The Michael Knowles Show


Ep. 387 - Mueller Collapses On Capitol Hill


Summary

Mueller's testimony on Capitol Hill today was a huge win for President Trump, and a huge loss for the Democrats. Democrats' hopes were dashed as former counsel Robert Mueller disintegrated in real time on today's Capitol Hill hearing. We will examine what he said and, more importantly, what he didn't say. Then, Gallup finds that Americans care about one issue above all the others as we head into 2020, and we ll analyze what that means for Trump and the Democrats running against him. Finally, Colorado State University publishes an Orwellian inclusive language guide that reveals the truth about why the left loves political correctness.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Democrats' hopes were dashed as former counsel Robert Mueller disintegrated in real time on Capitol Hill today.
00:00:07.960 We will examine what he said and, more importantly, what he didn't say.
00:00:11.840 Then, Gallup finds that Americans care about one issue above all the others as we head into 2020.
00:00:17.200 We'll analyze what it means for President Trump and for the Democrats running against him.
00:00:20.900 Finally, Colorado State University publishes an Orwellian inclusive language guide
00:00:27.000 that reveals the truth about why the left loves political correctness.
00:00:30.860 All that and more. I'm Michael Knowles, and this is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:40.540 First of all, let's get one thing absolutely clear.
00:00:43.840 Nobody cares about Robert Mueller. Nobody cares about the Mueller investigation.
00:00:47.540 Nobody cares about the Russian collusion conspiracy. Nobody cares about any of that.
00:00:52.560 Okay, everyone has moved on other than people on Twitter and partisan Democrats
00:00:57.940 who were upset that they weren't able to impeach the president,
00:01:00.740 who were upset that the president wasn't a traitor who was working on behalf of Russia.
00:01:04.680 That doesn't matter.
00:01:06.280 What does matter, however, is what Robert Mueller's testimony today means for 2020.
00:01:12.720 The investigation itself is old news. We've done it. It was old news before it even began.
00:01:17.440 But the testimony today actually does matter. And the main takeaway is
00:01:21.820 this was an absolutely devastating day for Democrats.
00:01:26.960 Now, I couldn't have predicted that. I figured. I figured what was going to happen is
00:01:31.600 Mueller releases his report. It exonerates Trump on colluding with Russia.
00:01:36.080 It refuses to exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice.
00:01:39.660 So the DOJ finally had to come to that conclusion and say Trump didn't obstruct justice.
00:01:44.200 They weren't going to go after him. Then Mueller has his press conference.
00:01:48.420 He writes his angry letter. So the Democrats at this point think Mueller's got some more fire left
00:01:53.000 in him. Maybe we can bring him out and fill in all the gaps that we weren't able to get out of
00:01:57.960 the Mueller report. So I would have expected there would be something, anything for the Democrats
00:02:02.660 to grab here. What happened surprised a lot of people today, which was that the guy just
00:02:08.480 completely collapsed. He just fell apart. OK, there were there were two moments that the
00:02:14.140 Democrats got today that they're going to be playing over and over again on the left wing
00:02:17.780 cable news channels. They're excited for exactly two moments. The first one is when Bob Mueller says
00:02:23.660 that you can indict a former president report did not conclude that he did not commit obstruction
00:02:31.340 of justice. Is that correct? That is correct. And what about total exoneration? Did you actually
00:02:37.880 totally exonerate the president? No. Now, in fact, your reports expressly states that it does not
00:02:44.280 exonerate the president. It does. OK, that that was actually the second moment. But the first moment
00:02:50.720 is they say that you can indict a former president. That's what Bob Mueller admits. Can you you can't go
00:02:56.660 after the president while he's in office, but you can't go but you can go after the president
00:03:01.260 after he's out of office? This is not a comment on Trump. This is a comment on the office of the
00:03:09.360 president, period. This is simply a procedural answer, a legal reality. Now, OK, that's fine. If
00:03:16.420 Democrats wanted to hear that, I guess it sort of sounds like Mueller can go after Trump or they're
00:03:21.940 going to go after Trump once he leaves office. The only other thing that Democrats got was when
00:03:27.740 Mueller said he didn't exonerate President Trump on obstruction, which we already knew. So this was
00:03:32.820 the highlight for Democrats testimony today. President Trump walks away from this episode
00:03:37.080 the victor. And here's why. Not even because certainly not nothing that President Trump did,
00:03:44.320 but because Bob Mueller looked weak and confused. The high point is Mueller says,
00:03:50.800 I didn't exonerate him entirely. OK, you got that. We already knew that from the report.
00:03:56.700 But already from the Mueller report, President Trump comes out looking pretty good. Mueller didn't
00:04:01.100 totally exonerate him on obstruction, which was bad for Trump, but it did exonerate him on collusion,
00:04:05.900 which is the actual crime in question. So pretty good. Today made President Trump's victory cleaner
00:04:12.180 because what it did, far from giving more fodder for partisan Democrats, it actually cast doubt on the
00:04:19.660 Russia investigation itself on the whole thing and frankly, on Mueller's role in the whole thing.
00:04:25.720 The biggest loser today probably was Bob Mueller because the Democrats had pinned all of their hopes
00:04:31.900 on Mueller. And and therefore, when he fell, the Democrats got hurt to a lesser degree. Democrats were
00:04:37.960 the big losers from today. Mueller wouldn't even grant Democrats their main talking point from their own
00:04:44.360 report. So Democrat Representative Hakeem Jeffries leapt in there to say that there is clear evidence
00:04:50.360 that Donald Trump obstructed justice. After Mueller said, I didn't totally exonerate him,
00:04:55.300 he comes in, he says, that's right. He obstructed justice. Mueller actually shut him down.
00:04:59.200 The investigation found substantial evidence that when the president ordered Don McGahn to fire the
00:05:04.680 special counsel and then lie about it, Donald Trump, one, committed an obstructive act,
00:05:10.060 two, connected to an official proceeding, three, did so with corrupt intent. Those are the elements
00:05:18.500 of obstruction of justice. This is the United States of America. No one is above the law. No one.
00:05:27.700 The president must be held accountable one way or the other.
00:05:31.740 Let me let me just say, if I might, I don't subscribe necessarily to your
00:05:36.740 the way you analyze that. I'm not saying it's out of the ballpark, but I'm not supportive of that
00:05:42.260 analytical charge. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for saying that what I said is complete BS.
00:05:48.040 So it all went downhill from there for the Russia conspiracy theorists. The Republicans jump in.
00:05:55.200 Republican Representative John Ratcliffe asked Bob Mueller about this issue of exonerating
00:06:01.660 or not exonerating. And he pointed out that Mueller's language in this report is bizarre.
00:06:07.840 It's bizarre to say, I couldn't totally perfectly conclude that he didn't commit a crime, so I don't
00:06:13.460 exonerate him. And what Representative Ratcliffe asked is, is there any other case that he can recall
00:06:19.080 of the DOJ choosing not to exonerate because innocence was not conclusively determined?
00:06:26.660 The example other than Donald Trump or the Justice Department determined that an
00:06:30.600 investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?
00:06:36.240 I cannot, but this is a unique situation. Okay, well, you can't. Time is short. I've got five
00:06:41.160 minutes. Let's just leave it at you can't find it because I'll tell you why. It doesn't exist.
00:06:46.060 Of course not. Of course it doesn't exist. Now, this is all just the setup because only now do things
00:06:52.620 start to get really weird. And it raises big questions about Bob Mueller himself. We'll get to that in a
00:06:58.000 second. But first, if you are not paying off your credit card bills every month, you are almost
00:07:03.420 certainly paying hundreds if not thousands of dollars in interest every year. Let Lending Club
00:07:08.700 help you out. With Lending Club, you can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with one fixed
00:07:14.620 monthly payment. Since 2007, Lending Club has helped millions of people regain control of their finances
00:07:19.800 with affordable fixed rate personal loans. I can speak a little bit from experience. It's not even that
00:07:24.940 I'm so terrible with money. You know, I'm running up crazy debt. It's just that I, like most dudes that
00:07:29.800 I know, are lazy when it comes to my finances. And I put it on the credit card and I forget about it and
00:07:34.280 I don't think about how much money I am wasting when you just use those high interest credit cards.
00:07:40.360 Don't do it, guys. Take control of your finances. Make it really easy. There's no trips to the bank.
00:07:45.680 There's no high interest credit cards. You just have to go to LendingClub.com and you will save a ton of
00:07:50.720 money. Tell them about yourself. Tell them how much you want to borrow. Pick the terms that are
00:07:54.380 right for you. And if you're approved, your loan is automatically deposited into your bank account
00:07:59.300 in as little as a few days. This is my kind of service. I don't even want to walk out my door.
00:08:04.620 Right into your bank account. That's why Lending Club is the number one peer-to-peer lending platform
00:08:08.320 with over $35 billion in loans issued. Stop wasting money. It takes two seconds to get control of your
00:08:14.980 finances and start making financial sense. Go to LendingClub.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S.
00:08:21.240 Check your rate in minutes. Borrow up to $40,000. That's LendingClub.com slash Knowles,
00:08:27.020 LendingClub.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. All loans made by one bank member FDIC, equal housing
00:08:33.240 lender. So you've got Mueller saying, I didn't totally exonerate Trump, but I'm not saying that
00:08:39.820 he's guilty of committing obstruction. He's guilty of this crime. Then things start to get weird.
00:08:47.280 So Mueller just starts stonewalling. And this is particularly with regard to the infamous
00:08:53.980 Steele dossier. That Steele dossier, you'll remember, was the report that was uncorroborated,
00:09:00.920 never proven, totally bogus, in many cases, report that this ex-intelligence guy, Christopher
00:09:07.060 Steele, made, almost certainly with Russian intelligence services. And he made it for Fusion
00:09:11.820 GPS, which is an opposition research firm that did work for Clinton and the Democrats.
00:09:16.600 This is central to the whole Russia conspiracy hoax and Mueller stonewalls on it. Here is
00:09:25.380 Representative Steve Chabot asking Mueller about Fusion and about Christopher Steele.
00:09:31.240 When discussing the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, you referenced, quote,
00:09:37.400 the firm that produced the Steele reporting, unquote. The name of that firm was Fusion GPS. Is that
00:09:44.500 correct? And you're on page 103? 103, that's correct. Volume 2.
00:09:51.720 When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele reporting, the name of the firm that produced
00:09:58.780 that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct? I'm not familiar with that.
00:10:04.820 Well, let me just help you. It was. It's not a trick question. It was Fusion GPS. Now,
00:10:12.240 Fusion GPS produced the opposition research document widely known as the Steele dossier.
00:10:18.960 And the owner of Fusion GPA was someone named Glenn Simpson. Are you familiar with that?
00:10:24.880 Outside of your purview? That's the whole investigation. The Steele dossier on which
00:10:34.640 the entire thing is predicated is outside of your purview? The Steele dossier is the beginning of
00:10:42.640 the Russia conspiracy. The Steele dossier was the predicate for the spying that took place,
00:10:48.360 the spying on members of the Trump campaign that started this whole three-year ordeal. And
00:10:54.300 Mueller seems like he doesn't know. He seems like he's ignorant of it. I mean, you have that line
00:10:58.900 from the congressman. He says, okay, and this was put together by Fusion GPS. Is that right?
00:11:05.160 And Mueller looks bewildered, dazed, and confused. He says, well, I don't, I'm not totally. And the
00:11:11.600 congressman has to lean in and say, it's not a trick question. It is Fusion GPS. It's in your own
00:11:16.780 report. Mueller seems totally ignorant of it. So then they go further. They start asking Mueller
00:11:21.720 not just about Fusion GPS, which is the firm that put it together, but Christopher Steele himself,
00:11:26.940 the ex-British intelligence analyst who put together the entire report. Mueller doesn't
00:11:32.920 seem to know very much about Christopher Steele either. Can you state with confidence that the
00:11:37.360 Steele dossier was not part of Russia's disinformation campaign? No, as I said in my opening
00:11:44.200 statement, that part of the building of the case predated me by at least 10 months. Yeah, I mean,
00:11:54.220 Paul Manafort's alleged crimes regarding tax evasion predated you. You had no problem charging
00:11:59.140 them. And matter of fact, this Steele dossier predated the attorney general, and he didn't have
00:12:04.340 any problem answering the question. When Senator Cornyn asked the attorney general the exact question
00:12:08.700 I asked you, director, the attorney general said, and I'm quoting, no, I can't state that with
00:12:13.620 confidence. And that's one of the areas I'm reviewing. I'm concerned about it, and I don't
00:12:18.420 think it's entirely speculative. Steele? Steele who? Christopher, I don't, uh, no, that name doesn't
00:12:25.780 ring any bell, does it? This was a great question from Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz. Unfortunately,
00:12:31.500 Gaetz went on a little bit too long in his question. He should have just gone in there and gotten the
00:12:35.320 clean hit. Because here's what he said. He said, let's talk about Christopher Steele.
00:12:40.140 Mueller says, well, that predates my experience in the investigation, so I can't talk about it.
00:12:45.040 And Gaetz has that great follow-up. He says, well, Manafort's tax problems predate your entrance
00:12:49.740 into the investigation. You're willing to talk about that. Why is it you're willing to talk about
00:12:54.460 things that make Trump look bad, but you're not willing to talk about things that make Democrats look
00:12:58.860 bad and maybe make Trump look pretty good? Why? It's pretty selective about what you're willing to talk
00:13:04.920 about and what you're not willing to talk about. It was a good hit. I don't mean to knock Congressman
00:13:09.460 Gaetz too much, but it should have been a cleaner hit. He should have ended it right there and let
00:13:13.220 Mueller stammer, which is what he did for much of the rest of the hearing. The fact remains, either way,
00:13:19.760 Mueller totally punted on Steele. This is pretty weird behavior. Two central figures and organizations
00:13:28.600 in this Russia investigation. Fusion GPS put the dossier together, took the Clintons' money,
00:13:34.680 took the Democrats' money, and Christopher Steele, the guy who actually wrote the thing.
00:13:41.320 That research that they put together launches the spying, launches the investigation.
00:13:48.140 And Bob Mueller, the head investigator, the special counsel, doesn't seem to know anything about
00:13:54.160 either of them. Not even that he's unwilling to talk about it. That he doesn't seem to,
00:13:58.680 oh, oh, Steele who? Fusion GPS who? Yeah, I never heard of her. This is difficult to believe. It raises
00:14:05.360 the question, is Mueller playing dumb? Or does Mueller actually not know what's going on in his
00:14:13.080 own investigation? How much does Bob Mueller know about his own investigation? I guess it could be either.
00:14:18.960 He could be playing dumb because he doesn't want to put himself at risk of committing perjury. Or he
00:14:25.080 doesn't want to make himself look too nakedly political. Or because when you play dumb, it
00:14:29.740 generally works to your advantage in politics. Bill Clinton has bragged about this. George Bush has
00:14:35.420 bragged about this. Playing a little below your mark is very helpful. But I don't know. Maybe he's not
00:14:41.700 playing dumb. Maybe he actually doesn't really know about these things. If that is the case, even if I'm
00:14:46.700 willing to believe that, this raises a more troubling question. If Bob Mueller doesn't know what's going
00:14:51.820 on in his investigation, who does? Because this has been the argument the whole time, is that this
00:14:58.520 investigation is extremely partisan. It's being staffed by never-Trumpers who hate the president's guts, who
00:15:04.240 have been caught in leaked text messages saying that they want to undermine the 2016 election and prevent
00:15:09.700 the people from electing Donald Trump. And all these guys have been caught as part of the Mueller
00:15:14.080 investigation. And the response the whole time was, okay, sure, there are a couple bad apples,
00:15:19.200 but Bob Mueller is a man beyond reproach. He's a former Marine. He's an FBI director under Republicans.
00:15:26.760 You couldn't possibly impugn his motives or his reputation or his competence.
00:15:33.700 Well, I don't know. If he doesn't know anything about his own investigation, then I guess that kind of
00:15:37.620 takes him off the table, doesn't it? If he doesn't know anything about his own investigation,
00:15:44.200 who does? Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe, Lisa Page? Who knows about it? Who was actually running it?
00:15:50.760 Who actually wrote this thing, if not Mueller? Or is Mueller playing dumb? Don't think this is some
00:15:57.220 partisan attack. There are a lot of left-wingers who are joining me in this criticism. We'll get to it
00:16:00.960 in just one second. But first, I have got to tell you about one of the coolest products I have ever
00:16:05.580 seen. And that is Paint Your Life. If you want to give an incredible gift, you have got to try
00:16:13.280 PaintYourLife.com. This is a gift that I gave to my stepbrother, for whom I was the best man.
00:16:20.780 I gave this to him for his wedding because it was the coolest gift I could possibly think of.
00:16:25.300 You can have an original painting made of yourself, of your children, of your family members,
00:16:29.880 of some special place you loved, of some pet. Maybe poor old Fido ain't with us anymore.
00:16:34.420 You can have a nice oil painting done of him at a price you can afford. And this is key,
00:16:38.280 because commissioning art can be very, very expensive. But PaintYourLife.com comes in
00:16:43.900 and gives you an incredible product. It is a true painting done by hand by a world-class artist.
00:16:49.600 It's not some fake, you know, just generated with smoke and mirrors. It's a real, genuine painting.
00:16:55.760 Makes the perfect gift for birthdays or weddings or anniversaries.
00:16:58.980 You choose the artist whose work you most admire. You work with him throughout the process until
00:17:03.500 every detail is perfect. So you're getting proofs all the time. There's no risk at all. If you don't
00:17:07.900 love the final painting, your money is refunded. This is great for decor. It's an actual work of art.
00:17:13.500 It's such, in a world of just cheap commodities, this is a real special gift. I'm already, because I was
00:17:18.500 so impressed with this painter in particular, I'm going to be commissioning another one of them.
00:17:22.300 I just love it. I can't speak highly enough of it. Right now is a limited time offer. You can get 30%
00:17:27.300 off your painting. That is right. 30% off you. I'm telling you once, I'm not going to say stop what
00:17:33.020 you're doing because I want you to finish my show. But then once my show is over, go check this out.
00:17:37.440 You are going to, it's going to blow your mind. You'll get 30% off free shipping, get the special
00:17:41.460 offer. The way to do it is to text Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S to 484848. That is K-N-O-W-L-E-S
00:17:50.180 to 484848. K-N-O-W-L-E-S to 484848. Message and data rates may apply.
00:18:00.880 So is Bob Mueller playing dumb or does Bob Mueller really have no idea what's going on in his
00:18:05.500 investigation? If it's the latter, then who ran the thing? Who wrote the thing? Who is behind this
00:18:11.240 witch hunt? Don't accuse me of having some partisan attack here that I'm carrying water for
00:18:18.340 Republicans or something. People from both sides of the aisle were absolutely flummoxed by this
00:18:23.940 performance today. Mike Cernovich, you know, the right-wing independent journalist, he suggested
00:18:29.380 that the hearing be adjourned because it constituted elder abuse against Bob Mueller looking a little
00:18:36.560 long in the tooth. On the other side of the aisle, David Axelrod, the chief strategist for Barack Obama,
00:18:41.600 he tweeted out simply, quote, this is very, very painful. He even tweeted out later,
00:18:48.080 he said, you know, this is a very delicate subject, but when Mueller testified before Congress six
00:18:53.400 years ago, he was a lot sharper than he is today. At one point, I kid you not, at one point,
00:18:59.200 Mueller couldn't remember which president appointed him U.S. attorney in Boston.
00:19:03.960 Director Mueller, I'm disappointed that some have questioned your motives throughout this process,
00:19:09.280 and I want to take a moment to remind the American people of who you are and your exemplary
00:19:15.120 service to our country. You are a Marine. You served in Vietnam and earned a bronze star and a
00:19:21.720 purple heart, correct? Correct. Which president appointed you to become the United States attorney
00:19:27.340 for Massachusetts? Which senator? Which president? Oh, which president?
00:19:34.700 I think that was President Bush. According to my notes, it was President Ronald Reagan had the
00:19:40.380 honor to do so. Under whose administration? My mistake.
00:19:44.660 Oh, man, this is genuinely, you pity the guy. I mean, he evokes a lot of sympathy here. Even from the
00:19:51.100 beginning, the question was, which president appointed you U.S. attorney? And he said, which
00:19:56.340 senator? Senators don't appoint you U.S. attorney. Presidents do that. No, which president? He goes,
00:20:02.340 I don't know, Bush? No, Reagan. Like, it's not a trick question. The same thing with Fusion GPS.
00:20:07.520 This isn't a trick question. We're just establishing your credibility. That was a friendly question from a
00:20:12.200 Democrat. Really bizarre. Look, he might be senile. He might have been off his meds or something.
00:20:19.080 Or he might be playing dumb. Either way, the most revealing part of this testimony is that he punted
00:20:27.680 on one question. So you saw a buildup. He punts on Christopher Steele. He punts on Fusion GPS.
00:20:36.120 Oh, I don't know. Little, what do I know? But then he's asked a very pointed question on how the
00:20:42.360 investigation got started. And people aren't really covering this, but this is the key to the testimony.
00:20:46.960 And it's a little bit complicated, so bear with me. Bob Mueller is asked why Joseph Mifsud,
00:20:53.840 who lied to the FBI, was not charged with a crime. If that name Joseph Mifsud sounds familiar,
00:21:00.520 he matters because he's this Maltese academic. He's a professor. He's in London. He's in Paris.
00:21:06.600 He's in Malta. He's in Rome. And he's clearly got ties to intelligence agencies. Some people say he's
00:21:13.240 tied to Russian intelligence. Some people say he's tied to Western intelligence. Maybe he's tied to
00:21:17.720 both. And he is the academic who told the Trump staffer, George Papadopoulos, that the Russians had
00:21:24.900 dirt on Clinton. So this whole episode, the whole question of whether this Russia investigation was
00:21:30.220 a setup from the very beginning, comes down to this guy, Joseph Mifsud. How did George Papadopoulos,
00:21:37.340 the Trump staffer, come to find out that, or hear rather, whether it's true or not, how did he come
00:21:43.800 to hear that the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton? And then how did he come to pass that
00:21:49.360 information along, which was the trigger that started the investigation, which allowed the
00:21:52.840 Obama administration to spy on the Trump campaign? How did that happen? Joseph Mifsud is at the center
00:21:59.120 of this. And Mueller refuses to answer. The FBI interviewed Joseph Mifsud on February 10th, 2017.
00:22:08.420 In that interview, Mr. Mifsud lied. You point this out on page 193, volume one, Mifsud denied.
00:22:15.140 Mifsud also falsely stated. In addition, Mifsud omitted. Three times he lied to the FBI,
00:22:21.440 yet you didn't charge him with the crime. Excuse me. I'm sorry. Did you say 193?
00:22:26.400 Volume one, 193. He lied three times. You pointed out in the report. Why didn't you charge him with
00:22:31.500 the crime? I can't get into internal deliberations with regard to who would or would not be charged.
00:22:38.520 A lot of other people for making a false statement. Let's remember this.
00:22:41.680 That's right. He charged a lot of other people for making false statements. But you see,
00:22:46.220 Mueller just keeps going back to this. I can't talk about internal deliberations.
00:22:49.400 I can't talk about why I charged somebody, but I didn't charge any other people.
00:22:53.100 Well, it's a little weird, Mr. Mueller, because on the one hand, you're charging Mike Flynn for lying.
00:23:01.100 You're charging Papadopoulos. You're charging all of these guys associated with Trump for,
00:23:07.300 in some cases, very minor lies. But then this guy, this academic, Joseph Mifsud,
00:23:13.940 who lies on three occasions to the FBI, he doesn't get charged with a crime. Why not?
00:23:19.420 The obvious implication is that he has worked with Western intelligence. The obvious implication
00:23:25.320 is that he's got a longstanding relationship with the FBI and the intelligence community.
00:23:30.180 And the question that is being raised is, what was Mifsud's role in talking to Papadopoulos?
00:23:39.840 Did Joseph Mifsud, this cosmopolitan academic who just floats, flits around all over the world,
00:23:46.040 just happen to bump into George Papadopoulos, just happen to say that the Russians had dirt on Hillary
00:23:52.800 Clinton, which just happened to prompt the events that led to the spying on the Trump campaign? Was
00:23:58.420 that just an accident? Or was there some collusion, not between Trump and the Russians,
00:24:05.320 but between the Obama administration and guys like Joseph Mifsud? That's the question. And that's a key
00:24:12.360 question that has not been answered. The FBI, did the FBI use Mifsud to prod Papadopoulos,
00:24:20.740 who was working on the Trump campaign? That's a crucial question. And Jim Jordan, thankfully,
00:24:24.960 does not let up. So he sets up this whole scene. Then he asks the question, point blank,
00:24:31.380 what is the relationship between the intelligence community and Professor Mifsud?
00:24:34.980 You point this out on page one of the report. July 31st, 2016, they opened the investigation
00:24:41.840 based on that piece of information. Diplomat tells Papadopoulos, Russians have dirt, excuse me,
00:24:48.220 Papadopoulos tells a diplomat, Russians have dirt on Clinton. Diplomat tells the FBI.
00:24:53.720 What I'm wondering is, who told Papadopoulos? How'd he find out?
00:24:58.860 I can't get into the evidentiary filing. Yes, you can, because you wrote about it. You gave us
00:25:02.900 the answer. Page 192 of the report, you tell us who told him. Joseph Mifsud. Joseph Mifsud's the
00:25:11.020 guy who told Papadopoulos, the mysterious professor who lives in Rome and London, works and teaches in
00:25:16.800 two different universities. This is the guy who told Papadopoulos. He's the guy who starts it all.
00:25:22.360 And when the FBI interviews him, he lies three times. And yet you don't charge him with a crime.
00:25:29.540 You charge Rick Gates for false statements. You charge Paul Manafort for false statements.
00:25:33.340 You charge Michael Cohen with false statements. You charge Michael Flynn, a three-star general,
00:25:37.820 with false statements. But the guy who puts the country through this whole saga,
00:25:43.120 starts it all for three years we've lived this now. He lies. And you guys don't charge him.
00:25:49.620 And I'm curious as to why.
00:25:50.860 Absolutely stellar performance from Jim Jordan here. And he nails him. Just look at Mueller's
00:25:57.620 reaction when he says, I want to get down to Mifsud. I want to know who told Papadopoulos
00:26:05.620 on the Trump campaign that the Russians had dirt on Hillary. And you see, Mueller won't let him get
00:26:10.380 the words out of his mouth. Mueller jumps in. I can't talk about that. This is nothing that I can
00:26:14.300 talk about. And Jordan's got him right where he wants him because he says, of course you can talk
00:26:18.400 about that. You already did. It's in your report. Or is it your report? It's in the Mueller report.
00:26:26.960 I don't know who wrote it. Clearly you don't have much of a recollection of it. But you already
00:26:30.960 admitted that it was Mifsud who told him. Again, raises the question, does Mueller know about his
00:26:36.080 own report? Is he playing dumb? He clearly looks uncomfortable here. He clearly looks nervous. He's
00:26:41.020 jumping and saying, we can't talk about how this whole thing started. The one common thread through all
00:26:44.900 this testimony is this guy will not talk about how this investigation got started. I wonder why
00:26:51.840 then Jim Jordan goes in for the kill. We'll get to that in a second. We'll also get to the number one
00:26:58.920 issue for Americans as we look down to 2020, according to Gallup polling and the Orwellian
00:27:03.980 inclusive language guide from Colorado State University. But first, I've got to say goodbye
00:27:10.320 to Facebook and YouTube. And I've got to tell you guys, today, 7 p.m. Eastern, 4 p.m. Pacific,
00:27:16.660 our latest episode of the conversation will be featuring the great Supreme Lord of the multiverse,
00:27:23.880 Andrew Klavan. He will be answering your questions live, so make them good. As always,
00:27:28.800 the episode is free to watch on YouTube and Facebook. Only subscribers can ask the questions.
00:27:34.080 Subscribe today at The Daily Wire. Get your questions answered by Drew Klavan at 7 p.m. Eastern,
00:27:38.840 4 p.m. Pacific, and join the conversation. I also have to give a little plug to our buddy Bill
00:27:44.760 Whittle's podcast. Bill Whittle, you know him. You've seen him before. He has an incredible podcast
00:27:51.540 out on the Apollo 11 mission, the moon landing. The other day, I put out a video talking to people
00:27:57.940 about all the various theories of how we didn't actually go to the moon. Between 6 and 20 percent
00:28:02.300 of Americans don't think we ever went to the moon because there's a lot of misinformation
00:28:06.180 floating out there. Check out this podcast. It is informative, it is historical, but it's also
00:28:11.160 incredibly inspiring because this month marks the 50th anniversary since we first put a man on the
00:28:16.860 moon. This new podcast by Esoteric Radio Theater is called Apollo 11, What We Saw. It shot immediately
00:28:23.060 to number three on iTunes, Apple podcasts. It stayed there in the top 10 for a week, and it's getting
00:28:29.120 great reviews. Almost 1 million people have listened to the podcast or watched it on YouTube. It's really
00:28:34.240 just excellent. Don't tell Bill that I was so kind about it, but it is really, really good.
00:28:39.520 And Bill is, he's an author, he's a pilot, he's a space enthusiast. He takes you on the journey of
00:28:45.060 what it took to get to the moon, what happened when we got there, and how we almost didn't get
00:28:48.380 there at all. All four episodes are available right now, so you can binge it. Head over to Apple
00:28:53.220 Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. Subscribe today to Apollo 11, What We Saw. While you're
00:28:58.240 there, please make sure that you subscribe to our show, The Michael Knowles Show. It really helps us out
00:29:02.880 when you subscribe, so please do that. Then you'll never miss even one syllable, one pearl of wisdom.
00:29:08.220 You can watch all of that. You can also watch the podcast episodes of Apollo 11 all over YouTube
00:29:14.740 at the Esoteric Radio Theater YouTube channel. Head over there right now. Head over to dailywire.com.
00:29:19.620 We'll be right back with a lot more.
00:29:21.020 So Jordan totally demolishes Mueller. He asks him the question. Mueller jumps. He doesn't want
00:29:39.580 to answer the question. He says he can't talk about it. Jordan says, of course you can talk
00:29:42.860 about it. You wrote it in the report that you apparently didn't even read. Then Jordan goes
00:29:47.800 in for the kill. Here he is. When the FBI interviewed him in February, FBI interviews
00:29:52.720 him in February, when the special counsel's office interviewed Mifsud, did he lie to you?
00:29:57.980 Can't get into that. Did you interview Mifsud? Can't get into that. Is Mifsud Western intelligence
00:30:02.880 or Russian intelligence? Can't get into that. A lot of things you can't get into. What's interesting,
00:30:07.960 you can charge 13 Russians. No one's ever heard of. No one's ever seen. No one's ever going to hear
00:30:13.360 of him. No one's ever going to see him. You can charge them. You can charge all kinds of people
00:30:17.320 who are around the president with false statements. But the guy who launches every, the guy who puts
00:30:23.380 this whole story in motion, you can't charge him. I think that's amazing. I'm not certain I agree
00:30:31.280 with your characterizations. Well, I'm reading from your report. Ouch. That's pretty bad. I'm not sure
00:30:37.480 I agree with your characterizations. They're not my characterizations, Mr. Mueller. They're yours.
00:30:42.820 I'm reading from your report. This is brutal for the Democrats on Capitol Hill who brought
00:30:48.540 Mueller up to testify. It shows us something that I had suspected, but I wouldn't have put money on,
00:30:56.040 which is that the Democrats' best shot here was to just run on the Mueller report and keep Mueller
00:31:02.060 himself quiet. Just take the report. You can spin the report however you want and just keep Mueller
00:31:08.080 quiet. But the Democrats couldn't do that because they were disappointed with the report because it
00:31:12.760 more or less exonerated the president. You know, a little bit on the edges or obstruction or some
00:31:17.060 tweety scent. So they could have used that. They could have taken those little bits and tried to say
00:31:22.720 that Trump was guilty of all these things. Instead, they wanted more. They thought that they would get
00:31:27.300 more by having Mueller testify. And there were more unanswered questions than answers in the report.
00:31:33.100 Namely, how did the investigation start? That question reflects very poorly on Democrats.
00:31:41.260 And it undermines whatever political win Democrats had with the report. I mean, they did have a little
00:31:48.140 bit of a win. Trump did get dinged in this report. He was not fully exonerated by Bob Mueller on
00:31:54.620 obstruction. They could have had it, but they got greedy. Now, with this testimony, it really is
00:32:01.060 making the whole Russia report and the whole investigation seem illegitimate. The only hope
00:32:06.220 for Democrats in all of this is that no one cares about Mueller or Russia or collusion or any of it.
00:32:10.400 They've all moved on. The bad news for Democrats right now is, one, they've lost even a minor talking
00:32:18.740 point. But two, Gallup polling shows that more people than ever are concerned about illegal
00:32:25.260 immigration, which is a terrible issue for them and a great issue for Republicans and President Trump.
00:32:31.360 Gallup polling shows more Americans than ever, ever before, are concerned about illegal immigration,
00:32:36.900 and it's the top issue in the country. 27% of Americans identify immigration as the most
00:32:42.200 important U.S. problem. This surpasses the previous high of 23% in June. To put that in perspective,
00:32:49.820 because it seems like kind of a low number, you think the top issue would have 75% or 80%. No,
00:32:54.940 people are very fragmented about what issues they care about. Very few issues since 2001,
00:33:00.760 since they really started this polling, have ever eclipsed 27%. So this is a top issue even historically.
00:33:08.420 Now, immigration is the biggest concern. The next biggest problem is government slash leadership.
00:33:15.140 And this isn't just, it's a problem for Trump, but it's not only a problem for Trump.
00:33:18.640 This has been the case since the second Obama term as well. So you got 27% immigration, 23%
00:33:26.160 government leadership. The next highest issues are racism, race relations at 7%, and healthcare at 7%.
00:33:34.240 So way, way below a quarter or a third what the number one and number two issues are.
00:33:40.900 Now, this is a double-edged sword for Trump. This actually isn't just all good news for Trump,
00:33:44.800 because the good news is he owns the illegal immigration issue, and this will help him
00:33:49.220 because he owns it. Except he hasn't built the wall. Fox News confirmed that CBP report the other day.
00:33:56.720 Customs and Border Protection came out and said, President Trump has not built one mile
00:34:00.760 of new border wall since he was elected president. And you heard some people pushing back,
00:34:07.040 the people who will just defend the president regardless of what's actually happening. They
00:34:11.200 were pushing back and saying, no, there is wall. There's new wall. Fox News confirmed the report.
00:34:15.260 So unless they have information, unless someone has information that I don't, right now it looks
00:34:19.380 like he hasn't built any new border wall. Look, I get that it's hard. I get it's hard from an
00:34:26.040 environmental perspective. It's hard from a zoning perspective. Obviously, it's hard from a bureaucratic
00:34:29.940 and a Democrat obstruction perspective. But if he hasn't built the wall,
00:34:35.380 he doesn't look great on that issue. It's also bad for President Trump because he's the incumbent,
00:34:41.220 which now makes him the object of everybody's ire, if you believe that the second biggest issue,
00:34:46.080 according to Americans, is government and leadership. So there is a simple fix for this.
00:34:50.920 It'll help him on the top biggest issue. And it'll help him on the second biggest issue.
00:34:57.140 Build the wall. Easy. Or if you can't build the wall because it's too hard,
00:35:02.860 at least propose a plan to get the wall built, a clear plan, so that we don't need to just keep
00:35:08.280 believing promises. Or if you can't do that, because I understand, very difficult to do that.
00:35:14.820 Short of that, start deporting criminal aliens. Like, start really deporting them. We were told
00:35:21.760 last week that the U.S. would be deporting millions of criminal aliens. Remember that? On Sunday,
00:35:26.880 there were all these protests all over the country. No, don't do it. There was a terrorist attack at an
00:35:30.840 ice facility. And do you know how many people we arrested? 18. Not 18 million, not 18,000. 18 people.
00:35:42.580 There were orders of magnitude more protesters protesting the alleged mass arrests and deportation
00:35:50.760 than there were people who actually got arrested to be deported.
00:35:56.180 Even, forget President, let's say he can't build the wall. Let's say he can't get a plan to build
00:36:00.260 the wall. Even deporting lots and lots of criminal aliens publicly would help him on the subject of
00:36:07.500 illegal immigration and on the subject of government and leadership. It would show leadership.
00:36:10.940 It would show progress on the top issue. President Trump had really good instincts in 2016 to focus
00:36:17.780 on immigration. It wasn't just him. A few other people got this. Actually, Daily Wire God King,
00:36:23.120 Jeremy Boring, and our senior producer, Jonathan Hay, he understood, both of them understood,
00:36:29.380 that immigration was going to be the big issue. Back in 2014, they made a movie, a movie called The Arroyo,
00:36:34.080 all about illegal immigration. Because they saw coming down the pike, this was going to be a big
00:36:38.680 problem. President Trump saw that in 2015 when he came down that elevator at Trump Tower. He made that,
00:36:45.560 in many ways, the defining issue of his campaign. Good moves. Smart. Ever since then, the issue has
00:36:52.940 moved even more in Trump's favor. Great. All the better. But you've got to show some leadership on it.
00:36:59.880 Also, I mean, time's running out, by the way. What is it already? We're already in the end of July
00:37:05.740 2019. Presidential campaigns move fast. So there needs to be action on that if President Trump is
00:37:12.240 going to capitalize on this new Gallup polling. Also important to remember, though, that people
00:37:17.460 don't only care about political issues. They might not even primarily care about political issues.
00:37:21.760 They also care about cultural issues. When I ask people why they voted for President Trump,
00:37:26.300 some of them will say, immigration, I want to get rid of illegals. I want to border control.
00:37:31.400 Some of them will say, the economy, I want jobs. The Obama economy was awful.
00:37:36.080 Many more people will say it wasn't that, that it was because they want to smash political correctness.
00:37:43.140 That they feel that political correctness is oppressive, it's damaging them, and they're done with it.
00:37:47.980 And we are now seeing political correctness to the extreme out of Colorado State University.
00:37:53.900 This story was reported last October, and now there's a final version of it coming out now.
00:38:00.600 Colorado State University has published something called an Inclusive Language Guide.
00:38:07.680 How Orwellian is that? It was from the Inclusive Language Committee or something. It's hosted on the
00:38:14.280 Women and Gender Collaborative website. I know you've got that in your bookmark, so make sure to go check
00:38:21.320 it out. I read through this guide. I counted 131 words that you're not allowed to say. In the original
00:38:30.460 draft of this, two of the words were American and America. This is at a public state-funded American
00:38:39.200 University. They said America is offensive, and American is offensive. If they find it so offensive,
00:38:48.260 maybe they shouldn't take any taxpayer funding from America. Maybe they shouldn't take government
00:38:52.780 subsidized and guaranteed loans from America. No, they're not willing to do that. Now, fortunately,
00:38:59.240 there was such a backlash to that in October, they took that out of the final version. But there are a
00:39:02.960 lot of other crazy things in this guide. I mean, obviously, we don't have time for 131. But here's an
00:39:07.260 example. Listen to just this logic. They say the word colored to refer to black people is offensive. Fair
00:39:15.040 enough. Yeah, people haven't used that word in a while. They say colored is a highly offensive racial
00:39:19.560 slur that was often used during segregation to separate people of color. Wait, what? Colored is bad.
00:39:30.280 Color is good. And if you use anything else, it's bad, I think. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense,
00:39:35.760 does it? But it's just a euphemism cycle. You had colored. That was the term that everyone was supposed
00:39:42.800 to use. Then that fell out of favor, and it became black. Then it became African American. Then it
00:39:47.080 went back to black again. Now it's people of color, which is exactly the same as saying colored people,
00:39:51.760 except if you say colored people, you're a racial bigot. And if you say people of color,
00:39:55.800 you're super woke for now. Obviously, it's going to change. Another phrase that you're not allowed
00:39:59.720 to say is hip hip hooray. This is true. They said because hip hip hooray developed from the German
00:40:07.520 hep hep, which they write was a harmless, adorable call shepherds would use when herding their sheep.
00:40:14.480 Okay. Seems like there's no problem, right? No, but they go on. But during the Holocaust,
00:40:19.080 German citizens started using it as a rallying cry when they would hunt down Jewish citizens
00:40:24.160 living in the ghettos. So if you use the phrase hip hip hooray, hip hip hooray, if you use that,
00:40:30.400 you are a Nazi, according to Colorado State University. They say you're not allowed to use the expression
00:40:34.920 a long time no see because that's offensive to Native Americans. How? I have no idea. They say
00:40:40.520 that you're not allowed to say no can do. Hey, Michael, can you help me out? No can do. That
00:40:44.800 apparently is offensive to Chinese people. Again, why? Couldn't possibly tell you. What's wilder though
00:40:50.400 than all of this, what you can say, what you can't say, the innocuous expressions that now I guess are
00:40:57.420 are evil and bigoted. What's more interesting than that is how woke expressions fall out of fashion
00:41:06.080 and are quickly deemed hateful. One example of this is they say you're no longer allowed to say
00:41:12.340 homosexual. I thought homosexual was the totally clinical PC term. No, they say you're not allowed
00:41:20.480 to say homosexual, but you can say, and what you should say, is a gay, okay, lesbian, okay, bisexual,
00:41:27.440 all right, pansexual, whatever, or queer. Do you remember like five minutes ago when we were told that
00:41:38.740 queer is the new n-word, that queer is a horrible racial slur, which is why that little twit, Carlos
00:41:46.300 Mazza, that little bigoted leftist at vox.com tried to get Steven Crowder and a lot of other
00:41:52.100 conservatives kicked off of YouTube? Do you remember that? Queer, because queer is the n-word. I went on
00:41:58.640 a television show and when they used the word queer, when it was used in a video, they bleeped it out
00:42:03.780 because we were now told queer is the new n-word, except then we're told from Colorado State, actually
00:42:09.600 queer is the right word and homosexual is the wrong word. So if Crowder had said homosexual in his podcast
00:42:15.140 or on his show, they'd go after him for that. And then if he says queer, they're going to go after
00:42:19.800 him for that. And you're damned if you do, and you're damned if you don't. And what it shows,
00:42:23.700 what all of this shows, these language guides are not about helping an aggrieved class, obviously not.
00:42:30.460 We were talking about this yesterday on the show. The left moves past their aggrieved classes and
00:42:36.220 ditches them as soon as it becomes politically useful. They used to prattle on about women's rights
00:42:40.680 and feminism. Now they ditch all those women for the transgender so-called community. Now they make,
00:42:47.240 now they force women out of business if they won't wax the genitals of grown men wearing a dress.
00:42:51.700 Now they won't let girls win high school scholarships to college because they force them to compete
00:42:56.760 against men in women's sports. So that's over. They always ditch those groups. It's also not about
00:43:01.400 civility. It's not about making a nicer community. The left is as vindictive and scolding as any when it
00:43:09.000 comes to these words. It's not about charity or civility. It's not even about the particular
00:43:13.980 words because the words change all the time. What it's about is shutting you up. What it's about is
00:43:20.440 forcing you to check in with the committee, check in with your overlords at Colorado State or Twitter
00:43:25.640 or YouTube or wherever before you say anything. Because it's not about the words, it's about the
00:43:32.040 opinions that you're expressing. This was all summed up in Alice in Wonderland. Excuse me,
00:43:37.420 Alice in Wonderland has this scene in it where Alice is talking to Humpty Dumpty.
00:43:42.380 And Humpty Dumpty says to Alice, when I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean,
00:43:48.420 neither more nor less. And Alice says, the question is whether you can make words mean so many different
00:43:55.040 things. And Humpty Dumpty knows better. He says, the question is, which is to be master? That is all.
00:44:03.080 We've talked about it before. And you see it again, clear as day out of Colorado State. The left would
00:44:10.200 master our culture by constantly changing and perverting the meaning of words. And the way that
00:44:16.580 conservatives can master the culture is by using words correctly, using words to mean what they mean.
00:44:23.260 When the left can't change the meaning of words, they totally obfuscate. I don't know. I couldn't
00:44:31.560 say. What does it mean? How do we know? You saw Bob Mueller doing it all day today.
00:44:38.260 We need to insist on using precise language. We need to insist on asking precise questions.
00:44:44.820 In the vague haziness of innuendo and emotion and smears and slander, the left will win.
00:44:54.800 But in the precision of language, in the precision of questions, in the precision of what is the truth,
00:45:00.580 that's conservatives' path forward. In the short run, when we insist on that, it hurts us. We might
00:45:05.840 get expelled from Colorado State. We might have milkshakes thrown at us on the street. We might get
00:45:11.440 squirted by weird super soakers in Missouri and ruin my nice suit. But in the long run,
00:45:16.320 that is the way that we will win. All right, that's our show. I had a great time today speaking
00:45:19.740 to TPUSA here in Washington, D.C. I'm going to be doing a number of other media appearances,
00:45:24.800 so you can check them out while I'm here in D.C. And then I'll be speaking for the Young
00:45:28.480 America's Foundation next week for their conference. And then I'll finally be back in La La Land.
00:45:34.660 In the meantime, get your mailbag questions in for tomorrow. I'm Michael Knowles. This is
00:45:38.300 The Michael Knowles Show. I'll see you then.
00:45:41.440 The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Rebecca Dobkiewicz and directed by Mike Joyner.
00:45:49.700 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Senior producer, Jonathan Hay. Our supervising producer
00:45:54.660 is Mathis Glover. And our technical producer is Austin Stevens. Edited by Danny D'Amico. Audio
00:46:00.060 is mixed by Dylan Case. Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera. And our production assistant is Nick Sheehan.
00:46:05.980 The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2019.
00:46:09.900 Hey, guys. Over on The Matt Wall Show today, as we all suffer through another Robert Mueller news
00:46:14.900 cycle, I'd like to turn our attention back to the story of Erica Thomas. She claimed to remember
00:46:20.520 that she was verbally assaulted by a racist white man at the grocery store. Well, the police report
00:46:24.440 is out and it's not good for her. And I think when a race hoax is exposed, we should talk about it
00:46:31.000 rather than just move on as the media wants us to do. Also, we're going to talk about an actress who
00:46:36.680 came out as pansexual, even though the term pansexual has no meaning. And also, Forever 21
00:46:42.960 unintentionally came up with the most hilarious marketing gimmick of all time.
00:46:48.080 And we'll talk about that also over on The Matt Wall Show.