The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 225 - I Don’t Believe Her

00:00:00.000 Christine Ford testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on a party that she attended 35 or 36 years ago with maybe five or maybe six or maybe seven people where Brett Kavanaugh attempted to grope her or maybe rape her or maybe murder her in a room with one other boy or maybe three other boys or well we'll analyze Dr. Ford's changing story and her uncredible testimony.

00:00:30.440 Then, miracle of miracles, Lindsey Graham becomes the GOP's most courageous senator and finally I will go through the mailbag that I didn't get to yesterday. I'm Michael Knowles and this is The Michael Knowles Show.

00:00:41.840 What a boof of a testimony yesterday. What a boof of a hearing. What a boof of a process for the United States Senate for confirming judges.

00:01:00.440 It was a mockery. It was disgraceful. Every Democrat should be taken out back and smacked around a little bit for what they did to our republic and what they did to our constitutional order yesterday. It was disgusting.

00:01:12.000 We learned a lot from it though. We learned that Ford is not believable. She's not believable. I'm not saying she gave horrible testimony. I'm not saying that, you know, she totally broke down.

00:01:23.600 Her testimony was fine. It probably, the people who want to believe what she says is true probably believe it still and the people who are skeptical saw all of the inconsistencies and contradictions in her testimony.

00:01:35.160 They saw all of the times that her lawyer leaned in and said, don't answer that. No, don't answer about how Dianne Feinstein referred lawyers to you.

00:01:41.780 Oh, don't answer about the advice you're getting from political operatives. Oh, don't answer about why you didn't do basic things.

00:01:46.900 She also apparently misrepresented what her polygraph was. We saw contradictions between her testimony on that polygraph and the letter she wrote to Dianne Feinstein.

00:01:56.000 It just broke down. It just wasn't believable. And Kavanaugh was believable. And it's as simple as that.

00:02:01.640 And anybody telling you, oh, you know, they're, but no, who knows? And this and that. No, her testimony was not believable. His was.

00:02:10.020 I actually, I have this relative. I won't say which relative of mine this is because I don't want to ruin her career and her life by just association with me.

00:02:18.160 But she texted me yesterday and she said, I, she is left of Lenin. I mean, she is, she is as far left as anybody that I know.

00:02:27.180 Certainly anybody in my family. She texted me and said, I think Kavanaugh is being falsely accused.

00:02:33.220 And I said, well, if you're saying it, then it's certainly true. And that's the impression you get. His testimony was very powerful.

00:02:39.260 It was hard to watch. It was hard to watch because it was pretty emotional. He couldn't keep the emotion back.

00:02:44.720 He was very credible. And she, I don't know if she's a crazy person or if she's misremembering something.

00:02:49.420 She's clearly a damaged individual just from, not only from her behavior, but the various, the various therapies that we're talking about that she, where all of this came from, apparently.

00:03:00.200 So we'll talk about all of that because her behavior was pretty weird.

00:03:05.060 I should note, I had a great time last night. I mean, you might notice I'm not in the studio right now. I'm still in Pittsburgh.

00:03:10.420 We had a great time at Franciscan University of Steubenville. The students were incredible, super, super smart.

00:03:16.580 I really shouldn't recommend this university to you because then a bunch of, like, the word is going to get out.

00:03:22.800 A bunch of lefties are going to go in. You know, they're going to ruin the whole place.

00:03:25.480 But it was incredible. I was really, really impressed with it. Very serious kids, super smart, well-educated.

00:03:31.300 So it was great, great to hang out with them. We talked about the simple joys of being right.

00:03:34.880 We're going to have more speeches coming up on my Covfefe on campus tour with YAF.

00:03:38.540 We're going to be going on October 24th and 25th to Grand Canyon University.

00:03:43.080 And I think we're going to Michigan after that, though I could be mistaking that.

00:03:46.640 But they're coming up, so if you want me to come to your school, get your request in through YAF because we're filling up fast.

00:03:52.720 So if you didn't watch the testimony yesterday, if you didn't watch the hearings, lucky you.

00:03:58.420 Oh, man. This was really, I mean, during my show, I was watching the testimony.

00:04:02.860 While I was supposed to be writing my speech, I was watching the testimony.

00:04:05.500 It was all drama. You want to be entertained? You got entertained. It was really hard to watch.

00:04:08.940 If you missed it, you can watch about 10 seconds of the testimony.

00:04:12.760 You'll understand what the whole thing was.

00:04:14.480 Here is Brett Kavanaugh, federal judge, D.C. Circuit judge, Supreme Court nominee,

00:04:20.600 being grilled on the meaning of the word boof from his 1982 high school yearbook.

00:04:28.180 Have you, I don't know if it's boofed or boofed, how do you pronounce that?

00:04:33.900 That refers to flatulence. We were 16.

00:04:36.440 That was from Sheldon Whitehouse. Sheldon Whitehouse, a pure hack, a pure partisan.

00:04:47.420 They all have been in this. I sort of give Kamala Harris and Cory Booker a little bit of leeway

00:04:53.280 because they're running for president, and it's still cheap and shallow, but at least there's a purpose to it.

00:04:58.100 But Dick Blumenthal, Dick Durbin, Sheldon Whitehouse, they're behaving like monsters.

00:05:05.500 I mean, they're behaving like hysterical little monsters. It's awful. It makes a mockery of our process.

00:05:10.280 And so yesterday, after all of these hearings, Sheldon Whitehouse leans in and goes,

00:05:14.140 I want to ask you more about your high school yearbook from 1982.

00:05:18.280 And Kavanaugh basically says, yeah, go right ahead.

00:05:21.240 Okay, United States Senate, Judiciary Committee, Supreme Court nominee.

00:05:24.820 Okay, let's talk about my yearbook.

00:05:26.080 You know, and so then he goes, well, what's the meaning of the word boof?

00:05:30.780 And Kavanaugh just knocks it out of the park.

00:05:32.980 And this highlights it. They're asking about these little, oh, did you ever have beer in high school?

00:05:38.840 Yes, Senator, I was a high school student.

00:05:41.960 Yeah.

00:05:42.860 Back when the drinking age was 18, actually.

00:05:45.140 So it's even more defensible.

00:05:46.680 Did you ever drink when you were a young man?

00:05:48.380 Yeah, on account of I was a young man.

00:05:51.200 So, yes, I did.

00:05:52.460 Idiots.

00:05:53.560 The way you know that this was a really serious hearing,

00:05:55.700 other than Democrats asking about how many times Brett Kavanaugh flatulated when he was 16,

00:06:01.940 the other way you know it was a really serious hearing is that they had Alyssa Milano there.

00:06:06.140 They had Alyssa Milano.

00:06:07.520 She was brought in as a guest of Feinstein or somebody,

00:06:10.560 and she's sitting there behind Kavanaugh.

00:06:12.780 Like, that's a serious person.

00:06:14.620 A really serious senator invites Alyssa Milano to the testimony. 0.99

00:06:20.080 Absolutely outrageous.

00:06:21.720 And the way that they all, I mean, it was so awful.

00:06:24.060 Chuck Grassley deserves a lot of blame here.

00:06:25.800 This never should have happened.

00:06:27.000 It never should have been brought to this.

00:06:28.540 They were so nice.

00:06:30.120 Everybody on the committee was so nice to Christine Ford,

00:06:32.980 and they were so hostile and so unfair and so outrageous to Brett Kavanaugh.

00:06:39.220 I had Ann Coulter on my show a couple days ago, a few days ago,

00:06:42.380 and I asked her about Dr. Ford,

00:06:44.620 and Ann, in her typical, you know, subdued, staid way, 0.79

00:06:49.540 said that she was obviously a lefty lunatic nutcase out of her mind. 1.00

00:06:53.680 And I thought that was a little unfair at the time.

00:06:56.080 Not quite so sure now after that testimony.

00:06:58.720 Here is how all of the senators,

00:07:01.140 here are the hard questions that they gave to Dr. Ford,

00:07:05.120 making these allegations, trying to ruin a man's life,

00:07:07.940 keep him off the Supreme Court,

00:07:09.800 take a fair judicial pick away from a sitting president,

00:07:13.380 duly elected president.

00:07:14.800 Here are the, here's the tough way that they grilled her. 1.00

00:07:17.300 You know you are not on trial.

00:07:20.080 You are not on trial.

00:07:22.200 You are sitting here before members of the United States Senate's Judiciary Committee

00:07:28.200 because you had the courage to come forward

00:07:33.280 because, as you have said, you believe it was your civic duty.

00:07:37.660 She most certainly is on trial.

00:07:43.360 She, this was the line, they all repeated this,

00:07:45.200 because they all wanted to get their little clip for their campaign ads.

00:07:47.360 So they said, and you, I just want you to know, you're not on trial.

00:07:50.360 You're not on, you are on trial.

00:07:52.360 She, Dr. Ford is on trial.

00:07:54.120 She is making a really serious, outrageous allegation

00:07:57.860 from something that allegedly happened 36 years ago.

00:08:02.180 An outrageous, I mean,

00:08:03.660 she's, she's calling him a rapist and a murderer.

00:08:07.020 Now, obviously the thing she describes was he groped her,

00:08:09.740 but she's saying he tried to rape me, he tried to murder me.

00:08:12.280 I thought he was going to kill me accidentally, whatever.

00:08:16.520 You're on trial.

00:08:17.300 Your credibility is on trial here,

00:08:19.000 and it needs to be seriously scrutinized.

00:08:21.200 But the Democrats have done away with due process.

00:08:23.440 They've done away with the rights of the accused.

00:08:25.120 They're tweeting out, believe all women. 0.99

00:08:26.740 Why would you believe all women? 1.00

00:08:28.440 Do, is there something about those double X chromosomes

00:08:30.560 that makes you incapable of lying?

00:08:33.080 What are you talking about?

00:08:34.540 They say, why would a woman lie? 1.00

00:08:35.960 I don't know.

00:08:36.400 I couldn't tell you,

00:08:37.000 but we went through several cases just a few days ago,

00:08:40.640 meant more than several cases of major rape allegations

00:08:43.660 that turned out to be hoaxes.

00:08:44.900 The biggest rape cases in recent history,

00:08:47.440 the two biggest rape cases were major hoaxes.

00:08:50.560 Maybe the three.

00:08:51.400 Tawana Brawley in the 80s,

00:08:52.800 which Al Sharpton made his career on.

00:08:54.780 The Duke Lacrosse case, obviously,

00:08:56.260 ruined those kids' lives.

00:08:57.700 And the UVA case.

00:08:58.680 The UVA is another example.

00:08:59.880 This was a major news story published in Rolling Stone.

00:09:02.200 It was a lie.

00:09:02.960 I don't know.

00:09:03.360 Why would people make up false allegations?

00:09:06.840 Psychosis, revenge, politics, convenience.

00:09:10.220 I don't know.

00:09:10.600 It happens a lot, though.

00:09:11.820 And some you just couldn't explain why.

00:09:13.540 So I don't know.

00:09:14.560 But they say, I believe you.

00:09:16.060 Why?

00:09:16.560 Why?

00:09:16.760 What evidence has she presented?

00:09:18.240 She's contradicted herself.

00:09:19.320 And we'll get to those examples in a second.

00:09:21.460 So, but the Democrats had to try to pick a lane here 0.99

00:09:23.820 because they tried to do two things at once

00:09:26.080 and it did not work.

00:09:27.140 The one, the first tactic was to say, Dr. Ford.

00:09:30.680 She's Dr. Ford.

00:09:31.960 She's not Mrs. Ford.

00:09:32.660 She's doctor. 1.00

00:09:33.500 She has a PhD.

00:09:34.860 She's a psychologist.

00:09:36.360 She, okay, she's a clinical psychologist. 0.66

00:09:38.320 Doctor, Dr. Ford.

00:09:39.460 Serious academic.

00:09:40.540 Published a lot of things.

00:09:41.440 Here's Feinstein going down that path

00:09:43.280 at the start of the hearings.

00:09:44.180 I have to say, when I saw your CV,

00:09:47.620 I was extremely impressed.

00:09:50.040 You have a bachelor's degree

00:09:51.720 from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,

00:09:54.980 two master's degrees,

00:09:56.740 one from Stanford and one from Pepperdine,

00:09:59.560 and a PhD from the University of Southern California,

00:10:03.180 better known to Senator Harris and I as USC.

00:10:06.620 You are a professor affiliated with both Stanford University

00:10:10.660 and Palo Alto University.

00:10:12.700 You have published over 65 peer-reviewed articles

00:10:17.040 and have received numerous awards

00:10:19.600 for your work and research.

00:10:23.680 And therefore, you're telling the truth

00:10:25.800 and relating the truth correctly

00:10:27.860 about an allegation that happened 36 years ago

00:10:30.540 that no one has ever heard of until five seconds ago.

00:10:32.700 Because, you know, you go to Palo Alto University or whatever.

00:10:36.080 By the way, I don't remember them introducing

00:10:37.760 Brett Kavanaugh this way.

00:10:38.960 I'm pretty impressed with Brett Kavanaugh's CV,

00:10:40.900 Yale undergrad, Yale law school,

00:10:42.420 clerked for the Supreme Court,

00:10:43.780 fed a staff secretary to the president,

00:10:45.600 worked on the Ken Starr investigation,

00:10:47.400 which is what a lot of this is about

00:10:49.100 because the Clinton world is getting revenge

00:10:50.780 and Democrats are getting revenge for that whole episode

00:10:53.360 and they're trying to flip it on a sex issue. 0.98

00:10:55.620 Then, what, federal judge?

00:10:57.740 Then, you know, he's on one of the most powerful courts

00:10:59.900 in the country, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,

00:11:01.600 and now a Supreme Court nominee.

00:11:03.280 That's a pretty good CV.

00:11:04.560 I don't remember them to,

00:11:05.360 oh, but she attends Palo Alto University 1.00

00:11:07.740 or she's affiliated with Palo Alto.

00:11:09.620 Okay, wow, incredible.

00:11:10.820 So, the reason they did that

00:11:12.120 is because they want to say

00:11:14.920 that she's this serious person.

00:11:17.020 Look, she's a professor, okay?

00:11:19.360 And no crazy people ever become professors, right?

00:11:22.240 No, like, we don't have an entire character trope

00:11:26.340 in popular culture of the wacky, crazy professor,

00:11:29.560 pie-in-the-sky, politicized, whatever.

00:11:31.440 No, she's a professor of Palo Alto University.

00:11:33.300 She couldn't be lying.

00:11:33.960 So, they go down that path.

00:11:35.660 They want to say, she's a super serious person.

00:11:38.680 But then they realize they have to make her

00:11:40.180 really likable and sweet and innocent and cute.

00:11:42.800 So, they're trying to do two things at once

00:11:44.340 and it doesn't quite work.

00:11:45.560 When I heard at the top of these hearings,

00:11:47.200 one of the first things Christine Ford said

00:11:49.040 made me really question what was going on here.

00:11:51.200 Here's right at the top of her hearings

00:11:52.660 when they introduce her.

00:11:54.300 I want to say that to everybody

00:11:57.200 that she has asked for,

00:12:00.340 anytime you ask for a break,

00:12:02.000 you get a break,

00:12:03.700 anytime there's something that you need

00:12:06.700 you don't have,

00:12:08.000 just ask us.

00:12:10.000 And you can have as much time

00:12:11.880 for your opening statement as you want.

00:12:14.640 And just generally let us know

00:12:18.860 if there's any issues.

00:12:21.640 Proceed, please.

00:12:25.580 Thank you.

00:12:26.280 Thank you, Senator Grassley.

00:12:27.780 I think after I read my opening statement,

00:12:31.220 I anticipate needing some caffeine

00:12:33.220 if that is available.

00:12:34.860 Okay.

00:12:37.380 Oh, I just anticipate.

00:12:38.960 Well, if you anticipated it,

00:12:39.940 then bring a cup of coffee to the hearing.

00:12:42.580 You anticipate, you just said you anticipated.

00:12:44.380 Or have a shot of espresso before you sit down.

00:12:47.160 Oh, I just might need some caffeine.

00:12:48.800 I might need a break after this

00:12:49.880 if you guys start grilling me.

00:12:50.860 I don't want to answer those questions.

00:12:52.120 He he he.

00:12:52.780 He he he, I'm so cute.

00:12:54.240 They're trying to play it both ways.

00:12:55.900 And by the way,

00:12:56.920 so we should be very blunt about this

00:12:59.500 because there's the question

00:13:00.560 of this political, disgusting, disgraceful circus

00:13:03.100 where they rip down a good man

00:13:04.320 who's never had any of these allegations

00:13:05.900 laid against him

00:13:06.680 until he was in the position

00:13:08.540 to swing the court

00:13:09.640 to be more right wing,

00:13:11.320 to be more originalist.

00:13:12.580 They ask,

00:13:13.160 why didn't this happen with Neil Gorsuch?

00:13:15.080 Neil Gorsuch was replacing Antonin Scalia.

00:13:17.200 It's hard to get more hardcore

00:13:18.540 and originalist than Scalia.

00:13:20.380 So it doesn't change the makeup of the court.

00:13:22.420 Brett Kavanaugh is replacing Anthony Kennedy.

00:13:24.180 Kennedy is the swing vote.

00:13:25.840 Kennedy was the squish. 0.92

00:13:27.040 Brett Kavanaugh appears to be

00:13:28.220 more rock ribbed than him.

00:13:29.600 This will fundamentally change

00:13:31.080 the composition of the court

00:13:32.160 and they're out for blood.

00:13:33.380 This is largely about Democrats' abortion lust.

00:13:36.160 This is largely about

00:13:37.420 how insistent they are

00:13:39.320 that we preserve

00:13:40.200 the fictitious constitutional right

00:13:41.760 to kill a baby in the womb.

00:13:43.200 But that's why they're reacting this way

00:13:44.720 to Kavanaugh instead of Gorsuch.

00:13:46.240 And every lefty

00:13:47.080 who's bringing up that comparison knows it.

00:13:49.280 Every major lefty,

00:13:50.400 every lefty analyst or elected official,

00:13:52.320 and they're just being obtuse.

00:13:54.180 But as to the matter,

00:13:55.540 did Brett Kavanaugh

00:13:56.400 grope this girl super drunk 1.00

00:13:58.040 in 1982 or whenever?

00:14:01.500 We have no reason to believe

00:14:03.180 that that's true.

00:14:04.200 Everyone who has been called on

00:14:05.380 as a witness to the event

00:14:06.780 or around the time

00:14:07.460 has said this isn't true

00:14:08.380 or I don't remember

00:14:09.100 or I've never met Brett Kavanaugh,

00:14:10.700 including the girl

00:14:11.500 that she says was there.

00:14:12.800 But also, I don't care.

00:14:16.420 I actually don't care

00:14:17.740 what happened in 1982.

00:14:19.180 I feel bad for her

00:14:20.080 if something happened in 1982.

00:14:21.420 I wish she'd told someone sooner

00:14:23.100 so whatever guy

00:14:23.940 was being aggressive with her

00:14:25.920 could have been punished for it.

00:14:27.700 But I don't care.

00:14:29.780 Nobody cares, by the way.

00:14:31.320 Nobody cares.

00:14:32.000 Not a single person

00:14:33.040 on that Judiciary Committee cares.

00:14:34.700 Not a single Democrat

00:14:35.740 who's demagoguing cares.

00:14:37.320 They are just making an issue

00:14:38.920 out of this

00:14:39.300 to keep an originalist

00:14:40.520 off of the court.

00:14:41.640 But she says

00:14:43.680 it's her civic duty.

00:14:44.980 She says it's her civic duty

00:14:46.860 to come here

00:14:47.900 and stop this guy

00:14:49.920 from being on the Supreme Court

00:14:50.940 because he'll have too much power.

00:14:52.860 Where was she

00:14:53.500 when he made it

00:14:54.080 to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,

00:14:55.680 one of the most powerful courts

00:14:57.360 in the country?

00:14:58.640 Where was she then?

00:14:59.600 That's one of the most powerful courts

00:15:00.860 in the country.

00:15:01.500 If she thought

00:15:02.100 that this was so important

00:15:03.080 to keep him off the Supreme Court,

00:15:05.120 why wouldn't she keep him

00:15:05.880 off the D.C. Circuit?

00:15:09.560 That court in many ways

00:15:11.200 sees more cases, right?

00:15:12.660 We see the big headline

00:15:14.640 or banner cases

00:15:15.440 make it up to the Supreme Court,

00:15:16.860 but most cases

00:15:17.920 don't make it up

00:15:18.460 to the Supreme Court.

00:15:19.220 If it was your civic duty,

00:15:20.620 why not stop him then?

00:15:22.280 Doesn't add up,

00:15:24.080 but it's certainly been

00:15:25.880 demagogued by Democrats.

00:15:27.260 So they try to play

00:15:28.240 the cutesy thing.

00:15:28.840 She's either the super serious,

00:15:30.040 sober academic,

00:15:30.800 or she's really, really cutesy. 0.96

00:15:32.440 And they should have picked Elaine 0.93

00:15:33.540 because I don't think

00:15:34.100 it played very well.

00:15:35.080 But then she makes 0.95

00:15:38.180 one of the most stunning

00:15:39.100 statements of the day.

00:15:41.080 I'll let her speak for herself.

00:15:43.240 We're here to accommodate you,

00:15:44.800 not to accommodate us.

00:15:46.080 Oh, thank you.

00:15:46.280 I'm used to being collegial.

00:15:48.160 Okay, go ahead.

00:15:52.560 Oh, you're used to being,

00:15:53.940 I'm used to being collegial.

00:15:55.120 That's why I'm going to

00:15:55.600 burn down a man's life 1.00

00:15:56.580 over 36-year-old allegations

00:15:58.240 that are refuted by everyone

00:15:59.720 that I occasionally say

00:16:00.800 were there,

00:16:01.240 even though I changed

00:16:02.140 the number of people

00:16:02.760 who were there left and right.

00:16:04.360 But I'm collegial.

00:16:05.500 I'm collegial.

00:16:06.180 I'm going to take away

00:16:08.700 from a duly elected president

00:16:09.980 his right,

00:16:10.660 his constitutional right

00:16:11.720 to put a judge on the court.

00:16:13.120 I'm going to take that away

00:16:13.940 because I'm collegial.

00:16:15.840 And Chuck Grassley

00:16:16.780 for his part the whole time.

00:16:17.980 Oh, and we can get you in.

00:16:18.900 Would you like a back rub?

00:16:20.140 Would you like,

00:16:20.880 how about,

00:16:21.240 is the lighting in the room okay?

00:16:22.520 Give me a break.

00:16:24.260 So pathetic.

00:16:25.440 Thank goodness

00:16:25.820 we have Lindsey Graham

00:16:26.580 to be the spine of the GOP.

00:16:28.120 We'll get to him in a second.

00:16:29.600 But outrageous,

00:16:32.260 a brazen statement.

00:16:33.940 I'm used to being collegial.

00:16:35.660 Not collegial at all.

00:16:36.800 This is horrific what's happening.

00:16:38.420 And if you,

00:16:39.000 look,

00:16:39.700 if something happened,

00:16:40.680 if you've got evidence

00:16:41.420 that something happened,

00:16:42.520 bring the evidence, okay?

00:16:43.720 Bring it.

00:16:44.160 But you don't have any evidence.

00:16:45.460 And actually the corroborating people

00:16:46.880 say it didn't happen.

00:16:48.340 So then she gets into the meat 0.89

00:16:50.040 of her accusation.

00:16:51.500 Here it is.

00:16:52.740 I believed he was going to rape me.

00:16:55.800 I tried to yell for help.

00:16:58.360 When I did,

00:16:59.680 Brett put his hand over my mouth 0.80

00:17:01.340 to stop me from yelling.

00:17:02.540 This is what terrified me the most

00:17:05.680 and has had the most lasting impact

00:17:07.660 on my life.

00:17:09.020 It was hard for me to breathe.

00:17:11.220 And I thought that Brett

00:17:12.440 was accidentally going to kill me.

00:17:18.420 So what is the allegation now?

00:17:20.680 The allegation first

00:17:21.960 was that he groped her.

00:17:23.580 He was super drunk

00:17:24.520 and he tried to get her shirt off.

00:17:26.040 And he, you know,

00:17:27.060 was kind of grabbing her on a bed.

00:17:29.000 Then the allegation was

00:17:31.200 he tried to rape me.

00:17:33.980 Nothing she's described

00:17:35.320 suggests he tried to rape her

00:17:37.140 or raped her.

00:17:38.420 Then she says

00:17:39.520 he was going to kill me.

00:17:42.960 What?

00:17:44.020 What are you talking about?

00:17:46.780 This is why

00:17:47.600 the senators brought up yesterday,

00:17:49.740 well, it's tell your truth.

00:17:51.820 Cory Booker said it.

00:17:52.640 Tell your truth.

00:17:53.860 Your truth.

00:17:54.420 We hear the left say this all the time.

00:17:55.720 Not the truth.

00:17:56.340 Your truth.

00:17:56.920 The reason they say this

00:17:58.340 is because they know

00:17:59.420 that the objective facts,

00:18:00.940 they can't stand on them at all.

00:18:02.460 It totally knocks them down.

00:18:04.500 So it has to be

00:18:05.120 all about subjective feeling.

00:18:07.360 Did he grope you

00:18:07.940 or did he try to murder you?

00:18:09.700 Which was it?

00:18:11.500 Well, I felt.

00:18:12.300 I felt he was going to murder me.

00:18:14.100 I thought he was going to go

00:18:14.840 slaughter my whole family.

00:18:16.180 Maybe go commit genocide somewhere.

00:18:18.160 I thought,

00:18:18.660 I'm pretty sure,

00:18:19.540 I just felt,

00:18:20.440 because I felt and I believe,

00:18:22.320 that 36 years ago

00:18:23.480 this guy was going to commit genocide.

00:18:25.200 Prove me wrong.

00:18:25.720 Well, that's what I felt.

00:18:27.080 That's my truth.

00:18:28.200 That's my truth.

00:18:29.460 So it went on like that.

00:18:33.440 There is no evidence

00:18:35.060 that Brett Kavanaugh

00:18:36.280 did anything to Christine Ford

00:18:38.360 in 1982

00:18:39.240 or at any other time.

00:18:41.060 The only suggestion

00:18:42.420 that he did that

00:18:43.280 comes from Christine Ford,

00:18:45.160 whose testimony

00:18:46.260 has a lot of holes in it

00:18:48.220 and is uncredible

00:18:50.560 just by virtue of the fact

00:18:51.980 that it's only coming up now,

00:18:54.060 five seconds before this guy

00:18:55.940 is going to make it

00:18:56.480 to the Supreme Court

00:18:57.320 with a political agenda

00:18:59.080 during a particularly heated moment

00:19:01.980 when the Supreme Court

00:19:02.940 has a lot of power

00:19:03.760 and the left

00:19:04.640 is totally ginned up

00:19:06.040 against President Trump.

00:19:08.000 There are a lot of contradictions

00:19:09.280 in this testimony.

00:19:10.160 Let's just go through them

00:19:10.860 very quickly.

00:19:11.740 John Nolte

00:19:12.280 put up a good piece

00:19:14.420 on this this morning.

00:19:16.100 In the letter to Feinstein,

00:19:17.800 she says that there were

00:19:18.700 five people at the party,

00:19:20.700 me and four others.

00:19:22.120 Then, in the statement

00:19:23.540 that she passed

00:19:24.240 her polygraph test on,

00:19:25.640 we'll get to that polygraph

00:19:26.580 in just one second,

00:19:27.720 she said it was four boys

00:19:28.980 and a couple of girls,

00:19:30.280 which means that at the minimum

00:19:31.500 there were six people there

00:19:33.060 and possibly seven people there

00:19:34.780 because in the first one

00:19:35.860 she said,

00:19:36.700 me and four others.

00:19:37.800 Then she says four boys,

00:19:38.620 a couple of girls.

00:19:39.200 Is she including herself

00:19:40.000 in the couple of girls?

00:19:40.980 Even if she is,

00:19:41.980 it still contradicts her letter

00:19:43.180 to Dianne Feinstein,

00:19:44.720 possibly,

00:19:45.220 certainly by one person,

00:19:46.320 maybe by two people.

00:19:47.420 Then there's the matter

00:19:48.080 of the therapist's notes.

00:19:49.580 In the therapist's notes

00:19:50.860 from this session

00:19:51.840 that she apparently had

00:19:52.940 in 2012,

00:19:54.280 30 years after the alleged event

00:19:55.900 happened and six years ago,

00:19:58.160 she said that there were

00:19:59.620 four people in the room

00:20:00.760 during the attempted rape.

00:20:02.360 Then when she spoke

00:20:03.060 to the Washington Post,

00:20:04.200 she said that there were

00:20:04.980 two people in the room

00:20:06.020 during the attempted rape

00:20:07.180 or the murder

00:20:07.640 or the groping

00:20:08.160 or whatever it was

00:20:09.340 at any given point

00:20:10.960 in her testimony.

00:20:12.440 Then she says

00:20:13.320 she had a fear of flying.

00:20:15.300 So this was the reason

00:20:16.200 that she couldn't come testify

00:20:17.180 in D.C.

00:20:17.800 and the Judiciary Committee

00:20:19.820 offered to fly to California.

00:20:21.760 So she said

00:20:22.500 she had a fear of flying.

00:20:24.160 But,

00:20:24.740 and the lawyer,

00:20:25.720 her lawyer said

00:20:26.460 that she could not fly

00:20:27.640 because she has a fear

00:20:28.460 of confined spaces

00:20:29.560 that came from this

00:20:30.860 alleged traumatic event

00:20:33.100 36 years ago.

00:20:34.480 But in her first letter

00:20:35.520 to Feinstein,

00:20:36.380 she said that she was

00:20:37.100 vacationing in the Mid-Atlantic

00:20:38.600 until August 7th

00:20:40.220 and then would be

00:20:40.940 in California

00:20:41.700 on August 10th.

00:20:44.240 So she,

00:20:44.960 I don't think she took

00:20:45.800 a horse and buggy there.

00:20:46.960 She's apparently flying.

00:20:47.920 She flew up to New Hampshire.

00:20:50.000 We've seen her flying

00:20:50.820 all over the place.

00:20:51.460 The lawyer's statement was

00:20:52.420 that she couldn't testify

00:20:53.680 because she has a fear

00:20:55.020 of flying.

00:20:55.800 So that just is not true,

00:20:57.520 right?

00:20:57.800 Or if she has a fear

00:20:59.060 of flying,

00:20:59.660 it's not a debilitating fear.

00:21:01.140 It's a fear

00:21:01.420 that she overcomes constantly.

00:21:02.640 So it wouldn't be an excuse

00:21:03.760 for her not to come to D.C.

00:21:05.140 So that's just a bald-faced lie

00:21:07.200 somewhere in there.

00:21:08.500 She also won't release

00:21:09.740 the therapy notes.

00:21:11.780 So the therapy notes

00:21:12.880 don't mention Kavanaugh.

00:21:14.900 When she talked about this

00:21:15.760 in 2012,

00:21:16.460 according to those

00:21:17.060 therapy notes,

00:21:17.560 she won't mention Kavanaugh.

00:21:18.680 But she won't answer

00:21:20.340 whether she gave these notes

00:21:21.640 to the Washington Post.

00:21:22.960 So she was asked this yesterday

00:21:24.460 during the testimony.

00:21:25.680 And she said,

00:21:26.160 oh, I just don't remember.

00:21:27.500 You don't remember?

00:21:28.140 This was less than

00:21:28.840 eight weeks ago.

00:21:30.440 Surely your short-term memory

00:21:31.820 must be really pretty bad.

00:21:33.740 Your long-term memory

00:21:34.580 might be a little bad too

00:21:35.440 because the story

00:21:35.940 keeps changing.

00:21:37.400 Did you give them

00:21:38.020 the therapy notes or not?

00:21:39.040 She won't hand over

00:21:39.840 the therapy notes now.

00:21:40.860 Why not?

00:21:41.460 I don't know.

00:21:41.860 What's in those

00:21:42.360 therapy notes?

00:21:43.660 But let's have a

00:21:44.640 seventh FBI investigation

00:21:45.800 of Brett Kavanaugh.

00:21:47.060 Let's do that.

00:21:47.720 We only have six so far.

00:21:49.120 Probably something's

00:21:49.900 got through there.

00:21:50.820 But she won't turn over

00:21:51.620 her therapy notes.

00:21:52.780 And then finally,

00:21:54.040 Ford named,

00:21:55.340 in the latest version

00:21:56.520 of her story,

00:21:57.340 she named the three men

00:21:58.660 and the one girl

00:21:59.400 at that party.

00:22:00.420 All of the three men

00:22:01.260 deny it,

00:22:01.900 no recollection

00:22:02.700 or categorically deny it.

00:22:04.180 And the girl

00:22:05.160 that she names there,

00:22:06.040 her friend,

00:22:07.020 says that she has

00:22:07.900 never ever met

00:22:09.240 Brett Kavanaugh.

00:22:10.620 So anybody who could

00:22:11.940 corroborate says

00:22:12.700 it didn't happen,

00:22:13.700 including the girlfriend,

00:22:15.120 including the girl

00:22:15.960 who was there,

00:22:16.400 says not only was

00:22:17.360 Brett Kavanaugh not there,

00:22:18.440 I have never met him.

00:22:20.480 So no evidence

00:22:22.260 whatsoever falls apart.

00:22:24.200 Is Christine Ford

00:22:25.080 lying?

00:22:25.680 Maybe.

00:22:26.240 Is she mistaken?

00:22:27.600 Maybe.

00:22:28.120 Is she a total lunatic? 1.00

00:22:29.580 Maybe.

00:22:30.220 I just don't know.

00:22:31.440 I don't know.

00:22:32.020 Her testimony was

00:22:32.700 a little weird.

00:22:33.580 She wasn't dancing 0.97

00:22:34.160 on the table or anything.

00:22:35.700 But we can deduce

00:22:37.880 from all of that testimony

00:22:39.240 that she's not credible.

00:22:41.640 Kavanaugh, however,

00:22:42.400 performed very well.

00:22:43.640 I'll just give you,

00:22:44.220 in case you missed it,

00:22:44.860 I'll give you a little

00:22:45.380 taste of his opening statement.

00:22:47.720 I have been a good judge.

00:22:50.480 And for this nomination,

00:22:52.640 another FBI background

00:22:54.100 investigation,

00:22:55.440 another American

00:22:56.360 Bar Association investigation,

00:22:58.800 31 hours of hearings,

00:23:01.160 65 senator meetings,

00:23:03.440 1,200 written questions,

00:23:05.280 more than all previous

00:23:07.020 Supreme Court nominees

00:23:08.200 combined.

00:23:10.860 Throughout that entire time,

00:23:13.380 throughout my 53 years

00:23:15.260 and seven months

00:23:16.280 on this earth,

00:23:17.200 until last week,

00:23:18.940 no one ever accused me

00:23:20.440 of any kind of sexual misconduct.

00:23:23.180 No one, ever.

00:23:25.760 A lifetime,

00:23:27.260 a lifetime of public service

00:23:29.060 and a lifetime

00:23:29.780 of high-profile public service

00:23:32.440 at the highest levels

00:23:33.980 of American government

00:23:35.160 and never a hint

00:23:37.100 of anything of this kind.

00:23:39.760 And that's because

00:23:40.540 nothing of this kind

00:23:41.840 ever happened.

00:23:44.060 Pretty powerful stuff.

00:23:46.480 Now, so he obviously denies it.

00:23:48.640 He gives some evidence.

00:23:49.400 He says,

00:23:49.700 I've never been accused

00:23:50.720 of this ever in my life

00:23:51.560 until five seconds

00:23:52.320 when I was threatening Democrats.

00:23:54.520 But listen to what he tells you.

00:23:55.960 He says,

00:23:56.180 I have gone through

00:23:57.800 more than all of the

00:23:59.160 previous Supreme Court

00:24:00.020 nominees combined.

00:24:02.640 Testimony,

00:24:03.260 investigations,

00:24:04.040 this and that.

00:24:04.760 This tells you something

00:24:05.640 about the government

00:24:06.240 breaking down,

00:24:07.020 about the process

00:24:07.660 breaking down.

00:24:08.680 And it's not Republicans

00:24:09.840 who are doing it.

00:24:10.820 It's not Republicans

00:24:11.660 who use the nuclear option

00:24:13.160 on judicial nominees.

00:24:14.240 It was Democrats.

00:24:15.000 It was Harry Reid.

00:24:15.800 He started this.

00:24:17.080 The Republicans

00:24:17.640 are not to blame for this.

00:24:19.360 The Democrats are to blame.

00:24:20.680 And it's despicable

00:24:21.340 and it's disgusting. 0.90

00:24:22.260 And it's bad for the government

00:24:23.460 because just wait.

00:24:24.940 Oh, just wait

00:24:25.800 until the Democrats

00:24:26.660 get a judicial nominee up.

00:24:28.120 I want Republicans

00:24:29.260 to destroy that person.

00:24:31.580 I want them to destroy them,

00:24:33.420 ruin them,

00:24:34.380 wreck them,

00:24:34.940 humiliate them,

00:24:35.620 and torture them. 0.58

00:24:36.520 Not because I think

00:24:38.500 that's a good thing to do

00:24:39.400 to the judicial nominee.

00:24:40.680 I don't know anything

00:24:41.340 about the judicial nominee.

00:24:43.520 But because the Republicans

00:24:45.140 cannot unilaterally disarm.

00:24:47.560 It is awful to the process.

00:24:49.760 It's unfair.

00:24:50.580 It's immoral to the people

00:24:51.720 who go up for this.

00:24:52.500 For people who have

00:24:53.380 judicial nominations

00:24:54.140 or any other appointments

00:24:55.580 or nominations.

00:24:56.420 It's unfair to so debase

00:24:58.540 our process this way.

00:25:00.300 And Democrats are going

00:25:01.020 to keep on doing it

00:25:01.820 because they have

00:25:02.340 no moral feeling whatsoever.

00:25:03.980 Certainly those people

00:25:04.720 on the Judiciary Committee.

00:25:07.900 And so we should not

00:25:09.000 unilaterally disarm.

00:25:09.920 We should give them

00:25:10.400 a taste of their own medicine.

00:25:11.660 Republicans take the high road.

00:25:12.840 They try to take the high road.

00:25:14.120 I get it.

00:25:14.760 I like that.

00:25:16.140 But the process of politics

00:25:17.800 is pretty ugly.

00:25:19.060 And you have to get your hands

00:25:20.180 a little bit dirty

00:25:20.720 if you're going to do it.

00:25:21.420 They should wreck the next person

00:25:22.780 and give the Democrats

00:25:23.420 a taste of their own medicine

00:25:24.360 because it's despicable

00:25:25.500 what they did to him.

00:25:26.760 Kavanaugh then won the audience over

00:25:28.300 when he mentioned one part

00:25:29.500 where he got choked up.

00:25:30.520 It was visibly...

00:25:31.820 It was difficult for him to speak.

00:25:33.300 Here he is.

00:25:34.300 I'm not questioning

00:25:35.520 that Dr. Ford

00:25:37.760 may have been sexually assaulted

00:25:39.400 by some person

00:25:41.020 in some place

00:25:42.480 at some time.

00:25:44.100 But I have never done this

00:25:46.740 to her

00:25:48.340 or to anyone.

00:25:50.680 That's not who I am.

00:25:52.800 It is not who I was.

00:25:55.400 I am innocent

00:25:56.600 of this charge.

00:25:59.080 I intend

00:26:00.080 no ill will

00:26:01.060 to Dr. Ford

00:26:02.240 and her family.

00:26:04.020 The other night,

00:26:04.780 Ashley and my daughter,

00:26:05.940 Liza,

00:26:06.340 said their prayers.

00:26:07.800 And little Liza,

00:26:09.200 all 10 years old,

00:26:10.400 said to Ashley,

00:26:18.580 we should pray for the woman.

00:26:23.720 Powerful stuff.

00:26:24.960 And by the way,

00:26:25.600 some people,

00:26:26.180 you know,

00:26:26.420 they watch these things

00:26:27.560 and they see

00:26:28.600 when people are putting

00:26:29.520 on a shaky voice

00:26:30.600 or they're pretending

00:26:31.580 or they're acting

00:26:32.480 or whatever.

00:26:33.560 That wasn't acting.

00:26:35.300 If that was acting,

00:26:36.340 then that guy is Brando.

00:26:38.400 You know,

00:26:38.700 that guy,

00:26:39.060 that guy is really

00:26:40.540 something else.

00:26:41.500 That seemed very,

00:26:42.820 very genuine.

00:26:43.860 Other parts of Dr. Ford's testimony,

00:26:45.800 I'm not so sure.

00:26:47.040 I'm not accusing her

00:26:48.300 of performing exactly,

00:26:52.200 but it was a little,

00:26:53.100 it was less credible,

00:26:54.160 let's put it that way.

00:26:55.420 So it became a farce.

00:26:57.440 They kept asking him

00:26:58.260 about his high school yearbook.

00:27:01.020 You saw the boof thing 0.96

00:27:02.140 at the beginning.

00:27:03.340 And so the boof thing

00:27:04.580 is absurd,

00:27:05.160 but it also highlights

00:27:07.160 not just the absurdity

00:27:08.460 of that questioning,

00:27:09.560 but broadly about asking people

00:27:11.160 what they did in high school.

00:27:13.000 Who cares?

00:27:14.300 This man has been

00:27:14.920 a federal judge

00:27:15.620 for over a decade.

00:27:17.200 This man has worked

00:27:18.560 for the president

00:27:19.140 in a pretty high level role.

00:27:20.860 This is a serious,

00:27:22.320 why?

00:27:22.960 Who cares?

00:27:24.840 What they do?

00:27:25.960 Are they going to ask him

00:27:26.760 about his high school

00:27:27.400 basketball scores?

00:27:28.600 Who cares?

00:27:28.880 What relevance is that

00:27:30.100 to anybody?

00:27:31.340 So it became a,

00:27:32.500 it became a farce.

00:27:34.160 And then,

00:27:35.000 then they go on

00:27:35.800 to Mark Judge.

00:27:36.520 You've heard of Mark Judge.

00:27:37.300 He's this conservative guy.

00:27:39.080 He was also accused

00:27:39.940 of being at the party.

00:27:41.080 And apparently he had

00:27:42.260 a pretty big alcoholism problem.

00:27:44.060 He wrote a book

00:27:44.680 where he put his friends' names

00:27:45.720 in it from high school,

00:27:46.800 you know,

00:27:47.220 but he like changed their names.

00:27:49.040 So it was,

00:27:49.880 you know,

00:27:50.060 he changed them slightly,

00:27:51.280 but he, you know,

00:27:51.800 give them a little shout out.

00:27:53.040 So here is Leahy,

00:27:55.340 Senator Leahy,

00:27:56.680 absolute,

00:27:57.780 decrepit,

00:28:00.360 corrupt crone, 1.00

00:28:01.680 asking about his friendship

00:28:03.980 with Mark Judge.

00:28:05.040 And it gets pretty ridiculous.

00:28:06.440 Let me ask you this.

00:28:09.140 The author of the book

00:28:10.000 titled Wasted,

00:28:10.920 Tales of a Gen X Drunk, 0.97

00:28:14.040 he references a Bart O'Kavanaugh

00:28:16.660 vomiting in someone's car

00:28:18.440 during beach week

00:28:19.220 and then passing out.

00:28:20.880 Is that you

00:28:21.440 that he's talking about?

00:28:23.220 Senator,

00:28:23.800 Mark Judge

00:28:24.820 was...

00:28:27.340 To your knowledge,

00:28:27.960 is that you

00:28:28.460 that he's talking about?

00:28:29.440 I'll explain

00:28:30.040 if you let me.

00:28:33.180 Proceed, please.

00:28:34.220 Mark Judge

00:28:36.380 was a friend of ours

00:28:37.700 in high school

00:28:38.340 who developed

00:28:39.420 a very serious

00:28:40.360 drinking problem,

00:28:41.640 an addiction problem

00:28:42.600 that lasted decades

00:28:44.360 and was very difficult

00:28:46.240 for him to escape from.

00:28:48.980 And

00:28:49.440 he nearly died.

00:28:52.500 And then he developed,

00:28:53.140 then he had leukemia

00:28:54.020 as well

00:28:54.560 on top of really...

00:28:55.820 I'm trying to get

00:28:56.680 a straight answer

00:28:57.800 from you,

00:28:58.380 Underwood.

00:28:58.720 Are you

00:29:00.580 Bart O'Kavanaugh

00:29:02.880 that he's referring to?

00:29:03.900 Yes or no?

00:29:04.620 You'd have to ask him.

00:29:06.320 Well,

00:29:06.880 I agree with you there.

00:29:10.120 Are you

00:29:10.800 Bart O'Kavanaugh?

00:29:12.380 It was one of the names

00:29:13.260 in this guy's

00:29:14.260 fictionalized account

00:29:15.120 of his youth

00:29:15.900 where he threw

00:29:16.540 in his friends' names.

00:29:17.160 Are you Bart O'Kavanaugh?

00:29:18.760 No, dummy,

00:29:19.440 I'm Brett Kavanaugh.

00:29:20.540 You have...

00:29:20.820 My name is right...

00:29:21.540 It's written on the nameplate.

00:29:23.700 It's written...

00:29:24.280 What are you insinuating?

00:29:25.680 There's a fictional account,

00:29:27.160 a fictionalized account

00:29:28.060 written by a guy

00:29:29.100 who was apparently

00:29:29.700 drunk throughout

00:29:30.260 a lot of high school

00:29:31.060 as part of his rehabilitation.

00:29:33.900 And you're going to say,

00:29:35.020 well,

00:29:35.280 in that fictionalized account

00:29:37.000 he wrote

00:29:37.380 where he talked about

00:29:38.000 a Bart O'Kavanaugh,

00:29:39.100 is that you?

00:29:39.960 I don't know, man.

00:29:41.400 Who cares?

00:29:42.940 Who...

00:29:43.240 Like,

00:29:44.380 I don't know if...

00:29:45.340 I don't know

00:29:45.980 if the fictional character

00:29:47.300 in this book

00:29:48.540 is referring to me.

00:29:50.340 Obviously,

00:29:50.880 it's got a similar name,

00:29:51.880 Bart O'Kavanaugh,

00:29:52.560 so he's clearly

00:29:53.240 playing on the name

00:29:54.040 for the name

00:29:54.760 of the character.

00:29:56.800 But,

00:29:57.000 are we to deduce

00:29:58.580 from that

00:29:58.980 that this is

00:29:59.700 some journalistic account

00:30:00.980 of their high school days?

00:30:02.140 Of course not.

00:30:04.100 Here's a sign

00:30:04.740 of the apocalypse,

00:30:05.440 then we're going to have to...

00:30:06.180 We're probably going to have to

00:30:06.800 go and get to mailbag.

00:30:08.400 Lindsey Graham

00:30:09.020 comes out

00:30:09.620 and wins the day.

00:30:11.120 This was

00:30:11.520 true moral clarity

00:30:13.520 and it took moral courage

00:30:14.560 to do it.

00:30:15.420 And I've got to tell you,

00:30:16.200 if you would ask me

00:30:16.760 two years ago

00:30:17.560 if the strongest people

00:30:19.540 in the United States Senate,

00:30:20.480 the toughest,

00:30:21.180 rock-ribbed,

00:30:21.720 most effective conservatives

00:30:22.880 were going to be

00:30:23.760 Lindsey Graham

00:30:24.380 and Mitch McConnell,

00:30:25.460 I would have laughed at you.

00:30:27.420 But,

00:30:27.980 I don't know,

00:30:28.360 cocaine's a hell of a drug,

00:30:29.320 you know?

00:30:29.600 Cocaine Mitch is coming out strong.

00:30:31.920 Covfefe's a hell of a drug, too.

00:30:33.200 And Lindsey Graham

00:30:34.040 has really gave it to them.

00:30:35.360 Here is Lindsey Graham, 0.98

00:30:37.060 for all intents and purposes,

00:30:38.180 ending the hearing.

00:30:38.800 If I wanted an FBI investigation,

00:30:41.460 you could have come to us.

00:30:43.120 What you want to do

00:30:44.080 is destroy this guy's life, 0.91

00:30:46.340 hold this seat open,

00:30:47.840 and hope you win in 2020.

00:30:49.920 You've said that,

00:30:51.340 not me.

00:30:52.900 You've got nothing

00:30:54.080 to apologize for.

00:30:56.200 When you see Sotomayor and Kagan

00:30:58.180 tell them that Lindsey said,

00:30:59.500 I'll owe,

00:31:00.340 because I voted for them.

00:31:02.000 I would never do to them

00:31:03.680 what you've done to this guy.

00:31:04.980 This is the most unethical sham

00:31:09.100 since I've been in politics.

00:31:12.440 And if you really wanted

00:31:13.580 to know the truth,

00:31:15.000 you sure as hell

00:31:15.780 wouldn't have done

00:31:16.340 what you've done to this guy.

00:31:17.980 Are you a gang rapist?

00:31:20.680 No.

00:31:25.060 I cannot imagine

00:31:26.620 what you and your family

00:31:28.060 have gone through.

00:31:29.380 Boy, y'all want power.

00:31:30.640 God, I hope you never get it.

00:31:32.340 I hope the American people

00:31:33.540 can see through this sham.

00:31:35.460 That you knew about it

00:31:36.780 and you held it.

00:31:38.060 You had no intention

00:31:39.460 of protecting Dr. Ford.

00:31:41.240 None.

00:31:42.300 She's as much of a victim 0.99

00:31:43.640 as you are.

00:31:45.500 God, I hate to say it

00:31:46.720 because these have been

00:31:48.020 my friends.

00:31:49.400 But let me tell you

00:31:50.140 when it comes to this.

00:31:52.620 You're looking for a fair process?

00:31:54.760 You came to the wrong town

00:31:56.640 at the wrong time, my friend.

00:31:59.440 Beautifully said.

00:32:00.360 Absolutely right.

00:32:01.380 And Kavanaugh then

00:32:02.060 at the very end of the hearings

00:32:03.140 they say,

00:32:03.680 as a man,

00:32:04.600 do you believe in God?

00:32:05.440 Kavanaugh?

00:32:05.800 He says, yes.

00:32:07.660 Excuse me.

00:32:08.840 He says, look me in the eye.

00:32:10.860 Tell me you didn't do this.

00:32:12.280 I did not do this.

00:32:13.420 That's how it ends.

00:32:14.380 So what's the takeaway?

00:32:15.580 Is she lying?

00:32:16.540 I don't know.

00:32:17.620 I'm more convinced

00:32:18.380 that she's lying

00:32:19.120 after the hearing

00:32:19.980 than I was before.

00:32:20.960 But I don't know.

00:32:21.660 Who's to say?

00:32:22.120 You can't possibly say.

00:32:23.500 Is she credible?

00:32:24.640 Certainly not.

00:32:28.020 100% not.

00:32:30.080 And I'm much more convinced

00:32:31.860 of that after the hearing

00:32:32.680 than I was before.

00:32:34.820 Democrats think

00:32:35.480 this looks good for them.

00:32:36.320 They think that this is going

00:32:37.060 to play really well

00:32:37.660 with women.

00:32:38.200 They're sucking up to women. 1.00

00:32:39.180 They think that they can

00:32:39.820 split off women 1.00

00:32:40.440 from the GOP coalition.

00:32:42.240 I don't know

00:32:42.980 if they realize

00:32:43.720 that women have husbands 0.97

00:32:45.240 and fathers and sons.

00:32:47.380 I'm not sure

00:32:47.860 if they realize that.

00:32:49.240 That maybe women in America 1.00

00:32:50.680 don't want men 1.00

00:32:51.720 to be able to have

00:32:52.960 their lives and reputations

00:32:54.340 and careers destroyed

00:32:55.500 over utterly unsubstantiated,

00:32:58.020 in fact,

00:32:58.720 in many cases,

00:32:59.620 discredited

00:33:00.300 35-year-old accusations.

00:33:02.880 I wonder if they know that.

00:33:04.740 It's such an obvious

00:33:05.720 miscarriage of justice.

00:33:06.720 I don't think

00:33:07.220 this plays very well.

00:33:08.780 They think that they can

00:33:09.480 get away with this too.

00:33:10.800 I mean,

00:33:11.100 if you just followed

00:33:11.700 the Twitter conversation yesterday

00:33:13.060 because it plays

00:33:13.920 into their intersectionality narrative.

00:33:16.300 So, you know,

00:33:17.880 I think Lindsey Graham

00:33:18.840 might have even joked

00:33:19.480 about this yesterday.

00:33:20.240 They tried to do it

00:33:22.000 to Clarence Thomas

00:33:22.740 and he played

00:33:23.700 the speech

00:33:25.820 of high-tech lynching.

00:33:27.880 He said,

00:33:28.140 this is a high-tech lynching

00:33:28.860 for uppity blacks. 0.99

00:33:29.760 Brett Kavanaugh

00:33:30.220 can't do this

00:33:31.120 and by the ideology

00:33:33.200 of intersectionality,

00:33:35.280 the worst people

00:33:36.080 on earth

00:33:36.380 are straight white men

00:33:37.320 who think that they're men

00:33:38.300 and they are the oppressors

00:33:39.540 and everyone else

00:33:40.220 should gang up

00:33:41.020 and band together

00:33:42.160 intersectionally

00:33:43.120 and overthrow them.

00:33:44.780 It's a particular

00:33:45.920 Marxist ideology

00:33:47.440 that views

00:33:49.520 all of history

00:33:50.100 as this sort of struggle.

00:33:54.440 It's unfair, obviously.

00:33:55.980 It's just as bad

00:33:57.480 to attack a straight white guy

00:33:59.140 as it is to attack

00:34:00.080 a gay, transsexual,

00:34:01.900 black woman. 0.99

00:34:03.320 I don't know.

00:34:04.500 But that's how they view the world.

00:34:06.660 They think they're going

00:34:07.100 to be able to hit it that way.

00:34:07.900 I think people are sick of it.

00:34:09.160 There was an ad

00:34:10.900 in the New York Times.

00:34:11.760 1,600 men purchased

00:34:13.100 an ad in the New York Times

00:34:14.240 to say that

00:34:16.140 we believe women,

00:34:17.020 we believe accusers.

00:34:19.440 That's not how

00:34:20.060 our process works, guys.

00:34:21.540 You don't just get

00:34:22.120 to accuse somebody.

00:34:23.260 We went through it

00:34:24.320 all last week.

00:34:24.800 There were a lot

00:34:25.320 of false rape accusations,

00:34:26.900 major ones,

00:34:28.000 national ones.

00:34:29.040 It's very bad

00:34:29.800 because those false accusations

00:34:30.980 really damage people

00:34:32.260 who have legitimately

00:34:33.140 actually suffered

00:34:35.340 from sexual assault

00:34:36.680 or any other kind of crime.

00:34:38.160 And it damages them.

00:34:39.700 It damages the credibility

00:34:40.860 of those crimes.

00:34:41.480 But that's the world

00:34:41.980 we live in.

00:34:42.420 There are fake accusations.

00:34:43.360 People are innocent

00:34:44.300 until proven guilty

00:34:45.140 no matter what

00:34:45.880 the Democrats want to do.

00:34:47.440 Right now,

00:34:48.040 the latest update I have

00:34:48.900 is Flake is voting yes,

00:34:49.940 Corker is voting yes,

00:34:51.060 and so it'll get

00:34:52.160 out of committee.

00:34:53.860 Some people are unsure

00:34:56.380 as to how it'll perform

00:34:57.480 in the Senate,

00:34:58.060 but it looks like

00:34:58.860 this will proceed

00:34:59.380 to a Senate vote.

00:35:00.160 I hope he gets through

00:35:00.900 and I can't wait

00:35:01.700 for Brett Kavanaugh,

00:35:02.860 Associate Justice Kavanaugh,

00:35:04.140 to be the guy

00:35:04.720 who overturns Roe v. Wade,

00:35:06.140 to be the swing vote.

00:35:07.940 That's going to be beautiful.

00:35:09.200 I cannot wait.

00:35:10.460 And I can't wait

00:35:11.020 for that next

00:35:11.660 Democrat judicial nominee

00:35:12.760 because we're going

00:35:13.360 to have a good time

00:35:13.820 with that.

00:35:14.420 We've got a lot

00:35:14.860 of mailbag to get to.

00:35:15.700 First question from Jamie.

00:35:17.040 Hey, Michael.

00:35:18.940 Do you think

00:35:19.480 spectral evidence

00:35:20.580 should be admissible

00:35:21.680 in court?

00:35:22.700 Given their support

00:35:23.280 for Christine Ford,

00:35:24.020 the Democrats seem

00:35:24.740 to think so.

00:35:25.500 I was curious

00:35:25.980 what you think

00:35:26.380 about its validity.

00:35:27.180 Thanks.

00:35:27.460 Love the show, Jamie.

00:35:28.540 Spectral evidence

00:35:29.340 is the evidence

00:35:30.620 from dreams

00:35:31.520 and hallucinations

00:35:32.440 that was used

00:35:34.340 during the Salem witch trials,

00:35:35.980 and apparently it is.

00:35:37.880 Apparently it is.

00:35:38.540 I don't think

00:35:40.020 it should be admissible,

00:35:41.000 obviously.

00:35:41.700 But the Democrats do,

00:35:42.800 and the Democrats

00:35:43.260 are half the country.

00:35:44.380 This also gets to

00:35:46.400 an issue

00:35:47.540 that we've talked

00:35:48.020 about before,

00:35:48.760 which is the neo-paganism,

00:35:51.560 the neo-cultishness

00:35:52.700 of the modern left,

00:35:54.180 because everybody's

00:35:56.300 got to serve somebody.

00:35:57.380 Everybody has

00:35:57.980 a religious view.

00:35:58.880 So if you don't

00:35:59.440 worship God,

00:36:00.280 the God of the Bible,

00:36:01.320 then you're going

00:36:02.240 to worship the environment,

00:36:03.860 the nature God,

00:36:04.920 the ecosystem,

00:36:08.620 whatever,

00:36:09.280 this or that,

00:36:09.920 or the yoga ritual,

00:36:11.160 like Matt Walsh

00:36:11.660 talks about yoga

00:36:12.360 as paganism.

00:36:13.400 He's right.

00:36:13.720 I mean,

00:36:13.800 there's this om

00:36:14.900 and these kind of rituals

00:36:16.640 to it,

00:36:17.160 which are religious

00:36:18.400 in nature.

00:36:19.280 And you're going

00:36:19.720 to go and you're

00:36:20.440 going to descend

00:36:21.060 into man's natural state,

00:36:22.480 which is paganism

00:36:23.360 and unreason.

00:36:25.820 And you're going

00:36:26.340 to have Democrats

00:36:28.100 demanding spectral evidence

00:36:29.380 be admitted in court.

00:36:30.360 I mean,

00:36:30.500 they have all but done

00:36:31.520 that during these hearings.

00:36:32.500 So I might not support it,

00:36:34.140 but that's the way

00:36:34.620 we're headed.

00:36:35.940 From Augustine,

00:36:37.360 or Augustine,

00:36:38.320 I don't know.

00:36:39.220 Hello,

00:36:39.600 dearest Michael.

00:36:41.040 I hope it's Augustine.

00:36:42.120 It's dearest Michael.

00:36:43.260 I have found myself

00:36:44.860 relying solely

00:36:45.560 on conservative news sources

00:36:46.720 such as the Daily Wire

00:36:48.000 and Fox News.

00:36:48.680 Are there any good

00:36:49.100 left-wing news sources

00:36:50.340 that I should look at

00:36:51.380 to balance my news?

00:36:52.660 Yes.

00:36:53.100 The Wall Street Journal

00:36:53.820 leans left

00:36:54.440 in its news reporting

00:36:55.260 and it's good.

00:36:56.640 The Financial Times

00:36:57.740 leans left,

00:36:58.500 probably more left

00:36:59.180 in its reporting.

00:36:59.900 It's good.

00:37:00.860 Those are obviously,

00:37:01.440 they have more of a focus

00:37:02.240 on business.

00:37:02.840 For political

00:37:03.960 left-wing outlets,

00:37:04.880 I can't think of good ones.

00:37:06.940 The New Republic

00:37:07.540 used to be okay.

00:37:08.420 That fell apart

00:37:09.100 a few years ago.

00:37:12.100 No,

00:37:12.660 I can't really think

00:37:13.360 of good ones.

00:37:15.200 But,

00:37:15.680 what that leaves you to do

00:37:16.660 is that means

00:37:17.060 you have to read

00:37:17.580 all the crazy ones.

00:37:18.480 That means you should

00:37:19.000 read Vox.com

00:37:20.140 even though it's awful

00:37:21.160 and they're total hacks. 0.58

00:37:22.440 You should read,

00:37:23.480 who else?

00:37:25.360 I don't know,

00:37:25.940 Mother Jones,

00:37:27.040 whatever,

00:37:27.440 you know.

00:37:27.780 Read the left-wing

00:37:28.720 crazy people

00:37:29.620 because what it will

00:37:30.700 at least do

00:37:31.360 is when you read

00:37:32.140 outlets that have

00:37:33.360 a particular opinion

00:37:35.460 on the right,

00:37:36.740 a preference for the right,

00:37:39.300 then when you read

00:37:40.200 the lefties,

00:37:41.080 you'll be able to get

00:37:42.380 probably new talking points,

00:37:44.600 new language,

00:37:45.360 new ways of talking

00:37:46.060 about things

00:37:46.620 and you can dismiss

00:37:47.880 that which is absurd

00:37:49.460 but it will give you

00:37:51.300 a better perspective

00:37:52.060 because it's not so much

00:37:53.300 different facts

00:37:54.040 that they're presenting.

00:37:55.620 You probably get all the facts

00:37:56.840 if you read the right-wing ones

00:37:57.940 but you're getting

00:37:58.760 different language

00:37:59.640 in the left-wing ones

00:38:00.580 and those different languages,

00:38:02.200 those different vocabularies

00:38:03.320 give you a different perspective

00:38:04.640 so at least you can understand

00:38:05.700 what the left is saying

00:38:06.640 and you can answer

00:38:07.580 their arguments.

00:38:08.260 You should always be able

00:38:09.060 to answer their arguments.

00:38:10.340 The benefit of being

00:38:11.400 in a left-wing culture

00:38:12.260 is that you're constantly

00:38:14.020 having to defend your views

00:38:14.940 and answer other people's arguments.

00:38:16.500 You know how they think

00:38:17.340 but they don't know

00:38:17.860 how you think

00:38:18.380 and one way to ensure

00:38:19.640 that remains true

00:38:20.840 is you've got to read

00:38:21.560 those crazy lefties

00:38:22.440 and then you can answer them.

00:38:24.320 From Joseph,

00:38:26.280 Mr. Knowles,

00:38:27.360 Love the show.

00:38:28.580 Honest question.

00:38:29.960 Why are you for individual

00:38:30.900 nation-states

00:38:31.560 against a supranational

00:38:32.680 global government

00:38:33.400 but for a supranational

00:38:34.680 global religious bureaucracy

00:38:36.220 a la the Catholic Church?

00:38:37.800 Doesn't huge bureaucracy

00:38:39.120 breed corruption?

00:38:39.940 Isn't the church

00:38:40.380 the last place

00:38:41.020 we would want corruption

00:38:41.900 especially to a global scale?

00:38:43.440 Isn't global religious corruption 0.83

00:38:44.660 what we're seeing now

00:38:45.360 in the Catholic Church

00:38:46.060 with this disgrace of a pope

00:38:47.740 embracing leftist values

00:38:49.020 and defending child molesters?

00:38:51.440 I'm not sure

00:38:52.240 that that last part is fair.

00:38:53.340 He's protected people

00:38:55.980 apparently knowing

00:38:57.700 of abuse of priests

00:38:59.260 and seminarians

00:38:59.980 but I don't think

00:39:00.540 there's evidence

00:39:00.960 that he protected people

00:39:02.720 that he knew

00:39:03.320 were abused children.

00:39:05.360 Wouldn't churches

00:39:05.900 based on one's

00:39:06.800 conscientious interpretation

00:39:07.800 of the Bible

00:39:08.500 be a better model?

00:39:10.120 Christ calls for unity

00:39:11.060 but does that mean

00:39:11.700 bureaucratic unity?

00:39:12.620 Doesn't the spirit

00:39:13.080 transcend nation language

00:39:14.200 while still keeping them intact?

00:39:16.100 Anyways,

00:39:16.460 I want your two cents.

00:39:17.160 P.S.

00:39:17.320 I love what you've done

00:39:17.900 with Shapiro's broom closet.

00:39:19.000 You've really made it your own.

00:39:20.720 Joseph,

00:39:21.340 well to answer your question

00:39:22.480 no I won't become a Protestant.

00:39:24.940 Though I appreciate your care.

00:39:27.740 No,

00:39:28.060 I've actually,

00:39:28.820 it's a good question you raise.

00:39:30.420 Why do I support

00:39:31.180 individual nation states

00:39:32.580 against imperial government

00:39:34.800 but I support

00:39:35.860 what is an imperial church?

00:39:37.980 A global church,

00:39:39.900 a universal church

00:39:40.900 which is the meaning

00:39:41.540 of the word Catholic.

00:39:43.520 The reason for that,

00:39:46.040 the nation states came about

00:39:47.600 after the Peace of Westphalia

00:39:48.880 in 1648.

00:39:50.080 It came about

00:39:50.640 because Protestants

00:39:51.440 and Catholics

00:39:51.880 fought a series of wars

00:39:53.920 and the Protestants won.

00:39:56.060 They at least didn't lose

00:39:57.200 which means they won.

00:39:59.320 If there were an empire

00:40:01.320 that were a Catholic empire

00:40:02.700 or Christian empire

00:40:03.640 what Christendom used to be

00:40:05.160 before the modern age,

00:40:06.440 before the Treaty of Westphalia,

00:40:07.520 before the Protestant revolution,

00:40:08.940 if there were a united Christendom,

00:40:10.960 I could support

00:40:11.820 that political order.

00:40:12.800 It certainly worked well enough

00:40:13.840 for Europe

00:40:14.280 when Europe was united.

00:40:15.380 But today,

00:40:17.860 we don't have

00:40:18.360 a united Christendom.

00:40:19.440 These supernational governments,

00:40:21.060 these giant imperial bureaucracies

00:40:22.840 are not Christian.

00:40:24.080 They're post-Christian. 0.99

00:40:25.100 They're secular.

00:40:26.460 They're the European Union.

00:40:27.720 They're the United Nations.

00:40:29.020 They're the International Criminal Court.

00:40:31.060 They're not Christendom.

00:40:33.680 The United Nations

00:40:34.240 doesn't make sense anyway

00:40:35.200 because you can't unite everybody.

00:40:37.520 That's the same

00:40:38.040 as not having everybody be united.

00:40:40.040 It's the part of national groups

00:40:42.620 and tribal groups

00:40:43.200 and clan groups

00:40:43.760 is that you are different from people

00:40:45.260 and you have different interests

00:40:46.100 and different backgrounds

00:40:46.800 and traditions.

00:40:48.120 So that's absurd.

00:40:49.020 But even the European Union,

00:40:50.340 if the European Union

00:40:51.320 were going to be run by,

00:40:53.000 I don't know,

00:40:54.000 Charles Borromeo or somebody

00:40:55.340 or is going to be run by

00:40:56.420 some strong Christian,

00:40:59.140 then perhaps.

00:41:00.560 But that isn't the case.

00:41:02.500 And that's not coming back.

00:41:04.280 I don't suspect

00:41:04.720 that's going to come back.

00:41:05.880 As for why I remain Catholic,

00:41:08.760 it's because I think

00:41:09.340 the Catholic Church

00:41:09.940 was instituted by Christ.

00:41:11.140 people will ask,

00:41:13.220 why don't you go to a church

00:41:15.500 that just believes the Bible?

00:41:17.760 I say, I attend the church

00:41:18.960 and I'm a member of the church

00:41:19.880 that wrote the Bible.

00:41:21.220 Now, part of the Bible,

00:41:23.840 Bible, Bible insistence 0.98

00:41:25.940 is a product of the Protestant Revolution 0.75

00:41:29.420 and later stages of it.

00:41:31.440 But I don't worship the Bible.

00:41:34.500 I love Scripture,

00:41:35.780 but I don't worship the Bible.

00:41:37.080 The Bible is not the Word of God. 0.95

00:41:38.500 Christ is the Word of God.

00:41:39.420 He says so in the book,

00:41:41.040 which is the Bible.

00:41:42.680 So I don't worship the Bible.

00:41:44.640 The Bible is wonderful.

00:41:47.180 It's Scripture.

00:41:48.620 It's revelation.

00:41:49.820 It's divine, sure.

00:41:51.300 But it's not the whole thing.

00:41:52.620 And I think,

00:41:53.940 as Chesterton says,

00:41:54.880 heresy is not when you

00:41:55.740 promote vice over virtue,

00:41:56.840 but when you promote one virtue

00:41:58.060 to the exclusion of all the others.

00:42:00.200 So we wouldn't want to exclude,

00:42:02.660 we wouldn't want to have only works

00:42:04.060 to the exclusion of faith 0.83

00:42:05.280 or only grace

00:42:08.200 to the exclusion of free will.

00:42:09.700 We wouldn't want to exclude these things.

00:42:11.040 Only justice to the exclusion of mercy.

00:42:13.040 All of these things

00:42:13.840 can be held together in God.

00:42:15.460 And so I,

00:42:16.800 despite all of the many problems

00:42:17.980 in my church,

00:42:18.620 I remain a member of it.

00:42:20.560 Okay, we've got time for,

00:42:21.420 I think, one more.

00:42:23.180 To the local papist

00:42:24.200 of the Daily Wire.

00:42:25.440 How do we Catholics

00:42:26.380 work around the whole

00:42:27.260 thou shalt not make unto thee

00:42:28.540 any graven image thing?

00:42:30.460 It seems like we pretend

00:42:31.380 there's an asterisk

00:42:32.100 on that commandment

00:42:33.020 that leads to the fine print

00:42:34.060 where it says,

00:42:34.860 unless I come to earth

00:42:35.500 in human form at some point,

00:42:36.640 then all bets are off.

00:42:37.800 I don't see any reason

00:42:38.860 this should be a law

00:42:39.880 that only applies to Jews,

00:42:41.120 like eating kosher bread

00:42:42.060 on the context it's presented in.

00:42:44.060 But we seem to violate it

00:42:45.280 pretty heavily,

00:42:45.960 especially since we don't

00:42:47.060 just make graven images of Christ,

00:42:49.200 which I can almost make

00:42:50.360 an exception for,

00:42:52.120 but also regular mortals

00:42:53.580 like Mary and the saints

00:42:54.520 and even beings like angels.

00:42:56.000 How do we square this practice

00:42:57.260 with the Bible?

00:42:58.060 Well, you've got to read

00:42:58.660 the Bible more carefully.

00:42:59.880 You talk about the asterisk

00:43:01.180 being added to the scripture,

00:43:02.480 the asterisk is in the scripture.

00:43:04.480 It's in Exodus itself.

00:43:05.640 I think it's Exodus 20

00:43:06.620 where we see

00:43:08.000 don't make any graven image.

00:43:09.660 And then in Exodus 25,

00:43:11.000 God tells Moses

00:43:12.800 to create statues of the angels,

00:43:15.960 cherubim and seraphim.

00:43:17.260 He says,

00:43:17.740 make these statues,

00:43:18.640 construct these statues.

00:43:20.400 He tells Moses

00:43:22.120 to make a serpent

00:43:24.160 and put him on a stick,

00:43:27.000 crucify the serpent.

00:43:27.760 And this will be a sign

00:43:31.120 to the Israelites.

00:43:33.460 All shallows are clear.

00:43:35.520 And one cannot read

00:43:36.360 one verse of the Bible

00:43:37.340 out of context.

00:43:38.140 You have to read it in context.

00:43:39.160 In this case,

00:43:40.040 the context is in the same book

00:43:41.180 and it's only a handful

00:43:42.040 of chapters away.

00:43:43.420 The reason that we don't

00:43:44.440 make a graven image

00:43:45.280 is so that you don't

00:43:46.080 worship the image.

00:43:47.060 But we don't worship images.

00:43:48.940 They are tools of veneration.

00:43:51.840 We have images.

00:43:52.560 I don't worship other images

00:43:53.980 that I see.

00:43:54.480 And I don't worship statues

00:43:55.880 of Jesus or Mary

00:43:57.380 or St. Joseph.

00:43:58.880 I don't worship Mary

00:44:00.180 as it is.

00:44:00.760 I pray to Mary,

00:44:01.740 but I don't worship Mary.

00:44:02.800 And no faithful Catholic does 1.00

00:44:04.080 and it's never been a part

00:44:04.900 of Catholic doctrine.

00:44:06.080 And it remains not that way.

00:44:08.080 All shallows are clear.

00:44:09.200 Before we go,

00:44:10.200 I'm just getting this in now.

00:44:11.900 It seems that Flake,

00:44:13.440 Flaky Jeff Flake

00:44:14.720 has allowed the vote

00:44:16.520 out of the Judiciary Committee,

00:44:18.120 but he is now saying

00:44:18.960 he will not vote for Kavanaugh

00:44:21.140 until an FBI investigation happens.

00:44:23.600 Jeff Flake continuing

00:44:25.160 to prove himself

00:44:26.100 the single worst person

00:44:27.920 who's ever called himself

00:44:28.960 a Republican.

00:44:30.040 What a jerk,

00:44:31.900 to use a,

00:44:32.720 to be polite.

00:44:33.900 What a jerk.

00:44:35.800 So I guess we're going to get

00:44:37.080 the seventh FBI investigation now.

00:44:39.020 The first six,

00:44:40.140 the first six,

00:44:40.940 that's not,

00:44:41.320 that didn't work.

00:44:42.020 By the way,

00:44:42.480 as Judge Kavanaugh said

00:44:44.000 during his testimony,

00:44:45.160 FBI investigations

00:44:46.060 are not conclusive.

00:44:47.480 This is what,

00:44:47.940 this is the investigation.

00:44:48.800 I'll do it for you now,

00:44:49.620 Senator Flake.

00:44:50.780 Hey, Mr. Kavanaugh,

00:44:51.920 what do you think happened?

00:44:53.600 I didn't do any of this.

00:44:55.100 Hey, Christine Ford,

00:44:56.820 what do you think happened?

00:44:58.120 I think he tried to murder me

00:44:59.740 and take me up

00:45:00.240 to planet Zebulon 6.

00:45:01.640 Okay, all right,

00:45:02.380 Dr. Ford, that's fine.

00:45:04.400 Mr. Judge,

00:45:05.100 what do you think happened?

00:45:05.860 Didn't happen.

00:45:06.680 Hey, that girl 1.00

00:45:07.900 that Ford said was there,

00:45:09.540 whose name I forget,

00:45:10.620 what do you think happened?

00:45:11.840 I've never met Brett Kavanaugh,

00:45:13.200 so that didn't happen.

00:45:14.460 Okay, hey, PJ,

00:45:15.720 what do you think happened?

00:45:16.440 Didn't happen.

00:45:17.340 Okay, that's the investigation.

00:45:18.840 I just, hey,

00:45:19.300 I saved everybody a lot of time.

00:45:20.440 I did the FBI investigation.

00:45:21.520 Please, somebody forward this

00:45:23.060 to Senator Jeff Flake

00:45:24.160 along with my restraint

00:45:27.340 at what I would like to say to him.

00:45:29.220 Two words,

00:45:29.740 not happy birthday.

00:45:31.360 That is,

00:45:32.260 that's really frustrating.

00:45:33.960 We'll talk about it more on Monday.

00:45:34.820 The Michael Knowles Show

00:45:41.280 is produced by

00:45:42.100 Senia Villareal,

00:45:43.680 executive producer

00:45:44.560 Jeremy Borey,

00:45:45.760 senior producer

00:45:46.480 Jonathan Hay,

00:45:47.600 our supervising producer

00:45:48.880 Mathis Glover,

00:45:50.200 and our technical producer

00:45:51.200 is Austin Stevens,

00:45:52.800 edited by Jim Nickel.

00:45:54.320 Audio is mixed

00:45:55.060 by Mike Coromina.

00:45:56.620 Hair and makeup

00:45:57.280 is by Jesua Olvera.

00:45:59.200 The Michael Knowles Show

00:45:59.980 is a Daily Wire

00:46:00.740 Forward Publishing production.

00:46:02.380 Copyright

00:46:02.800 Forward Publishing 2018.

00:46:04.820 Is your home's title

00:46:15.240 still in your name?

00:46:16.340 With one forged document,

00:46:17.660 scammers can steal

00:46:18.400 your home title

00:46:18.980 and equity,

00:46:20.020 but now you can

00:46:20.440 protect yourself.

00:46:21.480 Home title locks

00:46:22.080 at million dollar

00:46:22.680 triple lock protection

00:46:23.480 provides 24-7

00:46:24.540 title monitoring,

00:46:25.800 urgent alerts to changes,

00:46:27.140 and if fraud happens,

00:46:28.300 they'll spend up to

00:46:28.880 a million dollars

00:46:29.500 to fix it

00:46:30.100 and restore your title.

00:46:31.500 Use promo code

00:46:32.240 dailywire

00:46:32.860 at hometitlelock.com

00:46:34.120 for a free title

00:46:34.900 history report

00:46:35.480 plus a free 14-day trial

00:46:37.100 of their million dollar

00:46:38.160 triple lock protection.

00:46:39.480 Head over to

00:46:40.120 hometitlelock.com

00:46:41.180 now with promo code

00:46:42.160 dailywire

00:46:42.760 to ensure your title

00:46:43.660 is still in your name.

The Michael Knowles Show - September 28, 2018

Ep. 225 - I Don’t Believe Her

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript