00:40:54.380He's a kind of heterodox Democrat, but he's still a liberal Democrat.
00:40:57.320Bill Maher breaks with his party to defend the ballroom.
00:41:00.740so uh i see now he wants to get rid of the press pool in the white house and make it into an actual
00:41:08.200swimming pool did you see that i have seen it yes i have seen it look it was a swimming pool at one
00:41:14.440time in fact if you go in the stairs underneath where the briefing room is you can actually see
00:41:19.640the tile from where the pool used to be so he just maybe wants to restore it to all of its glory i
00:41:24.460don't know if he'll do it but he's been flirting with it this is the one thing that people get mad
00:41:28.700me not one thing they get mad at me and many things at least you're honest i don't i don't
00:41:33.740give a about any of this i i like the ballroom yeah america does need a ballroom i love that
00:41:38.220they we do yeah absolutely it's the united states of america having dinner in the grass it's a shame0.99
00:41:43.340it's stupid under a tent yeah under a lot on your feet you're wearing these expensive shoes1.00
00:41:48.300i don't know about those ones but maybe if you went to the white house you would spruce it up1.00
00:41:53.980anyway. Caroline, so good, man. She's so good. She's such a pro. And part of the reason that
00:42:03.840she can persuade Bill Maher here is because her argument carries weight. And Bill Maher agrees.
00:42:09.020He says, yeah, we're the United States of America. Like, what is the argument? Can someone explain
00:42:13.300to me the Democrat argument against the ballroom? Is the argument that the White House should not
00:42:20.340have a place to serve dinner? Is the argument that the White House should only have like a
00:42:25.600really ugly, cheap place to serve dinner? Is that it? You know, it's the White House, right? You
00:42:29.780know, we're America. Is the argument we should have a, we can, okay, you can build a cafeteria,
00:42:34.060but it's got to be a soup kitchen. Is that, that's the argument? No, I think the Democrat focus
00:42:40.300in this campaign has been on the ballroom. It's been on Jeffrey Epstein. That's been a big line.
00:42:48.120Jeffrey Epstein, which you will recall, is a Democrat scandal.
00:42:53.060Vast majority of the powerful people that Jeffrey Epstein was hanging out with were liberal Democrats.
00:43:00.140The argument that Trump hasn't been transparent on Epstein, the White House's release of the Epstein files is one of, if not the single largest, mass declassifications in American history.
00:43:12.080I don't even really support declassifications, mass declassifications, because I think that it
00:43:16.640can compromise due process, and sometimes governments need to keep things a little
00:43:21.280closer to the vest. But regardless, it's like one of the biggest ones ever. What's the argument?
00:43:25.520So, okay, you got the ballroom, you got these weird vague insinuations about Epstein, which
00:43:28.700is actually a Democrat scandal, not a Republican scandal. You've got complaints about gas prices,
00:43:33.900that's real, because of the war in Iran, which many Democrats would have supported and
00:45:57.980But if you turn somebody in, you get a 1% commission.
00:46:01.980may turn it down or you may say i'm not going to be a reporter any longer this is too easy
00:46:05.760so the reporter turns somebody in we're going to continue the same one percent so i love this
00:46:12.860so let's say use the number he used a million dollars you catch a million dollars in fraud
00:46:17.180you can catch the town dog catcher in a million dollars of fraud and by government standards a
00:46:21.440million dollars of fraud is nothing you get 10 grand 10 million dollars in fraud you get 100
00:46:28.320grand. It's a pretty nice salary for just catching some fraud. $100 million in fraud,
00:46:35.860which can be caught. You get a million bucks. Now, what about a billion dollars in fraud? Now,
00:46:44.160it's 10 million bucks. All of us, you're looking pretty good. Now, the left is always prattling on.
00:46:50.940They say there's not really a lot of fraud. Trump is just making this up. Oh, it's no big deal. He's
00:46:55.560just pointing to this because he doesn't want to deal with the fundamentals of government,
00:46:58.760the economy, and okay. Trump is saying, okay, challenge accepted. I say there's a lot of fraud.
00:47:05.840You say there's no fraud. Okay, tell you what, I'll pay you 1% of any of the fraud that anyone
00:47:11.480catches. On top of that, who are the people who should at least in theory be best able to uncover
00:47:17.880the fraud? It would be investigative journalists, right? It would be the people who are trained
00:47:23.440to root out corruption, but this would be a big loophole because they work for the news agencies.
00:47:29.780They're not so, you know, maybe they would be exempted from the reward. No, Trump says, no,
00:47:34.120no, you're not exempted. You know what? If you catch the fraud, you get the 1% too.
00:47:38.920Maybe you don't want to take it. Maybe you do want to take it because it pays a lot better
00:47:41.540than your local paper or your fake news outlet. So what is the secondary effect of this? One,
00:47:48.020it's to root out the fraud is the primary effect and to prove the Democrats to be liars.
00:47:52.880But the secondary effect is it will also get the good reporters to leave the establishment media where they are propping up these fake news outlets.
00:48:01.400So they're actually, it's a great little one-two here.
00:48:04.940It's just, of course, it takes the businessman president to figure out how incentives work.