The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 684 - Fauci Unchained

00:00:00.000 Dr. Fauci feels liberated. Dr. Fauci was just giving a press conference because now, you know,

00:00:07.920 he worked for Reagan, then he worked for Bush, then Clinton, then Bush, then Obama, then Trump.

00:00:13.900 Now he's working for Joe Biden. Presidents come and go. Dr. Fauci remains. And he was asked

00:00:18.740 about the differences in working for Biden and working for Trump. He couldn't be happier.

00:00:24.700 You've joked a couple of times today already about the difference in that you feel in being

00:00:31.800 kind of the spokesperson for this issue in this administration versus the previous one.

00:00:36.700 Can you talk a little bit about about how you feel

00:00:39.600 kind of released from from what you had been doing for the last year?

00:00:45.340 Yeah, but you said I was joking about it. I was very serious about it. I wasn't joking.

00:00:51.460 No, actually, I mean, I mean, obviously, I don't want to be going back, you know, over history. But

00:00:57.780 it was very clear that there were things that were said, be it regarding things like hydroxychloroquine

00:01:03.700 and other things like that, that really was uncomfortable because they were not based on

00:01:08.320 scientific fact. I can tell you, I take no pleasure at all in being in a situation of contradicting the

00:01:15.460 president. So it was really something that you didn't feel that you could actually say something

00:01:19.800 and there wouldn't be any repercussions about it. The idea that you can get up here

00:01:24.280 and talk about what you know, what the evidence, what the science is, and know that's it. Let the

00:01:31.160 science speak. It is somewhat of a liberating feeling. It's a liberating feeling. And as Dr.

00:01:36.960 Fauci feels more and more liberated, as Dr. Fauci has more and more liberty, our liberties seem to

00:01:44.360 shrink, seem to decay, seem almost to disappear. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.

00:01:49.800 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment from yesterday is from Alex Morris, who says,

00:02:01.340 if a conservative speaks in a forest and no one is around to hear them,

00:02:06.420 censor them anyway. That's true. This is the new opinion of the left.

00:02:10.420 It used to be if conservatives are around Twitter, if they're around YouTube, if they're around your

00:02:16.200 platform with lots of liberals on it, then you should censor them. But ever since they booted

00:02:21.140 Parler from the internet, it says, yeah, send conservatives out into the middle of nowhere

00:02:25.240 and then censor them anyway. Well, we're going to have a whole lot more of that coming. And I know

00:02:30.880 it makes people feel uncomfortable. If you want to feel really comfortable, you got to check out

00:02:35.160 Buttercloth. Buttercloth is the most comfortable dress shirt you will ever wear. That is not hyperbole in

00:02:41.560 any way. I didn't believe it until I tried it. You're not going to believe it until you try it.

00:02:45.000 And you have to try it. Buttercloth is not stiff and scratchy at all, like typical men's dress shirts.

00:02:50.700 It feels like you are wearing your favorite softest t-shirt. It feels, it almost feels like

00:02:55.000 you're wearing pajamas, but it looks really sleek like a dress shirt. There's this revolutionary fabric

00:02:59.520 with long fiber cotton and six-way stretch. I figured it was some crazy synthetic thing. It's not.

00:03:04.200 It's just really, really amazing cotton. It's breathable, keeps you warm in winter and cool in summer.

00:03:09.040 They even have one shirt where it's got little mint fibers in it. So you put it on even after

00:03:13.840 you've worn it many, many times and it cools your skin down. It's unbelievable. They got the

00:03:17.740 attention of ABC's hit show Shark Tank. They got a quarter million dollar investment in it and they

00:03:22.360 should have gotten a bigger investment, frankly. You should invest in Buttercloth. They're offering

00:03:26.440 right now 20% off your first purchase to our listeners. Go to buttercloth.com slash Knowles,

00:03:31.520 receive 20% off your first full price order. That is buttercloth.com slash Knowles,

00:03:37.060 K-O-W-L-E-S. You know how much I love Buttercloth. Really, really tremendous clothing.

00:03:44.300 Dr. Fauci feels so liberated that he can finally discuss the science without having to say things

00:03:50.120 that are not based in scientific fact. Like for instance, you remember at the start of the pandemic

00:03:55.040 when Dr. Fauci came out and said, do not wear masks. Masks don't work. Masks will not stop the

00:04:00.900 spread of a virus. Maybe they'll sort of make you feel good, but they won't actually do anything to

00:04:05.380 stop the spread. You remember when he said that and then weeks later completely contradicted himself

00:04:10.900 and said, now you have to wear masks. You should wear masks all the time. Then you remember weeks

00:04:14.940 after that, as he was still discussing how much you have to wear masks and he even wore a mask in

00:04:19.160 the middle of an empty baseball stadium right on there and he tried to dribble a pitch to the

00:04:23.000 catcher. Then he went back to his seat. What did he do? Sitting right next to his friends,

00:04:26.360 takes his mask off. You remember that? I'm so glad that now he doesn't feel that he has to

00:04:32.760 contradict scientific fact. And when he was asked about this, by the way, do you know what his

00:04:36.320 excuse was? This blatant contradiction. He said, well, look, at the time I said, don't wear masks,

00:04:42.360 we wanted to save the masks for the healthcare workers. So we didn't want all the plebs buying 1.00

00:04:46.960 it. You know, we didn't want all you proles buying up all the masks. Then the important elites can't

00:04:51.420 get him. So yeah, I lied to you. I told you to, you shouldn't wear the masks at all. And then when we

00:04:57.200 found out we had enough masks for the healthcare workers, I told you something different,

00:05:00.820 but you should believe me now. Even though I'm telling you at this very second that I lied to you

00:05:05.500 at the start of the pandemic, believe me now, scientific fact. What was missed, I think,

00:05:11.640 by a lot of people in that admission that Fauci made regarding healthcare workers and the reason

00:05:16.440 why he discouraged the masks and encouraged the masks. And the reason why he's actually said this

00:05:20.660 even on possible death rates or survival rates, all these sorts of things. He said, he said he was

00:05:27.540 hoping that if he gave out a certain number that could maybe push the conversation in another

00:05:32.460 direction. He's not just reading the scientific data such as it is. He's, he's an activist. He's

00:05:39.220 trying to push society in one direction or the other. Fair enough. That's part of his job as a

00:05:44.220 scientist. But that's not science in the way that we're talking about it, right? In the way that

00:05:50.240 Fauci's joking about it at the press briefing, he's saying, I just want to look, I'm just about the

00:05:54.620 facts. I don't have a political ideology. No, you do. You do. If you're, if you're saying that

00:05:59.840 you're going to lie to the public so that certain people can get something and certain people won't

00:06:04.140 buy it all up, that's a political consideration. And that's what all of this is about. Fauci's

00:06:09.120 liberation is a liberation for the technocracy. Fauci's liberation is a liberation for the blob,

00:06:18.300 the unaccountable bureaucrats who we do not elect, who presidents come and go and they stay

00:06:24.520 there forever. And they really are liberated under Biden because Biden is nobody. Biden is

00:06:29.820 absolutely nothing. If you unbuttoned his suit jacket and unbuttoned his shirt, you could stick

00:06:35.960 your hand all the way through. There's nothing but air in there. He is nothing but a vessel for that

00:06:41.200 blob, for that liberal establishment. Most of which is beyond the scope of democratic politics. Most of

00:06:48.280 which is the major multinational corporate interest, much of which is the big technology

00:06:55.160 interest that controls the flow of information in the public square. Most of which is the

00:06:58.420 administrative state that has very little connection to democratic politics. That is a liberation. But

00:07:05.880 that liberation is directly contrary to our liberties, the liberties that we, the people,

00:07:11.960 have enjoyed and enjoyed less and less with each passing breath that Dr. Fauci takes to regurgitate 0.72

00:07:19.560 his ridiculous edicts in public. The greatest, the greatest regret I would say that I have from the

00:07:26.080 Trump administration is that Trump did not get out there on day three and fire Fauci and banish him

00:07:33.080 to a far off island. He is a power mad liar. He is so deceitful. He is utterly ignorant of political 1.00

00:07:43.160 philosophy. He's very good at practical politics, but he's, he's either ignorant or intentionally 1.00

00:07:47.940 deceitful about the nature of the American constitutional order and political philosophy.

00:07:53.620 And he's a great danger to the country. And now that dude is liberated. One thing he's very happy to

00:07:59.200 announce, Dr. Fauci, is that the United States is going to be rejoining the World Health Organization.

00:08:04.400 You remember the, the US pulled out of the WHO because the WHO is a puppet organization for the

00:08:10.180 Chinese Communist Party. And the WHO permitted China to have this virus fester in their country. 0.87

00:08:17.800 They totally carried water for China. They totally lobbied for Chinese interests,

00:08:21.920 even as the virus was beginning to spread. And the head of the, of the WHO was, was picked

00:08:27.640 by the CCP and Dr. Fauci. So pleased to announce now that that mean old Trump is gone. Now we're

00:08:34.300 getting back to business as usual for the liberal blob. We're going to rejoin the WHO.

00:08:38.500 I am honored to announce that the United States will remain a member of the World Health Organization.

00:08:49.200 Yesterday, President Biden signed the letters retracting the previous administration's

00:08:56.560 announcement to withdraw from the organization. And those letters have been transmitted to the

00:09:05.020 Secretary General of the United Nations and to you, Dr. Tedros, my dear friend.

00:09:11.920 In addition to retracting the notification of withdrawal and retaining membership in the WHO,

00:09:22.780 the United States will cease the drawdown of United States staff seconded to the WHO and will resume

00:09:34.000 regular engagement of US government personnel with the WHO both directly and through our WHO

00:09:43.800 collaborating centers. Dr. Tedros, my dear friend, Dr. Tedros. Dr. Tedros, who's the head of the WHO,

00:09:52.860 was handpicked to lead that organization by the Chinese Communist Party as part of a broader

00:09:59.040 Chinese strategy to take over these multinational international institutions, many of which fall

00:10:05.220 under the umbrella of the United Nations, which should be bulldozed and turned into the Donald

00:10:10.060 Trump Presidential Library and Casino. Beautiful waterfront property. I think it would be a wonderful,

00:10:16.260 wonderful way to celebrate the first term of Trump's presidency. He's a young man compared to Joe Biden.

00:10:23.100 There's a lot of opportunity in the future. Tedros, WHO, many of these multinational institutions,

00:10:32.680 not just the non-governmental ones, but the corporate ones too, fall under this liberal blob and they are

00:10:38.420 so happy. These guys are back in power. You want to see how creepy this is? There was a clip going

00:10:45.340 around. Maybe you've heard about the conspiracy theory of the Great Reset or the idea that a lot of

00:10:51.480 liberal people are going to exploit the coronavirus issue to reset society, rework the economy, rework 0.93

00:11:00.300 various political orders. It's a radical, crazy conspiracy. I have no idea where they would have

00:11:05.740 gotten this idea from. It's a very pertinent question to ask, how do we build back better?

00:11:11.620 To build back better or whatever.

00:11:13.700 Do we have a chance to reset the clock and build back better than before?

00:11:17.580 To build back better than before. Remember the terrible damage of COVID as we try to build back

00:11:24.620 from this global pandemic. Joe Biden calls it build back better. Build back better.

00:11:32.080 Building back better. To do things differently. To build back better.

00:11:38.080 We're going to build it back better. And build it back better.

00:11:42.060 My plan to build back better. Start taking all the problems that have been created in education

00:11:50.660 and mental health and start to build back in a positive way. I have launched a booklet called

00:11:57.940 Build Back Better. Britain After Coronavirus. It's about building this country back better.

00:12:06.580 A growing conspiracy following it. It is called The Great Reset.

00:12:12.000 An unprecedented opportunity to rethink and reset the ways in which we live.

00:12:18.640 That clip could go on for several more minutes, okay? So I understand that some people get kooky

00:12:25.600 with their theories about these kind of cabals of evil elites ruling the world. I don't think you need

00:12:31.500 any kind of conspiracy theory. People in public, the liberal elite in public are coming out and

00:12:36.360 saying, yes, we're going to use this as an opportunity to rework the economy, to rework

00:12:40.260 society, to rework the political order. There's no question about that. There's obviously cooperation

00:12:45.100 going on, not just among the liberal blob in the United States, but around the world. Certainly,

00:12:51.420 certainly a time where we want to feel safe and secure, not just in our persons, but in our

00:12:57.100 personal data. That's why you got to check out LifeLock. A new tactic for stealing your credit

00:13:02.360 card and personal information has recently been discovered. This new web skimming attack or e-skimming

00:13:07.500 injects malicious code into a compromised e-commerce website's checkout process that pulls your order

00:13:13.320 information to display it on a fake checkout page that steals your information. It is important to

00:13:18.680 understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. Every day, we put our information

00:13:24.080 at risk on the internet. You could miss certain identity threats by just monitoring your credit,

00:13:29.200 which is why there's LifeLock. LifeLock is a leader in identity theft protection. It is so easy. I didn't

00:13:36.140 used to think this either. I used to think, ah, well, they're not going after my information.

00:13:40.140 They are, and it's very easy to get. No one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all

00:13:44.180 transactions at all businesses. LifeLock can see threats that you might miss on your own.

00:13:48.280 Join now and save up to 25% off your first year at LifeLock.com slash Knowles,

00:13:53.800 Canada view L-E-S. That is LifeLock.com slash Knowles, Canada view L-E-S for 25% off.

00:14:00.940 Use LifeLock. Do not go on the internet without LifeLock.

00:14:06.920 This idea of building back better, this idea of some people are calling it the great reset.

00:14:14.420 I don't really use that term because it sounds conspiratorial and it sounds like secret and

00:14:21.020 nefarious. It certainly is nefarious, but it's all out in public. You have plenty of these liberal

00:14:26.520 elites, some of the elected politicians and many unelected people describing this. And the way that

00:14:32.120 one builds back better or the way that one resets society is not really done through democratic

00:14:37.900 politics. In a way it is. Some of these people are elected, but mostly how this will be done is at

00:14:43.620 the administrative level or at the corporate level, also beyond the realm of democratic accountability.

00:14:51.900 When you put people out of work for nine months, 10 months, it's more than that now, I guess. I guess

00:14:56.600 we're coming up on a year, aren't we? When you put people out of work for that long, you make them

00:15:04.360 much more vulnerable to these sort of plans. You gin up society. You encourage the sort of riots that we

00:15:11.120 saw all year long. You clamp down on political rights. Now you can't, you can't go to church still

00:15:18.160 in many places. You could always go buy a dime bag of pot in California. You could always go to those

00:15:26.640 essential services, but you couldn't go to church. And the excuse for this was public health. Well,

00:15:33.380 who runs the public health? It's this bureaucracy. It's this doctor dictatorship. It's Dr. Fauci liberated.

00:15:39.320 And where, where do our liberties go with that liberation? Very, very creepy. There is one set

00:15:47.480 of rules for the people. There is one set of rules for the liberal elite. We talked about this a lot

00:15:53.240 yesterday. We mentioned yesterday how Joe Biden issued a mask mandate. He said on federal lands,

00:16:02.020 you must always wear a mask, no exceptions at all times. He then hours later goes to the Lincoln

00:16:09.000 Memorial to participate in this ritual. He goes, brings his entire family. Well, not the, not the

00:16:15.120 grandchildren that he refuses to acknowledge, but he brought the family that he will acknowledge.

00:16:19.880 He brings them to the Lincoln Memorial and they're just cello playing and it's all very beautiful.

00:16:24.620 They're not wearing masks. None of them are wearing masks. Hours after he mandated that all the rest of us

00:16:29.500 wear masks at these very places. Jen Psaki, the press secretary now for Biden was asked to question

00:16:36.020 about this yesterday. I said, you know, isn't that a kind of a mixed message that we're getting? We're

00:16:40.800 told you, everyone has to wear masks, but then Biden and his entire family won't wear masks themselves.

00:16:46.020 Psaki had a weak answer. Why weren't President Biden and all members of the Biden family masked at all

00:16:52.620 times on federal lands last night, if he signed an executive order that mandates masks on federal

00:16:58.280 lands at all times at the inaugural memorial. Yes. I think Steve, he was celebrating an evening of a

00:17:09.360 historic day in our country. And certainly he signed the mask mandate because it's a way to send a 0.74

00:17:14.860 message to the American public about the importance of wearing masks, how it can save tens of thousands

00:17:21.160 of lives. We take a number of COVID precautions, as you know, here in terms of testing, social distancing,

00:17:27.200 mask wearing ourselves as, as we do every single day. But I don't know that I have more for you on

00:17:33.220 it than that. Oh man. First, the first take that I have on this is not even having to do with the

00:17:39.420 substance, which we'll get to in a second. My first take is this woman is really bad at her job. I know 1.00

00:17:44.100 that the press are going to say she's wonderful and brave and stunning and glorious and everything.

00:17:47.920 Kayleigh McEnany, whether you like her or not, you should like her. She's just tremendous. But

00:17:52.280 even if you don't like her, you have to acknowledge she was very good at her job. She was very, very

00:17:57.480 good. She was always so prepared. She had killer answers. She had mic drop moments. Sarah Sanders,

00:18:02.620 incredibly good at her job. Okay. The Trump press secretaries did a great job. This woman fumbling 1.00

00:18:10.520 around. Well, uh, uh, he, uh, he didn't wear the mask because he wanted to send a message. Oh, he sent a

00:18:16.020 message. Oh, honey, he sent a message. It wasn't the message that you seem to think he's sending.

00:18:21.020 It wasn't the message that the masks are really important and we've all got to wear them. The

00:18:25.380 message he sent was there's going to be one set of rules for you, the peasants, and there's going

00:18:30.940 to be one set of rules for me and my family. And that's been true for the Biden family for many

00:18:35.320 years. If anybody did what the Biden family did in Ukraine, in China, selling political influence

00:18:43.540 for millions and millions of dollars, they would be in orange jumpsuits. Not the Biden family,

00:18:50.780 not the liberal elite, not the liberal establishment. Goes all the way down to the masks.

00:18:55.980 Well, he wanted to send a message of how important, if he wanted to send the message of how important

00:18:58.860 the masks are, he should wear the mask. We always, we who are on the staff, we always wear the mask.

00:19:03.700 You're not wearing a mask right now, are you Jen Psaki? No, you're not because it doesn't matter

00:19:08.160 because no one, no one believes, no one pushing the mask rules really believes that the masks do

00:19:15.400 anything. There are some gullible people out there who think that the masks are very important to

00:19:20.400 public health. But I, I promise you, Dr. Fauci doesn't think so. He told us he doesn't think so.

00:19:25.980 And then in his own behavior, he's demonstrated he doesn't think so. Jen Psaki doesn't think so.

00:19:30.560 She's not wearing the mask. The reporters who were in the press briefing room during the Trump

00:19:34.400 administration don't think so. They'd have their masks on for show during the press conference. 0.85

00:19:38.200 And when they thought the cameras were turned off, but sometimes they weren't turned off.

00:19:41.780 The minute the, the lights go down, they take the mask off. They don't believe this. Joe Biden

00:19:47.240 doesn't believe the masks matter. He doesn't wear one. Even after he mandates that everyone else wear

00:19:51.540 one on the exact spot where he's standing, he doesn't make his family wear one. None of these people

00:19:56.420 believe it. The idea that anybody could watch the Biden family traipse around these federal lands

00:20:02.060 without masks hours after he signs the mask mandate and still believe that the masks are anything but

00:20:08.240 a political prop astounds me. It is all about a new hierarchy. It's all about a new caste system.

00:20:17.580 It's all about one set of rules for the and one set of rules for me. You're going to see this

00:20:26.080 increase. There was a video yesterday posted by Biden to YouTube titled President Biden's

00:20:32.020 Wears in Day One Presidential Appointees in a Virtual Ceremony. This was posted on January 20th,

00:20:37.520 day he was inaugurated. The comments were turned off. Now, I think they've since been turned back on

00:20:46.220 and it, and we've now learned why they were turned off in the first place. This thing was ratioed as

00:20:52.360 can be. I think got about 5,000 likes and 25,000 dislikes, not a good ratio. And one does not even

00:20:58.540 want to look at the comments. This is what you're going to see. We talked about it yesterday. In the

00:21:04.620 name of democracy, we're going to see behavior that is very anti-democratic. We're going to see

00:21:11.040 Fauci liberated. We're already seeing that happen. And it's a very ugly thing. The reason they do this

00:21:18.800 is because they know that if they open up their agenda to democratic accountability, they'll lose.

00:21:25.040 They, I'm even, I'm going to put the election aside for a second. There are many questions that

00:21:30.240 one may have about, about the election and elections moving forward. I'm going to put that aside for a

00:21:34.740 second. If you put out there, if you said, I'll give an example that's very popular. If you said,

00:21:42.280 hey, I want a referendum on whether or not to let grown men into the girls changing room at the public

00:21:47.840 pool. How do you think that would do at a fair open ballot? I think probably it would be like 90 to 10

00:21:56.120 against that measure, right? I, I, there's no way that would pass. And yet the left with their vessel,

00:22:05.980 Joe Biden are pushing for that. Actually that specific example, they've already pushed for through

00:22:11.180 an executive order. Joe Biden, this is one of his first acts as president. Don't tell me he's going to

00:22:15.860 be moderate. He won't. He signs this order that reads in part, quote, every person should be treated

00:22:22.460 with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom

00:22:27.100 they love. Blah, blah, blah. Obviously just nothing, nothing, platitude, platitude. Give me the meat.

00:22:31.960 What does this mean? Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be

00:22:36.680 denied access to the restroom, the locker room or school sports. Hold up. As far as I know,

00:22:43.860 no child is told he can't use the bathroom or he can't play sports or he can't go to the locker

00:22:49.000 room. I don't see any example of that anywhere in the country unless Joe Biden is using a euphemism

00:22:56.320 here. Is he saying that it's not that children are denied access to play sports. It's that little

00:23:01.240 boys are denied access to play girl sports. That's what he's saying. Adults should be able to learn,

00:23:06.900 to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted or mistreated

00:23:11.160 because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based

00:23:16.280 stereotypes. People should be able to access healthcare and secure a roof over their heads

00:23:19.760 without being subjected to sex discrimination. All persons should receive equal treatment under

00:23:23.640 the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation. And there it is. There it is.

00:23:28.380 In one fell swoop, Joe Biden eliminated through executive order, girls' sports, girls' bathrooms, 1.00

00:23:35.660 girls' changing rooms. This pervert, and you know, I've, I've held off on calling him a pervert, 0.88

00:23:41.720 even when we were all making fun of the hair sniffing and all that stuff. I held off. I felt 0.97

00:23:45.400 it was kind of a cheap political shot. He's, he's a back slapper, not a pervert. This executive order

00:23:49.880 is perverted. It's sick. It's deranged. This sicko on his first day in office, second day in office, 0.96

00:23:58.200 makes it a top priority to let grown men into the little girls' changing room. Sick, sick stuff could 1.00

00:24:05.320 only ever happen through executive order. You know, Joe Biden has been right a couple of times.

00:24:14.560 I would say at, at most a couple of times. Broken clocks are right a couple of times a day. If you

00:24:21.360 want a clock that works though, you got to check out Vincero. These watches, they're super cool. They

00:24:25.980 look fabulous. Very, very stylish. A little, a little more intricate maybe than some other watches

00:24:31.720 on the market. They look tremendous and the price is really, really, really reasonable. Finding a watch

00:24:39.720 that is stylish, bold, and built to last can cost a pretty penny. Vincero watches are changing that.

00:24:47.420 They believe that you deserve to look good no matter your budget. You deserve better than settling for

00:24:52.180 something. Underwhelming. With the new year, they are now offering a five-year warranty and a 365-day

00:24:58.400 return policy. These are some of the best promises in the business. You're not going to want to return

00:25:03.280 it. When you put it on, you will know that you got more than you paid for. This is the best value for

00:25:08.840 your money, guaranteed. It's a little more of an intricate design. They look really, really good.

00:25:14.120 They've got 20,000 five-star reviews. It's really high-quality stuff. This deal is too good to pass

00:25:21.420 up. Get the year started right. Go to V-I-N-C-E-R-O watches.com forward slash Knowles to get 15% off

00:25:30.000 auto-applied at checkout. If you use that link, do not pay full price on these beautiful timepieces.

00:25:35.060 Head on over to VinceroWatches.com slash Knowles for 15% off right now. Go get them. I just ordered a new

00:25:42.500 one. I just ordered the Bellwether. I think it looks super sleek and stylish. Go check out Vincero.

00:25:48.440 Now that Biden is showing his radicalism, we are seeing pushback already with one

00:25:55.360 congressman, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, filing articles of impeachment against Joe Biden

00:26:03.060 already. He's two days into his presidency now. She's already filed articles of impeachment. I think

00:26:09.960 it's absolutely hilarious. Here is her reasoning. He's filed articles of impeachment on President

00:26:15.440 Joe Biden. We'll see how this goes. Now I say that's her reasoning because that's basically all

00:26:21.260 impeachment is going to mean from now on. I think the legal argument has something to do with the

00:26:27.280 massive evidence of his corruption in China, which was suppressed by the big tech companies

00:26:32.220 before the election, the Hunter Biden scandal that was completely shut down. You couldn't even message

00:26:37.240 the article because they wanted to throw the election for Joe Biden. And then only after it

00:26:41.200 didn't matter anymore, did they finally reopen that. There was a study that came out from the

00:26:46.900 Media Research Center that I think it was something like 14% of Biden voters could have changed their

00:26:53.060 vote had they known about that scandal. So that's, I guess, ostensibly the legal basis, but that's not

00:26:57.500 really. The basis for impeachment is purely political in this case, which is you're going to impeach my guy

00:27:05.200 multiple times. Well, I'm going to impeach your guy. And that's probably the way politics is going to start

00:27:10.660 working. Probably they're, I mean, they're still impeaching the past, the previous president. So there

00:27:19.380 will, there will be a Senate impeachment trial for Donald Trump who cannot be impeached because he's no

00:27:23.740 longer in office. And I know that there are some people who think this is an open constitutional

00:27:27.540 question. It's constitutionally absurd that the president can be convicted, impeached and convicted

00:27:33.480 after he has left office. It cannot happen. And if it does happen, it's a constitutional absurdity

00:27:40.820 and outrage. So now the Republicans are going to file impeachment against Biden. Fine by me.

00:27:46.860 Totally fine by me. Why? Is it because I think impeachment should be used this way? No, I don't

00:27:53.100 think impeachment should be used this way. I think there's a wrong way to use impeachment.

00:27:56.540 But impeachment is used this way. And I don't think that we're going to restore

00:28:01.580 a more dignified kind of politics by unilaterally disarming. I think that's what we've done for a

00:28:07.500 very long time. And it, and it didn't work out very well. We kind of tried this already. You know,

00:28:12.680 Barack Obama committed impeachable offenses, notably in his IRS scandal, uh, notable fast and

00:28:19.480 furious would be another example, but the IRS was really bad. DOJ, he, uh, spied on his political

00:28:25.680 rivals and tried to undermine their campaigns. If we're allowed to now impeach and convict presidents

00:28:29.920 after they've left office, let's do that. Let's impeach Obama. But we tried. Okay. I don't,

00:28:35.920 I don't want to hear, this is what we're going to hear. They're going to say Republicans started all

00:28:39.520 of this because in the nineties they impeached Bill Clinton over some eccentric activities in

00:28:45.400 the Oval Office, private matter. Well, that's not true. He was impeached for perjury, but

00:28:49.360 even putting that aside, okay, let's say, let's say the Clinton impeachment was ill-advised. Let's say

00:28:53.520 it was politically. Okay. Or partisan rather, rather than having a legal basis. Fine. We did

00:29:01.540 not impeach Barack Obama when we could have. John Boehner and Mitch McConnell refused to do it.

00:29:07.340 Did that buy us goodwill? Did that restore us to a dignified kind of politics? No. They impeached

00:29:13.060 Trump. They actually did exactly what Marjorie Taylor Greene did. Everyone remembers, well,

00:29:18.220 the current impeachment and they remember the, the impeachment a year ago. People forget the

00:29:23.400 articles of impeachment filed in 2017. Representative Al Green. Interestingly, it was

00:29:28.540 another representative Green who first proposed impeaching Trump in 2017, right at the beginning

00:29:34.820 of his presidency. Why? Well, Green's argument was if we don't impeach Trump, he might get reelected.

00:29:40.260 That's the argument for impeaching him now. They're saying if we don't impeach Trump and convict him

00:29:44.500 in the Senate, he might run for office again and get reelected. Does that sound like people who think

00:29:49.660 that they have the majority of Americans on their side? Does that sound like people who think that

00:29:55.860 democracy is going to triumph for them? Does that sound like people who believe their views are really,

00:30:01.920 really popular? I don't think so. I think it sounds like people who, who know that the only way that

00:30:07.060 they're going to win is through chicanery, through irregularity. I'll leave it at that. 1.00

00:30:12.960 You know, Mitch McConnell wants to delay this impeachment trial. Mitch McConnell, so the

00:30:25.560 conviction already happened. Mitch McConnell wants to delay the impeachment until mid-February.

00:30:30.320 So according to McConnell's timeline, the impeachment article would be read before the Senate on January

00:30:34.960 28th. Then Trump would have to respond by February 4th, even though he's out of office. Then he would have

00:30:40.940 another week until February 11th at the latest to submit a pre-trial brief. Then the House would be

00:30:46.040 required to submit a pre-trial brief by February 4th also. Then a rebuttal pre-trial brief would,

00:30:51.920 would happen February 13th. Then you get the impeachment trial.

00:30:58.720 Very strange. Obviously, we've never been in a situation like this before.

00:31:01.800 And even this whole idea of the impeachment, I mean, we were saying it traces back to Bill Clinton.

00:31:08.640 It doesn't. It actually goes back to, to Richard Nixon. You know, Watergate. And you know all those

00:31:15.540 things that are worse than Watergate today. Everything is worse than Watergate today. But

00:31:18.740 it really did begin. The Democrats did start all of this with Nixon. And it was ridiculous because

00:31:23.000 Nixon's offenses were, were nothing compared to what had been done by his predecessors who were 0.56

00:31:27.300 Democrats. But they really wanted to oust him because he was an effective and pretty tough

00:31:31.620 president. So we've, we've never done this. We've never removed a president from office through

00:31:37.280 impeachment. And, and we've certainly never removed a president for, from office after he left office

00:31:42.840 through impeachment. That's not even how impeachment works. But, so McConnell's trying to push it off and

00:31:48.460 push it off and push it off. I don't think this is about helping Trump. I think this is about gaining

00:31:52.420 leverage. Okay. I think this is about saying, look, Democrats, you're going to have this big

00:31:58.320 ambitious agenda. And I right now could make, I could give you your conviction. I could keep Trump

00:32:02.960 out of running for office again, or maybe I couldn't, maybe I could stand in the way. What

00:32:05.740 do you want? What do you want to do? I think Mitch McConnell's a wheeler and dealer. I don't think

00:32:08.880 he has any special love for Trump. And I think they're going to drag this out as leverage, which

00:32:13.240 one can expect. But if they do convict Trump, I don't even know what it means to convict Trump

00:32:19.780 after he's left office. That will make this problem so, so much worse. And we're not going to

00:32:26.080 win that argument through concession. We're not going to win this battle by playing nice. They don't

00:32:33.260 want to play nice with us. We need to get tougher. We need to assert ourselves. We need to stand up

00:32:39.100 with greater courage. You know, Joe Biden, one of the most disgusting aspects of his presidency,

00:32:45.540 and it's already pretty disgusting, is that he blasphemes his religion. He uses his religion 0.98

00:32:51.880 blasphemously to justify major, major evils, such as abortion and trying to get taxpayers to fund

00:32:58.660 abortion, that sort of thing, and questions of gender and everything else. So the USCCB, the US

00:33:04.180 Council of Catholic Bishops, usually a very weak organization, they came out under Archbishop Jose

00:33:09.240 Gomez, who I really like actually. I think he's a good guy. He came out and he criticized President

00:33:15.200 Biden, and he said, you know, this is really bad. I must, and he said all these nice things about

00:33:20.380 Biden, but then he said, I must point out that our new president has pledged to pursue certain

00:33:23.120 policies that would advance moral evils and threaten human life and dignity, most seriously

00:33:28.060 in the areas of abortion, but also contraception, marriage, gender, and the liberty of the church.

00:33:32.680 Now, Cardinal Cupich, who some, some people who are very rude have called Cardinal Cupcake,

00:33:38.080 but it's very rude. Cupich and other corrupt people in the Catholic church have pushed back on this,

00:33:43.640 said, how dare you stand up for unborn babies? Let, let them all die. Let, let Biden pursue his, 1.00

00:33:48.660 his murder, murderous agenda unimpeded. Come on, how dare you? I love that Gomez stood up here,

00:33:55.280 Archbishop Gomez. I wish that the bishops would stand up even further. Joe Biden must be excommunicated.

00:34:00.640 This is, he, he is in a state of grave mortal sin. Excommunication is not just a punishment.

00:34:05.200 It's something that one does out of compassion to right the guy's soul and to right the souls of the

00:34:11.720 flock because not just of the grave sin of supporting abortion, but this grave sin of 0.67

00:34:16.540 scandal, which is being incurred. But as long as we refuse to assert ourselves, as long as we refuse

00:34:22.920 to have courage, the worst elements of society are going to be liberated and it's going to be much

00:34:27.620 more difficult to, to reign them back in. You know, we just crossed 400,000 subscribers. Be sure

00:34:34.360 to check out RIP to the funniest commander in tweets, which are the funniest tweets from Trump's

00:34:39.740 presidency. We, we put this out there as a sort of in memoriam to Trump's Twitter account,

00:34:45.940 not even just to the administration, but the tweets, they're really, really tremendous.

00:34:49.560 Last night I walked in to sweet little Lisa because I was reading through some of Trump's

00:34:54.080 tweets on Diet Coke. And one of them I loved when he was attacking Diet Coke. He went out and he said,

00:34:59.780 you know, Coca-Cola is very angry with me because of my comments on Diet Coke. That's okay.

00:35:05.840 I'll still keep drinking that garbage. That is such a brilliant, so complex, so bizarre. And there 0.98

00:35:15.720 were some, so many wonderful tweets like that. So go check it out. Go check out Daily Wire's first

00:35:18.740 movie, Run, Hide, Fight. You know, we're in the entertainment game now. We got our first movie

00:35:22.460 out. The critics hate it and the audience loves it. It's got, it's got like a 2% critics on Rotten

00:35:27.860 Tomatoes and it's got like a 98% audience score because the movie is not politically correct and it's

00:35:33.780 not, you know, really nice and liberal and everything. So go check it out. You can get

00:35:37.340 25% off if you use promo code RHF to become a Daily Wire member. That is RHF for 25% off.

00:35:43.760 We will be right back with the mailbag.

00:35:57.900 All right. First question from Keith. Dear Michael, in several of your shows, you've said reality will

00:36:02.560 always reassert itself. Our culture and politics seem to careen further left for the next four years

00:36:08.340 under Biden's administration. In your opinion, what will be the first ways or areas in which

00:36:13.060 reality will begin to reassert itself against the insanity of the left and how far will our country

00:36:17.740 and culture have to sink before that happens? Well, we are seeing it reassert itself in one way

00:36:22.660 and it's this issue we were just talking about today. The girls' bathrooms thing

00:36:26.600 really seems to be an important issue and a wedge issue. When I say a wedge issue, I mean it drives a

00:36:34.120 wedge between our political opponents. You've got the left brought, let's say on the left you've got

00:36:39.120 feminists and you've got these gender ideologues, right? These kind of the transgenderists. 1.00

00:36:46.720 They're leftists, right? Feminists included. They're leftists. We're conservatives. But this issue 1.00

00:36:52.420 of the transgender bathrooms splits the left. It drives a wedge in between them, between the 1.00

00:36:56.220 feminists who say, wait a second, girls ought to be able to have sports. Girls ought to be able to 1.00

00:37:00.400 change in privacy. Girls ought to be able to have their own bathrooms. This is what we've been 1.00

00:37:04.160 fighting for for decades. And the transgenderists who say there's no such thing as girls, honey, 0.90

00:37:09.420 you know, men can define femininity and actually being a woman is nothing more than slapping on some

00:37:15.060 lipstick and a pair of stilettos. And then the feminists saying, what? How dare you? You can't 1.00

00:37:19.300 reduce femininity to that and then they sort of duke it out. And you see this in the battles between

00:37:24.240 J.K. Rowling, famously, and other leftists. J.K. Rowling is what you'd call a trans-exclusive

00:37:29.860 radical feminist. There's nothing radical about her view on gender. She's saying men and women are

00:37:34.900 different, right? There's nothing radical at all about that. The radical view is that men and women

00:37:39.740 are not different. So I do think that's one way in which reality will reassert itself. It is important

00:37:43.760 to recall, though, that conservative consolation is reality eventually reasserts itself, but it can

00:37:49.740 take a while. It can take a long time. French Revolution took a long time, okay? Lots of bad 0.98

00:37:57.180 things can happen in the meantime. There's something I noticed. You know, conservatives often talk about,

00:38:02.200 and I'll talk about it on the show too, the kind of progressive utopian view of politics, that the arc

00:38:07.140 of history bends toward justice. And we kind of make fun of that. And it's right to make fun of that

00:38:11.680 because the view is preposterous. However, conservatives have an analogous view, right?

00:38:18.480 Christians have a view. We think that history will end up in justice. It's just that it'll get a lot

00:38:23.380 worse before then in the end times, and then we'll have the second coming of Christ, and we'll have 0.95

00:38:28.160 this wonderful new heaven and new earth, right? Progressivism is just, in so many ways, an aping

00:38:36.480 of Christianity, an inversion of Christianity. We've talked about this many times on the show.

00:38:41.720 Political correctness is an anti-standard. It's a new speech code to overthrow the old moral codes.

00:38:48.300 And so you're seeing these analogous sorts of things. But when we say reality reasserts itself

00:38:54.880 in the end, we're making a similar claim to, you know, the arc of history bends toward justice.

00:38:59.020 But even for the progressives, when they say the arc of history bends toward justice,

00:39:02.560 well, it might take a long time, right? And they talk about that as well. So I think it is important

00:39:07.460 to recognize the similarities between our views. The difference is that theirs is a kind of mirror

00:39:13.320 image, you know, inversion of the true principle and the true moral order. From Matthew, future

00:39:21.020 press secretary Knowles, will Daily Wire hire a White House reporter for the Daily Wire to ask the

00:39:26.360 challenging questions of the Biden administration? You know, to compete with mainstream media and

00:39:30.020 actually get real reporting. I recommend Kayleigh McEnany. Yeah, she would be pretty great. Oh my gosh,

00:39:34.860 could you imagine if we sent Kayleigh in as the White House reporter asking questions of Jen Psaki, 0.98

00:39:40.580 who appears to have some whistling going on between the ears, just not quite up to the job in the way

00:39:46.780 that her predecessors in the Trump administration were? That'd be great. I can't imagine Biden would

00:39:50.660 ever let us in. I just don't see that happening. Conservatives always take questions from these

00:39:55.760 leftist reporters, but the left does not usually take questions of right-wing reporters. Very,

00:40:00.740 very few. One exception might be Peter Doocy. Peter Doocy from Fox News actually does very good work

00:40:06.920 and has needled Joe Biden for a long time, but that's it. You know, they'll let the one, maybe

00:40:11.620 one outlet out, which isn't even all that conservative these days. I don't think they

00:40:17.760 would let someone who's strongly conservative really in, into the room. So sadly, I don't think,

00:40:23.000 I think we're going to get a whole lot more questions of, so what color drapes does Joe want in the

00:40:27.900 Oval Office? Wow, what a fascinating question. From Daniel, Michael, I've noticed that you like

00:40:32.160 to use the phrase, the Protestant Revolution, to describe what they call the Reformation,

00:40:37.040 but a revolution implies the overthrow of a whole system, such as the French or Russian

00:40:41.200 revolutions. As it is inaccurate to term the American separation from Britain a revolution,

00:40:46.420 right, because it didn't overthrow Great Britain, likewise, it seems inaccurate to call the separation

00:40:50.360 of the Protestants from the Roman church a revolution. The church has not been overthrown,

00:40:54.520 but a schism has occurred. A Roman Catholic friend of mine calls it the Protestant schism,

00:40:59.540 and that seems a more appropriate description. What do you think? I agree with that. I think as a

00:41:03.480 matter of religion and theology, Protestant schism is more precise, just like you talk about the Great

00:41:11.060 Schism between the East and the West, right, that happened a thousand years ago. However, I still prefer, 1.00

00:41:17.420 for the purposes of this show, I still prefer the term Protestant Revolution, because putting religion

00:41:23.940 aside, that certainly the various Protestant denominations didn't overthrow the Catholic

00:41:28.960 church, but as a political matter, they did. As a political matter, the Protestants won.

00:41:36.360 The Protestant revolution, and by the way, I tend to view the Protestant, what is, whether you call it

00:41:41.420 the Protestant, I mean, it wasn't a reformation in the sense that it didn't reform the church,

00:41:46.160 it just created another church. So it's, I really don't use the term reformation, but whether you want

00:41:50.960 to call it a schism or a revolution or whatever, as a political matter, the Protestants won. You know,

00:41:58.340 what happened out of the Protestant revolution was you had all of these kind of wars of religion,

00:42:02.980 you had the 30 Years' War, and then the end of the 30 Years' War was the Peace of Westphalia,

00:42:06.640 which in 1648 established our system of nation-states. The world order, as we know it today,

00:42:12.640 was a product directly of the Protestant revolution. You would not have this system of nation-states

00:42:19.020 without it. And so, as a result, I do consider that to be a revolution. And I don't, who knows

00:42:25.240 what the next world order will be. You know, we're always, we always hear this term, the new world

00:42:29.080 order, a one world government, kind of going back to an empire model, but not a Christian empire. It's

00:42:33.960 like some kind of weird, secular, atheist, liberal empire, whatever. I just mean, until there is another

00:42:41.140 world order, you know, that, that revolution defines our political world. And so, I, I do prefer that

00:42:48.540 term. But I think precisely as a, as a religious matter, yes, it is, it is a schism. From Mitchell,

00:42:53.760 Dear Mr. Knowles, I am a 16-year-old writing from St. Paul, Minnesota. Believe it or not,

00:42:58.480 there are conservatives there. I was recently having a discussion with a friend and he proposed

00:43:02.340 getting rid of the two-party system because it seemed to result in the two sides hating each other.

00:43:06.280 However, we struggled to find a system to replace it. Would you recommend getting rid of the

00:43:09.940 two-party system? If so, what would you recommend replacing it with? No, I would not get rid of it.

00:43:13.340 I'm a great defender of the two-party system. The two-party system is good. If you have 20

00:43:19.140 different parties, like they have in many European countries, you have usually chaos and governments

00:43:24.500 collapsing. And sometimes you have radical parties empowered because more mainstream parties kind of

00:43:33.360 split the more mainstream vote and the radicals can kind of get in there sometimes. So I don't like

00:43:38.780 that at all. If you're saying we need to get rid of party politics altogether, that's just not going

00:43:43.500 to happen. We've had a two-party system in this country from the very beginning. We had this

00:43:49.120 Washington administration, which was nonpartisan theoretically, but it was federalist, right?

00:43:56.480 Leaned federalist. And you then had the federalists and you had then the Jeffersonian Republican

00:44:04.780 Democrats, right? Then you had other parties that cropped up in the wake. Andrew Jackson founded

00:44:10.640 the Democratic Party. You had the Whig Party. You had Abraham Lincoln sort of found the Republican

00:44:16.080 Party as the first Republican president. Not the first Republican nominee, but that party is founded

00:44:20.720 in 1854. First National Convention is 1856. First President is 1860. And you've had those two parties

00:44:27.340 ever since then. We might have a new party. I'm fine with that. I don't have any particular love

00:44:31.640 for the Republican Party. And I certainly don't have affection for the Democratic Party.

00:44:36.020 But I think we ought to probably keep, we will keep the party system. And I hope, I hope we keep 0.97

00:44:40.200 the two-party system for the purposes of having any kind of moderation or, or continuity in our

00:44:48.280 politics. From Brendan. Dear he who turns the covfefe up to 11. How palatable would the idea be of

00:44:56.080 admitting Puerto Rico as a state alongside rural parts of Northern California and Eastern Oregon

00:45:00.440 to make the state of Jefferson a proposed Pacific state. States were admitted as pairs of free and

00:45:05.120 slave states to maintain the balance of political power previously in our history. Do you think the 0.67

00:45:09.460 shared desire to grant statehood to these areas along with the resulting maintained balance of

00:45:14.860 political power would make this idea possible or even preferable for both sides of the political

00:45:18.980 aisle? Could you please explain too why Puerto Rico would be a lock for two Democratic senators 0.63

00:45:23.500 with no chance of Republicans winning either seat? Thanks. Well, if you just look at the political

00:45:28.000 preferences of Puerto Ricans, it's left wing. So I'm not saying that couldn't change over time,

00:45:33.680 but it would be, it would be a practical matter. It would be a lock if Puerto Rico were admitted as

00:45:39.800 a state. I don't like the idea of admitting Puerto Rico along with the proposed state of Jefferson or

00:45:45.040 something. One, because you'd have a lot of trouble if you started carving up U.S. states. Separations do 0.93

00:45:52.440 not happen peacefully. Separations of political territories into new political territories have

00:45:59.180 never happened peacefully as far as I can tell in this country or in the world rather. Very, very rarely.

00:46:05.560 So you'd, you'd be, you'd be hard pressed to do that, I think. I would be, as a practical matter,

00:46:11.500 no state is going to want to let itself be cracked up. And what would the purpose be? If you're going to

00:46:17.120 maintain the balance of power, why admit Puerto Rico is a state? I don't even see the argument for

00:46:21.560 admitting Puerto Rico is a state. If you could present a compelling argument for why it would

00:46:25.460 be advantageous to the country to admit Puerto Rico is a state, then I guess we could talk about how to

00:46:30.280 do it and maintain the balance of power. But, but even that, that idea of a compromise, by the way,

00:46:35.540 reminds us of the 1850s, which you're talking about in the mid 19th century, states were admitted

00:46:40.720 one slave, one free to maintain the balance of power. That got us a civil war. You know, that was,

00:46:47.080 I do not look to the 1850s as my load star when I'm trying to craft politics. And I fear that we're

00:46:54.780 in a situation that has some parallels to the 1850s. And if you were to get into a situation where

00:46:59.580 you're now admitting one democratic state, one Republican state, and you're banking on those

00:47:03.980 states remaining that way to maintain the balance of power, that is a, that is a scary situation to

00:47:09.820 be in. And I don't want to further provoke civil strife. From Ruby, Michael, I want to buy a Bible

00:47:16.040 and I'm overwhelmed with the number of options. I have done some research and I narrowed it down to

00:47:20.140 the NIV, the NET, and the RSV Bible. Do not buy the NIV. First thought, any word of advice would be

00:47:26.900 appreciated. Love your show. Thanks for all that you do. Yes, I would recommend, obviously I would

00:47:31.200 recommend a Catholic Bible. So, you know, you get the deuterocanonical books. It's a little bit

00:47:35.840 longer. The deuterocanonical books are the books that were taken out after the Protestant 0.87

00:47:38.960 Revolution. But so you get some extra books, get more bang for your buck in that way. And I

00:47:43.080 suspect more wisdom. If you were going to get a Catholic Bible, I would recommend the RSVCE, 1.00

00:47:50.320 the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition, or better yet, the Douay Reims, which is one of the

00:47:55.300 best Bible translations ever in history. If you don't want to do that, if that's a little too

00:48:00.640 macro snapping for your speed, then I would recommend getting the ESV for readability is a good

00:48:07.420 Protestant Bible. And the KJV is the most beautiful. I mean, that's just one of the greatest

00:48:11.940 works of literature ever produced in the English language. Well, I suppose a little less so for

00:48:17.780 readability, but it's still, you know, it's so beautiful. So maybe if you're going to buy a

00:48:23.140 Protestant Bible, I'd buy both of those, ESV and KJV. And I guess same thing is true for Catholic

00:48:28.400 Bible. If you're going to buy a Catholic Bible in English, maybe buy the RSVCE and the Douay Reims. 0.86

00:48:33.400 Sorry that I just spent more of your money for you. But I think, I think it's good to have both

00:48:36.700 with the sort of heightened, beautiful language and the readability. From Gavin. Hi, Michael. Love

00:48:42.320 the show. In the past, you've criticized soccer and other sports as un-American and referenced

00:48:47.180 boxing as a superior alternative. As someone who practices in fights in several combat sports,

00:48:51.820 I agree. However, I'm also a practicing Catholic and have often heard sports like boxing deemed

00:48:56.420 immoral, which is why though I practice striking sports such as boxing, I only compete in grappling

00:49:01.380 competitions like wrestling. What is your opinion on the morality of training and or competing in

00:49:05.780 mixed martial arts? Is it wrong to watch the UFC? Thanks. Hashtag came for Ben, stayed for Knowles.

00:49:10.680 I don't think it's wrong. No. I mean, you know, I'm coming from a perspective though, where my,

00:49:15.680 my priest is a boxer. Okay. So he's not a professional boxer, obviously, but he's, he is,

00:49:21.120 he's boxed. So I, I think it's a, it is a beautiful sport, right? It is sort of the,

00:49:25.760 the beautiful sport. And soccer is not, it's not the beautiful sport though. That, that is a popular

00:49:32.340 idea. It's just, it's kind of soft, you know, it's kind of boring. It's foreign. You just don't 1.00

00:49:38.280 like it. They're trying to import it into America, but it should not be imported. We import enough bad

00:49:43.280 ideas and bad things into America. We, we should do tough, good old American sports. And it, the more

00:49:48.500 it drives the rest of the world crazy, the better, as far as I'm concerned. That's, that to me is the

00:49:52.800 marker of how you know that it is a, a good sport. I don't think people should go out there and start

00:49:56.760 shivving each other and killing each other in the ring, but some good combat I think is perfectly

00:50:01.760 in keeping with the great tradition of sports. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles

00:50:05.720 Show. See you next week.

00:50:12.520 If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the

00:50:17.080 word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe. We're available on

00:50:22.260 Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Also, be sure to check out

00:50:27.840 the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, The Andrew Klavan Show, and The

00:50:32.560 Matt Walsh Show. The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies. Executive producer,

00:50:37.400 Jeremy Boring. Our technical director is Austin Stevens. Supervising producers, Mathis Glover and

00:50:43.040 Robert Sterling. Production manager, Pavel Vidovsky. Editor and associate producer, Danny D'Amico.

00:50:48.960 Audio mixer, Mike Coromina. Hair and makeup by Nika Geneva. And production coordinator,

00:50:55.240 McKenna Waters. The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2021.

00:51:01.480 Hey everybody, this is Andrew Klavan, host of The Andrew Klavan Show. You know, some people are

00:51:05.660 depressed because the republic is collapsing, the end of days is approaching, and the moons turn to

00:51:10.420 blood. But on The Andrew Klavan Show, that's where the fun just gets started. So come on over to The

00:51:15.140 Andrew Klavan Show and laugh your way through the fall of the republic with me, Andrew Klavan.

The Michael Knowles Show - January 22, 2021

Ep. 684 - Fauci Unchained

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript