Ep. 997 - The End Of Roe V. Wade!
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
176.57996
Summary
A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion could potentially overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the country's most important abortion ruling in decades. How did this happen? And why did it get leaked to the press?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Breaking news out of the Supreme Court. Politico is reporting a leak of the Supreme Court's opinion
00:00:06.600
in Dobbs versus Jackson Women's Health. This is the decision that could potentially overrule
00:00:13.060
Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. This is the decision that could potentially
00:00:18.300
obliterate the completely fictional national right to an abortion that was established in 1973.
00:00:24.760
The leak itself is shocking, unprecedented. You've never seen this kind of a breach of trust
00:00:31.720
from the Supreme Court. But from the decision that we've got, this is just a 98-page draft
00:00:38.300
of Justice Sam Alito writing the opinion of the court. According to this leak, if the leak is legit,
00:00:45.580
the Supreme Court is voting to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The court is
00:00:53.020
voting to overrule national abortion. Most important decision in my lifetime, if this is legit, from the
00:01:00.580
draft. Quote, Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the
00:01:07.660
decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the
00:01:12.700
abortion issue, Roe and Casey have inflamed debate and deepened division. We hold that Roe and Casey
00:01:19.700
must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is
00:01:25.980
implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the
00:01:30.960
defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely, the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
00:01:36.040
That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution.
00:01:41.980
But any such right must be deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition,
00:01:46.260
and implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The right to abortion does not fall within this
00:01:52.120
category. Until the latter part of the 20th century, such a right was entirely unknown in
00:01:57.340
American law. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or
00:02:03.900
prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and
00:02:11.760
return that authority to the people and their elected representatives. Obviously, if this is legit,
00:02:19.760
obviously, this is the right decision. It's right constitutionally, it's right legally, it's right
00:02:25.460
morally. There are two theories now on how this got leaked. One theory is that it was a liberal
00:02:33.000
activist who was working for Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor is the furthest left member of the
00:02:41.660
court. And so a lot of the chatter is surrounding her staff. The second theory is that this may have
00:02:48.640
been a hack. This went to the Politico National Security Reporter. So maybe it wasn't a leak from
00:02:54.100
the court. Maybe it was just someone going in and finding it in the court emails. I, for one,
00:02:59.540
suspect it was the former. I bet this was a leak. This is the sacrament for the left. Killing babies
00:03:07.340
on the altar of progress is their highest sacrament. We are not talking about safe, legal, and rare.
00:03:14.820
We are talking about abortion on demand without apology. Shout it from the rooftops. People are
00:03:20.840
shocked at the leak. They're shocked, they say, that you would have this kind of breach of trust on
00:03:26.420
the court. I'm not shocked at all. Of course, they leaked the opinion. These people kill babies.
00:03:30.940
Okay, if you're willing to kill a baby, you're probably willing to leak a document. The only
00:03:36.000
purpose, the only purpose to leaking this right now is to intimidate the conservative members of
00:03:41.680
the court into changing their opinion and protecting the license to kill babies all around
00:03:46.900
the country. The secondary purpose will be to pressure Democrat legislators into making Roe versus
00:03:53.820
Wade the law of the land. But the chief goal here is to intimidate the conservatives on the court.
00:03:58.560
Do not let them do it. We knew there were going to be shenanigans now more than ever.
00:04:03.520
Now, not just in my lifetime, probably in the last 50 years of politics.
00:04:07.040
Now more than ever is the time to hold strong. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show.
00:04:18.860
Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday from Spaghetti Noob, who says,
00:04:22.780
hey, Michael, how do they know that there are 150 female skulls in Mexico? How did they know how
00:04:29.580
those skulls identified? That's a great question. How do the leftists who are currently losing their
00:04:35.120
minds, how do they know that women's rights are being threatened? Isn't that so strange? A lot of
00:04:40.160
biologists these days. When you want to know for certain that your home is protected, you got to
00:04:45.120
check out Ring. Right now, go to ring.com slash Knowles. You know about Ring's video doorbell,
00:04:51.380
where you can see and speak to whoever's at your doorstep, whether you're in the home or at your
00:04:55.380
office or on the other side of the world. You know about Ring's alarm system. I absolutely love
00:05:01.040
Ring Alarm. Well, then the question is, have you gone pro? You need to go pro. I absolutely love this
00:05:07.800
product. CNET calls it a giant leap for home security. With Ring Alarm Pro, you are protecting not
00:05:14.220
just your physical home from the bad guys, from freeze, from fire, from flood, your windows,
00:05:19.220
your doors, all that stuff. You're also protecting your digital home because increasingly we're living
00:05:24.240
our lives online in the digital world. So you got to protect that. You got a lot of very valuable data
00:05:28.820
coming in and out. You must protect the real world and the digital world. You can do it all with Ring.
00:05:35.600
It's extremely simple to set up. It's a great deal, by the way, on their subscription. You get
00:05:41.420
professional monitoring for the ultimate peace of mind. They have the professional monitoring
00:05:46.200
call you. You can request emergency services. You've got worry-free security. Right now, to learn
00:05:53.420
more, go to ring.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. That is ring.com slash Knowles. Protect yourself
00:05:59.420
with the guys that I trust. Ring.com slash Knowles. If this opinion is legit, if the court is voting
00:06:07.780
to strike down Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, then Donald Trump has already secured his
00:06:14.020
spot as one of the greatest and most consequential presidents in the United States ever in American
00:06:20.220
history. This takes us all the way back to election 2016, the big debate over, well, should we support
00:06:27.580
Trump? Well, Trump's got some problems and he seems to have been kind of liberal in the past, but do well,
00:06:32.300
but the judges, but Roe v. Wade, but getting those conservatives on the court, well, it's not worth
00:06:38.420
it. I don't think he's going to really do it. And the judges won't hold firm. If this opinion is real,
00:06:43.480
this resolves the question. This resolves the question because one, Trump ended up being a very
00:06:49.580
relatively conservative president, much more conservative than anyone thought.
00:06:53.440
Trump did not turn out to be the crazy maniac who was going to overthrow democracy. He didn't do any of
00:06:57.980
that. But more importantly, he will have been the guy who got Roe v. Wade overruled by getting three
00:07:04.940
judges onto the court. Now, what the libs want to do is leak this so that one, they can cause riots
00:07:12.240
in the streets. Two, they can get death threats to the conservatives on the court. That's what they're
00:07:15.680
doing. That's what they're out for. It's the only thing that they could be out for. And as part of that
00:07:21.120
pressure campaign, they'll be pressuring the liberals in the House and in the Senate to pass a national law
00:07:27.360
saying that abortion is a protected right. Now, they don't have enough votes for that right now
00:07:33.540
because you'd have to get over the filibuster. You'd need 60 votes in the Senate. That doesn't exist.
00:07:38.360
You're not going to get Joe Manchin to vote for this. I don't think you're going to get Kyrsten Sinema
00:07:41.480
to vote for this. So then they'll have to get rid of the filibuster all in order to serve up more
00:07:48.240
innocent little baby sacrifices to their idol Moloch. That's what it's all about. They just are trying
00:07:55.340
to kill more babies. When you put it in those terms, it's so sick. It's so sick, but it's a
00:08:02.420
mania and it is their most deeply cherished right, quote unquote, in the country. And so they're going
00:08:08.780
to try to do that. And they think that this will help them in the midterms. That's the long game
00:08:14.520
here. They think that turning this election into an election about abortion is going to help them.
00:08:18.920
I think they're wrong about that. I don't think there's any evidence that this is going to help
00:08:22.380
them. I think infanticide plays not nearly as well in Peoria as they all think that it will.
00:08:28.080
I mentioned yesterday on the show, I said, I'm not making any predictions here, but I'm a little
00:08:32.360
worried about the Dobbs decision. The reason I was worried is because John Roberts suggested that he
00:08:37.660
was not going to write the opinion of the court. And I said, I'm not making any predictions here about
00:08:41.640
how the case is going to turn out, but it seems like some things are a little off here. It seems like
00:08:47.200
something. So if this is the case that Sam Alito is writing the opinion of the court,
00:08:52.900
then we don't know what this very well might be a 5-4 decision. We just don't know.
00:08:56.600
Maybe Roberts is going to side with the liberals. We're just, we're not sure. The thing we know
00:09:00.580
right now though is this draft was written in February. February 10th is what it stated.
00:09:06.960
If this is the opinion, it will be the most important political development in my lifetime,
00:09:14.440
really of the last 50 years. We're talking about 60 million babies. 60 million. We all use euphemisms
00:09:21.900
when we talk about abortion and women's healthcare and reproductive rights. And then we all use these,
00:09:27.740
we're talking about 60 million babies. The number is unfathomable. How many people in this country
00:09:33.180
should be walking around right now and are not because of this decision in 1973?
00:09:38.860
This is absolutely earth shattering stuff. And actually even beyond the question of abortion,
00:09:46.260
this, this leaked draft of the court opinion has achieved another shocking goal, which is all of a
00:09:51.620
sudden everyone's a biologist. All of a sudden you're seeing memes again, no uterus, no opinion.
00:09:58.260
This is a war on women. You're seeing all these arguments from 10 years ago. I thought we didn't
00:10:02.420
know what a woman was. Ketanji Jackson on this now will soon be on the Supreme Court
00:10:07.540
said that she can't tell what a woman is because she's not a biologist. All of a sudden everybody's
00:10:11.900
a biologist. Sam Alito can tell you what a woman is and all the people reading Sam Alito can tell you
00:10:16.180
what a woman is. Absolutely earth shattering stuff. And I won't let the libs get me down. They're
00:10:23.880
trying to gum this up. They're trying to pressure the conservatives to switch. What the conservatives need
00:10:29.280
to do right now, just come out with the opinion. I don't know if it's in its final draft. This goes
00:10:34.660
all the way back to February. So presumably it's in much better shape. Come out with the opinion.
00:10:40.480
If the opinion is substantially different from this draft, then we will know that the libs
00:10:46.300
have succeeded at pressuring, at threatening violence. That's really what this is about,
00:10:52.500
right? You, you whip up all of the riots. You're going to have a whole lot of mostly peaceful
00:10:56.580
demonstrations coming out with Molotov cocktails and rocks and all the rest of it.
00:11:01.380
And it will make a mockery of our system of government. I never want to hear about
00:11:05.300
the norms. Our norms are sacred, cherished democratic norms. I don't want to hear it
00:11:10.900
from the left anymore. I never want to hear the stupid phrase, January 6th. This is so much more
00:11:17.920
egregious an attack on our democracy than January 6th ever was. It's not even comparable.
00:11:23.540
It's not even comparable. The leaking of this document. I never want it. I don't want to see
00:11:29.860
any more crocodile tears from the libs. If I see them, I'm just going to collect them in my leftist
00:11:33.440
tears tumbler. The opinion is phenomenal news. The leak is really scary news, especially for the
00:11:41.420
judges who are going to be threatened now. So now is the time. Stand firm, guys. You can do it.
00:11:46.640
Stand firm. This is the moment. This is what we're all here for. And then we can celebrate with a nice,
00:11:51.620
big, delicious plate of Good Ranchers. Right now, go to GoodRanchers.com. Use promo code
00:11:58.360
Knowles. You know what I had for dinner last night? I'll give you one guess. It was Good Ranchers. I
00:12:02.040
loved it. It was the Good Ranchers better than organic chicken with the nice garlic rub. Sweet
00:12:07.080
little Elisa put it in a nice, nice chicken chili. It was absolutely fabulous. But you know my favorite
00:12:12.220
thing from Good Ranchers? It's the Wagyu burgers. You've got to try the Wagyu burgers. They're the best
00:12:17.900
burgers you're ever going to try. And right now, you can get two pounds of your new favorite burger
00:12:22.380
for free. For free with code Knowles. What is American Wagyu? It's some of the best beef you're
00:12:27.900
ever going to try. And by the way, you don't just need to use it for burgers. I mean, it makes
00:12:32.280
phenomenal, rich, buttery, delicious burgers. But you can use it for anything. You can use it for tacos.
00:12:37.720
You can use it for chili. You can just eat it. Just the meat, which is something that I do,
00:12:41.960
being of Italian extraction, sometimes a little fatty meat. Just tastes wonderful. Really phenomenal,
00:12:48.840
delicious stuff. But all their stuff is great. The steaks, everything. You want two pounds of
00:12:52.360
free Wagyu burgers and zero inflation? What are you waiting for? Use my code Knowles or visit
00:12:57.100
goodranchers.com slash Knowles. If you don't buy the meat in your house, then tell the person who does
00:13:02.380
to grab two pounds of free American Wagyu burgers today before they're gone. Promo code Knowles
00:13:07.320
at goodranchers.com slash Knowles. The White House is really, really focused on disinformation
00:13:15.180
and misinformation and censorship and propaganda. They're really focused on controlling the narrative.
00:13:21.820
Last week, the White House announced the creation of this new censorship agency called the Disinformation
00:13:26.800
Governance Board. And the announcement came just days after Elon Musk made it clear that he was
00:13:31.380
intending to buy Twitter specifically so that he could give conservatives more freedom of speech on
00:13:36.260
social media. You think that was a coincidence? I don't, it's a little, that's a little too much
00:13:40.660
of a coincidence for me. On top of it, the new director of the new censorship agency is a woman named
00:13:47.380
Nina Jankiewicz, who is not only a partisan leftist Democrat, but she's also ironically, or maybe
00:13:54.140
expectedly, we should say, one of the biggest purveyors of misinformation in the country, specifically
00:13:59.100
regarding Hunter Biden's laptop. She covered up for evidence of the Biden family's crimes. And yet,
00:14:05.620
despite all evidence to the contrary about this woman and about this board, the White House is
00:14:11.620
still insisting that the new censorship agency will not be partisan.
00:14:16.740
There's this woman, Nina Jankiewicz, who is going to be in charge of the board. She has said that she
00:14:22.520
thinks the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation. So should we look forward in the future to her
00:14:28.880
censoring internet traffic about the Hunter Biden laptop?
00:14:32.240
I think I noted exactly what the objective of the board is, including continuing the work of the prior
00:14:37.260
administration. And the woman you noted has extensive experience and has done extensive work addressing
00:14:43.900
disinformation. She has testified before Congress, testified in Europe. She has done, worked closely with
00:14:51.020
the Ukrainians and has unique expertise, especially at this moment we're facing.
00:14:54.760
Oh, okay. All right. Good. Well, that, that sounds great. And that look there it's,
00:14:59.220
this is just totally business as usual. Don't worry about it. But if the disinformation board
00:15:05.220
is not around specifically to censor political disinformation, what exactly is it going to do?
00:15:13.760
The mandate is not to adjudicate what is true or false online or otherwise. It will operate in a
00:15:20.960
nonpartisan and apolitical manner. It's basically meant to coordinate a lot of the ongoing work that
00:15:26.300
is happening. And what their focus is, the focus is on disinformation and threatens the homeland,
00:15:31.160
as I noted, which things like inciting things that would incite violent extremism, you know,
00:15:36.100
human traffickers and other transnational criminal organizations, any efforts that malign foreign
00:15:41.840
influence, anything that would endanger individuals during emergencies. So a lot of this work is
00:15:46.420
really about work that people may not see every day that's ongoing by the Department of Homeland
00:15:51.060
Security. It's just the, the censorship agency is just going to coordinate the ongoing work that's
00:15:57.640
happening, whatever that means, whatever ongoing work is. And it's just going to prevent violent
00:16:03.640
extremism and it's just going to stop foreign influence. What, who could object to that? Now,
00:16:10.200
of course, the Democrats have been baselessly accusing Republicans of all of those things for
00:16:15.940
years. They made up narratives about January 6th and they had a years long witch hunt based on a
00:16:22.140
hoax about Russian collusion. And they used all of that to shut up conservatives, stop us from speaking
00:16:27.320
on social media, and ultimately to silence a president, try to undo the 2016 election. So in practice,
00:16:32.560
the point of the board is simple and obvious. It's to keep conservatives from gaining political power.
00:16:37.520
And the tactic they're using is even simpler. They're going to shut up conservative communicators,
00:16:43.860
people with big shows, people with big platforms, and also just individuals, regular everyday
00:16:49.760
conservatives who share their opinion on social media. They're going to shut up all of us before
00:16:55.000
we can ever even get the message out. That's what they're doing. So they'll do it to regular Joe
00:17:00.860
Schmo on the street with regard to his Twitter account and his Facebook account and his Google
00:17:04.820
account. And they're going to do it all the way to the people here on social media, in the podcasting
00:17:10.700
world. And they're going to do it on cable news too, which is why they're launching a major attack
00:17:14.380
on Tucker Carlson. The New York Times has just published a three-part, I think seven bazillion word
00:17:20.920
expose, shocking undercover reporting on Tucker Carlson to expose the shocking fact that Tucker is
00:17:31.000
conservative. So when the Libs come out and they say, we've got a disinformation board,
00:17:36.560
we're not going to stop conservative speech. We just want to stop disinformation. The problem is
00:17:40.000
they define disinformation and misinformation as conservative speech. So I'll give you an example.
00:17:45.500
The New York Times is giving up the whole game here. The New York Times says they've identified five
00:17:50.300
areas of disinformation, misinformation, where Tucker Carlson is spreading dangerous fake news. Okay,
00:17:59.040
what are the five claims that Tucker has allegedly made that are such shocking disinformation,
00:18:04.520
misinformation that the Libs want to censor? Number one, we've got it right here. This is right
00:18:08.260
from the New York Times. That there are accusations that there is a ruling class intent on controlling
00:18:14.760
the lives of normal people and censoring anyone who stands in its way. They're saying that's
00:18:19.980
misinformation. The observation that there is a group of people who have political power who are
00:18:25.820
trying to censor us, which they just told us there is. If we repeat back to them what they just told
00:18:32.220
to us, that's dangerous misinformation. That's the first thing Tucker said. Second one, replacement
00:18:38.120
through immigration. Assertions that there is an intentional effort to replace native-born Americans
00:18:43.540
with immigrants, that immigration takes away the resources and power of native-born Americans.
00:18:47.900
Is that controversial? Is that even up for question now? The liberals brag about that. There
00:18:55.400
was a famous piece, infamous piece in the New York Times written by Michelle Goldberg saying we can
00:18:59.680
replace them. The New York Times and other liberal outlets have been bragging for years about the
00:19:05.760
demographic problem for Republicans because Republicans do much better among native-born Americans and they
00:19:11.820
do a whole lot worse among immigrants. And so as the immigrant portion of the population explodes,
00:19:16.960
because we're taking in a million legal immigrants per year and two million illegal immigrants per
00:19:21.020
year, probably more actually this year, that the consequence of this is going to be bad news for
00:19:25.180
Republicans and it's a demographic demise for them. They've been bragging about this for years.
00:19:31.660
Even though the majority of Americans, not just of Republicans, but a ton of Democrats too,
00:19:36.740
want drastically less immigration, legal and illegal, the ruling class keeps pushing it because it
00:19:42.600
benefits them politically. The big corporations get cheap labor, the Democrats get easy votes and
00:19:48.040
that's that. Is that, that's a shocking, dangerous conspiracy theory? No, that's, that's their published
00:19:53.080
self-professed strategy. Shifting gender roles, argument, this is, this is the third horrible,
00:19:58.660
dangerous idea that Tucker has allegedly talked about. Arguments that feminism and challenges to gender
00:20:03.160
norms have diminished masculinity, contributed to falling birth rates and led to the demise of traditional
00:20:08.260
family structures. They redefined the family. They redefined marriage and now they're chopping
00:20:13.820
off kids' genitals. I don't think that's a conspiracy theory. They're, they are now, you now have Democrats
00:20:19.580
from the lowest level all the way up to the White House crying. Jen Psaki was crying on camera because
00:20:25.700
the Republicans might not let all of these perverts pump little kids full of cross-sex hormones and
00:20:32.280
sterilized them. She was literally shedding real tears over that. Shocking, dangerous misinformation.
00:20:39.120
Discrimination against white people. Instances in which, in which Mr. Carlson speaks of racism against white
00:20:44.020
people and plays down racism against people of color. There is only one race of people that you, well,
00:20:49.440
sort of one and a half races of people that you are allowed to legally discriminate against in America. It is white
00:20:55.280
people primarily and for whatever reason, sometimes Asians get lumped into this specifically when it comes to
00:21:00.400
college admissions. Asians get white privilege when it comes to college admissions, but the only group
00:21:06.040
that it is not only legal but socially acceptable to discriminate against is white people. It's called
00:21:11.500
affirmative action. That's the policy. The policy is treat white people more harshly than other people.
00:21:17.940
Whatever you think, you can defend the policy, you can oppose the policy, but that is the policy. That's
00:21:21.920
all that it is. And, and furthermore, if you go on television right now and you say black people are
00:21:27.660
terrible, I hate black people or Mexican people are terrible, I hate, or Asian people are terrible,
00:21:32.300
you, you will be ostracized from society. But if you go on television and say white people are really
00:21:37.160
bad, they're evil, they need to apologize for their skin color, you'll get a show on CNN or MSNBC.
00:21:42.680
As a matter of social mores, it's the only group you're allowed to insult and encouraged to insult.
00:21:47.000
So it doesn't seem like a shocking conspiracy theory to me. And then furthermore, this is number five
00:21:52.860
that they accused Tucker of. Destruction of society. Warnings about the destruction of society,
00:21:57.480
civilization, and traditional values. We are transing little children. I think we're, I think
00:22:01.860
we're there. I think we're about, wherever Sodom and Gomorrah were, I think we're about, I think we're
00:22:07.940
turning that up to 11 now, okay? If that was 10, I think we're turning it up to 11. I mention this not
00:22:13.640
just to dunk on the New York Times, not even to defend Tucker, though. He's, he's doing a great job.
00:22:17.740
Now, I, I do it to point out, this is what they call disinformation or misinformation or malinformation
00:22:24.600
or whatever other, whatever other euphemism they want to use to shut us up. This is what they call
00:22:28.980
it. And, and this is what they're considering. So when we say these things, which are all obviously
00:22:34.560
true, they are going to censor us. They're telling us that they're going to censor us. And yet when we
00:22:40.240
say that they are telling us that they're going to censor us, that's considered misinformation too.
00:22:46.100
New York Times is furious and they're focusing in on Tucker in particular. This is no accident.
00:22:54.420
This is no coincidence that they're focusing in on Tucker. There was a woman from the New York
00:23:00.300
Times, Karen Urish, who just went on MSNBC to, to talk about her, her shocking, deep investigative
00:23:08.420
report, which is that she watched Tucker's show a few times. This is the most popular cable news show
00:23:13.400
in prime time. But she went in because she's the only liberal who's ever watched Tucker. She went
00:23:17.760
in and she said, what Tucker is saying is much more dangerous than she thought. It's just, we're
00:23:24.380
getting, we're getting waves in politics. Okay. We get waves of political change. And sometimes in your
00:23:30.760
life, if you want to feel better, you need real waves. You need one more wave. I'm so excited to talk
00:23:36.260
about a company that is really making a difference for our nation's veterans. That is one more wave.
00:23:40.760
One more wave uses surf therapy to help veterans stay active, engaged, and connected. The founder
00:23:46.220
of one more wave, Alex West is a retired Navy SEAL who noticed that for many veterans, especially those
00:23:51.020
with adaptive needs, standard off the shelf surfboards, say that 10 times fast with Sally selling
00:23:56.780
seashells by the seashore, a standard surfboards were not working. Okay. Well, what did he do? He
00:24:03.600
created a team of surfboard artists and surf instructors to work with grant recipients to design custom
00:24:09.260
equipment for their experience, level, and physical needs. One more wave connects veterans to their
00:24:14.700
global network of surfing volunteers who empower them to heal through surf therapy from coast to
00:24:20.720
coast. Fresh salt air, sunshine, and the exhilaration of flying down the face of a wave to keep more
00:24:27.880
veterans coming back for more. Since 2015, one more wave has empowered over 500 veterans to find healing
00:24:34.880
and community through surf therapy by providing customized surfing equipment and community.
00:24:39.880
They need your ongoing support. Help fund 10 new surf therapy grants by going to 1mwave.com
00:24:45.740
slash dailywire. Sign up to become a monthly sustaining donor. The average veteran grant costs
00:24:51.400
2,500 bucks. Every tax deductible donation counts. Help us continue to support those brave men and women
00:24:56.300
who have given so much for this nation. One, the number 1mwave.com slash dailywire. Become a sustaining
00:25:02.720
member today. One more wave is a 501c3 and your donation is tax-deductible. 1mwave.com for more
00:25:08.360
information. When the world goes broke, the Daily Wire builds alternatives. That's why we've started
00:25:14.680
our own publishing company called DW Books. We're proud to announce that one of the first books that
00:25:19.580
we're putting out is fiery but mostly peaceful, the 2020 riots and the gaslighting of America,
00:25:24.060
finally available for purchase today. The book is written by Julio Rosas who exposes the Black Lives Matter
00:25:29.320
riots that broke out across the country in the aftermath of George Floyd's death for the sham
00:25:34.060
that they were. Check out the trailer. The media gaslit the American people for all of 2020 as the
00:25:40.300
riots unfolded. They did not give you the full story. I was there. George Floyd, Kyle Rittenhouse,
00:25:45.880
Rayshard Brooks, Chaz in Seattle. I saw all the riots with my own eyes. Windshields being smashed,
00:25:52.520
giant rocks that were being thrown, businesses that were starting to be looted. The crowd started to
00:25:57.600
become hostile. All the cops were trapped and surrounded. Police were being ordered to retreat.
00:26:03.840
I experienced the tear gas. I experienced the smoke. This was very real to me. The mainstream media,
00:26:10.420
they were trying to call them protests. CNN with that chyron saying, fiery but mostly peaceful.
00:26:15.280
They're trying to push a narrative of don't believe your lying eyes because they were trying to appease
00:26:20.580
a very dedicated Antifa movement that's there. When you read my book, Fiery but Mostly Peaceful,
00:26:25.860
you will get the full story. You will learn what actually happened during the riots of 2020 and
00:26:30.580
what the media did not want to tell you. Buy my book, Fiery but Mostly Peaceful, everywhere books are
00:26:35.540
sold. The book is available for purchase on Amazon or anywhere you buy books online, so go order your
00:26:41.180
copy today. We'll be right back with a lot more.
00:26:55.860
The intrepid reporter for the New York Times, Karen Urish, just went on MSNBC to give her report
00:27:02.940
about watching Tucker Carlson's TV show a few times. She says it's way more dangerous than she expected.
00:27:10.240
Karen, I want to ask you what it was like for you to watch all these hours of Tucker Carlson's show.
00:27:16.520
It was revealing in a way that I can't even describe. I mean, I had no idea. I had not watched the show
00:27:26.780
before this project. And once I did, I realized that what we wanted to do would be to create an
00:27:40.760
immersive experience so that the people who read the New York Times, who most likely don't watch the
00:27:49.160
show on a regular basis, could feel what it's like. Because I think it's easy to dismiss what he's saying
00:27:57.180
as, you know, just another cable TV news host. But he's way more powerful and the content is way more
00:28:07.100
dangerous than, um, I think what, what anybody realizes unless you're watching the show on a daily
00:28:13.720
basis. Way more dangerous. This is an important word. What do they mean by dangerous? Do they mean it's
00:28:21.080
going to threaten people's physical safety? Probably not. The Democrats are not generally so worried about
00:28:27.380
that. They just leaked, for instance, this court opinion, the purpose of which was to threaten the physical
00:28:31.720
safety of the conservatives on the Supreme Court. We just spent two years of mostly peaceful riots
00:28:36.460
where the Libs not only, uh, rioted, but encouraged the riots. We're not just talking about street
00:28:43.700
thugs that were going out, throwing Molotov cocktails. We're talking about Democrats in the
00:28:47.660
highest echelons of power, supporting with their own money and with their own voices, the rioting.
00:28:54.220
Maxine Waters saying, this was even years ago, this was at the beginning of the Trump administration,
00:28:58.420
get up in their faces, go find Republicans when they're out in public, go to their homes where their
00:29:02.920
children sleep and yell and push back on them and say, you're not wanted here. Encouraging them.
00:29:08.880
Elected Democrats. You had plenty of Democrats going in and supporting the BLM rights. Kamala Harris,
00:29:15.820
who's now the vice president of the United States, allegedly. Kamala Harris comes out and tweets out
00:29:20.580
a fund to go bail out the rioters, not to bail out the mostly peaceful protesters. The mostly peaceful
00:29:26.700
protesters didn't get arrested to go bail out rioters. Staffers for Joe Biden did the same thing.
00:29:33.540
So I don't think it's that. Why are they freaking out now? They're freaking out now because they might
00:29:39.500
not be able to kill babies wherever they want in America. So I don't, it's not that kind of danger.
00:29:44.920
We're not talking about real physical danger. We're talking about danger to the political order.
00:29:50.980
So why are they going after Tucker? Why aren't they going after other conservative hosts on
00:29:56.260
television? Because Tucker is a little bit different. Okay. The liberals are fine to tolerate
00:30:03.160
the old order of conservatives using a very small array of talking points to kind of seem like they're
00:30:11.420
pushing back on the liberals, but not actually threatening their power. They're fine with that.
00:30:16.020
The liberals are happy to have court jester conservatives. They actually need the court
00:30:22.320
jester conservatives. They need the squishes. They even need the people who put up a good show,
00:30:27.600
but then when push comes to shove, when the battle is really getting intense, kind of back down a
00:30:32.220
little bit. They like that because if they have court jester conservatives, it legitimizes the liberals
00:30:36.800
power. But they don't like it when the conservatives actually threaten what they're doing. This is
00:30:43.400
something that Tucker does really well on TV. This is something in the world of podcasts that I really
00:30:47.560
try to focus on in this show. This show is not simply owning the libs. I like owning the libs.
00:30:52.860
I drink out of my leftist tears tumbler. My first book was a blank book called reasons to vote for
00:30:56.580
Democrats. I am not above owning the libs. I think it's very fun, but we've got to do more than just
00:31:00.660
own the libs. And frankly, if we want to own the libs, actually own the libs and actually get some
00:31:05.640
political power back, we can't just use the same old Republican talking points. We've got to think a
00:31:09.780
little bit differently, maybe about trade, maybe about immigration, maybe about the way we use
00:31:14.760
language, maybe about the way we wield political power. We've got to think a little bit differently.
00:31:19.300
We need some tough love for our side. My book with words, Speechless, is in many ways tougher on
00:31:24.500
conservatives than it is on liberals, because I think conservatives have been playing into the left's
00:31:28.440
hands. And we've got to change that. We've got to go in and change our tactics. That's the same kind
00:31:33.540
of thing. What I'm saying on podcasting, it's the same kind of thing Tucker's saying on TV, and he's
00:31:37.540
saying it to about four million people a night, which is why the libs are so upset. That's why
00:31:42.640
they're going after it. That's what the danger is. It's the danger to their political hegemony
00:31:48.260
that Tucker is really threatening. They go after us too. I mean, Media Matters has tried to get me
00:31:54.180
canceled for years now. But it's something that Tucker is doing. Tucker right now just has the
00:32:00.440
spotlight on him. He's the biggest guy on cable news. So they attack him. Dangerous. They're not
00:32:09.020
talking about physical danger. Here's my proof that the New York Times is not worried about
00:32:14.500
physical danger. The New York Times just ran an obit for a terrorist who died, an American domestic
00:32:19.300
terrorist who was associated with the leftist group, The Weather Underground. This is Kathy Boudin.
00:32:25.080
Here's the first tweet about the obit from the New York Times. Kathy Boudin, who was a member of the
00:32:32.800
Weather Underground, took part in the murderous 1981 holdup of a Brinks armored truck, died on Sunday.
00:32:37.440
She was 78. Okay, fair enough. That pretty much sums it up. But then they deleted that tweet and they
00:32:42.660
changed it. Here was the new tweet. Kathy Boudin, a member of the Weather Underground, imprisoned for
00:32:48.160
her role in a fatal robbery, but who later helped former inmates, died at 78. That's a little softer.
00:32:57.620
So they deleted the first one and put up the new one because the New York Times readers and leadership
00:33:04.160
and editors felt they were being a little too harsh on the felon murderer domestic terrorist. A woman who
00:33:12.740
participated in this robbery that killed two police officers in New York, one security guard and seriously
00:33:19.560
injured another security guard. So I'm not saying that we need to, you know, spike the football on this
00:33:26.080
woman's grave, but she was a domestic terrorist and now she's dead. Okay, a lot of people die. A lot of people
00:33:31.300
get obituaries. I think the New York Times got it right the first time, but they couldn't, it was too harsh.
00:33:36.060
The left has too much of a soft spot for domestic terrorists, especially the Weather Underground. They've been
00:33:41.260
fetting the Weather Underground for decades now, including this woman. This woman, after she got
00:33:45.240
out of the can, for some reason, she was permitted out of prison. I don't know why. If you kill multiple
00:33:50.000
people and you're convicted of felony murder, I think you should, at the very least, stay in prison
00:33:54.240
for life. But they let her out and she became a professor at Columbia University and she became,
00:34:00.060
I kid you not, the co-director and co-founder of the Columbia Center for Justice.
00:34:05.020
For Justice. A radical leftist terrorist who actually acted on her radicalism and killed
00:34:13.860
people became the director of the Center for Justice. Libs fine with that. Soft on that.
00:34:23.500
The danger for the Libs is not having leftist terrorists running around on the streets. The
00:34:28.620
danger for the Libs would be not having the leftist terrorists running around on the street. The
00:34:33.540
danger for the Libs would be changing the power structure such that leftist terrorists don't get
00:34:39.160
out of prison, don't get to teach at our schools, don't get to do whatever they want. That's the
00:34:43.180
threat to them. And they always focus on education. Do you notice this? Bill Ayers ends up around
00:34:49.780
education, another Weather Underground guy. Kathy Boudin ends up in education. All the focus, all the fight
00:34:55.340
is on education. Why? Because classrooms are crystal balls and they tell you what your society is going to
00:35:01.800
look like in 20 years. This is why the New York Times right now is up in a tizzy over the plan of
00:35:09.340
Republicans to ban a book from the classroom. The book is called Gender Queer. Here it is.
00:35:16.140
New York Times, how a debut graphic memoir became the most banned book in the country. Gender Queer,
00:35:22.880
what's it say? Maya Kababi's book, Gender Queer, about coming out as non-binary. You know,
00:35:28.620
a thing that you can totally do because that's totally real and not just made up. Landed the author
00:35:33.160
at the center of a battle over which books belong in schools and who gets to make that decision.
00:35:39.620
Then it goes on to talk about what a great book this is and how awful it is that it's being banned
00:35:43.580
in schools. Why is this being banned in schools? Because it's weird, creepy, gay, pederast porn.
00:35:50.480
That's why. It's not that it deals with difficult themes. That's fine. I don't mind dealing with
00:35:57.400
difficult themes even in school, even in high school or middle school. Frankly, even in elementary
00:36:01.220
school depending on how it's done. But this book, this is a comic book that does not have literary
00:36:07.720
value that furthermore includes a scene about a 14-year-old boy daydreaming about a little kid
00:36:15.260
having sex with a grown man. And it's a graphic novel, so it's drawn out. That's just obscene.
00:36:23.440
That's just porn. It's weird, creepy, pederast porn. It has no business in schools. Well,
00:36:30.440
what are you, are you for banning books? Yeah, duh. I'm certainly for banning books in fifth grade.
00:36:37.880
In elementary schools, I'm definitely for banning books. The libs are for banning books. They ban
00:36:41.580
the Bible from schools for half a century now, more than half a century. But of course, I'm for
00:36:48.300
banning some of these books. I don't know who needs to hear this. I know this really runs contrary to
00:36:53.560
a lot of talking points now, especially on the right. It is good to ban some books in some
00:37:01.780
circumstances. Here are people in history who have been for banning. I'll go even further. Here are
00:37:07.480
some people in history who have been for burning books. The apostles in the New Testament, in the
00:37:13.080
Acts of the Apostles, they burn books. They burn witchcraft books, sorcery books. Plato. Plato was
00:37:19.320
for burning books. Plato was for burning the books of Democritus. Who else was for burning books?
00:37:26.160
Martin Luther was for burning books. Martin Luther is not exactly my favorite guy in the world,
00:37:31.200
being a Catholic as I am, but he was for it. And then the Catholic Church was for banning Martin
00:37:36.540
Luther's books. And oh, right. Every civilization, every country in the history of the world,
00:37:42.320
including and especially the United States, has banned certain books in certain circumstances.
00:37:49.580
It was the libs who embraced this idea that we should never ban any sort of books in any context
00:37:55.600
whatsoever. If you want weird gay comic book porn in kindergarten, that's your right, darn it.
00:38:00.000
We're a free and liberal society. They were the ones who pushed this idea. It was always insane.
00:38:05.280
And the great victory for the left is they convinced conservatives to adopt this language.
00:38:09.860
We have never believed this. There is nothing conservative about it at all. Don't do it.
00:38:14.720
It's absolutely insane. Societies have the right to standards. And if we're not going to stand up on
00:38:22.140
this standard, if we're not going to stand up on no illustrated pederast porn in elementary schools,
00:38:28.940
then there are no standards. Okay. Then we're not conserving anything. Then to be a conservative
00:38:33.020
doesn't mean anything at all. What is it with the libs and the kids? They just have this sick
00:38:39.020
obsession with the kids. They want to kill the kids. When they can't kill the kids, they want to
00:38:43.180
castrate the kids. When they can't castrate the kids, they at the very least want to pervert the
00:38:47.060
kids' minds and fill them with all sorts of weird pornographic sexual confusion. What is it?
00:38:51.780
It's weird. It's just weird. Okay. I'm not trying to take cheap shots here. If you're just an
00:38:58.540
onlooker taking a look at the political scene, it is weird how obsessed the Democrats are with
00:39:04.860
screwing with kids' heads. It's really strange. Okay. There was a tweet going around for a while
00:39:13.900
that had gone viral. And it said, it's really not that complicated. They're just bad people who want
00:39:19.880
to diddle the kids or something to that effect. And I think it's not quite that simple. Unfortunately,
00:39:24.020
it's more ideological than that. And in a way, I think it makes perfect sense.
00:39:30.700
The libs realize that in order to transform society, you need to shape society. In order
00:39:35.820
to shape society, you need to shape people when they are most malleable, when they are most
00:39:40.020
impressionable. And the way to do that is when they're really, really little. You're physically
00:39:44.620
malleable. You are psychologically and mentally malleable. And that's what they're going after.
00:39:49.140
And we should not let them do it. If our ideology, if our version of free speech is such that
00:39:55.740
it defends a weird pederast porn in kindergarten, something has gone wrong with our idea of free
00:40:01.820
speech. They keep doing it. Tyra Banks is doing this. Tyra Banks, the former Victoria's Secret model,
00:40:08.480
is now producing a drag show for kids. Here it is. This is from Deadline. This is the Hollywood
00:40:15.080
trade paper. Tyra Banks to executive produce teen drag series for Discovery+. Discovery Plus is
00:40:25.820
entering the world of teenage drag shows with Tyra Banks. The Dancing with the Stars host and EP is
00:40:31.280
to executive produce this thing for the streaming service. The series follows five teens and their
00:40:35.680
families as they anticipate their biggest drag performance at Dragutant, a drag show designed as
00:40:41.580
a platform for LGBTQ plus teens to express themselves. Goes on. Every adult associated with
00:40:49.100
this should be in prison. If we lived in a sane society, then all the adults associated with telling
00:40:57.040
13-year-olds to, little 13-year-old boys to put on a dress and stiletto heels and dance sexually before
00:41:03.560
a bunch of grown pervert men, all of those adults would be in prison. Okay? And not that long ago,
00:41:09.660
the adults would be in prison actually in practice in America. I'm not suggesting that we turn America
00:41:15.080
into Mussolini's Italy or something. I'm saying we turn America into America six years ago when we
00:41:21.460
understood this kind of stuff. Six years ago when conservatives were saying, you know, I think there
00:41:27.040
might be a slippery slope. If we normalize all this kind of strange sexual behavior, next thing you know,
00:41:31.060
they're going to be sexualizing the kids. And what happened? The left said, oh, you're crazy.
00:41:35.040
You're a paranoid, crazy conservative. Here we go again with your slippery slope fallacy. Well,
00:41:39.140
here we go. We're down. We're slipping. We're slipped, I think. I think we're at the bottom of
00:41:43.820
the slope. Are we? Except whenever I think we're at the bottom of the slope, we keep slipping down
00:41:48.380
even further. Now, we are not merely seeing this out of Hollyweird. We're not merely, which before we
00:41:58.040
left LA, Jeremy would refer to Hollywood as Gamora by the sea. Okay, we're not just seeing it out of there.
00:42:03.440
We're seeing it out of the halls of political power as well. We're seeing this being pushed
00:42:06.600
from the top of our federal government. Richard Levine, who is a man who thinks that he's a woman,
00:42:15.800
who is the assistant secretary of health in America because we're living in the upside down world,
00:42:23.280
because we are through the looking glass. A dude who doesn't know what sex he is and is pretending to
00:42:28.380
be the other sex is one of the top health officials in the country. Richard Levine is coming out with
00:42:37.020
full-throated support of transgendering little kids, not just adults. He shouldn't do it to adults
00:42:44.280
either, but now he's pushing this for little kids. And his argument for it is that medical professionals
00:42:50.340
agree about gender-affirming care for kids. And gender-affirming is an ironic phrase because it
00:42:56.620
means gender-denying. Gender-affirming care is when you tell a little boy that he's a little girl,
00:43:01.720
according to the libs, which of course does not affirm anything. It only denies reality.
00:43:06.360
Here's what he said. He says, and this is in an interview with NPR.
00:43:10.420
In medicine, there's an evidence-based standard of care for the evaluation and treatment of trans
00:43:14.380
individuals, whether they're youth or adults. The standard is set by the World Professional
00:43:19.500
Association for Transgender Health. Oh, okay. So hold on. You're telling me that the standard
00:43:25.000
standard of what a man is and what a woman is, is being set by the transgender lobby.
00:43:31.420
Does that make a lot of sense? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
00:43:34.420
The last formal standards of care were released in 2011, and we expect the new standards of care
00:43:39.560
in 2022. So they're saying 10 years ago, 11 years ago, maybe they didn't quite think that we should
00:43:44.960
trans the kids yet. But now, look, it's the current year. It's the current moment. The past is always evil.
00:43:49.540
The present's always a crisis. The future's going to be great. And so now it's 2022,
00:43:53.540
and we've decided to mutilate little kids' genitals. Okay? And that's just, if you question
00:43:57.900
that, you're a bigot and an idiot. There are many other standards set by organized medicine. For
00:44:03.380
example, the Endocrine Society, which is an international organization of hormone specialists
00:44:08.040
and endocrinologists that has a standard of care. There have been comments from the American
00:44:12.680
Academy of Pediatrics, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, from the American Medical
00:44:16.820
Association, the American blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, all in support of evidence-based standards
00:44:20.800
of care for gender-affirming treatment. There's no argument among medical professionals, he says,
00:44:27.160
about the value and importance of gender-affirming care.
00:44:32.520
If the entire medical establishment is now suggesting that we should conduct experiments
00:44:40.080
on little tiny girls and boys and pump them full of unnatural hormones and chop up their genitals,
00:44:47.000
if that's the opinion of the medical establishment, all that tells you is that the modern medical
00:44:53.480
establishment needs to be dismantled. That doesn't tell you anything about the little girls and boys.
00:44:57.860
Doesn't tell you anything about sex, about the difference between men and women. Doesn't tell
00:45:01.440
you anything about medicine. It tells you everything you need to know about the political lobbies that
00:45:06.640
constitute the modern medical establishment that need to be dismantled brick by brick by brick.
00:45:11.480
These people need to get help. They need to not be making health care policy and they need to get
00:45:18.420
help. If you're a man who thinks that he's a woman, you need to take a pause, not be making health care
00:45:23.980
policy for the country, and go see a psychologist and work this out in your head. I say this actually
00:45:30.020
with a great deal of sympathy and with as much compassion as I can. Something's not right with you.
00:45:34.720
You're sick in the head and you need to get better and you need to not force your psychological
00:45:42.020
problems on the country. And especially you need to not force your psychological problems
00:45:48.020
on little kids. Okay. We just need to say no. You got to say no to the pederasty illustrated porn
00:45:55.540
in kindergarten. Okay. We got to say no to the sexually confused people trying to transgender the kids.
00:46:02.720
We got to say no to killing the babies based on a completely made up constitutional right from
00:46:09.520
19th. We just got to say no. Okay. And there's nothing fascist or illiberal or a threat to democracy
00:46:16.080
about that. No matter what the New York Times wants to say, no matter what the thugs who are about to be
00:46:20.520
mostly peacefully protesting with Molotov cocktails have to say about it, we need to stand firm. Okay.
00:46:25.600
The fact that we're getting a lot of pushback right now from the left on really basic stuff,
00:46:30.240
don't kill babies and don't trans the kids. We're getting so much pushback from the left on that.
00:46:35.000
That is going to impel a lot of squishy conservatives to say, hey guys, can we just give it up?
00:46:40.820
Ah, do we have to fight about this? This might, this might hurt us in the midterms. Spoiler alert,
00:46:45.520
it's not going to hurt you in the midterms. It's going to help you. Look what happened in Virginia.
00:46:48.540
Look what happened in Florida. No one cares about cutting your stupid corporate tax rates.
00:46:52.600
Everyone cares about protecting their kids. This is actually a winner for conservatives,
00:46:55.960
but that's a political calculation that's actually secondary to the moral calculus.
00:47:00.300
What we're doing is the right thing to do. And what the libs are doing is the wrong thing to do.
00:47:04.080
And the fact that they're pushing back so hard tells you everything you need to know that this
00:47:07.840
is the fight we've got to fight. Well, what are you, are you really going to die on the hill of,
00:47:13.900
are you willing to die? I don't intend to die on any hills, by the way. Are you willing to die on
00:47:18.480
the hill of not having pederast porn in kindergarten? Yeah, I guess so. I'm, I'm certainly
00:47:26.460
willing to fight on that hill. I don't intend to die on any hills. Are you, you're what, you're
00:47:30.320
really going to, you're willing to die on the hill of not killing over 800,000 babies a year through
00:47:33.920
abortion? Yeah, of course I am. Oh my, come on, Michael. You're really, you're going to die on
00:47:40.120
the hill of not letting extremely disturbed, sexually confused men make healthcare policy for all
00:47:46.340
of America and, and try to pump a little kids full of cross sex hormones. Uh-huh. Yeah, yeah, I am.
00:47:53.620
Why aren't you? Well, because we need to focus on the more important battles like tariffs.
00:47:59.020
Like, oh, oh, okay. All right. So, okay. All right, fine. Uh, no, that's, that's the old way.
00:48:06.560
That's the old way of fighting the political battles that the New York Times was basically fine with.
00:48:11.540
You know, they would push back a little, but that was fine. That all worked within the framework
00:48:15.760
of liberalism. They didn't, they didn't really call that dangerous and a threat to democracy and
00:48:22.520
try to upend elections and try to, you know, pull, pull threats on the members of the Supreme Court
00:48:29.000
for that stuff. Okay. They would complain. They would whine. No, no. Citizens United is going to
00:48:34.040
change campaign finance law. Even DC versus Heller is going to change gun control law. You didn't see
00:48:39.100
this stuff. Okay. You didn't see activists on the court releasing opinions, trying to put a target
00:48:44.920
on the heads of these justices. You didn't see seven bazillion word long New York Times exposés
00:48:50.880
trying to go after people for stating basic truths about reality. The only thing, this is a rule of
00:48:57.940
show business. The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about. Okay. And
00:49:01.420
in politics, the only thing worse than being attacked by the really bad people is not being
00:49:06.780
attacked by the really bad people at the New York Times or in the White House or anywhere else.
00:49:10.540
Okay. The fact that it's getting so hot right now tells you how important an issue this is. These
00:49:17.060
issues that we're fighting right now are of such importance. Don't go squishy now. I'm Michael
00:49:21.900
Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show. See you tomorrow.
00:49:23.760
The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies. Executive producer,
00:49:53.740
Jeremy Boring. Supervising producer, Mathis Glover. Production manager, Pavel Vidovsky. Editor and
00:50:00.380
associate producer, Danny D'Amico. Associate producer, Justine Turley. Audio mixer, Mike
00:50:05.920
Coromina. And hair and makeup by Cherokee Heart. Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:50:13.500
Hey there. This is John Bickley, Daily Wire editor-in-chief and co-host of Morning Wire.
00:50:17.860
On today's episode, crime in major cities spins out of control. The newly formed Disinformation
00:50:24.200
Governance Board comes under fire. And the Supreme Court hands down a unanimous decision on free speech
00:50:30.020
and religious liberty. Join us and get the facts first on the news you need to know with our show,