The Michael Knowles Show - Ep. 997 - The End Of Roe V. Wade!

00:00:00.000 Breaking news out of the Supreme Court. Politico is reporting a leak of the Supreme Court's opinion

00:00:06.600 in Dobbs versus Jackson Women's Health. This is the decision that could potentially overrule

00:00:13.060 Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. This is the decision that could potentially

00:00:18.300 obliterate the completely fictional national right to an abortion that was established in 1973.

00:00:24.760 The leak itself is shocking, unprecedented. You've never seen this kind of a breach of trust

00:00:31.720 from the Supreme Court. But from the decision that we've got, this is just a 98-page draft

00:00:38.300 of Justice Sam Alito writing the opinion of the court. According to this leak, if the leak is legit,

00:00:45.580 the Supreme Court is voting to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The court is

00:00:53.020 voting to overrule national abortion. Most important decision in my lifetime, if this is legit, from the

00:01:00.580 draft. Quote, Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the

00:01:07.660 decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the

00:01:12.700 abortion issue, Roe and Casey have inflamed debate and deepened division. We hold that Roe and Casey

00:01:19.700 must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is

00:01:25.980 implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the

00:01:30.960 defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely, the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

00:01:36.040 That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution.

00:01:41.980 But any such right must be deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition,

00:01:46.260 and implicit in the concept of ordered liberty. The right to abortion does not fall within this

00:01:52.120 category. Until the latter part of the 20th century, such a right was entirely unknown in

00:01:57.340 American law. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or

00:02:03.900 prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and

00:02:11.760 return that authority to the people and their elected representatives. Obviously, if this is legit,

00:02:19.760 obviously, this is the right decision. It's right constitutionally, it's right legally, it's right

00:02:25.460 morally. There are two theories now on how this got leaked. One theory is that it was a liberal

00:02:33.000 activist who was working for Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor is the furthest left member of the

00:02:41.660 court. And so a lot of the chatter is surrounding her staff. The second theory is that this may have

00:02:48.640 been a hack. This went to the Politico National Security Reporter. So maybe it wasn't a leak from

00:02:54.100 the court. Maybe it was just someone going in and finding it in the court emails. I, for one,

00:02:59.540 suspect it was the former. I bet this was a leak. This is the sacrament for the left. Killing babies

00:03:07.340 on the altar of progress is their highest sacrament. We are not talking about safe, legal, and rare.

00:03:14.820 We are talking about abortion on demand without apology. Shout it from the rooftops. People are 0.52

00:03:20.840 shocked at the leak. They're shocked, they say, that you would have this kind of breach of trust on

00:03:26.420 the court. I'm not shocked at all. Of course, they leaked the opinion. These people kill babies. 0.93

00:03:30.940 Okay, if you're willing to kill a baby, you're probably willing to leak a document. The only

00:03:36.000 purpose, the only purpose to leaking this right now is to intimidate the conservative members of

00:03:41.680 the court into changing their opinion and protecting the license to kill babies all around

00:03:46.900 the country. The secondary purpose will be to pressure Democrat legislators into making Roe versus

00:03:53.820 Wade the law of the land. But the chief goal here is to intimidate the conservatives on the court.

00:03:58.560 Do not let them do it. We knew there were going to be shenanigans now more than ever.

00:04:03.520 Now, not just in my lifetime, probably in the last 50 years of politics.

00:04:07.040 Now more than ever is the time to hold strong. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show.

00:04:18.860 Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment yesterday from Spaghetti Noob, who says,

00:04:22.780 hey, Michael, how do they know that there are 150 female skulls in Mexico? How did they know how

00:04:29.580 those skulls identified? That's a great question. How do the leftists who are currently losing their

00:04:35.120 minds, how do they know that women's rights are being threatened? Isn't that so strange? A lot of

00:04:40.160 biologists these days. When you want to know for certain that your home is protected, you got to

00:04:45.120 check out Ring. Right now, go to ring.com slash Knowles. You know about Ring's video doorbell,

00:04:51.380 where you can see and speak to whoever's at your doorstep, whether you're in the home or at your

00:04:55.380 office or on the other side of the world. You know about Ring's alarm system. I absolutely love

00:05:01.040 Ring Alarm. Well, then the question is, have you gone pro? You need to go pro. I absolutely love this

00:05:07.800 product. CNET calls it a giant leap for home security. With Ring Alarm Pro, you are protecting not

00:05:14.220 just your physical home from the bad guys, from freeze, from fire, from flood, your windows,

00:05:19.220 your doors, all that stuff. You're also protecting your digital home because increasingly we're living

00:05:24.240 our lives online in the digital world. So you got to protect that. You got a lot of very valuable data

00:05:28.820 coming in and out. You must protect the real world and the digital world. You can do it all with Ring.

00:05:35.600 It's extremely simple to set up. It's a great deal, by the way, on their subscription. You get

00:05:41.420 professional monitoring for the ultimate peace of mind. They have the professional monitoring

00:05:46.200 call you. You can request emergency services. You've got worry-free security. Right now, to learn

00:05:53.420 more, go to ring.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S. That is ring.com slash Knowles. Protect yourself

00:05:59.420 with the guys that I trust. Ring.com slash Knowles. If this opinion is legit, if the court is voting

00:06:07.780 to strike down Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, then Donald Trump has already secured his

00:06:14.020 spot as one of the greatest and most consequential presidents in the United States ever in American

00:06:20.220 history. This takes us all the way back to election 2016, the big debate over, well, should we support

00:06:27.580 Trump? Well, Trump's got some problems and he seems to have been kind of liberal in the past, but do well,

00:06:32.300 but the judges, but Roe v. Wade, but getting those conservatives on the court, well, it's not worth

00:06:38.420 it. I don't think he's going to really do it. And the judges won't hold firm. If this opinion is real,

00:06:43.480 this resolves the question. This resolves the question because one, Trump ended up being a very

00:06:49.580 relatively conservative president, much more conservative than anyone thought.

00:06:53.440 Trump did not turn out to be the crazy maniac who was going to overthrow democracy. He didn't do any of

00:06:57.980 that. But more importantly, he will have been the guy who got Roe v. Wade overruled by getting three

00:07:04.940 judges onto the court. Now, what the libs want to do is leak this so that one, they can cause riots 1.00

00:07:12.240 in the streets. Two, they can get death threats to the conservatives on the court. That's what they're

00:07:15.680 doing. That's what they're out for. It's the only thing that they could be out for. And as part of that

00:07:21.120 pressure campaign, they'll be pressuring the liberals in the House and in the Senate to pass a national law

00:07:27.360 saying that abortion is a protected right. Now, they don't have enough votes for that right now

00:07:33.540 because you'd have to get over the filibuster. You'd need 60 votes in the Senate. That doesn't exist. 0.97

00:07:38.360 You're not going to get Joe Manchin to vote for this. I don't think you're going to get Kyrsten Sinema

00:07:41.480 to vote for this. So then they'll have to get rid of the filibuster all in order to serve up more

00:07:48.240 innocent little baby sacrifices to their idol Moloch. That's what it's all about. They just are trying

00:07:55.340 to kill more babies. When you put it in those terms, it's so sick. It's so sick, but it's a

00:08:02.420 mania and it is their most deeply cherished right, quote unquote, in the country. And so they're going

00:08:08.780 to try to do that. And they think that this will help them in the midterms. That's the long game

00:08:14.520 here. They think that turning this election into an election about abortion is going to help them.

00:08:18.920 I think they're wrong about that. I don't think there's any evidence that this is going to help

00:08:22.380 them. I think infanticide plays not nearly as well in Peoria as they all think that it will.

00:08:28.080 I mentioned yesterday on the show, I said, I'm not making any predictions here, but I'm a little

00:08:32.360 worried about the Dobbs decision. The reason I was worried is because John Roberts suggested that he

00:08:37.660 was not going to write the opinion of the court. And I said, I'm not making any predictions here about

00:08:41.640 how the case is going to turn out, but it seems like some things are a little off here. It seems like

00:08:47.200 something. So if this is the case that Sam Alito is writing the opinion of the court,

00:08:52.900 then we don't know what this very well might be a 5-4 decision. We just don't know.

00:08:56.600 Maybe Roberts is going to side with the liberals. We're just, we're not sure. The thing we know

00:09:00.580 right now though is this draft was written in February. February 10th is what it stated.

00:09:06.960 If this is the opinion, it will be the most important political development in my lifetime,

00:09:14.440 really of the last 50 years. We're talking about 60 million babies. 60 million. We all use euphemisms

00:09:21.900 when we talk about abortion and women's healthcare and reproductive rights. And then we all use these,

00:09:27.740 we're talking about 60 million babies. The number is unfathomable. How many people in this country

00:09:33.180 should be walking around right now and are not because of this decision in 1973?

00:09:38.860 This is absolutely earth shattering stuff. And actually even beyond the question of abortion,

00:09:46.260 this, this leaked draft of the court opinion has achieved another shocking goal, which is all of a

00:09:51.620 sudden everyone's a biologist. All of a sudden you're seeing memes again, no uterus, no opinion.

00:09:58.260 This is a war on women. You're seeing all these arguments from 10 years ago. I thought we didn't 0.59

00:10:02.420 know what a woman was. Ketanji Jackson on this now will soon be on the Supreme Court

00:10:07.540 said that she can't tell what a woman is because she's not a biologist. All of a sudden everybody's

00:10:11.900 a biologist. Sam Alito can tell you what a woman is and all the people reading Sam Alito can tell you

00:10:16.180 what a woman is. Absolutely earth shattering stuff. And I won't let the libs get me down. They're 1.00

00:10:23.880 trying to gum this up. They're trying to pressure the conservatives to switch. What the conservatives need

00:10:29.280 to do right now, just come out with the opinion. I don't know if it's in its final draft. This goes

00:10:34.660 all the way back to February. So presumably it's in much better shape. Come out with the opinion.

00:10:40.480 If the opinion is substantially different from this draft, then we will know that the libs

00:10:46.300 have succeeded at pressuring, at threatening violence. That's really what this is about,

00:10:52.500 right? You, you whip up all of the riots. You're going to have a whole lot of mostly peaceful

00:10:56.580 demonstrations coming out with Molotov cocktails and rocks and all the rest of it.

00:11:01.380 And it will make a mockery of our system of government. I never want to hear about

00:11:05.300 the norms. Our norms are sacred, cherished democratic norms. I don't want to hear it

00:11:10.900 from the left anymore. I never want to hear the stupid phrase, January 6th. This is so much more

00:11:17.920 egregious an attack on our democracy than January 6th ever was. It's not even comparable.

00:11:23.540 It's not even comparable. The leaking of this document. I never want it. I don't want to see

00:11:29.860 any more crocodile tears from the libs. If I see them, I'm just going to collect them in my leftist

00:11:33.440 tears tumbler. The opinion is phenomenal news. The leak is really scary news, especially for the

00:11:41.420 judges who are going to be threatened now. So now is the time. Stand firm, guys. You can do it.

00:11:46.640 Stand firm. This is the moment. This is what we're all here for. And then we can celebrate with a nice,

00:11:51.620 big, delicious plate of Good Ranchers. Right now, go to GoodRanchers.com. Use promo code

00:11:58.360 Knowles. You know what I had for dinner last night? I'll give you one guess. It was Good Ranchers. I

00:12:02.040 loved it. It was the Good Ranchers better than organic chicken with the nice garlic rub. Sweet

00:12:07.080 little Elisa put it in a nice, nice chicken chili. It was absolutely fabulous. But you know my favorite

00:12:12.220 thing from Good Ranchers? It's the Wagyu burgers. You've got to try the Wagyu burgers. They're the best

00:12:17.900 burgers you're ever going to try. And right now, you can get two pounds of your new favorite burger

00:12:22.380 for free. For free with code Knowles. What is American Wagyu? It's some of the best beef you're

00:12:27.900 ever going to try. And by the way, you don't just need to use it for burgers. I mean, it makes

00:12:32.280 phenomenal, rich, buttery, delicious burgers. But you can use it for anything. You can use it for tacos.

00:12:37.720 You can use it for chili. You can just eat it. Just the meat, which is something that I do,

00:12:41.960 being of Italian extraction, sometimes a little fatty meat. Just tastes wonderful. Really phenomenal,

00:12:48.840 delicious stuff. But all their stuff is great. The steaks, everything. You want two pounds of

00:12:52.360 free Wagyu burgers and zero inflation? What are you waiting for? Use my code Knowles or visit

00:12:57.100 goodranchers.com slash Knowles. If you don't buy the meat in your house, then tell the person who does

00:13:02.380 to grab two pounds of free American Wagyu burgers today before they're gone. Promo code Knowles

00:13:07.320 at goodranchers.com slash Knowles. The White House is really, really focused on disinformation

00:13:15.180 and misinformation and censorship and propaganda. They're really focused on controlling the narrative.

00:13:21.820 Last week, the White House announced the creation of this new censorship agency called the Disinformation

00:13:26.800 Governance Board. And the announcement came just days after Elon Musk made it clear that he was

00:13:31.380 intending to buy Twitter specifically so that he could give conservatives more freedom of speech on

00:13:36.260 social media. You think that was a coincidence? I don't, it's a little, that's a little too much

00:13:40.660 of a coincidence for me. On top of it, the new director of the new censorship agency is a woman named

00:13:47.380 Nina Jankiewicz, who is not only a partisan leftist Democrat, but she's also ironically, or maybe 1.00

00:13:54.140 expectedly, we should say, one of the biggest purveyors of misinformation in the country, specifically

00:13:59.100 regarding Hunter Biden's laptop. She covered up for evidence of the Biden family's crimes. And yet,

00:14:05.620 despite all evidence to the contrary about this woman and about this board, the White House is

00:14:11.620 still insisting that the new censorship agency will not be partisan.

00:14:16.740 There's this woman, Nina Jankiewicz, who is going to be in charge of the board. She has said that she

00:14:22.520 thinks the Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation. So should we look forward in the future to her

00:14:28.880 censoring internet traffic about the Hunter Biden laptop?

00:14:32.240 I think I noted exactly what the objective of the board is, including continuing the work of the prior

00:14:37.260 administration. And the woman you noted has extensive experience and has done extensive work addressing

00:14:43.900 disinformation. She has testified before Congress, testified in Europe. She has done, worked closely with

00:14:51.020 the Ukrainians and has unique expertise, especially at this moment we're facing.

00:14:54.760 Oh, okay. All right. Good. Well, that, that sounds great. And that look there it's,

00:14:59.220 this is just totally business as usual. Don't worry about it. But if the disinformation board

00:15:05.220 is not around specifically to censor political disinformation, what exactly is it going to do?

00:15:13.760 The mandate is not to adjudicate what is true or false online or otherwise. It will operate in a

00:15:20.960 nonpartisan and apolitical manner. It's basically meant to coordinate a lot of the ongoing work that

00:15:26.300 is happening. And what their focus is, the focus is on disinformation and threatens the homeland,

00:15:31.160 as I noted, which things like inciting things that would incite violent extremism, you know,

00:15:36.100 human traffickers and other transnational criminal organizations, any efforts that malign foreign

00:15:41.840 influence, anything that would endanger individuals during emergencies. So a lot of this work is

00:15:46.420 really about work that people may not see every day that's ongoing by the Department of Homeland

00:15:51.060 Security. It's just the, the censorship agency is just going to coordinate the ongoing work that's

00:15:57.640 happening, whatever that means, whatever ongoing work is. And it's just going to prevent violent

00:16:03.640 extremism and it's just going to stop foreign influence. What, who could object to that? Now, 0.96

00:16:10.200 of course, the Democrats have been baselessly accusing Republicans of all of those things for

00:16:15.940 years. They made up narratives about January 6th and they had a years long witch hunt based on a

00:16:22.140 hoax about Russian collusion. And they used all of that to shut up conservatives, stop us from speaking

00:16:27.320 on social media, and ultimately to silence a president, try to undo the 2016 election. So in practice,

00:16:32.560 the point of the board is simple and obvious. It's to keep conservatives from gaining political power.

00:16:37.520 And the tactic they're using is even simpler. They're going to shut up conservative communicators,

00:16:43.860 people with big shows, people with big platforms, and also just individuals, regular everyday

00:16:49.760 conservatives who share their opinion on social media. They're going to shut up all of us before

00:16:55.000 we can ever even get the message out. That's what they're doing. So they'll do it to regular Joe

00:17:00.860 Schmo on the street with regard to his Twitter account and his Facebook account and his Google

00:17:04.820 account. And they're going to do it all the way to the people here on social media, in the podcasting

00:17:10.700 world. And they're going to do it on cable news too, which is why they're launching a major attack

00:17:14.380 on Tucker Carlson. The New York Times has just published a three-part, I think seven bazillion word

00:17:20.920 expose, shocking undercover reporting on Tucker Carlson to expose the shocking fact that Tucker is

00:17:31.000 conservative. So when the Libs come out and they say, we've got a disinformation board,

00:17:36.560 we're not going to stop conservative speech. We just want to stop disinformation. The problem is

00:17:40.000 they define disinformation and misinformation as conservative speech. So I'll give you an example.

00:17:45.500 The New York Times is giving up the whole game here. The New York Times says they've identified five

00:17:50.300 areas of disinformation, misinformation, where Tucker Carlson is spreading dangerous fake news. Okay, 0.96

00:17:59.040 what are the five claims that Tucker has allegedly made that are such shocking disinformation,

00:18:04.520 misinformation that the Libs want to censor? Number one, we've got it right here. This is right

00:18:08.260 from the New York Times. That there are accusations that there is a ruling class intent on controlling

00:18:14.760 the lives of normal people and censoring anyone who stands in its way. They're saying that's

00:18:19.980 misinformation. The observation that there is a group of people who have political power who are

00:18:25.820 trying to censor us, which they just told us there is. If we repeat back to them what they just told

00:18:32.220 to us, that's dangerous misinformation. That's the first thing Tucker said. Second one, replacement

00:18:38.120 through immigration. Assertions that there is an intentional effort to replace native-born Americans

00:18:43.540 with immigrants, that immigration takes away the resources and power of native-born Americans. 1.00

00:18:47.900 Is that controversial? Is that even up for question now? The liberals brag about that. There

00:18:55.400 was a famous piece, infamous piece in the New York Times written by Michelle Goldberg saying we can

00:18:59.680 replace them. The New York Times and other liberal outlets have been bragging for years about the

00:19:05.760 demographic problem for Republicans because Republicans do much better among native-born Americans and they

00:19:11.820 do a whole lot worse among immigrants. And so as the immigrant portion of the population explodes, 1.00

00:19:16.960 because we're taking in a million legal immigrants per year and two million illegal immigrants per

00:19:21.020 year, probably more actually this year, that the consequence of this is going to be bad news for

00:19:25.180 Republicans and it's a demographic demise for them. They've been bragging about this for years.

00:19:31.660 Even though the majority of Americans, not just of Republicans, but a ton of Democrats too,

00:19:36.740 want drastically less immigration, legal and illegal, the ruling class keeps pushing it because it

00:19:42.600 benefits them politically. The big corporations get cheap labor, the Democrats get easy votes and

00:19:48.040 that's that. Is that, that's a shocking, dangerous conspiracy theory? No, that's, that's their published

00:19:53.080 self-professed strategy. Shifting gender roles, argument, this is, this is the third horrible,

00:19:58.660 dangerous idea that Tucker has allegedly talked about. Arguments that feminism and challenges to gender

00:20:03.160 norms have diminished masculinity, contributed to falling birth rates and led to the demise of traditional

00:20:08.260 family structures. They redefined the family. They redefined marriage and now they're chopping

00:20:13.820 off kids' genitals. I don't think that's a conspiracy theory. They're, they are now, you now have Democrats

00:20:19.580 from the lowest level all the way up to the White House crying. Jen Psaki was crying on camera because 1.00

00:20:25.700 the Republicans might not let all of these perverts pump little kids full of cross-sex hormones and 1.00

00:20:32.280 sterilized them. She was literally shedding real tears over that. Shocking, dangerous misinformation.

00:20:39.120 Discrimination against white people. Instances in which, in which Mr. Carlson speaks of racism against white

00:20:44.020 people and plays down racism against people of color. There is only one race of people that you, well,

00:20:49.440 sort of one and a half races of people that you are allowed to legally discriminate against in America. It is white 0.91

00:20:55.280 people primarily and for whatever reason, sometimes Asians get lumped into this specifically when it comes to

00:21:00.400 college admissions. Asians get white privilege when it comes to college admissions, but the only group 0.99

00:21:06.040 that it is not only legal but socially acceptable to discriminate against is white people. It's called 0.89

00:21:11.500 affirmative action. That's the policy. The policy is treat white people more harshly than other people. 0.82

00:21:17.940 Whatever you think, you can defend the policy, you can oppose the policy, but that is the policy. That's

00:21:21.920 all that it is. And, and furthermore, if you go on television right now and you say black people are

00:21:27.660 terrible, I hate black people or Mexican people are terrible, I hate, or Asian people are terrible, 1.00

00:21:32.300 you, you will be ostracized from society. But if you go on television and say white people are really

00:21:37.160 bad, they're evil, they need to apologize for their skin color, you'll get a show on CNN or MSNBC. 1.00

00:21:42.680 As a matter of social mores, it's the only group you're allowed to insult and encouraged to insult.

00:21:47.000 So it doesn't seem like a shocking conspiracy theory to me. And then furthermore, this is number five

00:21:52.860 that they accused Tucker of. Destruction of society. Warnings about the destruction of society,

00:21:57.480 civilization, and traditional values. We are transing little children. I think we're, I think

00:22:01.860 we're there. I think we're about, wherever Sodom and Gomorrah were, I think we're about, I think we're

00:22:07.940 turning that up to 11 now, okay? If that was 10, I think we're turning it up to 11. I mention this not

00:22:13.640 just to dunk on the New York Times, not even to defend Tucker, though. He's, he's doing a great job.

00:22:17.740 Now, I, I do it to point out, this is what they call disinformation or misinformation or malinformation

00:22:24.600 or whatever other, whatever other euphemism they want to use to shut us up. This is what they call

00:22:28.980 it. And, and this is what they're considering. So when we say these things, which are all obviously

00:22:34.560 true, they are going to censor us. They're telling us that they're going to censor us. And yet when we

00:22:40.240 say that they are telling us that they're going to censor us, that's considered misinformation too.

00:22:46.100 New York Times is furious and they're focusing in on Tucker in particular. This is no accident.

00:22:54.420 This is no coincidence that they're focusing in on Tucker. There was a woman from the New York

00:23:00.300 Times, Karen Urish, who just went on MSNBC to, to talk about her, her shocking, deep investigative

00:23:08.420 report, which is that she watched Tucker's show a few times. This is the most popular cable news show

00:23:13.400 in prime time. But she went in because she's the only liberal who's ever watched Tucker. She went

00:23:17.760 in and she said, what Tucker is saying is much more dangerous than she thought. It's just, we're

00:23:24.380 getting, we're getting waves in politics. Okay. We get waves of political change. And sometimes in your

00:23:30.760 life, if you want to feel better, you need real waves. You need one more wave. I'm so excited to talk

00:23:36.260 about a company that is really making a difference for our nation's veterans. That is one more wave.

00:23:40.760 One more wave uses surf therapy to help veterans stay active, engaged, and connected. The founder

00:23:46.220 of one more wave, Alex West is a retired Navy SEAL who noticed that for many veterans, especially those

00:23:51.020 with adaptive needs, standard off the shelf surfboards, say that 10 times fast with Sally selling

00:23:56.780 seashells by the seashore, a standard surfboards were not working. Okay. Well, what did he do? He

00:24:03.600 created a team of surfboard artists and surf instructors to work with grant recipients to design custom

00:24:09.260 equipment for their experience, level, and physical needs. One more wave connects veterans to their

00:24:14.700 global network of surfing volunteers who empower them to heal through surf therapy from coast to

00:24:20.720 coast. Fresh salt air, sunshine, and the exhilaration of flying down the face of a wave to keep more

00:24:27.880 veterans coming back for more. Since 2015, one more wave has empowered over 500 veterans to find healing

00:24:34.880 and community through surf therapy by providing customized surfing equipment and community.

00:24:39.880 They need your ongoing support. Help fund 10 new surf therapy grants by going to 1mwave.com

00:24:45.740 slash dailywire. Sign up to become a monthly sustaining donor. The average veteran grant costs

00:24:51.400 2,500 bucks. Every tax deductible donation counts. Help us continue to support those brave men and women

00:24:56.300 who have given so much for this nation. One, the number 1mwave.com slash dailywire. Become a sustaining

00:25:02.720 member today. One more wave is a 501c3 and your donation is tax-deductible. 1mwave.com for more

00:25:08.360 information. When the world goes broke, the Daily Wire builds alternatives. That's why we've started

00:25:14.680 our own publishing company called DW Books. We're proud to announce that one of the first books that

00:25:19.580 we're putting out is fiery but mostly peaceful, the 2020 riots and the gaslighting of America,

00:25:24.060 finally available for purchase today. The book is written by Julio Rosas who exposes the Black Lives Matter

00:25:29.320 riots that broke out across the country in the aftermath of George Floyd's death for the sham 0.96

00:25:34.060 that they were. Check out the trailer. The media gaslit the American people for all of 2020 as the

00:25:40.300 riots unfolded. They did not give you the full story. I was there. George Floyd, Kyle Rittenhouse,

00:25:45.880 Rayshard Brooks, Chaz in Seattle. I saw all the riots with my own eyes. Windshields being smashed,

00:25:52.520 giant rocks that were being thrown, businesses that were starting to be looted. The crowd started to

00:25:57.600 become hostile. All the cops were trapped and surrounded. Police were being ordered to retreat.

00:26:03.840 I experienced the tear gas. I experienced the smoke. This was very real to me. The mainstream media,

00:26:10.420 they were trying to call them protests. CNN with that chyron saying, fiery but mostly peaceful.

00:26:15.280 They're trying to push a narrative of don't believe your lying eyes because they were trying to appease

00:26:20.580 a very dedicated Antifa movement that's there. When you read my book, Fiery but Mostly Peaceful,

00:26:25.860 you will get the full story. You will learn what actually happened during the riots of 2020 and

00:26:30.580 what the media did not want to tell you. Buy my book, Fiery but Mostly Peaceful, everywhere books are

00:26:35.540 sold. The book is available for purchase on Amazon or anywhere you buy books online, so go order your

00:26:41.180 copy today. We'll be right back with a lot more.

00:26:55.860 The intrepid reporter for the New York Times, Karen Urish, just went on MSNBC to give her report 0.91

00:27:02.940 about watching Tucker Carlson's TV show a few times. She says it's way more dangerous than she expected.

00:27:10.240 Karen, I want to ask you what it was like for you to watch all these hours of Tucker Carlson's show.

00:27:16.520 It was revealing in a way that I can't even describe. I mean, I had no idea. I had not watched the show

00:27:26.780 before this project. And once I did, I realized that what we wanted to do would be to create an

00:27:40.760 immersive experience so that the people who read the New York Times, who most likely don't watch the

00:27:49.160 show on a regular basis, could feel what it's like. Because I think it's easy to dismiss what he's saying

00:27:57.180 as, you know, just another cable TV news host. But he's way more powerful and the content is way more

00:28:07.100 dangerous than, um, I think what, what anybody realizes unless you're watching the show on a daily

00:28:13.720 basis. Way more dangerous. This is an important word. What do they mean by dangerous? Do they mean it's

00:28:21.080 going to threaten people's physical safety? Probably not. The Democrats are not generally so worried about

00:28:27.380 that. They just leaked, for instance, this court opinion, the purpose of which was to threaten the physical

00:28:31.720 safety of the conservatives on the Supreme Court. We just spent two years of mostly peaceful riots

00:28:36.460 where the Libs not only, uh, rioted, but encouraged the riots. We're not just talking about street

00:28:43.700 thugs that were going out, throwing Molotov cocktails. We're talking about Democrats in the

00:28:47.660 highest echelons of power, supporting with their own money and with their own voices, the rioting.

00:28:54.220 Maxine Waters saying, this was even years ago, this was at the beginning of the Trump administration,

00:28:58.420 get up in their faces, go find Republicans when they're out in public, go to their homes where their

00:29:02.920 children sleep and yell and push back on them and say, you're not wanted here. Encouraging them.

00:29:08.880 Elected Democrats. You had plenty of Democrats going in and supporting the BLM rights. Kamala Harris, 0.99

00:29:15.820 who's now the vice president of the United States, allegedly. Kamala Harris comes out and tweets out

00:29:20.580 a fund to go bail out the rioters, not to bail out the mostly peaceful protesters. The mostly peaceful

00:29:26.700 protesters didn't get arrested to go bail out rioters. Staffers for Joe Biden did the same thing.

00:29:33.540 So I don't think it's that. Why are they freaking out now? They're freaking out now because they might

00:29:39.500 not be able to kill babies wherever they want in America. So I don't, it's not that kind of danger.

00:29:44.920 We're not talking about real physical danger. We're talking about danger to the political order.

00:29:50.980 So why are they going after Tucker? Why aren't they going after other conservative hosts on

00:29:56.260 television? Because Tucker is a little bit different. Okay. The liberals are fine to tolerate

00:30:03.160 the old order of conservatives using a very small array of talking points to kind of seem like they're

00:30:11.420 pushing back on the liberals, but not actually threatening their power. They're fine with that.

00:30:16.020 The liberals are happy to have court jester conservatives. They actually need the court

00:30:22.320 jester conservatives. They need the squishes. They even need the people who put up a good show, 0.72

00:30:27.600 but then when push comes to shove, when the battle is really getting intense, kind of back down a

00:30:32.220 little bit. They like that because if they have court jester conservatives, it legitimizes the liberals

00:30:36.800 power. But they don't like it when the conservatives actually threaten what they're doing. This is

00:30:43.400 something that Tucker does really well on TV. This is something in the world of podcasts that I really

00:30:47.560 try to focus on in this show. This show is not simply owning the libs. I like owning the libs.

00:30:52.860 I drink out of my leftist tears tumbler. My first book was a blank book called reasons to vote for

00:30:56.580 Democrats. I am not above owning the libs. I think it's very fun, but we've got to do more than just

00:31:00.660 own the libs. And frankly, if we want to own the libs, actually own the libs and actually get some

00:31:05.640 political power back, we can't just use the same old Republican talking points. We've got to think a

00:31:09.780 little bit differently, maybe about trade, maybe about immigration, maybe about the way we use

00:31:14.760 language, maybe about the way we wield political power. We've got to think a little bit differently.

00:31:19.300 We need some tough love for our side. My book with words, Speechless, is in many ways tougher on

00:31:24.500 conservatives than it is on liberals, because I think conservatives have been playing into the left's

00:31:28.440 hands. And we've got to change that. We've got to go in and change our tactics. That's the same kind

00:31:33.540 of thing. What I'm saying on podcasting, it's the same kind of thing Tucker's saying on TV, and he's

00:31:37.540 saying it to about four million people a night, which is why the libs are so upset. That's why 0.99

00:31:42.640 they're going after it. That's what the danger is. It's the danger to their political hegemony

00:31:48.260 that Tucker is really threatening. They go after us too. I mean, Media Matters has tried to get me

00:31:54.180 canceled for years now. But it's something that Tucker is doing. Tucker right now just has the

00:32:00.440 spotlight on him. He's the biggest guy on cable news. So they attack him. Dangerous. They're not

00:32:09.020 talking about physical danger. Here's my proof that the New York Times is not worried about

00:32:14.500 physical danger. The New York Times just ran an obit for a terrorist who died, an American domestic

00:32:19.300 terrorist who was associated with the leftist group, The Weather Underground. This is Kathy Boudin.

00:32:25.080 Here's the first tweet about the obit from the New York Times. Kathy Boudin, who was a member of the

00:32:32.800 Weather Underground, took part in the murderous 1981 holdup of a Brinks armored truck, died on Sunday.

00:32:37.440 She was 78. Okay, fair enough. That pretty much sums it up. But then they deleted that tweet and they

00:32:42.660 changed it. Here was the new tweet. Kathy Boudin, a member of the Weather Underground, imprisoned for

00:32:48.160 her role in a fatal robbery, but who later helped former inmates, died at 78. That's a little softer.

00:32:57.620 So they deleted the first one and put up the new one because the New York Times readers and leadership

00:33:04.160 and editors felt they were being a little too harsh on the felon murderer domestic terrorist. A woman who

00:33:12.740 participated in this robbery that killed two police officers in New York, one security guard and seriously

00:33:19.560 injured another security guard. So I'm not saying that we need to, you know, spike the football on this

00:33:26.080 woman's grave, but she was a domestic terrorist and now she's dead. Okay, a lot of people die. A lot of people

00:33:31.300 get obituaries. I think the New York Times got it right the first time, but they couldn't, it was too harsh.

00:33:36.060 The left has too much of a soft spot for domestic terrorists, especially the Weather Underground. They've been

00:33:41.260 fetting the Weather Underground for decades now, including this woman. This woman, after she got 1.00

00:33:45.240 out of the can, for some reason, she was permitted out of prison. I don't know why. If you kill multiple

00:33:50.000 people and you're convicted of felony murder, I think you should, at the very least, stay in prison

00:33:54.240 for life. But they let her out and she became a professor at Columbia University and she became,

00:34:00.060 I kid you not, the co-director and co-founder of the Columbia Center for Justice.

00:34:05.020 For Justice. A radical leftist terrorist who actually acted on her radicalism and killed 0.99

00:34:13.860 people became the director of the Center for Justice. Libs fine with that. Soft on that.

00:34:23.500 The danger for the Libs is not having leftist terrorists running around on the streets. The

00:34:28.620 danger for the Libs would be not having the leftist terrorists running around on the street. The

00:34:33.540 danger for the Libs would be changing the power structure such that leftist terrorists don't get

00:34:39.160 out of prison, don't get to teach at our schools, don't get to do whatever they want. That's the

00:34:43.180 threat to them. And they always focus on education. Do you notice this? Bill Ayers ends up around

00:34:49.780 education, another Weather Underground guy. Kathy Boudin ends up in education. All the focus, all the fight

00:34:55.340 is on education. Why? Because classrooms are crystal balls and they tell you what your society is going to

00:35:01.800 look like in 20 years. This is why the New York Times right now is up in a tizzy over the plan of

00:35:09.340 Republicans to ban a book from the classroom. The book is called Gender Queer. Here it is.

00:35:16.140 New York Times, how a debut graphic memoir became the most banned book in the country. Gender Queer,

00:35:22.880 what's it say? Maya Kababi's book, Gender Queer, about coming out as non-binary. You know,

00:35:28.620 a thing that you can totally do because that's totally real and not just made up. Landed the author

00:35:33.160 at the center of a battle over which books belong in schools and who gets to make that decision.

00:35:39.620 Then it goes on to talk about what a great book this is and how awful it is that it's being banned

00:35:43.580 in schools. Why is this being banned in schools? Because it's weird, creepy, gay, pederast porn. 0.96

00:35:50.480 That's why. It's not that it deals with difficult themes. That's fine. I don't mind dealing with

00:35:57.400 difficult themes even in school, even in high school or middle school. Frankly, even in elementary

00:36:01.220 school depending on how it's done. But this book, this is a comic book that does not have literary

00:36:07.720 value that furthermore includes a scene about a 14-year-old boy daydreaming about a little kid

00:36:15.260 having sex with a grown man. And it's a graphic novel, so it's drawn out. That's just obscene.

00:36:23.440 That's just porn. It's weird, creepy, pederast porn. It has no business in schools. Well,

00:36:30.440 what are you, are you for banning books? Yeah, duh. I'm certainly for banning books in fifth grade.

00:36:37.880 In elementary schools, I'm definitely for banning books. The libs are for banning books. They ban 0.60

00:36:41.580 the Bible from schools for half a century now, more than half a century. But of course, I'm for

00:36:48.300 banning some of these books. I don't know who needs to hear this. I know this really runs contrary to

00:36:53.560 a lot of talking points now, especially on the right. It is good to ban some books in some

00:37:01.780 circumstances. Here are people in history who have been for banning. I'll go even further. Here are

00:37:07.480 some people in history who have been for burning books. The apostles in the New Testament, in the

00:37:13.080 Acts of the Apostles, they burn books. They burn witchcraft books, sorcery books. Plato. Plato was

00:37:19.320 for burning books. Plato was for burning the books of Democritus. Who else was for burning books?

00:37:26.160 Martin Luther was for burning books. Martin Luther is not exactly my favorite guy in the world,

00:37:31.200 being a Catholic as I am, but he was for it. And then the Catholic Church was for banning Martin

00:37:36.540 Luther's books. And oh, right. Every civilization, every country in the history of the world,

00:37:42.320 including and especially the United States, has banned certain books in certain circumstances.

00:37:49.580 It was the libs who embraced this idea that we should never ban any sort of books in any context

00:37:55.600 whatsoever. If you want weird gay comic book porn in kindergarten, that's your right, darn it. 0.92

00:38:00.000 We're a free and liberal society. They were the ones who pushed this idea. It was always insane.

00:38:05.280 And the great victory for the left is they convinced conservatives to adopt this language.

00:38:09.860 We have never believed this. There is nothing conservative about it at all. Don't do it.

00:38:14.720 It's absolutely insane. Societies have the right to standards. And if we're not going to stand up on

00:38:22.140 this standard, if we're not going to stand up on no illustrated pederast porn in elementary schools,

00:38:28.940 then there are no standards. Okay. Then we're not conserving anything. Then to be a conservative

00:38:33.020 doesn't mean anything at all. What is it with the libs and the kids? They just have this sick 1.00

00:38:39.020 obsession with the kids. They want to kill the kids. When they can't kill the kids, they want to

00:38:43.180 castrate the kids. When they can't castrate the kids, they at the very least want to pervert the

00:38:47.060 kids' minds and fill them with all sorts of weird pornographic sexual confusion. What is it?

00:38:51.780 It's weird. It's just weird. Okay. I'm not trying to take cheap shots here. If you're just an 0.88

00:38:58.540 onlooker taking a look at the political scene, it is weird how obsessed the Democrats are with

00:39:04.860 screwing with kids' heads. It's really strange. Okay. There was a tweet going around for a while

00:39:13.900 that had gone viral. And it said, it's really not that complicated. They're just bad people who want

00:39:19.880 to diddle the kids or something to that effect. And I think it's not quite that simple. Unfortunately,

00:39:24.020 it's more ideological than that. And in a way, I think it makes perfect sense.

00:39:30.700 The libs realize that in order to transform society, you need to shape society. In order

00:39:35.820 to shape society, you need to shape people when they are most malleable, when they are most

00:39:40.020 impressionable. And the way to do that is when they're really, really little. You're physically

00:39:44.620 malleable. You are psychologically and mentally malleable. And that's what they're going after.

00:39:49.140 And we should not let them do it. If our ideology, if our version of free speech is such that

00:39:55.740 it defends a weird pederast porn in kindergarten, something has gone wrong with our idea of free

00:40:01.820 speech. They keep doing it. Tyra Banks is doing this. Tyra Banks, the former Victoria's Secret model,

00:40:08.480 is now producing a drag show for kids. Here it is. This is from Deadline. This is the Hollywood

00:40:15.080 trade paper. Tyra Banks to executive produce teen drag series for Discovery+. Discovery Plus is

00:40:25.820 entering the world of teenage drag shows with Tyra Banks. The Dancing with the Stars host and EP is

00:40:31.280 to executive produce this thing for the streaming service. The series follows five teens and their

00:40:35.680 families as they anticipate their biggest drag performance at Dragutant, a drag show designed as

00:40:41.580 a platform for LGBTQ plus teens to express themselves. Goes on. Every adult associated with

00:40:49.100 this should be in prison. If we lived in a sane society, then all the adults associated with telling

00:40:57.040 13-year-olds to, little 13-year-old boys to put on a dress and stiletto heels and dance sexually before

00:41:03.560 a bunch of grown pervert men, all of those adults would be in prison. Okay? And not that long ago,

00:41:09.660 the adults would be in prison actually in practice in America. I'm not suggesting that we turn America

00:41:15.080 into Mussolini's Italy or something. I'm saying we turn America into America six years ago when we 0.88

00:41:21.460 understood this kind of stuff. Six years ago when conservatives were saying, you know, I think there

00:41:27.040 might be a slippery slope. If we normalize all this kind of strange sexual behavior, next thing you know,

00:41:31.060 they're going to be sexualizing the kids. And what happened? The left said, oh, you're crazy.

00:41:35.040 You're a paranoid, crazy conservative. Here we go again with your slippery slope fallacy. Well,

00:41:39.140 here we go. We're down. We're slipping. We're slipped, I think. I think we're at the bottom of

00:41:43.820 the slope. Are we? Except whenever I think we're at the bottom of the slope, we keep slipping down

00:41:48.380 even further. Now, we are not merely seeing this out of Hollyweird. We're not merely, which before we

00:41:58.040 left LA, Jeremy would refer to Hollywood as Gamora by the sea. Okay, we're not just seeing it out of there.

00:42:03.440 We're seeing it out of the halls of political power as well. We're seeing this being pushed

00:42:06.600 from the top of our federal government. Richard Levine, who is a man who thinks that he's a woman,

00:42:15.800 who is the assistant secretary of health in America because we're living in the upside down world,

00:42:23.280 because we are through the looking glass. A dude who doesn't know what sex he is and is pretending to

00:42:28.380 be the other sex is one of the top health officials in the country. Richard Levine is coming out with

00:42:37.020 full-throated support of transgendering little kids, not just adults. He shouldn't do it to adults 0.96

00:42:44.280 either, but now he's pushing this for little kids. And his argument for it is that medical professionals

00:42:50.340 agree about gender-affirming care for kids. And gender-affirming is an ironic phrase because it 0.75

00:42:56.620 means gender-denying. Gender-affirming care is when you tell a little boy that he's a little girl,

00:43:01.720 according to the libs, which of course does not affirm anything. It only denies reality.

00:43:06.360 Here's what he said. He says, and this is in an interview with NPR.

00:43:10.420 In medicine, there's an evidence-based standard of care for the evaluation and treatment of trans

00:43:14.380 individuals, whether they're youth or adults. The standard is set by the World Professional

00:43:19.500 Association for Transgender Health. Oh, okay. So hold on. You're telling me that the standard 0.90

00:43:25.000 standard of what a man is and what a woman is, is being set by the transgender lobby. 0.94

00:43:31.420 Does that make a lot of sense? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

00:43:34.420 The last formal standards of care were released in 2011, and we expect the new standards of care

00:43:39.560 in 2022. So they're saying 10 years ago, 11 years ago, maybe they didn't quite think that we should

00:43:44.960 trans the kids yet. But now, look, it's the current year. It's the current moment. The past is always evil.

00:43:49.540 The present's always a crisis. The future's going to be great. And so now it's 2022,

00:43:53.540 and we've decided to mutilate little kids' genitals. Okay? And that's just, if you question 0.73

00:43:57.900 that, you're a bigot and an idiot. There are many other standards set by organized medicine. For

00:44:03.380 example, the Endocrine Society, which is an international organization of hormone specialists

00:44:08.040 and endocrinologists that has a standard of care. There have been comments from the American

00:44:12.680 Academy of Pediatrics, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, from the American Medical

00:44:16.820 Association, the American blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, all in support of evidence-based standards

00:44:20.800 of care for gender-affirming treatment. There's no argument among medical professionals, he says,

00:44:27.160 about the value and importance of gender-affirming care.

00:44:32.520 If the entire medical establishment is now suggesting that we should conduct experiments

00:44:40.080 on little tiny girls and boys and pump them full of unnatural hormones and chop up their genitals, 0.99

00:44:47.000 if that's the opinion of the medical establishment, all that tells you is that the modern medical

00:44:53.480 establishment needs to be dismantled. That doesn't tell you anything about the little girls and boys.

00:44:57.860 Doesn't tell you anything about sex, about the difference between men and women. Doesn't tell

00:45:01.440 you anything about medicine. It tells you everything you need to know about the political lobbies that

00:45:06.640 constitute the modern medical establishment that need to be dismantled brick by brick by brick.

00:45:11.480 These people need to get help. They need to not be making health care policy and they need to get

00:45:18.420 help. If you're a man who thinks that he's a woman, you need to take a pause, not be making health care 0.73

00:45:23.980 policy for the country, and go see a psychologist and work this out in your head. I say this actually

00:45:30.020 with a great deal of sympathy and with as much compassion as I can. Something's not right with you.

00:45:34.720 You're sick in the head and you need to get better and you need to not force your psychological

00:45:42.020 problems on the country. And especially you need to not force your psychological problems

00:45:48.020 on little kids. Okay. We just need to say no. You got to say no to the pederasty illustrated porn

00:45:55.540 in kindergarten. Okay. We got to say no to the sexually confused people trying to transgender the kids. 1.00

00:46:02.720 We got to say no to killing the babies based on a completely made up constitutional right from

00:46:09.520 19th. We just got to say no. Okay. And there's nothing fascist or illiberal or a threat to democracy

00:46:16.080 about that. No matter what the New York Times wants to say, no matter what the thugs who are about to be

00:46:20.520 mostly peacefully protesting with Molotov cocktails have to say about it, we need to stand firm. Okay.

00:46:25.600 The fact that we're getting a lot of pushback right now from the left on really basic stuff,

00:46:30.240 don't kill babies and don't trans the kids. We're getting so much pushback from the left on that.

00:46:35.000 That is going to impel a lot of squishy conservatives to say, hey guys, can we just give it up?

00:46:40.820 Ah, do we have to fight about this? This might, this might hurt us in the midterms. Spoiler alert,

00:46:45.520 it's not going to hurt you in the midterms. It's going to help you. Look what happened in Virginia.

00:46:48.540 Look what happened in Florida. No one cares about cutting your stupid corporate tax rates.

00:46:52.600 Everyone cares about protecting their kids. This is actually a winner for conservatives,

00:46:55.960 but that's a political calculation that's actually secondary to the moral calculus.

00:47:00.300 What we're doing is the right thing to do. And what the libs are doing is the wrong thing to do.

00:47:04.080 And the fact that they're pushing back so hard tells you everything you need to know that this

00:47:07.840 is the fight we've got to fight. Well, what are you, are you really going to die on the hill of,

00:47:13.900 are you willing to die? I don't intend to die on any hills, by the way. Are you willing to die on

00:47:18.480 the hill of not having pederast porn in kindergarten? Yeah, I guess so. I'm, I'm certainly

00:47:26.460 willing to fight on that hill. I don't intend to die on any hills. Are you, you're what, you're

00:47:30.320 really going to, you're willing to die on the hill of not killing over 800,000 babies a year through

00:47:33.920 abortion? Yeah, of course I am. Oh my, come on, Michael. You're really, you're going to die on

00:47:40.120 the hill of not letting extremely disturbed, sexually confused men make healthcare policy for all 1.00

00:47:46.340 of America and, and try to pump a little kids full of cross sex hormones. Uh-huh. Yeah, yeah, I am. 0.98

00:47:53.620 Why aren't you? Well, because we need to focus on the more important battles like tariffs.

00:47:59.020 Like, oh, oh, okay. All right. So, okay. All right, fine. Uh, no, that's, that's the old way.

00:48:06.560 That's the old way of fighting the political battles that the New York Times was basically fine with.

00:48:11.540 You know, they would push back a little, but that was fine. That all worked within the framework

00:48:15.760 of liberalism. They didn't, they didn't really call that dangerous and a threat to democracy and

00:48:22.520 try to upend elections and try to, you know, pull, pull threats on the members of the Supreme Court

00:48:29.000 for that stuff. Okay. They would complain. They would whine. No, no. Citizens United is going to

00:48:34.040 change campaign finance law. Even DC versus Heller is going to change gun control law. You didn't see

00:48:39.100 this stuff. Okay. You didn't see activists on the court releasing opinions, trying to put a target

00:48:44.920 on the heads of these justices. You didn't see seven bazillion word long New York Times exposés

00:48:50.880 trying to go after people for stating basic truths about reality. The only thing, this is a rule of

00:48:57.940 show business. The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about. Okay. And

00:49:01.420 in politics, the only thing worse than being attacked by the really bad people is not being

00:49:06.780 attacked by the really bad people at the New York Times or in the White House or anywhere else.

00:49:10.540 Okay. The fact that it's getting so hot right now tells you how important an issue this is. These

00:49:17.060 issues that we're fighting right now are of such importance. Don't go squishy now. I'm Michael

00:49:21.900 Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show. See you tomorrow.

00:49:23.760 The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies. Executive producer,

00:49:53.740 Jeremy Boring. Supervising producer, Mathis Glover. Production manager, Pavel Vidovsky. Editor and

00:50:00.380 associate producer, Danny D'Amico. Associate producer, Justine Turley. Audio mixer, Mike

00:50:05.920 Coromina. And hair and makeup by Cherokee Heart. Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production.

00:50:11.360 Copyright Daily Wire 2022.

00:50:13.500 Hey there. This is John Bickley, Daily Wire editor-in-chief and co-host of Morning Wire.

00:50:17.860 On today's episode, crime in major cities spins out of control. The newly formed Disinformation 0.82

00:50:24.200 Governance Board comes under fire. And the Supreme Court hands down a unanimous decision on free speech

00:50:30.020 and religious liberty. Join us and get the facts first on the news you need to know with our show,

00:50:35.720 Morning Wire.

00:50:36.160 Morning Wire.

00:50:41.500 Morning Wire.

00:50:42.700 Morning Wire.

00:50:44.800 Morning Wire.

00:50:45.640 Morning Wire.

00:50:46.640 Morning Wire.

00:50:47.500 Morning Wire.

00:50:47.760 Morning Wire.

00:50:49.220 Morning Wire.

00:51:01.980 Morning Wire.

00:51:02.560 Hey there.

00:51:03.600 Morning Wire.

00:51:03.820 Morning Wire.

00:51:04.780 Morning Wire.

The Michael Knowles Show - May 03, 2022

Ep. 997 - The End Of Roe V. Wade!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript