The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 628 - Dems Sexually Harass Barrett

00:00:00.000 They actually did it. They did it. We joked about them doing it, and then they did it.

00:00:05.820 We all joked about how the Democrats were going to pull a Kavanaugh and accuse Judge Amy Coney 0.90

00:00:12.640 Barrett of sexual harassment during her Supreme Court nomination hearings. We didn't think it

00:00:17.020 was going to actually happen, right? But then they actually did it. Since you became a legal

00:00:23.120 adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal

00:00:28.840 or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature? No, Senator Hirono. Have you ever faced

00:00:34.720 discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct? No, Senator.

00:00:41.100 There are many jokes to be made here. I am going to refrain from making them. Actually,

00:00:46.200 I guess the Democrats themselves are the joke because the confirmation hearings only went

00:00:51.900 downhill from there. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.

00:00:58.840 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment from yesterday from Weston, who says the worst

00:01:09.340 thing about Klobuchar is her voice. It sounds like she's constantly on the brink of tears.

00:01:14.720 That's fair enough, but it's still better than Cory Booker, who constantly is in tears. So at least

00:01:21.780 with Klobuchar, you know, there's just maybe it's something about the vocal quality. But with Booker,

00:01:26.360 my goodness gracious, Spartacus was nearly crying tears of rage the whole time and maybe a few

00:01:31.520 droplets popped out. We will get to him as well. It was a very bad day for Democrats. It did not look

00:01:39.620 good at all. Look, anything could change. They might have some big trick up their sleeve today,

00:01:45.160 but it seemed as though for most of the hearings, the Democrats had just sort of given up. You know,

00:01:50.760 I know that we're all on eggshells here with these Supreme Court nominations. This is the issue in

00:01:57.320 the presidential election, at least for right now. And we thought that Judge Barrett was going to have

00:02:03.280 a close shave in there, but, but she did not. If you do want a close shave, however, I would recommend

00:02:08.320 you check out Harry Razors. Harry's Razors is the best I've ever used. Okay. I've, I just started using

00:02:15.420 Harry's, I'm going to say about a month ago, maybe a month and a half ago. And I've tried a bunch of

00:02:21.000 razor brands on my, these are the best, not even close. They've just come out with their sharpest

00:02:25.900 blades ever. Unlike some other razor companies, they are not charging you for their product

00:02:31.080 improvements. Harry's new sharper blades are still as low as $2 each. Now, if you're using some of the

00:02:38.640 big names that have been around for a long time, you're probably paying significantly more than that

00:02:43.140 for each razor. How do they do it? Harry's owns a German factory. They've been making razor blades

00:02:48.260 for 100 years. They source their steel from Sweden and they own the entire manufacturing process from

00:02:55.160 the R&D to the factory floor. This allows them to keep prices low. Your eighth shave is as sharp as

00:03:02.280 your first. How is that possible? I couldn't tell you, but they stand by it with a hundred percent

00:03:06.660 quality control guarantee. Harry's is available wherever you shop. You can get Harry's

00:03:12.840 sharpest blades ever at the big box drug and grocery stores near you. You just head on over

00:03:18.060 to the grooming aisle. And by the way, if you like to shop online, Harry's has a great offer for

00:03:22.340 listeners to my show. Go to get a Harry's trial set at harrys.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. You

00:03:29.540 get a five blade razor featuring their newer sharper blades, a weighted handle, foaming shave gel

00:03:34.360 with aloe, and the travel cover to protect your blade when you're on the go. By the way, you're going

00:03:38.700 to like, you're going to like the price that you have to pay. All right. You're not even going to

00:03:42.360 feel like you're, you're paying anything. You're not, you're not going to feel that way. Go to

00:03:45.800 harrys.com slash Knowles, redeem your trial offer today. So Senator Hirono opens up the hearings by

00:03:56.540 asking Judge Amy Coney Barrett, mother of seven, Catholic law professor, appellate judge, if she has

00:04:05.740 sexually harassed anybody. And the weird sex questions only got weirder from there. Democrats

00:04:13.020 really do have an obsession with sex here. They have an obsession with sex in the way that a fourth 0.99

00:04:19.820 grader has an obsession with sex. It's all they can think about. They can't raise their minds to

00:04:24.800 higher things. So the next question from Senator Hirono involves same sex marriage, the redefinition

00:04:33.460 of marriage, which occurred in this country, not through the legislatures, not through some

00:04:39.240 persuasion that, that we citizens had amongst one another. It's because Justice Anthony Kennedy

00:04:45.280 decided to redefine the fundamental political and social institution from the bench. And Maisie Hirono

00:04:53.020 is very worried that Judge Barrett does not agree with Justice Kennedy's romantic poetry.

00:04:58.900 This morning, Senator Feinstein asked you a question about the Supreme Court's 2015 decision

00:05:04.760 in Obergefell v. Hodges, a case in which the court recognized the constitutional right to same-sex

00:05:10.940 marriage. And I was disappointed that you wouldn't give a direct answer on whether you agreed with the

00:05:15.700 majority in that case, or if you instead agree with your mentor, Justice Scalia, that no such right

00:05:21.440 exists in the Constitution. Obviously, no such right exists in the Constitution. Does anybody seriously

00:05:28.320 believe that James Madison and Alexander Hamilton thought that what was going into that Constitution

00:05:34.400 was the fundamental redefinition of marriage for the first time in human history to not have 0.99

00:05:39.940 something to do with sexual difference, to not have something to do with the difference between men

00:05:43.260 and women? No, nobody thinks that. Does anybody seriously believe at the time the Constitution was

00:05:49.320 ratified, the public meaning of that document was that they were going to fundamentally redefine

00:05:54.480 marriage as now no longer having anything to do with sexual difference? No, nobody seriously believes

00:06:00.920 that. Does anybody seriously believe that in, I don't know, 1998, anybody believe the Constitution

00:06:09.360 fundamentally redefined marriage? How about 2008? How about 2012? Barack Obama in 2012 still did not support

00:06:17.380 gay marriage as any sort of political right, as any sort of legislative issue, certainly not as any

00:06:24.400 kind of constitutional issue. At least in his public speech. Maybe he was lying to us. Maybe in his

00:06:30.340 mind, he really did support it. But at the very least, I think we all have to admit, nowhere does

00:06:35.740 the Constitution redefine marriage. So what happens? Some robed lawyers on the Supreme Court decided to

00:06:41.680 take that issue away from the people and our self-government and fundamentally redefine it, which

00:06:47.560 follows perfectly in line with Justice Kennedy's jurisprudence when in Planned Parenthood v. Casey,

00:06:52.280 he said that we have the right to define our own conception of existence. We have the right to

00:06:58.460 redefine reality. Sure, if you can redefine reality, certainly you can redefine marriage. Amy Barrett

00:07:05.700 handles these questions very well, smacks them down, obviously isn't going to comment on individual

00:07:10.720 cases. Then Senator Hirono gets very, very upset because Barrett is dealing with this so well she's

00:07:17.920 not taking the bait. But Judge Barrett used a very, very offensive term. Do you know what that term

00:07:24.140 was? Drum roll. Sexual preference. Not once, but twice. You use the term sexual preference to describe

00:07:35.820 those in the LGBTQ community. And let me make clear, sexual preference is an offensive and outdated term.

00:07:44.740 It is used by anti-LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not.

00:07:53.840 Sexual orientation is a key part of a person's identity. That sexual orientation is both a normal

00:08:01.020 expression of human sexuality and immutable was a key part of the majority's opinion in Obergefell,

00:08:08.920 which, by the way, Scalia did not agree with. So if it is your view that sexual orientation is

00:08:14.660 merely a preference, as you noted, then the LGBTQ community should be rightly concerned whether

00:08:23.920 you would uphold their constitutional right to marry. I knew that Senator Hirono was a hack. I didn't know

00:08:32.880 that she was illiterate. I didn't know that she doesn't understand the basic meaning of words. 0.96

00:08:38.180 There is nothing offensive about the term preference. Sexual preference is the most precise term that we

00:08:46.860 can use to discuss these sexual issues that Senator Hirono is talking about. And there's nothing in it

00:08:53.500 that suggests that a preference is a free choice. Preferences can be innate. Preferences can come to us

00:09:00.440 from our very little childhood. I have had a preference for chocolate chip cookies over oatmeal

00:09:06.760 raisin cookies for as long as I can remember. I did not freely choose this preference. I did not

00:09:13.180 wake up one day and say, today I am now going to choose to prefer chocolate chip cookies. How about

00:09:18.700 ice cream? People have preferences. Do you like chocolate ice cream or vanilla ice cream?

00:09:21.820 I assume you didn't choose that preference. You didn't sit and intellectually decide, okay,

00:09:28.040 I am going to be a vanilla guy. That's what I'm going to prefer. No, your preferences are just that.

00:09:33.940 Actually, this is the difference between a preference and an opinion. Often though, this is one of my pet

00:09:40.080 peeves, but the left does this all the time. They don't know what an opinion is either. So for instance,

00:09:44.760 they'll say, well, these are the facts and everything else is just your opinion. As if to say opinions are

00:09:50.800 unreasonable, but opinions are not unreasonable. Opinions are statements of fact from our point

00:09:55.420 of view. So I form an opinion using my faculties of reason. Opinions can be true and some opinions

00:10:02.580 are false, but we can debate opinion because they're, they're actually referring to objective

00:10:08.460 fact. There's a third option, which is preference and you can't debate preference.

00:10:14.300 Degustibus non disputandem est is a Latin phrase, which means there's no arguing over taste. There's

00:10:22.740 no accounting for taste. I can't say to you, excuse me, Johnny, you're completely mistaken.

00:10:29.180 Vanilla is much more delicious than chocolate. I can try to make some arguments, but ultimately

00:10:33.500 that question is coming down to a question of taste and preference. There is, talk about Democrats

00:10:40.200 reaching. They, now they're begging, they're trying to redefine this term, which is perfectly

00:10:46.840 innocuous and perfectly precise because they ain't got nothing on judge Amy Coney Barrett. So finally,

00:10:53.920 once Senator Hirono stopped embarrassing herself at the Senate, Dianne Feinstein, who sometimes 0.91

00:11:00.380 embarrasses herself, but is at least more impressive than, than Macy Hirono. She got up and she talked about 0.52

00:11:05.840 the sexual question that the Democrats actually talk about the, the ones that they actually want

00:11:10.080 to, to know about, which is not sexual preferences. It's not even the redefinition of marriage.

00:11:15.840 It is whether or not we're all going to continue to pretend that the constitution protects the right 0.54

00:11:20.340 to kill a baby. Dianne Feinstein goes directly after Roe. 1.00

00:11:24.820 Do you agree with justice Scalia's view that Roe was wrongly decided?

00:11:29.620 So Senator, I do want to be forthright and answer every question so far as I can. I think

00:11:36.760 on that question, I, you know, I'm going to invoke Justice Kagan's description, which I think

00:11:42.220 is, um, perfectly put. When she was in her confirmation hearing, she said that she was not

00:11:47.540 going to grade precedent or give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down. And I think in an area where precedent

00:11:52.860 continues to be pressed and litigated, as is true of Casey, it would be particularly, um,

00:11:59.060 it would actually be wrong and a violation of the canons for me to do that as a sitting

00:12:03.080 judge. Um, so if, if I express a view on a precedent one way or another, whether I say

00:12:08.440 I love it or I hate it, it signals to litigants that I might tilt one way or another in a pending 1.00

00:12:13.860 case.

00:12:15.500 So on something that is really a major cause with major effect on over half of the population

00:12:24.760 of this country who are women, after all, it's, it's distressing not to get a straight 0.52

00:12:31.660 answer. So let me try again.

00:12:35.020 Let me try again, since I have no idea what you just said, Judge Barrett. And if you could

00:12:41.300 please tone down the vocabulary here to, I don't know, maybe, maybe a second or third grade

00:12:46.240 level, maybe I could understand it. You almost feel bad for Senator Feinstein listening to that

00:12:51.600 exchange because what Amy Barrett does is she doesn't just say, it's my right not to

00:12:55.880 say how I would rule on cases, which is fair enough. She doesn't owe Dianne Feinstein an

00:13:00.280 answer on any case, but she actually goes further and she says, you know, because these cases

00:13:04.440 are hotly contested, I, I can't tell you which way I'm leaning on this because if I were to

00:13:12.120 do that, then that would signal to the litigants some of my preferences and that would actually

00:13:16.800 change the course of justice. So she's making a really positive case for why she can't answer

00:13:22.220 these questions. The smarter senators decided just to move on. And, and unfortunately they

00:13:27.600 had nothing to move on to. So you had these wacky scenes, probably the wackiest scene yesterday

00:13:32.600 was a democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, who with a name like Whitehouse, I've always

00:13:39.380 wondered why this guy wasn't going to run for president. Why wouldn't you run for president?

00:13:43.940 He's been in the Senate for a long time. His last name is Whitehouse. You're, you're ready

00:13:48.020 to go. Right. But then he opened his mouth yesterday during these hearings. And I realized

00:13:51.940 why probably not the most viable presidential candidate. He went on and just tried out some

00:13:59.880 convoluted conspiracy theories involving dark money. What is the scheme here? Let me start

00:14:10.180 with this one. In all cases, there's big anonymous money behind various lanes of activity. One

00:14:20.520 lane of activity is through the conduit of the Federalist Society. It's managed by a guy,

00:14:25.760 was managed by a guy named Leonard Leo, and it's taken over the selection of judicial nominees.

00:14:32.720 How do we know that to be the case? Because Trump has said so over and over again. His Whitehouse

00:14:39.200 Council said so. So we have an anonymously funded group controlling judicial selection run

00:14:47.660 by this guy, Leonard Leo. Then in another lane, we have, again, anonymous funders running through

00:14:54.660 something called the Judicial Crisis Network, which is run by Carrie Severino, and it's doing

00:15:02.040 PR and campaign ads for Republican judicial nominees. So by the end of this presentation,

00:15:11.340 he's basically just Charlie Day at the conspiracy board, like, yeah, and then this connects to that,

00:15:16.240 and this connects to that, and where's Pepe Silvia? There's no point that he ever gets to. There's no

00:15:21.460 point. Okay, so there are conservative donors who fund organizations, and the organizations

00:15:27.660 influence some of the judicial conservative movement. Okay, you know, the left has that too.

00:15:36.080 I mean, the left here. Hey, here's one. Molly Hemingway posted this yesterday. This is from

00:15:39.800 the Americans for Public Trust. Here's Sheldon Whitehouse's dark money. Okay, so where's the

00:15:44.360 dark money? You've got Sheldon Whitehouse over here, and then you've got Arabella Advisors. You got 0.87

00:15:49.340 some money coming out of there. Then you got a guy named Eric Kessler. Then you got the Center for

00:15:53.700 American Progress, and you got the Democracy Alliance. You got George Soros here. He's funding

00:15:57.060 that. You got Tom Steyer. He's funding that. Then all the money flows there. Okay, is that,

00:16:01.100 so, does that mean Sheldon Whitehouse is an illegitimate senator? No, big politics attracts

00:16:06.440 big money. No surprise there. I was speaking to Senator Cruz yesterday. We covered a little bit of

00:16:11.720 this on the Verdict podcast. He pointed out to me that of the 20 top political donors, 14 of them

00:16:19.720 give almost exclusively to Democrats. Another three of them give to both sides, and then only three

00:16:26.360 give mostly to Republicans. So, if the Democrats really want to open this dark money door, fine by

00:16:32.260 me, most, the vast majority of the dark money is going to Democrats. But the point here from Sheldon

00:16:39.200 Whitehouse is not to expose anything about money. Nothing he said implies anything illegal whatsoever.

00:16:44.860 However, it's to delegitimize the court. It's to delegitimize this nominee so that they can try to

00:16:51.300 stack it later. It's a cynical tactic, but overall, probably the best card they had to play.

00:16:57.900 And when they ran out of that, we could rely on Corey Spartacus Booker to cry tears of rage, not

00:17:04.340 about Judge Barrett, but about President Trump. He didn't even try, really, to go after Judge Barrett.

00:17:12.360 What you saw, I would say, as a general rule here is that these guys were just not prepared. Now,

00:17:20.400 you will want to be prepared, and there's no better time than to do it right now with ReadyWise. You

00:17:25.300 should be prepared with long-term nutritional food options. ReadyWise has options such as emergency

00:17:30.780 meals, freeze-dried fruits and vegetables for convenient on-the-go nutrition, new adventure meals

00:17:35.720 for hiking, camping, and other outdoor activities. ReadyWise uses the finest ingredients and latest food

00:17:40.900 prep technology to ensure optimal taste and freshness. Every single recipe is crafted by

00:17:46.500 a team of chefs to provide a nutritional meal during critical times. Each meal is a combination

00:17:51.240 of both dehydrated and freeze-dried ingredients. Meals are packed into durable, long-lasting pouches

00:17:56.600 designed to keep food fresh for up to 25 years. You know, people get ReadyWise foods to be prepared

00:18:02.360 in case of an emergency. That's the point. But I will tell you, the taste is great. We actually,

00:18:07.140 we got some here at the office, and one of my producers, I said, what happened to all the

00:18:11.640 ReadyWise? Where is that? Where's it go? And he was eating it for lunch every day because they

00:18:15.740 actually taste very, very good. And you get the added benefit then of them having a shelf life

00:18:19.800 of 25 years. So you will be prepared in these uncertain times. This week, my listeners get free

00:18:24.540 shipping at ReadyWise.com when entering Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S at checkout or by calling 855-453-2945.

00:18:30.900 There is a 90-day no-questions-asked return policy. No risk taking the initiative to get yourself and your

00:18:36.020 family prepared. That is R-E-A-D-Y-W-I-S-E.com. Promo code Knowles to get free shipping.

00:18:43.220 Cory Booker, Spartacus, was not prepared with any dirt on Judge Barrett. So he went straight at

00:18:50.360 Trump. Specifically, he asked Judge Barrett about President Trump's refusal to say that he would

00:18:57.500 peacefully transfer power if he loses the election. I appreciate what you've said about respecting our

00:19:03.140 founding fathers, about the originalism. It's remarkable that we're at a place right now that

00:19:07.980 this is becoming a question and a topic. But I'm asking you, in light of our founding fathers,

00:19:15.280 in light of our traditions, in light that everyone who serves in that office has sworn an oath

00:19:21.420 where they, quote, swear to preserve and protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,

00:19:26.180 I'm just asking you, should a president commit themselves, like our founding fathers, I think,

00:19:32.640 have a clear intention, like the grace that George Washington showed, to the peaceful transfer of

00:19:39.120 power? Is that something that presidents should be able to do? Do you think that the president has

00:19:43.260 the power to pardon himself for any past or future crimes he may have committed against the United States

00:19:50.060 of America? Well, Senator Booker, that would be a legal question. That would be a constitutional

00:19:54.480 question. And so in keeping with my obligation not to give hints, previews or forecasts of how it

00:20:00.160 resolved the case, that's not one that I can answer. Well, I think I agree with you that it is an issue right 0.91

00:20:06.360 now, something I never thought would be an issue before. But it is an issue. Yeah, I agree with you,

00:20:12.200 Judge Barrett. Yeah, isn't Trump terrible? Because he won't say that he'll peacefully transfer power. 0.89

00:20:16.540 You know, Trump, the guy who won in 2016, and then we refused to give up power. And you know,

00:20:23.640 then he was president, and we, the left, tried to overthrow his presidency, and we're continuing to

00:20:28.160 do that. You know, you know, that guy, why won't he? You know, the guy running against Democrats,

00:20:33.540 our party, which just said that Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances. That was,

00:20:39.480 that was Hillary Clinton, the previous Democrat presidential nominee. You know that guy? Yeah,

00:20:43.700 can you believe he won't transfer power? That's a stupid question. Trump should never answer that 1.00

00:20:47.600 question. Don't get, the minute you accept the premise of that question, you've already lost

00:20:52.900 the idea that you might not peacefully transfer power to the left, which has spent the last nine

00:20:59.260 months burning the country to the ground. So once he moves past that stupid hack talking point, 1.00

00:21:04.980 then he moves to another stupid hack talking point and asks Judge Barrett to condemn white supremacy. 1.00

00:21:10.820 I'm going to ask you some questions that if you had told me five years ago, 0.99

00:21:16.420 that would be questions asked at a Supreme Court nomination hearing, I would have thought they

00:21:22.020 wouldn't be possible. But unfortunately, I think they're necessary to ask you. And I hope that you'll

00:21:27.280 give me direct answers. The first one, you've already spoken towards issues of racism, how you deplore it.

00:21:33.820 But I want to just ask you very simply, and I imagine you'll give me a very short, resolute

00:21:38.420 answer. But you condemn white supremacy, correct? Yes.

00:21:45.040 Thank you. I'm glad to see that you said that. I wish our president

00:21:48.020 would say that so resolutely and unequivocally as well. But we are at a time

00:21:53.140 that Americans are literally fearful because their president

00:21:56.780 cannot do that in the resolute manner in which you did. I'm sorry that that question had to even

00:22:03.780 be asked at this time. I'm sorry. I don't want it to be asked, but it has to be asked. It has to be.

00:22:08.980 Judge Barrett, do you condemn the tooth fairy? Yes. Yes, Senator Booker. Okay. And Judge Barrett,

00:22:14.640 I have to ask this because this is such a real live issue, not a completely fake contrived issue.

00:22:19.240 Do you, do you condemn the Easter bunny? Sure. Senator Booker, I condemn the Easter. Okay. I have

00:22:25.300 to, I have to ask you that. I didn't know what your answer would be. Judge Barrett, who has two black

00:22:30.020 kids that you adopted from Haiti. I didn't know your answer because Trump, Trump won't condemn that

00:22:35.560 super real thing. That thing that's totally real, that millions of people support, you know,

00:22:40.940 white supremacy, you know, that thing that's totally real. He just won't, he won't condemn it.

00:22:47.060 Right. Mr. President, racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and

00:22:54.780 thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are 1.00

00:23:03.060 repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans. And you had people, and I'm not talking about the 0.98

00:23:09.500 neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. We are a nation

00:23:15.040 founded on the truth that all of us are created equal. We are equal in the eyes of our creator.

00:23:23.680 We are equal under the law. And we are equal under our constitution. Those who spread violence in the

00:23:32.740 name of bigotry strike at the very core of America. How many times do I have to reject? I've rejected

00:23:39.740 David Duke, rejected David Duke. I've rejected the KKK, the Ku Klux Klan. From the time I'm five years old,

00:23:48.140 I rejected them. Now, I have been asked this question so many times. I have rejected it so many times.

00:23:53.600 I just wish he would give an answer. I just wish he could just tell us, what do you think about white

00:23:58.660 supremacy? You know, in this white supremacist country, that, you know, that real thing? You know,

00:24:04.260 what do you, so that's all they've got. They just make up a bunch of nonsense. And then Barrett 0.98

00:24:10.180 absolutely, of course, smacked it down. She smacked it down, by the way, without notes. This was maybe

00:24:17.200 the highlight of her performance at yesterday's hearing. She did it without notes. You are going

00:24:22.600 to want to take notes, however, at this wonderful conference that is coming up one week from today,

00:24:28.160 where the Daily Wire god king, Jeremy Boring, will be presenting alongside a team of world-renowned

00:24:35.420 business experts at Expert Ownership Live two-day virtual conference about leading through crisis.

00:24:41.260 The conference features a lineup of speakers like leadership author John Maxwell, the founders of

00:24:45.660 Duck Commander and Otterbox, the Benham Brothers, many others who can relate to what entrepreneurs and

00:24:50.260 leaders are going through right now. They will share stories about their own businesses and startup

00:24:54.660 journeys, the tough times that necessarily come with any company, even here at Daily Wire, even

00:25:00.360 actually when the business was doing well in a certain sense, there are these huge issues that

00:25:06.260 can come up that, that have threatened a lot of businesses, including our own. This conference is

00:25:10.400 one of those investments that your business will be thanking you for in the long run. So visit

00:25:13.900 expertownershiplive.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S, register for $197, buy a second ticket for a friend

00:25:21.220 for 50% off. And you, come on, look, you'll get to see Jeremy, which actually may be, I don't know

00:25:27.160 if that's a selling point or if that's, but look, he's got a lot of wisdom. Expertownership.com,

00:25:31.700 I'm sorry, expertownershiplive.com slash Knowles, buy one ticket for $197, get another one for 50%

00:25:38.480 off, expertownershiplive.com slash Knowles. Judge Barrett knocks it all down and does it without any

00:25:45.900 notes. A wonderful moment that was teed up by Texas Senator John Cornyn. You know, most of us have

00:25:52.140 multiple notebooks and notes and books and things like that in front of us. Can you hold up what

00:25:57.580 you've been referring to and answering our questions? Is there anything on it? That letterhead that says

00:26:05.360 United States Senate. That's impressive. Holds up a page from my own book, my own book,

00:26:12.820 Reasons to Vote for Democrats, A Comprehensive Guide. I think that's what that blank page was.

00:26:17.320 Speaking of which, by the way, this is just a little personal side note.

00:26:21.020 I am selling so many copies of this blank book, Reasons to Vote for Democrats, A Comprehensive

00:26:25.080 Guide, which President Trump called a great book for your reading enjoyment. I am selling so many

00:26:29.280 copies right now that I mention it not just to tell you how happy I am and to thank you for buying the

00:26:33.580 copies, but also to tell you I consider this like a secret poll of the election. The fact that all these

00:26:38.900 people are buying this joke on Democrats, it reminds me of some of these other kind of more

00:26:43.080 hidden poll numbers, right? Everyone says, oh, we all hate Trump. And yet 56% of Americans,

00:26:47.780 according to Gallup, say they're better off than they were four years ago. All these little,

00:26:51.680 little numbers, especially in swing states, are, seem to be very, very nice for the president.

00:26:56.280 But in any case, Judge Barrett, wherever she got her blank sheet of paper, she held it up. You have

00:27:01.620 senators here, the Democratic senators who could not even ask a question without notes. Their heads

00:27:09.160 were buried in their paper. Cory Booker was reading from the paper and he still messed up his delivery.

00:27:14.020 You have a Democratic presidential nominee who can't remember his own name. Can't, and we'll get to some

00:27:19.480 of his stumbles on the campaign trail in just a second. Can't remember much of anything. And then

00:27:24.440 you have our judicial nominee, Judge Barrett, who goes 12 hours yesterday without any notes.

00:27:34.040 The left, the Democrats, they don't have a chance against that. And so things are looking very good.

00:27:38.840 You don't want to count your chickens before they hatch. But right now it's looking very good for

00:27:44.140 Judge Barrett. We'll get more hearings today. We do have a lot to get to though, because actually I

00:27:49.500 felt the best Democratic arguments, or at least the most plausible, they weren't that plausible,

00:27:55.560 came from one of their presidential candidates who dropped out, who's not even in the Senate,

00:28:00.780 but he should be because he's much more impressive than all those other guys.

00:28:03.860 We will get to him in one second. If you haven't already heard though, Daily Wire's old glory

00:28:07.700 Daily Wire baseball bat is back. This is our limited edition, handcrafted, custom painted baseball bat

00:28:13.180 emblazoned with the DW logo. Since we relaunched this on Monday, they are almost all sold out.

00:28:18.560 Again, the first time we did it, it sold out in 48 hours, and it was only available to all access

00:28:22.720 in that case. Today is the last day they will be available. I don't even know if they're still

00:28:26.440 available right now, but you can try to get yours, okay? Try to get your number in. Text the keyword

00:28:32.640 baseball, B-A-S-E-B-A-L-L, to 83400. That's 83,400. 83400 to purchase your bat today. We'll be right back

00:28:42.760 with a lot more.

00:28:48.560 The closest thing to convincing opposition I saw yesterday against Barrett came from someone who

00:29:03.600 wasn't even in the room. This was Pete Buttigieg, who the left, the left thinks he's making good

00:29:08.400 arguments because he says things in a calm way and he's sort of polished and has some nice academic

00:29:14.640 credentials. So they think that the arguments he's making are sound. They're not, but they kind of

00:29:20.040 have the sound of soundness. And so they're calling him Slayer Pete on Twitter. It's kind of lame. It's

00:29:27.100 not going to stick. So Mayor Pete, Alfred E. Newman, that was the nickname that Trump gave him. He goes

00:29:32.580 on MSNBC and makes an argument against not just Barrett, but against her judicial philosophy of 0.80

00:29:40.440 originalism. This is what nominees do. They write the most seemingly unobjectionable, dry stuff. But

00:29:49.460 really what I see in there is judicial, a pathway to judicial activism cloaked in judicial humility.

00:29:58.040 At the end of the day, rights in this country have been expanded because courts have understood

00:30:04.360 what the true meaning of the letter of the law and the spirit of the Constitution is. And that is not

00:30:12.840 about time traveling yourself back to the 18th century and subjecting yourself to the same prejudices

00:30:20.160 and limitations as the people who write these words. The Constitution is a living document because

00:30:25.300 the English language is a living language. And you need to have some readiness to understand that

00:30:31.400 in order to serve on the court in a way that's actually going to make life better.

00:30:36.660 So nothing he just said is true and everything is extraordinarily radical,

00:30:41.160 but because he's saying it in a calm way, it seems almost plausible. He contradicts himself

00:30:45.260 immediately, right? He says, look, what I see here, Judge Barrett is talking about how she just wants to

00:30:51.640 read the text by what the words actually mean and what they were understood to mean at ratification.

00:30:56.320 That's judicial activism, okay? Because for decades now, the court has been expanding rights

00:31:03.720 based on how they know the truth and the spirit of the Constitution. So some judge writing in 2015

00:31:13.020 knows better than what the Constitution says than the people who wrote the Constitution and the people

00:31:19.680 who were alive at the time of ratification who wrote about the Constitution. Well, that's madness.

00:31:24.020 How on earth could you make that argument? Well, he says, because it's a living, breathing document.

00:31:28.760 Now, just as a simple matter, it is not living. It's dead. It's on dead paper. It's on dead trees

00:31:34.080 with dead ink. And it's not breathing. It's paper. And paper doesn't breathe. So it's not a living,

00:31:39.080 breathing document. He says, but the meaning of it changes as the English language changes.

00:31:43.500 So for instance, let's say that there's a law against murder. You cannot commit murder.

00:31:53.780 And then the word murder, because language changes over time, comes to mean not killing somebody

00:32:00.260 intentionally, but eating chocolate ice cream. That's just the new, I don't know, it's kind of a

00:32:04.240 weird way language evolved, but now for some reason murder means eating chocolate ice cream. Does that

00:32:08.980 mean that it is illegal for me to eat chocolate ice cream? Of course not. Could you imagine the chaos

00:32:15.780 that our laws would be subjected to, that our entire system of government would be subjected to

00:32:19.820 if we had to interpret statutes by what words mean at any given time? By the way, who's, who's

00:32:26.320 supposed to define how the words mean as they are changing? The reason we have linguistic

00:32:32.300 prescription, namely saying you should use, you should use words as they are defined is because

00:32:40.380 if you have linguistic description, meaning you should use words as whatever the way kind of

00:32:45.360 people are using them now, people use words differently. Now the, the, the, the very nature

00:32:51.680 of language changing means that at the moment, right now, as, as the meaning is somewhat unclear,

00:32:56.680 we can't arrive at a, at a specific meaning, which is Buttigieg's point is what he really wants to do

00:33:03.200 is just empower judges to impose their will on the language. Pete Buttigieg, who pretends to be a

00:33:08.020 moderate, his father was an, a radical academic. He was the president of the International Gramsci

00:33:15.480 Society. Antonio Gramsci is the, a first self-described cultural Marxist. He was the leader of the Italian

00:33:22.820 communist party and he wrote very pretty interesting texts actually about how Marx got certain things

00:33:29.340 wrong and we need to apply the Marxist revolutionary concepts to the culture, to take over institutions

00:33:35.040 and wage a war of position rather than a war of maneuver. This would later be interpreted by the

00:33:39.540 radicals of the sixties as the long march through the institutions, basically melding the language of

00:33:44.780 Mao and the language of Gramsci. Buttigieg's dad was such an admirer of Gramsci that he was a co-founder

00:33:51.800 and president of the International Gramsci Society. Okay. This guy is coming from a very radical

00:33:57.380 intellectual perspective, which comes down to, and Gramsci, by the way, is, is one of the major

00:34:02.000 influences on what we now call political correctness. Well, what Buttigieg is talking about

00:34:05.660 is political correctness, right? He's just saying, yeah, we're going to redefine words to mean whatever

00:34:09.100 we want them to mean. And then however we define them conveniently, that's what we're going to read

00:34:13.760 into the constitution. He then tries to defend this by, by citing Thomas Jefferson.

00:34:19.800 It was actually Thomas Jefferson himself who said that we might as well ask a man to still wear the

00:34:27.080 coat which fitted him when he was a boy, as expect future generations to live under what he called

00:34:32.960 the regime of their barbarous ancestors. So even the founders that these kind of deadhand originalists

00:34:41.380 claim fidelity to understood better than their ideological descendants, today's judicial

00:34:47.240 so-called conservatives. The importance of keeping with the times. And we deserve judges and justices

00:34:54.240 who understand that. What Thomas Jefferson was referring to, you don't need a crystal ball,

00:34:59.500 you can just read the rest of his writing. What he's referring to is not how future generations

00:35:04.100 should redefine basic language and usurp the power of the people to define how they're going to live.

00:35:12.920 He's talking about the amendment process. Nobody says we should live under exactly the same

00:35:17.220 constitution that they had in the 18th century. They're, they're saying, yeah, we should change

00:35:22.540 it with the times. Even Antonin Scalia said he wished it were even easier to change the constitution,

00:35:27.300 but there is a process. It's called the amendment process. But Buttigieg knows his radical ideas would

00:35:31.440 never make it through the amendment process. So instead he just wants to steal power. Even Buttigieg,

00:35:37.100 who's, I guess, the most articulate of the democratic players right now, who's coming out,

00:35:42.360 nothing. He's offering nothing. He's offering just spurious, ridiculous arguments. So Barrett did

00:35:47.900 very well. We're going to hear more from her today. The way you know that this is not going very well

00:35:52.620 for Democrats is that even the mainstream media are trying to change course here. Nancy Pelosi was on

00:36:00.460 talking to Wolf Blitzer on CNN and, you know, CNN just carries water for Democrats all the time.

00:36:06.520 But on this issue of, of the current process, Wolf Blitzer actually cut her off. And Nancy Pelosi

00:36:15.500 became so enraged. She accused them of shilling for the Republicans.

00:36:19.100 Even members of your own caucus, even members of your own caucus, Madam Speaker,

00:36:26.600 want to accept this deal. $1.8 trillion. Congressman Ro Khanna, for example.

00:36:31.360 Let me just, let me just quote Ro Khanna, a man, you know, well, I assume you admire him. He's a

00:36:36.460 Democrat. And he just said this. He said, people in need can't wait until February. $1.8 trillion

00:36:42.800 is significant. And more than twice the Obama stimulus, make a deal, put the ball in McConnell

00:36:49.440 court. So what do you say to Ro Khanna? What I say to you is, I don't know why you're always an

00:36:54.740 apologist. And many of your colleagues, apologists for the Republican position. Ro Khanna, that's nice.

00:37:01.740 That isn't what we're going to do. And nobody's waiting till February.

00:37:06.420 CNN, they're apologists for the Republican position. How can Nancy Pelosi say that with a 1.00

00:37:11.780 straight face? Not even Fox is apologizing and defending Republican positions anymore,

00:37:17.520 much less CNN. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? How does she say that? Because

00:37:23.940 occasionally they push back on Democrats and the Democrats are not used to that.

00:37:28.780 The thing you have to remember though, is that Wolf Blitzer and Nancy Pelosi want the same thing.

00:37:32.360 They want more government power and they want to spend more and more money and they want Democrats

00:37:36.880 to win elections. They want the same goals, but they're having a disagreement over tactics.

00:37:43.140 When the media and the left disagree, it's never over the end goal. When the media and conservatives

00:37:49.340 disagree, it's over the goals. It's over the vision of the country. It's over the politics,

00:37:54.460 but the political system rather. When the media and the left elected Democrats are disagreeing,

00:38:01.860 because obviously the media are the left, but when the media and elected Democrats are disagreeing,

00:38:05.080 it's over tactics, not politics. Pelosi is saying, I'm going to play hardball with Trump and maybe we

00:38:09.520 don't get a deal on COVID. Wolf Blitzer saying, damn it, you need a deal on COVID because 0.98

00:38:13.000 we're losing this election. So come on, Nancy, get your act together. It's like a little spat 0.99

00:38:19.340 between lovers. You know, they do want the same thing in the end, but there is disagreement now on

00:38:25.000 the left about how they go about that. They've got no answer. Joe Biden was asked about that Gallup

00:38:30.480 poll I referred to earlier. 56% of Americans say they're better off today than they were four years

00:38:34.940 ago. He was asked about what he would say to people who feel that way. Not only did he not have

00:38:41.800 an answer, it wasn't just that, he had the worst answer possible. Gallup reported last week,

00:38:47.940 56% of Americans said that they were better off today than they were four years ago, would have

00:38:53.580 been under the Obama Biden administration. So why should people who feel that they are better off

00:38:57.960 today under the Trump administration vote for you? Well, if they think that they probably shouldn't.

00:39:03.620 I'm Donald Trump and I approve this message. I don't think that's an actual Trump campaign.

00:39:08.780 I think someone just clipped that together on the internet, but it could be. I think Trump should

00:39:12.240 run that ad. What do you say to people who say they're better off under Trump, even with a pandemic,

00:39:16.720 even with an economic collapse, they're better off under Trump than they were under you as well.

00:39:20.360 I got nothing to say to them. I guess they shouldn't vote for me. Wrong answer. I mean,

00:39:24.960 it's the correct answer. It's the true answer, but politically it's incorrect. Politically,

00:39:29.280 it's not advantageous. Compare that guy to president Trump who is now, he's feeling better than ever.

00:39:36.320 He goes to a rally in Pennsylvania. He says he's feeling so good. He's feeling so safe from the

00:39:41.740 virus. He wants to kiss everybody. And I could have stayed in the basement of

00:39:45.740 the White House or maybe the top floor of the White House. I could have done that,

00:39:48.920 but I'm the president of the United States. I can't do that. I got to get out and I have to

00:39:52.800 meet people and I have to see people. And I know it's risky to do that, but you have to do what you

00:39:57.600 have to do. I'm the president. I can't sit in the basement and say, let's wait this thing out.

00:40:01.700 I'm not going to do that. And now I'm immune. They tell me I'm immune. I could come down and

00:40:07.060 start kissing everybody. I'll kiss every guy, man and woman, man and woman. Look at that guy, 0.99

00:40:13.220 how handsome he is. I'll kiss him. Not, not with a lot of enjoyment, but that's okay.

00:40:20.360 I'll kiss them all, all the men and the women, even the men. It won't be my favorite.

00:40:24.540 You got to remember, and we always forget it about this guy because he's,

00:40:28.540 he's pretty smooth about it. This is a showman. This guy is a comedian. I mean, he is a top tier

00:40:35.960 comedian. He's a top tier Hollywood guy and has been for 30 years. And I'm glad he's going out

00:40:41.560 there and doing rallies. He should be doing a whole lot more rallies. That is where he is thriving.

00:40:46.000 Democrats are trying to cook the debates. That's the right thing. Compare that, compare that guy on

00:40:49.900 his feet. There was a video going around of Trump dancing the YMCA on, on, uh, you know,

00:40:56.640 one of these platforms, one of these rally stages. There's no need to be unhappy. He's just,

00:41:02.200 he's feeling good. He's feeling healthy. Compare that to Joe who hasn't even had the coronavirus.

00:41:07.060 He can't remember anything. You may remember I got in trouble when we were running against

00:41:12.300 the Senator who was a Mormon, the governor. Okay. And I took him on. 0.84

00:41:18.020 No, he is a Senator. He was a governor. I like that Joe Biden starts this out. You may remember,

00:41:23.580 no, you, you may remember. I hope you remember. Cause I don't remember. What were we talking about?

00:41:27.860 Where am I? It's Joe Biden. That's Joe Biden without coronavirus. Donald Trump with coronavirus,

00:41:33.500 much more vigorous than Joe Biden without coronavirus. Speaking by the way of, of, uh,

00:41:39.760 Senator Romney, I mean, Biden has, you've seen these. He's, he's had so many of these moments.

00:41:45.320 He just recently, again, said that he's a proud Democrat running for the Senate. You know,

00:41:49.320 he doesn't even remember what office he's running for. Very, very sad. And in the midst of this,

00:41:55.160 speaking of Mitt Romney, you have the answer to the question that nobody was asking. Romney says,

00:42:00.860 here are my thoughts on the political situation. Cause it's one of these stupid, awful 1.00

00:42:07.320 infographics. I've stayed quiet with the approach of the election, but I'm troubled by our politics 1.00

00:42:13.300 as it has moved away from spirited debate to a vile, vituperative, hate-filled morass that is

00:42:18.760 unbecoming of any free nation, let alone the birthplace of modern democracy. The president

00:42:23.220 calls the democratic vice presidential candidate a monster. He repeatedly labels the speaker of the

00:42:28.900 house crazy. He calls for the justice department to put the prior president in jail. He attacks the

00:42:35.420 gut, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Then he says, does he ever get to the Democrats here?

00:42:41.140 He does. Oh yes. He says, Pelosi tears up the president's state of the union speech on national

00:42:46.180 television. Keith Olbermann calls the president, a terrorist media on the left and right amplify it

00:42:52.220 all. And, and you know, it's so awful. He even, he gives the Democrats another pass. He says,

00:42:56.940 Democrats launch blistering attacks of their own, though their presidential nominee refuses to stoop

00:43:01.440 as low as others. Biden, he's a good guy. Vote for Biden is what he's really saying. These attacks

00:43:07.440 are terrible. They're dangerous. It's time to lower the heat. Oh, this guy is insufferable,

00:43:14.280 Mitt Romney. He thinks that whining makes him virtuous. He thinks that sanctimony makes him 0.87

00:43:23.960 virtuous. He thinks that self-righteousness makes him righteous. It doesn't. This is pure cowardice.

00:43:34.020 That's, that's what we've got from Romney. You know, I voted for the guy in the general in 2012,

00:43:38.380 but in my defense, I worked for two of his primary opponents. I always knew Romney was like this

00:43:45.260 and, and he's proving it right. This is pure cowardice because what Romney is saying is I'm

00:43:51.040 a Republican, but not one of those Republicans. What Romney is saying is I hate the political

00:43:55.080 reality. Fine. I think a lot of us hate the political reality, or at least we would prefer a

00:43:59.500 different political reality. Yeah, I think all of us would. And he says, and I'm just,

00:44:03.600 I'm so much better than our politics. I'm so much better than this. I don't want to have to do

00:44:08.420 this. I don't want to have to vote for Trump. He's mean, buddy. There is nothing nice and kind

00:44:17.860 and virtuous about divorcing yourself from reality and choosing to live in fantasy. Nothing at all.

00:44:26.240 This is where we are. Politics happens in reality. It doesn't happen in fantasy. It doesn't happen in

00:44:30.800 ideological manifestos. It doesn't happen in Mitt Romney's pruned and gardened, wonderful walled off

00:44:38.300 life. It happens in reality. And if you want to do anything for us in politics, you have to do it

00:44:44.360 in reality. And these thinly veiled, uh, sort of subtle endorsements of Joe Biden, who would empower

00:44:52.960 all of these awful people is, is a, is a cowardly low sort of thing to do. And even if, even if he

00:45:00.320 would deny that, even if he says, no, I'm not subtly endorsing Biden, which I think he is, but even if he

00:45:05.060 weren't to throw up your hands and say, Oh, it's all awful. We've both got problems. We don't, this is

00:45:09.500 something that has been pushed by the left. The left has degraded our language. The left has degraded our

00:45:14.600 politics. The left has degraded our Supreme court nomination process. The left has degraded our

00:45:18.840 presidential elections by refusing to accept the results in 2000, in 2016, in 2017, in 2018, when

00:45:26.160 they tried to launch a coup d'etat, not successfully, thankfully. They have done this. And what Romney

00:45:34.340 wants to say is, Oh, we're both bad. Aren't we? Yeah. I'm a good guy. Don't you like me? Pathetic.

00:45:39.260 Absolutely pathetic. It's, it is an embarrassment that that man is in the U S Senate. It would be so much 1.00

00:45:44.520 better if he were not in the U S Senate. And if he gave that seat up to a conservative who has

00:45:49.400 courage, which is a virtue. And it's the prerequisite for all of the other virtues. I've got to get to

00:45:54.380 gay cookies before we go. I have to, I want to, I want to end where we began on Democrats, weird sex 1.00

00:46:01.180 obsession. Oreos beginning October 9th are shipping out rainbow colored cookies, colored cream cookies

00:46:11.080 that are given away to the first 10,000 people to share on social media, their idea of allyship.

00:46:16.460 Allyship is some newfangled word that refers to endorsing the sexual revolution, endorsing the 0.89

00:46:22.060 left's view on sex. Specifically, they say it's with regard. It used to be with regard to

00:46:26.840 homosexuality. Now it's obviously expanded much more than that to the LGBT T, which is kind of the T 0.86

00:46:32.880 undermines the G, right? Cause the transgender undermines the arguments for same, same sex attraction, 1.00

00:46:39.520 the homosexual orientation, because the T undermines your gender. So, you know, just to put it in simple 0.98

00:46:45.740 terms, if you're a gay guy and you say, oh, I can't change this. I was born this way. And then you got

00:46:51.420 the transgender movement comes along and says, of course you can change your gender. So then the gay 1.00

00:46:54.860 guy makes himself cosmetically look like a woman. I guess he's no longer a gay guy. So I guess he did 1.00

00:46:59.920 change his sexual orientation or he didn't change his gender or gender is a silly concept pushed by the 0.97

00:47:06.800 left. And really there's biological sex, which obviously you can't change. Either way, this is 0.78

00:47:12.240 an ideology. This is not a sexual preference or a sexual orientation or whatever words you want to

00:47:17.560 use. This is left-wing ideology. And it's even come into our cookies. Cookies! How did we get here?

00:47:27.700 The Democrat obsession with sex, the left's obsession with sex, it's not about guys who are 0.92

00:47:34.080 sexually attracted to other guys or gals who are sexually attracted to other gals or people who 0.69

00:47:39.240 are confused about their sex or have some kind of psychological issue. Not about that at all.

00:47:43.640 Not about that at all. It is about control. It derives from a simple phrase that the feminist 1.00

00:47:49.740 left gave us in the late 1960s, early 1970s. The personal is the political. The personal is the

00:47:57.640 political. That basically politics has to come down to everything in our society. Has to enter into the

00:48:04.800 bedroom. Has to enter into the local community. Has to enter into our sneakers. Has to enter into our

00:48:10.420 food. Has to enter into our chicken sandwiches. Has to enter into our cookies. Everything has to be

00:48:15.720 political. But there is a flip side to this, which is as everything becomes political, the only thing that

00:48:21.400 gets depoliticized is politics. No longer are we permitted to have disagreements over

00:48:27.560 the way our constitution should be enforced in our country. And how the systems that the

00:48:34.920 constitution sets up, I'll be more precise, will make the laws for us. We're not allowed to have

00:48:40.860 those discussions anymore. We're not allowed to have those debates. Now we have to just pretend that

00:48:45.180 the constitution means whatever Pete Buttigieg says it means, or whatever Anthony Kennedy says it

00:48:49.260 means, or whatever Ruth Ginsburg says it means. But, but interestingly, not what Amy Barrett says it

00:48:54.540 means. Politicizing everything is a distraction and an unmooring from any kind of traditional sense of

00:49:03.620 our society so that we will be distracted, look away. And in the meantime, our actual political

00:49:10.540 questions over eternal questions, justice, equality, liberty, all these things that we debate and we try to

00:49:17.140 figure out how they should be enacted in our society, those are taken away from us. And those are now being

00:49:23.380 made by the very ideologues who are distracting us with bread and circuses. And we saw a circus yesterday

00:49:31.360 on Capitol Hill, bread and circuses and gay cookies. All, all to turn us away from the real political decisions 0.99

00:49:40.800 that are being made far, far away from the free choice of we the people. That's our show. I'm Michael Knowles.

00:49:46.920 This is the Michael Knowles show. See you tomorrow.

00:49:48.420 If you enjoyed this episode, and frankly, even if you didn't, don't forget to subscribe. And if you

00:50:00.120 want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe.

00:50:04.960 We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Also,

00:50:10.500 be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show,

00:50:14.640 The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show. The Michael Knowles show is produced by Ben Davies,

00:50:20.260 executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Our technical director is Austin Stevens, supervising producers,

00:50:26.320 Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling, assistant director, Pavel Wadowski, editor and associate producer,

00:50:32.360 Danny D'Amico, audio mixer, Robin Fenderson, hair and makeup, Nika Geneva, and production assistant,

00:50:39.020 Ryan Love. The Michael Knowles show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.

00:50:43.480 You know, The Matt Walsh Show, it's not just another show about politics. I think there are

00:50:48.360 enough of those already out there. We talk about culture because culture drives politics and it 0.69

00:50:53.380 drives everything else. So my main focuses are life, family, faith. Those are fundamental.

00:51:00.540 And that's what this show is about. I hope you'll give it a listen.

00:51:03.280 I hope you'll give it a listen.

00:51:04.280 I hope you'll give it a listen.

00:51:08.260 We'll give it a listen.

00:51:09.380 We'll be right back.

00:51:10.160 we'll give it a listen.

00:51:10.960 We'll be right back.

The Michael Knowles Show - October 14, 2020

Ep. 628 - Dems Sexually Harass Barrett

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript