The Michael Knowles Show - December 05, 2019


Ep. 461 - The High Crime Of Orange Man Bad


Episode Stats


Length

49 minutes

Words per minute

174.46455

Word count

8,697

Sentence count

680

Harmful content

Misogyny

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Impeachment hearings are in full swing, and Democrats have their first chance to argue their case for removing Donald Trump from office. But will they be able to convince the Judiciary Committee that the president should be removed from office because he's a bad human being?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler and the House Judiciary Committee presided over the first
00:00:06.780 day of official impeachment hearings yesterday, where expert witnesses made the incisive
00:00:12.800 constitutional argument that orange man bad, orange man very bad. We will explain the expert
00:00:22.960 constitutional experts, and we will explain why they think the 2016 election should be overturned.
00:00:30.380 Their arguments and the arguments against impeachment, all of them coming from an 1.00
00:00:35.500 unexpected source. Then Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau trash talks President Trump behind
00:00:41.960 his back. Trans activists in Washington accuse cops of killing their families. And finally,
00:00:47.100 the mailbag. All that and more. I'm Michael Knowles, and this is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:52.960 For those of you who are not as expert in the Constitution as all of those experts that the
00:01:03.640 Democrats dragged before the impeachment hearings yesterday, I will just remind you that the
00:01:08.820 president can be removed from office for treason, bribery, other high crimes and misdemeanors,
00:01:17.820 and if the orange man is very bad. People miss that part. It's not taught as often in law schools
00:01:23.840 anymore, but it is certainly the case. It's actually a more egregious crime than treason,
00:01:28.660 bribery, or the high crimes and misdemeanors. The orange man being bad is the impeachable offense,
00:01:33.680 and that is pretty clearly what the Democrats are going to impeach Donald Trump over. We will go
00:01:38.840 through the circus that took place yesterday before the Judiciary Committee. We will go through the
00:01:44.800 species arguments of all of the Democratic testimony, and we will go through the one expert who managed to
00:01:55.200 pretty much shut down their case. But first, I've got to thank our friends over at Brick House. You know
00:02:01.700 that it is very important to eat your fruits and veggies, isn't it? Now, me, if I were left to my own
00:02:06.780 devices, my diet would consist of about 93% fatty Italian meats and about 7% provolone. But thankfully,
00:02:15.280 there is a way for me to get my veggies and my fruits through Brick House. Have you ever wondered why so
00:02:21.360 many Americans are sick, unhealthy, and overweight? Between the food supply and a sedentary lifestyle,
00:02:27.440 Americans are in worse shape than ever. So the team of on-staff physicians at Brick House Nutrition
00:02:33.660 created, Field of Greens. Field of Greens. So easy to use. It's so easy to add fruits and vegetables to
00:02:40.980 your daily routine without spending hours in the produce section or hiring a home chef or taking
00:02:46.200 cheap supplements that aren't going to do you any good. Field of Greens is made with real USDA organic
00:02:52.200 fruits and vegetables. It also helps boost your immunity by using antioxidants, and it assists
00:02:58.600 digestive health with prebiotics and probiotics. It is like having a doctor and a nutritionist in
00:03:05.800 your kitchen, but you don't need to think about anything. You just take one scoop. One scoop of
00:03:10.840 Field of Greens delivers a full serving of fruits and vegetables. Just drop it in a cup of water,
00:03:15.420 stir it, and you're done. Also, great for smoothies. That's how most of my friends like it. For me,
00:03:21.120 I'm just like a purist. I want the fruits and veggies. Put it in. I don't want to think about it.
00:03:25.000 Bottom line, this is real food. This is not extracts. You will look and feel better. It's
00:03:31.060 just so simple. I want to simplify my life as much as possible. There are enough complications. If I
00:03:36.680 need to think for more than two seconds about, oh, I didn't eat that vegetable, and I got to have this
00:03:41.620 and this, but no, none of that. Just one scoop, it's in. You're done. Go to BrickHouseKnowles.com.
00:03:47.560 You know that's my nickname. Go to BrickHouseKnowles.com and get 15% off your first order just for trying it
00:03:54.720 out with the promo code Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. That is BrickHouseKnowles, my nickname, .com,
00:04:00.780 promo code Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. All right, let's jump right in to the expert, super duper
00:04:06.920 expert testimony, beginning with Professor Pamela Carlin. One big mistake the Democrats made
00:04:14.840 at these impeachment hearings. Obviously, they're going to call their people. They're going to call
00:04:20.160 leftists. They're going to call Democrats. They're going to call people who hate Donald Trump.
00:04:23.800 All right, we just know that's going to happen. But it was a big mistake on their part to call
00:04:29.840 experts who are so obviously biased, who are so obviously partisan, who come across as such hacks.
00:04:38.340 The whole point of having experts show up to your impeachment hearings is to give this patina of
00:04:43.820 credibility, of non-partisanship, of, you know, we're just looking at the facts here, folks, and that's
00:04:49.620 why we have to remove the president. They just couldn't do that. They picked, for their first
00:04:53.720 witness, as partisan, as hacky, an expert as you could possibly imagine. Professor Pamela Carlin,
00:05:03.760 Stanford Law professor, radical leftist and Democrat. She wrote a whole book about how awful 1.00
00:05:09.200 the 2000 election was when Al Gore lost. She's an Obama appointee. She was under Obama, working for
00:05:16.080 Obama and Eric Holder, a very corrupt attorney general. She was the U.S. Deputy Assistant Attorney 0.99
00:05:21.280 General. She's an outspoken LGBT activist. In Obama's DOJ, she was a key person to implement
00:05:28.980 the redefinition of marriage. You look at her political donations, donates to a lot of Democrats,
00:05:35.220 and she, this is probably the worst part for her credibility, she called for the impeachment of 1.00
00:05:40.640 Trump two years ago. So if what the Democrats are saying now is, we weren't going to impeach Trump,
00:05:46.360 but now we have to because he made a long distance phone call to Ukraine or whatever the issue is with
00:05:51.240 the Ukraine phone call. That doesn't hold up when you realize that this law professor and this
00:05:56.140 Democratic activist was trying to impeach the guy two years ago. She actually said on camera,
00:06:02.020 on a microphone, that when she walks by the Trump hotel in Washington, D.C., she is so disgusted that
00:06:08.820 she has to cross to the other side of the street. I was struck, you know, I came in from the airport
00:06:14.580 yesterday and I got off the bus from Dulles down at L'Enfant Plaza and I walked up to the hotel and
00:06:19.960 as I was walking past what used to be the old post office building and is now the Trump hotel,
00:06:26.640 which I had to cross the street, of course. But are you staying there? God, no, never,
00:06:34.380 never. But as I was walking past it, I noticed there's a... No, never. Oh, it's so awful. I can't
00:06:40.400 even bear to be on the sidewalk in front of the hotel. Hi, I'm going to be your nonpartisan expert
00:06:45.500 witness. Okay, not a lot of credibility. She actually, as she's testifying, she said that she
00:06:50.560 was so riled up for these impeachment hearings that she didn't even eat Thanksgiving. All she was doing
00:06:57.920 was reading transcripts. She was so hungry, not for Turkey, but to oust the duly elected
00:07:03.860 president of the United States. You know, I spent all of Thanksgiving vacation
00:07:08.860 sitting there reading these transcripts. I didn't, you know, I ate like a turkey that came to us in
00:07:15.320 the mail that was already cooked because I was spending my time doing this. I was so excited.
00:07:21.480 Gobble, gobble, give me all those Ukraine transcripts. So in her blind hatred of the president,
00:07:26.620 she made a crucial error. Not just the Democrats' error in inviting her, but her error during her
00:07:34.420 testimony. She let her zeal to impeach this guy, her absolute disdain for the president come out
00:07:41.920 and cause her to bring Donald Trump's 13-year-old son into the picture. Now, the left loves bringing
00:07:50.760 children into politics. They do it all the time. They did it with the, the Parkland kids. After the
00:07:56.540 shooting at Parkland High School, they brought these, these traumatized kids in and put them on
00:08:01.580 a pedestal, put them on a stage, put, gave them a lot of money, gave them a big spotlight. Obviously,
00:08:06.040 they're doing that now with Greta Thunberg, the environmentalist child from Sweden. And they're
00:08:11.780 putting her on a stage and they're giving her a lot of attention and they, they're foisting her right 0.98
00:08:15.340 in front of the media. That's an awful thing that is absolutely indefensible, but that's kind of their
00:08:20.920 MO. They don't just do it though, for kids who want the spotlight. Baron Trump has very much shied
00:08:26.760 away from the spotlight. He doesn't go on stage. He doesn't want to be in the media. And this woman,
00:08:33.220 as she's describing why Trump is so awful, he's so awful because he thinks he's a king. He's so awful
00:08:38.600 because he thinks he's a royal. She decides to bring his 13 year old son into it. Big no, no.
00:08:46.440 What comparisons, Professor Carlin, can we make between Kings that the framers were afraid of
00:08:52.800 and the president's conduct today? So Kings could do no wrong because the King's word was law.
00:08:59.780 And contrary to what President Trump has said, article two does not give him the power to do
00:09:04.500 anything he wants. And I'll just give you one example that shows you the difference between him
00:09:09.020 and a king, which is the constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. So while the president
00:09:14.880 can name his son baron, he can't make him a baron. Oh, yeah. All right, folks, try the veal,
00:09:23.560 tip your waitress. I'll be here all week. See you later. The really egregious thing about that statement
00:09:28.500 is not that she brought the president's 13 year old son into the mix. She shouldn't have done that.
00:09:35.380 It's just how totally lame that joke was. It was such a reach. It was such a stretch. If the pun's
00:09:42.620 not going to work, just leave, let it go. If the joke's not going to work, just let it go. You don't,
00:09:47.500 you don't have to do that. Melania Trump did not like that line. Melania Trump comes out there. 1.00
00:09:54.740 She tweets, quote, a minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. 1.00
00:10:01.760 Pamela Carlin, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering and
00:10:06.080 using a child to do it. And she's absolutely right. And I will say as somebody who goes on camera a lot,
00:10:13.840 Pamela Carlin, you should be very embarrassed by how totally lame that pun was. If you're going to
00:10:18.520 try to make a joke in public like that, and you're going to workshop it and write it and be prepared to
00:10:23.920 give it, it should be at least 400% funnier than it was. That was very, very lame and also
00:10:31.300 inappropriate. And she felt it was obviously getting such blowback that she came out and
00:10:36.360 apologized for her earlier remarks during the same testimony. I want to apologize for what I said
00:10:45.280 earlier about the president's son. It was wrong of me to do that. I wish the president would apologize
00:10:51.260 obviously for the things that he's done that's wrong, but I do regret having said that.
00:10:55.920 Thank you, professor.
00:10:58.260 That's not an apology. That's not how you do an apology. When you do an apology, you don't say,
00:11:04.800 hey, I'm really sorry that I did this, but really that big jerk made me do it anyway. But anyway,
00:11:09.160 I'm really sorry. It's like an abusive husband doesn't, doesn't say, oh, I'm really sorry that I
00:11:14.480 physically harmed you. I mean, you did, you did burn the pot roast. So let's try to keep that in mind.
00:11:19.440 I wish you didn't burn the pot roast. But anyway, I'm really sorry. It's not an apology. But even
00:11:25.240 more than that, this wasn't a line that she just came up with in the moment, right? This was a,
00:11:32.500 it wasn't just some flippant thing that she said. She obviously had thought about this. It's such a
00:11:39.820 weird, stretchy, lame pun. She obviously was workshopping this when she was preparing her testimony.
00:11:45.700 She was probably workshopping it in the, the bathroom mirror in the morning. That's fine. People
00:11:51.500 do that when they're speaking in public, but it wasn't some spur of the moment. I'm sorry. I got
00:11:55.420 carried away. I don't know what I was thinking. She, she said it. I mean, she, she wrote it. She
00:12:01.480 planned it. It was, and then she got blowback and then she had to apologize. So really bad. I think
00:12:06.500 the worst part of the day for Democrats in terms of their top witnesses was this woman. She just
00:12:14.020 didn't, she didn't make the case for impeachment terribly well, nothing that we hadn't heard
00:12:17.860 before. And I think she really damaged Democrats' credibility. But it did get a whole lot worse
00:12:22.480 for them when Jonathan Turley, another law professor came out and just absolutely wrecked the whole
00:12:28.900 day. We will get to that in a second. First, I got to thank our friends over at NetSuite. You know,
00:12:33.700 when you're starting a business, when you're growing a business, it's very important to know your
00:12:37.460 numbers. The problem that growing businesses have is that they've, they've got this hodgepodge
00:12:43.760 of business systems, right? It's true in almost every business. So you're starting up a business
00:12:47.560 and you're using this software to manage your HR, using this software to manage your sales. You're
00:12:52.440 using this, right? And they, they're not talking to each other. So you've got this hodgepodge of
00:12:56.040 business systems and you just can't keep track of your numbers. That seriously prevents you from
00:13:01.740 growing. That's where NetSuite comes in very handy. Introducing NetSuite by Oracle, the business
00:13:05.860 management software that handles every aspect of your business in an easy to use cloud platform,
00:13:10.860 giving you the visibility and control that you need to grow. With NetSuite, you save time,
00:13:16.020 money, and unneeded headaches. By the way, time is money. All right. Time is money and
00:13:21.260 unneeded headaches is money too. By managing your sales, finance, accounting, orders, and HR
00:13:28.800 instantly, NetSuite allows you to see your whole business, control your whole business right from
00:13:33.940 your desktop or phone. That's why NetSuite is the world's number one cloud business system.
00:13:39.220 All right. You're starting a business. You're growing a business. It's very high stakes.
00:13:44.560 Why would you handicap yourself? Why would you not go in with the very best? Right now,
00:13:49.040 NetSuite is offering you valuable insights with a free guide, seven key strategies to grow your
00:13:54.400 profits at netsuite.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. That is netsuite.com slash Knowles,
00:14:00.180 K-N-W-L-E-S. These guys are the best in the business. Go over there right now, download the free
00:14:05.460 guide. You have nothing to lose. You have a lot to gain. Seven key strategies to grow your profits
00:14:10.360 at netsuite.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. The next guy they call up is this professor Noah Feldman.
00:14:22.060 Noah Feldman somehow was even more leftist than the last professor, Pamela Carlin, though he didn't
00:14:28.840 step in it quite as much as she did. Feldman tried to play his partisanship a little bit closer to the
00:14:33.580 vest. He's a Harvard law professor, a big liberal. I mean, he's gotten all sorts of plaudits from the
00:14:39.220 left-wing media and the left-wing public intellectual sphere. I think that's almost a contradiction in
00:14:44.600 terms. But his point, Noah Feldman's point, is that President Trump must cooperate with the
00:14:52.640 congressional Democrats' impeachment probe. He must cooperate. If he's not cooperating, he's breaking
00:14:57.900 the law. The job of the House is to investigate impeachment and to impeach. A president who says,
00:15:04.040 as this president did say, I will not cooperate in any way, shape or form with your process,
00:15:10.480 robs a coordinate branch of government. He robs the House of Representatives of its basic
00:15:15.460 constitutional power of impeachment. When you add to that the fact that the same president says,
00:15:21.060 my Department of Justice cannot charge me with a crime, the president puts himself above the law
00:15:27.320 when he says he will not cooperate in an impeachment inquiry. I don't think it's possible
00:15:31.660 to emphasize this strongly enough. A president who will not cooperate in an impeachment inquiry
00:15:37.320 is putting himself above the law. Now, putting yourself above the law as president is the core of
00:15:43.740 an impeachable offense because if the president could not be impeached for that, he would in fact
00:15:48.580 not be responsible to anybody. This is such BS with respect to Professor Feldman. This is such BS,
00:15:56.300 but it's what not only the Democrats are trying to do in this impeachment inquiry or impeachment
00:16:01.300 hearings now, it's what the left has been trying to do for a very long time. The president not just
00:16:06.580 giving the Democrats and Congress everything that they want is not a violation of the law. It's not
00:16:12.260 an impeachable offense. It's not putting himself above the law. What it's doing is saying that the
00:16:16.780 president is not subservient to Congress, which is a very important aspect of our government. Our
00:16:22.700 constitutional structure says that we have three co-equal branches of government. What the left has
00:16:28.100 wanted to do for a long time is have the president be subservient to the legislature. They want the
00:16:34.720 executive subservient to the legislature, just like you have in Britain, just like you have in a lot of
00:16:40.080 governments around the world. You have parliamentary supremacy, that they get to control the
00:16:44.360 executive, but that's not how it works here. We have three co-equal branches of government. This
00:16:48.620 is an important aspect of this whole impeachment circus because what the way that that will all
00:16:55.240 work, the way that you can have these two co-equal branches, the president and the legislature is if
00:16:59.800 there's some role for the judiciary. And what the left and the Democrats are trying to say is there's
00:17:03.660 no role for the judiciary whatsoever in the impeachment inquiry, but there is, there's a major role.
00:17:10.000 The constitution set up a major role for the judiciary. That's why the, the chief justice of
00:17:14.540 the Supreme court presides over the impeachment trial. Should it get to that point in the Senate,
00:17:20.460 there is a role here for the judiciary and professor Feldman doesn't want to accept that or admit that
00:17:28.720 because it would complicate matters for the Democrats. We have an incredibly partisan impeachment
00:17:35.200 going on right now. Only Democrats and, you know, a couple of their independent so-called
00:17:41.280 supporters are pushing for this. No Republicans are pushing for this. The Republicans are uniformly
00:17:47.720 opposing it. The president has absolutely no obligation to go along with this ridiculous
00:17:52.940 partisan charade because if the, the Congress, if the Democrats are allowed to impeach the president
00:17:59.100 over nothing simply because they don't like the cut of his jib, they think he's a bad president,
00:18:04.160 they want to oust him. You have in that case destroyed the separation of powers. You've
00:18:09.820 destroyed the co-equal branches of government. You now have parliamentary supremacy, congressional
00:18:13.960 supremacy, and an executive that is subservient to them. Feldman was pretty good at playing his
00:18:19.400 partisanship close to his vest, even though he was making pretty, pretty bad arguments, but he kind
00:18:25.140 of lost it a little bit when in his zeal to present himself as an unbiased expert, he told a lie.
00:18:32.060 He said that he was a skeptic of impeachment until he saw the transcript from the July 25th phone
00:18:38.480 call with Ukraine. Then he knew that this president's simply got to go, except representative Matt
00:18:45.440 Gates pointed out that that just isn't true. Until this call in July 25th, I was an impeachment
00:18:51.760 skeptic. The call changed my mind, sir. And for good reason. Thank you. I appreciate you. Right. Except he
00:18:56.540 didn't. Except he didn't. So you hear him say that very clearly to Matt Gates. He says, I was an impeachment
00:19:00.660 skeptic and then I changed my mind. Not true. Long before that July 25th phone call, Professor
00:19:06.440 Feldman was writing op-eds in which he said, the president is committing impeachable offenses.
00:19:13.260 Has no bearing on whether or not the Ukraine call was impeachable. Actually has no bearing on whether
00:19:17.560 the, the earlier alleged offenses are impeachable. But what it is to say is that Noah Feldman has been
00:19:23.460 pushing for impeachment for a long time. He's been pushing for impeachment, impeachment before the July 25th
00:19:30.660 came out. And he lied during his testimony, a blatant lie, a demonstrable lie. He lied and lost what I would
00:19:39.380 say is a lot of his credibility. Then you had the boring guy. We won't spend too much time on him. His name is
00:19:43.800 Michael Gerhart. He's from UNC School of Law. Gerhart, same thing, orange man bad, got to impeach him. The record 0.78
00:19:50.340 compiled thus far shows the president has committed several impeachable offenses including bribery, abuse of
00:19:57.620 power and soliciting a personal favor from a foreign leader to benefit himself personally, obstructing
00:20:04.260 justice and obstructing Congress. Our hearing today should serve as a reminder of one of the fundamental
00:20:11.940 principles that drove the founders of our constitution to break from England and to draft their own
00:20:20.500 constitution. The principle that in this country, no one is king. We have followed that principle since
00:20:28.260 before the founding of the constitution and it is recognized around the world as a fixed inspiring
00:20:34.580 American ideal. Oh, I'm sorry. All right. Is he done? He's done speaking now. Okay, that's fine. So
00:20:41.180 same, nothing terribly interesting here. And that's important because the purpose of these expert
00:20:47.500 witnesses is not to get more facts. The Democrats have already made their decision. They're going to
00:20:52.940 impeach him for whatever crime they can try to even pretend he committed. The purpose of these expert
00:20:58.160 witnesses is to convince the public. And I think Gerhart's testimony was important because it just showed
00:21:03.660 they had nothing. It was wasted testimony. It's nothing that is really being talked about. I also
00:21:08.560 want to correct Gerhart and the first lady, Pamela Carlin. They talk about how the founders hated kings
00:21:16.300 and Trump's not a king and the king is basically like a tin pot dictator. That just simply isn't true
00:21:23.120 about kings. First of all, some of our founding fathers did want a king. Alexander Hamilton pretty much
00:21:27.980 wanted to make George Washington a king. Kings were not just tin pot dictators in the, you know,
00:21:36.360 Caribbean or something like that. There actually is quite a lot to monarchy and there are limits to
00:21:41.120 monarchy. And anyway, it's just indicative of how much they are trying to oversimplify and misrepresent
00:21:47.640 the facts, not only about President Trump, but even about history and the constitution. Fortunately,
00:21:53.080 there was one law professor who gave testimony, who in a very measured way, without the hysterics,
00:22:01.260 without the emotion, without yelling and screaming and bringing in Baron Trump about it,
00:22:06.640 very calmly wrecked all of the previous arguments. We will get to that professor in a second.
00:22:13.040 We'll get to what it means for 2020, specifically Joe Biden. We'll get to a whole lot more. But first,
00:22:18.180 you have got to be prepared. And I want to prepare you because you never know when a natural disaster
00:22:25.800 or a political disaster, I think we have just been listening to a political disaster occur in real
00:22:30.340 time. You never know when that's going to strike. That's why you got to be ready. Wise Company uses
00:22:35.160 the finest ingredients and food preparation technology to ensure optimal freshness and flavor.
00:22:41.480 Every single recipe is created by a team of chefs and is unique to Wise Company. It's really just a
00:22:46.800 tremendous product. They combine both dehydrated and freeze-dried ingredients to get the best taste,
00:22:52.340 texture, and nutritional value. The final recipes are packed into durable, long-lasting packages.
00:22:58.420 They are designed to keep in moisture and to stop air seepage and to keep your food fresh,
00:23:03.220 delicious, and ready to be eaten, even if stored up to 25 years. This is the key.
00:23:09.360 Is the Armageddon going to happen in your lifetime? Is the apocalypse, is everything going to melt down?
00:23:13.880 Hopefully not. I hope that isn't the case. But why worry? Why have this level of stress?
00:23:19.140 The great thing about Wise Foods, you just go, you get it, you put it in the pantry,
00:23:23.220 you don't have to think about it. Hopefully everything's going to be okay. But when something
00:23:28.160 terrible does happen, eventually, if it happens, you will be ready. You won't have to worry about it
00:23:34.300 at all. You just pull out that food. They have these convenient four-serving pouch sizes
00:23:40.080 that virtually eliminate waste. They actually have entrees that are ready when you just open it up
00:23:45.960 in the pouch, pour in a little bit of water, and you are good to go. It makes being prepared
00:23:50.220 so easy. This week, Wise has extended its Black Friday sales event. Go to wisefoodstorage.com to
00:23:56.860 take advantage of these offers that only come around once a year, and they've extended it. In addition
00:24:02.000 to that, if you text WISE to 29691, you will be sent a $10 coupon code that can be used toward any
00:24:08.920 item on their website. No exclusions. That is WISE to 29691. And as always, shipping is free for my
00:24:17.200 listeners. Text WISE to 29691 for ongoing automated text offers from Wise Company. Message and data rates
00:24:23.960 may apply. Visit wisefoodstorage.com for privacy and terms. Here he is, Jonathan Turley, destroying
00:24:31.780 their arguments. What I would caution the committee is that these crimes have meaning. It gives me no joy
00:24:41.460 to disagree with my colleagues here, and I really don't have a dog in this fight. But you can't accuse
00:24:51.320 a president of bribery. And then when some of us note that the Supreme Court has rejected your type
00:24:58.280 of boundless interpretation, say, well, it's just impeachment. We really don't have to prove the
00:25:04.440 elements. That's a favorite mantra that is sort of close enough for jazz. Well, this isn't
00:25:12.000 improvisational jazz. Close enough is not good enough. If you're going to accuse a president
00:25:16.960 of bribery, you need to make it stick, because you're trying to remove a duly elected president
00:25:24.240 of the United States. Now, it's unfair to accuse someone of a crime, and when others say, well,
00:25:32.820 those interpretations you're using to define the crime are not valid, and to say they don't have
00:25:38.200 to be valid, because this is impeachment. That has not been the standard historically.
00:25:45.360 This is such a great point, and it shows you the goalposts constantly moving, right? They say,
00:25:51.560 the president committed bribery. And you go out there and say, no, he really didn't. And you can
00:25:55.760 look through the history of ratifying the Constitution. You can look through exactly what
00:26:01.240 bribery meant at the time. You can look through what bribery means today. Nowhere does what President
00:26:06.260 Trump did even come close to any recognizable definition of bribery, and the Democrats say,
00:26:11.520 yes, so what? So what? We're the Congress. We can do whatever we want. It doesn't matter if he
00:26:15.760 committed bribery. You say, okay, that's a legitimate argument to make. I mean, it's an illegitimate
00:26:20.440 constitutional argument, but it's a legitimate political argument to make. That's fine. But then
00:26:24.760 don't pretend you're impeaching him for bribery, because you're not, and you're admitting that you're
00:26:27.800 not. You're just moving the goalposts. By the way, Jonathan Turley, he's not some conservative
00:26:32.200 Republican. The guy is a liberal law professor. He's a professor at GW. Politico called him a
00:26:39.440 liberal law professor and civil libertarian. This guy called for the prosecution of Bush
00:26:46.020 administration officials for war crimes, okay? He's no friend to Republicans. He voted against
00:26:51.100 Trump in 2016, but even he knows this is bogus and it's totally out of line with historical precedent.
00:26:57.700 Jonathan Turley testified during the impeachment of Bill Clinton. This guy knows a thing or two
00:27:03.360 about the history of impeachment, and he says this is totally out of the historical line.
00:27:09.160 If you, my testimony lays out the criminal allegations in the previous impeachments,
00:27:14.580 those were not just proven crimes. They were accepted crimes. That is, even the Democrats on that
00:27:23.980 judiciary, that the judiciary committee agreed that Bill Clinton had committed perjury. That's on the
00:27:30.220 record. And there, and a federal judge later said it was perjury. Right. That's the history. By the way,
00:27:36.940 we haven't used, we haven't used impeachment a whole lot, which is why we've got to be very,
00:27:42.020 very careful about this. It's only the fourth, fourth time we've gone into this with a president.
00:27:47.020 And we had Andrew Johnson, then Richard Nixon, then Bill Clinton, now Trump. No president has ever
00:27:52.540 been removed from office through impeachment because he was impeached and then convicted. It has not
00:27:57.780 happened. We've got to be very, very careful about this. Turley then goes out there and gives the final
00:28:04.680 best line of the whole day. He, he summed up what was really going on. They, they mentioned that
00:28:13.620 President Trump has to be removed because of an abuse of power. Turley turns it around and he says,
00:28:20.160 there is an abuse of power going on. Your abuse of power. If you make a high crime and misdemeanor
00:28:28.160 out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It's your abuse of power.
00:28:35.720 There it is. Your abuse of power, Congress. You are abusing your power, your power of impeachment
00:28:41.840 here. There is no basis in reality. By the way, do you know who would back up Jonathan Turley on this
00:28:46.900 point? On pretty much all the points he just made? Jerry Nadler. Jerry Nadler, the guy who's
00:28:53.540 presiding over the whole democratic impeachment process. Jerry Nadler would back him up. And he
00:28:58.520 actually did back in the nineties when it was Bill Clinton who was being impeached. Here's Nadler.
00:29:04.200 The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national
00:29:09.900 election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our
00:29:17.300 very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not
00:29:23.540 do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in
00:29:29.180 Congress of the absolute necessity. There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment
00:29:36.820 which has been substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the
00:29:42.600 other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our
00:29:48.560 politics for years to come, and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political
00:29:54.440 institutions. The American people have heard all the allegations against the president and they
00:30:01.120 overwhelmingly oppose impeaching him. The people elected the president. They still support him.
00:30:08.800 We have no right to overturn the considered judgment of the American people.
00:30:14.860 Ding, ding, ding. You got it, Jerry. You bet. Absolutely right. I wish that Jerry Nadler
00:30:20.080 was showing up to preside over the impeachment hearings because that Jerry Nadler had it completely right.
00:30:26.780 And the current Jerry Nadler, like all the other hacks in his party trying to impeach him,
00:30:31.080 are making absolutely opposite and specious arguments now. We will get to what this means
00:30:35.540 for Joe Biden, big trouble. We will get to Justin Trudeau on a hot mic. We will even get to
00:30:40.240 a transgender meltdown and the mailbag. But first, I got to say goodbye to Facebook and YouTube. 0.98
00:30:45.200 By the way, this, this weekend in theaters nationwide, this Friday, you can go and check out
00:30:50.720 Safe Spaces. Friday, December 6th, starring Adam Carolla and Dennis Prager. No Safe Spaces
00:30:57.020 is in theaters. It's a terrific movie. I went to the premiere here in Hollywood. You got to go
00:31:01.860 check it out. Adam and Dennis take you on a wild ride to show you the effects of political correctness,
00:31:07.160 identity politics, and cancel culture. The film takes you through the impact on college campuses,
00:31:12.680 big tech, and Hollywood. No Safe Spaces argues that free speech is important to a free society.
00:31:19.700 It shows you how it's being threatened, what we can do to fight back. It is not your typical
00:31:25.060 documentary. It is super fun. It's got animation. It's got recreations. It's got a lot of Adam's
00:31:30.920 signature humor to help all of this truth be illuminated. It takes you behind the scenes at
00:31:37.880 Shapiro's crazy UC Berkeley tour. And if that weren't enough, there's a little cameo from Jeremy
00:31:45.620 Boring God King, The Daily Wire in there. And most importantly of all, I am in the film. I am in
00:31:50.800 the film. It's a little Easter egg. For one moment, you can see me. See if you can catch where I am in
00:31:56.320 the movie. It is going to be really, really fun. So go check it out. It's going to be a lot of fun.
00:32:02.100 No Safe Spaces rated PG-13 in theaters Friday, December 6th. The way that you can go check that
00:32:07.400 out is nosafespaces.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S for ticket information and theater locations.
00:32:12.980 It's going to be a lot of fun. It's a really, really good film. So go check it out. You know
00:32:17.080 what you get? 10 bucks a month, $100 for an annual membership. I think we actually just raised prices
00:32:21.460 a little bit. So look, it's worth it, folks. We're giving you a whole lot of stuff. Me, Ben, Drew,
00:32:26.580 Matt Walsh. We've got another kingdom on there, the third and final season.
00:32:30.420 We've got the Leftist Tears Tumblr. Dailywire.com. We'll be right back with a lot more.
00:32:46.400 Democrats are really bungling this impeachment thing, not just the testimony, but the fact
00:32:51.040 that if this goes to a trial, Joe Biden is going to have to testify. Biden's already saying that he
00:32:57.560 won't come to testify, but then they're trying to make the argument that Trump has to go
00:33:00.400 testify. Trump has to cooperate. But Joe Biden, who is a key figure in the whole impeachment probe
00:33:06.560 regarding Ukraine, he says that he won't testify. I think when they started impeachment, Democrats
00:33:12.540 were convinced that Biden wasn't going to be their nominee. Trouble is all of the people they thought
00:33:16.800 were going to be their nominees have now fallen apart. So it looks like it very well could be Joe
00:33:22.080 Biden. If he's the nominee, this is going to be a disaster for them because they're going to dredge up
00:33:26.380 all of his dirt. They're going to dredge up Hunter Biden. They're going to dredge up all
00:33:30.380 the corruption that Joe engaged in. It could really seriously backfire for Democrats, which
00:33:35.140 is why I think there's a chance they don't even impeach him. They don't let it get to that level.
00:33:39.460 But it will be a lot of fun if they do. On the other side of liberal politics, up in America's
00:33:45.300 hat over in Canada, Justin Trudeau was just caught on a hot mic making fun of the president. This
00:33:51.640 doesn't seem like a huge deal, but it actually does tell you something about the world leaders
00:33:56.040 and about Trump. Here he is. So he says, why is he late? Trudeau says he was late because he takes
00:34:05.980 a 40 minute press conference. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He's talking about Donald Trump. He takes a 40
00:34:10.300 minute press conference. I've watched his team's jaws just drop to the floor. Ha, ha, ha. Chatting with
00:34:19.200 Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron. Trump comes out and naturally just slams Justin Trudeau for
00:34:26.620 this. Do you have a video of Prime Minister Trudeau talking about you last time? Well, he's too fast.
00:34:35.160 Do you think that Germany's too naive? And honestly, with Trudeau, he's a nice guy. I find him to be a very nice guy. But you know, the truth is that
00:34:41.920 I called him out on the fact that he's not paying 2%. And I guess he's not very happy about it. I mean,
00:34:48.600 you were there. A couple of you were there. And he's not paying 2%. And he should be paying 2%. It's Canada.
00:34:54.260 They have money. And they should be paying 2%. So I called him out on that. And I'm sure he wasn't
00:34:59.120 happy about it. But that's the way it is. Look, I'm representing the U.S.
00:35:03.480 And he should be paying more than he's paying. And he understands that. So I can imagine, I can imagine he's
00:35:10.080 not that happy, but that's the way it is. Two key aspects here. He calls Trudeau two-faced.
00:35:16.520 And he says, look, it's the way it is. I represent the U.S. This is why people love Trump. This is why
00:35:22.620 people love Trump. It's because every politician is two-faced, duplicitous, sniveling, stab you in the
00:35:29.080 back. And Trump will stab you in the front. Trump is pretty direct. He doesn't hide his disdain for
00:35:38.480 people if they've crossed him. He doesn't play nice to their face and then behind their back go
00:35:44.160 and attack them. He'll attack them right out in the open. Maybe people don't like when he's that
00:35:50.340 combative, that mean. But they do like that he's blunt, that he's honest, that he'll tell you what
00:35:55.460 he means. What you see is what you get. And he comes out there and he says, I represent the United
00:36:00.040 States. Love me, hate me. I'm telling you where I stand. That is a breath of fresh air in politics.
00:36:05.040 And it's, it's manlier and it's more virtuous. I know it's odd to use the word virtue when it comes
00:36:10.160 to a thrice married lapsed Presbyterian, but it is, that is a real virtue. And the more sort of
00:36:18.240 sniveling leftists try to, try to unseat Trump. I think that that difference is going to be really,
00:36:26.660 really clear. Before we get to the mailbag, I have to mention this crazy story in Olympia,
00:36:31.420 Washington. Last month, the city council met and they were scolded, screamed at by transgender 1.00
00:36:35.920 activists. Even though the city council was paying tribute to them on trans remembrance day,
00:36:42.980 the, the transgender activists were, were furious anyway, for some reason. And one of the activists,
00:36:48.680 a guy named Amy Hart claimed that the police officers shouldn't, shouldn't be in the room.
00:36:54.260 The very fact that they had police officers there was an offense to transgender people because they
00:36:58.480 quote, kill trans families and make it unsafe to live. Here's the meltdown. 0.86
00:37:03.180 And you are telling me you're going to light up city hall to honor black and brown trans women.
00:37:11.160 You're going to light up a city hall that has police and police are a part of the problem.
00:37:16.920 They kill my families. They make it unsafe to live.
00:37:25.020 I'm a tranny suffering in the conditions you create for us to not live in this city.
00:37:30.380 Um, I want to say that I am a person that values, uh, hearing out people's pain and talking to their
00:37:40.700 hearts. And I feel like the people here at city hall, they don't do that. You with people's hearts,
00:37:46.400 you create illusions, point of order. I'm going to ask that you refrain.
00:37:50.320 I mean, this is broadcast live out in people's homes with families, young families.
00:37:55.020 Again, my point is like, like, you didn't, you didn't care what I just said, which proves my point.
00:38:02.120 You're not listening to my frustration and pain, having to deal with people like you who are worried
00:38:08.420 about what I'm saying instead of like, or how I'm saying instead of what I'm saying.
00:38:12.140 Um, obviously this is completely insane. What they're, they're saying that the cops are
00:38:16.800 targeting transgender people and killing them and making it impossible to live. There's just 1.00
00:38:21.220 no evidence of this whatsoever. This is not true, but I'm not going to make fun of these guys or,
00:38:28.620 or attack them in any way because obviously they've got a couple problems. All right. They've got some,
00:38:35.340 if you're a man who thinks that you're a woman, you've got some things kind of going on in your
00:38:39.060 psychology that mean maybe it's not all quite right. Right. And how this would traditionally
00:38:45.400 have been dealt with by society is with compassion, with empathy and saying, okay, they're there. It's
00:38:50.920 all right. You know, get it out. Maybe some therapy, maybe whatever. Try to, try to ameliorate the
00:38:55.740 condition. Now, however, we treat this, the fantasy, we treat the delusion, we treat the insanity
00:39:02.020 as though it were reality. That's the trouble. That's very disconcerting for everybody. It doesn't
00:39:09.040 help them. Look, they've obviously got a lot of psychological turmoil here. You would too,
00:39:13.200 if you were a man who thought that you were a woman, but to indulge all of this means you,
00:39:17.860 you don't make it any better. You just have the fantasies and the delusions become worse and worse
00:39:23.120 and worse. And this is true, not just on the human, the personal and psychological level.
00:39:28.100 This is true socially and politically as well. Even when you get to a topic like impeachment,
00:39:33.140 impeachment, the more you indulge this, this madness, orange man, bad, impeach him at all costs, 0.86
00:39:39.600 which Democrats have been saying since before he even took office.
00:39:43.440 That doesn't make things better. That doesn't pacify people. That doesn't unite people.
00:39:47.340 It only gets worse and worse and worse. And you have to start believing crazier and crazier things
00:39:52.080 that there's no legal basis for impeachment, that the president committed bribery, except even if he
00:39:57.280 didn't commit bribery, it doesn't matter anyway, because we're going to, you just have to get
00:40:00.740 crazier and crazier and crazier. People don't like that. People feel on edge. People feel anxious
00:40:05.460 when you do that. We prefer order. Order is better. It makes everyone feel at ease. It's
00:40:12.460 the reason why when you get online at a grocery store or something, people will wait in line for
00:40:16.940 35 minutes. But if someone cuts that line, everyone starts to lose their mind because that order is
00:40:22.040 gone. There doesn't seem to be any reason, any sense, any logic. We are at risk of losing that as a
00:40:28.020 society. We need to privilege, reason, logic, order, a measured society, both at the personal
00:40:35.000 level, like people who are screaming and having a fit here at a city council meeting, and at the
00:40:40.920 political and social level. Maybe it doesn't mean you get exactly what you want. You get to fulfill
00:40:45.120 your personal appetite or desire or your political appetite or desire. But in the long run, that is
00:40:49.980 the only sort of society that we're all going to be able to live in comfortably. Let's get to the
00:40:53.740 mailbag in our remaining moments from Alex. Dear Michael, history buff of the Daily Wire.
00:40:59.320 A professor of mine recently gave me, gave a talk on the book Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond.
00:41:05.720 The story cited is used as evidence that the Europeans purposefully spread smallpox among the
00:41:10.580 Native Americans by giving them the blankets of smallpox victims. Do you know of any other stories
00:41:16.760 like this, or is it an example of a gross overgeneralization by a left-wing historian? Any
00:41:21.320 thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. You know, the stories of giving Native
00:41:26.840 Americans smallpox blankets are exaggerated and they only happened in limited circumstances, but it
00:41:32.740 did happen. I mean, during Pontiac's rebellion, right after the French and Indian War, the British did
00:41:40.680 give Native American belligerents smallpox blankets, and I believe it did work. I mean, you call it an 1.00
00:41:46.460 early form of chemical warfare. That's true, but what, what people leave out of that discussion is
00:41:53.120 the warfare part of it. It's not like the Native Americans were sitting there, you know, eating
00:41:56.740 corn on the cob and being very peaceable, and the British came in because they're mean and wanted to 0.99
00:42:01.480 wipe them out. During Pontiac's rebellion, the Indians killed 2,000 civilians, 2,000 civilians, men, 0.64
00:42:08.940 women, and children, and they killed 400 soldiers. They were at war, and so the British fought back as
00:42:14.660 they could, but they gave them the diseased blankets and hoped that it would work, and in some cases it
00:42:20.120 did work. The narrative that the left wants to present of indigenous peoples or any sort of peoples
00:42:26.620 that Europeans engage with as totally peaceful, totally naive. They had no idea what war was. They
00:42:33.180 had no idea what conflict was. It's historically ridiculous, but worse than that, it robs these people
00:42:41.500 of their dignity, all right? The Indians had dignity. They fought good wars, all right? They, they fought
00:42:47.140 pretty hard. They were able to kill 2,000 people in Pontiac's rebellion, 2,000 civilians, and 400
00:42:51.820 soldiers, and then the British fought back against them, all right? This was an actual conflict, and, and
00:42:58.920 to say otherwise, it just, ironically, it, it dehumanizes the indigenous people and the Native Americans,
00:43:06.240 which is exactly what they accused the conservatives and the British and the settlers of doing. All
00:43:11.580 right, from Brian, I would love to hear your thoughts on the Spanish-American War. Thanks.
00:43:19.360 We could talk about this forever. It's a very important war that nobody remembers. Nobody talks
00:43:25.700 about the Spanish-American War or the War of 1812, a number of wars that get lost, Korean conflict.
00:43:30.600 But Spanish-American War was very, very important. The Spanish-American War set America on the course
00:43:37.900 of empire. So we fight the war. We get territories from Spain, Guam, Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Philippines.
00:43:45.360 All of a sudden, the U.S. has an empire, an empire that we didn't have before the Spanish-American 0.87
00:43:51.720 War. Now, this had certain bad effects. I mean, I guess you could ask, would Fidel Castro have ever
00:43:59.620 risen up in Cuba if Spain had maintained control over it? Well, Spain might have lost control at some
00:44:05.020 point. How about all the corruption in Puerto Rico right now? How about the dictatorship in the
00:44:09.680 Philippines? What would the effect be on America if America didn't pursue this imperial ambition? I think
00:44:15.360 that's kind of all idle speculation. I don't think it's really worth paying attention to. Rather than engage
00:44:21.480 in historical what-ifs, just look for the significance. The Spanish-American War was incredibly
00:44:27.160 significant, and a lot of our imperial ambitions here can be traced back to, a lot of our imperial
00:44:33.680 circumstances can be traced back to that conflict. From Aidan, as the resident papist, how do you
00:44:39.380 defend the ideas of purgatory, infant baptism, and the common wafer being used, or being the body of
00:44:46.360 Christ, from the heretical God-King? Thanks for the humorous and somewhat informative show. All right, 0.86
00:44:53.240 well, in our last moments here, you want me to defend the Catholic faith? All right. It's specifically
00:44:57.780 against my boss who signs my checks. Okay, great idea. Thanks very much. We do it all, you know, we
00:45:02.220 engage in religious discussions all the time here because you've got the Protestant God-King, you've got 0.94
00:45:09.240 the lowercase g, lowercase k, by the way, important for this discussion. You've got the Anglican Andrew
00:45:14.420 Clavin, you've got the Orthodox Jew, Ben, and you have the papist, me, and Matt Walsh, by the way, who's
00:45:20.000 not in LA, but we talked to him too. Very quickly, purgatory. You see purgatory in, scripturally, in
00:45:27.500 Second Maccabees, where they pray for the dead. Why would you pray for the dead if it's already
00:45:31.820 decided where they're going? Because there is some sort of purgatorial period in place. Matthew 5,
00:45:37.580 Christ tells us, the judge will put you into prison until you have paid the last cent, meaning you can get
00:45:43.240 out of this prison, whatever this prison is. Matthew 12 describes forgiveness, both in this age and in
00:45:49.800 the age to come, but if there's forgiveness in the age to come, that means that there is some sort of
00:45:54.340 purgatory. You also see this kind of imagery in 1 Corinthians and in 1 Peter, in the image of the
00:46:00.900 purifying fire, not the punishing fire of hell, but the purifying fire of purgatory. Infant baptism, we see 0.91
00:46:07.280 infant baptism actually a fair bit in scripture. Matthew 19, Christ says, let the children come to me.
00:46:13.240 Let the children come to me, not just the adults who can make a statement of faith. Luke 18 says,
00:46:19.080 now they were bringing even infants to Christ. And then in Colossians, Paul says that baptism has
00:46:25.660 replaced the circumcision. Circumcision occurs when you're a little baby. Baptism can too. And in Acts 0.85
00:46:31.380 16, you see whole households baptized, including the infants. It doesn't say whole households were
00:46:37.220 baptized except for people under the age of 15 or something, whole households entirely. So there's a 0.72
00:46:44.140 lot of evidence for that. The Eucharist, the wafer as the body and blood of Christ. In Luke 22, Christ
00:46:50.600 says, this is my body. The bread is my body. This is the institution of the Eucharist. John 6,
00:46:57.880 Christ says, my body is true food. My flesh is true drink. This is a hard saying, by the way,
00:47:02.880 because people run away from him when he says this. It's too hard. And he says, will you run away from
00:47:08.260 me to Peter? And Peter says, to whom shall we go? Christ says, I am the bread of life. Unless you eat
00:47:13.020 the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. And of course, in Matthew 26,
00:47:19.020 he tells us to do it. Take, eat, this is my body. The language is so clear, so precise, such an admittedly
00:47:25.500 hard saying that it would seem very clear. And then how do we know to interpret scripture in this way
00:47:31.940 rather than in any of the zillion other ways you could? Usually the Protestant argument is sola
00:47:37.600 scriptura, that scripture is formally sufficient to our salvation. And this is ironically not a scriptural
00:47:48.400 idea. You can look in scripture and see that sola scriptura is not sufficient. You see it in second
00:47:56.360 Thessalonians. So you hear, so then brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught
00:48:03.800 by us, either by word of mouth or by letter. So right there, the apostle says, hold fast to what we've told
00:48:13.000 you by letter in scripture, in writing, but also what we've told you by word of mouth. And that gets
00:48:19.560 to, of course, the institution of the church and the authority of the church, which we see at the
00:48:23.140 Council of Jerusalem and many other places. I think that was a three minute defense of the Catholic 0.52
00:48:28.640 faith. If the God King doesn't fire me, I'll be back here on Monday. In the meantime, I'm Michael
00:48:32.940 Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show. See you then.
00:48:34.900 If you enjoyed this episode, and frankly, even if you didn't, don't forget to subscribe.
00:48:45.820 And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends
00:48:50.220 to subscribe. We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.
00:48:56.220 Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show,
00:49:00.860 The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show. The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Rebecca
00:49:05.780 Dobkowitz and directed by Mike Joyner. Executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Senior producer, Jonathan
00:49:11.520 Hay. Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover. And our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:49:17.340 Assistant director, Pavel Wydowski. Edited by Danny D'Amico. Audio is mixed by Mike Coromina.
00:49:23.220 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera. And our production assistant is Nick Sheehan.
00:49:27.600 The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2019.
00:49:33.020 Hey everyone, it's Andrew Klavan, host of The Andrew Klavan Show. Nancy Pelosi says the Democrats
00:49:36.580 are going to go ahead and draw up impeachment charges because of whatever the hell they've
00:49:40.860 been talking about this time. But wait till you hear who their legal experts are and some of the
00:49:45.700 stuff they believe. Seriously, you will not believe it. It's on The Andrew Klavan Show. I'm Andrew Klavan.