Ep. 1669 - Trump and Elon Prove the Media Really Are Fake
Episode Stats
Words per minute
163.7954
Harmful content
Misogyny
16
sentences flagged
Hate speech
34
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode of The Michael Knowles Show, host Michael K. Knowles talks about a recent headline that sums up everything about the farce that is the Fourth Estate: Trump's foreign aid freeze throws journalism into chaos, and why that should be good for journalism.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
I've finally found it. After years and decades even of searching, I have finally found
00:00:05.920
the most perfect mainstream media article ever written. It comes to us thanks to President Trump
00:00:13.700
by way of Reporters Without Borders headline. Trump's foreign aid freeze throws journalism
00:00:21.220
around the world into chaos. Now, that headline alone is pretty funny. Why would the president's
00:00:28.520
enacting a policy throw journalism into chaos? Shouldn't that be good for journalism? Isn't
00:00:35.920
the president doing things the sort of thing that journalists exist to cover? Why is that throwing
00:00:43.760
journalism into chaos? We learn the reason in the subheader right here in bold. President Donald
00:00:50.700
Trump has frozen billions of dollars around the world in aid projects, including over $268 million
00:00:56.640
allocated by Congress to support independent media and the free flow of information.
00:01:02.520
I want you to hold on. Pause. Did you catch that? $268 million allocated by Congress to support
00:01:12.920
independent media. That, I'm pretty sure, is a contradiction in terms. Because media outlets
00:01:20.480
that depend for their very existence on hundreds of millions of dollars from the government
00:01:25.860
are, by definition, not independent. Those outlets are extremely dependent. They are the dependent
00:01:34.280
media. Traditionally, we call them state media, actually. But Reporters Without Borders goes on
00:01:40.460
and doubles down. The paragraph concludes by calling, quote, on international public and private
00:01:46.640
support to commit to the sustainability of independent media. Public support, that's government support
00:01:54.540
for independent media. And the demands are increasingly desperate, like the Wizard of Oz when he is revealed
00:02:00.820
as a fraud. We are the great and powerful independent media. Pay no attention to those government hacks
00:02:08.660
behind the curtain. But the jig is up. The establishment media are cut off and in freefall. No wonder they lied
00:02:17.620
and deceived and fought so hard against the facts and the will of the people to keep Trump out of office.
00:02:24.500
Their very existence depended upon it. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:02:38.660
Welcome back to the show. President Trump has just signed one of my favorite executive orders
00:02:54.080
yet. This touches on a very politically incorrect subject. And it's not transgenderism. Enough about
0.52
00:03:00.400
transgenderism. It's an even more important subject. There's so much more to say. First,
00:03:04.800
though, go to hillsdale.edu slash Knowles. As February
00:03:08.660
unfolds, many of us are settling into our routines, but that does not mean the opportunity for fresh
00:03:12.740
starts has passed. Whether your January goals are still going strong
00:03:16.720
or need a reset, this month offers the perfect moment to embrace learning and
00:03:20.740
growth. This February, I encourage you to spend time exploring something new.
00:03:25.260
Why should January have all the fun when it comes to personal development?
0.98
00:03:28.500
When you want to explore something new, you ought to check out Hillsdale College, offering more than 40
00:03:32.720
free online courses in the most enduring and important subjects. You can learn about C.S. Lewis,
00:03:38.480
the Book of Genesis, the U.S. Constitution, the Roman Republic, or the ancient church. I would
00:03:43.400
personally recommend Marxism, Socialism, and Communism. This brand new online course features
00:03:47.620
Hillsdale professors of history, politics, and economics as they examine Marx's life and writings,
00:03:52.760
the consequences in the Soviet Union, and the spread of cultural Marxism in America.
00:03:57.740
I really love Hillsdale. Hillsdale is one of the few reputable, serious institutions of learning
00:04:03.180
left in the United States. So right now, you can avail yourself of their resources. Go to
00:04:07.260
hillsdale.edu slash Knowles. It's free. Super easy to get started. Hillsdale.edu slash Knowles.
00:04:14.980
While we're talking about stupid headlines, there's one that I cannot let go.
00:04:19.460
This is probably my favorite headline I've seen in the past week or two. The Reporters Without
00:04:25.220
Borders one, that's the most perfect headline that totally sums up the farce of the fourth estate of
0.99
00:04:31.880
the great intrepid journalists and media. But this one's my favorite headline from Vox.com,
00:04:37.680
explanatory journalism from a liberal perspective. Vox.com headline, J.D. Vance accidentally,
00:04:44.980
directed us to a crucial moral question. And this is in response to J.D. Vance on television
00:04:52.680
talking about the order of charity. And some people are calling it the hierarchy of love and
00:04:57.800
the ordo amoris in Latin. J.D. Vance getting into a big fight with all of these prominent lib
00:05:03.560
journalists and Yale professors and Yale-affiliated people over a deeply Christian concept, but a concept
00:05:12.580
that even just comes from our common sense, going back to Aristotle to some degree, St. Augustine,
00:05:19.280
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, St. Gregory the Great, St. Thomas Aquinas, the ordo amoris.
00:05:24.000
The reason I love this headline so much is just this word accidentally. You know how happy I am
00:05:27.980
that we are now living under an administration in which the vice president will be giving lectures
00:05:34.160
on scholastic philosophy in Latin, on television, on Twitter, but this word accidentally.
00:05:41.460
Whatever you want to say about J.D. Vance. I really like J.D. Vance. Maybe you don't like J.D. Vance.
00:05:45.200
The libs hate J.D. Vance. Whatever you want to say about him. Does anyone seriously doubt that he is
00:05:51.400
intelligent? He seems like a pretty intelligent guy, right? He graduated Yale Law School, came from
00:05:56.820
nothing. Drug addicted mother, very difficult circumstances, came from nothing, rose up to graduate
0.99
00:06:02.820
the top law school in the country, top ranked, went on, wrote a book that was so powerful it became
00:06:09.940
a number one bestseller. Hollywood gobbled it up, made a big movie about it. He gets elected to the
00:06:14.680
Senate. He makes a boatload of money with Peter Thiel. He's an intelligent guy, right?
00:06:20.620
And whatever you want to say about him, the very fact that he is explicating scholastic philosophical
00:06:28.320
concepts in Latin on Twitter would seem to suggest he's fairly well-educated, even if you don't agree
00:06:33.560
with his conclusions. Generally speaking, when indisputably intelligent and well-educated men
00:06:41.440
explicate philosophical concepts in Latin, in public, they are not accidentally stumbling into moral
00:06:51.760
questions, okay? Whatever you want to say about J.D., that's not accidental, guys. Vox.com
00:06:58.200
is accidentally stumbling into a moral question because J.D. Vance raised it for them and they
00:07:03.480
could not ignore it because he's the vice president of the United States. And now we're having a
00:07:06.560
national debate on the Ordo Amoris, be still my beating heart. That's the accidental part. I think
00:07:12.980
Vox.com accidentally stumbled into the Dunning-Kruger effect. That's what I think just happened.
00:07:17.600
Beautiful, beautiful stuff. Now, speaking of immigration, AOC, we haven't heard from her a lot
00:07:23.500
lately. AOC just went on some random podcast to present her view of the reason we must have
00:07:33.200
illegal aliens in the country. And I'd never heard this claim before. AOC says we need illegal aliens
00:07:39.520
because Americans would not have survived COVID without illegal aliens.
0.56
00:07:47.200
Understand that America's immigration force and our community of immigrants, including and especially
00:07:54.740
the millions of undocumented people in this country, are why America has prospered, especially
00:08:02.000
why we survived the COVID-19 pandemic. And for all of the people who cast a vote based on grocery
00:08:10.880
prices and inflation, if you think your groceries are expensive now, wait until the farms are empty.
00:08:18.760
If you think houses are expensive now, wait until there's no one building them. Understand the
00:08:26.020
consequences of what this means. Because for America to not accept immigrants is the definition
0.53
00:08:35.460
of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Okay. Now, part of this argument, I have heard a lot
00:08:42.260
before. Part of this argument is the argument that the left consistently makes for illegal immigration.
00:08:49.020
Namely, if we don't allow criminal cartels to import a bunch of third world peasants into the country
1.00
00:08:56.340
so that we can pay them slave wages, who's going to pick our grapes? Who's going to clean our houses?
0.99
00:09:04.200
I don't think a lot of illegal aliens are plumbers, actually. That's what it's more of a skilled
00:09:09.040
position. But in any case, that's their argument. Who's going to who's going to clean our floors and
00:09:13.900
pick our grapes and work as our indentured servants, afraid that we could deport them at any moment so
00:09:19.340
that we can continue to mistreat them? That's that's their argument. Seems like a really nasty
00:09:22.920
argument to me, but that is their open defense of illegal immigration right now. But what about this?
00:09:29.940
We would not have survived COVID without illegal aliens. Well, AOC is just pointing to a particular
1.00
00:09:36.520
moment of national crisis to say that our economy could not survive without illegal aliens. That's
1.00
00:09:41.480
the broader point that she's making. That we are economically dependent upon illegal aliens.
00:09:48.500
And she's right. She's totally right about that. Got to give credit where credit's due. She's right.
00:09:54.100
The United States is economically dependent upon mass migration, certainly, and practically speaking
00:10:01.680
upon illegal immigration. That's that's true. That's why we need to enforce the law.
00:10:09.880
That she thinks that's an argument for just keeping the borders open and allowing the cartels to
00:10:14.540
shove a bunch of people into the country and the Democrats will get an electoral benefit. But even
0.56
00:10:19.380
just from an economic standpoint, she thinks that's the argument for it. But no, this is this is the
00:10:24.360
point that Trump is making. This is one of the reasons that people elected Trump to another term is
00:10:30.080
it is very bad for America to be this dependent upon mass migration. It's not that's not sustainable.
00:10:40.500
That means that we're not having kids. We're not replacing ourselves. We're not a strong country.
00:10:43.920
It is a really bad for America to be this economically dependent upon people who are
1.00
00:10:51.240
subverting our law, who are who exist outside of our legal system. That is not sustainable in the long
1.00
00:10:56.040
run. It is really bad. Let's broaden it out. It's really bad. We learned this from COVID for the United
00:11:01.000
States to be this dependent upon China for our supply chain. It's really bad because if a virus comes
00:11:07.140
out of China and the world gets shut down, we're up the creek without a paddle. And that that was
00:11:13.760
ostensibly just a virus that popped out of nowhere. Imagine now if we go to war with the places that
00:11:20.320
produce all of our stuff that have stolen all of our intellectual property. Right. It's all bad.
00:11:24.480
The liberals on the left and the right are arguing, no, we need to keep the status quo, man, because,
00:11:29.640
you know, we're just so dependent upon it. But what we're saying is the status quo is totally
00:11:34.420
unacceptable. It's hollowed out our manufacturing base. It's been bad for American families. It subverts
00:11:39.160
our immigration laws. It leads to rape and murder and a ton of fentanyl poisoning our country in the
00:11:45.020
case of illegal immigration. It makes us totally dependent on China and slave labor in China. It's
0.85
00:11:49.880
it's just that's unacceptable. So, yeah, I would say you're right. Thank you for highlighting the
00:11:54.840
problem. You're right. All the more reason to hurry up with the Tom Homan deportations because we need to
00:12:01.040
fix our economy so that we're not dependent on crime. There's so much more to say. First,
00:12:05.600
go to livemomentous.com. Use code Knowles. Success is not built on resolutions. Those are made to break.
00:12:12.840
It's built on taking action and building unstoppable momentum. When it comes to optimizing your health
00:12:18.500
span, living longer and living better, certain things are non-negotiable. Quality is at the top
00:12:23.360
of that list. And in the world of performance-focused supplements, Momentous stands alone. Their commitment
00:12:28.860
to NSF certification means every batch undergoes rigorous testing for heavy metals, harmful additives,
00:12:34.100
and label accuracy. It's why they've earned the trust of all 32 NFL teams and leading collegiate
00:12:40.280
sports dieticians nationwide and also ukulele-playing podcasters. While other brands chase trends that
00:12:47.120
flood the market with endless options, Momentous takes a different approach. They rely on research
00:12:52.740
and expert guidance to focus on what truly matters, mastering the fundamentals with unwavering consistency,
00:12:58.720
then tailoring supplementation to your specific goals. Speaking of fundamentals, protein and
00:13:04.100
creatine form the cornerstone. Momentous sources Creapure, the highest-grade creatine monohydrate
00:13:10.440
available, an essential supplement for both men and women seeking peak physical and cognitive
00:13:16.440
performance. Right now, go to livemomentous.com. Use code Knowles for 20% off your order today.
00:13:21.800
We're getting some breaking news right now. This is breaking news coming to us from CNN, a major update
00:13:28.800
from the Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk's role in the Trump administration. CNN,
00:13:34.740
please take it away. Yes, so this is a 19-year-old high school graduate who has used the unfortunate
00:13:41.740
nickname Big Balls online, so that would be one way that we could refer to him. He is now working at
00:13:47.720
Musk's behest inside Doge, and we looked into his background. And so we found, you know, several
00:13:55.160
notable things, Aaron, one of which is that this individual has founded multiple companies, including
00:14:01.240
one with another unfortunate name, Tesla.Sexy LLC, which he established in 2021. He would have been
00:14:08.640
around 16 years old. Now, this LLC controls dozens of web domains. I love 2025 so much. I love it so,
00:14:16.780
I love it so, so much. It's already so great. The vice president lecturing on St. Thomas Aquinas,
00:14:23.700
CNN complaining that Elon Musk, who's now kind of in the government, has hired a teenager,
00:14:29.700
genius, engineer, entrepreneur named Big Balls to cut away all of the waste. And frankly,
00:14:37.500
those are probably a prerequisite if you want to take on the Leviathan federal government and the
00:14:44.420
liberal patronage systems that Elon and Trump and the whole Doge team are trying to root out.
00:14:51.140
Really, really beautiful stuff. Right before that lady started talking about, how do I clean this up?
00:14:57.020
I don't want to have to repeat that phrase on air. You know, this is not CNN, okay? We're an elevated,
00:15:01.720
sophisticated, wholesome show. Maybe Grandi Coglioni. Does that count? Okay. Big Cajones?
00:15:10.240
Let's call it Big Cajones. Right before she starts talking about him, CNN, Giddily was reporting on a
00:15:16.700
story of some guy who was working for Doge who just got fired because he had some racist social
00:15:22.700
media posts or something. And so he has to leave Doge. It's so troubling that this guy had racist
00:15:28.280
social media posts, to which I would say, look, I don't know, maybe that guy had racist social media
00:15:33.380
posts. Not Big Cajones, but some other guy who was a little bit older. Maybe he had some racist
00:15:38.480
social media posts. But here's what I know for sure. The people who worked for the Biden administration
00:15:43.080
in the government, the people who worked for the Obama administration, the people who work in
00:15:47.960
democratic politics broadly, they don't just have some racist social media posts. They have
00:15:54.100
a racist public philosophy and ideology. They don't just post about their racial preferences on
00:16:02.300
some message board on social media. They speak about it openly and they enshrine their racist views
00:16:07.720
into law. They say that we need to punish white people in college admissions and in hiring. They say
00:16:13.680
we need to promote our favored races in college admissions and in hiring. They say things often
00:16:19.820
openly like we need to abolish whiteness. Like white whiteness is a problem. Okay. So I don't know.
0.95
00:16:29.000
You're telling me, let's just take CNN at its word that some random guy who worked for Elon had some
00:16:34.360
racist social media posts. Okay. Pretty much everyone who works for the Democrats espouses open racism.
00:16:41.600
And they're not even good engineers. So I don't know, man, I'm not really going to sweat it. Okay.
00:16:47.080
If we got some guy who's a really good engineer, who is certainly no worse in his political ideology
00:16:53.120
than the mainstream American left, and he can actually like get things done in the government.
00:16:58.000
I don't know. I'm not, I'm not sweating that. I guess he's been fired. I guess he's out,
00:17:01.260
but I'm not sweating that. Wait, you know what, you know what we need in the government? We need
00:17:05.600
big cojones. That's what, that's what we need in the government right now to, to root out the deeply
00:17:12.060
entrenched patronage system that, that has apparently been creating a feedback loop. I mean,
00:17:17.980
all the way down to my favorite headline, the most perfect mainstream media headline I've ever read.
00:17:25.180
Namely, oh no, Trump is cutting off all this government funding. What will happen to the
00:17:29.620
independent media? I guess there just is no independent media. I guess sweet little Elisa told me that she's
0.95
00:17:35.260
been telling me this for months, maybe over a year at this point. She goes, Mag,
00:17:39.080
I don't think there are any actual liberals. She's been saying, I've told you this. And I said,
00:17:45.540
what do you mean? She goes, I just, everyone, every like real person I talk to is not a liberal.
00:17:49.660
Is it just all fake? And I said, I don't know. It's kind of interesting. And the more that we learn
00:17:54.380
about federal spending at USAID, the more that we learn about the federal government just subsidizing
00:18:01.500
all of these supposedly independent media outlets, the more, yeah, it might just all be fake.
00:18:06.720
It might all be a total psyop. Now, speaking of the economy and President Trump's tax and spending
00:18:12.320
priorities, Caroline Leavitt, White House press secretary, just answered questions,
00:18:16.560
not on the spending side, but on the tax side. Are we going to get, come on,
00:18:21.620
this is a Republican administration. When are we getting a tax cut?
00:18:25.140
The House Republicans are fooling the idea of a five-year extension of the Trump tax cut.
00:18:29.480
Trump, President Trump wants it permanent. Would he sign a bill that has just a five-year
00:18:33.600
extension? So I'm glad you brought up taxes. Do you mind holding this so I can bring my receipts?
00:18:38.620
I like to bring the receipts. So these are the tax priorities of the Trump administration
00:18:43.500
that the president has laid out for members in that meeting today. No tax on tips, which is
00:18:49.380
obviously a very public campaign promise that the president made. No tax on seniors' social security.
00:18:54.200
No tax on overtime pay. Renewing President Trump's 2017 middle-class tax cuts. Again,
00:19:01.580
these are the president's priorities. Adjusting the salt cap. Eliminate all the special tax breaks
00:19:06.860
for billionaire sports team owners. Close the carried interest tax deduction loophole. Tax cuts
00:19:12.620
for made-in-America products. This will be the largest tax cut in history for middle-class
00:19:17.360
working Americans. The president is committed to working with Congress to get this done.
00:19:21.040
Okay. Not surprising at all. This is not man by its dog. Republican administration plans to cut
00:19:27.860
taxes. Trump cut taxes the first time, and now he's going to cut taxes even more.
00:19:33.400
This is a notable political story because it undercuts what some in the ideological avant-garde
00:19:42.760
of the American right seem to have been promoting, namely that Trump is this revolutionary figure who's
00:19:50.000
going to totally upend the traditional conservative views on anything, on taxing, on foreign policy,
00:19:58.040
on this, on that. And I don't think that's what Trump is. I said, I don't think it's so much that
00:20:04.360
he's changing GOP orthodoxy. In practice, he is changing how the GOP operates, but it's not so much
00:20:10.500
that he's revolutionizing GOP orthodoxy as he's just doing what other Republican presidents promised to do.
00:20:16.940
Just a great example on Israel. Some of the right-wing, avant-garde, extreme fringe really
00:20:23.860
doesn't like Israel and wants to change America's relationship with Israel, and they think that
00:20:30.600
Trump is going to do that. Trump is not going to do that. I promise you, Trump is not going to do
00:20:33.820
that. How did Trump change the GOP in his first term? He supported Israel even more. That's what he
00:20:42.780
did. The official American policy for decades has been that they're going to move the embassy
00:20:47.260
in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He did that. That's what he did. It's not that he was
00:20:54.600
revolutionary. It's not that he was innovative. It's that he just followed through on promises.
00:20:59.620
If anything, he was extra traditional. Now, one can debate the matter of Israel and how America
00:21:05.360
should relate to Israel or whatever. I'm just pointing out, what a lot of people think they're
00:21:10.080
going to get from Trump is not really what they're going to get from Trump. He's not a revolutionary.
00:21:15.240
He's just traditional. He's playing the hits. Okay, he's the Rolling Stones,
00:21:22.020
but he's really playing the hits. He's really doing it. When it comes to taxes, there are many
00:21:26.900
in the right-wing, avant-garde, who I think don't want us to cut taxes a lot. I think some of them
00:21:32.340
want us to raise taxes. Some of them want us to become more economically left-wing. I traditionally
00:21:38.740
understood his left wing. That ain't Trump. You can debate that. There's plenty of room for
00:21:45.540
argumentation about that, but that ain't Trump. Trump is going to cut your taxes.
0.79
00:21:50.700
Now, how about on tariffs? You say, well, Trump is really upending the GOP on tariff policy.
00:21:55.260
Not really. The GOP was founded on tariffs. Abraham Lincoln said, give me a tariff. I'll give you the
00:21:59.700
greatest country in the world. He's just giving you a fuller version of the hits, of what the GOP is.
00:22:11.100
One can debate that all one wants, but I'm just saying, if you go into the Trump administration
00:22:16.800
thinking that he's some revolutionary who's going to upend everything, you are going to be
00:22:22.280
disappointed. That's not what he's doing. He's doing something even more complex, even more nuanced,
00:22:29.220
even in a sense, even more revolutionary. Namely, he's a Republican who keeps his promises.
00:22:33.440
He's a Republican who does what everyone else said they were going to do for decades.
00:22:37.000
There's so much more to say. First, though, go to policygenius.com slash Knowles.
00:22:40.300
Securing your family's future has never been more critical than it is today.
00:22:44.200
As someone who advocates for smart financial planning, I can tell you that proper life insurance
00:22:47.900
is not just about sleeping better at night. It's also about empowering your loved ones with choices
00:22:52.340
when life takes unexpected turns. That is why I want to tell you about Policy Genius.
00:22:56.980
It's not an insurance company, which is actually why you can trust their numbers. They are the
00:23:01.980
country's leading online insurance marketplace. They let you compare quotes from America's top
00:23:06.380
insurers side-by-side, completely free, absolutely no hidden fees. Their platform uses real licensed
00:23:12.140
insurance experts who work for you, not the insurance companies, so you can find the best fit for your
00:23:16.800
family. With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just $292 per
00:23:21.800
year for $1 million of coverage. Some options are 100% online and let you avoid unnecessary medical
00:23:28.240
exams. The process is super fast and simple. Their licensed support team handles everything,
00:23:33.200
answering your questions, managing paperwork, and advocating for you throughout the entire process.
00:23:38.200
Do not just take my word for it. Thousands of satisfied customers have left five-star reviews
00:23:42.540
on Google and Trustpilot. No matter what stage of life you are in, Policy Genius helps you find the
00:23:47.360
perfect coverage for your specific situation. Secure your family tomorrow so that you have peace of
00:23:53.520
mind today. Head to policygenius.com slash Knowles, Canada W-L-E-S, or click the link in the description,
00:23:59.200
get your free life insurance quotes, and see how much you can save. Policygenius.com slash Knowles.
00:24:05.700
My favorite comment yesterday is from Jay Toro, who says,
00:24:08.260
Dude can't be saying the word dastardly while looking like a Hanna-Barbera villain. So true.
00:24:13.580
This is Al Green, the Democrat congressman. I will impeach Donald Trump for dastardly deeds done.
00:24:20.220
And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling kids and your dog too.
00:24:26.860
Okay. Speaking of Trump cutting things, and speaking of a really rough couple weeks for journalists,
00:24:34.880
Representative Brian Mast just went on CBS News, Face the Nation. It's that actually that same woman
00:24:42.340
who was interviewing J.D. Vance when he was lecturing her on two mystic philosophy.
00:24:47.540
She was pressing him on how Trump is cutting the government. Here's his beautiful response.
00:24:54.200
...purging of State Department personnel. What does that mean exactly?
00:24:57.900
Well, if you want to take a look at the State Department, where DEI has been a priority over,
00:25:03.280
let's say, diplomacy in many accounts, I could give you hundreds of examples of where they were authorizing.
00:25:08.780
Sure. Let's list them off. Half a million dollars to expand atheism in Nepal.
00:25:13.220
$50,000 to do, let's see, a transgender opera in Colombia.
00:25:17.420
$47,000 to do an LGBTQ trans comic book in Peru. $20,000 a pop to do drag shows in Ecuador.
00:25:26.020
Shall I continue with more examples of where DEI was the priority?
00:25:28.300
It certainly seems like there could be a review of things. Foreign aid, as you know,
00:25:32.560
is less than 1% of the entire federal budget. So we're talking small amounts of money by comparison.
00:25:39.440
We're still talking about tens and tens of billions of dollars. And if you want to go to
00:25:43.760
somebody else on the other side of the aisle, Samantha Powers, she had a worthy goal, although
00:25:47.980
it was a stupid goal. She said she was hoping to get the amount of foreign aid, U.S. aid dollars
00:25:52.920
that go to actual aid, up to 30 cents on the dollar from 10 cents on the dollar.
00:25:58.720
Beautiful, beautiful. First of all, big lesson here, make sure you know your stuff. Make sure you've
00:26:03.220
got evocative examples whenever you are engaging in a political debate. It's not just about abstract
00:26:10.860
principles and upper level. You've got to paint a picture for people and whatever he's talking about
00:26:15.480
there, you know, transgender painting in Peru or something. It's just really evocative. Now,
00:26:19.960
her response when she's been defeated in this exchange, she says, well, whatever, it's not that
00:26:24.940
much money. It's not that much money. Which brings me back, I think it was Isaiah Berlin,
00:26:29.480
who I was recently reading, writing about this in Two Conceptions of Liberty,
00:26:35.480
where he discusses the distinction between the political and the technological.
00:26:43.140
And this is really important because this is a shift that we're living through right now.
00:26:46.240
For much of my life, the political debate between the Republicans and the Democrats
00:26:51.800
consisted of people saying, look, at least the Republicans would say, look,
00:26:57.360
we agree on the ends that we desire. We agree on where we want to go. We all want the same stuff.
00:27:05.240
We just disagree about how to get there. You know, so we all want all XYZ policy. I don't even want
00:27:12.460
to list them. We all want, you know, equality and fraternity and liberty and whatever. You know,
00:27:19.000
we all agree on the political ends, but we just disagree on the most efficient way to get there.
00:27:25.920
Okay. Well, that's not actually a political debate. That's why we refer to the politics of
00:27:32.460
the last 20 or so years as the uniparty. Because there wasn't really, that's why we don't really
0.58
00:27:39.140
even view the shifting of many of these administrations as being a transfer of power so
00:27:43.960
much as a changing of shifts, to quote Walter Kern. It was just a technological debate. What's most
00:27:51.400
efficient? A political debate involves debate over ends. What do we want? Is it good to have a more
00:28:01.500
egalitarian society? I don't know. Or do we actually want a little bit more order? And do we want to
0.55
00:28:08.100
preserve more natural distinctions? And do we want to give people a greater opportunity without
00:28:15.080
handicapping them? Do we really want a more open society? Or do we want a society that's actually a
00:28:20.100
little bit more closed off to certain peoples? You know, face tattooed gangsters from Mexico, for
0.99
00:28:25.860
instance. And that's more closed off to certain ideas like communism or Nazism. Do we want, I don't
00:28:30.540
know. I don't want a more open society. I want a more closed society in certain respects. What do we
00:28:35.880
want? Do we, do we, I don't actually don't know that we really want to go to the same. Do we really
00:28:39.420
want a society that doesn't recognize the distinction between men and women? That's what
1.00
00:28:42.900
the left wants. I don't want that. We have different political ends. That's a real political debate.
00:28:47.940
Okay. And so the rejoinder from the left, which is, oh, it's just 1% of the federal budget. First of all,
00:28:53.580
1% of the federal budget, as Brian Mass points out, is a huge amount of money. Federal budget of
00:28:57.520
trillions and trillions of dollars. But even beyond that, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if
00:29:01.900
it's 0.1% of the federal, it doesn't matter if it's 0.001% of the federal budget. If it's bad stuff
00:29:08.060
that is advancing a bad agenda and taking our country to a bad place, I don't want it.
00:29:14.680
Because we do differ in the political ends that we want. I want a society that is more,
00:29:21.780
better ordered toward the good, the true, and the beautiful, to take it up to the 30,000 foot view.
00:29:26.340
And the left seems to want a society that is ordered toward the bad or that denies the moral
00:29:33.100
order altogether, that is ugly, that doesn't pursue standards of beauty, and that doesn't
00:29:41.000
even acknowledge the reality of truth. It says, what truth? Your truth or my truth? Okay. Those are
00:29:46.300
totally different ends. So I don't want one red cent of my government's money. I can't even say my
00:29:54.200
taxpayer dollars because we're a debtor nation at this point. So I don't want any single penny
00:29:59.060
that the United States is spending to go toward that nonsense around the world. That's what Trump
00:30:04.100
is saying. That's why it feels like a sea change. We're finally saying, no, I think we want different
00:30:09.440
things. And we have the power now, and we're going to pursue the things that we want, which happen to
00:30:13.820
be good. One of which is killing the Department of Education. There was some confusion over this
00:30:21.140
because Trump campaigned on ending the Department of Education. Then he picked Linda McMahon to run
00:30:25.900
the Department of Education. It became unclear. Are we really going to end this thing? Are we just
00:30:30.880
going to reform it? Trump being a polarizing figure, again, not anymore. Now most Americans voted for him,
00:30:39.120
but it was unclear. Are even the squish Republicans going to go for this? Are there? Well, we've got some
00:30:45.440
really strong backing now for ending the Department of Education from one of the great leading lights of
00:30:51.940
education reform in America, Betsy DeVos. Okay, and Betsy DeVos is a really important figure in
00:30:57.280
education reform, one, because she's been very successful at it, but two, because she can speak
00:31:02.860
to the whole GOP. She was Trump's education secretary in the first term, but she also worked
00:31:09.600
with Jeb Bush when Jeb Bush was governor of Florida. Jeb Bush, who's definitely a representative
00:31:13.320
of the more established wing of the GOP. And Jeb Bush, whose greatest achievement in Florida was
00:31:18.360
in education, in large part thanks to Betsy DeVos. This woman has credibility on this issue,
0.95
00:31:24.440
on the substance of the issue, and with the whole GOP. And Betsy DeVos just came out,
00:31:30.440
great column in the Free Press, shut down the Department of Education. I served as the 11th
00:31:38.740
U.S. Secretary of Education. That's how I know it's beyond repair. Clear a sign yet. Department
00:31:44.120
of Education is over. This is happening. Now, one really great Trump executive action that's coming
00:31:50.960
out. This was announced at the National Prayer Breakfast yesterday. Trump is finally going to
00:31:57.060
take on anti-Christian bias in our government. To confront such weaponization and religious
00:32:05.220
persecution today, I'm signing an executive order to make our attorney general, who's a great person,
00:32:11.680
she's going to be a great attorney general, Pam Bondi, the head of a task force, brand new,
00:32:20.360
to eradicate anti-Christian bias. About time, right? Anti-Christian bias.
00:32:27.800
I love this. And we'll get into the details of this. The executive order, it says that in this
00:32:33.900
atmosphere of anti-Christian government, hostility, and vandalism against Christian churches and places
00:32:38.960
of worship surged, with the number of such identified acts in 2023, exceeding by more than
00:32:43.960
three times the number from 2018. Catholic churches and institutions have been aggressively targeted
00:32:48.500
with hundreds of acts of hostility, violence, and vandalism. So there are a lot of particulars here.
00:32:54.420
We'll see how it's all implemented by the DOJ. But just even from Trump's announcement,
00:33:00.200
I love that he's saying anti-Christian hostility, anti-Christian bias in the government. Because a lot
0.95
00:33:08.420
of squish Republicans would say, we want to just generally and universally speaking, protect all
00:33:14.220
religions of all. It's all kind of whatever, man. No, there aren't really threats against all general
00:33:20.220
religions kind of broadly, man. That's not the problem. America wasn't founded on the principles
00:33:25.240
of just kind of, oh, the religions generally universally, man. The specific problem that
00:33:30.420
we saw explode during the Biden administration was bias against Christians. The DOJ wasn't spying
00:33:39.760
on Zoroastrians, all right? The DOJ was spying on Catholics, on the Latin mass, actually, the mass of
00:33:46.620
the ages. The problems that we saw, the attacks, the overt hostility, the discrimination, was against
00:33:54.700
Christians, okay? So we need to be particular. When you want to enforce universal conceptions of
0.97
00:34:03.400
justice, you have to do it in the particular. Life exists within particulars, particular times,
00:34:09.100
particular places, particular people. And in this case, the problem to be addressed is anti-Christian
00:34:14.020
bias. And you're not allowed to talk about it. Just as you're allowed to talk about discrimination
0.94
00:34:20.080
against any race except for white people, so too, you're allowed to talk about discrimination against
0.65
00:34:24.780
any religion except for Christians. But Christianity is the most persecuted religion in the world, and
00:34:29.180
it's not even close. And Christianity has been seriously persecuted in America recently by our
00:34:36.160
purportedly Catholic president, Joe Biden. And that's the problem that has to be addressed, and that's the
00:34:41.680
specific problem Trump is addressing, and I love it. You know, at The Daily Wire, we don't just watch
00:34:46.160
culture, we build it. Now we're building the future with AI. Yesterday, Jeremy Boring dropped the first
00:34:54.040
ever fully AI-produced Jeremy's Razors commercial. If you've not seen it yet, good news. We're showing it
00:35:01.760
A tale is told of a star that fell in the days when men were hair-covered brutes roaming the earth.
0.92
00:35:08.620
This shard of celestial steel was unlike anything early man had ever encountered. And from those
00:35:14.100
five fortuitous stainless steel blades came the world's first smooth silky shave. And it was in
00:35:20.180
that moment manliness burst into existence. This blade charged forward through the ages of steel and
00:35:26.840
dragon fire. Great conquerors slew tyrants. Founding fathers revolted. And as men's manes were tamed, so they
00:35:34.840
tamed the wild frontier. Also, Steve used it to get a good shave. And he's a pretty solid guy. But as power
00:35:43.880
often breeds enemies, so a wild bearded philosopher despised the blade for its glorious manly freedom. This
00:35:51.800
enemy of clean shaves bore the razor to a fiery peak and cast it in. The blade was gone.
00:35:59.800
A dark age of unmanliness ensued. An age of men wearing buns, drinking vegan milkshakes, and wearing
1.00
00:36:07.640
really tight pants and acting like a bunch of crybaby commies. Until one day, the great archaeologist and
00:36:15.000
CEO Jeremy Boring went on a dangerous quest on which many before had perished. Through seas,
00:36:21.080
mountains, and deepest catacombs, he found the blade still sharp as starlight. His mission was
00:36:26.600
to restore the blade to mankind and thereby restore manliness. Will my razor make you as manly as the
00:36:33.240
actual greatest man in all of human history? I guarantee it will. In the most emphatic way that
00:36:39.000
isn't legally binding. Hey, at least you'll be as manly as Steve. Jeremy's Razors, carve out your legacy.
00:36:49.000
That is crazy. Oh, I kicked a little bear there. That is crazy. I know some people have gotten
00:36:55.280
accustomed to AI now. But I remember, it was probably five years ago, more at this point, I was at a
00:37:02.040
college reunion. I was talking to a buddy of mine who's working. He was working on AI, pretty sophisticated
00:37:06.340
stuff before anyone really knew about it. And he said, hey, AI can make a poem and make pictures
00:37:11.160
now. And I know we all know this now, but at the time it was completely mind-blowing. And it's still
00:37:17.200
pretty mind-blowing to me that that can happen. You know, the Daily Wire believes AI is not here to
00:37:25.560
replace us. It's here to create epic things like wrestling a bear, launching razors into a volcano,
00:37:30.040
and of course, riding a lion. But you still have to shave the old-fashioned way. So do it with
0.89
00:37:34.320
Jeremy's Razors. Go to jeremysrazors.com right now. Get the second-gen razor and embrace the future.
00:37:41.280
Finally, finally, I've arrived at my favorite time of the week when I get to hear from you
00:37:45.700
in the mailbag. Our mailbag is sponsored by Pure Talk. Go to puretalk.com slash Knowles.
00:37:51.220
Claim your new iPhone or Galaxy phone with a qualifying purchase. Take it away.
00:37:56.700
Hi, Michael. First, I just wanted to say I love your show. My name is Kendra. I'm a 20-year-old.
00:38:03.080
I'm a senior in college. My question regards a class I'm taking, which is a requirement for part
00:38:08.940
of my degree. The professor is very liberal and makes sure her political stances are known in class.
1.00
00:38:19.980
to the white Judeo-Christian cisgender straight males prepared to be made uncomfortable.
00:38:23.960
And that made me uncomfortable. The content in her class is highly affected by her views and
00:38:32.840
differs from the textbook. So my question is, do I drop the class? Do I report to her professor? Or do
00:38:39.700
I grin and bear it and try really hard not to tear my hair out? Anyways, thank you.
00:38:44.580
Well, good question. I would say if you can withdraw from the class right now without getting a W on
00:38:52.260
the transcript, it might still be early enough. I don't know. So if you can withdraw from the class
00:38:56.140
and not have it affect your graduation or show up with a W on the transcript, I would do it.
00:39:04.560
That would be my prudential advice. Because this woman sounds like a complete lunatic,
1.00
00:39:10.240
so you're not actually going to learn anything in her class. It's good to take classes that
00:39:14.080
challenge your thinking. I'm all for studying wacky stuff, you know, and taking Karl Marx
00:39:19.200
seriously and all the rest. But it sounds like this woman is just not, you're not going to learn
0.99
00:39:24.340
very much from her. So I would withdraw if you can do it in a way that won't affect your graduation
00:39:31.220
and your transcript. And then I would report her. I wouldn't report her before you withdraw,
00:39:37.880
because then you might get blowback. She sounds like a vindictive, crazy woman.
1.00
00:39:41.840
So that's what I would do. And if you can't withdraw without getting a dub on the transcript,
00:39:46.780
then I would probably grit your teeth and bear it and remember for next time not to put yourself in
00:39:51.380
that position. But you got no one to hold them, no one to fold them, no one to walk away,
00:39:57.780
no one to run. This would seem like a run situation. Next question.
00:40:02.940
Smokey Mike, I love your show. I really just wanted to weigh in on women in combat.
00:40:09.020
It seems clear to me that women already serve a sacrificial role in an ordered society,
1.00
00:40:14.240
biologically just existing as a woman. It seems they're forced to be made vulnerable just through
00:40:19.820
their biological processes once a month and especially so during pregnancy. From my experience,
00:40:25.760
service in the military is sacrifice. We don't ask troops with missing limbs that have already lost
00:40:31.400
them in war to serve again. They would be at the bottom of the list to be drafted. If ever,
00:40:36.640
it's disordered to ask women to serve on the battlefield. Even losing their war, the Japanese
0.53
00:40:41.640
during World War II didn't train their 18-year-old girls to be kamikaze pilots. I just can't imagine
00:40:47.600
storming the beaches of Normandy and seeing these women getting shredded by Nazi machine guns.
00:40:53.960
I was a medic in the army and I promise you, I couldn't have done my mission seeing that.
00:41:02.560
My pleasure and well said. I totally agree with you on that take. It's women already
1.00
00:41:09.420
are called to certain sacrifices. That's not to say that men aren't called to sacrifice. Men are
00:41:14.060
called to physical sacrifice too, like combat in some cases. But we're called to different things.
00:41:19.440
And so I suppose part of this debate hinges on what you think the military is about.
00:41:26.580
If you think the military is about you, the individual, pursuing your desires and your
00:41:34.520
ambitions and having every right to do what everyone else gets to do and you want to do it,
00:41:39.240
then you can see an argument for women in combat. Namely, well, why should the fellas get to have
1.00
00:41:45.900
all the fun? But if you view military service as what it ought to be understood as, namely a sacrifice,
00:41:52.680
then it's harder to see that. Because telling women who want to serve on the front lines and catch
1.00
00:42:00.500
bullets from jihadis, telling those women, hey, sorry, you don't get to. It's bad for military
00:42:05.960
fitness. You are not as physically strong as the men. It's disordered for a nation to send its women
1.00
00:42:12.220
out to catch bullets for it. And it's going to compromise men on the battlefield who are going to
00:42:17.920
have a natural and good and virtuous response to go try to save you in particular rather than the
00:42:23.640
other guys. So you have to make yet one more sacrifice. The whole thing is about sacrifice.
00:42:29.540
Well, here's one more sacrifice. You have to sacrifice that particular ambition of yours to
00:42:32.920
do something else. I think that really reveals the debate for what it is, which is premised on a
00:42:40.740
misunderstanding of what the military is even about. Okay? If it's about sacrifice, let it be about
00:42:46.140
sacrifice. Totally agree. Next question. Greetings, Michael. You recently spoke about
00:42:51.660
psychedelics, and I'd like to offer a perspective grounded in virtue ethics. In Aristotle's framework,
00:42:57.020
virtue lies in the mean between excess and deficiency. In excess, psychedelics are used
00:43:02.040
irresponsibly, say at parties or among pagan priests inside of yurts. In deficiency, they are entirely
1.00
00:43:08.220
prohibited, as you might suggest. But could the virtuous mean be careful, intentional use in a sacred and
00:43:14.120
prayerful setting? Research has shown that a single use of psilocybin in a controlled environment
00:43:19.160
has been remarkably effective in helping individuals overcome addiction to alcohol and smoking.
00:43:24.840
Could this not extend to those burdened by other vicens, like pornography, addiction, or self-hatred?
00:43:29.760
If used in the proper preparation, such as confession in the holy space or before the blessed sacrament.
00:43:36.440
That doesn't dismiss risks, but asks whether psychedelics,
00:43:39.960
used reverently, could become a tool for grace and transformation. Thank you for reflecting on this.
00:43:45.720
I hope you enjoy these thoughts from the Lyceum of Minnesota.
00:43:49.000
Yes, it's a very good question. I have considered that before, but you've articulated it very well.
00:43:55.680
I'm skeptical. Because Aristotle recognizing that we want means between excesses does not mean that we'll,
00:44:04.960
taken to its extreme, that kind of logic could justify anything if you exceed the reasonable bounds
00:44:14.400
placed upon it by Aristotle and by his followers. So the question is, all right, is using psilocybin
00:44:21.360
one or two times, is that the virtuous mean between the excess or deficiency, the excess of doing a bunch
00:44:27.660
of like bathtub acid with your college friends every week, or the deficiency of not doing acid at all?
00:44:33.920
Or is the virtuous mean among substances to, you know, maybe smoke a cigar every now and again,
00:44:43.100
but not go all the way to actually doing acid or psilocybin? I don't know. The question you have to ask
00:44:48.520
yourself is, how does psilocybin work? How does, even accepting your anecdote, how does psilocybin work
00:44:54.880
at stopping people from want to be booze hounds or from smoking or getting over PTSD or something?
00:45:01.260
Well, the layman explanation is it rewires your brain. Okay, is that a good thing? I mean, we can rewire
00:45:10.300
our brain all the time by practicing virtuous habits. Is it good to just take that shortcut? Can we really
00:45:16.240
control the way that psychedelics rewire our brain? Is there a possibility that the costs of rewiring
00:45:23.040
our brain in that way will outweigh the benefits? Is it possible that the costs of rewiring our brain
00:45:28.860
in that way are intrinsically bad to do? Just as it's not wrong to have a drink socially, but it is
00:45:37.180
wrong to get blackout drunk because you lose control of your rational will. Well, isn't that what happens
00:45:45.260
with psychedelics? I don't know. If your argument says, look, we need to research this a little bit
00:45:51.280
more. We need to give more attention to this issue. Okay, fine. Research it all you like.
00:45:56.500
But I would not take that argument as, or a few anecdotes of guys quitting booze because they
00:46:03.200
tripped on mushrooms a few times. I would not take that as a license to do it myself or even an
00:46:09.200
encouragement. I'm skeptical. It seems dubious to me. Next question.
00:46:15.100
Hello, Mr. Knowles. My name is Charles. I recently finished reading The Divine Comedy and found the last
00:46:20.140
half of the Paradiso Enlightening, particularly St. Peter's examination of Dante's faith in
00:46:25.200
Canto 17. During this episode, Dante provides what can be assumed as his best argument for believing
00:46:30.880
in the resurrection. That is, for Christianity to have spread throughout the world without the
0.99
00:46:35.940
assistance of the divine, a miracle far greater would have occurred. Do you believe this to be the
00:46:40.740
best argument for the resurrection? If not, what argument would seed even the most incredulous to
00:46:45.860
believe in the resurrection? And why did Dante not use it? Thank you, Mr. Knowles. Godspeed.
00:46:51.240
Okay, really good question. I'm glad you're reading Dante. Yeah, that's a good argument.
00:46:55.280
There are other good arguments, though, namely that you have 500 eyewitnesses to the resurrection,
00:47:01.560
that all but one of the apostles went to their death to attest to the resurrection. So,
00:47:10.100
people generally don't take ships over to India to be ripped apart by tribals for a lie as St. Thomas
0.59
00:47:18.620
went over there. You could also point to contemporary historical accounts of people like Josephus or
00:47:28.100
Tacitus or Suetonius or so. I think those are all good arguments, too. So, why wouldn't Dante feature
00:47:35.940
that in the final cantos of the Paradiso? Well, because he's making a work of art. So, I think
00:47:40.900
that the arguments he makes, the pictures that he paints are fitting. I think it's the greatest work
00:47:47.640
of art basically ever made. But if Dante, instead of writing a big, beautiful epic poem, were instead
00:47:54.040
writing some rigorous logical syllogism or treatise, as he's done before, you know, that monarchy is a
00:48:01.360
logical syllogism. He might have relied on some of those other arguments, too. Okay. It's Friday,
00:48:07.140
which means it's Fake Headline Friday, which means I need your help to help me figure out what the
00:48:10.380
fake headline is. The rest of the show continues. Now, you do not want to miss it. Become a member.
00:48:13.720
Use code Knowles, Canada Be Really. That's a checkout for two months free on all annual plans.
00:48:31.360
That's a checkout for two months. Before, one or a