The Michael Knowles Show - July 11, 2019


Ep. 380 - Has Politics Ever Been This Fun?


Episode Stats

Length

46 minutes

Words per Minute

179.09164

Word Count

8,328

Sentence Count

706

Misogynist Sentences

18

Hate Speech Sentences

21


Summary

Trump hosts a social media summit at the White House today to combat big tech censorship. Meanwhile, star Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls Nancy Pelosi a racist, Iran tries to seize a British tanker, and the Brits threaten to blow Iran s boats out of the water. We ask the important question, has politics ever been this fun? All that and more, plus the mailbag.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 President Trump hosts a social media summit at the White House today to combat big tech
00:00:04.920 censorship. Meanwhile, star Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls Nancy Pelosi a racist.
00:00:12.560 Then Iran tries to seize a British tanker, so the Brits threaten to blow Iran's boats
00:00:17.360 out of the water. We ask the important question, has politics ever been this fun?
00:00:22.320 All that and more, plus the mailbag. I'm Michael Knowles and this is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:30.000 Some people like to pretend that politics has never been this bad. They say, oh no,
00:00:38.180 the chaos in the White House. Oh no, the chaos and the crazy left and the Democrats.
00:00:43.460 We do this because we like to feign hardship. This is something that people do. This is how
00:00:49.360 people bond sometimes in groups. If you're meeting a new group of people, if you're working together
00:00:54.420 or you're on a project together, you're at a conference or something, you'll notice people
00:00:58.120 like to complain because they sometimes bond over imagined or real hardship. But I am here to tell
00:01:05.480 you, especially with today's news cycle, politics has never been this fun. And it is nowhere clearer
00:01:12.680 than in President Trump's tweet storm about the social media summit. Talk about taking a frustrating
00:01:19.080 news item and turning it to just pure joy. We'll get to that in a second. But first,
00:01:23.880 I need to proselytize to you about my favorite way to sleep, which is purple mattress. Come into my
00:01:32.380 boudoir. Please sleep as though you are sleeping in my bed. Am I me tooing you right now? I might be. I
00:01:37.820 don't know. Purple mattress is the greatest mattress ever invented. Period. I love it. I've had the
00:01:45.120 privilege. You know, I travel all around the country to college campuses. I had the privilege on one
00:01:49.080 occasion to stay at the Ritz Carlton, maybe the nicest hotel in the country. And every morning I
00:01:54.720 woke up and I thought, Oh, that just doesn't feel as good as my purple mattress. Purple mattress is
00:01:59.680 the greatest luxury I've ever slept in. It is firm and soft at the same time. How is that possible?
00:02:04.980 It's not an inner spring. It's not a memory foam. It's this new material. It was developed by rocket
00:02:10.360 scientists. I couldn't possibly explain it, but it's just amazing. It sleeps cool, which is really
00:02:15.220 important in the summer. So you're not going to just wake up in a puddle of sweat. It's, it's an
00:02:19.560 unbelievable bet. I recommend it to all of my friends. And even the Ritz Carlton feels like I'm
00:02:25.500 sleeping on a heap of garbage compared to my purple mattress. How about that? It gives you a zero
00:02:31.100 gravity like feel for any sleeping position. And you get a 100 night risk-free trial. If you are not
00:02:36.800 fully satisfied, you can return your mattress for a full refund. You're not going to want to return it.
00:02:40.680 It's just great. Back by 10 year warranty, free shipping and returns, free in-home setup and old
00:02:45.420 mattress removal. You're going to love purple. Right now, my listeners will get a free purple
00:02:50.860 pillow with the purchase of a mattress. That is in addition to the great free gifts they're offering
00:02:55.340 site-wide. How do you get this amazing deal? Take out your phone. If you're driving, pull over.
00:03:00.940 Text Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to 84888. The only way to get this free pillow is to text Knowles,
00:03:08.440 K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to 84888. Message and data rates may apply. K-N-O-W-L-E-S, to 84888.
00:03:19.540 There's a social media summit going on at the White House right now.
00:03:23.120 Why are they doing this? Because the social media big tech companies, every single one of them,
00:03:27.900 have shown that they are willing to censor conservatives. And it started out with the
00:03:31.980 fringy people like Alex Jones, and then it moved into more mainstream kind of comedian types like
00:03:36.820 Gavin McGinnis. Then they started going after Stephen Crowder, who's about as mainstream as
00:03:40.960 they get. They're going after all of us. They've demonetized a lot of my videos on YouTube. They
00:03:46.160 have restricted or outright censored some of my videos on YouTube. They restricted my PragerU video
00:03:51.900 about how important words are. They're going after all of us. So President Trump is going to hold a
00:03:57.940 White House summit. Here is how he announced the summit on Twitter. Quote,
00:04:02.180 A big subject today at the White House Social Media Summit will be the tremendous dishonesty,
00:04:07.400 bias, discrimination, and suppression practiced by certain companies. We will not let them get
00:04:12.940 away with it much longer. The fake news media will also be there, but for a limited period.
00:04:17.800 The fake news is not as important or as powerful as social media. They have lost tremendous credibility
00:04:23.340 since that day in November 2016 that I came down the escalator with the person who is to become
00:04:29.060 your future first lady. When I ultimately leave office in six years, or maybe 10 or 14, just kidding,
00:04:36.440 they will quickly go out of business for lack of credibility or approval from the public. That's why
00:04:42.060 they will all be endorsing me at some point, one way or the other. Could you imagine having sleepy Joe
00:04:47.840 Biden or Alfred E. Newman or a very nervous and skinny version of Pocahontas, 1,000 out of 24th,
00:04:56.800 I think he got that fraction wrong. As your president, rather than what you have now,
00:05:01.500 so great looking and smart, a true stable genius.
00:05:08.000 Sorry to say that even social media would be driven out of business along with, and finally,
00:05:15.080 the fake news media. I'm sorry. I thought I could get through it and I can't. I also want to point out
00:05:20.800 there are some kind of random capitalizations in here. When he was referring to Pete Buttigieg,
00:05:26.100 who he calls Alfred E. Newman, like the Mad Magazine character, he actually tagged an Alfred
00:05:30.180 E. Newman account. So I don't know who that person is. This was a masterpiece. Comparative literature
00:05:37.640 classes, poetry classes are going to be studying this tweet storm in the future for its rhetorical
00:05:44.920 brilliance. I'm not kidding. What more could you want? This is hilarious and it actually accomplishes
00:05:52.940 something. So a lot of people, what they think is that Trump's tweet storms are just gratuitous.
00:05:57.200 They're crazy. They're weird. They're wacky. They might be weird. They might be wacky, but they're
00:06:01.340 not gratuitous. They actually are accomplishing something. They have a point. He's not just writing
00:06:07.100 them because they're funny. He's writing them because they are calling attention to the social
00:06:12.060 media summit. We haven't heard a whole lot about this social media summit. A couple headlines here and
00:06:17.680 there, but the mainstream media and the big tech companies have had every interest in blacking it
00:06:22.560 out. It hasn't really been trending on social media. Mainstream media haven't been covering it. Why?
00:06:27.080 Because conservative voices in social media are a huge threat to both of those institutions.
00:06:32.380 So how does Trump call attention to it? Is he sends out this wacky tweet storm that is too much to ignore.
00:06:40.300 So he, how does he, he goes after the fake news. So he hits them really hard, but maybe they could
00:06:48.160 ignore that. Then he says, we won't let them get away with it much longer. So there's a threat. You
00:06:52.220 think they'd probably have to cover the threat. Then he just starts talking about how he walked down
00:06:57.760 the escalator with his wife. And that's kind of strange. Then he says he might leave office in 10 or
00:07:03.300 14 years. So he might stay beyond his constitutional term limits. He says, just kidding. But you just feel
00:07:09.120 if you're in the media, you have to report on that. Then he makes fun of Joe Biden. Then he makes fun of
00:07:16.440 Pete Buttigieg. Then he makes fun of Elizabeth Warren. And as he's making fun of her, he gets
00:07:23.680 the fraction wrong. She's one 1,024th Native American. He says it's 1,000 out of 24th, which would make her
00:07:30.520 incredibly Native American. It would make her many, many multiples Native American.
00:07:34.640 It's 1,000 divided by 24 is quite a lot. Then he uses this phrase, which is the one that's
00:07:41.920 actually been plucked out. So great looking and smart, a true stable genius. The media at this
00:07:48.640 point, even if they could ignore the other stuff, they can't ignore that because it's hilarious.
00:07:53.480 And they will use that to pretend that Trump is a crazy narcissist. He's not. He's just really,
00:07:58.840 really good at getting attention because he's gotten everyone's attention. Obviously he's got my
00:08:02.940 attention. I'm reading the whole thing, but everybody has been doing this in the mainstream
00:08:06.340 media today. And now we're talking about the social media summit. So what is the social media
00:08:11.000 summit? Trump invited his most ardent social media supporters to the White House to discuss censorship.
00:08:19.340 So CNN, now that they have to report on this, CNN has been describing them as right-wing extremists.
00:08:25.040 The White House is in chaos as the right-wing extremists descend. So who was invited?
00:08:30.000 The head of the students for Trump. See, a right-wing extremist. I mean, he's the young
00:08:37.300 Trump supporter. A Twitter account named Carpe Donctum, which describes itself as the eternally
00:08:44.180 sarcastic meme smith specializing in the creation of memes to support President Donald J. Trump.
00:08:50.960 And the talk show host Bill Mitchell, who is a huge Trump supporter. His Twitter banner is just like a
00:08:56.440 glowing golden picture of Donald Trump. These are not far-right people. He's not inviting
00:09:02.480 white nationalists, neo-Nazis, all the regular gang that the mainstream media scaremongers with.
00:09:10.940 He is, however, inviting eccentric people. I mean, one of the guy's names is Carpe Donctum. That's
00:09:16.020 pretty eccentric. This sends the right message. The message that this is sending is that the White
00:09:22.160 House is not going to back down on this. So he's threatening. He's saying there will be
00:09:26.840 consequences. What will the consequences be? I don't know. He probably doesn't know. But he's
00:09:30.580 saying there will be. He then holds the summit, which in itself shows that they're taking this
00:09:34.960 seriously. And then, crucially, he's not just inviting the buttoned-up people. He's not just
00:09:40.900 inviting the ones who have bow ties on and who are really super serious and have a lot of law degrees.
00:09:46.400 He's inviting these hardcore pro-Trump social media accounts with names like Carpe Donctum.
00:09:54.420 He's saying we're not going to give an inch. We're not going to apologize at all. It sends an
00:09:58.400 important message into 2020. We'll get to that in a second, and then we'll get to this wonderful
00:10:02.700 story about Nancy Pelosi. But first, I have to thank another sponsor and invite you once again
00:10:08.320 into my boudoir. You are so lucky today. I've got to tell you about Bolin Branch Sheets. You know,
00:10:13.760 really, the same could be said of Bolin Branch. I talk about how much I love my mattress.
00:10:18.900 Bolin Branch Sheets is another example of, if you ever have the opportunity to stay
00:10:23.040 at some of these super-duper nice hotels, one thing you'll notice is that the sheets feel
00:10:28.260 completely different from the sheets you have at home. Because the sheets you have at home,
00:10:31.640 if you're anything like me, you would go out and buy the cheapest things at the store,
00:10:35.740 and maybe they'd feel like sandpaper or they'd feel like really nothing at all.
00:10:39.080 Bolin Branch Sheets give you that five-star hotel luxury quality at home for an incredible deal.
00:10:47.480 When I started registering for my wedding gifts last year when I was getting married,
00:10:51.640 I would notice that really high-quality luxury sheets could cost $1,000. Sometimes they could
00:10:56.620 cost even more than that. Bolin Branch Sheets give you exactly the same quality, but they're only a
00:11:01.600 couple hundred bucks. How do they do that? Because they cut out the middleman. So they go direct to
00:11:06.220 you. They pass on those savings. From bedding to blankets, everything Bolin Branch makes is made
00:11:10.360 from pure, 100% organic cotton. It means they start out very soft. They're already very soft once you
00:11:16.700 try them, but they get softer over time. Somehow the sheets get better the more you use them.
00:11:21.680 Shipping is free. You can try them for 30 nights. There is no risk and no reason not to give them a
00:11:26.160 try. You know that I take my sleep very seriously. I need at least 19, 20 hours a night of sleep to
00:11:31.760 maintain this beauty. I need to make sure I get my beauty rest. Bolin Branch Sheets are top of the
00:11:38.960 line. To get you started right now, my listeners will get $50 off your first set of sheets at
00:11:44.620 bolinbranch.com, promo code Michael, M-I-C-H-A-E-L. $50 off your first set of sheets is a pretty good
00:11:51.040 deal. I'm saving you a lot of money. Go to bolinbranch.com for $50 off your first set of sheets.
00:11:56.160 B-O-L-L and branch.com, promo code Michael. Bolinbranch.com, promo code Michael.
00:12:02.700 So what is the message that Trump is sending here into 2020?
00:12:07.200 The previous GOP strategy, this is like BT. We're dividing time between BT and, I don't know,
00:12:16.180 AT, the year of our Trump. In BT, in before Trump time, the GOP would have experienced all this
00:12:24.740 censorship, would have experienced all this slander, all of these smears, and they would
00:12:28.860 have stayed quiet. Don't dignify it with a response. Don't acknowledge the eccentric figures in our
00:12:36.020 ranks, people who give themselves names like Carpe Donctum and who post memes all over Twitter. No,
00:12:42.340 no, they're not. We just wear bow ties and we go to really fancy lunches in Washington.
00:12:47.680 That was the old, you know, I love George W. Bush, but George W. Bush did not know how to handle the
00:12:53.560 media. Same thing with Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney had no idea how to handle the media. Still doesn't.
00:12:59.540 Trump doubles down. And he doesn't just double down and say, I defend this person. I defend their
00:13:05.160 right to free speech. He doubles down about how good looking he is. He invites Carpe Donctum to the
00:13:12.100 White House. This shows boldness. It's not just words. It's not just paying lip service to giving
00:13:18.380 everyone a fair shot. He is actually exhibiting that boldness himself. We talk about this all the
00:13:23.600 time. The best defense is a good offense. This has always been the case. So my only criticism of this
00:13:32.320 event is that I'm not there, but I'll be in D.C. in a couple of weeks. So maybe I'll get to stop by
00:13:37.720 the Covfefe Palace then. That is the hope. This is good news on the GOP front, but there's even more
00:13:43.740 good news, which is on the Democrat front. And this is the chickens coming home to roost. This
00:13:50.220 was only a matter of time. For years now, the left has baselessly smeared conservatives as bigots.
00:13:58.960 We've warned the whole time this is harmful to the public discourse. It's dangerous in a
00:14:03.440 democratic republic. You shouldn't be able to just smear people as bigots. The Democrats haven't
00:14:08.120 cared. They've egged it on. Now the chickens are coming home to roost because the Democrats are
00:14:14.520 starting to use this same cynical strategy against the older Democrats. How did all of this start?
00:14:21.640 How did AOC and her compatriots start accusing Nancy Pelosi of racism? This all started because
00:14:28.960 the most vocal Democrat showboaters on this border crisis refused last week to vote for funding to
00:14:36.540 help mitigate the crisis. That's Ilhan Omar, AOC, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley. These are all
00:14:43.980 the young radicals who every day have me wondering if President Trump should just dissolve the Congress
00:14:48.480 and name himself king for life. I mean, if this is the future of our country, this is the future of
00:14:52.940 Congress. It doesn't look very good. And so they've been talking about how important it is to fund this
00:14:58.200 crisis and get the beds and get the sheets and help the kids. And then it comes time for a bipartisan
00:15:03.580 border funding bill. This had broad bipartisan agreement and they wouldn't do it. And even
00:15:10.220 mainstream leftists called them out over this hypocritical border vote. Here is Rashida Tlaib
00:15:15.720 on Martha Raddatz's show on ABC trying to answer for her hypocritical vote.
00:15:21.020 I want to stop you here for just a second. McAleenan has been sounding the alarm for months for resources
00:15:27.300 to help the migrants. You voted against the $4.6 billion emergency border bill to deal with the
00:15:33.480 surge of migrants that included almost $3 billion to provide shelter and care for unaccompanied
00:15:38.980 children. Acting Secretary McAleenan says those funds are critical to get children out of custody and
00:15:45.240 transfer. Even if the bill didn't have anything you wanted. Do you know what the CPP agents said
00:15:50.520 on the ground though, Martha? She's proud. I'm this, I'm that. She won't even let Martha Raddatz
00:15:56.080 get the question out because she knows the question is a total indictment of her. So Nancy Pelosi uses
00:16:03.120 this opportunity to show, look, guys, these screeching, ignorant, young Congresswomen don't know
00:16:09.620 anything. They're, they're not actually the leaders of this party. We're the ones getting things done.
00:16:14.980 Pelosi tells the New York Times and tells Maureen Dowd, who's a columnist there, quote,
00:16:19.260 all these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world, but they didn't have any
00:16:23.980 following. They're four people and that's how many votes they got. Pretty harsh criticism from the
00:16:29.260 Speaker of the House. She's completely right. AOC made it to Congress with 14,000 votes.
00:16:36.400 There are about a quarter million registered voters in her district, maybe more than that.
00:16:42.300 She got 14,000 votes in that primary that no one thought was going to matter because there was an
00:16:46.940 entrenched incumbent and Joe, it was Joe Crowley. He'd been there for a long time and he didn't
00:16:52.960 campaign. She went in, she got 14,000 votes. She wins the primary. She makes it to Congress. So she's
00:16:57.700 got this huge, almost 5 million person Twitter following. No one actually in her district likes her
00:17:03.220 that much. She's polling very low in her district. In fact, part of the reason why AOC
00:17:08.060 is making such a spectacle of herself is because there's a fair chance that she won't get reelected.
00:17:14.080 There's rumors up in New York that they're going to redistrict her out of her district.
00:17:18.540 So she makes this big spectacle. AOC seizes on that. How can, or rather Pelosi seizes on that
00:17:25.180 toward AOC? Now, how can AOC respond? She could respond by showing why Nancy Pelosi is wrong on the
00:17:32.520 border. She could respond by making a principled argument about how Congress's complicity in the
00:17:38.820 border crisis. She could respond by trying to secure the border and discouraging people from
00:17:42.980 putting themselves in this position in the first place by crossing illegally. But she didn't do any of
00:17:47.940 that because she's a hardcore radical leftist and she doesn't know anything. So instead she called
00:17:54.280 Pelosi racist. And I, oh, I love it so much. Oh, it's just the greatest. I wish they would do this all
00:18:02.200 the time. She tells the Washington Post, quote, the persistent singling out, it got to a point where it
00:18:07.700 was just outright disrespectful. The explicit singling out of newly elected women of color. Take that Nancy
00:18:16.300 Pelosi. Wasn't just AOC. Ilhan Omar jumped on this bandwagon too. She tweeted out, quote,
00:18:23.220 patético. I guess she's, she must've learned from Beto O'Rourke and Cory Booker and Julian Castro and
00:18:29.240 Jose Diaz-Balart that in America now we speak Spanish instead of English. I don't know. I wonder
00:18:34.760 why they call her un-American. Patético, she writes. You know they're just salty about who is wielding the
00:18:42.320 power to shift public sentiment these days. Cis, sorry, not sorry. It's like the worst combination
00:18:49.980 of millennial thinking and millennial language. The millennial thinking is if you disagree with me,
00:18:55.100 you're a bigot. Everyone who disagrees with me is Hitler. That's, that's the millennial leftist
00:19:00.320 mantra. And then there's all this stupid language. You call each other cis, S-I-S, like sister,
00:19:06.260 gender, which means you're assuming their gender. And that's horribly offensive as far as I'm
00:19:11.980 concerned. Then they'll say things like, sorry, not sorry, just these sort of vapid expressions.
00:19:16.640 And all the point, the point is just very blunt and simple. She's calling Nancy Pelosi a racist.
00:19:22.380 What's ironic about this, and you know my feelings on Nancy Pelosi, there is no evidence that Nancy
00:19:28.600 Pelosi harbors some racial bigotry. It's like when they tried to call Biden a racist. There's no evidence
00:19:33.820 of that. There is, however, plenty of evidence that these young, fresh faces, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib,
00:19:41.820 those people, that they actually do harbor racial bigotry. Ilhan Omar, just to remind you, has claimed that
00:19:49.060 Israel hypnotized the world, and she has publicly prayed to Allah to awaken people to the evil of Israel.
00:19:56.800 She has claimed that politicians only support Israel because the Jews bribe them, and she has also claimed
00:20:02.360 that Jews aren't loyal to the United States. Repeatedly done this, Ilhan Omar. Pelosi was the
00:20:09.680 one who had to say, hey, lady, cool it on the racism. Ayanna Pressley, who's another one of these
00:20:14.240 fresh faces, she tweeted out just yesterday or two days ago to Kellyanne Conway, quote,
00:20:19.480 at Kellyanne, oh, hi, distraction, Becky. Remember that time your boss tore babies from their mother's
00:20:25.520 arms and threw them in cages? Yeah, take a seat and keep my name out of your lying mouth. Now,
00:20:31.740 for those of you who aren't familiar with like weird leftist millennial speak, Becky is a derogatory term
00:20:38.400 for white women. So Becky is considered this generic white woman name. It's kind of like calling someone
00:20:45.440 a cracker. It's saying you're bland, you know, to be a white woman is to be sort of uninteresting and
00:20:51.320 boring. This is the sort of thing that we would expect from Ayanna Pressley. To give you context,
00:20:58.240 Ayanna Pressley is a graduate of the same college as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and it shows.
00:21:04.800 Pressley, rather, has never done anything in her professional life other than work for politicians
00:21:09.600 or be a politician. So she's got a very narrow and shallow background. But just consider the racism
00:21:17.120 of that statement to call, to criticize Kellyanne Conway on the basis of her race. Imagine if a
00:21:24.720 white congresswoman referred to a black senior White House advisor by some stereotypically black
00:21:30.940 name, as though that were a slur. If they said, oh, hi, distraction, Shaniqua. Oh, hi, distraction,
00:21:37.320 Chantel. I don't know. Imagine the outrage that you would hear from that. Actually, you don't have to
00:21:43.180 imagine it because, forget a Republican congresswoman, a comedian, a generally left-wing
00:21:48.480 comedian, one time made a racially offensive joke about a black senior White House aide who was
00:21:55.460 Valerie Jarrett. That was Roseanne Barr who made that joke. She lost her network TV show within hours.
00:22:04.360 But Ayanna Pressley, fresh-faced Democratic congresswoman, does the exact same thing to a
00:22:10.140 woman in the exact same position? Nothing. Nada. Doesn't matter. They don't bring it up.
00:22:17.060 This has always been the double standard. And I suspect it's going to continue to be the double
00:22:21.200 standard. Conservatives have always just dealt with it. I mean, it is hard to fight back against this
00:22:26.280 because we don't want to get in the muck with them as much as they do. It's just disgusting. You
00:22:30.540 don't want to get into a fight with a skunk because either way you're not going to leave smelling very
00:22:33.800 good. But now, finally, the Democrats themselves are experiencing the poisonous fruits of their
00:22:40.840 decades of racial divisiveness. This is it. I mean, Nancy Pelosi and her whole crew, they stoked this
00:22:47.940 racial resentment. They stoked all of this racial division. And now they are the victims of it because
00:22:54.240 it never ends. If you have a politics that's just based on division and entitlement and resentment
00:23:00.140 and envy, that's not going to end. We're not going to reach a point where those evil, wicked lusts and
00:23:08.360 passions are satisfied. They are ravenous passions. They go on forever. And now the Democrats are eating
00:23:13.060 their own, and it's absolutely fabulous to watch. Meanwhile, during this entire clown show,
00:23:19.860 one story that has not really gone mentioned is we've more or less just averted a war with Iran
00:23:25.040 like yesterday. Yesterday, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is the military
00:23:32.540 wing of Iran, attempted to seize a British oil tanker in the Persian Gulf. So Iran for weeks now
00:23:39.360 has been provoking the West because they're trying to create a sense of urgency to save the Iran deal
00:23:45.140 that is more or less expired. And they're trying to save certain waivers from Europe so that Europe can
00:23:51.160 continue to cooperate with Iran. And so what did they do? They set a couple oil tankers on fire.
00:23:56.660 They shot down our drone out of the sky. They're trying to provoke us into some kind of conflict
00:24:00.860 to scare the entire world about a war in Iran and a war in the Middle East so that we'll give in to
00:24:07.100 them and basically appease Iran. I guess we've forgotten that appeasement hasn't worked very well
00:24:12.920 in history. So Iran now, the latest thing they've done, because the US and Europe has really handled
00:24:19.520 these provocations with great restraint and pretty well. So what they did yesterday is they sent a
00:24:25.220 couple boats to go seize a British oil tanker. What they didn't expect, though, is that the British
00:24:32.140 oil tanker was being escorted by the HMS Montrose, which was much more heavily armed than the British
00:24:38.840 tanker. So you've got this incredibly provocative maneuver by Iran to basically force the oil tanker
00:24:45.340 into Iranian waters so that they can seize it. At that point, that's when the Brits turned their
00:24:50.480 four and a half inch main gun and their surface ship torpedo defense on the Iranian boats, in addition
00:24:57.440 to two 30 millimeter automatic machine guns and a sea captor missile system. And just just to kick it
00:25:04.480 all off, they deployed their rocket launching helicopter to circle the Iranian boats. So it's just like
00:25:10.760 these little, you know, Iranian bullies pull up and then you just see the full weight of the British
00:25:17.580 empire as though it were resurrected again in the Straits of Hormuz and the Iranians back off.
00:25:25.240 Of course, what are they going to do? They blow them out of the water. This was the, uh, this was the,
00:25:30.900 the very subdued response from the British. The Royal Navy, HMS Montrose, which was also there,
00:25:37.080 pointed its guns at the boats and warned them over radio at which point they dispersed.
00:25:42.680 Classic British understatement. You know, it's, it's, as if to say, yes, well, no, no big deal. You
00:25:47.600 know, uh, it's okay. We, we averted it. This was a major provocation. This could have turned into open
00:25:52.400 fire. How was this averted? How was the possibility of war averted? It was because the British were
00:25:59.400 prepared to go to war. I mean, this is the premise that we've been talking about for weeks.
00:26:04.520 The way you get peace is by being prepared for war. You get peace through strength. It's the
00:26:11.360 phrase of Ronald Reagan. It's the phrase of Barry Goldwater. It's the phrase of conservatives now
00:26:15.300 for 70 years. Peace through strength. You'll hear the left try to, uh, browbeat conservatives and say,
00:26:25.040 you're warmongers, you're hawks, you're bloodthirsty because we want to build up the military.
00:26:30.500 You should point out to them that the two most peaceful presidents in modern history
00:26:35.400 are Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump. And those are the two guys who were called cowboys. Those
00:26:39.900 are the two guys who were called warmongers. Those are two guys who have built up the military
00:26:44.080 dramatically, but they've built up the military because they know by building it up, they're
00:26:48.880 reducing the likelihood that, that we're going to actually have to deploy the military.
00:26:52.680 Bullies. When you don't stand up to a bully, when you appease a bully, that is an open invitation for
00:27:02.160 aggression. That is an open invitation for war. When you stand up to them and you launch your,
00:27:09.880 you deploy your rocket launching helicopter to circle them and you point all your guns at them
00:27:14.020 and you say, we will blow you out of the water. Not a shot is fired. That's how you have peace.
00:27:22.020 It's a lesson the left doesn't usually get, but we should send it because the lessons of history
00:27:26.660 are clear. Appeasement doesn't work and, and being prepared for war does work. And moreover,
00:27:32.780 imagine if a bullet had gone off yesterday, we would be talking today about possible war with Iran.
00:27:37.240 And now we don't have to talk about that. Now we just get to talk about Donald Trump calling himself
00:27:42.720 good-looking and youthful and a very stable genius and making fun of Sleepy Joe and making fun of
00:27:49.340 Alfred E. Newman, Pete Buttigieg and watching the democratic party implode on its own premises
00:27:54.900 because now they're just all calling each other racists and bigots. We get this wonderful news cycle.
00:28:01.000 Politics has never been more fun than it is right now. And the reason it's fun is because we're
00:28:06.100 extraordinarily prepared. We're showing a tough face to big tech, tough face to censorship,
00:28:11.440 tough face to Iran. Because we are standing up, willing to do hard things, we get to have as much
00:28:19.300 fun and we get to guzzle as many leftist tears as we want. We've got to get to the mailbag. But first,
00:28:23.920 speaking of leftist tears, go over to dailywire.com. You get me, you get the Andrew Klavan show,
00:28:27.900 you get the Ben Shapiro show, you get the Matt Wolfe show, you get to ask questions in the mailbag
00:28:31.800 that's coming up right now. You get to ask questions backstage. You get another kingdom,
00:28:35.600 you get everything and you get the leftist tears tumbler. Never more important than now. And it's
00:28:41.260 only going to heat up as we approach 2020. Go to dailywire.com. We'll be right back with the mailbag.
00:28:45.780 Jumping right in from Brett. Michael, was Martin Luther King a socialist? Yes. Yes, he was.
00:29:04.580 Don't take my word for it. In a letter dated July 18th, 1952, Martin Luther King wrote, quote,
00:29:11.580 quote, I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than
00:29:16.900 capitalistic. It was 1952. One of the lines that sometimes conservatives will say is that
00:29:23.200 Martin Luther King for most of his life was very conservative and he was very capitalistic and
00:29:28.940 oriented toward free markets. And then only later in his life, in the early 1960s, did he become a
00:29:34.260 little more radical and more socialistic. That isn't true. He always had a pretty socialist economic
00:29:39.400 bent to him. Both sides want to claim Martin Luther King. The conservatives claim Martin Luther King
00:29:45.560 because of his most famous speech, I Have a Dream, in which he talks about a world in which racial
00:29:50.660 division won't matter and black children will play with white children. And this is a vision that
00:29:55.580 conservatives love. And the left claims Martin Luther King because he said certain things that these
00:30:00.880 days we might call identitarian. He was an advocate for black people, for black rights, because he was
00:30:07.060 economically quite radical. He wanted a jobs program. He wanted the war on poverty. He wanted
00:30:11.660 more socialist economics. He at one point talked about the nationalization of industry as being a
00:30:17.700 good thing. And so he's a complex figure. We have made him a simple figure because we claim him as a
00:30:23.820 secular saint. I mean, we have a day for him. We celebrate him on the secular liturgical year.
00:30:29.100 We've turned him into a legend that he really was not. You know, he had supreme moral clarity in
00:30:37.180 certain areas. If you watch his speech, I've Been to the Mountaintop, it's one of the most powerful
00:30:41.580 speeches in American history. And then he was murdered the next day. Then you learn that he was
00:30:47.580 one of the most prolific womanizers in the history of American politics. You realize that he didn't always
00:30:53.160 practice his moral vision himself. And parts of his moral vision were wrong, like socialism.
00:30:58.180 socialism. The worship, the veneration of Martin Luther King, veneration is the better word here.
00:31:05.180 The veneration of Martin Luther King is problematic because he's a sort of problematic figure.
00:31:11.640 This is why a lot of conservatives at the time that the Martin Luther King Day was created
00:31:15.560 suggested that if there was going to be a day for the advancement of black people and for the
00:31:21.180 abolition of slavery and to commemorate the advancement of civil rights, particularly for blacks,
00:31:25.900 that that day should celebrate Frederick Douglass rather than Martin Luther King. And I tend to be
00:31:30.860 of that persuasion too. I think Frederick Douglass is one of the greatest writers in American history.
00:31:35.260 He was profoundly anti-socialist. He defended the rights of property. And this obviously partakes
00:31:43.620 much more of sort of our theories of natural law and the foundation on which the country was built.
00:31:48.680 So it would be nice to have a Frederick Douglass Day. It would be nice if he were the one that we
00:31:52.760 were to look to because unfortunately the left has a point when they say Martin Luther King had many
00:31:58.480 leftist dogmas and many socialist dogmas. That's true and it was true even in the early 1950s.
00:32:04.320 From Adam, would you rather meet and have a conversation with your great-great-great-grandfather
00:32:09.940 or your great-great-great-grandson? Who would you like to learn more from, the past or the future?
00:32:16.480 Certainly my great-great-great-grandfather. There's no question about that. I don't care
00:32:20.340 what happens to my great-great-great-great-grandson. I don't care what his world is like. It won't
00:32:25.540 affect me. I'll be long dead by the time he comes around. And to meet my great-great-great-grandson
00:32:32.160 would compromise my free will because I'd see how history has unfolded. And so I wouldn't be living it in
00:32:37.540 real time. I would be dooming myself to a sort of fatalism or a determinism. And I don't want any of
00:32:42.380 that. But I am interested in the future. And the way that you learn about the future is you learn
00:32:46.680 about the past. Because we live our lives in narrative. We live our lives in stories. And our
00:32:52.100 understanding of the past profoundly influences our understanding of the present which shapes
00:32:56.400 our future. So I would love to meet my great-great-great-grandfather. And for a couple
00:33:01.560 reasons. One, I think there's a lot that has been lost over the last 100 or 200 years. And so it would
00:33:07.100 be good to see what's been lost and try to bring it back. On the other hand, I think conservatives
00:33:11.440 in particular are given to nostalgia, which is history after a few drinks, as my priest Father
00:33:16.820 Rutler says. So you don't want to be nostalgic either. You want to talk to this guy and he'll
00:33:21.120 tell you, yeah, things weren't so great then either. Yeah, we had the same daily concerns that you guys
00:33:26.160 have too. And this is what happens generally when you open a history book. When you engage with the
00:33:31.500 reality of history, you realize that the legends that we tell ourselves aren't quite so simple.
00:33:36.700 And actually what happened is much more complicated and much more interesting from
00:33:41.100 Anonymous. Dear Michael, King of Covfefe, my girlfriend and I have had issues lately. We've
00:33:48.760 been dating for four years and recently have discovered some religious and philosophical
00:33:53.280 differences in us. For example, she's open to the idea of Christianity, but she can't guarantee
00:33:59.720 conversion. She doesn't explicitly denounce abortion as evil, etc.
00:34:05.100 What do you suggest is the best course of action? Do I try to convert her to my Christian
00:34:11.380 morals and beliefs? If so, how? I love her very much and want to make this work. Thanks. All
00:34:16.540 the best, Anonymous. I would not recommend picking a girlfriend or a fiance or a wife based on some
00:34:29.080 checklist. I would not recommend doing it based on whether she checks off all the boxes. I think
00:34:36.600 that's so clinical. It's not how love really works. And what we're talking about is love. You're not
00:34:42.580 just picking someone to serve you. You are falling in love. And if you're falling in love, then your love
00:34:49.020 for that person, your desire, your will will help to transform that person. You know, I've known sweet
00:34:54.880 little Elisa since we were about 10 years old and we dated in high school. We split for college. We
00:34:59.820 got back together later. We've kind of weaved in and out. We were always in each other's lives
00:35:02.940 though. And you learn something, which is you either grow together or you grow apart.
00:35:08.640 And it is almost impossible not to grow together if you love each other and you, you spend a lot of
00:35:15.440 time together. You, you sort of have to, I mean, it's, that's just how people, I mean, this happens
00:35:21.540 with your friends. You will be influenced by your friends. You will be known by the friends you keep.
00:35:25.780 And that is all the more true when you're talking about someone you're dating or fiance or wife.
00:35:32.120 That said, doesn't mean you should just lay off and say, oh, it doesn't matter at all.
00:35:36.400 If you have religious and philosophical differences, you should talk about it. Not in a scolding way,
00:35:41.540 not in a debating way, but in a loving way. You, you think that you understand the truth and you
00:35:49.100 obviously then want to convince the person you love of the truth. And I suspect the same is true
00:35:53.780 of her. You know, in that, since I've been 10 years old, since I met sweet little Elisa,
00:35:59.900 she and I have held very different views. We've kind of gone in all sorts of directions and we've
00:36:05.000 grown together. Now we agree on probably most things, but it's not always the case. And our views
00:36:09.960 are changing on things all the time too, as new evidence presents itself and circumstances change.
00:36:14.380 That's the way that I would do it. You know, Cole Porter saying, let's do it. Let's fall in love.
00:36:19.620 He didn't say, let's do it. Let's make sure that on a checklist, we all check every single box
00:36:24.260 and that you can be a good spouse for me and fulfill my needs. It's not how it goes.
00:36:30.460 You want to make sure that you don't have fundamental oppositional ideas of the world.
00:36:36.040 I mean, that's going to be very important when you raise children, but it doesn't sound like
00:36:39.460 that's quite the issue. So I would, uh, I would say go along with it and, you know,
00:36:44.280 have a love affair. And, and, uh, if it stops working, it's fine. Break up, find somebody else.
00:36:49.560 But if you're just worried about something 30 years down the road, some problem that you're
00:36:53.260 inventing, don't borrow a problem from the future for today, sufficient to today or the problems of
00:36:59.800 of today. From Mark, Michael, I think you were off base when you criticized Megan Rapinoe for saying,
00:37:07.700 I deserve this when she won the soccer game. I'm not a fan of Megan. She and her team had just won
00:37:13.420 the world woman's cup and was basking in that glory. That did look like an alcoholic beverage
00:37:18.000 in her hand. I suspect that her statement was more from an ego fulfilled than from leftism.
00:37:23.100 She just won big time. Love the commentary. Keep up the great work. Mark. I agree with you that
00:37:29.560 what she was doing was fulfilling her own ego. I'm just saying that's wrong. And it's,
00:37:34.440 it's especially wrong in sports. It's unsportsmanlike. You're not supposed to do that.
00:37:38.740 At the end of a game, you're supposed to go around and say good game to everybody. You're supposed to
00:37:42.040 be humble. You're supposed to obviously take some joy in your achievement. You're supposed to
00:37:46.940 succeed. You're supposed to win. But then you're not supposed to just talk about how great you are and say,
00:37:53.000 I deserve this. I deserve this. I mean, she wasn't joking when she said, you can sort of joke about
00:37:58.580 I'm the greatest. Muhammad Ali sometimes would joke about it. I'm the greatest. But there was a real
00:38:03.560 wit. There was a real cleverness. She didn't have wit or cleverness. She said, I deserve this.
00:38:07.340 She doesn't deserve this. She won a sports game for a variety of reasons, some of which are her own
00:38:11.660 talent, which she doesn't deserve. She was just given her talent. Some of which is her skill, which she has
00:38:16.900 worked on and developed over time. Some of which are the circumstances of the people she was playing with
00:38:21.640 and the people that she was playing against. Say thank you. Say good game to the other guys. Say,
00:38:26.940 I'm really glad we won. Say, it's really cool that I get to hold this trophy. Say, I'm so grateful to
00:38:31.000 this country that they would allow me to represent them, to have this great feat. But I deserve this.
00:38:37.060 She doesn't deserve anything. What you're saying is it's not about leftism. It's about ego fulfilled.
00:38:42.920 Leftism is ego fulfilled. I mean, they actually celebrate pride. It's all just me, me, me. I deserve this.
00:38:49.680 I deserve that. That is what it is. You're completely right, but that's leftism and that's
00:38:54.700 no good. From Michael. Hey, Michael. It's Michael. Hi, Michael. Out of all in the Daily Wire, cheers
00:39:00.100 to you for having the best show. That's very kind. Thank you very much. Feel free to gloat. Well,
00:39:04.240 I'm not Megan Rapinoe, so maybe I won't. Anyways, how do you react when there are things that are
00:39:09.140 personally challenging for your faith, whether that be history or doctrine? Good question. History
00:39:15.880 doesn't challenge my faith. One, because the history of Christianity is extraordinarily misrepresented in
00:39:23.320 the pop culture. And as someone who spent even a few moments skimming through the history,
00:39:28.500 you can just point out the glaring historical inaccuracies that people regularly point to.
00:39:34.020 You know, the Crusades is the worst event in the history of the world or something like that.
00:39:38.540 So the history wouldn't bother me, though, even if it were true, because people are fallen and
00:39:43.440 institutions are imperfect. And that's just that not only is history imperfect and flawed,
00:39:50.860 but so is the present and so will be the future. That doesn't challenge my faith at all. Actually,
00:39:54.600 my faith tells us that. My faith tells us the poor will always be with us. My faith tells me,
00:40:00.600 take up your cross and bear it. So that's fine. The doctrinal aspects are actually one of the reasons
00:40:08.320 why I'm Catholic and why I like the Catholic Church quite a lot is because despite all of the many,
00:40:16.060 many immense problems over the millennia in the Catholic Church, the weight of their history,
00:40:21.680 the inertia of that institution has, I think, protected it from a lot of the doctrinal craziness
00:40:27.860 that we're now seeing in some of my other friends' churches, where they've got pride flags outside of
00:40:32.060 the church or they're changing doctrine willy-nilly or they're radically changing views of the human
00:40:40.360 person and marriage and abortion and life and all of these things. It's not to say that there aren't
00:40:45.740 a lot of Catholics who do want to change those things. It's just that the institution of the
00:40:50.200 church has prevented them from doing it because it's so old and has so much history. Even the popes
00:40:55.020 can't change doctrine. The popes are very fallible when they're trying to change doctrine. So it
00:41:01.520 doesn't present many challenges. I do have a lot of questions about the faith. I mean,
00:41:06.540 I don't know even one drop in the ocean of what the faith is. I don't comprehend even one iota of
00:41:14.100 the faith. But 10,000 problems or 10,000 questions doesn't make one doubt, as I believe John Henry
00:41:21.340 Newman said. From Nick. Hey, Eric Swalwell. I'm sorry you had to drop out of the presidential race.
00:41:27.340 Me too. Since you've acted in plays, I'm curious, what's your favorite work of Shakespeare if you
00:41:32.220 had to pick one? Personally, I don't think it gets any better than Hamlet. But what is your pick and
00:41:36.700 why? You're absolutely right, Nick. The answer is Hamlet. I think it's the greatest play ever written.
00:41:41.740 And the reason for that, I mean, there's a reason why it is considered the greatest play ever
00:41:46.120 written and why it's done all the time. Because it is so powerfully, broadly, and profoundly human.
00:41:54.040 And because the play is about a question that interests me very much, which is the history of
00:42:00.560 Western Christendom, particularly in light of the Protestant Revolution. So the play is really all about
00:42:06.960 the Protestant Revolution and the points that the Protestant revolutionaries were making,
00:42:13.020 and the problems of the Catholic Church and the points that the Catholic Church were making,
00:42:17.560 and what it means for Europe, that Christianity had this big split in Western Europe. And,
00:42:24.500 you know, even early on, Gertrude, the mother of Hamlet, says, don't go to Wittenberg. Don't go to
00:42:30.740 the center of Protestantism. You have Hamlet debating throughout the whole play doctrines of the faith.
00:42:37.060 From the very beginning, we see the soul of Hamlet's father is coming out from purgatory.
00:42:43.320 Many Protestants doubt the existence of purgatory. Later on, Hamlet doubts the existence of purgatory.
00:42:48.860 These questions are being debated throughout the whole play. And those are the questions that really
00:42:53.660 are animating the modern era from, say, 1500 to the present. And so we're seeing them work out there.
00:43:01.820 Unfortunately, the end of Hamlet is not terribly uplifting. That probably gives you a preview of
00:43:07.120 what we're in store for in modern Western Christendom. But, you know, it tells the story,
00:43:14.500 at least. And that's the purpose of art. All right, one last question. Let's see. One last question here.
00:43:22.160 I'll go down. I want, like, a good question. Okay, here we go. From Kurt.
00:43:26.720 Hey, Covfefe. I enjoy the show. What advice would you give to applicants who feel they have a
00:43:33.140 disadvantage in today's world for being a white male? Would you suggest they describe themselves
00:43:37.660 as Native American following the footsteps of Elizabeth Warren? Thanks, Matt. Well, you could
00:43:43.720 honestly say that. You could say that I'm a Native American. Native means born and from birth. And
00:43:50.920 American is American. I'm American from birth. I'm a Native American. That's it. So I could put that
00:43:56.120 down on my college essay, though I don't do it. It is true that right now there are laws on the books
00:44:02.000 that discriminate against white people and Asians, for instance, affirmative action in college
00:44:07.800 admissions. There is a sort of sense in the popular culture that being white is a bad thing. You heard
00:44:14.580 Ayanna Pressley make that derogatory comment about white women before. She's a member of Congress with
00:44:20.120 no pushback whatsoever from the media. Beyond race on sex, there is a sense that men are
00:44:26.100 awful. They talk about toxic masculinity. Women do everything better than men. Men are terrible
00:44:31.880 knuckle-dragging people who don't deserve due process or consideration of their opinions. Yeah,
00:44:36.640 that's all frustrating and stupid. I don't like to complain about it too much. I mean, I like to call
00:44:41.360 attention to it. I like to fight it. I don't want to whine and complain. You know, everybody's got a
00:44:46.080 problem and that's ours. It's a line from Tennessee Williams' play, Orpheus Descending.
00:44:50.620 There's a vagabond guy who he wants to spend the night at a woman's house and she says, no. He says,
00:44:56.340 I got nowhere to go. And she says, well, everybody's got a problem and that's yours. I mean, people have
00:45:00.800 problems historically in the grand scheme of things. Having the Hollywood and the mainstream media go
00:45:06.260 against you isn't the biggest one. Also, suffering can be sanctifying. So if you do it nobly, if you
00:45:13.540 respond to suffering in a dignified way, that is good for your soul and it's good for society. So that's what I
00:45:19.800 would do. I wouldn't try to cheat it. I wouldn't try to get around it. I would just honestly say,
00:45:23.900 I am who I am. I'm not ashamed of the circumstances of my birth. Neither are you. I would point out the
00:45:31.600 contradictions and the double standards in their racial and sexual arguments. And I would go on
00:45:37.540 with my life and laugh at all of their craziness because they're the ones who seem to be so upset and
00:45:42.360 angry and crazed all the time. And I think you and I are having a great time because politics has
00:45:46.820 never been more fun. All right, that's our show. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles
00:45:50.260 Show. I'll see you next week.
00:45:51.500 The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Rebecca Dobkowitz and directed by Mike Joyner. Executive
00:46:02.220 producer, Jeremy Boring. Senior producer, Jonathan Hay. Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover. And
00:46:08.220 our technical producer is Austin Stevens. Edited by Danny D'Amico. Audio is mixed by Dylan Case.
00:46:13.900 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera. And our production assistant is Nick Sheehan. The Michael Knowles
00:46:18.700 show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2019. Today on the Ben Shapiro show,
00:46:24.420 AOC versus Nancy Pelosi, the cat fight. Can we call it that? Begins. That's today on the Ben Shapiro show.