Ep. 387 - Mueller Collapses On Capitol Hill
Summary
Mueller's testimony on Capitol Hill today was a huge win for President Trump, and a huge loss for the Democrats. Democrats' hopes were dashed as former counsel Robert Mueller disintegrated in real time on today's Capitol Hill hearing. We will examine what he said and, more importantly, what he didn't say. Then, Gallup finds that Americans care about one issue above all the others as we head into 2020, and we ll analyze what that means for Trump and the Democrats running against him. Finally, Colorado State University publishes an Orwellian inclusive language guide that reveals the truth about why the left loves political correctness.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Democrats' hopes were dashed as former counsel Robert Mueller disintegrated in real time on Capitol Hill today.
00:00:07.960
We will examine what he said and, more importantly, what he didn't say.
00:00:11.840
Then, Gallup finds that Americans care about one issue above all the others as we head into 2020.
00:00:17.200
We'll analyze what it means for President Trump and for the Democrats running against him.
00:00:20.900
Finally, Colorado State University publishes an Orwellian inclusive language guide
00:00:27.000
that reveals the truth about why the left loves political correctness.
00:00:30.860
All that and more. I'm Michael Knowles, and this is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:40.540
First of all, let's get one thing absolutely clear.
00:00:43.840
Nobody cares about Robert Mueller. Nobody cares about the Mueller investigation.
00:00:47.540
Nobody cares about the Russian collusion conspiracy. Nobody cares about any of that.
00:00:52.560
Okay, everyone has moved on other than people on Twitter and partisan Democrats
00:00:57.940
who were upset that they weren't able to impeach the president,
00:01:00.740
who were upset that the president wasn't a traitor who was working on behalf of Russia.
00:01:06.280
What does matter, however, is what Robert Mueller's testimony today means for 2020.
00:01:12.720
The investigation itself is old news. We've done it. It was old news before it even began.
00:01:17.440
But the testimony today actually does matter. And the main takeaway is
00:01:21.820
this was an absolutely devastating day for Democrats.
00:01:26.960
Now, I couldn't have predicted that. I figured. I figured what was going to happen is
00:01:31.600
Mueller releases his report. It exonerates Trump on colluding with Russia.
00:01:36.080
It refuses to exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice.
00:01:39.660
So the DOJ finally had to come to that conclusion and say Trump didn't obstruct justice.
00:01:44.200
They weren't going to go after him. Then Mueller has his press conference.
00:01:48.420
He writes his angry letter. So the Democrats at this point think Mueller's got some more fire left
00:01:53.000
in him. Maybe we can bring him out and fill in all the gaps that we weren't able to get out of
00:01:57.960
the Mueller report. So I would have expected there would be something, anything for the Democrats
00:02:02.660
to grab here. What happened surprised a lot of people today, which was that the guy just
00:02:08.480
completely collapsed. He just fell apart. OK, there were there were two moments that the
00:02:14.140
Democrats got today that they're going to be playing over and over again on the left wing
00:02:17.780
cable news channels. They're excited for exactly two moments. The first one is when Bob Mueller says
00:02:23.660
that you can indict a former president report did not conclude that he did not commit obstruction
00:02:31.340
of justice. Is that correct? That is correct. And what about total exoneration? Did you actually
00:02:37.880
totally exonerate the president? No. Now, in fact, your reports expressly states that it does not
00:02:44.280
exonerate the president. It does. OK, that that was actually the second moment. But the first moment
00:02:50.720
is they say that you can indict a former president. That's what Bob Mueller admits. Can you you can't go
00:02:56.660
after the president while he's in office, but you can't go but you can go after the president
00:03:01.260
after he's out of office? This is not a comment on Trump. This is a comment on the office of the
00:03:09.360
president, period. This is simply a procedural answer, a legal reality. Now, OK, that's fine. If
00:03:16.420
Democrats wanted to hear that, I guess it sort of sounds like Mueller can go after Trump or they're
00:03:21.940
going to go after Trump once he leaves office. The only other thing that Democrats got was when
00:03:27.740
Mueller said he didn't exonerate President Trump on obstruction, which we already knew. So this was
00:03:32.820
the highlight for Democrats testimony today. President Trump walks away from this episode
00:03:37.080
the victor. And here's why. Not even because certainly not nothing that President Trump did,
00:03:44.320
but because Bob Mueller looked weak and confused. The high point is Mueller says,
00:03:50.800
I didn't exonerate him entirely. OK, you got that. We already knew that from the report.
00:03:56.700
But already from the Mueller report, President Trump comes out looking pretty good. Mueller didn't
00:04:01.100
totally exonerate him on obstruction, which was bad for Trump, but it did exonerate him on collusion,
00:04:05.900
which is the actual crime in question. So pretty good. Today made President Trump's victory cleaner
00:04:12.180
because what it did, far from giving more fodder for partisan Democrats, it actually cast doubt on the
00:04:19.660
Russia investigation itself on the whole thing and frankly, on Mueller's role in the whole thing.
00:04:25.720
The biggest loser today probably was Bob Mueller because the Democrats had pinned all of their hopes
00:04:31.900
on Mueller. And and therefore, when he fell, the Democrats got hurt to a lesser degree. Democrats were
00:04:37.960
the big losers from today. Mueller wouldn't even grant Democrats their main talking point from their own
00:04:44.360
report. So Democrat Representative Hakeem Jeffries leapt in there to say that there is clear evidence
00:04:50.360
that Donald Trump obstructed justice. After Mueller said, I didn't totally exonerate him,
00:04:55.300
he comes in, he says, that's right. He obstructed justice. Mueller actually shut him down.
00:04:59.200
The investigation found substantial evidence that when the president ordered Don McGahn to fire the
00:05:04.680
special counsel and then lie about it, Donald Trump, one, committed an obstructive act,
00:05:10.060
two, connected to an official proceeding, three, did so with corrupt intent. Those are the elements
00:05:18.500
of obstruction of justice. This is the United States of America. No one is above the law. No one.
00:05:27.700
The president must be held accountable one way or the other.
00:05:31.740
Let me let me just say, if I might, I don't subscribe necessarily to your
00:05:36.740
the way you analyze that. I'm not saying it's out of the ballpark, but I'm not supportive of that
00:05:42.260
analytical charge. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for saying that what I said is complete BS.
00:05:48.040
So it all went downhill from there for the Russia conspiracy theorists. The Republicans jump in.
00:05:55.200
Republican Representative John Ratcliffe asked Bob Mueller about this issue of exonerating
00:06:01.660
or not exonerating. And he pointed out that Mueller's language in this report is bizarre.
00:06:07.840
It's bizarre to say, I couldn't totally perfectly conclude that he didn't commit a crime, so I don't
00:06:13.460
exonerate him. And what Representative Ratcliffe asked is, is there any other case that he can recall
00:06:19.080
of the DOJ choosing not to exonerate because innocence was not conclusively determined?
00:06:26.660
The example other than Donald Trump or the Justice Department determined that an
00:06:30.600
investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?
00:06:36.240
I cannot, but this is a unique situation. Okay, well, you can't. Time is short. I've got five
00:06:41.160
minutes. Let's just leave it at you can't find it because I'll tell you why. It doesn't exist.
00:06:46.060
Of course not. Of course it doesn't exist. Now, this is all just the setup because only now do things
00:06:52.620
start to get really weird. And it raises big questions about Bob Mueller himself. We'll get to that in a
00:06:58.000
second. But first, if you are not paying off your credit card bills every month, you are almost
00:07:03.420
certainly paying hundreds if not thousands of dollars in interest every year. Let Lending Club
00:07:08.700
help you out. With Lending Club, you can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with one fixed
00:07:14.620
monthly payment. Since 2007, Lending Club has helped millions of people regain control of their finances
00:07:19.800
with affordable fixed rate personal loans. I can speak a little bit from experience. It's not even that
00:07:24.940
I'm so terrible with money. You know, I'm running up crazy debt. It's just that I, like most dudes that
00:07:29.800
I know, are lazy when it comes to my finances. And I put it on the credit card and I forget about it and
00:07:34.280
I don't think about how much money I am wasting when you just use those high interest credit cards.
00:07:40.360
Don't do it, guys. Take control of your finances. Make it really easy. There's no trips to the bank.
00:07:45.680
There's no high interest credit cards. You just have to go to LendingClub.com and you will save a ton of
00:07:50.720
money. Tell them about yourself. Tell them how much you want to borrow. Pick the terms that are
00:07:54.380
right for you. And if you're approved, your loan is automatically deposited into your bank account
00:07:59.300
in as little as a few days. This is my kind of service. I don't even want to walk out my door.
00:08:04.620
Right into your bank account. That's why Lending Club is the number one peer-to-peer lending platform
00:08:08.320
with over $35 billion in loans issued. Stop wasting money. It takes two seconds to get control of your
00:08:14.980
finances and start making financial sense. Go to LendingClub.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S.
00:08:21.240
Check your rate in minutes. Borrow up to $40,000. That's LendingClub.com slash Knowles,
00:08:27.020
LendingClub.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. All loans made by one bank member FDIC, equal housing
00:08:33.240
lender. So you've got Mueller saying, I didn't totally exonerate Trump, but I'm not saying that
00:08:39.820
he's guilty of committing obstruction. He's guilty of this crime. Then things start to get weird.
00:08:47.280
So Mueller just starts stonewalling. And this is particularly with regard to the infamous
00:08:53.980
Steele dossier. That Steele dossier, you'll remember, was the report that was uncorroborated,
00:09:00.920
never proven, totally bogus, in many cases, report that this ex-intelligence guy, Christopher
00:09:07.060
Steele, made, almost certainly with Russian intelligence services. And he made it for Fusion
00:09:11.820
GPS, which is an opposition research firm that did work for Clinton and the Democrats.
00:09:16.600
This is central to the whole Russia conspiracy hoax and Mueller stonewalls on it. Here is
00:09:25.380
Representative Steve Chabot asking Mueller about Fusion and about Christopher Steele.
00:09:31.240
When discussing the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, you referenced, quote,
00:09:37.400
the firm that produced the Steele reporting, unquote. The name of that firm was Fusion GPS. Is that
00:09:44.500
correct? And you're on page 103? 103, that's correct. Volume 2.
00:09:51.720
When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele reporting, the name of the firm that produced
00:09:58.780
that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct? I'm not familiar with that.
00:10:04.820
Well, let me just help you. It was. It's not a trick question. It was Fusion GPS. Now,
00:10:12.240
Fusion GPS produced the opposition research document widely known as the Steele dossier.
00:10:18.960
And the owner of Fusion GPA was someone named Glenn Simpson. Are you familiar with that?
00:10:24.880
Outside of your purview? That's the whole investigation. The Steele dossier on which
00:10:34.640
the entire thing is predicated is outside of your purview? The Steele dossier is the beginning of
00:10:42.640
the Russia conspiracy. The Steele dossier was the predicate for the spying that took place,
00:10:48.360
the spying on members of the Trump campaign that started this whole three-year ordeal. And
00:10:54.300
Mueller seems like he doesn't know. He seems like he's ignorant of it. I mean, you have that line
00:10:58.900
from the congressman. He says, okay, and this was put together by Fusion GPS. Is that right?
00:11:05.160
And Mueller looks bewildered, dazed, and confused. He says, well, I don't, I'm not totally. And the
00:11:11.600
congressman has to lean in and say, it's not a trick question. It is Fusion GPS. It's in your own
00:11:16.780
report. Mueller seems totally ignorant of it. So then they go further. They start asking Mueller
00:11:21.720
not just about Fusion GPS, which is the firm that put it together, but Christopher Steele himself,
00:11:26.940
the ex-British intelligence analyst who put together the entire report. Mueller doesn't
00:11:32.920
seem to know very much about Christopher Steele either. Can you state with confidence that the
00:11:37.360
Steele dossier was not part of Russia's disinformation campaign? No, as I said in my opening
00:11:44.200
statement, that part of the building of the case predated me by at least 10 months. Yeah, I mean,
00:11:54.220
Paul Manafort's alleged crimes regarding tax evasion predated you. You had no problem charging
00:11:59.140
them. And matter of fact, this Steele dossier predated the attorney general, and he didn't have
00:12:04.340
any problem answering the question. When Senator Cornyn asked the attorney general the exact question
00:12:08.700
I asked you, director, the attorney general said, and I'm quoting, no, I can't state that with
00:12:13.620
confidence. And that's one of the areas I'm reviewing. I'm concerned about it, and I don't
00:12:18.420
think it's entirely speculative. Steele? Steele who? Christopher, I don't, uh, no, that name doesn't
00:12:25.780
ring any bell, does it? This was a great question from Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz. Unfortunately,
00:12:31.500
Gaetz went on a little bit too long in his question. He should have just gone in there and gotten the
00:12:35.320
clean hit. Because here's what he said. He said, let's talk about Christopher Steele.
00:12:40.140
Mueller says, well, that predates my experience in the investigation, so I can't talk about it.
00:12:45.040
And Gaetz has that great follow-up. He says, well, Manafort's tax problems predate your entrance
00:12:49.740
into the investigation. You're willing to talk about that. Why is it you're willing to talk about
00:12:54.460
things that make Trump look bad, but you're not willing to talk about things that make Democrats look
00:12:58.860
bad and maybe make Trump look pretty good? Why? It's pretty selective about what you're willing to talk
00:13:04.920
about and what you're not willing to talk about. It was a good hit. I don't mean to knock Congressman
00:13:09.460
Gaetz too much, but it should have been a cleaner hit. He should have ended it right there and let
00:13:13.220
Mueller stammer, which is what he did for much of the rest of the hearing. The fact remains, either way,
00:13:19.760
Mueller totally punted on Steele. This is pretty weird behavior. Two central figures and organizations
00:13:28.600
in this Russia investigation. Fusion GPS put the dossier together, took the Clintons' money,
00:13:34.680
took the Democrats' money, and Christopher Steele, the guy who actually wrote the thing.
00:13:41.320
That research that they put together launches the spying, launches the investigation.
00:13:48.140
And Bob Mueller, the head investigator, the special counsel, doesn't seem to know anything about
00:13:54.160
either of them. Not even that he's unwilling to talk about it. That he doesn't seem to,
00:13:58.680
oh, oh, Steele who? Fusion GPS who? Yeah, I never heard of her. This is difficult to believe. It raises
00:14:05.360
the question, is Mueller playing dumb? Or does Mueller actually not know what's going on in his
00:14:13.080
own investigation? How much does Bob Mueller know about his own investigation? I guess it could be either.
00:14:18.960
He could be playing dumb because he doesn't want to put himself at risk of committing perjury. Or he
00:14:25.080
doesn't want to make himself look too nakedly political. Or because when you play dumb, it
00:14:29.740
generally works to your advantage in politics. Bill Clinton has bragged about this. George Bush has
00:14:35.420
bragged about this. Playing a little below your mark is very helpful. But I don't know. Maybe he's not
00:14:41.700
playing dumb. Maybe he actually doesn't really know about these things. If that is the case, even if I'm
00:14:46.700
willing to believe that, this raises a more troubling question. If Bob Mueller doesn't know what's going
00:14:51.820
on in his investigation, who does? Because this has been the argument the whole time, is that this
00:14:58.520
investigation is extremely partisan. It's being staffed by never-Trumpers who hate the president's guts, who
00:15:04.240
have been caught in leaked text messages saying that they want to undermine the 2016 election and prevent
00:15:09.700
the people from electing Donald Trump. And all these guys have been caught as part of the Mueller
00:15:14.080
investigation. And the response the whole time was, okay, sure, there are a couple bad apples,
00:15:19.200
but Bob Mueller is a man beyond reproach. He's a former Marine. He's an FBI director under Republicans.
00:15:26.760
You couldn't possibly impugn his motives or his reputation or his competence.
00:15:33.700
Well, I don't know. If he doesn't know anything about his own investigation, then I guess that kind of
00:15:37.620
takes him off the table, doesn't it? If he doesn't know anything about his own investigation,
00:15:44.200
who does? Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe, Lisa Page? Who knows about it? Who was actually running it?
00:15:50.760
Who actually wrote this thing, if not Mueller? Or is Mueller playing dumb? Don't think this is some
00:15:57.220
partisan attack. There are a lot of left-wingers who are joining me in this criticism. We'll get to it
00:16:00.960
in just one second. But first, I have got to tell you about one of the coolest products I have ever
00:16:05.580
seen. And that is Paint Your Life. If you want to give an incredible gift, you have got to try
00:16:13.280
PaintYourLife.com. This is a gift that I gave to my stepbrother, for whom I was the best man.
00:16:20.780
I gave this to him for his wedding because it was the coolest gift I could possibly think of.
00:16:25.300
You can have an original painting made of yourself, of your children, of your family members,
00:16:29.880
of some special place you loved, of some pet. Maybe poor old Fido ain't with us anymore.
00:16:34.420
You can have a nice oil painting done of him at a price you can afford. And this is key,
00:16:38.280
because commissioning art can be very, very expensive. But PaintYourLife.com comes in
00:16:43.900
and gives you an incredible product. It is a true painting done by hand by a world-class artist.
00:16:49.600
It's not some fake, you know, just generated with smoke and mirrors. It's a real, genuine painting.
00:16:55.760
Makes the perfect gift for birthdays or weddings or anniversaries.
00:16:58.980
You choose the artist whose work you most admire. You work with him throughout the process until
00:17:03.500
every detail is perfect. So you're getting proofs all the time. There's no risk at all. If you don't
00:17:07.900
love the final painting, your money is refunded. This is great for decor. It's an actual work of art.
00:17:13.500
It's such, in a world of just cheap commodities, this is a real special gift. I'm already, because I was
00:17:18.500
so impressed with this painter in particular, I'm going to be commissioning another one of them.
00:17:22.300
I just love it. I can't speak highly enough of it. Right now is a limited time offer. You can get 30%
00:17:27.300
off your painting. That is right. 30% off you. I'm telling you once, I'm not going to say stop what
00:17:33.020
you're doing because I want you to finish my show. But then once my show is over, go check this out.
00:17:37.440
You are going to, it's going to blow your mind. You'll get 30% off free shipping, get the special
00:17:41.460
offer. The way to do it is to text Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S to 484848. That is K-N-O-W-L-E-S
00:17:50.180
to 484848. K-N-O-W-L-E-S to 484848. Message and data rates may apply.
00:18:00.880
So is Bob Mueller playing dumb or does Bob Mueller really have no idea what's going on in his
00:18:05.500
investigation? If it's the latter, then who ran the thing? Who wrote the thing? Who is behind this
00:18:11.240
witch hunt? Don't accuse me of having some partisan attack here that I'm carrying water for
00:18:18.340
Republicans or something. People from both sides of the aisle were absolutely flummoxed by this
00:18:23.940
performance today. Mike Cernovich, you know, the right-wing independent journalist, he suggested
00:18:29.380
that the hearing be adjourned because it constituted elder abuse against Bob Mueller looking a little
00:18:36.560
long in the tooth. On the other side of the aisle, David Axelrod, the chief strategist for Barack Obama,
00:18:41.600
he tweeted out simply, quote, this is very, very painful. He even tweeted out later,
00:18:48.080
he said, you know, this is a very delicate subject, but when Mueller testified before Congress six
00:18:53.400
years ago, he was a lot sharper than he is today. At one point, I kid you not, at one point,
00:18:59.200
Mueller couldn't remember which president appointed him U.S. attorney in Boston.
00:19:03.960
Director Mueller, I'm disappointed that some have questioned your motives throughout this process,
00:19:09.280
and I want to take a moment to remind the American people of who you are and your exemplary
00:19:15.120
service to our country. You are a Marine. You served in Vietnam and earned a bronze star and a
00:19:21.720
purple heart, correct? Correct. Which president appointed you to become the United States attorney
00:19:27.340
for Massachusetts? Which senator? Which president? Oh, which president?
00:19:34.700
I think that was President Bush. According to my notes, it was President Ronald Reagan had the
00:19:40.380
honor to do so. Under whose administration? My mistake.
00:19:44.660
Oh, man, this is genuinely, you pity the guy. I mean, he evokes a lot of sympathy here. Even from the
00:19:51.100
beginning, the question was, which president appointed you U.S. attorney? And he said, which
00:19:56.340
senator? Senators don't appoint you U.S. attorney. Presidents do that. No, which president? He goes,
00:20:02.340
I don't know, Bush? No, Reagan. Like, it's not a trick question. The same thing with Fusion GPS.
00:20:07.520
This isn't a trick question. We're just establishing your credibility. That was a friendly question from a
00:20:12.200
Democrat. Really bizarre. Look, he might be senile. He might have been off his meds or something.
00:20:19.080
Or he might be playing dumb. Either way, the most revealing part of this testimony is that he punted
00:20:27.680
on one question. So you saw a buildup. He punts on Christopher Steele. He punts on Fusion GPS.
00:20:36.120
Oh, I don't know. Little, what do I know? But then he's asked a very pointed question on how the
00:20:42.360
investigation got started. And people aren't really covering this, but this is the key to the testimony.
00:20:46.960
And it's a little bit complicated, so bear with me. Bob Mueller is asked why Joseph Mifsud,
00:20:53.840
who lied to the FBI, was not charged with a crime. If that name Joseph Mifsud sounds familiar,
00:21:00.520
he matters because he's this Maltese academic. He's a professor. He's in London. He's in Paris.
00:21:06.600
He's in Malta. He's in Rome. And he's clearly got ties to intelligence agencies. Some people say he's
00:21:13.240
tied to Russian intelligence. Some people say he's tied to Western intelligence. Maybe he's tied to
00:21:17.720
both. And he is the academic who told the Trump staffer, George Papadopoulos, that the Russians had
00:21:24.900
dirt on Clinton. So this whole episode, the whole question of whether this Russia investigation was
00:21:30.220
a setup from the very beginning, comes down to this guy, Joseph Mifsud. How did George Papadopoulos,
00:21:37.340
the Trump staffer, come to find out that, or hear rather, whether it's true or not, how did he come
00:21:43.800
to hear that the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton? And then how did he come to pass that
00:21:49.360
information along, which was the trigger that started the investigation, which allowed the
00:21:52.840
Obama administration to spy on the Trump campaign? How did that happen? Joseph Mifsud is at the center
00:21:59.120
of this. And Mueller refuses to answer. The FBI interviewed Joseph Mifsud on February 10th, 2017.
00:22:08.420
In that interview, Mr. Mifsud lied. You point this out on page 193, volume one, Mifsud denied.
00:22:15.140
Mifsud also falsely stated. In addition, Mifsud omitted. Three times he lied to the FBI,
00:22:21.440
yet you didn't charge him with the crime. Excuse me. I'm sorry. Did you say 193?
00:22:26.400
Volume one, 193. He lied three times. You pointed out in the report. Why didn't you charge him with
00:22:31.500
the crime? I can't get into internal deliberations with regard to who would or would not be charged.
00:22:38.520
A lot of other people for making a false statement. Let's remember this.
00:22:41.680
That's right. He charged a lot of other people for making false statements. But you see,
00:22:46.220
Mueller just keeps going back to this. I can't talk about internal deliberations.
00:22:49.400
I can't talk about why I charged somebody, but I didn't charge any other people.
00:22:53.100
Well, it's a little weird, Mr. Mueller, because on the one hand, you're charging Mike Flynn for lying.
00:23:01.100
You're charging Papadopoulos. You're charging all of these guys associated with Trump for,
00:23:07.300
in some cases, very minor lies. But then this guy, this academic, Joseph Mifsud,
00:23:13.940
who lies on three occasions to the FBI, he doesn't get charged with a crime. Why not?
00:23:19.420
The obvious implication is that he has worked with Western intelligence. The obvious implication
00:23:25.320
is that he's got a longstanding relationship with the FBI and the intelligence community.
00:23:30.180
And the question that is being raised is, what was Mifsud's role in talking to Papadopoulos?
00:23:39.840
Did Joseph Mifsud, this cosmopolitan academic who just floats, flits around all over the world,
00:23:46.040
just happen to bump into George Papadopoulos, just happen to say that the Russians had dirt on Hillary
00:23:52.800
Clinton, which just happened to prompt the events that led to the spying on the Trump campaign? Was
00:23:58.420
that just an accident? Or was there some collusion, not between Trump and the Russians,
00:24:05.320
but between the Obama administration and guys like Joseph Mifsud? That's the question. And that's a key
00:24:12.360
question that has not been answered. The FBI, did the FBI use Mifsud to prod Papadopoulos,
00:24:20.740
who was working on the Trump campaign? That's a crucial question. And Jim Jordan, thankfully,
00:24:24.960
does not let up. So he sets up this whole scene. Then he asks the question, point blank,
00:24:31.380
what is the relationship between the intelligence community and Professor Mifsud?
00:24:34.980
You point this out on page one of the report. July 31st, 2016, they opened the investigation
00:24:41.840
based on that piece of information. Diplomat tells Papadopoulos, Russians have dirt, excuse me,
00:24:48.220
Papadopoulos tells a diplomat, Russians have dirt on Clinton. Diplomat tells the FBI.
00:24:53.720
What I'm wondering is, who told Papadopoulos? How'd he find out?
00:24:58.860
I can't get into the evidentiary filing. Yes, you can, because you wrote about it. You gave us
00:25:02.900
the answer. Page 192 of the report, you tell us who told him. Joseph Mifsud. Joseph Mifsud's the
00:25:11.020
guy who told Papadopoulos, the mysterious professor who lives in Rome and London, works and teaches in
00:25:16.800
two different universities. This is the guy who told Papadopoulos. He's the guy who starts it all.
00:25:22.360
And when the FBI interviews him, he lies three times. And yet you don't charge him with a crime.
00:25:29.540
You charge Rick Gates for false statements. You charge Paul Manafort for false statements.
00:25:33.340
You charge Michael Cohen with false statements. You charge Michael Flynn, a three-star general,
00:25:37.820
with false statements. But the guy who puts the country through this whole saga,
00:25:43.120
starts it all for three years we've lived this now. He lies. And you guys don't charge him.
00:25:50.860
Absolutely stellar performance from Jim Jordan here. And he nails him. Just look at Mueller's
00:25:57.620
reaction when he says, I want to get down to Mifsud. I want to know who told Papadopoulos
00:26:05.620
on the Trump campaign that the Russians had dirt on Hillary. And you see, Mueller won't let him get
00:26:10.380
the words out of his mouth. Mueller jumps in. I can't talk about that. This is nothing that I can
00:26:14.300
talk about. And Jordan's got him right where he wants him because he says, of course you can talk
00:26:18.400
about that. You already did. It's in your report. Or is it your report? It's in the Mueller report.
00:26:26.960
I don't know who wrote it. Clearly you don't have much of a recollection of it. But you already
00:26:30.960
admitted that it was Mifsud who told him. Again, raises the question, does Mueller know about his
00:26:36.080
own report? Is he playing dumb? He clearly looks uncomfortable here. He clearly looks nervous. He's
00:26:41.020
jumping and saying, we can't talk about how this whole thing started. The one common thread through all
00:26:44.900
this testimony is this guy will not talk about how this investigation got started. I wonder why
00:26:51.840
then Jim Jordan goes in for the kill. We'll get to that in a second. We'll also get to the number one
00:26:58.920
issue for Americans as we look down to 2020, according to Gallup polling and the Orwellian
00:27:03.980
inclusive language guide from Colorado State University. But first, I've got to say goodbye
00:27:10.320
to Facebook and YouTube. And I've got to tell you guys, today, 7 p.m. Eastern, 4 p.m. Pacific,
00:27:16.660
our latest episode of the conversation will be featuring the great Supreme Lord of the multiverse,
00:27:23.880
Andrew Klavan. He will be answering your questions live, so make them good. As always,
00:27:28.800
the episode is free to watch on YouTube and Facebook. Only subscribers can ask the questions.
00:27:34.080
Subscribe today at The Daily Wire. Get your questions answered by Drew Klavan at 7 p.m. Eastern,
00:27:38.840
4 p.m. Pacific, and join the conversation. I also have to give a little plug to our buddy Bill
00:27:44.760
Whittle's podcast. Bill Whittle, you know him. You've seen him before. He has an incredible podcast
00:27:51.540
out on the Apollo 11 mission, the moon landing. The other day, I put out a video talking to people
00:27:57.940
about all the various theories of how we didn't actually go to the moon. Between 6 and 20 percent
00:28:02.300
of Americans don't think we ever went to the moon because there's a lot of misinformation
00:28:06.180
floating out there. Check out this podcast. It is informative, it is historical, but it's also
00:28:11.160
incredibly inspiring because this month marks the 50th anniversary since we first put a man on the
00:28:16.860
moon. This new podcast by Esoteric Radio Theater is called Apollo 11, What We Saw. It shot immediately
00:28:23.060
to number three on iTunes, Apple podcasts. It stayed there in the top 10 for a week, and it's getting
00:28:29.120
great reviews. Almost 1 million people have listened to the podcast or watched it on YouTube. It's really
00:28:34.240
just excellent. Don't tell Bill that I was so kind about it, but it is really, really good.
00:28:39.520
And Bill is, he's an author, he's a pilot, he's a space enthusiast. He takes you on the journey of
00:28:45.060
what it took to get to the moon, what happened when we got there, and how we almost didn't get
00:28:48.380
there at all. All four episodes are available right now, so you can binge it. Head over to Apple
00:28:53.220
Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. Subscribe today to Apollo 11, What We Saw. While you're
00:28:58.240
there, please make sure that you subscribe to our show, The Michael Knowles Show. It really helps us out
00:29:02.880
when you subscribe, so please do that. Then you'll never miss even one syllable, one pearl of wisdom.
00:29:08.220
You can watch all of that. You can also watch the podcast episodes of Apollo 11 all over YouTube
00:29:14.740
at the Esoteric Radio Theater YouTube channel. Head over there right now. Head over to dailywire.com.
00:29:21.020
So Jordan totally demolishes Mueller. He asks him the question. Mueller jumps. He doesn't want
00:29:39.580
to answer the question. He says he can't talk about it. Jordan says, of course you can talk
00:29:42.860
about it. You wrote it in the report that you apparently didn't even read. Then Jordan goes
00:29:47.800
in for the kill. Here he is. When the FBI interviewed him in February, FBI interviews
00:29:52.720
him in February, when the special counsel's office interviewed Mifsud, did he lie to you?
00:29:57.980
Can't get into that. Did you interview Mifsud? Can't get into that. Is Mifsud Western intelligence
00:30:02.880
or Russian intelligence? Can't get into that. A lot of things you can't get into. What's interesting,
00:30:07.960
you can charge 13 Russians. No one's ever heard of. No one's ever seen. No one's ever going to hear
00:30:13.360
of him. No one's ever going to see him. You can charge them. You can charge all kinds of people
00:30:17.320
who are around the president with false statements. But the guy who launches every, the guy who puts
00:30:23.380
this whole story in motion, you can't charge him. I think that's amazing. I'm not certain I agree
00:30:31.280
with your characterizations. Well, I'm reading from your report. Ouch. That's pretty bad. I'm not sure
00:30:37.480
I agree with your characterizations. They're not my characterizations, Mr. Mueller. They're yours.
00:30:42.820
I'm reading from your report. This is brutal for the Democrats on Capitol Hill who brought
00:30:48.540
Mueller up to testify. It shows us something that I had suspected, but I wouldn't have put money on,
00:30:56.040
which is that the Democrats' best shot here was to just run on the Mueller report and keep Mueller
00:31:02.060
himself quiet. Just take the report. You can spin the report however you want and just keep Mueller
00:31:08.080
quiet. But the Democrats couldn't do that because they were disappointed with the report because it
00:31:12.760
more or less exonerated the president. You know, a little bit on the edges or obstruction or some
00:31:17.060
tweety scent. So they could have used that. They could have taken those little bits and tried to say
00:31:22.720
that Trump was guilty of all these things. Instead, they wanted more. They thought that they would get
00:31:27.300
more by having Mueller testify. And there were more unanswered questions than answers in the report.
00:31:33.100
Namely, how did the investigation start? That question reflects very poorly on Democrats.
00:31:41.260
And it undermines whatever political win Democrats had with the report. I mean, they did have a little
00:31:48.140
bit of a win. Trump did get dinged in this report. He was not fully exonerated by Bob Mueller on
00:31:54.620
obstruction. They could have had it, but they got greedy. Now, with this testimony, it really is
00:32:01.060
making the whole Russia report and the whole investigation seem illegitimate. The only hope
00:32:06.220
for Democrats in all of this is that no one cares about Mueller or Russia or collusion or any of it.
00:32:10.400
They've all moved on. The bad news for Democrats right now is, one, they've lost even a minor talking
00:32:18.740
point. But two, Gallup polling shows that more people than ever are concerned about illegal
00:32:25.260
immigration, which is a terrible issue for them and a great issue for Republicans and President Trump.
00:32:31.360
Gallup polling shows more Americans than ever, ever before, are concerned about illegal immigration,
00:32:36.900
and it's the top issue in the country. 27% of Americans identify immigration as the most
00:32:42.200
important U.S. problem. This surpasses the previous high of 23% in June. To put that in perspective,
00:32:49.820
because it seems like kind of a low number, you think the top issue would have 75% or 80%. No,
00:32:54.940
people are very fragmented about what issues they care about. Very few issues since 2001,
00:33:00.760
since they really started this polling, have ever eclipsed 27%. So this is a top issue even historically.
00:33:08.420
Now, immigration is the biggest concern. The next biggest problem is government slash leadership.
00:33:15.140
And this isn't just, it's a problem for Trump, but it's not only a problem for Trump.
00:33:18.640
This has been the case since the second Obama term as well. So you got 27% immigration, 23%
00:33:26.160
government leadership. The next highest issues are racism, race relations at 7%, and healthcare at 7%.
00:33:34.240
So way, way below a quarter or a third what the number one and number two issues are.
00:33:40.900
Now, this is a double-edged sword for Trump. This actually isn't just all good news for Trump,
00:33:44.800
because the good news is he owns the illegal immigration issue, and this will help him
00:33:49.220
because he owns it. Except he hasn't built the wall. Fox News confirmed that CBP report the other day.
00:33:56.720
Customs and Border Protection came out and said, President Trump has not built one mile
00:34:00.760
of new border wall since he was elected president. And you heard some people pushing back,
00:34:07.040
the people who will just defend the president regardless of what's actually happening. They
00:34:11.200
were pushing back and saying, no, there is wall. There's new wall. Fox News confirmed the report.
00:34:15.260
So unless they have information, unless someone has information that I don't, right now it looks
00:34:19.380
like he hasn't built any new border wall. Look, I get that it's hard. I get it's hard from an
00:34:26.040
environmental perspective. It's hard from a zoning perspective. Obviously, it's hard from a bureaucratic
00:34:29.940
and a Democrat obstruction perspective. But if he hasn't built the wall,
00:34:35.380
he doesn't look great on that issue. It's also bad for President Trump because he's the incumbent,
00:34:41.220
which now makes him the object of everybody's ire, if you believe that the second biggest issue,
00:34:46.080
according to Americans, is government and leadership. So there is a simple fix for this.
00:34:50.920
It'll help him on the top biggest issue. And it'll help him on the second biggest issue.
00:34:57.140
Build the wall. Easy. Or if you can't build the wall because it's too hard,
00:35:02.860
at least propose a plan to get the wall built, a clear plan, so that we don't need to just keep
00:35:08.280
believing promises. Or if you can't do that, because I understand, very difficult to do that.
00:35:14.820
Short of that, start deporting criminal aliens. Like, start really deporting them. We were told
00:35:21.760
last week that the U.S. would be deporting millions of criminal aliens. Remember that? On Sunday,
00:35:26.880
there were all these protests all over the country. No, don't do it. There was a terrorist attack at an
00:35:30.840
ice facility. And do you know how many people we arrested? 18. Not 18 million, not 18,000. 18 people.
00:35:42.580
There were orders of magnitude more protesters protesting the alleged mass arrests and deportation
00:35:50.760
than there were people who actually got arrested to be deported.
00:35:56.180
Even, forget President, let's say he can't build the wall. Let's say he can't get a plan to build
00:36:00.260
the wall. Even deporting lots and lots of criminal aliens publicly would help him on the subject of
00:36:07.500
illegal immigration and on the subject of government and leadership. It would show leadership.
00:36:10.940
It would show progress on the top issue. President Trump had really good instincts in 2016 to focus
00:36:17.780
on immigration. It wasn't just him. A few other people got this. Actually, Daily Wire God King,
00:36:23.120
Jeremy Boring, and our senior producer, Jonathan Hay, he understood, both of them understood,
00:36:29.380
that immigration was going to be the big issue. Back in 2014, they made a movie, a movie called The Arroyo,
00:36:34.080
all about illegal immigration. Because they saw coming down the pike, this was going to be a big
00:36:38.680
problem. President Trump saw that in 2015 when he came down that elevator at Trump Tower. He made that,
00:36:45.560
in many ways, the defining issue of his campaign. Good moves. Smart. Ever since then, the issue has
00:36:52.940
moved even more in Trump's favor. Great. All the better. But you've got to show some leadership on it.
00:36:59.880
Also, I mean, time's running out, by the way. What is it already? We're already in the end of July
00:37:05.740
2019. Presidential campaigns move fast. So there needs to be action on that if President Trump is
00:37:12.240
going to capitalize on this new Gallup polling. Also important to remember, though, that people
00:37:17.460
don't only care about political issues. They might not even primarily care about political issues.
00:37:21.760
They also care about cultural issues. When I ask people why they voted for President Trump,
00:37:26.300
some of them will say, immigration, I want to get rid of illegals. I want to border control.
00:37:31.400
Some of them will say, the economy, I want jobs. The Obama economy was awful.
00:37:36.080
Many more people will say it wasn't that, that it was because they want to smash political correctness.
00:37:43.140
That they feel that political correctness is oppressive, it's damaging them, and they're done with it.
00:37:47.980
And we are now seeing political correctness to the extreme out of Colorado State University.
00:37:53.900
This story was reported last October, and now there's a final version of it coming out now.
00:38:00.600
Colorado State University has published something called an Inclusive Language Guide.
00:38:07.680
How Orwellian is that? It was from the Inclusive Language Committee or something. It's hosted on the
00:38:14.280
Women and Gender Collaborative website. I know you've got that in your bookmark, so make sure to go check
00:38:21.320
it out. I read through this guide. I counted 131 words that you're not allowed to say. In the original
00:38:30.460
draft of this, two of the words were American and America. This is at a public state-funded American
00:38:39.200
University. They said America is offensive, and American is offensive. If they find it so offensive,
00:38:48.260
maybe they shouldn't take any taxpayer funding from America. Maybe they shouldn't take government
00:38:52.780
subsidized and guaranteed loans from America. No, they're not willing to do that. Now, fortunately,
00:38:59.240
there was such a backlash to that in October, they took that out of the final version. But there are a
00:39:02.960
lot of other crazy things in this guide. I mean, obviously, we don't have time for 131. But here's an
00:39:07.260
example. Listen to just this logic. They say the word colored to refer to black people is offensive. Fair
00:39:15.040
enough. Yeah, people haven't used that word in a while. They say colored is a highly offensive racial
00:39:19.560
slur that was often used during segregation to separate people of color. Wait, what? Colored is bad.
00:39:30.280
Color is good. And if you use anything else, it's bad, I think. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense,
00:39:35.760
does it? But it's just a euphemism cycle. You had colored. That was the term that everyone was supposed
00:39:42.800
to use. Then that fell out of favor, and it became black. Then it became African American. Then it
00:39:47.080
went back to black again. Now it's people of color, which is exactly the same as saying colored people,
00:39:51.760
except if you say colored people, you're a racial bigot. And if you say people of color,
00:39:55.800
you're super woke for now. Obviously, it's going to change. Another phrase that you're not allowed
00:39:59.720
to say is hip hip hooray. This is true. They said because hip hip hooray developed from the German
00:40:07.520
hep hep, which they write was a harmless, adorable call shepherds would use when herding their sheep.
00:40:14.480
Okay. Seems like there's no problem, right? No, but they go on. But during the Holocaust,
00:40:19.080
German citizens started using it as a rallying cry when they would hunt down Jewish citizens
00:40:24.160
living in the ghettos. So if you use the phrase hip hip hooray, hip hip hooray, if you use that,
00:40:30.400
you are a Nazi, according to Colorado State University. They say you're not allowed to use the expression
00:40:34.920
a long time no see because that's offensive to Native Americans. How? I have no idea. They say
00:40:40.520
that you're not allowed to say no can do. Hey, Michael, can you help me out? No can do. That
00:40:44.800
apparently is offensive to Chinese people. Again, why? Couldn't possibly tell you. What's wilder though
00:40:50.400
than all of this, what you can say, what you can't say, the innocuous expressions that now I guess are
00:40:57.420
are evil and bigoted. What's more interesting than that is how woke expressions fall out of fashion
00:41:06.080
and are quickly deemed hateful. One example of this is they say you're no longer allowed to say
00:41:12.340
homosexual. I thought homosexual was the totally clinical PC term. No, they say you're not allowed
00:41:20.480
to say homosexual, but you can say, and what you should say, is a gay, okay, lesbian, okay, bisexual,
00:41:27.440
all right, pansexual, whatever, or queer. Do you remember like five minutes ago when we were told that
00:41:38.740
queer is the new n-word, that queer is a horrible racial slur, which is why that little twit, Carlos
00:41:46.300
Mazza, that little bigoted leftist at vox.com tried to get Steven Crowder and a lot of other
00:41:52.100
conservatives kicked off of YouTube? Do you remember that? Queer, because queer is the n-word. I went on
00:41:58.640
a television show and when they used the word queer, when it was used in a video, they bleeped it out
00:42:03.780
because we were now told queer is the new n-word, except then we're told from Colorado State, actually
00:42:09.600
queer is the right word and homosexual is the wrong word. So if Crowder had said homosexual in his podcast
00:42:15.140
or on his show, they'd go after him for that. And then if he says queer, they're going to go after
00:42:19.800
him for that. And you're damned if you do, and you're damned if you don't. And what it shows,
00:42:23.700
what all of this shows, these language guides are not about helping an aggrieved class, obviously not.
00:42:30.460
We were talking about this yesterday on the show. The left moves past their aggrieved classes and
00:42:36.220
ditches them as soon as it becomes politically useful. They used to prattle on about women's rights
00:42:40.680
and feminism. Now they ditch all those women for the transgender so-called community. Now they make,
00:42:47.240
now they force women out of business if they won't wax the genitals of grown men wearing a dress.
00:42:51.700
Now they won't let girls win high school scholarships to college because they force them to compete
00:42:56.760
against men in women's sports. So that's over. They always ditch those groups. It's also not about
00:43:01.400
civility. It's not about making a nicer community. The left is as vindictive and scolding as any when it
00:43:09.000
comes to these words. It's not about charity or civility. It's not even about the particular
00:43:13.980
words because the words change all the time. What it's about is shutting you up. What it's about is
00:43:20.440
forcing you to check in with the committee, check in with your overlords at Colorado State or Twitter
00:43:25.640
or YouTube or wherever before you say anything. Because it's not about the words, it's about the
00:43:32.040
opinions that you're expressing. This was all summed up in Alice in Wonderland. Excuse me,
00:43:37.420
Alice in Wonderland has this scene in it where Alice is talking to Humpty Dumpty.
00:43:42.380
And Humpty Dumpty says to Alice, when I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean,
00:43:48.420
neither more nor less. And Alice says, the question is whether you can make words mean so many different
00:43:55.040
things. And Humpty Dumpty knows better. He says, the question is, which is to be master? That is all.
00:44:03.080
We've talked about it before. And you see it again, clear as day out of Colorado State. The left would
00:44:10.200
master our culture by constantly changing and perverting the meaning of words. And the way that
00:44:16.580
conservatives can master the culture is by using words correctly, using words to mean what they mean.
00:44:23.260
When the left can't change the meaning of words, they totally obfuscate. I don't know. I couldn't
00:44:31.560
say. What does it mean? How do we know? You saw Bob Mueller doing it all day today.
00:44:38.260
We need to insist on using precise language. We need to insist on asking precise questions.
00:44:44.820
In the vague haziness of innuendo and emotion and smears and slander, the left will win.
00:44:54.800
But in the precision of language, in the precision of questions, in the precision of what is the truth,
00:45:00.580
that's conservatives' path forward. In the short run, when we insist on that, it hurts us. We might
00:45:05.840
get expelled from Colorado State. We might have milkshakes thrown at us on the street. We might get
00:45:11.440
squirted by weird super soakers in Missouri and ruin my nice suit. But in the long run,
00:45:16.320
that is the way that we will win. All right, that's our show. I had a great time today speaking
00:45:19.740
to TPUSA here in Washington, D.C. I'm going to be doing a number of other media appearances,
00:45:24.800
so you can check them out while I'm here in D.C. And then I'll be speaking for the Young
00:45:28.480
America's Foundation next week for their conference. And then I'll finally be back in La La Land.
00:45:34.660
In the meantime, get your mailbag questions in for tomorrow. I'm Michael Knowles. This is
00:45:41.440
The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Rebecca Dobkiewicz and directed by Mike Joyner.
00:45:49.700
Executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Senior producer, Jonathan Hay. Our supervising producer
00:45:54.660
is Mathis Glover. And our technical producer is Austin Stevens. Edited by Danny D'Amico. Audio
00:46:00.060
is mixed by Dylan Case. Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera. And our production assistant is Nick Sheehan.
00:46:05.980
The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2019.
00:46:09.900
Hey, guys. Over on The Matt Wall Show today, as we all suffer through another Robert Mueller news
00:46:14.900
cycle, I'd like to turn our attention back to the story of Erica Thomas. She claimed to remember
00:46:20.520
that she was verbally assaulted by a racist white man at the grocery store. Well, the police report
00:46:24.440
is out and it's not good for her. And I think when a race hoax is exposed, we should talk about it
00:46:31.000
rather than just move on as the media wants us to do. Also, we're going to talk about an actress who
00:46:36.680
came out as pansexual, even though the term pansexual has no meaning. And also, Forever 21
00:46:42.960
unintentionally came up with the most hilarious marketing gimmick of all time.
00:46:48.080
And we'll talk about that also over on The Matt Wall Show.