Ep. 673 - Everything Is Worse Than Watergate
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
181.6395
Summary
Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, is celebrating every holiday except Kwanzaa and Hanukkah. What does that have to do with politics? And why is she celebrating them? Michael Knowles explains.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
It's a day that ends in why, which means that President Trump is doing something to irritate
00:00:05.440
the media, which means that in the words of the apparently immortal journalist,
00:00:10.900
Carl Bernstein, whatever Trump is doing is worse than Watergate.
00:00:16.260
It's not deja vu. This is something far worse than occurred in Watergate. We have both a criminal
00:00:23.360
president of the United States in Donald Trump and a subversive president of the United States.
00:00:28.840
This is the ultimate smoking gun tape. It is the tape with the evidence of what this president is
00:00:35.920
willing to do to undermine the electoral system and illegally, improperly and immorally try to
00:00:45.940
instigate a coup in any other presidency, any other presidency. This tape would be evidence enough to
00:00:53.780
result in the impeachment of the president of the United States and really an immediate call by the
00:01:00.020
members of Congress, including of his own party, that he resign immediately.
00:01:05.060
And we need that call because this, of course, is worse than Watergate. Just like in September when
00:01:12.060
Bob Woodward or when Carl Bernstein rather said that President Trump downplaying COVID was worse than
00:01:18.140
Watergate. Or 2019 when he said that President Trump's phone call with Ukraine was worse than
00:01:24.000
Watergate. Or in 2017 when Bernstein said the Russia probe felt worse than Watergate. Most things,
00:01:31.640
I think, are worse than Watergate. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:35.980
Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment from yesterday is from Jeremy's Rance who said,
00:01:48.040
didn't Kamala say she was Jewish too? She's literally celebrating every holiday. Pandering.
00:01:54.380
Yes, of course she is. And now she also is apparently stealing lines from Martin Luther King
00:01:58.180
and anecdotes from Martin Luther King and pretending that that was her own childhood.
00:02:01.920
The issue with celebrating every holiday, of course, and you see this from so many liberals
00:02:07.060
who say, oh, happy Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, solstice, festivus, all these sort of things.
00:02:16.680
The problem with celebrating every holiday is then you are celebrating no holidays. Really what you're
00:02:21.980
celebrating is a kind of liberal multiculturalism. That's the real religion you're celebrating because
00:02:26.360
if you're celebrating Christmas, then you are not celebrating the pagan holiday of solstice.
00:02:31.920
If you're celebrating Hanukkah, you're not celebrating Kwanzaa. You gotta, when, when you make
00:02:37.700
one choice about religion, when you have one religious vision, that necessarily excludes the
00:02:45.280
other visions. But pandering Kamala Harris doesn't, doesn't want to do that sort of thing
00:02:49.020
because the real religion on the left is secular liberalism. Not very, uh, not very good for our
00:02:57.580
country. Does not make us feel very confident about the future. Does not make us feel very secure
00:03:03.340
in our beliefs. Very often doesn't make us feel secure even in our own data in person, which is
00:03:09.760
why you got to check out LifeLock. It is important to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are
00:03:14.560
affecting our lives. You can miss certain identity threats by just monitoring your credit. Good thing
00:03:20.180
there's LifeLock. LifeLock detects a wide range of identity threats. For instance,
00:03:24.520
your social security number for sale on the dark web. If they detect your information has
00:03:29.060
potentially been compromised, they will send you an alert. Uh, very, very important. No one can
00:03:35.840
prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but LifeLock can see threats that
00:03:41.640
you might miss on your own. I were a very long time thought that nobody was after my dad. I thought,
00:03:47.180
oh, that's just for other people. No, it's okay. Seriously, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound
00:03:53.540
of cure here. People are after your data. You can join right now and save up to 25% off your first
00:04:01.720
year. Go to LifeLock.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. That is LifeLock.com slash Knowles,
00:04:10.000
K-N-O-W-L-E-S for 25% off. You know how fabulous LifeLock is. We've been talking about them for a
00:04:16.180
very long time. Go over there, protect yourself today. CNN would save a lot of money on contributor
00:04:25.540
fees. If instead of paying Carl Bernstein, whatever they've been paying him for 50 years,
00:04:30.920
they, or however long CNN's been around, I guess 40 years, they just had a, a windup doll and it
00:04:37.140
looked like Carl Bernstein. And then they pull the tab. And then when, when they let go, it said worse
00:04:41.600
than Watergate because that is the only reason that he is employed by these networks. I'm not,
00:04:47.860
I'm not merely making fun of Carl Bernstein. That is actually the media strategy. The only reason that
00:04:52.780
guy has a job is so that every six months or a year they can trot him out on TV and his job,
00:05:00.220
the role that has been scripted for him is for him to say that whatever non-traversy of the day is out
00:05:04.560
there is worse than Watergate. In this case, because president Trump had a phone call with secretary of
00:05:08.960
state of Georgia and said, Hey, I want there to be ballot security. I, uh, look, there was tens of
00:05:14.140
thousands of ballots that look very fraudulent to me and we're only down by whatever it is, 11,000 or
00:05:20.140
12,000. So, uh, you look into those ballots. Otherwise this election could, uh, could be won
00:05:25.500
through fraud on the part of Joe Biden. And then they leaked the phone call and then they take one
00:05:31.060
little two second clip out of it. And then Bernstein goes on and says, worse than Watergate. The reason I
00:05:36.400
got a little flubbed up in the introduction, I said Woodward accidentally instead of Bernstein
00:05:40.340
because those were the two journalists, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein and Bernstein, who's
00:05:45.380
the one they trot out more often is sort of like the Ben Affleck to Bob Woodward's Matt Damon. You
00:05:51.060
know, Bob Woodward is the one who has at least some talent and Carl Bernstein just kind of, kind of
00:05:57.100
went along for the ride. Beyond all of the nonsensical allegations of worse than Watergate that we hear
00:06:04.080
from Bernstein every six months. Think about some of the scandals on the left. Watergate has been
00:06:12.200
blown up into this massive, massive, the worst possible scandal ever. It wasn't actually in the
00:06:17.760
grand scope of presidential scandals. It wasn't all that big a deal compared to say allegations that
00:06:23.680
John Kennedy stuffed the ballot boxes through the daily machine in Illinois in 1960 to steal that
00:06:28.320
election, perhaps from Richard Nixon. LBJ famously stealing his Senate seat in 1948 in Texas. That
00:06:35.200
one went all the way up to the Supreme Court and the court simply wouldn't hear the case.
00:06:38.240
They didn't even rule on it. And that is what landed him then in the vice presidency and then
00:06:41.900
after Kennedy's assassination in the presidency. How about Barack Obama spying on the Trump campaign
00:06:47.440
in 2016? That seems worse than Watergate. How about Hillary Clinton's campaign colluding with a
00:06:52.520
foreign adversary, ironically colluding with Russia to put together the bogus steel dossier to try to
00:06:58.500
subvert the Trump campaign? What about that? That's certainly worse than Watergate. Give me a break. I
00:07:04.780
don't want to hear it anymore. I, you know, I, I don't want to hear anymore on from the left. You'll hear
00:07:11.240
about how Nixon was the most corrupt president. Nixon was nothing compared to Barack Obama. Nixon was,
00:07:17.600
you think Nixon was dishonest? That guy's nothing compared to Joe Biden, who at least would appear
00:07:23.560
to be about to ascend to the presidency. Nothing compared to Hillary Clinton. Give me a break.
00:07:30.980
They do this also with McCarthy. You'll always hear about McCarthyism and this awful McCarthyism
00:07:36.400
during the, during the early 20th century, when this awful Senator pretended that there were communists
00:07:42.860
working in the federal government. There were communists working in the federal government.
00:07:47.360
We, we, there was a communist who helped found the United Nations. His name was Alger Hiss and he was
00:07:51.780
a very high level employee at the state department. He was at the DOJ before that. He was a convicted
00:07:56.340
communist. It was, I suppose it was after the statute of limitations had run it. There's all book about
00:08:01.300
this called Witness by Whitaker Chambers. It's the book that turned Reagan from a liberal into a
00:08:04.700
conservative. For all of McCarthy's flaws, for all of Nixon's flaws, they were men with flaws like
00:08:09.540
everybody else. To, to posit them as the kind of supreme evil of political scandal, it's completely
00:08:15.400
ridiculous and it's a way to distract from the legitimate democratic scandals. You know,
00:08:20.760
we've been hearing a lot over the past few days about how Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley and about a
00:08:26.400
dozen senators along with a hundred to 150 Republican members of Congress are going to object to the
00:08:33.700
certification of the electoral college results. And what this means is you had the vote on election
00:08:38.820
day. Then who knows, there was a long process in some of these states where they just kept finding
00:08:43.900
votes under a rock, underneath the dresser and lift up the couch cushions. They find some more votes.
00:08:48.680
And then there were, there were some questions about how these votes were counted. Transparency,
00:08:52.780
poll watchers in Pennsylvania, the violation of the state constitution, pretty, pretty blatant.
00:08:58.640
And so then it goes to the electoral college, the electoral college voted. And then finally,
00:09:02.980
the electoral college votes are read before the house and the Senate. And you can object to this.
00:09:07.640
This has happened many times. Democrats have done it much more often than Republicans have,
00:09:11.660
even very recently. And so now that Republicans want to do it, the, the left is throwing a big
00:09:16.400
hissy fit. Some Republicans are raising objections too. And I want to take those objections seriously
00:09:22.920
because I think they merit consideration, even though they're not very good. Liz Cheney and Tom Cotton
00:09:28.820
are coming out and saying they oppose the objection to these, this is a certification,
00:09:36.380
because it sets a dangerous precedent. The argument is if Republicans are going to object
00:09:43.860
to the certification of the electoral college vote, then Democrats might do that to us in the future.
00:09:51.220
And I would be willing to entertain this argument if it were not the case that the Democrats
00:09:59.100
already do that. They've done that. They did it last time. They did it a couple of times before that.
00:10:06.320
They did it before that. They have done it multiple times in the 20th century, 21st century. And famously,
00:10:14.320
we had this issue in 1876 and which resulted in the compromise of 1877. Moreover, they're going to do it
00:10:22.520
again. So you're telling me I've got to forget about what the Democrats are doing right now,
00:10:27.960
present tense, because it might set a bad precedent for the future, even though the Democrats are already
00:10:35.460
doing it right now. This reminds me of what, what we always hear from the squishy Republicans
00:10:40.060
on big tech censorship. They say, we can't ever use the government to stop the left from censoring
00:10:46.900
conservatives right now in the here and now, because if we do that, then they might use it to censor us
00:10:53.220
in the future, even though they're already censoring us in the present. Well, then I don't care about
00:10:57.560
that hypothetical. I care about what's happening right now. I'm not going to give the left an actual
00:11:02.960
victory right now so that I can maybe win a hypothetical victory in the future after I've already lost
00:11:10.300
right now. That doesn't make any sense. I'm worried about the present tense, not the precedence. Can I
00:11:18.680
get an amen to that? We ask it in the name of the monotheistic God, Brahma and God known by many
00:11:27.380
names, by many different faiths. A man and a woman. A man and a woman. That is some silly
00:11:37.440
democratic representative. I don't even remember his name. This democratic representative was giving
00:11:43.480
this sort of prayerful invocation. And of course, he doesn't know the meaning of the word amen. Amen
00:11:50.660
does not have anything to do with being male or female. It's a very ancient Hebrew word and it has
00:11:56.960
nothing to do with sex whatsoever. Okay, fair enough. So we're all laughing at this guy. We're all
00:12:02.720
correcting him. I think that's the wrong strategy. I think that completely misunderstands what's
00:12:07.260
happening. Conservatives are getting this all wrong in the same way that they get political
00:12:11.640
correctness wrong more generally. It is not enough to laugh at these guys. While we're busy laughing
00:12:20.120
and correcting these guys on these silly redefinitions and ridiculous etymologies, they're scoring
00:12:27.000
victories. That's what happened. Remember Latinx, Latinx? Remember how we all joked about that? Remember
00:12:34.260
how we all joked about turning chairman into chairperson or chairwoman? That was a little,
00:12:39.440
I guess it was in the nineties people joked about that. Then it happened. The Latinx thing is being
00:12:43.220
totally mainstreamed. He or her, zur, being totally mainstreamed. The singular they, being totally
00:12:49.700
mainstreamed. What happens is the left doesn't care about these etymologies. The left doesn't care.
00:12:55.840
They're not going to feel embarrassed if you say, wait, actually, amen has nothing to do with men or
00:12:58.960
women. You're going to say, yeah, whatever. Now it's political. Now you better say amen or a woman.
00:13:05.000
I have a strong hunch that this phrase is actually going to be mainstreamed. Beyond that,
00:13:10.360
listen to the new standard. He says, he invokes the monotheistic God, the name of the monotheistic
00:13:15.340
God, Brahma. Brahma is not the monotheistic God. Brahma is the name of a pagan deity from South Asia
00:13:21.360
that is a foreign deity in the, in the United States. But there's the establishment of a new
00:13:27.580
standard. And this new standard is secular liberalism. And the new standard is enforced
00:13:31.840
by politically correct speech codes and politically correct behavior codes. And we giggle and we correct
00:13:36.340
them and they enforce the standard. There is a way around this, but conservatives don't quite know
00:13:41.180
how to do it. They can't quite see it. And if you want to see really well, you've got to go to
00:13:45.600
Coastal. At Coastal.com, you can get prescription glasses starting at $9 with free shipping and 30
00:13:52.960
day risk-free returns. I didn't say $900. Sometimes you see glasses like, no, I didn't say $90. I said
00:13:59.120
$9. Plus they have the most advanced virtual try on technology that you will find anywhere. With
00:14:05.400
Coastal, you don't have to spend hours at the store or hundreds of dollars to get a new style.
00:14:09.860
Just go to Coastal.com, pick the frames that you want, enter your prescription details and your
00:14:15.200
glasses will arrive in just a few days. I love it. I've never seen anything like it because this is
00:14:20.860
the trouble with buying glasses online. You just don't know really how they're going to look. And
00:14:24.700
usually it's just like a kind of picture and you put your face there. No, with Coastal, you can see,
00:14:29.180
you can turn your head. You can see how they look on the side. It's really, really impressive stuff.
00:14:32.920
So helpful when you want to buy glasses and you can't beat the prices. For a limited time,
00:14:37.240
they are offering our listeners the best deal they have got going anywhere. 50% off your first pair
00:14:42.080
of glasses at Coastal.com slash Michael. Get free shipping, 30-day risk-free returns and 50% off
00:14:47.880
at Coastal.com slash Michael. It's only for a limited time. C-O-A-S-T-A-L.com slash Michael.
00:14:54.020
Some restrictions apply. Great way to get very affordable, good looking glasses, which you
00:14:59.880
should go check out immediately. There is a way around this, but it's going to be very difficult
00:15:09.640
for conservatives. The way that the left is able to trample the culture and establish these new
00:15:15.860
standards and get people to start saying a woman, which they're actually going to do. Remember they
00:15:19.440
changed rest in peace to rest in power. Rest in power doesn't make any sense, but the left all
00:15:23.220
says it now. So, I mean, I could, the left changed Christmas trees into holiday trees. What holiday are
00:15:28.660
they talking about? The only holiday that has a tree is Christmas, but still people now talk about
00:15:32.360
holiday trees. How? How do they do it? Because the left is willing to defend their new politically
00:15:40.160
correct standards. They're willing to go out on a limb and say, you need to use the language that we
00:15:44.760
want you to use. And the only way conservatives have responded is, hey, we're not going to tell
00:15:51.780
you that you should say a certain thing or behave in a certain way. We would never impose on you. We
00:15:56.080
would never force our views on you. You can't legislate, those sort of things. But we just,
00:16:00.540
just please don't make us do it. Not how it works, folks. Not how speech codes work. Not how language
00:16:06.060
works. Not how behavior works. Either the Christmas tree is going to be, you're going to call it a
00:16:13.400
Christmas tree or you're going to call it a holiday tree. But you're going to call it something. It's
00:16:17.420
going to have a name. And the left is trying to push this view. Either we're going to pray to God or
00:16:23.980
we're going to pray to Brahma. You're not going to pray to both. You can't, you can't pray to both
00:16:27.660
actually. And so they, so the way political correctness advances is they destroy the old
00:16:33.800
standards. They say, you're not allowed to say chair man. You're not allowed to pray to God.
00:16:39.120
You're not allowed to say amen. You're not allowed to call it a Christmas tree. You're not allowed.
00:16:43.140
You're not allowed. You're not allowed. You're not allowed. That's offensive. That's wrong. And
00:16:47.240
because they believe in their new standard, they're willing to enforce it. We don't really
00:16:53.420
believe in it anymore. The way to actually fight back against this is to publicly say amen a lot
00:16:58.700
and really believe it. The way to fight back against this is to actually have a robust,
00:17:03.380
I suppose you'd say traditional culture, which is heavily, heavily Christian culture and actually
00:17:08.800
believe in it and actually be willing to make claims about it and actually say, there is one
00:17:13.600
God, his name is God. And that's the God that we worship in the United States. And we don't worship
00:17:18.080
a bunch of other gods. Are you willing to make that claim? Are you willing to go out there and
00:17:23.140
exert those standards? Are you willing to say, hey, not only is it not the case that men can become
00:17:28.660
women, but it is disordered that men should behave like women and we should discourage them from doing
00:17:34.460
it. Are you willing to go that far? Are you willing to actually, and by the way, when I say that far,
00:17:39.660
I mean the thing everyone would have agreed on 10 years ago. The idea that men are not women,
00:17:44.880
because the rut that conservatives in the right are stuck in is they'll say, hey,
00:17:49.860
I don't want to make any claims. Look, if you want, if you're a man and you want to pretend to
00:17:53.360
be a woman, that's totally fine. It's fine. Just don't make me do it. Just don't. Well,
00:17:57.840
in that case, you've established the principle that a man really can become a woman or that it's
00:18:01.820
totally normal or totally acceptable. You've established the principle that a Christmas tree,
00:18:05.720
yeah, maybe it's not a Christmas tree. You've established the principle that maybe the God that,
00:18:09.420
that our nation has historically worshiped, that we can find reference to him in the
00:18:14.680
Declaration of Independence and in state constitutions and in the Connecticut code and
00:18:21.300
in the writings of all of our forefathers, that that, maybe that God's actually Brahma,
00:18:26.480
right? Maybe. It's not though. And unless we are willing to make substantive moral claims,
00:18:34.400
which frankly, I think most conservatives are not because I think we're cowardly and we think it's
00:18:38.400
impolite or something and we don't even really believe it much ourselves. Unless we're going to do
00:18:42.680
that, you're going to get a man. You're going to, you're not going to get just a man. You're going
00:18:45.560
to get a woman. You're going to get political correctness. This is why political correctness
00:18:49.020
advances. We laugh at it. We joke about it and they get the wins. New standards. You know,
00:18:54.800
it was a little bizarre the other day because I saw that a figure on the left, this entertainer,
00:19:00.300
James Corden, he hosts one of the late shows. James Corden is overweight. He doesn't,
00:19:05.220
doesn't look super healthy. And he came out and he posted a video and he said,
00:19:09.100
you know, I'm going to partner with Weight Watchers now, which I think has since renamed
00:19:12.840
themselves. I think they're now called WW because you, because these new changing standards say you're
00:19:17.640
not allowed to criticize being overweight. You're not allowed to suggest that's better to be a healthy
00:19:22.980
weight than an unhealthy weight. So they changed their name and he says, anyway, I'm going to partner
00:19:26.680
with Weight Watchers because I feel unhealthy and I want to be healthier. And I felt it was so
00:19:33.240
refreshing. It was so traditional. It was so sane. Take a listen. I've realized that every year for the
00:19:41.520
past decade, probably even 15 years on January 1st, I've told myself and anyone that would listen
00:19:50.220
that this is it. This is the year I'm going on a diet. I'm going to lose a load of weight.
00:19:54.840
I'm fed up with the way I look. I'm fed up with being unhealthy and this is it. This is the year I'm
00:19:59.940
doing it. And because of that, I've over Christmas eaten everything that's in the fridge because in
00:20:06.720
my head in January, I'm starting this diet and it'll be a success. And as you can see, well, it hasn't.
00:20:16.860
And it started to get me down in a way that I've just sort of never really been able to stick
00:20:24.880
to anything like that. And I think I've just probably spent a long time just accepting that
00:20:31.240
this is my body and that's it. But I really am sick and tired really of just doing the same thing
00:20:43.080
every year. Totally understandable. Totally normal feeling. I think a lot of us have felt it
00:20:49.700
various times. You think, I'm just not, I'm not feeling good. I should do something to better
00:20:53.940
myself. I'm not perfect the way that I am. None of us is. And we can always do things to maybe
00:20:58.520
improve our lives and practice some virtues and exercise. Sure. Okay. So he says that therefore,
00:21:02.760
I'm going to go start, start up with Weight Watchers. But they won't use that word,
00:21:07.940
weight, or that term Weight Watchers, because there's a new standard which says, no, you don't
00:21:14.080
need to be thin and healthy to be thin and healthy. No, actually, these are covers from Cosmo
00:21:20.860
magazine. Cover says, this is healthy. And it's an obviously very overweight woman who's obviously
00:21:28.580
not healthy. 11 women on why wellness doesn't have to be one size fits all. Now here, here,
00:21:36.520
I guess is, is one of these tricks posed by political correctness. Conservatives want to
00:21:42.600
be polite. If you saw either of these women on the cover of Cosmo, either of these unhealthy
00:21:48.280
women who it says, this is healthy. If you saw either of them on the street, would you walk up
00:21:52.580
to them and say, hey, you're, you're unhealthy, you're fat, you're unhealthy. No, nobody would do
00:21:56.620
that. That's impolite. We don't want to be impolite. It is the left that is making us say things that
00:22:03.560
are uncomfortable and might seem impolite because they're not merely saying, hey, be nice to people
00:22:09.720
who, you know, have certain deficiencies or people who have certain health problems or whatever.
00:22:14.360
Yeah, of course, no one needs to tell you that. They're walking up to us and they're saying, hey,
00:22:18.800
hey, two plus two equals five, right? You need to say that two plus two equals five. If you don't
00:22:25.040
say that two plus two equals five, you're a bigot. And we look at that and we say, look, man, I don't
00:22:30.800
care, you know, if the lady, whatever, she's got her own struggles or whatever. But two plus two does
00:22:36.420
not equal five. And that is not healthy. That, that is an inversion of standards. It's what political
00:22:42.100
correctness always does because the whole, because it is a purely negative movement. And I think the
00:22:49.180
amen, a women thing is kind of waking some people up to this. It's a purely negative movement to
00:22:56.460
overturn everything we once thought was true, to remake the world. You know, John Kennedy
00:23:02.300
popularized this phrase when he was president and he was referring to a socialist playwright,
00:23:09.840
George Bernard Shaw. And he was quoting Shaw and Kennedy said, some people see things that are
00:23:15.320
and say, why? I dream things that never were and say, why not? And his brother, Robert Kennedy,
00:23:21.900
then used this phrase when he was running for president. Then after Robert Kennedy died,
00:23:25.240
Ted Kennedy quoted it at Robert's funeral. And a lot of left-wing politicians have quoted this as
00:23:29.680
an inspiration ever since then. And one of the funny things about Kennedy quoting literature
00:23:34.760
is that John Kennedy liked to quote literature, but he never read literature. So he's always
00:23:39.020
misquoting all these authors. Dante is misquoting Shaw. What he said, what he was quoting from Shaw is
00:23:46.460
actually a scene from a play series called Back to Methuselah. And that phrase comes from the mouth of
00:23:52.060
the serpent in the garden of Eden tempting Eve. It is the words of the devil. Even Shaw is describing the
00:23:58.640
words of the devil here. And the left is quoting this as some great thing. But it reminds me of
00:24:03.940
Whitaker Chambers who says, communism, you know, he's an ex-communist. And by extension, I think we
00:24:09.300
could say all sort of radical leftism. It is the, it's not a new ideology. It's the second oldest
00:24:16.440
alternative faith of mankind that began in the garden when the serpent said, ye shall be as gods.
00:24:22.860
It's trying to construct a fantasy world whereby this is healthy, whereby amen is, who cares about the
00:24:30.200
etymology of it, who cares about what it means. It means whatever we say it means. And that nasty word
00:24:34.720
men is in there. And we can't have man in there because men are bad. Because according to the new
00:24:40.100
standard, men are bad and we, and the future is female and there's actually no such thing as men or
00:24:46.600
women. That is a, a totally new code. And if we think that we're going to oppose that kind of code
00:24:53.480
with limp laughing and with these sort of shallow encomia to libertinism and you do you and do
00:25:04.000
whatever you want, we're, we're hoping for something that never was and never will be. No society has
00:25:08.540
ever existed that way and ours will not either. And, and it's why we have continued to lose,
00:25:13.640
lose, lose. And what do we do to losers? We fire them. That's what we do. And we get better people,
00:25:19.380
which is why you need ZipRecruiter. If you want, if you got, you know, if you want your team to be
00:25:23.840
performing, you got to hire really good people. Best way to find really good people, ZipRecruiter.
00:25:27.980
When you post a job on ZipRecruiter, it gets sent out to over 100 top job sites with one click. Then
00:25:34.140
ZipRecruiter's matching technology scans thousands of resumes and profiles to send you the most qualified
00:25:39.640
people for your job. If you are seriously interested in a candidate, you can even invite them to apply
00:25:46.060
for your job with just one click. It's not just like throwing spaghetti at the wall.
00:25:50.680
ZipRecruiter will go out, send an email from you and you stand out from the competition. It's so
00:25:56.740
effective that four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate through the
00:26:02.420
site within the first day. It's the most important investment that your business can make is in people.
00:26:07.980
And when you're conducting these kinds of searches, time is money. You want to get the best fit. Right now,
00:26:12.620
you can try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles. That is ZipRecruiter.com slash
00:26:18.280
K-N-O-W-L-E-S. Just go to ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles. ZipRecruiter, the absolute 100%
00:26:28.360
smartest way to hire. Go check them out. Also, you know, Daily Wire has been talking for a long time.
00:26:35.680
We lived in Hollywood for a long time. Since the beginning of this company, basically, we've said
00:26:39.620
we want to affect culture. We want to go out there. We don't want, don't want to just comment
00:26:45.820
on culture, but we actually want to put that culture out into the world. We want to be makers
00:26:49.800
of culture so that conservatives can overcome this criticism we sometimes get, which is that
00:26:55.300
we just whine, whine, whine, but we never actually go out there and do things and produce things.
00:26:59.620
Well, we're doing that. We, the minute we left New Salinas, California, we're out here in Nashville.
00:27:05.360
We're actually creating things. We have our first movie coming out. It's coming out in 10 days or
00:27:11.100
less. Nine days, I guess. That movie is Run, Hide, Fight. Make sure you go check out the Run,
00:27:17.720
Hide, Fight trailer after the show. You can check it out on the Daily Wire YouTube channel and gear up
00:27:21.880
to watch the premiere with us in about nine days. Head on over to dailywire.com. We'll be right back
00:27:27.500
with a lot more. So you've got the new fat standards, right? New standards of weight and
00:27:44.440
beauty. You also have new racial standards. And this one is a little, it's a little more subtle too. I
00:27:50.920
noticed with all these big viral stories going around the Amen and, you know, Bernstein, all
00:27:57.560
these sorts of things. What's more interesting about them is not what's on the surface. What's
00:28:02.240
more interesting is what's beneath. And this is certainly true of a video that went viral. It's
00:28:06.020
Cenk Uygur. He's that guy from the Young Turks who just yells all the time and he's very vulgar. And
00:28:12.520
that's just, that's this whole shtick is he just yells and he's kind of like, you know, the entire
00:28:16.400
left, I guess that's their shtick. They just yell and say a lot of swear words, but
00:28:19.800
Cenk Uygur did the thing that everybody with a blue check mark on Twitter is tempted to do
00:28:27.260
at the airport when their flight is delayed. You are so tempted to just immediately go and
00:28:33.520
complain on social media. I think we've all done it. Every single conservative, moderate, liberal.
00:28:38.080
If you have any kind of social media network, you complain about it. And then you hope that in some
00:28:43.880
mystical way, this will get your plane to show up more quickly. So Cenk loses it because he's
00:28:49.780
more excitable than most people. The flight's delayed however many hours and he starts filming
00:28:55.680
the staff because he's not getting answers and he starts, starts badgering them. Take a listen.
00:29:00.420
We've been here three hours and American Airlines sucks. They decided for whatever reason to screw
00:29:09.580
everybody on this flight. It just frustrates me that some industries just get to screw you over and
00:29:14.720
go, nah, you got to fly at some point, right? And it's Gustavo. That's a TYT viewer. And I'm hungry
00:29:22.480
and I'm tired. And so like, you know me, I get more agitated when I'm hungry and tired. So look,
00:29:30.200
if you guys think this is bad, wait till if that plane doesn't actually come from the hangar in 20 minutes.
00:29:36.560
Is the flight coming? Supervisor, is the flight coming? Supervisor, you at least got to be honest.
00:29:45.620
Is there a flight? Is there a plane? You got to be honest. Is there a plane? Is there a plane?
00:29:52.880
Where's the plane? Where's the plane? Okay. So it's, it's, it's rude. He shouldn't do this,
00:29:59.160
but it's actually kind of funny, right? And he's, it's not, he's not actually right in the face.
00:30:02.980
He's kind of making a joke about it. And so I'm, I actually, I can't believe I have to
00:30:06.980
sort of defend Cenk Uygur for being just as rude as he always is, but not particularly rude.
00:30:13.900
What's interesting in this story to me is that when this was posted to the internet,
00:30:18.280
it sort of went viral. The, the comment on it was, here is a two minute video of Cenk Uygur screaming at
00:30:23.940
black airline employees because the flight was delayed. Why do I care that the airline employees
00:30:31.180
are black? Why do I care? Why does that make it worse? Now I, I suspect what's happening here
00:30:36.780
is the, the viral post is pointing out the kind of hypocrisy, this irony of the new left-wing
00:30:44.320
politically correct standard, which is, you know, black people are sort of a special class. Really
00:30:49.040
any historically aggrieved minority who can claim grievance and victimhood is a special class
00:30:55.580
entitled to special privileges and white people are bad in the same way that, you know, women are good
00:31:00.380
and any kind of sexual, sexually confused person is really good, but men are really bad, you know,
00:31:05.880
and you see this in the slogans of die white cis scum, you know, or dead white males are terrible
00:31:12.220
and you got to take them out of university curricula. Decolonize the English department,
00:31:15.720
which is very funny because, you know, for instance, major English writers just as a
00:31:20.480
sort of by definition tend to be white, white guys because the English people are white.
00:31:25.240
And so you always hear like decolonize, get the white people out of the English department. I think you
00:31:29.340
wouldn't, you wouldn't say get the Italians out of the Italian department, would you? You wouldn't say
00:31:32.820
get the Chinese people out of the Chinese department. That's decolonizing, but this is a
00:31:37.500
new standard. It's a new, and obviously identity politics is this. It's creating new sort of special
00:31:43.400
groups and special privileges for, for various people. But I just think it's, it's counterproductive
00:31:50.080
for conservatives to do this sort of thing because I just don't believe it. I don't,
00:31:54.880
Cenk Uygur yelling at a black guy is in no way worse than him yelling at a white guy.
00:32:01.260
It doesn't, I don't think it's a special crime or some special offense if he does that. I do think
00:32:07.740
it's worse if Cenk Uygur yells at a woman than at a man because there, there used to be an old
00:32:12.960
standard called chivalry and men were supposed to treat women differently. But I don't think that
00:32:17.940
we should treat each other differently on the basis of our race. I think that's a far more superficial
00:32:22.580
distinction than sexual difference, which is real. The new standards obliterate all of that,
00:32:27.480
that traditional understanding of things. And I just don't, I think that it's very easy and
00:32:33.600
actually feels good for conservatives to just laugh about this thing because you can either laugh or
00:32:38.880
you can cry. But I don't think it's going to help us fight these new crazy standards. Not one little
00:32:44.340
bit. I think it's going to ease the implementation of those standards because unless we push back again,
00:32:50.260
I mean, forget about Cenk Uygur for a second, unless we push back and say, no, it's not a women,
00:32:54.720
it's a men. That's the words you say. And you say amen after we have prayer to open up the Congress
00:33:01.160
as we have for hundreds of years. And you don't just get to choose whatever words you say. You say
00:33:07.560
the correct word. I think there are going to be a lot of people who are, who have played this game a
00:33:12.440
little more squishy over the years. Said, look, we don't, we're free speech purists, right? That's kind of
00:33:18.500
the traditional conservative response to these politically correct standards. You can say
00:33:23.740
whatever you want. That isn't true. That isn't true. Conservatives have always defended standards.
00:33:29.760
I don't think you should be able to walk up to a woman and scream obscenities in her face.
00:33:33.240
I think that's wrong and you should be punished for doing that. I don't think that you should be able to
00:33:39.820
walk out onto an NFL field and disrespect the American flag. I think that's an incoherent act.
00:33:46.040
I think to defend it on first amendment grounds is absurd because you are, you're protesting the
00:33:51.420
country itself without which you wouldn't have a first amendment. I don't think you should be able
00:33:56.040
to call a Christmas tree, uh, some other kind of name. It's not, I don't, I'm not saying you should
00:34:01.800
be arrested for it. I'm just saying we as a society should not tolerate that sort of thing.
00:34:06.020
There were, the left has always understood this. The left has always understood that there are always
00:34:09.500
limits to speech and behavior and conservatives in fighting against political correctness. I think
00:34:16.420
we just believed our own abstractions a little too much, but this was true according to Thomas
00:34:21.060
Jefferson. This is true according to John Locke. This is true according to John Milton, the greatest
00:34:26.920
defender of free speech in the English language, wrote Areopagitica. There are always limits. There
00:34:31.380
necessarily have to be. If this leftist tears tumbler is a tumbler, then it's not a frisbee.
00:34:35.500
And I can't call it a frisbee. If I, if I'm really permitted in society to call this thing a
00:34:40.840
frisbee, then communication totally breaks down and we have no way of speaking to one another.
00:34:45.380
And our reasoned self-government devolves into a bunch of grunts and violence and raw passion,
00:34:54.120
appetite, and self-interest. And increasingly that's the country we're getting. And the only way we're
00:34:59.260
going to be able to push back against that is if we can actually articulate our own vision
00:35:03.060
and have the confidence to defend it. It's not just jank with all these kind of new silly
00:35:08.700
racial standards. There's, there's another one. Three, three acts that were nominated
00:35:14.580
for the 2021 best children's album Grammy award. Didn't realize there was a children's album Grammy
00:35:20.760
award. Three of them declined their nomination because they were white. Kid you not, Alistair Mook,
00:35:28.540
Dog on Fleas, and the Okie Dokie Brothers. It's like I'm reading something in the Babylon Bee.
00:35:34.680
These are all musicians, I guess. They said that the lack of, of black nominees has them turning
00:35:40.620
down their nominations. And Mook, one of these guys, his, his album about, called Be a Pain was
00:35:46.800
like about Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks and Harvey Milk, who is an absolute derelict, but he's
00:35:53.240
been turned into sort of a gay civil rights leader. But he had a very shady life. So his whole thing is
00:36:00.340
about this kind of woke, you know, identity politics. This guy said that to have a slate of
00:36:07.540
all white nominees is really tone deaf. He'd love to win a Grammy, but I don't want it like this where
00:36:13.340
the playing field's not even. What's your evidence that the playing field's not even? What's the better
00:36:16.660
album? What album do you think is better that was made by, you know, some person of color? What,
00:36:22.820
what is it? The, the mere fact that you're white doesn't mean you're bad. I mean, this is actually,
00:36:29.060
this new standard is why sort of white identitarian people were able to get, get a little bit of a
00:36:35.000
foothold a number of years ago because there was this campaign that was going up where it said,
00:36:39.440
it's okay to be white. And it was obviously a troll and people reacted against it. They said,
00:36:45.000
how dare, you can't say that. It's not okay to be white. What if, you know, what if, what if people
00:36:49.040
started tearing down posters that said it's okay to be Chinese or it's okay to be, uh, Zambian or
00:36:55.960
it's okay to be French or, I don't know, they probably would do that. And that's frankly,
00:37:00.040
it's not okay to be French. But how did we, how do we devolve from sort of tolerance, justice,
00:37:09.580
you know, being nice to people, that sort of thing to there's a new rigid caste system and white
00:37:14.960
people shouldn't win Grammys. This actually is also at the heart of the amen thing, because while
00:37:21.720
conservatives are busy laughing about how the word men has nothing to do with the meaning of the word
00:37:27.360
amen, the problem is not the etymology. It's the, it's the premise that men are bad, right? Because
00:37:33.940
then if you just see men in anything, you should just take it out. That man is a bad word. It's not.
00:37:41.580
The idea that now there are these certain groups who are, who are bad and we've got to remove them
00:37:46.200
from society is a vicious, evil, unjust idea. And you got to get rid of that. It's not that we got
00:37:53.520
to school people on the, the development of language. It's that we've got to take away the
00:37:58.620
silly premise that men are bad. Amen. So what's wrong with that? First of all, man is a gender neutral
00:38:03.920
word. It refers to mankind. In the beginning, God created man, both male and female. He created them.
00:38:09.420
It's a King James Bible. And so politically correct feminists come in in the seventies and
00:38:16.060
they say, actually we're women, W-I-M-M-I-N or W-O-M-Y-N or whatever kind of nonsense.
00:38:22.420
And the way that conservatives responded is they kind of giggled about it and said, oh,
00:38:26.060
haha, how silly, how funny. The actual response is no, no, you don't get to rewrite every single
00:38:32.580
word and you don't get to redefine every single concept and you don't get to castigate whole swaths
00:38:37.420
of the society, half the population, a little less than half the population as evil and wrong.
00:38:42.160
You don't get to do that. And we're not going to permit you to do that. So quiet down. That,
00:38:47.180
this is a big problem of identity politics. And the, the practitioner of identity politics,
00:38:53.860
par excellence today is the presumptive future vice president, Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris doesn't
00:39:02.480
believe a single thing. I don't know that she has one serious belief in her body. She wakes up in
00:39:07.120
the morning, licks her index finger, puts it up in the air, figures out which way the wind is
00:39:10.420
blowing. So Harris tells this story to Elle magazine a couple of months ago. Senator Harris
00:39:16.980
started her life's work young. She laughs from her gut the way you would with families. She
00:39:21.260
remembers being wheeled through an Oakland, California civil rights march in a stroller
00:39:24.700
with no straps with her parents and her uncle. At some point she fell from the stroller. Few safety
00:39:29.900
regulations existed back then. And the adults caught up in the rapture of protests just kept on
00:39:34.300
marching. By the time they noticed little Kamala was gone and doubled back, she was understandably
00:39:38.340
upset. My mother tells the story about how I'm fussing, Harris says. She's like, baby, what do you
00:39:44.160
want? And do you know what Kamala said? Freedom, freedom. She even mispronounced it. Oh my gosh,
00:39:51.100
what a story, right? Never happened. Never happened. Just like Kamala smoking blunts listening to Tupac in
00:39:56.320
college before Tupac's album came out. Just like Kamala Harris celebrating Kwanzaa before Kwanzaa
00:40:01.860
even existed. This story also never happened. She stole it from Martin Luther King, who in an
00:40:09.220
interview to Playboy in 1965 said, I never will forget a moment in Birmingham when a white policeman
00:40:14.980
accosted a little Negro girl, seven or eight years old, who was walking in a demonstration with her
00:40:19.220
mother. What do you want? The policeman asked her gruffly. And the little girl looked him straight in
00:40:23.500
the eye and answered, feed him. She couldn't even pronounce it, but she knew it was beautiful.
00:40:29.020
Many times when I've been in sorely trying situations, the memory of that little, little
00:40:32.660
one has come into my mind and has buoyed me. And that little girl was Kamala Harris, except it wasn't.
00:40:37.960
It wasn't because Kamala Harris would have been one year old at that, at that point. And as far as we
00:40:42.920
can tell, she, she never hung out with Martin Luther King. She just stole the story. She will not
00:40:48.660
really be called out for this. Conservatives will laugh about it, will make fun of her.
00:40:53.500
We will point out the absurdity of it. And then she will likely become vice president and not,
00:41:01.660
and the media won't mind, won't be really in part of any of her biographies. She gets a pass and
00:41:08.460
Kamala Harris gets a pass because her entire political career is trading on these, what should
00:41:17.700
be trivial aspects of her identity, but they're not because she is practicing identity politics.
00:41:23.680
Kamala Harris never talks about her accomplishments in politics. You'll notice she's never the one who
00:41:29.360
goes out and says, Hey, you know, when I was attorney general in California, man, I put so
00:41:34.180
many young black guys in jail. Oh yeah, man, I locked them up for anything. Yeah. I even looked at you
00:41:37.980
wrong on the street. I put them in jail. She doesn't talk about that, does she? Does she? There was some
00:41:43.240
criticism of her actually for that on identitarian grounds, but she doesn't really talk about
00:41:48.320
anything she's done. No laws she's passed, no particular cases she's worked on because that's,
00:41:54.640
that's not what she views to be her political value. She views her political value to be the
00:41:58.720
color of her skin and her sex. And that's very pathetic, but it's what she trades on. And it's
00:42:03.780
why she prattles on about made up stories about Kwanzaa and made up stories about talking about
00:42:08.240
freedom at protests, ripping off Martin Luther King. It's lies, lies, lies. And in the meantime,
00:42:18.320
we're being told by the left that we can't listen to conservative officials, conservative politicians,
00:42:25.080
because they're the liars, not at all. The left, it's, that is the lie. Goes back to Methuselah,
00:42:30.900
goes back to imagining things that never were and saying, why not? Now, Jake Tapper has committed
00:42:40.460
a, an offense that I absolutely cannot tolerate. Jake Tapper is saying he will not have Kayleigh
00:42:48.520
McEnany on his show anymore. This is terrible. I'm furious about this sort of thing because Kayleigh
00:42:55.800
McEnany makes all of our political hearts go pitter patter. The reason he won't have her on,
00:42:59.800
she lies. Well, there are some people that are such, um, they're just so mendacious. I just
00:43:06.160
wouldn't put them on air. Um, Kayleigh McEnany. I, I never booked her. Uh, Jason Miller from,
00:43:12.940
uh, the Trump campaign. I would never book him. I mean, these are just people who just,
00:43:17.200
they just tell lies the way that, you know, most people breathe. And there was no value in that.
00:43:23.740
I don't view, uh, Kellyanne Conway the same way. She was a senior advisor to the president.
00:43:28.300
Uh, she was more of a filibusterer and a subject changer. I thought subject changer. That's right.
00:43:34.180
That's what she would do than, uh, than, uh, than a liar. And I think it's different. I really do.
00:43:38.940
And, and there is a, there is a, uh, a risk in just like lumping everybody together. There's a big
00:43:45.360
difference between somebody like Kayleigh McEnany, who just like, this is what she does. She tells lies
00:43:49.940
all the time. She can't acknowledge reality. So, uh, I'm not, I'm just not, I'm just not going to
00:43:54.960
put somebody like that on air. You think Jake Tapper is going to put Kamala Harris on air?
00:44:01.360
Kayleigh McEnany does not lie. I don't think even, you know, within the normal parameters of
00:44:06.940
political figures, bending the truth. I don't think she's particularly a particular great offender
00:44:11.960
of that. Kamala Harris does. I mean, she just lies like air. So does Joe Biden. That's why he had to
00:44:17.680
drop out of the 1988 presidential race all those years ago. Cause he was already just, he just would
00:44:22.860
lie like he breathes, right? He would, he would go out, he would steal people's speeches. He would
00:44:27.480
make up, he made up facts about his academic history that were just completely bogus. Do you
00:44:33.880
think Jake Tapper is going to have Joe Biden on? Do you think he's going to have Kamala Harris on?
00:44:37.760
Well, something tells me that he will because all these standards only apply to the right and the
00:44:45.420
right needs to get wise to it and live up to and push our own standards and recognize that there
00:44:52.100
are going to be standards in society. You got, you got to push them. Speaking of discerning truth
00:44:57.000
from falsehood, we are in the heat of it right now. People are going to be voting in the Georgia Senate
00:45:03.040
race. So we'll know the answer to who is going to control the Senate. And we're going to have this
00:45:08.560
vote that Cruz and Hawley and other senators are leading tomorrow and certifying or not certifying
00:45:14.020
the, the electoral college. And some people are a little more excitable about this than others.
00:45:21.380
Probably the most outlandish claims have come from the lawyer, Lynn Wood. Lynn Wood has come out and
00:45:29.440
said, chief justice, John Roberts and other powerful individuals are caught up in a blackmail plot
00:45:35.900
involving the rape and murder of children. And this is all being run by the international
00:45:40.320
intelligence agencies. Now, the reason why this even is being brought up at all, the reason why
00:45:49.360
anybody believes in this is because the intelligence agencies have lied to us for a very long time and
00:45:54.380
they have very little credibility. My interest here is not in sussing out whether or not the chief
00:45:58.460
justice of the United States is a psychosexual sadist. It would see, it would seem unlikely to
00:46:04.400
me. If Lynn Wood has, has evidence, then he should present it. You know, I mean, that would be,
00:46:09.860
that would be pretty shocking. That'd probably give us a lot to talk about for, uh, and it'd give us at
00:46:13.900
least a week of shows, I think. But what my interest here is, is more how these sort of theories come
00:46:20.520
about. Because what the left is saying is that the right is so dishonest and the right has no care for
00:46:26.860
the truth. And all we do is listen to fake news that, uh, these sort of conspiracy theories, uh,
00:46:31.480
crop up and, and that's really all, all of our fault. The reason that Lynn Wood can go out there
00:46:39.360
and say that the chief justice of the United States is a child rapist and murderer and have
00:46:43.880
any single person in the country believe him is because Jeffrey Epstein existed. I guess he doesn't
00:46:51.580
exist anymore. It's because if, if Lynn Wood goes out and says, there's an international cabal of
00:46:58.860
extremely wealthy, influential pedophiles and, uh, and sort of rapists and all these sorts of things.
00:47:05.860
And that involves heads of industry and heads of state and even royalty and prime ministers and
00:47:11.100
presidents. Uh, the reason he could say that is because that did happen. I'm not, I don't, I'm not
00:47:16.660
saying John Roberts is like killing children or anything, but I, I am saying Jeffrey Epstein
00:47:20.240
existed. Bill Clinton flew around on his plane a lot. Prince Andrew had to resign from his family
00:47:25.120
over this. It's a real, that's a real scandal. Okay. And then Jeffrey Epstein gets a sweetheart
00:47:30.100
deal when he finally gets pinched on this stuff. And the sweetheart deal, according to Alex Acosta,
00:47:33.980
then U S attorney is because Epstein belonged to intelligence and because Epstein's associate had
00:47:40.100
direct ties to foreign intelligence. So it's not, I'm not saying Lynn Wood is telling the truth or
00:47:46.880
anything like that. What I'm saying is the people whose fault it is that there is no trust in these
00:47:53.300
institutions or the people running the institutions. It's the fault of the CIA. It's the fault of the
00:48:00.940
DOJ. It's the fault of the FBI. It's the fault of these guys who abused their power. When specifically
00:48:08.260
when it comes to the 2016 election and trying to overthrow Trump, it's the fault of Bill Clinton.
00:48:12.740
It's the fault of Prince Andrew. People always tie Trump to, to Jeffrey Epstein. Worth remembering,
00:48:18.520
Trump kicked Epstein out of his club, right? When he thought he was a shady character. So I'm not
00:48:23.640
saying there was no association, but very different kind of association than you saw with Bill Clinton.
00:48:28.900
That's how. And then Jeffrey Epstein winds up dead in prison through a series of absolutely
00:48:34.380
improbable events. And we're just told, nope, nevermind. He killed himself. Nevermind.
00:48:44.640
The, the collapse of faith in the institutions is the fault of the left.
00:48:51.720
Singularly the fault of the left. And I don't care. Look, maybe Lynn Wood is a complete nutter.
00:48:56.140
Might be. Sort of appears that way. But it's not his fault. It's not the conservative's fault.
00:49:01.780
It's the left's fault for doing this. And they do it, not even just through these institutions,
00:49:08.020
they do it in the language itself. When you come, when everything's worse than Watergate,
00:49:12.820
then I guess Watergate relatively wasn't that bad in the scheme of political scandals.
00:49:17.540
When the word amen, you know, I believe, let it, so be it. That's where, when this word of accord
00:49:25.280
is now highly politicized into radical gender politics, we lose our ability to communicate.
00:49:34.940
Not our fault. We're not the ones who push that sort of thing. The only way back is for us to not
00:49:41.880
just throw our hands up in the air and retreat to the frivolous, shallow slogans that have gotten us
00:49:48.360
by the last 10 or 15 years on the right. We have to stand for something. We need a moral vision,
00:49:54.040
or we will, in fact, fall for anything. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show. See you tomorrow.
00:50:03.860
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:50:08.420
word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe. We're available on Apple
00:50:13.560
Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Also, be sure to check out the other
00:50:18.860
Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show.
00:50:24.040
The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies, executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our
00:50:28.980
technical director is Austin Stevens, supervising producers Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling,
00:50:34.800
production manager Pavel Vidovsky, editor and associate producer Danny D'Amico, audio mixer Mike
00:50:40.980
Coromino, hair and makeup by Nika Geneva, and production assistant McKenna Waters. The Michael
00:50:46.780
Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:50:50.640
If you prefer facts over feelings, aren't offended by the brutal truth, and you can still laugh at the
00:50:56.000
insanity filling our national news cycle, well, tune in to The Ben Shapiro Show. We'll get a whole lot
00:51:02.160
Did you know that over 85% of grass-fed beef sold in U.S. grocery stores is imported? That's why I buy
00:51:12.020
all my meat from GoodRanchers.com instead. Good Ranchers products are 100% born, raised, and
00:51:17.480
harvested right here in the USA from local family farms. Plus, there's no antibiotics ever, no added
00:51:23.120
hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient. That's meat. Best of all, Good Ranchers
00:51:28.440
delivers straight to your door for added convenience. So lock in a secure supply of American
00:51:32.500
meat today. Subscribe now at GoodRanchers.com and get free meat for life and $40 off with
00:51:37.360
code DAILYWIRE. That's $40 off and free meat for life with code DAILYWIRE. Good Ranchers,