The Michael Knowles Show - September 02, 2021


Ep. 835 - This Is What Demons Sound Like


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

178.34853

Word Count

8,525

Sentence Count

640

Misogynist Sentences

16

Hate Speech Sentences

33


Summary

Today, the Supreme Court refused to block a Texas law that would have made abortion illegal in that state. This means that for the first time since 1973, there is a state in this country in which abortion is effectively illegal. This is wonderful, wonderful news.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 They say that no news is good news, and that is certainly true today. The Supreme Court was asked
00:00:06.180 by abortion supporters to block a Texas pro-life law, and the court did nothing, which is the best
00:00:13.500 thing it could have done, because that means that today, for the first time since 1973,
00:00:19.140 there is a state in this country in which abortion is effectively illegal. This is wonderful,
00:00:25.120 wonderful news. It could potentially, though don't get your hopes up, but it could potentially
00:00:29.820 lead to the overturn of Roe v. Wade, in large part because of the clever way the law was written.
00:00:36.280 Now, the libs are losing it. They're crying. They're screaming. They're fear-mongering. They're
00:00:39.920 making really, really dumb arguments in favor of killing babies in the womb. Meanwhile, on the
00:00:45.120 topic of dehumanization, prominent libs want to keep the unvaccinated out of hospitals. The American
00:00:52.740 people, though, I think have had enough. If one poll is to be believed right now, most Americans
00:00:57.740 even think Joe Biden should resign. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:07.480 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday from Jacqueline Twerd, who said,
00:01:11.160 Classrooms shouldn't be like a teacher's home where they can hang whatever ridiculous
00:01:15.040 stuff. I'll clean it up. Whatever ridiculous stuff they feel like. Whatever happened to the
00:01:20.880 times tables in the alphabet? Thank you. Yes, these teachers who are hanging the pride progress flag
00:01:26.340 or the Antifa flag even, they seem to think that the classroom is just their fiefdom in which they
00:01:33.000 can do whatever they want. In part, this is because of a misguided understanding of what is called
00:01:39.520 academic freedom that now even the right defends. The left kind of pushed it, but even the right
00:01:45.140 defends it. It's just completely preposterous. The third grade classroom is not a free marketplace of
00:01:49.780 ideas and it never has been and it should not be and it never will be. It's a place to teach kids
00:01:55.760 basics. So I absolutely agree with your point. I wish not only the left, but conservatives would wake
00:02:00.600 up. I wish they could hear the truth. And if you want to hear the truth, if you want to hear just good
00:02:06.840 music, I'd recommend checking out your Raycons. I love Raycons. They are a better product than some of
00:02:14.360 the other brands on the market. All right. I'm going to try to be nice about it, but you know,
00:02:17.840 look, Raycons, they don't have the little stems sticking out so you don't look like a bug.
00:02:21.320 They don't only come in one color. They come in a lot of cool, stylish colors, great fit of their
00:02:27.080 gel tips for your comfort. They sound better. They work better. They've got a 32-hour battery life.
00:02:31.640 I love my Raycons, okay? And especially when my sweet little baby starts crying, you know,
00:02:38.380 whether I'm in the house, maybe we're on a plane or in the car, it's nice to know that I can just pop
00:02:43.420 in my Raycons and have a nice little bit of peace and quiet. They're really great. They start at half the price
00:02:47.380 of other premium audio brands, but they sound just as good. They actually sound better if you ask me.
00:02:53.560 Raycons comes with a 45-day happiness guarantee, so you really can't lose. Give them a try. You
00:02:57.640 will see what I mean. Great way to listen to really good audio books like Speechless.
00:03:02.300 Create your own soundtrack with Raycon. Right now, my listeners can get 15% off their Raycon order at
00:03:06.600 buyraycon.com slash Knowles. That's buyraycon.com slash Knowles. Save 15% on Raycons. You're going to
00:03:11.460 love them. Tell me how much you love them. Buyraycon.com slash Knowles.
00:03:14.700 This Texas law is magnificent. So the court decision was 5-4 because, of course, Chief
00:03:20.520 Justice John Roberts sided with the libs. And the decision was not over the constitutionality
00:03:25.500 of the law. The decision was whether or not to grant abortionists in Texas a special emergency
00:03:32.220 halting of the new pro-life law. So thankfully, the five at least sort of conservative justices,
00:03:40.320 Thomas. Thomas, certainly conservative. Alito, certainly conservative. Gorsuch, a little squishier.
00:03:46.840 Kavanaugh, a lot squishier. And Amy Barrett, a lot squishier. But all five of them, to their great
00:03:53.160 credit, voted in favor of allowing the Texas law to go into effect. This is a very, very important
00:03:58.980 decision. And then you had the three libs, really the four libs, because Chief Justice John Roberts
00:04:03.200 was there. And he voted to stop the law. One small point on John Roberts before we get into what this
00:04:09.700 law actually does. John Roberts' whole purpose, I believe, is that he wants to maintain the
00:04:17.640 institutional credibility of the court. Because he's the chief justice. So he has a responsibility
00:04:22.340 not just to the decisions, but also to the institution itself. And so I think what John
00:04:28.520 Roberts is trying to do here is seem that he's above politics, because he will often vote with
00:04:34.580 the liberals. Ironically, though, what the effect of his machinations had been is to make the court seem
00:04:42.700 much, much more party political, to make the court seem much less principled. He has ironically
00:04:50.140 destroyed the institutional credibility of the court, because he's very clearly just picking his side
00:04:54.800 based on the poll numbers, based on the politics, based on what he thinks will be able to placate
00:05:00.780 the people, rather than upholding some kind of constitutional principle. But the principle
00:05:05.200 upheld, at least in this decision, the Texas law, which was passed in May, bans all abortions in the
00:05:11.640 state after around six weeks of pregnancy. The law is not based on some arbitrary timetable, you know,
00:05:18.320 six weeks in one day, and it's a human being, but six weeks minus one day, you know, five weeks in
00:05:24.080 six days, and it's actually not a human being. The law is based on when you can detect a heartbeat,
00:05:30.720 and you can detect a heartbeat very early, because these are human beings. So because a lot of women
00:05:36.240 don't even know they're pregnant at six weeks, the law effectively makes abortion illegal.
00:05:41.200 Now, how does this law operate? There have been plenty of heartbeat bills, and they've been struck
00:05:46.100 down by various courts. So what makes this law a little different? The law allows private citizens
00:05:53.740 to sue abortionists and anyone else who helps a woman to obtain an abortion, including some sicko
00:06:01.940 dude who gives the woman a ride to the clinic, or provides financial assistance for the abortion.
00:06:07.580 The citizens can bring these suits, even if they don't have any connection to the people that they
00:06:12.180 are suing beyond their relationship as citizens. If they win in the lawsuits, the law entitles them
00:06:17.860 to a minimum of $10,000 in damages, plus attorney's fees. So this is really providing an incentive or a
00:06:25.720 disincentive for the abortionists and for the various ghouls who help out in this process. We haven't seen
00:06:31.420 laws like this before, and it makes it a little bit harder for the courts to strike it down. It's a
00:06:35.940 brilliant, brilliant law, and I'm very glad that it's in effect. The White House is furious. They're
00:06:40.380 really, really upset that babies will live. There will be babies today who are not murdered in the
00:06:47.520 state of Texas. There will be babies today who will go on and have a long life, and in 10 and 20 years,
00:06:52.580 you'll be able to talk to these babies who are alive because this law is in effect. And the White
00:06:58.100 House is furious about it. They consider it an extreme threat.
00:07:01.380 The Press on abortion. We've seen in a number of states, Republican-led states, an effort on voting
00:07:08.920 rights, for instance, to pass similar legislation throughout the country on voting rights. What's
00:07:14.000 the level of concern at the White House that the decision on Texas specifically will lead to a
00:07:18.460 similar raft of laws across the country? And what is the recourse for the White House at a federal
00:07:23.440 level to help prevent this?
00:07:24.540 Ms. Well, the step that can be taken is the codification of Roe, something the
00:07:28.820 president and the vice president have called for and would require Congress to act on.
00:07:33.380 I will note that certainly we've seen, this is not the first threat to Roe we've seen in a state
00:07:37.720 across the country. It's an extreme threat. And again, I would just note, this is offering up to
00:07:42.520 $10,000 to individuals who report someone who is going to get an abortion. I mean, that is what
00:07:48.420 we're talking about here. So, and beyond that, as I've already outlined.
00:07:52.820 Based. To use the lingo of the kids, based. Awesome. Great. Love it.
00:07:58.440 This is a great, great way. By the way, you're going to hear that this law is punishing women.
00:08:04.660 It's going to throw women in jail. It's not. It's not. You're not, you don't get to sue the women.
00:08:09.720 You sue the abortionists and you sue the little minions of the abortionist and you sue all the
00:08:14.760 people and the CADs and the degenerate men paying for the abortions. You get to sue all of them.
00:08:21.300 Those are the people who are targeted here. And it is an extreme threat to Roe versus Wade.
00:08:25.820 What Jen Psaki is admitting here, by the way, is that Roe versus Wade is a ridiculous decision.
00:08:31.360 That's her admission. When she is asked by this leftist activist reporter, he's like,
00:08:36.380 how do we stop it? How do we stop it? He's like, she says, well, what we have to do is codify Roe
00:08:41.840 versus Wade into law. Why do we have to codify Roe versus Wade into law? Because it's a weak decision.
00:08:47.480 There is no constitutional right to an abortion. Even if you're the strongest abortion supporter in the
00:08:52.160 world, it just isn't there. It just doesn't exist. And, and even the intellectual and the
00:08:59.660 intellectually honest leftists who support abortion and look at Roe versus Wade, they will tell you the
00:09:06.900 case does not have very much constitutional merit. And so now they're saying we need to codify it into
00:09:10.580 law. You have to codify it into law because it's a ridiculous decision. And if there is justice,
00:09:15.380 even a little bit of justice in this world, it ought to be overturned. CNN freaking out about this.
00:09:20.680 They've brought on their chief legal analyst, Jeffrey Toobin. Jeffrey Toobin has a lot of
00:09:27.220 personal expertise on creepy sex questions. As you will recall, he lost one of his jobs some months
00:09:34.100 ago because he was caught having sex with someone he loves on camera on a zoom meeting with his
00:09:40.840 colleagues. So Jeffrey Toobin, but, and that, that event involved one person other than the spectators.
00:09:49.300 So Jeffrey Toobin is back on CNN and Jeffrey Toobin, often like I do on this show, we don't do that.
00:09:55.940 We don't have that in common. But one thing we do have in common is that occasionally on air,
00:10:00.840 we will say, I told you so. And Jeffrey Toobin did tell you so when it came to Roe versus Wade.
00:10:05.260 Donald Trump ran for president saying, I will appoint justices to the Supreme Court who will
00:10:10.340 vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. He has three appointees on the court. There are three other appointees on the
00:10:16.200 court, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and John Roberts, who have spoken out against Roe v. Wade
00:10:25.540 before, although Roberts has later said he supports the precedent. But there are five justices, it
00:10:31.360 appears, the three Trump appointees, plus, there they are on the screen, plus Thomas and Alito,
00:10:38.440 who seem like solid votes to overturn Roe v. Wade. You know, we've been accused, those of us who have
00:10:45.700 been saying that Roe is about to be overturned as being chicken little, the sky is falling, the sky is
00:10:50.580 falling. We'll see, because it certainly looks like the sky is falling now. The sky is falling
00:10:55.920 because fewer babies will be killed in Texas. Don't forget, you're going to be told that women have a
00:11:03.740 right. They have a sacred constitutional natural right to kill their children. They don't. They
00:11:10.220 don't. They don't have that right. But you're going to be told, only focus on this. Only focus on the
00:11:14.780 poor abortionist who's just trying to scrape by and feed his family by committing infanticide at
00:11:20.560 Planned Parenthood. Just think about him. Don't forget, this involves a baby. And that's not just an
00:11:28.460 abstract. It's not just a hypothetical. There will be babies who are permitted to live because of this
00:11:35.500 law. And you will have to look them in the eye, at least on camera. They'll look at you and you'll
00:11:42.140 see them. And you will have to explain, at least to yourself, why you think that it would be better
00:11:47.880 if they were killed. Why you think that it's wrong that they were permitted to live. Jeffrey Toobin's
00:11:53.240 going to have to do that. But Jeffrey Toobin is an abortion supporter, not just in theory. He tried
00:11:58.060 to pay off his mistress to kill his child and his mistress wouldn't do it. Now he's got the child
00:12:02.880 and he's going to have to look that kid in the eye someday if he has a relationship with that kid
00:12:06.640 and explain why he tried to kill that baby and why he still supports the right, quote unquote,
00:12:13.520 of people to kill babies just like him all over the country. Now, if you want to get a real accounting
00:12:19.340 of what's going on, okay, not just in politics, but in your finances, you're going to want to check out
00:12:23.820 Truebill. If you're anything like me, you've started a bunch of free trials that you forgot
00:12:29.540 to cancel. Now, sometimes a free trial is great and you stick with the service and that's cool.
00:12:33.480 A lot of times it's just a scam and you do the free trial and then you never cancel it. And then
00:12:37.580 you end up paying a ton of money needlessly. Do not let greedy corporations take money that you
00:12:43.100 don't need to spend. Truebill will let you take control of your subscriptions. Truebill is the new app
00:12:48.160 that helps you identify and stop paying for subscriptions that you don't need,
00:12:51.500 that you don't want or that you just forgot about. On average, people have saved up to $720
00:12:56.320 a year with Truebill. That's a lot of money. Because companies make subscriptions hard to cancel,
00:13:03.000 Truebill makes it incredibly simple. Just link your accounts and Truebill will cancel your unwanted
00:13:07.860 subscriptions in one tap. And your Truebill concierge is there when you need them to cancel
00:13:12.660 unwanted subscriptions so you don't have to do it. They've got 2 million users. They've helped people
00:13:16.160 save over $100 million. Do it right now. Don't fall for subscription scams. Start canceling today
00:13:21.220 at Truebill.com slash Knowles. That's Truebill.com slash Knowles. It'll save you potentially a
00:13:26.000 thousand dollars, more than a thousand dollars a year. Truebill.com slash Knowles. CNN's legal
00:13:32.280 analyst Jeffrey Toobin is really upset about the new Texas pro-life law because he supports the
00:13:41.280 abstract right to abortion and also because he has tried to pay to procure abortions himself.
00:13:46.000 According to this law, if he did what he has done in Texas, he could be sued for at least $10,000
00:13:51.340 plus attorney fees. So he's got a real personal interest here in making sure that these babies
00:13:57.180 don't get to live. And now he's going after the court. He's trying to dissuade the court. And so he
00:14:01.540 goes on television and he says, look, the institutional reputation of the court is at stake here.
00:14:06.300 Here we are on September 1st, the first day since 1973, when a state has been able to ban abortion.
00:14:16.120 1973 is the year of Roe v. Wade. And the Supreme Court has said nothing. They have allowed the second
00:14:23.740 most famous opinion of the last hundred years after Brown v. Board of Education to essentially be
00:14:29.580 violated, be overrun, but they haven't even said a word about it, which strikes me as a real blow
00:14:37.840 against the Supreme Court's institutional reputation, aside from the issue of whether
00:14:42.480 this law is right or wrong. A real blow against the Supreme Court's reputation, regardless of whether
00:14:49.500 the law is right or wrong. I don't think that's true. You know what I think was a blow against the
00:14:54.540 Supreme Court's reputation? Roe v. Wade. I think Roe v. Wade was a huge blow against the court's
00:14:59.220 reputation because it showed that the court was nothing more than a partisan political lawmaking
00:15:04.220 body rather than a judiciary. I think that aside from the issue of whether you think abortion is
00:15:10.300 right or wrong, I think we all should be able to admit Roe v. Wade was the attack on the court's
00:15:15.660 reputation. And they can either make that right now or they can persist in error and humiliation
00:15:21.420 and degradation of the court. There's a woman, some Brooklyn chick, who's apparently a medical
00:15:27.500 doctor. Her name is Dara Cass. And she, I think she shows you some of the hysteria you're going to
00:15:32.420 see from the left media on this issue. She tweeted out, get on birth control now. Any form that is
00:15:40.740 reliable, oral contraceptives, NuvaRing, Norplant, IUD, something now, now, hurry.
00:15:46.440 Okay. So what she's admitting here is that the left uses abortion as birth control, as contraception,
00:15:55.800 but it's obviously not contraception because the baby is conceived and then they just kill it.
00:15:59.060 What she's admitting is there are a lot of leftists who are so cavalier about abortion,
00:16:04.480 about killing babies, that they don't even, they won't even put on a condom.
00:16:08.700 They won't even, they won't, that's all right, we'll just deal with it later with abortion.
00:16:11.580 And the left tells us they don't do that, but then she's just admitted they do.
00:16:16.240 Beyond that point, beyond that point. Get on birth control now. Anything, oral cut,
00:16:21.980 NuvaRing, IUD, do something. I've got, I've got another idea. How about you just have babies
00:16:26.680 like they do in normal civilizations that are not dying? How about you just do that? I know this
00:16:32.500 is a crazy radical idea. How about you just like be open to life and have babies and actually fully
00:16:40.040 give of your love to another person and then make your life better by having a baby. A lot of people
00:16:45.120 can't have babies. It's a hard, there are a lot of people who struggle with infertility, okay?
00:16:49.760 Who would, who would give their limbs, who would cut off an arm at least to have a baby. And this
00:16:56.260 cavalier woman, you know, we are a dying civilization. I mean that in a very technical way. We, we are not
00:17:02.720 having enough children to continue as a civilization. And this has been true for decades now,
00:17:09.020 and it seems to be getting worse and worse each year. And other civilizations are having babies
00:17:14.400 because they're lively and we're dying and we're decayed. And something's gone really rotten within
00:17:18.920 us, which is how you get creepy statements like this. This woman goes on. She goes, if you find out
00:17:25.100 you're pregnant and do not want to be, you have very little time to do it. Do not shut down. This will
00:17:29.640 be hard, but you can't delay. Call me. We will figure this out together. What a psycho. This woman is
00:17:35.620 saying, call me and I will kill your child. This is what demons sound like. Okay. This is,
00:17:41.880 if you want to know, you read the Bible or you, you read accounts of demons throughout history and
00:17:48.140 in stories and myths and in history and real stories. So what does a demon sound like? A demon
00:17:54.180 sounds like that lady. Call me, call me now. Don't let it, don't let them stop you from killing.
00:17:59.980 I'll help you. I'll kill your baby. Give me your baby. Ah, good grief lady. What? This is scary
00:18:06.660 stuff. And I mentioned it. I mean, it's so obvious with her, but you're going to hear this kind of
00:18:12.180 stuff from a lot of people. And I don't forget who the prince of this world is. Okay. Don't forget.
00:18:17.840 This is a fallen world. There's a lot of bad stuff here, but you're going to hear these same kinds of
00:18:21.440 things from people in the media, from politicians, maybe from people, you know, when you hear it,
00:18:25.980 one, don't be seduced to maybe try to change their mind. Three, flee from that. That is,
00:18:32.940 you were playing with some bad juju, my friends. Now, before we move on from the topic of abortion
00:18:37.560 and get to much more serious topics, like the woo flu, I, I do need to address something because
00:18:44.400 I've, I've seen it a lot in the popular discourse and you're going to hear it a lot more in the coming
00:18:48.440 days as this law is debated. You're going to hear really dumb abortion arguments. Okay. You're
00:18:53.120 going to hear really dumb pro-choice arguments. Here's one of them. Here's one you're going to
00:18:57.840 hear. Hey, pro-lifer, you don't want to kill babies in the womb, right? So I guess you're
00:19:05.440 probably against the death penalty then, right? You have to be. No, no, you don't because those are,
00:19:12.960 those are different issues that involve different moral questions. You, yet you can oppose killing
00:19:21.280 innocent little babies in the womb and still have a more nuanced or complex or opposite view of what
00:19:26.920 ought to be done for convicted criminals. They're different questions. Oh yeah. Huh? Yeah. They're
00:19:33.460 different questions. Huh? Mr. Pro-lifer. Well, so if you're pro-life, uh, you probably support COVID
00:19:39.180 vaccine mandates, don't you? If you're, if you're going to be consistent, if you're going to be, uh,
00:19:43.140 no, again, I think I, I thought I just made this clear. Those are different issues involving
00:19:49.860 different moral questions. So one can oppose the killing of innocent little babies in the womb
00:19:55.340 and still have some questions and some resistance to taking an experimental drug for a cough that for
00:20:01.860 most people is not that bad. You, you actually can, I know it's hard to think. I was once,
00:20:08.000 I was on a panel at Politicon and some lib guy, he made these arguments. He was, and I couldn't hear
00:20:13.380 him that well. I were in, it was a very, uh, echoey gigantic space. So I couldn't hear all he was
00:20:18.080 saying, but you could hear it later on the microphone. And he made these arguments. He
00:20:20.780 was saying, uh, you know, well, if you, then you have to oppose the death penalty. No, you don't
00:20:24.880 buddy. Well, but if you're pro-life, if you're pro-life, then you have to support all of these
00:20:33.260 other unassociated issues. You don't, you don't. Pro-life is a slogan. And like all political slogans,
00:20:40.860 it represents an idea, but it cannot convey the fullness of that idea. Just like you might say
00:20:47.440 you're pro-choice, but you do not support the choice of Texans to pass this law to ban abortion
00:20:51.600 because the phrase pro-choice is just, is referring to your support for a specific issue, namely
00:20:56.480 killing babies in the womb through abortion. There are many other stupid arguments that you're
00:21:00.460 going to hear with abortion, but don't, one, don't get suckered into them because they're almost not
00:21:05.020 worth your time refuting, but they are easily refuted because we're talking about a specific issue.
00:21:09.900 Don't let them distract you because I think if you talk about that issue in particular,
00:21:13.240 if you focus on what is actually at stake, they don't, they don't have a leg to stand on.
00:21:19.960 Now, speaking of this dehumanizing talk, it's really deep. The way that the libs talk about
00:21:25.960 abortion is really, it's literally dehumanizing. They're taking a human and pretending he's not a
00:21:30.540 human, but the libs do this generally. Don Lemon just did this on CNN. He said that if you are skeptical
00:21:38.500 of the vaccine, you don't want to get the new experimental drug for the Wu flu, you should
00:21:43.240 not go to the hospital when you get sick. If you're not going to get vaccinated, you don't
00:21:48.300 want to social distance, you don't want to wear a mask, then maybe you don't want to go to the
00:21:51.920 hospital when you get sick. I know that sounds harsh, but you're taking up the space for people
00:21:58.480 who are doing things the right way. If you're not going to lose a few pounds, chubby, then maybe you
00:22:03.520 don't want to go to the hospital when you get a heart attack. Okay. All right. Look, I know that sounds
00:22:07.880 harsh. I know that, Hey, look, if you're not going to stop having homosexual sex, then maybe you're
00:22:13.940 not going to want to go to the hospital when you get AIDS. Okay. I know that sounds harsh, but I,
00:22:19.480 Hey, I know that, but look, but, but, but that's what he's saying. That's the argument he's making.
00:22:24.840 And it's dehumanizing. And so we can point that out, but I think once you get it, you get it. Okay.
00:22:31.160 Once you get it, you get it. And you realize this whole thing is dehumanizing. The whole leftist idea
00:22:37.200 is dehumanizing. It tells you to varying degrees that you don't have any particular dignity. You
00:22:44.200 don't, you're not entitled to any particular choice. You do not have really any rights whatsoever
00:22:50.900 that we don't give you, that we, the ruling elite, don't provide you. That is, that is a very
00:22:58.800 dehumanizing idea. You, you hear it from, from various sections of the left in different ways.
00:23:07.580 Sometimes it's materialist. Sometimes it's Gnostic. Sometimes it's liberal. Sometimes it's
00:23:12.700 socialist. Sometimes it's this, but it's always, it's always dehumanizing. Okay. And on the,
00:23:18.800 on the substantive point, by the way, they're also wrong. It's not even just that they're wrong in
00:23:24.060 principle, like on this COVID thing. They're also wrong on the substantive point. They've been wrong
00:23:28.140 about this virus from the beginning. If you want to hear right opinions, I got a surprise for you.
00:23:36.180 It's not, I guess it's no longer a surprise. In October, our backstage episode is going to be a
00:23:40.560 little bit different. Instead of just tuning in from your home, you'll be able to see us live in
00:23:45.120 person on stage at the famous Ryman Auditorium, one of the most famous venues in the country,
00:23:50.440 right here in Nashville, doing what we do best, owning the libs, making sense, making, making sense
00:23:58.640 of this crazy world. Join me, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, Jeremy Boring, Matt Walsh, and Andrew
00:24:03.180 Klavan. We're backstage like never before. We have a very special offer for our members starting at 11
00:24:08.500 a.m. Eastern today. Daily Wire members will get dibs to buy your tickets ahead of general admission.
00:24:15.020 So check your email for an exclusive code you can use to pre-order your tickets. Once you have your
00:24:19.500 code, pre-purchase your tickets ahead of everyone else at dailywire.com slash Ryman, R-Y-M-A-N.
00:24:24.880 If you're not a member, then you can join today at dailywire.com slash subscribe to get your choice
00:24:29.720 of seats or wait until tickets go on sale everywhere tomorrow, Friday, September 3rd. Check your email.
00:24:35.080 Make sure you don't miss out. I very much look forward to seeing you all there. We'll be right
00:24:38.280 back with a lot more.
00:24:49.500 Joe Rogan got COVID. Joe Rogan, that anti-vax, misinformer, idiot stooge Rogan. Serves him right.
00:25:07.120 He got COVID. When are we going to his funeral? Oh, he's fine. He's completely fine. Here he is.
00:25:11.720 I got up in the morning, got tested and turns out I got COVID. So we immediately threw the
00:25:17.600 kitchen sink at all kinds of meds, monoclonal antibodies, ivermectin, Z-Pak, prednisone,
00:25:27.920 everything. And I also got an NAD drip and a vitamin drip. And I did that three days in a row.
00:25:35.400 And so here we are on Wednesday and I feel great. I really only had one bad day. Sunday sucked,
00:25:43.840 but Monday was better. Tuesday felt better than Monday. And today I feel good. I actually feel
00:25:49.580 pretty good. Uh, that's the good news. The bad news is we have to move Friday, the Friday show in
00:25:58.360 Nashville. That's too bad. That's, I actually didn't realize he was in Nashville. Otherwise I might've
00:26:03.360 tried to go see him, but so that's too bad. He can't, he can't play in Nashville, but, uh, he's,
00:26:07.380 he's fine. And I, I saw people tweeting about this yesterday and they said, Joe Rogan, yeah,
00:26:14.300 serves him right. The, that anti-vax, yeah, that'll show you, Joe, that'll teach you. What'll it teach
00:26:20.100 you? I, Joe, it, I, all it taught me was that Joe was right. Joe Rogan came, by the way, he's not any
00:26:25.640 of those things people called him. He came out and he said, look, I'm not anti-vax, but if you're a
00:26:30.700 young, healthy person, I just, as a prudential matter, I don't see why you should go get this
00:26:34.100 vaccine. I just think, you know, it's an experimental drug for a thing that doesn't pose a great threat.
00:26:38.780 So you do in a cost benefit. I don't think it's a, it's a huge deal. And then he, so he, that's how
00:26:45.220 he lived. Then he got the virus and then he took ordinary medicine. And he, he had said a lot,
00:26:52.320 for a lot of the time that it's kind of like a mild cold. It's not a big deal. They, everyone said it
00:26:55.800 was awful misinformation. Then he gets it, he takes some medicine. It feels like a mild cold and then
00:26:59.380 he's fine. A couple of days later, it seems like Joe was right. Seems like Joe. And did you hear
00:27:05.800 what, what he took? Oh, that idiot, that Rube, he took. Can you believe he took? Oh, I can't even
00:27:13.760 say it. Ivermectin. Why that's, that's a horse dewormer. Don't you know? This is another meme going
00:27:22.280 around the libs right now. They're saying Ivermectin, you'd have to be an idiot to take Ivermectin.
00:27:27.640 And Ivermectin is not for humans. It's for horses. That idiot. He took an, he took a horse
00:27:32.840 dewormer. Ivermectin is, is not for horses. Horses can take it just like horses can take
00:27:42.940 aspirin, but you wouldn't say aspirin is for horses. There's horse aspirin. Okay. So I guess
00:27:47.680 you would don't want to take horse aspirin and there's horse Ivermectin, but Ivermectin is an FDA
00:27:53.540 approved antiviral that has been prescribed to humans for many, many years. The person who
00:27:59.460 discovered Ivermectin won a Nobel prize. Okay. This is a, this is a real thing. Not only that,
00:28:05.860 I've got, let's see how long before we get taken off the internet for this one. Ivermectin
00:28:10.200 has been shown in at least some studies to have an effect in suppressing coronavirus.
00:28:17.360 I'm not saying that it's the best way to treat your coronavirus. There are also studies that are a
00:28:21.700 little confused on this that say, well, maybe it actually won't in the levels that you can take
00:28:25.800 it, but here we go. Mayo Clinic, Ivermectin. This is how humans should take it. Here's the
00:28:31.060 proper use. It doesn't say proper use, put it in your horses. It says proper use, take it a single
00:28:35.440 dose with a full glass of water, right? It's obviously used by humans for, for a number of
00:28:39.320 conditions. And then here we have from the NIH, that, that vaunted institution, the National Institutes
00:28:44.980 of Health, Ivermectin, an award-winning drug with expected antiviral activity against COVID-19.
00:28:49.560 And this was published October 7th, 2020. Not, not all that long ago. Now, sure, perhaps some data
00:28:55.440 say, well, actually, sure, it can be effective in theory, but in the doses that you'd have to take
00:29:00.020 it, it may be, it won't be. So I'm not sure it's the best thing to do, but don't, don't call Joe
00:29:05.760 Rogan an idiot because he's taking a drug that has been very effective at fighting off things in humans.
00:29:12.260 And that has been shown at least in some experiments to have antiviral properties specifically
00:29:17.240 against this COVID-19. It's just, you are, as you try to, I'm speaking to you libs,
00:29:25.140 you hypothetical lib out there, as you try to preen and, and prattle and, and seem so much smarter than
00:29:33.840 everybody else, you are revealing your own ignorance. The same thing on these, these abortion
00:29:40.120 arguments. When someone comes up and says, well, you're pro-life, you probably, you probably oppose the
00:29:46.420 death penalty then, right? You know, what, what they are revealing is that they haven't given two
00:29:51.040 seconds thought to this issue. They are, what, what they're revealing with those glib sorts of
00:29:56.500 statements is how shallow their thinking is. And the same thing is, you're taking ivermectin. What
00:30:01.220 are you, a horse? Oh, you, you haven't even Googled this drug. Okay. You haven't even given this,
00:30:06.540 you're just repeating some clip of John Oliver or something that you've seen. These people are not to
00:30:14.020 be taken seriously. Speaking of taking care of animals though, how's this for a segue? Speaking
00:30:19.640 of taking care of animals, the Taliban are apparently taking care of those dogs that were left
00:30:26.200 by the United States upon the evacuation from Afghanistan. So you remember this is, the United
00:30:30.840 States left well over a hundred Americans, probably many more than that. The United States left Afghan
00:30:36.620 allies. I've actually spoken to friends of mine who are either in the armed forces or have been in the
00:30:43.380 armed forces who have, have been getting calls from Americans who are stuck or from friends of
00:30:50.540 Americans who are stuck in Afghanistan. So this is a real problem of Christians who are stuck,
00:30:56.780 chaplains and priests of lots of people who are there. So this is a real problem. But then what
00:31:02.560 everyone freaked out about was that they left the dogs. The service, the poor dogs are in Afghanistan.
00:31:06.840 So okay, it's not a good look. The Taliban though, these PR geniuses, they are, they're PR geniuses.
00:31:13.520 Are taking to the Western press to let you know, don't worry, we're taking care of your dogs.
00:31:18.500 The Americans left the dogs to get out from their specific places, but our teams and our
00:31:24.140 officials called, they're in charge of those dogs. And today they came to port and they are trying to
00:31:30.980 collect the dogs and they are trying to facilitate for them and what they need to give them.
00:31:36.800 Is there, is they alive and home in your home?
00:31:39.240 Um, particularly, I cannot give you a specific number, but they are alive. And, uh, from the
00:31:45.520 beginning, when we come to the front line, the front door of airport, we were in, we were in touch
00:31:52.280 with the, uh, in charge of the dog and they are working and they are, uh, feeding the dogs. And I
00:31:58.220 think there's no problem.
00:31:59.100 And there's no problem. This is good news, right? This is, I, I hate that I have, the, the, the Taliban
00:32:05.220 have been very good about this from the beginning. They've been very good at their propaganda
00:32:11.300 and the West has not been. So they held that press conference when they took over the presidential
00:32:17.580 palace in Kabul. Joe Biden wouldn't hold a press conference. So you're seeing here, you're saying,
00:32:24.200 oh my gosh, the Taliban is giving greater transparency to the press and the people than
00:32:27.360 the White House is. Then the Taliban is asked about freedom of speech. They say, you know,
00:32:32.440 you in the West like to talk about freedom of speech. What about Facebook? Facebook censoring
00:32:36.000 lots and lots of your people, including the duly elected president, for goodness sakes,
00:32:39.820 on January 7th. Ooh, yeah, you can't really talk about that. And now the West, we can't even take
00:32:44.820 care of our own service dogs. Don't worry, the Taliban's taking care of it. So if you point this
00:32:51.200 out, if you point out any criticisms of the West, any of the Western occupation of Afghanistan,
00:32:58.100 of the Afghan national army, quote unquote, that did not last as an army for very long, that had a lot
00:33:03.200 of problems of its own, including widespread sexual abuse, including ghost troops, ghost soldiers who
00:33:08.420 didn't even exist at all. They were just, it was just a scam to be paid by the West and pass it out
00:33:13.560 to various tribal leaders and warlords and corrupt officials. If you point out any of this, the theft,
00:33:20.560 the fragging, all of that, now apparently you're a white supremacist. According to CNN, according to CNN,
00:33:31.200 quote, white supremacist praise of the Taliban takeover concerns U.S. officials. Okay. Now,
00:33:39.320 there's the absurdity on its face that white supremacists are exactly the cheerleaders of the
00:33:47.040 Taliban, right? I don't know many white supremacists who are supportive of Middle Eastern,
00:33:55.860 non-white caliphates. Okay. So I think probably the issue is a little more complicated than that.
00:34:01.800 But even, let's just take it right at face value. What they're saying is that white supremacists are
00:34:07.600 totally a real thing. It's totally a real big problem in America, the white supremacy. Okay.
00:34:13.040 And the white supremacists are cheering on the Taliban who took over Afghanistan. And that's
00:34:19.820 concerning U.S. officials who gave the country to the Taliban. So the White House officials,
00:34:30.280 not just to this administration, but the previous one as well, they come to terms with the Taliban and
00:34:38.020 say, okay, you're going to run Afghanistan from now on. The Taliban is now our ally. Don't forget
00:34:41.920 that we're fighting with the Taliban against ISIS. And the White House officials are now very concerned
00:34:49.440 that the white supremacists are supportive of the White House's policy. Does that make the White
00:34:55.780 House white supremacists? Does that make the white supremacists White House supremacists? What is it?
00:35:00.140 Who is it? Who started the Taliban? We did. We did. We funded the people who created the Taliban. I'm not
00:35:06.060 saying that that was a horrible decision. I'm not saying that foreign policy doesn't change. I'm not
00:35:10.600 saying it wasn't justified in the eighties against the Soviet Union, but we funded the people who
00:35:15.240 started the Taliban through the Afghan Mujahideen freedom fighters. We did it through Pakistan's
00:35:19.500 inter-services intelligence agency. Also one of our great allies, which created the Taliban,
00:35:27.280 which Harvard, Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, another kind of sort of loose ally in the
00:35:34.460 fight against the Soviet Union. And then the ISI, our great allies were harboring bin Laden for years,
00:35:39.640 but then they also kind of gave it up. So please, please spare me. I mentioned this earlier
00:35:43.720 on the show a few days ago. Spare me the sanctimony over the allies and the enemies. And
00:35:50.660 this is, if you're, if you support the Taliban, you're a white supremacist. Joe Biden supports the
00:35:56.320 Taliban. So is he a white supremacist? No, this is just a way of coming after anybody that in any way
00:36:06.300 creates a problem for the increasingly incoherent narrative of the ruling class. It also is being
00:36:13.820 used to make a political enemy and dissident out of anyone who supports the end of the Afghan war.
00:36:20.440 You're not allowed to do that. The media do not want you to do that. Meanwhile, we still have these
00:36:27.460 people that were supposed to get out of Afghanistan, right? We've already gotten a lot of Afghans out,
00:36:31.860 but we still have some Americans and some special Afghan allies who, who make a good case for why we
00:36:37.340 should get them out, including an interpreter. So there was an interpreter who actually rescued
00:36:41.020 Joe Biden and John Kerry and Chuck Hagel some years ago. Their helicopter went down and then this guy
00:36:47.880 helped get them out. And now he's been left behind. And he said, please save me. I'm going to be killed.
00:36:53.200 I'm in hiding with my family. Joe Biden, please get me out of the country. The U.S. still hasn't done
00:36:57.920 it. Jen Psaki comes out and says, don't worry, we will not leave you behind.
00:37:01.640 An interpreter who helped rescue then Senator Joe Biden when he was stranded 13 years ago in
00:37:06.800 Afghanistan is now in hiding. He told the Wall Street Journal, hello, Mr. President, save me and my
00:37:12.680 family. Don't forget me. What's your response to him? And why is he and other Afghan allies like him
00:37:18.860 still in the country if the president believes, as he said today, that the mission was an extraordinary
00:37:23.740 success? Well, I would say first, our message to him is thank you for fighting by our side for the
00:37:29.800 last 20 years. Thank you for the role you played in helping a number of my favorite people out of a
00:37:36.100 snowstorm and for all of the work you did. And our commitment is enduring, not just to American
00:37:41.760 citizens, but to our Afghan partners who have fought by our side. And our efforts and our focus
00:37:47.220 right now is, as you heard General McKenzie say and others say over the last 24 hours, is to the
00:37:52.800 diplomatic phase. We will get you out. We will honor your service. And we're committed to doing exactly
00:37:58.680 that. I'm sure this is a great comfort to this guy who's stuck in Afghanistan, right? This is a great
00:38:05.140 comfort because Jen Psaki, because the White House is saying they will get you out. Just like they said
00:38:12.700 they would not leave any Americans in Afghanistan before the final withdrawal, except they actually
00:38:17.060 did that. Just like they said Afghanistan would not fall to the Taliban anytime soon, even though it
00:38:22.840 did within a matter of days. Just like they said, just like they said, just like they said,
00:38:26.980 a promise from Joe Biden's White House and a buck 50 would get you a cup of coffee if Joe Biden's
00:38:37.320 inflation did not raise the price of a cup of coffee. Now it's going to be his word plus probably
00:38:42.160 three or four dollars to get you a cup of coffee. It's worth nothing. There is a consequence to
00:38:48.020 incompetence. There is a consequence to not fulfilling your promises. And the consequence is that if I were
00:38:52.500 that guy in Afghanistan, I'd stay in hiding. I'd figure out a plan B because I wouldn't rely on the
00:38:59.060 Biden administration. Most Americans believe Joe Biden should resign. That is a shocking,
00:39:09.380 that is a shocking number. It comes from Rasmussen, which is a right-leaning poll firm, but they've got
00:39:13.540 pretty good numbers. They've got a pretty good record. Rasmussen is saying 52% of Americans want Joe Biden to
00:39:21.380 resign. Only 39% are opposed to him resigning. A full 60% want him impeached. 37% do not want him impeached.
00:39:32.100 Furthermore, so that's really bad in and of itself, but then it gets even worse. A full 58% do not believe
00:39:40.660 that Kamala Harris is qualified to be president. And 47% of Americans haven't been paying attention.
00:39:47.180 Now 40%, oh no, it's, it's even crazier. 47% believe that she's not at all qualified to be
00:39:55.040 president. So I'm sorry, I've got to correct myself. Only 38% have not been paying attention.
00:40:00.100 They think she is qualified. And now this is the best news for Joe Biden because the majority of
00:40:07.800 Americans want him gone and an even greater majority of Americans want him impeached.
00:40:11.940 But Americans are so terrified of Kamala Harris that it probably wouldn't happen.
00:40:19.160 That's really big. As I mentioned earlier, I don't think Joe Biden should be impeached. I don't think
00:40:23.240 he's committed an impeachable offense. I know that these days you can be impeached for, you know,
00:40:28.520 how you take your coffee in the morning. I know that these days the constitutional legal requirements
00:40:32.520 for impeachment have been thrown by the wayside in favor of political considerations. But I'm still
00:40:37.260 standing by the constitution and I still think that there is a legal aspect to impeachment. And so I
00:40:42.920 don't think he's committed a crime as far as I can tell. The one crime he might be committing now
00:40:47.560 is coming out of the incoherence of American foreign policy because we helped to start a terrorist group
00:40:56.840 called the Haqqani Network. It was one of the largest recipients of, of CIA funding during our fight
00:41:02.960 in Afghanistan against the Soviets. The Haqqani Network is a terrorist organization and the United
00:41:08.280 States considers it officially a terrorist organization. And the Haqqani Network, the US
00:41:14.060 official headline is that the Haqqani Network and the Taliban are different. But in reality,
00:41:18.100 they're not. The Haqqani Network has been folded into the Taliban. They're the same thing now.
00:41:22.360 So the United States is allies with the Taliban, but we still consider the Haqqani Network a terrorist
00:41:27.220 organization. And we were just hearing yesterday from the White House and the State Department
00:41:31.680 that they very likely will fund the Taliban. They will send foreign aid to the Taliban,
00:41:37.080 which means they'll be funding a terrorist organization, which is a crime. So I get in
00:41:40.980 that way, he may have committed a crime, but otherwise it's just, it's just incompetence.
00:41:44.920 It's just maladministration, which is very bad, but I don't think it's impeachable.
00:41:49.080 And should he resign? I don't, I don't know. I don't want him to. I'm with the people who fear
00:41:55.920 Harris more than Biden. Biden seems to me mostly incompetent. And so when he's handling a withdrawal
00:42:03.960 from Afghanistan, which in principle, I think still many, most Americans support, even if he
00:42:09.440 bungles it tremendously, I just, I mean, that's, that's really awful. But I'm, I'm not convinced
00:42:15.380 we'd be in a better spot with Kamala Harris. This is really, really bad news for the White House.
00:42:19.620 When you're best shot at holding onto political power is that people hate your deputy even more,
00:42:26.120 you're not, you're not in a, in a terrific position. Meanwhile, the left's PR,
00:42:32.060 generally speaking, is not that great. The Taliban's got great PR. The Democratic Party
00:42:36.840 has pretty bad PR. And actually getting back to our first topic today, pro-life and pro-abortion,
00:42:42.560 a guest on MSNBC who was on Al Sharpton's show thought that it would be clever to compare
00:42:49.600 American pro-lifers to suicide bombers. This is a matter of civil rights. Having the right to an
00:42:57.380 abortion is a constitutional right. It's grounded in the rights of privacy that is within the
00:43:02.080 constitution. And I find it really interesting that part of this argument is an argument about,
00:43:08.780 you know, the rights and abortion is not explicitly listed in the constitution, but you know what,
00:43:13.360 neither is the right to bear arms. That the way that we interpret that law is the interpretation
00:43:18.940 of a constitutional provision, the second amendment. In this, we are interpreting another, we're
00:43:24.660 interpreting another constitutional provision, yet that's, we're not applying that same logic to
00:43:30.380 this situation. I'm not sure where this lady went to law school, but I think she might be
00:43:35.320 misinterpreting the constitution here because she's saying, yes, no, I mean, maybe the right to an
00:43:40.460 abortion. Yeah, sure. You can't find it in the constitution, but you can't find the right to bear,
00:43:43.760 keep and bear arms either. Except you can, it's in the second amendment and it's spelled out in
00:43:51.320 exactly those words. She, I don't even know what she's trying to say, but the constitution is quite
00:43:58.840 clear that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Meanwhile, as she
00:44:06.240 acknowledges, there is no right to an abortion. She's saying that the right to an abortion is implied
00:44:11.580 by the general right to privacy that also doesn't exist in the constitution. Show me the general
00:44:17.160 right to privacy. Where's that? Where's that? Good luck interpreting that in the, interpreting
00:44:22.380 that in the constitution. You're not going to find it. Then she goes on to make her final point.
00:44:28.200 We're all like suicide bombers. What it reminds me of quite honestly is a suicide bomber. Someone who
00:44:35.960 feels like they have the right and the moral duty to mess up somebody else's life for the greater good.
00:44:42.320 So the pro-lifers were like suicide bombers because you know what a suicide bomber does?
00:44:47.760 He has a suicide bomber believes that he has the right and the duty to mess up someone else's life
00:44:55.660 for what they perceive to be the greater good. Like an abortionist? Like you're saying to be like a
00:45:05.880 suicide bomber, you have to think that you have the right to mess up someone's life. So what is
00:45:09.440 messing up someone's life? Is messing up someone's life, I guess, preventing someone from killing
00:45:13.860 someone else if that person wants to kill someone else? I guess, you know, in a way you could call
00:45:19.100 that messing up someone's life, but I'm going to give you two scenarios. One is you prevent someone
00:45:23.820 from killing another person and that is inconvenient for that other person. So what is a greater example
00:45:30.900 of messing up someone's life? That or killing someone, which, which messes up someone's life
00:45:38.000 more? I think the latter probably does. So this woman, not the brightest bulb in the pack
00:45:46.580 on MSNBC with Al Sharpton, also not the sharpest tool in the shed.
00:45:52.360 He doesn't get any respect. No R-E-S-P-I-C-T, Al Sharpton.
00:45:58.860 Show some R-E-S-P-I-C-T.
00:46:02.240 Nor should this woman, because the argument she is making
00:46:04.920 is actually undercutting the point that she, she is trying and failing to make.
00:46:13.740 We've got so much more to get to, but we've got to pause it there. We're going to pause it there
00:46:19.500 on this good news that today, for the first time in a very long time,
00:46:27.040 the law got a little bit more just and babies are going to be able to live and they're going
00:46:32.340 to have a life. And this is good stuff. Enjoy the victories while we get them. They are few
00:46:36.240 and far between. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show. See you tomorrow.
00:46:38.800 The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies. Executive
00:47:08.660 producer Jeremy Boren. Our technical director is Austin Stevens. Supervising producer Mathis
00:47:14.200 Glover. Production manager Pavel Vidovsky. Editor and associate producer Danny D'Amico.
00:47:20.240 Associate producer Justine Turley. Audio mixer Mike Coromina. And hair and makeup by Nika Geneva.
00:47:26.740 The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:47:31.200 Today on The Ben Shapiro Show, a holy war breaks out after Texas bans abortion after detection of
00:47:36.460 fetal heartbeat. The Biden administration continues to declare its own heroism while telling Americans
00:47:40.960 that the Taliban might be our friends now. And Don Lemon says if you're unvaccinated,
00:47:44.760 don't go to the hospital if you get sick. That's today on The Ben Shapiro Show. Give it a listen.