Ep. 380 - Has Politics Ever Been This Fun?
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
179.09164
Summary
Trump hosts a social media summit at the White House today to combat big tech censorship. Meanwhile, star Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls Nancy Pelosi a racist, Iran tries to seize a British tanker, and the Brits threaten to blow Iran s boats out of the water. We ask the important question, has politics ever been this fun? All that and more, plus the mailbag.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
President Trump hosts a social media summit at the White House today to combat big tech
00:00:04.920
censorship. Meanwhile, star Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls Nancy Pelosi a racist.
00:00:12.560
Then Iran tries to seize a British tanker, so the Brits threaten to blow Iran's boats
00:00:17.360
out of the water. We ask the important question, has politics ever been this fun?
00:00:22.320
All that and more, plus the mailbag. I'm Michael Knowles and this is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:30.000
Some people like to pretend that politics has never been this bad. They say, oh no,
00:00:38.180
the chaos in the White House. Oh no, the chaos and the crazy left and the Democrats.
00:00:43.460
We do this because we like to feign hardship. This is something that people do. This is how
00:00:49.360
people bond sometimes in groups. If you're meeting a new group of people, if you're working together
00:00:54.420
or you're on a project together, you're at a conference or something, you'll notice people
00:00:58.120
like to complain because they sometimes bond over imagined or real hardship. But I am here to tell
00:01:05.480
you, especially with today's news cycle, politics has never been this fun. And it is nowhere clearer
00:01:12.680
than in President Trump's tweet storm about the social media summit. Talk about taking a frustrating
00:01:19.080
news item and turning it to just pure joy. We'll get to that in a second. But first,
00:01:23.880
I need to proselytize to you about my favorite way to sleep, which is purple mattress. Come into my
00:01:32.380
boudoir. Please sleep as though you are sleeping in my bed. Am I me tooing you right now? I might be. I
00:01:37.820
don't know. Purple mattress is the greatest mattress ever invented. Period. I love it. I've had the
00:01:45.120
privilege. You know, I travel all around the country to college campuses. I had the privilege on one
00:01:49.080
occasion to stay at the Ritz Carlton, maybe the nicest hotel in the country. And every morning I
00:01:54.720
woke up and I thought, Oh, that just doesn't feel as good as my purple mattress. Purple mattress is
00:01:59.680
the greatest luxury I've ever slept in. It is firm and soft at the same time. How is that possible?
00:02:04.980
It's not an inner spring. It's not a memory foam. It's this new material. It was developed by rocket
00:02:10.360
scientists. I couldn't possibly explain it, but it's just amazing. It sleeps cool, which is really
00:02:15.220
important in the summer. So you're not going to just wake up in a puddle of sweat. It's, it's an
00:02:19.560
unbelievable bet. I recommend it to all of my friends. And even the Ritz Carlton feels like I'm
00:02:25.500
sleeping on a heap of garbage compared to my purple mattress. How about that? It gives you a zero
00:02:31.100
gravity like feel for any sleeping position. And you get a 100 night risk-free trial. If you are not
00:02:36.800
fully satisfied, you can return your mattress for a full refund. You're not going to want to return it.
00:02:40.680
It's just great. Back by 10 year warranty, free shipping and returns, free in-home setup and old
00:02:45.420
mattress removal. You're going to love purple. Right now, my listeners will get a free purple
00:02:50.860
pillow with the purchase of a mattress. That is in addition to the great free gifts they're offering
00:02:55.340
site-wide. How do you get this amazing deal? Take out your phone. If you're driving, pull over.
00:03:00.940
Text Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to 84888. The only way to get this free pillow is to text Knowles,
00:03:08.440
K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to 84888. Message and data rates may apply. K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to 84888.
00:03:19.540
There's a social media summit going on at the White House right now.
00:03:23.120
Why are they doing this? Because the social media big tech companies, every single one of them,
00:03:27.900
have shown that they are willing to censor conservatives. And it started out with the
00:03:31.980
fringy people like Alex Jones, and then it moved into more mainstream kind of comedian types like
00:03:36.820
Gavin McGinnis. Then they started going after Stephen Crowder, who's about as mainstream as
00:03:40.960
they get. They're going after all of us. They've demonetized a lot of my videos on YouTube. They
00:03:46.160
have restricted or outright censored some of my videos on YouTube. They restricted my PragerU video
00:03:51.900
about how important words are. They're going after all of us. So President Trump is going to hold a
00:03:57.940
White House summit. Here is how he announced the summit on Twitter. Quote,
00:04:02.180
A big subject today at the White House Social Media Summit will be the tremendous dishonesty,
00:04:07.400
bias, discrimination, and suppression practiced by certain companies. We will not let them get
00:04:12.940
away with it much longer. The fake news media will also be there, but for a limited period.
00:04:17.800
The fake news is not as important or as powerful as social media. They have lost tremendous credibility
00:04:23.340
since that day in November 2016 that I came down the escalator with the person who is to become
00:04:29.060
your future first lady. When I ultimately leave office in six years, or maybe 10 or 14, just kidding,
00:04:36.440
they will quickly go out of business for lack of credibility or approval from the public. That's why
00:04:42.060
they will all be endorsing me at some point, one way or the other. Could you imagine having sleepy Joe
00:04:47.840
Biden or Alfred E. Newman or a very nervous and skinny version of Pocahontas, 1,000 out of 24th,
00:04:56.800
I think he got that fraction wrong. As your president, rather than what you have now,
00:05:01.500
so great looking and smart, a true stable genius.
00:05:08.000
Sorry to say that even social media would be driven out of business along with, and finally,
00:05:15.080
the fake news media. I'm sorry. I thought I could get through it and I can't. I also want to point out
00:05:20.800
there are some kind of random capitalizations in here. When he was referring to Pete Buttigieg,
00:05:26.100
who he calls Alfred E. Newman, like the Mad Magazine character, he actually tagged an Alfred
00:05:30.180
E. Newman account. So I don't know who that person is. This was a masterpiece. Comparative literature
00:05:37.640
classes, poetry classes are going to be studying this tweet storm in the future for its rhetorical
00:05:44.920
brilliance. I'm not kidding. What more could you want? This is hilarious and it actually accomplishes
00:05:52.940
something. So a lot of people, what they think is that Trump's tweet storms are just gratuitous.
00:05:57.200
They're crazy. They're weird. They're wacky. They might be weird. They might be wacky, but they're
00:06:01.340
not gratuitous. They actually are accomplishing something. They have a point. He's not just writing
00:06:07.100
them because they're funny. He's writing them because they are calling attention to the social
00:06:12.060
media summit. We haven't heard a whole lot about this social media summit. A couple headlines here and
00:06:17.680
there, but the mainstream media and the big tech companies have had every interest in blacking it
00:06:22.560
out. It hasn't really been trending on social media. Mainstream media haven't been covering it. Why?
00:06:27.080
Because conservative voices in social media are a huge threat to both of those institutions.
00:06:32.380
So how does Trump call attention to it? Is he sends out this wacky tweet storm that is too much to ignore.
00:06:40.300
So he, how does he, he goes after the fake news. So he hits them really hard, but maybe they could
00:06:48.160
ignore that. Then he says, we won't let them get away with it much longer. So there's a threat. You
00:06:52.220
think they'd probably have to cover the threat. Then he just starts talking about how he walked down
00:06:57.760
the escalator with his wife. And that's kind of strange. Then he says he might leave office in 10 or
00:07:03.300
14 years. So he might stay beyond his constitutional term limits. He says, just kidding. But you just feel
00:07:09.120
if you're in the media, you have to report on that. Then he makes fun of Joe Biden. Then he makes fun of
00:07:16.440
Pete Buttigieg. Then he makes fun of Elizabeth Warren. And as he's making fun of her, he gets
00:07:23.680
the fraction wrong. She's one 1,024th Native American. He says it's 1,000 out of 24th, which would make her
00:07:30.520
incredibly Native American. It would make her many, many multiples Native American.
00:07:34.640
It's 1,000 divided by 24 is quite a lot. Then he uses this phrase, which is the one that's
00:07:41.920
actually been plucked out. So great looking and smart, a true stable genius. The media at this
00:07:48.640
point, even if they could ignore the other stuff, they can't ignore that because it's hilarious.
00:07:53.480
And they will use that to pretend that Trump is a crazy narcissist. He's not. He's just really,
00:07:58.840
really good at getting attention because he's gotten everyone's attention. Obviously he's got my
00:08:02.940
attention. I'm reading the whole thing, but everybody has been doing this in the mainstream
00:08:06.340
media today. And now we're talking about the social media summit. So what is the social media
00:08:11.000
summit? Trump invited his most ardent social media supporters to the White House to discuss censorship.
00:08:19.340
So CNN, now that they have to report on this, CNN has been describing them as right-wing extremists.
00:08:25.040
The White House is in chaos as the right-wing extremists descend. So who was invited?
00:08:30.000
The head of the students for Trump. See, a right-wing extremist. I mean, he's the young
00:08:37.300
Trump supporter. A Twitter account named Carpe Donctum, which describes itself as the eternally
00:08:44.180
sarcastic meme smith specializing in the creation of memes to support President Donald J. Trump.
00:08:50.960
And the talk show host Bill Mitchell, who is a huge Trump supporter. His Twitter banner is just like a
00:08:56.440
glowing golden picture of Donald Trump. These are not far-right people. He's not inviting
00:09:02.480
white nationalists, neo-Nazis, all the regular gang that the mainstream media scaremongers with.
00:09:10.940
He is, however, inviting eccentric people. I mean, one of the guy's names is Carpe Donctum. That's
00:09:16.020
pretty eccentric. This sends the right message. The message that this is sending is that the White
00:09:22.160
House is not going to back down on this. So he's threatening. He's saying there will be
00:09:26.840
consequences. What will the consequences be? I don't know. He probably doesn't know. But he's
00:09:30.580
saying there will be. He then holds the summit, which in itself shows that they're taking this
00:09:34.960
seriously. And then, crucially, he's not just inviting the buttoned-up people. He's not just
00:09:40.900
inviting the ones who have bow ties on and who are really super serious and have a lot of law degrees.
00:09:46.400
He's inviting these hardcore pro-Trump social media accounts with names like Carpe Donctum.
00:09:54.420
He's saying we're not going to give an inch. We're not going to apologize at all. It sends an
00:09:58.400
important message into 2020. We'll get to that in a second, and then we'll get to this wonderful
00:10:02.700
story about Nancy Pelosi. But first, I have to thank another sponsor and invite you once again
00:10:08.320
into my boudoir. You are so lucky today. I've got to tell you about Bolin Branch Sheets. You know,
00:10:13.760
really, the same could be said of Bolin Branch. I talk about how much I love my mattress.
00:10:18.900
Bolin Branch Sheets is another example of, if you ever have the opportunity to stay
00:10:23.040
at some of these super-duper nice hotels, one thing you'll notice is that the sheets feel
00:10:28.260
completely different from the sheets you have at home. Because the sheets you have at home,
00:10:31.640
if you're anything like me, you would go out and buy the cheapest things at the store,
00:10:35.740
and maybe they'd feel like sandpaper or they'd feel like really nothing at all.
00:10:39.080
Bolin Branch Sheets give you that five-star hotel luxury quality at home for an incredible deal.
00:10:47.480
When I started registering for my wedding gifts last year when I was getting married,
00:10:51.640
I would notice that really high-quality luxury sheets could cost $1,000. Sometimes they could
00:10:56.620
cost even more than that. Bolin Branch Sheets give you exactly the same quality, but they're only a
00:11:01.600
couple hundred bucks. How do they do that? Because they cut out the middleman. So they go direct to
00:11:06.220
you. They pass on those savings. From bedding to blankets, everything Bolin Branch makes is made
00:11:10.360
from pure, 100% organic cotton. It means they start out very soft. They're already very soft once you
00:11:16.700
try them, but they get softer over time. Somehow the sheets get better the more you use them.
00:11:21.680
Shipping is free. You can try them for 30 nights. There is no risk and no reason not to give them a
00:11:26.160
try. You know that I take my sleep very seriously. I need at least 19, 20 hours a night of sleep to
00:11:31.760
maintain this beauty. I need to make sure I get my beauty rest. Bolin Branch Sheets are top of the
00:11:38.960
line. To get you started right now, my listeners will get $50 off your first set of sheets at
00:11:44.620
bolinbranch.com, promo code Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L. $50 off your first set of sheets is a pretty good
00:11:51.040
deal. I'm saving you a lot of money. Go to bolinbranch.com for $50 off your first set of sheets.
00:11:56.160
B-O-L-L and branch.com, promo code Michael. Bolinbranch.com, promo code Michael.
00:12:02.700
So what is the message that Trump is sending here into 2020?
00:12:07.200
The previous GOP strategy, this is like BT. We're dividing time between BT and, I don't know,
00:12:16.180
AT, the year of our Trump. In BT, in before Trump time, the GOP would have experienced all this
00:12:24.740
censorship, would have experienced all this slander, all of these smears, and they would
00:12:28.860
have stayed quiet. Don't dignify it with a response. Don't acknowledge the eccentric figures in our
00:12:36.020
ranks, people who give themselves names like Carpe Donctum and who post memes all over Twitter. No,
00:12:42.340
no, they're not. We just wear bow ties and we go to really fancy lunches in Washington.
00:12:47.680
That was the old, you know, I love George W. Bush, but George W. Bush did not know how to handle the
00:12:53.560
media. Same thing with Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney had no idea how to handle the media. Still doesn't.
00:12:59.540
Trump doubles down. And he doesn't just double down and say, I defend this person. I defend their
00:13:05.160
right to free speech. He doubles down about how good looking he is. He invites Carpe Donctum to the
00:13:12.100
White House. This shows boldness. It's not just words. It's not just paying lip service to giving
00:13:18.380
everyone a fair shot. He is actually exhibiting that boldness himself. We talk about this all the
00:13:23.600
time. The best defense is a good offense. This has always been the case. So my only criticism of this
00:13:32.320
event is that I'm not there, but I'll be in D.C. in a couple of weeks. So maybe I'll get to stop by
00:13:37.720
the Covfefe Palace then. That is the hope. This is good news on the GOP front, but there's even more
00:13:43.740
good news, which is on the Democrat front. And this is the chickens coming home to roost. This
00:13:50.220
was only a matter of time. For years now, the left has baselessly smeared conservatives as bigots.
00:13:58.960
We've warned the whole time this is harmful to the public discourse. It's dangerous in a
00:14:03.440
democratic republic. You shouldn't be able to just smear people as bigots. The Democrats haven't
00:14:08.120
cared. They've egged it on. Now the chickens are coming home to roost because the Democrats are
00:14:14.520
starting to use this same cynical strategy against the older Democrats. How did all of this start?
00:14:21.640
How did AOC and her compatriots start accusing Nancy Pelosi of racism? This all started because
00:14:28.960
the most vocal Democrat showboaters on this border crisis refused last week to vote for funding to
00:14:36.540
help mitigate the crisis. That's Ilhan Omar, AOC, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley. These are all
00:14:43.980
the young radicals who every day have me wondering if President Trump should just dissolve the Congress
00:14:48.480
and name himself king for life. I mean, if this is the future of our country, this is the future of
00:14:52.940
Congress. It doesn't look very good. And so they've been talking about how important it is to fund this
00:14:58.200
crisis and get the beds and get the sheets and help the kids. And then it comes time for a bipartisan
00:15:03.580
border funding bill. This had broad bipartisan agreement and they wouldn't do it. And even
00:15:10.220
mainstream leftists called them out over this hypocritical border vote. Here is Rashida Tlaib
00:15:15.720
on Martha Raddatz's show on ABC trying to answer for her hypocritical vote.
00:15:21.020
I want to stop you here for just a second. McAleenan has been sounding the alarm for months for resources
00:15:27.300
to help the migrants. You voted against the $4.6 billion emergency border bill to deal with the
00:15:33.480
surge of migrants that included almost $3 billion to provide shelter and care for unaccompanied
00:15:38.980
children. Acting Secretary McAleenan says those funds are critical to get children out of custody and
00:15:45.240
transfer. Even if the bill didn't have anything you wanted. Do you know what the CPP agents said
00:15:50.520
on the ground though, Martha? She's proud. I'm this, I'm that. She won't even let Martha Raddatz
00:15:56.080
get the question out because she knows the question is a total indictment of her. So Nancy Pelosi uses
00:16:03.120
this opportunity to show, look, guys, these screeching, ignorant, young Congresswomen don't know
00:16:09.620
anything. They're, they're not actually the leaders of this party. We're the ones getting things done.
00:16:14.980
Pelosi tells the New York Times and tells Maureen Dowd, who's a columnist there, quote,
00:16:19.260
all these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world, but they didn't have any
00:16:23.980
following. They're four people and that's how many votes they got. Pretty harsh criticism from the
00:16:29.260
Speaker of the House. She's completely right. AOC made it to Congress with 14,000 votes.
00:16:36.400
There are about a quarter million registered voters in her district, maybe more than that.
00:16:42.300
She got 14,000 votes in that primary that no one thought was going to matter because there was an
00:16:46.940
entrenched incumbent and Joe, it was Joe Crowley. He'd been there for a long time and he didn't
00:16:52.960
campaign. She went in, she got 14,000 votes. She wins the primary. She makes it to Congress. So she's
00:16:57.700
got this huge, almost 5 million person Twitter following. No one actually in her district likes her
00:17:03.220
that much. She's polling very low in her district. In fact, part of the reason why AOC
00:17:08.060
is making such a spectacle of herself is because there's a fair chance that she won't get reelected.
00:17:14.080
There's rumors up in New York that they're going to redistrict her out of her district.
00:17:18.540
So she makes this big spectacle. AOC seizes on that. How can, or rather Pelosi seizes on that
00:17:25.180
toward AOC? Now, how can AOC respond? She could respond by showing why Nancy Pelosi is wrong on the
00:17:32.520
border. She could respond by making a principled argument about how Congress's complicity in the
00:17:38.820
border crisis. She could respond by trying to secure the border and discouraging people from
00:17:42.980
putting themselves in this position in the first place by crossing illegally. But she didn't do any of
00:17:47.940
that because she's a hardcore radical leftist and she doesn't know anything. So instead she called
00:17:54.280
Pelosi racist. And I, oh, I love it so much. Oh, it's just the greatest. I wish they would do this all
00:18:02.200
the time. She tells the Washington Post, quote, the persistent singling out, it got to a point where it
00:18:07.700
was just outright disrespectful. The explicit singling out of newly elected women of color. Take that Nancy
00:18:16.300
Pelosi. Wasn't just AOC. Ilhan Omar jumped on this bandwagon too. She tweeted out, quote,
00:18:23.220
patético. I guess she's, she must've learned from Beto O'Rourke and Cory Booker and Julian Castro and
00:18:29.240
Jose Diaz-Balart that in America now we speak Spanish instead of English. I don't know. I wonder
00:18:34.760
why they call her un-American. Patético, she writes. You know they're just salty about who is wielding the
00:18:42.320
power to shift public sentiment these days. Cis, sorry, not sorry. It's like the worst combination
00:18:49.980
of millennial thinking and millennial language. The millennial thinking is if you disagree with me,
00:18:55.100
you're a bigot. Everyone who disagrees with me is Hitler. That's, that's the millennial leftist
00:19:00.320
mantra. And then there's all this stupid language. You call each other cis, S-I-S, like sister,
00:19:06.260
gender, which means you're assuming their gender. And that's horribly offensive as far as I'm
00:19:11.980
concerned. Then they'll say things like, sorry, not sorry, just these sort of vapid expressions.
00:19:16.640
And all the point, the point is just very blunt and simple. She's calling Nancy Pelosi a racist.
00:19:22.380
What's ironic about this, and you know my feelings on Nancy Pelosi, there is no evidence that Nancy
00:19:28.600
Pelosi harbors some racial bigotry. It's like when they tried to call Biden a racist. There's no evidence
00:19:33.820
of that. There is, however, plenty of evidence that these young, fresh faces, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib,
00:19:41.820
those people, that they actually do harbor racial bigotry. Ilhan Omar, just to remind you, has claimed that
00:19:49.060
Israel hypnotized the world, and she has publicly prayed to Allah to awaken people to the evil of Israel.
00:19:56.800
She has claimed that politicians only support Israel because the Jews bribe them, and she has also claimed
00:20:02.360
that Jews aren't loyal to the United States. Repeatedly done this, Ilhan Omar. Pelosi was the
00:20:09.680
one who had to say, hey, lady, cool it on the racism. Ayanna Pressley, who's another one of these
00:20:14.240
fresh faces, she tweeted out just yesterday or two days ago to Kellyanne Conway, quote,
00:20:19.480
at Kellyanne, oh, hi, distraction, Becky. Remember that time your boss tore babies from their mother's
00:20:25.520
arms and threw them in cages? Yeah, take a seat and keep my name out of your lying mouth. Now,
00:20:31.740
for those of you who aren't familiar with like weird leftist millennial speak, Becky is a derogatory term
00:20:38.400
for white women. So Becky is considered this generic white woman name. It's kind of like calling someone
00:20:45.440
a cracker. It's saying you're bland, you know, to be a white woman is to be sort of uninteresting and
00:20:51.320
boring. This is the sort of thing that we would expect from Ayanna Pressley. To give you context,
00:20:58.240
Ayanna Pressley is a graduate of the same college as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and it shows.
00:21:04.800
Pressley, rather, has never done anything in her professional life other than work for politicians
00:21:09.600
or be a politician. So she's got a very narrow and shallow background. But just consider the racism
00:21:17.120
of that statement to call, to criticize Kellyanne Conway on the basis of her race. Imagine if a
00:21:24.720
white congresswoman referred to a black senior White House advisor by some stereotypically black
00:21:30.940
name, as though that were a slur. If they said, oh, hi, distraction, Shaniqua. Oh, hi, distraction,
00:21:37.320
Chantel. I don't know. Imagine the outrage that you would hear from that. Actually, you don't have to
00:21:43.180
imagine it because, forget a Republican congresswoman, a comedian, a generally left-wing
00:21:48.480
comedian, one time made a racially offensive joke about a black senior White House aide who was
00:21:55.460
Valerie Jarrett. That was Roseanne Barr who made that joke. She lost her network TV show within hours.
00:22:04.360
But Ayanna Pressley, fresh-faced Democratic congresswoman, does the exact same thing to a
00:22:10.140
woman in the exact same position? Nothing. Nada. Doesn't matter. They don't bring it up.
00:22:17.060
This has always been the double standard. And I suspect it's going to continue to be the double
00:22:21.200
standard. Conservatives have always just dealt with it. I mean, it is hard to fight back against this
00:22:26.280
because we don't want to get in the muck with them as much as they do. It's just disgusting. You
00:22:30.540
don't want to get into a fight with a skunk because either way you're not going to leave smelling very
00:22:33.800
good. But now, finally, the Democrats themselves are experiencing the poisonous fruits of their
00:22:40.840
decades of racial divisiveness. This is it. I mean, Nancy Pelosi and her whole crew, they stoked this
00:22:47.940
racial resentment. They stoked all of this racial division. And now they are the victims of it because
00:22:54.240
it never ends. If you have a politics that's just based on division and entitlement and resentment
00:23:00.140
and envy, that's not going to end. We're not going to reach a point where those evil, wicked lusts and
00:23:08.360
passions are satisfied. They are ravenous passions. They go on forever. And now the Democrats are eating
00:23:13.060
their own, and it's absolutely fabulous to watch. Meanwhile, during this entire clown show,
00:23:19.860
one story that has not really gone mentioned is we've more or less just averted a war with Iran
00:23:25.040
like yesterday. Yesterday, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is the military
00:23:32.540
wing of Iran, attempted to seize a British oil tanker in the Persian Gulf. So Iran for weeks now
00:23:39.360
has been provoking the West because they're trying to create a sense of urgency to save the Iran deal
00:23:45.140
that is more or less expired. And they're trying to save certain waivers from Europe so that Europe can
00:23:51.160
continue to cooperate with Iran. And so what did they do? They set a couple oil tankers on fire.
00:23:56.660
They shot down our drone out of the sky. They're trying to provoke us into some kind of conflict
00:24:00.860
to scare the entire world about a war in Iran and a war in the Middle East so that we'll give in to
00:24:07.100
them and basically appease Iran. I guess we've forgotten that appeasement hasn't worked very well
00:24:12.920
in history. So Iran now, the latest thing they've done, because the US and Europe has really handled
00:24:19.520
these provocations with great restraint and pretty well. So what they did yesterday is they sent a
00:24:25.220
couple boats to go seize a British oil tanker. What they didn't expect, though, is that the British
00:24:32.140
oil tanker was being escorted by the HMS Montrose, which was much more heavily armed than the British
00:24:38.840
tanker. So you've got this incredibly provocative maneuver by Iran to basically force the oil tanker
00:24:45.340
into Iranian waters so that they can seize it. At that point, that's when the Brits turned their
00:24:50.480
four and a half inch main gun and their surface ship torpedo defense on the Iranian boats, in addition
00:24:57.440
to two 30 millimeter automatic machine guns and a sea captor missile system. And just just to kick it
00:25:04.480
all off, they deployed their rocket launching helicopter to circle the Iranian boats. So it's just like
00:25:10.760
these little, you know, Iranian bullies pull up and then you just see the full weight of the British
00:25:17.580
empire as though it were resurrected again in the Straits of Hormuz and the Iranians back off.
00:25:25.240
Of course, what are they going to do? They blow them out of the water. This was the, uh, this was the,
00:25:30.900
the very subdued response from the British. The Royal Navy, HMS Montrose, which was also there,
00:25:37.080
pointed its guns at the boats and warned them over radio at which point they dispersed.
00:25:42.680
Classic British understatement. You know, it's, it's, as if to say, yes, well, no, no big deal. You
00:25:47.600
know, uh, it's okay. We, we averted it. This was a major provocation. This could have turned into open
00:25:52.400
fire. How was this averted? How was the possibility of war averted? It was because the British were
00:25:59.400
prepared to go to war. I mean, this is the premise that we've been talking about for weeks.
00:26:04.520
The way you get peace is by being prepared for war. You get peace through strength. It's the
00:26:11.360
phrase of Ronald Reagan. It's the phrase of Barry Goldwater. It's the phrase of conservatives now
00:26:15.300
for 70 years. Peace through strength. You'll hear the left try to, uh, browbeat conservatives and say,
00:26:25.040
you're warmongers, you're hawks, you're bloodthirsty because we want to build up the military.
00:26:30.500
You should point out to them that the two most peaceful presidents in modern history
00:26:35.400
are Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump. And those are the two guys who were called cowboys. Those
00:26:39.900
are the two guys who were called warmongers. Those are two guys who have built up the military
00:26:44.080
dramatically, but they've built up the military because they know by building it up, they're
00:26:48.880
reducing the likelihood that, that we're going to actually have to deploy the military.
00:26:52.680
Bullies. When you don't stand up to a bully, when you appease a bully, that is an open invitation for
00:27:02.160
aggression. That is an open invitation for war. When you stand up to them and you launch your,
00:27:09.880
you deploy your rocket launching helicopter to circle them and you point all your guns at them
00:27:14.020
and you say, we will blow you out of the water. Not a shot is fired. That's how you have peace.
00:27:22.020
It's a lesson the left doesn't usually get, but we should send it because the lessons of history
00:27:26.660
are clear. Appeasement doesn't work and, and being prepared for war does work. And moreover,
00:27:32.780
imagine if a bullet had gone off yesterday, we would be talking today about possible war with Iran.
00:27:37.240
And now we don't have to talk about that. Now we just get to talk about Donald Trump calling himself
00:27:42.720
good-looking and youthful and a very stable genius and making fun of Sleepy Joe and making fun of
00:27:49.340
Alfred E. Newman, Pete Buttigieg and watching the democratic party implode on its own premises
00:27:54.900
because now they're just all calling each other racists and bigots. We get this wonderful news cycle.
00:28:01.000
Politics has never been more fun than it is right now. And the reason it's fun is because we're
00:28:06.100
extraordinarily prepared. We're showing a tough face to big tech, tough face to censorship,
00:28:11.440
tough face to Iran. Because we are standing up, willing to do hard things, we get to have as much
00:28:19.300
fun and we get to guzzle as many leftist tears as we want. We've got to get to the mailbag. But first,
00:28:23.920
speaking of leftist tears, go over to dailywire.com. You get me, you get the Andrew Klavan show,
00:28:27.900
you get the Ben Shapiro show, you get the Matt Wolfe show, you get to ask questions in the mailbag
00:28:31.800
that's coming up right now. You get to ask questions backstage. You get another kingdom,
00:28:35.600
you get everything and you get the leftist tears tumbler. Never more important than now. And it's
00:28:41.260
only going to heat up as we approach 2020. Go to dailywire.com. We'll be right back with the mailbag.
00:28:45.780
Jumping right in from Brett. Michael, was Martin Luther King a socialist? Yes. Yes, he was.
00:29:04.580
Don't take my word for it. In a letter dated July 18th, 1952, Martin Luther King wrote, quote,
00:29:11.580
quote, I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than
00:29:16.900
capitalistic. It was 1952. One of the lines that sometimes conservatives will say is that
00:29:23.200
Martin Luther King for most of his life was very conservative and he was very capitalistic and
00:29:28.940
oriented toward free markets. And then only later in his life, in the early 1960s, did he become a
00:29:34.260
little more radical and more socialistic. That isn't true. He always had a pretty socialist economic
00:29:39.400
bent to him. Both sides want to claim Martin Luther King. The conservatives claim Martin Luther King
00:29:45.560
because of his most famous speech, I Have a Dream, in which he talks about a world in which racial
00:29:50.660
division won't matter and black children will play with white children. And this is a vision that
00:29:55.580
conservatives love. And the left claims Martin Luther King because he said certain things that these
00:30:00.880
days we might call identitarian. He was an advocate for black people, for black rights, because he was
00:30:07.060
economically quite radical. He wanted a jobs program. He wanted the war on poverty. He wanted
00:30:11.660
more socialist economics. He at one point talked about the nationalization of industry as being a
00:30:17.700
good thing. And so he's a complex figure. We have made him a simple figure because we claim him as a
00:30:23.820
secular saint. I mean, we have a day for him. We celebrate him on the secular liturgical year.
00:30:29.100
We've turned him into a legend that he really was not. You know, he had supreme moral clarity in
00:30:37.180
certain areas. If you watch his speech, I've Been to the Mountaintop, it's one of the most powerful
00:30:41.580
speeches in American history. And then he was murdered the next day. Then you learn that he was
00:30:47.580
one of the most prolific womanizers in the history of American politics. You realize that he didn't always
00:30:53.160
practice his moral vision himself. And parts of his moral vision were wrong, like socialism.
00:30:58.180
socialism. The worship, the veneration of Martin Luther King, veneration is the better word here.
00:31:05.180
The veneration of Martin Luther King is problematic because he's a sort of problematic figure.
00:31:11.640
This is why a lot of conservatives at the time that the Martin Luther King Day was created
00:31:15.560
suggested that if there was going to be a day for the advancement of black people and for the
00:31:21.180
abolition of slavery and to commemorate the advancement of civil rights, particularly for blacks,
00:31:25.900
that that day should celebrate Frederick Douglass rather than Martin Luther King. And I tend to be
00:31:30.860
of that persuasion too. I think Frederick Douglass is one of the greatest writers in American history.
00:31:35.260
He was profoundly anti-socialist. He defended the rights of property. And this obviously partakes
00:31:43.620
much more of sort of our theories of natural law and the foundation on which the country was built.
00:31:48.680
So it would be nice to have a Frederick Douglass Day. It would be nice if he were the one that we
00:31:52.760
were to look to because unfortunately the left has a point when they say Martin Luther King had many
00:31:58.480
leftist dogmas and many socialist dogmas. That's true and it was true even in the early 1950s.
00:32:04.320
From Adam, would you rather meet and have a conversation with your great-great-great-grandfather
00:32:09.940
or your great-great-great-grandson? Who would you like to learn more from, the past or the future?
00:32:16.480
Certainly my great-great-great-grandfather. There's no question about that. I don't care
00:32:20.340
what happens to my great-great-great-great-grandson. I don't care what his world is like. It won't
00:32:25.540
affect me. I'll be long dead by the time he comes around. And to meet my great-great-great-grandson
00:32:32.160
would compromise my free will because I'd see how history has unfolded. And so I wouldn't be living it in
00:32:37.540
real time. I would be dooming myself to a sort of fatalism or a determinism. And I don't want any of
00:32:42.380
that. But I am interested in the future. And the way that you learn about the future is you learn
00:32:46.680
about the past. Because we live our lives in narrative. We live our lives in stories. And our
00:32:52.100
understanding of the past profoundly influences our understanding of the present which shapes
00:32:56.400
our future. So I would love to meet my great-great-great-grandfather. And for a couple
00:33:01.560
reasons. One, I think there's a lot that has been lost over the last 100 or 200 years. And so it would
00:33:07.100
be good to see what's been lost and try to bring it back. On the other hand, I think conservatives
00:33:11.440
in particular are given to nostalgia, which is history after a few drinks, as my priest Father
00:33:16.820
Rutler says. So you don't want to be nostalgic either. You want to talk to this guy and he'll
00:33:21.120
tell you, yeah, things weren't so great then either. Yeah, we had the same daily concerns that you guys
00:33:26.160
have too. And this is what happens generally when you open a history book. When you engage with the
00:33:31.500
reality of history, you realize that the legends that we tell ourselves aren't quite so simple.
00:33:36.700
And actually what happened is much more complicated and much more interesting from
00:33:41.100
Anonymous. Dear Michael, King of Covfefe, my girlfriend and I have had issues lately. We've
00:33:48.760
been dating for four years and recently have discovered some religious and philosophical
00:33:53.280
differences in us. For example, she's open to the idea of Christianity, but she can't guarantee
00:33:59.720
conversion. She doesn't explicitly denounce abortion as evil, etc.
00:34:05.100
What do you suggest is the best course of action? Do I try to convert her to my Christian
00:34:11.380
morals and beliefs? If so, how? I love her very much and want to make this work. Thanks. All
00:34:16.540
the best, Anonymous. I would not recommend picking a girlfriend or a fiance or a wife based on some
00:34:29.080
checklist. I would not recommend doing it based on whether she checks off all the boxes. I think
00:34:36.600
that's so clinical. It's not how love really works. And what we're talking about is love. You're not
00:34:42.580
just picking someone to serve you. You are falling in love. And if you're falling in love, then your love
00:34:49.020
for that person, your desire, your will will help to transform that person. You know, I've known sweet
00:34:54.880
little Elisa since we were about 10 years old and we dated in high school. We split for college. We
00:34:59.820
got back together later. We've kind of weaved in and out. We were always in each other's lives
00:35:02.940
though. And you learn something, which is you either grow together or you grow apart.
00:35:08.640
And it is almost impossible not to grow together if you love each other and you, you spend a lot of
00:35:15.440
time together. You, you sort of have to, I mean, it's, that's just how people, I mean, this happens
00:35:21.540
with your friends. You will be influenced by your friends. You will be known by the friends you keep.
00:35:25.780
And that is all the more true when you're talking about someone you're dating or fiance or wife.
00:35:32.120
That said, doesn't mean you should just lay off and say, oh, it doesn't matter at all.
00:35:36.400
If you have religious and philosophical differences, you should talk about it. Not in a scolding way,
00:35:41.540
not in a debating way, but in a loving way. You, you think that you understand the truth and you
00:35:49.100
obviously then want to convince the person you love of the truth. And I suspect the same is true
00:35:53.780
of her. You know, in that, since I've been 10 years old, since I met sweet little Elisa,
00:35:59.900
she and I have held very different views. We've kind of gone in all sorts of directions and we've
00:36:05.000
grown together. Now we agree on probably most things, but it's not always the case. And our views
00:36:09.960
are changing on things all the time too, as new evidence presents itself and circumstances change.
00:36:14.380
That's the way that I would do it. You know, Cole Porter saying, let's do it. Let's fall in love.
00:36:19.620
He didn't say, let's do it. Let's make sure that on a checklist, we all check every single box
00:36:24.260
and that you can be a good spouse for me and fulfill my needs. It's not how it goes.
00:36:30.460
You want to make sure that you don't have fundamental oppositional ideas of the world.
00:36:36.040
I mean, that's going to be very important when you raise children, but it doesn't sound like
00:36:39.460
that's quite the issue. So I would, uh, I would say go along with it and, you know,
00:36:44.280
have a love affair. And, and, uh, if it stops working, it's fine. Break up, find somebody else.
00:36:49.560
But if you're just worried about something 30 years down the road, some problem that you're
00:36:53.260
inventing, don't borrow a problem from the future for today, sufficient to today or the problems of
00:36:59.800
of today. From Mark, Michael, I think you were off base when you criticized Megan Rapinoe for saying,
00:37:07.700
I deserve this when she won the soccer game. I'm not a fan of Megan. She and her team had just won
00:37:13.420
the world woman's cup and was basking in that glory. That did look like an alcoholic beverage
00:37:18.000
in her hand. I suspect that her statement was more from an ego fulfilled than from leftism.
00:37:23.100
She just won big time. Love the commentary. Keep up the great work. Mark. I agree with you that
00:37:29.560
what she was doing was fulfilling her own ego. I'm just saying that's wrong. And it's,
00:37:34.440
it's especially wrong in sports. It's unsportsmanlike. You're not supposed to do that.
00:37:38.740
At the end of a game, you're supposed to go around and say good game to everybody. You're supposed to
00:37:42.040
be humble. You're supposed to obviously take some joy in your achievement. You're supposed to
00:37:46.940
succeed. You're supposed to win. But then you're not supposed to just talk about how great you are and say,
00:37:53.000
I deserve this. I deserve this. I mean, she wasn't joking when she said, you can sort of joke about
00:37:58.580
I'm the greatest. Muhammad Ali sometimes would joke about it. I'm the greatest. But there was a real
00:38:03.560
wit. There was a real cleverness. She didn't have wit or cleverness. She said, I deserve this.
00:38:07.340
She doesn't deserve this. She won a sports game for a variety of reasons, some of which are her own
00:38:11.660
talent, which she doesn't deserve. She was just given her talent. Some of which is her skill, which she has
00:38:16.900
worked on and developed over time. Some of which are the circumstances of the people she was playing with
00:38:21.640
and the people that she was playing against. Say thank you. Say good game to the other guys. Say,
00:38:26.940
I'm really glad we won. Say, it's really cool that I get to hold this trophy. Say, I'm so grateful to
00:38:31.000
this country that they would allow me to represent them, to have this great feat. But I deserve this.
00:38:37.060
She doesn't deserve anything. What you're saying is it's not about leftism. It's about ego fulfilled.
00:38:42.920
Leftism is ego fulfilled. I mean, they actually celebrate pride. It's all just me, me, me. I deserve this.
00:38:49.680
I deserve that. That is what it is. You're completely right, but that's leftism and that's
00:38:54.700
no good. From Michael. Hey, Michael. It's Michael. Hi, Michael. Out of all in the Daily Wire, cheers
00:39:00.100
to you for having the best show. That's very kind. Thank you very much. Feel free to gloat. Well,
00:39:04.240
I'm not Megan Rapinoe, so maybe I won't. Anyways, how do you react when there are things that are
00:39:09.140
personally challenging for your faith, whether that be history or doctrine? Good question. History
00:39:15.880
doesn't challenge my faith. One, because the history of Christianity is extraordinarily misrepresented in
00:39:23.320
the pop culture. And as someone who spent even a few moments skimming through the history,
00:39:28.500
you can just point out the glaring historical inaccuracies that people regularly point to.
00:39:34.020
You know, the Crusades is the worst event in the history of the world or something like that.
00:39:38.540
So the history wouldn't bother me, though, even if it were true, because people are fallen and
00:39:43.440
institutions are imperfect. And that's just that not only is history imperfect and flawed,
00:39:50.860
but so is the present and so will be the future. That doesn't challenge my faith at all. Actually,
00:39:54.600
my faith tells us that. My faith tells us the poor will always be with us. My faith tells me,
00:40:00.600
take up your cross and bear it. So that's fine. The doctrinal aspects are actually one of the reasons
00:40:08.320
why I'm Catholic and why I like the Catholic Church quite a lot is because despite all of the many,
00:40:16.060
many immense problems over the millennia in the Catholic Church, the weight of their history,
00:40:21.680
the inertia of that institution has, I think, protected it from a lot of the doctrinal craziness
00:40:27.860
that we're now seeing in some of my other friends' churches, where they've got pride flags outside of
00:40:32.060
the church or they're changing doctrine willy-nilly or they're radically changing views of the human
00:40:40.360
person and marriage and abortion and life and all of these things. It's not to say that there aren't
00:40:45.740
a lot of Catholics who do want to change those things. It's just that the institution of the
00:40:50.200
church has prevented them from doing it because it's so old and has so much history. Even the popes
00:40:55.020
can't change doctrine. The popes are very fallible when they're trying to change doctrine. So it
00:41:01.520
doesn't present many challenges. I do have a lot of questions about the faith. I mean,
00:41:06.540
I don't know even one drop in the ocean of what the faith is. I don't comprehend even one iota of
00:41:14.100
the faith. But 10,000 problems or 10,000 questions doesn't make one doubt, as I believe John Henry
00:41:21.340
Newman said. From Nick. Hey, Eric Swalwell. I'm sorry you had to drop out of the presidential race.
00:41:27.340
Me too. Since you've acted in plays, I'm curious, what's your favorite work of Shakespeare if you
00:41:32.220
had to pick one? Personally, I don't think it gets any better than Hamlet. But what is your pick and
00:41:36.700
why? You're absolutely right, Nick. The answer is Hamlet. I think it's the greatest play ever written.
00:41:41.740
And the reason for that, I mean, there's a reason why it is considered the greatest play ever
00:41:46.120
written and why it's done all the time. Because it is so powerfully, broadly, and profoundly human.
00:41:54.040
And because the play is about a question that interests me very much, which is the history of
00:42:00.560
Western Christendom, particularly in light of the Protestant Revolution. So the play is really all about
00:42:06.960
the Protestant Revolution and the points that the Protestant revolutionaries were making,
00:42:13.020
and the problems of the Catholic Church and the points that the Catholic Church were making,
00:42:17.560
and what it means for Europe, that Christianity had this big split in Western Europe. And,
00:42:24.500
you know, even early on, Gertrude, the mother of Hamlet, says, don't go to Wittenberg. Don't go to
00:42:30.740
the center of Protestantism. You have Hamlet debating throughout the whole play doctrines of the faith.
00:42:37.060
From the very beginning, we see the soul of Hamlet's father is coming out from purgatory.
00:42:43.320
Many Protestants doubt the existence of purgatory. Later on, Hamlet doubts the existence of purgatory.
00:42:48.860
These questions are being debated throughout the whole play. And those are the questions that really
00:42:53.660
are animating the modern era from, say, 1500 to the present. And so we're seeing them work out there.
00:43:01.820
Unfortunately, the end of Hamlet is not terribly uplifting. That probably gives you a preview of
00:43:07.120
what we're in store for in modern Western Christendom. But, you know, it tells the story,
00:43:14.500
at least. And that's the purpose of art. All right, one last question. Let's see. One last question here.
00:43:22.160
I'll go down. I want, like, a good question. Okay, here we go. From Kurt.
00:43:26.720
Hey, Covfefe. I enjoy the show. What advice would you give to applicants who feel they have a
00:43:33.140
disadvantage in today's world for being a white male? Would you suggest they describe themselves
00:43:37.660
as Native American following the footsteps of Elizabeth Warren? Thanks, Matt. Well, you could
00:43:43.720
honestly say that. You could say that I'm a Native American. Native means born and from birth. And
00:43:50.920
American is American. I'm American from birth. I'm a Native American. That's it. So I could put that
00:43:56.120
down on my college essay, though I don't do it. It is true that right now there are laws on the books
00:44:02.000
that discriminate against white people and Asians, for instance, affirmative action in college
00:44:07.800
admissions. There is a sort of sense in the popular culture that being white is a bad thing. You heard
00:44:14.580
Ayanna Pressley make that derogatory comment about white women before. She's a member of Congress with
00:44:20.120
no pushback whatsoever from the media. Beyond race on sex, there is a sense that men are
00:44:26.100
awful. They talk about toxic masculinity. Women do everything better than men. Men are terrible
00:44:31.880
knuckle-dragging people who don't deserve due process or consideration of their opinions. Yeah,
00:44:36.640
that's all frustrating and stupid. I don't like to complain about it too much. I mean, I like to call
00:44:41.360
attention to it. I like to fight it. I don't want to whine and complain. You know, everybody's got a
00:44:46.080
problem and that's ours. It's a line from Tennessee Williams' play, Orpheus Descending.
00:44:50.620
There's a vagabond guy who he wants to spend the night at a woman's house and she says, no. He says,
00:44:56.340
I got nowhere to go. And she says, well, everybody's got a problem and that's yours. I mean, people have
00:45:00.800
problems historically in the grand scheme of things. Having the Hollywood and the mainstream media go
00:45:06.260
against you isn't the biggest one. Also, suffering can be sanctifying. So if you do it nobly, if you
00:45:13.540
respond to suffering in a dignified way, that is good for your soul and it's good for society. So that's what I
00:45:19.800
would do. I wouldn't try to cheat it. I wouldn't try to get around it. I would just honestly say,
00:45:23.900
I am who I am. I'm not ashamed of the circumstances of my birth. Neither are you. I would point out the
00:45:31.600
contradictions and the double standards in their racial and sexual arguments. And I would go on
00:45:37.540
with my life and laugh at all of their craziness because they're the ones who seem to be so upset and
00:45:42.360
angry and crazed all the time. And I think you and I are having a great time because politics has
00:45:46.820
never been more fun. All right, that's our show. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles
00:45:51.500
The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Rebecca Dobkowitz and directed by Mike Joyner. Executive
00:46:02.220
producer, Jeremy Boring. Senior producer, Jonathan Hay. Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover. And
00:46:08.220
our technical producer is Austin Stevens. Edited by Danny D'Amico. Audio is mixed by Dylan Case.
00:46:13.900
Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera. And our production assistant is Nick Sheehan. The Michael Knowles
00:46:18.700
show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2019. Today on the Ben Shapiro show,
00:46:24.420
AOC versus Nancy Pelosi, the cat fight. Can we call it that? Begins. That's today on the Ben Shapiro show.