820And if there's no cognitive activity, even if machines are keeping your organs alive, you're not really alive.
00:07:24.480Brain death, however, is pretty controversial.
00:07:27.320There was a New England Journal of Medicine article in 2008 that noted this uncomfortable fact that is going to make a lot of people start to question whether or not they should check that box on their driver's license.
00:07:39.340The uncomfortable fact is that organs are harvested from living people, by definition.
00:07:48.980The New England Journal of Medicine says, quote,
00:07:51.760The uncomfortable conclusion to be drawn from this literature is that although it may be perfectly ethical to remove vital organs for transplantation from patients who satisfy the diagnostic criteria of brain death,
00:08:02.840the reason it is ethical, the reason it is ethical cannot be that we are convinced they are really dead.
00:08:09.180At worst, this is still the New England Journal, at worst, this ongoing reliance on the conflation of brain death, quote, unquote, with real death.
00:08:18.300This reliance suggests that the medical profession has been gerrymandering the definition of death to carefully conform with conditions that are most favorable for transplantation.
00:08:27.920At best, the rule has provided misleading ethical cover that cannot withstand careful scrutiny.
00:08:34.460I used to check the box on my driver's license.
00:09:23.800I think after COVID, when the medical industry lied to so many people, when the medical industry lied about that virus, about how to prevent the virus, about the risks of the virus, about the six feet and the masks and the vaccines and all the rest of it.
00:09:37.260But a lot of people questioned the ethics of the medical industry.
00:09:40.940I'm not saying they questioned the technical proficiency of the medical industry.
00:09:46.020This is where a lot of the libs will try to trip up conservatives.
00:09:49.180They'll say, what, you don't trust modern medicine?
00:09:51.940Well, what happens when you get a disease?
00:09:56.520You think you know better than the doctors?
00:09:57.860No, I'm not saying we know better than the doctors most of the time when it comes to the technical aspects of disease advancement and treatment.
00:10:06.720What I doubt, what I seriously doubt, is the ethics of the medical profession.
00:10:12.560And this kind of case, which is not a one-off case, drives that home.
00:10:19.040The medical genius elites are very good at harvesting organs.
00:10:24.360It's impressive that we can harvest organs from people and transplant them to other people and have them work a lot of the time.
00:10:28.980However, their ethical education has not kept up with their technical education.
00:10:38.180Their ethical education is probably worse than a fifth grader 50 years ago.
00:10:42.160And so, as the New England Journal of Medicine is saying, what they've done is they've used euphemisms.
00:10:47.360They've changed the meaning of words, just as we see the libs do so much these days.
00:10:52.160Undocumented Americans to mean illegal alien or a trans woman to mean a man.
00:10:56.940They use these euphemisms, they use these words to persuade you that living is really death.
00:11:05.140And they do this for the utilitarian reason that they believe, well, look, you're going to die anyway.
00:11:08.620Or if you don't die, you're going to have some brain damage and you're going to be a burden to society.
00:11:13.460You're going to require a lot of care.
00:11:14.620So, better to just kill you and then use your organs for someone who might live than to try to give you the fullest medical treatment.
00:11:23.820That's not a scientific judgment or a medical judgment.
00:11:28.500And these people are not qualified to make those ethical judgments.
00:11:31.100The uncomfortable reality is what kills you, what kills the organ donor, is retrieving the organs.
00:11:39.160That's what actually leads to the death.
00:11:41.780And that creates an ethical question that the modern, technocratic, genius, utilitarian libs who run our institutions do not want us to think about.
00:11:53.860Is it any wonder that a medical industry and a liberal establishment that can't differentiate between a man and a woman, a medical industry that will put little boys on cross-sex hormones because they don't know the difference between a man and a woman, that that same medical industry can't tell the difference between life and death?
00:14:47.420I said, let's look at the medical literature and what it says.
00:14:50.180It says that trans people don't have to transition, don't have to have gender dysphoria, don't have to get surgery, and don't have to get hormones.
00:14:58.000If they feel they are a different gender than their biosex, then they are trans and they are valid.
00:15:05.000And I said, understandably, this is ridiculous.
00:15:07.520Then I can present exactly how I am, and I can be trans and valid if I say that's my gender identity.
00:15:14.560And so I said, let me prove how ridiculous this is using reducio ad absurdum by being trans for five, six months, and hopefully people will understand then how ridiculous this is.
00:15:27.620Okay, so he pretended to be transgender for six months, and now he's hoping people understand how ridiculous this is.
00:15:37.980However, people are not going to see how ridiculous this is as a result of him pretending to be trans.
00:15:45.260Because it is not possible to pretend to be trans, because trans is pretend.
00:15:50.800So it's not, the people, first of all, if the story even gets out there, I'm not sure that you're going to hear about it far beyond, that was Alex Stein's show or maybe my show.
00:15:58.860But you're not going to hear about it far beyond that, but you're not going to hear about it far beyond that.
00:16:02.400Even if people do, there's no difference between what that guy did and what any trans person did.
00:16:14.520It's just called being trans, which is to say it's just plain pretend.
00:16:17.720Also, transgenderism is not the end that the libs are seeking.
00:16:24.760Transgenderism, like gay marriage, like the whole sexual revolution, is just a stop along the way to an even more radical end.
00:16:33.320And you're beginning to see the next stage of the sexual revolution for the left, which is not men pretending to be women or women pretending to be men.
00:16:42.160It's the abolition of sexual difference altogether.
00:16:45.340It's everyone becoming a kind of formless, sexless blob.
00:16:51.100It's sterility and it's mutilation and it's everyone looking just kind of androgynous.
00:16:58.180It's pretty girls making themselves look ugly and men making themselves look effeminate and everyone just looking like Pat from SNL.
00:17:06.160You know, just everyone looking like this type of person where you can't tell, are they man, are they woman?
00:17:12.840And the joke on the old SNL sketch was that you should be able to tell whether the person is a man or a woman, but sometimes you can't.
00:17:23.440The reality of it now is that it is by design that you can't tell if a person is a man or a woman.
00:17:29.900Because ultimately, the real end of transgenderism is transcending humanity.
00:17:38.020It's called transhumanism among some of the weirdo ideologues out there.
00:17:42.040But you hear it spoken of in the mainstream, that we're going to upload our consciousness, that we're going to live forever somehow.
00:17:50.480We're going to enhance our bodies through the fourth industrial revolution to meld with technology so that sexual difference won't even really matter anymore.
00:17:58.060The left-wing writer and ideologue Yuval Harari says, we're going to become homo deus, not homo sapiens.
00:18:05.520We're going to consciously create a new kind of creature.
00:18:09.400We're going to make ourselves evolve beyond that to homo deus, to man as a kind of god.
00:18:14.760So that's really what they're after in the long run.
00:27:41.040Despite the Palestinian state, so-called, admits on its website, quote,
00:27:46.120despite the displacement of more than 1 million Palestinians in 1948 and the displacement of more than 200,000 Palestinians, majority of them to Jordan after the 1967 war,
00:27:57.020the Palestinian world population was 14 million by the end of 2022, which means that the number of Palestinians in the world has doubled about 10 times since the Nakba,
00:28:05.760the Nakba being the ethnic displacement of the Palestinian Arabs at the founding of Israel.
00:28:11.180And more than half of them lived in historical Palestine by the end of 22.
00:28:15.360Number of Palestinians in the world more than doubled 10 times since the beginning of what these people are calling a genocide.
00:28:24.360I think, by definition, that means there hasn't been a genocide.
00:28:31.580And I'm not even particularly partisan or extreme on the issue of the Israel-Gaza, Israel-Palestine conflict.
00:28:38.160I recognize it's a complex issue, one of the most complex and thorny political issues in foreign policy.
00:28:44.760However, I've said many times, it's a difficult conflict because the rational political goal for each side of the conflict is the ethnic cleansing of the other.
00:28:58.260And some people hear that and they think that ethnic cleansing means genocide.
00:29:08.700They're not totally unrelated, but they're different.
00:29:10.760And for Israel, especially after the October 7th attack, they cannot tolerate the security risk of an independently governed Palestinian state that close on its border.
00:30:03.580I bring it up not even to get into the Israel-Palestine issue, to point out how radical Kamala Harris is.
00:30:11.840She knows this is a bad issue for her.
00:30:13.380This is why she said she didn't want to talk about it.
00:30:15.200But the official position of Kamala Harris right now, as she just stated, you heard it with your own ears, is the state of Israel is committing a genocide.
00:30:26.060Well, lady, first of all, that's a pretty audacious claim.
00:30:29.080But if that's what you really believe, how can you continue to support the state of Israel?
00:30:34.360She is currently the vice president of the United States.
00:30:36.720Her administration is arming Israel and has been arming Israel to the teeth for years.
00:30:41.360If she seriously believes that the state of Israel is committing a genocide, that means that Kamala Harris is admitting to being complicit in genocide.
00:31:39.700Major, major blunder that reveals her complete inadequacy for the job.
00:31:47.980Now, speaking of the Harris campaign, Kamala Harris has an agenda for black men.
00:31:54.060Kamala Harris has rolled out an agenda for black men that got her into a little bit of trouble.
00:31:58.860Because her campaign plan, her agenda for black men promised, quote, one million loans that are fully forgivable to black entrepreneurs, capital B black, black entrepreneurs, and others to start a business.
00:32:10.100Education, training, and mentorship programs that help black men get good-paying jobs, legalizing recreational marijuana and creating opportunities for black Americans to succeed in this new industry, and helping black men provide care for their aging parents.
00:32:24.240Do you catch what's maybe a little bit of a problem about this plan, this agenda for black men?
00:32:32.100It's probably illegal is the problem with it.
00:32:37.220She's saying, yeah, the government is going to discriminate in favor of black men.
00:32:43.420But if you discriminate in favor of one race, that means necessarily that you're discriminating against other races.
00:32:51.600So another way to write the Kamala agenda for black men is we are going to deny loans, fully forgivable loans, to white people and Hispanic people and Asian people.
00:33:02.660We are going to deny education, training, and mentorship to whites, Asians, and Hispanics so that whites, Asians, and Hispanics have a harder time getting good-paying jobs.
00:33:13.500Then the marijuana one is my favorite one.
00:33:15.300She goes, yeah, all you black guys, you love just like smoking dope, right?
00:33:18.040Yeah, we'll give you a lot more dope if you want.
00:33:42.700Then after that, we'll help black men provide care for their aging parents, meaning we will not help white people and Hispanics and Asians to care for their parents.
00:33:53.040So the Harris campaign realized this was not a good look.
00:33:55.680And they announced on Monday that it's an agenda for everyone.
00:34:03.540It's an agenda for black men or it's an agenda for everyone?
00:34:06.840Well, that phrase, and others, is doing a lot of work.
00:34:10.160We're going to, we've got this program for black entrepreneurs and others.
00:34:13.860Well, if it's for others, then it's not for black entrepreneurs, and it's for everybody.
00:34:17.980But it obviously is for black entrepreneurs, and this is the problem for the left.
00:34:21.240The left very much wants to discriminate on the basis of race.
00:34:26.380Very much wants to, and has enshrined that in law, especially in civil rights law.
00:34:31.160However, the left also has cynically used the notion of equal protection and non-discrimination to advance their agenda.
00:34:42.620So they also have to say we will not discriminate on the basis of race, and there's just an irreconcilable contradiction here.
00:34:48.380So they're going to use little weasel phrases like, and others, or whatever, to advance what they really want, which is racial discrimination against whites, against Asians, slightly in favor of Hispanics, and especially in favor of black people.
00:35:01.820They're going to use that kind of weasel language to pretend that they believe in some kind of racial equality.
00:35:57.260Harris goes to church highlighting the absence of religion in the 2024 campaign.
00:36:01.460In an increasingly secular country, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are highlighting their personal faiths less than other recent candidates.
00:36:11.560But, you know, over the weekend, Harris went to New Birth Missionary Baptist Church outside Atlanta.
00:36:17.320And Tim Walsh went to Victorious Believers Ministries in Saginaw, Michigan.
00:37:28.420But now I guess she sort of pays lip service to Christianity, but obviously contradicts non-negotiable aspects of the political expression of Christianity,
00:37:37.640notably on killing little babies and on marriage and on a lot of stuff.
00:40:47.980But there's an excellent article in the New York Times by Ross Douthat, who is the best columnist at the New York Times.
00:40:53.760Is the world ready for a religious comeback?
00:40:56.560The heyday of the new atheism in Western life when anti-God tracts by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens bestrode bestseller lists did not arrive.
00:41:04.380These brilliant new arguments for God's existence were suddenly discovered.
00:41:07.400Rather, it was because of specific events and deeper forces making the time ripe.
00:41:12.700I highly recommend you read the whole column.
00:41:17.160Douthat is saying, we might be ready for a religious comeback because the cause of our fashionable atheism that's really dominated for the last 20 years.
00:41:26.980It's starting in the early to mid-2000s and petering out probably five or six years ago beginning to wane.
00:41:33.440It didn't come about because of some philosophical discovery or some theological insight or even some material scientific discovery.
00:41:41.800It came about because of passions owing to particular historical events.
00:41:51.900The reason the new atheism hit was not because Christopher Hitchens made some good argument.
00:41:56.520He didn't really make any good arguments.
00:41:57.640He certainly didn't make any new arguments or Richard Dawkins or anyone.
00:42:00.660It's because of the 9-11 attacks because 9-11, when Muslim radicals decided to fly planes into buildings, that made people skeptical of extreme religion, serious religion.
00:42:12.880Now, of course, different religion than our religion.
00:42:15.320Islam is a rather different religion than Christianity.
00:42:18.280But the atheists and the secularists seized upon it opportunistically so that they could attack religion broadly and really specifically Christianity.
00:42:52.380So that made people skeptical of religion.
00:42:54.120In any case, the New Atheism was about passions that came from particular historical events.
00:43:01.660And if passion and history can lead us into certain bad ideas, that means that passion and history might be able to lead us out of certain bad ideas.
00:43:10.460I think we're seeing passions aroused by certain historical events right now leading us back to God.
00:43:16.720For starters, the trans ideology, the fact that the supposed elites and geniuses in our country are trying to put your kid on puberty blockers, castrate your kid, lead him into all sorts of self-harm and probably shorten his life.
00:43:28.440Based on science against religion, that's going to turn people against science, and it's going to turn people back toward religion.
00:43:37.180Not that I think ultimately there's any real conflict.
00:43:41.920The fact that we were promised by the atheists, if we just embrace atheism, we'll be more powerful, we'll be stronger, we'll be more rational than ever.
00:43:50.820We become much less rational, and we become much less powerful.
00:43:53.980How about the self-undermining of the whole scientific endeavor?
00:43:58.200The fact that our so-called genius scientists are now telling us things that are patently false.
00:44:04.960They're telling us men can become women, they're telling us babies aren't babies, and they're telling us that living people are dead, and they try to harvest their organs.
00:44:11.060The self-undermining of the scientific endeavor, when you take God out of it and necessarily weaken morality, that is going to do it too.
00:44:33.260I think the world is ready for a religious comeback.
00:44:36.040I think that Tocqueville's observation in democracy of America is probably right, that America is either going to take religion more seriously.
00:44:45.840America might even become Catholic, as Tocqueville pointed out.
00:44:49.140You're seeing an outsized influence of Catholicism.
00:44:52.360At the very least, we can say traditional religion, or it's going to give up religion altogether.