The Michael Knowles Show - October 31, 2025


Ep. 1847 - What No One Noticed About Sydney Sweeney's Dress


Episode Stats

Length

49 minutes

Words per Minute

189.56172

Word Count

9,315

Sentence Count

679

Misogynist Sentences

20

Hate Speech Sentences

21


Summary

Sidney Sweeney wore a see-through dress to an awards gala, and it caused a stir. What does this have to do with politics? And what does it mean for the future of the 2020 Democratic primary race?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 There's a lot I want to get to. A prominent Democrat in Congress can't explain why she
00:00:04.600 voted to shut the government down. A former major conservative thought leader just endorsed
00:00:10.080 Zoran Mamdani for New York mayor. Support for so-called same-sex marriages cratering,
00:00:15.920 all massive developments. But speaking of massive developments,
00:00:21.640 I have to speak for a moment about Sidney Sweeney. Yesterday, I got a lot of flack from
00:00:27.540 the producers because I did not cover Sidney Sweeney. Sidney Sweeney did not cover Sidney
00:00:32.800 Sweeney, it turns out. I didn't really know what they were talking about. I had seen her name
00:00:37.860 trending in the morning. I was writing my show, but I didn't pay it much attention.
00:00:41.940 Then sometime yesterday afternoon, a photo of the reason she was trending finally hit my Twitter feed.
00:00:49.960 And after I regained custody of my eyes, I understood why the producers wanted me to talk
00:00:55.360 about it. For the few who did not catch it, Sidney Sweeney showed up to some awards gala
00:01:02.180 wearing a see-through dress. And this is a family show, so we'll blur it out a little bit.
00:01:09.200 But to be fair, it was not a full Kanye wife dress. It was not completely transparent, but
00:01:15.900 it left very little to the imagination, which excited lots of people, but it also disappointed a lot of
00:01:23.900 people, especially conservatives who like to claim Ms. Sweeney is one of our own.
00:01:29.920 The only two takes I saw on the dress yesterday were disapproval on the one hand that it's immodest
00:01:37.400 and approval on the other hand, if you got it flaunted. But I think there is actually a third
00:01:44.660 option that I have not heard anyone else mention. And it is an option that reconciles the dress,
00:01:50.680 which we know she wore, with the fact that Sidney Sweeney is a Republican, which we know
00:01:55.320 because of reporting about her voter ID. I think the dress was subversive.
00:02:02.180 I don't want to give too esoteric a Straussian reading here, but I think the dress was subversive
00:02:08.460 because, here's my evidence, the event that she wore it to was Variety Magazine's Power of Women
00:02:16.400 Gala. That was the name of it. And while we've been told for decades that women only have power
00:02:22.560 when they're feminist boss ladies who wear pantsuits and act like men, Sidney Sweeney's dress said,
00:02:30.080 no, the power of women is in our femininity. The power of women is especially in some particular
00:02:38.320 anatomical features that men don't have. It has actually a vital biological power. And yes,
00:02:44.380 the power of women is in no part, no small part rather, in women's physiques.
00:02:51.380 I'm not saying the dress is conservative exactly, but it sure ain't feminist.
00:02:56.960 I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:03:14.380 Welcome back to the show. Kamala Harris wants to lower the voting age to 16. I used to oppose that
00:03:22.080 kind of thing. Now, I think the way young Gen Z is trending, lowering the voting age might actually
00:03:28.580 end up giving us Francisco Franco or something. So anyway, we'll get to that. Also, question of the
00:03:33.620 day. It's in the comments. Give me your thoughts below. What is the best Halloween candy? I have the
00:03:37.620 correct answer, but I'll check to see if you do as well. Before we get into anything, I want to tell
00:03:43.860 you about Done With Debt. Go to donewithdebt.com. Are you drowning in credit card and loan debt?
00:03:48.920 You're not alone. But here's something most people don't know. Fall is actually the best time of year
00:03:53.340 to negotiate with lenders. Why? Because credit card companies and lenders are doing year-end
00:03:58.360 accounting. They desperately need to clear problem accounts from their books before audits begin.
00:04:02.120 This creates a narrow window where they are far more willing to cut deals than any other time of year.
00:04:05.940 Done With Debt has cracked the code on this timing advantage. They know exactly which companies are
00:04:10.180 most motivated to negotiate right now and use this insider knowledge to get results you can't
00:04:14.780 achieve on your own. Best part, no bankruptcy, no new loans, no credit damage. In fact, most clients
00:04:20.480 end up with more money in their pocket within the first month because they're no longer drowning in
00:04:24.520 minimum payments. This window will not stay open forever. Once Q4 hits, lenders tighten up again,
00:04:29.740 and your leverage totally disappears. I've seen how debt can really screw up people's lives.
00:04:34.860 Do not let it happen. Get started right now. While you still have time, go to donewithdebt.com.
00:04:41.560 Talk with one of their specialists for free. That is donewithdebt.com. Donewithdebt.com.
00:04:49.700 Do you know what today is? Today is Friend Friday. That's what I'm calling it now. I tried this out
00:04:56.000 last week or two weeks ago when I was still in the country, and I really liked it where I bring on a
00:05:01.380 friend and we kind of beat up the stories. I get, listen, sometimes I get in a vacuum here. It's
00:05:06.900 just me and the microphone and the camera and my cigars and my beautiful candles, which we'll talk
00:05:10.760 about later. But I got to bring in another voice sometimes, make sure I'm not totally off, especially
00:05:16.720 on a topic as controversial as Sidney Sweeney's dress. So anyway, this time I'm bringing on my
00:05:21.200 friend, Jack Posobiec. Jack, thank you for coming on the show.
00:05:26.820 Happy Christian Halloween to you, Michael Knowles.
00:05:30.100 Hey, I want to get to that later, too. I had a big debate on this yesterday,
00:05:33.580 and I suspect, and in fact, I know that you're totally right about this.
00:05:38.300 So before we get into Halloween, I do want to talk about dressing up for a second.
00:05:44.280 Sidney Sweeney, you saw the dress?
00:05:45.680 No, I didn't see Sidney Sweeney trending at all yesterday. I have no idea what you're referring
00:05:50.740 to. I only have a completely wholesome Twitter feed. So, well, I'll fill you in then, Jack,
00:05:56.460 obviously. Sidney Sweeney wore a dress that some are calling slightly immodest. However,
00:06:01.820 I kind of wonder if there's some subversion here. Look, I really want to claim Sidney Sweeney
00:06:06.320 is one of our own. She's apparently a registered Republican. I like that she is pretty in a normal
00:06:12.400 way, not in like a weird 20 teens, androgynous, freaky way. And so is there, what's your take
00:06:18.520 on the dress?
00:06:20.920 So, I mean, look, I've got a take on it. It might be a little bit of a thought crime,
00:06:26.280 but the, all right, all right. It's not necessarily conservative, but it is right-wing coded.
00:06:33.540 And the reason that I say that it's right-wing coded is because it's anti-Kardashian.
00:06:38.060 Sidney Sweeney is the anti-Kardashian.
00:06:40.580 Okay. I don't know if you were plugged in during the monologue, but I said almost a similar thing.
00:06:47.520 I said, it's not quite conservative, but it's at least anti-feminist. What do you mean anti-Kardashian?
00:06:54.420 Yeah. So, Kardashian is this sort of, like that look that's been kind of going around. I think it
00:06:59.940 started in like the late 2000s, really blew up in like the 2010s along with the Kardashian look,
00:07:06.900 and you see this everywhere. You see like the huge contours and, and, and I just, I'm just going
00:07:12.880 to say it, man. It's like twerking culture. It's just full on twerking culture. And, and more about
00:07:17.880 that base, no trouble.
00:07:18.820 In fact, we, we all, we all know what Sidney Sweeney is bringing back. She went on SNL,
00:07:24.680 she did the little sketch where she dressed, I'm going to say it, she dressed as a Hooters
00:07:27.500 girl. And they're talking about a certain large, uh, assets in terms of her, obviously
00:07:34.260 her intellect and her poise that she is bringing back to the forefront. And this has been something
00:07:41.220 that has been de-emphasized in our culture for a very long time. And I'm just going to say
00:07:45.680 it is right-wing coded because it is nurturing. It is life-giving. It is, uh, it is, and it
00:07:51.580 is the true essence of femininity, which is of course, motherhood.
00:07:55.520 Wow. Because if you're saying, you know, if, if the culture is all about that base, no
00:08:00.240 treble, that feature is, is kind of left-coded because it's androgynous, you know, men and
00:08:07.820 women have that feature, but only women have, have the other feature.
00:08:11.460 Correct. Wow. That's pretty, wow. This has been kind of like a topic on the internet for
00:08:17.940 a while too. It's sort of one of those, uh, there's a website that I've heard of it's
00:08:21.940 for four channel or something like that. I'm not, I've never seen it myself, but, uh, you
00:08:27.060 know, where this topic has come up to quite, quite an extent. And Sydney Sweeney is sort
00:08:31.300 of like the avatar of this side of the debate, where if you want to bring true femininity back,
00:08:36.640 that means, and, and look, go back to, uh, to America circa 1992. I saw this like internet
00:08:41.860 hall of fame clip that was going around yesterday or earlier this week on Twitter, where it was
00:08:46.060 the, it was Apache helicopters were flying the pace car of NASCAR at the Hooters 500 in like
00:08:55.080 Charlotte, North Carolina. And it was like, it's like, that was the America I grew up in.
00:09:00.700 And you know something, it was just better. Yeah. I'm not saying it was the 1950s exactly,
00:09:06.960 but it was probably preferable. No, it wasn't, it wasn't the conservative 1950s,
00:09:09.980 but it was just better. This, this ties in to a major news story that a lot of people said was
00:09:15.800 not possible, which is according to an economist, you gov poll. So it's not necessarily a right-wing
00:09:23.620 poll support for same-sex marriage. So-called has fallen to 54%. And this is one of these issues,
00:09:31.820 you know, I grew up, I'm old enough to remember when marriage was between a man and a woman.
00:09:36.080 And some of our audience actually is probably so young. They don't remember that. Then you get
00:09:39.900 2015 Obergefell, the Supreme court redefines marriage. That push had been building for some
00:09:44.620 time, really since willing grace in the late nineties. And then it just, it stopped being a
00:09:50.320 political issue. And there were a handful of us who said, yo guys, you can't give up on marriage.
00:09:54.220 It's the fundamental political institution, but all the Republicans, virtually all of the
00:09:59.520 prominent conservatives, they said, now guys, we lost marriage, move on. Obergefell will never be
00:10:04.820 overturned. This is just how it is now. And I thought like, there's no way, right? This is the basic
00:10:09.260 political unit. There's the gods of the copy book headings are going to come back. Is this a sign
00:10:14.060 that we will see the overturning of Obergefell and the re restatement of a proper true marriage?
00:10:21.660 We'll get to that in one second. First though, I want to tell you about legacy box, go to legacy
00:10:25.520 box.com slash Knowles, natural disasters like fires, hurricanes, and tornadoes strike every year.
00:10:31.740 Just recently, we've seen the devastation of hurricane Melissa in the Caribbean.
00:10:35.600 When nature takes its toll, your most precious memories trapped on VHS camcorder tapes,
00:10:40.040 as well as old family pictures could be lost forever in an instant. Decades, maybe who knows,
00:10:45.180 a century of memories just gone forever. No longer there to share and remember for generations to
00:10:50.460 come. That's why you're going to love legacy box right now. You can easily access those memories
00:10:55.860 and protect them forever with 50% off using code Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. Legacy box makes preserving
00:11:02.080 your memories simple. You just load your old tapes, film, and pictures into the box and send it back.
00:11:06.580 You'll receive everything digitized on a thumb drive or in the cloud, ready to watch and share
00:11:10.900 over 1 million families of trusted legacy box to safeguard their legacies for future generations.
00:11:15.720 Do not wait to protect what matters most. I love it. I've used legacy box. Gosh, I don't know. First
00:11:20.980 time I ever sent in some tapes and stuff to legacy box many years ago, five years ago for a limited
00:11:26.720 time only. You can visit legacybox.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. Save 50%. That's legacybox.com
00:11:33.260 slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. The shop 50% off. The sale will not last long. There is still time to
00:11:39.420 get your memories digitized in time for the holidays. Legacybox.com slash Knowles. Jack,
00:11:45.940 is Obergefell getting overruled? I think, I think if you look at the traction, right, if you look at
00:11:51.340 the traction and where it's going on this and, and Obergefell, you know, people could say what they
00:11:55.040 want. And I think it's actually a separate issue from same-sex marriage, even though it's sort of like
00:11:59.240 in, in, in political psychology, isn't because we know that the justices take up cases based on
00:12:04.360 public opinion. We certainly know that Roberts has done this. It's been sort of a hallmark of
00:12:07.480 his time on the court that, look, it was not properly judged in the same way that Roe v. Wade
00:12:14.140 was not properly judged. This is just not something that's covered in the constitution. It's not there.
00:12:18.720 It's not in the bill of rights. It's certainly not in any of the amendments. Marriage was always a
00:12:22.920 state institution. It is covered by the 10th amendment because no powers that are given to the federal
00:12:27.520 government are, all of those are left with the states. And so it's always been that way. And
00:12:32.280 they can't just write things into the constitution. No one ever tried to put this up. No one ever tried
00:12:36.720 to make this an amendment. They just sort of pushed it through the courts, which we've seen the left
00:12:39.960 doing since the 1960s. If they can't win at the ballot box, they go to the courtroom. And so it is
00:12:45.140 something where when you realize that, look, there, and you mentioned there weren't a lot of
00:12:48.340 Republicans and conservatives that spoke out, but the very first Republican that I ever worked for
00:12:53.500 many moons ago, uh, first as an intern, as a campaign staffer, it was Rick Santorum and Rick
00:12:59.120 Santorum, my Senator in Pennsylvania, he took a lot of flack and people can go back and look at his
00:13:04.140 comments, which were colorful to say the least about this. And he said, if you put this into
00:13:09.120 practice, right, if you put it into law and trying to anywhere, that what it will do will open up a
00:13:14.400 Pandora's box of trouble, where if you say that anything can be marriage, then all of a sudden you
00:13:21.220 will completely distort society. And it won't just be men and men and women and women, but we'll have
00:13:26.500 all sorts of relationships being enshrined in government, being enshrined by government in
00:13:30.640 law. And guess what? That's exactly what we're seeing. Certainly with the rise of surrogacy,
00:13:35.320 certainly with the rise of new technologies, we're now seeing like polyamorous marriages and
00:13:39.840 children being raised by three fathers, three women, and all sorts of just complete and utter
00:13:45.880 wildness, which ultimately always turns out very badly for the children. And so, you know,
00:13:53.000 he took a lot, a lot of flack for that. If anyone remembers the comments I'm referring to from like
00:13:57.180 05, 06, you'll know what I'm saying. That it's, it's something where he was completely right because
00:14:02.440 they didn't stop there. That's what led to the push for the trans movement. That's what led to like
00:14:06.560 drag queen story hour and all the rest of it. Because the minute that they got that the entire machinery,
00:14:11.300 the political machinery that they had built or starting with, by the way, you're totally right on
00:14:14.860 really grace. That was like the first. And then modern family became the second. This is the mass
00:14:18.920 media. This is the, you know, the mass normalization of this type of stuff. And, and it was pushed on
00:14:24.960 society in a way that nobody ever really sat down and had a debate about. We just sort of were told
00:14:30.460 that we have to accept this and, and they've completely gone over the rails with it. And a lot
00:14:35.720 of people are pointing back to 2013, really a lot of these bad decisions, bad policies that came out of
00:14:40.120 the Obama era that it's time to take a look at again. And I will, by the way, just add as an
00:14:44.600 anecdote. So my, my son, my oldest son, um, he had his first, uh, reconciliation class a couple of
00:14:50.320 nights ago. And in, and it, since it was the first class, we were sort of talking about all of the
00:14:54.960 sacraments. And when they brought up matrimony, the, uh, you know, the teacher, she said, you know,
00:15:00.660 and by the way, just so everybody knows marriage is between one man and one woman kind of like looks
00:15:05.480 around the room. Everybody got that good moving on. Well, even in, you know, it's so funny. It only
00:15:10.900 occurred to me recently, the word matrimony comes from the word mater, you know, like mother in Latin.
00:15:17.660 And so the notion that you could have matrimony between two men is, is undercut by the very word
00:15:24.220 itself. Uh, yes, Rick Santorum is one of the most vindicated men in America. Every day that goes by,
00:15:31.620 he is more and more vindicated. Uh, and you make a good point on Obergefell being different from
00:15:38.920 same sex marriage, quote unquote. Uh, you know, I do wonder though on the state versus federal issue.
00:15:44.880 I remember I was a student and I got to talk to Scalia once or twice. And we, one of, one of the
00:15:51.480 times, one of the students asked him about marriage and whether it was a state's issue or federal issue.
00:15:56.180 And he said, well, you know, the problem is it's very hard for it to be a state's issue because you
00:16:01.700 can't have a country where someone is married in Massachusetts, but not married in Oklahoma.
00:16:05.700 What happens when they move? What happens when they travel? So it, it creates problems.
00:16:09.780 What they did with the Massachusetts, um, I think it was Massachusetts was the first state. And this
00:16:13.900 is exactly what they were trying to do with that under the, under the contract clause of the
00:16:17.800 constitution is same, same idea as having a driver's license in one state. You can, you know,
00:16:21.540 you shouldn't have to get a driver's license in every state.
00:16:23.980 Yeah. So then my question is regardless of what the, well, I actually have two questions.
00:16:30.040 We were told that this issue like abortion and Roe v. Wade was, was just done. It was set in law.
00:16:35.960 It was never going to be overturned in our lifetimes. Two questions. Will we see the overruling
00:16:41.220 of Obergefell in our lifetime and on, on any kind of grounds on, you know, textualist grounds,
00:16:47.540 originalist grounds or substantive grounds? And two, will the culture, will we see the majority of
00:16:53.580 people turn against gay marriage so-called in our lifetimes? I think we will. I think,
00:17:00.220 and I caught what you were saying about Gen Z, I caught you what you're saying about the polling
00:17:03.460 on this. I think a lot of people realize, you know, especially Gen Z when they look at,
00:17:07.740 you know, sort of the, the laws that came out of the sixties, that was sort of seen as the boomer
00:17:12.340 era. Then the laws that came out of the nineties, the Clinton, the Gen X era, and then the laws that
00:17:16.900 came out of Obama and the policy changes. This was the millennial era of politics where they had
00:17:21.780 primacy. And the idea being that everything has gone a little bit too far in one direction.
00:17:26.740 And we need to look at things that we want to reel back. And you look at some of those big changes,
00:17:31.300 there's no way that you can say Obergefell wasn't a major change to the way things have been done.
00:17:36.640 By the way, not just in the United States of America, throughout all of human history,
00:17:41.500 the nuclear family is the oldest institution on planet earth. It predates literally everything.
00:17:48.160 It predates the Bible. It predates history itself. We go into the caves.
00:17:51.780 Of the cavemen. And what do we find? We find mom, dad, kids. It's all there.
00:17:56.880 Yeah, I agree. I just think these people who thought that they were going to bet on their
00:18:02.220 own ideology over human nature and the fact that we're social creatures and coupling creatures and
00:18:07.020 biological creatures, I think that was, that was really a bad bet. Okay.
00:18:10.840 I want to turn to more mundane political. Say it again.
00:18:13.560 Which gets us back to Sidney Sweeney.
00:18:15.920 Which does get us back to Sidney Sweeney. In fact, now I want to move to much less pleasant
00:18:20.840 matters, unfortunately, more mundane matters. Democrat representative Janelle Bynum was just
00:18:27.560 being interviewed by C-SPAN Washington Journal, which I've done that show a number of times and
00:18:32.380 it's a kind of a liberal show, but it's on C-SPAN. You know, it's not, it's not supposed to be
00:18:37.000 polemical. It's certainly not right wing. She goes on C-SPAN. They ask her about the government
00:18:42.940 shutdown. She doesn't have an answer.
00:18:46.260 They did have a clean CR vote on September 19th in the House. Did you vote for it?
00:18:54.740 I disagree with your characterization and want to make sure that we're very clear about
00:19:00.360 what Republicans have been doing. Any bill that they've put forth, they've always had
00:19:04.680 some extra stuff to it. There's always been a poison pill to it. So I disagree with your
00:19:09.560 characterization. What were the poison pills of the clean CR or the continuing resolution?
00:19:14.620 You say it's not clean. That was voted on in the House in mid-September.
00:19:20.840 Here's what's important. I think what you're trying to do
00:19:23.860 is shift the responsibility to Democrats.
00:19:27.980 So for those who haven't followed the shutdown all that closely,
00:19:32.120 the Republicans offered a continuing resolution to keep current spending levels through November,
00:19:39.100 and then there would be more of a budgetary fight. But that means that they offered to Democrats
00:19:43.880 the opportunity to vote for a budget that was essentially the same budget they had already
00:19:49.280 voted for under Biden. And the Democrats voted for it under Biden, and they refused to vote for
00:19:53.640 the exact same thing under Trump. And so Washington Journal calls this lady out for it, Janelle Bynum,
00:20:00.140 and says, hey, why'd you vote for it one time, not the other? She goes, I totally dispute your
00:20:05.860 characterization because there's a poison pill. Simple follow-up question. What's the poison pill?
00:20:10.160 Humana, humana, humana, humana. Jack, two questions. One, what is the average IQ in the
00:20:18.960 House of Representatives here on Capitol Hill broadly? And two, that might be too difficult
00:20:23.500 to question to answer or too depressing a question. Two, what were Democrats thinking
00:20:29.180 getting into this shutdown fight?
00:20:30.360 Look, I'm just going to say this, that it has been remarked to me on more than one occasion
00:20:39.280 that when you move from the House side of the Capitol Hill to the Senate side, that you
00:20:43.840 can actually feel the rise in IQ when you're going over. And not all senators, I would add,
00:20:51.440 but there is a sense that the seriousness, it just kind of elevates a little bit. And to all the House
00:20:58.780 members that I'm, that I'm friends with, you know, exactly what I mean.
00:21:02.340 Yeah. Hey, listen, some of my best friends are, are members of the House of Representatives,
00:21:05.800 but nevertheless.
00:21:06.560 Some of my best friends, they're not all of them. Some, I assume are good people,
00:21:10.360 you know, and, um, you know, what were they thinking? Look, the Democrats' singular focus
00:21:16.020 since 2025, even actually go back further since 2016, is just do the opposite of Trump.
00:21:22.140 Whatever Trump wants, just do the opposite, which I've, I've often argued that this is something
00:21:26.740 that Trump should actually take into consideration when he's like, I'm going to breathe air today.
00:21:31.720 And the Democrats are going, we're not going to breathe air at all anymore.
00:21:34.380 No, it's going to be terrible, right? Just, just start supporting things that, you know,
00:21:38.460 they have to also support just to like complete them, drive them crazy and have them chasing their
00:21:42.300 tail all the time. They walk themselves into a corner. This isn't the first time they've done this
00:21:46.500 and they'll sit there and you ask them a basic follow-up question, really simple,
00:21:52.440 totally fair question. You said there were poison pills. Okay, great. What's the poison pill?
00:21:56.080 Well, can't answer. I saw Tara Palmieri had, um, this, uh, this, uh, former media matters,
00:22:02.740 like intern on, who's running for Congress up in the Chicago area and said, so you were indicted
00:22:06.960 for obstructing ice. Well, I was indicted for free speech. Okay. Let's play the video of what
00:22:11.540 you did. They said you were beating on the hood. She plays the video. She's beating on the hood of
00:22:15.040 the ice car and said, well, what do you think about this video? I mean, and, and these charges,
00:22:19.000 there's a, there's a six year, um, you know, possible penalty, which could by the way,
00:22:23.460 preclude your ability to serve in the house. She hangs up. She just hangs up. It's, it's one
00:22:28.400 of the most stunning things I've ever seen. Doesn't even have a basic answer to a simple
00:22:32.600 question. And so look, hats off to, you know, uh, as Rush Limbaugh used to call them random
00:22:37.560 acts of journalism, because this is journalists actually doing their job. Just ask basic follow-up
00:22:44.180 questions and you see them completely fall apart. Yes. I, it, in a way the, that exchange,
00:22:50.400 she was like a figure of the whole shutdown fight in as much as there was an obvious follow-up
00:22:57.160 that, that the Democrat never thought about. They, they, they never seem to think or to
00:23:02.580 understand how this story was going to end. So on the shutdown, they say, look, we're on the wrong
00:23:06.760 side of virtually every 80, 20 issue other than abortion, environmentalism, and healthcare. And no
00:23:12.500 one cares about abortion, environmentalism. Okay. We're going to make this about healthcare. All right.
00:23:16.500 We're shutting the government down. And the Republicans come out and they say, hold on,
00:23:20.100 you're shutting the government down because you want to give healthcare to illegals. That's one
00:23:23.260 change you want to make the healthcare. And because you want to give more federal subsidies to rich
00:23:27.040 people, that's another change you want to make the healthcare. And the Democrats say, uh, uh,
00:23:31.080 and they don't know what to do. They're according to all available reporting,
00:23:35.320 they're feeling the pressure right now. This is the first locked shutdown rather in my lifetime
00:23:39.520 that has not been blamed on Republicans. Trump's numbers are going up during the shutdown. So it's,
00:23:44.360 Schumer's plan completely backfired. The Dems are probably going to have to cave and be in a worse
00:23:48.800 position than they were before. It's the same thing with this lady on TV. Well, you know,
00:23:52.560 there was a poison pill. Okay. What was it? Uh, uh, hummina, hummina, hummina. You gotta,
00:23:57.880 you gotta like, guys, I'm not, you don't need to be count von Metternich here, but you have to figure
00:24:01.280 out like step one, two, and three. How is the plan going to end? Okay. Speaking of strange
00:24:07.140 electoral matters, a former major conservative thought leader is endorsing Zoe Ron in New York.
00:24:14.480 We'll get to that momentarily. First, I want to tell you about the St. Paul Center. Go to
00:24:18.280 stpaulcenter.com slash America. One of my absolute favorite organizations in the country is the St.
00:24:24.880 Paul Center. Uh, I have two books on my desk at home. One is a daily devotional. One is the Ignatius
00:24:33.020 Study Bible, uh, that was, uh, compiled by Scott Hahn. Great, great theologian and leader of the
00:24:39.940 St. Paul Center. It's just, just magnificent. Uh, there, there, if you want a deeper reach into
00:24:46.180 the Bible, I strongly, strongly recommend you check them out. America has reached a cultural
00:24:51.600 and spiritual crossroads where here, you're seeing it all around the culture, all sorts of
00:24:55.880 demographics. People are looking for the truth and in their search, more and more people are turning
00:24:59.620 to the Bible for answers. Bible Across America is a nationwide Bible study, the biggest Bible study
00:25:04.260 in the country. It's hosted by the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology. Join the seven-week Bible
00:25:09.560 study exploring the personal challenge of performing Jesus as teacher and Lord. Join the movement and
00:25:16.840 learn to share your faith confidently starting November 5th. Sign up at stpaulcenter, S-T-P-A-U-L
00:25:24.440 center dot com slash America. Also folks, very, very exciting. You're getting the first glimpse of
00:25:33.100 this. The Michael Knowles Lux Adventus Advent calendar set, Advent candle set. I'm so sorry.
00:25:42.640 It pairs with your Advent calendar. You know, last year we had the, uh, smells and bells candles. We've
00:25:49.820 had many candles, especially liturgically themed ones. And we sold a zillion of them and they're
00:25:53.960 just so good. You, you went out, you bought them, they sold out. Then you yelled at me because they
00:26:00.000 sold out. Well, we have this year, it smells like just a fresh, beautiful pine forest. You have the
00:26:05.920 three purple candles with the one pink candle to meditate on the last four things, death, judgment,
00:26:12.120 heaven, and hell. This is being sold for a very, very limited time. It's actual, it's beeswax,
00:26:18.300 like the ancient Christian tradition of beeswax candles. It's just magnificent. You need to get
00:26:23.800 them now. They're being sold for a very, very limited time because we want to be able to ship
00:26:26.520 them so that you have them for Advent. So if you want it right now, go to thecandleclub.com.
00:26:32.240 You can get them there. Order them now though, because they're going to sell out and I want you to get
00:26:36.660 them for Advent and they're just magnificent. Okay. Jack, Bill Crystal. Remember him? Bill Crystal.
00:26:44.480 Real quick. I want the candles, man. You're selling me on this. We need the candles in the
00:26:51.040 Pozo household. I know. It is actually, this is a product almost perfectly tailor-made for the
00:26:57.500 Pozo household. I just love it. When we, we were going to do a different kind of candle. I said,
00:27:01.880 guys, you know what we have? We need to do a full Advent, like one for each week, last four things.
00:27:08.760 I'm very excited for it. I look forward to smuggling a few out of you.
00:27:11.840 I love, especially like right when you get to Christmas, the week one candle is like hanging
00:27:15.320 on for dear life. It's like, it's like right at the bottom. Cause you always have the different,
00:27:19.480 you know, cause one week to week and then Godete. But then like, we always get that last one of it.
00:27:23.380 Come on, come on. I can get, there's a little bit of wick left and you could just get in there.
00:27:26.840 Also, did you know, so some of our high church mainline Protestant friends,
00:27:30.880 they, they do that tradition of the four, uh, you know, candles for the four weeks. And,
00:27:35.120 but that's awesome. But they make it, they make it like really nice and happy.
00:27:39.440 So, and a friend had sent me a kind of like a Protestant Advent wreath. And it was, it was like
00:27:45.960 hope, joy, happiness, whatever. It was all this like happy stuff. And I said, no, no, no. But the
00:27:51.360 Catholic version is the last four things. So as you're leading into, uh, up to Christmas, you meditate
00:27:57.200 on, uh, death, judgment, heaven and hell, which I love. I listened, but we have to get you some
00:28:06.540 candles, Jack. Uh, I also, I need to get your take on Bill Kristol, former, I don't know, one of the
00:28:14.600 grand poobahs of the conservative movement. He, he caught a terminal case of TDS 10 years ago,
00:28:20.440 turned on Trump. He now says he would vote for mom Donnie for mayor of New York. He wouldn't even
00:28:26.900 vote for Cuomo. He's not even that kind of Democrat anymore. He's going to vote for the Muslim
00:28:30.220 communist. This was so extreme that even Jonah Goldberg, another, uh, you know, once a real
00:28:36.600 thought leader on, on the right kind of shifted a little bit after Trump because he really hated
00:28:41.300 Trump. But, but even Jonah comes out yesterday, he says, hold on, look, I like Bill. He's a friend
00:28:46.420 of mine, but what the hell are we doing? Why are you voting for what, or why, why are you supporting
00:28:52.380 Zoran Mamdani? He can't understand it. Can you? Well, yeah, it's, it's, it's really simple. I mean,
00:28:59.800 it, it just kind of goes back to what we were saying earlier about the Democrats. They've taken
00:29:03.620 the exact same tack where if someone is anti-Trump, they see that as, okay, you're my friend. So I'm
00:29:09.940 going to be friends with you. I'm going to be supportive of you. If someone is as further to the left
00:29:15.420 or as far as someone that Trump has attacked, therefore must be someone that I will lend my
00:29:20.460 support to. So they're, they're North star, right? Which we were told was true conservatism.
00:29:24.920 Remember these were the true conservatives TM, true conservatives would always oppose Trump and
00:29:30.280 always support. Let me just, and let me just follow the, this, this line of thought, always
00:29:34.000 support the constitution, always support the founders, always support the Muslim, uh, communists
00:29:40.300 who have only been American for about five minutes, but also whose parents say that they're
00:29:44.660 not American at all who have spent their entire public life. Let's see, demonizing, uh, demonizing
00:29:52.100 white people telling us that the NYPD is the tool of the IDF telling us that, uh, they are going to
00:29:58.660 basically strip everything from anyone who's built anything in New York city and give it to the
00:30:04.860 migrants. This is the true blessings of conservatism. Yes. Of course it makes total sense.
00:30:10.660 It does. It does. No, there is a, there's a kind of internal logic to the way you're describing it,
00:30:15.160 Jack. And it, you know, at a really basic level, I, I wonder if Jonah Goldberg is confused because
00:30:21.640 he's been invading against tribalism and politics and all, you know, that became really popular in the
00:30:26.800 late 20 teens is for people to say, well, I'm against tribalism or whatever. I, I, I just think
00:30:32.600 at a basic level, politics is a team sport. You know, Machiavelli writes well of this in, uh,
00:30:39.320 the discourses on Livy, uh, but this is, it's not a particularly profound insight. It's just how
00:30:44.000 politics works. You got to bring people together because politics is how we all live together.
00:30:47.760 And it's a team sport. And 10 years ago, Bill Kristol switched teams. And so now he's on the
00:30:52.960 other team. And I mean, that's substantially what you just said to Jack, uh, but I don't know.
00:30:58.180 Why is that so complicated? I don't even think that's bad. Some people say, well,
00:31:00.720 it's just awful to think of politics as a team sport. Why is it? I don't know. We're social
00:31:04.480 creatures. That's how we got to do stuff together. We have to cooperate. And in any society,
00:31:09.440 they're going to be differing opinions. And so you got to build coalitions. I don't know.
00:31:13.180 In a way, I think Kristol is being kind of honest here. He's saying, look, I left the team 10 years
00:31:19.480 ago. Now I'm on the other team and I'm going all the way. I'm, I'm in, you know, give me the Jersey
00:31:23.880 coach. I'm yes. Bill Kristol, principled conservatives for Muslim Ugandan communists,
00:31:30.400 before I let you go, Jim. And actually, if, if just to add on that, um, you know,
00:31:35.420 if you look at, so if you look at his father, Irving Kristol, so he is a former Democrat as well.
00:31:40.780 So, and you saw this with a lot of the, yeah, the birth of the neoconservative movement was sort
00:31:45.700 of like, they were the Democrats who left over the Vietnam war and then moved over to the Republican
00:31:51.980 party and then have sort of been kind of like ensconced there and then through the Bush years,
00:31:56.920 et cetera. So really this is sort of just a return to form.
00:32:00.160 Yes. And you know, it's funny, the neocons are justifiably, you know, beaten about in political
00:32:05.440 discourse. And a lot of them, they were like ex Trotskyites who became Democrats and then became
00:32:11.640 conservatives when they were mugged by reality, they said. But I'll tell you though, that first
00:32:15.980 gen of neoconservatives, you read some of like Irving Kristol's writings, a lot of it's very thoughtful,
00:32:21.200 very serious. And I don't know, it'd be, it's hard for me to imagine Irving Kristol supporting
00:32:26.400 Mom Donnie. I, it's a, it's a, it's a sad turn of events. Before I let you go, Kamala Harris wants
00:32:33.680 to lower the voting age to 16. Give it to your, in her own words.
00:32:38.540 I think we should reduce voting age to 16.
00:32:41.280 I'll tell you why. So Gen Z, they're age about 13 through 27. They've only known the climate
00:32:55.080 crisis. They missed substantial parts of their education because of the pandemic.
00:32:59.860 If they're in high school or college, especially in college, it is very likely that whatever they've
00:33:08.620 chosen as their major for study may not result in an affordable wage. They've coined the term
00:33:15.800 climate anxiety to describe fear of not only being able to buy a home, but that fear will be wiped out
00:33:25.460 by extreme weather, but fear of having children. It goes on. I just, I don't have time or, or
00:33:31.180 patience. Jack, I I'm in reflexively opposed to this, especially if the argument for letting 16
00:33:38.220 year olds vote is that they're completely neurotic and afraid of an imaginary problem. But then I look
00:33:44.140 around at Gen Z and I notice at least on the right, these guys are pretty trad, you know, I mean,
00:33:50.520 they're pretty right wing and I mean, in many ways, the kids are all right. Oh, should we lower the
00:33:55.900 voting age? I mean, I, uh, I'm like you, I think I'm reflexively against anything that allows more
00:34:02.980 people to vote. I think universal suffrage is one of those things that we, uh, that we really should
00:34:07.300 be having more conversations about and something I talked to Charlie about quite a bit, um, uh, on,
00:34:12.400 on thought crime on our, our sort of like taboo breaking show. But, but no, you're right though.
00:34:17.200 I will say though about Gen Z that you're right. The, the, the, the thing with Gen Z is this,
00:34:22.400 there's no middle in Gen Z, right? It's either you're like all the way to the right, or you're
00:34:27.040 all the way to like, you know, Zoran Mamdani and Luigi Maggioni. There's no middle, there's no
00:34:32.560 middle ground. There's no centrist. There's no half measures. It's either you're like full on trad.
00:34:38.260 I support Trump, deport everyone, you know, that, that hasn't been America for like more than 10 years.
00:34:43.940 Uh, or you're like all the way on the left and you just want to burn it all the way down. So
00:34:48.280 I'm not sure exactly how it strikes out, but I will say this, that when you talk about the neurosis,
00:34:53.140 you were talking about the anxiety. People don't blame Republicans for the lockdowns. They don't
00:34:58.120 blame the conservatives for the, for the shutdowns in, in their formative years, right? That is very
00:35:05.920 squarely blamed on her party, on Joe Biden or whoever it was that was making those decisions
00:35:11.140 in the white house. And I think that's one of the big reasons that you're seeing people who
00:35:15.940 are just totally out for revenge against the government. Yes. And now finally, before I let
00:35:20.700 you go, what will you be dressing as for Halloween tonight, Jack, or are you boycotting it because
00:35:26.360 it's a terrible evil satanic holiday? So Halloween is Christian. Halloween has been Christian since
00:35:31.920 735 when Pope Gregory ordained all saints day as November 1st, it has no connection whatsoever to
00:35:38.800 any Irish folk holidays. There's no evidence of this whatsoever, despite what 19th century bad
00:35:44.620 history tells you. There's also no evidence by the way that that Irish folk holiday had anything to do
00:35:49.840 with paganism. This is totally made up just like Wiccanism is totally made up in the modern era.
00:35:54.840 It has no connection or bearing to anything historical. And in fact, Halloween itself has always
00:36:00.480 been a Christian holiday. Now, just like Christmas, that doesn't mean it hasn't been secularized over the
00:36:06.800 years. And certainly we've seen that. And we have seen the rise of occultists and paganists
00:36:11.480 that are trying to invert a Christian holiday. So it's, it's the start of all hallowed tide, as you
00:36:16.640 know. Uh, so all hallows Eve, all hallows day, all saints day, and then followed by all souls day,
00:36:22.000 which we pray for the souls of the faithful departed in purgatory. So we are going up as a family, uh, as a
00:36:28.540 family costume, as we do every single year. I am not at liberty yet to say, uh, I cannot even give any
00:36:34.440 clues as to what it might be, but check our social media because my wife is very insistent that we do
00:36:40.440 not, uh, that we do not, uh, divulge this, but I would just say this to everybody out there.
00:36:44.780 It, there's a right way and a wrong way to do Halloween. If you're doing it in a way that's
00:36:48.460 having fun, if you're going out and you're remembering the souls of the faithful departed,
00:36:52.060 that's absolutely the best way to do it. Remember your mortality, uh, mock the demons,
00:36:57.640 mock the occult, mock Satanism in all of its forms, and then go out and have fun. That's the best way to do it.
00:37:04.300 It's a great, what a great idea, Jack, uh, a man who basically needs no introduction or
00:37:10.360 salutation or valediction, but, uh, it is at least a perfunctory matter. Where can people go find you
00:37:17.680 to see more? What's, uh, uh, at Jack Posobiec all over, all over Twitter. And the podcast is
00:37:25.000 human events daily. We're actually, we're going to be running our, our normal Halloween special with
00:37:30.440 Dr. Taylor Marshall discussing the Christian origins of Halloween. I'm sure it'll be very,
00:37:35.820 very politically correct. Very tame. Jack, always excellent to see you. Thank you for coming on.
00:37:40.840 God bless, man. Good to see you, man. Okay. Uh, before we get to the mailbag, I want to
00:37:46.020 tell you about Pure Talk. Go to puretalk.com slash Knowles. I love Pure Talk. And I'm very,
00:37:52.720 very proud to say that it is my wireless company because they don't just talk the talk,
00:37:56.460 they walk the walk, especially when it comes to supporting our veterans. This month,
00:38:00.200 Pure Talk is choosing to support Canines for Warriors, an incredible organization that rescues
00:38:04.260 and trains dogs and pairs them with veterans struggling with PTSD. These are men and women
00:38:09.040 who served with honor, but when they come home, that brotherhood, that support network they had
00:38:13.220 in the military too often disappears. Canines for Warriors steps up to fill that gap, giving these
00:38:18.200 heroes purpose, companionship, and healing. That is exactly why Pure Talk, a veteran-led company,
00:38:23.620 supports them. Choose a wireless company that shares your values. And with talk text and plenty
00:38:29.400 of 5G data for just 25 bucks a month, you could also be saving a lot of money. I've had Pure Talk
00:38:35.420 for five years now or something. It is fabulous. Best service you're going to get, best customer
00:38:40.760 service you're going to get. The people on the other end of the phone speak English. That's a good
00:38:44.600 start. And they support great causes. And by the way, you're going to save a ton of money. Go to
00:38:48.300 puretalk.com slash Knowles Canada WLAS. Make the switch today. That is puretalk.com slash Knowles
00:38:52.960 Canada WLAS. Switch to America's wireless company, Pure Talk. Ladies and gentlemen, it's that glorious
00:38:58.920 time of year again, the season of giving. And this time, we're the ones doing the giving. Once a year,
00:39:03.620 every single year, we offer our best deal of the year. And yes, it's happening right now.
00:39:07.280 DealerWire Plus memberships are 50% off. Half off this year is more to enjoy than ever before.
00:39:12.760 More new series, documentaries, and films. More of Ben, Matt, Drew, Isabel, you boy. Even our newest
00:39:19.180 host, Matt Fradd, a fellow Catholic, and the man of impeccable taste, joining us here at The Daily
00:39:24.840 Wire. We are also ramping up our investigative journalism, real journalism, by the way. And of
00:39:28.860 course, bringing you our massive seven-part cinematic series, The Pendragon Cycle, The Rise
00:39:33.800 of Merlin, premiering January 22nd, 2026. It's epic. It's mythic. It's everything Hollywood forgot how to
00:39:39.500 make. So do not wait. Get your Daily Wire Plus membership today. Save 50% and join us in the
00:39:44.820 fight. Okay. My favorite comment yesterday is from McGred7364. Funny, the Pope blesses a hunk of ice
00:39:54.760 and suddenly climate change is no longer going to destroy humanity. I know that's kind of a joke.
00:40:00.400 God works in mysterious ways. The Pope had this pre-scheduled climate thing as part of one of
00:40:10.640 his many events that he goes to. And he was asked to bless ice and popes and bishops and priests
00:40:15.620 bless water. So he blesses the water. And then Bill Gates comes out and says, climate change isn't a
00:40:20.480 threat anymore. All nature, my friends, is but art unknown to thee. All chance direction which thou
00:40:26.540 canst not see. Finally, finally, we arrive at my favorite time of the week, the mailbag.
00:40:30.700 Mailbag is sponsored by Pure Talk at puretalk.com slash Knowles Canada W-L-E-S to make the switch
00:40:34.600 today. Take it away. Hey, Michael. My girlfriend and I are kind of going through a rocky patch right
00:40:41.560 now. I'd say, in fact, she'd like to break up with me for the one reason that I do not believe
00:40:48.700 that Jesus Christ is the literal son of God incarnate and come down to earth. Like, I do believe God is
00:40:55.280 real, absolutely, but I don't think he'd do that. And I do believe Jesus was real, a very,
00:41:03.500 very incredibly smart man, incredibly intelligent man, somebody we should absolutely model our lives
00:41:08.060 after, you know, who died for his convictions. And please sell me on the Catholic Church. Sell me on
00:41:16.760 Jesus. I don't understand and I don't want to lose her. She's literally perfect.
00:41:23.020 That's very sweet. Okay. Well, uh, sorry that you're going through this rough patch in your
00:41:28.500 relationship, but this might be a good opportunity to re-examine exactly what you think and believe
00:41:33.240 and what the issue really is. Cause you say, you know, look, I, I, I love Jesus. I think he's great.
00:41:39.400 I think he's really smart. I think he's really moral. I think he's the kind of person to model
00:41:43.500 your life after. I just don't think he's God. And my girlfriend has a problem with this and she
00:41:48.100 doesn't see a future with me. If I don't, I don't think he's God, but I think he's really great in
00:41:51.980 everything. But he says he's God. He says in no uncertain terms that he is God before Abraham was,
00:42:00.460 I am. And, and he says it many other times in many different ways. So he says that, which means,
00:42:08.600 and you might say, well, I just don't believe that part. Okay. But now you get to C.S. Lewis's
00:42:13.220 trilemma, which is that if he says he's God and he's not really God, then he's either a lunatic,
00:42:24.020 but you said he's not a lunatic. You said he seems really intelligent and, you know, really,
00:42:28.660 really great and everything really with it. Or he's a liar, but you said he's, he's someone to
00:42:36.540 model your life after. So you're saying he's someone to model your life after, but he's dishonest
00:42:41.140 and he's a fraud. Or there's one third option, which is that he is who he says he is. And he
00:42:46.900 really is the Lord, but that's it. I think maybe the conflict that you're, you're arriving at is
00:42:52.460 you, you want to occupy a middle ground that is not tenable when it comes to faith. And your
00:43:01.040 girlfriend is rightly intuiting that that's not going to, that's unstable and you're not going
00:43:07.060 to remain there. You can't remain there because it doesn't make any sense. Either Christ is
00:43:12.540 intelligent and moral and someone to model your life after, a great moral teacher and all these
00:43:18.240 things, and God and literally God, the son of God incarnate, second person of the Holy Trinity.
00:43:25.980 Or he's none of those things. Or he's not particularly intelligent, or at least he's not
00:43:32.980 particularly moral, or at least he's not someone to model your life after. He's not those things.
00:43:38.740 But what he can't be is a really intelligent, great moral teacher who's a liar or duped. He can't be
00:43:47.900 that thing. So the only view that is really not plausible at all is the view that you hold right
00:43:53.420 now. And so anyway, I think the evidence for Christ's divinity is manifest. And I think it's totally
00:44:01.800 persuasive. And I think the resurrection is totally persuasive. And I think that when you encounter
00:44:07.100 Christ, even just reading the Bible in your room, you have the reaction that you say, this is true.
00:44:14.800 This just rings true because you have reason and you are able to perceive the truth and it just kind
00:44:20.620 of stirs something in you. And I think all the history and the church and all the rest of it also
00:44:25.560 speak to that. But whatever answer you're going to, maybe you're going to really ask this question
00:44:31.720 and say, oh no, I think it's all fake. And you're going to be like a Reddit tier atheist or something.
00:44:34.700 I guess you could arrive at that conclusion, though it would be mistaken. But the one place
00:44:40.000 you can't remain is where you are right now. And your girlfriend's intuiting that. And she realizes
00:44:43.380 you're either going to fall one way or the other. And she doesn't want to bet her life on that kind
00:44:49.000 of instability. And I don't really blame her for it. So it's wonderful that you love your girlfriend.
00:44:52.320 You don't want to lose her. But I think you got to just buckle down on this question and come to
00:44:57.760 whatever the honest answer is and then be honest with your girlfriend. Okay, next question.
00:45:02.460 Hi, Michael. My name is Megan and I'm a devoted member of the Creme de la Creme.
00:45:06.940 Without getting into the details of why, I'm a divorced mother. I just turned 40 and I would
00:45:12.940 like to get remarried and maybe have one more kid. Due to recent events, I have been advised by the
00:45:19.260 internet that because I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints that many other
00:45:24.220 Christians do not view me as a Christian. I would like your advice on how I can go about dating and
00:45:30.400 finding a godly man. Thank you for your advice. Okay, well, a lot of these questions are probably
00:45:37.640 a little above my pay grade given the particularity of your, you know, beliefs and religious practices.
00:45:45.180 Um, so I give you the, through my Catholic lens, I give you the view. Um, we don't believe in
00:45:54.100 divorce. You know, we don't think it's sacramentally possible. Um, however, it doesn't
00:46:00.420 mean that you're just necessarily consigned to, you know, throwing your hands in the air or something
00:46:04.540 like that. I guess the question would be, was your marriage valid in the first place? That's the,
00:46:11.280 that would be the first answer, the question that I would ask if I were trying to figure out if
00:46:14.820 someone could continue to date or whatever. Um, was your marriage valid in the first place? Was
00:46:19.760 something withheld, you know, unjustly before the marriage? Was it done with coercion or under
00:46:25.120 duress? Or this is why the Catholic Church has, um, nullment investigations. Uh, is, is the marriage
00:46:31.980 reparable? Maybe not. Um, anyway, so that would be how I would first approach that question. Now put
00:46:37.800 that aside for a second. Let's get to your second question. Your second question is, you know, look,
00:46:41.400 I'm Mormon and people don't consider me Christian. And you are, you are just going to encounter that
00:46:46.880 because, uh, you know, LDS doesn't affirm the Nicene Creed say, or the, uh, you know, the Trinity,
00:46:54.960 the central mystery of the faith. And so I don't, I don't think you're going to persuade a lot of
00:47:01.440 Protestants or Catholics that, you know, it's, it's all the same thing. And I say, this is someone who
00:47:07.300 really, really loves the LDS. I was with a good LDS friend of mine just a few days ago. Um,
00:47:13.560 but I, I just think if you're going to remain and within that religious view and religious tradition,
00:47:19.120 um, you're going to be running up against a wall if you're going to try to convince, uh,
00:47:24.140 Protestants or Catholics or Eastern Orthodox or whatever, that it's the same view. Uh, I don't
00:47:29.920 think it's really going to work. So I guess as a, as a practical matter, you, you could,
00:47:34.040 assuming the question of the knowledge of the marriage or whatever is figured out,
00:47:39.060 you could, you could continue to date within LDS. Um, but anyway, those are, those are all just
00:47:45.100 little hints of how to maybe try to proceed. Uh, but I really, I, I feel for the position that
00:47:51.060 you're in. It's a very, very difficult position. And I, you know, sometimes on the internet is you're
00:47:57.540 describing these kinds of feuds with people on Twitter or something. Sometimes people just view
00:48:02.260 everything as a cold intellectual calculation. And that's not really what you're talking about.
00:48:05.760 You're saying, look, I'm a human being. I've had this problem. It's a fallen world. And you know,
00:48:09.940 I've got my kid and I've got, uh, I'd like to, this marriage fell apart and I'd like to date. And
00:48:14.980 it's, you know, it's, it's like a real personal social kind of question. And so I really feel for
00:48:20.540 you. I think we can all pray for you and your difficult situation and then hope you can navigate
00:48:25.880 things in such a way that, that are conducive to the truth and therefore conducive to your flourishing
00:48:29.980 because you, you know, you're not, I don't think you're, you're exactly going to flourish and be
00:48:37.360 happy if you, if you pursue a line of life that is, that is contrary to the truth, trying to paper
00:48:45.000 over things, you know, that's, it's not going to work. You're going to, you're going to face the
00:48:49.000 problem that you're facing right now, which is you're, you're trying to beat your head against a
00:48:51.760 wall, trying to convince, you know, like a Southern Baptist or something that LDS theology is
00:48:56.020 substantially the same as, as, uh, his theology. It's not, not going to work. Okay. Uh, it is
00:49:02.280 Fake Headline Friday. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member.
00:49:05.340 Use code Knowles Canada WLAS to check out for two months free on all annual plans.