00:04:00.360By all rights, L.A. is going to remain Democrat.
00:04:05.600Okay, I want to temper everybody's expectations here.
00:04:08.000Even though Spencer Pratt is running an incredible, amazing campaign, best Republican campaign I've seen in California ever, I wasn't alive for the Reagan days, so the best one ever.
00:04:19.140Despite all of that, if you look at the prediction markets right now, Karen Bass, the current Democrat mayor of L.A., a former card-carrying communist, actual communist, is the overwhelming favorite to remain mayor of L.A.
00:04:33.700According to the Kalshi markets, 68% chance Karen Bass remains mayor, 27% chance Spencer
00:04:40.700Pratt unseats her. He's going up. Karen Bass, no, she's not even really down a little bit.
00:04:47.480She's actually kind of up from where she had been. The one who really cratered was this socialist
00:04:51.240candidate from the city council, Nitya Raman. So look, by all rights, Bass is going to remain
00:04:57.920mayor and Spencer Pratt's campaign will be valiant but unsuccessful. Now, if you look at the polling,
00:05:02.520not the prediction markets, but the polling, things look a little bit better.
00:05:06.560Emerson College polled in May. Bass has a 30% support. Pratt has 22% support.
00:05:13.960Raman has 19% support. So it's much, much closer in the actual polls than it would be in the
00:05:19.000prediction markets, which makes sense. The issue here is that undecided voters are dropping sharply.
00:05:25.380So Pratt is probably not going to pry the purple-haired lunatics. He's not going to pry
00:05:30.920the illegal aliens and all the people that Karen Bass wants to vote for. So he's really relying on
00:05:36.020those undecided voters. As the undecided voter number gets smaller, his odds are going to go
00:05:40.640down. But still, it's an eight-point race in California that's pretty impressive.
00:05:45.440Rahman is helping him here, or the socialists splitting the left-wing vote is actually helping
00:05:49.400Spencer Pratt. So you say, all right, look, the odds that this great Republican candidate actually
00:05:54.100wins pretty, pretty low. However, Karen Bass is doing her level best to get a Republican elected
00:06:00.040there because she is running a horrible campaign. She knows she's running a horrible campaign.
00:06:04.340That's why she dropped out of the debate after Spencer Pratt completely dominated at that first
00:06:08.240debate. Karen Bass said, whatever, I'm not facing this guy on stage. Nitya Raman, same thing.
00:06:13.180Karen Bass does make the mistake of going on CNN, doing an interview with my old pal,
00:06:18.700Alex Michelson. Alex, who is a great objective down the middle reporter,
00:06:23.560probably leans a little bit left. So he's certainly not a Republican,
00:06:27.000but he's just he tries to ask fair questions he asks a very simple question of karen bass
00:06:33.100the biggest issue in los angeles is the homeless problem la residents have to worry about getting
00:06:38.980stabbed by schizophrenic crackheads on the street even in the nice neighborhoods this is a big big
00:06:45.020problem it's only gotten worse over over the past decades they tried to fix it over the last year or
00:06:51.240two. Not a lot of advancement here. So simple question. Hey, Mayor Bass, why should voters
00:06:57.660trust you on the biggest issue when you haven't done anything about it in the last year or two?
00:07:02.740You said that your goal was to end street homelessness in L.A. by 2026. It's now 2026.
00:07:10.180And we haven't ended it. We have not ended it and we're not close to ending it.
00:07:13.940How are you so off? Well, basically, when I said that it was at the beginning of my term,
00:07:20.720I am very committed to achieving that goal I didn't anticipate some of the
00:07:26.420bureaucratic barriers that I would experience but I am prepared to take
00:07:31.640those on now but you promised that it would go away a hundred percent and it's
00:07:37.280only gone down about 17.6 percent right so why should people trust you that
00:07:42.080you're gonna be able to get to the hundred because let me just tell you for
00:07:45.020the first time we've had a decrease at all. You should be thankful. Now, there's a one-sixth
00:07:58.700reduced chance that you get stabbed by a crackhead on the street. Where are my thank yous?
00:08:05.340Excuse me. Look, I know I promised that I would solve this problem, and I haven't,
00:08:10.020and it's only gone down by 17.5%. But come on, that's pretty good. He says, no, but hold on,
00:08:16.680you promised you'd fix it. This isn't brain surgery. Why? It shouldn't be that hard to get
00:08:20.600the vagrant, dangerous criminals off the streets. No, but you don't understand. The reason I
00:08:25.280couldn't do it is because I was not able to overcome bureaucratic red tape. Okay, so why
00:08:31.380do people, why should people think that you're going to do that now? Because now I'm prepared
00:08:34.720to do that. Don't worry. Forget about my record. Forget about my complete failure. Forget about
00:08:40.940my incompetence at best or just ideological affinity for the criminals at worst. Don't
00:08:46.260worry. Don't look at what I've done. Just listen to my words. I super double doggy promise to do
00:08:53.620it next time. That was not an interview on the Daily Wire. That was not an interview on the
00:08:59.920Michael Knowles show. That was not an interview on Fox News. That was CNN. And that's a California
00:09:05.020reporter who was asking that question. And she's got nothing. And the haughtiness, the pride,
00:09:11.620the hubris to say, what are you talking about? The number went down very slightly. Come on,
00:09:18.660let me off the hook. She then, she steps in it again. Karen Bass was asked, also this is by
00:09:25.420Politico. Politico is a left-wing outlet. Said, hey, Mayor Bass, simple question,
00:09:31.060should non-citizens vote? Should foreigners decide American elections?
00:09:38.260Councilmember Hugo Sotomartes, who has endorsed you, he wants to explore ways to let non-citizens
00:09:45.000vote in city elections. I know that there are some cities that already do this, but
00:09:50.380you know, politics is all about timing. With Donald Trump in the White House, is this the
00:09:56.640right time for Los Angeles to go down this path? Well, I think we need to explore it. Now, I've
00:10:01.160not seen exactly what he's calling for. I have a little familiarity of what happens in other cities,
00:10:07.140and, for example, some cities will allow people to vote in, like, city council and school board
00:10:13.360elections because they pay local taxes, but they are not necessarily undocumented. They might be
00:10:19.540here completely legally, but have not finished the citizenship process. So we'll wait and see.
00:10:25.560We'll wait and see? What are you talking about? We'll wait and see. You're the mayor.
00:10:29.660It's a question for you. Do you support foreigners deciding our elections?
00:10:37.280He goes, well, look, we got to explore that. What is the top issue in people's minds?
00:10:42.640usually it's the economy the the there's the national economy which is a little bit out of
00:10:49.620the control of state and local leaders but california has really screwed it up at the
00:10:53.880state and local level they have screwed up the economy they've screwed up affordability as much
00:10:58.440as it is possible to screw it up gas in california is what seven bucks a gallon
00:11:03.700it's because of the taxes because of the terrible regulatory environment you want to talk about the
00:11:10.600affordability crisis in California, Karen Bass and Gavin Newsom allowed LA to burn to the ground.
00:11:16.900That made things a little more expensive, didn't it? It's kind of difficult to deal
00:11:22.060with affordability when you don't have a house. That's why Spencer Pratt has a successful campaign
00:11:25.440here. So the biggest issue, she totally screws up. The second biggest issue, which sometimes
00:11:32.300even supplants the economy in voters' minds, is mass migration. This influx of foreigners,
00:11:38.480especially not just from the perspective of the labor market or of crime, but especially from
00:11:43.320the perspective of sovereignty, of our identity, of having some control over our political destiny.
00:11:50.740And she says, yeah, we're going to have to explore letting foreigners decide elections.
00:11:54.500Why? Because if Americans decided elections, if people with skin in the game financially,
00:12:03.800as a matter of their family, as a matter of their tradition within their communities.
00:12:08.780If Americans decided elections, Democrats would not have a chance.
00:12:12.420The reason that Democrats support mass migration, and they have been explicit about this
00:12:17.120for decades, the reason they support mass migration is because they want to give themselves
00:14:36.740Policy Genius' licensed team helps guide you through the process, makes it real easy, explains the coverage, amounts, prices, and terms clearly.
00:14:43.240No wonder PolicyGenius has thousands of positive reviews.
00:14:45.860Give yourself the peace of mind that comes with getting things checked off your list.
00:14:48.860Protecting your family is an act of love and responsibility.
00:14:51.500Modern tools make it easier than people think.
00:14:53.660With PolicyGenius, you can see if you can afford 20-year life insurance policies starting at just $276 a year for $1 million in coverage.
00:14:59.540Go to PolicyGenius.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S, to compare life insurance quotes from top companies to see how much you can save.
00:30:01.860and then we get some left winger. I think that's a pretty good lineup because everybody could kind
00:30:05.720of disagree, but sometimes would agree with each other. So anyway, I'm grateful for Dave's statement
00:30:11.120there. And I look forward to seeing him on a bar fight show or something. But what about the first
00:30:16.160part where you say, okay, well, maybe Michael was totally right in his prediction. Maybe Dave was
00:30:21.100wrong in his prediction. But Dave and Nick Fuentes both take issue with my analysis. My analysis was
00:30:27.940part of my prediction I said was, if Massey goes down, this will be evidence that Trump
00:30:32.800has an ironclad grip on the Republican Party. And the two of them, they say, oh, brother,
00:30:37.480here we go. No, it doesn't show. That's not what it will chiefly show. What's going to show
00:30:42.100is that the pro-Israel lobby has an ironclad grip on the Republican Party. That will be the chief
00:30:47.300takeaway if Massey goes down. But I don't think Massey's going to go down. Yeah, no, I don't think
00:30:51.960he's going to go down. No, he'll win. It'll be close, whatever. Okay. So I want to point out,
00:30:56.380I was also completely correct in my political analysis of the broader context here.
00:31:03.060And let's be totally clear about it. I am not denying in the least that pro-Israel donors
00:31:08.980wanted to take Massey out. I'm not denying that at all. It's a little complicated because
00:31:12.660Massey's biggest individual backer was ardently pro-Israel. That's a slight confounding factor,
00:31:17.860but it's true. AIPAC wanted to take Massey out. The pro-Israel donors really wanted to take Massey
00:31:22.500out. But that was not the chief takeaway. And my proof of this is all of the other races,
00:31:29.820all of the other primaries that Trump intervened in. You can say the Israel issue was a big factor
00:31:35.680in the Massey race. How do you explain Brad Raffensperger in Georgia? Israel didn't play
00:31:40.980a single role in that election. That primary race was about Raffensperger's reaction to the 2020
00:31:46.840presidential election. How do you explain Bill Cassidy's Senate primary? Bill Cassidy's Senate
00:31:52.580primary had nothing whatsoever to do with Israel. He just irritated Trump by turning against him,
00:31:59.940turning against him on the issue of impeachment. How do you explain the five Indiana state
00:32:04.440legislators who went down in their primary campaigns in all the races that Trump intervened
00:32:08.800in? That issue wasn't about Israel. That was about redistricting because they turned on Trump on
00:32:14.100redistricting. My point is not that the pro-Israel donors didn't want to take Massey out. My point
00:32:19.880is that the chief takeaway of Massey going down alongside Raffensperger and Cassidy and the
00:32:24.740Indiana legislature all at the same time is that the only common thread there wasn't Israel. It
00:32:32.000wasn't the 2020 election. It wasn't impeachment. It wasn't redistricting. Those were individual
00:32:35.700issues. The only common thread to them all going down at the same time is that Trump turned on them
00:32:42.840and told voters not to vote for them. And so if we're trying to find the common thread,
00:32:48.340the chief cause of their going down, the only conclusion that we can draw is that it was Trump
00:32:54.140having an ironclad grip on the Republican Party, despite the predictions and prognostications of
00:33:00.800podcasters who keep being proven wrong. That's my point. I'll go even further in the Massey race.
00:33:07.380There are a number of Republican congressmen who don't like Israel, who have voted to defund Israel.
00:33:11.940who are still in their seats. I'm sure AIPAC would love to take them out too.
00:33:17.540The deciding factor is Trump hadn't turned on them. That's where I get my political observation
00:33:23.820from. I'd go even further. The last point I'll make on Massey is, had Massey played nicey with
00:33:29.820Trump, had Massey voted for the big, beautiful bill, had Massey not started palling around with
00:33:34.980Ro Khanna, an unctuous Democrat, Trump very likely would not have turned on him. And even
00:33:41.580if you had the pro-Israel donors trying to take him out, my point is that wouldn't have mattered
00:33:45.660because the decisive factor was Trump. Now, once again, as I pointed this out in the Massey race,
00:33:50.240you can say it's good that Massey opposed the GOP. You can say it's good that Massey opposed
00:33:53.880Trump. You can say you like Massey more than Trump or the Republicans. You can say any of
00:33:57.740those things. You can say you want to be a libertarian instead of a conservative. I'm not
00:34:01.140making any comment on that. In this context, all I'm saying is if you want to understand what's
00:34:09.560going on in politics, and if you want to be able to be more likely to make accurate political
00:34:14.080predictions, you have to understand the underlying structures, how party politics actually works.
00:34:20.960And the fact that, look, you know how much I hate to say I told you so, but the fact that my
00:34:27.100observations and predictions have this habit of being proven correct, look, none of us is omniscient,
00:34:35.100But the fact that there is pattern recognition here and they do keep playing out in reality, that would seem to suggest that that analysis on what's going on in politics is the more accurate one.
00:34:47.200And, you know, I hate to say I told you so, but who knows?
00:34:50.280Maybe, David, very nice comments there.
00:34:53.520Maybe we can hash it out on a bar fight, I hope in the future.