Ep. 513 - Never Let A Crisis Go To Waste
Summary
As the U.S. death toll from the Wu-Flu pandemic hits 100, some experts are wondering whether grinding the global economy to a halt might have been something of an overreaction. We examine the scientific data and the philosophical reasons why the left never lets a crisis go to waste.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
As the U.S. death toll from the Wu flu hits 100, some experts are wondering whether grinding the
00:00:05.760
global economy to a halt might have been something of an overreaction. We examine the scientific data
00:00:11.620
and the philosophical reasons why the left never lets a crisis go to waste. Then President Trump
00:00:17.840
officially secures the Republican nomination for president, and Joe Biden is set to sail to his own
00:00:23.080
party's nomination if he can only remember who and where he is. All that and more, I'm Michael
00:00:28.240
Knowles, and this is the Michael Knowles Show. Welcome back to the crisis. We are in a crisis
00:00:40.440
crisis, I think. There are so many crises, I don't know if I can even keep all of them straight in my
00:00:46.380
mind. Here are some numbers to update you on the Wu flu pandemic. The U.S. death toll has now reached
00:00:53.080
100. Coincidentally, that number is the same number of people who will die today in car accidents.
00:01:02.120
I'm not advocating some particular policy over another. I am simply giving you those two numbers
00:01:07.900
to give you some perspective. You have been watching the mainstream media shriek and wail and
00:01:14.480
gnash their teeth and rip their garments and tell you that this is the end of the world.
00:01:19.480
It's been about two months since we had the first confirmed case of Wu flu,
00:01:24.840
Kung flu, coronavirus in the United States. 100 people have died.
00:01:31.180
On average, 102 people will die today from car accidents. I'll give you another number.
00:01:36.660
7,452. That's the number of people who will die today just because. Just because. That's how many
00:01:46.380
people die every day in the United States? 7,452. Now, of course, is it a very bad thing if more
00:01:53.220
people than that die unnecessarily because of a pandemic? Yes, that's a very bad thing.
00:01:58.520
But why do I mention 7,452? I mention that number because if the media talked about 7,452 deaths
00:02:10.360
today, if they focused in on everyone, every story, every 24 hours a day you were hearing
00:02:16.580
about this, you would think that something is terribly, terribly wrong. And yet, that's how
00:02:21.740
life goes. Just every single day, nothing really we can do to stop it. Here's another number to give
00:02:28.420
you perspective. A lot of people keep comparing the United States to Italy because Italy had a bad
00:02:34.300
response to the coronavirus. They were sort of uniquely situated to have that virus run roughshod
00:02:40.420
through the whole country. We're told that we're 11 days behind Italy. Italy had a confirmed case 11
00:02:46.580
days before us. And so if you look at where Italy is, that's where we're going to be in 11 days,
00:02:51.060
except that isn't true. So at this point, we have 100 confirmed dead.
00:02:57.000
At this point in Italy, you know, 11 days ahead, they had 200 confirmed dead. So they had double
00:03:06.800
the number of deaths from coronavirus. And our population is five and a half times larger.
00:03:14.860
All right, that's shows you some, I got yelled at on Twitter the other day because I pointed out
00:03:20.900
that Italy and America are different countries. People were so upset by that because we all have
00:03:25.640
to be alarmists. We all have to be in the crisis all of the time. There's no limit to what we should
00:03:30.360
do to stop the crisis. Alarmists are saying we need to look and listen to the experts. I'm a little
00:03:37.260
skeptical of experts. Most people should be skeptical of experts. Experts tend to know a lot about their
00:03:41.660
one very narrow field and they don't know a lot about everything else. There is one expert who is
00:03:48.060
urging caution. You probably won't hear about him very much in the mainstream media. His name is John
00:03:52.500
Ioannidis. He's a Stanford epidemiologist. His specialty is meta science. Meta science is like
00:03:59.880
the science of looking at all those bogus scientific studies, right? It's the science of science. And he's
00:04:06.400
a very respected epidemiologist. So he looked at what's going on in the data here, right? And what
00:04:15.600
they're seeing is projecting the diamond princess mortality rate. So that was that cruise ship onto the
00:04:21.820
age structure of the US population. The death rate among people infected with COVID-19 coronavirus
00:04:27.380
would be 0.125%. He goes on. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data, there were just
00:04:35.120
seven deaths among the 700 infected passengers and crew. The real death rate could stretch from five
00:04:41.640
times lower, 0.025%, to five times higher, 0.625%. Adding these extra sources of uncertainty,
00:04:50.920
reasonable estimates for the case fatality ratio in the general US population vary from 0.05% to 1%.
00:05:00.740
That could be the death rate, 0.05% to 1%. That huge range markedly affects how severe the pandemic is
00:05:08.300
and what should be done. A population wide case fatality rate of 0.05% is lower than seasonal influenza.
00:05:15.420
If that is the true rate locking down the world with potentially tremendous social and financial
00:05:19.940
consequences may be totally irrational, it's like an elephant being attacked by a house cat.
00:05:26.600
Frustrated and trying to avoid the cat, the elephant accidentally jumps off a cliff and dies.
00:05:31.640
That is from John Ionides. I don't know if I'm pronouncing his name correctly, but what he's saying
00:05:37.460
is absolutely sensible. And you're not allowed to inject reason and sense into a crisis because the
00:05:46.420
crisis has to be all emotion all of the time. But he makes a very good point on the data. We'll get
00:05:51.420
to that in one second. First, I got to thank our friends over at LifeLock. Something tells me over
00:05:56.960
the next couple of weeks, you're going to be spending a lot more time indoors and online
00:06:01.240
because of coronavirus. And what that means is thieves will have more opportunities to steal
00:06:06.840
your identity, especially during tax season. There's a lot of uncertainty right now in tax season.
00:06:11.020
Is it going to be delayed? The filing deadline? Anyway, I'm sure there's going to be a lot that's
00:06:15.660
going around the internet with your valuable information. Criminals can steal that information
00:06:21.560
from your devices and sell it on the dark web or use it to commit identity theft. To help prevent this,
00:06:28.500
you need LifeLock. LifeLock is the number one most recognized brand in identity theft protection.
00:06:34.720
LifeLock monitors for uses of your personal info, alerts you to possible suspicious activity,
00:06:39.840
and if you become a victim of identity theft, a dedicated identity restoration specialist will
00:06:45.060
work to fix it. Nobody can prevent all identity theft to monitor all transactions, but LifeLock
00:06:50.640
means one less thing to stress about during tax season. Join now and save up to 25% off your first
00:06:56.780
year. Go to lifelock.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. That's lifelock.com slash Knowles for 25% off.
00:07:02.920
The point that this epidemiologist from Stanford is making is we just don't have reliable data.
00:07:11.920
And so you see it among the people freaking out on the internet, you know, on the left, right,
00:07:15.980
and center. They're saying, look, we have this very small sample size, very limited information,
00:07:23.560
and we're all going to die if we don't shut down the global economy. I don't think that there's
00:07:28.500
sufficient evidence to draw that conclusion. And we are making massively destructive decisions
00:07:34.260
based on those limited data. I'm not saying it's necessarily the wrong decision that we're making,
00:07:42.220
but it is certainly the case that the decisions we're making are destructive. Think about how
00:07:46.620
many people are out of work right now. Think about how much wealth has been completely destroyed.
00:07:51.900
Think about how many businesses are going to go under as a result of this. Think about what the
00:07:55.560
world is going to look like two or three weeks from now, once the crisis of the Wu flu has passed.
00:08:03.960
Maybe it was worth it. Maybe it wasn't worth it. Maybe we overreacted. I'll give you an example of a
00:08:11.040
policy that may very well be worse than the thing it's fighting. Right now, I kid you not, in cities
00:08:17.580
across America, one of the responses to the coronavirus is to let criminals out of prison.
00:08:24.440
That's true. LA County announced that it would let 600 criminals out of jail because what you want
00:08:33.020
during a time of crisis, uncertainty, and panic is more criminals on the street, right? That makes
00:08:39.460
sense. I'm so glad we elect these guys. They're so smart. They totally get it. Right now in Philadelphia,
00:08:45.880
Philadelphia, the Philadelphia police department will no longer be making arrests for all narcotics
00:08:53.620
offenses, any kind of narcotics offense. You're selling, you're using, you're buying, whatever.
00:08:59.400
You're good. You're not getting arrested. A cop can watch you sell crack cocaine on the street.
00:09:05.320
You will not be arrested. Theft from persons. A cop can look at you, watch you rob somebody
00:09:12.460
and say, well, my hands are tied. I can't arrest you anymore because of a Chinese virus. Because of
00:09:19.380
it, let me, let's see how this logic makes sense. Because of a Chinese virus, if a police officer
00:09:23.800
watches a criminal rob an old lady on the street, he can't arrest the guy. Okay. Retail theft. You go
00:09:33.160
and rob a store. Can't get arrested for it. Enjoy. The stores are yours. Go on, go on in robbers.
00:09:39.160
You'll, you, you will get off scot-free. Theft from auto. Bust in and steal the guy's radio. That's,
00:09:46.220
that's, uh, totally fine. Burglary. Break into somebody's house. Vandalism. Bench warrants.
00:09:52.740
Stolen autos. Cool, man. It's going to be grand theft auto all over our streets, except in real life
00:09:58.160
now. Economic crimes, such as passing bad checks. We're going to need bad checks because nobody's
00:10:04.800
going to have any money pretty soon. Fraud and prostitution. That is all now effectively legal
00:10:13.000
in Philadelphia as a response to a, a very bad flu. Does that make sense to you? Does that make
00:10:23.700
any sense at all? The, the argument, the reason they're doing this, they say, is because they don't
00:10:27.980
want to overcrowd the jails. Cause I guess then there's a chance the prisoners get the Wu flu.
00:10:36.260
Even though the infection rate, certainly the mortality rate for people who are under 60 and
00:10:41.280
70, very, very low. They don't do that when there's a particularly bad seasonal flu, do they?
00:10:46.760
Did they do that during swine flu, which killed 15,000 Americans or more? I don't think so.
00:10:53.580
Did they do it during the Ebola crisis? They said, okay, no more, we're not going to arrest
00:10:57.040
people now for crimes. I don't think so. Alarmists always tell us that an overreaction is better
00:11:06.060
than an underreaction. They say this is true all, in all cases, all the time. We have to overreact.
00:11:13.620
Is that true? Let's say, for instance, just, just using the crimes that are now effectively legal in
00:11:22.200
Philadelphia as an example, let's say as a result of this, all these policies, one person,
00:11:30.220
one extra person survives the virus, but then another person overdoses on heroin because you're
00:11:39.680
no longer making arrests for narcotics offenses. Person overdoses on crack, gets hooked on some
00:11:48.100
horrible drug, ruins their life, or flat out dies. Then was the policy worth it? I don't know, even if
00:11:56.060
you're making this kind of cold utilitarian calculation of just the sheer number of people
00:12:00.960
who are going to live or who are going to die, you haven't saved a life in that, in that hypothetical,
00:12:05.920
right? Let's use another example. Let's say that as a result of this policy, one person survives the
00:12:13.180
virus, goes on to live another three or four years, mostly healthy, but a girl falls into prostitution
00:12:20.000
because you're no longer making arrests for prostitution. So it's easier for pimps to prey on
00:12:24.100
them, and the number goes up. Ruins her life. Was that worth it? I'm not saying it is or it isn't.
00:12:33.640
I'm not even, at this moment, advocating one policy or another, though I certainly have thoughts on some
00:12:39.520
policies like this dumb jailbreak decision in Philadelphia and Los Angeles and other places, too.
00:12:46.340
I'm simply asking, are we sure that an overreaction is always a good idea? You let all the criminals
00:12:54.200
out of prison. What could go wrong there? Maybe it would have been better not to do that. Maybe it would
00:13:00.700
have been better not to close down every single business. Maybe, I don't know, I'm raising
00:13:05.640
uncomfortable questions. It seems very clear, though, to me that an overreaction is not always
00:13:12.340
better than an underreaction. Orange County right now, I saw a new regulation going around the internet.
00:13:20.840
I believe it's legitimate. I heard it from a pretty legitimate source that you can be punished with fines
00:13:26.620
or jail time. If you are caught walking outside in certain places in Orange County, California,
00:13:32.840
with people who are not in your household. So I'm in my apartment, you know, got sweet little Elisa
00:13:40.060
there. We want to go on a walk. That's okay. If I want to meet a friend who doesn't live with me for
00:13:44.120
a walk, I could go to jail. Does that make a lot of sense? Doesn't make sense to me. Is that legal?
00:13:49.600
I'm skeptical. Crisis always serves the left. This is something that even well-meaning conservatives
00:13:57.640
have forgotten during this coronavirus thing. Conservatives need to keep a cool head here because
00:14:04.200
otherwise, the left will transform our society, transform our politics before we even know what
00:14:11.120
happened. The left thrives on panic and crisis. That is why they are always trying to gin them up.
00:14:20.000
Okay. A great example, the last crisis before this crisis is the environmental crisis. That's what
00:14:27.240
they call it, right? Initially it was global cooling. Then it was global warming. Then it was
00:14:31.360
climate change. Now it has become climate crisis, which is really, really the sweet spot for the left.
00:14:38.200
And the climate crisis says, kind of sounds a little bit similar to what we're hearing now,
00:14:41.900
that the whole world is going to end in 12 years or 10 years or eight years or six months.
00:14:46.260
If we don't take dramatic action that radically transforms our society, that just coincidentally
00:14:56.000
and conveniently gives the left everything they've wanted for a hundred years.
00:15:00.080
If we don't pass the green new deal and pay out reparations for slavery, then the sun monster is
00:15:09.020
going to kill us. It's a crisis. The environment's going to fall apart. What do reparations for slavery
00:15:13.040
have to do with the environment? No idea. No time to ask questions. How dare you ask a question?
00:15:18.140
We're in a crisis. Just pass it. We got to read, we got to pass the bill so we can find out what's
00:15:23.560
in the bill. That's what they told us during Obamacare too. Crisis. Crisis does not serve
00:15:29.740
conservative ends ever. We'll get to why in a second. First, I got to thank our friends over at Ring.
00:15:34.140
Speaking of our safety and security, listen, while you're being holed up at home during the coronavirus,
00:15:42.740
you are going to want to know who is at your door before you go and answer it, especially if things
00:15:46.960
get a little rocky. I mean, I don't think that people sitting idle for weeks at a time with whole
00:15:51.700
cities shut down, they're not always the most well-behaved people, all right? So you're going
00:15:55.280
to want to have a little bit of protection. Ring gives you protection at every corner. It helps you
00:15:59.320
create custom affordable security for your home. Ring's video doorbells let you answer the door
00:16:04.560
and check in on your home anytime. It doesn't matter where you are. You can be in your bedroom,
00:16:08.500
lying sick from WooFlu. You can be in the office. You can be at a beach. Ring's full home security
00:16:14.240
systems give you everything you need to protect your family, pets, and property. Get a special offer
00:16:19.860
on the Ring welcome kit right now when you go to ring.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. I had dinner last
00:16:26.360
night with friends that I gave ring to. They love it. They talk about it all the time. You are going
00:16:31.800
to want it as well. That welcome kit includes the Ring video doorbell 2 and Chime Pro. It's all you
00:16:37.340
need to start building a ring of security around your home. Ring.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S.
00:16:42.760
It's ring.com slash Knowles. Always a crisis. How about the water crisis? Remember that one? There's a
00:16:50.480
water crisis, and so we need massive government intrusion into our lives. You don't hear about that one
00:16:56.300
as much anymore. That was more popular maybe five or ten years ago. Hopefully the crisis got better.
00:17:00.700
What about the overpopulation crisis? Remember that one? That's a real deep cut. That one comes
00:17:04.700
back from the 70s. They were still talking about it, though, in the 80s or the 90s, that there are
00:17:09.500
too many people. So that's why you've got to go along with the left's agenda on sex, abortion,
00:17:17.240
everything. You have to, on government interference in those things, you have to do it because we've got
00:17:21.780
an overpopulation crisis. You remember in the 70s, they talked about the population bomb, that if we
00:17:28.300
didn't have all these radical leftist policies, really inhuman policies, especially in terms of
00:17:35.060
abortion, if we didn't have that, then within 10 or 20 years, there'd be mass starvation all over the
00:17:39.700
world. What happened? The world population doubled and were richer and fatter than ever before.
00:17:44.680
Looks like we survived that crisis. I'm real glad we didn't listen to all the alarmists during that
00:17:49.940
crisis. There's one now on college campuses, you hear this all the time, the campus rape crisis. We
00:17:55.100
are told that one in four or one in five women on college campuses are raped. They will be raped.
00:18:02.360
That number, that's a shocking, terrifying statistic, right? Then you got to think about it for a second.
00:18:08.240
If that statistic is true, then Harvard Yard is a more dangerous place for young women than downtown
00:18:17.240
Aleppo. You can saunter around the outskirts of Baghdad late at night. You'd be much safer than
00:18:23.880
if you walk through old campus at Yale. Does anybody really believe that? No, of course not.
00:18:29.120
But it's a crisis. Don't, don't ask these questions. We need to deprive people of their
00:18:35.440
due process rights. That's, that's one response to the, the crisis on campus. They have, instead of,
00:18:41.580
instead of putting rape, which is a very serious crime through the criminal justice system,
00:18:45.020
which is set up to deal with serious crimes, they have campus tribunals with professors,
00:18:50.280
the acting as judges and jury and executioner, at least figuratively. I don't know, maybe literally
00:18:56.200
too. They set that up. Well, and if you took two moments to think about the crisis, the statistic,
00:19:02.000
you'd say, wait a second, you're telling me we need to get rid of our due process rights in America,
00:19:06.420
the rights of the accused, run roughshod over those people's rights.
00:19:09.900
because you're saying that Harvard Yard is more dangerous than, than Karachi? I don't,
00:19:18.680
is that true? I don't think that they'll, they have to push you past the point of reason in order
00:19:24.400
to get you to buy into their radical conclusions. Crisis always serves the left because crisis means
00:19:31.940
that everything is broken. It's not just like a little inconvenience. It's not just a little problem.
00:19:36.940
A little problem is actually a good place for conservatives because conservatives are in the
00:19:43.280
business of conserving. We like to fix things, fix things up a little bit, but not totally destroy
00:19:48.440
them or totally change them. We want to preserve, we want to conserve the tradition. Now, obviously,
00:19:55.220
over time, things wear down. They need repair. They can be improved, but that's where a conservative
00:20:03.100
thrives. If you're in a crisis, everything is broken. You've got to start from scratch. You've
00:20:08.820
got to fundamentally transform America, to quote Barack Obama. This is very advantageous to the
00:20:14.740
left. This is intrinsically not conservative. It means there, there's nothing really worth
00:20:19.620
preserving. Things have gone so horribly wrong. So what's going on in this crisis? What are people
00:20:24.960
saying? When you get past the tweets, when you get past the mainstream media, what are people
00:20:30.620
really saying about this? Well, people are saying that President Trump is doing a good job. You don't
00:20:36.620
need to just listen to the Republicans. You don't need to just listen to the conservatives. Even
00:20:41.100
some of the most left-wing Democratic governors in America who are working with Trump on this crisis,
00:20:49.180
on this pandemic, it's probably the more precise word to use, are saying that he's doing a very good
00:20:55.060
job. It's pretty shocking if all you watch is CNN. But if you're looking at people who have actually
00:21:00.940
interacted with this administration, you realize there's actually been some responsibility,
00:21:05.240
accountability, efficiency. Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York came out and he said, you know,
00:21:11.880
the Trump administration doing a great job. This government cannot meet this crisis
00:21:16.700
without the resources and capacity of the federal government. I spoke to the president this morning
00:21:26.960
again. He is ready, willing and able to help. I've been speaking with members of his staff
00:21:35.140
late last night, early this morning. We need their help, especially on the hospital capacity issue.
00:21:44.200
I think the president was 100 percent sincere in saying that he wanted to work together
00:21:50.500
in partnership. His team has been on it. I know a team when they're on it and I know a team when
00:21:59.140
they're not on it. His team is on it. They've been responsive late at night, early in the morning
00:22:05.180
and they've thus far been doing everything that they can do. And I want to say thank you and I want to
00:22:12.920
say that I appreciate it. Thank you. I appreciate it, man. That's a different tune than we've been
00:22:19.180
hearing from some Democratic officials for the last three years who say that Trump is Hitler and
00:22:23.700
he's terrible and he's a Russian who stooge and we got to throw him out of office and he's a racist
00:22:27.460
and a bigot. Well, the people who are working with him, even high ranking Democratic governors of
00:22:32.620
very left wing states are saying he's actually doing an excellent job here. It's not just Andy Cuomo
00:22:37.980
because you might say, well, Andy Cuomo has probably known Trump for a while. They're both New Yorkers
00:22:41.360
known each other a long time. No, it's not just Andy Cuomo. Gavin Newsom, Democratic governor of
00:22:46.780
California said almost exactly the same thing. We had a private conversation, but he said,
00:22:51.540
we're going to do the right thing and you have my support, all of our support logistically and
00:22:56.920
otherwise. So before he made those statements publicly, I had a private conversation with him
00:23:01.740
around 4.30 West Coast time and he said everything that I could have hoped for and we had a very long
00:23:11.500
conversation and every single thing he said, they followed through on. So I'm just not interested
00:23:17.840
in finding daylight on those statements because every single thing, his administration, and it
00:23:25.040
starts at the top, including the vice president, has been consistent with the expectation that we
00:23:32.140
repatriate these passengers and we do it in a way that does justice to the spirit that defines the best
00:23:37.660
of our country and the state of California. Sounds pretty good. They've, they've been very supportive.
00:23:43.540
They've followed up on all of their promises. Looks like the Trump administration is doing a good job.
00:23:48.480
I think now we talked about yesterday, how the left is trying to just use this crisis in a very
00:23:54.020
just basically political, political partisan hack way to attack Donald Trump all the time.
00:24:01.440
When you hear that, I don't think you need to send them those people, the updates from the
00:24:08.000
coronavirus task force. I don't think you need to send them even the statistics, send them those
00:24:12.220
clips, send them to maybe the two most prominent democratic governors in America saying that the
00:24:18.260
Trump administration is doing a good job, which I think up until this point, certainly they have been
00:24:23.480
doing an excellent job. Now, there are some proposals on the table that are maybe not as
00:24:29.980
excellent as what we've seen heretofore from the Trump administration. We'll get to those in a
00:24:34.600
second. We'll get to some of the polling on what Americans think about it and we will get to the
00:24:38.280
2020 race. But first, I've got to thank our friends over at First Leaf. Oh man, this is going to be the
00:24:43.560
most important thing while you are quarantining yourself. You need First Leaf wine. I love First
00:24:51.440
Leaf. They gave me a freebie, First Leaf, and I loved it so much. Now I pay anything. I give them
00:24:59.660
my credit card. I say, whatever it is, send me more of your product. First Leaf created an introductory
00:25:04.900
six pack of wine for me based off of a quiz that I took all for just $29.95. Six pack of wine for
00:25:13.200
$29.95. These wines normally go for at least $20 a piece and you can get them for $5 a piece for
00:25:19.660
your introductory box. When the bottles arrive, this is what's so cool. You try them and they were
00:25:23.860
really excellent wines, but you know, one or two, I'm like, eh, that's not my taste. So I rate them
00:25:27.740
down. The next box is, includes wines I didn't even know I would like, but it's totally tailored to
00:25:33.780
your taste. Sign up today and get six bottles of wine for only $29.95 plus free shipping. Just go
00:25:39.580
to tryfirstleaf.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. Trust the company that I use to help me relax at the end
00:25:46.200
of the day. That's six bottles of wine for only $29.95 plus free shipping at tryfirstleaf.com slash
00:25:52.100
Knowles. All right. There's a lot that the Trump administration could do. It's on the table right
00:26:01.020
now. There's even a chance that we might all be on the Yang Gang now. There's a proposal for a sort
00:26:06.080
of proto-universal basic income, free money from the government. What could go wrong? We'll get to
00:26:11.680
all of that. First, I have got to say goodbye to Facebook and YouTube. Head on over right now to
00:26:16.120
dailywire.com slash subscribe. Very important. We actually just launched a new show. It's called
00:26:20.540
All Access Live over at dailywire.com. It's Ben, Daily Wire, God King, Jeremy Boring. They kicked it
00:26:27.480
off Monday evening. Jeremy and I did one last night, so you can go check that out. We're going
00:26:32.580
to be doing episodes for the rest of this week at 8 p.m. Eastern, 5 p.m. Pacific. I really like it.
00:26:38.340
It's pretty much just hanging out. The thing I like most about it, it's a perfect example of the
00:26:43.220
market working for us. You know, at any other time in history, we probably would not have had the
00:26:48.760
technology that we do now that would be able to just go straight back into your homes as you are
00:26:55.200
sitting on your couches and just speak to you during this time of crisis when we're all
00:27:02.320
quarantined. That's All Access Live. Go check it out. It's initially for our All Access members,
00:27:07.620
but that's what we want to do ultimately, but right now it's for all you guys. So head on over
00:27:12.140
dailywire.com. We'll be right back with a lot more. All right. So what do Americans think about
00:27:29.720
this response? Last month, 77% of Americans expressed confidence in the government's handling
00:27:38.000
of the virus. That was before all the quarantines, before all the restaurants and bars were closed,
00:27:43.300
before everybody was thrown out of work because of overzealous mayors and governors and those sorts
00:27:49.620
of people. 77% expressed confidence in the government's handling of the virus. That number
00:27:55.540
has dropped substantially. The current level is 61% of Americans who say that they are very or somewhat
00:28:00.720
confident in the government's response. 24% say they're very confident. 37% say that they're
00:28:06.120
somewhat confident. The drop is entirely Democrats. And it's, by the way, we should look at the wording
00:28:12.380
of this question. How confident are you in the government's response? That includes the federal
00:28:16.320
government, Trump, but also the state and local government. For me in Los Angeles, Eric Garcetti
00:28:21.760
is the mayor. Gavin Newsom is the, is the governor. So if I were asked that question, I would say, well,
00:28:28.820
I'm not confident in the local government's response. I am confident in the federal government's
00:28:36.120
response, but that's not really included in the question. So the drop is entirely Democrats.
00:28:41.980
Less than half of Democrats express confidence in the government's ability to handle an outbreak.
00:28:48.880
Republicans remain as confident. So what the polling reflects is that what we're seeing right now is a
00:28:55.780
leftist freak out, not only in terms of policy, but even in the reaction to the policy. Conservatives
00:29:01.440
feel basically the same way that we felt a month ago. Most people think the Trump administration is
00:29:09.280
doing a good job here. Democratic governors of the two most prominent left-wing states think that the
00:29:14.940
Trump administration is doing a good job here. All things seem to be under control. So why the freak
00:29:23.640
out? The answer here is the media. You remember Mara Gay. Mara Gay is the New York Times editorial
00:29:31.340
board member who was on MSNBC the other day with Brian Williams, and she confused her arithmetic by six
00:29:38.580
orders of magnitude when talking about Mike Bloomberg. You remember that? Somebody tweeted recently that
00:29:43.300
actually with the money he spent, he could have given every American a million dollars.
00:29:47.340
Got it. Let's put it up on the screen. When I read it tonight on social media, it kind of all became
00:29:54.180
clear. Bloomberg spent 500 million on ads, U.S. population 327 million. Don't tell us if you're
00:30:00.780
ahead of us on the math. He could have given each American one million dollars and have had lunch money
00:30:06.900
left over. It's an incredible way of putting it. It's an incredible way of putting it. It's true.
00:30:12.560
It's disturbing. Oh, it's true. It's disturbing. It's amazing. Wait a second. It's just not right.
00:30:18.560
It's wrong by six orders of magnitude. Okay. That Mara Gay, who then didn't apologize for saying that,
00:30:24.560
she actually then wrote a column about how if you criticize her for getting her math extraordinarily
00:30:30.920
wrong, then you're a racist. That's a member of the New York Times editorial board. Didn't take any
00:30:35.320
responsibility. Anyway, she's back and she is exemplifying the media dishonesty in this crisis
00:30:43.200
against President Trump. So Mara Gay tweets this, uh, about President Trump.
00:30:51.320
Quote, Trump told governors this morning, they are on their own respirators, ventilators, all of the
00:30:59.220
equipment. Try getting it yourselves. Mr. Trump told the governors during the conference call,
00:31:04.460
a recording of which was shared with the New York Times. Well, it sounds pretty bad, doesn't it?
00:31:09.440
He's saying you're on your own. Wow. What an irresponsible, feckless federal government.
00:31:14.200
They can't even get the equipment. They're saying you're on your own. We can't do anything,
00:31:17.200
right? Except that's not what happened. The very next line, which Mara Gay left out, quote,
00:31:23.820
we will be backing you, but try getting it yourselves. Point of sales, much better,
00:31:30.020
much more direct if you can get it yourself. That completely changes what the first sentence means.
00:31:40.660
And Mara Gay knows this. The New York Times know this. So they take out the part that shows what
00:31:46.920
the government response actually is. And they take the first line, twist its meaning completely,
00:31:51.340
and make it seem like Trump is pushing all of the responsibility onto the stats, states.
00:31:56.160
It's when, when Trump is telling them, respirators, ventilators, try getting it for yourselves.
00:32:03.760
That if you say, try getting it for yourselves, because we're not going to get it for you.
00:32:07.640
That means something very different than try getting it for yourselves. We'll back you,
00:32:12.080
but it'll be more direct and simple and quick if you get it yourselves. Those are completely
00:32:17.160
different meanings. Mara Gay, it would seem intentionally twisted that. I don't know how it
00:32:23.180
couldn't have been intentional. The New York Times had the recording. Presumably, Mara Gay read the
00:32:27.760
article. So she just tweeted something out that was false, that was a lie. It was a lie. Trump did say
00:32:36.500
those words, but the words meant something completely different when you leave out the crucial part of
00:32:42.980
the statement. That's what we're hearing from the media. That's why I'm saying, if you're looking at
00:32:47.640
the media right now and you're panicking and you're freaking out, just don't. It's dumb. Don't tune
00:32:53.240
it out. These people, you're going to listen to Mara Gay. She's going to tell you the truth. I don't
00:32:57.460
think so. You know, if you want to whip yourself up into hysterics, then go watch the lying mainstream
00:33:03.480
media. But if you don't, if you want a more realistic view of what's going on, then you got to
00:33:08.460
look elsewhere. So what's the Trump administration's new response? Now things are getting a little bit
00:33:13.420
dicey. Steve Mnuchin, treasury secretary, gave a press conference yesterday in which he talked
00:33:18.360
about a new policy for relief that the federal government is considering. This came to them
00:33:23.940
from Mitt Romney. So just to give you a little preview of, of how great, great, this is going
00:33:29.060
to be wonderful, conservative, reasonable. Came from Mitt Romney. The policy is to send direct
00:33:36.540
checks to everybody. Free money. Here's Steve Mnuchin announcing the policy.
00:33:41.720
When you say a stimulus package for American workers, do you mean direct payments to Americans?
00:33:46.940
Or are you talking about a payroll tax holiday? Although the president likes the idea of the
00:33:51.500
payroll tax holiday, I will tell you what we've heard from many people. And the president has
00:33:55.880
said we can consider this. The payroll tax holiday would get people money over the next six to eight
00:34:01.340
months. We're looking at sending checks to Americans immediately. And what we've heard from
00:34:06.640
hardworking Americans, many companies have now shut down, whether it's bars or restaurants.
00:34:11.040
Americans need cash now. And the president wants to get cash now. And I mean now in the next two
00:34:16.680
weeks. I will be previewing that with the Republicans. There's some numbers out there.
00:34:22.780
They may be a little bit bigger than what's in the press. Maybe even bigger than what's in the
00:34:26.960
press. What's in the press is a thousand dollars. So it might be bigger. What, 1500, 2000, 2500? Who
00:34:32.760
knows? One man in particular in this country is particularly excited by all this. What did you say
00:34:38.300
about Mitt Romney? That he's joined the Yang gang. We're getting a lot of new members. Uh, certainly
00:34:43.320
under the worst circumstances anyone can imagine. He's joined the Yang gang. We're all on the Yang
00:34:47.760
gang now, man. The, one of the most radical democratic candidates for president. Looks like
00:34:52.000
his proposal is being endorsed by Mitt Romney. That's no surprise. Mitt Romney is one of the most
00:34:57.220
radical democratic candidates for president. Oh, wait, hold on. He was a Republican. Sort of,
00:35:01.140
maybe. Uh, but it is disappointing to see the Trump administration talk about this.
00:35:05.420
I guess we're all on the Yang gang, but it's a bad idea. Why is it a bad idea? Well,
00:35:09.740
let's give the policy it's due. If the policy were simply the government giving people short-term
00:35:19.140
direct relief one time without any other consequences, whatever, that's fine. Is it
00:35:26.800
going to work? I'm not convinced it would work, but I don't have any major problem with that.
00:35:31.960
It would probably be better if it were on the state and local level rather than at the federal level
00:35:35.580
because people are just more responsive there. It'd be, it'd be better if we could figure out
00:35:40.440
exactly who the money should go to because look, we've all taken a hit during this coronavirus,
00:35:45.140
but some people don't need the money. Some people really do need the money. Some people can afford
00:35:49.740
to miss two weeks of work. Some people can't afford to miss two days of work. So you want the money to
00:35:54.940
be targeted to the people who need it because there is real relief that has to come from this
00:35:58.660
awful virus that came out of China. We should send China the invoice. No question about that.
00:36:03.540
But if it were just in a vacuum, I could almost understand it. If the only stimulus they were
00:36:10.860
considering was giving people this direct money, I could maybe understand that. That's not the only
00:36:18.000
stimulus they're considering. They're considering a whole lot more as well. You've got every major
00:36:22.400
lobbying group now going, descending on Capitol Hill to try to get some of that money.
00:36:26.760
It's a bad idea because it will set a precedent. This is the precedent for the universal basic
00:36:35.720
income. The Yang is thrilled about it. The supporters of the universal basic income are
00:36:41.140
thrilled about it. And the universal basic income is awful. It's a terrible idea. There's no argument
00:36:45.080
for it. It's inhuman. It's a way to ensnare you and get you trapped and dependent on the federal
00:36:51.080
government, not even a more local government, which is at least easier to shake yourself out of. At least
00:36:55.740
there you can move. At least there, these are laboratories of democracy, each of our state
00:36:59.620
governments, but this would be a federal program. Do we really think you're going to mail somebody
00:37:04.360
$1,000, $2,000, I don't know, $3,000, this one-time check for relief. We really think it's
00:37:11.120
going to be one time. What if the coronavirus goes into July? They're only going to get one check.
00:37:18.140
$3,000 even is not going to last you through July. What if it goes away because viruses die in the
00:37:26.680
heat and then the summer is fine and then it comes back again in the fall? Are we going to get another
00:37:30.640
$1,000, $2,000, $3,000 check? Are we going to get another trillion dollar bailout program?
00:37:35.960
We'll need one. We'll need one. Look, we need one. The economy is collapsing because of these dumb
00:37:42.220
policies. Some policies are smart. Some policies are pretty dumb. Trouble with the crisis is you
00:37:48.380
can't really sift the smart ones from the dumb ones. Is this going to be the last bailout? I don't think
00:37:55.180
so. Is this going to be the last we've heard of UBI? I don't think so. It's going to be the precedent
00:37:58.440
and it's going to go forward and become a regular policy. We might not get Yang style UBI now but we
00:38:07.880
will get a lot closer to it. We will hasten that day of getting UBI style redistribution. If a
00:38:16.420
Republican conservative administration does this, you've got to be much, much more careful about this
00:38:21.960
and the states are really happy that the federal government's been supporting them. Maybe we need
00:38:25.720
to support the states. And if you want direct relief, and by the way, people need direct relief.
00:38:29.820
Okay? People, you can't just go in and say, hey, nobody can work for two months. All right,
00:38:34.480
you're on your own. Right? You can't do that. That's wrong too. You need some way to make them whole.
00:38:40.160
But a massive, bloated, inevitably corrupt program from the federal government that's going to set the
00:38:47.000
stage for a massive new welfare program, probably not the way to do it. All right. The Chinese
00:38:53.900
government is not making this any easier on us in this crisis. Chinese government is now,
00:39:00.900
I can't tell if they're parroting American leftist propaganda or if the American leftists are parroting
00:39:05.900
Chinese propaganda. It's a real chicken or egg situation. But China is jumping on the identity
00:39:10.640
politics bandwagon. They are now saying that it is racist to refer to this virus as a Chinese virus,
00:39:18.340
to call it the Wuhan virus or the Wu flu or the Kung flu or the chop flu or the sweet and sour
00:39:23.500
sickened or lung pao sickened or there are a lot of, obviously there are a lot of nicknames for this.
00:39:28.540
But China doesn't have a problem with any of those names in particular. China has a problem generally
00:39:34.660
with pointing out that the virus came from China. The news service China, Jinhua News, which is a
00:39:42.360
mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party, they tweeted out, quote, racism is not the right tool
00:39:48.620
to cover your own incompetence. Racism. If you call it the Chinese virus, the Wuhan virus,
00:39:55.180
if you point out where it came from, you're a racist. China is obviously stoking divisions that
00:40:02.940
are already in the United States. Worth remembering for our useful idiot friends who parrot propaganda
00:40:09.020
from communist governments. These totalitarian regimes have been doing this for a long time.
00:40:15.140
So during the, especially during the 1960s, the Soviet Union was fanning the flames of racial division
00:40:21.580
because the America experts in the Soviet Union know a whole lot about our political divisions.
00:40:28.800
Same thing in China. The Chinese communist government knows a lot about our political divisions. They are
00:40:34.700
fanning the flame and useful idiots in the United States are parroting that propaganda. Don't parrot
00:40:40.260
that. If you call the Wu flu or the Wuhan virus or any of those terms, if you call that racist,
00:40:46.380
you are parroting the propaganda of one of the most evil regimes on the face of the earth.
00:40:52.880
Dr. Fauci, Dr. Fauci gives us another update. Fauci is the, he's the kind of public face of public
00:41:01.680
health here in the coronavirus epidemic. He was asked, is this president Trump's fault?
00:41:08.440
Is the lack of testing president Trump's fault? He says, absolutely not. He says it's no, nobody's
00:41:14.800
fault, but certainly not the president's fault. So when you hear left-wingers blaming Trump saying that
00:41:22.760
the testing, there, there aren't any tests. You point them to Dr. Fauci. All right. Dr. Fauci has a lot
00:41:27.400
of credibility. He's been around in public health for decades and decades. And he said, yes, it's too
00:41:32.680
bad that we don't have a lot of testing, but it's not the president's fault. It's part of the system.
00:41:38.140
Before we go, I got to get to a little bit of 2020 news. Last night, President Trump officially
00:41:42.060
clinched the Republican nomination for president. Poor Bill Weld, his primary challenger is, he's done.
00:41:48.860
He's finished. Obviously Trump was going to get it though. There is something worth noting here.
00:41:53.280
Turnout has been very, very high. Uh, there, the Trump campaign actually posted a video about how
00:42:02.900
high the turnout has been. President Trump cruises to victory with a record-breaking
00:42:06.960
Republican turnout. Trump got more total votes than Obama got as an incumbent. Republican turnout
00:42:12.580
operation in Texas is extraordinary. Complete domination. Receiving more primary votes than than
00:42:17.700
any sitting president. We're winning. We're winning all over. We have record turnout for an incumbent
00:42:24.560
president. The Republican party has never been unified like it is now. Turnout was also huge for
00:42:32.940
Donald Trump. President Trump celebrating a record-breaking victory. It's not even a party. It's a
00:42:37.760
more than President Obama had by a wide margin. Let's realize how good Donald Trump's political
00:42:45.880
operation is. To all Americans tonight. I'm with you, the American people. I am with you. I will fight
00:42:57.100
for you. And I will win for you. And we are going to keep America great. Keep America great. There it
00:43:05.720
is. I mean, this is a big number. We've been talking about it since New Hampshire. The Democrats are
00:43:10.240
expecting record-high turnout in 2020. And yet, the turnout's been lower than it was in 2016,
00:43:17.640
very often in states all around the country. Whereas President Trump, who is guaranteed to
00:43:22.120
get the nomination, his turnout has been double that of Barack Obama when he was looking at re-election,
00:43:29.440
of George W. Bush when he was looking at re-election. It's been double that. So what does that tell us?
00:43:34.960
It tells us there is still a lot of enthusiasm for Trump. And if the numbers hold on the government's
00:43:39.300
response to coronavirus, then it looks like those turnout numbers will hold in November. Unless the
00:43:46.900
economy completely tanks. And that's a real open question right now. On the other side of the aisle,
00:43:53.520
Joe Biden just clinched the Democratic nomination for president. He clobbered, I mean, he didn't clinch
00:43:58.800
it, but he clinched it. Right? He didn't, he's still got to go and get all the, all of the delegates,
00:44:03.100
but he, he clinched it. He won Florida, Arizona, and Illinois. He now has 1,147 delegates to Bernie's
00:44:10.240
861. Bernie does not have a path to victory right now. The only reason Bernie is staying in this race
00:44:16.960
is in case Joe collapses. I don't mean that electorally. I mean that physically. Joe Biden
00:44:21.960
does not seem to be particularly vigorous. We, there was, he was giving a campaign speech the other
00:44:28.700
night. And at the end of it, he just stood there. Like he didn't know where to go. He didn't know
00:44:32.800
what should happen next. And, and his, his wife actually had to come out and try to drag him off
00:44:36.620
the stage. Thank you all. Thank you all for listening. Oh, thanks. Thanks. Thanks. Okay.
00:44:58.700
So what is that? I mean, we don't, we don't know what it is. Maybe they were filming a commercial.
00:45:04.920
Maybe he was giving a small speech. We don't know. It's been floating around the internet
00:45:07.900
outside of context, but whatever he's doing there, I hope he's not in front of a large crowd
00:45:13.520
because it's totally quiet. But even if he's just standing there in front of a camera giving a
00:45:17.540
message, he looks like a zombie. He looks like he's going to go, thank you. Thank you all for listening.
00:45:24.040
And then he's sort of standing there oddly. And, and his wife kind of walks out looking nervous and
00:45:32.940
we're just like, ah, okay, Joe. And then she gives him a hug and he looks, oh, hey, you're there.
00:45:37.180
Huh? Okay. Oh, okay. All right. Well, bye. That's not a candidate who looks like he's about to run away
00:45:44.440
with the presidency. And so Bernie's staying in the race to try to take it from him. It's going to be a
00:45:49.800
much more exciting election now than we thought it would be when the economy was going gangbusters.
00:45:54.400
I thought Trump would win 57 states. Now another crisis or maybe the reaction to the crisis is
00:46:01.220
throwing that reelection victory into great question. I guess we'll have to wait and see
00:46:07.000
how the rest of it shakes out and hope that president Trump doesn't overreact to the overreaction,
00:46:12.660
which would put us in even more peril. All right. That's our show. Come back tomorrow.
00:46:17.020
In the meantime, I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles show. See you then.
00:46:19.800
If you enjoyed this episode, and frankly, even if you didn't, don't forget to subscribe.
00:46:30.320
And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends
00:46:34.720
to subscribe. We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.
00:46:40.720
Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro show,
00:46:45.360
the Andrew Klavan show, and the Matt Walsh show.
00:46:47.840
The Michael Knowles show is produced by Ben Davies and directed by Mike Joyner.
00:46:53.240
Executive producer, Jeremy Boren. Supervising producers, Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:46:58.940
Technical producer, Austin Stevens. Assistant director, Pavel Widowski. Editor and associate
00:47:04.600
producer, Danny D'Amico. Audio mixer, Robin Fenderson. Hair and makeup, Nika Geneva. Production
00:47:11.680
assistant, Ryan Love. The Michael Knowles show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:47:18.260
Hey everyone, it's Andrew Klavan, host of the Andrew Klavan show. Hell yes, it's the Chinese virus.
00:47:23.540
It's the doggone Chinese virus. I'll explain why on the Andrew Klavan show. I'm Andrew Klavan.