00:19:17.360The people did not elect the senators.
00:19:19.700The Senate was elected by the state governments, not by the people.
00:19:22.580many many people just could not vote and now we pretend that voting is an end to itself and some
00:19:30.660sort of sacred right but voting is an instrument voting is an instrument to get us a good government
00:19:34.620good government which is there for the common good of all if you have well over two-thirds of
00:19:42.220democrats who are now saying they they're not proud to be an american they don't love their
00:19:47.540country. They're not rooting for their country. Why would we let them vote? They're telling us
00:19:54.300they are not interested in our best interests. They want us to lose. Why would we give them a
00:20:00.160say in our government? How do you actually disenfranchise the people who openly hate
00:20:05.260your country? I don't know. That's a little bit tricky. I guess one way to do it is to deport a
00:20:09.000lot of people if you can deport them. Another way to do it would be to denaturalize some people who
00:20:13.100We are denaturalizing some people right now who committed immigration fraud.
00:20:16.860One way to do it would be to restore our previous system of voting, which is that if you committed very serious crimes, you would lose your right to vote.
00:20:27.460One way to do it would be to install basic measurements, basic responsibilities in order to exercise the right to vote.
00:20:36.800Like you have to go get an ID card to prove who you are.
00:20:39.780Like you have to actually show up to the polls on Election Day.
00:20:42.660like you have to care at all. Like you have to care at all. That would be one way to do it.
00:20:49.200But you cannot have a good country. You cannot have a thriving, successful country
00:20:53.600if two-thirds of the people voting actively want to destroy the country.
00:20:59.660If two-thirds of the people voting don't want the good of the country.
00:21:05.860We are starved for the legit foreigner posts and for the bot and even porn posts.0.95
00:21:12.660that say they love America because so many of the people running our country and participating in0.94
00:21:17.500our elections openly hate the country. Unsustainable. Now, speaking of Democrats,
00:21:26.220there's one Democrat who, I don't know if she's actually rooting for our government or maybe she's
00:21:31.580rooting for our country, but she does like, this is weird, she's one of the most anti-Trump
00:21:35.240Democrats and she's apparently charmed by President Trump's heir apparent, J.D. Vance.
00:21:51.240You told him during the break that he should run for president because he has a good vibe.
00:21:55.040I think that even though for a Republican, mind you, I said to you in the beginning of this conversation, I don't think that he's a bad guy.
00:22:02.100So if he runs against, say, Gavin Newsom, that will be an interesting debate to see those two because they're both intelligent.
00:22:08.540Joy Behar is super duper lib. I'm not saying she's like an Antifa operative or something.1.00
00:22:16.300She's more representative than that, actually. She's a kind of not all that with it, not all
00:22:22.300that informed, reflexive liberal who just has Trump derangement syndrome, who hates anything
00:22:28.720conservative and Republican. But J.D. Vance goes on her show and she says, you know, I think that
00:22:33.580guy's intelligent. Furthermore, I don't think he's a bad guy. This is an amazing breakthrough
00:22:39.520because Democrats, I mean, this has almost become cliche to understand it this way.
00:22:47.840Republicans tend to think Democrats are misinformed. And sometimes they have bad
00:22:51.900intentions, like the ones who are rooting against America. But mostly they're misinformed. As Ronald
00:22:56.740Reagan said, it's not that our liberal friends are ignorant. It's that they know so many things0.93
00:23:00.820that aren't so. They just don't quite get it, and they don't understand us. Study after study
00:23:07.320has shown that the right understands the left much more than the left understands the right.
00:23:12.820We disagree with the left, but we know where they're coming from. We see how they arrived
00:23:16.560at their conclusions. It's just based on mistaken premises, both about hard facts and also about
00:23:22.240first principles. The left doesn't understand the right, by and large. And so the left has
00:23:27.380to conclude that people on the right are either impossibly stupid or malevolent, that we actually1.00
00:23:32.900have bad intentions. Those are basically the only conclusions. And what's so notable about Joy1.00
00:23:37.960Behar's response to Vance's, she knocks both of those things down. She says, look, for a Republican,0.98
00:23:43.540I think he's pretty good. Look, I don't think I agree with him. I don't think, but he's not stupid,
00:23:51.400and I don't think he's a bad guy. I don't think he has bad intentions. And I pointed this out0.73
00:23:54.980yesterday. I said that the clip to me that really showed JD's prowess on The View was when he was
00:24:02.080talking to Whoopi. And Whoopi said, you know, what do you think about them? Erase some black
00:24:05.740history. And he said, well, Whoopi, what do you mean? And he didn't even say it in a condescending0.80
00:24:10.760way. He didn't say like, can you cite your sources? Boom, you can't, owned, lib, destroyed,
00:24:16.120facts, logic, boom. She didn't say that. He just said, hold on. Even when the audience started to
00:24:21.980boo him a little bit. He goes, no, no, I'm just trying to, I just, I want to make sure I'm
00:24:25.000responding to your actual point so that we're not talking past each other. What specifically
00:24:30.220are you talking about? And it was so disarming. It was devastating because she had no answer.
00:24:36.520She ended up going viral because she said, oh, I mean, there's so many examples that I can't pick
00:24:42.280even one. And it totally took the air out of that conversation. What's really amazing about
00:24:49.320the Joy Behar clip is you're seeing some people on the right who are attacking J.D. Vance for
00:24:57.760charming Joy Behar. I think, hold on, this is one of the most conservative people in American
00:25:02.540politics. In many ways, much more conservative than the GOP. In many ways, drawing on deeper
00:25:11.320wellsprings of conservatism than what has passed for conservatism in the last four or five decades,
00:45:55.780It's just, it's really the kind of the never Trump faction is the one that is most outraged
00:46:01.720about the memorandum of understanding.
00:46:04.560And they're directing a lot of their ire at J.D. Vance, which tells you, you don't need
00:46:10.840a PhD in logic to know that that means that J.D. Vance, whether he wins or loses, whether
00:46:16.480he even gets a nomination or not, J.D. Vance is the heir to Trumpism because all the people
00:46:20.980who hated Trump specifically in 2016 really hate J.D. Vance in 2026. So that tells you that for
00:46:27.320better or worse, J.D. Vance is the heir to the Trump political movement. You're going to see
00:46:32.460these fault lines reemerge. It's not that they went away in 2016. It's not even that Trump really
00:46:38.820persuaded all of these people to support him or to change their views on tariffs or immigration
00:46:42.840or foreign policy or whatever. It's just that Trump was too big and he won over the people
00:46:47.500and you could not be in Republican politics if you didn't play ball with Trump.
00:46:51.580And then when Trump, the individual, goes away, all of those fault lines are going to reemerge.
00:46:55.980This is just how it is in the conservative coalition.
00:46:58.820There are lots of different groups, the neocons and the paleocons and the libertarians and the traditionalists, and there's not a ton holding them together.0.52
00:47:05.600There was at least something holding them together during the latter part of the 20th century, which was the Soviet Union.
00:47:11.140The Soviet Union, which could get the traditionalists and the religious right opposed to the secular material atheism of the Soviet Union, could get the libertarians opposed to the collectivism of the Soviet Union,
00:47:20.600could get the Warhawk Democrats, the neocons, opposed to the imperialism of the Soviet Union.
00:47:27.080But then the Soviet Union fell apart. The conservative coalition ceased to make a ton
00:47:31.880of sense. That's what we're heading back into. And a lot of these fights over the Iran deal are
00:47:36.240proxy battles over that. One last story before I go, I have to get to this. This is really,
00:47:40.340really funny. It's from the New York Times. The New York Times accidentally admitting
00:47:44.740that the Epstein scandal is not a Trump scandal.
00:47:49.560We'll get back to some of the kind of crazy conspiracy theories about Israel.
00:47:52.780They say they've got blackmail on him, on Trump, and they run the show,
00:47:56.280and he's a puppet for, and they were, Epstein was a Mossad agent or whatever.
00:48:00.660And they say, you know, Epstein's got all this dirt on Trump.
00:48:03.640That's how they're all controlling the government.