00:15:58.560So for us, I think it's the opposite. The truth is our friend. Everything that conservatives believe in works. Countries don't become as powerful as America in just 250 years. Don't go from a bunch of guys clinging to the coast of a continent to this major superpower without freedom. Freedom works every time it's tried.
00:16:17.900You know, Greece became an empire. Rome became an empire by being because they started out being free. The same thing has happened to us. That's the thing we're trying to defend. And you do it, you know, you can't do it. You can't always be playing defense. I think that's the problem. You do have to solve problems, but you solve them in a free way. You know, you solve them in a way that doesn't say, oh, the government is going to do this for you, which means someone's money and freedom is being taken away.
00:16:42.140You know, I think that this is if I had to pick two things that I think the right could work on a little less belligerence in telling the truth, you know, tell the truth fearlessly, absolutely fearlessly.
00:16:52.780But you don't have to be belligerent about it. And the other thing is notice the problems before the left does.
00:16:58.980The left is really good at this, at picking up things that kind of bother people and then elevating them.
00:17:03.520And I think, you know, we have it. We actually have the solution to inflation.
00:17:08.160It's don't print so much money, which means don't spend so much money, you know.
00:17:12.020And I think that that's the thing that we just, we are not fearless about facing, especially our politicians.
00:17:17.740That is the one era where conservatives, I think, prefer fantasy over the left.
00:17:23.180The left has it 99.9% of the time, but we, we're a little too rosy, you know, and we, when the left brings up affordability, say, or problems in the healthcare system, we just try to dismiss it and minimize it.
00:21:46.160And if I'm out, then I think a lot of other people are out.
00:21:48.900So Tucker's out of the GOP. He's been one of the leading conservative voices for decades,
00:21:54.280and he's out of the GOP. And a lot of people are asking, why? Not because the Republican Party is
00:22:01.940so great. As I frequently say, the Republican Party is the absolute worst party in the United
00:22:06.820States other than the Democrats. But why is he doing this now? And what changed? And I think
00:22:14.500the most obvious answer is that Tucker, in this stage of his public life, is doing a Pat Buchanan
00:22:20.540thing. Pat Buchanan, who also was one of the leading Republicans who ran to get the GOP
00:22:25.960nomination for president in 1992 after Reagan, who advised Nixon, who advised Reagan, who ultimately
00:22:31.320lost the nomination to Bush. And then he left the GOP and ran for president on the Reform Party
00:22:36.660ticket. And then he was an independent for a few years. Then he came back to be a Republican again.
00:22:41.320And so you could say, all right, maybe he's doing a Pat Buchanan kind of thing.
00:22:45.500He feels that the Republican Party is not sufficiently conservative.
00:22:49.020We're not conservative in the right way.
00:22:50.680Even here, Tucker says the big issue is the GOP is too pro-Israel.
00:22:55.180Pat Buchanan also was skeptical of Israeli influence on American politics and on the GOP.
00:23:00.420So the analogy, I think, works pretty well, except that if the issue is that the GOP is too pro-Israel, the GOP has been pro-Israel for the whole time Tucker's been a Republican and for well before Tucker was a public Republican.
00:23:19.900You know, he says it was 35 years here.
00:23:22.080The GOP has been pro-Israel since at least Richard Nixon.
00:23:25.480Richard Nixon saved the nation of Israel.
00:23:27.880The nation of Israel probably would not exist without Richard Nixon's help.
00:23:32.320So, and even before that, the GOP, from the very founding of the state of Israel,
00:23:38.020the GOP was favorably inclined toward it.
00:35:02.800Yes, 100 percent, 100 percent. And this is why, you know, I heard you talking about the whole Tucker, I'm leaving the Republican Party thing, which, you know, listen, I've been calling for ideological borders for a long time.
00:35:12.560So I'm also in favor of ideological self-deportation. So self-deportation is a perfectly fine policy for those who are illegal immigrants into the Republican Party and take advantage of our culture and values and refuse to assimilate.0.98
00:35:23.400They can leave. It's OK. But, you know, the thing. Are you calling to send Tucker to Bukele's prison camp or anything? Can we make news on this show or?1.00
00:35:32.800I mean, I'm not calling for him necessarily to be sent there.
00:35:36.440But if you wound up, no, we're not doing that.
00:35:38.680But if he decides to self-deport to his house in Qatar, that is perfectly fine with me.0.88
00:35:43.260In any case, when you do that, when you have people in the Republican Party who keep saying that they're going to leave because they're pissed off with Iran.0.98
00:35:51.260By the way, I'll point out, I'm not super happy with our current Iran policy.1.00
00:35:54.900I'm sticking around and voting for the Republicans because I don't want these schmucks to win in November.1.00
00:35:59.180And this is, I think, the biggest thing that you've been pointing out for a while, which is, you know, the alternative to whatever is going on, whatever the issues we have with what's going on on any of the sides.
00:36:08.880The alternative is these people who are literally standing there protesting in favor of algae and calling for their political opponents to be jailed on the basis of they just don't like them.
00:36:18.780And so if you think that that everything that we saw under Joe Biden has gone away permanently, whenever people say woke is dead, woke is not dead.
00:36:25.980woke is just asleep and it is perfectly capable of waking up at any second and being significantly
00:36:31.100worse than it ever was, by the way. If you think that it's going away or that it's moderated or
00:36:34.840something, that is absolutely untrue. The left, Unleash, will come for revenge, not just on Trump,
00:36:40.740but on everybody who just doesn't share their value system. And I think that's what you're
00:36:44.160seeing there. I totally agree. This is one where I get the impulse to say, well, not everything is
00:36:51.620going exactly as I want and, oh, the GOP is imperfect and, oh, I prefer this policy. I get
00:36:57.200it, of course. And look, I love cigars and port and tweed and talking about beautiful ideas in
00:37:03.940the realm of forms. It feels great. Light a nice fire and a nice cozy study. Wouldn't that be fun?
00:37:09.680But as much as I enjoy the purity of that experience, politics is not pure. It's ugly
00:37:15.840and mucky and messy. And it involves being on teams with people who you don't like or who you
00:37:21.600don't think are competent or who, you know, and to your point, but you say, I don't like the Iran
00:37:26.100policy either from the exact opposite direction. But you say, I'm not thrilled with that, but I'm
00:37:30.540sticking on the team. I'm going to try to change the team from within to some degree, but we got
00:37:34.620to focus on who the big threats are. I totally agree. The impulse to just kind of walk away from
00:37:39.640politics, I don't have it. I don't know, which is why I'm still here at 2000 episodes and which is
00:37:44.520why i'll be clinging to my desk at episode 4000 as you drag me kicking and screaming you say enough
00:37:49.920i've had it with the cigars you're leaving the studio michael i will still be clinging to it
00:37:53.280because it just seems to me that the political project is something we are called to do and to
00:37:58.060your point it's a great rejoinder ben which is that you in countries that have uh really
00:38:03.660explosive civil strife you don't get to sit around debating a swimming pool you don't get to do it
00:38:09.260And it's actually a privilege to be able to do so.
00:38:37.240at which point I have to say, Michael,
00:38:39.100That is not you're you're probably if you're looking for, like, total available market, I feel like that is limiting your total available market, quoting Dante in the original Italian in the media on your show.
00:38:48.780Yeah. Yes. The populist, the populist angle to quoting Dante in the original Italian is limited.
00:38:54.900I mean, I'm just going to put that out there as a tactical matter. But if the if this sort of idea is that, you know, the that you're going to walk away, then you're going to walk back in.
00:39:05.620Like your point is really well taken, which is that the Republican Party has moved in the direction of a lot of the people who are now complaining about the most over the course of the last 10 years in a lot of different ways.
00:39:16.920It's gotten more conservative in a lot of different ways.
00:39:18.780It's also gotten bigger government in a lot of ways I don't like over the course of the last 10 years.
00:39:23.280I mean, there have been a lot of changes in the in the Republican Party.
00:39:26.100Some of them I like, some of them I don't.
00:39:27.480But again, when it comes right down to it in November, one of these parties is going to have a lot more control.0.95
00:39:32.540And I'd prefer that it not be the party that is busily attempting to trans the kids, which, again, that will come back.0.84
00:39:38.180If you think that's not if you think that's gone away, it's never coming back.1.00
00:39:40.940Nonsense. That absolutely 100 percent will come back.
00:39:43.080Yeah, that's right. The party that is still wants to trans the kids, which is the crazy, craziest ideological policy of the last ever.0.95
00:39:50.860And and the party that wants to jail its opponents and the party that wants to do violence against us.0.80
00:44:42.520He says the free market is the most efficient way to allocate resources,
00:44:45.700but we need to recognize that there are some resources that are not solvent,
00:44:51.040and there are some that are not marketable.
00:44:53.460Sorry, there are some needs which are not solvent,
00:44:54.880and there are some resources which are not marketable and don't achieve a satisfactory price.
00:44:59.040What he's saying, in other words, is perfectly harmonized with what Pope Leo is saying.
00:45:04.340He's saying, look, yeah, JP2 is focusing more explicitly on the free market and the goods of
00:45:08.460the free market. But he's saying, look, some people are destitute. And the arch ideological
00:45:14.120laissez-faire capitalist would say, too bad, you're on your own. I got mine and my property is 100%
00:45:19.660perfectly, absolutely mine. And too bad, I'm not my brother's keeper and you can go starve on the
00:45:24.300street. But what JP2 and Leo are saying is, no, no, no. When there are needs that are not solvent,
00:45:30.360when there are resources that are not marketable, that can't obtain a satisfactory price in the0.98
00:45:35.240market, we have an obligation to intervene because men have dignity, which is prior to
00:45:41.200market regulations. And so that doesn't necessarily mean that you need some big
00:45:47.700government, some central planner to step in, though there probably is a role for the government.
00:45:51.320It could be charity. It could be the role of the church. It could be corporate philanthropy.
00:45:55.500But in any case, we actually do have an obligation to the poor people, to the elderly people, to the people who can't really take care of themselves, to the people who don't really find a place within the free market.
00:46:08.020We furthermore have an obligation to help try to bring those people into the market so that resources can be allocated efficiently.
00:46:14.360There is, in other words, a right to property and a universal destination of goods.
00:46:18.400And man actually does have a dignity that is prior to all of those market considerations, market considerations that nonetheless are important when we're talking about the good of properly allocating resources in a society.
00:46:28.980There's really no contradiction whatsoever from what Leo is saying.
00:46:32.460He's not being as explicit in his promotion of the goods of the free market, but there is no contradiction here between him and JP II, who everybody loves, and the long story of Catholic social teaching.
00:46:44.520I mean, JP2 even goes on and says, in third world contexts, certain objectives stated by Rerun Novarum remain valid and in some cases still constitute a goal to be reached if man's work and his very being are not to be reduced to the level of a mere commodity.